
==== Front
EMBO J
EMBO J
The EMBO Journal
0261-4189
1460-2075
Nature Publishing Group UK London

39169154
204
10.1038/s44318-024-00204-3
News & Views
DNA replication recruits a friend to overcome a challenging break-up
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4153-3818
Dewar James M James.Dewar@vanderbilt.edu

grid.152326.1 0000 0001 2264 7217 Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN USA
21 8 2024
21 8 2024
9 2024
43 18 38153817
29 7 2024
6 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ applies to the data associated with this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data, but does not extend to the graphical or creative elements of illustrations, charts, or figures. This waiver removes legal barriers to the re-use and mining of research data. According to standard scholarly practice, it is recommended to provide appropriate citation and attribution whenever technically possible.
Replication complexes, or replisomes, are removed from DNA upon completion of DNA synthesis, but the importance of replisome removal, as well as how cells might respond to defects in this process, has remained elusive. New work by Polo Rivera et al (2024) and Olson et al (2024) reveals that leftover replisomes are an obstacle to replication and provides a first glimpse into the biochemical mechanisms that solve this problem.

Two recent articles reveal that leftover replisome impede the next round of replication, and how specific helicases can help to overcome this problem.

Subject terms

DNA Replication, Recombination & Repair
NIHR35GM128696 Dewar James M issue-copyright-statement© European Molecular Biology Organization 2024
==== Body
pmcIn eukaryotes, faithful DNA replication is enforced by the fidelity and spatiotemporal regulation of the replication machinery (“replisome”). In humans, ~60,000 pairs of replisomes are loaded onto DNA, activated (Fig. 1A, “initiation”), and then diverge from the site of loading (Fig. 1A, “origins”) to synthesize kilobases of DNA (Fig. 1A, “elongation”). Replisomes emanating from adjacent origins ultimately converge on the same stretch of DNA, resulting in “termination” (Fig. 1A), which is historically the least-studied stage of DNA replication. Converging replisomes can seamlessly pass each other because they encircle different strands of the parental DNA (Fig. 1A, “fork merger”) (Dewar et al, 2015; Dewar and Walter, 2017). The replisome is then removed from DNA (Fig. 1A, “replisome unloading”), which involves ubiquitylation of the replisome by a ubiquitin ligase (SCFDia2 in yeast, CRL2Lrr1 in vertebrates), followed by removal of the replisome from DNA by the p97 ATPase. Defects in the fork-merger stage of termination were reported several decades ago in prokaryotic systems and more recently in eukaryotic systems (Campos et al, 2023; Deegan et al, 2019). In contrast, the need for a replisome unloading mechanism has remained unclear.Figure 1 Mechanisms of replication termination.

(A) Cartoon depicting the three main stages of DNA replication: initiation, elongation, and termination. Key steps of termination are shown in detail, except for resolution of double-stranded DNA intertwines by topoisomerases, omitted for simplicity. (B) Cartoon depicting retention of replisomes in the mcm7-10R mutant, described by Polo Rivera et al (C) Cartoon depicting the likely mechanism through which leftover replisomes are removed by Rrm3/Pif1 in the mcm7-10R mutant, based on the results of Polo Rivera et al (D) Cartoon depicting the consequences of defective replisome removal in the mcm7-10R rrm3Δ mutant, based on the results of Polo Rivera et al (E) Cartoon depicting the structures of the human and yeast replisomes as well as the recruitment mechanisms for Rrm3 and RTEL1 identified by Olson et al.

After replisomes pass each other during termination, they translocate along the template DNA strand until they encounter, and then slide over, double-stranded DNA from the downstream lagging strands of the opposing fork (Fig. 1A). Accordingly, complete synthesis and ligation of DNA occur in Xenopus egg extracts regardless of whether replisome unloading takes place (Dewar et al, 2015). Similarly, yeast cells lacking SCFDia2 are unable to ubiquitylate and unload the replisome, but do not exhibit any delay in the completion of S phase or mitosis (Maric et al, 2014). It was therefore conceivable that replisome unloading was not important for DNA replication. However, although SCFDia2 and CRL2Lrr1 are evolutionarily unrelated, they share the same mechanism of replisome recognition and thus represent an example of convergent evolution (Jenkyn-Bedford et al, 2021); this suggested that replisome unloading may be required in both yeast and vertebrates as a solution for an evolutionarily conserved obstacle to DNA replication.

Yeast dia2∆ cells lacking SCFDia2 activity exhibit genome instability, sensitivity to DNA damaging agents, and growth defects. It was not previously possible to attribute these phenotypes to defects in replisome unloading, because SCFDia2 has various substrates. Also, while human cells lacking CRL2Lrr1 exhibit slowed DNA synthesis due to defects in replisome recycling (Fan et al, 2021), similar defects are not seen in yeast cells lacking SCFDia2 (Maric et al, 2014) and could thus also reflect other targets of CRL2LRR1. To address the role and importance of replisome unloading, Polo Rivera et al (2024) created a ubiquitylation-deficient allele of MCM7, the primary replisome component that is ubiquitylated by SCFDia2. The resulting mcm7-10R mutant is defective for ubiquitylation and replisome unloading both in reconstituted reactions as well as in cells (Fig. 1B). Although mcm7-10R mutants still underwent residual replisome ubiquitylation and unloading, Polo Rivera et al found that combining this allele with the dia2-∆TPR allele, which inhibits recruitment of SCFDia2 to the replisome, severely inhibited replisome unloading, thus providing a genetic tool to examine the consequences of replisome unloading defects. Strikingly, the mcm7-10R dia2-∆TPR double mutants phenocopied full dia2∆ mutants, demonstrating that the genome instability and growth defects in dia2∆ cells were mostly attributable to replisome unloading defects. These experiments are the first to show a direct role for replisome unloading in ensuring genome stability.

Analysis of genome stability in mcm7-10R mutants by Polo Rivera et al (2024) led to a surprising discovery; mcm7-10R mutants experienced spontaneous DNA damage that was greatest during the second cell cycle after replisomes were allowed to accumulate on DNA. This observation suggested that replisome retention created a problem in the ensuing cell cycle. The 5’−3’ helicases Rrm3 and Pif1 are important for facilitating fork merger during termination (Deegan et al, 2019), and Polo Rivera et al noted that null mutants also exhibit synthetic lethality with dia2∆ mutants, suggesting that Rrm3 and Pif1 might respond to defects in replisome unloading. The authors found that mcm7-10R rrm3∆ mutants, but not mcm7-10R pif1∆ mutants, were synthetically sick while mcm7-10R rrm3∆ pif1∆ mutants were synthetically lethal. These results indicated that Rrm3 plays an important role when replisome unloading is defective, and Pif1 can partially compensate for this role. Strikingly, mcm7-10R rrm3∆ mutants exhibited a stronger replisome-unloading defect and increased DNA damage compared to mcm7-10R mutants. This indicated that Rrm3 acts to limit DNA damage by promoting the unloading of non-ubiquitylated replisomes. Elegant cell-cycle synchronization experiments by Polo Rivera et al showed that Rrm3 acts in the second S phase to remove replisomes that persist from the first S phase. Overall, these data show that replisomes persisting from the previous cell cycle can create DNA damage during S phase if not removed by Rrm3 and, most likely, also Pif1.

It is unclear how Pif1 and Rrm3 remove leftover replisomes, but previous studies suggest a simple mechanism. Pif1 and Rrm3 unwind DNA ahead of replication forks, and Pif1 helicase has been reported to displace inactive replisomes from DNA (preprint: Hill et al, 2020). Thus, the simplest model consistent with the data by Polo Rivera et al (2024) is that Rrm3 and Pif1 unwind DNA to remove leftover replisomes from the prior cell cycle (Fig. 1C). Replisomes normally pass each other during termination because they encircle opposite DNA strands (Dewar et al, 2015). In contrast, replisomes encircle both DNA strands after termination, which would prevent them from being bypassed. The core replisome components can slide on DNA (Gros et al, 2015), suggesting that a retained replisome will probably slide ahead of a new replisome until an opposing replisome is encountered during termination (Fig. 1D). At this point it is likely that Rrm3 and Pif1 would unwind the DNA between converging replisomes to remove the retained replisome. However, it was also reported that a nucleosome can block the core replisome components from sliding on DNA (preprint: Hill et al, 2020) so it will be important to directly test this model.

Polo Rivera et al (2024) identify a new role for the 5’−3’ helicases Rrm3 and Pif1 during termination, in addition to their previously described role in facilitating fork merger. These enzymes can directly recognize DNA, but it is challenging to envisage how direct recognition of DNA substrates would allow for seamless termination, without slowing or stalling, as previously reported (Dewar et al, 2015). To address this question, Olson et al (2024) employ a tour de force of structure-function analyses. Olson et al identify an intrinsically disordered region (IDR) in the N-terminal region of Rrm3 and use both biochemical reconstitution and genetic experiments to show that this ‘N-IDR’ is necessary for Rrm3 function during termination. N-IDR is required for recruitment of Rrm3 to the replisome and, strikingly, fusion of N-IDR to an unrelated helicase with the same polarity supports termination. Thus, the N-IDR physically links 5’−3’ helicase activity to the replisome to ensure efficient termination. A combination of Alphafold modeling, biochemical reconstitution, and genetic analysis identified interactions between N-IDR and the replisome components Polε and GINS that are crucial for Rrm3 recruitment to the replisome and function during termination (Fig. 1E). Thus, Olson et al reveal the protein-protein interactions between Rrm3 and the replisome that allow Rrm3 to function during termination. To address whether this is conserved beyond yeast, Olson et al (2024) performed Alphafold modeling of vertebrate 5’−3’ helicases. They identified an N-IDR in RTEL1, a helicase implicated in replication termination (Campos et al, 2023), and showed that the N-IDR allows RTEL1 to interact with POLε within the vertebrate replisome (Fig. 1E). Thus, the N-IDR recruitment mechanism identified for yeast Rrm3 appears to be evolutionarily conserved in vertebrates.

The results of Olson et al point to an elegant mechanism with an exciting implication. The IDR of both Rrm3 and RTEL1 contacts the leading strand polymerase, and the N-IDR length is ideally suited to allow Rrm3/Rtel1 to access the lagging strand DNA template, upon which it would need to translocate in order to unwind DNA ahead of the replication fork (Fig. 1E). Furthermore, Olson et al note that Rrm3 and RTEL1 are evolutionarily unrelated yet both function during termination and share a recruitment mechanism. This represents yet another example of convergent evolution within the termination apparatus, just like SCFDia2 and CRL2LRR1, which are also evolutionarily unrelated but nevertheless interact with the replisome using a conserved biochemical mechanism. The recruitment mechanism of Rrm3/RTEL1 establishes convergent evolution as a paradigm within the termination machinery and cements the view that the obstacles to termination are evolutionarily conserved, but the solutions were developed relatively late during evolution.

The results of these studies raise important future directions. The Polo Rivera et al study lays the foundation for understanding the cellular consequences of termination defects. Up until this point it has been challenging to specifically interfere with termination because many of the proteins involved play roles during other aspects of replication. For example, Rrm3 responds to replisome stalling at protein barriers (Brüning et al, 2014) and CRL2Lrr1 is crucial for fork progression by ensuring replisome recycling (Fan et al, 2021). However, it should now be possible to deliberately and specifically examine the consequences of defects in the final stages of DNA replication by comparison of mcm7-10R and MCM7 strains (perhaps in a rrm3∆ background to exacerbate the effect). Olson et al have raised important questions about the functions of 5’−3’ helicases during termination. Rrm3 appears to be constitutively associated with the replisome (Reusswig et al, 2022), while RTEL1 recruitment is regulated (Campos et al, 2023). This difference suggests that constitutive recruitment of RTEL1 to replisomes may be problematic in a way that constitutive Rrm3 recruitment is not, perhaps due to the susceptibility of the vertebrate replisome to the generation of lagging strand gaps (Zellweger et al, 2015) that would be substrates for RTEL1. It will be important to understand the importance of regulated, rather than constitutive, recruitment of RTEL1 to the replisome and the underlying mechanisms of regulation.

In conclusion, Polo Rivera et al (2024) and Olson et al (2024) reveal key mechanisms of replication termination and provide genetic tools to dissect this under-studied aspect of DNA replication. These works are a testament to the awesome power of yeast genetics and highlight the value of combining classical genetic approaches with cutting-edge biochemical reconstitution.

Acknowledgements

J.M.D. was supported by NIH grant R35GM128696.

Disclosure and competing interests statement

The author declares no competing interests.

See also: O Olson et al (July 2024)

See also: C Polo Rivera et al (July 2024)
==== Refs
References

Brüning JG Howard JL McGlynn P Accessory replicative helicases and the replication of protein-bound DNA J Mol Biol 2014 426 3917 3928 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.10.001 25308339
Brüning JG, Howard JL, McGlynn P (2014) Accessory replicative helicases and the replication of protein-bound DNA. J Mol Biol 426:3917–392825308339 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.10.001
Campos LV Van Ravenstein SX Vontalge EJ Greer BH Heintzman DR Kavlashvili T McDonald WH Rose KL Eichman BF Dewar JM RTEL1 and MCM10 overcome topological stress during vertebrate replication termination Cell Rep. 2023 42 112109 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112109 36807139
Campos LV, Van Ravenstein SX, Vontalge EJ, Greer BH, Heintzman DR, Kavlashvili T, McDonald WH, Rose KL, Eichman BF, Dewar JM (2023) RTEL1 and MCM10 overcome topological stress during vertebrate replication termination. Cell Rep. 42:11210936807139 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112109
Deegan TD Baxter J Ortiz Bazán M Yeeles JTP Labib KPM Pif1-family helicases support fork convergence during DNA replication termination in eukaryotes Mol Cell 2019 74 231 244.e239 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.01.040 30850330
Deegan TD, Baxter J, Ortiz Bazán M, Yeeles JTP, Labib KPM (2019) Pif1-family helicases support fork convergence during DNA replication termination in eukaryotes. Mol Cell 74:231–244.e23930850330 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.01.040
Dewar JM Budzowska M Walter JC The mechanism of DNA replication termination in vertebrates Nature 2015 525 345 350 10.1038/nature14887 26322582
Dewar JM, Budzowska M, Walter JC (2015) The mechanism of DNA replication termination in vertebrates. Nature 525:345–35026322582 10.1038/nature14887
Dewar JM Walter JC Mechanisms of DNA replication termination Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2017 18 507 516 10.1038/nrm.2017.42 28537574
Dewar JM, Walter JC (2017) Mechanisms of DNA replication termination. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 18:507–51628537574 10.1038/nrm.2017.42
Fan Y Köberlin MS Ratnayeke N Liu C Deshpande M Gerhardt J Meyer T LRR1-mediated replisome disassembly promotes DNA replication by recycling replisome components J Cell Biol 2021 220 e202009147 10.1083/jcb.202009147 34037657
Fan Y, Köberlin MS, Ratnayeke N, Liu C, Deshpande M, Gerhardt J, Meyer T (2021) LRR1-mediated replisome disassembly promotes DNA replication by recycling replisome components. J Cell Biol 220:e20200914734037657 10.1083/jcb.202009147
Gros J Kumar C Lynch G Yadav T Whitehouse I Remus D Post-licensing specification of eukaryotic replication origins by facilitated Mcm2-7 sliding along DNA Mol Cell 2015 60 797 807 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.022 26656162
Gros J, Kumar C, Lynch G, Yadav T, Whitehouse I, Remus D (2015) Post-licensing specification of eukaryotic replication origins by facilitated Mcm2-7 sliding along DNA. Mol Cell 60:797–80726656162 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.10.022
Hill J, Eickhoff P, Drury LS, Costa A, Diffley JFX (2020) The eukaryotic replisome requires an additional helicase to disarm dormant replication origins. Preprint at bioRxiv 10.1101/2020.2009.2017.301366
Jenkyn-Bedford M Jones ML Baris Y Labib KPM Cannone G Yeeles JTP Deegan TD A conserved mechanism for regulating replisome disassembly in eukaryotes Nature 2021 600 743 747 10.1038/s41586-021-04145-3 34700328
Jenkyn-Bedford M, Jones ML, Baris Y, Labib KPM, Cannone G, Yeeles JTP, Deegan TD (2021) A conserved mechanism for regulating replisome disassembly in eukaryotes. Nature 600:743–74734700328 10.1038/s41586-021-04145-3
Maric M Maculins T De Piccoli G Labib K Cdc48 and a ubiquitin ligase drive disassembly of the CMG helicase at the end of DNA replication Science 2014 346 1253596 10.1126/science.1253596 25342810
Maric M, Maculins T, De Piccoli G, Labib K (2014) Cdc48 and a ubiquitin ligase drive disassembly of the CMG helicase at the end of DNA replication. Science 346:125359625342810 10.1126/science.1253596
Olson O, Pelliciari S, Heron E, Deegan TD (2024) A common mechanism for recruiting the Rrm3 and RTEL1 accessory helicases to the eukaryotic replisome. EMBO J 43. 10.1038/s44318-024-00168-4
Polo Rivera C, Deegan TD, Labib KP (2024) CMG helicase disassembly is essential and driven by two pathways in budding yeast. EMBO J 43 10.1038/s44318-024-00161-x
Reusswig KU Bittmann J Peritore M Courtes M Pardo B Wierer M Mann M Pfander B Unscheduled DNA replication in G1 causes genome instability and damage signatures indicative of replication collisions Nat Commun 2022 13 7014 10.1038/s41467-022-34379-2 36400763
Reusswig KU, Bittmann J, Peritore M, Courtes M, Pardo B, Wierer M, Mann M, Pfander B (2022) Unscheduled DNA replication in G1 causes genome instability and damage signatures indicative of replication collisions. Nat Commun 13:701436400763 10.1038/s41467-022-34379-2
Zellweger R Dalcher D Mutreja K Berti M Schmid JA Herrador R Vindigni A Lopes M Rad51-mediated replication fork reversal is a global response to genotoxic treatments in human cells J Cell Biol 2015 208 563 579 10.1083/jcb.201406099 25733714
Zellweger R, Dalcher D, Mutreja K, Berti M, Schmid JA, Herrador R, Vindigni A, Lopes M (2015) Rad51-mediated replication fork reversal is a global response to genotoxic treatments in human cells. J Cell Biol 208:563–57925733714 10.1083/jcb.201406099
