
==== Front
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
0934-9723
1435-4373
Springer Berlin Heidelberg Berlin/Heidelberg

39052135
4906
10.1007/s10096-024-04906-8
Research
An audit of central venous catheter insertion and management practices in two French university hospitals
Khanafer Nagham nagham.khanafer@chu-lyon.fr

12
Gardes Sophie 3
De-Santis Nathalie 3
Liard Céline 4
Deschamps Florian 4
Verbist Pauline 4
Nancey Stephane 5
Cotte Eddy 6
Martin Olivier 7
Argaud Laurent 7
Lukaszewicz Anne Claire 7
Vanhems Philippe 12
1 grid.412180.e 0000 0001 2198 4166 Service d’Hygiène Epidémiologie et Prévention, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon (HCL), Lyon, France
2 grid.7849.2 0000 0001 2150 7757 PHE3ID team, Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Inserm U1111, CNRS UMR5308, ENS de Lyon, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, France
3 https://ror.org/023xgd207 grid.411430.3 0000 0001 0288 2594 Service d’Hygiène, Epidémiologie et Prévention, Hôpital Lyon Sud, HCL, Pierre Bénite, France
4 grid.481595.4 0000 0004 0642 092X Becton Dickinson and Company, Le Pont-De-Claix, France
5 grid.413852.9 0000 0001 2163 3825 Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Hôpital Lyon, Sud, HCL, Pierre Bénite, France
6 https://ror.org/023xgd207 grid.411430.3 0000 0001 0288 2594 Department of surgery, Hôpital Lyon Sud, HCL, Pierre Bénite, France
7 https://ror.org/02qt1p572 grid.412180.e 0000 0001 2198 4166 Intensive Care Department, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, HCL, Lyon, France
25 7 2024
25 7 2024
2024
43 10 19271930
29 5 2024
19 7 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Objective

To assess the compliance with French guidelines for the prevention of central venous catheter (CVC)-related infections in two university hospitals.

Methods

An observational audit was conducted in 7 wards using a digital tool.

Results

The prerequisite of hand hygiene (HH) were respected by 90% of health-care worker; 86% performed HH prior to equipment preparation and 59% repeated it prior to infusion. Wearing gloves when necessary and rinsing were respected in 46.7% and 75.6% of the observations.

Conclusion

Findings showed an acceptable level of adherence to recommended practices for CVC management. However, barriers of unrespect evidence-based recommendations need to be investigated in depth.

Keywords

Audit
Central venous catheter
Infection control and prevention
Practices
Hospices Civils de LyonOpen access funding provided by Hospices Civils de Lyon.

issue-copyright-statement© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Central venous catheters (CVCs) are commonly used in hospitalized patients, particularly in the intensive care unit (ICU), and in units where long-term administration of cancer chemotherapies and parenteral nutrition are necessary [1]. Despite their huge benefits, they also have complications (thrombotic, mechanical,…) of various severities, including infection.

In France, the prevalence survey of 2022 showed that 3.2% of hospitalized patients had a CVC compared to 2.3% in 2017, which is probably related to an increase in vulnerability factors of patients [2]. In the Eurobact 2 study, CVC-related bacteremia accounted for 26.4% of bacteremia cases in the ICU and was associated with a mortality rate of 24.7% [3].

Outside specific vascular units, operating room, or interventional radiology department, CVCs can be inserted in the ICU room under aseptic conditions that are more difficult to control, even though it is a frequent and “protocoled” procedure. The daily manipulation of catheter multiple times per day for the administration of fluids, drugs, and blood products, and the frequency of connection and disconnection procedures pose significant challenges in controlling infectious risks associated with CVC. The French Society of Hospital Hygiene (SF2H) has published its recommendations for the prevention of this risk, which have been incorporated shortly thereafter into institutional protocols for the management of these devices [4–6].

This implementation project aimed to assess compliance with French guidelines for the prevention of CVC-related infections in two university hospitals.

Methods

A multicenter collaborative audit was conducted between the infection control teams (ICT) of Edouard Herriot Hospital and Lyon Sud Hospital, two university hospitals of Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France and Becton Dickinson (BD), a company producing catheters. Two trained nurses from BD (previously working in hospital) completed separately the observations in 7 wards: ICU (n = 4) and surgery (n = 3). The targeted units had not been audited in the last five years. The audit grid (100 criteria) was developed by the ICT and BD based on the recommendations of the French Society of Hospital Hygiene [4–6]. Signature Solutions™, a digital tool developed by BD, was used to capture the observations in real time and to allow their analysis. Descriptive analyses were performed to describe the percentage of compliance with national recommendations. The data were reported as the number of observations and not as the number of professionals. A feedback session was held for each unit, attended by the health-care worker (HCW) manager, doctors, and/or technical nurses, with the unit’s hygiene correspondents present whenever feasible.

The implementation of the audit was validated by the establishment’s legal experts and the Data Protection Officer.

Results

A total of 90 observations of CVCs maintenance were carried out between July and November, 2021 in 4 ICUs (n = 48) and 3 surgical units (n = 42). To complete these observations, 12 working days were necessary. In 40% of observations, allergies were assessed, while in about 12% of observations, complications were explained (Fig. 1A). Figure 1 A shows also that patient’s identity was verified in 31% of observations and the procedure was explained to the patient in 54% of observations indicated that the procedure was explained to the patient.

Fig. 1 Percentage of compliance. (A) Percentage of compliance of care safety by participating department. (B) Percentage of compliance of catheter flushing.

The compliance with the criteria used to evaluate the rinsing techniques, including the use of an appropriate volume (= 10 mL), a pulsating technic, flushing of all lumens, and the application of positive pressure at the end of the procedure, is illustrated in Fig. 1B. is Compliance with hand hygiene prerequisites (short-sleeved uniform, no jewelry, and short nails without varnish or artificial nails), hand hygiene indications, checking product expiration dates, and handling lines are described in Table 1.

Table 1 Description of compliance regarding hand hygiene and CVC handling

	Compliant observations, n (%)	
Hand hygiene prerequisites(1), n = 90	81 (90)	
Hand hygiene before the preparation of materials, n = 88	76 (86)	
Repeated hand hygiene before infusion/handling lines, n = 84	50 (59)	
Checking product expiration dates, n = 90	13 (14)	
Handling lines with gauze and alcoholic antiseptic(2), n = 90	75 (83)	
Wearing gloves when recommended(3), n = 90	42 (46)	
Rinsing performed, n = 90	68 (75)	
(1) Short-sleeved uniform, no jewelry, and short nails without varnish or artificial nails

(2) Using gauze impregnated by an alcoholic antiseptic when the catheter lumen is open (change of extension with or without valve) and for administration of medication and blood sampling

(3) Sterile gloves are recommended for the insertion of CVC or when the lumen of CVC is open (see (1)). Alternatively, non-sterile gloves are recommended for blood sampling

Discussion

CVCs are widely used in the ICU, as well as in other surgical and medical departments. Compliance with recommendations can help reduce the risks associated with these devices, particularly the risk of infection, which is largely preventable [7]. Our audit’s findings revealed a certain degree of variation in adherence to current protocols. More than 70% of the observations showed compliance with good practices concerning the use of gauze and alcoholic antiseptic for line handling, as well as the performance of rinsing at the end of the procedure. However, some practices were not in line with evidence-based recommendations, particularly hand hygiene, rinsing procedures, asepsis, etc. Similar results have been reported in the literature [8, 9].

The use of gauze and alcoholic antiseptic for line handling preceded by hand hygiene is crucial for preventing the risk of infection. Numerous studies have demonstrated the value of antiseptic-impregnated caps for better control of this risk [10–12]. The cost is undoubtedly high; however, it provides enhanced prevention, particularly in hospitals/wards experiencing problems with the application of standard precautions.

Mechanical complications of CVCs can be prevented by the implementation of the pulsed flushing technique, which also helps to prevent drug incompatibilities and catheter occlusion during use [13]. Our results show that pulsed rinsing method is utilized in only 41% of observations. Therefore, this represents an essential aspect that must be addressed in our action plan.

Differences in practice were observed between ICU and non-ICU wards, particularly in terms of the “procedure explained” criteria, which were linked to the patient’s cognitive (e.g. Sedation, coma,.) capacity during the CVC care, as well as in terms of allergy testing and identity verification.

The ICT provided feedback on the results to raise awareness among participating teams concerning the importance of effective CVC management, identifying areas in need for improvement, and establishing training programs to be adapted to each specialty in terms of duration and methodology (such as instructor-based education, virtual instructor-led training, scenario-based learning, simulation-based learning, e-learning.). This feedback was an opportunity to remind the importance of ongoing training in this area, given the development of medical devices and recommendations.

The surveillance of infections on CVC outside ICU and/or hospital is complex. The short duration of hospitalization, the practice of patients maintaining central lines outside of hospitals is increasing; the difficulty to follow-up post discharge can underestimate the burden of these infections [14]. HCWs are less well trained and not sufficiently aware about the risks associated with these devices, which is why observations in these sectors are particularly important [15].

A prospective study combining audit, training, and patient monitoring was planned for 2024 in the 4 ICUs that took part in this audit. The following areas will be proposed to improve practices: knowledge of the different types of CVC, principles of use, awareness of related risks, the rinsing process, antisepsis of the skin, etc.

Conclusion

Our results indicated a satisfactory level of compliance with National guidelines for the management of CVC. Nevertheless, it is essential to investigate the barriers that impede the respect of evidence-based recommendations. This study is part of a dynamic approach to enhance the quality and safety of care. Evaluations of professional practices, aim to reduce discrepancies between what is done and what should be done according to the guidelines and recommendations. This collaboration with an industrial company and the use of a digital tool significantly minimized the time required to assess CVC management and compare them to current protocols.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge HCW for this collaboration.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: NK, SG, NDS, CL, FD, PV and PV, statistical analysis: NK. Writing—original draft: NK. Writing-review and editing (alphabetic order): SG, NDS, CL, FD, PV, SN, EC, OM, LA, ACK and PV. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

None.

Open access funding provided by Hospices Civils de Lyon.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Declarations

Conflicts of interest/Competing interests

Nagham Khanafer, Sophie Gardes, Nathalie De-Santis, Stephane Nancey, Eddy Cotte, Olivier Martin, Laurent Argaud, Anne Claire Lukaszewicz, and Philippe Vanhems have no conflicts of interest related to this study to declare.

Céline Liard, Florian Deschamps, and Pauline Verbist are employed by Becton Dickinson.

Ethics approval (include appropriate approvals or waivers)

Not applicable.

Consent to participate (include appropriate statements)

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Kehagias E Galanakis N Tsetis D Central venous catheters: which, when and how Br J Radiol 2023 96 20220894 10.1259/bjr.20220894 37191031
Kehagias E, Galanakis N, Tsetis D (2023) Central venous catheters: which, when and how. Br J Radiol 96:20220894. 10.1259/bjr.2022089437191031 10.1259/bjr.20220894
2. Santé Publique France Principaux résultats de l’enquête nationale de prévalence 2022 des infections nosocomiales et des traitements anti-infectieux en établissement de santé 2023 [Available: https://www.santepubliquefrance.fr/maladies-et-traumatismes/infections-associees-aux-soins-et-resistance-aux-antibiotiques/infections-associees-aux-soins/documents/enquetes-etudes/principaux-resultats-de-l-enquete-nationale-de-prevalence-2022-des-infections-nosocomiales-et-des-traitements-anti-infectieux-en-etablissement-de-s].
3. Tabah A Buetti N Staiquly Q Ruckly S Akova M Aslan AT Epidemiology and outcomes of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections in intensive care unit patients: the EUROBACT-2 international cohort study Intensive Care Med 2023 49 2 178 190 10.1007/s00134-022-06944-2 36764959
Tabah A, Buetti N, Staiquly Q, Ruckly S, Akova M, Aslan AT et al (2023) Epidemiology and outcomes of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections in intensive care unit patients: the EUROBACT-2 international cohort study. Intensive Care Med 49(2):178–190. 10.1007/s00134-022-06944-236764959 10.1007/s00134-022-06944-2
4. SF2H Actualisation des précautions standard. HYGIÈNES 2017;XXV
5. SF2H. Antisepsie de la peau saine avant un geste invasif chez l’adulte (2016) HYGIÈNES XXIV(2)
6. SF2H Bonnes pratiques et gestion des risques associés au PICC (2014) HYGIÈNES XXI(6)
7. O’Grady NP Prevention of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections N Engl J Med 2023 389 12 11211 11131 10.1056/NEJMc2312283
O’Grady NP, Prevention of Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (2023) N Engl J Med 389(12):11211–11131. 10.1056/NEJMc231228310.1056/NEJMc2312283
8. Lin FF Murphy N Martinez A Marshall A An audit of central venous catheter insertion and management practices in an Australian tertiary intensive care unit: a quality improvement project Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2022 70 103217 10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103217 35184971
Lin FF, Murphy N, Martinez A, Marshall A (2022) An audit of central venous catheter insertion and management practices in an Australian tertiary intensive care unit: a quality improvement project. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 70:103217. 10.1016/j.iccn.2022.10321735184971 10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103217
9. Furuya EY Dick A Perencevich EN Pogorzelska M Goldmann D Stone PW Central line bundle implementation in US intensive care units and impact on bloodstream infections PLoS ONE 2011 6 1 e15452 10.1371/journal.pone.0015452 21267440
Furuya EY, Dick A, Perencevich EN, Pogorzelska M, Goldmann D, Stone PW (2011) Central line bundle implementation in US intensive care units and impact on bloodstream infections. PLoS ONE 6(1):e15452. 10.1371/journal.pone.001545221267440 10.1371/journal.pone.0015452
10. Merrill KC, Sumner S, Linford L, Taylor C, Macintosh C Impact of universal disinfectant cap implementation on central line-associated bloodstream infections (2014.) Am J Infect Control 42(12):1274–1277. 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.09.008
11. Wright MO Tropp J Schora DM Dillon-Grant M Peterson K Boehm S Continuous passive disinfection of catheter hubs prevents contamination and bloodstream infection Am J Infect Control 2013 41 1 33 38 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.05.030 23084024
Wright MO, Tropp J, Schora DM, Dillon-Grant M, Peterson K, Boehm S et al (2013) Continuous passive disinfection of catheter hubs prevents contamination and bloodstream infection. Am J Infect Control 41(1):33–38. 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.05.03023084024 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.05.030
12. Kamboj M Blair R Bell N Son C Huang YT Dowling M Use of Disinfection Cap to Reduce Central-Line-Associated Bloodstream infection and blood culture contamination among hematology-oncology patients Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015 36 12 1401 1408 10.1017/ice.2015.219 26394849
Kamboj M, Blair R, Bell N, Son C, Huang YT, Dowling M et al (2015) Use of Disinfection Cap to Reduce Central-Line-Associated Bloodstream infection and blood culture contamination among hematology-oncology patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 36(12):1401–1408. 10.1017/ice.2015.21926394849 10.1017/ice.2015.219
13. Guiffant G Durussel JJ Merckx J Flaud P Vigier JP Mousset P Flushing of intravascular access devices (IVADs) - efficacy of pulsed and continuous infusions J Vasc Access 2012 13 1 75 78 10.5301/JVA.2011.8487 21748725
Guiffant G, Durussel JJ, Merckx J, Flaud P, Vigier JP, Mousset P (2012) Flushing of intravascular access devices (IVADs) - efficacy of pulsed and continuous infusions. J Vasc Access 13(1):75–78. 10.5301/JVA.2011.848721748725 10.5301/JVA.2011.8487
14. Leeman H Cosgrove SE Williams D Keller SC Assessing burden of central line–associated bloodstream infections present on hospital admission AJIC 2020 48 2 216 218 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.08.010
Leeman H, Cosgrove SE, Williams D, Keller SC (2020) Assessing burden of central line–associated bloodstream infections present on hospital admission. AJIC 48(2):216–218. 10.1016/j.ajic.2019.08.01010.1016/j.ajic.2019.08.010
15. Dumyati G, Concannon C, Wijngaarden Ev, Love TMT, Graman P, Pettis AM et al (2014) Sustained reduction of central line-associated bloodstream infections outside the intensive care unit with a multimodal intervention focusing on central line maintenance AJIC 42(7): 723–730. 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.03.353
