
==== Front
EMBO J
EMBO J
The EMBO Journal
0261-4189
1460-2075
Nature Publishing Group UK London

38997504
154
10.1038/s44318-024-00154-w
Method
PUFFFIN: an ultra-bright, customisable, single-plasmid system for labelling cell neighbourhoods
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1521-2359
Lebek Tamina 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4392-7183
Malaguti Mattias 17
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7776-7985
Boezio Giulia LM 2
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7529-8492
Zoupi Lida 34
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1020-5240
Briscoe James 2
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4429-6232
Elfick Alistair 56
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4018-9480
Lowell Sally sally.lowell@ed.ac.uk

1
1 grid.4305.2 0000 0004 1936 7988 Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH16 4UU UK
2 https://ror.org/04tnbqb63 grid.451388.3 0000 0004 1795 1830 The Francis Crick Institute, London, NW1 1AT UK
3 https://ror.org/01nrxwf90 grid.4305.2 0000 0004 1936 7988 Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD UK
4 grid.4305.2 0000 0004 1936 7988 Simons Initiative for the Developing Brain, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XD UK
5 https://ror.org/01nrxwf90 grid.4305.2 0000 0004 1936 7988 Institute for Bioengineering, School of Engineering, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 3DW UK
6 https://ror.org/01nrxwf90 grid.4305.2 0000 0004 1936 7988 UK Centre for Mammalian Synthetic Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3BF UK
7 https://ror.org/01nrxwf90 grid.4305.2 0000 0004 1936 7988 Present Address: Centre for Engineering Biology, Institute of Quantitative Biology, Biochemistry and Biotechnology, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH9 3FF UK
12 7 2024
12 7 2024
9 2024
43 18 41104135
28 10 2023
5 6 2024
10 6 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ applies to the data associated with this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data, but does not extend to the graphical or creative elements of illustrations, charts, or figures. This waiver removes legal barriers to the re-use and mining of research data. According to standard scholarly practice, it is recommended to provide appropriate citation and attribution whenever technically possible.
Cell communication coordinates developmental processes, maintains homeostasis, and contributes to disease. Therefore, understanding the relationship between cells in a shared environment is crucial. Here we introduce Positive Ultra-bright Fluorescent Fusion For Identifying Neighbours (PUFFFIN), a cell neighbour-labelling system based upon secretion and uptake of positively supercharged fluorescent protein s36GFP. We fused s36GFP to mNeonGreen or to a HaloTag, facilitating ultra-bright, sensitive, colour-of-choice labelling. Secretor cells transfer PUFFFIN to neighbours while retaining nuclear mCherry, making identification, isolation, and investigation of live neighbours straightforward. PUFFFIN can be delivered to cells, tissues, or embryos on a customisable single-plasmid construct composed of interchangeable components with the option to incorporate any transgene. This versatility enables the manipulation of cell properties, while simultaneously labelling surrounding cells, in cell culture or in vivo. We use PUFFFIN to ask whether pluripotent cells adjust the pace of differentiation to synchronise with their neighbours during exit from naïve pluripotency. PUFFFIN offers a simple, sensitive, customisable approach to profile non-cell-autonomous responses to natural or induced changes in cell identity or behaviour.

Synopsis

While there are some options for labeling cellular neighbours, they often have low flexibility, require modification of multiple cells with different plasmids, or are otherwise technically challenging. To overcome these limitations, this study develops Positive Ultra-bright Fluorescent Fusion For Identifying Neighbours (PUFFFIN), a method based on secretion and receptor-independent uptake of a positively charged fluorescent fusion molecule.

PUFFFIN uses a universal uptake mechanism to deliver fluorescent label to neighbouring cells without the need to engineer them with label-uptake machinery.

All PUFFFIN components are encoded on a single modular plasmid, amenable to delivery by transfection, electroporation, or lentivirus.

PUFFFIN enables ultra-bright colour-of-choice labelling for unambiguous and rapid labelling of neighbours in cell culture or in vivo.

PUFFFIN labelling does not compromise viability, enabling functional analysis of live neighbours.

PUFFFIN labelling is used to demonstrate that pluripotent cells adjust the pace of differentiation to synchronise with their neighbours.

Positive Ultra-bright Fluorescent Fusion For Identifying Neighbours, or PUFFFIN, allows visualization and isolation of surrounding cells in culture, tissues, or embryos to profile non-cell-autonomous responses.

Keywords

Neighbour Labelling
Synthetic Signalling
PUFFFIN
HaloTag
Pluripotency
Subject terms

Biotechnology & Synthetic Biology
Stem Cells & Regenerative Medicine
Methods & Resources
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100010269 Wellcome Trust (WT) 220298 218470 203149 Lebek Tamina Lowell Sally http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000268 UKRI | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/W014610/1 Malaguti Mattias http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004410 European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO) 792-2021 Boezio Giulia LM http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000266 UKRI | Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) EP/X031225/1 Boezio Giulia LM http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100015504 Simons Initiative for the Developing Brain (SIDB) http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000848 University of Edinburgh (ED) Chancellor’ s Fellowship Zoupi Lida issue-copyright-statement© European Molecular Biology Organization 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

All multicellular life depends on cell-cell communication. It is, therefore, important to understand the mechanisms by which cells influence their neighbours. Traditional approaches to characterise neighbour responses are often based on image analysis, which is limited by the available combination of fluorescence channels (Lin et al, 2015; Lun and Bodenmiller, 2020). This limitation is being overcome by advances in spatial transcriptomics technologies (Walker et al, 2022), but these are technically challenging for analysing complex tissues at single-cell resolution, remain beyond the technical and financial reach of many laboratories, and do not allow for functional assays to test the properties of live neighbours. Alternative approaches are needed to facilitate simple, reliable, sensitive, unbiased analysis of neighbour responses.

One such approach is to engineer synthetic signalling pathways that allow particular cells to induce expression of fluorescent proteins in neighbours, allowing those neighbours to be isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and then profiled, for example, using omics analysis, or subjected to functional assays to assess fate, potency or other behaviours. Recent advances in protein design and cell engineering provide a range of such neighbour-labelling systems (Malaguti et al, 2024) with a notable example being synNotch (Gordon et al, 2015; Morsut et al, 2016; Roybal et al, 2016; Huang et al, 2016) and its derivatives, such as synNQ (He et al, 2017), TRACT (Huang et al, 2017), SyNPL (Malaguti et al, 2022), gLCCC (Zhang et al, 2022) or diffusible synNotch (Toda et al, 2020). Other synthetic signalling systems include Tango (Talay et al, 2017; Sorkaç et al, 2023) and its light-inducible versions (Kim et al, 2017, 2019; Cho et al, 2022), G-baToN (Tang et al, 2020), and the proximity labelling systems FAP-DAPA (Carpenter et al, 2020), LIPSTIC (Pasqual et al, 2018) and uLIPSTIC (Nakandakari-Higa et al, 2024). One limitation of these powerful systems is that they are based upon synthetic receptor-ligand interactions, so they require genetic modification of ‘sender’ cells and ‘responding’ cells (Morsut et al, 2016; Toda et al, 2020; Tang et al, 2020; Malaguti et al, 2022; Zhang et al, 2022).

Simpler systems engineer fluorescent molecules for both export by senders and uptake by surrounding cells. This is made possible by the fusion of signal peptides and cell-penetrating peptides, such as the HIV-1 transactivator of transcription (TATk), with fluorescent proteins. This concept has been exemplified by the PTD-GFP system for green-fluorescent protein (GFP) (Flinterman et al, 2009), and by the Cherry-niche (Ombrato et al, 2019, 2021) and its inducible version (CILP) (Zhang et al, 2023) for the red-fluorescent mCherry. The Cherry-niche system, in particular, has proven its efficacy in characterising the tumour niche (Ombrato et al, 2019; Nolan et al, 2022). Nonetheless, access to alternative systems for the secretion and uptake of fluorescent proteins would enhance flexibility in the design of neighbour-labelling experiments.

Supercharged GFP has previously been used as a macromolecule-delivery system (McNaughton et al, 2009; Cronican et al, 2010; Thompson et al, 2012a). It is engineered to have a theoretical net charge of +36 (+36GFP) (Lawrence et al, 2007), facilitating interaction with cell membranes and subsequent endocytosis (McNaughton et al, 2009; Thompson et al, 2012b). +36GFP is efficiently taken-up by mammalian cells (McNaughton et al, 2009), and so proteins fused to +36GFP can be delivered into cells, outperforming fusions to commonly used cell-penetrating peptides (such as the TATk peptide and the Penetratin peptide) in several cell lines (Cronican et al, 2010).

In this study, we set out to examine whether +36GFP could be re-purposed for neighbour labelling. To maximise the range of applications, we explored strategies for signal amplification, with the aim of developing a sensitive system that could unambiguously identify even relatively transient interactions and be amenable to live imaging. We also sought simple options for changing the colour of labelling so that the system could be combined with any existing fluorescent reporters, and a customisable design of exchangeable modules that would maximise the flexibility of experimental design. We aimed to design a system that could be readily delivered to intact tissues or embryos using electroporation or viral infection, and which could be stably implemented in cultured cells, including pluripotent cells.

Neighbour-labelling tools open up opportunities for testing how differentiation in one cell influences differentiation in surrounding cells. Between day 4.5 and day 5.5 of mouse development, cells take the first step towards embryonic lineage commitment by exiting from naïve pluripotency (Nichols and Smith, 2009; Smith, 2017). It is not known whether the timing of this transition is coordinated between neighbouring cells, for example, to ensure that all cells complete the transition by E5.5. However, there is indirect evidence suggesting that this might be the case. For example, timely exit seems unlikely to depend only on cells sharing the same pro-differentiation environment: within initially homogenous monolayer cultures, some naïve cells exit the naïve state more than a day later than other cells within the same dish, despite being exposed to the same culture conditions, and independently of cell cycle status (Kalkan et al, 2017; Strawbridge et al, 2020; Jayaram et al, 2023). This observation also suggests that timely exit is not governed by a reliable intrinsic clock or by long-range synchronisation mechanisms.

We therefore hypothesised that short-range communication between cells helps to synchronise the rate of exit from naïve pluripotency, akin to a community effect (‘local-synchronisation hypothesis’). We also considered two alternative possibilities: that local communication desynchronises the rate of exit (‘local de-synchronisation hypothesis’), or that the rate of exit in one cell is not influenced by the rate of exit in neighbouring cells. Until now, it has been challenging to distinguish these hypotheses because the timing of exit from naïve pluripotency is functionally defined using clonal commitment assays to establish changes in potency (Kalkan et al, 2017), limiting the utility of imaging-based approaches. Fluorescent neighbour labelling overcomes this challenge, making it possible to compare the differentiation status of close neighbours to that of more distant cells using functional clonal assays of commitment status rather than relying on molecular markers.

Here we present a novel system, called PUFFFIN, for fluorescent neighbour labelling in culture or in vivo. We use PUFFFIN to obtain evidence that pluripotent cells adjust the pace of differentiation to synchronise with their neighbours during exit from naïve pluripotency.

Results

PUFFFIN can unambiguously label surrounding cells

We set out to design a system that could facilitate unambiguous labelling of neighbours after delivery of a single plasmid (Fig. 1A). The supercharged green-fluorescent protein +36GFP (Fig. 1B), is a positively-charged version of GFP (Lawrence et al, 2007) that can be taken up by mammalian cells when exogenously introduced to cultures (McNaughton et al, 2009; Cronican et al, 2010; Thompson et al, 2012b). We, therefore, decided to assess whether +36GFP could form a core component of a neighbour-labelling system. We added the human serum albumin signal peptide (Dugaiczyk et al, 1982), which is cleaved upon secretion, to create a secreted form of +36GFP which we refer to as s36GFP.Figure 1 Design and proof of concept of PUFFFIN labelling.

(A) PUFFFIN cell lines can be generated by transfection with the random integration plasmid containing the PUFFFIN expression construct. The resulting cells stably express s36GFP-mNG which is transferred to nearby cells while retaining nuclear mCherry-3NLS. (B) Electrostatic surface potential is shown for wild-type GFP (PDB ID: 4kw4), +36GFP (AlphaFold predicted structure), and s36GFP-mNG (AlphaFold predicted structure). (C) The PUFFFIN expression cassette on the random integration plasmid contains the following parts: cHS4 insulators on both ends, the strong ubiquitous CAG promoter, the labelling protein s36GFP-mNG fused by a flexible 14 amino acid linker, an IRES for translation of downstream components, the puromycin resistance gene, a p2A self-cleaving peptide, nuclear mCherry-3NLS, and a synthetic polyA with a mammalian terminator. (D) Mock flow cytometry plot showing the three populations expected for PUFFFIN labelling. (E) Unmodified mCherry- cells become s36GFP-mNG+ after mixing with mCherry+ s36GFP-mNG+ secretors in a 1:4 unmodified cell:secretor co-culture. 10,000 cells were analysed for the control panels and 30,000 cells for the 48 h 1:4 co-culture. Three independent experiments were performed, and a representative set is shown. +36GFP, green-fluorescent protein with a theoretical net charge of +36; 14, 14 AA linker; BB, backbone; CAG, CMV early enhancer/chicken β-actin promoter; cHS4, chicken hypersensitive site 4 insulator; FP, fluorescent protein; GFP, green-fluorescent protein; IRES, internal ribosome entry site; NLS, nuclear localisation signal; mNG, mNeonGreen; polyA, polyadenylation tail; PuroR, puromycin resistance gene; s36GFP, +36 green-fluorescent protein with an N-terminal secretion signal.

To maximise the sensitivity, speed, and specificity of neighbour labelling, we sought a strategy to boost fluorescence intensity. To achieve this, we fused s36GFP to the ultra-bright green-fluorescent mNeonGreen (mNG) (Shaner et al, 2013) as a signal amplifier (Fig. 1B). This was the first step towards generating a system we call ‘positive ultra-bright fluorescent fusion for identifying neighbours’ (PUFFFIN).

The PUFFFIN plasmid also encodes mCherry-3NLS, which remains inside the nucleus and serves to distinguish secretors from surrounding cells that have taken up s36GFP-mNG (Fig. 1A,C,D). The PUFFFIN expression cassette is driven by the strong ubiquitous CAG promoter (Niwa et al, 1991; Dou et al, 2021) and cHS4 insulators flank the expression cassette to guard against silencing (Chung et al, 1993) (Fig. 1C).

We delivered the PUFFFIN plasmid to HEK293 cells and generated stable monoclonal cell lines. The resulting “secretor” cell lines expressed mCherry-3NLS and s36GFP-mNG at levels that clearly distinguish secretors from unmodified cells by flow cytometry (Figs. 1E and Fig. EV1A).

To test the neighbour-labelling capacity of s36GFP-mNG, we mixed a minority of unmodified cells with an excess of secretors (1:4 ratio) to ensure that unmodified cells were likely to be in proximity to secretors. Within 48 h, over 95% of the unmodified cells became clearly s36GFP-mNG+ (Figs. 1E and Fig. EV1A–C). As expected, reducing the proportion of secretor cells reduced the extent of labelling in unmodified cells (Fig. EV1B). Secretors can also efficiently transfer s36GFP-mNG to UCH1N chordoma cells, mShef7 human embryonic stem (ES) cells, and E14tg2a mouse ES cells (Fig. EV1D).

This demonstrates that mammalian cells expressing the PUFFFIN plasmid unambiguously label surrounding cells.

PUFFFIN labelling is confined to the local cell neighbourhood

A successful neighbour-labelling system depends on labelling being limited to nearby cells. To test this, we plated a small number of secretors among a large excess of unmodified cells (50:1 ratio) and performed time-lapse imaging.

Over time, green fluorescence became associated with unmodified cells that were in the proximity of secretors, while more distant cells remained unlabelled (Figs. 2A; Mov. EV1). This indicates that the s36GFP-mNG label is delivered only to nearby cells. To further assess the distance of labelling, we established a border between a secretor population and a population of unmodified cells, as illustrated in Fig. 2B. The two populations were plated in two different wells separated by a removable two-well insert and cultured to confluency, upon which the insert was removed so both populations could expand towards each other.Figure 2 Distance and speed of PUFFFIN labelling.

(A) Stills from live imaging of a 50:1 unmodified cell:secretor co-culture over 19 h. Scale bars are 50 μm. (B) Schematic of the experimental setup for testing the PUFFFIN labelling range. Secretors and acceptors are seeded separately and cultured to confluency in a removable cell culture insert. Insert is removed to allow both cell types to close the gap. Labelling at the border can be observed by fluorescence microscopy. (C) Stills from live imaging of a border experiment shows close labelling range. Scale bars are 50 μm. (D) Distance of labelling shown as quantification of mCherry and GFP intensity from live imaging data at 19 h time point. Fluorescence profiles with a width of 300 μm starting with the last secretor were measured in 10 μm intervals over an 1890-μm-long border between secretors and unmodified cells. Mean for 189 profiles and the 95% confidence interval of the mean for GFP (green) and mCherry (pink). (E) Speed of labelling is dependent on co-culture ratio and time: flow cytometry analysis of different unmodified cell:secretor ratios in a pelleted suspension co-culture as a time course experiment. Grey numbers (bottom right of each plot) are the percentage of unmodified cells in Q4 (see Fig. 1D), green numbers (bottom left of each plot) are the percentage of unmodified cells in Q1 (see Fig. 1D). 50,000 cells were analysed for each sample. Three independent experiments were performed, and a representative set is shown.

s36GFP-mNG labelling became visible in unmodified cells that had reached the immediate neighbourhood of the secretor population but was not visible further from the border between the two populations in Fig. 2C and Mov. EV2. Using the last time point of the live imaging, we quantified the red and green fluorescence intensity from the border starting with the last secretor (identified by nuclear mCherry). Whereas mCherry was not detected beyond the last secretor, the GFP intensity decreased gradually with distance, reaching its half maximum at 35 μm from the border (Fig. 2D). We determined the average cell diameter as 11.6 ± 1.6 μm and conclude that clear labelling is detectable up to approximately three cells away from the border with weaker labelling extending a few cells beyond this (we note that this experiment is not designed to determine whether or not the green-fluorescent fusion protein can travel directly across several cell diameters, because the distance of labelling from the border will be dependent on cell division and cell migration as well as direct transfer of label).

Taken together, these data confirm that clearly detectable label is delivered only to cells that are in close proximity to secretors.

PUFFFIN labelling is transferred rapidly between cells

During the time-lapse experiments described above (Fig. 2A,C) we could detect green fluorescence within neighbours of secretors within 30 min. To further assess how long it takes for the s36GFP-mNG label to become detectable, we mixed unmodified cells with secretors at different ratios and then used centrifugation to bring them together rapidly at high density. We incubated the pelleted co-culture for 15, 30, 45, or 60 min, and then analysed green fluorescence within the mCherry-negative unmodified cell fraction at various time points (Fig. 2E).

With an excess of PUFFFIN secretors (1:9 ratio), more than half of the unmodified cells (56%) were labelled with s36GFP-mNG within 15 min of mixing them with secretors, and nearly all of them (98%) were labelled within 1 h. For the 1:1 co-culture, labelling was slightly slower: only around 5% of cells were labelled after 15 min, increasing to over 75% after 1 h.

In co-cultures where secretor cells formed a small minority (50:1 unmodified cells:secretor cells), labelling could be detected at low levels within the first hour. In this case, labelling was restricted to a minor fraction of cells, consistent with labelling being restricted to the close proximity of these sparse secretors (Fig. EV2A).

We also examined the speed of labelling in unmodified cells mixed with an excess of secretors (1:9 ratio) and then allowed to attach onto tissue culture plastic (Fig. EV2B). In this case, labelling was detected within the majority of cells (71%) within 2 h of plating the cells.

We conclude that PUFFIN labelling can be transferred rapidly to neighbouring cells at levels that can be detected by flow cytometry or by live imaging and that labelling intensity is dependent on the co-culture ratio.

The PUFFFIN system has a modular design to combine manipulation of cell function with customisable neighbour labelling within a single plasmid

To achieve ready customisability, we use the extensible mammalian modular assembly (EMMA) platform (Martella et al, 2017) to combine all components of PUFFFIN within a single plasmid comprised of modular exchangeable parts (Fig. 3A).Figure 3 Modular design of PUFFFIN plasmid assembly.

(A) Standard PUFFFIN expression construct. The numbers above the plasmid chart stand for positions in the EMMA platform. (B) Assembly of different parts allows, for example, a combination of the s36GFP-mNG label with a non-secreted fluorescent protein (FP) in another colour. The PUFFFIN label could be a fusion of s36GFP with an amplifier other than mNeonGreen to change the colour of the label. (C) The selection gene could be replaced by a gene of interest, (D) and the ubiquitous CAG promoter by a cell type-specific promoter.

For example, to make a version of PUFFFIN that is compatible with cells that already contain red-fluorescent reporters, we exchanged the mCherry-3NLS transgenes to a cytoplasmic blue-fluorescent tagBFP (Subach et al, 2008) (Figs. 3B and  EV3), and at the same time replaced the IRES with a t2A self-cleaving peptide (Liu et al, 2017). We used this customised construct to generate a stable polyclonal line of secretors in which the vast majority of cells (>95%) are s36GFP-mNeonGreen+ tagBFP+ (Fig. EV3), without the need for selecting clonal cell lines.

To expand the utility of the system for functional experiments, the puromycin resistance gene can be exchanged for any transgene of interest for manipulating or monitoring cell behaviour (Fig. 3C) (the selection gene is dispensable because stably expressing secretors can be purified based on fluorescent signal rather than antibiotic selection).

Similarly, the CAG promoter can be switched to an inducible or a cell type-specific promoter for regulatable or tissue-specific expression of the PUFFFIN construct (Fig. 3D). This offers the opportunity to manipulate cell behaviour in a specific set of cells while simultaneously delivering a fluorescent label to their neighbours.

The PUFFFIN system can be customised for colour-of-choice labelling using HaloTag® technology

We demonstrate above (Figs. 1 and 2) that mNeonGreen is an effective signal amplifier that facilitates bright neighbour labelling using PUFFFIN. However, s36GFP-mNeonGreen labelling is not compatible with cells that already express GFP, such as green-fluorescent reporter lines. We, therefore, sought an approach to further customise the PUFFFIN construct so that labelling can be performed in any colour of choice without the need for additional genetic manipulation of the PUFFFIN plasmid.

To achieve this, we replaced the coding sequence of mNeonGreen with a HaloTag® (Los et al, 2008), illustrated in (Figs. 4A,B and EV4A), creating an s36GFP-HaloTag fusion protein (‘PUFFHalo’) that can bind any HaloTag fluorescent ligand (England et al, 2015; Cook et al, 2023) (Fig. 4C). We used this new construct to generate stable PUFFHalo secretor lines.Figure 4 Combination of PUFFFIN with HaloTag technology enables colour-of-choice neighbour labelling.

(A) The modularity of PUFFFIN allows an assembly termed “PUFFHalo” that contains HaloTag as an amplifier instead of mNeonGreen. (B) As an alternative to the s36GFP-mNG label, s36GFP (green) was fused to HaloTag (grey) as a signal amplifier by a 14 amino acid-long linker (blue) (AlphaFold predicted structure). (C) Neighbour labelling is possible with PUFFHalo but has only low green fluorescence on its own. The label can be bound by HaloTag ligands, e.g. dyes in different colours, which amplifies the labelling signal. (D) Comparison of unmodified cells, s36GFP-mNG secretors and PUFFHalo secretors shows low green-fluorescence of the unstained PUFFHalo. (E) Unmodified cells and PUFFHalo secretors were incubated for 2 h with or without the HaloTag ligand Janelia Fluor (JF646). (F) Flow cytometry of 48 h 1:1 co-cultures of unmodified cells and PUFFHalo secretors were incubated for 2 h with or without the HaloTag ligand JF646. For (D–F), three independent experiments were performed, and a representative set is shown. (G) Live imaging of a 48 h 50:1 co-culture of unmodified cells and PUFFHalo secretors with the HaloTag ligand JF646, with Hoechst nuclear staining and WGA488 membrane staining. Dotted lines mark regions selected for orthogonal views. The left image shows the merge of all channels, right only far-red JF646 (PUFFHalo) and red (mCherry-3NLS, secretor nuclei). Scale bars are 50 μm, image depth is 11.5 μm.

We first confirmed that the residual green fluorescence from the s36GFP was relatively dim in the absence of any amplifier, and therefore likely to be compatible with GFP-based reporters, and unlikely to override our ability to customise the colour of PUFFFIN labelling using HaloTag-binding dyes (Fig. 4D). We then tested whether we could customise the colour of PUFFFIN labelling using fluorescent HaloTag ligands. We cultured secretors in the presence or absence of far-red (JF646) or green (OregonGreen) fluorescent dyes and observed a strong shift in fluorescence following dye addition (Figs. 4E and  EV4B). This suggests that PUFFHalo can be labelled with different fluorophores and detected by flow cytometry.

We next tested the ability of PUFFHalo to label neighbours, by mixing secretors with unmodified cells in a 1:1 co-culture at high density for 48 h. More than 99% or 85% of unmodified cells were labelled by the PUFFHalo in the presence of far-red or green HaloTag fluorescent ligands, respectively (Figs. 4F and EV4C). This suggests PUFFHalo can be transferred to unmodified neighbours of secretor cells, and that labelled neighbours can be clearly identified by flow cytometry.

Finally, we investigated the potential of PUFFHalo for live imaging applications, by mixing a low number of secretors with an excess of unmodified cells (50:1 ratio) for 48 h and imaging the cells following the addition of HaloTag dyes. Labelling was clearly visible within neighbours of mCherry+ secretors and could also be seen decorating the cell membrane and underlying substrate (Figs. 4G and EV4D,E). This suggests that PUFFHalo can be used to monitor neighbour labelling in live cells in real time.

We conclude that PUFFHalo is readily customisable using HaloTag-compatible dyes to offer labelling in a colour of choice, and that the Halo-compatible dyes can further enhance the sensitivity of neighbour labelling.

The PUFFFIN system can be used for neighbour labelling in vivo

We next asked if PUFFFIN could be delivered to tissues in vivo or ex vivo. To facilitate packaging into a viral vector or transduction by electroporation, we reduced the size of the PUFFFIN construct by removing the selection cassette and insulator sequences to generate minimal constructs (Fig. 5A).Figure 5 PUFFFIN labelling in model systems of development.

(A) Three versions of the minimal PUFFFIN expression construct, including a minimal PUFFHalo, were designed for applications where plasmid size is a limiting factor for efficient delivery, e.g. in vivo electroporation. (B) Schematic showing a Hamburger Hamilton (HH) stage 15 embryo indicating the site imaged 24 h after delivery of the minimal PUFFHalo plasmid. (C) Confocal imaging of trunk ectoderm of an HH15 chicken embryo, electroporated in the caudal ectoderm at HH10 with minimal PUFFHalo and incubated ex ovo for 24 h. Embryos were incubated for 1 h with the HaloTag ligand JF646 (orange) before staining with DAPI (cyan) and mCherry nanobody to boost the fluorescence signal (pink). The left image shows the maximum intensity projection of all channels, right only far-red JF646 (PUFFHalo) and red (mCherry-3NLS, secretor nuclei). Scale bars are 50 μm, image depth is 13.5 μm. (D) Flow cytometry of live cells from pooled dissociated chick trunks (3–5 trunks per sample) for control embryos (electroporated with PBS) and for embryos electroporated with minimal PUFFHalo. Two independent experiments were performed, and a representative set is shown. (E) Flow cytometry of mESCs in 2iLIF as single cultures or 24 h co-cultures of unmodified cells and PUFFHalo secretors (different ratios as indicated in Figure), incubated for 2 h with the HaloTag ligand JF646 (far-red). Three independent experiments were performed, and a representative set is shown. (F) Immunofluorescence microscopy of a 24 h 9:1 mESC co-culture in naïve pluripotency medium (2iLIF) shows PUFFHalo labelling around secretors. Scale bars are 50 μm.

We packaged the smallest minimal PUFFFIN construct into a lentivirus (Fig. EV5A) and used it to transduce mouse brain organotypic slices (Fig. EV5B) (Eigel et al, 2019) at low titre (8.9 × 106 TU/mL), aiming to obtain mosaic and sparse expression. Transduced brain slices were cultured for a further 10 days, then examined for expression of s36GFP-mNeonGreen and mCherry-3NLS. We found that strongly mCherry-positive nuclei were surrounded by s36GFP-mNeonGreen signal (Fig. EV5C), indicating successful lentiviral delivery of the PUFFFIN system, although the complex morphology of neural cells made it difficult to assess whether the label had spread to neighbours in this experimental context.

We then delivered the minimal PUFFFIN s36GFP-HaloTag (minimal PUFFHalo) construct by electroporation into Hamburger Hamilton (HH) stage 10 chick embryos. We targeted the caudal ectoderm (Fig. 5B) using a low concentration of plasmid, aiming to obtain mosaic and sparse expression. Embryos were allowed to develop for a further 24 h, then examined for expression of s36GFP-HaloTag and mCherry-3NLS at HH15. Similar to the results obtained with brain slices (Fig. EV5C), strongly mCherry-positive cells within the chick caudal ectoderm were surrounded by s36GFP-HaloTag label (Fig. 5C). Label appeared to have spread into mCherry-negative cells close to transduced cells, but not into more distant cells (Fig. 5C). Distance of labelling was restricted to around 3–4 cell diameters, similar to the distance of labelling previously observed in cell cultures (Fig. 5C: compare with Figs. 2 and 4).

To confirm the transfer of the label into neighbours, we performed flow cytometry analysis on dissociated trunk cells 24 h after electroporation. Transduced cells were identified by expression of nuclear mCherry, with the strongest mCherry signal being associated with the highest levels of s36GFP-HaloTag, as expected (Fig. 5D). s36GFP-HaloTag could also be detected in a small population of mCherry-negative cells, at levels comparable to labelling observed in cell culture experiments where secretors were in a small minority (Fig. 5D: compare with Fig. EV2A).

We conclude that the PUFFFIN system can be delivered by lentiviral infection or electroporation and can be used for neighbour labelling in vivo.

Implementation of PUFFFIN in pluripotent cells

Pluripotent cells provide a simple and tractable experimental system for studying cell fate decisions, so we asked whether PUFFFIN could be implemented in mouse ES cells (mESCs). We delivered the PUFFHalo plasmid to mESCs and generated stable monoclonal cell lines. The resulting secretor cell lines expressed mCherry-3NLS and s36GFP-HaloTag at levels that clearly distinguished secretors from unmodified cells by flow cytometry (Fig. 5E).

To test the neighbour-labelling capacity of s36GFP-HaloTag in pluripotent cells, we mixed unmodified cells with secretors in various ratios. When secretors were in the minority (9:1 ratio), a minor subpopulation of unmodified cells became labelled, whereas when secretors formed the majority (1:9 ratio), almost all unmodified cells became labelled (Fig. 5E). In 9:1 co-cultures, s36GFP-HaloTag label appeared to have spread into mCherry-negative cells close to secretors, but not into more distant cells (Fig. 5F), in keeping with observations made in HEK293 cells (Figs. 2 and 4) and chick embryos (Fig. 5C).

We conclude that PUFFFIN can be used for neighbour labelling in pluripotent cells, opening up opportunities for studying how cells influence their neighbours during differentiation.

Pluripotent cells adjust the pace of differentiation to coordinate with their neighbours during exit from naïve pluripotency

Cells exit naïve pluripotency at different rates, even within the same culture (Kalkan et al, 2017). It remains an open question whether cells coordinate the pace of differentiation with nearby cells. For example, do the faster-differentiating cells signal to nearby cells (but not more distant cells) to ‘speed up’, in order to limit the degree of asynchrony (local-synchronisation hypothesis)? Or does the opposite happen, with faster-differentiating cells signalling to nearby cells to ‘slow down’, in order to diversify the rate of exit (local de-synchronisation hypothesis)? The third possibility is that the rate of differentiation is not locally coordinated in either direction, i.e. cells pay no attention to the rate of differentiation of their neighbours.

To distinguish between these three hypotheses, we made use of a well-established experimental system (Betschinger et al, 2013; Kalkan et al, 2017; Mulas et al, 2023) in which naïve cells are released from naïve pluripotency culture conditions (2iLIF culture medium) and given the opportunity to differentiate over the course of 48 h in N2B27 differentiation medium. At any given time during this transition, clonal assays can be used to measure the proportion of cells that have irreversibly committed to exit the naïve pluripotent state. These assays are performed by plating cells at clonal density in 2iLIF: naïve cells are able to form colonies under these conditions, while cells that have committed to exit the naïve state are not. Using this approach, it has been shown that cells exit naïve pluripotency asynchronously over the course of 48 h (Kalkan et al, 2017). Based on this experimental setup, we designed an experiment using PUFFFIN neighbour labelling to ask whether cells coordinate the rate of differentiation with their neighbours (Fig. 6A).Figure 6 Pluripotent cells adjust the pace of differentiation to coordinate with their neighbours during exit from naïve pluripotency.

(A) Experimental design for co-culturing naïve unmodified cells with a minority of either naïve or pre-differentiated PUFFHalo secretors for 24 h. Secretors, their neighbours and non-neighbours can then be isolated by FACS and screened in functional assays, e.g. testing for pluripotency by clonal commitment assay where only uncommitted cells can form colonies. (B) In all four experimental conditions, PUFFHalo labelling is effective in a 24 h 9:1 co-culture as shown by IF microscopy. Scale bars are 50 μm. (C) Three alternative hypotheses can be considered for the experimental outcome of testing the colony formation efficiency (CFE) of neighbours and non-neighbours of naïve or pre-differentiated secretors in the clonal commitment assay. (D) CFE Neighbour-to-Non-neighbour ratio coloured by biological replicate. Red crossbars show the mean and standard error of the mean (SEM). P values represent Bonferroni-adjusted, two-sided Fisher’s exact tests relative to the 2iLIF medium, using the sum of the colony counts averaged over five independent biological replicates. Five independent experiments with three non-independent replicates were performed.

To represent ‘faster-differentiating cells’, we released s36GFP-HaloTag secretor mESCs into N2B27 for 24 or 48 h, to initiate exit from naïve pluripotency. We seeded these pre-differentiated secretor cells among an excess of naïve unmodified cells (9:1 ratio) to create a situation where secretors were at a more advanced stage of differentiation than their unmodified neighbours. As a control, we seeded naïve secretors among an excess of naïve unmodified cells (9:1 ratio), to create a situation where secretors were at the same stage of differentiation as their unmodified neighbours. All co-cultures were then cultured for 24 h in N2B27 (Fig. 6A). To establish the baseline colony-forming efficiency (CFE) for cells not exposed to differentiation conditions, we co-cultured secretors with unmodified cells (9:1 ratio) in 2iLIF throughout.

We confirmed that PUFFFIN components remain expressed, and that labelling continues to operate during differentiation, with labelling restricted to neighbours of mCherry-positive cells as expected (Fig. 6B). Flow cytometry could distinguish secretors (mCherry, s36GFP-HaloTag double positive), neighbours (s36GFP-HaloTag single positive), and non-neighbours (double negative) (Fig. EV6A).

We sorted secretors, neighbours, and non-neighbours from all co-cultures and plated them at clonal density in 2iLIF (250 live cells per dish). We first examined data from control co-cultures in which secretors had not been pre-differentiated. If PUFFFIN labelling itself has adverse effects on colony-forming efficiency then we would expect to see significantly fewer colonies arising from labelled cells than unlabelled cells, but this was not the case (labelled cells formed 90.1 ± 12.4 colonies, unlabelled cells formed 93.8 ± 20.5 colonies) (Fig. EV6B).

We next examined data from co-cultures in which secretors had been pre-differentiated in N2B27 for 24 or 48 h then further differentiated for an additional 24 h as co-cultures (experimental design illustrated in Fig. 6A,C). We first focused on the secretors taken from these co-cultures. As expected, almost no colonies formed from these cells (2.9 ± 1.4 colonies formed from secretors pre-differentiated for 24 h then differentiated in co-culture for a further 24 h; 1.4 ± 0.4 colonies formed from secretors pre-differentiated for 48 h then differentiated in co-culture for a further 24 h). This is consistent with previous reports that almost all cells exit naïve pluripotency within 48 h of culture in N2B27 (Kalkan et al, 2017).

We next focused on the unmodified (non-secretor) cells within the N2B27 co-cultures: in all cases, these had been exposed to N2B27 for only 24 h, during the co-culture period (Fig. 6A). It has previously been reported that around 2/3 of cells can form colonies in 2iLIF following 25 h culture in N2B27, when compared with baseline CFE of cells never exposed to differentiation conditions (Kalkan et al, 2017). We first examined data from cells distant from pre-differentiated cells (non-neighbours/unlabelled cells): around 60% of these non-neighbours form colonies (61% from 24h-pre-differentiated co-cultures and 58% from 48h-pre-differentiated co-cultures) when compared to baseline CFE (Fig. EV6B). We then examined neighbours of secretors (labelled cells) in control N2B27 co-cultures: 63% formed colonies when compared to baseline CFE (Fig. EV6B). Therefore, in all these cases, cells that had not been in close proximity to pre-differentiated cells exit naive pluripotency at a rate comparable with previous reports (Kalkan et al, 2017).

In contrast, neighbours of pre-differentiated cells tended to form fewer colonies: 46% for neighbours of 24h-pre-differentiated cells, or 41% for neighbours of 48h-pre-differentiated cells, when compared to baseline CFE (Fig. EV6B). This suggests that neighbours of pre-differentiated cells may tend to commit to exit naïve pluripotency at a faster-than-normal rate.

To more closely examine differences in the behaviours of neighbours vs non-neighbours, we plotted the ratio of colony-forming efficiencies (CFE) for neighbours vs non-neighbours sorted from the same dish (N:NN ratio). For control co-cultures, the average N:NN ratio was close to 1 (0.96) and was not significantly different from baseline, indicating no consistent bias in CFE of neighbours vs. non-neighbours, as expected (Fig. 6D). In contrast, for cultures containing pre-differentiated secretors, the average N:NN ratio was significantly different from the baseline ratio (Fig. 6D). This indicates that pre-differentiated secretors influence the behaviour of their neighbours, and that this is unlikely to be attributable to artefactual effects of the labelling process. The ratio of colonies forming from neighbours:non-neighbours fell below, rather than above, 1 for co-cultures containing pre-differentiated secretors (Fig. 6D) in keeping with the predictions of the local-synchronisation hypothesis, and contrary to the predictions of the alternative hypotheses (Fig. 6C).

The observed difference in colony-forming efficiency between neighbours vs non-neighbours of pre-differentiated cells is unlikely to be due to differences in viability because only viable cells were sorted from co-cultures, and viability was also subsequently confirmed following sorting. The difference is also unlikely to relate to any adverse effect of the labelling process itself because there is no decrease in colony-forming efficiency in labelled neighbours taken from control cultures that lack pre-differentiated cells (Fig. 6D). We, therefore, conclude that our findings are most likely explained by neighbours of pre-differentiated cells being encouraged to exit naïve pluripotency by their pre-differentiated neighbours.

These experiments highlight particular strengths of PUFFFIN neighbour labelling. Firstly, it enables functional assays to be performed on live cells to compare properties of neighbours and non-neighbours, for example the clonal commitment assay that we use here. This facilitates sensitive detection of changes in cell potency that can occur prior to overt changes in the expression of molecular markers of differentiation, revealing changes that might not be detected by image analysis or other marker-based analysis. Secondly, the ability to directly compare neighbours and non-neighbours within the same dish makes it possible to sensitively detect significant changes that might not so easily be detected by classical bulk co-culture experiments.

We conclude that PUFFFIN neighbour labelling provides a sensitive, reliable, and flexible approach for detecting how cells influence their neighbours.

Discussion

We demonstrate that positive ultra-bright fluorescent fusion for identifying neighbours (PUFFFIN) can be used to unambiguously, sensitively, and rapidly label cell neighbourhoods. We use PUFFFIN to obtain evidence that pluripotent cells coordinate the rate of differentiation with their neighbours.

The integration of PUFFFIN with HaloTag technology, PUFFHalo, enables colour-of-choice labelling with high signal-to-noise ratio without the need to reengineer the PUFFHalo plasmid. The HaloTag could, in principle, also be used for supporting extended live imaging (Cook et al, 2023), pulse-chase experiments (Yim et al, 2022), and specific degradation of the label using HaloPROTACS (Buckley et al, 2015). Our modular design can incorporate any transgene of interest to study non-cell-autonomous effects of experimentally induced changes in the identity of behaviour.

PUFFFIN offers a high level of customisability, a convenient single-plasmid delivery system, and receptor-independent transfer that does not require any modifications to the cells that receive the label. For example, the system could be delivered to embryos via electroporation in order to uncover non-cell autonomous responses to developmental regulators, or by viral transduction into tissues to uncover interactions between different tissues, or by grafting of PUFFFIN-engineered cancer cells into mice to characterise the tumour niche. Combining PUFFFIN with organoid technologies could generate powerful models for understanding how cell communication orchestrates self-organisation and regulates disease states.

We have not yet tested our system with tissue-specific drivers of PUFFFIN and it remains to be established how effective labelling will be at lower levels of expression. When delivering the PUFFFIN system by electroporation into chick embryos (Fig. 5) or lentiviral delivery into mouse brain organotypic slice cultures (Fig. EV5) we noticed that cells with low expression of mCherry sometimes lacked detectable PUFFFIN label, suggesting that relatively high levels of expression from the PUFFFIN construct may be necessary for effective labelling. The minimum level of PUFFFIN expression required for effective labelling is likely to depend on cell type and context, and, therefore, should be assessed for each experimental setup.

Another lesson learned from our experiments in brain slice cultures was that secretor cells with complex morphologies may be challenging to distinguish from their neighbours using imaging-based approaches alone. However, the modular design of the PUFFFIN construct (Fig. 3) should make it straightforward to overcome this problem by switching nuclear mCherry for a cytoplasmic or cell membrane-associated fluorescent protein that more clearly demarcates the outer limits of the secretor cells. Furthermore, we anticipate that any difficulties distinguishing secretors from labelled neighbours will be limited to imaging-based analyses and are unlikely to present any problems during flow cytometry.

A particular strength of fluorescent neighbour-labelling systems is that they allow for functional assays of live cells in experiments to compare the properties of neighbours vs non-neighbours. For example, we have used sensitive clonal assays of cell potency to address the question of whether mouse pluripotent cells coordinate the rate of differentiation with their neighbours during exit from naïve pluripotency. It is clear that diversity in potency emerges during exit from naïve pluripotency both in culture (Betschinger et al, 2013; Leeb et al, 2014; Kalkan et al, 2017) and in vivo (Acampora et al, 2017; Malaguti et al, 2019; Neagu et al, 2020): our findings suggest that cells may communicate with each other to limit the extent of this asynchrony. A number of elegant approaches have provided evidence for the synchronisation of differentiation between sibling pluripotent cells (Deathridge et al, 2019; Strawbridge et al, 2020; Chaigne et al, 2020); our findings indicate that there is also some degree of synchronisation between unrelated neighbours, suggesting that synchronisation may depend on cell-cell communication rather than only on clonal relationships.

PUFFFIN presents an effective and flexible approach for illuminating cellular neighbourhoods, offering many opportunities to discover how cells influence the functional properties of surrounding cells during development, homoeostasis, regeneration, and disease.

Methods

Reagents and tools table

Reagent/Resource	Reference or source	Identifier or catalogue number	
Experimental models	
Human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293	Blin lab		
E14Ju09 (129/Ola) mouse embryonic stem cells (subclone of E14tgta tested for high germline competence)	(Doetschman et al, 1987)		
mShef7 human embryonic stem cells	Blin lab		
(Gouti et al, 2014)	
UCH1N human chordoma‐derived cell line	Wilson lab		
(Fujita et al, 2016)	
C57BL/6J (mouse)	Obtained from Charles River Laboratories		
Gallus gallus (chicken)	Obtained from Henry Stewart & Co.		
NEB® 5-alpha Competent E. coli (Subcloning efficiency)	New England Biolabs	#C2988J	
NEB® 10-beta Competent E. coli (High efficiency)	New England Biolabs	#C3019I	
PUFFFIN lentivirus	This study		
Recombinant DNA	
YCe3736_HC_Amp_ccdB_receiver vector	Pollard lab, available on AddGene	#100637	
p_cHS4-CAG-s36GFP-mNG-IRES-PuroR-p2A-mCherry-3NLS-polyA-cHS4	This study	pTL5	
p_cHS4-CAG-s36GFP-mNG-t2A-PuroR-p2A-BFP-polyA-cHS4	This study	pTL50	
p_cHS4-CAG-s36GFP-HaloTag-IRES-PuroR-p2A-mCherry-3NLS-polyA-cHS4	This study	pTL51	
p_pyCAG-s36GFP-HaloTag-IRES-mCherry-3NLS-polyA	This study	pTL52	
p_pyCAG-s36GFP-mNG-IRES-mCherry-3NLS-polyA	This study	pTL53	
p_pyCAG-s36GFP-mNG-t2A-mCherry-3NLS-polyA	This study	pTL54	
pLenti6_cppt-CMV-Puffling-opre	This study	pLenti6	
Antibodies	
Mouse monoclonal anti-mNeonGreen (32F6, 1:500)	Proteintech	#17882377,	
RRID: AB_2827566	
Rabbit polyclonal anti-HaloTag (1:500)	Promega	#G9281	
RRID: AB_713650	
Rabbit polyclonal anti-RFP (1:1000)	Rockland	#600-401-379,	
RRID: AB_2209751	
Rat monoclonal anti-mCherry (1:1000)	Invitrogen	#M11217,	
RRID: AB_2536611	
RFP-Booster Alexa Fluor® 568 (1:500)	ChromoTek	#rb2AF568	
RRID: AB_2827576	
Chemicals, enzymes, and other reagents	
2-mercaptoethanol	Gibco	#31350010	
2-well removable culture-inserts	Ibidi	#80209	
3-well removable culture-inserts	Ibidi	#80369	
4-well μ-slides	Ibidi	#80426	
8-well μ-slides	Ibidi	#80806-90	
Accutase	Invitrogen	#00-4555-56	
Amphotericin B	Gibco	#15290026	
B-27 Supplement	Gibco	#17504044	
Bovine serum albumin	Sigma-Aldrich	#A7906	
CHIR99021	Axon Mechem	#1386	
d-glucose	Sigma-Aldrich	#G8769	
DAPI	Biotium	#40043	
DMEM/F-12	Gibco	#21331020	
Donkey serum	Sigma-Aldrich	#D9663	
DRAQ7	Abcam	#ab109202	
Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, high glucose, pyruvate)	Gibco	#41966029	
Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)	Sigma-Aldrich	#D8537	
Earle’s balanced salt solution (calcium, magnesium, phenol red)	Gibco	#24010043	
FACSmax cell dissociation solution	amsbio	AMS.T200100	
Fibronectin	Sigma-Aldrich	#F1141	
Fluoromount-G® mounting medium	SouthernBiotech	#0100-01	
Foetal calf serum (FCS)	Biosera	#FB-1280/500	
Formaldehyde 37–41%	Fisher Scientific	#F/1501/PB08	
Gelatine	Sigma-Aldrich	#G1890	
Glasgow minimum essential medium (GMEM)	Gibco	#1171035	
Glutamax™ supplement	Thermo Scientific	#35050-038	
Heat-inactivated horse serum, New Zealand origin	Gibco	#26050088	
Hibernate™-A medium	Gibco	#A1247501	
Hoechst 33342	Apexbio	#A3472-APE	
Hoechst 33342 solution	Thermo Scientific	#62249	
Janelia Fluor 646 (JF646) ligand	Promega	#GA1120	
l-glutamine	Invitrogen	#25030-024	
Laminin	Sigma-Aldrich	#L2020	
Leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF)	produced in-house		
Lipofectamine 3000 transfection reagent	Invitrogen	#L3000001	
Millicell cell culture inserts (30 mm, hydrophilic PTFE, 0.4 µm)	Merck-Millipore	#PICM0RG50	
Minimum essential medium (MEM)	Gibco	#12360038	
Monarch plasmid DNA Miniprep Kit	New England Biolabs	#T1010	
N-2 supplement	Gibco	#17502048	
NEBridge Golden Gate Assembly Kit (BsmBI-v2)	New England Biolabs	#E1602L	
Neurobasal medium	Gibco	#21103049	
Non-essential amino acids	Invitrogen	#11140-036	
OregonGreen ligand	Promega	#G2801	
PD0325901	Axon Mechem	#1408	
Penicillin/streptomycin	Invitrogen	#15140-122	
Phenol red-free DMEM	Gibco	#31053028	
Poly-l-ornithine	Sigma-Aldrich	#P4957	
ProLong™ Gold Antifade Mountant	Invitrogen	#P36930	
Pulled glass capillary	Harvard Apparatus	#EC1 64-0766	
Puromycin dihydrochloride	Sigma-Aldrich	#P8833	
Q5 HotStart High Fidelity Polymerase	New England Biolabs	#M0493S	
Sodium pyruvate	Invitrogen	#11360-039	
SYBR™ Green Nucleic Acid Gel Stain	Invitrogen	#S7563	
T4 DNA Ligase	New England Biolabs	#M0202S	
Triton X-100	Sigma-Aldrich	#X100	
Trypan blue	Gibco	#15250061	
Trypsin	Invitrogen	#15090-046	
Wheat Germ Agglutinin CF®488 A Conjugate (WGA488)	Biotium	#BT29022-1	
X-Gal	Promega	#V3941	
Zero Blunt TOPO PCR Cloning Kit	Invitrogen	#450245	
Software	
R version 4.2.1 (tidyverse, rstatix)	(R Core Team, 2024)		
Bluues Version 2.0	(Walsh et al, 2012)		
ColabFold	(Mirdita et al, 2022)		
ImageJ 1.53t (FIJI)	(Schindelin et al, 2012)		
Other	
BD FACSAria II cell sorter	BD Biosciences		
BD LSRFortessa cell analyzer	BD Biosciences		
Celigo 4 Channel	Nexcelom Bioscience		
ECLIPSE Ti	Nikon		
Electro Square Porator ECM830	BTX		
Opera Phenix™ High-Content Screening System	PerkinElmer		
SP8 Inverted confocal microscope	Leica		
TC20 automated cell counter	BioRad		
VT1000 S vibratome	Leica		

Construct design

We chose the following parts for the PUFFFIN construct design: the strong, ubiquitous CAG promoter (Niwa et al, 1991) should ensure high expression levels of the PUFFFIN construct and is followed by a Kozak consensus sequence (GCCGCCACC). The PUFFFIN fusion proteins start with a secretion signal peptide (s) from the human serum albumin (HSA) precursor (Dugaiczyk et al, 1982), optimised for mammalian expression by balanced GC content and improved codon adaptation index (0.96 instead of 0.65 in original sequence), followed by a short two amino acid RG linker to maintain the sequence context of the HSA precursor, to prevent issues with cleavage of the signal peptide upon secretion. The sequence of +36GFP (Lawrence et al, 2007) is codon optimised for expression in mammalian cells (Bar-Shir et al, 2015), the N-terminal His-tag was removed from the original sequence. The 14 amino acid-long linker is glycine-serine rich for stability, while the small polar amino acid threonine makes it flexible (Chen et al, 2013). To increase the fluorescent signal of s36GFP, it was fused to an amplifier: either the ultra-bright green-fluorescent protein mNeonGreen (Shaner et al, 2013) or a HaloTag (Los et al, 2008). An internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) follows the s36GFP-amplifier coding sequence, to allow expression of a downstream puromycin N-acetyltransferase (PAC) gene, which confers resistance (PuroR) to the antibiotic puromycin dihydrochloride (de la Luna et al, 1988), enabling selection of clones with stable integration of the PUFFFIN constructs. The resistance gene can be replaced with a functional transgene of interest (GOI). A 2A self-cleaving peptide from porcine teschovirus-1 (p2A) (Tang et al, 2016) separates PAC and the subsequent fluorescent protein. The red-fluorescent mCherry (Shaner et al, 2004) was fused to three C-terminal SV40 nuclear localisation signals (3NLS) to drive nuclear localisation (Malaguti et al, 2013, 2022). Alternatively, cytoplasmic blue-fluorescent tagBFP (Subach et al, 2008) was used instead of mCherry-3NLS. A STOP cassette, consisting of a synthetic polyA (SPA) site (Levitt et al, 1989) and a C2MAZ terminator-binding sequence (Yonaha and Proudfoot, 2000) halts downstream transcription and translation. The whole expression construct is flanked by chicken β-globin insulators (cHS4) to prevent silencing at the random integration site (Chung et al, 1993). This was confirmed by culturing secretors to passage 15 without a decrease in s36GFP-mNG or mCherry-3NLS expression levels determined by flow cytometry. Ampicillin can be used for selective outgrowth of competent cells. We recommend linearisation with the PvuI restriction enzyme. These random integration plasmids containing s36GFP-mNeonGreen or s36GFP-HaloTag are 9913 bp and 10,159 bp in size, respectively.

For applications where a large plasmid size decreases delivery efficiency, we designed minimal PUFFFIN plasmids without insulators or mammalian selection gene, the smallest of which is 6840 bp in size (pyCAG-s36GFP-mNG-t2A-mCherry-3NLS-polyA). This minimal construct was adapted for the construction of a lentiviral vector by an in-house service following a standard protocol (McCloskey et al, 2014).

All plasmids created for this study will be deposited on Addgene and can be requested through the corresponding author.

Protein folding and charge prediction

Protein folding prediction for +36GFP, s36GFP-mNG, and s36GFP-HT was done with ColabFold (Mirdita et al, 2022). Bluues Version 2.0 (Walsh et al, 2012) was used for prediction of theoretical net charge and electrostatic surface potential of the folded sequences and wild-type GFP (PDB ID: 4kw4).

EMMA cloning: DNA domestication, assembly, and purification

In the original EMMA toolkit publication, the authors domesticate DNA parts by subcloning them into different entry vectors for each position in the assembly (Martella et al, 2017). We modified this strategy in order to use the same entry vector for each position. PCR primers for DNA domestication were designed as follows: 5′-(N)6-BsmBI binding site-N-fusion site-(N)20-3′. As an example, the primers for position 1 were: Forward: 5′-(N)6-CGTCTC-N-TAGG-(N)20-3′, Reverse: 5′-(N)6-CGTCTC-N-CCAT-(N)20-3′. PCR amplification was performed with a Q5 HotStart High Fidelity Polymerase (NEB, #M0493S), and resulting blunt-ended PCR products were cloned into a pCR-Blunt II-TOPO vector (Invitrogen Zero Blunt TOPO PCR Cloning Kit; #450245) to generate domesticated DNA. This strategy allows for the creation of functional DNA sequences spanning multiple positions, without the need for assembly connectors. New DNA sequences, e.g. for the s36GFP-mNG fusion protein, were custom-synthesised by GeneArt or Integrated DNA Technologies.

TOPO Cloning reactions were transformed into NEB® 10-beta Competent E. coli (High Efficiency) (NEB, #C3019I) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Bacteria were plated onto pre-warmed kanamycin resistance LB agar plates in the presence of X-gal (Promega, #V3941) for blue/white screening, and incubated overnight at 37 °C. White colonies were picked into 5 ml LB in the presence of kanamycin, and incubated at 37 °C prior to DNA purification.

EMMA assemblies of parts into the YCe3736_HC_Amp_ccdB_receiver vector (a kind gift from Prof Steven Pollard, also available on Addgene: #100637) were carried out using the NEBridge Golden Gate Assembly Kit (BsmBI-v2) (NEB, #E1602L), using 75 ng of each part and 2 μl of enzyme mix in a 20 μl reaction, performing 60 cycles of digestion (42 °C, 5 min) and ligation (16 °C, 5 min), followed by heat inactivation of enzymes (60 °C, 5 min). For assemblies involving domesticated parts harbouring extra BsmBI restriction sites, an extra ligation step was performed following heat inactivation: the reaction volume was increased to 30 μl, adding 400 U (1 μl) T4 DNA Ligase (NEB, #M0202S), and incubating the reactions at 16 °C for an additional 5–16 h.

About 10 μl of the assembly reaction was transformed into NEB® 5-alpha Competent E. coli (Subcloning Efficiency) (NEB, #C2988J) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Bacteria were plated onto pre-warmed ampicillin resistance LB agar plates at two densities: 1/10 and 9/10 of the transformation reaction, and incubated overnight at 37 °C. Colonies were picked into 5 ml LB in the presence of ampicillin, and incubated at 37 °C prior to DNA purification. In our experience, colonies obtained with subcloning efficiency E. coli usually contain the correctly assembled plasmid. Should no colonies be obtained with subcloning efficiency E. coli, the remaining 10 μl of the assembly reaction can be transformed into high-efficiency E. coli. In our experience, in this instance, it is necessary to screen more bacterial colonies to identify correct assemblies.

Plasmid DNA was purified using the Monarch Plasmid DNA Miniprep Kit (NEB, #T1010), and subjected to diagnostic restriction digest and subsequent gel electrophoresis. Sequences of clones with correct banding patterns were verified by either Sanger sequencing of inserts or whole plasmid sequencing with Oxford Nanopore Technologies.

Cell line generation and maintenance

HEK293 cells or E14Ju09 mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) were transfected with 3 μg of linearised plasmid using Lipofectamine 3000 Transfection Reagent (Invitrogen, #L3000001) in wells of a six-well plate. Selection with 2 μg/ml puromycin dihydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich; #P8833) was started 48 h after transfection for transfected cells and a mock transfection control. Cells were replated from the six-well plate at 1/10 and 9/10 densities onto 10 cm cell culture dishes and resulting colonies picked and expanded as monoclonal lines. Polyclonal lines were considered to only contain stable integrants following the death of all cells in the mock transfection control dishes.

All HEK293-derived cell lines were maintained in HEK293 culture medium—Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, high glucose, pyruvate; Gibco, #41966029) with 10% foetal calf serum (FCS; Biosera, #FB-1280/500)—under standard culture conditions (37 °C and 5% CO2) and passaged after washing with Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Sigma-Aldrich, #D8537) using 0.025% trypsin (Invitrogen, #15090-046). To enrich the stable polyclonal s36GFP-HT secretor line for high transgene expressing cells, cells were prepared for flow cytometry as described below, and sorted based on fluorescent marker expression on a BD FACSAria II. After sorting, cells were cultured for 2 weeks in a culture medium supplemented with penicillin/streptomycin (100 U/ml; Invitrogen, #15140-122).

The mESC cell lines were routinely cultured in LIF/Serum + PD03 medium on gelatine coating (0.1%; Sigma-Aldrich, #G1890): Glasgow Minimum Essential Medium (GMEM; Gibco, #1171035) supplemented with 10% foetal calf serum (FCS; Biosera, #FB-1280/500), 100 U/ml LIF (produced in-house), 2-mercaptoethanol (100 nM; Life Tech, #31350010), 1X non-essential amino acids (Invitrogen, #11140-036), sodium pyruvate (1 mM; Invitrogen, #11360-039), and PD0325901 (0.5 μM; Axon Medchem, #1408). Stable lines were cultured for a minimum of 14 days in 2iLIF on fibronectin-coating (Sigma-Aldrich, #F1141) at the start of experiments. 2iLIF was made with 50% DMEM/F-12 (Gibco, #21331020) and 50% Neurobasal Medium (Gibco, #21103049), supplemented with 2-mercaptoethanol (100 nM, Gibco, #31350010), 1X non-essential amino acids (Invitrogen, #11140-036), l-glutamine (2 mM; Invitrogen, #25030-024), 1X N2 (Gibco, #17502048), 1X B27 (Gibco, #17504044), LIF (100 U/ml; produced in-house), CHIR99021 (3 μM; Axon Medchem, #1386), and PD0325901 (1 μM; Axon Medchem, #1408). 2i (2iLIF without LIF) and N2B27 (2iLIF without LIF, CHIR, and PD03) medium were used in addition to 2iLIF as indicated for experiments. Cells were cultured under standard culture conditions and passaged after washing with Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Sigma-Aldrich, #D8537) using Accutase (Invitrogen, #00-4555-56).

All routinely used cell lines tested negative for mycoplasma contamination.

Co-culture experiments

Secretors and unmodified cells were detached from the cell culture vessel using trypsin or Accutase, resuspended in culture medium, pelleted by centrifuging at 300 × g for 3 min, resuspended in an appropriate amount of medium and counted to plate cells at unmodified cells-to-secretor ratios indicated for each experiment. Co-culture cell suspensions were thoroughly mixed before plating in the respective vessel. Single cultures for secretors and unmodified cells were included in all experiments.

Flow cytometry

For flow cytometry experiments, for 2–48 h time points cells were cultured under standard conditions in 12-well plates, detached using trypsin and quenched in HEK293 culture medium; for 15–60 min time points cells were mixed in suspension and pelleted at 300 × g for 1 min prior to incubation at 37 °C and 5% CO2; or for 0 h time points mixed on ice immediately prior to analysis.

For pelleted suspension cultures with different cell lines as unmodified cells, mShef7 human pluripotent cells, E14tg2a mouse pluripotent cells and UCH1N human chordoma cells were received as fresh single cell suspensions and immediately counted for 1:1 co-culture ratio. For co-cultures unmodified cells were mixed with HEK293 secretors in HEK293 culture medium (500 μL total volume), for single cultures cells remained in their respective medium. All cell suspensions were pelleted at 300 × g for 1 min prior to incubation for 90 min at 37 °C and 5% CO2.

Cells were pelleted by centrifuging at 300 × g for 3 min and resuspended in 10% FCS in PBS with either DAPI (1 μM; Biotium, #40043) or DRAQ7 (300 nM; Abcam, #ab109202) live/dead staining. No DAPI/No DRAQ7 controls were included in all experiments. Samples were analysed on a BD LSRFortessa Cell Analyzer using V 450/50-A (blue fluorescence), B 530/30-A (green fluorescence), Y/G 610/20-A (red fluorescence) and R 670/14-A (far-red fluorescence) laser/filters combinations.

Live imaging

Cells were plated on 7.5 μg/ml fibronectin-coated (Sigma-Aldrich, #F1141) 4-well μ-slides (Ibidi, #80426) with or without removable culture-inserts (Ibidi, two-well #80209 or three-well #80369). Culture inserts were removed 8 h prior to imaging and HEK293 culture medium was changed to imaging medium—phenol red-free DMEM (Gibco, #31053028) with 10% FCS (Biosera, #FB-1280/500) and 2% glutamate/pyruvate (100 mM sodium pyruvate, Invitrogen #11360-039; 200 mM l-glutamine, Invitrogen, #25030-024). Slides were imaged for brightfield, red and green fluorescence at 15 min intervals over 19 h on an Opera Phenix™ High-Content Screening System (PerkinElmer) under standard culture conditions.

Quantification of labelling distance from live imaging data

For the final time point of the live imaging data (19 h), an 1890-μm-long border between secretors and unmodified cells was analysed. In FIJI (Schindelin et al, 2012), a 10 μm × 300 μm rectangle was placed orthogonally to the border starting with the last secretor and its intensity profile for green and red fluorescence plotted (Analyze - Plot profile). The rectangle was then moved 10 μm along the border and adjusted to the last secretor. This was repeated for the whole length of the border resulting in 189 profiles for GFP and mCherry. Fluorescence intensity values were normalised to 1, the mean of all profiles and the 95% confidence interval of the mean of GFP and mCherry, and the half-maximum of GFP were calculated and visualised. In the same image, the diameter for 200 representative cells with clear outlines in brightfield was measured, with the mean and its 95% confidence interval calculated.

HaloTag staining and analysis

Cells were plated for co-culture experiments as described above, either in 12-well plates for flow cytometry or in fibronectin-coated eight-well μ-slides for live imaging. On the day of analysis, the HEK293 culture medium was replaced by imaging medium containing either Janelia Fluor 646 (JF646) ligand (10 nM; Promega, #GA1120) or OregonGreen ligand (50 nM; Promega, #G2801) or no HaloTag dye. Cells were incubated for 2 h at 37 °C and prepared for and processed by flow cytometry as described above. Hoechst 33342 (100 ng/ml; Apexbio, #A3472-APE) nuclear staining was added to the medium of the eight-well slide 1 h prior to imaging, and WGA488 (1 μg/ml; Wheat Germ Agglutinin CF®488 A Conjugate; Biotium, #BT29022-1) membrane staining was added to single wells immediately before imaging on an Opera Phenix™ High-Content Screening System (PerkinElmer).

Colony-forming efficiency in clonal commitment assay

Culture and fluorescence-activated cell sorting

mESC cell lines were generally cultured in 2iLIF. Adapting an existing protocol for testing the colony-forming efficiency during exit from naïve pluripotency (Kalkan et al, 2017), four conditions were tested: (1) Unmodified cells and secretors were cultured in 2iLIF prior to co-culture in 2iLIF. (2) Unmodified cells and secretors were cultured in 2i for 24 h prior to co-culture in N2B27. (3) Unmodified cells were cultured in 2i for 24 h and secretors in 2i for 24 h followed by N2B27 for 24 h prior to co-culture in N2B27. (4) Unmodified cells were cultured in 2i for 24 h and secretors in 2i for 24 h followed by N2B27 for 48 h prior to co-culture in N2B27. 2iLIF single cultures for unmodified cells and secretors were included as controls.

All co-cultures were seeded with a 9:1 unmodified cell : secretor ratio at a density of 5 × 104 cells per cm−2 for a 24 h co-culture. Culture medium was replaced with medium (2iLIF or N2B27, respectively) containing JF646 ligand (10 nM; Promega, #GA1120) 1.5 h prior to sample processing. Co-cultures were washed with PBS, detached with accutase and quenched in respective medium, and pelleted by centrifuging at 300 g for 3 min. Pellets were resuspended in either 2iLIF + DAPI or N2B27 + DAPI (1 μM DAPI; Biotium, #40043). All samples were kept on ice from this point onwards.

Cells were sorted using a BD FACSAria II Cell Sorter. Gating for secretors, labelled unmodified cells (‘neighbours’), and unlabelled unmodified cells (‘non-neighbours’) was determined using single culture controls. For the clonal commitment assay, 20,000 cells were sorted into 200 μL 2iLIF + Pen/Strep (Invitrogen, #15140-122).

For the clonal commitment assay, sorted cell samples were counted using the BioRad TC20 Automated Cell Counter and trypan blue live/dead staining. For each sample (secretors, neighbours, and non-neighbours for four different conditions with three technical replicates per sample) 250 live cells were plated in 2iLIF + Pen/Strep into one well of a six-well plate with poly-l-ornithine (Sigma-Aldrich, #P4957) and laminin (Sigma-Aldrich, #L2020) coating. Plates were cultured for 6 days under standard conditions and half media changes were done every other day. On the day of analysis (1 μg/ml; Wheat Germ Agglutinin CF®488 A Conjugate; Biotium, #BT29022-1) membrane staining was added to the medium and plates imaged on the Celigo plate imager. Colonies were counted in FIJI (Schindelin et al, 2012).

Statistical analyses for colony-forming efficiency

Data analysis was performed in R version 4.2.1 (R Core Team, 2024) using the packages tidyverse and rstatix. For the colony-forming efficiency (CFE), the mean colony number and the standard error of the mean (SEM) were calculated for neighbours and non-neighbours in all culture conditions. Percentages relative to populations in 2iLIF were calculated using the mean colony numbers. P values for neighbour-to-non-neighbour ratios represent Bonferroni-adjusted, two-sided Fisher’s exact tests relative to the 2iLIF medium, using the sum of the colony counts averaged over five independent biological replicates.

Antibody staining and immunofluorescence microscopy of mESCs

Co-cultures and single cultures of mESC secretors and unmodified cells were cultured on 7.5 μg/ml fibronectin-coated (Sigma-Aldrich, #F1141) eight-well μ-slides (Ibidi, #80806-90) for 24 h under standard conditions. Cells were washed with PBS and fixed for 20 min at RT with 4% formaldehyde in PBS. After three washes with PBS, slides were incubated overnight at 4 °C with blocking solution: PBS with 5% donkey serum and 0.1% Triton X-100). Primary antibodies diluted in blocking solution were added and the slides were incubated for 3 h at RT, followed by washing three times with PBS. The slides were incubated with secondary antibodies and DAPI diluted in a blocking solution for 1 h at RT. Slides were washed three times with PBS before adding 90% glycerol in PBS to all wells. Slides were kept at 4 °C until imaged on a Nikon ECLIPSE Ti or Leica SP8 inverted confocal microscope.

Brain slice experiments

Animals

All animal experiments were carried out in accordance with the guidelines established by the Animal Care (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and under the authority of Home Office project license PP5764018 (L.Z.).

Mouse organotypic brain slice cultures

This brain slice culture protocol was previously published (Eigel et al, 2019). Briefly, C57BL/6J mouse pups (postnatal days 2–4) were decapitated and their brains were dissected in cold Hibernate™-A Medium (Gibco, #A1247501) on ice. Dissected brains were then mounted on a vibratome (Leica VT1000 S) and 250-300 μm coronal cortical slices were collected in ice-cold Hibernate-A medium. The slices were immediately transferred onto Millicell cell culture inserts (30 mm, hydrophilic PTFE, 0.4 µm, Merck-Millipore, #PICM0RG50) with pre-warmed slice medium containing 50% MEM (Gibco, #12360038) with 25% Earle’s Balanced Salt Solution (Gibco, #24010043), 25% heat-inactivated horse serum, New Zealand origin (Gibco, #26050088), 1% Glutamax™ Supplement (Thermo Scientific, #35050-038), 1% penicillin–streptomycin (Invitrogen, #15140-122), 0.5% Amphotericin B (Gibco, #15290026) and 6.5 mg/ml glucose (Sigma-Aldrich, #G8769). Each membrane insert contained three cortical slices (1 slice/mouse). The culture medium was changed every other day. Slices were kept in culture for 7 days at 37 °C and 5% CO2 prior to lentiviral transduction. 8.9 × 106 TU/ml of PUFFFIN lentivirus was added to the slices which were cultured for a further 10 days after viral transduction.

Slice culture immunofluorescence

Cortical slices were washed once with PBS before they were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS for 1 h at room temperature (RT). The slices were subsequently rinsed in PBS and blocked in 3% heat-inactivated horse serum heat-inactivated horse serum, New Zealand origin (Gibco, #26050088), 2% Bovine Serum Albumin (Sigma-Aldrich, #A7906) and 0.5% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich, #X100) in PBS for 2 h at RT. Following blocking, the slices were incubated for 48 h with primary antibodies at 4 °C on a shaker. The slices were then washed three times with blocking solution and incubated with the appropriate secondary antibodies overnight at 4 °C on a shaker. Finally, the slices were washed in PBS, counterstained with Hoechst 33342 solution (Thermo Scientific, #62249) and mounted on a glass microscopic slide using Fluoromount-G® mounting medium (SouthernBiotech, #0100-01).

Primary antibodies used: Rabbit- anti-RFP, pre-adsorbed (RRID:AB_2209751, Rockland, #600-401-379, 1:1000), and mouse anti-mNeonGreen (32F6, RRID: AB_2827566, Proteintech, #17882377). Secondary antibodies were all purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Alexa, 1:1000). Images were obtained using confocal laser scanning microscopy (Leica microsystems, TCS SP8) and processed using Fiji image processing package (Schindelin et al, 2012).

Chick experiments

Chicken embryos and electroporation

Fertilised chicken embryos (Gallus gallus) were obtained from Henry Stewart & Co. Ltd and kept in humidified incubators at 38 °C until the desired stage (Hamburger and Hamilton, 1951). Eggs were incubated for 35 h to reach HH10 stages and then injected in the caudal lateral epiblast via a pulled glass capillary (Harvard Apparatus, #EC1 64-0766) with plasmid solution mixed with SYBR green (Invitrogen, #S7563). PUFFHalo minimal plasmid was injected at a final concentration of 250 ng/μl to achieve mosaic labelling.

Ex ovo electroporations were performed similarly to those previously described (Williams and Sauka-Spengler, 2021). In short, embryos were isolated via hole-punched Whatman filter paper and placed ventral side up in an electroporation chamber with a negative electrode at the bottom filled with Tyrodes saline. The plasmid mixture was injected in the space between the vitelline membrane and the CLE of the embryo. The positive electrode was placed over the CLE to achieve targeted plasmid electroporation (pulse regime—7 V, 50 ms. length, 3 pulses, 500 ms. interval). Embryos were then cultured for 24 h using the EC culture method (Chapman et al, 2001) in 35 mm dishes and screened for transfection efficiency (i.e. presence of mCherry fluorescence within the trunk). On the day of analysis, embryos were incubated in an L15 medium containing Janelia Fluor 646 (JF646) ligand (500 nM; Promega, #GA1120) for 1 h at 37 °C.

Healthy and transfected embryos were dissected and processed for immunohistochemistry or flow cytometry.

Immunohistochemistry of chick embryos

Chicken embryos were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 h at RT. Embryos were washed twice in PBS, incubated with 10 μg/ml DAPI and 1:500 RFP-Booster Alexa Fluor® 568 (Chromotek, #rb2AF568) for 2 h at RT and washed extensively in PBS. Embryos were mounted between coverslips with ProLong™ Gold Antifade Mountant (Invitrogen, #P36930) and imaged with a Leica SP8 confocal microscope. Images were processed with Fiji (Schindelin et al, 2012).

Flow cytometry of chick cells

For flow cytometry experiments, embryo trunks were dissected, and 3–5 trunks were pooled per sample. Samples were dissociated in FACSmax Cell Dissociation Solution (Amsbio, #AMS.T200100) for 20 min at 37 °C with shaking. Cells were pelleted by centrifuging at 600 × g for 4 min and resuspended in 1% BSA in PBS with DAPI (1 μg/ml). Samples were analysed on a BD LSRFortessa Cell Analyzer using V 450/50-A (blue fluorescence), Y/G 610/30-A (red fluorescence), and R 670/30-A (far-red fluorescence) laser/filters combinations.

Supplementary information

Peer Review File

Movie EV1

Movie EV2

Expanded View Figures

Expanded view

Figure EV1 Secretors can effectively label unmodified cells by transferring s36GFP-mNG.

(A) Flow cytometry of a 1:4 co-culture of unmodified cells and a second independent monoclonal secretor line (secretor clone 2) at 0 and 48 h time points. Three independent experiments were performed, and a representative set is shown. (B) Flow cytometry of a 48 h co-culture with unmodified cells and either secretor clone 1 or secretor clone 2 seeded at different co-culture ratios. Grey numbers (bottom left of each plot) are the percentage of unmodified cells in Q4, and green numbers (bottom right of each plot) are the percentage of unmodified cells in Q1. Three independent experiments were performed, and a representative set is shown. (C) Live imaging of single cultures of unmodified cells or secretors and a 48 h 1:4 co-culture of unmodified cells and secretors with Hoechst nuclear staining. The scale bar is 50 μm. (D) Flow cytometry of 1:1 90 min pelleted suspension co-cultures of different unmodified cell types and HEK293-derived secretors.

Figure EV2 PUFFFIN labelling is time-dependent and fast.

(A) Speed of labelling with few secretors by flow cytometry analysis of different 50:1 unmodified cell:secretor ratios in a pelleted suspension co-culture as a time course experiment. Grey numbers are percentage of unmodified cells in top polygon, green numbers are percentage of unmodified cells in bottom polygon. 50,000 cells were analysed for each sample. Three independent experiments were performed, and a representative set is shown. (B) Speed of labelling in an attached monolayer co-culture shown by flow cytometry analysis of a 1:9 unmodified cell:secretor co-culture time course experiment. 10,000 unmodified cells were analysed for each sample. Grey numbers (bottom left of each plot) are the percentage of unmodified cells in Q4, and green numbers (bottom right of each plot) are the percentage of unmodified cells in Q1. Three independent experiments were performed, and a representative set is shown.

Figure EV3 Modularity of the PUFFFIN expression construct allows change of colour for the secretor-cell-marker.

Polyclonal secretors expressing s36GFP-mNG and cytoplasmic tagBFP made by random integration of the blue-green secretor construct (top) are shown by flow cytometry (left) and imaging live cells for green and blue fluorescence (right). The scale bar is 50 μm.

Figure EV4 PUFFHalo integrates HaloTag technology with PUFFFIN for choice-of-colour labelling.

(A) Electrostatic surface potential is shown for s36GFP-HaloTag (AlphaFold predicted structure). (B) Unmodified cells and PUFFHalo secretors were incubated for 2 h with or without the HaloTag ligand OregonGreen. Three independent experiments were performed, and a representative set is shown. (C) Flow cytometry of 48 h 1:1 co-cultures of unmodified cells and PUFFHalo secretors were incubated for 2 h with or without the HaloTag ligand OregonGreen. Three independent experiments were performed, and a representative set is shown. (D) Live imaging of single cultures of unmodified cells and 48 h 50:1 co-cultures of unmodified cells and PUFFHalo secretors with or without the HaloTag ligand JF646, all with Hoechst nuclear staining and WGA488 membrane staining. Scale bars are 50 μm. Two regions of the 48 h 1:1 co-culture with JF646 are magnified to show neighbours and non-neighbours. Scale bars of (1) and (2) are 10 μm. (E) Three single planes of a Z-stack for a 48 h 1:1 co-culture with JF646, WGA488, and Hoechst staining were selected to highlight different localisations of the s36GFP-HT label. Scale bars are 50 μm.

Figure EV5 PUFFFIN expression in mouse organotypic brain slices using a lentiviral vector.

(A) Minimal PUFFFIN expression construct as used in lentivirus vector. (B) Illustration of the experimental design for transducing cultured mouse cortical slices with the PUFFFIN lentivirus. (C) Immunofluorescence of mouse cortical organotypic slices untransduced or transduced with 8.9 × 106 TU/ml of PUFFFIN lentivirus, cultured for 10 days after injection, and stained for mNeonGreen and mCherry, and counterstained with Hoechst. Scale bars are 50 μm.

Figure EV6 PUFFHalo labelling in mESCs can be utilised for investigating exit from pluripotency.

(A) PUFFHalo labelling shown for 2iLIF single cultures and 24 h 9:1 co-cultures in different media conditions shown by flow cytometry. Three independent experiments were performed, and a representative set is shown. (B) Colony formation efficiency (CFE) is shown as the number of colonies for the clonal commitment assay counted after 6 days in 2iLIF, coloured by biological replicate. Boxes denote data within the 25th and 75th percentiles, the middle line represents the median, and the whiskers extend from the upper and lower quartiles to a distance of 1.5 times from the median. Below the plot, mean colony numbers ± standard error of the mean (SEM) and percentages relative to 2iLIF are reported for secretors, neighbours and non-neighbours. Five independent experiments with three non-independent replicates were performed.

Supplementary information

Expanded view data, supplementary information, appendices are available for this paper at 10.1038/s44318-024-00154-w.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Mihaly Badonyi for support with construct design of the s36GFP label and the s36GFP-mNG and PUFFHalo fusion proteins, as well as advice on statistical analyses. We thank Charles AC Williams for help with HaloTag staining and imaging support. We are thankful to Rachel White and Steven M Pollard for providing the YCe3736_HC_Amp_ccdB receiver vector and assistance with EMMA cloning. We thank the labs of Val Wilson and Guillaume Blin for the valuable feedback and reagents shared, especially Heather MacPherson and Raffee Wright II, for providing MShef7 and UCH1N cell suspensions. We are grateful to Pamela Brown for the construction and production of the PUFFFIN lentivirus. We appreciate the help of Linh Huynh and Keisuke Kaji with high-throughput imaging of the colony formation assay. We thank Miguel Robles Garcia for facilitating micropatterning of PUFFFIN cells to produce our cover image. Thank you to the group members of the Lowell Lab, especially but without any particular order, to Jen Annoh, Sophie Brumm, Eleanor Earp, Aisling Fairweather, Matthew French, Alicia Louis Perez Lezcano, and Maria Rosa Portero Migueles. We are grateful to the facilities at the Institute for Regeneration and Repair of the University of Edinburgh, especially Fiona Rossi at the Flow Cytometry Core Facility, Justyna Cholewa-Waclaw at the High-Content Screening Facility, Matthieu Vermeren at the Imaging Facility, and Theresa O’Connor at the Tissue Culture Facility; and Iain Porter and Adrian Garcia Burgos from the IMPACT Facility at the Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences. TL was supported by the Integrative Cell Mechanisms PhD Programme, with funding from Wellcome [218470], and the University of Edinburgh School of Biological Sciences and a core grant to the Wellcome Centre for Cell Biology [203149]. MM was supported by a BBSRC Engineering Biology Transition Award (BB/W014610/1), and by a University of Edinburgh School of Biological Sciences internal Seeding Fund award. SL is supported by a Wellcome Trust Senior Fellowship [220298]. LZ is supported by a University of Edinburgh Chancellor’s Fellowship and by the Simons Initiative for the Developing Brain. GLMB was supported by EMBO ALTF (792-2021) and UKRI (EP/X031225/1).

Author contributions

Tamina Lebek: Conceptualisation; Resources; Data curation; Formal analysis; Funding acquisition; Validation; Investigation; Visualisation; Methodology; Writing—original draft; Writing—review and editing. Mattias Malaguti: Supervision; Investigation; Visualisation; Methodology; Resources; Funding acquisition. Writing—review and editing. Giulia LM Boezio: Data curation; Validation; Investigation; Visualisation; Methodology; Writing—review and editing. Lida Zoupi: Data curation; Validation; Investigation; Visualisation; Methodology; Writing—review and editing. James Briscoe: Supervision; Funding acquisition; Project administration; Writing—review and editing. Alistair Elfick: Resources; Supervision; Writing—review and editing. Sally Lowell: Supervision; Funding acquisition; Methodology; Writing—original draft; Project administration; Writing—review and editing.

Source data underlying figure panels in this paper may have individual authorship assigned. Where available, figure panel/source data authorship is listed in the following database record: biostudies:S-SCDT-10_1038-S44318-024-00154-w.

Data availability

The datasets produced in this study (imaging files, flow cytometry files and numerical data) are available alongside a README file at the Figshare data repository: 10.6084/m9.figshare.25745106.

The source data of this paper are collected in the following database record: biostudies:S-SCDT-10_1038-S44318-024-00154-w.

Disclosure and competing interests statement

The authors declare no competing interests.
==== Refs
References

Acampora D Di Giovannantonio LG Garofalo A Nigro V Omodei D Lombardi A Zhang J Chambers I Simeone A Functional antagonism between OTX2 and NANOG specifies a spectrum of heterogeneous identities in embryonic stem cells Stem Cell Rep 2017 9 1642 1659 10.1016/j.stemcr.2017.09.019
Acampora D, Di Giovannantonio LG, Garofalo A, Nigro V, Omodei D, Lombardi A, Zhang J, Chambers I, Simeone A (2017) Functional antagonism between OTX2 and NANOG specifies a spectrum of heterogeneous identities in embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Rep 9:1642–165910.1016/j.stemcr.2017.09.019
Bar-Shir A Liang Y Chan KWY Gilad AA Bulte JWM Supercharged green fluorescent proteins as bimodal reporter genes for CEST MRI and optical imaging Chem Commun 2015 51 4869 4871 10.1039/C4CC10195B
Bar-Shir A, Liang Y, Chan KWY, Gilad AA, Bulte JWM (2015) Supercharged green fluorescent proteins as bimodal reporter genes for CEST MRI and optical imaging. Chem Commun 51:4869–487110.1039/C4CC10195B
Betschinger J Nichols J Dietmann S Corrin PD Paddison PJ Smith A Exit from pluripotency is gated by intracellular redistribution of the bHLH transcription factor Tfe3 Cell 2013 153 335 347 10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.012 23582324
Betschinger J, Nichols J, Dietmann S, Corrin PD, Paddison PJ, Smith A (2013) Exit from pluripotency is gated by intracellular redistribution of the bHLH transcription factor Tfe3. Cell 153:335–34723582324 10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.012
Buckley DL Raina K Darricarrere N Hines J Gustafson JL Smith IE Miah AH Harling JD Crews CM HaloPROTACS: use of small molecule PROTACs to induce degradation of HaloTag fusion proteins ACS Chem Biol 2015 10 1831 1837 10.1021/acschembio.5b00442 26070106
Buckley DL, Raina K, Darricarrere N, Hines J, Gustafson JL, Smith IE, Miah AH, Harling JD, Crews CM (2015) HaloPROTACS: use of small molecule PROTACs to induce degradation of HaloTag fusion proteins. ACS Chem Biol 10:1831–183726070106 10.1021/acschembio.5b00442
Carpenter MA Wang Y Telmer CA Schmidt BF Yang Z Bruchez MP Protein proximity observed using fluorogen activating protein and dye activated by proximal anchoring (FAP–DAPA) system ACS Chem Biol 2020 15 2433 2443 10.1021/acschembio.0c00419 32786268
Carpenter MA, Wang Y, Telmer CA, Schmidt BF, Yang Z, Bruchez MP (2020) Protein proximity observed using fluorogen activating protein and dye activated by proximal anchoring (FAP–DAPA) system. ACS Chem Biol 15:2433–244332786268 10.1021/acschembio.0c00419
Chaigne A Labouesse C White IJ Agnew M Hannezo E Chalut KJ Paluch EK Abscission couples cell division to embryonic stem cell fate Dev Cell 2020 55 195 208.e5 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.09.001 32979313
Chaigne A, Labouesse C, White IJ, Agnew M, Hannezo E, Chalut KJ, Paluch EK (2020) Abscission couples cell division to embryonic stem cell fate. Dev Cell 55:195–208.e532979313 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.09.001
Chapman SC Collignon J Schoenwolf GC Lumsden A Improved method for chick whole-embryo culture using a filter paper carrier Dev Dyn 2001 220 284 289 10.1002/1097-0177(20010301)220:3<284::AID-DVDY1102>3.0.CO;2-5 11241836
Chapman SC, Collignon J, Schoenwolf GC, Lumsden A (2001) Improved method for chick whole-embryo culture using a filter paper carrier. Dev Dyn 220:284–28911241836 10.1002/1097-0177(20010301)220:3<284::AID-DVDY1102>3.0.CO;2-5
Chen X Zaro JL Shen W-C Fusion protein linkers: property, design and functionality Adv. Drug Deliv Rev 2013 65 1357 1369 10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.039 23026637
Chen X, Zaro JL, Shen W-C (2013) Fusion protein linkers: property, design and functionality. Adv. Drug Deliv Rev 65:1357–136923026637 10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.039
Cho KF Gillespie SM Kalogriopoulos NA Quezada MA Jacko M Monje M Ting AY A light-gated transcriptional recorder for detecting cell-cell contacts eLife 2022 11 e70881 10.7554/eLife.70881 35311648
Cho KF, Gillespie SM, Kalogriopoulos NA, Quezada MA, Jacko M, Monje M, Ting AY (2022) A light-gated transcriptional recorder for detecting cell-cell contacts. eLife 11:e7088135311648 10.7554/eLife.70881
Chung JH Whiteley M Felsenfeld G A 5′ element of the chicken β-globin domain serves as an insulator in human erythroid cells and protects against position effect in Drosophila Cell 1993 74 505 514 10.1016/0092-8674(93)80052-G 8348617
Chung JH, Whiteley M, Felsenfeld G (1993) A 5′ element of the chicken β-globin domain serves as an insulator in human erythroid cells and protects against position effect in Drosophila. Cell 74:505–5148348617 10.1016/0092-8674(93)80052-G
Cook A Walterspiel F Deo C HaloTag-based reporters for fluorescence imaging and biosensing ChemBioChem 2023 24 e202300022 10.1002/cbic.202300022 36815462
Cook A, Walterspiel F, Deo C (2023) HaloTag-based reporters for fluorescence imaging and biosensing. ChemBioChem 24:e20230002236815462 10.1002/cbic.202300022
Cronican JJ Thompson DB Beier KT McNaughton BR Cepko CL Liu DR Potent delivery of functional proteins into mammalian cells in vitro and in vivo using a supercharged protein ACS Chem Biol 2010 5 747 752 10.1021/cb1001153 20545362
Cronican JJ, Thompson DB, Beier KT, McNaughton BR, Cepko CL, Liu DR (2010) Potent delivery of functional proteins into mammalian cells in vitro and in vivo using a supercharged protein. ACS Chem Biol 5:747–75220545362 10.1021/cb1001153
de la Luna S Soria I Pulido D Ortín J Jiménez A Efficient transformation of mammalian cells with constructs containing a puromycin-resistance marker Gene 1988 62 121 126 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90585-9 3371661
de la Luna S, Soria I, Pulido D, Ortín J, Jiménez A (1988) Efficient transformation of mammalian cells with constructs containing a puromycin-resistance marker. Gene 62:121–1263371661 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90585-9
Deathridge J Antolović V Parsons M Chubb JR Live imaging of ERK signalling dynamics in differentiating mouse embryonic stem cells Development 2019 146 dev172940 10.1242/dev.172940 31064783
Deathridge J, Antolović V, Parsons M, Chubb JR (2019) Live imaging of ERK signalling dynamics in differentiating mouse embryonic stem cells. Development 146:dev17294031064783 10.1242/dev.172940
Doetschman T Gregg RG Maeda N Hooper ML Melton DW Thompson S Smithies O Targetted correction of a mutant HPRT gene in mouse embryonic stem cells Nature 1987 330 576 578 10.1038/330576a0 3683574
Doetschman T, Gregg RG, Maeda N, Hooper ML, Melton DW, Thompson S, Smithies O (1987) Targetted correction of a mutant HPRT gene in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature 330:576–5783683574 10.1038/330576a0
Dou Y Lin Y Wang T Wang X-Y Jia Y Zhao C The CAG promoter maintains high-level transgene expression in HEK293 cells FEBS Open Bio 2021 11 95 104 10.1002/2211-5463.13029 33155423
Dou Y, Lin Y, Wang T, Wang X-Y, Jia Y, Zhao C (2021) The CAG promoter maintains high-level transgene expression in HEK293 cells. FEBS Open Bio 11:95–10433155423 10.1002/2211-5463.13029
Dugaiczyk A Law SW Dennison OE Nucleotide sequence and the encoded amino acids of human serum albumin mRNA Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1982 79 71 75 10.1073/pnas.79.1.71 6275391
Dugaiczyk A, Law SW, Dennison OE (1982) Nucleotide sequence and the encoded amino acids of human serum albumin mRNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79:71–756275391 10.1073/pnas.79.1.71
Eigel D Zoupi L Sekizar S Welzel PB Werner C Williams A Newland B Cryogel scaffolds for regionally constrained delivery of lysophosphatidylcholine to central nervous system slice cultures: a model of focal demyelination for multiple sclerosis research Acta Biomater 2019 97 216 229 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.08.030 31425890
Eigel D, Zoupi L, Sekizar S, Welzel PB, Werner C, Williams A, Newland B (2019) Cryogel scaffolds for regionally constrained delivery of lysophosphatidylcholine to central nervous system slice cultures: a model of focal demyelination for multiple sclerosis research. Acta Biomater 97:216–22931425890 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.08.030
England CG Luo H Cai W HaloTag technology: a versatile platform for biomedical applications Bioconjug Chem 2015 26 975 986 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00191 25974629
England CG, Luo H, Cai W (2015) HaloTag technology: a versatile platform for biomedical applications. Bioconjug Chem 26:975–98625974629 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.5b00191
Flinterman M Farzaneh F Habib N Malik F Gäken J Tavassoli M Delivery of therapeutic proteins as secretable TAT fusion products Mol Ther 2009 17 334 342 10.1038/mt.2008.256 19050698
Flinterman M, Farzaneh F, Habib N, Malik F, Gäken J, Tavassoli M (2009) Delivery of therapeutic proteins as secretable TAT fusion products. Mol Ther 17:334–34219050698 10.1038/mt.2008.256
Fujita N Suzuki S Watanabe K Ishii K Watanabe R Shimoda M Takubo K Tsuji T Toyama Y Miyamoto T Chordoma-derived cell line U-CH1-N recapitulates the biological properties of notochordal nucleus pulposus cells J Orthop Res 2016 34 1341 1350 10.1002/jor.23320 27248133
Fujita N, Suzuki S, Watanabe K, Ishii K, Watanabe R, Shimoda M, Takubo K, Tsuji T, Toyama Y, Miyamoto T et al (2016) Chordoma-derived cell line U-CH1-N recapitulates the biological properties of notochordal nucleus pulposus cells. J Orthop Res 34:1341–135027248133 10.1002/jor.23320
Gordon WR Zimmerman B He L Miles LJ Huang J Tiyanont K McArthur DG Aster JC Perrimon N Loparo JJ Mechanical allostery: evidence for a force requirement in the proteolytic activation of notch Dev Cell 2015 33 729 736 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.05.004 26051539
Gordon WR, Zimmerman B, He L, Miles LJ, Huang J, Tiyanont K, McArthur DG, Aster JC, Perrimon N, Loparo JJ et al (2015) Mechanical allostery: evidence for a force requirement in the proteolytic activation of notch. Dev Cell 33:729–73626051539 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.05.004
Gouti M Tsakiridis A Wymeersch FJ Huang Y Kleinjung J Wilson V Briscoe J In vitro generation of neuromesodermal progenitors reveals distinct roles for Wnt signalling in the specification of spinal cord and paraxial mesoderm identity PLoS Biol 2014 12 e1001937 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001937 25157815
Gouti M, Tsakiridis A, Wymeersch FJ, Huang Y, Kleinjung J, Wilson V, Briscoe J (2014) In vitro generation of neuromesodermal progenitors reveals distinct roles for Wnt signalling in the specification of spinal cord and paraxial mesoderm identity. PLoS Biol 12:e100193725157815 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001937
Hamburger V Hamilton HL A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo Dev Dyn 1951 195 231 272 10.1002/aja.1001950404
Hamburger V, Hamilton HL (1951) A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. Dev Dyn 195:231–27210.1002/aja.1001950404
He L Huang J Perrimon N Development of an optimized synthetic Notch receptor as an in vivo cell–cell contact sensor Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2017 114 5467 5472 10.1073/pnas.1703205114 28490499
He L, Huang J, Perrimon N (2017) Development of an optimized synthetic Notch receptor as an in vivo cell–cell contact sensor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:5467–547228490499 10.1073/pnas.1703205114
Huang T Niesman P Arasu D Lee D De La Cruz AL Callejas A Hong EJ Lois C Tracing neuronal circuits in transgenic animals by transneuronal control of transcription (TRACT) eLife 2017 6 e32027 10.7554/eLife.32027 29231171
Huang T, Niesman P, Arasu D, Lee D, De La Cruz AL, Callejas A, Hong EJ, Lois C (2017) Tracing neuronal circuits in transgenic animals by transneuronal control of transcription (TRACT). eLife 6:e3202729231171 10.7554/eLife.32027
Huang T-H Velho T Lois C Monitoring cell-cell contacts in vivo in transgenic animals Development 2016 143 4073 4084 10.1242/dev.142406 27660327
Huang T-H, Velho T, Lois C (2016) Monitoring cell-cell contacts in vivo in transgenic animals. Development 143:4073–408427660327 10.1242/dev.142406
Jayaram S, Romeike M, Buecker C (2023) The asynchrony in the exit from naive pluripotency cannot be explained by differences in the cell cycle phase. Preprint at 10.1101/2023.09.15.557731
Kalkan T Olova N Roode M Mulas C Lee HJ Nett I Marks H Walker R Stunnenberg HG Lilley KS Tracking the embryonic stem cell transition from ground state pluripotency Development 2017 144 1221 1234 10.1242/dev.142711 28174249
Kalkan T, Olova N, Roode M, Mulas C, Lee HJ, Nett I, Marks H, Walker R, Stunnenberg HG, Lilley KS et al (2017) Tracking the embryonic stem cell transition from ground state pluripotency. Development 144:1221–123428174249 10.1242/dev.142711
Kim CK Cho KF Kim MW Ting AY Luciferase-LOV BRET enables versatile and specific transcriptional readout of cellular protein-protein interactions eLife 2019 8 e43826 10.7554/eLife.43826 30942168
Kim CK, Cho KF, Kim MW, Ting AY (2019) Luciferase-LOV BRET enables versatile and specific transcriptional readout of cellular protein-protein interactions. eLife 8:e4382630942168 10.7554/eLife.43826
Kim MW Wang W Sanchez MI Coukos R von Zastrow M Ting AY Time-gated detection of protein-protein interactions with transcriptional readout eLife 2017 6 e30233 10.7554/eLife.30233 29189201
Kim MW, Wang W, Sanchez MI, Coukos R, von Zastrow M, Ting AY (2017) Time-gated detection of protein-protein interactions with transcriptional readout. eLife 6:e3023329189201 10.7554/eLife.30233
Lawrence MS Phillips KJ Liu DR Supercharging proteins can impart unusual resilience J Am Chem Soc 2007 129 10110 10.1021/ja071641y 17665911
Lawrence MS, Phillips KJ, Liu DR (2007) Supercharging proteins can impart unusual resilience. J Am Chem Soc 129:1011017665911 10.1021/ja071641y
Leeb M Dietmann S Paramor M Niwa H Smith A Genetic exploration of the exit from self-renewal using haploid embryonic stem cells Cell Stem Cell 2014 14 385 393 10.1016/j.stem.2013.12.008 24412312
Leeb M, Dietmann S, Paramor M, Niwa H, Smith A (2014) Genetic exploration of the exit from self-renewal using haploid embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 14:385–39324412312 10.1016/j.stem.2013.12.008
Levitt N Briggs D Gil A Proudfoot NJ Definition of an efficient synthetic poly(A) site Genes Dev 1989 3 1019 1025 10.1101/gad.3.7.1019 2570734
Levitt N, Briggs D, Gil A, Proudfoot NJ (1989) Definition of an efficient synthetic poly(A) site. Genes Dev 3:1019–10252570734 10.1101/gad.3.7.1019
Lin J-R Fallahi-Sichani M Sorger PK Highly multiplexed imaging of single cells using a high-throughput cyclic immunofluorescence method Nat Commun 2015 6 8390 10.1038/ncomms9390 26399630
Lin J-R, Fallahi-Sichani M, Sorger PK (2015) Highly multiplexed imaging of single cells using a high-throughput cyclic immunofluorescence method. Nat Commun 6:839026399630 10.1038/ncomms9390
Liu Z Chen O Wall JBJ Zheng M Zhou Y Wang L Ruth Vaseghi H Qian L Liu J Systematic comparison of 2A peptides for cloning multi-genes in a polycistronic vector Sci Rep 2017 7 2193 10.1038/s41598-017-02460-2 28526819
Liu Z, Chen O, Wall JBJ, Zheng M, Zhou Y, Wang L, Ruth Vaseghi H, Qian L, Liu J (2017) Systematic comparison of 2A peptides for cloning multi-genes in a polycistronic vector. Sci Rep 7:219328526819 10.1038/s41598-017-02460-2
Los GV Encell LP McDougall MG Hartzell DD Karassina N Zimprich C Wood MG Learish R Ohana RF Urh M HaloTag: a novel protein labeling technology for cell imaging and protein analysis ACS Chem Biol 2008 3 373 382 10.1021/cb800025k 18533659
Los GV, Encell LP, McDougall MG, Hartzell DD, Karassina N, Zimprich C, Wood MG, Learish R, Ohana RF, Urh M et al (2008) HaloTag: a novel protein labeling technology for cell imaging and protein analysis. ACS Chem Biol 3:373–38218533659 10.1021/cb800025k
Lun X-K Bodenmiller B Profiling cell signaling networks at single-cell rResolution Mol Cell Proteomics 2020 19 744 756 10.1074/mcp.R119.001790 32132232
Lun X-K, Bodenmiller B (2020) Profiling cell signaling networks at single-cell rResolution. Mol Cell Proteomics 19:744–75632132232 10.1074/mcp.R119.001790
Malaguti M Lebek T Blin G Lowell S Enabling neighbour labelling: using synthetic biology to explore how cells influence their neighbours Development 2024 151 dev201955 10.1242/dev.201955 38165174
Malaguti M, Lebek T, Blin G, Lowell S (2024) Enabling neighbour labelling: using synthetic biology to explore how cells influence their neighbours. Development 151:dev20195538165174 10.1242/dev.201955
Malaguti M Migueles RP Blin G Lin C-Y Lowell S Id1 stabilizes epiblast identity by sensing delays in nodal activation and adjusting the timing of differentiation Dev Cell 2019 50 462 477.e5 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.05.032 31204172
Malaguti M, Migueles RP, Blin G, Lin C-Y, Lowell S (2019) Id1 stabilizes epiblast identity by sensing delays in nodal activation and adjusting the timing of differentiation. Dev Cell 50:462–477.e531204172 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.05.032
Malaguti M Nistor PA Blin G Pegg A Zhou X Lowell S Bone morphogenic protein signalling suppresses differentiation of pluripotent cells by maintaining expression of E-Cadherin eLife 2013 2 e01197 10.7554/eLife.01197 24347544
Malaguti M, Nistor PA, Blin G, Pegg A, Zhou X, Lowell S (2013) Bone morphogenic protein signalling suppresses differentiation of pluripotent cells by maintaining expression of E-Cadherin. eLife 2:e0119724347544 10.7554/eLife.01197
Malaguti M Portero Migueles R Annoh J Sadurska D Blin G Lowell S SyNPL: synthetic Notch pluripotent cell lines to monitor and manipulate cell interactions in vitro and in vivo Development 2022 149 dev200226 10.1242/dev.200226 35616331
Malaguti M, Portero Migueles R, Annoh J, Sadurska D, Blin G, Lowell S (2022) SyNPL: synthetic Notch pluripotent cell lines to monitor and manipulate cell interactions in vitro and in vivo. Development 149:dev20022635616331 10.1242/dev.200226
Martella A Matjusaitis M Auxillos J Pollard SM Cai Y EMMA: an extensible mammalian modular assembly toolkit for the rapid design and production of diverse expression vectors ACS Synth Biol 2017 6 1380 1392 10.1021/acssynbio.7b00016 28418644
Martella A, Matjusaitis M, Auxillos J, Pollard SM, Cai Y (2017) EMMA: an extensible mammalian modular assembly toolkit for the rapid design and production of diverse expression vectors. ACS Synth Biol 6:1380–139228418644 10.1021/acssynbio.7b00016
McCloskey C Rada C Bailey E McCavera S van den Berg HA Atia J Rand DA Shmygol A Chan Y Quenby S The inwardly rectifying K+ channel KIR7.1 controls uterine excitability throughout pregnancy EMBO Mol Med 2014 6 1161 1174 10.15252/emmm.201403944 25056913
McCloskey C, Rada C, Bailey E, McCavera S, van den Berg HA, Atia J, Rand DA, Shmygol A, Chan Y, Quenby S et al (2014) The inwardly rectifying K+ channel KIR7.1 controls uterine excitability throughout pregnancy. EMBO Mol Med 6:1161–117425056913 10.15252/emmm.201403944
McNaughton BR Cronican JJ Thompson DB Liu DR Mammalian cell penetration, siRNA transfection, and DNA transfection by supercharged proteins Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009 106 6111 6116 10.1073/pnas.0807883106 19307578
McNaughton BR, Cronican JJ, Thompson DB, Liu DR (2009) Mammalian cell penetration, siRNA transfection, and DNA transfection by supercharged proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:6111–611619307578 10.1073/pnas.0807883106
Mirdita M Schütze K Moriwaki Y Heo L Ovchinnikov S Steinegger M ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all Nat Methods 2022 19 679 682 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 35637307
Mirdita M, Schütze K, Moriwaki Y, Heo L, Ovchinnikov S, Steinegger M (2022) ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all. Nat Methods 19:679–68235637307 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1
Morsut L Roybal KT Xiong X Gordley RM Coyle SM Thomson M Lim WA Engineering customized cell sensing and response behaviors using synthetic notch receptors Cell 2016 164 780 791 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.012 26830878
Morsut L, Roybal KT, Xiong X, Gordley RM, Coyle SM, Thomson M, Lim WA (2016) Engineering customized cell sensing and response behaviors using synthetic notch receptors. Cell 164:780–79126830878 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.012
Mulas C, Stammers M, Salomaa SI, Heinzen C, Suter DM, Smith A, Chalut KJ (2023) ERK signalling orchestrates metachronous transition from naïve to formative pluripotency. Preprint at 10.1101/2023.07.20.549835
Nakandakari-Higa S, Walker S, Canesso MCC et al (2024) Universal recording of immune cell interactions in vivo. Nature 627:399–406
Neagu A van Genderen E Escudero I Verwegen L Kurek D Lehmann J Stel J Dirks RAM van Mierlo G Maas A In vitro capture and characterization of embryonic rosette-stage pluripotency between naive and primed states Nat Cell Biol 2020 22 534 545 10.1038/s41556-020-0508-x 32367046
Neagu A, van Genderen E, Escudero I, Verwegen L, Kurek D, Lehmann J, Stel J, Dirks RAM, van Mierlo G, Maas A et al (2020) In vitro capture and characterization of embryonic rosette-stage pluripotency between naive and primed states. Nat Cell Biol 22:534–54532367046 10.1038/s41556-020-0508-x
Nichols J Smith A Naive and primed pluripotent states Cell Stem Cell 2009 4 487 492 10.1016/j.stem.2009.05.015 19497275
Nichols J, Smith A (2009) Naive and primed pluripotent states. Cell Stem Cell 4:487–49219497275 10.1016/j.stem.2009.05.015
Niwa H Yamamura K Miyazaki J Efficient selection for high-expression transfectants with a novel eukaryotic vector Gene 1991 108 193 199 10.1016/0378-1119(91)90434-D 1660837
Niwa H, Yamamura K, Miyazaki J (1991) Efficient selection for high-expression transfectants with a novel eukaryotic vector. Gene 108:193–1991660837 10.1016/0378-1119(91)90434-D
Nolan E Bridgeman VL Ombrato L Karoutas A Rabas N Sewnath CAN Vasquez M Rodrigues FS Horswell S Faull P Radiation exposure elicits a neutrophil-driven response in healthy lung tissue that enhances metastatic colonization Nat Cancer 2022 3 173 187 10.1038/s43018-022-00336-7 35221334
Nolan E, Bridgeman VL, Ombrato L, Karoutas A, Rabas N, Sewnath CAN, Vasquez M, Rodrigues FS, Horswell S, Faull P et al (2022) Radiation exposure elicits a neutrophil-driven response in healthy lung tissue that enhances metastatic colonization. Nat Cancer 3:173–18735221334 10.1038/s43018-022-00336-7
Ombrato L Nolan E Kurelac I Mavousian A Bridgeman VL Heinze I Chakravarty P Horswell S Gonzalez-Gualda E Matacchione G Metastatic-niche labelling reveals parenchymal cells with stem features Nature 2019 572 603 608 10.1038/s41586-019-1487-6 31462798
Ombrato L, Nolan E, Kurelac I, Mavousian A, Bridgeman VL, Heinze I, Chakravarty P, Horswell S, Gonzalez-Gualda E, Matacchione G et al (2019) Metastatic-niche labelling reveals parenchymal cells with stem features. Nature 572:603–60831462798 10.1038/s41586-019-1487-6
Ombrato L Nolan E Passaro D Kurelac I Bridgeman VL Waclawiczek A Duarte D Lo Celso C Bonnet D Malanchi I Generation of neighbor-labeling cells to study intercellular interactions in vivo Nat Protoc 2021 16 872 892 10.1038/s41596-020-00438-5 33311715
Ombrato L, Nolan E, Passaro D, Kurelac I, Bridgeman VL, Waclawiczek A, Duarte D, Lo Celso C, Bonnet D, Malanchi I (2021) Generation of neighbor-labeling cells to study intercellular interactions in vivo. Nat Protoc 16:872–89233311715 10.1038/s41596-020-00438-5
Pasqual G Chudnovskiy A Tas JMJ Agudelo M Schweitzer LD Cui A Hacohen N Victora GD Monitoring T cell–dendritic cell interactions in vivo by intercellular enzymatic labelling Nature 2018 553 496 500 10.1038/nature25442 29342141
Pasqual G, Chudnovskiy A, Tas JMJ, Agudelo M, Schweitzer LD, Cui A, Hacohen N, Victora GD (2018) Monitoring T cell–dendritic cell interactions in vivo by intercellular enzymatic labelling. Nature 553:496–50029342141 10.1038/nature25442
R Core Team (2024) R core team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria http://www.R-project.org
Roybal KT Williams JZ Morsut L Rupp LJ Kolinko I Choe JH Walker WJ McNally KA Lim WA Engineering T cells with customized therapeutic response programs using synthetic notch receptors Cell 2016 167 419 432.e16 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.011 27693353
Roybal KT, Williams JZ, Morsut L, Rupp LJ, Kolinko I, Choe JH, Walker WJ, McNally KA, Lim WA (2016) Engineering T cells with customized therapeutic response programs using synthetic notch receptors. Cell 167:419–432.e1627693353 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.011
Schindelin J Arganda-Carreras I Frise E Kaynig V Longair M Pietzsch T Preibisch S Rueden C Saalfeld S Schmid B Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis Nat Methods 2012 9 676 682 10.1038/nmeth.2019 22743772
Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, Kaynig V, Longair M, Pietzsch T, Preibisch S, Rueden C, Saalfeld S, Schmid B et al (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–68222743772 10.1038/nmeth.2019
Shaner NC Campbell RE Steinbach PA Giepmans BNG Palmer AE Tsien RY Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein Nat Biotechnol 2004 22 1567 1572 10.1038/nbt1037 15558047
Shaner NC, Campbell RE, Steinbach PA, Giepmans BNG, Palmer AE, Tsien RY (2004) Improved monomeric red, orange and yellow fluorescent proteins derived from Discosoma sp. red fluorescent protein. Nat Biotechnol 22:1567–157215558047 10.1038/nbt1037
Shaner NC Lambert GG Chammas A Ni Y Cranfill PJ Baird MA Sell BR Allen JR Day RN Israelsson M A bright monomeric green fluorescent protein derived from Branchiostoma lanceolatum Nat Methods 2013 10 407 409 10.1038/nmeth.2413 23524392
Shaner NC, Lambert GG, Chammas A, Ni Y, Cranfill PJ, Baird MA, Sell BR, Allen JR, Day RN, Israelsson M et al (2013) A bright monomeric green fluorescent protein derived from Branchiostoma lanceolatum. Nat Methods 10:407–40923524392 10.1038/nmeth.2413
Smith A Formative pluripotency: the executive phase in a developmental continuum Development 2017 144 365 373 10.1242/dev.142679 28143843
Smith A (2017) Formative pluripotency: the executive phase in a developmental continuum. Development 144:365–37328143843 10.1242/dev.142679
Sorkaç A Moșneanu RA Crown AM Savaş D Okoro AM Memiş E Talay M Barnea G retro-Tango enables versatile retrograde circuit tracing in Drosophila eLife 2023 12 e85041 10.7554/eLife.85041 37166114
Sorkaç A, Moșneanu RA, Crown AM, Savaş D, Okoro AM, Memiş E, Talay M, Barnea G (2023) retro-Tango enables versatile retrograde circuit tracing in Drosophila. eLife 12:e8504137166114 10.7554/eLife.85041
Strawbridge SE, Blanchard GB, Smith A, Kugler H, Martello G (2020) Embryonic stem cells commit to differentiation by symmetric divisions following a variable lag period. Preprint at 10.1101/2020.06.17.157578
Subach OM Gundorov IS Yoshimura M Subach FV Zhang J Grüenwald D Souslova EA Chudakov DM Verkhusha VV Conversion of red fluorescent protein into a bright blue probe Chem Biol 2008 15 1116 1124 10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.08.006 18940671
Subach OM, Gundorov IS, Yoshimura M, Subach FV, Zhang J, Grüenwald D, Souslova EA, Chudakov DM, Verkhusha VV (2008) Conversion of red fluorescent protein into a bright blue probe. Chem Biol 15:1116–112418940671 10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.08.006
Talay M Richman EB Snell NJ Hartmann GG Fisher JD Sorkaç A Santoyo JF Chou-Freed C Nair N Johnson M Transsynaptic mapping of second-order taste neurons in flies by trans-Tango Neuron 2017 96 783 795.e4 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.10.011 29107518
Talay M, Richman EB, Snell NJ, Hartmann GG, Fisher JD, Sorkaç A, Santoyo JF, Chou-Freed C, Nair N, Johnson M et al (2017) Transsynaptic mapping of second-order taste neurons in flies by trans-Tango. Neuron 96:783–795.e429107518 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.10.011
Tang R Murray CW Linde IL Kramer NJ Lyu Z Tsai MK Chen LC Cai H Gitler AD Engleman E A versatile system to record cell-cell interactions eLife 2020 9 e61080 10.7554/eLife.61080 33025906
Tang R, Murray CW, Linde IL, Kramer NJ, Lyu Z, Tsai MK, Chen LC, Cai H, Gitler AD, Engleman E et al (2020) A versatile system to record cell-cell interactions. eLife 9:e6108033025906 10.7554/eLife.61080
Tang X Liu X Tao G Qin M Yin G Suo J Suo X “Self-cleaving” 2A peptide from porcine teschovirus-1 mediates cleavage of dual fluorescent proteins in transgenic Eimeria tenella Vet Res 2016 47 68 10.1186/s13567-016-0351-z 27352927
Tang X, Liu X, Tao G, Qin M, Yin G, Suo J, Suo X (2016) “Self-cleaving” 2A peptide from porcine teschovirus-1 mediates cleavage of dual fluorescent proteins in transgenic Eimeria tenella. Vet Res 47:6827352927 10.1186/s13567-016-0351-z
Thompson DB Cronican JJ Liu DR Engineering and identifying supercharged proteins for macromolecule delivery into mammalian cells Methods Enzymol 2012 503 293 319 10.1016/B978-0-12-396962-0.00012-4 22230574
Thompson DB, Cronican JJ, Liu DR (2012a) Engineering and identifying supercharged proteins for macromolecule delivery into mammalian cells. Methods Enzymol 503:293–31922230574 10.1016/B978-0-12-396962-0.00012-4
Thompson DB Villaseñor R Dorr BM Zerial M Liu DR Cellular uptake mechanisms and endosomal trafficking of supercharged proteins Chem Biol 2012 19 831 843 10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.06.014 22840771
Thompson DB, Villaseñor R, Dorr BM, Zerial M, Liu DR (2012b) Cellular uptake mechanisms and endosomal trafficking of supercharged proteins. Chem Biol 19:831–84322840771 10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.06.014
Toda S McKeithan WL Hakkinen TJ Lopez P Klein OD Lim WA Engineering synthetic morphogen systems that can program multicellular patterning Science 2020 370 327 331 10.1126/science.abc0033 33060357
Toda S, McKeithan WL, Hakkinen TJ, Lopez P, Klein OD, Lim WA (2020) Engineering synthetic morphogen systems that can program multicellular patterning. Science 370:327–33133060357 10.1126/science.abc0033
Walker BL Cang Z Ren H Bourgain-Chang E Nie Q Deciphering tissue structure and function using spatial transcriptomics Commun Biol 2022 5 1 10 10.1038/s42003-022-03175-5 34987157
Walker BL, Cang Z, Ren H, Bourgain-Chang E, Nie Q (2022) Deciphering tissue structure and function using spatial transcriptomics. Commun Biol 5:1–1034987157 10.1038/s42003-022-03175-5
Walsh I Minervini G Corazza A Esposito G Tosatto SCE Fogolari F Bluues server: electrostatic properties of wild-type and mutated protein structures Bioinformatics 2012 28 2189 2190 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts343 22711791
Walsh I, Minervini G, Corazza A, Esposito G, Tosatto SCE, Fogolari F (2012) Bluues server: electrostatic properties of wild-type and mutated protein structures. Bioinformatics 28:2189–219022711791 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts343
Williams RM Sauka-Spengler T Ex ovo electroporation of early chicken embryos STAR Protoc 2021 2 100424 10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100424 33899011
Williams RM, Sauka-Spengler T (2021) Ex ovo electroporation of early chicken embryos. STAR Protoc 2:10042433899011 10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100424
Yim WW-Y Yamamoto H Mizushima N A pulse-chasable reporter processing assay for mammalian autophagic flux with HaloTag eLife 2022 11 e78923 10.7554/eLife.78923 35938926
Yim WW-Y, Yamamoto H, Mizushima N (2022) A pulse-chasable reporter processing assay for mammalian autophagic flux with HaloTag. eLife 11:e7892335938926 10.7554/eLife.78923
Yonaha M Proudfoot NJ Transcriptional termination and coupled polyadenylation in vitro EMBO J 2000 19 3770 3777 10.1093/emboj/19.14.3770 10899130
Yonaha M, Proudfoot NJ (2000) Transcriptional termination and coupled polyadenylation in vitro. EMBO J 19:3770–377710899130 10.1093/emboj/19.14.3770
Zhang S Zhang Q Liu Z Liu K He L Lui KO Wang L Zhou B Genetic dissection of intercellular interactions in vivo by membrane-permeable protein Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2023 120 e2120582120 10.1073/pnas.2120582120 36574652
Zhang S, Zhang Q, Liu Z, Liu K, He L, Lui KO, Wang L, Zhou B (2023) Genetic dissection of intercellular interactions in vivo by membrane-permeable protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 120:e212058212036574652 10.1073/pnas.2120582120
Zhang S Zhao H Liu Z Liu K Zhu H Pu W He L Wang RA Zhou B Monitoring of cell-cell communication and contact history in mammals Science 2022 378 eabo5503 10.1126/science.abo5503 36454848
Zhang S, Zhao H, Liu Z, Liu K, Zhu H, Pu W, He L, Wang RA, Zhou B (2022) Monitoring of cell-cell communication and contact history in mammals. Science 378:eabo550336454848 10.1126/science.abo5503
