
==== Front
F1000Res
F1000Res
F1000Research
2046-1402
F1000 Research Limited London, UK

10.12688/f1000research.73317.3
Systematic Review
Articles
Corporate governance and shareholders’ confidence in cooperatives: a systematic literature review
[version 3; peer review: 2 approved]

Thangaveloo Arasu Conceptualization Data Curation Formal Analysis Methodology Validation Writing – Original Draft Preparation Writing – Review & Editing a12
Dorasamy Magiswary Conceptualization Methodology Supervision Validation Writing – Original Draft Preparation Writing – Review & Editing https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8651-1079
b23
Bin Ahmad Abdul Aziz Methodology Supervision Validation Writing – Review & Editing 2
Marimuthu Siva Barathi Writing – Review & Editing https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6633-4204
4
Jayabalan Jayamalathi Writing – Review & Editing https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9351-0605
25
1 VNK Bersatu Resources Sdn Bhd, Klang, Selangor, 41200, Malaysia
2 Faculty of Management, Multimedia University, Cyberjaya, Selangor, 63100, Malaysia
3 Taylor's University, Subang Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
4 University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2350, Australia
5 Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Kajang, Selangor, 43000, Malaysia
a 1142200005@student.mmu.edu.my
b magiswary.dorasamy@mmu.edu.my
No competing interests were disclosed.

4 3 2024
2022
11 14429 2 2024
Copyright: © 2024 Thangaveloo A et al.
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Background

The confidence of Bottom 40 (B40) shareholders is crucial for cooperative’s sustenance within wider corporate governance. An in-depth study on cooperatives is needed, as they play a crucial role in the Malaysian economic system and contribute greatly to the country’s social development. However, in the current landscape, confidence among shareholders is at stake. This study aims to identify the research gap into corporate governance for cooperativess in relation to B40 shareholder confidence, as well as identify current study challenges and develop a conceptual framework for future research.

Methods

We conducted a systematic literature review, with the use of agency theory to assess shareholders’ confidence. Emerald, ProQuest, InderScience, Scopus and Science Direct were the online databases used in this study to search five keyword phrases: corporate governance, confidence, cooperative, agency theory and Bottom 40% (B40) household. Tranfield’s five stages were used to conduct the systematic review.

Results

Only 5 of the 324 studies assess shareholders’ confidence in cooperatives, as well as one paper on B40 and two papers on agency theory. Our review presents three major findings. First, research in the context of B40 shareholder’s confidence in cooperatives is scarce. Second, the challenges related to shareholders’ confidence in B40 are major issues in the context. Third, research on agency theory in the context of shareholders’ confidence within cooperatives and corporate governance is still scant.

Conclusions

This review urges the research community to conduct more studies based on the highlighted research gaps.

Cooperatives
corporate governance
shareholders
B40
Malaysia
confidence
agency theory
The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.Revised Amendments from Version 2

1. Cooperatives and corporations are separately defined to avoid confusion. Corporations is organizational entities that have unique structures, objectives, and styles of governance. A cooperative is an officially recognized legal body. 2. The bottom 40 shareholders are given more description. 3. Corrected misspelled “cooperations” as “cooperatives” 4. More suggestions on the future research is added.
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Malaysia’s cooperative movement began in the early twentieth century. Cooperatives are organisations whose purpose is to enhance its members’ economic value in line with cooperative goals. Cooperatives is defined as “an autonomous association of persons united voluntarily to meet their common economic, social and cultural needs and aspirations through a jointly owned and democratically controlled enterprise” (International Cooperative Alliance). Consumer cooperatives, labour cooperatives, finance or banking cooperatives, and community cooperatives are only a few examples of cooperatives from various industries. Cooperatives play a crucial part in the Malaysian economic system and contribute greatly to the country’s social development. Their contributions are valued at the same level as those made by other businesses, in terms of the value-added to the national economy. 1 This study considers the corporate governance of cooperatives and its relation to shareholders’ confidence. Corporate governance is a system of internal rules, procedures and employees that meets shareholders and other stakeholders’ requirements via the management and control of management operations with strong business skills, objectivity, responsibility and integrity.

A lack of confidence in the ability of the cooperative management, can in turn, could trigger a financial crisis within the cooperatives. Thus, the failure of a cooperative could become inevitable, which may eventually damage shareholders willingness to provide future investment. 2 The effect of shareholders’ views is even more critical in the case of cooperatives, because these companies often have political influence. Politically linked companies can possess bad corporate governance practices and higher-level corporate issues because they depend heavily on the federal government. 3 Thus, studying corporate governance’s impact on the confidence levels of shareholders in cooperatives is essential. Serious consequences may arise if it affects the confidence of Bottom 40 (B40) household shareholders. B40 refers to the bottom 40% in Malaysian household income; categorized as low-income householders earning below 4850 Malaysian Ringgit (RM) per month (approximately USD$1158). Various cooperatives offered a share to the B40 employees or B40 members as one of the cooperatives benefits. Such cooperatives in Malaysia include the Armed Forces Cooperative, National Land Finance Co-operative Society (NLFCs), Koperasi Permodalan Felda Berhad and many more. Factors such as transparency, trustworthiness, integrity and good governance, are the key factors in creating shareholder confidence, and ensuring cooperative organisations remain competitive.

Corporate governance

Malaysia’s awareness of the importance of corporate governance began after the 1997 financial crisis, which hit many Southeast Asian countries, resulting in a tremendous decline in share prices and currency value. 4 One major cause of the situation was the absence of confidence and honesty, as well as poor corporate governance within many organisations. 5 – 7 One of the country’s oldest cooperatives, Malay Officers Cooperative Credit and Investment Society (MOCCIS), was declared bankrupt in 2008. The government also seized the accounts of three cooperatives in December 2008, after it was discovered that they had misled over 5,000 members into investing RM80 million in unlawful get-rich-quick schemes. Koperasi Taqwa Malaysia Berhad (Kotaqwa), Koperasi Ushahawan Malaysia Berhad (KUMB), and Koperasi Birr Berhad (Birr) were the three cooperatives (Consumers’Association of Penang). Literature has documented evidence that a reliable corporate governance framework can have a significant impact in improving strong efficiency along with emerging economic situations. 5 – 7 Corporate governance framework is a framework of rules and procedures by which the decisions in cooperatives are made, and how the controllers are held accountable for them.

Problems with cooperatives' shareholders

For most scholars, researching the confidence of shareholders in a cooperative organisation is a challenge because of limited literature linking confidence to cooperatives. Therefore, in this study, we seek to describe the notion of shareholders’ confidence, in order to understand how it related to the cooperatives’ effectiveness. Agency theory may help to shed some light on the existing body of knowledge, to address the problems within this context.

Agency theory and cooperatives

According to agency theory, businesses operate as agents for their shareholders. That is, shareholders engage in corporate ownership and pledge their assets to the management of the cooperatives' directors and officers. The relationship between cooperative governance and shareholder confidence is examined using the agency theory. 8 Agency theory is a relevant theory in this context that influences Malaysia’s corporate governance structures. This study’s analysis provides valuable information on how business management and shareholder confidence.

The research questions for this study are as follows: 1. Is there a research gap in B40 shareholders’ confidence in the cooperatives sector?

2. What are the challenges related to shareholders’ confidence in B40?

3. What will be the conceptual framework for B40 shareholders’ confidence in the cooperatives sector?

The objectives of this proposal are as follows:

1. To identify if there is a research gap in B40 shareholders’ confidence in the cooperatives sector.

2. To understand the challenges related to shareholders’ confidence in B40.

3. To propose a conceptual framework for B40 shareholders’ confidence in cooperatives sector.

Two primary reasons for conducting a systematic literature review are as follows; firstly it enables researchers to locate and systematise existing literature on a specific research topic and determine the level of interest that scholars have shown in investigating a particular topic. Secondly, it adds to our understanding of the types of relationships studied in the context. This study aims to understand and evaluate the B40 shareholders’ confidence in cooperatives, concerning risk, expected return and confidence in future investment possibilities. This study is an initiative to identify the major challenges involved in corporate governance practices in cooperative firms.

Methods

Ethics

This study was approved by the Research Ethical Committee of Multimedia University, Malaysia (EA2712021).

This study is designed to present a literature review, research gap analysis, conceptual framework and insights gained on cooperatives and their relation to B40 shareholder’s confidence. The literature review is based on the five stages of systemic review proposed by Tranfield et al. 9

Figure 1 below depicts the systematic flowchart of the review methodology.

Figure 1. Five stages of systematic review.

Identifying and evaluating studies

Articles investigating the confidence components in corporate governance within the context of cooperatives, do not specifically discuss the confidence of shareholders particularly in cooperatives. This study found that the Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance (MCCG) did not apply to cooperatives investors, in terms of there being no explicit regulations for how and when their practices may be improved. Effective corporate governance structure improves B40 shareholders confidence in terms of transparency, trustworthiness, integrity and good governance. As a result, we opted to check the number of publications for the specified keywords as the first step. The keywords range from broad themes (corporate governance) to more targeted terms (corporate governance/confidence/cooperative/B40).

Criteria of inclusion and exclusion

In order to conduct the search for this study, the following exclusion and inclusion criteria was used, detailed in Figure 2 also. Papers were selected if they were published between year 2000 and 2021, had been peer-reviewed, written in English, and if they addressed cooperatives and corporate governance. Journals, conference proceedings, dissertations and special issues were included in the inclusion criteria. Five major databases that were used to conduct the searches; Emerald, Scopus, Science direct, Inderscience and ProQuest.

Figure 2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Keywords

In order to review the literature comprehensively, we followed Tranfield et al.,’s systematic literature review methods, and used Emerald, ProQuest, InderScience, Scopus and Science Direct to search the following keywords: (1) corporate governance, (2) confidence, (3) cooperative, (4) agency theory and (5) B40. 9 The phrases searched included: ‘corporate governance’, ‘corporate governance and investors/shareholders confidence’, ‘corporate governance and investors/shareholders confidence and cooperative’, ‘corporate governance and investors/shareholders confidence and B40’ and ‘corporate governance and investors/shareholders confidence and cooperative and B40’. The search began with more general searches using the terms ‘corporate governance’ and/or ‘confidence.’ The searches were conducted between 1st June 2021 and 15th June 2021.

Search strategy

The search strategy was based on the keyword search, in order to investigate papers in the five major online databases, including Emerald, ProQuest, InderScience, Scopus and Science Direct. This selection was based on these databases’ widespread use and high level of academic merit. 10 Furthermore, these databases include a large number of periodicals devoted to business and cooperatives. The keywords selected were combined into five possible combinations, as shown in Table 1. The search on ‘corporate governance’ alone initially produced 77,864 publications. When searched with ‘corporate governance and investors/shareholders confidence’, the number dropped to 2,304. When we used the keyword combinations of ‘corporate governance and investors/shareholders confidence and cooperative,’ the number was 324. Subsequently, we found only one publication when we searched for ‘corporate governance and investors/shareholders confidence and B40’. The same was also true when we searched for ‘corporate governance and investors/shareholders confidence and cooperative and B40’; only one publication was found.

Table 1. Summary of keyword results.

No.	Online database	Corporate governance	Corporate governance AND Investors’ confidence OR Shareholders confidence	Corporate governance AND Investor/shareholders confidence AND Cooperative	Corporate governance AND Investor/shareholders confidence AND B40	Corporate governance AND Investor/shareholders confidence AND Cooperative AND B40	
1	Emerald	18000	898	65	0	0	
2	ProQuest	16524	482	171	0	0	
3	InderScience	3546	105	28	0	0	
4	Scopus	21766	118	0	0	0	
5	Science Direct	18028	701	60	1	1	
	Total:	77864	2304	324	1	1	

We used the following technique to extract papers from the major web databases mentioned above, summarised in Figure 3. Only confidence in cooperatives papers linked to the B40 group, were selected for further evaluation.

Figure 3. Extraction process.

Results

From the 324 papers found through searching for ‘corporate governance and investors/shareholders confidence and cooperative, we found five papers relevant to our investigation. Only 5 of the 324 studies assess shareholders’ confidence in cooperatives, as well as one paper on B40 and two papers on agency theory. The findings are summarised in Table 2.

Table 2. Summary of core papers.

Author(s)	Theory	Respondents	Research method	Findings	Challenges/limitations	
12 Shahid & Abbas (2019)	Market timing theory, Catering theory	Non-financial listed firms	Mixed methods	Confidence financial investment level is higher in the firms with good company governance practices.	Nil	
13 Gould, Melecky & Panterov (2016)	Nil	Ten-year averages of data for more than 100 countries over 1970–2014	Quantitative	Significant effect of income convergence, as growth (overall and for the poorest 40%) is slower in countries with higher initial income levels.	Causal link from finance to growth is notoriously difficult to prove.	
14 Zekos (2003)	Neoclassical theory	SME & MNE	Qualitative	Organizational learning capacity (OLC) is significantly related to customer orientation within strategic sourcing units.	Market definition is made more complex; market data is often hard to find.	
15 Norman & Norman (2016)	Agency theory, stewardship theory, economic theory	CEO’s	Qualitative	More than 75% of chief executives are said to have “golden parachute” regardless of their performance in failed companies.	The paper was largely undertaken by the analysis of secondary data sources.	
16 Mardini & Lahyani (2020)	Agency theory, impression management theory	Non-financial SPF-120 French listed firms	Quantitative	FP, measured using both market (Tobin's q) and accounting (return on equity and return on assets) indicators.	The scoring method used intellectual capital disclosures (ICDs) relating to human capital (HC), structural capital (SC) and relational capital (RC).	

Although most of these studies have focused on the direct impact of confidence in cooperatives, some authors are interested in investigating the confidence effect that significant shareholders can exert. Only 5 of the 324 studies, displayed in Table 2, discuss shareholders’ confidence in cooperatives, including one paper on B40, and two papers on agency theory. The results of the analysis are presented in Table 3.

Table 3. Summary of theories focused.

Theory	No of papers	Authors (Year)	
Agency theory	2	15 Norman and Norman (2106), 16 Mardini and Lahyani (2020)	
Market timing theory	1	12 Shahid, and Abbas (2019)	
Catering theory	1	12 Shahid, and Abbas (2019)	
Neoclassical theory	1	14 Zekos (2003)	
Stewardship theory	1	15 Norman and Norman (2016)	
Economic theory	1	15 Norman and Norman (2016)	
Impression management theory	1	16 Mardini and Lahyani (2020)	

Table 3 lists two papers with agency theory and six other theories, which were used in the studies based on different context.

Discussion

There are several gaps identified in this study. This paper emphasizes the scarcity of studies on corporate governance related to B40 shareholders confidence in the context of cooperatives. More research and case studies are crucial for cooperatives to understand and adopt any possible recommendations; the implication of which would be to encourage B40 shareholders to invest in such cooperatives.

A limitation of our study is the number of keywords selected; it would have been possible to obtain more papers in our search if the keywords were expanded to broader fields of study, not so specific in nature, such as B40. This could possibly lead to publication biases.

Research gap in B40 shareholders’ confidence in the cooperatives sector

Only one paper discussed the importance of the B40 shareholders confidence in the form of trust in cooperatives However, the shareholders’ confidence was not sufficiently discussed in order to provide research depth and direction. Filling the research gap is vital to building more knowledge of B40 shareholders’ confidence in investment portfolios; which will help cooperatives build confidence in shareholders as a critical feature. The data are shown in Tables 4 and 5.

Table 4. Plotting of papers on shareholder confidence in cooperatives, B40, and agency theory.

Author(s)	Shareholder confidence in cooperatives	B40	Agency theory	
12 Shahid & Abbas (2019)	√			
13 Gould, Melecky & Panterov (2016)	√	√		
14 Zekos (2003)	√			
15 Norman & Norman (2016)	√		√	
16 Mardini & Lahyani (2020)	√		√	

Table 5. Summary of papers on shareholder confidence in cooperatives, B40, and agency theory.

Research gaps	No of papers	Authors (Year)	Key takeaways/points to discuss	
Shareholder confidence in cooperatives	5	12 Shahid, and Abbas (2019), 13 Gould, Melecky & Panterov (2016), 14 Zekos (2003), 15 Norman & Norman (2016), 16 Mardini & Lahyani (2020)	Overall, the articles did not highlight the shareholders confidence for future investment so there is a gap to be analysed.	
B40	1	13 Gould, Melecky & Panterov (2016)	The articles did not discuss briefly on B40 investors. Key consideration in adopting B40 investors into the study.	
Agency theory	2	15 Norman &Norman (2016), 16 Mardini & Lahyani (2020)	The agency theory does not test some relationship between B40 shareholders confidence, CC and CG.	

Challenges related to shareholders’ confidence in B40

The main challenges with shareholders confidence in cooperatives is that it does not stand alone. The challenges related to shareholders’ confidence, in general, can be grouped into four categories, including external, internal, government related and population size. The external challenges include corporate tax and social behaviour of shareholders. Restrictive government policies and the high populations in B40 groups are another challenge related to shareholders confidence in B40s. However, these challenges do not sufficiently address the issues faced by B40 shareholders, which is one of the research gaps this study has identified. Furthermore, B40 shareholders are generally illiterate and need more knowledge about investment portfolio.

Conceptual framework for B40 shareholders’ confidence in the cooperatives sector

Agency theory has not been tested for B40 shareholders, particularly to address shareholders’ confidence in cooperatives. Shareholder’s confidence is a missing piece within the agency theory; especially in cooperatives. Protecting the interests of B40 shareholders who invest in the company and have expectations about the business and their investments, are critical. 11 Thus, we propose the following conceptual framework for further studies.

Figure 4. Conceptual framework.

The rationale behind the scarcity of such low research on B40 shareholders is due to a general perception that they are not major contributor to national income and B40 population are not seen as investors in cooperatives context (Share Prosperity Vision 2030). This can be addressed in future by creating more awareness and investment programmes to B40. These activities will help B40 to involve more in buying shares, understand investment and transit to M40 group.

Future recommendations

Researchers looking into the association between B40 shareholder confidence, corporate governance and cooperatives could use the primary findings of this publication, to generate ideas for future research. Two primary research themes could be considered in the future and we hope the academic community conduct more research on the following:

Focus on comparative and longitudinal studies for B40

Future research should focus on comparative and longitudinal studies to understand the dynamics of B40 shareholders’ confidence, and explore the impact of digital technology, behavioural finance, policy changes, and sustainability practices on their engagement with cooperatives.

Corporate governance in cooperatives for M40 shareholders

Future studies also should focus more on the Middle 40 (M40) shareholders, because they are the main contributors to the national GDP. M40 households make up 40% of Malaysia’s population, includes mostly wage earners, in public and private sectors, earning between RM4850-10959 per month.

Conclusion

The purpose of this study is to update corporate governance and cooperatives research communities about research gaps, namely in the areas of shareholder confidence, particularly among B40 shareholders. No unique confidence metric exists today, nor a case study explicitly dedicated to confidence. In this study, we used a five-stage technique to review papers based on a thorough examination of the literature in a particular field. According to our in-depth analysis of these papers, there are three primary areas which have room for research. Firstly, there is a pressing need for researchers to standardise the terminologies used the discuss corporate governance, cooperatives and shareholder confidence. Secondly, more research is needed to determine whether corporate governance, cooperatives, shareholder’s confidence and the B40 group to form the basis for more effective policy formulation and the basis for guiding the next generation of effective investment. Thirdly, investing in education, vocational training, and digital access for the B40 group enhances their skill set and opens avenues in entrepreneurship, e-commerce, and remote work, crucial for boosting Malaysia’s productivity, innovation, and economic growth. In this context, the extent of the commonalities between shareholder confidence and B40 could be investigated further due to its scarcity in research. Finally, further empirical research is needed to understand the elements that influence B40 shareholders’ confidence in the context of corporate governance and cooperatives.

Data availability

Underlying data

All data underlying the results are available as part of the article and no additional source data are required.

Reporting guidelines

Figshare: Prisma checklist and data flow diagram doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.16822225

This project contains the following extended data: • Data file 1. (Checklist, DOCX format)

• Data file 2. (Flow diagram, PDF format)

Acknowledgement

We thank the Multimedia University, Malaysia for the support and opportunity to write this paper.

10.5256/f1000research.122224.r127021
Reviewer response for version 2
Subramaniam Ravichandran K. 1Referee https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9165-0196

1 School of Business, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
25 3 2022 Copyright: © 2022 Subramaniam RK
2022
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Version 2recommendationapprove
Response to author's comment:

Author - We have removed the non-profit cooperative component and used the cooperatives category in general. 

Reviewer - Satisfactorily done

Author - We have now emphasized the scarcity of the B40 related research.

Reviewer - Satisfactorily done

Author - Rationale for low research in B40 Shareholders and how to address it in the future is now added.

Reviewer - Satisfactorily done

Author -  Changed 'Cooperative corporations' to 'Cooperatives'. 

Reviewer - Satisfactorily done

Author - Elaborated on corporate governance framework. Figure 2 was revised.

Reviewer - Satisfactorily done

Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated?

Yes

Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes

Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

I have done Corporate governance-related papers and as such I am fine to review this paper

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

10.5256/f1000research.76961.r122503
Reviewer response for version 1
R Rajeswari 1Referee
1 Jai Bharath Arts and Science College, Perumbavoor, India
7 2 2024 Copyright: © 2024 R R
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Version 1recommendationapprove
The paper has been well drafted with a precise introduction, research strategy, results drawn, and the conclusion derived. The research questions and objectives set for the study clearly suit the purpose of the study. However, the study can be improved to make it error free.

Main issues: Since the word “Cooperative Cooperation” may be new to many readers, it would be appropriate to clarify if the term “Cooperations” and “Cooperative Cooperative” have different meanings.

Can mention more about the bottom 40 shareholders and the ways in which it can change the economic development of Malaysia.

Even though, the authors have stated about the scarcity of resources for collection of data on such a topic, authors should emphasise more on this matter, collect the data, analyse it and take the required information for the study.

Misspelled “cooperations” as “cooperatives” in many areas of the study.

It will be better if the authors have more suggestions on the future of such a topic and to influence more people to conduct study in this subject.

Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated?

Yes

Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes

Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Marketing, International Business, and Logistics and Supply Chain Management.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

10.5256/f1000research.76961.r122501
Reviewer response for version 1
Subramaniam Ravichandran K. 1Referee https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9165-0196

1 School of Business, Monash University Malaysia, Subang Jaya, Malaysia
21 2 2022 Copyright: © 2022 Subramaniam RK
2022
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Version 1recommendationapprove-with-reservations
This paper has been well written with a clear introduction, comprehensive literature, search strategy, and overall results. The theory is sound and backed up with research questions and objectives. However, here are my pointers for the authors to improve the article in order for it to be of indexable quality:

Main Issues: As there were no info/data available on 'Non-profit Cooperatives', then it is better to just stick to a study on 'Cooperatives' as otherwise, we will be misrepresenting the research.

Based on the overall literature sourced, there has only been one study on B40 out of 77,864. So the authors need to emphasize the scarcity of this study instead of downplaying it by saying it is merely limited. This is a significant finding.

With regards to contribution the authors could mention the rationale for such low research and how this could be addressed in the future.

Using the words 'Cooperative corporations', is rather confusing. Suggest simplifying it to the word 'Cooperatives'.

Other Issues: Need to have a clear definition of 'Cooperatives' to avoid ambiguity.

Suggest elaborating on the term 'corporate governance framework'.

Under the research questions and objectives portion, instead of 'Cooperatives', the authors misspelled it as 'cooperation' and this has been repetitive.

In Figure 2, indicated as 'remove non-profit Cooperatives' and exclude 'profit Cooperatives' to rectify appropriately.

Very few papers discuss the importance of the B40 shareholders’ mentioned under the heading "Research gap in B40 shareholders’ confidence in the cooperative corporation sector" is not correct as there were only one (as per table 1).

Table 4 & 5 on the non-profit corporations, can be removed to maintain clarity and consistency. 

Are the rationale for, and objectives of, the Systematic Review clearly stated?

Yes

Is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes

Are sufficient details of the methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results presented in the review?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

I have done Corporate governance-related papers and as such I am fine to review this paper

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
==== Refs
References

1 Hashim MK Zakaria M : Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats of Cooperatives in Malaysia. Journal of the Asian Academy of Applied Business (JAAAB). 2015.
2 Hossain B : Directors’ remuneration and performance: Evidence from the textile sector of Bangladesh. J. Asian Finance Econ. Bus. 2020;7 (6 ):265–275. 10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no6.265
3 Mohammed NF Ahmed K Ji XD : Accounting conservatism, corporate governance and political connections. Asian Rev. Account. 2017;25 (2 ):288–318. 10.1108/ARA-04-2016-0041
4 Hong H Stein JC : A unified theory of underreaction, momentum trading and overreaction in asset markets. J. Financ. 1999;54 :2143–2184. 10.1111/0022-1082.00184
5 CG Watch Report: Asian Corporate Governance Association and CLSA Limited2018.
6 Zhou H Owusu-Ansah S Maggina A : Board of directors, audit committee, and firm performance: Evidence from Greece. J. Int. Account. Audit. Tax. 2018;31 (1 ):20–36. 10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2018
7 Al-ahdal WM Alsamhi MH Tabash MI : The impact of corporate governance on financial performance of Indian and GCC listed firms: An empirical investigation. Res. Int. Bus. Finance. 2020;51 (1 ):101013–101083. 10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.101083
8 Jensen MC Meckling WH : Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. J. Financ. Econ. 1976;3 (no.4 ) (October 1976),305–360. Practice. London: Sage. 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
9 Tranfield D Denyer D Smart P : Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. Br. J. Manag. 2003;14 (3 ):207–222. 10.1111/1467-8551.00375
10 Research.com. Top Journals for Computer Science and Electronics.2022. Reference Source
11 Tricker RI : The cultural dependence of corporate governance. Keeping Good Companies. 2012;64 (1 ):27–31.
12 Shahid MS Abbas M : Does corporate governance play any role in investor confidence, corporate investment decisions relationship? Evidence from Pakistan and India. J. Econ. Bus. 2019;105 :105839. 10.1016/j.jeconbus.2019.03.003
13 Gould DM Melecky M Panterov G : Finance, growth and shared prosperity: Beyond credit deepening. J. Policy Model. 2016;38 (4 ):737–758. 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2016.06.004
14 Zekos GI : MNEs, globalisation and digital economy: legal and economic aspects. Managerial Law. 2003;45 :1–296. 10.1108/03090550310770875
15 Norman ID Norman BMA : Juxtaposition of Hohfeldian Rights, Principle-Based Ethics, Functionings, and the health-Seeking Behavior of Sub-Saharan Africa. Advances in Applied Sociology. 2016;06 (10 ):344–362. 10.4236/aasoci.2016.610026
16 Mardini GH Lahyani FE : Impact of firm performance and corporate governance mechanisms on intellectual capital disclosures in CEO statements. J. Intellect. Cap. 2020. ahead-of-print. 10.1108/JIC-02-2020-0053
