
==== Front
J Am Chem Soc
J Am Chem Soc
ja
jacsat
Journal of the American Chemical Society
0002-7863
1520-5126
American Chemical Society

37722679
10.1021/jacs.3c06798
Communication
Peculiar Phosphonate Modifications of Velvet Worm Slime Revealed by Advanced Nuclear Magnetic Resonance and Mass Spectrometry
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5217-5070
Poulhazan Alexandre †‡
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1590-1808
Baer Alexander †§
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6340-5167
Daliaho Gagan ⊥
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3570-9787
Mentink-Vigier Frederic ||
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9624-6416
Arnold Alexandre A. ‡
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3590-9153
Browne Darren C. #
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4469-991X
Hering Lars §
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8752-7363
Archer-Hartmann Stephanie ○
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5740-4175
Pepi Lauren E. ○
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6166-9432
Azadi Parastoo ○
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4357-304X
Schmidt Stephan △
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0737-2440
Mayer Georg §
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7467-7119
Marcotte Isabelle *‡
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1417-9251
Harrington Matthew J. *⊥
‡ Department of Chemistry, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Quebec H2X 2J6, Canada
§ Department of Zoology, Institute of Biology, University of Kassel, Kassel D-34132, Germany
⊥ Department of Chemistry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0B8, Canada
|| National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Tallahassee, Florida 32310, United States
# Department of Biological and Chemical Sciences, University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus, Barbados BB11000, West Indies
○ Complex Carbohydrate Research Center, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, United States
△ Chemistry Department, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf D-40225, Germany
* Email: marcotte.isabelle@uqam.ca.
* Email: matt.harrington@mcgill.ca.
18 09 2023
27 09 2023
18 09 2024
145 38 2074920754
28 06 2023
© 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society
2023
The Authors
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Nature is rich with examples of highly specialized biological materials produced by organisms for functions, including defense, hunting, and protection. Along these lines, velvet worms (Onychophora) expel a protein-based slime used for hunting and defense that upon shearing and dehydration forms fibers as stiff as thermoplastics. These fibers can dissolve back into their precursor proteins in water, after which they can be drawn into new fibers, providing biological inspiration to design recyclable materials. Elevated phosphorus content in velvet worm slime was previously observed and putatively ascribed to protein phosphorylation. Here, we show instead that phosphorus is primarily present as phosphonate moieties in the slime of distantly related velvet worm species. Using high-resolution nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), natural abundance dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP), and mass spectrometry (MS), we demonstrate that 2-aminoethyl phosphonate (2-AEP) is associated with glycans linked to large slime proteins, while transcriptomic analyses confirm the expression of 2-AEP synthesizing enzymes in slime glands. The evolutionary conservation of this rare protein modification suggests an essential functional role of phosphonates in velvet worm slime and should stimulate further study of the function of this unusual chemical modification in nature.

Fonds QuÃ©bÃ©cois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies 10.13039/501100003150 293818 National Institute of General Medical Sciences 10.13039/100000057 GM122698 Canada Research Chairs 10.13039/501100001804 950-231953 Fonds QuÃ©bÃ©cois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies 10.13039/501100003150 275130 Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 10.13039/501100001659 SCHM 2748/5-1 Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 10.13039/501100001659 SFB 120-Z02 Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 10.13039/501100001659 MA 4147/7-1 Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 10.13039/501100001659 MA 4147/2 European Commission 10.13039/501100000780 10100085000 Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 10.13039/501100000038 RGPIN-2018-06200 Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 10.13039/501100000038 RGPIN- 2018-05243 Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 10.13039/501100000038 950-231953 Division of Materials Research 10.13039/100000078 DMR-1933525 Division of Materials Research 10.13039/100000078 DMR-1644779 National Institute of General Medical Sciences 10.13039/100000057 R24GM137782 document-id-old-9ja3c06798
document-id-new-14ja3c06798
ccc-price
==== Body
pmcVelvet worms comprise an ancient group of terrestrial invertebrates, including about 230 described species. The two major subgroups, Peripatidae and Peripatopsidae, diverged about 380 MYA.1 Velvet worms capture their prey by projecting sticky slime from the papillae on each side of their head2 (Movie S1). This gel-like slime, primarily comprised of proteins, transforms into solid fibers under mechanical shearing and rapid drying. The struggling of the ensnared prey accelerates hardening into glassy fibers with a stiffness comparable to Nylon.3 These biopolymeric fibers can be solubilized in water, and new indistinguishable fibers can be drawn mechanically in vitro from the resulting solution.3 The mechanism for reversible fiber formation is thus encoded in the chemical structure of the proteins. Indeed, mechanoresponsive fiber formation outside the animal’s body under ambient conditions and their recyclability provides a promising avenue for bioinspired development of sustainable plastics and glues.3 Yet, many questions remain regarding slime composition and underlying biochemical mechanisms guiding reversible fiber formation.

Previous biochemical analyses from several onychophoran species have revealed a primarily proteinaceous composition with components of different sizes.4−6 Mid-molecular-weight (MMW) proteins and small quantities of lipids (<1%) were proposed to form condensed nanodroplets,4 while low-molecular-weight (LMW) proteins are proposed to act as antimicrobial components.6 However, several high-molecular-weight (HMW) proteins were shown to be the major structural component of slime fibers.3−8 Based on positive phosphostaining and elemental analysis of the HMW proteins from the Peripatopsidae species Euperipatoides rowelli, as well as the high content of divalent cations (Mg2+, Ca2+), phosphate-mediated electrostatic interactions were hypothesized to drive reversible fiber formation.7,9 However, the prediction of phosphorylated amino acids in Eu. rowelli slime was solely based on bioinformatics analyses, and never experimentally confirmed.7 Moreover, similar analysis of HMW slime protein sequences from a Peripatidae species collected in Singapore did not detect phosphorylation sites.10

Here, we elucidated the chemical nature of the slime’s phosphorus content in two distantly related velvet worm species using natural abundance NMR spectroscopy and heteronuclear dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) experiments with magic-angle spinning (MAS), in combination with higher-energy collision-induced dissociation (HCD) tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) analysis of glycan protein modifications. We demonstrate that in both species—the peripatopsid Eu. rowelli and the peripatid Epiperipatus barbadensis—large slime proteins possess an extremely rare post-translational modification consisting of phosphonated glycans. The occurrence of this protein modification in both species indicates a highly conserved feature over at least 380 MY, suggesting a critical functional role in the slime storage, fiber formation, and/or adhesion.

Phosphorus is ubiquitous in living organisms and typically found as phosphate esters (C–O–P bond),11 and less frequently as phosphonates (C–P bond) in natural organophosphorus compounds.12−14 We applied solution and solid-state (ss) 31P NMR experiments to differentiate between these forms in the slime from Eu. rowelli (Figures 1a, b) and Ep. barbadensis (Figures 1c, d).1,13 Several intense 31P NMR signals appear at 20–23 ppm (Figures 1b and d), which are unambiguously assigned to phosphonates and are not environmental contaminations (Figure S1). Additional weaker phosphate peaks between 0–5 ppm, only found in Eu. rowelli, are ascribed to phosphoproteins rather than phospholipid phosphate esters, considering the low lipid abundance (Figure S2).7 Quantitative peak analysis reveals that Eu. rowelli‘s slime contains 17 times more phosphonates than phosphates (Figure 1b), while phosphates are essentially absent in Ep. barbadensis (Figure 1d). The 31P NMR spectra reveal a difference in the phosphonate region, with three peaks being detected in Eu. rowelli’s slime at 22.2/21.6/21.0 ppm while the 21.0 ppm peak is absent in Ep. barbadensis. This suggests subtle differences between their phosphonate environments and may indicate evolutionary variations between the two onychophoran subgroups. In addition, the lack of phosphates in the slime of Ep. barbadensis is consistent with the lack of phosphorylation sites detected in the HMW proteins of the Singapore velvet worm (Eoperipatus sp., a representative of Peripatidae).10

Figure 1 31P ssNMR reveals phosphonates in the slime of two distantly related onychophoran species. Photographs of (a) the peripatopsid Euperipatoides rowelli and (b) corresponding solution (black) and solid-state (red) 31P NMR spectra indicate predominant phosphonates (Phn, highlighted in blue) compared to phosphate ester (Pho, green). (c) Photographs of the peripatid Epiperipatus barbadensis and (d) corresponding slime 31P ssNMR spectrum shows only phosphonates.

These results provide strong evidence that the high phosphorus content in velvet worm slime previously ascribed to phosphorylated proteins7,9 is, rather, associated with phosphonate-rich molecules. These findings apply to both fibrilized and nonfibrilized slime, as revealed for Eu. rowelli (Figure 1b and Table S1). Phosphonates were also detected in the bodies of both species by ssNMR (Figure S3). The occurrence of natural phosphonates is well supported for various marine and freshwater organisms; whereas phosphonate-containing moieties have only rarely been detected in terrestrial invertebrates (see literature review of natural phosphonates in Table S2). We thus proceeded to a detailed characterization of the phosphonate moiety and its association with slime proteins.

Comparison of 1D 1H (31P-decoupled) and 1H–31P TOCSY (total correlation spectroscopy) solution NMR spectra of Eu. rowelli slime to those of several phosphonate standards15 revealed that they are in good agreement with 2-aminoethylphosphonate (2-AEP) (Figures S4 and S5, and Table S1). In marine microorganisms, the biosynthesis pathway of 2-AEP is catalyzed by phosphoenolpyruvate mutase (PEPm), phosphoenolpyruvate decarboxylase (Ppd) and 2-aminoethyl phosphonate transaminase (AEPt).16−18 Local BLAST searches of published protein sequences of these three enzymes17 against transcriptomes of Eu. rowelli and Principapillatus hitoyensis (representative of Peripatidae, like Ep. barbadensis) revealed that PEPm-, Ppd- and AEPt-encoding genes are expressed in the slime glands of both onychophoran species (Tables S3–S6), supporting the ability of velvet worms to produce 2-AEP phosphonate moieties. In addition to the slime gland, these genes are expressed in several other tissues, consistent with the detection of phosphonates in various parts of the body of the worm (Table S4 and Figure S3), suggesting a role of 2-AEP in other biological functions.

1H and 31P solution NMR diffusion experiments on Eu. rowelli slime revealed that phosphonates are associated with large molecules (Figure S6). On the other hand, lipid extraction, 13C ssNMR, and phenol-sulfuric acid assay show low amounts of lipids and glycans in the slime7 (Figures S1 and S7), excluding phosphonate modification of lipids or pure polysaccharides. Therefore, phosphonates are most likely associated with HMW proteins. 31P ssNMR experiments on HMW (>300 kDa), MMW (100–300 kDa), and LMW (8–100 kDa) fractions obtained from a triple dialysis of the slime confirm this hypothesis (Figure 2). Phosphonates are indeed associated with molecules above 100 kDa, while LMW compounds contain phosphates (Figure 2b). According to previous SDS-PAGE analyses, this includes HMW monomers/complexes (232–429/478–634 kDa) or MMW (110 kDa) proteins in Eu. rowelli slime.4,10

Figure 2 Triple dialysis of Eu. rowelli slime followed by 31P ssNMR. (a) Simultaneous triple dialysis setup. (b) Dialysis fractions analyzed by 31P ssNMR show that HMW proteins contain most of the phosphonates (Phn), while LMW proteins (<100 kDa) lack phosphonates but contain phosphates (Pho).

Deeper structural analysis of the 2-AEP moieties was performed by MAS-DNP and HCD-MS/MS. MAS-DNP provides enhanced sensitivity (Figure 3a and Figure S8), enabling detection and identification of carbon signals in endogenous abundance, and determination of proximity between carbon and phosphorus atoms by monitoring the magnetization transfer from 31P to 13C during cross-polarization (CP); as duration increases, carbons further from the phosphorus atom gradually appear on the spectra (Figure 3a, b). The 2D 31P–13C CP MAS-DNP ssNMR experiments performed on slime further confirm that 13C–31P contacts arise from phosphonates rather than from phosphorylation (Figure S9). Furthermore, carbons closer to the phosphonate moieties have chemical shifts of 24.8 and 35.4 ppm (Figure 3b and Figure S10), which agrees well with 2-AEP’s structure (Table S1). This is further confirmed by the natural abundance 15N MAS-DNP ssNMR spectrum in which the signal at ∼31 ppm could correspond to 2-AEP’s amine (Figure S11). Carbons further from the phosphorus atom appear at 63.3/75.0 ppm in Eu. rowelli, and 61.1/66.5/75.0 ppm in Ep. barbadensis, which are typical of glycans (Figure 3a, b, Table S7),16,19 indicating the presence of phosphonated glycans in the slime. Additionally, an intermolecular contact with a carbon at 44.4 ppm, possibly corresponding to arginine carbon side chain (Figure 3a, Figures S10–S12) was detected only in Eu. rowelli’s slime. DFT calculations (Figure S13) support an ∼2.9 Å distance between 2-AEP’s phosphorus and arginine.

Figure 3 MAS-DNP and HCD-MS/MS identify phosphonoglycans in velvet worm slime. (a) MAS-DNP 1H–31P–13C double CP spectra reveal carbon atoms close to 31P atoms (black line) as compared to direct 1H–13C CP spectra (orange dashed line) showing all carbons. (b) 13C peak intensities as a function of CP mixing time shows the sequential proximity of the 31P atom to 13C. (c) HCD-MS/MS fragmentation of tryptic peptides in Eu. rowelli are indicative of 2-AEP modified HexNAc glycans attached to slime proteins. (d) Schematic representation of phosphonoglycans decorating slime proteins. Distances were estimated using MAS-DNP CP build-ups of Eu. rowelli and density-functional theory; X atom represents possible intermolecular contact with arginine.

The 2-AEP modification of glycans associated with slime proteins is further corroborated by HCD-MS/MS analyses of trypsin-digested Eu. rowelli slime. The results show oxonium ions revealing both unmodified and 2-AEP-modified N-acetylhexosamine (HexNAc) decorating tryptic peptides (Figures 3c and Figure S14). Previous biochemical analyses of the peripatopsid Eu. kanangrensis assumed that carbohydrates mostly occur as N-acetyl galactosamine (GalNAc)5 bound to slime proteins via O-glycosylation. However, the exact linking pattern and nature of the carbohydrate units require further investigation (Figure 3d).

The physicochemical properties of glycans and, by extension, the possible interactions with charged amino acids will be altered by 2-AEP functionalization.20,21 At the native pH of 5.2 for the ejected slime,3 the phosphonate moiety is most likely in a zwitterionic charge state (Figure S15), consistent with previous work highlighting the role of electrostatic interactions between slime proteins during storage and fiber formation.7 The local charge density in the HMW proteins should increase their solubility, while also enabling electrostatic interactions with divalent ions present at elevated concentrations in the slime.4 This chemical strategy resembles that observed in well-studied biological adhesives derived from mussels and sandcastle worms. These materials are enriched in charged amino acid residues, as well as post-translational protein modifications such as 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) and phosphoserine, which are crucial for material formation and function.22,23 Electrostatic interactions are especially important in these systems for influencing phase separation of proteins, which functions in storage, transport, and eventual solidification into functional glues.22−24 The charged phosphonate moieties discovered here may thus contribute to onychophoran slime storage and its transition to recyclable biopolymeric fibers.

The occurrence of phosphonates in slimes from distinct onychophoran subgroups suggests that phosphonate production has been evolutionarily conserved for at least 380 MY and might be shared by all existing onychophoran species. Given the large metabolic cost to produce this modification,16 the evolutionary conservation of phosphonate production suggests an important role in the formation and function of slime fibers. More generally, natural phosphonates have been reported across various taxonomic groups of organisms, associated with small organic molecules, glycans, lipids, or decorating biomolecules such as glycolipids, glycoceramides, and glycoproteins with diverse functions (see detailed information and references in Table S2). Given that phosphonate producers have been predominantly reported in aquatic environments, our findings suggest that the prevalence of natural phosphonates in terrestrial organisms may be underestimated.14,16,17,25 Notably, the ancestors of velvet worms (and their closest extant relatives, water bears and arthropods) were extinct lobopodians that mostly, if not exclusively lived in marine habitats.26 Therefore, phosphonate production might be an ancestral feature inherited from marine lobopodians, and it seems probable that phosphonates may be detected in other descendants of this lineage, including tardigrades and various arthropods (as already confirmed for migratory locusts; Table S2).

In conclusion, this work describes a rare, presumably charged phosphonoglycan modification (containing 2-AEP) of HMW proteins in onychophoran slime. Verifying the potential functions of this modification requires further investigation, but our key insights into the molecular composition and assembly of velvet worm slime may help to inspire the design of sustainable polymers and adhesives. Furthermore, the discovery of phosphonates in another terrestrial invertebrate underlines the necessity to consider phosphonates as a potential source of organophosphorus in understudied groups of animals and their biological functions.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.3c06798.Materials and Methods; control for bacteria and environment contamination of the slime samples (Figure S1); Mobility selective 13C NMR spectra of Eu. rowelli native aggregated slime fibers (Figure S2); 31P NMR to detect phosphonates in slime and tissues of both velvet worm species (Figure S3); frequency-specific 31P decoupled 1H solution NMR spectra (Figure S4); 2D 1H–31P hetero TOCSY for coupling in phosphonate standards and slime (Figure S5); 1H and 31P DOSY of Eu. rowelli slime locate phosphonates in large objects (Figure S6); lipid extraction from slime demonstrates phosphonates in protein fraction (Figure S7); Sensitivity of NMR experiments and MAS-DNP enhancement methodology (Figure S8); 2D 13C–31P contacts as detected by 2D MAS-DNP on native slime in Eu. rowelli (Figure S9); comparison of MAS-DNP 31P–13C build-up spectra of slimes from both species (Figure S10); MAS-DNP natural abundance 15N for protein and 2-AEP identification (Figure S11); 13C–13C MAS-DNP double quantum/single quantum correlations in the slime (Figure S12); DFT calculated 3D structure representation of the phosphonate in the slime (Figure S13); HCD-MS/MS chromatogram of peptide with 2-AEP-glycan modification (Figure S14); 2-AEP charge and corresponding phosphonates in velvet worm slime (Figure S15); 31P, 13C and 1H chemical shift of phosphonate standards and slime (Table S1); known natural phosphonate moieties (Table S2); sequencing and assembly statistics of tissue-specific transcriptomes from Eu. rowelli and P. hitoyensis. (Table S3); local BLAST of phosphonate biocatalytic enzymes in the spirochete bacterium Treponema denticola (Table S4); best matches of protein BLAST of phosphonate enzymes in velvet worms (Table S5); deduced protein sequences of cloned phosphonate enzyme genes from Eu. rowelli and P. hitoyensis (Table S6); comparison of slime and reported glycophosphonate chemical shifts (Table S7) (PDF)

Movie S1, slow motion video of slime ejection by a living specimen of Ep. barbadensis (AVI)

Supplementary Material

ja3c06798_si_001.pdf

ja3c06798_si_002.avi

Author Contributions

† A.P. and A.B. contributed equally to this work. The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (grants MA 4147/7-1 and 4147/2 to G.M., and grants SCHM 2748/5-1 and SFB 120-project Z02 to S.S.), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (grant RGPIN-2018-05243 to M.J.H. and grant RGPIN-2018-06200 to I.M.), a Canada Research Chair award (CRC Tier grant 2 950-231953 to M.J.H.), the Fonds de Recherche du Quebec – Nature et Technologies (B2X doctoral research scholarship 275130 and international internship scholarship 293818 to A.P.), the National Institutes of Health (grant R24GM137782 to P.A.), GlycoMIP, a National Science Foundation Materials Innovation Platform funded through Cooperative Agreement (grant DMR-1933525 to P.A.), a European Union’s grant agreement No 10100085000 (PANACEA), the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory that is supported by the National Science Foundation Cooperative Agreement No. DMR-1644779 and the State of Florida, and the MAS-DNP instrument and probe development is supported by the National Institute of Health (GM122698). Collecting and export permits were kindly provided by the Office of Environment & Heritage (NSW National Parks & Wildlife Service), the Department of the Environment of Australia, and the National System of Conservation Areas (SINAC, MINAE) for Eu. rowelli and the Ministry of Environment and National Beautification, Green and Blue Economy of Barbados for Ep. barbadensis. We thank D. M. Rowell, I. S. Oliveira, C. Martin, and I. Schumann for help with specimen collection, S. Treffkorn for assistance with RNA extractions, and I. S. Oliveira for assistance with velvet worm photography.

Abbreviations

NMR nuclear magnetic resonance

2-AEP 2-aminoethyl phosphonate

MMW mid-molecular-weight proteins

LMW low-molecular-weight proteins

HMW high-molecular-weight proteins

MS mass-spectrometry

Phn phosphonate

Pho phosphate

ssNMR solid-state NMR

PEPm phosphoenolpyruvate mutase

Ppd phosphoenolpyruvate decarboxylase

AEPt 2-aminoethyl phosphonate transaminase

MAS-DNP magic-angle spinning combined with dynamic nuclear polarization

HCD MS/MS higher-energy collision induced dissociation combined with tandem mass spectrometry

CP cross-polarization

HexNAc N-acetylated hexose

GalNAc N-acetyl galactosamine

DOPA 3,4-dihydroxyphenyalanine

MAS magic-angle spinning

DFT density-functional theory

CID collisional-induced dissociation
==== Refs
References

Oliveira I. d. S. ; Bai M. ; Jahn H. ; Gross V. ; Martin C. ; Hammel J. U. ; Zhang W. ; Mayer G. Earliest onychophoran in amber reveals gondwanan migration patterns. Curr. Biol. 2016, 26 (19 ), 2594–2601. 10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.023.27693140
Mayer G. ; Oliveira I. S. ; Baer A. ; Hammel J. U. ; Gallant J. ; Hochberg R. Capture of prey, feeding, and functional anatomy of the jaws in velvet worms (Onychophora). Integr. Comp. Biol. 2015, 55 (2 ), 217–227. 10.1093/icb/icv004.25829018
Baer A. ; Schmidt S. ; Haensch S. ; Eder M. ; Mayer G. ; Harrington M. J. Mechanoresponsive lipid-protein nanoglobules facilitate reversible fibre formation in velvet worm slime. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8 (1 ), 974 10.1038/s41467-017-01142-x.29042549
Baer A. ; Hoffmann I. ; Mahmoudi N. ; Poulhazan A. ; Harrington M. J. ; Mayer G. ; Schmidt S. ; Schneck E. The internal structure of the velvet worm projectile slime: A small-angle scattering study. Small 2023, 19 , 2300516 10.1002/smll.202300516.
Benkendorff K. ; Beardmore K. ; Gooley A. A. ; Packer N. H. ; Tait N. N. Characterisation of the slime gland secretion from the peripatus, Euperipatoides kanangrensis (Onychophora: Peripatopsidae). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B, Biochem. Mol. Biol. 1999, 124 (4 ), 457–465. 10.1016/S0305-0491(99)00145-5.
Haritos V. S. ; Niranjane A. ; Weisman S. ; Trueman H. E. ; Sriskantha A. ; Sutherland T. D. Harnessing disorder: onychophorans use highly unstructured proteins, not silks, for prey capture. Proc. Royal Soc. B, Biol. Sci. 2010, 277 (1698 ), 3255–3263. 10.1098/rspb.2010.0604.
Baer A. ; Hänsch S. ; Mayer G. ; Harrington M. J. ; Schmidt S. Reversible supramolecular assembly of velvet worm adhesive fibers via electrostatic interactions of charged phosphoproteins. Biomacromolecules 2018, 19 (10 ), 4034–4043. 10.1021/acs.biomac.8b01017.30114911
Nielsen C. Animal Evolution: Interrelationships of the Living Phyla, 3rd ed.; Oxford University Press: 2012.
Baer A. ; Horbelt N. ; Nijemeisland M. ; Garcia S. J. ; Fratzl P. ; Schmidt S. ; Mayer G. ; Harrington M. J. Shear-induced β-crystallite unfolding in condensed phase nanodroplets promotes fiber formation in a biological adhesive. ACS Nano 2019, 13 (5 ), 4992–5001. 10.1021/acsnano.9b00857.30933471
Lu Y. ; Sharma B. ; Soon W. L. ; Shi X. ; Zhao T. ; Lim Y. T. ; Sobota R. M. ; Hoon S. ; Pilloni G. ; Usadi A. ; et al. Complete sequences of the velvet worm slime proteins reveal that slime formation is enabled by disulfide bonds and intrinsically disordered regions. Adv. Sci. 2022, 9 (18 ), e2201444 10.1002/advs.202201444.
Mackey K. R. M. ; Paytan A. Phosphorus cycle. In Encyclopedia of Microbiology, 3rd ed.; Schaechter M. , Ed.; Academic Press: Oxford, 2009; pp 322–334.
Horsman G. P. ; Zechel D. L. Phosphonate biochemistry. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117 (8 ), 5704–5783. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00536.27787975
Murienne J. ; Daniels S. R. ; Buckley T. R. ; Mayer G. ; Giribet G. A living fossil tale of Pangaean biogeography. Proc. Royal Soc. B, Biol. Sci. 2014, 281 (1775 ), 20132648 10.1098/rspb.2013.2648.
Yu X. ; Doroghazi J. R. ; Janga S. C. ; Zhang J. K. ; Circello B. ; Griffin B. M. ; Labeda D. P. ; Metcalf W. W. Diversity and abundance of phosphonate biosynthetic genes in nature. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110 (51 ), 20759–20764. 10.1073/pnas.1315107110.
Cade-Menun B. J. Improved peak identification in 31P-NMR spectra of environmental samples with a standardized method and peak library. Geoderma 2015, 257–258 , 102–114. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.12.016.
Acker M. ; Hogle S. L. ; Berube P. M. ; Hackl T. ; Coe A. ; Stepanauskas R. ; Chisholm S. W. ; Repeta D. J. Phosphonate production by marine microbes: exploring new sources and potential function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2022, 119 (11 ), e2113386119 10.1073/pnas.2113386119.35254902
Bartlett C. ; Bansal S. ; Burnett A. ; Suits M. D. ; Schaefer J. ; Cegelski L. ; Horsman G. P. ; Weadge J. T. Whole-cell detection of C-P bonds in bacteria. Biochemistry 2017, 56 (44 ), 5870–5873. 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00814.29068202
Rice K. ; Batul K. ; Whiteside J. ; Kelso J. ; Papinski M. ; Schmidt E. ; Pratasouskaya A. ; Wang D. ; Sullivan R. ; Bartlett C. ; Weadge J. T. ; Van der Kamp M. W. ; Moreno-Hagelsieb G. ; Suits M. D. ; Horsman G. P. The predominance of nucleotidyl activation in bacterial phosphonate biosynthesis. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10 (1 ), 3698 10.1038/s41467-019-11627-6.31420548
Kang X. ; Zhao W. ; Dickwella Widanage M. C. ; Kirui A. ; Ozdenvar U. ; Wang T. CCMRD: a solid-state NMR database for complex carbohydrates. J. Biomol. NMR 2020, 74 (4–5 ), 239–245. 10.1007/s10858-020-00304-2.32125579
Paschinger K. ; Wilson I. B. H. Analysis of zwitterionic and anionic N-linked glycans from invertebrates and protists by mass spectrometry. Glycoconj. J. 2016, 33 (3 ), 273–283. 10.1007/s10719-016-9650-x.26899268
Paschinger K. ; Wilson I. B. H. Anionic and zwitterionic moieties as widespread glycan modifications in non-vertebrates. Glycoconj. J. 2020, 37 (1 ), 27–40. 10.1007/s10719-019-09874-2.31278613
Waite J. H. Mussel adhesion - essential footwork. J. Exp. Biol. 2017, 220 (4 ), 517–530. 10.1242/jeb.134056.28202646
Stewart R. J. ; Wang C. S. ; Shao H. Complex coacervates as a foundation for synthetic underwater adhesives. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 167 (1–2 ), 85–93. 10.1016/j.cis.2010.10.009.21081223
Renner-Rao M. ; Jehle F. ; Priemel T. ; Duthoo E. ; Fratzl P. ; Bertinetti L. ; Harrington M. J. Mussels fabricate porous glues via multiphase liquid-liquid phase separation of multiprotein condensates. ACS Nano 2022, 16 (12 ), 20877–20890. 10.1021/acsnano.2c08410.36413745
Lockwood S. ; Greening C. ; Baltar F. ; Morales S. E. Global and seasonal variation of marine phosphonate metabolism. ISME J. 2022, 16 (9 ), 2198–2212. 10.1038/s41396-022-01266-z.35739297
Ortega-Hernández J. Lobopodians. Curr. Biol. 2015, 25 (19 ), R873–R875. 10.1016/j.cub.2015.07.028.26439350
