
==== Front
Influenza Other Respir Viruses
Influenza Other Respir Viruses
10.1111/(ISSN)1750-2659
IRV
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
1750-2640
1750-2659
John Wiley and Sons Inc. Hoboken

10.1111/irv.70008
IRV70008
IRV-2024-165.R1
Systematic Review
Systematic Review
Burden of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Infection Among Adults in Nursing and Care Homes: A Systematic Review
Osei‐Yeboah Richard https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4622-3691
1 richard.osei-yeboah@ed.ac.uk

Amankwah Stephen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0397-5810
2
Begier Elizabeth 3
Adedze Miranda https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6782-9305
4
Nyanzu Franklin 5
Appiah Pious 6
Ansah Jochebed Ode Boakye 7
Campbell Harry 1
Sato Reiko 8
Jodar Luis 9
Gessner Bradford D. 9
Nair Harish 1 10 11
1 Centre for Global Health, Usher Institute University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
2 Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics Polish Academy of Sciences Warsaw Poland
3 Global Medical Development Scientific and Clinical Affairs Pfizer Vaccines Dublin Ireland
4 Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden
5 Department of Epidemiology and Disease Control, School of Public Health University of Ghana Accra Ghana
6 Department of Medical Microbiology, Medical School, College of Health Sciences University of Ghana Accra Ghana
7 Department of Population Health University of Toledo Toledo Ohio USA
8 Value & Evidence Pfizer Inc Collegeville Pennsylvania USA
9 Vaccines Medical Development, Scientific and Clinical Affairs Pfizer Inc Collegeville Pennsylvania USA
10 MRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Research Unit (Agincourt), School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg South Africa
11 School of Public Health Nanjing Medical University Nanjing People's Republic of China
* Correspondence:
Richard Osei‐Yeboah (richard.osei-yeboah@ed.ac.uk)

16 9 2024
9 2024
18 9 10.1111/irv.v18.9 e7000820 8 2024
17 4 2024
29 8 2024
© 2024 The Author(s). Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

ABSTRACT

Background

Older adults in nursing and care homes (NCHs) are vulnerable to severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection, hospitalization, and death. This study aimed to gather data on RSV disease among older adults in NCHs and identify reported risk factors for RSV hospitalization and case fatality.

Methods

The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022371908). We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Global Health databases to identify articles published between 2000 and 2023. Observational and experimental studies conducted among older adults in NCHs requiring assistive care and reporting RSV illness were included and relevant data were extracted.

Results

Of 18,690 studies screened, 32 were selected for full‐text review, and 20 were included. Overall, the number of NCH residents ranged from 42 to 1459 with a mean age between 67.6 and 85 years. Attack rates ranged from 6.7% to 47.6% and annual incidence ranged from 0.5% to 14%. Case fatality rates ranged from 7.7% to 23.1%. We found similar annual incidence rates of RSV‐positive acute respiratory infection (ARI) of 4582 (95% CI: 3259–6264) and 4785 (95% CI: 2258–10,141) per 100,000 reported in two studies. Annual incidence rate of RSV‐positive lower respiratory tract infection was 3040 (95% CI: 1986–4454) cases per 100,000 adults. Annual RSV‐ARI hospital admission rates were between 600 (95% CI: 190–10,000) and 1104 (95% CI: 350–1930) per 100,000 person‐years. Among all RSV disease cases, commonly reported chronic medical conditions included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart failure, ischemic heart disease, coronary artery disease, hypertension, diabetes, kidney dysfunction, cerebrovascular accident, malignancies, dementia, and those with a Charlson comorbidity score > 6.5.

Conclusion

Data on RSV infection among NCH residents are limited and largely heterogeneous but document a high risk of illness, frequent hospitalization, and high mortality. Preventive interventions, such as vaccination, should be considered for this high‐risk population. Nationally representative epidemiologic studies and NCH‐based viral pathogen surveillance could more precisely assess the burden on NCH residents.

adults
and care home
burden
infection
nursing
respiratory syncytial virus
Pfizer 10.13039/100004319 source-schema-version-number2.0
cover-dateSeptember 2024
details-of-publishers-convertorConverter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.4.8 mode:remove_FC converted:16.09.2024
Funding: This work was supported by Pfizer through the University of Edinburgh, UK. The University of Edinburgh maintains the right to publish and present these results. Pfizer was involved in designing the study, analyzing, and interpreting data, and contributed to drafting and finalizing the manuscript for publication. Richard Osei‐Yeboah and Harish Nair were paid contractors to Pfizer in connection with the development of this manuscript.
==== Body
pmc1 Introduction

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major cause of respiratory tract infections in infants, older adults, and other high‐risk groups. A recently published meta‐analysis from the United States reported a pooled RSV‐related hospitalization incidence from prospective studies of 282 per 100,000 in adults aged 65 years and above [1] after adjustment for reduced sensitivity of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) nasopharyngeal/nasal swab testing, which is an issue among older adults [2, 3]. Previous studies suggest that RSV‐attributable morbidity and mortality among older adults may be similar to seasonal influenza epidemics [4, 5]. Large‐scale epidemiological studies on the impact of RSV and influenza virus on hospitalization and mortality rates in older adults reported findings similar to the previous studies [6, 7, 8]. Novel estimates of RSV‐associated hospital admission in adults in the European Union show that about 92% of admissions are reported in adults older than 65 years [9]. Further, a recent global meta‐analysis projected that 787,000 hospitalizations in adults aged 65 years and above are occurring annually in high‐income countries alone [10]. Older adults with chronic respiratory diseases, heart failure, and immunosuppressing conditions are at higher risk from severe or fatal RSV infections [11, 12, 13]. Immunosenescence and decreased levels of RSV‐specific neutralizing antibodies in the serum also contribute to higher susceptibility to severe RSV infections [14, 15, 16, 17].

Nursing and care home (NCH) residents may have an increased risk of severe RSV infections, compared with community‐dwelling persons of equivalent age [11]. This may be due to the increased prevalence of comorbidities in NCH residents, which is associated with severe RSV infection, including neuropsychiatric, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal disorders, hypertension, vascular disease, arthritis, depression, and gastroesophageal reflux disease [12, 13]. It may also be due to increased frailty [4], and increased risk of acquiring RSV infection in a closed environment.

Recent reviews have focused predominantly on epidemiological, clinical, diagnostic, and therapeutic data and prevention options for RSV infection among older adults [5, 6, 7] but only a few existing reviews have focused on RSV burden among NCH residents. We aimed to gather data on RSV infections among older adults in NCHs, report the burden of disease including incidence rates and associated case fatality rates, and identify reported risk factors for hospitalization. A better understanding of RSV burden in NCHs will be critical to prioritize preventive vaccination campaigns and ensure that access to novel antivirals is readily available to treat this high‐risk populations.

1.1 Study Objectives and Registration

The study was conducted in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [8]. The study was registered in PROSPERO with reference number CRD42022371908. This study did not require institutional review board approval.

1.2 Data Searches

We conducted a systematic literature review to identify up‐to‐date data published on RSV infections in NCHs across the globe using pre‐defined search queries. We systematically searched three databases—Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE and Ovid Global Health (1973 onwards) for original studies published on RSV infections in NCHs from January 1, 2000, to June 30, 2023. We hand‐searched the reference lists of all included studies and other relevant studies to identify additional eligible studies. We did not apply language restrictions to our searches. The queries used for the database searches are included in the supporting information.

1.3 Study Screening and Selection

1.3.1 Inclusion Criteria

We included papers reporting RSV disease occurrence, prevalence, or incidence rates among residents of nursing, care, residential, or retirement homes where residents require assistive care. We considered papers using experimental–randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational–cohort, cross‐sectional, case–control study designs. We included studies that confirmed RSV using diagnostic tests such as PCR, cell culture, immunofluorescence, and other rapid antigen‐based tests. Studies reporting RSV infection frequency from RSV serology (e.g., pre‐and‐post‐RSV season serology or acute and convalescent specimens) and studies reporting 28‐day post‐RSV infection mortality were considered.

1.3.2 Exclusion Criteria

We excluded studies that did not report on RSV disease in NCHs. We excluded case series and case reports describing clinical presentations attributable to RSV, studies reporting RSV infections only among adults with chronic medical conditions, studies only reporting geriatric medical facility or hospital‐acquired infections, reviews or systematic reviews or scoping reviews (references were hand‐searched), and proceedings from conferences (unless in a peer‐reviewed publication as a full research paper).

1.4 Title and Abstract Screening

At least two reviewers (ROY, SA, MA, FN, PA, and JOBA) screened the titles and abstracts of each study using the Covidence App (©2023). Conflicts resulting from the inclusion and exclusion of studies were resolved through discussion and consensus. Eligible studies were selected for full‐text review.

1.5 Full‐Text Review

At least two reviewers (ROY, SA, MA, FN, PA, and JOBA) screened the full‐text of each selected study for eligibility using the Covidence App (2023). Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were selected for data extraction. Any conflicts regarding inclusion of studies or extracted data were resolved through discussion and consensus. We hand‐searched the reference lists of included papers to identify any relevant missing papers.

1.6 Risk of Bias Assessments and Data Extraction

For each of the selected studies, two reviewers (ROY and SA) independently assessed for risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool for RCTs [14] and the Risk of Bias in Non‐Randomized studies of Exposure (ROBINS‐E) tool for observational studies [15]. Risk of bias plot for RoB 2 was generated using the robvis package in RStudio (version 1.2.5019) on R Software (version 4.1.2) [16]. We extracted relevant data from the selected studies that included the study characteristics, outcome measures, the RSV subtypes where available, risk factors, and control measures. We calculated the RSV incidence/attack rates (IR/AR) from studies that did not directly report these data where necessary.

1.7 Data Analysis

We conducted a descriptive analysis of the data (number and age of NCH residents, date, and location of study), diagnostic tests involved, and the timeframe of RSV assessment (seasonal only, entire year). We could not perform a meta‐analysis due to the high level of heterogeneity in the data between countries, differences in outcome measure reporting, and the smaller number of cases reported in some studies.

2 Results

We screened the titles and abstracts of 18,690 studies of which 31 were eligible for full‐text assessment. We identified an additional article for full‐text screening from a hand search of reference lists of the selected studies. Of the 32 articles, 20 were eligible for inclusion in the study (Figure 1). Studies were published between April 18, 2000, and March 1, 2023. Of the 20 included studies, nine were conducted in the United States [17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25], two in Canada [26, 27], one each in Japan [28], Netherlands [29], England [30], Czech Republic [31], Portugal [32], Hong Kong [33], France [34], Slovenia [35], and one multi‐country (Belgium, Estonia, Germany, Spain, United Kingdom, and United States) [11].

FIGURE 1 PRISMA flowchart outlining the search records of RSV disease in NCHs.

2.1 Overview of Study Characteristics

The total number of nursing home residents studied in the 20 included studies combined was 10,114 (range 42 to 1459, mean 423) from over 694 NCHs. The mean age of the study participants was between 67.6 and 85 years and median age between 73 and 88 years. There were seven studies reporting RSV disease attack rates [17, 18, 19, 26, 28, 29, 30] and 13 studies reporting RSV incidence rates, incidence proportion, or prevalence estimates [11, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 27, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35].

2.2 RSV Disease Attack Rates in NCHs

Of the seven studies reporting RSV disease attack rates, there were three retrospective cohort, three prospective cohort and one mixed (prospective and retrospective) cohort study. The mean age of NCH residents in these studies ranged from 68.1 to 85 years. The number of NCH residents at risk of RSV infection ranged from 10 to 1459, and laboratory‐confirmed RSV cases ranged between 4 and 24. The overall RSV AR ranged from 6.7% to 47.6% (Table 1).

TABLE 1 Description of published studies reporting RSV disease occurrence in NCHs.

Source (author/year)	Country	Study design	Study period	Age, mean (SD)/median (IQR)	No. of residents	No. of infected	Incidence a /attack rate (IR/AR)/prevalence	Mode of viral confirmation	
Najeros Pérez et al., 2023 [11]	Europe and United States	Prospective cohort	Season 1 (October 2019 to March 2020)	82.7 (8.5)	664	15	IR: 4785 cases per 100,000 person‐years (95% CI: 2258–10,141)

AR: 2.26%

	RT‐PCR	
Season 2 (October 2020 to June 2021)	83.4 (8.4)	494	1	IR: 291 cases per 100,000 person‐years (95% CI: 40–2097)

AR: 0.20%

	
Barrett et al., 2020 [17]	United States	Retrospective cohort	January 24 to February 24, 2019	73 (IQR: 47–89)	42	20	AR: 47.6%	Rapid RT‐PCR	
Caram et al., 2009 [18]	United States	Prospective cohort	January 29 to February 26, 2008	68.1 (16.8)	52	7	AR: 13.5%	Culture, direct fluorescent antibody test, RT‐PCR	
Spires et al., 2017 [19]	United States	Prospective cohort	January 5–21, 2015	Mean 81.3	41	6	AR: 42.9% b	RT‐PCR	
Checovich et al., 2020 [20]	United States	Randomized control trial	2016–2017, 2017–2018, 2018–2019	83.7 (9.9)	497	38	Incidence: 7.6%	RT‐PCR	
Ellis et al., 2003 [21]	United States	Retrospective cohort	August 1995 to July 1999	≥65	381 (Nursing homes) 81,885‐person years	1105	RSV‐positive tests: 1120 per week per 100,000 (in influenza season); 960 per week per 100,000 (in RSV season); 30 per week per 100,000 (in non‐winter‐viral season)	Culture, antigen‐positive test	
Falsey et al., 2008 [22]	United States	Observational	1998–2000	85.3 (67–102)	452	25 out of 382 tested	Incidence: 6.5% c	Enzyme immunoassay	
McElhaney et al., 2004 [23]	United States	Randomized control trial	Study 1 (February to March 2000)	Study 1: 81.3 (8.2)	Study 1: 89	Study 1: 0	Study 2 incidence: 2.8%	Culture	
Study 2 (December 2000 to March 2001)	Study 2:83.6 (6.5)	Study 2:109	Study 2:3	
O'Neil et al., 2019 [24]	United States	Prospective cohort	December 2, 2015, to April 30, 2016	67.6 (1.1)	105	2	Incidence: 2.0%	rRT‐PCR	
Diaz‐Decaro et al., 2018 [25]	United States	Prospective cohort	May to July 2015	Range: 65–85	832	1	Prevalence: 5.5% d	Multiplex nested PCR	
Loeb et al., 2000 [26]	Canada	Mixed prospective and retrospective cohort	July 1, 1993 to June 30, 1996	Mean 85	75	5	AR: 6.7% f	Immunofluorescence microscopy	
Johnstone et al., 2014 [27]	Canada	Prospective cohort	September and October 2009, 2010, and 2011	86 (80–90)	1072	12 out of 87 symptomatic residents	Incidence: 14% e	Multiplex respiratory viral panel	
Doi et al., 2014 [28]	Japan	Retrospective cohort	Mid‐January 2014	81.5 (8.5)	99	24	AR: 24%	RT‐PCR	
Meijer et al., 2013 [29]	Netherlands	Prospective cohort	December 2012	Mean 84	10	4	AR: 38%	PCR	
Yip et al., 2018 [30]	England	Retrospective observational	July 28, 2016, to March 27, 2017	Not specified	1459	13 RSV cases from 168 individual ILI outbreaks g	AR: 20.5% (95% CI: 15.4–23.1) g	Microbiological	
Beran et al., 2021 [31]	Czech Republic	Prospective cohort	Season 1 (August 1, 2003, to May 31, 2004)	80.46 (7.04)	1249	0	h IR (ARI): 4582 cases (95% CI: 3259–6264) per 100,000 person‐years; IR (LRTI): 3040 cases (95% CI: 1986–4454) per 100,000 person‐years	PCR	
Season 2 (August 1, 2004, to May 20, 2005)	81.20 (6.61)	1277	
Chasqueira et al., 2018 [32]	Portugal	Prospective cohort	November 2013 to April 2014	Male: 83 (9.2) Female: 85 (7.2)	1022	5	Incidence: 0.5%	PCR	
Hui et al., 2008 [33]	Hong Kong	Prospective cohort	April 2006 to March 2007	84.9 (8.9)	771	21	Incidence: 9.3% i	Rapid multiplex nested PCR and paired serology	
Masse et al., 2017 [34]	France	Cross‐sectional	2013/2014–2016/2017 (December 1, 2013, to April 16, 2017)	88 (63–103)	107	3	Incidence: 2.8%	RT‐qPCR	
Ursic et al., 2016 [35]	Slovenia	Prospective cohort	December 5, 2011, to May 31, 2012	84 (79.8–88.8)	90	5 out of 56 residents	Incidence: 8.9% j	PCR	
a Incidence rates are reported per person‐years, attack rates, incidence proportion, and prevalence in %.

b RSV and/or human metapneumovirus (HMPV) were identified in 30 of the residents through epidemiologic investigation. Laboratory testing was done for 14 residents out of 30 and 6 were positive for RSV. The RSV attack rate was calculated from the laboratory‐confirmed cases [19].

c A total of 617 residents were enrolled of which 452 completed the study and 382 had paired sera at baseline and 53 weeks for viral analysis [22].

d Symptomatic ARIs in 52 residents; 10 of 52 residents had detectable viral pathogen; RSV was confirmed in one resident from one of three NCHs. The total period prevalence was stratified per NCH facility and target pathogen [25].

e All RSV cases were reported in a single year [26].

f A total of 269 nasopharyngeal swaps were obtained from 233 symptomatic residents. Nasopharyngeal swaps positive for respiratory viruses were 87 (symptomatic residents) of which 12 were RSV [27].

g Total of 168 viral respiratory outbreaks of which RSV accounted for 13 cases. The median RSV cases per outbreak was 9 cases (IQR: 6–11). The overall number of individuals infected by RSV in the 13 outbreaks was not provided. The attack rate was reported for residents and excluded staff [30].

h Incidence rate of RSV‐positive acute respiratory infection (ARI) and lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) per 100,000 person‐years [31].

i A total of 259 episodes of influenza‐like illnesses (ILI) in 194 residents. Nasopharyngeal aspirates were done in 256 out of 259 episodes. The total count of pathogens (bacteria and viruses) isolated throughout the episodes was 227 of which 21 RSV cases were confirmed [33].

j Of 90 residents there were 56 ARIs, 34 were confirmed for respiratory viruses and five RSV cases were identified [35].

2.3 RSV Disease Incidence Rates, Incidence Proportion, and Prevalence Estimates in NCHs

Of the 13 studies reporting incidence rates, incidence proportion, and prevalence estimates, there were two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 11 observational studies: nine prospective cohort studies, one retrospective cohort study, and one cross‐sectional study (Table 1). The study participants ranged from 90 to 1249 residents. The mean age was between 67.6 and 84.9 years whilst the median age was between 84 and 88 years.

The overall RSV disease incidence proportion ranged widely from 0.5 to 14%. Two studies reported RSV‐positive ARI which ranged between 4582 (95% CI: 3259–6264) per 100,000 person‐years [31] and 4785 (95% CI: 2258–10,141) per 100,000 person‐years [16]. RSV‐positive lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) episode incidence rate was 3040 (95% CI: 1986–4454) cases per 100, 000 person‐years [31].

Ellis et al., report that weekly RSV‐positive tests varied per season—1120 per week per 100,000 person‐years (in influenza season), 960 per week per 100,000 person‐years (in RSV season), and 30 per week per 100,000 person‐years (in a non‐winter season) [21]. In this study, RSV season excluded dates classified as influenza season and in each of the seasons, the dates of influenza season were completely overlapped by RSV season, which would cause substantial underestimation of RSV cases.

2.4 RSV‐Associated Case Fatality

Overall case fatality rate ranged from 7.7% to 23.1% [18, 19, 30, 31, 32, 33] (Table 2). Only one study reported population‐based mortality rates [21]. In this study, the reported mortality rate among non‐high‐risk groups was 1630 (95% CI: 1070–2200) per 100,000 person‐years, whilst high‐risk groups had a mortality rate of 1730 (95% CI: 1150–2330) per 100,000 person‐years [21] (Table 2). High‐risk groups were defined as all persons and events following a medical encounter with diagnostic or procedure codes indicating asthma/chronic lung disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic heart disease, cancer/immunocompromised, human immunodeficiency virus, and chronic renal or liver disease or filled prescriptions for the treatment of these conditions. Non–high‐risk groups included all other persons and events [21].

TABLE 2 Case definition, RSV‐associated hospitalization, length of stay, and case fatality.

Source (author/year)	Case definition	No. of hospitalization (%)	Length of stay (days)	No. of fatality (%)	
Najeros Pérez et al., 2023 [11]	An ARI was defined as a respiratory infection when at least 2 of the following signs and/or symptoms occurred together: rhinorrhea/nasal congestion, sore throat, cough (new or increasing), sputum production (new or increasing), shortness of breath or dyspnea (new or increasing), wheezing (new or increasing), or feverishness or fever (temperature ≥37.5°C). Confirmed RSV‐ARI was defined as an ARI episode with detection of RSV by RT‐PCR in a combined nasal and throat swab.	0	0	0	
Barrett et al., 2020 [17]	Community living center resident who developed upper respiratory symptoms (rhinorrhea and cough) and tested positive for RSV.	4 (20%)	1–9 days	0 (0%)	
Caram et al., 2009 [18]	Three respiratory symptoms (new‐onset or increase in chronic cough, new‐onset or increase in sputum, dyspnea, chills, headache, myalgias, malaise, sore throat, or nasal congestion) or two respiratory symptoms and temperature of 38.01°C or greater.	Not specified	Not specified	1 (14.3%)	
Spires et al., 2017 [19]	Symptoms: Fever ≥37.8°C (100.0°F), cough, dyspnea, rhinorrhea or sneezing, hoarseness, congestion, fatigue, and malaise.	Not specified	Not specified	5 (16.7%)	
Checovich et al., 2020 [20]	Characterized by any 2 of the following symptoms: cough, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea/runny nose, sore throat, or fever.	Not specified	Not specified	Not specified	
Ellis et al., 2003 [21]	Not defined	No high risk: 600 (190–1000) per 100,000 person‐years; High‐risk: 1140 (350–1930) per 100,000 person‐years	Not specified	No high risk: 1603 (1070‐2200) per 100,000 person‐years; High risk: 1730 (1150–2330) per 100,000 person‐years	
Falsey et al., 2008 [22]	Respiratory tract infections were categorized according to standard definitions and included common cold, influenza‐like illness, pharyngitis, otitis media, sinusitis (defined as upper respiratory infection (URI)) and acute bronchitis and pneumonia (defined as LRI).	Not specified	Not specified	Not specified	
McElhaney et al., 2004 [23]	The new onset of two symptoms: one respiratory symptom (cough, sore throat, nasal or sinus congestion, or runny nose) and one additional respiratory symptom or one constitutional symptom (feverishness, chills/sweats, myalgia, fatigue, headache, poor endurance, or increased shortness of breath).	Not specified	Not specified	Not specified	
O'Neil et al., 2019 [24]	Fever ≥37.3°C (99.1°F), headache, sore throat, shortness of breath, chills, muscle and/or joint pain, coughing, wheezing, fatigue, congestion, or runny nose, or change of mental status or confusion.	Not specified	Not specified	Not specified	
Diaz‐Decaro et al., 2018 [25]	Clinical symptoms suggestive of influenza‐like illness (ILI), that is, fever, congestion, rhinorrhea, cough (with or without sputum production), shortness of breath, or other pulmonary complaints (pleurisy and wheezing)	Not specified	Mean: 60 days a	Not specified	
Loeb et al., 2000 [26]	Upper respiratory tract infection was defined by the presence of at least 2 of the following signs or symptoms: runny nose or sneezing; nasal congestion; sore throat, hoarseness, or difficulty swallowing; dry cough; and cervical lymphadenopathy. Lower respiratory tract infection was defined by the presence of at least 3 of the following: new or increased cough; new or increased sputum production; fever (temperature >38°C); pleuritic chest pain; new or increased findings on chest examination; and one of the following: new or increased shortness of breath, a respiratory rate of more than 25 breaths/min, or worsening mental or functional status. Pneumonia was defined by the presence of compatible radiological findings and at least 2 of the above symptoms or signs.	Not specified	Not specified	0 (0%)	
Johnstone et al., 2014 [27]	Fever (≥38 C), worsening cough, nasal congestion, sore throat, headache, sinus problems, muscle aches, fatigue, ear ache or infection, chills, not otherwise explained by an alternative diagnosis	Not specified	Not specified	Not specified	
Doi et al., 2014 [28]	Not defined	Not specified	Not specified	Not specified	
Meijer et al., 2013 [29]	Not defined	Not specified	Not specified	Not specified	
Yip et al., 2018 [30]	According to Public Health England guideline	3 care homes reporting admissions	Not specified	3 (23.1%) care homes	
Berran et al., 2021 [31]	ARI: Patients requiring medical attention and presenting ≥ 4 of the following signs/symptoms: nasal congestion, sore throat, cough, sputum, dyspnea, rhinorrhea, wheezing, rales, rhonchi, and fever (axillary temperature ≥38.0°C in season 1 and ≥37.5°C in season 2); LRTI: Diagnosis of bronchitis, broncho‐pneumonia or pneumonia confirmed by X‐ray.	4 (10.3%)	Median: 18.5 (14.0–37.0)	3 (7.7%)	
Chasqueira et al., 2018 [32]	Sudden onset of symptoms, at least one respiratory symptom (cough, sore throat, shortness of breath, and coryza), and a clinician's judgment that the illness was due to an infection.	Not specified	Not specified	1(20%)	
Hui et al., 2008 [33]	Clinical presentation consisting of fever >37.8°C or an acute deterioration in physical or mental ability, plus either new onset of one or more respiratory symptoms or an acute worsening of a chronic condition involving respiratory symptoms.	Not specified	Not specified	3 (12%)	
Masse et al., 2017 [34]	Person developing sudden onset of any constitutional symptom, in addition to any respiratory sign.	Not specified	Not specified	Not specified	
Ursic et al., 2016 [35]	Upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) or lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI).	Not specified	Not specified	Not specified	
a Relates to all residents who tested for respiratory tract infection and are not specific to RSV.

2.5 RSV Subtype

Five of 20 studies reported frequency of RSV subtypes (i.e., RSV A/B). RSV‐A alone infection was identified in one case [11]. Both RSV‐A and RSV‐B infections were reported in two studies—RSV‐A was identified in the majority of the cases: 28/39 cases (71.8%) and in 10/12 cases (83.3%) [27]. For the other two studies, RSV‐B alone was identified in 4/4 cases (100%) [29], and in 6/14 (42.9%) laboratory‐tested cases [19].

2.6 Clinical Characteristics and Chronic Medical Conditions Among RSV Cases

The medical history and clinical characteristics of RSV disease case‐patients included current or a history of smoking, mobility limitations (bed or wheelchair‐bound), clinical characteristics (fever [37.7°C–40.0°C], wheezing, rhinorrhea, sore throat, malaise, change in sputum production, new or increased cough, myalgia, hoarseness, and sneezing), pleuritic chest, and pneumonia [17, 18, 26, 28, 29]. Tube feeding [33] and polypharmacy (five medications or more) [27] were other patient characteristics described among individuals with RSV‐positive tests. Common chronic medical conditions reported among RSV cases compared with non‐cases were (congestive) heart failure, COPD, respiratory allergy, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, kidney dysfunction, malignancy, dementia, cerebrovascular accident, ischemic heart disease, coronary artery disease, end‐stage renal disease, and multiple comorbidities resulting in a Charlson comorbidity score greater than 6.5.

2.7 Risk Factors for RSV Infection

One study [31] reported risk factors for RSV infection and these included being a female, odds ratio (OR): 4.98 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.62–15.33); chronic heart failure, OR: 2.31 (1.13–4.73), and diabetes requiring insulin, OR: 9.82 (2.20–43.90).

2.8 RSV Hospitalization and Length of Stay

Two studies [17, 30] reported RSV cases that required hospitalization (Table 2). Four out of 20 (20%) and 3/13 (23.1%) RSV cases required hospitalization, respectively [17, 30]. One study reported that 4/39 RSV cases (10.3%) required hospitalization [31] (Table 2). Among residents classified as not high risk, the RSV hospitalization rate was 600 (95% CI: 190–1000) per 100,000 person‐years and the hospitalization rate among residents classified as high‐risk was 1140 (95% CI: 350–1930) per 100,000 person‐years [21].

The overall length of stay in the hospital was 1 to 9 days [17] and a median of 18.5 (IQR: 14–37 days) [31] (Table 2). One study reported a mean length of stay of 60 days, but this related to all residents testing positive for any viral respiratory tract infection and not specific to RSV [25].

2.9 Diagnostic Tests

The diagnostic tests for RSV included a combination of rapid real‐time PCR, and reverse transcription PCR (RT‐PCR), as well as other low‐sensitivity testing modalities such as viral culture, direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) test, and immunofluorescence microscopy (IFM). Two studies used either only IFM or relied on microbiological evidence of pathogens such as culture [26, 30]. In some settings, RSV and other viral pathogens were confirmed by either only or a combination of PCR (including reverse transcription quantitative PCR [RT‐qPCR]), viral culture, antigen‐positive tests, enzyme immunoassay, rapid multiplex nested PCR, and paired serology.

2.10 Management and Control Measures

NCHs followed specific management and control protocols and the measures deployed across the NCHs were similar in some instances. Management and control measures included the relocation/cohorting of positive patients into single or double occupancy rooms, halting new admissions and group activities, daily environmental rounds, and high audits for hand hygiene [17]. Isolation and cohorting of infected and directly exposed residents involved the creation of distance between separate units [29]. Moving each symptomatic patient to a private room or to a room housing another case, all cases were placed on contact and droplet precautions [19]. Affected units were closed to new admissions and transfers [30]. Loeb et al. reported that treatment and transfer decisions for individual cases were at the discretion of the resident physician. Infection control measures were implemented during events considered as outbreaks according to the policies and procedures of each institution and the local public health departments [26]. One study reported that no control measure was deployed and no isolation or restriction of positive cases occurred [18]. The use of intravenous antibiotics, intravenous fluids, oxygen supplementation, and extensive involvement of allied health staff were used in managing RSV disease patients [33].

3 Discussion

We systematically reviewed studies regarding RSV infection among older adults in NCHs. Our study included 20 studies and present the most comprehensive assessment of the burden of RSV infection in NCHs completed to date, with 13 additional studies compared with a 2019 review [36]. While available data on the frequency and associated morbidity and mortality of RSV infection among NCH residents are largely heterogeneous and limited, including in some cases by use of low sensitivity testing modalities, it is nevertheless clear that NCH residents experience a high risk of illness, frequent hospitalization, and high mortality, indicating that preventive interventions, such as RSV vaccination, should be considered for this high‐risk population.

Whilst we found high variability of ARs in the studies included in this review, most studies showed that NCH residents have substantially higher RSV ARs than what has been reported in older adults. It is reported from previous studies that RSV ARs in NCHs could be 5%–10% per year with significant rates of pneumonia and deaths [37]. ARs in the studies included in this review were higher than annual incidence rates but both were at least several fold higher than published rates among community dwelling older adults. ARs reached 47.6%, which is about 5.3–6.6 times higher than ARs of 8.9% [38] and 4.2%–7.2% [39] reported in previous prospective cohorts of community‐dwelling older adults. A previous systematic review of burden of RSV among older adults in long‐term care including seven studies covering 1984 to 2016 found that RSV incidence proportions ranged from 1.1% to 13.5% [36]. The annual RSV disease incidence proportion in our review reached 14%, which is about twice the reported incidence in community‐dwelling older adults [39]. Seasonal RSV infection rate in a NCH was found to be higher in the influenza season (1120 cases per week per 100,000) compared with the RSV season (960 cases per week per 100,000) [21]; however, we observed inconsistencies in the reporting of cases where influenza and RSV seasons overlapped. RSV season excluded dates that overlapped with influenza season implying that more RSV cases were assigned to influenza season; therefore, the reported higher RSV infection rate in the influenza season may not be accurate in this population [40]. Alternatively, this may be driven by viral pathogen surveillance being predominately focused on influenza and thus testing is often increased during this time period.

Additionally, higher proportions of adults in long‐term care facilities than community‐dwelling adults were reported to be living with current chronic medical conditions—COPD, diabetes, vascular disorders, cardiac disorders, renal and urinary disorders, neoplasm, and respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders [11]. Our systematic review documents that these chronic medical conditions are commonly reported among RSV cases compared with non‐RSV cases in NCHs.

Few studies reported RSV‐associated hospital admissions among NCH residents; among those that did, we found high rates of hospital admission and overall length of stay. The rates of hospital admission found among non‐high‐risk and high‐risk residents in our study (600 vs. 1140 per 100,000) were higher than rates reported from a pooled estimate of 347 (203–595) per 100,000 adults aged ≥65 years in high‐income countries after adjusting for under‐ascertainment [10]. Among the hospitalized RSV‐ARI cases, we found longer hospital lengths of stay in NCH residents (median: 18.5 days) compared with community‐dwelling older adults hospitalized with RSV (median: 9 days) [41]. Case‐fatality rates in NCHs were as high as 23.1%. Pooled RSV in‐hospital CFR estimates among community dwelling older adults in high‐income countries were 6.1% and 7.1% [10, 42], or 1/3 to 1/4 the CFR of non‐hospitalized NCH residents.

Similar to disease occurrence, this greatly increased risk of death in NCH residents likely reflects the underlying health of older adults living in NCHs, including greater comorbidities and advanced age. NCH residents are generally frail with reduced or impaired physical activity [43, 44] and may experience higher multimorbidity, increased disability, and disease complexity compared with the general population [4, 13, 43]. Reilev et al. report that most NCH residents in Norway had more than one chronic condition. In this study, the number of comorbidities a resident had was associated with low quality of life (QoL) scores, and those with multiple comorbidity (≥5 conditions) showed the greatest impact on their well‐being [45]. Other contributing factors may exist such as greater intensity of exposure in a relatively confined setting of NCHs.

Our study further identified risk factors—being a female, chronic heart failure and, diabetes requiring insulin—for RSV infection in this population. Similar risk factors for RSV‐associated hospital admissions and severe outcomes, especially underlying cardiopulmonary and metabolic conditions have been reported among community‐dwelling [46, 47].

The burden of RSV may be largely underestimated in older adults due to low levels of testing or diagnostic limitations such as viral culture and antigen detection insensitivity due to low viral titers [3, 37, 40], which like the results in reported rates being half of the true incidence even when comprehensive nasal/nasopharyngeal swab testing is conducted [2, 10]. In frail NCH residents, testing may also be limited for several reasons including the inability to obtain clinical specimens, which may potentially lead to an underestimation of the RSV burden. Further, there are multiple additional potential sources of underestimation of the incidence of RSV disease, such as the timing of surveillance and case definition used [40, 48]. Testing methods in the included studies were likely low sensitivity, which would imply that ARs and IRs were substantially greater than reported.

The risk of bias assessments of the included studies showed that the RCTs had an overall low risk of bias. However, there were some concerns about missing outcome data and the selection of the reported results, and a high risk of bias related to the measurement of outcomes (RSV infection/case positivity) (Figure S1). RCTs primarily focused on diagnostic tool/testing efficiency. For the observational studies, two studies showed an overall high risk of bias, four studies had some concerns overall and 12 studies showed a low risk of bias (Table S1). Most of the observational studies had concerns about the measurement of the outcome. We found that some studies did not clearly report missing data and the selection of the reported results in some studies was confusing. For instance, when RSV and influenza seasons overlapped, RSV cases were assigned to the influenza season. In one study, this led to higher counts of RSV cases in the influenza season than in the RSV season. Although we observed some biases in a few of the included studies, our findings highlight the substantial burden of RSV in NCHs in a high‐risk population and underscore the need to ensure the prevention of RSV infections and outbreaks in NCHs.

It is important to prioritize this population for RSV prevention and vaccination programs and priority setting. Two RSV vaccines, RSVPreF3‐AS01E and RSVpreF, have been approved for use in older adults aged over 60 years by the Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) in the United States and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) [49, 50, 51]. Post‐marketing surveillance to assess the likely impact of the introduction of RSV immunization on preventing severe infections and hospitalizations in this population will be necessary in the next few years.

4 Conclusion

Data on RSV infection among NCH residents are limited and largely heterogeneous but document a high risk of illness, frequent hospitalization, and high mortality. Preventive interventions, such as RSV vaccination, should be considered for this high‐risk population. Nationally representative epidemiologic studies and NCH‐based viral pathogen surveillance could more precisely assess the burden in NCH residents.

Author Contributions

Richard Osei‐Yeboah: conceptualization, writing – original draft, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, visualization, validation, software. Stephen Amankwah: methodology, formal analysis, data curation, investigation, validation. Elizabeth Begier: funding acquisition, supervision, validation, project administration. Miranda Adedze: investigation, methodology, data curation. Franklin Nyanzu: investigation, methodology, data curation. Pious Appiah: investigation, methodology, data curation. Jochebed Ode Boakye Ansah: investigation, data curation, methodology. Harry Campbell: conceptualization, investigation, supervision, validation, project administration, methodology, resources. Reiko Sato: funding acquisition, supervision, project administration, methodology, resources. Luis Jodar: funding acquisition, validation, supervision, project administration, methodology, resources. Bradford D. Gessner: funding acquisition, validation, supervision, project administration, methodology, resources. Harish Nair: conceptualization, investigation, validation, supervision, project administration, methodology, resources.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Peer Review

The peer review history for this article is available at https://www.webofscience.com/api/gateway/wos/peer‐review/10.1111/irv.70008.

Supporting information

Figure S1: Risk of bias assessments of randomised controlled trials using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool.

Table S1: Risk of bias in non‐randomised studies of exposure (ROBINS‐E) assessment for observational studies.

Data Availability Statement

All the data used in this review are presented.
==== Refs
References

1 J. M. McLaughlin , F. Khan , E. Begier , D. L. Swerdlow , L. Jodar , and A. R. Falsey , “Rates of Medically Attended RSV Among US Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Open Forum Infectious Diseases 9 , no. 7 (2022): ofac300.35873302
2 J. Ramirez , R. Carrico , A. Wilde , et al., “Diagnosis of Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Adults Substantially Increases When Adding Sputum, Saliva, and Serology Testing to Nasopharyngeal Swab RT–PCR,” Infectious Disease and Therapy 12 , no. 6 (2023): 1593–1603.
3 C. Onwuchekwa , L. M. Moreo , S. Menon , et al., “Under‐Ascertainment of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Adults due to Diagnostic Testing Limitations: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Journal of Infectious Diseases 228 (2023): 173–184.36661222
4 R. O. Barker , B. Hanratty , A. Kingston , S. E. Ramsay , and F. E. Matthews , “Changes in Health and Functioning of Care Home Residents Over Two Decades: What Can We Learn From Population‐Based Studies?” Age and Ageing 50 , no. 3 (2021): 921–927.33951152
5 A. T. Borchers , C. Chang , M. E. Gershwin , and L. J. Gershwin , “Respiratory Syncytial Virus‐‐A Comprehensive Review,” Clinical Reviews in Allergy and Immunology 45 , no. 3 (2013): 331–379.23575961
6 N. Haber , “Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Elderly Adults,” Médecine et Maladies Infectieuses 48 , no. 6 (2018): 377–382.29548714
7 H. H. Nam and M. G. Ison , “Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Adults,” BMJ 366 (2019): l5021.31506273
8 M. J. Page , J. E. McKenzie , P. M. Bossuyt , et al., “The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews,” BMJ 372 (2021): n71.33782057
9 R. Osei‐Yeboah , P. Spreeuwenberg , M. Del Riccio , et al., “Estimation of the Number of Respiratory Syncytial Virus–Associated Hospitalizations in Adults in the European Union,” Journal of Infectious Diseases 228 (2023): 1539–1548.37246742
10 Y. Li , D. Kulkarni , E. Begier , et al., “Adjusting for Case Under‐Ascertainment in Estimating RSV Hospitalisation Burden of Older Adults in High‐Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Modelling Study,” Infectious Disease and Therapy 12 , no. 4 (2023): 1137–1149.
11 S. Narejos Pérez , J. M. Ramón Torrell , A. Põder , et al., “Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease Burden in Community‐Dwelling and Long‐Term Care Facility Older Adults in Europe and the United States: A Prospective Study,” Open Forum Infectious Diseases 10 , no. 4 (2023): ofad111.37065988
12 G. Akner , “Analysis of Multimorbidity in Individual Elderly Nursing Home Residents. Development of a Multimorbidity Matrix,” Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 49 , no. 3 (2009): 413–419.19185359
13 K. L. Moore , W. J. Boscardin , M. A. Steinman , and J. B. Schwartz , “Patterns of Chronic Co‐Morbid Medical Conditions in Older Residents of U.S. Nursing Homes: Differences Between the Sexes and Across the Agespan,” Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging 18 , no. 4 (2014): 429–436.
14 J. P. T. Higgins , D. G. Altman , P. C. Gotzsche , et al., “The Cochrane Collaboration's Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias in Randomised Trials,” BMJ 343 , no. oct18 2 (2011): d5928‐d.22008217
15 ROBINS‐E Development Group , Higgins JM , Rooney A , et al., “Risk of Bias in Non‐Randomized Studies ‐ of Exposure (ROBINS‐E). Launch Version, 20 June 2023,” (2023), https://www.riskofbias.info/welcome/robins‐e‐tool.
16 L. A. McGuinness and J. P. T. Higgins , “Risk‐of‐Bias Visualization (Robvis): An R Package and Shiny Web App for Visualizing Risk‐of‐Bias Assessments,” Research Synthesis Methods 12 , no. 1 (2021): 55–61.32336025
17 N. Barrett , L. Bailey , F. Ford , et al., “Respiratory Syncytial Virus Outbreak in a Veterans Affairs Long‐Term Care Facility,” Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice 28 , no. 4 (2020): 200–203.
18 L. B. Caram , J. Chen , E. W. Taggart , et al., “Respiratory Syncytial Virus Outbreak in a Long‐Term Care Facility Detected Using Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction: An Argument for Real‐Time Detection Methods,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 57 , no. 3 (2009): 482–485.19187415
19 S. S. Spires , H. K. Talbot , C. A. Pope , and T. R. Talbot , “Paramyxovirus Outbreak in a Long‐Term Care Facility: The Challenges of Implementing Infection Control Practices in a Congregate Setting,” Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 38 , no. 4 (2017): 399–404.28065183
20 M. M. Checovich , S. Barlow , P. Shult , E. Reisdorf , and J. L. Temte , “Evaluation of Viruses Associated With Acute Respiratory Infections in Long‐Term Care Facilities Using a Novel Method: Wisconsin, 2016–2019,” Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 21 , no. 1 (2020): 29–33.31636034
21 S. E. Ellis , C. S. Coffey , E. F. Mitchel , R. S. Dittus , and M. R. Griffin , “Influenza and Respiratory Syncytial Virus Associated Morbidity and Mortality in the Nursing Home Population,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 51 , no. 6 (2003): 761–767.12757561
22 A. R. Falsey , G. E. Dallal , M. A. Formica , et al., “Long‐Term Care Facilities: A Cornucopia of Viral Pathogens,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 56 , no. 7 (2008): 1281–1285.18557966
23 J. E. McElhaney , S. Gravenstein , S. K. Cole , et al., “A Placebo‐Controlled Trial of a Proprietary Extract of North American Ginseng (CVT‐E002) to Prevent Acute Respiratory Illness in Institutionalized Older Adults,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 52 , no. 1 (2004): 13–19.14687309
24 C. A. O'Neil , L. Kim , M. M. Prill , et al., “Respiratory Viral Surveillance of Healthcare Personnel and Patients at an Adult Long‐Term Care Facility,” Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology 40 , no. 11 (2019): 1309–1312.31551105
25 J. D. Diaz‐Decaro , B. Launer , J. A. McKinnell , et al., “Bayesian Evidence and Epidemiological Implications of Environmental Contamination From Acute Respiratory Infection in Long‐Term Care Facilities,” Epidemiology and Infection 146 , no. 7 (2018): 832–838.29633685
26 M. Loeb , A. McGeer , M. McArthur , R. W. Peeling , M. Petric , and A. E. Simor , “Surveillance for Outbreaks of Respiratory Tract Infections in Nursing Homes,” CMAJ 162 , no. 8 (2000): 1133–1137.10789627
27 J. Johnstone , R. Parsons , F. Botelho , et al., “Immune Biomarkers Predictive of Respiratory Viral Infection in Elderly Nursing Home Residents,” PLoS ONE 9 , no. 9 (2014): e108481.25275464
28 I. Doi , N. Nagata , H. Tsukagoshi , et al., “An Outbreak of Acute Respiratory Infections due to Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus in a Nursing Home for the Elderly in Ibaraki, Japan, 2014,” Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases 67 , no. 4 (2014): 326–328.25056086
29 A. Meijer , P. Overduin , D. Hommel , Y. van Rijnsoever‐Greven , A. Haenen , and M.‐J. Veldman‐Ariesen , “Outbreak of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections in a Nursing Home and Possible Sources of Introduction: The Netherlands, Winter 2012/2013,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 61 , no. 12 (2013): 2230–2268.24329823
30 J. L. Y. Yip , S. Kapadia , A. Ahmed , and S. Millership , “Outbreaks of Influenza‐Like Illness in Care Homes in the East of England: Impact of Variations in Neuraminidase Inhibitor Provision,” Public Health 162 (2018): 98–103.29990618
31 J. Beran , A. Ramirez Villaescusa , R. Devadiga , et al., “Respiratory Syncytial Virus Acute Respiratory Infections in >/= 65‐Year‐Old Adults in Long‐Term Care Facilities in the Czech Republic,” Central European Journal of Public Health 29 , no. 3 (2021): 167–176.34623114
32 M. J. Chasqueira , P. Paixao , M. L. Rodrigues , et al., “Respiratory Infections in Elderly People: Viral Role in a Resident Population of Elderly Care Centers in Lisbon, Winter 2013‐2014,” International Journal of Infectious Diseases 69 (2018): 1–7.29391246
33 D. S. Hui , J. Woo , E. Hui , et al., “Influenza‐Like Illness in Residential Care Homes: A Study of the Incidence, Aetiological Agents, Natural History and Health Resource Utilisation,” Thorax 63 , no. 8 (2008): 690–697.18250183
34 S. Masse , L. Capai , and A. Falchi , “Epidemiology of Respiratory Pathogens Among Elderly Nursing Home Residents With Acute Respiratory Infections in Corsica, France, 2013‐2017,” BioMed Research International 2017 (2017): 1423718.29392127
35 T. Ursic , N. G. Miksic , L. Lusa , F. Strle , and M. Petrovec , “Viral Respiratory Infections in a Nursing Home: A Six‐Month Prospective Study,” BMC Infectious Diseases 16 , no. 1 (2016): 637.27814689
36 A. Childs , A. R. Zullo , N. R. Joyce , et al., “The Burden of Respiratory Infections Among Older Adults in Long‐Term Care: A Systematic Review,” BMC Geriatrics 19 , no. 1 (2019): 210.31382895
37 A. R. Falsey and E. E. Walsh , “Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Adults,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews 13 , no. 3 (2000): 371–384.10885982
38 A. R. Falsey , P. A. Hennessey , M. A. Formica , C. Cox , and E. E. Walsh , “Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Elderly and High‐Risk Adults,” New England Journal of Medicine 352 , no. 17 (2005): 1749–1759.15858184
39 K. Korsten , N. Adriaenssens , S. Coenen , et al., “Burden of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Community‐Dwelling Older Adults in Europe (RESCEU): An International Prospective Cohort Study,” European Respiratory Journal 57 , no. 4 (2021): 2002688.33060153
40 M. H. Rozenbaum , J. Judy , D. Tran , K. Yacisin , S. K. Kurosky , and E. Begier , “Low Levels of RSV Testing Among Adults Hospitalized for Lower Respiratory Tract Infection in the United States,” Infectious Disease and Therapy 12 , no. 2 (2023): 677–685.
41 P. Loubet , N. Lenzi , M. Valette , et al., “Clinical Characteristics and Outcome of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection Among Adults Hospitalized With Influenza‐Like Illness in France,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection 23 , no. 4 (2017): 253–259.27903461
42 M. Savic , Y. Penders , T. Shi , A. Branche , and J. Y. Pirçon , “Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease Burden in Adults Aged 60 Years and Older in High‐Income Countries: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses 17 , no. 1 (2023): e13031.36369772
43 H. Luo , T. Y. Lum , G. H. Wong , J. S. Kwan , J. Y. Tang , and I. Chi , “Predicting Adverse Health Outcomes in Nursing Homes: A 9‐Year Longitudinal Study and Development of the FRAIL‐Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quick Screening Tool,” Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 16 , no. 12 (2015): 1042–1047.26602760
44 X. Zhang , Q. Dou , W. Zhang , et al., “Frailty as a Predictor of all‐Cause Mortality Among Older Nursing Home Residents: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis,” Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 20 , no. 6 (2019): 657–663. e4.30639171
45 M. Reilev , C. Lundby , J. Jensen , S. P. Larsen , H. Hoffmann , and A. Pottegard , “Morbidity and Mortality Among Older People Admitted to Nursing Home,” Age and Ageing 49 , no. 1 (2019): 67–73.31763682
46 E. Walsh , D. Peterson , and A. Falsey , “Risk Factors for Severe Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Elderly Persons,” Journal of Infectious Diseases. 189 , no. 2 (2004): 233–238.14722887
47 A. Njue , W. Nuabor , M. Lyall , et al., “Systematic Literature Review of Risk Factors for Poor Outcomes Among Adults With Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in High‐Income Countries,” Open Forum Infectious Diseases 10 , no. 11 (2023): ofad513.38033988
48 M. H. Rozenbaum , E. Begier , S. K. Kurosky , et al., “Incidence of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in Older Adults: Limitations of Current Data,” Infectious Disease and Therapy 12 , no. 6 (2023): 1487–1504.
49 J. Wise , “First RSV Vaccine for Older Adults Is Approved in Europe,” BMJ 381 (2023): p978.
50 M. Melgar , A. Britton , L. E. Roper , et al., “Use of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccines in Older Adults: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices — United States, 2023,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 72 , no. 29 (2023): 793–801.37471262
51 K. Kingwell , “RSV Vaccines Score Landmark FDA Approvals,” Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery 22 (2023): 523–525.
