
==== Front
PLOS Glob Public Health
PLOS Glob Public Health
plos
PLOS Global Public Health
2767-3375
Public Library of Science San Francisco, CA USA

10.1371/journal.pgph.0003739
PGPH-D-24-00567
Research Article
Medicine and Health Sciences
Health Care
Health Care Providers
Physicians
People and Places
Population Groupings
Professions
Medical Personnel
Physicians
Medicine and Health Sciences
Mental Health and Psychiatry
Psychological Stress
Biology and Life Sciences
Psychology
Psychological Stress
Social Sciences
Psychology
Psychological Stress
People and places
Geographical locations
Africa
Sierra Leone
People and Places
Population Groupings
Professions
Medical Personnel
Medicine and Health Sciences
Mental Health and Psychiatry
Biology and Life Sciences
Psychology
Emotions
Social Sciences
Psychology
Emotions
Social Sciences
Economics
Finance
Research and Analysis Methods
Research Design
Qualitative Studies
Perceptions of burnout among public sector physicians in Sierra Leone: A qualitative study
Health workers’ perceptions about burnout in Sierra Leone
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3172-2749
Jalloh Mohamed B. Conceptualization Data curation Formal analysis Investigation Methodology Project administration Software Supervision Validation Visualization Writing – original draft Writing – review & editing 1 *
Naveed Asad Methodology Writing – original draft Writing – review & editing 2
Johnson Sylnata A. A. Data curation Formal analysis Investigation Methodology Validation Writing – original draft Writing – review & editing 3
Bah Abdul Karim Data curation Formal analysis Methodology Validation Writing – original draft 4
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7724-7429
Jegede Adesola G. Data curation Formal analysis Validation Writing – original draft 5
Barrie Fatmata B. Data curation Validation Writing – original draft 5
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8686-2776
Virk Amrit Formal analysis Validation Writing – original draft Writing – review & editing 6
Sillah Arthur Conceptualization Methodology Supervision Validation Writing – original draft Writing – review & editing 7
1 Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
2 Division of General Surgery, St Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
3 Sierra Leone Psychiatric Teaching Hospital, Freetown, Sierra Leone
4 University of Sierra Leone Teaching Hospitals Complex, Freetown, Sierra Leone
5 College of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, University of Sierra Leone, Freetown, Sierra Leone
6 School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
7 School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
Robinson Julia Editor
PLOS: Public Library of Science, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

* E-mail: jallom1@mcmaster.ca
16 9 2024
2024
4 9 e000373915 3 2024
28 8 2024
© 2024 Jalloh et al
2024
Jalloh et al
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

In Sierra Leone, physicians face a high risk of burnout due to systemic challenges, with studies suggesting a gap in recognizing and addressing this condition. We explored public-sector physicians’ experiences and perceptions of the organizational structures and characteristics needed to help them thrive in a resource-limited practice setting. We conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 24 public sector physicians across Western Area Urban (Freetown), Bo, Kono, and Kambia districts in Sierra Leone. Thematic content analysis was carried out using both deductive and inductive techniques to generate codes and identify key themes. Physicians in Sierra Leone face multifaceted challenges that significantly impact both healthcare delivery and personal well-being. Our findings reveal that overwhelming workload and stringent schedules contribute to burnout, directly compromising patient care quality. The emotional burden of caring for patients with economic constraints in accessing treatment further exacerbates physician stress. Limited resources, such as insufficient medical supplies and personnel, foster a sense of helplessness among clinicians, leading to detachment and cynicism towards their ability to effect change. In the absence of formal institutional support, physicians often rely on peer support to manage burnout. These challenges collectively undermine physicians’ ability to provide optimal care, as the emotional and physical toll affects their decision-making and engagement with patients. Within Sierra Leone’s resource-constrained healthcare context, systemic reforms are necessary to address the root causes of physician burnout, and to improve patient care. Our findings suggest that implementing formal support structures, including counselling services and mentorship programs, is crucial. Improving working conditions through better resource allocation and infrastructure development is essential. Developing strategies to address the emotional burden of care, including robust training programs, could enhance physician well-being, reduce burnout, and consequently improve the overall quality of patient care in Sierra Leone’s public health sector.

The authors received no specific funding for this work. Data AvailabilityThe full dataset is not made publicly available in a repository due to ethical restrictions. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Sierra Leone Ethics and Scientific Review Committee (SLESRC No.007/012024; email:efoday@mohs.gov.sl). When applying for ethical approval, the authors did not specify that the data would be publicly available in a repository. As part of the written and verbal consent, the authors assured participants that all data would be confidential and that access to the recordings would be restricted to the research team. The authors specified that "some of their words" may be used to report the findings of the study (included in the paper as non-identifiable quotes). However, making all raw data publicly available would be a breach of participants' ethical rights.
Data Availability

The full dataset is not made publicly available in a repository due to ethical restrictions. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Sierra Leone Ethics and Scientific Review Committee (SLESRC No.007/012024; email:efoday@mohs.gov.sl). When applying for ethical approval, the authors did not specify that the data would be publicly available in a repository. As part of the written and verbal consent, the authors assured participants that all data would be confidential and that access to the recordings would be restricted to the research team. The authors specified that "some of their words" may be used to report the findings of the study (included in the paper as non-identifiable quotes). However, making all raw data publicly available would be a breach of participants' ethical rights.
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Burnout is a psychological condition characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a decreased sense of personal accomplishment and can be caused by chronic work-related stress [1]. While it is primarily studied in high-income countries [2–4], it may be more prevalent in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), owing to limited resources and healthcare personnel. A study in Nigeria found that 46% of physicians suffer from burnout due to long working hours, insufficient pay, and unfavourable working conditions [5]. In Ghana, during the COVID-19 pandemic, 21% of the healthcare workers experienced burnout [6].

Burnout among healthcare professionals in Sierra Leone is a critical issue, particularly given the country’s well-documented healthcare challenges [7]. A qualitative study conducted during the Ebola outbreak found that health care workers experienced high levels of stress, emotional exhaustion, and burnout [8]. Furthermore, another study examining public sector healthcare workers’ motivation and retention in Sierra Leone revealed that low wages, poor working conditions, and limited opportunities for professional development contribute to diminished motivation and high attrition rates, which exacerbate burnout [9].

The psychological burden imposed on physicians by societal and systemic expectations significantly affects their ability to maintain professional commitment and personal well-being [10]. Symptoms of burnout are often mistaken for general work-related stress, highlighting a gap in the understanding and recognition of this issue [11]. This discrepancy suggests a lack of familiarity with burnout, underscoring the need for educational interventions to bridge the knowledge gap.

Organizational structure and characteristics are crucial for addressing physician burnout. Mitigating burnout should be integral to strategies aimed at improving health care systems [12]. Effective organizational strategies include locally developed modifications to clinical work processes [13]. Factors such as understaffing, lack of resources, difficult work schedules, inadequate job security, and poor salaries in public hospitals contribute significantly to burnout [14].

The impact of physician burnout extends beyond professional performance to personal life, leading to issues such as depression, suicidal ideation, substance abuse, and reduced work hours [15]. Moreover, burnout affects families, with spouses of burnout physicians experiencing secondary emotional trauma [16]. Addressing physician burnout is crucial not only for the well-being of healthcare professionals, but also for the effective functioning of healthcare systems.

In this study, we explored public sector physicians’ experiences of burnout and their perceptions of the organizational structures and characteristics needed to help them thrive in a resource-limited practice setting. Understanding these perspectives is vital, not only for enhancing the well-being of healthcare professionals but also for informing policy actions and improving healthcare delivery systems.

Methods

Study setting

Sierra Leone, located on the west coast of Africa, is home to approximately 7.7 million people and had a Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita of US$1663 in 2018 (Purchasing Power Parity constant 2017 international $) [17]. More than half of the population lives below the poverty line, with an average life expectancy of 51 years at birth [17].

The country has a three-tier public healthcare system consisting of peripheral health units, 21 hospitals at the district level, and three specialist hospitals for referral cases. Furthermore, there are 45 private clinics and 27 private hospitals, the majority of which are situated in the capital city of Freetown [17].

This study was conducted across four districts in Sierra Leone: Freetown (Western Area Urban), Bo (Southern province), Kono (Eastern province), and Kambia (Northwestern province). Freetown and Bo are two of the most densely populated out of the country’s 16 districts. The country has fewer than 500 doctors including fewer than 100 specialists and consultants. A majority of these health professionals are concentrated in urban areas [9].

Study design

This is an exploratory qualitative study employing in-depth structured interviews with 24 participants between April 1, 2022 and July 31, 2022. This study was designed through a series of discussions with research team members to ensure relevance to the larger project goals while retaining elements to support pragmatic analysis [18]. We adopted a pragmatic approach involving both deductive and inductive elements. However, we did not aim to produce a formal and generalizable theory. Instead, our study adopted a constructivist perspective, acknowledging that any analysis is shaped by the specific context of time, place, and situation [19]. We reported the study methods and results according to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) guidelines [20].

Sampling

Participants were recruited purposively through maximum variation (mixture of men/women and career stages [house officers, medical officers, registrars, and various work regions]) to include those with first-hand knowledge and experience of service provision within public healthcare facilities in Sierra Leone. All the participants were over 18 years of age.

The interviews were conducted using predeveloped English interview guides. Two members of the study team, MBJ and either AKB or SAAJ – all of whom are medical doctors trained in qualitative interview methods – conducted each interview. One member led the interview while the other took notes. All interviews complied with the principle of informed consent, were audio-recorded, and lasted an average of 40 minutes.

The data sampling and collection process were carried out in collaboration with local physicians (AKB and SAAJ) and medical students (AGJ and FBB) who recruited participants and facilitated the interviews. We recruited a diverse sample of doctors from various departments, regions, and levels of experience (Table 1).

10.1371/journal.pgph.0003739.t001 Table 1 Characteristics of study participants.

Characteristic	Category	Total N (%)	
Sex	Female	12 (50.0)	
	Male	12 (50.0)	
Age range (years)	26–30	10 (41.7)	
	31–35	9 (37.5)	
	36–40	4 (16.7)	
	>40	1 (4.2)	
Designation	House officer (intern)	5 (20.8)	
	Medical officer	11 (45.8)	
	Registrar (resident)	5 (20.8)	
	Specialist	2 (8.3)	
	Consultant physician	1 (4.2)	
Location	Freetown	16 (66.7)	
	Kambia	2 (8.3)	
	Bo	3 (12.5)	
	Kono	3 (12.5)	

We ensured the trustworthiness of the data by adhering to health research standards of credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability [21]. To ensure credibility, long-term contacts with participants were maintained, extending up to a year when needed, to seek post-interview clarifications. Moreover, our research team was comprised of experienced researchers who collaboratively developed and fine-tuned the interview guide. Involving local researchers helped tailor data collection and analysis to the setting, ensuring context-sensitive questions and terminology. This enhanced the sense of study ownership among participants. The involvement of local researchers also helped balance power dynamics during the interviews, considering influencing social factors such as gender and work experience. With a local researcher present, participants were more at ease in discussing contentious or sensitive issues [22].

Data analysis

Data analysis was informed by a general pragmatic approach, aligning emerging themes grounded in the data with pre-determined focal areas relevant to the overarching study objectives [18]. The audio recordings were transcribed verbatim into Microsoft Word and then imported into NVIVO software (version 12) to facilitate data analysis.

Two authors (MBJ and AKB) initially coded the transcripts independently, thereby forming a data framework featuring emerging themes and subthemes. Multiple strategies were used to enhance the validation of the data interpreted [19]. As we progressed with the coding, connections between categories emerged, facilitating a more theoretical coding approach. This method, paired with ongoing comparison, enabled a transition from descriptive to conceptual analysis. Consequently, we were able to construct a framework that guided further data sampling and coding, which enhanced our understanding of emerging themes and data saturation [23]. Efforts were made to check for ‘deviant cases’, which could potentially contradict the emerging themes. Finally, the data framework and draft narrative were shared with the co-authors, including those involved in data collection and the lead investigator to check for alignment with the study objectives, and collectively reviewed over several iterations.

Participant and public involvement statement

The study design, conduct, and reporting did not involve participants or the public due to unforeseen delays and time constraints. However, we are considering a higher level of public and stakeholder engagement in disseminating the research findings.

Ethical considerations

This study was approved and granted ethical clearance from the Sierra Leone Ethics and Scientific Review Committee (SLESRC No.007/012024). All participants gave their written informed consent before participating in the study. We ensured proper storage and management of the data. The recordings were deleted from the original devices and saved in password-protected files on both the computers and external hard drives. The transcripts and field notes were also deidentified and saved in a secure, password-protected file on both the computers and external hard drives.

Results

Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of all participants included in the analysis for this study. A total of 24 interviews were conducted across four districts in Sierra Leone, with an equal distribution of male and female participants. The majority of participants (41.7%) were between the ages of 26 and 30. Medical officers comprised the largest group of participants interviewed (45.8%), followed by house officers (interns) (20.8%), and registrars (residents) (20.8%). The majority of interviews were conducted in Freetown (66.7%) (Table 1).

Our study revealed several unique themes, sequentially discussed in the sections that follow:

Workload and work schedule

Many clinicians reported that excess workload and tight work schedules had an impact on them. This was not merely an issue of personal wellness, but it extends to the quality of patient care and the overall efficacy of healthcare systems. One resident expressed:

"Well, it’s huge, really, because we are charged with lot of responsibilities. Especially when we are on call. We have to clerk every patient that comes to the hospital in detail. Make sure we get treatment plans for them, review them throughout the day, make sure they are okay. And then when consultants come back, we have to review the patient meaning consultants make corrections. It’s very hectic, when you’re on call, it gets worse because you have to stay in the hospital for about two to three days, depending on how the call last…. You hardly sleep because at any time when you wake up in the middle of the night you see patients, it’s very hectic.”–(Male, PB006)

A house officer added:

“It’s a busy job, yes, it is and yes there are times that I feel overburdened, there are times I feel like catching a break, feel like am hungry, but you can’t get up to go and eat because you feel like you haven’t done yet. At times I feel overburdened because it’s not an easy job and there are not enough people to do it, yes that happen.–(Female, PB002)

This underscores the relentlessness of physicians’ work life and the detrimental impact it can have on their wellbeing. The burnout issue is intensified by understaffing and increased workload, as articulated by a medical officer from a secondary facility in Freetown:

“…there are four doctors in the facility, two work in Paediatrics, two in Obstetrics and Gynaecology and there is one who rotates in all departments between the outpatient and female medical ward. It’s a hospital that focuses mainly on maternal and under five care but we have a female medical ward and an outpatient, so whenever you are not working in Paediatrics, you are rotating in these departments, so like basically you are working most of the time like the ward as to covered 24/7 so even if you are not at the hospital they will call you and say, so even if you are not working, you are working so it’s feel as if you are working all the time.”–(Female, PB017)

Challenges in patient care and resource constraints

Physicians highlighted the difficulty of dealing with patients who cannot afford treatment or necessary tests, the limitations of the local healthcare system, and the emotional strain of witnessing patients’ suffering. The severe poverty faced by many, combined with the obligation to pay for out-of-pocket care, frequently results in patients’ inability to afford the recommended treatment. Adding to this burden is the registration fee that all patients are required to pay upon hospital arrival. This financial issue contributes to compassion fatigue and burnout as clinicians strive to balance optimal care with patients’ monetary constraints.

"It’s either they’re not able to afford the treatment because you’re in a public sector and most of the people who come to the public sector hospitals are literally poor…"–(Male, PB015)

A medical officer in Freetown added:

“…but the lack of resources can be very, very frustrating and like then that can tear you apart. In the fact that if you see a patient suffering, for example, you see you have a critical patient who is on oxygen. They’re not like in the blink of an eye. The electricity just went out like that. And you see that patient struggling for breath. And you can’t do much there’s like not involved because sometimes even the backup generators that we have in the facilities, they will tell you that oh, we don’t have like fuel we don’t have reserved fuel to power these generators…. So sometimes you lose patients. Yeah. So, the only thing they will tell you oh yeah, you save some you lose some you understand, but these are all preventable factors. So, if you can’t really, if we can’t really like work in an environment where we have adequate resources or equipment, then it can be really overwhelming for the doctors…”–(Male, PB013)

Additionally, interviewees discussed issues like lack of supplies (gloves, sterile gauze), inefficient system (delays in obtaining blood for emergencies), and the resulting negative impact on patient care and physician well-being.

"I had to check the blood sugar…the glucose level of the patient and I needed a glucometer. I looked all round, there was no glucometer…"–(Male, PB003)

Detachment and cynicism towards work

This theme came out strongly among many participants, often cited as a significant component of physician burnout. This concept is characterized by a pervasive negative attitude towards one’s job, a loss of interest in work-related activities, and a reduced sense of personal accomplishment.

One resident encapsulates this sentiment:

“Yes, yes. I mean. I mean before I think when I was an intern, I think it was the first time I witnessed someone passing away, and I burst into tears. I was crying, and all people could say were like, I mean you just… eventually you get to a point where you don’t even care about it.”–(Female, PB009)

The inherent nature of the medical profession—the persistent exposure to stress, the demands for perfection and accountability, and the relentless working hours—can engender a sense of cynicism and detachment. This is more than just simple job dissatisfaction; it is a profound disconnection from one’s work that can have significant ramifications on both personal well-being and patient care.

A medical officer working in Kambia district hospital reflects on this:

“It is exhausting… sometimes, you have frustrating days. Some days you get angry from the start of the day. You’re angry with everything and everyone. Some days are so frustrating, you cannot get yourself that you’re gonna wish that you’re not even here. But the reality is you are here, like you are the only source of hope in terms of medical provision; you and your team. So, we have no option, we have no choice.”–(Male, PB007)

Another medical officer added:

"It feels like I’m going through the motions, detached from the real purpose of my work. The frustration, the endless paperwork, the administrative burdens—it’s hard to remember why I started this in the first place."–(Female, PB020)

This sense of detachment is not an individual failing, but rather an indication of systemic issues within the healthcare industry that need to be addressed.

"We have to sit back and watch our patients, well to say perish… and we cannot really help in anything."–(Male, PB015)

Lack of institutional support and coping mechanisms

The respondents express the absence of formal support systems within the hospital for dealing with stress and burnout.

Many respondents explain how they use peer support as a coping mechanism, talking and deliberating on their shared difficulties.

"So, since all of us are frustrated together, we kind of … like serve as … like therapists for one another."–(Male, PB004)

"Nobody cares, nobody comes to their aid, and in fact when we have young people with mental illness, people will be ascribing it to drug abuse or other things instead of actually looking at other possibilities like work environment."–(Male, PB012)

"The work I do, I work as a doctor and I have a lot of stress in that work, psychological stress… that should not be personal, it has to be institutionalized."–(Female, PB001)

Physicians’ recommendations for change

The issue of physician burnout calls for strategic interventions, as identified by the physicians in our study. Key focus areas include the creation of a more favourable working environment that supports both the mental and physical well-being of physicians. Financial incentives and appropriate compensation for overtime work are essential for recognizing and motivating extra effort. Effective policy implementation and retention strategies are required to ensure a stable and supportive professional environment. Establishing structured work hours and robust institutional support is crucial for preventing overwork and managing workplace stress. Developing communication platforms offers physicians a space to share challenges and gain communal support, thereby reducing feelings of isolation. Enhancing the recognition of physicians’ contributions and performance appreciation is fundamental to boosting morale and job satisfaction and addressing the critical issue of burnout in healthcare. It is crucial to implement strategies that guarantee the long-term viability of the recommendations outlined below.

Improved working environment

Physicians emphasize the urgent need for improved work environments. As stated by one house officer:

"And the environment, we hope for a better environment… these are things I want to recommend, I want to appeal that the authorities look into, to improve on them."–(Male, PB003)

An environment conducive to mental and physical well-being can significantly reduce stress and burnout. This involves addressing factors such as workplace safety, adequate resources, and a supportive atmosphere.

Financial incentives and overtime compensation

The lack of adequate compensation, particularly for overtime work, is a significant contributor to burnout. One resident suggests:

"If you have to work overtime, you should be motivated. You can have an incentive for that. I think that incentive can give you the extra energy to keep on pushing."–(Female, PB005)

Incentivizing overtime work can provide financial support and recognition for the additional efforts made by physicians, potentially enhancing morale and reducing burnout.

Policy and retention plans

Physicians are calling for political attention to retention strategies, highlighting the need for well-structured policies to retain trained professionals:

"So, it’s a thing that you really need political attention to look into because you train lots of people and then they will leave because there’s no proper retention plan in place."–(Male, PB015)

Effective retention plans may include career development opportunities, supportive leadership, and policies that acknowledge and address the unique challenges faced by physicians.

Structured work hours and institutional support

Overwork is a prevalent issue contributing to burnout. A suggestion to tackle this is:

"Let us start with the institutions, developing systems that will take care of their welfare plus have a structure of how many hours to work."–(Male, PB012)

Structured work hours can prevent chronic overwork, while institutional support systems can provide resources and assistance to manage workplace stress.

Platforms for communication and support

Creating platforms for physicians to share experiences and challenges is crucial:

“So, let us have a platform that is good for all of us, and we can go and share our problems and issues with, and then discuss sometimes by just talking to some of them, it takes away about 50 to 70% of the burden of some of them."–(Male, PB011)

Such platforms can foster a sense of community, provide emotional support, and offer solutions to common problems, significantly reducing the sense of isolation that can accompany physician burnout.

Recognition and performance appreciation

Finally, acknowledging and appreciating the work of physicians is vital:

"Salaries, performance approval, and then appreciating works… those are the kind of things that will help improve the system."–(Female, PB021)

Recognition, whether through financial rewards, career advancement opportunities, or simple acknowledgments, can boost morale and job satisfaction, which are essential in combating burnout.

Discussion

This study explored the experiences and perceptions of burnout among public-sector physicians in Sierra Leone, given the paucity of research in settings with limited resources. Despite the increasing awareness of physician burnout, the complex interplay of poorly understood barriers presents a unique challenge (Fig 1). These barriers have significant implications for individual well-being and effectiveness of healthcare delivery.

10.1371/journal.pgph.0003739.g001 Fig 1 Interconnected determinants of physician burnout.

The figure presents an integrative model identifying three core contributors to physician burnout—relational factors, patient financial burdens, and practice environment stressors—each depicted as interconnected elements influencing the central issue.

Several themes emerged: the impact of heavy workloads and demanding schedules, obstacles encountered in patient care due to resource constraints, necessity of policy and retention strategies, growing sense of detachment and cynicism among physicians towards their work, and a lack of institutional support and coping strategies.

Healthcare worker workload and patient care quality

Our study has identified several concerns regarding clinician workload and tight schedules, which aligns with recent literature. Accumulated evidence indicates that high workloads, particularly in inpatient settings, are associated with adverse outcomes, including increased hospital length of stay, delayed discharge, increased costs, and negatively impacted quality improvement efforts [24]. These factors contribute to clinician burnout, a global issue in the healthcare system.

The well-being of healthcare workers is crucial as it directly impacts the quality of patient care. Excessive work-related stress can lead to physical, psychological, and behavioural complications in physicians, which can compromise patient care [25]. The increased workload for hospital physicians due to residency work-hour restrictions and efforts to improve patient throughput further exacerbates this issue, demanding that hospitalists function in various capacities, potentially beyond their capabilities [26].

Furthermore, long working hours and extended shift durations for senior resident physicians have been associated with adverse patient and physician safety outcomes [27]. Preventable medical errors, which contribute to a significant number of patient deaths annually, have been linked to an excess clinical workload among resident physicians [26]. Insights from other healthcare professionals further support the detrimental effects of high workloads on patient care, highlighting the need for effective workload management strategies [28]. Healthcare workers under work overload are more likely to experience burnout and express intentions to leave their jobs, which can lead to understaffing and perpetuating the cycle of excess workload and decreased care quality [2]. These findings underscore the importance of addressing workload and work schedule issues not just from a wellness perspective but also as a critical component of maintaining patient care quality and efficacy within healthcare systems.

Our study revealed a critical issue that requires attention, namely, the absence of institutional support and coping mechanisms for physicians, which has been widely recognized in the literature. The increased psychological burden faced by healthcare workers due to demanding workloads and insufficient resources emphasizes the need for measures to build resilience and coping skills [10]. One study emphasized the necessity of theory-based interventions and supportive leadership to foster social support among healthcare workers [29]. This suggests that institutional support systems should be structured and implemented to improve the mental health of healthcare workers [29]. Without proper support, the stressors experienced by healthcare workers can lead to a range of mental health issues, including depression, anxiety, and insomnia, particularly in regions such as sub-Saharan Africa during the COVID-19 pandemic [30].

Physicians in Sierra Leone use various strategies to combat burnout, such as prioritizing physical well-being and seeking clinical variety, which reflect a deep-seated desire for knowledge and skill advancement. This drive for professional development can be linked to career progression, highlighting the need for bespoke training programs tailored to the needs of different healthcare settings and specialties. Establishing such programs could provide the dual benefit of enhancing career satisfaction and mitigating burnout [31]. Additionally, changes in institutional policies, particularly during public health emergencies, significantly affect the mental health of healthcare workers [6, 32]. Thus, practical recommendations aimed at fostering resilience and mental well-being are crucial, especially for adapting to evolving healthcare challenges [33].

Our study reflects the well-documented global trend of physician burnout characterized by detachment and cynicism. This state, emerging from prolonged stress and not indicative of personal failure, evolves into a form of organizational cynicism, a critical view of institutional motives and values [34, 35]. This pervasive condition transcends job dissatisfaction and extended working hours. Physicians, especially residents, experience decreased empathy, potentially leading to diminished care quality and heightened perception of medical errors [36]. Notably, in settings such as emergency departments, professionalism endures despite the growing cynicism and eroding empathy [37]. This underlines the need for systemic solutions to address the root causes of burnout, thereby safeguarding both health care providers’ well-being and patient care standards.

Organizational factors

This study indicates that physicians are acutely aware of the organizational roots that contribute to burnout. However, there is a prevalent tendency to prioritize personal protective strategies over systemic solutions. This inclination stems from the long-standing cultural image of physicians as being perfect and unwavering, which often leads them to downplay their own vulnerability, traits that are known to predispose them to burnout, and lead them to seek individualized solutions [38]. Physicians often feel uncertain about who should tackle organizational factors, and this sense of losing control over their professional environment not only fuels burnout, but also hinders their capacity to change at the organizational level [2].

Additionally, there is a noticeable lack of clarity among physicians regarding the effective confrontation of organizational challenges [39]. The erosion of control is identified as a key factor contributing to burnout among physicians [40]. This loss of control is often linked to external factors beyond their influence, leading to a sense of powerlessness [41]. The lack of autonomy due to various organizational challenges acts as a double-edged sword, exacerbating burnout and hindering effective interventions [15]. Physicians feel caught in a cycle where the erosion of control not only contributes to their burnout, but also diminishes their capacity to implement necessary changes within the organization [39].

Introducing monetary incentives for overtime within the social organization of medical work has broader implications. While financial incentives can provide immediate support and recognition [42], it is crucial to implement these measures cautiously to avoid inadvertently contributing to the institutionalization of burnout [43]. A balanced approach that includes both financial and non-financial support, such as effective workload management, creation of supportive work environments, and provision of professional development opportunities. Addressing these areas comprehensively is crucial to ensure the long-term well-being of physicians.

Relational factors

Our study highlights the impact of relational factors on physician burnout in Sierra Leone. The results suggest that positive colleague interactions serve as a buffer against burnout, whereas isolation and unsupportive supervision exacerbate it. This aligns with earlier findings that emphasize the benefits of coaching and mentoring in talent development among medical trainees [44]. Indeed, participants highlighted the significance of peer support in alleviating burnout symptoms, reinforcing the notion that supportive supervision models, including mentorship, can be effective interventions. Addressing excessive working hours is crucial for both patient safety and physician wellbeing [27]. Implementing a comprehensive approach that combines mentorship, supportive supervision, and manageable work hours can effectively reduce burnout by addressing both long working hours and deeper relational factors contributing to physician burnout.

Strengths and limitations

Our study is the first to explore a deeper understanding of physicians’ perception of burnout in Sierra Leone. Selecting a diverse group of doctors based on sex, age, and demographics allowed us to capture a wide range of perspectives. Although the sample size was small, with only 24 participants, Patton noted that qualitative research often focuses on small, specifically chosen samples, sometimes as few as one subject, to explore a particular issue in depth [45]. In our case, data saturation was achieved after approximately 20 interviews, with four additional interviews for assurance. However, we recognize that different contexts may reveal different experiences.

The present study is not without limitations. The recruitment of study participants through gatekeepers may have impacted their willingness to participate due to their relationships with these gatekeepers, potentially leading to researcher or participant bias. To mitigate this, in-country investigators only attended participant interviews when necessary. Data analysis and reporting were conducted jointly and iteratively by two authors (MBJ and AKB) until consensus was reached. It is important to note that the results of this qualitative study are based on the perceptions of the interviewed public sector physicians and may not be generalizable to all healthcare workers in Sierra Leone or other contexts. These findings provide valuable insights into the specific experiences of the participants, which can inform targeted interventions in similar settings.

Conclusion

In this study, we aimed to explore the experiences and perceptions of burnout among public-sector physicians in Sierra Leone. We found that organizational and relational factors, including heavy workloads, resource constraints, and lack of institutional support, significantly contribute to burnout. Detailed accounts from interviewed physicians highlighted the relentless nature of their work schedules, the emotional and professional toll of inadequate resources, and the urgent need for systemic changes to improve their work environment and overall well-being. To mitigate the effects of burnout, policymakers should adopt a multifaceted approach. This involves investing in the healthcare workforce to alleviate workload, providing adequate necessary resources to reduce stress and boost morale, and empowering workers through increased autonomy. Furthermore, promoting supportive and respectful work culture is of utmost importance. In resource-constrained settings, systemic reforms are necessary to improve working conditions and develop strong support networks. These measures not only reduce the burden on healthcare providers, but also enhance their well-being and the quality of patient care they deliver.

Supporting information

S1 Checklist Inclusivity in global research.

(DOCX)

10.1371/journal.pgph.0003739.r001
Decision Letter 0
Nowrouzi-Kia Behdin Academic Editor
© 2024 Behdin Nowrouzi-Kia
2024
Behdin Nowrouzi-Kia
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Submission Version0
14 May 2024

PGPH-D-24-00567

Health Workers’ Conceptualization and Perceptions About Burnout in  Sierra Leone: A Qualitative Analysis Of Public Sector Physicians

PLOS Global Public Health

Dear Dr. Jalloh,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Global Public Health. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jun 13 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at globalpubhealth@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgph/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Behdin Nowrouzi-Kia

Academic Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

Journal Requirements:

1. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

2. Please include a complete copy of PLOS’ questionnaire on inclusivity in global research in your revised manuscript. Our policy for research in this area aims to improve transparency in the reporting of research performed outside of researchers’ own country or community. The policy applies to researchers who have travelled to a different country to conduct research, research with Indigenous populations or their lands, and research on cultural artefacts. The questionnaire can also be requested at the journal’s discretion for any other submissions, even if these conditions are not met.  Please find more information on the policy and a link to download a blank copy of the questionnaire here: https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/s/best-practices-in-research-reporting. Please upload a completed version of your questionnaire as Supporting Information when you resubmit your manuscript.

3. Please provide separate figure files in .tif or .eps format only and remove any figures embedded in your manuscript file. Please also ensure all files are under our size limit of 10MB.

For more information about figure files please see our guidelines:

https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/s/figures 

https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/s/figures#loc-file-requirement

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

The reviewer has suggested you provide minor revisions before the article is considered for publication

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Does this manuscript meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria? Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe methodologically and ethically rigorous research with conclusions that are appropriately drawn based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS Global Public Health does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: I examined the article with great interest; it's intriguing. The authors have endeavoured to present a qualitative study of the problem of burnout that is of interest to the scientific community in the context of a country with limited resources.

There are aspects to which the authors can adhere in order to improve the quality of their article.

---------------------

1- In the ‘abstract’, it is preferable to underline these points:

+ add keywords, such as perception and contextualisation, to make it easier to characterise and index the study in bibliographic databases.

---------------------

2- With regard to the ‘introduction’ section, a number of points could be highlighted:

+ improve the general data section on the subject with more references, which is limited. And in any case, more recent literature. Ideally, from 2 to 5 years ago.

---------------------

3. In the ‘discussion’ section, the following points can be put forward to improve the quality of the article:

+ It is preferable to enrich the discussion with more references on the various themes raised by the study.

Reviewer #2: About the title.

The title of the article announces two components - objectives: conceptualization and doctors' perceptions, however, the article does not present conceptualization information in the results, in the discussion or in the conclusion.

In the introduction of the article the concept that served as the basis for this qualitative study is cited and in Study Design of methods it is said: “We adopted a pragmatic approach involving both deductive and inductive elements. However, we did not aim to produce a formal and generalizable theory. Then, in Data Analysis: “Multiple strategies were used to enhance the validation of the data interpreted. (14) As we progressed with the coding, connections between categories emerged, facilitating a more theoretical coding approach. This method, paired with ongoing comparison, enabled a transition from descriptive to conceptual analysis. Consequently, we were able to construct a framework that guided further data sampling and coding, which enhanced our understanding of emerging themes and data saturation.” This description informs us how the researchers organized the sample, the interviews and the responses of the interviewees, for the analysis and presentation of the results, confirming that the qualitative study was focused on perceptions.

Due to the above, I suggest reviewing the title: “Conceptualization and perceptions of health workers on burnout in Sierra Leone: a qualitative analysis of public sector doctors”, I propose as an example: Qualitative study of Perceptions on burnout in the work of public sector doctors in Sierra Leone. 2022.

In the results I suggest checking:

Physicians Recommendations for Change, “Financial incentives and appropriate compensation for overtime work are essential for recognizing and motivating extra effort.” (...) It is crucial to implement strategies that guarantee the long-term viability of the recommendations outlined below.” And in: Financial Incentives and Overtime Compensation: which contains the researchers' analysis that appears in the article as: “Incentivizing overtime work can provide financial support and recognition for the additional efforts made by physicians, potentially enhancing morale and reducing burnout.”, because executing these statements would produce, that the monetary payment of overtime work the institutionalization of burnout, in contradiction of all the findings of the study.

In conclusion I propose to take into account in the writing:

The writing of the conclusion must compare the objectives and results based on the list of perceptions obtained from the interviewed doctors who describe explanations, demands and aspirations from their work experience.

The results of a qualitative study cannot be generalized as the perceptions of workers or doctors in the sector are restricted to the perceptions of the public sector doctors interviewed.

Perceptions describe a situation resulting from a set of labor relations in a health system with limitations and scope. More than a risk, it is a result.

The risk is to maintain the situation until it is no longer temporary and becomes a characteristic of the institution or system that serves the population in conditions of poverty.

The social organization of medical work should not include monetary incentives to work overtime because it would negate the organizational and relational factors that produce job burnout.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Chadrack KABEYA DIYOKA

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

10.1371/journal.pgph.0003739.r002
Author response to Decision Letter 0
Submission Version1
10 Jun 2024

Attachment Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

10.1371/journal.pgph.0003739.r003
Decision Letter 1
Dey Avanti Staff Editor
© 2024 Avanti Dey
2024
Avanti Dey
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Submission Version1
13 Aug 2024

PGPH-D-24-00567R1

Perceptions of Burnout Among Public Sector Physicians in Sierra Leone: A Qualitative Study

PLOS Global Public Health

Dear Dr. Jalloh,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Global Public Health. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please address the minor outstanding suggestions made by Reviewer #2.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 12 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at globalpubhealth@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgph/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Avanti Dey, PhD

Staff Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

**********

2. Does this manuscript meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria? Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe methodologically and ethically rigorous research with conclusions that are appropriately drawn based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS Global Public Health does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Perceptions of Burnout Among Public Sector Physicians in Sierra Leone: A Qualitative Study

PGPH-D-24-00567R1

Following improvements to the manuscript quality, we are confident that it is technically sound and should be accepted for publication. This is because it provides valuable information that can contribute to the understanding of the organisational structures and characteristics necessary for public sector doctors to flourish in a country with limited resources.

Reviewer #2: I reviewed the abstract and the final version of the manuscript

Summary: Abstract

The title is changed correctly; however, the conclusions are recommendations of the researchers (of the authors of the article), it does not contrast the results of the research with the objectives of the research. It is striking to maintain in the conclusions “offer incentives for working overtime” when that is a minority expression among those interviewed.

Final manuscript

The title and text are maintained without the changes that are present in the summary.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Chadrack KABEYA DIYOKA

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

10.1371/journal.pgph.0003739.r004
Author response to Decision Letter 1
Submission Version2
18 Aug 2024

Attachment Submitted filename: Response to Reviewersv2.docx

10.1371/journal.pgph.0003739.r005
Decision Letter 2
Robinson Julia Staff Editor
© 2024 Julia Robinson
2024
Julia Robinson
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Submission Version2
29 Aug 2024

Perceptions of Burnout Among Public Sector Physicians in Sierra Leone: A Qualitative Study

PGPH-D-24-00567R2

Dear Dr Jalloh,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Perceptions of Burnout Among Public Sector Physicians in Sierra Leone: A Qualitative Study' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Global Public Health.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact globalpubhealth@plos.org.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Global Public Health.

Best regards,

Julia Robinson

Executive Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

***********************************************************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):
==== Refs
References

1 Maslach C , Jackson SE , Leiter MP . Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual [Internet]. Palo Alto, CA Consulting Psychologists Press. 1996 [cited 2023 Jan 19]. Available from: https://www.scirp.org/(S(351jmbntvnsjt1aadkposzje))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=713472.
2 Sibeoni J , Bellon-Champel L , Mousty A , Manolios E , Verneuil L , Revah-Levy A . Physicians’ Perspectives About Burnout: a Systematic Review and Metasynthesis. J Gen Intern Med. 2019;34 (8 ):1578–90. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05062-y 31147982
3 Shalaby R , Oluwasina F , Eboreime E , El Gindi H , Agyapong B , Hrabok M , et al . Burnout among Residents: Prevalence and Predictors of Depersonalization, Emotional Exhaustion and Professional Unfulfillment among Resident Doctors in Canada. Int J Environ Res Public Heal 2023, Vol 20, Page 3677 [Internet]. 2023 Feb 19 [cited 2023 Feb 22];20 (4 ):3677. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/3677. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043677 36834373
4 Shanafelt TD , Bradley KA , Wipf JE , Back AL . Burnout and self-reported patient care in an internal medicine residency program. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136 (5 ):358–67. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-5-200203050-00008 11874308
5 Ogunsemi OO , Alebiosu OC , Shorunmu OT . A survey of perceived stress, intimidation, harassment and well-being of resident doctors in a nigerian teaching hospital. Niger J Clin Pract. 2010;13 (2 ):183–6. 20499753
6 Konlan KD , Asampong E , Dako-Gyeke P , Glozah FN . Burnout syndrome among healthcare workers during COVID-19 Pandemic in Accra, Ghana. PLoS One [Internet]. 2022;17 (6 June):1–21. Available from: doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268404 35709139
7 Ribacke KJB , Saulnier DD , Eriksson A , Schreeb J von. Effects of the West Africa Ebola virus disease on health-care utilization—A systematic review. Front Public Heal. 2016;4 (OCT ):1–12.
8 McMahon SA , Ho LS , Brown H , Miller L , Ansumana R , Kennedy CE . Healthcare providers on the frontlines: A qualitative investigation of the social and emotional impact of delivering health services during Sierra Leone’s Ebola epidemic. Health Policy Plan. 2016;31 (9 ):1232–9. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czw055 27277598
9 Wurie HR , Samai M , Witter S . Retention of health workers in rural Sierra Leone: Findings from life histories. Hum Resour Health [Internet]. 2016;14 (1 ):1–15. Available from: doi: 10.1186/s12960-016-0099-6 26746680
10 Rose S , Hartnett J , Pillai S . Healthcare worker’s emotions, perceived stressors and coping mechanisms during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS One [Internet]. 2021 Jul 9;16 (7 ):e0254252. Available from: doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254252 34242361
11 West CP , Dyrbye LN , Shanafelt TD . Physician burnout: contributors, consequences and solutions. J Intern Med. 2018;283 (6 ):516–29. doi: 10.1111/joim.12752 29505159
12 West CP , Dyrbye LN , Shanafelt TD . Physician burnout: contributors, consequences and solutions. J Intern Med. 2018 Jun;283 (6 ):516–29. doi: 10.1111/joim.12752 29505159
13 Frishman GN , Raker CA , Frankfurter D . Well-being in trainee and faculty physicians. Med Educ Online. 2021 Dec;26 (1 ):1950107. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2021.1950107 34252014
14 Abdo SAM , El-Sallamy RM , El-Sherbiny AAM , Kabbash IA . Burnout among physicians and nursing staff working in the emergency hospital of Tanta University, Egypt. East Mediterr Heal J = La Rev sante la Mediterr Orient = al-Majallah al-sihhiyah li-sharq al-mutawassit. 2016 Mar;21 (12 ):906–15. doi: 10.26719/2015.21.12.906 26996364
15 Ruzycki SM , Lemaire JB . Physician burnout. CMAJ [Internet]. 2018;190 (2 ):E53—E53. Available from: https://www.cmaj.ca/content/190/2/E53. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.170827 29335264
16 Grimmer SA , Jacquin KM . When perceived physician burnout leads to family burnout: How secondary emotional trauma impacts physician spouses. Ment Heal Sci. 2023;1 (4 ):231–41.
17 Virk A , Jalloh MB , Koedoyoma S , Smalle IO , Bolton W , Scott JA , et al . What factors shape surgical access in West Africa? A qualitative study exploring patient and provider experiences of managing injuries in Sierra Leone. BMJ Open [Internet]. 2021 Mar 1 [cited 2023 Jan 17];11 (3 ):e042402. Available from: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/11/3/e042402. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042402 33649054
18 Yvonne Feilzer M. Doing Mixed Methods Research Pragmatically: Implications for the Rediscovery of Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm. J Mix Methods Res [Internet]. 2009 Oct 22;4 (1 ):6–16. Available from: doi: 10.1177/1558689809349691
19 Green J , Thorogood N . Qualitative Methods for Health Research [Internet]. 2nd edition. SAGE Publications Ltd. London: SAGE Publishing; 2009 [cited 2023 Feb 22]. 195–228 p. Available from: https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-methods-for-health-research/book254905.
20 Tong A , Sainsbury P , Craig J . Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Heal Care [Internet]. 2007 Dec 1 [cited 2023 Jan 17];19 (6 ):349–57. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/intqhc/article/19/6/349/1791966. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042 17872937
21 Forero R , Nahidi S , De Costa J , Mohsin M , Fitzgerald G , Gibson N , et al . Application of four-dimension criteria to assess rigour of qualitative research in emergency medicine. BMC Health Serv Res [Internet]. 2018 Feb 17 [cited 2023 May 4];18 (1 ):1–11. Available from: https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-018-2915-2.29291745
22 Ritchie J , Lewis J , Nicholls CM , Ormston R . Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.; 2013.
23 Schmidt C. The Analysis of Semi-Structured Interviews. In: Flick U , von Kardoff E , Steinke I , editors. A Companion to Qualitative Research: Paradigms, Theories, Methods, Practice and Contexts. 1st ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.; 2008. p. 351–7.
24 Smith EM , Keniston A , Welles CC , Vukovic N , McBeth L , Harnke B , et al . Inpatient clinician workload: a scoping review protocol to understand the definition, measurement and impact of non-procedural clinician workloads. BMJ Open. 2022 Dec;12 (12 ):e062878. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062878 36523243
25 Rostami F , Babaei-Pouya A , Teimori-Boghsani G , Jahangirimehr A , Mehri Z , Feiz-Arefi M . Mental Workload and Job Satisfaction in Healthcare Workers: The Moderating Role of Job Control. Front public Heal. 2021;9 :683388. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.683388 34540781
26 Michtalik HJ , Yeh H-C , Pronovost PJ , Brotman DJ . Impact of Attending Physician Workload on Patient Care: A Survey of Hospitalists. JAMA Intern Med [Internet]. 2013 Mar 11;173 (5 ):375–7. Available from: doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.1864 23358680
27 Barger LK , Weaver MD , Sullivan JP , Qadri S , Landrigan CP , Czeisler CA . Impact of work schedules of senior resident physicians on patient and resident physician safety: nationwide, prospective cohort study. BMJ Med [Internet]. 2023 Mar 1;2 (1 ):e000320. Available from: http://bmjmedicine.bmj.com/content/2/1/e000320.abstract. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000320 37303489
28 Banda Z , Simbota M , Mula C . Nurses’ perceptions on the effects of high nursing workload on patient care in an intensive care unit of a referral hospital in Malawi: a qualitative study. BMC Nurs. 2022 Jun;21 (1 ):136. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00918-x 35650646
29 Labrague LJ . Psychological resilience, coping behaviours and social support among health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review of quantitative studies. J Nurs Manag. 2021 Oct;29 (7 ):1893–905. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13336 33843087
30 Oyat FWD , Oloya JN , Atim P , Ikoona EN , Aloyo J , Kitara DL . The psychological impact, risk factors and coping strategies to COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers in the sub-Saharan Africa: a narrative review of existing literature. BMC Psychol [Internet]. 2022;10 (1 ):284. Available from: doi: 10.1186/s40359-022-00998-z 36457038
31 Maresca G , Corallo F , Catanese G , Formica C , Lo Buono V . Coping Strategies of Healthcare Professionals with Burnout Syndrome: A Systematic Review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Feb;58 (2 ). doi: 10.3390/medicina58020327 35208650
32 Owens IT . Supporting nurses’ mental health during the pandemic. Nursing2023 [Internet]. 2020;50 (10 ). Available from: https://journals.lww.com/nursing/fulltext/2020/10000/supporting_nurses__mental_health_during_the.13.aspx.
33 Shapiro GK , Cantab MA , Mpa MPP , Psych C , Schulz-quach C , Beck L , et al . An Institutional Model for Health Care Workers ‘ Mental Health During Covid-19. NEJM Catal [Internet]. 2021;66 (10 ):1–18. Available from: https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.20.0684.
34 Volpe RL , Mohammed S , Hopkins M , Shapiro D , Dellasega C . The negative impact of organizational cynicism on physicians and nurses. Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2014;33 (4 ):276–88. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0000000000000026 25350015
35 Smith S. Healthcare Burnout: Impact, Consequences & Administrative Burden [Internet]. GHX. 2023. Available from: https://www.ghx.com/the-healthcare-hub/healthcare-burnout/.
36 Billings ME , Lazarus ME , Wenrich M , Curtis JR , Engelberg RA . The effect of the hidden curriculum on resident burnout and cynicism. J Grad Med Educ. 2011 Dec;3 (4 ):503–10. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-11-00044.1 23205199
37 Batley NJ , Nasreddine Z , Chami A , Zebian D , Bachir R , Abbas HA . Cynicism and other attitudes towards patients in an emergency department in a middle eastern tertiary care center. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2016;16 (1 ):36. Available from: doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0539-y 26823070
38 Gazelle G , Liebschutz JM , Riess H . Physician burnout: coaching a way out. J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Apr;30 (4 ):508–13. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3144-y 25527340
39 Panagioti M , Panagopoulou E , Bower P , Lewith G , Kontopantelis E , Chew-Graham C , et al . Controlled Interventions to Reduce Burnout in Physicians: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb;177 (2 ):195–205. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7674 27918798
40 Senturk JC , Melnitchouk N . Surgeon Burnout: Defining, Identifying, and Addressing the New Reality. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019 Nov;32 (6 ):407–14. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1692709 31824232
41 Omar AS , Shouman Y , Sudarsanan S . Burnout signals are alarming worldwide: the active role of leadership. Vol. 2019 , Qatar Medical Journal. 2019.
42 Shah GM , Memon NA , Tunio G . Determining the Effect of Financial and Moral Incentives on Job Satisfaction of Teachers at Higher Education Institutes: Dr. Ghulam Murtaza Shah, Dr. Noor Ahmed Memon, Dr. Ghazala Tunio. Int J Manag Res Emerg Sci. 2021;11 (4 ).
43 Chemali Z , Ezzeddine FL , Gelaye B , Dossett ML , Salameh J , Bizri M , et al . Burnout among healthcare providers in the complex environment of the Middle East: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct;19 (1 ):1337. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7713-1 31640650
44 Subramaniam A , Silong AD , Uli J , Ismail IA . Effects of coaching supervision, mentoring supervision and abusive supervision on talent development among trainee doctors in public hospitals: Moderating role of clinical learning environment. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2015 Aug 13 [cited 2023 Dec 4];15 (1 ):1–9. Available from: https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-015-0407-1 25592199
45 Patton MQ . Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Theory and practice; Fourth Edition. SAGE Publ Inc. 2015;832 .
