
==== Front
Cureus
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus Palo Alto (CA)

10.7759/cureus.67080
Pharmacology
Mechanisms of Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Beneficial Effects of Semaglutide: A Review
Muacevic Alexander
Adler John R
Alfawaz Sultan 1
Burzangi Abdulhadi 1
Esmat Ahmed 1
1 Department of Clinical Pharmacology, King Abdulaziz University, Faculty of Medicine, Jeddah, SAU
Sultan Alfawaz saalfawaz@kau.edu.sa
17 8 2024
8 2024
16 8 e6708017 8 2024
Copyright © 2024, Alfawaz et al.
2024
Alfawaz et al.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This article is available from https://www.cureus.com/articles/283918-mechanisms-of-non-alcoholic-fatty-liver-disease-and-beneficial-effects-of-semaglutide-a-review
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease stands as the predominant cause of chronic liver disease, with its prevalence and morbidity expected to escalate significantly, leading to substantial healthcare costs and diminished health-related quality of life. It comprises a range of disease manifestations that commence with basic steatosis, involving the accumulation of lipids in hepatocytes, a distinctive histological feature. If left untreated, it often advances to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, marked by inflammatory and/or fibrotic hepatic changes, leading to the eventual development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease-related cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Because of the liver's vital role in body metabolism, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is considered both a consequence and a contributor to the metabolic abnormalities observed in the metabolic syndrome. As of date, there are no authorized pharmacological agents for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Semaglutide, with its glycemic and weight loss advantages, could potentially offer benefits for individuals with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. This review aims to investigate the impact of semaglutide on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

insulin resistance
glp-1 receptor agonist
type 2 diabetes mellitus
nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
semaglutide
==== Body
pmcIntroduction and background

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is an endocrine disease that has been established to be attributed to several factors of genetic and environmental nature, the most prominent of which being an unregulated diet, physical inactivity, and tobacco smoking [1]. Global estimates of diabetic patients currently stand at around 537 million, with projections indicating a potential increase to a staggering 642 million by 2040 [2]. Furthermore, from the beginning of the millennium until 2019, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) had seen an increase in its prevalence by a factor of three, increasing from 151 million cases to 463 million globally [1].

Obesity is directly correlated with T2DM, the hallmark of which is insulin resistance (IR) [3]. In addition, obesity is a problem for the majority of those with T2DM, as it affects approximately 80% of those patients [4]. The proportion of overweight and obese people in the world has been rising for the past few decades. An estimation of as high as 30% of Americans are considered obese [4]. In terms of obesity, the adipose tissues of obese people go through a process known as hypertrophy and hyperplasia, which leads to an increase in the secretion of lipotoxic substances such as leptin, glycerol, adiponectin, and non-esterified fatty acids, along with various cytokines and chemokines that promote inflammation and cause lipotoxicity [5]. Furthermore, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are all linked to obesity, which can cause IR, hypertension, and dyslipidemia [6]. It is a metabolic liver disease under which falls a wide range of progressive pathological states, beginning with mild steatosis to steatohepatitis and eventually ending in a cirrhotic liver and possibly hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [7]. There is a rapid rise in the prevalence of NAFLD around the world, coinciding with the epidemics of obesity and T2DM. Recent studies have revealed that a staggering 30% of the general population has evidence of NAFLD and that it affects 70-80% of obese or diabetic patients [8,9]. T2DM appears to contribute significantly to the deterioration from NAFLD to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), cirrhosis, and possibly HCC [10]. It has become evident that NAFLD, and particularly NASH that has progressed to more advanced stages of fibrosis, also contributes to the development of the wide range of T2DM’s micro- and macrovascular complications [11]. Consequently, patients with T2DM who have NAFLD and advanced fibrosis should be monitored for signs of the disease early on [12].

Semaglutide, which functions as a glucagon-like peptide type 1 (GLP-1) agonist, is a recently available, once-weekly drug. It has recently been found to have a favorable outcome in the management of the hepatic metabolic complications that are caused by obesity, namely NAFLD and steatohepatitis, along with its use in the treatment of obesity itself [13,14]. Furthermore, this positive hepatic metabolic effect might be due to enhanced lipid degradation via the enhancement of the protein kinase AMPK (AMP-activated protein kinase) [15]. It is worthy of mention that semaglutide, as a GLP-1 receptor agonist, may influence free fatty acids by improving insulin sensitivity, inhibiting lipolysis, and affecting gastrointestinal motility. The modulation of oxidative stress (OS) may be a product of the broader metabolic improvements associated with GLP-1 receptor agonists [16]. The specific interactions and molecular pathways involved are areas of ongoing research.

In addition, the reduction of the mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTOR) and consequently reducing the hepatic injury caused by NAFLD justify the prophylactic use of semaglutide against the disease [17]. Furthermore, the integral membrane protein α/β hydrolase domain-6 (ABHD6) has been proposed to play a role in the pathophysiology of the metabolic syndrome (MS) [18].

In fact, semaglutide was experimentally found to decrease the expression of ABHD6, which functions by hydrolysis of monoacylglycerol, and hence alleviates the degree of NAFLD.

Review

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Type 2 diabetes mellitus stands as the prevalent metabolic disorder, primarily distinguished by metabolic disorders, including hyperglycemia, hyperlipidemia, and IR [19]. It is linked to severe complications and concurrent health conditions, which encompass cardiovascular disease, MS, NAFLD, end-stage kidney disease, and retinopathy [20]. As of 2021, the IDF Diabetes Atlas (10th edition) has estimated that up to 537 million adults globally are diagnosed as diabetic, while 6.7 million deaths during that year have been attributed to DM. It is predicted that the number of adult patients diagnosed with diabetes will increase to 693 million by the year 2030 [21]. The main underlying factors in the development of diabetes are cellular injuries and energy metabolism dysfunction, which also play a significant role in the emergence of complications. Diagnosis is typically based on certain cutoffs of blood glucose levels. These processes impact the diabetes phenotype and subsequently contribute to the progression of both microvascular and macrovascular complications [22]. T2DM represents 90% of all documented diabetes cases and bears the primary cause for the majority of the complications associated with diabetes [23].

The pathophysiology of T2DM is significantly influenced by IR and disruptions in insulin secretion. The risk factors associated with T2DM and IR comprise obesity, higher calorie consumption, advancing age, lack of physical activity, and genetic susceptibility [24]. Moreover, a chronic state of elevated blood sugar levels leads to an intracellular rise in reactive oxygen species (ROS), potentially resulting in persistent multiorgan damage, including the liver, kidney, and brain [25]. The liver has a crucial function in the body's overall response to insulin [26]. The occurrence of NAFLD rises in individuals with diabetes [27]. Similarly, pre-existing diabetes stands as an autonomous risk factor for the advancement of NAFLD, heightened liver-related mortality, and the occurrence of HCC, as demonstrated in a prospective study [28].

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease ranks as the most prevalent chronic hepatic condition, representing roughly 25% of all cases of chronic liver disease globally [29]. In developed countries, NAFLD stands as the leading contributor to liver disorders and abnormal liver enzymes in both Eastern and Western regions, resulting in a substantial strain on healthcare systems [30]. This disease refers to a spectrum of hepatic disorders in which deposition of lipid droplets in hepatocytes occurs due to underlying causes other than alcohol [31]. It is liable to progress to be superimposed by inflammation, which is then termed NASH. NASH can be diagnosed histopathologically when ballooning of hepatocytes and lobular inflammation is demonstrated on top of the previously established lipid accumulation. Thereafter, the pathological progression of NASH eventually leads to hepatic fibrosis, which predisposes to cirrhosis and possibly HCC (Figure 1) [32].

Figure 1 Stages and progression of liver diseases

Adapted from [33].

NAFLD: non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; NASH: non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; OXPHOS: oxidative phosphorylation; ATP: adenosine triphosphate; TCA: tricarboxylic acid cycle; KCs: Kupffer cells; HSCs: hepatic stellate cells; EMT: epithelial–mesenchymal transition

The pathogenesis behind NAFLD is linked to the "two-hit" theory. The initial hit is triggered by IR, stemming from an excessive influx of fatty acids into hepatocytes. The second hit involves inflammation linked to elevated insulin levels, hepatotoxicity resulting from free fatty acids, high levels of leptin, OS, and dysfunction in mitochondria [34]. The occurrence of NAFLD in individuals with T2DM was approximated to be 69% when identified through ultrasonography, compared to 87% when discovered through histopathology or MRI [35]. These assessments are anticipated due to the usual characteristics of T2DM, which involve IR, along with elevated levels of liver enzymes, triglycerides (TG), and lipids in the bloodstream [36]. Hence, NAFLD is frequently seen as an indication of MS in the liver and is commonly found as a comorbidity in individuals with T2DM [37]. Individuals with diabetes are at a significantly greater risk of developing hepatic steatosis compared to those without diabetes, with a likelihood ranging from 35% to 80% [38]. This epidemiological link indicates that NAFLD and T2DM have common causal factors, pathophysiological mechanisms, and potential treatment approaches.

Pathophysiological mechanisms shared between non-alcoholic liver disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus

The intricate interconnection of pathophysiological processes between T2DM and NAFLD is multifaceted, encompassing various biochemical pathways and feedback mechanisms (Figure 2) [35].

Figure 2 Pathophysiological mechanisms shared between NAFLD and T2DM

 Adapted from [39].

LPS: lipopolysaccharides; CRP: C-reactive protein; TNF-⍺: tumor necrosis factor; IL-6: interleukin-6; ROS: reactive oxygen species; NAFLD: non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; FFA: free fatty acids; TLR: toll like receptor; T2DM: type 2 diabetes mellitus

Impaired glucose metabolism

Derangement in the metabolism of glucose and subsequent hyperglycemia are distinctive characteristics of T2DM. Despite elevated insulin levels, an increase in gluconeogenesis leads to both fasting and post-meal hyperglycemia [40]. Individuals with T2DM and NAFLD often exhibit liver-specific IR, where insulin is unable to effectively control the release of glucose [41]. The prolonged elevation of blood glucose levels stimulates de novo lipogenesis (DNL) through two distinct mechanisms. Firstly, it directly boosts the activity of the tricarboxylic acid cycle and the synthesis of acyl CoA, which serves as a precursor for both DNL and glucose production. Secondly, it indirectly achieves this by triggering the expression of carbohydrate-responsive element-binding protein (ChREBP) and liver X receptor-α (LXRα), which function in promoting the transcription of genes like FAS cell surface death receptor (FAS) and stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD-1) [42]. These metabolic shifts lead to increased levels of plasma FFA and TG, along with the accumulation of ectopic fat. This, in turn, results in changes in insulin function, reduced ATP synthesis in muscles, diminished production of nitric oxide (NO), and reduced insulin-stimulated activation of phosphoinositol-3 kinase (PI3K), pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase isozyme 1, and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS). Furthermore, the persistent increase in blood glucose levels leads to progressive damage to the beta cells, an increase in the release of OS and ROS, cytoplasmic DNA fragmentation, alterations in mitochondrial structure, and the triggering of proapoptotic pathways [42].

Insulin resistance

Individuals with IR who have NAFLD exhibit diminished insulin sensitivity not just in muscle but also in the adipose tissue and liver [43]. In scenarios of IR, adipose tissue progressively becomes resistant to the insulin's ability to inhibit fat release, leading to an elevated release of fatty acids [44]. IR is characterized by higher insulin levels, which, when combined with elevated lipolysis and/or increased dietary fat intake, encourage the synthesis of TG in the liver [45]. Hepatic IR, induced by the activation of protein kinase C epsilon (PKC𝜀) through diacylglycerol, could be the pivotal pathological connection between NAFLD and T2DM [46].

Oxidative stress

In the liver, diabetes is regarded as the primary factor responsible for triggering OS, which elevates the concentration of ROS within the tissue. This, in turn, significantly reduces the levels of antioxidants, leading to elevations in lipid peroxidation and protein oxidation [47]. The body consistently generates free radicals through routine metabolic processes and interactions with environmental factors. In normal circumstances, antioxidants shield the body from the harmful effects of free radical production in vivo. OS arises from a disproportion between systems that generate radicals and those that effectively neutralize them, resulting in either an escalation of free radical production, a reduction in antioxidant activity, or both. In diabetes, protein glycation and glucose autoxidation have the potential to induce the generation of free radicals and accelerate the process of lipid peroxidation. Furthermore, the deficiencies in the body's antioxidant defenses become evident in diabetes. This includes alterations in antioxidant enzyme function, disruptions in glutathione metabolism, and diminished levels of ascorbic acid [48].

The extent of the progression from NAFLD to steatohepatitis depends on the extent of oxidative damage occurring in the liver [47]. In investigating the connection between insulin and leptin resistance in hepatic steatosis, Zhang and co-workers found that IR occurs initially, followed by the development of leptin resistance, and, subsequently, steatosis approximately two to three weeks later [49]. However, the link between leptin and hepatic steatosis has generated differing conclusions, despite the frequent occurrence of leptin resistance in obese individuals. This resistance is a significant contributor to the accumulation of hepatic fats and, consequently, the development of steatosis [50].

Inflammation

Inflammatory pathways are integral to the development of IR. Notably, chronic inflammation and a variety of mediators are released by various immune cells and adipocytes, most notably IL-6, TNF- α, and IL-1 [51]. Inflammation is linked with heightened OS and mitochondrial dysfunction. Hepatocellular inflammation involves various inflammatory cells; Kupffer cells, specifically, are integral to the development and advancement of NAFLD. They regulate the storage of TG in the liver, facilitate the inflammatory process, contribute to the process of lipid peroxidation, generate ROS, and activate nuclear transcription factors like NF-κB. These factors control the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, namely TNF-α and TGF-β, ultimately leading to injury in liver tissue [35]. Moreover, FFAs act as the main instigators of inflammation by promoting mitochondrial lipid oxidation, elevating ROS, and augmenting microsomal cytochromes like CYP4A1 and CYP2E1 [52]. Lipid peroxidation is a disruptive process that targets the polyunsaturated fatty acids found in cell membranes. It generates compounds like malondialdehyde and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal, which can diffuse from the cell and impact areas distant from the initial site of oxidation, making them crucial cytotoxic mediators. In addition, these compounds aid in the chemotaxis of neutrophils and have the potential to activate hepatic stellate cells, leading to increased collagen expression and the accumulation of fibrous tissue [51]. Additionally, individuals diagnosed with T2DM experience heightened systemic inflammation marked by increased levels of C-reactive protein, IL-1β, and IL-6 [53]. The excess accumulation of body fat frequently observed in individuals with T2DM is associated with the heightened production of proinflammatory cytokines by adipose tissue [54]. It was found that the mix of cytokines in the liver significantly contributes to the emergence of various aspects of human NAFLD, such as inflammation, fibrosis, and the formation of tumors [55].

AMP-activated protein kinase

AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) consists of a trimeric assembly that includes three subunits: an α subunit weighing 63 kDa, a β subunit weighing 38 kDa, and a γ subunit also weighing 38 kDa, wherein the α subunit is the catalytic portion, whereas the β and γ subunits possess regulatory functions [56]. The α subunit consists of three domains spanning from the N-terminal to the C-terminal: a kinase domain, a self-inhibitory domain that reduces the activity of AMPK at low levels of AMP, and a carboxy-terminal domain [57]. Furthermore, alterations in the intracellular ratio of AMP to ATP significantly influenced AMPK activity. When the levels of AMP/ATP increased, it led to the activation of AMPK, which, in turn, inhibited lipogenesis and enhanced the oxidation of fatty acids [58]. In mammals, these three subunits are present in seven different forms, specifically α1 and α2, β1 and β2, and γ1, γ2, and γ3 [59]. The predominant expression of subunits α1, α2, γ1, and γ2 occurs in the liver [57]. AMPK, a critical component in metabolic regulation, acts as an indicator of OS to the cells in response to OS and energy deficits within the body. It then governs target proteins through phosphorylation, impacting lipid metabolism [60]. Prior research has established that upon activation, AMPK has the ability to control lipid metabolism at the cellular level via the phosphorylation of several proteins that impact the synthesis of fatty acids, cholesterol, and the oxidation of fatty acids. As an example, AMPK, through phosphorylation, suppressed the function of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGR), a pivotal player in the regulation of cholesterol synthesis [61]. Simultaneously, AMPK has the capacity to phosphorylate and activate hormone-sensitive lipase (HSL), subsequently enhancing the breakdown of fatty acylglycerol and cholesterol lipids [62]. Furthermore, certain researchers identified possible mechanisms by which AMPK diminishes the buildup of fat in the liver [63,64]. AMPK in its active state is capable of phosphorylating and subsequently deactivating acetyl-CoA-carboxylase (ACC), thereby preventing its dimerization and consequently reducing the synthesis of fatty acids. Malonyl-CoA serves as a synthetic precursor for fatty acids and simultaneously inhibits the activity of carnitine acyltransferase 1 (CPT1). AMPK aids in the phosphorylation of ACC, rendering it inactive, which in turn diminishes the production of malonyl-CoA. This reduction enhances the expression of CPT1, thereby boosting the oxidation of fatty acids. To summarize, AMPK has the capability to phosphorylate essential downstream proteins, decreasing the buildup of lipids, enhancing the oxidation of fatty acids, and impeding the production of cholesterol and fatty acids. Consequently, the AMPK pathway holds potential as a potential therapeutic approach in the treatment of NAFLD.

Mechanistic target of rapamycin

The mechanistic target of rapamycin is a serine/threonine protein kinase possessing a molecular weight of 289 kDa, belonging to the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-related kinase (PIKK) family. It operates within two distinct complexes: mTORC1 and mTORC2 [65]. The mTORC1 pathway contributes to both lipogenesis and easing NAFLD by regulating the autophagy process. The activity of the mTOR pathway is affected by a variety of triggers, including a high-fat diet, excessive intake of processed carbohydrates, and elevated insulin levels. These factors regulate the activation of mTOR, often via the stimulation of the PI3K/AKT axis [66]. The mTOR pathway is sensitive to different sources of energy, including carbohydrates, lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids. It achieves this via the activation of mTOR complexes (mTORC1 and mTORC2). Consequently, mTOR is vital in controlling many metabolic processes, in addition to cellular proliferation and differentiation [67]. Thus, the mTOR complex is crucial in the control of nutrient availability and growth factors influencing various mechanisms and genes [68]. The synthesis of fatty acids and triacylglycerol in the liver is significantly regulated by DNL-induced Sterol Regulatory Element-Binding Protein 1 (SREBP1), a crucial factor in nutritional control. The mTORC1 pathway regulates anabolism and catabolism in accordance with fluctuating physiological nutrient levels [68]. Additionally, mTORC1 is involved in regulating DNL by boosting the transcription of SREBP1, which contributes to the development of NAFLD [69]. In situations of excessive nutrient intake when the liver is unable to completely metabolize the surplus dietary nutrients, the transformation of DNL into triacylglycerol becomes crucial. Subsequently, mTORC2 oversees the regulation of ChREBP1, leading to hepatic insulin resistance and DNL, while also promoting the accumulation of fat in the liver, contributing to NAFLD. Reducing ChREBP1 expression is necessary to eliminate the RICTOR subunit (the RPTOR independent companion of mTORC2) from mTORC2, which typically occurs during fasting [70-72].

α/β hydrolase domain-6

The α/β hydrolase domain-6 is a newly identified integral membrane protein that can break down monoacylglycerol [73].

Earlier research has indicated that ABHD6 is mainly responsible for controlling endocannabinoid signaling within the brain [74]. Nevertheless, the latest findings implicate ABHD6 in the development of different metabolic conditions, including MS, disorders in insulin secretion, obesity, and T2DM [75-77]. Notably, ABHD6 is widely expressed, with its presence detected in various tissues, including the liver, kidney, small intestine, and white adipose tissue [78]. When antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) was used to suppress the expression of ABHD6 in peripheral tissues, it resulted in weight loss, decreased hepatic steatosis, and improvement in various metabolic derangements in mice on a high-fat diet [75]. Moreover, the increased browning of adipose tissue and improved function of brown adipose tissue in ABHD6-knockout mice are, to some extent, a result of the buildup of 1-monoacylglycerol, which activates both PPARα and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) [77]. In summary, suppressing ABHD6 activity may hold promise for potential therapeutic applications in managing MS, obesity, and NAFLD.

Management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Lifestyle alterations continue to be the fundamental approach in managing NAFLD and are recommended for all individuals affected by the condition [79]. The evidence indicates that a Mediterranean diet is among the recommended dietary patterns, coupled with a focus on reducing calories to manage a 7-10% reduction in baseline body weight [80]. According to the current guidelines provided by the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) and the World Health Organization (WHO), it's recommended to incorporate exercise along with dieting, considering individual cardiovascular risk factors and any associated health conditions [81]. The complexity of managing NAFLD is due to the lack of well-established, effective disease-modifying treatment options [82]. The management strategies have an indirect impact by enhancing IR and glycemic control, which consequently aids in the treatment of T2DM. Therefore, pharmaceutical treatment should be limited to individuals with the most substantial risk of disease advancement in NAFLD. Consequently, the focus is on managing associated or coexisting conditions (such as diabetes, obesity, and NAFLD) to regulate the patient’s glycemic levels, hepatic function, and lipid profile [83].

Pharmacological treatment is advised for patients who fail to reach their targeted body weight parameters and for patients whose disease has progressed to NASH and a stage of fibrosis of 2 or higher (F2) as confirmed by a biopsy [84]. The Greek Atorvastatin and Coronary Heart Disease Evaluation (GREACE) trial examined the safety of statins in NAFLD. The author's findings indicated that statin treatment is well-tolerated and can enhance liver function tests while decreasing the risk of cardiovascular complications in individuals with mildly to moderately abnormal liver tests that may be related to NAFLD [85]. While hyperinsulinemia linked to IR can harm the liver, the administration of exogenous insulin in patients with T2DM can be beneficial. Research demonstrated that T2DM patients, who had inadequate control using oral antidiabetic medications, experienced a reduction in hepatic fat by 12.6% to 9.9% on proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) after a 12-week treatment with insulin glargine. Simultaneously, there was an enhancement in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from 7.9% to 7.2% [86].

Metformin remains a first-line agent in the treatment of T2DM [82]. It reduces body fat, enhances hepatic insulin sensitivity, promotes fatty acid oxidation, and lowers DNL [87,88]. It has not been approved for the treatment of NAFLD in the absence of diabetes [82]. In individuals diagnosed with NAFLD, metformin led to reduced levels of serum aminotransferases and enhanced IR. Nevertheless, it did not induce any changes in liver histology [89]. Furthermore, a recent meta-analysis suggested that metformin could potentially serve as a viable medication for managing NAFLD [90]. Moreover, the use of sulfonylureas for NAFLD induced by T2DM has not yet been supported by prospective studies [91]. Typically, both conditions present OS, which may be alleviated by using a dosage of 800 IU/day of vitamin E for a duration of 96 weeks. This treatment regimen can enhance liver function, steatosis, inflammation, and ballooning (with the exception of fibrosis) and result in NASH resolution in 43% of patients [92]. Pentoxifylline, a non-specific phosphodiesterase inhibitor, plays a role in reducing inflammatory mediators like TNF-α [93]. There have been conflicting findings regarding changes in plasma aminotransferases and imaging for hepatic steatosis, as some studies have demonstrated improvements while others have shown no significant changes [94]. Thiazolidinediones enhance insulin sensitivity in adipose tissue by activating PPARγ, which results in increased fatty acid uptake and storage [95]. An elevation in adiponectin levels accompanies the improvement of proinflammatory adipokines, leading to a reduction in gluconeogenesis and enhancement in the influx of fatty acids and insulin sensitivity [96]. Additionally, they facilitate the restoration of typical adipose tissue functions and contribute to the reduction of fat accumulation in the liver [97]. Presently, there is inadequate research evidence available to distinguish the use of various dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DDP-IV) inhibitors in individuals with both diabetes and NAFLD. Furthermore, they are relatively contraindicated to be used in patients with severe liver derangement [98]. Moreover, sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2) are often useful in ameliorating steatosis and inflammation. Glycosuria, through its induction of negative energy balance and the shift toward utilizing lipids as an energy source, can lead to halting the progression of steatosis and fibrosis [82]. More research studies are needed before these agents can be implemented clinically. In March 2024, resmetirom (a thyroid hormone receptor-β agonist) received accelerated approval in the USA for use with diet and exercise to treat adults with noncirrhotic NASH with moderate to advanced liver fibrosis. The medication is also under regulatory review in the European Union for the treatment of NASH [99]. Interestingly, animal studies have indicated that analogs of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) help alleviate hepatic steatosis and steatohepatitis [98,100,101].

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists could present favorable therapeutic possibilities in managing NAFLD due to their advantageous impacts on blood sugar levels and weight reduction [102,103]. Human hepatocytes have been observed to contain GLP-1 receptors, and there is a hypothesis suggesting that activating these receptors with GLP-1 receptor agonists may yield beneficial outcomes on hepatic steatosis, fatty acid oxidation, lipotoxicity, and the cytokines linked to liver inflammation and fibrosis [104]. Additionally, GLP-1 receptor agonists could potentially offer indirect beneficial effects on the liver by enhancing insulin release in accordance with elevated blood sugar levels, reducing the release of glucagon, prolonging gastric emptying, and leading to substantial weight loss [14].

Out of the GLP-1 receptor agonists, semaglutide has displayed the most significant advantages with regard to optimizing glycemic control and weight loss [105]. In a recently conducted phase three clinical trial involving overweight and obese individuals, semaglutide exhibited a substantial reduction in body weight, amounting to 14.9%, in contrast to the 2.4% decrease observed in the placebo group [106]. Furthermore, semaglutide has demonstrated decreased occurrences of cardiovascular and renal complications in T2DM patients [107-110]. It has subsequently gained approval for the management of T2DM and long-term weight control.

Semaglutide

Semaglutide (Ozempic®; Novo Nordisk A/S, Denmark) is an analog of GLP-1 approved for once-weekly subcutaneous treatment of T2DM in many countries [111]. The extensive SUSTAIN program revealed that once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide displayed effective glycemic control compared to various comparator treatments. It also offered supplementary clinical advantages, including weight reduction, decreased cardiovascular risk, and lowered systolic blood pressure, all with minimal incidence of hypoglycemia [112].In addition, the Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People with Obesity (STEP) trials demonstrated that a high-dose, once-weekly 2.4 mg semaglutide effectively reduces body weight in individuals with obesity. Although semaglutide was associated with a higher incidence of gastrointestinal side effects, it was generally safe and well tolerated [113]. In January 2020, Ozempic received FDA approval for its use in adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes [111]. Recent studies indicate that treatment with semaglutide has shown notable enhancements in liver enzymes, decreased liver stiffness, and improved metabolic parameters among individuals with NAFLD/NASH (Table 1). 

Table 1 Studies on weekly subcutaneous semaglutide for NAFLD/NASH

NAFLD: non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; NASH: non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

Reference	Type of the study	Medication	Number of patients and duration of the treatment	Effects	
Davies et al. (2021) [114]    	Double-blind, double-dummy phase 3 superiority study	Once-weekly subcutaneous administration of semaglutide 2.4 mg versus semaglutide 1.0 mg versus placebo.	1164 for 68 weeks	Semaglutide notably lowered ALT and C-reactive protein levels involving individuals with type 2 diabetes and/or obesity.	
Okamoto et al. (2021) [115]  	Retrospective, single-center, cohort study  	Semaglutide 0.25 mg was administered once weekly, and the dosage was increased to 0.5 mg once weekly after four weeks, or to 1.0 mg once weekly if the 0.5 mg dose for ≥4 weeks proved insufficient in terms of efficacy.	50 for six months	Semaglutide seems to be more effective in treating type 2 diabetes compared to other GLP-1 RAs. Liver-related parameters showed significant improvement after six months of treatment.	
Volpe et al. (2022) [116]  	Prospective, single-arm, real-life study	Semaglutide administered at doses ranging from 0.25 mg to 1 mg weekly.	48 for 52 weeks	Semaglutide improved glucose control and body composition, as well as enhanced the clinical presentation and reduced the severity of NAFLD in patients with type 2 diabetes.	
Schattenberg et al. (2023) [117]      	Randomized, placebo-controlled trials	Once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide (2.4 mg in STEP 1 and 1.0 mg or 2.4 mg in STEP 2)	STEP 1:1307 STEP 2: 643 for 68 weeks  	Semaglutide showed a favorable impact on NASH components in overweight/obese patients with or without type 2 diabetes.	

Glucagon-like peptide type 1 receptor agonists could potentially exert beneficial effects on oxidative stress through direct inhibition of the generation of OS through the cAMP-PKA pathway activated by the GLP-1 receptor, which in turn hinders oxidative stress production derived from NADPH oxidase [118]. Moreover, in experimental animal models, atherosclerotic lesion progression showed more favorable outcomes with increased circulating concentrations of GLP-1, attributed to the suppression of oxidative stress [16]. Furthermore, semaglutide suppressed the increased expression of pro-inflammatory factors, namely TNF-α and IL-6, and reduced overall fat accumulation in the liver [119].

Semaglutide (C187H291N45O59), which has a mass of 4113.58 g/mol, possesses a peptide structure composed of 31 amino acids. This structure is 94% similar to the natural GLP-1, which aims to reduce potential immunogenic responses [120]. The eighth position's alanine residue is replaced by Aib (2 aminoisobutyric acid), preventing the DDP-4 enzymes from degrading semaglutide. Similar to liraglutide, semaglutide also features a substitution of the lysine residue at the 34th position found in native GLP-1 with arginine. The replacement of arginine at the 34th position was crucial in the creation of the GLP-1 analog using the asemi-recombinant process [121]. The lysine residue at the 26th position was modified by acylation to facilitate its attachment to a C18 fatty diacid using a hydrophilic linker called "γGlu-2xOEG". This modification extended the half-life of the compound in the body by increasing its binding to albumin and reducing renal clearance [122].

Semaglutide enhances the effectiveness of incretin function through the activation of GLP-1 receptors. It acts through various mechanisms, including increased insulin secretion (dependent on glucose levels), suppression of glucagon secretion, and inhibition of gluconeogenesis in the liver, resulting in lower fasting and postprandial blood glucose levels [122]. Semaglutide has exhibited a promising proinsulin to insulin ratio, indicating enhanced efficiency in beta-cell function and increased insulin production [123,124]. It also showed enhanced insulin sensitivity, potentially attributed to an overall decrease in body weight [125]. Additionally, semaglutide results in weight reduction, a product of decreased caloric consumption and delayed gastric motility [126]. Semaglutide has an extended half-life of approximately one week, which makes it optimal for once-weekly injections [127,128]. In disease-free Caucasian and Japanese individuals, the once-weekly administration of semaglutide leads to dose-dependent increases in exposure for both 0.5 mg and 1 mg doses [129]. Clinical studies in pharmacology and population pharmacokinetics analyses from phase 3a trials have indicated that no dose adjustment is necessary based on renal or hepatic impairment or ethnicity [130,131]. Additionally, the population pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that the most significant indicator of semaglutide exposure is body weight, as overweight and obese individuals tend to exhibit lower semaglutide exposure [130,132]. It was found that drug interactions have indicated that there is no need for dosage adjustments with commonly prescribed oral medications when taken alongside once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide [133].

While generally well tolerated, semaglutide exhibits gastrointestinal upset of varying severity, such as nausea, vomiting, altered bowel movements, and indigestion. These symptoms are typically dose-dependent and tend to diminish within two weeks of starting treatment [134]. Less common adverse effects of semaglutide include nasopharyngitis, headaches, infections in the urinary and upper respiratory tracts, as well as elevated levels of pancreatic enzymes (amylase and lipase) [112,135-137]. In some instances, isolated cases of acute pancreatitis have been documented, necessitating the cessation of treatment. Episodes of hypoglycemia are rare with semaglutide. However, when used with insulin analogs or other medications that lower blood sugar, a dose reduction is typically required [121]. Besides these, extremely uncommon instances of temporary reactions at the injection site have also been documented [123]. Similar to other GLP-1 agonists, semaglutide exhibits some infrequent adverse effects, including tachycardia, in addition to cases of cholelithiasis and cholecystitis [126].

Conclusions

Treatment with semaglutide showed notable enhancements in liver enzymes, decreased liver stiffness, and improved metabolic parameters among individuals with NAFLD/NASH. Hence, it could possess hepatoprotective effects in NAFLD patients associated with T2DM. Nevertheless, there are concerns regarding potential gastrointestinal side effects. Further experimental studies are recommended to delve into the detailed molecular mechanisms through which semaglutide affects NAFLD as well as evaluate the occurrence rates of side effects associated with semaglutide (safety of semaglutide). Moreover, clinical studies are advised to determine the clinical effectiveness of semaglutide treatment in individuals with various metabolic conditions, such as NAFLD and liver fibrosis.

Disclosures

Author Contributions

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Concept and design:  Sultan Alfawaz, Abdulhadi Burzangi , Ahmed Esmat

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Sultan Alfawaz, Abdulhadi Burzangi , Ahmed Esmat

Drafting of the manuscript:  Sultan Alfawaz, Abdulhadi Burzangi , Ahmed Esmat

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Sultan Alfawaz, Abdulhadi Burzangi , Ahmed Esmat
==== Refs
References

1 Prevalence and reasons of increased type 2 diabetes in Gulf Cooperation Council Countries Saudi Med J Aljulifi MZ 481 490 42 2021 33896777
2 IDF Diabetes Atlas: global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040 Diabetes Res Clin Pract Ogurtsova K da Rocha Fernandes JD Huang Y 40 50 128 2017 28437734
3 Obesity, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes: associations and therapeutic implications Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes Wondmkun YT 3611 3616 13 2020 33116712
4 Liver fibrosis associated with adipose tissue and liver inflammation in an obesity model Med J Malaysia Setyaningsih WA Sari DC Romi MM Arfian N 304 310 76 2021 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34031327/ 34031327
5 Mechanism linking diabetes mellitus and obesity Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes Al-Goblan AS Al-Alfi MA Khan MZ 587 591 7 2014 25506234
6 Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease: what is important for primary care physicians? J Family Med Prim Care Ahmed MH Husain NE Almobarak AO 45 52 4 2015 25810989
7 Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: pathogenesis and disease spectrum Annu Rev Pathol Hardy T Oakley F Anstee QM Day CP 451 496 11 2016 26980160
8 Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Metabolites Mantovani A Petracca G Beatrice G Csermely A Lonardo A Targher G 73 11 2021 33513761
9 Exploring the landscape of steatotic liver disease in the general US population Liver Int Ciardullo S Carbone M Invernizzi P Perseghin G 2425 2433 43 2023 37592856
10 Complications, morbidity and mortality of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease Metabolism Mantovani A Scorletti E Mosca A Alisi A Byrne CD Targher G 154170 111S 2020 32006558
11 Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and chronic vascular complications of diabetes mellitus Nat Rev Endocrinol Targher G Lonardo A Byrne CD 99 114 14 2018 29286050
12 Editorial: a diabetologist's perspective on the diagnosis and monitoring of NAFLD Aliment Pharmacol Ther Targher G 710 711 52 2020 32886383
13 Therapeutic potential of semaglutide, a newer GLP-1 receptor agonist, in abating obesity, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and neurodegenerative diseases: a narrative review Pharm Res Mahapatra MK Karuppasamy M Sahoo BM 1233 1248 39 2022 35650449
14 Mechanisms and possible hepatoprotective effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and other incretin receptor agonists in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol Targher G Mantovani A Byrne CD 179 191 8 2023 36620987
15 The AMPK pathway in fatty liver disease Front Physiol Fang C Pan J Qu N Lei Y Han J Zhang J Han D 970292 13 2022 36203933
16 Comparison of effects of injectable semaglutide and dulaglutide on oxidative stress and glucose variability in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a prospective preliminary study Diabetes Ther Omachi T Ohara M Fujikawa T 111 126 15 2024 37880502
17 The mTORC1/AMPK pathway plays a role in the beneficial effects of semaglutide (GLP-1 receptor agonist) on the liver of obese mice Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol Reis-Barbosa PH Marcondes-de-Castro IA Marinho TS Aguila MB Mandarim-de-Lacerda CA 101922 46 2022 35427802
18 Semaglutide may alleviate hepatic steatosis in T2DM combined with NFALD mice via miR-5120/ABHD6 Drug Des Devel Ther Li R Ye Z She D 3557 3572 16 2022
19 Gut microbiota: a new target for T2DM prevention and treatment Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Liu L Zhang J Cheng Y Zhu M Xiao Z Ruan G Wei Y 958218 13 2022 36034447
20 Diagnostic performance of central and generalized adiposity in detecting risk of diabetes mellitus in adolescents Afr Health Sci Musa DI Agbana BE Adeola MF Idache BM Abu S Iwuagwu TE 119 126 22 2022 37092097
21 Quantifying the underestimation of projected global diabetes prevalence by the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) Diabetes Atlas BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Tönnies T Rathmann W Hoyer A Brinks R Kuss O 0 9 2021
22 Common mechanisms underlying diabetic vascular complications: focus on the interaction of metabolic disorders, immuno-inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction Cell Commun Signal Xue C Chen K Gao Z 298 21 2023 37904236
23 Type 2 Diabetes (Nursing) StatPearls [Internet] Goyal R Singhal M Jialal I Castano M Treasure Island (FL) StatPearls Publishing 2023 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK568737/
24 Pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus Int J Mol Sci Galicia-Garcia U Benito-Vicente A Jebari S 6275 21 2020 32872570
25 A PPARγ, NF-κB and AMPK-dependent mechanism may be involved in the beneficial effects of curcumin in the diabetic db/db mice liver Molecules Jiménez-Flores LM López-Briones S Macías-Cervantes MH Ramírez-Emiliano J Pérez-Vázquez V 8289 8302 19 2014 24945581
26 Insulin regulation of gluconeogenesis Ann N Y Acad Sci Hatting M Tavares CD Sharabi K Rines AK Puigserver P 21 35 1411 2018 28868790
27 Fatty liver disease in diabetes mellitus Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr Bhatt HB Smith RJ 101 108 4 2015 26005676
28 Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and diabetes: from physiopathological interplay to diagnosis and treatment World J Gastroenterol Leite NC Villela-Nogueira CA Cardoso CR Salles GF 8377 8392 20 2014 25024596
29 AGA clinical practice update: diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in lean individuals: expert review Gastroenterology Long MT Noureddin M Lim JK 764 774 163 2022 35842345
30 Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Prevention and Treatment of Atherosclerosis: Improving State-of-the-Art Management and Search for Novel Targets [Internet] Ding L Oligschlaeger Y Shiri-Sverdlov R Houben T 585 589 Cham (CH) Springer 2022 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK584310/
31 Efficacy and safety of semaglutide in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease World J Gastroenterol Zhu K Kakkar R Chahal D Yoshida EM Hussaini T 5327 5338 29 2023 37899788
32 Experimental data on the role of melatonin in the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease Biomedicines Terziev D Terzieva D 1722 11 2023 37371817
33 Remodeling of mitochondrial plasticity: the key switch from NAFLD/NASH to HCC Int J Mol Sci Longo M Paolini E Meroni M Dongiovanni P 4173 22 2021 33920670
34 Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: pathogenesis and intervention Precis Nutr Hao L Chai Z 29 2 2023 https://journals.lww.com/pn/fulltext/2023/03000/nonalcoholic_fatty_liver_disease__pathogenesis_and.1.aspx
35 Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and type 2 diabetes: common pathophysiologic mechanisms Curr Diab Rep Saponaro C Gaggini M Gastaldelli A 607 15 2015 25894944
36 Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a bidirectional relationship Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol Muzica CM Sfarti C Trifan A 6638306 2020 2020 33425804
37 Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a bidirectional relationship Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) Rhee EJ 226 233 34 2019 31565874
38 Oral administration of Bacillus toyonensis strain SAU-20 improves insulin resistance and ameliorates hepatic steatosis in type 2 diabetic mice Front Immunol Ren Z Okyere SK Xie L 837237 13 2022 35242140
39 Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and type 2 diabetes: Pathophysiological mechanisms shared between the two faces of the same coin Explor Med Acierno C Caturano A Pafundi P Nevola R Adinolfi L Sasso F 287 306 1 2020
40 Glucose metabolism and hyperglycemia Am J Clin Nutr Giugliano D Ceriello A Esposito K 217 222 87 2008
41 The complex link between NAFLD and type 2 diabetes mellitus - mechanisms and treatments Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Targher G Corey KE Byrne CD Roden M 599 612 18 2021 33972770
42 Insulin resistance drives hepatic de novo lipogenesis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease J Clin Invest Smith GI Shankaran M Yoshino M 1453 1460 130 2020 31805015
43 Effect of adipose tissue insulin resistance on metabolic parameters and liver histology in obese patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease Hepatology Lomonaco R Ortiz-Lopez C Orsak B 1389 1397 55 2012 22183689
44 Insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes: role of fatty acids Diabetes Metab Res Rev Arner P 0 9 18 Suppl 2 2002
45 Relationship between hepatic/visceral fat and hepatic insulin resistance in nondiabetic and type 2 diabetic subjects Gastroenterology Gastaldelli A Cusi K Pettiti M 496 506 133 2007 17681171
46 The entangled relationship between NAFLD, insulin resistance and obesity (ERNIRO) EC Endocrinol Metab Res Nikhra V 349 359 4 2019 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336019191_The_Entangled_Relationship_between_NAFLD_Insulin_Resistance_and_Obesity_ERNIRO
47 Molecular and pathological events involved in the pathogenesis of diabetes-associated nonalcoholic fatty liver disease J Clin Exp Hepatol Bedi O Aggarwal S Trehanpati N Ramakrishna G Krishan P 607 618 9 2019 31695251
48 Protective effects of green tea extract against hepatic tissue injury in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Abolfathi AA Mohajeri D Rezaie A Nazeri M 740671 2012 2012 22956978
49 Temporal relationship between diet-induced steatosis and onset of insulin/leptin resistance in male Wistar rats PLoS One Zhang L Song H Ge Y Ji G Yao Z 0 10 2015
50 Leptin in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a narrative review Metabolism Polyzos SA Kountouras J Mantzoros CS 60 78 64 2015 25456097
51 Lipid peroxidation: production, metabolism, and signaling mechanisms of malondialdehyde and 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal Oxid Med Cell Longev Ayala A Muñoz MF Argüelles S 360438 2014 2014 24999379
52 Effects of binge ethanol on lipid homeostasis and oxidative stress in a rat model of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease J Physiol Biochem Grasselli E Voci A Demori I De Matteis R Compalati AD Gallo G Vergani L 341 353 70 2014 24481563
53 Adipose tissue insulin resistance in adolescents with and without type 2 diabetes Pediatr Obes Kelsey MM Forster JE Van Pelt RE Reusch JE Nadeau KJ 373 380 9 2014 23861170
54 Adipose tissue in obesity-related inflammation and insulin resistance: cells, cytokines, and chemokines ISRN Inflamm Makki K Froguel P Wolowczuk I 139239 2013 2013 24455420
55 Evolution of inflammation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: the multiple parallel hits hypothesis Hepatology Tilg H Moschen AR 1836 1846 52 2010 21038418
56 Effect of different γ-subunit isoforms on the regulation of AMPK Biochem J Willows R Navaratnam N Lima A Read J Carling D 1741 1754 474 2017 28302767
57 AMPK: a novel target for treating hepatic fibrosis Oncotarget Liang Z Li T Jiang S 62780 62792 8 2017 28977988
58 Regulation of AMP-activated protein kinase by natural and synthetic activators Acta Pharm Sin B Grahame Hardie D 1 19 6 2016 26904394
59 AMP-activated protein kinase: a cellular energy sensor that comes in 12 flavours FEBS J Ross FA MacKintosh C Hardie DG 2987 3001 283 2016 26934201
60 AMPK: positive and negative regulation, and its role in whole-body energy homeostasis Curr Opin Cell Biol Hardie DG 1 7 33 2015 25259783
61 Inhibition of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase signaling leads to hypercholesterolemia and promotes hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance Hepatol Commun Loh K Tam S Murray-Segal L 84 98 3 2019 30619997
62 AMPK phosphorylates desnutrin/ATGL and hormone-sensitive lipase to regulate lipolysis and fatty acid oxidation within adipose tissue Mol Cell Biol Kim SJ Tang T Abbott M Viscarra JA Wang Y Sul HS 1961 1976 36 2016 27185873
63 Treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: role of AMPK Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab Smith BK Marcinko K Desjardins EM Lally JS Ford RJ Steinberg GR 0 40 311 2016
64 Apple polyphenol extract alleviates high-fat-diet-induced hepatic steatosis in male C57BL/6 mice by targeting LKB1/AMPK pathway J Agric Food Chem Li D Liu F Wang X Li X 12208 12218 67 2019 31608624
65 mTOR: a potential new target in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease Int J Mol Sci Feng J Qiu S Zhou S 9196 23 2022 36012464
66 Nutrient mTORC1 signaling contributes to hepatic lipid metabolism in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease Liver Res Chen H 15 22 4 2020
67 mTORC1 balances cellular amino acid supply with demand for protein synthesis through post-transcriptional control of ATF4 Cell Rep Park Y Reyna-Neyra A Philippe L Thoreen CC 1083 1090 19 2017 28494858
68 The mTOR-autophagy axis and the control of metabolism Front Cell Dev Biol Deleyto-Seldas N Efeyan A 655731 9 2021 34277603
69 SREBP1-induced fatty acid synthesis depletes macrophages antioxidant defences to promote their alternative activation Nat Metab Bidault G Virtue S Petkevicius K 1150 1162 3 2021 34531575
70 mTORC2 regulates amino acid metabolism in cancer by phosphorylation of the cystine-glutamate antiporter xCT Mol Cell Gu Y Albuquerque CP Braas D 128 138 67 2017 28648777
71 Epigenetics in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease Mol Aspects Med Lee J Kim Y Friso S Choi SW 78 88 54 2017 27889327
72 Adipose tissue mTORC2 regulates ChREBP-driven de novo lipogenesis and hepatic glucose metabolism Nat Commun Tang Y Wallace M Sanchez-Gurmaches J 11365 7 2016 27098609
73 α/β-hydrolase domain-containing 6 (ABHD6)- a multifunctional lipid hydrolase Metabolites Pusch LM Riegler-Berket L Oberer M Zimmermann R Taschler U 761 12 2022 36005632
74 Dual inhibition of alpha/beta-hydrolase domain 6 and fatty acid amide hydrolase increases endocannabinoid levels in neurons J Biol Chem Marrs WR Horne EA Ortega-Gutierrez S 28723 28728 286 2011 21665953
75 The serine hydrolase ABHD6 Is a critical regulator of the metabolic syndrome Cell Rep Thomas G Betters JL Lord CC 508 520 5 2013 24095738
76 α/β-Hydrolase domain-6-accessible monoacylglycerol controls glucose-stimulated insulin secretion Cell Metab Zhao S Mugabo Y Iglesias J 993 1007 19 2014 24814481
77 α/β-hydrolase domain 6 deletion induces adipose browning and prevents obesity and type 2 diabetes Cell Rep Zhao S Mugabo Y Ballentine G 2872 2888 14 2016 26997277
78 Monoacylglycerol signalling and ABHD6 in health and disease Diabetes Obes Metab Poursharifi P Madiraju SR Prentki M 76 89 19 Suppl 1 2017 28880480
79 AGA clinical practice update on lifestyle modification using diet and exercise to achieve weight loss in the management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: expert review Gastroenterology Younossi ZM Corey KE Lim JK 912 918 160 2021 33307021
80 Treatment of NAFLD with diet, physical activity and exercise J Hepatol Romero-Gómez M Zelber-Sagi S Trenell M 829 846 67 2017 28545937
81 Exercise as medicine: the impact of exercise training on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease Curr Hepatol Rep Thorp A Stine JG 402 411 19 2020 33767944
82 Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and diabetes Metabolism Hazlehurst JM Woods C Marjot T Cobbold JF Tomlinson JW 1096 1108 65 2016 26856933
83 NAFLD as a continuum: from obesity to metabolic syndrome and diabetes Diabetol Metab Syndr Godoy-Matos AF Silva Júnior WS Valerio CM 60 12 2020 32684985
84 Dietary and pharmacological treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease Medicina (Kaunas) Jeznach-Steinhagen A Ostrowska J Czerwonogrodzka-Senczyna A Boniecka I Shahnazaryan U Kuryłowicz A 166 55 2019 31137547
85 Safety and efficacy of long-term statin treatment for cardiovascular events in patients with coronary heart disease and abnormal liver tests in the Greek Atorvastatin and Coronary Heart Disease Evaluation (GREACE) Study: a post-hoc analysis Lancet Athyros VG Tziomalos K Gossios TD 1916 1922 376 2010 21109302
86 Effects of insulin glargine and liraglutide therapy on liver fat as measured by magnetic resonance in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial Diabetes Care Tang A Rabasa-Lhoret R Castel H 1339 1346 38 2015 25813773
87 Effects of rosiglitazone and metformin on liver fat content, hepatic insulin resistance, insulin clearance, and gene expression in adipose tissue in patients with type 2 diabetes Diabetes Tiikkainen M Häkkinen AM Korsheninnikova E Nyman T Mäkimattila S Yki-Järvinen H 2169 2176 53 2004 15277403
88 Metformin and salicylate synergistically activate liver AMPK, inhibit lipogenesis and improve insulin sensitivity Biochem J Ford RJ Fullerton MD Pinkosky SL 125 132 468 2015 25742316
89 Evolving role for pharmacotherapy in NAFLD/NASH Clin Transl Sci Attia SL Softic S Mouzaki M 11 19 14 2021 32583961
90 Effect of metformin on nonalcoholic fatty liver based on meta-analysis and network pharmacology Medicine (Baltimore) Huang Y Wang X Yan C 0 101 2022
91 Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus Indian J Endocrinol Metab Dharmalingam M Yamasandhi PG 421 428 22 2018 30090738
92 Pioglitazone, vitamin E, or placebo for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis N Engl J Med Sanyal AJ Chalasani N Kowdley KV 1675 1685 362 2010 20427778
93 Pentoxifylline improves nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a randomized placebo-controlled trial Hepatology Zein CO Yerian LM Gogate P Lopez R Kirwan JP Feldstein AE McCullough AJ 1610 1619 54 2011 21748765
94 Pentoxifylline for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a randomized controlled trial Ann Hepatol Van Wagner LB Koppe SW Brunt EM Gottstein J Gardikiotes K Green RM Rinella ME 277 286 10 2011 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21677329/ 21677329
95 Thiazolidinediones and the liver in humans Curr Opin Lipidol Yki-Järvinen H 477 483 20 2009 19779336
96 The role of adiponectin in the pathogenesis and treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease Diabetes Obes Metab Polyzos SA Kountouras J Zavos C Tsiaousi E 365 383 12 2010 20415685
97 Long-term pioglitazone treatment for patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and prediabetes or type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized trial Ann Intern Med Cusi K Orsak B Bril F 305 315 165 2016 27322798
98 Glucagon-like peptide-1 reduces hepatic lipogenesis via activation of AMP-activated protein kinase J Hepatol Ben-Shlomo S Zvibel I Shnell M 1214 1223 54 2011 21145820
99 Resmetirom: first approval Drugs Keam SJ 729 735 84 2024 38771485
100 Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor activation stimulates hepatic lipid oxidation and restores hepatic signalling alteration induced by a high-fat diet in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis Liver Int Svegliati-Baroni G Saccomanno S Rychlicki C 1285 1297 31 2011 21745271
101 Exendin-4, a glucagon-like protein-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, reverses hepatic steatosis in ob/ob mice Hepatology Ding X Saxena NK Lin S Gupta NA Anania FA 173 181 43 2006 16374859
102 Liraglutide improves carotid intima-media thickness in patients with type 2 diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: an 8-month prospective pilot study Expert Opin Biol Ther Rizvi AA Patti AM Giglio RV 1391 1397 15 2015 26195184
103 Liraglutide improves metabolic parameters and carotid intima-media thickness in diabetic patients with the metabolic syndrome: an 18-month prospective study Cardiovasc Diabetol Rizzo M Rizvi AA Patti AM 162 15 2016 27912784
104 The GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide for the treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis Hepatology Dichtel LE 2290 2292 74 2021 33960005
105 Management of endocrine disease: are all GLP-1 agonists equal in the treatment of type 2 diabetes? Eur J Endocrinol Nauck MA Meier JJ 0 34 181 2019
106 Once-weekly semaglutide in adults with overweight or obesity N Engl J Med Wilding JP Batterham RL Calanna S 989 1002 384 2021 33567185
107 Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes N Engl J Med Marso SP Bain SC Consoli A 1834 1844 375 2016 27633186
108 Effect of semaglutide on subclinical atherosclerosis and cardiometabolic compensation: a real-world study in patients with type 2 diabetes Biomedicines Patti AM Giglio RV Allotta A 1362 11 2023 37239033
109 Novel therapeutical approaches to managing atherosclerotic risk Int J Mol Sci Giglio RV Pantea Stoian A Al-Rasadi K 4633 22 2021 33924893
110 Impact of glucose-lowering medications on cardiovascular and metabolic risk in type 2 diabetes J Clin Med Patti AM Rizvi AA Giglio RV Stoian AP Ligi D Mannello F 912 9 2020 32225082
111 Pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide in healthy chinese subjects: a double-blind, phase 1, randomized controlled trial Adv Ther Shi A Xie P Nielsen LL Skjøth TV He X Haugaard SP 550 561 38 2021 33159658
112 Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide monotherapy versus placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 1): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multinational, multicentre phase 3a trial Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol Sorli C Harashima S-i Tsoukas GM Unger J Karsbøl JD Hansen T Bain SC 251 260 5 2017 28110911
113 The impact once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg will have on clinical practice: a focus on the STEP trials Nutrients Alabduljabbar K Al-Najim W le Roux CW 2217 14 2022 35684020
114 Semaglutide 2· 4 mg once a week in adults with overweight or obesity, and type 2 diabetes (STEP 2): a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial Lancet Davies M Færch L Jeppesen OK 971 984 397 2021 33667417
115 Efficacy and safety of semaglutide in glycemic control, body weight management, lipid profiles and other biomarkers among obese type 2 diabetes patients initiated or switched to semaglutide from other GLP-1 receptor agonists J Diabetes Metab Disord Okamoto A Yokokawa H Nagamine T Fukuda H Hisaoka T Naito T 2121 2128 20 2021 34900848
116 Once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide improves fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: a 52-week prospective real-life study Nutrients Volpe S Lisco G Fanelli M 4673 14 2022 36364937
117 Prevalence of, and effect of semaglutide on, features of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in patients with obesity with and without type 2 diabetes: analysis of data from two randomised placebo-controlled trials using SomaSignal tests J Hepatol Schattenberg J Grønbæk H Kliers I 811 812 78 2023
118 Role of semaglutide in the treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Diabetes Metab Syndr Bandyopadhyay S Das S Samajdar SS Joshi SR 102849 17 2023 37717295
119 Semaglutide ameliorates metabolism and hepatic outcomes in an NAFLD mouse model Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Niu S Chen S Chen X 1046130 13 2022 36568109
120 Absorption, metabolism and excretion of the GLP-1 analogue semaglutide in humans and nonclinical species Eur J Pharm Sci Jensen L Helleberg H Roffel A 31 41 104 2017 28323117
121 Semaglutide, a glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonist with cardiovascular benefits for management of type 2 diabetes Rev Endocr Metab Disord Mahapatra MK Karuppasamy M Sahoo BM 521 539 23 2022 34993760
122 The discovery and development of liraglutide and semaglutide Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Knudsen LB Lau J 155 10 2019 31031702
123 Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus exenatide ER in subjects with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 3): a 56-week, open-label, randomized clinical trial Diabetes Care Ahmann AJ Capehorn M Charpentier G 258 266 41 2018 29246950
124 Intestinal permeation enhancers for oral delivery of macromolecules: a comparison between salcaprozate sodium (SNAC) and sodium caprate (C10) Pharmaceutics Twarog C Fattah S Heade J Maher S Fattal E Brayden DJ 78 11 2019 30781867
125 Reductions in insulin resistance are mediated primarily via weight loss in subjects with type 2 diabetes on semaglutide J Clin Endocrinol Metab Fonseca VA Capehorn MS Garg SK 4078 4086 104 2019 30938762
126 Semaglutide as a promising antiobesity drug Obes Rev Christou GA Katsiki N Blundell J Fruhbeck G Kiortsis DN 805 815 20 2019 30768766
127 Discovery of the once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue semaglutide J Med Chem Lau J Bloch P Schäffer L 7370 7380 58 2015 26308095
128 Semaglutide, a once-weekly human GLP-1 analog, does not reduce the bioavailability of the combined oral contraceptive, ethinylestradiol/levonorgestrel J Clin Pharmacol Kapitza C Nosek L Jensen L Hartvig H Jensen CB Flint A 497 504 55 2015 25475122
129 A randomized trial investigating the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of subcutaneous semaglutide once-weekly in healthy male Japanese and Caucasian subjects Adv Ther Ikushima I Jensen L Flint A Nishida T Zacho J Irie S 531 544 35 2018 29536338
130 Population pharmacokinetics of semaglutide for type 2 diabetes Diabetes Ther Overgaard RV Delff PH Petri KC Anderson TW Flint A Ingwersen SH 649 662 10 2019 30788808
131 Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of semaglutide in people with hepatic impairment Diabetes Obes Metab Jensen L Kupcova V Arold G Pettersson J Hjerpsted JB 998 1005 20 2018 29205786
132 Semaglutide s.c. once-weekly in type 2 diabetes: a population pharmacokinetic analysis Diabetes Ther Carlsson Petri KC Ingwersen SH Flint A Zacho J Overgaard RV 1533 1547 9 2018 29907893
133 Effect of semaglutide on the pharmacokinetics of metformin, warfarin, atorvastatin and digoxin in healthy subjects Clin Pharmacokinet Hausner H Derving Karsbøl J Holst AG Jacobsen JB Wagner FD Golor G Anderson TW 1391 1401 56 2017 28349387
134 Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes Expert Opin Investig Drugs Tan X Cao X Zhou M Zou P Hu J 1083 1089 26 2017
135 Safety and efficacy of semaglutide once weekly vs sitagliptin once daily, both as monotherapy in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes Diabetes Obes Metab Seino Y Terauchi Y Osonoi T 378 388 20 2018 28786547
136 Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus once-daily insulin glargine as add-on to metformin (with or without sulfonylureas) in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 4): a randomised, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre, multinational, phase 3a trial Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol Aroda VR Bain SC Cariou B 355 366 5 2017 28344112
137 Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus once-daily sitagliptin as an add-on to metformin, thiazolidinediones, or both, in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 2): a 56-week, double-blind, phase 3a, randomised trial Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol Ahrén B Masmiquel L Kumar H Sargin M Karsbøl JD Jacobsen SH Chow F 341 354 5 2017 28385659
