
==== Front
Cureus
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus Palo Alto (CA)

10.7759/cureus.67068
Preventive Medicine
Public Health
Infectious Disease
Geographic Distribution and Temporal Trends of Zika Virus Outbreaks in India (2016–2023): Insights From the Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme Data
Muacevic Alexander
Adler John R
Asokan Dinesh 1
Bommu Siva Prasad Reddy 1
Mall Anjali 1
Pardeshi Geeta 1
1 Community Medicine, Grant Government Medical College and Sir JJ Group of Hospitals, Mumbai, IND
Anjali Mall singhanjali7111@gmail.com
17 8 2024
8 2024
16 8 e6706817 8 2024
Copyright © 2024, Asokan et al.
2024
Asokan et al.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This article is available from https://www.cureus.com/articles/275711-geographic-distribution-and-temporal-trends-of-zika-virus-outbreaks-in-india-2016-2023-insights-from-the-integrated-disease-surveillance-programme-data
Introduction

This study examines the geographic distribution and temporal trends of Zika virus (ZIKV) outbreaks in India from 2016 to 2023 using data from the Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP). The burden of ZIKV in India has risen due to its rapid spread and significant health impacts. Existing literature highlights seasonal and geographic patterns but lacks a comprehensive, long-term analysis specific to India. This study addresses this gap by analyzing trends over seven years to inform better public health responses.

Methods

A secondary data analysis was conducted using publicly available data from the IDSP on reported Zika cases from January 2016 to December 2023. Descriptive statistical methods and geographic information system (GIS) mapping techniques were employed to analyze the geographic distribution and temporal trends of ZIKV outbreaks in India. The data were analyzed and visualized using R software version 4.3.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), with heat maps and choropleth maps to identify hotspots, and line diagrams to identify temporal trends.

Results

Zika outbreaks predominantly occurred during the post-monsoon season, accounting for 47.62% (n = 10) of the total 21 outbreaks, followed by the monsoon season with 33.33% (n = 7), and summer with 19.05% (n = 4). Two deaths were reported during a significant outbreak in Madhya Pradesh in 2018. Temporal trends indicated notable spikes in cases in 2018 (131 cases) and 2021 (234 cases), with no cases reported in 2019 and 2020. The geographic distribution maps highlighted significant concentrations of ZIKV outbreaks in specific districts within Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, and Kerala.

Discussion

The study identified seasonal patterns, with most cases occurring in the post-monsoon season. The geographic spread of the ZIKV was observed in eight states from 2016 to 2023. GIS identified three hotspots in Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, and Kerala.

Conclusion

The study highlights the need for heightened surveillance and targeted intervention preparedness during high-risk seasons. Enhancing testing facilities and data reporting systems could improve outbreak identification, management, and response.

geographic information system
integrated disease surveillance programme
public health
seasonal trends
gis
india
zika virus
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

The Zika virus (ZIKV) has recently reemerged as a significant public health threat in Maharashtra and across India. In response to reported cases of Zika virus in Maharashtra, the Director General of Health Services (DGHS) at the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare has issued a comprehensive advisory to all states emphasizing the critical need for heightened vigilance regarding Zika virus across India [1]. Despite the absence of reported Zika-associated microcephaly cases in India since 2016, state authorities are urged to maintain preparedness and swiftly report any suspected cases to the Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP) and National Center for Vector Borne Diseases Control (NCVBDC) for a prompt response [2]. Over the past decade, sporadic outbreaks have highlighted its potential to spread rapidly, posing a growing concern for public health officials and communities alike [3].

India, as the world’s most populous country, faces unique challenges in disease management. The increased prevalence of vector-borne diseases, particularly those transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes, underscores the urgency of addressing the Zika virus [4]. India faces a critical public health concern due to the influx of international travelers from Zika-endemic regions. With the recent surge in Zika outbreaks within the country, the Zika virus is a growing major concern of public health in India [5]. ZIKV is an arthropod-borne virus belonging to the Flaviviridae family [6]. Zika virus was first identified in Uganda in 1947 when it was isolated from a sentinel rhesus monkey in the Zika forest [7]. The virus later spread to humans, with the first large outbreak occurring in 2007 on the Pacific Island of Yap in the Federated States of Micronesia [8]. Before this, only 14 cases of human Zika virus disease had been documented worldwide. Subsequent outbreaks occurred in French Polynesia (2013-2014) and South America (2015-2016), raising global concern [9].

In 2016, India reported its first confirmed Zika cases in Gujarat [10]. These cases were detected in Ahmedabad, marking the initial introduction of Zika virus into the country. The Krishnagiri district of Tamil Nadu reported a Zika virus case in July 2017 [11]. Maharashtra witnessed a recent surge in Zika cases, particularly in Pune. As of July 2, 2024, Maharashtra reported eight cases, of which six were in Pune, one in Kolhapur, and one in Sangamner [12]. Geographic information system (GIS) plays a pivotal role in tracking and analyzing the spread of Zika virus. By integrating data on weekly outbreaks from IDSP across India, GIS enables public health authorities to visualize hotspots, identify trends, and strategize targeted interventions to mitigate transmission [13].

Studying the characteristics of the Zika virus for the whole of India as well as region-wise is crucial for understanding transmission dynamics and time trends. Analyzing weekly outbreaks helps identify seasonal patterns, assess the effectiveness of control measures, and inform timely public health responses tailored to the region's unique epidemiological landscape [14]. Given the rapid geographic spread associated with recent ZIKV outbreaks, understanding the epidemiology and dynamics of the virus in different regions is crucial. India, with its diverse ecological landscapes and widespread mosquito populations, presents a unique setting for studying the transmission patterns and impact of ZIKV [15]. Furthermore, the potential introduction of more virulent strains from other endemic regions underscores the urgent need for comprehensive surveillance and preventive strategies tailored to local conditions [16]. This study was conducted with the rationale that by analyzing the geographical distribution and temporal trends of Zika virus outbreaks in India from January 2016 to December 2023 using GIS, policy implementation gaps can be identified, and targeted interventions can be developed to mitigate future public health crises. The primary research question guiding this study is as follows: What are the geographical distribution patterns and temporal trends of Zika virus outbreaks in India during this period? To address this question, the study set out to achieve several objectives: to analyze the geographical distribution of Zika virus outbreaks using GIS, to identify temporal trends in these outbreaks, and to highlight regions with significant concentrations of Zika virus cases and potential hotspots [17].

Materials and methods

Study design

This study employed a secondary data analysis with descriptive and spatial analysis components to examine the geographic distribution and temporal trends of Zika virus outbreaks in India from January 2016 to December 2023. GIS and statistical methods were utilized to achieve these objectives.

Inclusion criteria

The study included data from all weeks between January 2016 and December 2023 where ZIKV outbreaks were reported and published on the IDSP website.

Exclusion criteria

Data from weeks where no ZIKV outbreaks were reported were excluded. Additionally, weeks with missing or inaccessible data due to technical issues on the IDSP website were excluded from the analysis.

Data collection

Data for the study were collected from the IDSP, which provides comprehensive surveillance data on various diseases, including the Zika virus. The dataset covered all reported Zika cases within the specified period. Due to occasional technical issues with the IDSP website, data for certain weeks were inaccessible and were therefore excluded from the analysis. Data collection involved downloading and compiling weekly reports from the IDSP portal, ensuring that all relevant information on Zika virus outbreaks was captured. The data were sourced from nationwide reports, ensuring representation across different regions of India.

Data analysis

Statistical analysis and GIS image generation were conducted using R software version 4.3.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). The analysis focused on identifying spatial and temporal patterns in Zika virus outbreaks across India. Heat maps and choropleth maps were created to visualize the geographic distribution of outbreaks, highlighting areas with significant concentrations of cases. Line diagrams were used to depict temporal trends, showing variations in outbreak occurrences over the study period. Descriptive statistics, including the interquartile range (IQR) and other relevant tests, were calculated to summarize the frequency and distribution of Zika virus cases. Spatial analysis techniques were employed to identify hotspots and patterns of disease spread.

Ethical considerations

The Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) approval was not required for this study as it involved the analysis of publicly available data from the IDSP, maintained by the Government of India. The use of publicly accessible data ensured that no personal or sensitive information was accessed, maintaining the ethical integrity of the research.

Results

The analysis of the IDSP data from 2016 to 2023 revealed a distinct seasonal pattern in Zika virus outbreaks in India. Outbreaks predominantly occurred during the post-monsoon season (47.62%), followed by the monsoon season (33.33%), and summer (19.05%). The chi-square test for season-wise distribution yielded a p-value of 0.28, indicating no statistically significant association between the season and the incidence of outbreaks. However, when combined, the monsoon with post-monsoon periods showed a significant association with a p-value of 0.0046 (p < 0.05). During the study period, only two deaths were reported, both in 2018 in Madhya Pradesh, involving an 18-year-old male with co-infection of dengue and Japanese encephalitis (JE) and a 23-year-old woman who succumbed to multi-organ failure.

Table 1 shows that the median duration between the onset and reporting of Zika virus outbreaks in India from 2016 to 2023 varied significantly based on settlement type. Rural areas had a median duration of five days (IQR: 4-8) compared to urban areas with two days (IQR: 0-3.5), with a significant p-value of 0.0373. For seasons, the median duration during the monsoon was 3.5 days (IQR: 1-6) and five days (IQR: 3-9) in summer, with no significant difference (p-value: 0.3746). First-time outbreaks had a median of four days (IQR: 1-6) versus three days (IQR: 5-13.5) for repeat outbreaks (p-value: 0.8642). Comparing years, the median duration for 2017-2021 was four days (IQR: 1-5), and for 2022-2023, it was 3.5 days (IQR: 2-7.5), with no significant difference (p-value: 0.6629).

Table 1 Analysis of the median duration between onset and reporting of Zika virus outbreaks in India (2016–2023).

n = number of outbreaks. The p-values were calculated using the Mann–Whitney U test. A p-value less than 0.05 is considered statistically significant (*).

Category	Group (n)	The median duration between onset and reporting of the outbreak in days (IQR)	Mann-Whitney U value	p-value	
Settlement	Rural (9)	5 (4-8)	18.5	0.0373*	
Urban (8)	2 (0-3.5)	
Seasons	Monsoon (14)	3.5 (1-6)	20.0	0.3746	
Summer (3)	5 (3-9)	
First or repeat outbreak	First (13)	4 (1-6)	25.5	0.8642	
Repeat (4)	3 (5-13.5)	
Years	2017-2021 (9)	4 (1-5)	27.0	0.6629	
2022-2023 (8)	3.5 92-7.5)	

Figure 1 depicts the trend of Zika virus cases in India from 2016 to 2023. During the years 2018 and 2021, there were significant spikes, with reported cases of 131 and 234, respectively. There were no cases reported in 2019 and 2020. In 2022, only two cases were observed, followed by a rise to 18 cases in 2023.

Figure 1 Trend of Zika virus cases in India from 2016 to 2023.

Figure 2 shows the trend of Zika virus cases in India from 2016 to 2023. Notable outbreaks were recorded in 2017 and 2018, each with two outbreaks. The most significant spike in outbreaks was observed in 2021, with eight reported outbreaks. The years 2019 and 2020 saw no outbreaks. There were minor increases in 2022 and 2023, with two and seven outbreaks, respectively.

Figure 2 Trend of Zika virus outbreaks in India from 2016 to 2023.

Figure 3 provides a heat map of the geographic distribution of Zika virus cases across India. The map highlights several hotspots in Uttar Pradesh, specifically in Kanpur, Fatehpur, and Lucknow. In Madhya Pradesh, significant concentrations are seen in Bhopal, Vidhisha, Sehore, Sagar, Hoshangabad, Raisen, and Narsinghpur. In Kerala, notable hotspots are observed in Trivandrum, Ernakulam, Kannur, and Kollam. In Maharashtra, cases occurred sporadically in Mumbai Suburban, Kolhapur, and Raigad, without significant concentrations. The color gradient and bubble sizes indicate the intensity of cases, with larger bubbles and darker colors representing higher case numbers.

Figure 3 Heat map of Zika virus cases in India from 2016 to 2023.

Image credits: Dinesh Asokan, Siva Prasad Reddy Bommu, Anjali Mall, and Geeta Pardeshi.

Figure 4 shows the locations of Zika research and testing centers across India. These centers include the National Institute of Virology (NIV) Pune in Maharashtra, Sawai Man Singh Medical College (SMS) Jaipur in Rajasthan, All India Institutes of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) Bhopal in Madhya Pradesh, King George's Medical University (KGMU) Lucknow in Uttar Pradesh, Manipal Institute of Virology in Karnataka, and several centers in Kerala, including National Institute of Virology (NIV) Unit Alappuzha, KIMS Trivandrum, Trivandrum Medical College, and the Institute of Advanced Virology. These centers are strategically located in regions with higher incidences of Zika cases to facilitate rapid response and research activities. These labs were crucial in the outbreak investigations from 2016 to 2023.

Figure 4 Choropleth map of Zika virus testing centers utilized in India from 2016 to 2023.

NIV: National Institute of Virology; SMS: Sawai Man Singh Medical College; AIIMS: All India Institutes of Medical Sciences; KGMU: King George's Medical University.

Image credits: Dinesh Asokan, Siva Prasad Reddy Bommu, Anjali Mall, and Geeta Pardeshi.

Discussion

Our analysis of the IDSP data from 2016 to 2023 revealed a distinct seasonal pattern in Zika virus outbreaks in India, predominantly occurring during the post-monsoon season (10, 47.62%), followed by the monsoon season (7, 33.33%), and summer (4, 19.05%). Despite the lack of statistical significance in season-wise distribution (p-value = 0.28), the combined monsoon/post-monsoon periods showed a significant association (p-value = 0.0046), suggesting favorable conditions for mosquito breeding during these times.

The analysis reveals significant disparities in the median duration between the onset and reporting of Zika virus outbreaks in India, notably longer in rural areas (five days) compared to urban areas (two days), with a significant p-value of 0.0373. This suggests that rural regions face challenges such as limited healthcare infrastructure and delayed access to diagnostic facilities, leading to slower outbreak reporting. No significant differences were found based on season, outbreak frequency, or time period, indicating consistent public health responses across these variables. These findings highlight the urgent need for targeted interventions to improve outbreak reporting efficiency in rural areas and the continuous enhancement of public health strategies.

The geographic distribution of Zika virus cases across India, with hotspots in Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, and Kerala, underscores the need for region-specific strategies to manage and control outbreaks. The presence of research and testing centers in these high-incidence regions, such as NIV Pune, SMS Jaipur, AIIMS Bhopal, KGMU Lucknow, and various centers in Kerala, has been crucial in facilitating rapid response and research activities. However, the observed gaps in outbreak reporting and the significant spikes in cases during 2018 and 2021 may be due to the availability of testing centers in these states, while other states lacking such facilities might be underreporting or not reporting cases at all. To address this issue, it is imperative to increase the number of ZIKV testing centers across the country to ensure comprehensive and timely diagnosis and reporting. This will help in promptly identifying and containing outbreaks.

The two deaths reported during the study period, both occurring in 2018, emphasize the potential severity of Zika virus infections, particularly when co-infections with other diseases such as dengue and Japanese encephalitis are present. This finding underscores the importance of integrated disease management strategies and the need for healthcare systems to be prepared for multi-faceted public health challenges. Moving forward, it is imperative to focus on strengthening diagnostic capabilities, enhancing surveillance systems, and promoting timely reporting to effectively manage and control Zika virus outbreaks in India.

The findings from this study align well with the broader understanding of Zika virus outbreaks both in India and globally. Previous research has consistently demonstrated the influence of seasonal patterns on the incidence of Zika virus. For instance, Bhardwaj et al. (2017) highlighted that the monsoon season creates favorable conditions for the breeding of Aedes mosquitoes, the primary vector for Zika virus transmission [18]. Dhimal et al. (2018) emphasized the importance of GIS in tracking arboviral diseases across Asia, which aligns with our study's use of GIS to map Zika virus outbreaks across India [19].

Biswas et al. (2020) provided a detailed analysis of the Zika virus outbreak in India in 2018, underscoring the significance of a rapid response and containment strategies, which is consistent with our findings of concentrated outbreaks in certain regions and the need for localized interventions [20]. Yadav et al. (2022) discussed challenges during the Zika outbreak in newer states of India, highlighting the critical need for expanding diagnostic capabilities to ensure timely detection and response [21]. This is particularly relevant to our findings, as limited testing facilities in the country may have contributed to the underreporting of Zika cases in regions distant from major testing centers.

Limitations

The study's reliance on IDSP government surveillance data is comprehensive but may have reporting gaps due to technical glitches and the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to incomplete outbreak data for certain weeks and no reported cases in 2019-2020. Additionally, focusing on specific outbreaks and regional responses may limit the generalizability of findings to other regions with different ecological and epidemiological contexts.

Conclusions

Continuous surveillance and targeted interventions, especially during high-risk seasons, are crucial for managing Zika outbreaks in India. This study identified key geographical hotspots and temporal patterns through mapping and trend analysis, facilitating targeted interventions and more efficient resource allocation. Expanding testing capabilities, particularly in identified hotspots, and improving surveillance infrastructure are essential to capture a more accurate epidemiological picture and enhance response strategies. The study successfully fulfilled its objectives by comprehensively understanding the spatial distribution and temporal trends of ZIKV outbreaks, thereby effectively answering the research question.

To improve the management of Zika outbreaks, it is recommended that a dedicated percentage of the public health budget be allocated to enhancing existing laboratories at medical colleges or district head hospitals across all states for sample collection and storage. This should be complemented by investments in human resources and the training of healthcare workers for early diagnosis and response. Samples can then be transported to ZIKV testing labs for further investigations, providing a clearer picture of the geographical spread of the disease and enabling better preventive techniques specific to each region. Public awareness campaigns should also be implemented to encourage early symptom reporting and foster community involvement in outbreak prevention. By implementing these recommendations, India can improve its preparedness and response to Zika virus outbreaks, ultimately reducing the impact of the disease on public health.

Disclosures

Author Contributions

Human subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve human participants or tissue.

Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Concept and design:  Dinesh Asokan, Anjali Mall, Geeta Pardeshi

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Dinesh Asokan, Siva Prasad Reddy Bommu, Anjali Mall, Geeta Pardeshi

Drafting of the manuscript:  Dinesh Asokan, Anjali Mall, Geeta Pardeshi

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Dinesh Asokan, Siva Prasad Reddy Bommu, Anjali Mall, Geeta Pardeshi

Supervision:  Dinesh Asokan, Anjali Mall, Geeta Pardeshi
==== Refs
References

1 A review- recent outbreak of Zika viruses in India, its vectorology and virology Res Rev J Microbiol Virol Srivastava A Kachhawaha N 25 33 9 2019
2 An update on Zika virus in Asia Infect Chemother Lim SK Lim JK Yoon IK 91 100 49 2017 28681575
3 Atypical clinical presentation of Zika virus from India Indian J Pathol Microbiol Shukla S Yadav PD Patil S Jain A Aggarawal V 673 674 66 2023 37530371
4 Clinico-epidemiological and genomic profile of first Zika virus outbreak in India at Jaipur city of Rajasthan state J Infect Public Health Malhotra B Gupta V Sharma P 1920 1926 13 2020 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876034120304299 33172818
5 Cluster containment strategy: addressing Zika virus outbreak in Rajasthan, India BMJ Glob Health Singh R Gupta V Malhotra B 0 4 2019
6 Detection of Zika virus disease in Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India 2021 during the second wave of COVID-19 pandemic J Med Virol Yadav PD Niyas VK Arjun R 2346 2349 94 2022 35102566
7 First report on the transmission of Zika virus by Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae) during the 2018 Zika outbreak in India Acta Trop Singh H Singh OP Akhtar N Sharma G Sindhania A Gupta N Valecha N 105114 199 2019 31442386
8 History of ZIKV infections in India and management of disease outbreaks Front Microbiol Khaiboullina S Uppal T Martynova E Rizvanov A Baranwal M Verma SC 2126 9 2018 30258421
9 Knowledge regarding Zika virus infection among dental practitioners of tricity area (Chandigarh, Panchkula and Mohali), India Niger Postgrad Med J Gupta N Randhawa RK Thakar S Bansal M Gupta P Arora V 33 37 23 2016 27098947
10 Knowledge, attitudes, and practices among health-care providers regarding Zika virus infection J Int Soc Prev Community Dent Sharma S Tyagi A Ramachandra S Bhuyan L Dash KC Raghuvanshi M 41 47 8 2018 29629328
11 Modeling Zika transmission dynamics: prevention and control J Biol Syst Roy P Upadhyay RK Caur J 719 749 28 2020
12 Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Union Health Ministry issues advisory to states in view of Zika virus cases from Maharashtra 7 2024 2030371 8 2024 https://pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=2030371#:~:text=In%20view%20of%20some%20reported,virus%20situation%20in%20the%20country
13 Preparedness of public health-care system for Zika virus outbreak: an Indian perspective J Infect Public Health Gupta N Yadav PD Patil DY Sapkal G 949 955 13 2020 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1876034120304299 32340832
14 Prevalence of dengue, chikungunya, and Zika viruses in febrile pregnant women: an observational study at a tertiary care hospital in North India Am J Trop Med Hyg Gupta A Jain P Venkatesh V Agarwal A Reddy DH Jain A 168 173 106 2021 34607306
15 Know India. Climate 7 2024 5 2024 https://knowindia.india.gov.in/profile/climate.php
16 Re-visiting the evolution, dispersal and epidemiology of Zika virus in Asia Emerg Microbes Infect Pettersson JH Bohlin J Dupont-Rouzeyrol M 1 8 7 2018 29323102
17 Serious concern of congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) in India: a narrative review J Pregnancy Kumar M Kumar S Kumar R Jha MK Tiwari SN Gupta P 1758662 2024 2024 38961858
18 Zika virus: current concerns in India Indian J Med Res Bhardwaj S Gokhale MD Mourya DT 572 575 146 2017 29512599
19 Threats of Zika virus transmission for Asia and its Hindu-Kush Himalayan region Infect Dis Poverty Dhimal M Dahal S Dhimal ML 40 7 2018 29759076
20 Zika outbreak in India in 2018 J Travel Med Biswas A Kodan P Gupta N Soneja M Baruah K Sharma KK Meena S 0 27 2020
21 Zika a vector borne disease detected in newer states of India amidst the COVID-19 pandemic Front Microbiol Yadav PD Kaur H Gupta N 888195 13 2022 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35756041/ 35756041
