
==== Front
Afr J Emerg Med
Afr J Emerg Med
African Journal of Emergency Medicine
2211-419X
2211-4203
African Federation for Emergency Medicine

S2211-419X(24)00035-1
10.1016/j.afjem.2024.08.007
Original article
South African palliative care provider perspectives on emergency medical services in palliative situations
Gage Caleb Hanson caleb.gage@gmail.com
a⁎
Gwyther Liz b
Stassen Willem a
a Division of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
b Division of Interdisciplinary Palliative Care and Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
⁎ Corresponding author. caleb.gage@gmail.com
30 8 2024
12 2024
30 8 2024
14 4 231239
29 4 2024
14 8 2024
16 8 2024
© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of African Federation for Emergency Medicine.
2024

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Introduction

Due to the frequent intersection of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) with palliative situations and the increasing global need for palliative care, there has been increased recognition of the need for palliative care integration with EMS. However, EMS and palliative care systems remain segregated in many Low-to-Middle Income Country contexts, as in South Africa (SA). The aim of this study was to gather perspectives of palliative care providers in SA concerning EMS in palliative situations.

Methods

A qualitative design employing individual semi-structured interviews was implemented. Ten interviews with experienced doctors and nurses holding post-graduate palliative medicine qualifications were conducted. Verbatim transcriptions of interviews were subjected to content analysis with an inductive-dominant approach to develop codes and categories.

Results

Four categories were developed: (1) Disposition towards EMS, (2) Perceived EMS challenges, (3) Positive EMS impact across patients’ palliative care journeys and (4) Methods of EMS and palliative care system integration. Participants maintained an overall positive view of EMS and palliative care integration, noting the beneficial impact of EMS and suggesting various methods of integration, while also highlighting challenges and concerns.

Conclusion

EMS and palliative care integration would be mutually beneficial to both systems while benefiting patient well-being and the broader healthcare system. Potentially low-cost, high-impact interventions suggested by participants, such as palliative care cards for patients and enhancing EMS and palliative care system communication, represent efficacious and judicious use of limited resources within the SA context. Pilot studies investigating these suggestions should be conducted.

Keywords

EMS
Paramedic
Palliative care
End-of-life
Homecare
==== Body
pmc African relevance

• Africa contains disproportionately high palliative care needs when compared with the rest of the world due to large disease burdens coupled with rapidly increasing and ageing populations resulting in high prevalence of life-limiting illnesses.

• Despite these needs, access to palliative care within Africa remains inadequate as palliative care systems are underdeveloped and resources are constrained.

• To meet the high demand for palliative care on the continent, palliative care integration with other disciplines, such as Emergency Medical Services (EMS), has been recommended.

• As EMS systems continue to develop within Africa it is imperative that integration with palliative care begin.

Alt-text: Unlabelled box

Introduction

Palliative care is ‘an approach that improves the quality of life of patients and their families facing the problems associated with life-threatening illness, through the prevention and relief of suffering by means of early identification and impeccable assessment and treatment of pain and other problems, physical, psychosocial and spiritual’ [1]. Palliative care is integrative in nature, incorporating a broad spectrum of healthcare disciplines, including emergency medicine, to provide holistic patient care [1,2]. Recently, there has been increased recognition of the need for palliative care integration in out-of-hospital emergency medical services (EMS) [[3], [4], [5], [6]]. This is due to the frequent intersection of EMS with palliative situations [7] and the increasing global need for palliative care [8]. For the purposes of this study, ‘palliative situation’ is defined as any event involving the care of a patient with palliative needs, including emergency, non-emergency, and end-of-life situations.

Progress has been made with EMS and palliative care integration in various high-income countries (HICs), such as Australia [5] and Canada [9]. Part of the approach in these contexts has been gaining the perspectives of EMS and palliative care providers, patients, and family members on EMS in palliative situations [10,11]. Despite raising some concerns, such as a lack of EMS provider palliative care training, these role-players have generally viewed EMS involvement in palliative situations positively [11]. However, palliative care provider perspectives are relatively scarce and further research, particularly in low-to-middle income countries (LMICs), has been recommended [4].

Within the LMIC context of South Africa (SA), EMS and palliative care systems remain segregated [12]. There is little research on the topic in SA, and within LMICs more generally, despite a greater need for palliative care when compared with HICs due to disproportionately high burdens of disease and life-limiting complications thereof [4]. SA literature which does exist has demonstrated frequent intersection between EMS and palliative situations [12] and has gained EMS provider perspectives on palliative care [13]. However, palliative care provider perspectives concerning EMS are absent in the country. To assist in filling this knowledge gap, our study aimed to gather perspectives of palliative care providers in SA concerning EMS in palliative situations.

Methods

Design

A qualitative design employing individual semi-structured interviews was implemented. Husserlian descriptive phenomenology, which seeks to describe the lived experience of participants, provided the underlying theoretical framework [14].

Setting

SA maintains two healthcare sectors: private and state [15]. State healthcare is provided by the government to all citizens while private healthcare is accessible exclusively to those with adequate financial means or healthcare insurance. EMS are, likewise, divided into these sectors. Out-of-hospital emergency care is provided using a paramedic-led rather than physician-led model [13]. Formal higher education (HE) training is required to register as an EMS provider, however, this requirement is recent, and many providers with vocational training remain registered and practicing [16]. HE courses range from one (assistant) to four years (practitioner) in duration.

Most SA palliative care is provided by non-governmental organizations (NGOs) which provide hospice services [17]. These NGOs are registered as charities and are reliant on donations and volunteers including doctors, nurses and social workers. As of 2018, 150 hospices and 8 hospital-based palliative care services exist in SA [18]. However, inequalities exist in the distribution of these facilities and many areas of the country lack access to palliative care.

Data collection

An interview schedule was jointly developed by the authors based on contextualisation of current literature and previous work by Gage et al. [4,13]. The interview schedule (Supplementary Material 1) contained six questions referencing career background, utility, barriers, concerns, and feasibility vis-à-vis EMS use for palliative situations in SA. Pre-determined prompts and probes were included for each question to enhance in-depth exploration of participant perspectives and limit the introduction of interviewer biases.

Interviews were performed virtually by CG using Microsoft Teams™, with cameras, audio-recording, and transcription enabled, at an agreed upon time. A pilot interview was performed prior to data collection by CG and LG. Data from this interview has been included in the final report as LG met inclusion criteria and content from this pilot aligned with the other interviews. Interviews were conducted one-on-one with no third parties present.

Palliative care providers were contacted via email circulation through palliative and hospice databases: The Association of Palliative Care Practitioners of South Africa (PALPRAC), Association of Palliative Care Centres (APCC), University of Cape Town (UCT) Division of Interdisciplinary Palliative Care and Medicine. PALPRAC is a non-profit organization made up of SA doctors trained in palliative medicine [2]. The APCC is a national association of hospices with members from all nine SA provinces [19]. The UCT Division of Interdisciplinary Palliative Care and Medicine is the section of the university dedicated to palliative care education [20]. A brief description of the study was presented and interested providers meeting inclusion criteria signed a consent form.

Inclusion criteria were palliative care providers with post-graduate palliative qualifications (e.g. Post-Graduate Diploma) with a minimum of two years palliative care experience in SA. Exclusion criteria were palliative care providers other than nurses and medical doctors.

Eight interviews, including the pilot, were held from April to October 2023 meeting recommendations for phenomenological studies [21]. After analysis, two further interviews were performed in March 2024 to confirm saturation. Four participants knew of the interviewer from previous collaborations and all participants were aware the study formed part of the interviewer's post-graduate studies. No participants refused or dropped out of the study. No repeat interviews were conducted.

Analysis

Content analysis was performed using the framework of Erlignsson and Brysiewicz with an inductive dominant approach [22]. Transcriptions were read repeatedly for familiarisation after which initial coding was performed. Meaning units were captured, condensed, coded and categorized using NVivo version 14 (Fig. 1). Categories were then reviewed, refined, named, defined and written in the final report. These steps were performed alongside data collection as field notes were recorded during interviews.Fig. 1 Coding tree.

Fig 1

CG independently analysed the data. Researcher triangulation was then performed between all authors where codes and categories were discussed and finalised. Data saturation, as detailed by Saunders et al., [23] was confirmed after ten interviews as evidenced by a lack of additional data during the final two interviews.

Reflexivity and trustworthiness

This study formed part of my (CG) postgraduate studies in Emergency Medicine. During this study I was employed as a lecturer at an SA EMS college. My previous experience with qualitative interviewing was gathering EMS provider perspectives on palliative care. My personal bias is in favour of EMS and palliative care integration. However, several participants raised valid concerns which must be considered. The framework of Guba was applied to ensure data trustworthiness regarding credibility, transferability, dependability and confirmability [24]. Table 1 denotes the methods by which these criteria were pursued.Table 1 Methods employed to ensure data trustworthiness.

Table 1Credibility	Pilot interview, opportunity for participants to refuse participation, frequent debriefing sessions among research team, researcher triangulation, member checking (resulting in no changes), reflexive commentary.	
Transferability	Thorough description of data collection methods including number and length of interviews and the data-collection time-period, results compared with available literature, use of the COnsolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative (COREQ) research checklist [25].	
Dependability	Thorough descriptions of research design, implementation, and data collection, reflexive commentary.	
Confirmability	Researcher triangulation, member checking, verbatim transcriptions of audio-recordings produced.	

Ethical approval for the study was provided by the UCT Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC Reference Number: 220/2023).

Results

Ten participants were interviewed (Table 2). Interviews lasted between 34 and 57 minutes. Four categories, with subcategories, were developed (Table 3). Participants maintained an overall positive view of EMS and palliative care integration, noting the beneficial impact of EMS and suggesting various methods of integration, while also highlighting challenges and concerns.Table 2 Interviewee and interviewer details.

Table 2	Gender	Qualifications	Post-Grad Palliative Experience	Environment	
Interviewee #1	Female	Medical Doctor - specialised in family medicine, PGDip Palliative Medicine, MSc Palliative Medicine, PhD Palliative Medicine	30 years	Urban	
Interviewee #2	Female	Medical Doctor - specialised in family medicine, MPhil Palliative Medicine, PGDip Health Professions Education	19 years	Urban	
Interviewee #3	Male	Medical Doctor, Palliative Care Short Course	9 years	Urban and Peri-Urban	
Interviewee #4	Female	Medical Doctor, MPhil Palliative Medicine	27 years	Urban	
Interviewee #5	Female	Professional Nurse, Short Course Palliative Care	9 years	Urban	
Interviewee #6	Female	Medical Doctor, Psychiatrist, Master's in Early Childhood Intervention, PGDip Interdisciplinary Pain Management, PGDip Palliative Medicine	4 years	Peri-Urban and Rural	
Interviewee #7	Female	Medical Doctor, PGDip HIV Management, MSc Palliative Medicine	8 years	Urban	
Interviewee #8	Female	Professional Nurse, Bachelor of Social Science, PGDip Palliative Medicine	7 years	Urban	
Interviewee #9	Female	Medical Doctor, PGDip Palliative Medicine, Mphil Palliative Medicine, Mphil Bioethics	9 years	Urban	
Interviewee #10	Female	Intermediate Life Support1, Medical Doctor - specialised in emergency medicine, PGDip Palliative Medicine	5 years	Urban and Peri-Urban	
Interviewer (CG)	Male	Emergency Care Practitioner2, MPhil Emergency Medicine, Palliative Care Short Course3	10 years (EMS experience)	Urban and Peri-Urban	
PGDip = Postgraduate Diploma, MSc = Master of Sciences, PhD = Doctor of Philosophy, HIV = Human Immunodeficiency Virus

1 Vocational paramedic training. Historically this training involved a three-tier system: basic, intermediate, advanced.

2 In SA, an Emergency Care Practitioner is a paramedic with a 4-year Bachelor's Degree in Emergency Medical Care.

3 10-week course through UCT introducing basic palliative care management principles.

Table 3 Categories and subcategories developed from interviews.

Table 3(1) Disposition Towards EMS	(2) Perceived EMS Challenges	(3) Positive EMS Impact Across Patients’ Palliative Care Journeys	(4) Methods of EMS and Palliative Care System Integration	
(a) Calming effect

(b) Capabilities in palliative situations

(c) Unreliability in service delivery

	(a) Persisting EMS and palliative care cultures

(b) Decision-making in challenging circumstances

(c) Moral distress

	(a) Unique insight into determinants of patient health

(b) Providing initial containment

(c) Liaising with palliative care providers

(d) Safe patient transitioning

(e) Determining trajectory of care

	(a) Collaborative approaches

(b) Education of all role-players

(c) Potential, unintended consequences

	

Discussion

Participants were asked to share their perceptions regarding EMS in palliative situations regarding feasibility, utility and concerns within the SA context. Below, each category is discussed with supporting quotations extracted from interviews. Interviewees are identified by number. (e.g. Interview #1)

Disposition towards EMS

Overall, participants expressed a positive disposition towards EMS in palliative situations, however, some concerns and negative views were raised. Their disposition was grounded in personal experience and discussed in terms of EMS (a) calming effect, (b) capablities in palliative situations and (c) unreliability in service delivery.(a) Calming effect

Participants noted the calming effect which EMS bring to palliative situations due to their expertise and professionalism, expressing appreciation and respect for the role they play.“It may be a small [EMS] role…but I think it's really an important role bringing the patient to us in a comfortable, calm, professional way. I appreciate that.” – Interview #4

“…it was a…really hectic case…and it was such a relief to just know that they [EMS] were there.” – Interview #8

Previous qualitative work in HICs has likewise demonstrated a positive disposition of palliative care providers towards EMS and the reassurance which EMS bring [10,11] Juhrmann et al. [11] noted that EMS held a revered public identity and were perceived as crisis resolvers. An earlier Canadian study found that patients and families with palliative needs experienced peace of mind knowing EMS were available 24/7 [10]. Moreover, participants highlighted the reassurance EMS bring to palliative care providers themselves, particularly in emergency situations. These perceptions align with those of SA EMS providers who likewise perceived palliative care positively [13].(a) Capabilities in palliative situations

While integration was recommended, there were mixed perceptions concerning current EMS capabilities in palliative situations. Some participants expressed confidence in EMS while others expressed negative views.“We've used EMS around here and yeah, I'm pretty confident in their skills and expertise, I wouldn't hesitate to call them.” – Interview #5

“I think from the doctors’ side of things, there's a lack of respect for for paramedics.” – Interview #9

Confidence in EMS was based primarily on their clinical abilities in emergency situations. Such expertise is valuable when managing patients with palliative needs as they are prone to abrupt deterioration and acute exacerbations of illness [[26], [27], [28]]. While EMS are trained in the management of some common palliative emergencies, such as seizures, they are untrained in others, for example, superior vena cava obstruction. Thus, several participants questioned EMS provider ability to manage these situations appropriately while others described negative views of EMS providers, perceiving a lack of capabilities and interest, particularly among basic EMS providers.“A lot of our…lower tier EMS professionals, just don't have the ability. I mean most of the guys we see… will see a patient [in respiratory distress]…and not do anything about it…So like to try and train those guys up when they're not interested…” – Interview #7

As basic EMS providers in SA form the majority of the workforce, such perceptions evoke concern. The potential integration of EMS and palliative care in SA across specific EMS qualifications remains an area for study, however, it appears logical that such integration must incorporate basic providers to be of significant benefit. Lamba et al., [29] previously suggested only those EMS providers with a desire for palliative care would be suitable for integration. This may be a beneficial criterion for basic EMS providers in SA to be involved with palliative care.

Several participants further expressed negative views of EMS concerning unnecessary transport. While transport is an important EMS function, it is not always appropriate in palliative situations. Many patients wish to be treated without conveyance to a medical facility [30,31]. EMS were described as “glorified bus drivers”, “taxi” and “transport services” with participants recounting invariable patient transportation regardless of context. Thus, one participant has suggested patients “…don't phone an ambulance” (Interview #8).

These perceptions appear aligned with a large study in the Western Cape province of SA which found that 98% (n=240 730) of patients responded to by EMS were transported to hospital despite 83% (n=199 062) of these not having received any EMS treatment [32]. Within LMICs EMS are frequently used solely for transportation purposes [33] Should EMS and palliative care integration take place in SA, mechanisms for homecare without conveyance, for example a “treat and release” approach [5] that is underpinned by an appropriate legislative framework, require development.(a) Unreliability in service delivery“When you call EMS, you are just trying them…to see if they will come or not.” - Interview #3

“I would say out in [rural area]…people probably choose a taxi rather than going with ambulance, just cause the taxi is faster than waiting for an ambulance to arrive.” – Interview #6

Participants distinguished between private and state EMS services within SA. Whereas private EMS were described as reliable, quick and available, state EMS were described as unreliable and problematic. Furthermore, according to participants, while private EMS were willing to transport patients to private hospices, state EMS were unwilling and did not prioritise end-of-life situations resulting in prolonged waiting times for an ambulance.

Due to financial constraints and a lack of transportation options, patients with palliative needs in rural areas are largely reliant on state EMS along with the vast majority of SA citizens who do not hold health insurance (83%) [34]. Compounding the problem is the relative lack of available palliative services in these areas. Within HICs, EMS integration with palliative care has been recommended specifically in rural areas where 24/7 palliative care services are unavailable as EMS may fill this gap [35]. However, within LMICs, this may be of only theoretical benefit as EMS systems are frequently underdeveloped [33]. Despite SA maintaining one of the most developed EMS systems within Africa, [36] the unreliability of (state) EMS, remains a challenge. This unreliability may be due to geographic challenges, the significant number of rural areas, and a lack of rural infrastructure all of which restrict EMS access. In addition, as one participant noted, some areas may be unsafe for both EMS and palliative care providers to enter. Attacks on EMS providers have been frequently reported in SA, resulting in certain areas requiring a police escort [37,38]. For meaningful EMS and palliative care integration in SA, EMS systems should be further capacitated, particularly in rural areas.

Perceived EMS challenges

While expressing some concerns, participants also perceived challenges faced by EMS providers in palliative situations, potentially inhibiting their abilities to appropriately manage such situations. These challenges were expressed as a) persisting EMS and palliative care cultures, b) decision-making in challenging circumstances and c) moral distress.(a) Persisting EMS and palliative care cultures“That's kind of the traditional…EMS [life-saving approach], but that's not necessarily appropriate in palliative care. It might not be within the patient's goals of care to bring them to hospital.” – Interview #7

EMS culture is interventionist in nature, through curative approaches in emergency settings, with the aim of saving life and limb [39,40]. Supportive palliative approaches, such as allowing natural death, are relatively foreign to EMS culture. Thus, EMS feel uneasy in palliative situations, as SA EMS providers have detailed [13]. This apparent cultural conflict has been a frequently cited reason for EMS and palliative care segregation [28,40,41]. However, with correct training, EMS and palliative care cultures may be complementary [26,28].

While EMS culture requires a change in palliative situations, participants identified that palliative culture too, may require a shift to allow EMS inclusion. For example, one participant noted palliative care providers often feel protective of their patients and may avoid including other providers. EMS may be particularly avoided as they may provide inappropriate care and transport. Another participant, however, noted that palliative care may benefit from the more structured approach used by EMS and may, therefore, benefit from training concerning EMS.(a) Decision-making in challenging circumstances

Decision-making for EMS in palliative situations was described as difficult due to competing wishes of those involved, minimal system and legal support, and a lack of on-scene information.“I also think one of the biggest barriers [for EMS] is the medico-legal things that are not unpacked yet and that decision making..” – Interview #2

“So there is that very difficult information gap…because there's a mismatch between what the patient and family expect...So I think it is very, very challenging for EMS personnel.” – Interview #1

Participants noted the unfair nature of expectation upon EMS providers to make challenging decisions under time pressure in isolation. They also detailed the consequences of poor decisions including overlooking patients with unidentified palliative needs and failing to diagnose emergencies in palliative situations which require active intervention. “Missing” these emergencies was identified as worse than unnecessary conveyance by EMS. One participant described such a situation in which an EMS provider decided against conveyance due to the palliative nature of the situation when, in fact, conveyance was necessary for emergency treatment. Such difficulties may partly explain why conveyance is the default EMS decision. Murphy-Jones and Timmons [42] remarked that conveyance provides a “safety net” for EMS providers, ostensibly providing medico-legal protection. SA EMS providers have likewise identified decision-making challenges in palliative situations for similar reasons, feeling constrained in their approach to palliative situations as a result [13]. To alleviate these challenges, one participant described the potential creation of a palliative care card.“You've got a Road to Health for children. Should there be a palliative care card for people who have got a progressive illness…which immediately gives all the clinical information that the EMS personnel needs at that particular time?” – Interview #1

The Road to Health booklet, in widespread use across SA, keeps a record of children's growth, immunisations, and healthcare interventions from birth [43]. SA EMS providers refer to these booklets when managing paediatrics and are trained in their use. Implementing a similar palliative care booklet represents a potentially low-cost, high-impact intervention which may be of use not only to EMS, but to the broader healthcare system. We highly recommend this intervention be explored.(a) Moral distress“I think we are absolutely not using our resources correctly…if we don't teach our EMS healthcare professionals to provide palliative care. I think we are firstly creating moral distress in our healthcare professionals and therefore they won't stay in the profession long.” – Interview #2

“The training of EMS is very algorithmic…[But] sometimes… palliative care, it's not algorithmic.” – Interview #9

EMS providers globally, including in SA, have expressed their experiences of distress when disregarding their training in palliative situations and have likewise identified the need for palliative care education [13,27,40]. This suggests EMS providers realise an alternate approach is required in palliative situations, however, they are unaware of appropriate strategies. As stated by participants, the ability to effectively calm stressful palliative situations through symptom control, communication strategies, and care planning, relieves moral distress in healthcare workers, however, this cannot be achieved without education. Participants referred to this ability as “containment” of palliative situations. Furthermore, they noted healthcare providers themselves require containment to avoid moral distress and, if not adequately equipped, will “crumble” in palliative situations. Not only would palliative care integration assist EMS providers in palliative situations, but the containment strategies learned may benefit them more generally as they are often required to contain chaotic emergency situations.

Positive EMS impact across patients’ palliative care journeys

Despite these challenges and concerns, participants identified the unique position of EMS as intermediaries and its potential positive impact across patients’ palliative care journeys. As EMS arrive in palliative situations they gain a) unique insight into determinants of patient health, b) provide initial containment, c) liaise with palliative care providers, d) safely transition patients, and e) determine trajectory of care.(a) Unique insight into determinants of patient health“…[EMS] provide such a unique insight into people's lives…You see people at their worst. So its a great opportunity to network and collaborate.” – Interview #6

As first-responders, EMS providers frequently enter patient homes. This privileged position within healthcare provides access to valuable information, such as living conditions, socioeconomic status, educational needs, and barriers to care [44]. This unique insight into social and structural determinants of health allows EMS to contribute toward bespoke care plans based on observed circumstances and link patients with relevant services within the broader palliative care team [44]. To leverage this unique insight for palliative care provision may require a mindset shift for EMS providers. Information regarding determinants of health may frequently be overlooked, particularly in emergency situations where their focus is, appropriately, on intervening and transporting. Thus, a need exists for EMS to identify divergent contexts and shift priorities accordingly.(a) Providing initial containment“…[EMS] would be like a first-responder…If they could feedback to the home care doctor…could give morphine…and hand over to a homecare team instead of taking the patient to hospital, then that would be really helpful...” – Interview #8

Initial containment functions would be valuable for palliative care providers as EMS may arrive at palliative situations sooner than home palliative services and relay necessary information. This EMS ability to rapidly respond to an incident and stabilize palliative emergencies before linking the patient with further care would improve patient wellbeing. To achieve participants’ visions of initial containment, avoiding unnecessary conveyance, and homecare team handover, SA EMS providers must be capacitated to do so. This may involve the development of new policies allowing on-scene discharges by advanced EMS providers; a skill within their scope of practice, though not currently used.(a) Liaising with palliative care providers

Participants noted EMS providers may act as their “eyes and ears” in palliative situations not only by relaying information, but also implementing management strategies.“[EMS] need to be able to link with services. You've been called, there's a crisis, an initial assessment of the patient, an understanding that this is…a known palliative care patient…and linking…being able to communicate with the patient's treating providers.” – Interview #10

Dent et al. [45] demonstrated that palliative telephonic advice provided to EMS resulted in decreased rates of unnecessary transport and improved patient care. Cultivating communication between EMS and palliative care systems represents another potentially low-cost, high-impact intervention. Through increased homecare, the use of EMS as liaisons may decrease overall healthcare costs by reducing unnecessary hospital admissions. Though a cost-benefit analysis is yet to be performed in SA, this benefit has been frequently emphasized in the literature and should be studied as it is particularly relevant to LMIC settings [4,9,35].(a) Safe patient transitioning

Furthermore, participants expounded upon the benefits of safe patient handling and transportation by EMS. EMS provider handling of patients with palliative needs was described as pleasant and professional.“For a patient to get into a family's car, it's horrific. When you can't walk properly and you drag them out and you're pulling and pushing them and they're ill, they can't sit up…but somehow [with EMS] it just seems more professional. It seems more controlled.”. – Interview #4

While EMS transport may be beneficial, two participants questioned whether it necessitated EMS. One recommended dedicated palliative care transport services apart from EMS, while another objected to this, and another enquired whether patient handling and transport could be performed by non-EMS personnel. Within the resource-limited SA setting it has been argued that integrating current EMS and palliative care systems may be more cost-effective than establishing a new specialised unit [12]. Despite differing ideas, participants agreed that safe patient transitioning is an important aspect of palliative situations which EMS are capable of managing.(a) Determining trajectory of care

According to participants, EMS decision-making determines patient trajectory and consequences of inappropriate decisions include artificial life-prolongation, increased healthcare costs, and negative patient and family experience. However, with appropriate training, participants perceived beneficial trajectories being set by EMS.“[EMS] intubating the patient at the end of life…now the patient lands up in ICU [Intensive Care Unit]. It's expensive. There's the trauma of it. The patient is not where they want to be when they die. The family is separated from their loved one at the end of their life. Apart from the pain and discomfort to the actual patient”. – Interview #7

Breyre et al. [46] found that implementation of an EMS and hospice collaboration, which involved training EMS providers in palliative care, decreased EMS transport rates in palliative situations from 80.3% to 19.6%, allowing more beneficial care trajectories. Given the substantial impact of EMS decision-making in palliative situations on patients, families, healthcare providers and economy, EMS integration with palliative care appears desirable. This may be particularly relevant in LMIC contexts which contain the vast majority of patients with palliative needs globally [47,48] and require efficient use of limited resources.

Methods of EMS and palliative care system integration

All participants agreed integration was necessary and identified various integrative methods for implementation in SA. These methods were discussed in terms of (a) collaborative approaches, (b) education of all role-players and (c) potential, unintended consequences.(a) Collaborative approaches“So it's about creating awareness in government and policymakers about why palliative care is so important in South Africa…that's where I would start: creating awareness with the public and from the top”. – Interview #6

“Research is a very strong integration tool… So I do think…a next step is to do a pilot study”. – Interview #2

When considering EMS, participants recognized the need for palliative care provider input which is currently lacking. As one participant said, “You give us input. How much input do we give?” (Interview #4) To foster this input, areas for collaboration, such as regular, joint EMS and palliative care meetings, were suggested.

In 1990 the Commission on Health Research and Development stated that improving LMIC research capacity is ‘one of the most powerful, cost-effective and sustainable means of advancing health and development’ [49]. Pilot studies within the LMIC context of SA may be of worldwide benefit and should be conducted. We recommend these studies analyse modes of EMS palliative care delivery such as community paramedic models, methods of enhanced EMS and palliative system communication,and the effect of these upon hospital conveyance rates, overall EMS caseload, patient and family member satisfaction. Secondary analyses may include safety and efficacy of “treat and release” approaches and expanded EMS scope of practice to include commonly used medications within palliative care.(a) Education of all role-players

Education for all role-players, including EMS and palliative care providers, patients, families, and general public, was identified by participants as the primary method of EMS and palliative care integration.“More needs to be done to bring the two services closer to each other. So this can only be done by…giving more training to…EMS so that [they] can understand how palliative care services work and how these two services can collaborate.” – Interview #3

“…I don't know what [EMS] study, but if I look at…what we were taught as doctors [about EMS], I was taught nothing.” – Interview #6

One participant reasoned that palliative care training would “make for a better paramedic all round.” (Interview #5). This is likely true as EMS and palliative care systems, despite differing functions, share several key goals including patient quality of life, symptom management, and relief of suffering. Therefore, just as EMS and palliative care integration may improve palliative care provision, it may likewise improve emergency care provision.

Participants identified the following areas for EMS provider education: basic palliative care principles, communication practices, management of common palliative symptoms and emergencies, ethical issues, end-of-life care and situational recognition (i.e. curative vs support care). As no EMS palliative care curriculum in SA exists, these areas may inform curriculum development. Participants recommended a palliative care module for EMS at undergraduate level and an introductory short course for qualified EMS providers.(a) Potential, unintended consequences

Though EMS and palliative care integration may confer benefits, some participants warned of potential consequencessuch as EMS providers misinterpreting end-of-life and emergency situations.“The EMS…may also find itself in a situation where you guys are overwhelmed, but also faced by…new situations…having to make very difficult decisions that you wouldn't normally make.” – Interview #3

The concern regarding overwhelmed EMS has been raised previously [50]. An expanded palliative care role may strain EMS resources due to amplified caseload and incident times. Current evidence has failed to demonstrate this; though such evidence is limited to HICs [35]. Within LMICs, given their greater burdens of palliative needs, this concern may remain valid. However, EMS and palliative care integration may decrease overall caseload through provision of homecare. In SA, for example, many patients in palliative situations use EMS repeatedly throughout a given year for hospital conveyance [12] and many of these may be unnecessary should adequate homecare be available. Thus, through decreased repeat patient cases, overall EMS caseload may decrease in the long-term. Along with current SA EMS palliative caseload, this represents an area for further inquiry.

Concerns raised by participants over potential consequences require thoughtful consideration. While the integration of EMS and palliative care has been recommended internationally, the possibility of unintended consequences remains. It should be recognized that EMS and palliative care integration, while providing benefits, will likely result in novel challenges. This further justifies pilot studies before large-scale implementation.“It's very feasible. We [also] don't really have a choice. Families phone ambulances, ambulances go to houses…It's already happening.” - Interview #10

“Why haven't we done it yet?” - Interview #2

Despite these potential consequences, participants concluded the benefits of EMS and palliative care integration outweigh potential risks and integration is both feasible and necessary in SA. Integration would be mutually beneficial to both EMS and palliative care systems, while concurrently benefiting patient well-being and the broader healthcare system through provision of homecare and reduced rates of unnecessary hospital admission. This represents efficacious and judicious use of limited resources within the LMIC context of SA.

Limitations

This study must be interpreted considering its inherent limitations. The perspectives of participants may not represent those of other palliative care providers within SA or abroad, limiting transferability. Given the voluntary nature of participation, self-selection bias is likely present. However, participants were broadly distributed across SA and situated in diverse contexts which resulted in a range of perspectives. Furthermore, the transferability of perspectives contained here have been discussed in light of similar studies in various contexts.

Conclusion

The aim of this study was to gather perspectives of palliative care providers in SA concerning EMS in palliative situations. Four categories were developed from the interviews: (1) Disposition towards EMS, (2) Perceived EMS challenges, (3) Positive EMS impact across patients’ palliative care journeys and (4) Methods of EMS and palliative care system integration. Participants demonstrated an overall positive disposition towards EMS while highlighting various concerns and challenges involving EMS use. Despite these challenges, participants described many benefits of EMS use in palliative situations and recommended integration through various methods such as creating awareness, education and collaborative efforts. Many suggested methods, such as palliative care cards for patients and enhancing EMS and palliative care system communication, represent potentially low-cost, high-impact interventions. Pilot studies investigating these suggestions should be conducted.

Dissemination of results

Results from this qualitative interview study were shared with The Association of Palliative Care Practitioners of South Africa, Association of Palliative Care Centres, the University of Cape Town Division of Interdisciplinary Palliative Care and Medicine and with various EMS service providers.

Authors' contribution

Authors contributed as follows to the conception or design of the work; the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work; and drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content: CG 70%; WS 20% and LG 10%. All authors approved the version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

Appendix Supplementary materials

Image, application 1

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Barbara Wade for her availability as a counsellor should she have been required during the data collection phase.

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.afjem.2024.08.007.
==== Refs
References

1 World Health Organization. Palliative care, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/palliative-care; 2020 [accessed 29 April 2024].
2 The Association of Palliative Care Practitioners of South Africa. About Us, https://palprac.org/palprac/about-us/; 2024 [accessed on 29 April 2024].
3 Gage C.H. Stander C. Gwyther L. Stassen W. Emergency medical services and palliative care: protocol for a scoping review BMJ Open 12 2022 e062054 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062054
4 Gage C.H. Stander C. Gwyther L. Stassen W. Emergency medical services and palliative care: a scoping review BMJ Open 13 2023 e071116 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071116
5 Juhrmann M.L. Vandersman P. Butow P.N. Clayton JM. Paramedics delivering palliative and end-of-life care in community-based settings: a systematic integrative review with thematic synthesis Palliat Med 2021 1 17 10.1177/02692163211059342
6 Peran D. Uhlir M. Pekara J. Approaching the end of their lives under blue lights and sirens − scoping review J Pain Symptom Manage 2021 1 11 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.04.023
7 Kamphausen A. Roese H. Oechsle K. Challenges faced by prehospital emergency physicians providing emergency care to patients with advanced incurable diseases Emerg Med Int 2019 2019 1 11 10.1155/2019/3456471
8 World Health Organization. Assessing the development of palliative care worldwide: a set of actionable indicators, https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/345532; 2021 [accessed on 29 April 2024].
9 Rosa A. Dissanayake M. Carter D. Sibbald S. Community paramedicine to support palliative care Prog Palliat Care. 2021 1 5 10.1080/09699260.2021.1912690 35493974
10 Carter A.J.E. Arab M. Rsw M.S.W. Paramedics providing palliative care at home: a mixed-methods exploration of patient and family satisfaction and paramedic comfort and confidence CJEM 21 4 2020 513 522 10.1017/cem.2018.497
11 Juhrmann M.L. Butow P.N. Platts C.M. It breaks a narrative of paramedics, that we're lifesavers': a qualitative study of health professionals', bereaved family members' and carers' perceptions and experiences of palliative paramedicine Palliat Med 37 8 2023 1266 1279 10.1177/02692163231186451 37452564
12 Gage C.H. Spies B. Crombie K. The use of emergency medical services for palliative situations in Western Cape Province, South Africa: a retrospective, descriptive analysis of patient records S Afr Med J. 113 11 2023 41 46 10.7196/SAMJ.2023.v113i11.1136
13 Gage C.H. Geduld H. Stassen W. South African paramedic perspectives on prehospital palliative care BMC Palliat Care 19 1 2020 153 10.1186/s12904-020-00663-5 33032579
14 Christensen M. Welch A. Barr J. Husserlian descriptive phenomenology : a review of intentionality, reduction and the natural attitude J Nurs Educ Pract 7 8 2017 113 118 10.5430/jnep.v7n8p113
15 South African Government. Health, https://www.gov.za/about-sa/health; 2022 [accessed 29 April 2024].
16 Burger H. Krause R. Blanchard C. Position paper on undergraduate palliative medicine education for doctors in South Africa Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med 14 1 2022 e1 e7 10.4102/phcfm.v14i1.3202
17 Gwyther E. South Africa: the status of palliative care J Pain Symptom Manage 24 2 2002 236 238 10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00455-4 12231155
18 Drenth C. Sithole Z. Cur B. Palliative care in South Africa J Pain Symptom Manage 55 2 2020 170 177 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.04.024
19 Association of Palliative Care Centres, https://apcc.org.za/; 2024 [accesed 29 April 2024].
20 Univerisity of Cape Town. Division of Family Medicine, https://health.uct.ac.za/school-public-health/divisions/family-medicine; 2024 [accessed 29 April 2024].
21 Marshall B. Cardon P. Poddar A. Fontenot R. Does sample size matter in qualitative research?: A review of qualitative interviews in is research J Comput Inf Syst 54 1 2013 11 22 10.1080/08874417.2013.11645667
22 Erlingsson C. Brysiewicz P. A hands-on guide to doing content analysis Afr J Emerg Med 7 3 2017 93 99 10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001 30456117
23 Saunders B. Sim J. Kingstone T. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization Qual Quant 52 4 2018 1893 1907 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8 29937585
24 Shenton AK. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects Educ Inf 22 2004 63 75 10.3233/EFI-2004-22201
25 Elsevier. COREQ Checklist, http://cdn.elsevier.com/promis_misc/ISSM_COREQ_Checklist.pdf. 2024 [accesed 12 August 2024].
26 Carron P. Dami F. Diawara F. Palliative care and prehospital emergency medicine: analysis of a case series Medicine 93 25 2014 1 3 10.1097/MD.0000000000000128 (Baltimore)
27 Ausband S.C. March J.A. Brown LH. National prevalence of palliative care protocols in emergency medical services Prehosp Emerg Care 6 2002 36 41 10.1080/10903120290938751 11789648
28 Duchateau FX. Palliative care and prehospital emergency medicine - apparently conflicting approaches? Eur J Emerg Med 19 2012 1 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32834d0d93 22223128
29 Lamba S. Schmidt T.A. Chan G.K. Integrating palliative care in the out-of-hospital setting: four things to jump-start an EMS-palliative care initiative Prehosp. Emerg. Care 17 4 2013 511 520 10.3109/10903127.2013.811566 23968313
30 Gomes B. Higginson I.J. Calanzani N. Preferences for place of death if faced with advanced cancer: a population survey in England, Flanders, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, Portugal and Spain Ann Oncol 23 8 2012 2006 2015 10.1093/annonc/mdr602 22345118
31 Ratshikana-Moloko M. Ayeni O. Tsitsi J.M. Spiritual care, pain reduction, and preferred place of death among advanced cancer patients in Soweto, South Africa J Pain Symptom Manage 60 1 2020 37 47 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.01.019 32045675
32 Binks F. Hardy A. Wallis L.A. Stassen W. The variables predictive of ambulance non-conveyance of patients in the Western Cape, South Africa Afr J Emerg Med 13 4 2023 293 299 10.1016/j.afjem.2023.09.006 37807978
33 Suryanto P.V. Boyle M. EMS systems in lower-middle income countries: a literature review Prehosp Disaster Med 32 1 2017 64 70 10.1017/S1049023X1600114X 27938449
34 Stats South Africa. General Household Survey, https://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P0318/P03182021.pdf; 2021 [accessed 29 April 2024].
35 Surakka L.K. Peake M.M. Kiljunen M.M. Preplanned participation of paramedics in end-of-life care at home: a retrospective cohort study Palliat Med 2020 1 8 10.1177/0269216320981713
36 Mould-Millman N.K. Dixon J.M. Sefa N. The state of emergency medical services (EMS) systems in Africa Prehosp Disaster Med 32 3 2017 273 283 10.1017/S1049023X17000061 28228178
37 Western Cape Government. News, https://www.westerncape.gov.za/news/department-condemns-senseless-assaults-ems-crews; 2023 [accessed 29 April 2024].
38 Ground Up. Article, https://groundup.org.za/article/ems-workers-demand-end-to-attacks-and-robberies-while-on-duty-in-nelson-mandela-bay; 2024 [accessed 29 April 2024].
39 Waldrop D. Clemency B. Maguin E. Lindstrom H. Prehospital providers’ perceptions of emergency calls near life's end Am J Hosp Palliat Care 32 2 2015 198 204 10.1177/1049909113518962 24413610
40 Lord B. Récoché K. O'Connor M. Paramedics’ perceptions of their role in palliative care: analysis of focus group transcripts J Palliat Care 28 1 2012 36 40 10.1177/082585971202800106 22582470
41 Kirk A. Crompton P.W. Knighting K. Paramedics and their role in end-of-life care: perceptions and confidence J Paramed Pract 9 2 2017 71 79 10.12968/jpar.2017.9.2.71
42 Murphy-Jones G. Timmons S. Paramedics’ experiences of end-of-life care decision making with regard to nursing home residents: an exploration of influential issues and factors Emerg Med J 33 10 2016 722 726 10.1136/emermed-2015-205405 27189852
43 South African Department of Health. Healthcare workers’ guide to the Road to Health book, https://www.health.gov.za/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/RTHB-USER-GUIDE-layout_PRINT-READY_12Aug2020.pdf; 2020 [accessed 29 April 2024].
44 Juhrmann M.L. Grindrod A.E. Gage C.H. Emergency medical services: the next linking asset for public health approaches to palliative care? Palliative Care Soc Pract 2023 1 11 10.1177/26323524231163195
45 Dent T. Tipping I. Anderson R. Daniels C. Hospice advice and rapid response service for ambulance clinicians BMJ Support Palliat Care 10 3 2020 296 299 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-001911
46 Breyre A. Taigman M. Salvucci A. Effect of a mobile integrated hospice healthcare program on emergency medical services transport to the emergency department Prehosp Emerg Care 26 2022 364 369 10.1080/10903127.2021.1900474 33689535
47 Poudel A. Bhuvan K.C. Shrestha S. Nissen L. Access to palliative care: discrepancy among low-income and high-income countries J Glob Health 9 2 2019 10.7189/jogh.09.020309
48 van der Plas W.Y. Benjamens S. Kruijff S. The increased need for palliative cancer care in Sub-Saharan Africa Eur J Surg Oncol 46 7 2020 1373 1376 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.03.212 32265092
49 Binns C.W. Health research-essential link to equity in development Asia Pac J Public Health 4 4 1990 278 10.1177/101053959000400420
50 Pekarsky B. Seymour-Walsh A. Wright C. The role of ambulance services in reducing the gaps in access to end-of-life care: from conversations to policy Prog Palliat Care 29 2 2021 98 105 10.1080/09699260.2020.1871174
