
==== Front
Genetics
Genetics
genetics
Genetics
0016-6731
1943-2631
Oxford University Press US

38376816
10.1093/genetics/iyae007
iyae007
Knowledgebase & Database Resources
AcademicSubjects/SCI01180
AcademicSubjects/SCI01140
PomBase: a Global Core Biodata Resource—growth, collaboration, and sustainability
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6277-726X
Rutherford Kim M Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8666-9746
Lera-Ramírez Manuel Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6330-7526
Wood Valerie Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK

Blake J Editor
Corresponding author: Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Sanger Building, Old Addenbrooke's Site, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK. Email: kmr44@cam.ac.uk
Corresponding author: Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Sanger Building, Old Addenbrooke's Site, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, UK. Email: vw253@cam.ac.uk
Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

5 2024
20 2 2024
20 2 2024
227 1 iyae00728 11 2023
13 1 2024
20 2 2024
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Genetics Society of America.
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

PomBase (https://www.pombase.org), the model organism database (MOD) for fission yeast, was recently awarded Global Core Biodata Resource (GCBR) status by the Global Biodata Coalition (GBC; https://globalbiodata.org/) after a rigorous selection process. In this MOD review, we present PomBase’s continuing growth and improvement over the last 2 years. We describe these improvements in the context of the qualitative GCBR indicators related to scientific quality, comprehensivity, accelerating science, user stories, and collaborations with other biodata resources. This review also showcases the depth of existing connections both within the biocuration ecosystem and between PomBase and its user community.

model organism
model organism database
MOD
fission yeast
Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Global BioData Coalition
Global Core Biodata Resource
standardization
FAIR
database
knowledgebase
biocuration
Wellcome Trust 10.13039/100010269 218236/Z/19/Z
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Understanding the intricate mechanisms and processes that govern the behavior of eukaryotic cells is a fundamental goal in modern biology. Schizosaccharomyces pombe (S. pombe) is one of the model organisms critical to this pursuit. Research utilizing S. pombe has played a pivotal role in elucidating fundamental aspects of cell cycle control (Nurse 2020), cell division (Mangione and Gould 2019), chromosome biology (Sato et al. 2021), epigenetic inheritance (Grewal 2023), telomere biology (Kanoh 2023), and many other core-conserved cellular processes. More recently, aging (Ohtsuka et al. 2023), autophagy (Alao et al. 2023), RNA processing (Larochelle et al. 2017), posttranscriptional regulation (Hernández-Elvira and Sunnerhagen 2022), autophagy (Xu and Du 2022), and mitochondrial processes (Dinh and Bonnefoy 2023) have become areas of increased focus.

PomBase (https://www.pombase.org) is the authoritative model organism database (MOD) for S. pombe, serving as a comprehensive knowledgebase that supports fission yeast researchers and the broader scientific community (Lock et al. 2020; Harris et al. 2022; Toda et al. 2023). Through detailed curation, standardization, and integration of information derived from thousands of focused experiments, it provides a repository for molecular data at the level of the gene and protein. PomBase aims to be a fully Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (FAIR)-compliant resource (Wilkinson et al. 2016). In addition to a sophisticated query tool, PomBase also offers organism and domain-level overviews across multiple axes of classification including function, process, location, phenotype, human disease gene ortholog, curation, and characterization progress.

By consulting PomBase at every stage of the research cycle, the fission yeast community gains valuable insights to plan experiments, interpret experimental data, analyze results, and inform subsequent investigations. The integration of diverse data sets enables meaningful connections to be made between new and existing information, stimulating novel scientific discoveries that contribute significantly to advancements in our understanding of eukaryotic cell biology.

Since the previous update in 2022, content curated by PomBase has featured prominently in many publications including studies related to the regulation of heterochromatin spreading (Greenstein et al. 2022), mitotic spindle dynamics (Lera-Ramirez et al. 2022), identification of novel genes involved in sexual reproduction (Billmyre et al. 2022), and defining contractile ring components (Snider et al. 2022). The genome sequence and annotated features from PomBase were used for studies including the dissection of epigenetic pathways (Bao et al. 2022), translational control (Duncan and Mata 2022), nuclear membrane integrity (Ader et al. 2023), and work supporting the role of inositol pyrophosphate (IPP) as an agonist of RNA 3′-processing and transcription termination (Schwer et al. 2022). PomBase's curated resources have also been used to study human disease networks and mechanisms (Chesnel et al. 2020; Calvo et al. 2021; Minnis et al. 2021) and in the study of the conserved mechanisms affecting aging and lifespan (Romila et al. 2021; Uehara et al. 2021; Mori et al. 2023). Some human genes (>350) are conserved in S. pombe but absent from budding yeast, making S. pombe a powerful single-cell organism for the study of the related human gene functions. Recent examples where PomBase played a supporting role in the characterization of genes conserved in humans but absent in budding yeast include the identification of novel factors for mRNA splicing (Anil et al. 2022; Selicky et al. 2022). PomBase extends its reach beyond fission yeast by disseminating curated knowledge to other biological databases and also by providing support for functional inferences which inform the interpretation of conserved gene functions in many other species including human (Feuermann M., Huaiyu M., Gaudet P. et al., manuscript in review).

PomBase was recently awarded Global Core Biodata Resource (GCBR) status by the Global Biodata Coalition. The GCBR's mission is to define fundamental biodata resources worldwide to enable funders to better coordinate the funding, management, and growth of the research infrastructure (Anderson and Global Life Science Data Resources Working Group 2017). Resources are assessed across a range of indicators: (1) scientific focus and quality of science; (2) the community served by the resource; (3) quality of service; (4) funding, governance, and legal infrastructure; and (5) accelerating science (see https://zenodo.org/records/7468719 for a full list of indicators).

Some of the individual indicators for compliance are straightforward to quantify, implement, and evaluate. The community served by the resource can be measured by metrics including usage (via web analytics), acknowledgements, and citations. Quality of service can be assessed using percentage availability per month, response times, backup and disaster recovery, and the use of recognized standards for recording data provenance. Funding, governance and legal infrastructure criteria are largely satisfied when appropriate licensing and an active advisory board are in place. Other aspects of resource data management, maintenance, and growth are more scientifically relevant but are necessarily qualitative and are difficult to describe or evaluate because scope, specialization, data sources, data types, and data volume vary between resources. For example, it is currently difficult to establish accurately the size and content of the curatable literature corpus for a specific species or data type. The community contribution to a resource and the breadth and depth of curation coverage (curation completeness) for different data types are also difficult to assess because appropriate metrics have not been defined. The extent of collaboration and data and software sharing between resources and the value to the research community generated by improved efficiency is similarly difficult to quantify. The final GCBR evaluation category “accelerating science” is the most challenging area in which to demonstrate compliance because it involves a qualitative assessment of how effectively the data resource is meeting the needs of the scientific community via counterfactual and “accelerating science” user stories (Global Biodata Coalition 2022 Dec 21). These difficult-to-evaluate, qualitative indicators are critical for the understanding of global biodata resource contributions and sustainability efforts.

For PomBase, with a staff of only 2–3.5 full-time equivalent (FTE), it is essential that resources are deployed efficiently and outputs produced by other groups are not duplicated. Resource sharing strategies deployed at PomBase range from the development of reusable extendible open-source software, reuse of software and tools developed by others, data sharing (inwards and outwards) and the co-development of standards and quality control systems. All these strategies improve efficiency while continuing to meet evolving user requirements and contributing to resource sustainability efforts across the bioresource ecosystem.

In this database update, we present PomBase's continuing growth and improvement since the previous resource update in 2022 (Harris et al. 2022). Improvements are discussed in the context of the qualitative GCBR indicators related to scientific quality, evaluation of comprehensivity, accelerating science, and the connections, collaborations, and data sharing with other biodata resources.

Assessing scientific quality: growth, completeness, and coverage

In the biocuration field, resource productivity can be simplistically measured by curated data increase. In PomBase, experimentally supported curated statements or annotations, sourced from the primary literature, show a consistent year-on-year growth, increasing from 287,000 in January 2022 to 392,000 as of November 2023 (Fig. 1a). For a knowledgebase, curation growth can include both novel data and duplicate statements from different experiments. Recording redundant observations of different provenance and from different methods is necessary because it increases confidence in the result or broader hypothesis. However, metrics evaluating knowledge accumulation based solely on data growth do not provide information about the knowledge coverage (or completeness) in a specific domain. Users need to be confident that knowledge coverage is adequate for data analyses or interpretation of results making it a pivotal aspect of scientific quality. Knowledge coverage grows more slowly than annotation count because only novel, previously uncurated observations contribute to its increase. Assessing knowledge completeness is challenging because an absence of coverage can be due to either uncurated publications or an absence of published data. Methods used to assess the knowledge coverage and target knowledge gaps at PomBase are discussed in the next section.

Fig. 1. Metrics to assess curation growth and coverage. a) Experimentally supported curated statements or annotations, sourced from the primary literature, show a consistent year-on-year growth (https://curation.pombase.org/pombe/stats/annotation). Major data types collected by PomBase are shown. b) Classifying proteins as functionally “known” or “unknown” is 1 way to describe the completeness of both curation and scientific knowledge (https://www.pombase.org/status/gene-characterisation). Here, we classify protein-coding genes as “known” or “unknown” based on GO biological process assignment to biologically meaningful grouping classes and show changes over time. We separate known into (1) “known from an experiment in S. pombe” (red / bottom band), where the process is completely or partially characterized in low-throughput experiments in S. pombe, and (2) “known from an inference from another species” (yellow / band second to bottom). We separate “unknown” into (1) “conserved unknown” (dark gray / band second from top), present in some species outside the Schizosaccharomyces clade, and (2) “species-specific unknown” (light gray / top band), restricted to the fission yeast clade.

Literature curation coverage and contents

Once all “curatable” publications are identified, the percentage of fully curated publications provides an additional metric to assess curation completeness. In some domains and for some model species, the volume of literature makes it difficult to establish even the approximate number of “curatable” publications. For PomBase, identifying domain-specific literature is relatively straightforward by retrieving publications from PubMed that mention “fission yeast” or “S. pombe” (14,155 publications, November 2023). The manual triage process examining title and abstract identifies incorrectly retrieved publications, for example, when fission yeast is mentioned in the abstract but is not the experimental system used (3199 publications). Publications are then classified as either “uncuratable” or “curatable.” Uncuratable publications are in scope for PomBase by topic but have no obvious gene-specific experimental data; these publications are classified into subtopics [for example, biotechnology or toxicity studies (89), theoretical modeling (111), methods or reagents (967), wild-type features (301), or review (1348)]. This triage process classifies publications within PomBase and also effectively creates a training data set for machine learning (ML) publication classifiers. The remaining “curatable” publications are expected to contain experimental data (6724). The difference between the number of “curatable” (6724) and “curated” (4440) publications (2284) provides an alternative measure of curation completion (66% for PomBase).

Using high-level overviews or “slims” to assess curation coverage

To describe biological observations consistently, most curation activities make extensive use of defined domain-specific concepts (“terms” or “classes”) from ontologies approved by the Open Biological and Biomedical Ontology (OBO) Foundry (Jackson et al. 2021). Ontologies are directed graphs where the root node defines the most general classes [for example, Gene Ontology (GO) “biological process”], while more specific terms (“subclasses”) describe increasingly specific concepts (i.e. “cellular metabolic process,” “DNA metabolic process,” “DNA replication”) (Ashburner et al. 2000). One way to provide an overview of knowledge coverage is via an ontology “slim set,” a set of informative “high-level” biologically meaningful grouping classes (Lock et al. 2018). We use the biological process aspect of the GO (one of the most widely used bio-ontologies) to illustrate ontology overviews (Gene Ontology Consortium et al. 2023).

The “slim set” for the GO biological process ontology relevant to a single-celled species includes terms such as “DNA replication,” “transmembrane transport,” “mitochondrion organization,” and “lipid metabolic process” that represent biological modules of interest to groups of researchers with a specific focus. PomBase provides slim sets, accessible prominently from the PomBase front page, for each of the 3 GO aspects (molecular function, biological process, and cellular component), for disease associations of known human orthologs, and most recently for phenotypes (https://www.pombase.org/browse-curation/fypo-slim). Lists of genes annotated to each slim term (e.g. “DNA replication”) and its descendants/subclasses can be browsed, downloaded, or used in queries. Critically, to allow knowledge coverage to be assessed, each “slim” page also indicates the number of gene products not covered by the slim set.

There are 2 reasons that genes may not be assigned to a GO slim category: (1) the annotated terms are not currently covered by the slim set, or (2) the gene products are currently unannotated. Gene products may be unannotated because they are unknown (uncharacterized or unpublished) or because they are curatable (i.e. known) but have yet to be curated.

PomBase prioritizes broad GO annotation coverage and accuracy alongside specificity. We consider general and correct curation over the entire corpus to be more critical for genome-wide investigations than annotation completeness in only the areas of biology that are intensively studied in fission yeast. However, both breadth and depth (specificity) of annotation completeness are the long-term aims. GO breadth of coverage is improved by identifying and targeting knowledge gaps in the uncurated (i.e. the unannotated but curatable) portion of the GO slim sets. We believe that our GO process coverage at the slim level (breadth) is close to completion (PomBase GO biological process slim; https://www.pombase.org/browse-curation/fission-yeast-bp-go-slim-terms) and that we are making good progress with specificity (based on literature completion metrics above).

Once complete coverage of a slim set is established using all available published or inferred information, increased coverage will only be derived from newly published gene characterizations (in either the species of interest or inferred from another species) (Wood et al. 2019) or inferences from newly identified distant orthologs of previously characterized genes, for example using AlphaFold (Monzon et al. 2022). However, at PomBase (and likely other MODs), much of the valuable experimental detail, including connections between gene products (i.e. protein kinase or transcription factor targets) and much of the reproduced experimental data that will provide increased confidence in curated statements, remains to be captured. No standard metrics exist to assess breadth or depth of curation, and it is therefore difficult to establish how complete knowledge capture is in any domain for available published results.

Unknown (uncharacterized) proteins

Proteins without a known function have become an area of increased concern in recent years, following observations that gene characterization rates have stagnated and a large proportion of proteins remain unstudied or understudied even in model organisms (Sinha et al. 2018; Wood et al. 2019; Kustatscher et al. 2022; Rocha et al. 2023). Classifying proteins as functionally known or unknown is an additional way to describe the completeness of both curation and scientific knowledge (Fig. 1b).

There are multiple ways to classify whether a gene is functionally characterized, and the concept of “characterization” is clearly a continuum. However, as an initial step in defining “unknowns,” we devised a simple binary classification, based on biological processes at the level of the GO slim set (see above) (Wood et al. 2019). This classification requires a meaningful biological process assignment (i.e. program or pathway) rather than a precise molecular function (activity). We select meaningful biological process terms as used on the slim set (i.e. DNA replication, translation, chromosome segregation, cytokinesis) and omit general terms (i.e. metabolism, cellular process, and responses to various chemicals). The rationale for this process-focused approach is that (1) the same molecular functions are often reused in many different cellular contexts, (2) most researchers focus on biological programs rather than specific activities, and (3) many proteins are members of protein complexes that are relatively well-studied at the level of the biological process, but the precise molecular function of each subunit is not known or difficult to describe. For example, subunits of well-studied complexes [e.g. anaphase-promoting complex (APC) or ESCRT III complex] will often have no assigned molecular function beyond “protein binding” but are well-studied at the process level. We reason that knowledge of a specific, but well-evidenced biological, process is usually sufficient to bring a partially characterized gene to the attention of the relevant researchers for more detailed investigation. We further separate these functionally classified proteins depending on whether the biological process is derived directly from studies in fission yeast or is inferred from orthologs in other species (Fig. 1b). In addition, we classify the “functionally unknown” proteins based on whether they are conserved outside the Schizosaccharomyces clade or if they are currently identified as Schizosaccharomyces specific. This classification allows us to identify universally conserved, or eukaryotically conserved, unknown proteins and provide inventories of priority unstudied genes or poorly characterized genes. This list of unstudied genes is updated daily (https://www.pombase.org/status/priority-unstudied-genes).

The PomBase unknown protein inventory was first published in 2019. Since then, the number of unstudied proteins using this metric has decreased from 693 to 618. We periodically review unknown proteins for available functional data from other species.

Collaboration: software and data sharing

Reuse of external software to enhance PomBase

When PomBase requires new tools and visualizations for curated or imported data, we evaluate and, whenever possible, reuse existing software rather than developing new tools in house.

Since 2018, the PomBase gene pages have featured the JBrowse genome browser widget in the summary section (Buels et al. 2016). The genome sequence and the 316 accompanying data tracks hosted in the full JBrowse instance (https://pombase.org/jbrowse/) are of general interest to most users and of special interest to the gene expression and heterochromatin communities. However, we found from user feedback that the genome context is not always the most biologically relevant summary display on gene pages (for example, structural biologists or cell biologists). The new gene page summary section allows users to set their preferred view to JBrowse or one of several new views described below (Fig. 2a).

Fig. 2. New gene page summary and protein feature views. a) The gene page summary section has been redefined to allow users to set their preference to the existing JBrowse (genome browser) view or one of several new views. b) The new protein feature summary view uses the RCSB 1D Feature Viewer to display protein features (i.e. mutated residues, modifications, and structural features), illustrated here using the Cdc15 F-Bar membrane adaptor (https://pombase.org/gene/SPAC20G8.05c). c) The new protein feature “full view” also uses the RCSB 1D Feature Viewer and is accessible via a link from the summary view. This view provides a comprehensive display of engineered amino acid mutations (substitutions and deletions) linked to phenotype information. Mouse-over provides feature details. Illustrated here using Cdc15 protein F-Bar membrane adaptor (https://pombase.org/gene_protein_features/SPAC20G8.05c).

Protein feature viewer

PomBase phenotype annotation captures the results of genetic experiments by linking a phenotypic observation to the genotype of a mutant strain and to the experimental conditions. Phenotypes are the most commonly annotated data type in PomBase, with an increase from 99,300 annotations in January 2022 to over 185,000 as of November 2023. This genotype-to-phenotype data include 6442 alleles encoding protein variants (substitutions and partial deletions) used for over 28,700 phenotype annotations. The continual growth of phenotype data and the simultaneous growth in curated protein modifications (to over 60,000) requires new tools to enable users to view potentially hundreds of data points from different data types simultaneously for any single gene/protein. To make this possible, we have implemented a protein feature summary using the Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics (RCSB) 1D Feature Viewer (Segura et al. 2021). The new protein feature summary view displays amino acid mutagenesis and modifications in the context of the protein sequence (Fig. 2b). The linked full protein feature view includes all amino acid mutations for single locus genotypes including multiple amino acid substitution alleles and serial deletion alleles (Fig. 2c).

Protein structure views using Mol*

We recently imported and displayed S. pombe experimental protein structures from Protein Data Bank (PDB) (484 structures for >400 proteins) and protein structures predicted by AlphaFold (5124 proteins, database version 2022 November 1) into PomBase (see also data reuse section below) (PDBe-KB consortium 2020; Varadi et al. 2022). We display these structures using Mol* (/molstar/), an open-source JavaScript library developed by RCSB-PDB (Sehnal et al. 2021). Mol* provides high-performance graphics and data handling allowing users to visualize and interrogate protein structures. We configured Mol* to provide informative views and metadata based on consultation with structural biologists, illustrated here using the Lsm7 protein (Fig. 3). We provide the same protein structure view on the publication pages for any research publication containing an experimental protein structure. In the future, we will link mutated residues in protein feature view (Fig. 2c), to the corresponding residues in the protein structure view.

Fig. 3. New structure views. Mol* (/molstar/), a web-based open-source toolkit developed by RCSB-PDB, is used to display protein structures from the PDB and AlphaFold. Illustrated here using the Lsm7 protein PDB entry as part of the Lsm2-8 complex (https://www.pombase.org/gene/SPCC285.12).

Viewing reactions with the Rhea widget

A multiyear collaboration between the GO consortium (GOC) and the Rhea reaction database has mapped more than 4500 GO catalytic activities to Rhea reactions (Gene Ontology Consortium 2021; Bansal et al. 2022). We were able to take advantage of this valuable resource and the reaction diagram widget from Rhea, to display chemical equations alongside the associated activities on 794 GO molecular function pages (Fig. 4). These reaction widgets are also available via the gene pages by mouse-over any associated molecular function.

Fig. 4. The Rhea reaction widget. The widget provided by the Rhea reaction database makes use of the GO to Rhea mappings to display reactions for all annotated GO activities.

Reuse of PomBase software by other resources

PomBase website Code

The PomBase website code provides intuitive displays, a versatile query system, and visualization tools (described above) (Lock et al. 2019; Harris et al. 2022). The website system is supported by a data import and processing pipeline that allows daily updates and a curation database using the Chado schema (Mungall et al. 2007).

The website code is designed to be low maintenance and for long-term sustainability. It is easily extendable to incorporate novel data types and new visualizations enabling rapid reuse by other communities including emerging model species.

Since the 2022 MOD resource update publication (Harris et al. 2022), we have made many extensions to the website code. In addition to the protein structure and protein feature views described above, we have improved the Advanced Query tool to enable querying by transcript number, RNA length (spliced and unspliced), and presence of coiled-coils or disordered regions (for protein-coding genes).

We previously reported the implementation of JaponicusDB (https://www.japonicusdb.org/) for the emerging model fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces japonicus as part of a 2-month project using the PomBase website and database system (Rutherford et al. 2022). This is, to our knowledge, the first MOD maintained entirely by the research community with no dedicated professional biocuration effort. The JaponicusDB user base is relatively small (approximately 2000 unique users per year compared to 45,000 for PomBase), and the active community is substantially smaller. This model is effective for this small but highly motivated community because basic content can be provided and managed by the users with no manual intervention by PomBase staff. There is no development overhead since all new PomBase features (as described above) are automatically deployed nightly for JaponicusDB.

Canto curation tool reuse

The online curation tool Canto (https://curation.pombase.org/) is developed and maintained by the PomBase team to support curation by professional curators and publication authors (Rutherford et al. 2014). Canto supports genotype management and ontology-based curation (including GO, phenotypes, and protein modifications) with associated metadata, provenance, and annotation extensions (Huntley et al. 2014). Canto is easily extendable to incorporate additional ontology-based annotation types with associated metadata. Canto has now been deployed for several other communities, including PHI-base for pathogen–host interaction phenotypes (Urban et al. 2017; Cuzick et al. 2023), FlyBase for phenotype annotation of Drosophila melanogaster, and the S. japonicus MOD JaponicusDB as described above.

Data dissemination from PomBase to other resources

PomBase disseminates curated data sets to a wide range of biological repositories and knowledgebases (Fig. 5). We provide over 27,000 experimentally supported, manually curated annotations to the GO database (Gene Ontology Consortium et al. 2023), accessible via the AmiGO browser (Carbon et al. 2009). These data are further disseminated by the GOC to the UniProtKB GOA database (Huntley et al. 2015), accessible via the QuickGO browser (Binns et al. 2009), and disseminated by GO or GOA to FungiDB, NCBI, and Ensembl Genomes.

Fig. 5. Major knowledge dissemination pathways from PomBase. PomBase provides regular updates of curated data to major bioresources and repositories. We export manually curated gene structures to the ENA. ENA gene structures are used to provide the UniProtKB protein sequence (and subsequently used by InterPro resources and AlphaFold). We submit protein families and protein family updates to Pfam. As part of the GOC, we export functional annotation to the GO repository which is further disseminated to GOA and UniProtKB (and to NCBI and FungiDB, not shown). Phenotype data are exported to the Monarch Initiative knowledgebase. RNA features and GO curation are exported to RNACentral. The genome and nucleotide sequences and features are imported by Ensembl Genomes. Protein and genetic interaction data are submitted to BioGRID.

The experimental knowledge captured in GO statements is subsequently used to inform unstudied species and to fill annotation gaps in well-studied species by annotation transfer. This is probably the most important activity of the MODs after supporting their immediate research community (Oliver et al. 2016). PomBase is one of the richest sources of experimental cell-level curation for transfer to orthologs in other species via the GO PAN-GO project (Gaudet et al. 2011). Via the PAN-GO pipeline, we provide experimental support for 565,172 inferred GO annotations across ∼150 key species increasing to 697,000 for all inference methods (data from QuickGO, 2023 November 20). Most of the propagated annotations inform the biology of unstudied or under-annotated fungi. However, because, S. pombe proteins are broadly conserved among eukaryotes (over 70% have human orthologs), S. pombe GO curation is also used to support over 6800 inferred human annotations (increased from 3863 in 2019) (Feuermann M., Huaiyu M., Gaudet P. et al., manuscript in review).

We have recently submitted 100,000 S. pombe phenotype annotations to the Monarch Initiative, an integrative data and analytic platform connecting phenotypes to genotypes across species (Shefchek et al. 2020). This will make fission yeast data available to compare phenotypes between species and to explore the effects of directed mutations of conserved protein residues. These data are further disseminated by Monarch to other resources, including the Critical Path Institute (https://c-path.org/), to support collaborations that accelerate drug development.

PomBase exports ncRNA data and annotation to the RNACentral RNA repository (RNAcentral Consortium 2021). Export files are updated daily and ingested by RNACentral at each release ∼3 times annually. The number of annotated fission yeast noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) has increased from 318 to 7518 since 2022. Some ncRNA features have been merged, some unsupported ncRNAs have been deleted, and several recently published ncRNAs have been annotated with GO terms and phenotypes.

PomBase has collaborated with BioGRID since 2013 to curate physical and genetic interactions (Oughtred et al. 2021). Interaction data curated by BioGRID are refreshed in PomBase after each BioGRID release, and reciprocally, interaction data curated from small-scale experiments by PomBase are periodically submitted to BioGRID. We recently extended the data model for genetic interactions at PomBase to associate the interactions with genotypes rather than genes and to connect them with the phenotypes they enhance or suppress. This change will help geneticists interpret interactions more quickly and will improve consistency between phenotype and genetic interaction annotations. After these improvements, the PomBase data processing pipeline continues to support the export of the gene-to-gene connections to BioGRID.

As the database authority with responsibility for genome feature coordinate changes, the accuracy of S. pombe gene structures at NCBI, Ensembl Genomes, and FungiDB and their derived protein sequences in UniProtKB, InterPro, and AlphaFold is dependent on PomBase. We have also improved the submission process to support European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) updates with each PomBase release. This streamlined update procedure will ensure that all resources have rapid access to accurate gene structures. Finally, we also submit novel protein families and updates for domains of unknown function (DUFs) to the Pfam protein family database.

Data ingested into PomBase from other resources

During each nightly update, PomBase imports data from many other sources. Genetic and physical interaction data are imported from BioGRID as part of a reciprocal arrangement (export is described above). Manual GO annotation is supplemented by phylogenetically inferred annotations provided by the GOC PAINT pipeline (Gaudet et al. 2011). In addition, computationally inferred GO annotation is imported from the GOA database (Huntley et al. 2015). These annotations are provided by the InterPro2GO mappings maintained by InterPro (Burge et al. 2012), by Rhea2GO mappings maintained by the GOC and Rhea, and by the UniProtKB mappings derived from keywords, pathways, subcellular locations, and the UniProtKB rule-based system (UniProtKB-KW, UniPathway, UniProtKB-SubCell, and UniRule, respectively) (Bansal et al. 2022; UniProt Consortium 2023).

Protein domains and families are imported from InterPro (Paysan-Lafosse et al. 2023). Known protein structures are imported from PDB and predicted structures from the AlphaFold database (wwPDB consortium 2019; Varadi et al. 2022). All article details (author, title, abstract, etc.) are imported from PubMed. Inferred molecular pathways are imported from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database (Kanehisa et al. 2023).

We maintain manual inventories of orthologs between S. pombe and Saccharomyces cerevisiae and between S. pombe and human based on integrated predictions and divergent orthologs derived from experiments (i.e. co-conservation of protein complex subunits). For these orthologs, the HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC) and Saccharomyces Genome Database (SGD) symbols and descriptions are imported to display on the gene pages (Seal et al. 2023; Wong et al. 2023). For orthologs in other species, we provide links to the DRSC Integrative Ortholog Prediction Tool (DIOPT) which integrates ortholog predictions from over 20 providers (Hu et al. 2011). We also map Monarch disease ontology (Mondo) terms from human disease-associated proteins to orthologous pombe proteins (Vasilevsky et al. 2022). Over 3500 fission yeast proteins have human orthologs, 1513 of which are mapped to disease genes (increased from 1401 in August 2021). Disease associations allow users to retrieve all genes implicated in specific disease types (i.e. premature aging syndromes or metabolic disorders) using the PomBase Advanced Search tool. This resource has been used to classify diseases caused by interactors of btn1 (the ortholog of the human gene causative for Batten disease) (Minnis et al. 2021) and identify mitochondrial diseases associated with 65 nonessential fission yeast mutants that fail to proliferate in low glucose (Mori et al. 2023).

Collaboration to develop global standards

The OBO Foundry ontologies used by PomBase include GO, the Sequence Ontology (SO) (Eilbeck et al. 2005), the Protein Ontology (PRO) (Natale et al. 2017), the Mondo disease ontology (Vasilevsky et al. 2022), and the protein modification ontology (PSI-MOD) (Montecchi-Palazzi et al. 2008). We continue to contribute new classes, corrections, and other revisions to these ontologies and are one of the largest contributors to GO ontology development. PomBase curators develop and maintain the Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology (FYPO) (Harris et al. 2013). Since the previous database publication in 2022, FYPO has grown from ∼7500 terms to over 8,100 terms, and the number of phenotype annotations has increased from ∼99,000 to 184,000 as of November 2023.

FYPO makes use of the Phenotype And Trait Ontology (PATO), the Chemicals of Biological Interest ontology (ChEBI), the Relations Ontology (RO), and GO to relate and logically define phenotype terms (Hastings et al. 2016; Gkoutos et al. 2018; Gene Ontology Consortium et al. 2023; Mungall et al. 2023). FYPO development uses the Ontology Development Kit (ODK; Matentzoglu et al. 2022), which provides a release pipeline that seamlessly incorporates ontology reasoning, continuous integration checks, and generation of production files. We participate in the Unified Phenotype Ontology (uPheno) effort to integrate multiple phenotype ontologies into a unified cross-species ontology (Matentzoglu et al. 2019).

Partnerships improving curated content

Collaborative publishing via microPublications

MicroPublications provide a mechanism to describe brief, novel findings, negative and/or reproduced results, and results which may lack a broader scientific narrative and would usually remain unpublished (Raciti et al. 2018). PomBase has been a partner of the microPublication journal since 2020, to contribute to the editorial process and ensure compliance with data standards. The number of S. pombe articles published by this route has increased from 6 in 2021 to 11 in 2023 (year to November), covering topics from biochemistry, phenotypes, methods, software, and expression.

Community collaboration by author-led curation

The most extensive collaborative project at PomBase is the long-term interaction with the fission yeast community via our community curation project. Community curation actively engages authors in building FAIR-shared biological knowledge (Wilkinson et al. 2016; Lock et al. 2020).

To date, 440 authors have curated 1,124publications generating over 23,000 standardized, evidenced, and provenanced annotations from directed gene-specific hypothesis-driven experiments (i.e. excluding high-throughput data sets). The current curation status of publications by year published is shown in Fig. 6. This ongoing collaboration with authors improves curation quality because co-curation by biological domain experts (authors) and ontology experts (biocurators) usually includes a dialogue to refine and extend annotation. Authors benefit from participation in the curation process in multiple ways including increased publication visibility, satisfying funders’ dissemination criteria, and a deeper understanding of curated data for reuse purposes.

Fig. 6. Current low-throughput curatable publication status by year published. The current curation status of the low-throughput publications identified as containing gene-specific experimental data (i.e. curatable) classified by publication date as of November 2023. Five categories are displayed: (1) admin curated (green): papers curated exclusively by PomBase staff who concentrate on legacy publications; (2) community curated (blue): curated papers with annotations contributed by authors (these are largely restricted to papers published since 2012 when Canto was launched); (3) uncurated, curator assigned: publications assigned to a PomBase curator but not yet curated; (4) uncurated, community assigned (red): assigned to a community member but not yet curated; and (5) uncurated, unassigned: not yet assigned for curation.

Quality control contributions

As science progresses, new interpretations often replace existing incorrect or incomplete explanations. Often historical experiments are not replicated and are gradually revealed to be over-interpreted by newer research, although negative results or corrections are rarely explicitly published (Wood et al. 2020). At PomBase, curators routinely review existing annotations (experimental and inferred) for consistency and accuracy when curating newer publications. As a result of this incremental checking, PomBase provides one of the largest contributions to the correction of manual and electronically inferred GO annotations (Wood et al. 2020; Feuermann M., Huaiyu M., Gaudet P. et al., manuscript in review). Evaluating data quality and removing outdated assertions is critical for basic research scientists but also because curated data are used as training data for function prediction, large language models (LLMs), and other ML applications. We have also developed a generic pipeline to validate and correct the protein residue positions referred to by alleles and protein modifications (Lera-Ramirez, manuscript in preparation).

Similar to many other aspects of biocuration discussed above, the value of identifying and fixing errors is difficult to quantify and even more difficult to attribute.

Conclusions

The interconnectivity of the biological data resource ecosystem

Biological databases may give the appearance of being disparate and autonomous resources. In reality, resources are deeply interdependent and routinely cooperate to establish standards and to exchange curated data, data models, software tools, ontologies, quality control pipelines, and data formats. Model organism resource staff frequently interact with other bioresources via GitHub, e-mail, Slack, and regular online, in-person consortia, and International Society of Biocuration (ISB; https://www.biocuration.org/) meetings.

These—frequently organic—collaborative efforts reduce duplication of work for both curators and developers and ensure that resources can focus on other important tasks specific to their respective communities. The MODs collaborate on many large-scale projects such as the GOC (Gene Ontology Consortium et al. 2023) and Alliance of Genome Resources (Alliance of Genome Resources Consortium 2020) and also on many smaller projects such as the automation of gene summaries (Kishore et al. 2020) and collaborative quality control using shared annotation (Wood et al. 2020). Here, we have presented some of the PomBase features made possible by this, often informal, collaborative network in the context of the GCBR indicators related to scientific quality, collaboration, sustainability, and impact. We have described data sharing both inwards and outwards and contributions to global standards and quality control. We have provided a progress update for the most ambitious collaborative project undertaken by PomBase: the multicontributor community curation project empowering authors to FAIRify their data and knowledge derived from in-depth hypothesis-driven research.

Difficulties defining metrics for impact

It is challenging for a knowledgebase to evaluate how it contributes to scientific impact. Some aspects of impact can be derived from curation activities related to setting and promoting standards as described above. However, it is also important to demonstrate how the resource adds value for its users by integrating knowledge in a way that is not possible for individual researchers or research groups. A recommended way to demonstrate impact is via “the counterfactual” (i.e. indicating the consequences for the biodata resource ecosystem if the resource ceased to exist). Powerful testimonials and “use cases” from user surveys (Wood et al. 2017) and letters of support are the most impactful way to demonstrate counterfactual arguments by explaining in detail how users engage with and depend upon biological resources. However, the qualitative nature of these outputs makes them difficult to evaluate, and the provision for including such documents in grant applications is limited.

Another difficulty is that resources such as PomBase are often not explicitly cited by users because their use is constant and incremental (i.e. regularly checking gene-specific facts and planning the next experiment). The many ways in which integrated data improve efficiency in basic biology by helping to formulate hypotheses and interpret results often do not align with citability. Despite this, we can track via citations some of the innovative ways in which key scientific investigations have used PomBase (a current selection is provided in the introduction).

It was recently proposed that knowledgebases should be weighted differently by funding bodies and that strong innovation is not necessary (Karp 2022). Knowledgebases are impactful not through novelty but because they are critical to scientific innovation while also reducing scientific costs. Across the resource infrastructure, cost savings of up to 20 times the investment are identified for bioresources (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/about/our-impact/impact-report-2021). It is clear from our community surveys that knowledgebases are vitally important as a way to connect research communities and support discovery and that without them much research would be difficult or impossible. However, demonstrating the complete range of outputs and impacts of these resources will remain a challenging task.

Future directions

Support for ML, artificial intelligence, and rule-based approaches

Detailed and accurate factual statements are required to train artificial intelligence (AI) and ML models. To support the emerging AI/ML field, we provide training data sets for the identification of curatable publications and data types (genotypes, phenotypes) that are used by various in-progress ML projects.

We recently revised nomenclature guidelines to make biological entities (genes, proteins, alleles) more machine-readable to improve automated named entity recognition by publishers (Lera-Ramírez et al. 2023). As a proof of principle, Genetics, G3, and microPublications now provide deep links from publications into PomBase for gene mentions (e.g. cdc15), by using a lexicon of PomBase entities. To reduce manual input steps in curation, we plan to identify named entities (genes, proteins, and alleles) in publications to preload the Canto curation tool (Rutherford et al. 2014).

We are actively working with AI and ML communities as the “human-in-the-loop” to support the application of machine-based methods. Work to date in this area includes evaluating ML-based function predictions provided by bioinformatics researchers (Rodríguez-López et al. 2023), reviewing rule-based predictions from UniProtKB ARBA pipeline (UniProt Consortium 2021), and reviewing ontology definitions generated by LLMs (DRAGON-AI; Toro et al. 2023).

Curating specificity

Finally, we will continue to build richer, more comprehensive connections among curated data of all types. Notably, we are converting S. pombe GO annotations to follow the GO Causal Activity Modeling (“GO-CAM”) principles established by the GOC (Thomas et al. 2019). Manually curated S. pombe GO annotations already include a rich set of “annotation extensions” that capture reaction substrates, effector–target connections, and regulatory effects (Huntley et al. 2014). PomBase has already curated 3579 genes-to-gene connections for 602 genes and 5245 molecular function to biological process connections for 2372 genes. Converting these extended annotations to GO-CAM models will improve PomBase's representation of how protein activities are connected into pathways and how pathways are interconnected. To make these connections accessible to PomBase users, pathway diagrams generated using GO-CAM data will be added to the gene page summary views.

Expertly curated data are critical to the efficient and successful application of model species as research tools (Oliver et al. 2016; Bellen et al. 2021; Wood et al. 2022). Despite the widely acknowledged dependence of the international biological research community on biological knowledgebases, most resources face continual challenges communicating their value to funders. We hope to continue to navigate these challenges and are committed to maintaining PomBase as a reliable source of comprehensive, quality-controlled, curated knowledge derived from both large- and small-scale S. pombe experiments. In particular, to improve sustainability, a major aim of our next funding cycle is to integrate PomBase data into the Alliance of Genome Resources. We will also continue to collaborate closely with our user community and other resources and incorporate their valuable research and feedback to shape our strategic direction. This virtuous cycle of research providing knowledge to the MODs in turn empowers researchers to pose innovative questions that drive knowledge advancement and expedite discoveries.

Supplementary Material

iyae007_Peer_Review_History

Acknowledgments

PomBase thanks the fission yeast community for contributing data sets and literature curation and for providing valuable feedback on the website; Juan Mata (PI) and Jürg Bähler (Co-PI) and our advisory board for their continual support; Antonia Lock for constructive comments on the manuscript; Nico Matentzoglu (Monarch Initiative) for assistance with deploying the ODK to manage FYPO development; Daniela Raciti, Karen Yook, and the microPublications team for providing the S. pombe microPublications platform and ongoing support; Charlie Hoffman, Sarah Sabatinos, and Sarah Lambert for supporting our microPublication editorial process; Pascale Gaudet and Marc Feuermann for implementing our recommendations for improving GO annotations and ontology content; Snezka Oliferenko for overseeing the community submissions for JaponicusDB; Thomas Schalch for input in structure displays; James Seager (Rothamsted Research) for contributions to Canto; Jaqueline Hayles for contributions to PomBase; and Jon Hollis, Matthew Fairbairn, and team at the Babraham Institute for hosting and supporting the PomBase website.

Data availability

All PomBase code is available under an open-source license from the PomBase GitHub organization (https://github.com/pombase), where each major aspect of the project—including curation, website, Chado database, FYPO, and Canto—has a dedicated repository. In addition to the web page displays and query result downloads described above, PomBase data can be downloaded in bulk from the website (see https://www.pombase.org/datasets). Available downloads include nightly database dumps and monthly releases of the entire Chado curation database and a range of specific curated data sets, including GO annotations, single-allele phenotypes, protein modifications, high-confidence physical interactions, and manually curated ortholog lists.

Funding

This research was funded in whole by the Wellcome Trust (grant number 218236/Z/19/Z to Juan Mata). For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright license to any author accepted manuscript version arising from this submission.

Author contributions

V.W. and K.M.R. wrote the manuscript. K.M.R. developed the website, Canto software, and maintained the database. V.W. and M.L.-R. performed data and literature curation. M.L.-R. wrote analysis scripts and reviewed the manuscript. All the authors commented on the manuscript draft.
==== Refs
Literature cited

Ader  NR, Chen  L, Surovtsev  IV, Chadwick  WL, Rodriguez  EC, King  MC, Lusk  CP. 2023. An ESCRT grommet cooperates with a diffusion barrier to maintain nuclear integrity. Nat Cell Biol. 25 (10 ):1465–1477. doi:10.1038/s41556-023-01235-4.37783794
Alao  J-P, Legon  L, Dabrowska  A, Tricolici  A-M, Kumar  J, Rallis  C. 2023. Interplays of AMPK and TOR in autophagy regulation in yeast. Cells. 12 (4 ):519. doi:10.3390/cells12040519.36831186
Gene Ontology Consortium, Aleksander  SA, Balhoff  J, Carbon  S, Cherry  JM, Drabkin  HJ, Ebert  D, Feuermann  M, Gaudet  P, et al  2023. The Gene Ontology knowledgebase in 2023. Genetics. 224 (1 ):iyad031. doi:10.1093/genetics/iyad031.36866529
Alliance of Genome Resources Consortium . 2020. Alliance of Genome Resources Portal: unified model organism research platform. Nucleic Acids Res. 48 (D1 ):D650–D658. doi:10.1093/nar/gkz813.31552413
Anderson  WP, Global Life Science Data Resources Working Group. 2017. Data management: a global coalition to sustain core data. Nature. 543 (7644 ):179. doi:10.1038/543179a.
Anil  AT, Choudhary  K, Pandian  R, Gupta  P, Thakran  P, Singh  A, Sharma  M, Mishra  SK. 2022. Splicing of branchpoint-distant exons is promoted by Cactin, Tls1 and the ubiquitin-fold-activated Sde2. Nucleic Acids Res. 50 (17 ):10000–10014. doi:10.1093/nar/gkac769.36095128
Ashburner  M, Ball  CA, Blake  JA, Botstein  D, Butler  H, Cherry  JM, Davis  AP, Dolinski  K, Dwight  SS, Eppig  JT, et al  2000. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet. 25 (1 ):25–29. doi:10.1038/75556.10802651
Bansal  P, Morgat  A, Axelsen  KB, Muthukrishnan  V, Coudert  E, Aimo  L, Hyka-Nouspikel  N, Gasteiger  E, Kerhornou  A, Neto  TB, et al  2022. Rhea, the reaction knowledgebase in 2022. Nucleic Acids Res. 50 (D1 ):D693–D700. doi:10.1093/nar/gkab1016.34755880
Bao  K, Shan  C-M, Chen  X, Raiymbek  G, Monroe  JG, Fang  Y, Toda  T, Koutmou  KS, Ragunathan  K, Lu  C, et al  2022. The cAMP signaling pathway regulates Epe1 protein levels and heterochromatin assembly. PLoS Genet. 18 (2 ):e1010049. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1010049.35171902
Bellen  HJ, Hubbard  EJA, Lehmann  R, Madhani  HD, Solnica-Krezel  L, Southard-Smith  EM. 2021. Model organism databases are in jeopardy. Dev Camb Engl. 148 (19 ):dev200193. doi:10.1242/dev.200193.
Billmyre  RB, Eickbush  MT, Craig  CJ, Lange  JJ, Wood  C, Helston  RM, Zanders  SE. 2022. Genome-wide quantification of contributions to sexual fitness identifies genes required for spore viability and health in fission yeast. PLoS Genet. 18 (10 ):e1010462. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1010462.36301993
Binns  D, Dimmer  E, Huntley  R, Barrell  D, O’Donovan  C, Apweiler  R. 2009. QuickGO: a web-based tool for Gene Ontology searching. Bioinformatics. 25 (22 ):3045–3046. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp536.19744993
Buels  R, Yao  E, Diesh  CM, Hayes  RD, Munoz-Torres  M, Helt  G, Goodstein  DM, Elsik  CG, Lewis  SE, Stein  L, et al  2016. JBrowse: a dynamic web platform for genome visualization and analysis. Genome Biol. 17 (1 ):66. doi:10.1186/s13059-016-0924-1.27072794
Burge  S, Kelly  E, Lonsdale  D, Mutowo-Muellenet  P, McAnulla  C, Mitchell  A, Sangrador-Vegas  A, Yong  S-Y, Mulder  N, Hunter  S. 2012. Manual GO annotation of predictive protein signatures: the InterPro approach to GO curation. Database J Biol Databases Curation. 2012 :bar068. doi:10.1093/database/bar068.
Calvo  IA, Sharma  S, Paulo  JA, Gulka  AOD, Boeszoermenyi  A, Zhang  J, Lombana  JM, Palmieri  CM, Laviolette  LA, Arthanari  H, et al  2021. The fission yeast FLCN/FNIP complex augments TORC1 repression or activation in response to amino acid (AA) availability. iScience. 24 (11 ):103338. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.103338.34805795
Carbon  S, Ireland  A, Mungall  CJ, Shu  S, Marshall  B, Lewis  S, AmiGO HubWeb Presence Working Group. 2009. AmiGO: online access to ontology and annotation data. Bioinformatics. 25 (2 ):288–289. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn615.19033274
Chesnel  F, Couturier  A, Alusse  A, Gagné  J-P, Poirier  GG, Jean  D, Boisvert  F-M, Hascoet  P, Paillard  L, Arlot-Bonnemains  Y, et al  2020. The prefoldin complex stabilizes the von Hippel-Lindau protein against aggregation and degradation. PLoS Genet. 16 (11 ):e1009183. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1009183.33137104
Cuzick  A, Seager  J, Wood  V, Urban  M, Rutherford  K, Hammond-Kosack  KE. 2023. A framework for community curation of interspecies interactions literature. eLife. 12 :e84658. doi:10.7554/eLife.84658.37401199
Dinh  N, Bonnefoy  N. 2023. Schizosaccharomyces pombe as a fundamental model for research on mitochondrial gene expression: progress, achievements and outlooks. IUBMB Life. doi:10.1002/iub.2801.
Duncan  CDS, Mata  J. 2022. Translation-complex profiling of fission yeast cells reveals dynamic rearrangements of scanning ribosomal subunits upon nutritional stress. Nucleic Acids Res. 50 (22 ):13011–13025. doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1140.36478272
Eilbeck  K, Lewis  SE, Mungall  CJ, Yandell  M, Stein  L, Durbin  R, Ashburner  M. 2005. The Sequence Ontology: a tool for the unification of genome annotations. Genome Biol. 6 (5 ):R44. doi:10.1186/gb-2005-6-5-r44.15892872
Gaudet  P, Livstone  MS, Lewis  SE, Thomas  PD. 2011. Phylogenetic-based propagation of functional annotations within the Gene Ontology Consortium. Brief Bioinform. 12 (5 ):449–462. doi:10.1093/bib/bbr042.21873635
Gene Ontology Consortium . 2021. The Gene Ontology resource: enriching a GOld mine. Nucleic Acids Res. 49 (D1 ):D325–D334. doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa1113.33290552
Gkoutos  GV, Schofield  PN, Hoehndorf  R. 2018. The anatomy of phenotype ontologies: principles, properties and applications. Brief Bioinform. 19 (5 ):1008–1021. doi:10.1093/bib/bbx035.28387809
Global Biodata Coalition . 2022. Global Core Biodata Resources: concept and selection process. doi:10.5281/ZENODO.5845115; [accessed 2023 Nov 25]. Available from https://zenodo.org/record/5845115
Greenstein  RA, Ng  H, Barrales  RR, Tan  C, Braun  S, Al-Sady  B. 2022. Local chromatin context regulates the genetic requirements of the heterochromatin spreading reaction. PLoS Genet. 18 (5 ):e1010201. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1010201.35584134
Grewal  SIS . 2023. The molecular basis of heterochromatin assembly and epigenetic inheritance. Mol Cell. 83 (11 ):1767–1785. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2023.04.020.37207657
Harris  MA, Lock  A, Bähler  J, Oliver  SG, Wood  V. 2013. FYPO: the Fission Yeast Phenotype Ontology. Bioinformatics. 29 (13 ):1671–1678. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt266.23658422
Harris  MA, Rutherford  KM, Hayles  J, Lock  A, Bähler  J, Oliver  SG, Mata  J, Wood  V. 2022. Fission stories: using PomBase to understand Schizosaccharomyces pombe biology. Genetics. 220 (4 ):iyab222. doi:10.1093/genetics/iyab222.35100366
Hastings  J, Owen  G, Dekker  A, Ennis  M, Kale  N, Muthukrishnan  V, Turner  S, Swainston  N, Mendes  P, Steinbeck  C. 2016. ChEBI in 2016: improved services and an expanding collection of metabolites. Nucleic Acids Res. 44 (D1 ):D1214–D1219. doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1031.26467479
Hernández-Elvira  M, Sunnerhagen  P. 2022. Post-transcriptional regulation during stress. FEMS Yeast Res. 22 (1 ):foac025. doi:10.1093/femsyr/foac025.35561747
Hu  Y, Flockhart  I, Vinayagam  A, Bergwitz  C, Berger  B, Perrimon  N, Mohr  SE. 2011. An integrative approach to ortholog prediction for disease-focused and other functional studies. BMC Bioinformatics. 12 (1 ):357. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-357.21880147
Huntley  RP, Harris  MA, Alam-Faruque  Y, Blake  JA, Carbon  S, Dietze  H, Dimmer  EC, Foulger  RE, Hill  DP, Khodiyar  VK, et al  2014. A method for increasing expressivity of Gene Ontology annotations using a compositional approach. BMC Bioinformatics. 15 (1 ):155. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-15-155.24885854
Huntley  RP, Sawford  T, Mutowo-Meullenet  P, Shypitsyna  A, Bonilla  C, Martin  MJ, O’Donovan  C. 2015. The GOA database: Gene Ontology annotation updates for 2015. Nucleic Acids Res. 43 (Database issue ):D1057–D1063. doi:10.1093/nar/gku1113.25378336
Jackson  R, Matentzoglu  N, Overton  JA, Vita  R, Balhoff  JP, Buttigieg  PL, Carbon  S, Courtot  M, Diehl  AD, Dooley  DM, et al  2021. OBO Foundry in 2021: operationalizing open data principles to evaluate ontologies. Database J Biol Databases Curation. 2021 :baab069. doi:10.1093/database/baab069.
Kanehisa  M, Furumichi  M, Sato  Y, Kawashima  M, Ishiguro-Watanabe  M. 2023. KEGG for taxonomy-based analysis of pathways and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 51 (D1 ):D587–D592. doi:10.1093/nar/gkac963.36300620
Kanoh  J . 2023. Roles of specialized chromatin and DNA structures at subtelomeres in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Biomolecules. 13 (5 ):810. doi:10.3390/biom13050810.37238680
Karp  PD . 2022. Reviewing knowledgebase and database grant proposals in the life sciences: the role of innovation. Database J Biol Databases Curation. 2022 :baac106. doi:10.1093/database/baac106.
Kishore  R, Arnaboldi  V, Van Slyke  CE, Chan  J, Nash  RS, Urbano  JM, Dolan  ME, Engel  SR, Shimoyama  M, Sternberg  PW, et al  2020. Automated generation of gene summaries at the Alliance of Genome Resources. Database J Biol Databases Curation. 2020 :baaa037. doi:10.1093/database/baaa037.
Kustatscher  G, Collins  T, Gingras  A-C, Guo  T, Hermjakob  H, Ideker  T, Lilley  KS, Lundberg  E, Marcotte  EM, Ralser  M, et al  2022. Understudied proteins: opportunities and challenges for functional proteomics. Nat Methods. 19 (7 ):774–779. doi:10.1038/s41592-022-01454-x.35534633
Larochelle  M, Hunyadkürti  J, Bachand  F. 2017. Polyadenylation site selection: linking transcription and RNA processing via a conserved carboxy-terminal domain (CTD)-interacting protein. Curr Genet. 63 (2 ):195–199. doi:10.1007/s00294-016-0645-8.27582274
Lera-Ramirez  M, Nédélec  FJ, Tran  PT. 2022. Microtubule rescue at midzone edges promotes overlap stability and prevents spindle collapse during anaphase B. eLife. 11 :e72630. doi:10.7554/eLife.72630.35293864
Lera-Ramírez  M, Bähler  J, Mata  J, Rutherford  K, Hoffman  CS, Lambert  S, Oliferenko  S, Martin  SG, Gould  KL, Du  L-L, et al  2023. Revised fission yeast gene and allele nomenclature guidelines for machine readability. Genetics. 225 (3 ):iyad143. doi:10.1093/genetics/iyad143.37758508
Lock  A, Harris  MA, Rutherford  K, Hayles  J, Wood  V. 2020. Community curation in PomBase: enabling fission yeast experts to provide detailed, standardized, sharable annotation from research publications. Database J Biol Databases Curation. 2020 :baaa028. doi:10.1093/database/baaa028.
Lock  A, Rutherford  K, Harris  MA, Hayles  J, Oliver  SG, Bähler  J, Wood  V. 2019. PomBase 2018: user-driven reimplementation of the fission yeast database provides rapid and intuitive access to diverse, interconnected information. Nucleic Acids Res. 47 (D1 ):D821–D827. doi:10.1093/nar/gky961.30321395
Lock  A, Rutherford  K, Harris  MA, Wood  V. 2018. PomBase: the scientific resource for fission yeast. Methods Mol Biol Clifton NJ. 1757 :49–68. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-7737-6_4.
Mangione  MC, Gould  KL. 2019. Molecular form and function of the cytokinetic ring. J Cell Sci. 132 (12 ):jcs226928. doi:10.1242/jcs.226928.31209062
Matentzoglu  N, Goutte-Gattat  D, Tan  SZK, Balhoff  JP, Carbon  S, Caron  AR, Duncan  WD, Flack  JE, Haendel  M, Harris  NL, et al  2022. Ontology Development Kit: a toolkit for building, maintaining and standardizing biomedical ontologies. Database. 2022 :baac087. doi:10.1093/database/baac087.36208225
Matentzoglu  N, Osumi-Sutherland  D, Balhoff  JP, Bello  S, Bradford  Y, Cardmody  L, Grove  C, Harris  MA, Harris  N, Köhler  S, et al  2019. uPheno 2: framework for standardised representation of phenotypes across species. doi:10.7490/F1000RESEARCH.1116540.1; [accessed 2023 Nov 23]. Available from https://f1000research.com/posters/8-403
Minnis  CJ, Townsend  S, Petschnigg  J, Tinelli  E, Bähler  J, Russell  C, Mole  SE. 2021. Global network analysis in Schizosaccharomyces pombe reveals three distinct consequences of the common 1-kb deletion causing juvenile CLN3 disease. Sci Rep. 11 (1 ):6332. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-85471-4.33737578
Montecchi-Palazzi  L, Beavis  R, Binz  P-A, Chalkley  RJ, Cottrell  J, Creasy  D, Shofstahl  J, Seymour  SL, Garavelli  JS. 2008. The PSI-MOD community standard for representation of protein modification data. Nat Biotechnol. 26 (8 ):864–866. doi:10.1038/nbt0808-864.18688235
Monzon  V, Paysan-Lafosse  T, Wood  V, Bateman  A. 2022. Reciprocal best structure hits: using AlphaFold models to discover distant homologues. Bioinforma Adv. 2 (1 ):vbac072. doi:10.1093/bioadv/vbac072.
Mori  A, Uehara  L, Toyoda  Y, Masuda  F, Soejima  S, Saitoh  S, Yanagida  M. 2023. In fission yeast, 65 non-essential mitochondrial proteins related to respiration and stress become essential in low-glucose conditions. R Soc Open Sci. 10 (10 ):230404. doi:10.1098/rsos.230404.37859837
Mungall  CJ, Emmert  DB, FlyBase Consortium. 2007. A Chado case study: an ontology-based modular schema for representing genome-associated biological information. Bioinformatics. 23 (13 ):i337–i346. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm189.17646315
Mungall  C, Matentzoglu  N, Balhoff  J, Osumi-Sutherland  D, Duncan  B, Pgaudet, Tan S, Hoyt  CT, Pilgrim  C, Overton  JA, et al  2023 . oborel/obo-relations: 2023-08-18 release. doi:10.5281/ZENODO.8263469; [accessed 2023 Nov 23]. Available from https://zenodo.org/record/8263469
Natale  DA, Arighi  CN, Blake  JA, Bona  J, Chen  C, Chen  S-C, Christie  KR, Cowart  J, D’Eustachio  P, Diehl  AD, et al  2017. Protein Ontology (PRO): enhancing and scaling up the representation of protein entities. Nucleic Acids Res. 45 (D1 ):D339–D346. doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1075.27899649
Nurse  P . 2020. Fission yeast cell cycle mutants and the logic of eukaryotic cell cycle control. Mol Biol Cell. 31 (26 ):2871–2873. doi:10.1091/mbc.E20-10-0623.33320707
Ohtsuka  H, Otsubo  Y, Shimasaki  T, Yamashita  A, Aiba  H. 2023. Ecl family genes: factors linking starvation and lifespan extension in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Microbiol. 120 (5 ):645–657. doi:10.1111/mmi.15134.37525511
Oliver  SG, Lock  A, Harris  MA, Nurse  P, Wood  V. 2016. Model organism databases: essential resources that need the support of both funders and users. BMC Biol. 14 (1 ):49. doi:10.1186/s12915-016-0276-z.27334346
Oughtred  R, Rust  J, Chang  C, Breitkreutz  B-J, Stark  C, Willems  A, Boucher  L, Leung  G, Kolas  N, Zhang  F, et al  2021. The BioGRID database: a comprehensive biomedical resource of curated protein, genetic, and chemical interactions. Protein Sci Publ Protein Soc. 30 (1 ):187–200. doi:10.1002/pro.3978.
Paysan-Lafosse  T, Blum  M, Chuguransky  S, Grego  T, Pinto  BL, Salazar  GA, Bileschi  ML, Bork  P, Bridge  A, Colwell  L, et al  2023. InterPro in 2022. Nucleic Acids Res. 51 (D1 ):D418–D427. doi:10.1093/nar/gkac993.36350672
PDBe-KB consortium . 2020. PDBe-KB: a community-driven resource for structural and functional annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 48 (D1 ):D344–D353. doi:10.1093/nar/gkz853.31584092
Raciti  D, Yook  K, Harris  TW, Schedl  T, Sternberg  PW. 2018. Micropublication: incentivizing community curation and placing unpublished data into the public domain. Database J Biol Databases Curation. 2018 :bay013. doi:10.1093/database/bay013.
RNAcentral Consortium . 2021. RNAcentral 2021: secondary structure integration, improved sequence search and new member databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 49 (D1 ):D212–D220. doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa921.33106848
Rocha  JJ, Jayaram  SA, Stevens  TJ, Muschalik  N, Shah  RD, Emran  S, Robles  C, Freeman  M, Munro  S. 2023. Functional unknomics: systematic screening of conserved genes of unknown function. PLoS Biol. 21 (8 ):e3002222. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002222.37552676
Rodríguez-López  M, Bordin  N, Lees  J, Scholes  H, Hassan  S, Saintain  Q, Kamrad  S, Orengo  C, Bähler  J. 2023. Broad functional profiling of fission yeast proteins using phenomics and machine learning. eLife. 12 :RP88229. doi:10.7554/eLife.88229.37787768
Romila  CA, Townsend  S, Malecki  M, Kamrad  S, Rodríguez-López  M, Hillson  O, Cotobal  C, Ralser  M, Bähler  J. 2021. Barcode sequencing and a high-throughput assay for chronological lifespan uncover ageing-associated genes in fission yeast. Microb Cell Graz Austria. 8 (7 ):146–160. doi:10.15698/mic2021.07.754.
Rutherford  KM, Harris  MA, Lock  A, Oliver  SG, Wood  V. 2014. Canto: an online tool for community literature curation. Bioinformatics. 30 (12 ):1791–1792. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu103.24574118
Rutherford  KM, Harris  MA, Oliferenko  S, Wood  V. 2022. JaponicusDB: rapid deployment of a model organism database for an emerging model species. Genetics. 220 (4 ):iyab223. doi:10.1093/genetics/iyab223.35380656
Sato  M, Kakui  Y, Toya  M. 2021. Tell the difference between mitosis and meiosis: interplay between chromosomes, cytoskeleton, and cell cycle regulation. Front Cell Dev Biol. 9 :660322. doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.660322.33898463
Schwer  B, Garg  A, Sanchez  AM, Bernstein  MA, Benjamin  B, Shuman  S. 2022. Cleavage-polyadenylation factor Cft1 and SPX domain proteins are agents of inositol pyrophosphate toxicosis in fission yeast. mBio. 13 (1 ):e0347621. doi:10.1128/mbio.03476-21.35012333
Seal  RL, Braschi  B, Gray  K, Jones  TEM, Tweedie  S, Haim-Vilmovsky  L, Bruford  EA. 2023. Genenames.org: the HGNC resources in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. 51 (D1 ):D1003–D1009. doi:10.1093/nar/gkac888.36243972
Segura  J, Rose  Y, Westbrook  J, Burley  SK, Duarte  JM. 2021. RCSB Protein Data Bank 1D tools and services. Bioinformatics. 36 (22-23 ):5526–5527. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa1012.33313665
Sehnal  D, Bittrich  S, Deshpande  M, Svobodová  R, Berka  K, Bazgier  V, Velankar  S, Burley  SK, Koča  J, Rose  AS. 2021. Mol* Viewer: modern web app for 3D visualization and analysis of large biomolecular structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 49 (W1 ):W431–W437. doi:10.1093/nar/gkab314.33956157
Selicky  T, Jurcik  M, Mikolaskova  B, Pitelova  A, Mayerova  N, Kretova  M, Osadska  M, Jurcik  J, Holic  R, Kohutova  L, et al  2022. Defining the functional interactome of spliceosome-associated G-patch protein Gpl1 in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Int J Mol Sci. 23 (21 ):12800. doi:10.3390/ijms232112800.36361590
Shefchek  KA, Harris  NL, Gargano  M, Matentzoglu  N, Unni  D, Brush  M, Keith  D, Conlin  T, Vasilevsky  N, Zhang  XA, et al  2020. The Monarch Initiative in 2019: an integrative data and analytic platform connecting phenotypes to genotypes across species. Nucleic Acids Res. 48 (D1 ):D704–D715. doi:10.1093/nar/gkz997.31701156
Sinha  S, Eisenhaber  B, Jensen  LJ, Kalbuaji  B, Eisenhaber  F. 2018. Darkness in the human gene and protein function space: widely modest or absent illumination by the life science literature and the trend for fewer protein function discoveries since 2000. Proteomics. 18 (21-22 ):e1800093. doi:10.1002/pmic.201800093.30265449
Snider  CE, Bhattacharjee  R, Igarashi  MG, Gould  KL. 2022. Fission yeast paxillin contains two Cdc15 binding motifs for robust recruitment to the cytokinetic ring. Mol Biol Cell. 33 (4 ):br4. doi:10.1091/mbc.E21-11-0560.35108037
Thomas  PD, Hill  DP, Mi  H, Osumi-Sutherland  D, Van Auken  K, Carbon  S, Balhoff  JP, Albou  L-P, Good  B, Gaudet  P, et al  2019. Gene ontology Causal Activity Modeling (GO-CAM) moves beyond GO annotations to structured descriptions of biological functions and systems. Nat Genet. 51 (10 ):1429–1433. doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0500-1.31548717
Toda  T, Kitamura  K, Kume  K, Yukawa  M, Koyano  T, Ueno  M. 2023. The joy of the 11th International Fission Yeast Meeting in Hiroshima (POMBE2023 Hiroshima) after a long wait due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Genes Cells Devoted Mol Cell Mech. 28 (9 ):646–652. doi:10.1111/gtc.13055.
Toro  S, Anagnostopoulos  AV, Bello  S, Blumberg  K, Cameron  R, Carmody  L, Diehl  AD, Dooley  D, Duncan  W, Fey  P, et al  2023. Dynamic Retrieval Augmented Generation of Ontologies using Artificial Intelligence (DRAGON-AI); [accessed 2024 Jan 3]. Available from http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.10904
Uehara  L, Saitoh  S, Mori  A, Sajiki  K, Toyoda  Y, Masuda  F, Soejima  S, Tahara  Y, Yanagida  M. 2021. Multiple nutritional phenotypes of fission yeast mutants defective in genes encoding essential mitochondrial proteins. Open Biol. 11 (4 ):200369. doi:10.1098/rsob.200369.33823662
UniProt Consortium . 2021. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 49 (D1 ):D480–D489. doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa1100.33237286
UniProt Consortium . 2023. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2023. Nucleic Acids Res. 51 (D1 ):D523–D531. doi:10.1093/nar/gkac1052.36408920
Urban  M, Cuzick  A, Rutherford  K, Irvine  A, Pedro  H, Pant  R, Sadanadan  V, Khamari  L, Billal  S, Mohanty  S, et al  2017. PHI-base: a new interface and further additions for the multi-species pathogen-host interactions database. Nucleic Acids Res. 45 (D1 ):D604–D610. doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1089.27915230
Varadi  M, Anyango  S, Deshpande  M, Nair  S, Natassia  C, Yordanova  G, Yuan  D, Stroe  O, Wood  G, Laydon  A, et al  2022. AlphaFold protein structure database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. Nucleic Acids Res. 50 (D1 ):D439–D444. doi:10.1093/nar/gkab1061.34791371
Vasilevsky  NA, Matentzoglu  NA, Toro  S, Flack  JE, Hegde  H, Unni  DR, Alyea  GF, Amberger  JS, Babb  L, Balhoff  JP, et al Mondo: unifying diseases for the world, by the world. medRxiv doi:10.1101/2022.04.13.22273750, 03 May 2022, preprint: not peer reviewed.2022.
Wilkinson  MD, Dumontier  M, Aalbersberg  IJJ, Appleton  G, Axton  M, Baak  A, Blomberg  N, Boiten  J-W, da Silva Santos  LB, Bourne  PE, et al  2016. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data. 3 (1 ):160018. doi:10.1038/sdata.2016.18.26978244
Wong  ED, Miyasato  SR, Aleksander  S, Karra  K, Nash  RS, Skrzypek  MS, Weng  S, Engel  SR, Cherry  JM. 2023. Saccharomyces Genome Database update: server architecture, pan-genome nomenclature, and external resources. Genetics. 224 (1 ):iyac191. doi:10.1093/genetics/iyac191.36607068
Wood  V, Carbon  S, Harris  MA, Lock  A, Engel  SR, Hill  DP, Van Auken  K, Attrill  H, Feuermann  M, Gaudet  P, et al  2020. Term matrix: a novel Gene Ontology annotation quality control system based on ontology term co-annotation patterns. Open Biol. 10 (9 ):200149. doi:10.1098/rsob.200149.32875947
Wood  V, Harris  M, Lock  A, Rutherford  K. 2017. New PomBase website 2017, Group Leader Survey Summary. Apollo—University of Cambridge Repository; [accessed 2023 Nov 23]. Available from https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/289549
Wood  V, Lock  A, Harris  MA, Rutherford  K, Bähler  J, Oliver  SG. 2019. Hidden in plain sight: what remains to be discovered in the eukaryotic proteome?  Open Biol. 9 (2 ):180241. doi:10.1098/rsob.180241.30938578
Wood  V, Sternberg  PW, Lipshitz  HD. 2022. Making biological knowledge useful for humans and machines. Genetics. 220 (4 ):iyac001. doi:10.1093/genetics/iyac001.35380659
wwPDB consortium . 2019. Protein Data Bank: the single global archive for 3D macromolecular structure data. Nucleic Acids Res. 47 (D1 ):D520–D528. doi:10.1093/nar/gky949.30357364
Xu  D-D, Du  L-L. 2022. Fission yeast autophagy machinery. Cells. 11 (7 ):1086. doi:10.3390/cells11071086.35406650
