
==== Front
Genetics
Genetics
genetics
Genetics
0016-6731
1943-2631
Oxford University Press US

36799927
10.1093/genetics/iyad025
iyad025
Investigation
Neurogenetics
AcademicSubjects/SCI01180
AcademicSubjects/SCI01140
Genome-wide analysis reveals novel regulators of synaptic maintenance in Drosophila
Sidisky Jessica M Department of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University, 111 Research Drive, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA

de Paula Moreira Danielle Department of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University, 111 Research Drive, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA

Okumus Meryem Department of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University, 111 Research Drive, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA

Caratenuto Russell Department of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University, 111 Research Drive, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA

Drost Cassidy Department of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University, 111 Research Drive, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA

Connors Bali Department of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University, 111 Research Drive, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA

Hussain Sarrah Department of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University, 111 Research Drive, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA

Alkhatib Stephanie Department of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University, 111 Research Drive, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8102-9133
Babcock Daniel T Department of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University, 111 Research Drive, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA

Wildonger J Associate Editor
Corresponding author: Email: dab416@lehigh.edu
Conflicts of interest The authors confirm that no conflicts of interest exist.

4 2023
17 2 2023
17 2 2023
223 4 iyad02529 4 2022
09 2 2023
07 3 2023
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Genetics Society of America.
2023
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Maintaining synaptic communication is required to preserve nervous system function as an organism ages. While much work has been accomplished to understand synapse formation and development, we understand relatively little regarding maintaining synaptic integrity throughout aging. To better understand the mechanisms responsible for maintaining synaptic structure and function, we performed an unbiased forward genetic screen to identify genes required for synapse maintenance of adult Drosophila neuromuscular junctions. Using flight behavior as a screening tool, we evaluated flight ability in 198 lines from the Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are associated with a progressive loss of flight ability with age. Among the many candidate genes identified from this screen, we focus here on 10 genes with clear human homologs harboring SNPs that are most highly associated with synaptic maintenance. Functional validation of these genes using mutant alleles revealed a progressive loss of synaptic structural integrity. Tissue-specific knockdown of these genes using RNA interference (RNAi) uncovered important roles for these genes in either presynaptic motor neurons, postsynaptic muscles, or associated glial cells, highlighting the importance of each component of tripartite synapses. These results offer greater insight into the mechanisms responsible for maintaining structural and functional integrity of synapses with age.

Drosophila
synapse
neuromuscular junction
flight
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Synapses are the key structures that underlie communication in the nervous system. While synaptic growth and development are well established (Turrigiano and Nelson 2004; Collins and DiAntonio 2007), relatively little is known regarding how synapses are maintained during aging. Synaptic communication is a dynamic process that requires these structures to be responsive to changes throughout all stages of life of an organism (Bishop et al. 2010; López-Otín et al. 2013). Emerging evidence has highlighted the importance of autophagy (Vijayan and Verstreken 2017) and proteostasis (Martínez et al. 2018) in sustaining synapses. Synaptic dysfunction is also among the earliest hallmarks of neurodegenerative diseases (Selkoe 2002; Oddo et al. 2003; Lodato et al. 2018), highlighting the central role of synaptic maintenance in sustaining neuronal function. To better understand the cellular and molecular mechanisms by which synaptic integrity is maintained, we seek to identify and characterize the genes involved in maintaining healthy synapses through aging.

One well-established model to study synaptic integrity has been the Drosophila neuromuscular junction (NMJ) (Jan and Jan 1976; Broadie and Bate 1993a, b). The larval NMJ is a well-characterized model that has been indispensable for our understanding of synapse growth and development (Collins and DiAntonio 2007; Harris and Littleton 2015). However, these structures only remain for a few days before being dismantled shortly after puparium formation (Liu et al. 2010), limiting our ability to use this model to study aging synapses over longer periods of time. In order to understand how synapses are maintained with age, one appealing model is the adult dorsal longitudinal muscle (DLM) NMJs that are required for flight behavior (Fernandes et al. 1991; Fernandes and VijayRaghavan 1993; Fernandes et al. 1996; Fernandes and Keshishian 1998; Hebbar and Fernandes 2004). These structures form tripartite synapses comprised of presynaptic motor neurons, postsynaptic muscles, and closely associated glia (Danjo et al. 2011). These tissues are amenable to assess both synaptic structure and function throughout the adult stage (Babcock and Ganetzky 2014; Sidisky et al. 2021).

One major strength of using Drosophila is the power of forward genetic screens to identify novel genes associated with a particular phenotype (Palladino et al. 2002). In addition to mutagenesis screens, using variation that exists in natural populations has emerged as a powerful tool for identifying genes associated with biological processes. The Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP), for example, consists of over 200 fully sequenced isogeneic fly stocks to identify single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with a given trait (Mackay et al. 2012). The DGRP has been used in several genome-wide studies including traumatic brain injury (TBI) (Katzenberger et al. 2015), retinitis pigmentosa (Chow et al. 2016), and dopaminergic neuron viability (Davis et al. 2021). Additionally, DGRP studies can also use changes in locomotor behavior, such as climbing to study the decline in physical activity on lifespan (Wilson et al. 2020). With the strength of Genome-wide association studies studies, the DGRP could be applied to identify novel genes involved with synaptic maintenance.

In this study, we utilized the DGRP to identify novel regulators of synaptic maintenance at adult DLM NMJs in association with progressive loss of flight ability. Our screen detected variation in maintaining flight ability across DGRP lines. Here we focus primarily on the 10 most highly associated genes that have clear human homologs. We then functionally validated candidate genes that harbor SNPs associated with defects in maintaining flight ability using both mutant analysis and tissue-specific RNAi knockdown. We found that a progressive loss of flight ability is a strong indicator of defects in synaptic maintenance through quantification of gross morphology showing changes in neurite length, bouton count, and assessment of presynaptic and postsynaptic markers. Overall, our results described here identify several genes that regulate the maintenance of synaptic structure and function with age.

Methods

Fly stocks and husbandry

Fly stocks were maintained at 25°C on standard Drosophila medium. Flies used for experimental analysis were collected shortly after eclosion, separated by sex, and aged for 3 days or 21 days at 29°C.

The following fly stocks were obtained from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center: DGRP fly stocks (Mackay et al. 2012), CoraEY07598 (#16848) (Bellen et al. 2004), MSP300MI02921 (#43857) (Nagarkar-Jaiswal et al. 2015), futschN94 (#8805) (Hummel et al. 2000), cv-2225–3 (#6342) (Conley et al. 2000), serrateD (#81122) (Fleming et al. 1990), frq206131 (#18939) (Thibault et al. 2004), DOPR2MB05108 (#24743) (Bellen et al. 2011), GMAPEP491 (#10130) (Bellen et al. 2004), BMCPBG02446 (#12688) (Bellen et al. 2004), pumiliobem (#6782) (Stern et al. 1995), 10xUAS-mCD8::GFP (#32184) (Pfeiffer et al. 2010), Oregon-R (#5), MHC-Gal4 (#55132) (Klein et al. 2014), Repo-Gal4 (#7415) (Sepp et al. 2001), BG380-Gal4 (#80580) (Sanyal 2009), Tubulin-gal4 (Lee and Luo 1999) UAS-Dicer-2 (#24651) (Dietzl et al. 2007), UAS-Dicer-2 (#24650) (Dietzl et al. 2007), UAS-MSP300IR (#32848) (Ni et al. 2011), UAS-futschIR (#40834) (Ni et al. 2011), UAS-cv-2IR (#37514) (Ni et al. 2011), UAS-serrateIR (#34700) (Perkins et al. 2015), UAS-frq2IR (#28711) (Ni et al. 2009), UAS-DOPR2IR (#65997) (Ni et al. 2009), UAS-GMAPIR (#64863) (Ni et al. 2009), and UAS-BMCPIR (#37498) (Perkins et al. 2015). The following fly stocks were obtained from the Vienna Drosophila Resource Center: UAS-coraIR (#9788) (Dietzl et al. 2007) and UAS-pumilioIR (#45815) (Dietzl et al. 2007).

Flight behavior

Analysis of flight behavior was performed as previously described (Babcock and Ganetzky 2014). For assessment of flight behavior, flies were transferred to glass vials and released down a 90-cm tube with a removable plastic sheet coated in Tangle Trap (Tanglefoot Company). The landing average for each fly was recorded to the nearest centimeter as previously described (Sidisky et al. 2021). For all experiments, males and females were assayed separately. For flight experiments using the DGRP stocks, the landing height was calculated as the flight index, which is determined by subtracting the average landing height at Day 21 (D21) from the Day 3 (D3) value.

Immunohistochemistry

DLMs were dissected as previously described (Sidisky and Babcock 2020). Briefly, preps were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min and washed with 1 × phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) four times. Preparations were then flash frozen using liquid nitrogen and dissected in ice-cold PBS. Samples were next treated with blocking buffer (0.1% normal goat serum, 0.2% Triton X-100) for at least 1 h at 4°C. For gross morphology assessment, tissues were stained with FITC-conjugated anti-horseradish peroxidase (HRP) 1:200 (Jackson Laboratories) for 2 h at room temperature (RT) in a dark box and then washed 4 × for 5 min each with PBS with 0.3% Triton (PBS-T). For all other experiments, tissues were blocked for at least 1 h and then treated with primary antibodies for 48 h at 4°C. After four PBS-T washes, samples were then incubated in secondary antibodies for 2 h at RT in the dark. Samples were then washed 4 × with PBS-T and mounted on glass slides with Vectashield (Vector Laboratories). The following primary antibody was used: mouse monoclonal anti-SYNORF1 1:25 (3C11, target Synapsin, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank) (Klagges et al. 1996), rabbit anti-Drosophila p21-activated kinase (dPak) 1:2,000 (Harden et al. 1996), and chicken polyclonal anti-GFP (Thermo Fisher). The following secondary antibodies were used: goat anti-mouse Alexa-488 1:200 (Invitrogen), goat anti-rabbit Alexa-568 1:200 (Invitrogen), Cy3-conjugated anti-HRP 1:500 (Jackson Laboratories), FITC-conjugated anti-HRP 1:200 (Jackson Laboratories), AF647-conjugated anti-HRP 1:25 (Jackson Laboratories), and Phalloidin 647 1:1,000 (Abcam ab176759).

Assessment of synaptic morphology

DLM images were acquired using a 63 × oil objective (N.A. 1.4) on a Zeiss LSM 880 confocal microscope. Z-stacks of 45 slices (0.7 µm interval) were acquired at a constant depth starting from the top surface of muscle fiber D (Sidisky et al. 2021). For image analysis of gross morphology (Fig. 11, Supplementary Figures 1 and 7), 10 images were acquired from independent samples for each genotype. Z-stacks were transformed into maximum intensity projections using FIJI software (Schindelin et al. 2012). Total neurite length (µM) was measured using the Simple Neurite Tracer (SNT) plug-in to trace the HRP staining (Longair et al. 2011; Arshadi et al. 2021) and then analyzed using the Skeletonize 3D plug-in (Schindelin et al. 2012) for each image. Brightness and contrast were adjusted using ImageJ software (NIH) Fiji (Schindelin et al. 2012) and Adobe Photoshop CC2022.

Fig. 1. Progressive loss of flight ability varies across genetic backgrounds. Average landing heights of 198 DGRP stocks measured at Day 3 (teal dots) and Day 21 (purple dots). Orange bars represent the magnitude of difference between these values for each stock and were calculated by (D21 − D3). Error bars represent SEM. Flight ability was analyzed for each condition in triplicate.

Quantification of bouton density and presynaptic and postsynaptic markers

DLM images for assessment of bouton density, bouton number, and presynaptic and postsynaptic markers were acquired using a 63 × objective (N.A. 1.4) on a Zeiss LSM 880 confocal microscope at a 2.5 × zoom. Confocal parameters were uniform for all images and genotypes with optimization for the synaptic markers. Z-stacks of 30 slices of muscle fiber D (1.0 µm interval) were acquired at a constant depth from the surface of the muscle fiber D. For image analysis, 12 images were acquired, 3 per sample, over 4 independent samples for an accurate assessment of synaptic markers in the anterior region of muscle fiber D for Day 3 and Day 21 females for each mutant and controls. Z-stacks were transformed into maximum intensity projections using FIJI software (Schindelin et al. 2012). Bouton density was calculated by first identifying synaptic boutons through the neuronal membrane marker HRP (Jan and Jan 1982) to count the boutons with FIJI's Region of Interest (ROI) tool (Schindelin et al. 2012). The total neurite length was accessed as described above using SNT plug-in to trace the HRP (Longair et al. 2011; Arshadi et al. 2021) and then analyzed using the Skeletonize 3D plug-in (Schindelin et al. 2012) for each image. Bouton density was then calculated by dividing the bouton number by total neurite length and multiplying by 1,000 µM for all samples. Brightness and contrast were adjusted using ImageJ software (NIH) Fiji (Schindelin et al., 2012) and Adobe Photoshop CC2022.

To assess synaptic markers, DLM images were acquired as described above for the bouton density assessment with 12 images acquired for each group, 3 per sample, over 4 independent samples for an accurate assessment of synaptic markers in the anterior region of muscle fiber D for Day 3 and Day 21 females for each mutant and control. First boutons were identified with HRP and selected using the oval area tool in FIJI (Schindelin et al. 2012). The presynaptic marker Synapsin and the postsynaptic density marker dPak were assessed by counting the number of boutons positive for either marker. The synapsin- or dPak-positive boutons were calculated as a percentage out of the total number of boutons in each image. Brightness and contrast were adjusted using ImageJ software (NIH) Fiji (Schindelin et al. 2012) and Adobe Photoshop CC2022.

Total RNA isolation and reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction

Total RNA was isolated from a group of 30 DLMs of 3-day-old adult female mutant flies. For the RNAi fly lines, groups of 20 whole bodies of 3-day-old adult female flies or third instar larvae were used to isolate the total RNA. Immediately after isolating each group, all tissues (DLMs/whole bodies/larvae) were flash frozen on liquid nitrogen and stored on −80°C freezer as previously described (Sidisky et al. 2021). Mutant lines used in these experiments are described above, and the control group was Oregon-R (also called wildtype). For RNAi experiments, F1 female flies were collected from the following crosses: (1) test groups [MHC-gal4 (muscle driver) females and males of UAS-coraIR, UAS-MSP300IR, UAS-serrateIR, UAS-frq2IR, and UAS-pumilioIR and tubulin-gal4 (ubiquitous driver) females and males of UAS-futschIR, UAS-CV-2IR, UAS-GMAPIR, and UAS-BMCPIR] and (2) control groups (Oregon-R females and males of the RNAi lines described above). Due to technical limitations, the mRNA expression level of DOPR2 was not assessed.

Total RNA extraction was performed with Monarch Total RNA Miniprep Kit (NEB) following tissue and leukocyte protocol as previously described (Kao et al. 2019). Total RNA purity and integrity was accessed on NanoDrop One Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher). cDNA was synthesized using qScript cDNA SuperMix (Quantabio) according to manufacturer's instruction.

Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed using PowerUP Sybr Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) on an ABI7300 or a Rotor-Gene. Each assay was run in technical triplicates on ABI7300 and in technical duplicates on Rotor-Gene. Data normalization was performed against Actin5C (Dalui and Bhattacharyya 2014) and calibrated to proper control, as described on each figure. Primer efficiencies were determined, and analysis was performed with LinREgPCR (Ruijter et al. 2009). Primer pairs were designed using NCBI primer design tool and are listed in Supplementary Table 3.

Statistical analysis

Data are shown as mean or mean ± SD. The statistical significance of the flight behavior, synaptic morphology, bouton density, and assessment of pre- and postsynaptic markers were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc comparisons. RT-qPCR data was analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test for more than two independent small samples and Mann–Whitney U test to compare two independent small samples. All statistical analyses were carried out using GraphPad PRISM 9 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). SNP analysis associated with the progressive loss of flight ability was generated through the DGRP pipeline (http://dgrp2.gnets.ncsu.edu/) (Huang et al. 2014).

Results

Maintenance of flight ability varies across genetic backgrounds

To identify genes required to maintain synaptic integrity, we first screened for a progressive loss of flight ability with age as an initial readout. Our previous work demonstrated a strong link between impaired flight ability and the loss of DLM synaptic integrity (Sidisky and Babcock 2020; Sidisky et al. 2021), suggesting that this strategy would likely uncover genes associated with synaptic maintenance. We assessed flight ability in 198 DGRP fly stocks at both Day 3 and Day 21. We chose Day 3 for our initial measurements to allow the DLM innervation pattern to stabilize following pruning that occurs during metamorphosis (Hebbar and Fernandes 2005). We used Day 21 since our previous findings revealed synaptic defects in a model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) at this time (Sidisky and Babcock 2020). The average landing height for each genotype was scored at both timepoints (Fig. 1, dots), and genotypes were ranked based on the difference between these values (Fig. 1, orange bars). While the majority of stocks performed well at Day 3, we found greater variability of flight performance at Day 21. Flight ability remained similar between Days 3 and 21 for some genotypes, while others showed a major reduction in flight ability with age (Fig. 1, Supplementary Table 1). Overall, these results demonstrate that maintaining flight ability with age is a phenotype that varies considerably across genetic backgrounds.

Age-dependent flight impairments are linked to synaptic defects

To assess whether a progressive loss of flight performance is associated with impaired synaptic maintenance within DLMs, we measured NMJ morphology in DGRP stocks that ranked high or low in our initial screen. We found that NMJ integrity remained intact with age in Line 301, which showed a strong flight performance at Day 21, with total neurite length remaining consistent with age (Supplementary Fig. 1a, c, and e). In contrast, NMJ morphology in Line 91, which flew poorly at Day 21, displayed a significant decrease in neurite length from Day 3 to Day 21 (Supplementary Fig. 1b, d, and e). These data suggest that, while other factors can certainly influence flight behavior, the use of the progressive loss of flight ability is an effective strategy for identifying genes regulating synaptic maintenance.

Identification of genes harboring SNPs associated with progressive flight defects

We identified SNPs associated with the progressive loss of flight ability by submitting the ranked order of DGRP stocks from our assay into the DGRP pipeline (http://dgrp2.gnets.ncsu.edu/) (Huang et al. 2014). This analysis revealed that SNPs in several genes were highly associated with a loss of flight ability (Supplementary Table 2). To begin functionally validating this data set, we initially focused on a subset of these genes that includes the 10 most highly associated genes with a loss of flight ability that also have a clear human ortholog (Table 1). To further investigate the potential roles of these genes in maintaining synaptic integrity, we acquired publicly available mutant alleles and RNAi transgenes associated with these genes for analysis.

Table 1. Top candidate genes with human orthologs.

Rank	Candidate gene	SNPa	P-valuea	Human ortholog	OMIM	
1	cora	2R:15117148	1.87E-07	EPB41L1	602879	
2	Msp300	2L: 5154234	4.69E-07	SYNE1	608441	
3	futsch	X: 1325055	5.64E-07	MAP1A	600178	
4	cv-2	2R:17242555	8.13E-07	BMPER	608699	
5	Serrate	3R: 23009203	1.18E-06	JAG1	601920	
6	Frq2	X: 18092812	5.10E-06	NCS1	603315	
7	DopR2	3R: 25457938	6.75E-06	ADRB1	109630	
8	Gmap	X: 15388968	6.96E-06	TRIP11	604505	
9	Bmcp	3L: 11713848	6.97E-06	SLC25A30	610793	
10	pumilio	3R: 4967373	1.31E-05	PUM2	607205	
Identification of genes harboring SNPs that are most significantly associated with a progressive loss of flight. This list highlights the 10 most highly associated genes that have a clear human homolog.

SNP with the most statistically significant association for this candidate gene.

Mutant analysis of candidate genes reveals defects in flight behavior

To functionally validate the hits from our screen, we assessed flight performance with age using mutant alleles for each candidate gene. To account for possible sex-specific differences, male and female flies were collected, raised, and assessed separately. Although we did not encounter any sex-specific differences in flight performance for DGRP fly stocks, we did uncover some differences with a few mutant alleles (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. 2). Because of this, we analyzed male and female flight performance separately. For each allele, flight ability was measured at both Day 3 and Day 21, and transcript levels were assessed for changes in gene expression (Supplementary Fig. 3).

Fig. 2. Female flight ability in mutants of candidate genes. Measurement of flight ability using females with mutant alleles for each candidate gene. Each allele was assessed in comparison to the appropriate genetic background. a) Flight ability for mutant alleles with a white background. b) Flight ability for mutant alleles with a yellow–white background. c) Flight ability for mutant alleles with an Oregon-R background. The average landing height (black bars) for each condition is assessed at Day 3 (gray dots) and Day 21 (purple dots). ****P < 0.0001; ***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05; n.s., not significant, using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc comparisons. Flight ability was analyzed for each condition in triplicate.

In our mutant analysis of female flies, we found that mutations in 9 of the 10 candidate genes showed a significant flight defect in comparison to wildtype controls from their genetic background (Fig. 2). The only exception was the allele SerD, which did not differ significantly from the Oregon-R control. Mutations in eight of these genes displayed a progressive, age-dependent loss of flight ability [cora, futsch, msp300, Crossveinless 2 (cv-2), FRQ2, DopR2, GMAP, and BMCP], while the pumilio showed severe flight defects at both Day 3 and Day 21. Interestingly, a significant decrease in the transcript level was only detected in Golgi microtubule-associated protein (GMAP) and BMCP alleles (Supplementary Fig. 3). This suggests that some of the flight defects are due to factors beyond a simple reduction in the gene expression level.

When performing mutant analysis using male flies, we found that mutations in 8 of the 10 candidate genes displayed a significant flight defect compared to wildtype controls from their genetic background (Supplementary Fig. 2). Among these eight mutant alleles, six showed a progressive, age-dependent decline in flight performance (cora, msp300, cv-2, serrate, frq2, BMCP), while the other two (futsch, pumilio) showed a significant flight defect even at Day 3. Neither of the mutant alleles for the two remaining genes (GMAP and DOPR2) showed a flight defect (Supplementary Fig. 2). It is currently unclear why sex-specific differences in flight performance exist specifically with these two alleles, but this could help determine the mechanism by which these genes help maintain flight performance with age. Altogether, these results align with the initial findings from our DGRP screen and highlight the roles of these genes in maintaining flight performance with age.

Mutations in candidate genes disrupt NMJ morphology

Since mutant alleles for each of the candidate genes showed a significant loss of flight performance, we next tested whether this functional deficit is accompanied by a loss of structural integrity at DLM synapses. Since 5 of the 10 alleles are in a white mutant background, we first examined these alleles in comparison to their wildtype control (Fig. 3). We measured total neurite length at Day 3 and Day 21 in GMAP, frq2, BMCP, DopR2, and pum mutants, which each showed a progressive loss of flight performance in females. We found that total neurite length in white mutants did not change significantly with age (Fig. 3a and g). The values for frq2 and pum mutants similarly remained unchanged (Fig. 3c, f, and g). Surprisingly, we detected increased neurite length at Day 21 in DopR2, GMAP, and BMCP mutants compared to Day 3. This suggests that alterations to neurite length alone do not account for the loss of flight performance.

Fig. 3. Synaptic morphology in candidate gene mutations in a white background. a–f) Confocal images of white mutants as well as alleles of candidate genes in this background stained with 647-conjugated HRP (black) at 63 × magnification. g) Quantification of total neurite length for each allele at Day 3 (gray dots) and Day 21 (blue dots). h) Quantification of bouton density for each allele at Day 3 (gray dots) and Day 21 (blue dots). Sample size = n of 10 for each timepoint and genotype. ****P < 0.0001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05; n.s., not significant, using a one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc comparisons. The scale bar is 10 µm for each pair of images.

In addition to neurite length, we also measured bouton density in each of these mutant alleles to assess synaptic morphology (Fig. 3h). We found a significant decrease in bouton density in DopR2, BMCP, and pum alleles, suggesting that changes to boutons more closely align with flight defects than neurite length itself.

To determine whether more subtle changes to synaptic structure beyond gross morphology occur in these mutant alleles, we also analyzed presynaptic and postsynaptic markers in these conditions. In each of these mutant alleles, we measured the percentage of synaptic boutons that stained positive for the presynaptic marker synapsin as well as the postsynaptic marker dPak at both Day 3 and Day 21. All five of the mutant alleles in this genetic background showed a progressive loss of synapsin-positive boutons by Day 21 compared to controls (Fig. 4). Similarly, we found a significant decrease in dPak-positive boutons by Day 21 in four of the five alleles, with the pum allele being the only exception. Together, these results demonstrate that defects with synaptic proteins correlate to age-dependent defects in synaptic function much more closely than changes to gross morphology.

Fig. 4. Presynaptic and postsynaptic defects in candidate gene mutations in a white background. a–f) Confocal images of white mutants as well as alleles of candidate genes in this background stained with 647-conjugated HRP (blue) at 63 × magnification. Synapses are labeled using the presynaptic marker synapsin (green) or dPak (magenta) at both Day 3 and Day 21. g) Quantification of the percentage of boutons that are synapsin-positive at Day 3 (gray dots) and Day 21 (green dots). h) Quantification of the percentage of boutons that are dPak-positive at Day 3 (gray dots) and Day 21 (magenta dots). Sample size = n of 12 for each timepoint and genotype. ****P < 0.0001; ***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05; n.s., not significant, using a one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc comparisons. The scale bars are 10 µm for each pair of images.

We next performed the same analysis using mutant alleles for candidate genes generated in a separate yellow–white background. When measuring progressive changes to neurite length, we similarly found a progressive increase in neurite length compared to yw controls with mutant alleles of futsch, cora, cv-2, and msp300 (Fig. 5a–f). However, there was also a progressive loss of bouton density in each of these mutants (Fig. 5g). This may suggest that the increased neurite length may not be completely functionally intact.

Fig. 5. Synaptic morphology in candidate gene mutations in a yellow–white background. a–e) Confocal images of yellow–white mutants as well as alleles of candidate genes in this background stained with 647-conjugated HRP (black) at 63 × magnification. f) Quantification of total neurite length for each allele at Day 3 (gray dots) and Day 21 (blue dots). g) Quantification of bouton density for each allele at Day 3 (gray dots) and Day 21 (blue dots). Sample size = n of 12 for each timepoint and genotype. ****P < 0.0001; ***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05; n.s., not significant, using a one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc comparisons. The scale bar is 10 µm for each pair of images.

We also analyzed presynaptic and postsynaptic markers in these mutant alleles with age. Similar to the other mutant alleles, we found a progressive loss of both synapsin-positive and dPak-positive boutons in mutant alleles of futsch, cora, cv-2, and msp300 (Fig. 6). Overall, these mutant alleles displayed remarkably similar phenotypes compared to those in other genetic backgrounds.

Fig. 6. Presynaptic and postsynaptic defects in candidate gene mutations in a yellow–white background. a–e) Confocal images of white mutants as well as alleles of candidate genes in this background stained with 647-conjugated HRP (blue) at 63 × magnification. Synapses are labeled using the presynaptic marker synapsin (green) or dPak (magenta) at both Day 3 and Day 21. f) Quantification of the percentage of boutons that are synapsin-positive at Day 3 (gray dots) and Day 21 (green dots). g) Quantification of the percentage of boutons that are dPak-positive at Day 3 (gray dots) and Day 21 (magenta dots). Sample size = n of 12 for each timepoint and genotype. ****P < 0.0001; ***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05; n.s., not significant, using a one-way ANOVA with Tukey's Post hoc comparisons. The scale bars are 10 µm for each pair of images.

Finally, we measured NMJ gross morphology and synaptic markers in an allele of serrate in comparison to Oregon-R controls. When assessing gross morphology in serrate mutants, we again observed a progressive increase in total neurite length and a progressive decrease in bouton density (Fig. 7). However, we found similar phenotypes in the Oregon-R controls, revealing that the genetic background is responsible, at least to some extent, for the alterations to synaptic gross morphology in these mutants.

Fig. 7. Synaptic morphology in candidate gene mutations in an Oregon-R background. a, b) Confocal images of Oregon-R mutants as well as the serrate allele in this background stained with 647-conjugated HRP (black) at 63 × magnification. c) Quantification of total neurite length for each allele at Day 3 (gray dots) and Day 21 (blue dots). d) Quantification of bouton density for each allele at Day 3 (gray dots) and Day 21 (blue dots). Sample size = n of 12 for each timepoint and genotype. ****P < 0.0001; **P < 0.01; n.s., not significant, using a one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc comparisons. The scale bar is 10 µm for each pair of images.

While the changes to gross morphology in serrate mutants appear to depend on genetic background, we found very different results using synaptic markers in these mutants. We observed a progressive loss of both synapsin-positive and dPak-positive boutons in serrate mutants compared to controls (Fig. 8). Altogether, these results suggest that mutations in most of the candidate genes from our screen display an age-dependent loss of flight ability, accompanied by an increase in neurite length, decrease in bouton density, and progressive loss of both presynaptic and postsynaptic markers.

Fig. 8. Presynaptic and postsynaptic defects in candidate gene mutations in an Oregon-R background. a, b) Confocal images of Oregon-R mutants as well as the serrate allele in this background stained with 647-conjugated HRP (blue) at 63 × magnification. Synapses are labeled using the presynaptic marker synapsin (green) or dPak (magenta) at both Day 3 and Day 21. c) Quantification of the percentage of boutons that are synapsin-positive at Day 3 (gray dots) and Day 21 (green dots). d) Quantification of the percentage of boutons that are dPak-positive at Day 3 (gray dots) and Day 21 (magenta dots). Sample size = n of 12 for each timepoint and genotype. ****P < 0.0001; ***P < 0.001; n.s., not significant, using a one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc comparisons. The scale bars are 10 µm for each pair of images.

Tissue-specific knockdown of candidate genes highlights the roles of neurons, muscles, and glia in synaptic maintenance

The NMJs located within the DLMs are tripartite synapses (Danjo et al. 2011) that consist of presynaptic motor neurons, postsynaptic muscles, and closely associated glial cells (Fig. 9a). This arrangement allows for the analysis of each of these structures (Fig. 9b–i).

Fig. 9. Structure of the DLM tripartite synapse. a) Illustration of the tripartite DLM synapse, highlighting motor neurons that innervate the DLMs, as well as glial cells that are tightly associated with these structures. b–e) Confocal analysis of motor neurons (green), glial cells (blue), and muscles (magenta) to demonstrate structural layout of DLM synapses. Glial cells are labeled by expressing a membrane-bound GFP using Repo-Gal4 and false-colored blue. Motor neurons are labeled using Cy3-HRP and colored green. Muscles are labeled using 647-phalloidin and colored magenta. f–i) Higher magnification of synaptic structures as seen within boxed region of e. Scale bar in c is 20 µm for b–e. Scale bar in i is 10 µm for f–i.

To uncover the tissue(s) in which our candidate genes are required to maintain synaptic integrity, we selectively knocked each of these genes down in either muscles (MHC-Gal4), motor neurons (BG380-Gal4), or glia (Repo-Gal4). Tissue-specific knockdown of candidate genes in female flies (Fig. 10) revealed roles for each component of the tripartite synapse in maintaining synaptic integrity.

Fig. 10. a–j) Female flight ability with RNAi knockdown of candidate genes. Measurement of flight ability in females using tissue-specific knockdown of each candidate gene. Each gene was knocked down in muscles (magenta), motor neurons (green), and glia (blue) and also compared to controls (gray). The average landing height (black bars) for each condition is assessed at Day 3 and Day 21. All dots represent individual data points. ****P < 0.0001; ***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05; n.s., not significant, using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc comparisons. Flight ability was analyzed for each condition in triplicate.

Upon knockdown in the muscle, nearly every candidate displayed a strong phenotype. Knockdown of MSP300 or frq2 was lethal (Fig. 10b and f and Supplementary Table 4), while knockdown of cora showed a strong flight defect even at an early timepoint (Fig. 10a). Measurement of transcript levels confirmed that the majority of the candidate genes had a significant decrease in expression upon RNAi-mediated knockdown (Supplementary Fig. 6). The remaining genes, with the exception of cv-2, showed a progressive, age-dependent loss of flight ability, demonstrating the need for most of these candidate genes within postsynaptic muscles.

We also knocked down expression of each candidate gene in presynaptic motor neurons. We found that knocking down 3 of the 10 candidate genes resulted in a progressive loss of flight performance, as seen upon knockdown of futsch, cv-2, or frq2 (Fig. 10c, d, and f).

Finally, we examined glial-specific knockdown of each candidate gene in maintaining flight performance. We found small but significant effects upon knockdown of either DopR2 or Gmap in glia (Fig. 10g–h), while the most striking progressive loss of flight ability was found by knocking down cora (Fig. 10a).

We also analyzed flight performance in male flies using the same genotypes. The phenotypes found in male flies largely recapitulated the results found using females (Supplementary Fig. 4), with a few notable exceptions. Glial-specific knockdown of cora, for example, was lethal in male flies (Supplementary Fig. 4a). Additionally, muscle-specific knockdown of cv-2 resulted in progressive loss of flight ability (Supplementary Fig. 4d). Finally, motor neuron-specific knockdown of cora, msp300, serrate, and pumilio showed a much stronger flight defect in male flies compared with females (Supplementary Fig. 4a, b, e, and j). We also measured flight performance using each Gal4 driver alone (Supplementary Fig. 5) as additional controls and only observed a small yet significant change in flight behavior using BG380-Gal4. We did not observe any additional flight defects in these controls, suggesting that the flight defects found are primarily due to the specific knockdown of the candidate genes.

Altogether, these results highlight the need for our candidate genes to maintain flight performance through their expression in various synaptic tissues. Muscle, motor neurons, and glia each had several genes that were required within these tissues. Interestingly, the majority of our candidate genes are required in multiple tissues, suggesting shared mechanisms of maintenance in muscles, motor neurons, and glia.

RNAi-mediated knockdown of candidate genes disrupts NMJ morphology

To assess whether tissue-specific knockdown of candidate genes impairs synaptic integrity at DLM synapses, we measured gross morphology of NMJs upon knockdown of these genes knocked down in various tissues. We chose one example of a condition resulting in progressive flight defects in each tissue: muscle, motor neuron, and glia.

We first accessed NMJ morphology upon muscle-specific knockdown of serrate in postsynaptic muscle tissue. At Day 3, serrate knockdown showed early signs of impairment with a decrease in neurite length compared to the control (Fig. 11a, b, and e). By Day 21, the serrate knockdown showed a progressive loss of neurite length compared with the age-matched controls (Fig. 11c–e). We also confirmed that the use of the Gal4 drivers alone did not produce a change in neurite length (Supplementary Fig. 7). These results demonstrate a role for serrate in retaining synaptic integrity through postsynaptic muscle tissue.

Fig. 11. Synaptic defects with RNAi knockdown of candidate genes. a–d) Confocal images of ser RNAi knockdown in muscle tissue using MHC-Gal4 stained with FITC-conjugated HRP (black) at 63 × magnification. UAS-ser  IR crossed to Oregon-R serves as the control. e) Quantification of total neurite length of ser RNAi muscle knockdown (µm). f–i) Confocal images of motor neuron knockdown of futsch using BG380-Gal4 and controls at Day 3 and Day 21. j) Quantification of total neurite length of futsch RNAi motor neuron knockdown. k–n) Representative images of cora glia RNAi knockdown using Repo-Gal4 and controls. o) Quantification of total neurite length of cora glia RNAi knockdown. Sample size = n of 10 for each timepoint and genotype. ****P < 0.0001; ***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05 n.s., not significant, using a one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc comparisons. The scale bar in d, i, and n is 20 µm.

We next assessed NMJ morphology upon knockdown of futsch in motor neurons. At Day 3, motor neuron knockdown of futsch resulted in a total neurite length comparable to the control (Fig. 11f, g, and j). However, by Day 21, futsch knockdown displayed a significant decrease in total neurite length when compared to Day 3 (Fig. 11g and j) and age-matched controls (Fig. 11h–j). These data demonstrate the role of futsch in maintaining synaptic structure by acting in presynaptic motor neurons.

To investigate the role of glia in preserving synaptic integrity, we assessed how knockdown of cora in glia impacts synaptic morphology (Fig. 11k–o). At Day 3, we observed no change in neurite length between glia knockdown of cora and the controls (Fig. 11k, l, and o). In contrast, by Day 21, cora knockdown in glia presented a significant increase in neurite length compared to the Day 21 control and the Day 3 knockdown (Fig. 11l–o). Both the flight defect in glia knockdown of cora (Fig. 10a) and the increase in neurite length suggests that cora may have a role in regulating neurite growth in glia to sustain synaptic integrity. Together, these results support the tissue-specific roles of each gene as regulators of synaptic maintenance.

Discussion

Our results highlight genes with a wide variety of functions that mediate synaptic maintenance with age. Mutations in the vast majority of candidate genes recapitulated the results uncovered through SNP analysis using the DGRP, and tissue-specific knockdown of these genes revealed critical roles for these genes in various tissues that comprise the tripartite synapse.

One striking result uncovered from this screen was the finding that the majority of these candidate genes have roles in multiple tissues to maintain synaptic integrity. This highlights the important features of motor neurons, muscles, and glia needed to keep these complex structures maintained with age.

Although further studies will be needed to identify the specific mechanisms by which these genes are required to maintain synaptic integrity, we briefly highlight the known functions of these genes to determine how they may be involved in this process.

Muscle development and function

As a ligand for the Notch receptor, serrate is most commonly associated with wing morphogenesis (Speicher et al. 1994). However, the flight defects and disruption of synaptic morphology seen here indicate a specific role for serrate within muscle cells. Previous work has demonstrated a role for serrate in the development of the indirect flight muscles. Specifically, serrate is required for proliferation of adult muscle progenitor (AMP) cells, from which the indirect flight muscles develop (Gunage et al. 2014). Our results showing a progressive, age-dependent loss of synaptic maintenance suggest that serrate is also required in muscles after their development.

Notch signaling has also been shown to affect synapse morphology in the olfactory circuit in Drosophila. Activation of the Notch ligand Delta in postsynaptic projection neurons acts back on presynaptic olfactory receptor neurons for canonical Notch signaling, thus restricting the overall architecture of glomeruli (Kidd and Lieber 2016). Since muscles are the postsynaptic cells of NMJs, our results suggest that serrate could regulate synaptic morphology via a similar mechanism. Serrate was also identified as a modifier of TDP-43-mediated toxicity in a Drosophila model of ALS (Zhan et al. 2013), further highlighting the role of serrate in maintaining neuromuscular integrity.

Human Jagged-1 (JAG1) likewise acts as a Notch ligand, with mutations identified in patients afflicted by the hereditary axonal neuropathy Charcot–Marie–Tooth disease type 2 (CMT2) (Sullivan et al. 2020). With human JAG1 being required to maintain peripheral nerve integrity, it will be interesting to determine how muscle-specific knockdown of serrate maintains synaptic integrity in our Drosophila model.

We also found that muscle-specific knockdown of BMCP impairs synaptic maintenance. BMCP, which acts as a mitochondrial carrier protein, is proposed to regulate energy metabolism. Loss of function mutations in BMCP result in starvation sensitivity, decreased fertility, and reduced weight gain on a high-calorie diet, suggesting a role in maintaining metabolic homeostasis (Sánchez-Blanco et al. 2006). In contrast, overexpression of BMCP rescued locomotor impairments and the shortened lifespan resulting from expression of mutant huntingtin in glial cells (Besson et al. 2010). Our results showing a muscle-specific requirement of BMCP for maintaining synaptic integrity could be due to the fact that the indirect flight muscles use an incredible amount of energy (Wigglesworth 1949) and include an abundance of mitochondria (Sohal 1975).

The mammalian homolog solute carrier family 25 (SLC25A30) is associated with the transport of solutes across the inner mitochondrial membrane. In mice, SLC25A30 expression is most abundant in the kidney, where it is proposed to respond to increased mitochondrial metabolism (Haguenauer et al. 2005). Our results in the current study suggest that mitochondrial activity in DLMs plays a crucial role in maintaining synaptic integrity.

Synaptic development

Coracle physically interacts with postsynaptic glutamate receptors (GluRs) and is required for proper synaptic localization and anchoring of receptors with GluRIIa subunits. Loss of function mutations in coracle results in decreased GluRIIa localization at both embryonic and larval NMJs (Chen et al. 2005). Our results are also consistent with a postsynaptic role in muscles, as both structural and functional integrity of DLM synapses are impaired following muscle-specific knockdown of coracle. It is possible that failure to maintain proper GluR localization leads to the morphological synaptic defects presented in this study.

Interestingly, we also found synaptic impairment when coracle is knocked down in glial cells. Previous work has demonstrated that coracle is required for the formation of septate junctions (Lamb et al. 1998). Additionally, loss of coracle function disrupts the integrity of the blood–brain barrier in Drosophila embryos (Stork et al. 2008), which is primarily formed by glial cells. Finally, knockdown of coracle in epidermal cells promotes dendrite overgrowth in sensory neurons (Tenenbaum et al. 2017). It is certainly possible that coracle also acts to limit synaptic growth by acting in glia that is closely associated with NMJs.

The human homolog of Cora is similarly involved in regulating GluR activity. Specifically, erythrocyte membrane protein band 4.1-like 1 (EPB41L1) regulates the insertion of AMPA receptors at glutamatergic synapses (Lin et al. 2009). Mutations in EPB41L1 disrupt glutamatergic systems in nonsyndromic intellectual disability (Hamdan et al. 2011), highlighting the role of regulating postsynaptic receptors in neuronal maintenance. Additionally, knocking out protein 4.1B, another member of the family of proteins 4.1, in mice causes peripheral nerve abnormalities and decreased levels of Caspr2, which has a Drosophila ortholog dNrxIV, another component of the septate junction (Buttermore et al. 2011; Cifuentes-Diaz et al. 2011; Einheber et al. 2013). Our results together with these previous data show that the family of proteins 4.1 is essential for the peripheral axon–glia interaction.

Frequenin 2 (Frq2) is a calcium-binding protein that regulates neurotransmitter release as well as bouton formation. Knockdown of frq2 in motor neurons resulted in reduced quantal content, increased bouton number, and fewer active zones per bouton at larval NMJs, while the opposite phenotypes were observed in gain-of-function conditions (Romero-Pozuelo et al. 2007). Our results confirm a role for Frq2 in adult motor neurons but also show defects upon muscle-specific knockdown. Further studies will be needed to better understand how loss of Frq2 impacts the structure and function of both pre- and postsynaptic tissues.

Human neuronal calcium sensor 1 (NCS1) functions as a calcium ion sensor to modulate synaptic activity and secretion (Bourne et al. 2001). Evidence has also shown that the calcium-binding activity of NCS1 specifically modulates A-type K+ currents (Nakamura et al. 2001).

Futsch is a microtubule-associated protein with a well-established role in both neurite and synapse development (Hummel et al. 2000; Roos et al. 2000). It is thus unsurprising that disrupting Futsch function can dismantle synaptic structure and function. Human microtubule-associated protein 1a (MAP1A) similarly acts to stabilize microtubules and is found primarily within the central nervous system (Fink et al. 1996).

MSP-300, also referred to as Drosophila nesprin-1, is responsible for the proper positioning of organelles such as mitochondria and nuclei within muscle cells (Elhanany-Tamir et al. 2012). Additionally, MSP-300 has been shown to regulate synapse maturation by localizing specific mRNAs (Packard et al. 2015) as well as GluRs (Morel et al. 2014) to postsynaptic sites. Our findings are consistent with a role of MSP-300 in postsynaptic muscle cells, as muscle-specific knockdown produced a progressive loss of flight ability.

The human homolog spectrin repeat-containing nuclear envelope protein 1 (SYNE1) encodes nesprin-1. Mutations in SYNE1 have been identified in patients suffering from spinocerebellar ataxia and autosomal recessive 8 (SCAR8) (Izumi et al. 2013), as well as Emery–Dreifuss muscular dystrophy (Zhang et al. 2007). It will be of great interest to investigate whether synaptic maintenance is defective in these conditions.

Pumilio is a translational repressor that has functions both in presynaptic motor neurons and postsynaptic muscle (Menon et al. 2009). Pum represses expression and translation of the GluR subunit GluRIIA, while mutations in Pum increase levels of GluRIIA dramatically (Menon et al. 2004). Our results showing a flight defect upon muscle-specific knockdown suggest that maintaining proper levels of postsynaptic proteins suck as GluRIIA is crucial for maintaining synaptic integrity with age.

The human homolog pumilio RNA-binding family member 2 (PUM2) has been shown to regulate genome stability (Lee et al. 2016). Together with our results demonstrated here, this highlights the potential role of maintaining gene expression over time in order to maintain synaptic integrity.

Intracellular transport

GMAP is uniformly expressed in late embryonic as well as larval stages, where it localizes primarily to the cis side of the Golgi stacks, near the endoplasmic reticulum. Golgi organization and anterograde transport through the Golgi are impaired by overexpression of GMAP (Friggi-Grelin et al. 2006). We found a progressive flight defects upon muscle-specific knockdown of GMAP. Thus, it is possible that Golgi sorting and processing are particularly sensitive in the DLMs.

The human homolog, thyroid hormone receptor interactor 11 (TRIP11), similarly encodes a Golgi microtubule-associated protein. Mutations in TRIP11 have been associated with lethal skeletal dysplasia (Smits et al. 2010). Specifically, hypomorphic TRIP11 mutations impaired secretion from the Golgi apparatus in patients suffering from odontochondrodysplasia (Wehrle et al. 2019).

While Futsch is known to regulate synaptic growth and development as mentioned above, microtubule instability resulting from loss of Futsch also results in defective axonal transport and neurodegeneration (Bettencourt da Cruz et al. 2005). Our results showing a progressive loss of flight ability upon knockdown in presynaptic motor neurons suggest that sustained axonal transport is central to synaptic maintenance.

Intercellular signaling

Our screen also revealed genes associated with intercellular signaling, which is fitting when considering the close connections between neurons, muscles, and glia at these NMJs. cv-2, for example, encodes a secreted protein that can either promote or inhibit BMP signaling (Conley et al. 2000) and physically binds with the BMP receptor thickveins (Serpe et al. 2008). Although the role of cv-2 has been most extensively investigated in wing development, BMP signaling is also critical for synapse development (Aberle et al. 2002; Marqués et al. 2002; Sweeney and Davis 2002; McCabe et al. 2003; Rawson et al. 2003; McCabe et al. 2004). We also recently identified the need for sustained BMP signaling with age to maintain synaptic integrity using mayday mutants (Sidisky et al. 2021). Our results here show a requirement of cv-2 expression within muscles, suggesting a postsynaptic role for maintaining synapses.

Human BMP-binding endothelial cell precursor-derived regulator (BMPER) has also been shown to be a negative regulator of BMP signaling, as BMPER protein inhibits BMP signaling and osteoblast differentiation (Binnerts et al. 2004). Additionally, mutations in human BMPER have been associated with the lethal skeletal disorder diaphanospondylodysostosis (Funari et al. 2010).

DopR2 is a specific dopamine receptor that is primarily found in the mushroom body, where it plays an important role in olfactory memory (Han et al. 1996). DopR2 is also involved in the optomotor response to a moving visual stimulus. Knockdown of DopR2 impairs dopaminergic innervation of the fan-shaped body, impairing this motor response (Akiba et al. 2020). Interestingly, knockdown of DopR2 also results in an upregulation of immune and stress response genes (Regna et al. 2016), which is also associated with neurodegeneration (Cao et al. 2013).

While these studies have shown a clear role for DopR2 within the Drosophila brain, it is surprising that muscle-specific knockdown results in impaired synaptic maintenance. This suggests the possibility that there is dopaminergic innervation in either the indirect flight muscles or some other muscle tissue.

The human gene beta-1-adrenergic receptor (ADRB1) encodes a G-protein-coupled receptor found in greatest abundance in cardiac muscles (Frielle et al. 1987), and mutations in ADRB1 are associated with an increased risk of congenital heart failure (Small et al. 2002). Although the Drosophila homolog functions as a receptor for a different neurotransmitter, our results showing a role for DopR2 in postsynaptic muscle cells suggest that manipulation of neurotransmitter receptor signaling could impact synaptic maintenance.

Overall, our results shown here highlight several genes with wide-ranging functions that are required to maintain synaptic integrity with age. Further mechanistic studies should help further clarify the processes within motor neurons, muscles, and glia that are necessary to maintain these complex structures over time. These results will hopefully serve as a starting point for numerous future studies aimed at revealing neuroprotective mechanisms and strategies for maintaining nervous system function with age.

Supplementary Material

iyad025_Supplementary_Data

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank members of the Babcock laboratory for helpful discussions and suggestions regarding the manuscript. This research was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01NS110727 to DTB).

Data availability

The authors affirm that the conclusions of the article are fully contained within the article, figures, and tables. All reagents generated in this study will be made available upon request.

Supplemental material available at GENETICS online.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R01NS110727 to DTB).
==== Refs
Literature cited

Aberle  H, Haghighi  AP, Fetter  RD, McCabe  BD, Magalhães  TR, Goodman  CS. Wishful thinking encodes a BMP type II receptor that regulates synaptic growth in Drosophila. Neuron. 2002;33 (4 ):545–558. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00589-5.11856529
Akiba  M, Sugimoto  K, Aoki  R, Murakami  R, Miyashita  T, Hashimoto  R, Hiranuma  A, Yamauchi  J, Ueno  T, Morimoto  T. Dopamine modulates the optomotor response to unreliable visual stimuli in Drosophila melanogaster. Eur J Neurosci. 2020;51 (3 ):822–839. doi:10.1111/ejn.14648.31834948
Arshadi  C, Günther  U, Eddison  M, Harrington  KI, Ferreira  TA. SNT: a unifying toolbox for quantification of neuronal anatomy. Nat Methods.  2021;18 (4 ):374–377. doi:10.1038/s41592-021-01105-7.33795878
Babcock  DT, Ganetzky  B. An improved method for accurate and rapid measurement of flight performance in Drosophila. J Vis Exp. 2014;(84 ):e51223. doi:10.3791/51223 24561810
Bellen  HJ, Levis  RW, He  Y, Carlson  JW, Evans-Holm  M, Bae  E, Kim  J, Metaxakis  A, Savakis  C, Schulze  KL, et al  The Drosophila gene disruption project: progress using transposons with distinctive site specificities. Genetics. 2011;188 (3 ):731–743. doi:10.1534/genetics.111.126995.21515576
Bellen  HJ, Levis  RW, Liao  G, He  Y, Carlson  JW, Tsang  G, Evans-Holm  M, Hiesinger  PR, Schulze  KL, Rubin  GM, et al  The BDGP gene disruption project: single transposon insertions associated with 40% of Drosophila genes. Genetics. 2004;167 (2 ):761–781. doi:10.1534/genetics.104.026427.15238527
Besson  MT, Dupont  P, Fridell  YW, Liévens  JC. Increased energy metabolism rescues glia-induced pathology in a Drosophila model of Huntington’s disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19 (17 ):3372–3382. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddq249.20566711
Bettencourt da Cruz  A, Schwärzel  M, Schulze  S, Niyyati  M, Heisenberg  M, and Kretzschmar  D. Disruption of the MAP1B-related protein FUTSCH leads to changes in the neuronal cytoskeleton, axonal transport defects, and progressive neurodegeneration in Drosophila. Mol Biol Cell. 2005;16 (5 ):2433–2442. doi:10.1091/mbc.e04-11-1004.15772149
Binnerts  ME, Wen  X, Canté-Barrett  K, Bright  J, Chen  HT, Asundi  V, Sattari  P, Tang  T, Boyle  B, Funk  W, et al  Human crossveinless-2 is a novel inhibitor of bone morphogenetic proteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;315 (2 ):272–280. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.01.048.14766204
Bishop  NA, Lu  T, Yankner  BA. Neural mechanisms of ageing and cognitive decline. Nature. 2010;464 (7288 ):529–535. doi:10.1038/nature08983.20336135
Bourne  Y, Dannenberg  J, Pollmann  V, Marchot  P, Pongs  O. Immunocytochemical localization and crystal structure of human frequenin (neuronal calcium sensor 1). J Biol Chem. 2001;276 (15 ):11949–11955. doi:10.1074/jbc.M009373200.11092894
Broadie  KS, Bate  M. Development of larval muscle properties in the embryonic myotubes of Drosophila melanogaster. J Neurosci. 1993a;13 (1 ):167–180. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-01-00167.1993.8093714
Broadie  KS, Bate  M. Development of the embryonic neuromuscular synapse of Drosophila melanogaster. J Neurosci. 1993b;13 (1 ):144–166. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-01-00144.1993.8093713
Buttermore  ED, Dupree  JL, Cheng  J, An  X, Tessarollo  L, Bhat  MA. The cytoskeletal adaptor protein band 4.1B is required for the maintenance of paranodal axoglial septate junctions in myelinated axons. J Neurosci. 2011;31 (22 ):8013–8024. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1015-11.2011.21632923
Cao  Y, Chtarbanova  S, Petersen  AJ, Ganetzky  B. Dnr1 mutations cause neurodegeneration in Drosophila by activating the innate immune response in the brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110 (19 ):E1752–E1760. doi:10.1073/pnas.1306220110.23613578
Chen  K, Merino  C, Sigrist  SJ, Featherstone  DE. The 4.1 protein coracle mediates subunit-selective anchoring of Drosophila glutamate receptors to the postsynaptic actin cytoskeleton. J Neurosci. 2005;25 (28 ):6667–6675. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1527-05.2005.16014728
Chow  CY, Kelsey  KJ, Wolfner  MF, Clark  AG. Candidate genetic modifiers of retinitis pigmentosa identified by exploiting natural variation in Drosophila. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25 (4 ):651–659. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddv502.26662796
Cifuentes-Diaz  C, Chareyre  F, Garcia  M, Devaux  J, Carnaud  M, Levasseur  G, Niwa-Kawakita  M, Harroch  S, Girault  JA, Giovannini  M, et al  Protein 4.1B contributes to the organization of peripheral myelinated axons. PLoS One. 2011;6 (9 ):e25043. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025043.
Collins  CA, DiAntonio  A. Synaptic development: insights from Drosophila. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2007;17 (1 ):35–42. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2007.01.001.17229568
Conley  CA, Silburn  R, Singer  MA, Ralston  A, Rohwer-Nutter  D, Olson  DJ, Gelbart  W, Blair  SS. Crossveinless 2 contains cysteine-rich domains and is required for high levels of BMP-like activity during the formation of the cross veins in Drosophila. Development. 2000;127 (18 ):3947–3959. doi:10.1242/dev.127.18.3947.10952893
Dalui  S, Bhattacharyya  A. Herbicide paraquat induces sex-specific variation of neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration in Drosophila melanogaster. Indian J Biochem Biophys. 2014;51 :567–573.25823231
Danjo  R, Kawasaki  F, Ordway  RW. A tripartite synapse model in Drosophila. PLoS One. 2011;6 (2 ):e17131. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017131.
Davis  J, Da Silva Santos  C, Zavala  NC, Gans  N, Patracuolla  D, Fehrenbach  M, Babcock  DT. Characterizing dopaminergic neuron vulnerability using genome-wide analysis. Genetics. 2021;218 (4 ):iyab081. doi:10.1093/genetics/iyab081.
Dietzl  G, Chen  D, Schnorrer  F, Su  KC, Barinova  Y, Fellner  M, Gasser  B, Kinsey  K, Oppel  S, Scheiblauer  S, et al  A genome-wide transgenic RNAi library for conditional gene inactivation in Drosophila. Nature. 2007;448 (7150 ):151–156. doi:10.1038/nature05954.17625558
Einheber  S, Meng  X, Rubin  M, Lam  I, Mohandas  N, An  X, Shrager  P, Kissil  J, Maurel  P, Salzer  JL. The 4.1B cytoskeletal protein regulates the domain organization and sheath thickness of myelinated axons. Glia. 2013;61 (2 ):240–253. doi:10.1002/glia.22430.23109359
Elhanany-Tamir  H, Yu  YV, Shnayder  M, Jain  A, Welte  M, Volk  T. Organelle positioning in muscles requires cooperation between two KASH proteins and microtubules. J Cell Biol. 2012;198 (5 ):833–846. doi:10.1083/jcb.201204102.22927463
Fernandes  J, Bate  M, Vijayraghavan  K. Development of the indirect flight muscles of Drosophila. Development. 1991;113 (1 ):67–77. doi:10.1242/dev.113.1.67.1765009
Fernandes  JJ, Celniker  SE, VijayRaghavan  K. Development of the indirect flight muscle attachment sites in Drosophila: role of the PS integrins and the stripe gene. Dev Biol. 1996;176 (2 ):166–184. doi:10.1006/dbio.1996.0125.8660859
Fernandes  JJ, Keshishian  H. Nerve-muscle interactions during flight muscle development in Drosophila. Development. 1998;125 (9 ):1769–1779. doi:10.1242/dev.125.9.1769.9521914
Fernandes  J, VijayRaghavan  K. The development of indirect flight muscle innervation in Drosophila melanogaster. Development. 1993;118 (1 ):215–227. doi:10.1242/dev.118.1.215.
Fink  JK, Jones  SM, Esposito  C, Wilkowski  J. Human microtubule-associated protein 1a (MAP1A) gene: genomic organization, cDNA sequence, and developmental- and tissue-specific expression. Genomics. 1996;35 (3 ):577–585. doi:10.1006/geno.1996.0400.8812494
Fleming  RJ, Scottgale  TN, Diederich  RJ, Artavanis-Tsakonas  S. The gene Serrate encodes a putative EGF-like transmembrane protein essential for proper ectodermal development in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Dev. 1990;4 (12a ):2188–2201. doi:10.1101/gad.4.12a.2188.2125287
Frielle  T, Collins  S, Daniel  KW, Caron  MG, Lefkowitz  RJ, Kobilka  BK. Cloning of the cDNA for the human beta 1-adrenergic receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987;84 (22 ):7920–7924. doi:10.1073/pnas.84.22.7920.2825170
Friggi-Grelin  F, Rabouille  C, Therond  P. The cis-Golgi Drosophila GMAP has a role in anterograde transport and Golgi organization in vivo, similar to its mammalian ortholog in tissue culture cells. Eur J Cell Biol. 2006;85 (11 ):1155–1166. doi:10.1016/j.ejcb.2006.07.001.16904228
Funari  VA, Krakow  D, Nevarez  L, Chen  Z, Funari  TL, Vatanavicharn  N, Wilcox  WR, Rimoin  DL, Nelson  SF, Cohn  DH. BMPER Mutation in diaphanospondylodysostosis identified by ancestral autozygosity mapping and targeted high-throughput sequencing. Am J Hum Genet. 2010;87 (4 ):532–537. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.08.015.20869035
Gunage  RD, Reichert  H, VijayRaghavan  K. Identification of a new stem cell population that generates Drosophila flight muscles. Elife. 2014;3 :e03126. doi:10.7554/eLife.03126.
Haguenauer  A, Raimbault  S, Masscheleyn  S, Gonzalez-Barroso Mdel  M, Criscuolo  F, Plamondon  J, Miroux  B, Ricquier  D, Richard  D, Bouillaud  F, et al  A new renal mitochondrial carrier, KMCP1, is up-regulated during tubular cell regeneration and induction of antioxidant enzymes. J Biol Chem. 2005;280 (23 ):22036–22043. doi:10.1074/jbc.M412136200.15809292
Hamdan  FF, Gauthier  J, Araki  Y, Lin  DT, Yoshizawa  Y, Higashi  K, Park  AR, Spiegelman  D, Dobrzeniecka  S, Piton  A, et al  Excess of de novo deleterious mutations in genes associated with glutamatergic systems in nonsyndromic intellectual disability. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;88 (3 ):306–316. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.02.001.21376300
Han  KA, Millar  NS, Grotewiel  MS, Davis  RL. DAMB, a novel dopamine receptor expressed specifically in Drosophila mushroom bodies. Neuron. 1996;16 (6 ):1127–1135. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80139-7.8663989
Harden  N, Lee  J, Loh  HY, Ong  YM, Tan  I, Leung  T, Manser  E, Lim  L. A Drosophila homolog of the Rac- and Cdc42-activated serine/threonine kinase PAK is a potential focal adhesion and focal complex protein that colocalizes with dynamic actin structures. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16 (5 ):1896–1908. doi:10.1128/MCB.16.5.1896.8628256
Harris  KP, Littleton  JT. Transmission, development, and plasticity of synapses. Genetics. 2015;201 (2 ):345–375. doi:10.1534/genetics.115.176529.26447126
Hebbar  S, Fernandes  JJ. Pruning of motor neuron branches establishes the DLM innervation pattern in Drosophila. J Neurobiol. 2004;60 (4 ):499–516. doi:10.1002/neu.20031.15307154
Hebbar  S, Fernandes  JJ. A role for Fas II in the stabilization of motor neuron branches during pruning in Drosophila. Dev Biol. 2005;285 (1 ):185–199. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.06.015.16055111
Huang  W, Massouras  A, Inoue  Y, Peiffer  J, Ràmia  M, Tarone  AM, Turlapati  L, Zichner  T, Zhu  D, Lyman  RF, et al  Natural variation in genome architecture among 205 Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel lines. Genome Res. 2014;24 (7 ):1193–1208. doi:10.1101/gr.171546.113.24714809
Hummel  T, Krukkert  K, Roos  J, Davis  G, Klämbt  C. Drosophila Futsch/22C10 is a MAP1B-like protein required for dendritic and axonal development. Neuron. 2000;26 (2 ):357–370. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81169-1.10839355
Izumi  Y, Miyamoto  R, Morino  H, Yoshizawa  A, Nishinaka  K, Udaka  F, Kameyama  M, Maruyama  H, Kawakami  H. Cerebellar ataxia with SYNE1 mutation accompanying motor neuron disease. Neurology. 2013;80 (6 ):600–601. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182815529.23325900
Jan  L, Jan  Y. L-glutamate as an excitatory transmitter at the Drosophila larval neuromuscular junction. J Physiol (Lond).  1976;262 (1 ):215–236. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011593.186587
Jan  LY, Jan  YN. Antibodies to horseradish peroxidase as specific neuronal markers in Drosophila and in grasshopper embryos. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982;79 (8 ):2700–2704. doi:10.1073/pnas.79.8.2700.6806816
Kao  SY, Nikonova  E, Ravichandran  K, Spletter  ML. Dissection of Drosophila melanogaster flight muscles for omics approaches. J Vis Exp. 2019;(152 ). doi:10.3791/60309-v
Katzenberger  RJ , Chtarbanova S, Rimkus SA, Fischer JA, Kaur G, Seppala JM, Swanson LC, Zajac JE, Ganetzky B, Wassarman DA, Death following traumatic brain injury in Drosophila is associated with intestinal barrier dysfunction. Elife. 2015;4 :e04790. doi:10.7554/eLife.04790.
Kidd  S, Lieber  T. Mechanism of notch pathway activation and its role in the regulation of olfactory plasticity in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One. 2016;11 (3 ):e0151279. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151279.
Klagges  BR, Heimbeck  G, Godenschwege  TA, Hofbauer  A, Pflugfelder  GO, Reifegerste  R, Reisch  D, Schaupp  M, Buchner  S, Buchner  E. Invertebrate synapsins: a single gene codes for several isoforms in Drosophila. J Neurosci. 1996;16 (10 ):3154–3165. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-10-03154.1996.8627354
Klein  P, Müller-Rischart  AK, Motori  E, Schönbauer  C, Schnorrer  F, Winklhofer  KF, Klein  R. Ret rescues mitochondrial morphology and muscle degeneration of Drosophila Pink1 mutants. Embo j. 2014;33 (4 ):341–355. doi:10.1002/embj.201284290.24473149
Lamb  RS, Ward  RE, Schweizer  L, Fehon  RG. Drosophila coracle, a member of the protein 4.1 superfamily, has essential structural functions in the septate junctions and developmental functions in embryonic and adult epithelial cells. Mol Biol Cell. 1998;9 (12 ):3505–3519. doi:10.1091/mbc.9.12.3505.9843584
Lee  S, Kopp  F, Chang  TC, Sataluri  A, Chen  B, Sivakumar  S, Yu  H, Xie  Y, Mendell  JT. Noncoding RNA NORAD regulates genomic stability by sequestering PUMILIO proteins. Cell. 2016;164 (1–2 ):69–80. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.017.26724866
Lee  T, Luo  L. Mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker for studies of gene function in neuronal morphogenesis. Neuron. 1999;22 (3 ):451–461. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80701-1.10197526
Lin  DT, Makino  Y, Sharma  K, Hayashi  T, Neve  R, Takamiya  K, Huganir  RL. Regulation of AMPA receptor extrasynaptic insertion by 4.1N, phosphorylation and palmitoylation. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12 (7 ):879–887. doi:10.1038/nn.2351.19503082
Liu  Z, Chen  Y, Wang  D, Wang  S, Zhang  YQ. Distinct presynaptic and postsynaptic dismantling processes of Drosophila neuromuscular junctions during metamorphosis. J Neurosci. 2010;30 (35 ):11624–11634. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0410-10.2010.20810883
Lodato  MA, Rodin  RE, Bohrson  CL, Coulter  ME, Barton  AR, Kwon  M, Sherman  MA, Vitzthum  CM, Luquette  LJ, Yandava  CN, et al  Aging and neurodegeneration are associated with increased mutations in single human neurons. Science. 2018;359 (6375 ):555–559. doi:10.1126/science.aao4426.29217584
Longair  MH, Baker  DA, Armstrong  JD. Simple Neurite Tracer: open source software for reconstruction, visualization and analysis of neuronal processes. Bioinformatics. 2011;27 (17 ):2453–2454. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr390.21727141
López-Otín  C, Blasco  MA, Partridge  L, Serrano  M, Kroemer  G. The hallmarks of aging. Cell. 2013;153 (6 ):1194–1217. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.039.23746838
Mackay  TF, Richards  S, Stone  EA, Barbadilla  A, Ayroles  JF, Zhu  D, Casillas  S, Han  Y, Magwire  MM, Cridland  JM, et al  The Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel. Nature. 2012;482 (7384 ):173–178. doi:10.1038/nature10811.22318601
Marqués  G, Bao  H, Haerry  TE, Shimell  MJ, Duchek  P, Zhang  B, O'Connor  MB. The Drosophila BMP type II receptor Wishful Thinking regulates neuromuscular synapse morphology and function. Neuron. 2002;33 (4 ):529–543. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00595-0.11856528
Martínez  G, Khatiwada  S, Costa-Mattioli  M, Hetz  C. ER proteostasis control of neuronal physiology and synaptic function. Trends Neurosci. 2018;41 (9 ):610–624. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2018.05.009.29945734
McCabe  BD, Hom  S, Aberle  H, Fetter  RD, Marques  G, Haerry  TE, Wan  H, O'Connor  MB, Goodman  CS, Haghighi  AP. Highwire regulates presynaptic BMP signaling essential for synaptic growth. Neuron. 2004;41 (6 ):891–905. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00073-X.15046722
McCabe  BD, Marqués  G, Haghighi  AP, Fetter  RD, Crotty  ML, Haerry  TE, Goodman  CS, O'Connor  MB. The BMP homolog Gbb provides a retrograde signal that regulates synaptic growth at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. Neuron. 2003;39 (2 ):241–254. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00426-4.12873382
Menon  KP, Andrews  S, Murthy  M, Gavis  ER, Zinn  K. The translational repressors Nanos and Pumilio have divergent effects on presynaptic terminal growth and postsynaptic glutamate receptor subunit composition. J Neurosci. 2009;29 (17 ):5558–5572. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0520-09.2009.19403823
Menon  KP, Sanyal  S, Habara  Y, Sanchez  R, Wharton  RP, Ramaswami  M, Zinn  K. The translational repressor Pumilio regulates presynaptic morphology and controls postsynaptic accumulation of translation factor eIF-4E. Neuron. 2004;44 (4 ):663–676. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.10.028.15541314
Morel  V, Lepicard  S, Rey  AN, Parmentier  ML, Schaeffer  L. Drosophila Nesprin-1 controls glutamate receptor density at neuromuscular junctions. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2014;71 (17 ):3363–3379. doi:10.1007/s00018-014-1566-7.24492984
Nagarkar-Jaiswal  S, Lee  PT, Campbell  ME, Chen  K, Anguiano-Zarate  S, Gutierrez  MC, Busby  T, Lin  WW, He  Y, Schulze  KL, et al  A library of MiMICs allows tagging of genes and reversible, spatial and temporal knockdown of proteins in Drosophila. Elife. 2015;4 :e05338. doi:10.7554/eLife.05338.
Nakamura  TY, Pountney  DJ, Ozaita  A, Nandi  S, Ueda  S, Rudy  B, Coetzee  WA. A role for frequenin, a Ca2+-binding protein, as a regulator of Kv4 K+-currents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98 (22 ):12808–12813. doi:10.1073/pnas.221168498.11606724
Ni  JQ, Liu  LP, Binari  R, Hardy  R, Shim  HS, Cavallaro  A, Booker  M, Pfeiffer  BD, Markstein  M, Wang  H, et al  A Drosophila resource of transgenic RNAi lines for neurogenetics. Genetics. 2009;182 (4 ):1089–1100. doi:10.1534/genetics.109.103630.19487563
Ni  JQ, Zhou  R, Czech  B, Liu  LP, Holderbaum  L, Yang-Zhou  D, Shim  HS, Tao  R, Handler  D, Karpowicz  P, et al  A genome-scale shRNA resource for transgenic RNAi in Drosophila. Nat Methods. 2011;8 (5 ):405–407. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1592.21460824
Oddo  S, Caccamo  A, Shepherd  JD, Murphy  MP, Golde  TE, Kayed  R, Metherate  R, Mattson  MP, Akbari  Y, LaFerla  FM. Triple-transgenic model of Alzheimer’s disease with plaques and tangles: intracellular Abeta and synaptic dysfunction. Neuron. 2003;39 (3 ):409–421. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00434-3.12895417
Packard  M, Jokhi  V, Ding  B, Ruiz-Cañada  C, Ashley  J, Budnik  V. Nucleus to synapse Nesprin1 railroad tracks direct synapse maturation through RNA localization. Neuron. 2015;86 (4 ):1015–1028. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.04.006.25959729
Palladino  MJ, Hadley  TJ, Ganetzky  B. Temperature-sensitive paralytic mutants are enriched for those causing neurodegeneration in Drosophila. Genetics. 2002;161 (3 ):1197–1208. doi:10.1093/genetics/161.3.1197.12136022
Perkins  LA, Holderbaum  L, Tao  R, Hu  Y, Sopko  R, McCall  K, Yang-Zhou  D, Flockhart  I, Binari  R, Shim  HS, et al  The transgenic RNAi project at Harvard Medical School: resources and validation. Genetics. 2015;201 (3 ):843–852. doi:10.1534/genetics.115.180208.26320097
Pfeiffer  BD, Ngo  TT, Hibbard  KL, Murphy  C, Jenett  A, Truman  JW, Rubin  GM. Refinement of tools for targeted gene expression in Drosophila. Genetics. 2010;186 (2 ):735–755. doi:10.1534/genetics.110.119917.20697123
Rawson  JM, Lee  M, Kennedy  EL, Selleck  SB. Drosophila neuromuscular synapse assembly and function require the TGF-beta type I receptor saxophone and the transcription factor Mad. J Neurobiol. 2003;55 (2 ):134–150. doi:10.1002/neu.10189.12672013
Regna  K, Kurshan  PT, Harwood  BN, Jenkins  AM, Lai  CQ, Muskavitch  MA, Kopin  AS, Draper  I. A critical role for the Drosophila dopamine D1-like receptor Dop1R2 at the onset of metamorphosis. BMC Dev Biol. 2016;16 (1 ):15. doi:10.1186/s12861-016-0115-z.27184815
Romero-Pozuelo  J, Dason  JS, Atwood  HL, Ferrús  A. Chronic and acute alterations in the functional levels of Frequenins 1 and 2 reveal their roles in synaptic transmission and axon terminal morphology. Eur J Neurosci. 2007;26 (9 ):2428–2443. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05877.x.17970740
Roos  J, Hummel  T, Ng  N, Klämbt  C, Davis  GW. Drosophila Futsch regulates synaptic microtubule organization and is necessary for synaptic growth. Neuron. 2000;26 (2 ):371–382. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)81170-8.10839356
Ruijter  JM, Ramakers  C, Hoogaars  WM, Karlen  Y, Bakker  O, van den Hoff  MJ, Moorman  AF. Amplification efficiency: linking baseline and bias in the analysis of quantitative PCR data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37 (6 ):e45. doi:10.1093/nar/gkp045.19237396
Sánchez-Blanco  A, Fridell  YW, Helfand  SL. Involvement of Drosophila uncoupling protein 5 in metabolism and aging. Genetics. 2006;172 (3 ):1699–1710. doi:10.1534/genetics.105.053389.16387864
Sanyal  S . Genomic mapping and expression patterns of C380, OK6 and D42 enhancer trap lines in the larval nervous system of Drosophila. Gene Expr Patterns. 2009;9 (5 ):371–380. doi:10.1016/j.gep.2009.01.002.19602393
Schindelin  J, Arganda-Carreras  I, Frise  E, Kaynig  V, Longair  M, Pietzsch  T, Preibisch  S, Rueden  C, Saalfeld  S, Schmid  B, et al  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9 (7 ):676–682. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2019.22743772
Selkoe  DJ . Alzheimer’s disease is a synaptic failure. Science. 2002;298 (5594 ):789–791. doi:10.1126/science.1074069.12399581
Sepp  KJ, Schulte  J, Auld  VJ. Peripheral glia direct axon guidance across the CNS/PNS transition zone. Dev Biol. 2001;238 (1 ):47–63. doi:10.1006/dbio.2001.0411.11783993
Serpe  M, Umulis  D, Ralston  A, Chen  J, Olson  DJ, Avanesov  A, Othmer  H, O'Connor  MB, Blair  SS. The BMP-binding protein Crossveinless 2 is a short-range, concentration-dependent, biphasic modulator of BMP signaling in Drosophila. Dev Cell. 2008;14 (6 ):940–953. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2008.03.023.18539121
Sidisky  JM, Babcock  DT. Visualizing synaptic degeneration in adult Drosophila in association with neurodegeneration. J Vis Exp. 2020;(159 ). doi:10.3791/61363
Sidisky  JM, Weaver  D, Hussain  S, Okumus  M, Caratenuto  R, Babcock  D. Mayday sustains trans-synaptic BMP signaling required for synaptic maintenance with age. Elife. 2021;10 :e54932. doi:10.7554/eLife.54932.
Small  KM, Wagoner  LE, Levin  AM, Kardia  SL, Liggett  SB. Synergistic polymorphisms of beta1- and alpha2C-adrenergic receptors and the risk of congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2002;347 (15 ):1135–1142. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa020803.12374873
Smits  P, Bolton  AD, Funari  V, Hong  M, Boyden  ED, Lu  L, Manning  DK, Dwyer  ND, Moran  JL, Prysak  M, et al  Lethal skeletal dysplasia in mice and humans lacking the golgin GMAP-210. N Engl J Med. 2010;362 (3 ):206–216. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0900158.20089971
Sohal  RD . Mitochondrial changes in flight muscles of normal and flightless Drosophila melanogaster with age. J Morphol. 1975;145 (3 ):337–353. doi:10.1002/jmor.1051450307.804040
Speicher  SA, Thomas  U, Hinz  U, Knust  E. The Serrate locus of Drosophila and its role in morphogenesis of the wing imaginal discs: control of cell proliferation. Development. 1994;120 (3 ):535–544. doi:10.1242/dev.120.3.535.8162853
Stern  M, Blake  N, Zondlo  N, Walters  K. Increased neuronal excitability conferred by a mutation in the Drosophila bemused gene. J Neurogenet. 1995;10 (2 ):103–118. doi:10.3109/01677069509083458.8592271
Stork  T, Engelen  D, Krudewig  A, Silies  M, Bainton  RJ, Klämbt  C. Organization and function of the blood-brain barrier in Drosophila. J Neurosci. 2008;28 (3 ):587–597. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4367-07.2008.18199760
Sullivan  JM, Motley  WW, Johnson  JO, Aisenberg  WH, Marshall  KL, Barwick  KE, Kong  L, Huh  JS, Saavedra-Rivera  PC, McEntagart  MM, et al  Dominant mutations of the Notch ligand Jagged1 cause peripheral neuropathy. J Clin Invest. 2020;130 (3 ):1506–1512. doi:10.1172/JCI128152.32065591
Sweeney  ST, Davis  GW. Unrestricted synaptic growth in spinster-a late endosomal protein implicated in TGF-beta-mediated synaptic growth regulation. Neuron. 2002;36 (3 ):403–416. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(02)01014-0.12408844
Tenenbaum  CM, Misra  M, Alizzi  RA, Gavis  ER. Enclosure of dendrites by epidermal cells restricts branching and permits coordinated development of spatially overlapping sensory neurons. Cell Rep. 2017;20 (13 ):3043–3056. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.001.28954223
Thibault  ST, Singer  MA, Miyazaki  WY, Milash  B, Dompe  NA, Singh  CM, Buchholz  R, Demsky  M, Fawcett  R, Francis-Lang  HL, et al  A complementary transposon tool kit for Drosophila melanogaster using P and piggyBac. Nat Genet. 2004;36 (3 ):283–287. doi:10.1038/ng1314.14981521
Turrigiano  GG, Nelson  SB. Homeostatic plasticity in the developing nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;5 (2 ):97. doi:10.1038/nrn1327.14735113
Vijayan  V, Verstreken  P. Autophagy in the presynaptic compartment in health and disease. J Cell Biol. 2017;216 (7 ):1895–1906. doi:10.1083/jcb.201611113.28515275
Wehrle  A, Witkos  TM, Unger  S, Schneider  J, Follit  JA, Hermann  J, Welting  T, Fano  V, Hietala  M, Vatanavicharn  N, et al  Hypomorphic mutations of TRIP11 cause odontochondrodysplasia. JCI Insight. 2019;4 (3 ):e124701. doi:10.1172/jci.insight.124701.
Wigglesworth  VB . The utilization of reserve substances in Drosophila during flight. J Exp Biol. 1949;26 (2 ):150–163. doi:10.1242/jeb.26.2.150.15395188
Wilson  KA, Beck  JN, Nelson  CS, Hilsabeck  TA, Promislow  D, Brem  RB, Kapahi  P. GWAS for lifespan and decline in climbing ability in flies upon dietary restriction reveal decima as a mediator of insulin-like peptide production. Curr Biol. 2020;30 (14 ):2749–2760.e2743. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2020.05.020.32502405
Zhan  L, Hanson  KA, Kim  SH, Tare  A, Tibbetts  RS. Identification of genetic modifiers of TDP-43 neurotoxicity in Drosophila. PLoS One. 2013;8 (2 ):e57214. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057214.
Zhang  Q, Bethmann  C, Worth  NF, Davies  JD, Wasner  C, Feuer  A, Ragnauth  CD, Yi  Q, Mellad  JA, Warren  DT, et al  Nesprin-1 and -2 are involved in the pathogenesis of Emery Dreifuss muscular dystrophy and are critical for nuclear envelope integrity. Hum Mol Genet. 2007;16 (23 ):2816–2833. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddm238.17761684
