
==== Front
Cureus
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus Palo Alto (CA)

10.7759/cureus.66981
Dentistry
Breakthrough in the Development of Endodontic Irrigants
Muacevic Alexander
Adler John R
Naladkar Kapil 1
Chandak Manoj 1
Sarangi Swayangprabha 1
Agrawal Paridhi 1
Jidewar Namrata 1
Suryawanshi Tejas 1
Hirani Palak 1
1 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND
Kapil Naladkar knaladkar32@gmail.com
16 8 2024
8 2024
16 8 e6698121 11 2023
16 8 2024
Copyright © 2024, Naladkar et al.
2024
Naladkar et al.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This article is available from https://www.cureus.com/articles/210800-breakthrough-in-the-development-of-endodontic-irrigants
The three main components of endodontic success are three-dimensional obturation, pulp space sterilization, and biomechanical preparation. Instrumentation techniques are insufficient to accomplish complete disinfection of the pulp space. It is essential to use additional tools, such as endodontic irrigants. This review article aims to provide a general overview of the different root canal irrigants and their clinical uses. Endodontic treatment focuses more on removing infectious material from the root canal system to facilitate the healing of an existing periapical lesion or to prevent the periradicular tissues from being infected. It is important to note that instrumentation alone can reach every part of the root canal wall. Therefore, the irrigation procedure is a crucial aspect of endodontic therapy.

Irrigation requires the application of various irrigants, like sodium and chlorhexidine, to get rid of debris, bacteria, and tissue leftovers. The accomplishment of root canal treatments counts heavily on the thoroughness of irrigation, contributing to optimal canal shaping and disinfection. Modern root canal irrigation systems incorporate syringes, needles, and advanced delivery mechanisms, including sonic and ultrasonic devices. These inventions aim to enhance the mechanical action of irrigants, reaching intricate canal anatomy more efficiently. Understanding the dynamics of root canal irrigation and staying abreast of technological advancements are essential for clinicians to achieve improved treatment outcomes in endodontic procedures.

removal of smear layer
irrigation in endodontics
ultrasonic device
root canal therapy
irrigants
==== Body
pmcIntroduction and background

To perform a successful endodontic root treatment, it is necessary to remove bacteria and bacterial toxins thoroughly and any remaining viable and nonviable pulpal tissue from the root canal [1]. While carrying out biomechanical therapy, the irrigation fluids act as lubricants and cleansers, effectively eliminating bacteria and related products associated with tissue degradation [2]. Irrigation is crucial in root canal treatment, particularly for removing pathogens [3]. When ultrasonic energy is used, irrigation helps to break down tissue, improve the cutting efficiency of the file, and reduce the temperature of the file and tooth. Planktonic biofilm bacterial extrusion into the apical region may be inhibited by irrigation [4].

The primary objective of an endodontist is to either prevent an infection from spreading to the periradicular tissue or remove infectious debris and microbes through a root canal. Irrigation depends on the irrigant's mechanism of action and the capacity to interact with the element, material, and structure. Because this dissolves organic matter, removes microbes, serves as a lubricant, and is nontoxic, sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) is an efficient disinfectant [5]. Chemical irrigators are used in the root canal to dissolve tissue remnants, eliminate microorganisms, and thoroughly clean the area without any negative effects. Several irrigating solutions eliminate microbes when they come in contact with microorganisms because they possess antimicrobial activity. These characteristics should be present in the perfect irrigant solution. It should be capable of dissolving the remnants of nonvital pulp, inactivating endotoxins, and having a broad antimicrobial action [6]. It is verified that the intracanal introduction of the irrigating solution provides analgesic-like action, playing a critical component in pain regulation [7]. It cannot be accomplished alone by biomechanical preparation. Therefore, the use of irrigants is a must [8,9].

Review

The irrigation agitation techniques and devices can be classified as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1 Classification of irrigation agitation techniques and devices

Manual agitation technique

Dentists continue to use the manual irrigation technique using needles every day. In this case, a range of gauge needles or cannulas are used to apply the irrigant, which can be applied gently or forcefully [10].

Syringe irrigation with needles/cannulas involves using needles or cannulas with different gauges to dispense an irrigant into a canal. This action can be performed passively or through agitation by pushing and pulling the needle within the canal [11,12]. The size and structure of the irrigation tip greatly affect the flow pattern, speed, depth of reaching, and pressure on the walls and apex of the canal. The gauge of the irrigation tip primarily determines how deeply the irrigant can be introduced into a canal. To carry out a successful endodontic root treatment, it is crucial to effectively eliminate bacteria, bacterial toxins, and remnants of both viable and nonviable pulpal tissue from the root canal [13]. Biomechanical therapy involves using irrigating fluids as lubricants and cleansers to eliminate bacteria and products associated with tissue deterioration [14].

Manual dynamic agitation

In order to work effectively, an irrigant must be closer to the canal walls. Often, the irrigant finds it challenging to access the periapical portion of the canal due to the phenomenon known as the vapor lock effect [15,16]. A snugly fitting gutta-percha cone moved gently upward and downward inside an instrumented canal can enhance the displacement and create an efficient hydrodynamic effect. The elements influencing manual dynamic irrigation include the higher frequency of back-and-forth motion (3.3 Hz) of the gutta-percha point, which leads to greater intracanal pressure changes during pushing movements. This results in more significant fluid movement within the canal than Rinsendo's (Durr Dental Co., Bietigheim-Bissingen, Germany) positive-negative hydrodynamic pressure frequency (1.6 Hz). The latter most likely makes it possible to mix the spent, reacted irrigant more effectively with the fresh, unreacted solution [17].

Machine-assisted agitation technique

The development of manually assisted systems resulted in the evolution of instruments that can slowly rotate into the root canal filled with irrigants using handpieces. Files and other instruments may exhibit a smooth surface with increasing taper or even a surface with lateral extensions of plastic files [18-21]. Ruddle has a rotary handpiece-attached microbrush to help remove dentinal debris from root canals. Microbrush spins at roughly 300 revolutions/minute. These brushes are not meant to irrigate the canal spaces directly. These are planned alternatives for agitating root canal irrigants. Canal Brush (Roeko Canal Brush™, Coltène/Whaledent, Langenau, Germany) is another endodontic microbrush that has just entered the market [22]. This incredibly flexible microbrush can be used manually with a rotating motion and is made entirely of polypropylene. The small, flexible root canal brush with irrigant debris was successfully removed from the canal.

Quantec-E irrigation system

Attached to the Quantec-E Endo System (Sybron Endo, Orange, CA) is the self-containing fluid dispensary unit known as the Quantec-E irrigation system [23]. A greater volume of irrigant would be produced, the irrigant exposure time would increase, and deeper irrigant access inside the root canal would be made possible. Quantec-E irrigation did, according to studies by Walters et al., produce cleaner canal walls and more by removing smear layers and debris from the canal [19,24]. It provides continuous irrigation during instrumentation. During the treatment, it is crucial to maintain a constant flow of irrigant into the root canal rather than delivering it intermittently with a syringe needle. The self-adjusting file (SAF) system is designed for endodontic therapy and minimizes the need for physical intervention during cleaning and shaping procedures. It uses a VATEA irrigation pump and a specialized handpiece head (Rement Dental Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong) that permits an uninterrupted irrigant flow across the file. There are two diameters available: 1.5 and 2.0. Both are incredibly compressible. The dimensions of the 0.5 and 2.0 mm compressed files are 20k and 35k, respectively [25]. The system features continuous irrigation, effectively flushing the root canal with solutions to remove debris, disinfect, and provide clear visibility. Thanks to its self-adjusting action and continuous irrigation, SAF reduces the time required for root canal procedures compared to traditional methods. Clinical studies have shown that SAF effectively cleans and shapes root canals, leading to high success rates and improved patient outcomes.

Sonic irrigation

Tronstad et al. [17] introduced sonic instruments in 1985. Compared to ultrasonic irrigation, it produces minimal shear stresses and works at a frequency of 1-6 kHz. Numerous sonic irrigation tools are available in the marketplace [26]. Endodontic treatments have a higher success rate by using acoustic streaming to activate the disinfectant, and the irrigation process is completed and enhanced. It breaks the layers of smears and enhances debridement [27]. Compared to the syringe irrigation technique, it shows better irrigation for clearing debris and smears of the canal [28]. Endo activator is a mechanic-based system comprising different polymer tips and a handpiece. The tips are adaptable and tough to break. It dislodges the biofilm within the long, tortuous, narrow canal of teeth. It delivers 10,000 cpm/minute [29-31]. Sonic irrigation in endodontics offers several advantages. It facilitates thorough cleaning and disinfection of the root canal system compared to conventional methods. Sonic energy helps better penetrate the irrigation solution into complex anatomical structures, ensuring the comprehensive removal of debris and bacteria. Additionally, it enhances the removal of contaminants from hard-to-reach areas within the root canal, such as lateral canals and isthmuses, which may be challenging to access using traditional techniques. Moreover, sonic irrigation can reduce instrumentation time, improving efficiency during endodontic procedures.

Ultrasonic irrigation

Ultrasonic oscillates at 25- 30 kHz [32,33]. There are two types of ultrasonics: simultaneous ultrasonic instrumentation and irrigation (UI) and passive ultrasonic irrigation [2]. During ultrasonic continuous irrigation, an irrigant is administered intravenously through tubing that is attached to an irrigation-delivering syringe via a Luer lock (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ). At the same time, the ultrasonic handpiece activates the needle [34,35]. PUI offers benefits such as improved penetration into complex structures, better debris and bacteria removal, and enhanced disinfection, especially in challenging areas like isthmuses and lateral canals. Success with PUI hinges on factors like case specifics, practitioner skill, and equipment quality. When used properly, PUI helps to improve treatment results by effectively cleansing and disinfecting the root canal system. Weller et al. first used the term "passive ultrasonic irrigation" [31]. This noncutting technique lessens the possibility of irregularly shaped canal development. During PUI, ultrasonic waves transfer energy from a file to the irrigating solution, resulting in two phenomena. The irrigant undergoes cavitation and streaming [36,37]. Like other endodontic techniques, the success of ultrasonic irrigation depends on several variables, such as the particulars of the case, the skill of the clinician, and the caliber of the tools used. When applied correctly, ultrasonic irrigation can significantly contribute to more comprehensive root canal treatment and improved patient results.

Modern root canal disinfection methods combine the conventional CMP method with ultrasonics and lasers. While lasers have been sold commercially in dentistry since 1990, ultrasonic devices were initially launched in endodontics. Dentistry uses lasers for many purposes: caries detection (DIAGNOdent Pen, KaVo Dental, Biberach an der Riss, Germany), pulpal blood flow diagnosis, dentinal hypersensitivity treatment, pulp capping, pulpotomy, smear layer removal, sterilizing root canals, teeth preparation, enamel etching, gingivectomy, bleaching, periodontal pocket disinfection, calculus removal, and laser photosensitization of the root canal [37,38]. Both the dentin's deeper layers and the surfaces of root canals are susceptible to the bactericidal effects of this kind of laser.

Pressure alteration devices

This appears to be associated with traditional syringe needle irrigant delivery. Because of the air trapping, it is challenging to reach the apical third region of the root canal [38]. Concurrent irrigant conveyance and aspiration through pressure alternation devices offer a viable solution to this problem [39]. The EndoVac system (Discus Dental, Culver City, CA) provided apical negative pressure irrigation. The upper two-thirds of the root canal uses a suction method to clear debris and promote irrigation flow. Macrocannula, microcannula, and the tip of master delivery are its three constituent parts. At the same time that it distributes the irrigant, the master delivery tip expels it. The macrocannula is made of plastic and measures 55 mm long. It is on a titanium handle and has a 0.02 taper for coarseness. Negative pressure thus provides a steady supply of new irrigants to the working region. EndoVac can securely supply the irrigant's instrumenting length without extruding into the periapical region [40,41]. Rinsendo is a pressurized suction device that operates at about 100 rpm [42]. It consists of a cannula and a handpiece with an exit orifice. The irrigation speed is 6.2 mL/minute and is operated by an air compressor. This system involves drawing 65 mL of a 1.6 Hz oscillating rinsing solution from a syringe and transferring it to the root canal using a specially designed cannula. The Rinsendo system underwent evaluation using a split tooth model, revealing its effectiveness lower than manual dynamic irrigation [43].

Photoactivated disinfection

Endodontic irrigation with photoactivated disinfection (PAD) aims to reduce any bacteria in the root canal. The photosensitizer (PS), when coupled with oxygen, produces cytotoxic species and is used in the PAD technique in conjunction with low-intensity visible light. The bacteria perish as a result of this breach in their cell wall. Furthermore, PAD is effective against protozoa and viruses [44,45]. The PS attaches itself to the surface of microorganisms and binds there. It is a highly diluted form of toluidine blue O. It takes up light energy, releases oxygen, and then changes into highly reactive oxygen radicles and ions [46].

Ozone-based delivery system

Three oxygen atoms make up the triatomic molecule known as ozone. It is applied topically as oxygen/ozone gas and ozonated water. As a result of its instability and simple dissociation again into oxygen (O2), singlet oxygen (O1), a strong oxidizing agent that additionally harms microorganisms, is released. Several delivery systems for endodontic irrigation include the OzoTop, Heal Ozone (Kavo), and Neo Ozone Water-S units. Ozonated water was shown by Nagayoshi et al. to be very effective at eliminating gram-positive and negative microorganisms [41,47].

Laser

Recent research has shown that pulsed energy from lasers can activate irrigation solutions. This discovery suggests that using erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet, erbium-doped yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser light in a laser-activation irrigation system may be more effective for removing dentinal debris and smear layer during dental procedures. Moreover, the antibacterial properties of NaOCl are enhanced through lasers. Er:YAG is the best laser for removing dentinal debris and smear layers, according to numerous studies. The optical fiber’s tip emits laser energy that travels along the canal rather than always lateral to the walls. Although a total removal of the bacteria and biofilm was not yet achievable, a delivery system that lets lateral radiation emission attempted to improve the antimicrobial effect to get around this restriction [48,49]. As a result, strong evidence is still lacking for the direct disinfection of root canals using high-power lasers.

Conclusions

To properly clean and disinfect canals during a dental instrumentation procedure, it is recommended to flush a significant volume of NaOCl solution into the canals. After shaping, the canals should be thoroughly washed with citric acid or aqueous EDTA. To rinse each canal, 5-10 mL of the chelating irrigant should be used and left to run for at least one minute. Finally, giving the area a last rinse with an antibacterial solution is advised after removing the smear layer.

Disclosures

Author Contributions

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Concept and design:  Kapil Naladkar, Namrata Jidewar, Manoj Chandak, Swayangprabha Sarangi, Paridhi Agrawal, Tejas Suryawanshi, Palak Hirani

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Kapil Naladkar, Namrata Jidewar, Manoj Chandak, Swayangprabha Sarangi, Paridhi Agrawal, Tejas Suryawanshi, Palak Hirani

Drafting of the manuscript:  Kapil Naladkar, Namrata Jidewar, Manoj Chandak, Swayangprabha Sarangi, Paridhi Agrawal, Tejas Suryawanshi, Palak Hirani

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Kapil Naladkar, Namrata Jidewar, Manoj Chandak, Swayangprabha Sarangi, Paridhi Agrawal, Tejas Suryawanshi, Palak Hirani
==== Refs
References

1 The efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation to remove artificially placed dentine debris from different-sized simulated plastic root canals Int Endod J Lee SJ Wu MK Wesselink PR 607 612 37 2004 15317564
2 Complications during root canal irrigation-literature review and case reports Int Endod J Hülsmann M Hahn W 186 193 33 2000 11307434
3 Irrigation in endodontics Dent Clin North Am Haapasalo M Shen Y Qian W Gao Y 291 312 54 2010 20433979
4 Irrigation of the apical root canal Endod Topics Park E Shen YA Haapasalo M 54 73 27 2012
5 Eradication of endodontic infection by instrumentation and irrigation solutions Endod Topics Haapasalo M Endal U Zandi H Coil JM 77 102 10 2005
6 Negative pressure irrigation system: a reveiw J Pharm Res Ashik Ahamed A David Raj J 13 2019
7 An emerging alternative for pain control: mechanism and applications of cryotherapy in endodontics: pharmaceutical science-dentistry and endodontics Int J Life Sci Pharma Res Sarangi S Chandak M Ikhar A Dayanand M Jidewar N 123 129 13 2023
8 Comparative evaluation of different irrigation techniques with conventional irrigation technique for the removal of double antibiotic paste from root canal-an in vitro study Int J Res Pharm Sci Samrudhi K Anuja I Pradnya N 5578 5583 11 2020 https://ijrps.com/home/article/view/1026
9 Comparative evaluation of apical debris extrusion during root canal preparation using three different rotary file systems F1000Res Rajnekar R Mankar N Nikhade P Chandak M 1 14 12 2023
10 The effect of root canal taper on the irrigant flow: evaluation using an unsteady computational fluid dynamics model Int Endod J Boutsioukis C Gogos C Verhaagen B Versluis M Kastrinakis E van der Sluis LW 909 916 43 2010 20618877
11 Effectiveness of a brush in removing postinstrumentation canal debris J Endod Keir DM Senia ES Montgomery S 323 327 16 1990 2081946
12 The EndoVac method of endodontic irrigation, part 2--efficacy Dent Today Schoeffel GJ 82 87 82, 84, 86-7 27 2008 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18240636/
13 National Center for Biotechnology Information: PubChem patent summary for US-6179617-B1: microbrush for endodontic use JAMDSR 3 2024 Ruddle CJ 52 60 1 2001 https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/patent/US6179617
14 Root canal debridement efficacy of different final irrigation protocols Int Endod J Al-Ali M Sathorn C Parashos P 898 906 45 2012 22486845
15 Evaluation of smear layer removal after use of a canal brush: an SEM study Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod Garip Y Sazak H Gunday M Hatipoglu S 0 6 110 2010
16 Comparison of the Vibringe system with syringe and passive ultrasonic irrigation in removing debris from simulated root canal irregularities J Endod Rödig T Bozkurt M Konietschke F Hülsmann M 1410 1413 36 2010 20647107
17 Effectiveness and safety of a sonic vibratory endodontic instrument Endod Dent Traumatol Tronstad L Barnett F Schwartzben L Frasca P 69 76 1 1985 http://10.1111/j.1600-9657.1985 3861317
18 Pressure alteration techniques in endodontics- a review of literature J Clin Diagn Res Pasricha SK Makkar S Gupta P 0 6 9 2015
19 Efficacy of irrigation with rotary instrumentation J Endod Walters MJ Baumgartner JC Marshall JG 837 839 28 2002 12489655
20 Endodontic file systems with special emphasis on self-adjusting files: a comprehensive review J Oper Dent Endod Misgar BA Goyal V Goyal P Koul T Sharma D Kour T 14 23 6 2021
21 Ultrasonic debridement of root canals: an insight into the mechanisms involved J Endod Ahmad M Pitt Ford TR Crum LA 93 101 13 1987 3471836
22 Newer endodontic irrigation devices: an update J Med Dent Sci Elumalai D Kumar A Tewari RK Mishra SK Iftekhar H Alam S Andrabi M 4 8 13 2014
23 Endodontic disinfection: tsunami irrigation Saudi Endod J Ruddle CJ 7 15 1 2015
24 A quantitative and qualitative analysis of ultrasonic versus sonic endodontic systems on canal cleanliness and obturation Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod Kanter V Weldon E Nair U Varella C Kanter K Anusavice K Pileggi R 809 813 112 2011 21906970
25 Effectiveness of different final irrigant activation protocols on smear layer removal in curved canals J Endod Caron G Nham K Bronnec F Machtou P 1361 1366 36 2010 20647097
26 Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices J Endod Gu LS Kim JR Ling J Choi KK Pashley DH Tay FR 791 804 35 2009 19482174
27 Effects of constraint on the oscillatory pattern of endosonic files J Endod Walmsley AD Williams AR 189 194 15 1989 2607288
28 A scanning electron microscope evaluation of root canal débridement with the endosonic ultrasonic synergistic system Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Cunningham WT Martin H 527 531 53 1982 6954428
29 In vivo debridement efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation following hand-rotary instrumentation in human mandibular molars J Endod Gutarts R Nusstein J Reader A Beck M 166 170 31 2005 15735461
30 The in vivo evaluation of hand/rotary/ultrasound instrumentation in necrotic, human mandibular molars J Endod Burleson A Nusstein J Reader A Beck M 782 787 33 2007 17804312
31 Efficacy of ultrasonic cleaning J Endod Weller RN Brady JM Bernier WE 1 17 6 1980
32 Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literature Int Endod J Van der Sluis LW Versluis M Wu MK Wesselink PR 415 426 40 2007 17442017
33 The solvent action of sodium hypochlorite on pulp tissue of extracted teeth Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Senia ES Marshall FJ Rosen S 96 103 31 1971 5275511
34 Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of a new apical negative pressure irrigating system with conventional irrigation needles in the root canals Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod Shin SJ Kim HK Jung IY Lee CY Lee SJ Kim E 479 484 109 2010 20219604
35 Comparison of the EndoVac system to needle irrigation of root canals J Endod Nielsen BA Craig Baumgartner J 611 615 33 2007 17437884
36 Penetration depth of a dye marker into dentine using a novel hydrodynamic system (RinsEndo) Int Endod J Hauser V Braun A Frentzen M 644 652 40 2007 17532774
37 Foundations of chaotic mixing Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci Wiggins S Ottino JM 937 970 362 2004 15306478
38 Sensitisation of cariogenic bacteria to killing by light from a helium-neon laser J Med Microbiol Burns T Wilson M Pearson GJ 401 405 38 1993 8510132
39 Microbiological evaluation of photo-activated disinfection in endodontics (an in vivo study) Br Dent J Bonsor SJ Nichol R Reid TM Pearson GJ 337 0 337-41, discussion 329 200 2006 16568063
40 Endodontic photoactivated disinfection using a conventional light source: an in vitro and ex vivo study Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod Schlafer S Vaeth M Hørsted-Bindslev P Frandsen EV 634 641 109 2010 20303060
41 Efficacy of ozone on survival and permeability of oral microorganisms Oral Microbiol Immunol Nagayoshi M Fukuizumi T Kitamura C Yano J Terashita M Nishihara T 240 246 19 2004 15209994
42 Laser induced explosive vapor and cavitation resulting in effective irrigation of the root canal. Part 1: a visualization study Lasers Surg Med Blanken J De Moor RJ Meire M Verdaasdonk R 514 519 41 2009 19639622
43 Visualization of irrigant flow and cavitation induced by Er:YAG laser within a root canal model J Endod Matsumoto H Yoshimine Y Akamine A 839 843 37 2011 21787501
44 Disinfection of root canals with photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming J Endod Peters OA Bardsley S Fong J Pandher G Divito E 1008 1012 37 2011 21689561
45 Efficacy of photon induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) on root canals infected with Enterococcus faecalis: a pilot study Endod Prac Jaramillo DE Aprecio RM Angelov N DiVito E McClammy TV 28 33 5 2012 https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Efficacy-of-photon-induced-photoacoustic-streaming-Jaramillo-Aprecio/4538b265d2e5afbb6524925665aac6ac46f0cce8
46 The use of lasers in dentistry: principles of operation and clinical applications Compend Contin Educ Dent Stabholz A Zeltser R Sela M Peretz B Moshonov J Ziskind D Stabholz A 935 948 24 2003 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14733160/ 14733160
47 Effects of Er:YAG laser irradiation on biofilm-forming bacteria associated with endodontic pathogens in vitro J Endod Noiri Y Katsumoto T Azakami H Ebisu S 826 829 34 2008 18570988
48 Er:YAG laser: antimicrobial effects in the root canals of dogs' teeth with pulp necrosis and chronic periapical lesions Photomed Laser Surg Leonardo MR Guillén-Carías MG Pécora JD Ito IY Silva LA 295 299 23 2005 15954818
49 Present status and future directions - irrigants and irrigation methods Int Endod J Boutsioukis C Arias-Moliz MT 588 612 55 Suppl 3 2022 35338652
