
==== Front
Sci Rep
Sci Rep
Scientific Reports
2045-2322
Nature Publishing Group UK London

72619
10.1038/s41598-024-72619-1
Article
Qualitative evaluation of trace elements in commercially packaged forms of tobacco using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy
Kripa Adlene Edith A. 1
Ongole Ravikiran ravikiran.ongole@manipal.edu

1
Unnikrishnan V. K. 2
Adarsh U. K. 2
1 https://ror.org/02xzytt36 grid.411639.8 0000 0001 0571 5193 Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104 Karnataka India
2 https://ror.org/02xzytt36 grid.411639.8 0000 0001 0571 5193 Department of Atomic Molecular Physics, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, 576104 Karnataka India
14 9 2024
14 9 2024
2024
14 215117 12 2023
9 9 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Oral cancer is the most common malignancy in many developing countries, such as India, due to increased consumption of smokeless tobacco. The trace elemental components in commercially packaged forms of tobacco can play a significant role in the pathogenesis of oral cancer. To qualitatively assess the trace elements in various types of commercially packaged forms of tobacco using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). Two popular varieties of ‘Paan masala’ that contained a mixture of slaked lime with areca nut, catechu, and other flavouring agents (tobacco was absent) and four types of packaged tobacco were obtained from ‘Paan’ shops. The contents in the packets were made into pellets using a hydraulic press and subjected to elemental analysis using LIBS. A ten-trial experiment was carried out on all six pellets. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) database was used to assess the emission lines. The elements obtained from commercially packaged tobacco and Paan masala were similar: calcium (Ca), iron (Fe), aluminium (Al), nickel (Ni), and chromium (Cr). Substances that cause DNA damage and carcinogenesis are inorganic elements such as nickel. Our study revealed that carcinogens such as nickel are present in the commercially packaged forms of tobacco and ‘Paan masala’ samples.

Keywords

Oral cancer
Smokeless tobacco
Trace elements
Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy
Subject terms

Oncology
Risk factors
Engineering
Optics and photonics
Physics
Manipal Academy of Higher Education, ManipalOpen access funding provided by Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal

issue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Limited 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) are defined as “any oral mucosal abnormality that is associated with a statistically increased risk of developing oral cancer”. These are diseases with various clinical features, histological classifications such as hyperkeratosis and different grades of dysplasia, and a mixture of risk factors or etiology. OPMDs are classified as oral leukoplakia, oral erythroplakia, proliferative verrucous leukoplakia, oral lichen planus, and oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF)1,2. Leukoplakia and OSMF have a prevalence of 4.11% and 4.96% respectively globally with the highest incidence in the Asian population and its common risk factors are tobacco and betel quid chewing along with alcohol consumption3. It is well established that tobacco in both smokeless and smoked forms plays a major role in causing oral potentially malignant disorders and oral cancer4. The end products of unburned tobacco are sucked, chewed (dipped), gargled, applied to the gums or teeth, and sometimes fine tobacco mixtures are inhaled into the nostril refers to as smokeless tobacco5. It is also often referred to as “spit” or “spitting” tobacco, as chewers spit saliva and extracts of tobacco that accumulate in the oral cavity. This smokeless tobacco usually contains nicotine, tobacco, abrasives, chemicals, sweeteners, and salts. These habits influence oral health and increase the risk of oropharyngeal carcinoma6. The use of smokeless tobacco with or without betel quid is common in many South Asian countries. Smokeless tobacco is used by 26% of the total Indian adult population and is out of proportionally consumed by the middle- and lower-income population7. The reason to consume smokeless tobacco is the belief of less injurious compared to other forms of tobacco, relief from anxiety and toothache, family traditions, lack of awareness, and addiction8. Addiction and dependence on smokeless tobacco is the impact of nicotine in the dopaminergic system which assists in reinforcing and rewarding conduct9. Betel quid is a mixture of substances comprising at least one of the two essential constituents such as tobacco or areca nut in raw, manufactured, or processed form wrapped together in a betel leaf and placed in the mouth or chewed which remains in contact with the mucosa for prolonged period10,11. On the other hand, ‘paan masala’ is a dehydrated, nonperishable preparation of areca nut, catechu (acacia catechu), slaked lime (calcium oxide and calcium hydroxide), cardamom, and a variety of artificial fragrances and flavour12. ‘Paan masala’ is often substituted for smokeless tobacco because it claims to contain no tobacco-related products. Areca nut is the major raw ingredient of paan masala and betel quid, which constitutes of tannins (stimulant and alkaloid). It provides relaxation, and concentration, diminishes hunger and hence these are widely consumed in lower economic populations13. Prolonged exposure to these products causes micromolecular alterations, which are often followed by morphological alterations in the oral mucosa that are clinically evident as OPMDs, which later may have the potential to turn into oral cancer14. The predisposing changes in the oral mucosa of oral cancer patients are referred to as OPMDs which have a statistically increased risk of progressing into malignancies and trace elements play a major role in causing OPMDs15. Trace elements are broadly classified as macro elements (Calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), magnesium (Mg), sodium (Na), potassium (K), chlorine (Cl) and sulphur (S)) and microelements (Iron (Fe), copper (Cu), iodine (I), manganese (Mn), zinc (Zn), molybdenum (Mo), cobalt (Co), fluorine (F), selenium (Se) and chromium (Cr)). While Nickel (Ni), cadmium (Cd), arsenic (As), and lead (Pb) are considered carcinogens16. The process of carcinogenesis begins with damage to the DNA followed by gene mutation due to replication of the damaged DNA that causes alteration in proteins and cancer development. In India, 7% of lesions with severe epithelial dysplasia undergo malignant transformation and the mechanism involved in this malignant progression is still unknown17. There is a need to assess the presence of trace elements in the commercially packaged form of tobacco and paan masala to understand the role of trace elements in the causation of OPMDs and oral cancer. Our objective was to assess the presence of trace elements in commercially packaged tobacco and paan masala using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS).

It is well established via various experimental-analytical procedures that the metal contents in the plant species share similar qualitative composition and differ only in terms of concentrations at which they are present18, which is influenced by multiple physical and environmental factors19. As already mentioned, certain trace elements/heavy metals, like nickel, which are known to induce biological changes upon excess ingestion/consumption are also present in these samples. Thus, it is important to monitor the presence/content (qualitative/quantitative) of these elements in food and other means of human consumption. It is true that the ‘carcinogen-marked’ heavy metals are found in many of the plant materials that are often part of the human diet. However, the instance of tobacco and paan masala is different compared to other products. Since the contact and absorption in such cases with the said carcinogenic elements are direct either through inhalation or extended chewing and in both cases, the frequency of consumption is much higher compared to other food products due to addiction. The objective of the article is to report the presence of these heavy metals in the packaged tobacco/non-tobacco claimed products that should be considered by the policymakers regarding the regulations on the sale and consumption of these products.

Materials and methods

Sample collection

A total of four commercially packaged forms of tobacco and two paan masala packets were obtained from paan shops in Mangalore, India. The list of the ingredients as described by the manufacturers was noted. The ingredients mentioned on the ‘Paan masala’ packets were areca nuts, catechu, lime, permitted spices, cardamom, lime, menthol, and added flavours. The packets clearly mentioned that they did not contain tobacco. All commercially packaged forms of tobacco mentioned the presence of 100% tobacco. The sample names of each ‘paan masala’ and the commercially packaged form of tobacco (for the purpose of the study) were denoted as PM1, PM2, T1, T2, T3, and T4, respectively (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1 Commercially packaged form of tobacco (sample T4).

Sample preparation

The contents in the packet were in a coarse semi powdered form. The contents of the packet were ground, and 2 g of the powder was weighed and made into a pellet using a hydraulic press. The formed pellet (Fig. 2) was further dried using a desiccator. The obtained sample was subjected to laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS).

Fig. 2 Formed pellet of sample T4.

LIBS is a qualitative/semiquantitative elemental characterization technique based on atomic emissions from samples. The LIBS system employed in the current study uses a high-energy pulsed laser (Nd: YAG) operating at 532 nm with a 6 ns pulse width and a 10 Hz repetition rate to ablate the sample. The laser beam was reflected in the orthogonal direction using a glass prism, followed by a biconvex lens (lens 1) with a 6 cm focal length, which focused the beam to a micrometer-size spot on the sample surface. A high-energy laser beam focused on the sample surface creates sufficient energy density to induce ablation of the sample in a localized spot, and a plasma is created. Plasma emits the characteristic emissions of its constituents, which are collected and collimated by the same lens (lens 1) used for focusing the laser. The collimated signal is then focused on to the spectrograph input by another biconvex lens (lens 2) with a focal length of 20 cm. The spectrograph grating disperses the signal in the wavelength domain, which is then recorded using a charged couple device (CCD) detector connected to a personal computer (PC). An exposure time of 10 ms is required to record each spectrum in single-shot mode, where a single pulse from the laser is used to induce and excite the plasma and then collect the corresponding plasma emissions. The spectra recorded from the samples were subjected to data preprocessing, including baseline correction and normalization. It is followed by analysis based on the known-element database (local and NIST database) to qualitatively characterize the samples. From each pellet sample, 10 spectra were recorded from different spots on the pellet to ensure the reproducibility of the identified emissions.

Results

Two different samples of paan masala and four different samples of commercially packaged tobacco were labelled PM1, PM2, T1, T2, T3, and T4, respectively. The LIBS data were collected in the spectral range of 260–520 nm. Ten prominent emission lines from calcium were identified in the analysed spectral range at 316.17 nm, 370.71 nm, 393.75 nm, 396.26 nm, 422.68 nm, 430.53 nm, 431.03 nm, 432.15 nm, 442.76 nm, and 445.75 nm. Nine emission lines of iron were identified from the spectrum, at 285.56 nm, 318.19 nm, 344.05 nm, 358.39 nm, 360.16 nm, 373.72 nm, 400.04 nm, 404.47 nm, and 438.64 nm. Aluminium emissions were detected at 279.86 nm and 309.59 nm. The analysed region contained the prominent emission line from nickel at 280.6 nm. Like nickel, chromium emission was also prominent at a single position at 357.52 nm.

There was no difference in the elemental composition between the groups of ‘Paan masala’, which claimed no tobacco, and those of commercially packaged tobacco (100% tobacco). Hence, the analysed spectral range of both groups was plotted in a single graph, as shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3 Trace elements recognized using the NIST database and characteristics lines are marked.

The absolute intensity values in the LIBS spectrum do not correlate with the concentrations of the respective elements identified unless a calibration plot is constructed with known concentrations of the elements in the samples. Thus, the results of the current study are limited to only a qualitative assessment. The absolute intensity among the analysed samples is tabulated in Tables 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. However, the relative intensity variations of elements between different samples of comparable composition can indicate the relative variations in concentrations of the respective elements as shown in Fig. 4.

Table 1 Average intensity of trace elements present in PM1.

Elements	Most intense line (nm)	Average intensity (counts)	
Al	279.86	3517.75 ± 342.8	
Ni	280.62	2107.22 ± 267	
Cr	357.51	797.66 ± 128.2	
Fe	374.97	2061.4 ± 149.8	
Ca	393.88	55702.7 ± 1162.1	

Table 2 Average intensity of trace elements present in PM2.

Elements	Most intense line (nm)	Average intensity (counts)	
Al	279.86	\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:2105.83\pm\:845.7$$\end{document}	
Ni	280.62	\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:1481.6\pm\:427.1$$\end{document}	
Cr	357.51	\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:2473\pm\:555.1$$\end{document}	
Fe	374.97	\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:751.8\pm\:153.9$$\end{document}	
Ca	393.88	\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:21092.4\pm\:2288.5$$\end{document}	

Table 3 Average intensity of trace elements present in T1.

Elements	Most intense line (nm)	Average intensity (counts)	
Al	279.86	\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:1931.74\pm\:247.6$$\end{document}	
Ni	280.62	\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:1639\pm\:430$$\end{document}	
Cr	357.51	\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:765.6\pm\:102$$\end{document}	
Fe	374.97	\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:250.83\pm\:46.4$$\end{document}	
Ca	393.88	\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:53918.4\pm\:3175.6$$\end{document}	

Table 4 Average intensity of trace elements present in T2.

Elements	Most intense line (nm)	Average intensity (counts)	
Al	279.86	\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:2776.75\pm\:623.5$$\end{document}	
Ni	280.62	\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:1897.75\pm\:401.1$$\end{document}	
Cr	357.51	\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:667.5\pm\:77.2$$\end{document}	
Fe	374.97	\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:1043.67\pm\:134.7$$\end{document}	
Ca	393.88	\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:25718.5\pm\:2989.3$$\end{document}	

Table 5 Average intensity of trace elements present in T3.

Elements	Most intense line (nm)	Average intensity (counts)	
Al	279.86	\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:2328.5\pm\:454$$\end{document}	
Ni	280.62	\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:1507.4\pm\:312$$\end{document}	
Cr	357.51	1014\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:\pm\:\:235.3$$\end{document}	
Fe	374.97	802.85\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:\pm\:145.2$$\end{document}	
Ca	393.88	\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:15131.3\pm\:1771.3$$\end{document}	

Table 6 Average intensity of trace elements present in T4.

Elements	Most intense line (nm)	Average intensity (counts)	
Al	279.86	\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:15100.7\pm\:8631.4$$\end{document}	
Ni	280.62	\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:8631.4\pm\:181.4$$\end{document}	
Cr	357.51	\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:3272.67\pm\:\:709.3$$\end{document}	
Fe	374.97	\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:1105\pm\:380.3$$\end{document}	
Ca	393.88	\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:56523.4\pm\:1303.7$$\end{document}	

Fig. 4 Comparison of variation of trace elements among the analysed samples.

LIBS analysis of packaged tobacco products indicated the presence of 5 trace elements, namely, Al, Cr, Ni, Fe, and Ca.

Interpretation of the statistical analysis

The average relative intensities of the trace elements (Al, Fe, Cr, Ni, and Ca, ) in all six groups of ‘paan masala’ and commercially packaged forms of tobacco were compared using the ANOVA Kruskal Wallis test (Fig. 5). There was a statistically significant difference in the relative intensities of each trace element between different commercially packaged forms of tobacco (p-value < 0.001) that is tabulated in Table 7.

Fig. 5 Kruskal Wallis test to compare the relative spectral intensity of trace elements between commercially packaged forms of tobacco.

Table 7 Kruskal Wallis test to compare the relative spectral intensity of trace elements between commercially packaged forms of tobacco.

Elements	Intensity	Median	Interquartile range	P value	
Al	\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:4626.88\pm\:\:2107.57$$\end{document}	2552.62	4351.17	< 0.001	
Ni	2877.39\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:\pm\:$$\end{document} 1154.99	1768.37	2237.31	< 0.001	
Cr	\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:1498.40\pm\:\:449.10$$\end{document}	905.83	1931.84	< 0.001	
Fe	\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:1002.59\pm\:\:245.02$$\end{document}	923.26	717.54	< 0.001	
Ca	\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:38014.38\pm\:\:7894.27$$\end{document}	39818.45	36306.05	< 0.001	

Discussion

Our study aimed to assess elements in commercially packaged forms of tobacco and ‘paan masala’ that claimed to contain no tobacco. To the best of our knowledge, laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) has not been used to assess the elemental composition of commercially packaged tobacco and paan masala. Since LIBs are a “put and play” method, they have been used for various applications, such as elemental mapping of trace elements in different hard and soft tissues, leading to early diagnosis of malignancies, calculi/stones, biological or dental material such as pellets or powders, and detection of bacteria/viruses in bioaerosols20,21. LIBS aids in the multifaceted detection of elements and does not require sample preparation. Furthermore, it is a noncontact experimental procedure, and all states of matter, such as solid, liquid, and gas, can be assessed22.

It is well established that smokeless tobacco products play a major role in causing OPMDs and oral cancer12. Chiba et al.23 reviewed various toxic elements in tobacco and smokeless tobacco. Various elements, such as Cr, Al, Ni, As, Mn, Cu, Pb, mercury (Hg), and Zn, were detected in the tobacco products. Some trace elements are chemical carcinogens that may be genotoxic or nongenotoxic. Genotoxic carcinogens interact directly with DNA, resulting in chromosomal aberrations and DNA damage. The latter are chemicals that act directly as tumour promoters, induce an inflammatory response, and cause immunosuppression and tissue toxicity. The oxidation states of Cr, Be (beryllium), Ni, Cd, and As are considered carcinogens by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)15.

Ni must be taken up by humans (adults – 45 µg/day) but is injurious when it is taken in excess. Humans are exposed to Ni for various reasons, such as ingestion of contaminated water, cigarette smoking, and contact with the skin from Ni-contaminated water or soil. Nickel sulfides and oxides have a greater risk of causing cancer24. It is known that Ni ions have a lower binding affinity for DNA and combine with histones present in the cell nucleus. Ni-nucleic acid histone complexes that are formed cause the initiation of DNA damage. They initiate carcinogenesis by attaching to DNA protein (histone), causing DNA to mutilate, leading to cross-linking of DNA interstrand and DNA proteins and breakage of the DNA strand25.

Chromium, especially Cr (III), is a nutrient that acts along with insulin to metabolize glucose, fat, and proteins (900 µg/day). The carcinogenic compounds are zinc chromate, calcium chromate, lead chromate, and strontium chromate, which are all hexavalent chromium compounds. The most carcinogenic form of chromium is CrO4 − 2. They initiate carcinogenesis by producing reactive oxygen species (ROS) and suppressing the p53 gene15. The p53 gene is a tumour suppressor gene that plays a major role in cell division, and DNA repair, and inhibits angiogenesis. They function through transcription-mediated apoptosis and G1 cell cycle arrest26. Cr was present in our analysis, and Cr compounds cannot be assessed using LIBS, which was a limitation of our study.

Dhaware et al.27 determined the presence of toxic metals such as As, Cd, Cu, and Pb in various types of Indian smokeless tobacco (gutkha, creamy stuff, khaini, mishri, tooth powder, zarda) products using differential pulse anodic stripping voltammetry (DPASV). There were also negligible concentrations of other elements, such as Ni, Cr, and Hg. Mohammed et al.28 quantified the presence of various elements in Shisha and Doksha tobacco products using energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDXRF). They observed higher concentrations of calcium and other elements, such as Al, Ni, Cr, Fe, Mg, K, Zn, and strontium. Our study showed that all the commercially packaged forms of tobacco have the presence of carcinogenic elements such as Ni and other elements such as Cr, Fe, and Al were also observed. Patients who chewed various smokeless tobacco and smoked tobacco products with confirmed OSMF were assessed by Bagewasi et al.29 and Kode et al.30 to determine the role of trace elements in the etiopathogenesis of OSMF. They also reported that there was an increase in salivary copper levels in patients with OSMF who chewed various tobacco products. There was also an alteration in the Cu/Zn ratio and decreased Fe levels in patients with OSMF.

Surprisingly, there was no difference in the qualitative elemental composition of commercially packaged tobacco and ‘paan masala’ packets (which claimed no tobacco) in our study. It is true that our current attempt does not provide any leads to the quantitative assessment of these heavy metals. But with the LIBS technique, which has a detection limit of ppm levels (on direct sample analysis) in general, it was able to detect these elements, hinting at the abundance of these heavy metals in their content. We agree that these are indirect assumptions on the quantitative analysis part that should be verified using calibration-based/ calibration-free approaches in LIBS in future studies of the work.

Conclusion

The consumption of smokeless forms of tobacco has increased over the past decade in India and Southeast Asia. Packaged forms of tobacco and betel quid are popularly consumed in India. Our study revealed the presence of various elements, such as calcium, aluminium, iron, chromium, and the known carcinogenic element nickel. Interestingly, the commercially packaged form (Paan masala), claimed by the manufacturer to be tobacco-free, has a similar composition to that of tobacco-containing packets. Recently, paan masala has gained more popularity over smokeless forms of tobacco owing to numerous commercial advertisements endorsing its use as a mouth freshener. This seems to have led people to believe paan masala to be harmless. Our study will hopefully generate debate amongst policymakers to relook at the potentially detrimental effects of paan masala and if required make laws regulating the sale and consumption of these products as well. Further, we recommend an assessment of the elemental composition of blood, saliva, and tissue specimens in patients with deleterious chewing habits. We hope that this study will provide insight into the role of elements involved in the etiopathogenesis of OPMDs and oral cancer.

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful for the support provided by the Device Development Program, Department of Science & Technology (DST), Government of India (DST/TDT/DDP-26/2018) and Department of Atomic Energy (DAE), Board of Research in Nuclear Sciences (BRNS), Government of India (34/14/04/2014-BRNS).

Author contributions

Kripa Adlene Edith A—data curation, Methodology, original draft, review, and editing. Ravikiran Ongole—data curation, conceptualization, supervision, original draft, review, and editing. Unnikrishnan V K—acquisition, analysis, interpretation of data. Adarsh U K—acquisition, analysis, interpretation of data, and editing.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal

Data availability

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Lorini L Overview of oral potentially malignant disorders: From risk factors to specific therapies Cancers (Basel) 2021 13 1 16 10.3390/cancers13153696
Lorini, L. et al. Overview of oral potentially malignant disorders: From risk factors to specific therapies. Cancers (Basel). 13, 1–16 (2021).10.3390/cancers13153696
2. Warnakulasuriya S Oral potentially malignant disorders: A consensus report from an international seminar on nomenclature and classification, Convened by the WHO Collaborating Centre for oral Cancer Oral Dis. 2021 27 1862 1880 10.1111/odi.13704 33128420
Warnakulasuriya, S. et al. Oral potentially malignant disorders: A consensus report from an international seminar on nomenclature and classification, Convened by the WHO Collaborating Centre for oral Cancer. Oral Dis. 27, 1862–1880 (2021).33128420 10.1111/odi.13704
3. Kumari P Debta P Dixit A Oral potentially malignant disorders: Etiology, pathogenesis, and transformation into oral cancer Front. Pharmacol. 2022 13 1 24 10.3389/fphar.2022.825266
Kumari, P., Debta, P. & Dixit, A. Oral potentially malignant disorders: Etiology, pathogenesis, and transformation into oral cancer. Front. Pharmacol. 13, 1–24 (2022).10.3389/fphar.2022.825266
4. Vini M Detection of trace metals among the most commonly available smoked and smokeless tobacco products J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 2017 9 1855 1857
Vini, M. et al. Detection of trace metals among the most commonly available smoked and smokeless tobacco products. J. Pharm. Sci. Res. 9, 1855–1857 (2017).
5. Group, I. A. for R. on C. W. Personal Habits and Indoor Combustions. Volume 100 E, A Review of Human Carcinogens. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans (2009).
6. Waheed S Siddique N Rahman S Evaluation of trace elements in chewing tobacco and snuff using instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) and atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) Radiochim. Acta 2009 97 763 769 10.1524/ract.2009.1672
Waheed, S., Siddique, N. & Rahman, S. Evaluation of trace elements in chewing tobacco and snuff using instrumental neutron activation analysis (INAA) and atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS). Radiochim. Acta. 97, 763–769 (2009).10.1524/ract.2009.1672
7. Sujay Shah, S. S., Dave, B., Shah, B. D. R. & Mehta, R. S. T. R. & Rutvik Dave, R. D. Socioeconomic and Cultural Impact of Tobacco in India (2018).
8. Rahman MA Why do Bangladeshi people use smokeless tobacco products? Asia-Pacific J. Public. Health 2015 27 NP2197 NP2209 10.1177/1010539512446957
Rahman, M. A. et al. Why do Bangladeshi people use smokeless tobacco products? Asia-Pac. J. Public. Health 27, NP2197–NP2209 (2015).10.1177/1010539512446957
9. Dani JA De Biasi M Cellular mechanisms of nicotine addiction Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2001 70 439 446 10.1016/S0091-3057(01)00652-9 11796143
Dani, J. A. & De Biasi, M. Cellular mechanisms of nicotine addiction. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 70, 439–446 (2001).11796143 10.1016/S0091-3057(01)00652-9
10. Patidar KA Parwani R Wanjari SP Patidar AP Various terminologies associated with areca nut and tobacco chewing: A review J. Oral Maxillofac. Pathol. 2015 19 69 10.4103/0973-029X.157205 26097311
Patidar, K. A., Parwani, R., Wanjari, S. P. & Patidar, A. P. Various terminologies associated with areca nut and tobacco chewing: A review. J. Oral Maxillofac. Pathol. 19, 69 (2015).26097311 10.4103/0973-029X.157205
11. Niaz K Smokeless tobacco (paan and Gutkha) consumption, prevalence, and contribution to oral cancer Epidemiol. Health 2017 39 e2017009 10.4178/epih.e2017009 28292008
Niaz, K. et al. Smokeless tobacco (paan and Gutkha) consumption, prevalence, and contribution to oral cancer. Epidemiol. Health 39, e2017009 (2017).28292008 10.4178/epih.e2017009
12. Niaz, K. et al. Smokeless tobacco (paan and Gutkha) consumption, prevalence, and contribution to oral cancer. Epidemiol. Health 39 (2017).
13. Farooq, A. D. & Abbas, G. General Aspects of Areca Nut Addiction. Neuropathology of Drug Addictions and Substance Misuse Volume 3: General Processes and Mechanisms, Prescription Medications, Caffeine and Areca, Polydrug Misuse, Emerging Addictions and Non-Drug Addictions, vol. 3 (Elsevier Inc., 2016).
14. Islam S How each component of betel quid is involved in oral carcinogenesis: Mutual interactions and synergistic effects with other carcinogens—A review article Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2019 21 1 13 10.1007/s11912-019-0800-8
Islam, S. et al. How each component of betel quid is involved in oral carcinogenesis: Mutual interactions and synergistic effects with other carcinogens—A review article. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 21, 1–13 (2019).10.1007/s11912-019-0800-8
15. Mulware SJ Trace Elements and Carcinogenicity: A Subject in Review 3 Biotech 2013 3 85 96 10.1007/s13205-012-0072-6 28324563
Mulware, S. J. Trace elements and carcinogenicity: A subject in review. 3 Biotech 3, 85–96 (2013).28324563 10.1007/s13205-012-0072-6
16. IARC. List of Classifications by Cancer Sites with Sufficient or Limited Evidence in Humans, Volumes 1 to 113 * Cancer Site Carcinogenic Agents with Sufficient Evidence in Humans Agents with Limited Evidence in Humans Lip, Oral Cavity, and Pharynx List of Cl 1–12 (2020).
17. Speight PM Khurram SA Kujan O Oral potentially malignant disorders: Risk of progression to malignancy Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 2018 125 612 627 10.1016/j.oooo.2017.12.011 29396319
Speight, P. M., Khurram, S. A. & Kujan, O. Oral potentially malignant disorders: Risk of progression to malignancy. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 125, 612–627 (2018).29396319 10.1016/j.oooo.2017.12.011
18. Kumar V Sharma A Bhardwaj R Thukral AK Elemental composition of plants and multivariate analysis Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett. 2019 42 45 50 10.1007/s40009-018-0715-1
Kumar, V., Sharma, A., Bhardwaj, R. & Thukral, A. K. Elemental composition of plants and multivariate analysis. Natl. Acad. Sci. Lett. 42, 45–50 (2019).10.1007/s40009-018-0715-1
19. Watanabe T Evolutionary control of leaf element composition in plants: Rapid report New. Phytol. 2007 174 516 523 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02078.x 17447908
Watanabe, T. et al. Evolutionary control of leaf element composition in plants: Rapid report. New. Phytol. 174, 516–523 (2007).17447908 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02078.x
20. Anabitarte, F., Cobo, A. & Lopez-Higuera, J. M. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy: Fundamentals, applications, and challenges. ISRN Spectrosc. 1–12 (2012).
21. Gaudiuso R Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy for human and animal health: A review Spectrochim Acta B Spectrosc. 2019 152 123 148 10.1016/j.sab.2018.11.006
Gaudiuso, R. et al. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy for human and animal health: A review. Spectrochim Acta B Spectrosc. 152, 123–148 (2019).10.1016/j.sab.2018.11.006
22. Yu X Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy application in environmental monitoring of water quality: A review Environ. Monit. Assess. 2014 186 8969 8980 10.1007/s10661-014-4058-1 25255856
Yu, X. et al. Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy application in environmental monitoring of water quality: A review. Environ. Monit. Assess. 186, 8969–8980 (2014).25255856 10.1007/s10661-014-4058-1
23. Chiba M Masironi R Toxic and trace elements in tobacco and tobacco smoke Bull. World Health Organ. 1992 70 269 275 1600587
Chiba, M. & Masironi, R. Toxic and trace elements in tobacco and tobacco smoke. Bull. World Health Organ. 70, 269–275 (1992).1600587
24. Rodríguez-Tomàs, E. et al. Trace elements under the spotlight: A powerful nutritional tool in cancer. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 68 (2021).
25. Guo H Nickel Carcinogenesis Mechanism: DNA Damage Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019 20 1 18 10.3390/ijms20194690
Guo, H. et al. Nickel carcinogenesis mechanism: DNA damage. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 1–18 (2019).10.3390/ijms20194690
26. Approach C Practice C Contemporary oral Medicine Contemp. Oral Med. 2019 10.1007/978-3-319-72303-7
Approach, C. & Practice, C. Contemporary oral medicine. Contemp. Oral Med.10.1007/978-3-319-72303-7 (2019).10.1007/978-3-319-72303-7
27. Dhaware D Deshpande A Khandekar RN Chowgule R Determination of toxic metals in indian smokeless tobacco products Sci. World J. 2009 9 1140 1147 10.1100/tsw.2009.132
Dhaware, D., Deshpande, A., Khandekar, R. N. & Chowgule, R. Determination of toxic metals in indian smokeless tobacco products. Sci. World J. 9, 1140–1147 (2009).10.1100/tsw.2009.132
28. Mohammad AB Mohammad SHK Mohammad MK Khan AS Al-Hajjaj MS Quantification of trace elements in different Dokha and Shisha tobacco products using EDXRF J. Anal. Toxicol. 2019 43 E7 E22 10.1093/jat/bky095 30462216
Mohammad, A. B., Mohammad, S. H. K., Mohammad, M. K., Khan, A. S. & Al-Hajjaj, M. S. Quantification of trace elements in different Dokha and Shisha tobacco products using EDXRF. J. Anal. Toxicol. 43, E7–E22 (2019).30462216 10.1093/jat/bky095
29. Bagewadi, S. B. et al. Estimation of Salivary Copper, Zinc, Iron, and Copper-to-Zinc Ratio in Oral Submucous Fibrosis Patients: A Case–Control Study 2–5 (2022).
30. Ankolekar Kode M Rashmiraj Karjodkar F Estimation of the serum and the salivary trace elements in OSMF patients J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2013 7 1215 1218 23905144
Ankolekar Kode, M. & Rashmiraj Karjodkar, F. Estimation of the serum and the salivary trace elements in OSMF patients. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 7, 1215–1218 (2013).23905144
