
==== Front
Nat Commun
Nat Commun
Nature Communications
2041-1723
Nature Publishing Group UK London

52021
10.1038/s41467-024-52021-1
Article
Dual client binding sites in the ATP-independent chaperone SurA
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1670-7356
Schiffrin Bob 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6656-1578
Crossley Joel A. 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7160-6136
Walko Martin 12
Machin Jonathan M. 1
Nasir Khan G. 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3765-0325
Manfield Iain W. 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9852-6366
Wilson Andrew J. 24
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0802-5937
Brockwell David J. 1
Fessl Tomas 3
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2437-7761
Calabrese Antonio N. 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3079-8039
Radford Sheena E. s.e.radford@leeds.ac.uk

1
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6165-8509
Zhuravleva Anastasia a.zhuravleva@leeds.ac.uk

1
1 https://ror.org/024mrxd33 grid.9909.9 0000 0004 1936 8403 Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
2 https://ror.org/024mrxd33 grid.9909.9 0000 0004 1936 8403 Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, School of Chemistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
3 grid.14509.39 0000 0001 2166 4904 Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
4 https://ror.org/03angcq70 grid.6572.6 0000 0004 1936 7486 Present Address: School of Chemistry, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
14 9 2024
14 9 2024
2024
15 807119 1 2024
23 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
The ATP-independent chaperone SurA protects unfolded outer membrane proteins (OMPs) from aggregation in the periplasm of Gram-negative bacteria, and delivers them to the β-barrel assembly machinery (BAM) for folding into the outer membrane (OM). Precisely how SurA recognises and binds its different OMP clients remains unclear. Escherichia coli SurA comprises three domains: a core and two PPIase domains (P1 and P2). Here, by combining methyl-TROSY NMR, single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer (smFRET), and bioinformatics analyses we show that SurA client binding is mediated by two binding hotspots in the core and P1 domains. These interactions are driven by aromatic-rich motifs in the client proteins, leading to SurA core/P1 domain rearrangements and expansion of clients from collapsed, non-native states. We demonstrate that the core domain is key to OMP expansion by SurA, and uncover a role for SurA PPIase domains in limiting the extent of expansion. The results reveal insights into SurA-OMP recognition and the mechanism of activation for an ATP-independent chaperone, and suggest a route to targeting the functions of a chaperone key to bacterial virulence and OM integrity.

Dual binding sites are identified in the outer membrane chaperone SurA, providing substrate recognition and mechanistic insights into this ATP-independent chaperone.

Subject terms

Solution-state NMR
Single-molecule biophysics
Chaperones
https://doi.org/10.13039/501100000268 RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/T000635/1 Zhuravleva Anastasia https://doi.org/10.13039/100004440 Wellcome Trust (Wellcome) 094232/Z/10/Z 105615/Z/14/Z 094232/Z/10/Z Zhuravleva Anastasia issue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Limited 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

The outer membrane (OM) of Gram-negative bacteria is key to cell survival and virulence, providing structural integrity and presenting a barrier to antibiotics, bile salts and detergents1,2. The OM bilayer is densely packed with OM proteins (OMPs)3–5, that form cylindrical β-barrel structures of varying size (8–26 strands in E. coli)6–8. These proteins perform a variety of functions, including nutrient acquisition, efflux of toxic molecules, and OM assembly, and play critical roles in pathogenesis8. OMPs have a complex biogenesis pathway: they are synthesised on cytoplasmic ribosomes and bind to the chaperones Trigger Factor and SecB, before their Sec mediated secretion into the periplasm9. Therein, they are maintained in a soluble and folding-competent state by periplasmic chaperones (e.g., SurA, Skp, FkpA, and Spy)10,11, before being folded into the OM by the essential OMP complex known as the β-barrel assembly machinery (BAM)12–14. In E. coli, BAM is a ~ 203 kDa heteropentameric complex, consisting of the conserved subunit BamA, itself a 16-stranded OMP, and four lipoproteins (BamB-E)15–18.

Current evidence suggests that OMPs fold in vivo by sequential formation of β-strands that is templated by the N-terminal β-strand of BamA’s β-barrel (β1) making a β-augmentation interaction with the C-terminal β-strand of the incoming OMP substrate7,19–22. The C-terminal strand in OMPs typically contains a β-signal sequence [ζxGxx[Ω/Φ]x[Ω/Φ] where ζ is a polar residue; Ω is an aromatic residue; Φ is a hydrophobic residue and x is any residue. The β-signal sequence, and in particular its final residue, plays a pivotal role in OMP assembly in vivo23,24 and in vitro24–26. Consistent with this model, a recently discovered antibiotic, darobactin, acts as a potent antibacterial by mimicking and inhibiting the OMP: BamA β-augmentation interaction at this site27–29. This model of BAM-catalysed OMP assembly suggests that chaperones need to deliver unfolded OMPs to BAM for their folding in a vectorial manner, commencing with their C-terminal β-strand.

SurA is thought to be the major OMP chaperone in the periplasm and the primary route for OMP delivery to BAM30,31. Deletion of SurA leads to loss of OM integrity, upregulation of the σE envelope stress response and increased permeability of the OM to large antibiotics, such as vancomycin and rifampicin30,32–36. SurA is also involved in the biogenesis of virulence factors, including adhesins, pili, and autotransporters37–46, and deletion of SurA restores antibiotic sensitivity in a multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain47. In E. coli, SurA contains three domains: a core comprising the N-terminal and C-terminal regions, and two tandem peptidyl prolyl isomerase (PPIase) domains (P1 and P2), only the latter of which is enzymatically functional (Fig. 1a)48. The isolated core domain has chaperone activity49, and multiple lines of evidence point to functional roles for the P1 and/or P2 domains in facilitating the prevention of OMP aggregation and the delivery of OMPs to BAM35,41,49–52. Dynamic domain rearrangements between the core and PPIase domains have been proposed to play a role in SurA activity (Fig. 1a, b), although how this disfavours aggregation and promotes delivery to BAM is unclear50,53–56.Fig. 1 Structure, conformations and domain architecture of E. coli SurA.

a Crystal structure of wild-type (WT) E. coli SurA (PDB: 1M5Y48) with missing residues added using MODELLER56,119. In this structure the P1 domain is bound to the core domain (named here, SurA core-P1 closed). Regions are coloured grey (N-terminal region of the core domain), green (P1), yellow (P2) and orange (C-terminal region of the core domain). This colour scheme for SurA domains is used throughout. b Model of WT SurA in which the P1 domain is extended away from the core domain (named here SurA core-P1 open). The model was built using MODELLER56,119 and the crystal structures of full-length SurA (PDB: 1M5Y48) and SurA-ΔP2 (PDB: 2PV359). c Bar chart showing the percentage of SurA homologues from the InterPro family IPRO15391 (14,422 homologues) which contain at least one PPIase domain (1+PPIase) or are core domain only (Core only) homologues. d Domain architecture of E. coli SurA-WT and the SurA domain deletion variants used in this study. The signal sequence was not present in the constructs used here, but the numbering used reflects the gene numbering and includes the signal peptide (residues 1–22) (white). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

How SurA achieves its specificity for OMP sequences is also unknown, with previous studies indicating a preference for Ar-X-Ar and Ar-Ar containing sequences57 (where Ar is an aromatic residue and X is any amino acid), or aromatic-enriched sequences containing an Ar-X-Ar-X-Pro motif58. Accordingly, the peptide WEYIPNV was shown to bind SurA with µM affinity (Kd 1–14 µM)58, with X-ray crystallography showing that this peptide binds to the P1 domain56,59. This led to a model for SurA-client recognition in which the P1 domain confers SurA’s specificity for OMP sequences, with the core domain acting as a more general chaperone35,59. Structures of a second aromatic-rich peptide (NFTLKFWDIFRK) bound to the P1 domain (PDB: 2PV2), and to a SurA construct lacking the P2 domain, named SurA-∆P2 (PDB: 2PV3), support the view that the P1 and/or core domains are important players in SurA-client recognition59. It remains unclear, however, whether SurA-client interactions involve a diffuse binding interface between core and P1, or if binding involves specific binding sites, and how SurA inter-domain re-arrangements, that are known to occur upon client binding56, mediate its chaperone function.

Here we address these questions using methyl-TROSY NMR, smFRET, binding assays using different OMPs and OMP-derived peptides, and bioinformatic analysis of conservation across SurA sequences. The results reveal that SurA has two conserved client binding hotspots that mediate affinity for unfolded OMP substrates, one in the core domain and one in the P1 domain, and add a distinct dimension to previous models suggesting that SurA binds its clients via a large and diffuse binding interface54,56. The discovery of the two binding hotspots provides an opportunity to target these sites with small molecules to attenuate virulence and increase bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics by inhibiting a chaperone key to biogenesis of the OM.

Results

SurA domains tune the conformational properties of a bound OMP client

We began our investigations into the role of the different SurA domains in OMP binding by examining the conservation of PPIase domains in SurA homologues across bacterial species. Using AlphaFold2 (Methods)60,61, we determined the number and taxonomy of organisms containing SurA sequences that contain only a core domain, versus those that contain one or more PPIase domains. The analysis revealed that >99% of SurA homologues contain at least one PPIase domain (99.5% of 14,244 homologues) (Fig. 1c), with the few examples of sequences which lack PPIase domains largely restricted to bacteria specialised to extreme environments (Source Data file). This suggests that the presence of at least one PPIase domain is functionally important for bacterial survival and/or virulence.

Previous small-angle neutron scattering (SANS) and smFRET experiments have shown that binding to SurA expands its (unfolded) OMP clients54,62,63. However, the roles of the different SurA domains in expansion were unknown. To address this question, we used pulsed interleaved excitation smFRET (Supplementary Methods) to monitor the effects of binding SurA-WT, or a construct lacking both PPIase domains (SurA-core) (Fig. 1d), on the conformation and dynamics of the model OMP, OmpX56,64,65. Building on recent work63, we labelled the N- and C-termini of OmpX with a FRET donor and acceptor dye pair (Methods), and used smFRET to monitor OmpX conformations under different conditions. Fluorescence anisotropy experiments indicated that both dyes at both termini have sufficient rotational freedom to allow changes in FRET values to be assigned to OmpX end-to-end distances (Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Methods).

Unfolded OmpX diluted from high concentrations of denaturant into low (0.1 M) urea (apo-OmpX) yielded a broad raw FRET distribution (Eraw) with an maximum at ~0.85, suggesting a distribution of conformational species ranging from collapsed to more expanded species in rapid equilibrium (Fig. 2a, upper two panels). Non-random-coil chain behaviour of unfolded OMPs in low amounts of denaturant is well-established in the field54,63,66, as might be expected for an unfolded protein poised to fold once it encounters a bilayer. By contrast, OmpX fully unfolded in 4 M urea resulted in a narrower distribution with a significantly lower Eraw maximum (~0.45) (Supplementary Fig. 1d), consistent with a more highly unfolded ensemble, as reported previously63,66,67.Fig. 2 smFRET captures the conformational dynamics of unfolded OmpX in the presence or absence of SurA variants.

a Schematic showing OmpX (black line) with donor and acceptor fluorophores on the N- and C-termini (green and red) with example alternate conformers shaded in grey (top), Eraw histogram (middle) and BVA analysis (lower) for apo-OmpX. The solid black line represents the expected standard deviation for a static (ms timescale) FRET population. The white circles show the mean si for bin widths of 0.05 of Eraw. b OmpX + SurA-WT and (c) OmpX + SurA-core with panels as in (a). The schematic of SurA is coloured according to Fig. 1. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

When apo-OmpX is bound to SurA-WT (in 0.1 M urea) the smFRET distribution broadens and its maximum is shifted to a lower Emax value (~0.7) compared with that of apo-OmpX, consistent with a shift in equilibrium to favour more expanded conformations. Hence, binding to the chaperone results in a net expansion of the collapsed chain, as previously reported63 (Fig. 2b, upper two panels). Remarkably, the addition of SurA-core shifts the Eraw values of OmpX to even lower Emax values compared to the protein alone and bound to SurA-WT (Eraw maxima of ~0.45), with a concomitant depletion of species with higher apparent Eraw values (Fig. 2c, upper two panels). This suggests that the P1 and P2 domains modulate the conformations and dynamics of SurA-bound OMP clients. Both SurA-WT and SurA-core have been shown to bind to unfolded OMPs with similar affinity (~μM) and with Hill coefficients > 149,50, suggesting that multiple copies of SurA variants could be bound to each unfolded OmpX chain. One contribution to the greater expansion observed for SurA-core could be additional SurA-core molecules bound to OmpX compared with SurA-WT, although microscale thermophoresis (MST) experiments indicated similar Hill coefficients for the binding of OmpX to both variants, consistent with previous results50 (Supplementary Fig. 2).

We next investigated the timescales of dynamics of the OmpX chain of the different samples apo-OmpX (in 0.1 M and 4 M urea) and bound to SurA-WT or SurA-core (in 0.1 M urea). Using Burst Variance Analysis (BVA) and corrected FRET efficiency vs normalised fluorescence lifetime we probed for dynamics on ms and faster timescales68,69 (Methods). Dynamic exchange between species with different E values are observed on both timescales for unfolded apo-OmpX in 0.1 M urea, as well as OmpX bound to SurA-WT and SurA-core (Fig. 2a–c, lower panels, Supplementary Fig. 1). This is consistent with the behaviour expected for a collapsed unfolded chain where dynamics are limited by inter residue interactions in the unfolded-state ensemble66. By contrast, ms dynamics are not observed in OmpX in 4 M urea in the BVA analysis (Supplementary Fig. 1d) while faster dynamics are observed as evidenced by the lifetime analysis (Supplementary Fig. 1d), consistent with the behaviour expected for a fully unfolded polymer66.

Collectively, the results show that binding to the SurA core domain alone is sufficient to cause a net expansion of unfolded OmpX. In addition, they suggest a role for the PPIase domains in limiting the extent of expansion of the bound client compared to SurA-core, which causes the greatest degree of expansion and lacks these domains.

The SurA core and P1 domains are involved in client binding

Previous smFRET experiments have shown that client binding alters the interactions between the P1 and core domains of SurA56, although data are currently lacking on precisely where, and how, the different SurA domains interact with their clients and the residues that determine their molecular recognition. To map the client binding regions on SurA in more detail we used site-specific methyl labelling and TROSY NMR. We specifically labelled the δ1 carbon atoms of isoleucine (29 residues) and ε carbon atoms of methionine (14 residues) with 13C, providing residue-specific probes that span all three domains of SurA (Supplementary Fig. 3a–c)70,71. Of the resulting 43 peaks in the spectrum of apo-SurA (i.e., without client), 33 were not overlapped or broadened, and could be assigned unambiguously using mutation (see Methods), providing probes for all three domains (18 in the core, 7 in P1, and 8 in P2). While the majority of peaks have high intensity, three non-overlapped peaks were broadened and of low intensity (M46, I217 and M400) (Supplementary Fig. 3d, e). These three residues are located at, or close to, the core-P1 interface in the crystal structure (Supplementary Fig. 3f, g), suggesting that core-P1 conformational rearrangements occur on an intermediate NMR timescale (~µs-ms)72. These conformational rearrangements are likely due to interconversions between the core-P1 closed and open states (Fig. 1a, b), as observed using smFRET56 and SANS53. Analysis of chemical shift changes for the SurA domain deletion variants SurA-∆P1 (that lacks the P1 domain), SurA-∆P2 (that lacks the P2 domain) and SurA-core (that lacks both PPIase domains) (Fig. 1d), confirmed that the P1 domain indeed makes extensive interactions with the core, while P2 is more remote (Supplementary Figs. 4, 5).

We next analysed the effect of adding unfolded OmpX on the chemical shift and linewidths of SurA-WT 13CH3 resonances using NMR (Fig. 3a–e, Supplementary Fig. 6). Both of these types of peak changes (shifts and/or broadening), can report on binding or conformational changes caused by binding at the location of the corresponding 13CH3 probe73,74. To ensure a substantial fraction of bound SurA (chosen as ~60% given a Kd of ~1 µM56,63) we employed 5 µM concentrations of both SurA and unfolded OmpX. This ensured sufficient binding, and good signal to noise within a few hours data acquisition (Methods), while maintaining an OMP concentration low enough to minimise aggregation75. Reductions in the peak intensity of methyl-TROSY resonances of SurA-WT were observed upon the addition of unfolded OmpX, whereas only small chemical shift perturbations (CSPs) were detected (Fig. 3c, Supplementary Fig. 6). Such behaviour (changes in intensity, but only small CSPs) has been observed previously for interactions between other chaperones and their unfolded substrates76–78, suggesting heterogeneous binding interactions and/or intermediate exchange dynamics. Notably, the intensities of most peaks corresponding to residues in the SurA core domain were affected, consistent with this domain being a major location of OMP interactions35,49,56 (Fig. 3c). Similarly, 6 out of 7 peaks corresponding to residues in the P1 domain were reduced in intensity by ~50% upon OmpX binding, with one peak (M231) severely affected. By contrast, the peaks representing residues in the P2 domain were much less affected, with small (10–40%) reductions in intensity for all resonances, likely due to the slower molecular tumbling of the chaperone in its client-bound state79. We mapped the Z-scores (Methods)80 of the SurA-WT peak intensity changes in the presence of OmpX (Fig. 3d) onto a model of the chaperone in a core-P1 open state (Fig. 3e). This analysis showed that regions in the core and P1 domains directly interact with OmpX, while P2 is largely uninvolved in OmpX binding, consistent with previous cross-linking mass spectrometry (MS) and hydrogen exchange MS (HDX-MS) data56.Fig. 3 Dual binding hotspots in SurA mediate affinity for OMP substrates.

a OmpX-derived peptides analysed here mapped onto the crystal structure of natively folded OmpX (PDB: 1QJ864). b OmpX sequence highlighting peptides analysed, coloured as in (a). Ar-X-Ar and Ar-Ar motifs are highlighted with yellow boxes. c Raw intensity change data and (d) Z-score plots of peak intensity ratios for SurA-WT binding to OmpX. Peaks which are broadened below the noise in the intensity ratio plots are indicated by an asterisk. For these peaks, the noise value for the bound spectra was used in the calculation of Z-scores. Signal to noise ratios were used for the calculation of errors in peak intensities (Methods). e Residues showing significant Z-scores for SurA-WT binding to OmpX mapped onto a model of SurA in a core-P1 open conformation. The 13C- labelled δ1 and ε carbon atoms of Ile and Met residues, respectively, are shown as spheres coloured by Z-score (red for Z-scores > 0 and white for Z-scores <= 0). f Raw CSP data and (g) Z-score plots of CSPs for SurA-WT binding to the OmpX-derived KHD (β6) peptide, comprising a 15-residue sequence that forms β-strand 6 in the OmpX native state. h Residues showing different CSP Z-scores for SurA-WT binding to the KHD (β6) peptide mapped onto a SurA core-P1-open model (coloured as in (g)). The effects of other OmpX-derived peptides on the SurA spectrum are shown in Supplementary Figs. 9, 10. i Model of SurA-WT in the core-P1 open state bound with peptides modelled in at the two binding hotspots. A short polypeptide sequence from a neighbouring molecule in the crystal structure (PDB: 1M5Y48) (cyan) is located in the core domain binding crevice. A peptide identified by phage-display which binds to the SurA P1 domain (WEYIPNV)58 (pink) is modelled in from the P1-WEYIPNV peptide crystal structure (PDB: 2PV159). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Next, to examine the effect of client size and sequence on SurA interactions, we studied the interactions between SurA and different OMPs: tOmpA (19 kDa), OmpF (37 kDa), and tBamA, the transmembrane domain of BamA (43 kDa) (Supplementary Fig. 7a). These clients bind SurA-WT with Kd 3.7 ± 1.0 μM, Ki 5.2 ± 1.7 µM, and Kd 1.4 ± 0.1 μM for tOmpA50, OmpF81 and tBamA (Supplementary Fig. 7b), respectively (the inhibition constant (Ki) for binding of OmpF to SurA was obtained from phage-based ELISA assays81). In each case, the perturbation patterns in NMR resonances were similar to those observed when SurA binds OmpX, with key interactions involving the core and P1 binding sites, and P2 largely uninvolved (Supplementary Fig. 8).

OMP binding hotspots in the core and P1 domains of SurA

While the NMR data presented above suggest that OmpX engages in widespread interactions involving the SurA core and P1 domains, this raises the question of which interaction sites on SurA are key for OmpX recognition and binding affinity. To identify whether, and how, different regions of SurA interact with different residues in the sequence of OmpX, we examined the effect of binding of six short (15 residue) peptides on the NMR spectrum of methyl-labelled SurA-WT. These peptides correspond to regions that form β-strands in native OmpX and also contain Ar-X-Ar or Ar-Ar motifs that have been implicated in SurA binding57,58,81 (Fig. 3a, b, Supplementary Table 2). While all OmpX-derived peptides were found to bind to SurA (Supplementary Figs. 9,10), their affinities (Kds > ~100 µM, Supplementary Fig. 11) are more than 100-times weaker than that of full-length OmpX (Kd of ~1 µM56,63), implying avidity effects when SurA binds its full length OMP clients.

The addition of the OmpX-derived peptides (200 µM) to SurA (5 µM) also results in substantial changes (intensity reductions and/or CSPs) in the core and/or P1 domains, but with the P2 domain mostly unperturbed (Fig. 3f, g, Supplementary Figs. 9, 10), consistent with the results obtained using full-length OmpX (Fig. 3c, d). However, by contrast to the results for full-length OmpX, peptide binding to the core domain results in the most substantial changes to residues located between the two lobes of the N-domain (residues I91, M109, M114, I132, and M136), with other core domain residues being less, or not affected (Fig. 3h, Supplementary Figs. 9, 10). In the crystal structure of SurA-WT a helix from the core-P1 linker region of a neighbouring molecule in the crystal lattice was found at this location, suggestive of a putative, functional protein-protein interaction site, consistent with our finding that this region is directly involved in client binding (Fig. 3i, Supplementary Fig. 12a). In addition to perturbations to residues in the core domain, the binding of three of the five Ar-X-Ar containing OmpX peptides (QMN (corresponding to the second β-strand of OmpX, named β2), KHD (β6) and SVD (β8), and the Ar-Ar containing peptide NKN (β4)), also affect the peak for M231 in the P1 domain (Fig. 3f–h, Supplementary Figs. 9, 10). This residue is located in the region where the peptide WEYIPNV binds in the crystal structure of the WEYIPNV-P1 complex (Fig. 3i, Supplementary Fig. 12b)59. Previous results also showed that diazirine-labelled OmpX forms cross-links to a residue (E248) located close to this site56. In the NMR spectrum of SurA-WT bound to WEYIPNV (Supplementary Fig. 13a–h) we also observed severe broadening of the resonance for M231, indicating that this peak is a reporter of direct interaction at this site. Interestingly, patches of high conservation are observed at both the core and P1 domain binding sites determined here (Supplementary Fig. 12c, d), consistent with these interaction hotspots being important for SurA function.

We also noted that the magnitude of changes in peak intensity and CSPs in the SurA core and P1 peptide binding sites varies significantly for the different OmpX peptides. For example, binding to the peptide GVI (OmpX β3) results in significant perturbations in resonances arising from core residues, but only subtle perturbations to those in the P1 binding site (Supplementary Figs. 9, 10). By contrast, binding to NKN (OmpX β4) most severely affects residues in the P1 site and results in smaller perturbations in the core domain (Supplementary Figs. 9, 10). The different peptide sequences, therefore, have different kinetic and/or thermodynamic signatures of binding to the core and P1 SurA binding hotspots, suggesting different (but as yet not fully understood) sequence specificities at each site.

Binding of an OmpX-derived peptide promotes an activated open state

Binding of WEYIPNV to SurA-WT55,56, and the gain-of-function mutant SurA-S220A51, are known to promote SurA core-P1-open states (Fig. 1b). Residue S220 is located at the core-P1 interface48 (Supplementary Fig. 14a), and results in the suppression of OM assembly defects caused by BamA/B mutations55,56, implying that activation of SurA involves release of the P1 domain from the core domain52. Binding of the peptide WEYIPNV to SurA-WT causes substantial CSPs in the P1 domain, as well as the broadening of the M231 peak described above, as expected given the known binding specificity of WEYIPNV for this domain59 (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Figs. 13, 15). In addition, CSPs are observed for peaks corresponding to residues across the whole core domain, except for residues in the core binding site mapped above using OmpX-derived peptides (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Fig. 13). Identical shifts in these core domain peaks are observed for SurA-S220A, indicating that these peaks report on the same conformational change in both cases (Fig. 4b, Supplementary Fig. 13g), and provide an NMR fingerprint for core-P1 opening. In addition to the changes observed for residues lining the core and P1 binding sites (Supplementary Fig. 9), binding of the OmpX-derived peptide QMN (OmpX β2), resulted in CSPs in identical (or similar) directions to those for the SurA-S220A variant (Fig. 4c, Supplementary Fig. 14). Combined, these results not only demonstrate that QMN peptide binds to SurA-WT in the identified cleft in the core domain, but that binding results in conformational changes associated with core-P1 opening, mirroring those observed for the S220A variant (Supplementary Fig. 14).Fig. 4 Binding of an OmpX-derived peptide promotes core-P1 open ‘activated’ SurA.

Chemical shift differences between (a) SurA-WT + WEYIPNV and SurA-WT alone, (b) SurA-S220A and SurA-WT, and (c) SurA-WT + QMN peptide (OmpX β2) and SurA-WT alone. Peaks which were broadened beyond detection in peptide-containing samples are indicated with an asterisk. Conf.: residues indicative of conformational change (Supplementary Fig. 14). Samples contained 5 µM SurA or SurA-S220A, in 5 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, at 25 °C. In samples containing the WEYIPNV or QMN peptides, these were present at 50 µM or 200 µM, respectively. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Ar-X-Ar motifs are vital for specific binding to the SurA hotspots

To investigate the role of aromatic-containing motifs in SurA binding to the core and P1 binding sites, we produced an Ar-X-Ar-containing peptide from the sequence of a de novo designed transmembrane β-barrel (TMB), named MVK (TMB2.3 β3)82. Despite TMB2.3 and SurA having no evolutionary history, we observed interactions of MVK (TMB2.3 β3) with SurA-WT in both the core and P1 binding sites (Supplementary Fig. 16). These results provide additional supporting evidence that both the P1 and core binding sites recognise Ar-X-Ar motifs that are enriched in OMP sequences57.

We next substituted aromatic residues within the Ar-X-Ar motif (YRY) of the OmpX-derived QMN (β2) peptide (QMNYRY) with Ala, both separately (QMNARY, QMNYRA), and together (QMNARA) (Supplementary Fig. 17, Supplementary Table 2). Peptides with a single Ala substitution removed the interaction with the core binding site and reduced peptide interaction at the P1 site (Supplementary Fig. 17a–f), while interactions with both sites were abolished by the double Ala substitution (Supplementary Fig. 17g, h). Finally, we recorded NMR spectra of SurA-WT in the presence of two truncated QMN (β2) peptides: one comprising the N-terminal eight residues of QMN (QMNKMGGF - QMNN-term), which lacks an Ar-X-Ar motif, and one comprising the C-terminal seven residues, which contains the Ar-X-Ar motif (NLKYRYE - QMNC-term). As expected, QMNN-term that contains no Ar-X-Ar motif, had little effect on the spectrum of SurA-WT, consistent with the importance of Ar-X-Ar in mediating affinity (Fig. 5a, b). By contrast, QMNC-term demonstrated binding at the core site, but with binding largely abolished at the P1 site (Fig. 5c, d). Intriguingly, the CSPs shown to be indicative of the core-P1 conformational change when full-length QMN (β2) binds (Supplementary Fig. 14) are absent for QMNC-term binding (Fig. 5d), suggesting that whilst Ar-X-Ar motifs mediate binding, their flanking sequences are also important for relaying information to SurA when bound. Taken together, these results highlight the crucial role of Ar-X-Ar motifs in OMP recognition at both binding hotspots, and highlight the different sequence specificities at the two binding sites.Fig. 5 Effects of truncation of the OmpX-derived QMN (b2) peptide on the methyl-TROSY NMR spectrum of SurA-WT.

Intensity ratio (a, c) and CSP (b, d) plots are shown for SurA-WT bound to (a, b) the N-terminal 8 residues of QMN (QMNN-term - QMNKMGGF), and (c, d) the C-terminal 7 residues of QMN (QMNC-term - NLKYRYE). Peaks which were broadened beyond detection in peptide-containing samples are indicated with an asterisk. Conf.: residues indicative of conformational change (Supplementary Fig. 14). Samples contained 5 µM SurA ± 200 µM peptide, 5 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, at 25 °C. int: intensity. Signal to noise ratios were used for the calculation of errors in peak intensities in (a, c) (Methods). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Discussion

The OMP chaperone, SurA, plays a key role in cell envelope homoeostasis33,34 and in promoting bacterial growth and virulence47,83. Yet, despite recent progress in mapping SurA domain dynamics (using smFRET56, SANS53, and NMR55) and client binding (using cross-linking MS54,56, HDX-MS56, and SANS54), the molecular details of how SurA binds its substrates and releases them to BAM for folding remain poorly understood. Here, we used methyl-TROSY NMR to map regions of the chaperone responsible for client recognition and binding in residue-specific detail. Previous models suggested that the affinity between the unfolded OMP client and SurA is mediated by diffuse binding to the chaperone surface involving the core/P1 (and potentially P2) domains54,56. In addition to the possibility of weak, diffuse binding, our NMR data, generated using different OMP sequences and OMP-derived peptides, revealed two OMP-binding hotspots, one located in the crevice between the two lobes of the N-domain of the core, and the other in the P1 domain. Differences (>100-fold) in affinity of short peptides derived from OmpX compared with the intact protein highlight the potential importance of both the binding hotpots and diffuse, weak interactions across the binding surface to enhance binding affinity. Further, from the perspective of the OMP client, we show that aromatic-containing motifs are important for OMP recognition at both sites, but that different patterns of aromatic residues and/or their flanking residues alter the specificity for each site. Ar-X-Ar motifs are enriched in OMPs57, and are often found at the membrane-water interface in native OMP structures6,7. The specificity of SurA for these motifs helps explain how the chaperone can bind many different OMPs that exhibit a large diversity of sequence, size, and structures (Supplementary Fig. 7).

Recent AlphaFold-based predictions of the interaction between unfolded OmpA and SurA also suggested that clients bind in the core domain binding site we identified here84. These models suggested that a tyrosine (Y128) located at the base of the SurA core binding site forms π-π interactions with aromatic residues in OmpA. This prediction is consistent with the crucial importance of aromatic residues in the substrate for binding at this site, as we show via substitution of Tyr with Ala in the Ar-X-Ar motif of the OmpX-derived QMN peptide (Supplementary Fig. 17). The two binding hotspots may have different roles in chaperone function, for instance, promoting core-P1 opening, client expansion, client release and/or delivery to BAM. Additionally, by enabling different regions of the same unfolded OMP chain to anchor to each site, the two binding hotspots may facilitate vectorial delivery of unfolded OMPs to BAM for folding. Exactly how OMPs are released from SurA and delivered to BAM remain open questions, but changes in conformational dynamics of SurA on BAM binding50, together with the weak affinities of SurA-OMP interactions49,81,85, and ultimately the driving force of the onset of OMP folding into the OM86 are all likely to play a role.

Combining the evidence presented, we propose a refined model for SurA:OMP chaperone activity (Fig. 6). In the absence of its OMP clients, SurA is found predominantly in its auto-inhibited core-P1 closed state52,53. Binding of unfolded OMPs via their aromatic motifs to the chaperone promotes opening of the core-P1 interface to create a more active state. Given that the core binding site is accessible in core-P1 closed models48,53, the results suggest that auto-inhibition of core activity by P1 occurs via suppression of conformational dynamics of the two lobes that comprise the core domain binding site, rather than direct blocking of this site from OMP binding. Consistent with this, crosslinking P1 to the core domain leads to OMP assembly defects in vivo52 and reduced crosslinking to OMP substrates in vitro54. Relief of the auto-inhibition of the core domain by P1 (in which the P2 domain may play a role49,52) could involve increased flexibility and dynamics within the core domain’s binding crevice, and/or clamp-like motions between the two lobes of the N-domain. Increased flexibility induced by mutations is known to enhance the activity of other ATP-independent chaperones, such as Spy87, and clamp-like binding sites are commonly found in both ATP-dependent (e.g., Hsp70, and Hsp90 families)88, and ATP-independent chaperones (e.g., Skp, prefoldin)88,89. Activation of ATP-independent chaperones often involves order-to-disorder transitions and/or changes in oligomeric state90,91, while for ATP-dependent chaperones, activation depends upon structural rearrangements caused by the binding, hydrolysis and/or release of nucleotides92,93. By contrast, our data reveal that in the case of SurA, it is interaction with substrates which induces domain rearrangements that activate the chaperone.Fig. 6 Proposed activation mechanism for OMP binding to SurA.

In the absence of substrate SurA is predominantly in an auto-inhibited core-P1 closed conformation (top) with a minor population (~25%53) of an active core-P1 open conformation (right). Binding of OMP substrates (red) to the two identified binding hotspots in the core and P1 domains enables activation of the chaperone and leads to OMP expansion (left). These dual binding sites recognise aromatic containing motifs (e.g., Ar-X-Ar) that are enriched in OMP sequences57. Whether it is OMP binding to the core site, P1 site, or both, that leads to chaperone activation is currently not clear, though our results implicate P1 binding in this process (Fig. 4, Supplementary Fig. 13). Binding sites of both hotspots are accessible in the core-P1 closed state suggesting that auto-inhibition is due to repression of conformational dynamics of the core domain, rather than steric blocking, and that sequences linking binding motifs in intact unfolded OMP clients are important for chaperone activation. Expansion of the substrate and prevention of locally collapsed regions in the unfolded chain by activated SurA suggests a mechanism for delivery of the ‘linearised’ client to BAM for its vectorial folding into the OM54,63.

Inhibition of SurA activity is a promising strategy for combating Gram-negative pathogen growth, virulence, and resistance to current antibiotics. However, given previous models based on diffuse binding to the chaperone surface, how this could be achieved was unclear. Our identification of two binding hotspots for OMP clients in the core and P1 domains reveal these sites as excellent potential targets for small molecules, which could potentially interfere simultaneously with chaperone binding, activation, substrate remodelling, and OMP delivery to BAM.

Methods

Bioinformatics analysis of SurA domain conservation

To assess the level of conservation of PPIase domains in SurA domain architectures, we obtained 14,244 SurA homologues from the InterPro database (InterPro family IPRO15391). We identified core only homologues in several steps. First, homologues were filtered by selecting those which had no predicted PPIase domain InterPro families (IPR046357, IPR000297, IPR023058, or IPR023034) annotated in their UniProt entries (1159 sequences). Next, we used AlphaFold structural predictions for these sequences to separate homologues which contain unannotated PPIase domains from genuine core only homologues. Of the 1159 sequences, 1120 predicted structures were found in the EBI-hosted AlphaFold database (https://alphafold.ebi.ac.uk/) (AF_<uniport_id > _F1_model_v3.pdb files). We generated structural predictions for the remaining 39 homologues using Alphafold-Multimer (v2.1.0) installed on a local workstation and the reduced databases as described at https://github.com/deepmind/alphafold. We then used DSSP predictions of the secondary structure for filtering as, unlike the core domain, PPIase domains all have a topology that includes three consecutive β-strands. Successful filtering was manually confirmed by visualisation in PyMOL. By evaluating these AlphaFold2-generated structures we found that only 73/1159 of these sequences were predicted to be true core domain only homologues (Source Data file). The majority of these are from the γ-protobacterial class in the genus Halomonas (49/73). Therefore, only ~0.5% of the 14,244 SurA homologues in the InterPro database are predicted to be core domain only homologues (Fig. 1c). Analysis was carried out using in-house Python 3 scripts and made use of the Biopython (v1.79)94,95 library.

Conservation analysis of SurA homologues

To obtain a set of SurA homologues with a three domain architecture, sequences with lengths between 400 and 450 residues were extracted from the InterPro SurA_N family (IPRO15391)96 (8250/14,225 homologues). These sequences were then clustered with CD-HIT97 using a 40% sequence identity threshold to give 303 representative sequences. A multiple sequence alignment (MSA) of these sequences was obtained with Clustal Omega98 with default settings accessed via JalView v2.11.2.599. This MSA was used to generate per residue conservation scores via the ConSurf webserver100,101. Residues with a ConSurf score of 7/9 or higher were considered highly conserved.

Plasmid constructs

The expression plasmid pET28b containing the mature SurA sequence (residues 21–428) preceded by an N-terminal 6x His-tag and thrombin-cleavage site (pSK257)102 was a kind gift from Daniel Kahne (Harvard University, USA). The thrombin-cleavage site was changed to a TEV-cleavage site using mutagenesis, yielding SurA with the N-terminal sequence MGSS(H)6SSGENLYFQG. SurA domain deletion variants SurA-∆P1, SurA-∆P2, and SurA-core were constructed by deleting codons for residues 172–280, 281–389 or 172–389, respectively, as described previously49. The expression plasmid for the mature sequence of tOmpA (residues 22–192) in pET11a103 was kindly provided by Karen Fleming (John Hopkins University, USA). Codon-optimised synthetic genes (Eurofins) of the mature sequences of OmpX (residues 24–171) and OmpF (residues 23–362) were cloned into pET11a (Novagen) between the NdeI (5′) and BamHI (3′) restriction sites. pET29b+ expression plasmids encoding the Cys-OmpX-Cys, Cys-OmpX, and OmpX-Cys constructs used in smFRET experiments were obtained from TWIST bioscience. The Cys-OmpX-Cys construct contained the N-terminal sequence Met-Gly-Ser-Cys followed by the codon-optimised mature OmpX sequence (residues 24–171) and an additional C-terminal Cys residue63. The Cys-OmpX50 and OmpX-Cys single Cys variants of the Cys-OmpX-Cys construct lacked the C-terminal and N-terminal Cys residues, respectively. The Cys-tBamA construct for use in MST experiments, was also obtained from TWIST bioscience in a pET29b+ expression vector. This construct contained the N-terminal sequence Met-Gly-Ser-Cys followed by the codon-optimised mature tBamA sequence (residues 425–810). The two natural Cys residues in tBamA were mutated to Ser (C690S/C700S). To create tBamA-pET11a, residues 425–810 of BamA were amplified by PCR, using plasmid BamAB-pETDUET-1 (kindly donated by Susan Buchanan (NIH, USA)) as the template, and the resultant product was then ligated into pET11a between NdeI and BamHI restriction sites. The plasmids containing SurA isoleucine and methionine point mutants (Supplementary Table 3) used in NMR peak assignment experiments were obtained from TWIST bioscience cloned into pET29b+. All mutagenesis was performed using Q5 site-directed mutagenesis (NEB). The protein sequences of expressed OMPs and SurA variants are provided in the Source Data file.

Expression and purification of unlabelled SurA-WT and SurA variants

Plasmids encoding wild-type SurA or SurA variants were transformed into BL21(DE3) cells (Stratagene). Cells were grown in LB medium supplemented with 40 µg/mL kanamycin at 37 °C with shaking (200 rpm) until an OD600 of ~0.6 was reached. The temperature was subsequently lowered to 20 °C, and expression induced with 0.4 mM IPTG. After ~18 h, cells were harvested by centrifugation, resuspended in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2, 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, containing EDTA-free protease inhibitor tablets (Roche), and lysed using a cell disrupter (Constant Cell Disruption Systems). The cell debris was removed by centrifugation (20 min, 4 °C, 39,000 × g), and the lysate was diluted to 0.5–1 L volume with 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2, 150 mM NaCl, and applied to 2 × 5 mL HisTrap columns (Cytiva). The columns were washed with 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2, 150 mM NaCl and 20 mM imidazole and SurA was eluted with 20 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 500 mM imidazole, pH 7.2. The eluate was dialysed extensively against 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, before being concentrated to ~200 µM with Vivaspin 20 concentrators (Sartorius; 5 kDa MWCO), aliquoted, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. Protein concentrations were determined spectrophotometrically (Supplementary Table 4).

Labelling of Cys-OmpX-Cys variant

Purified Cys-OmpX-Cys was covalently labelled stochastically with Alexa Fluor 488 and ATTO 565 dyes via maleimide chemistry. A sample containing 423 μM Cys-OmpX-Cys in 25 mM Tris-HCl, 6 M Gdn-HCl, pH 7.2, was incubated with 10 mM DTT for 30 min. This sample was subsequently buffer exchanged into 25 mM Tris-HCl, 6 M Gdn-HCl, pH 7.2 (that had been sparged for 15 min with nitrogen gas) using Zeba spin desalting columns (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Alexa Fluor 488 C5 maleimide (Thermo Fisher Scientific) (10 mM dissolved in DMSO) and ATTO 565 maleimide (ATTO-TEC GmbH) (10 mM dissolved in DMSO) were immediately added to the OmpX sample to final concentrations of 635 µM and 1.17 mM, respectively. The total sample volume was 500 µL. The labelling reaction was incubated at 25 °C for 30 min only to avoid non-specific labelling. The reaction was quenched with 10 mM DTT and the sample then loaded onto a Superdex Peptide 10/300 column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with 3 M Gdn-HCl, 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2 to remove the excess free dye. Samples were collected every 1 mL and peak protein fractions tested for dye labelling using a Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Samples containing double-labelled Cys-OmpX-Cys were snap-frozen using liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until required.

Labelling of Cys-OmpX and OmpX-Cys variants

Cys-OmpX was labelled with Alexa Fluor 488 as previously described50. For labelling of Cys-OmpX with ATTO 565 and OmpX-Cys with both Alexa Fluor 488 and ATTO 565, samples containing 300 µM protein were first incubated with 10 mM DTT for 30 min. Samples were then buffer exchanged into 25 mM Tris-HCl, 6 M Gdn-HCl, pH 7.2 (that had been sparged for 15 min with nitrogen gas) using Zeba spin desalting columns (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Either Alexa Fluor 488 C5 maleimide (Thermo Fisher Scientific) (10 mM dissolved in DMSO) or ATTO 565 maleimide (ATTO-TEC GmbH) (10 mM dissolved in DMSO) as appropriate were immediately added to final concentrations of 450 µM (1.5x excess) and incubated at 25 °C for 30 min. The reaction was quenched with 10 mM DTT, and the sample then loaded onto a Superdex Peptide 10/300 column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with 3 M Gdn-HCl, 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2 to remove the excess free dye. Samples were collected every 1 mL and peak protein fractions tested for dye labelling using a Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

smFRET data collection

Samples were measured at a volume of 100 μL in an 18 well sample chamber (81817, Ibidi) with the focal spot 50 μm above the cover glass on a custom-built confocal microscope (Supplementary Methods) at room temperature (~21 °C). Laser powers measured before the objective lens of the two lasers used for donor and acceptor excitation were an average of 75 μW and 35 μW, respectively. smFRET of samples was measured at a concentration of ~75 pM OmpX in measurement buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, 0.1 M urea, 0.02% (v/v) Tween-20, pH 8.0) with 1 mM aged Trolox ((±)-6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchromane-2-carboxylic acid) to prevent photobleaching of the sample104. Aged Trolox was prepared by adding 1 mM of Trolox to measurement buffer and incubating the sample overnight at room temperature on a rotary shaker to dissolve before being filtered using a 0.22 μm pore size membrane. Tween-20 (0.02% v/v) was added to prevent non-specific absorption to the glass slide. In experiments monitoring FRET-labelled OmpX in the presence of SurA variants, a concentration of 30 μM SurA-WT or SurA-core was used. Each sample was freshly prepared and measured in 1 h acquisitions with a total of 5 measurements for apo-OmpX (0.1 M urea) and 6 measurements for OmpX + SurA-WT and OmpX + SurA-core. apo-OmpX in 4 M urea was measured for 1 h.

smFRET data analysis

The ptu files from the SymPhoTime64 software were converted into HDF5 data files using phconvert v0.9 (available at https://github.com/Photon-HDF5/phconvert). Each of these files was then merged to create one file for each condition. These merged files were then analysed using the FRETBursts v0.7.1 python package105. Firstly, the background was independently calculated for every 60 s period of measurement. Following the background calculation, a burst search was performed, selecting bursts with a minimum threshold of 3x the background signal in the donor and acceptor channels, a minimum total burst size of 50 photons in the donor and acceptor channels from the donor excitation. Bursts were then corrected106 through the FRETBursts software105 using the following values: donor leakage = 0.14, direct excitation = 0.14, gamma factor = 1.0 and beta factor = 1.4. Bursts were then filtered by removing events with an S > 0.7 and <0.3 and an ALEX-2CDE107 filter with a cut off of 95 (as implemented in FRETBursts) to remove bursts with photobleaching, excessive photophysics or potential multi-molecule events.

BVA68 was used to assay for dynamics on the ms timescale occurring during bursts. This analysis compares the expected variance in Eraw based on shot noise against the measured variance in Eraw in each individual burst (si). BVA was performed in the FRETbursts environment. To calculate si, we segmented each burst into consecutive windows of 5 photons, and calculated the standard deviation of all windows within the burst. To help visualise the average si at each Eraw we segmented the Eraw axis into bins with a width of 0.05.

The apparent fluorescence lifetime of the donor fluorophore in the presence of the acceptor (τD(A)) within each FRET burst was calculated by taking the mean microtime (corresponding to donor excitation and donor emission) and subtracting the mean microtime of the instrument response function108. The lifetime of the donor molecule in the absence of the acceptor (τD(0)) was calculated in the same fashion, but for OmpX molecules which were only labelled with a donor fluorophore (i.e., a S value >0.9). The static and dynamic FRET lines were calculated using the FRETlines python package version e099b1a (available at https://github.com/Fluorescence-Tools/FRETlines)109.

Expression and purification of SurA variants for NMR spectroscopy

Plasmids containing wild-type SurA or SurA variant genes were transformed into BL21(DE3) cells (Stratagene). A daytime starter culture of 5 mL LB, supplemented with 40 µg/mL kanamycin, was grown from a single colony for ~6 h at 30 °C to an OD600 of ~0.5. This culture was centrifuged, resuspended in 100% D2O and added to NMR media (Supplementary Table 5) supplemented with 40 µg/mL kanamycin, in 250 mL baffled conical flasks, for overnight growth at 30 °C. For a typical 100 mL culture the volume of the overnight culture was 24 mL. The following morning the remaining 76 mL of NMR media supplemented with 40 µg/mL kanamycin was added to the culture and grown at 37 °C until an OD600 of ~0.5–6 was reached (~4–6 h). Reagents for Ile and Met labelling α-ketobutyric acid and L-methionine (Supplementary Table 6) at 70 mg/L and 250 mg/L were added and the culture grown for 1 h before expression was induced with the addition of 0.4 mM IPTG. After 6 h of expression the cells were harvested by centrifugation. We found that expression with 2x M9 minimal media (Supplementary Table 5) to increase buffering capacity led to an approximately 1.5–2-fold increase in yields110. Purification was performed as for unlabelled SurA with some variation in the protocol for the purification of Ile and Met variants for assignment. For the latter, all buffers were the same, but cells from these small-scale expression cultures (50 mL) were lysed by sonication, resuspended in 1 mL and His6 SpinTrap columns (Cytivia) were used for the purification according to manufacturer’s instructions.

Expression and purification of OMPs

OMPs (OmpX, tOmpA, OmpF, tBamA, Cys-tBamA, Cys-OmpX-Cys, Cys-OmpX and OmpX-Cys) were purified using a method adapted from McMorran et al.111. Briefly, E. coli BL21[DE3] cells (Stratagene) were transformed with a plasmid containing the gene sequence of the mature OMP. Overnight cultures were subcultured and grown in LB medium (500 mL) supplemented with carbenicillin (100 μg/mL), at 37 °C with shaking (200 rpm). Protein expression was induced with IPTG (1 mM) once an OD600 of 0.6 was reached. After 4 h the cells were harvested by centrifugation (5000 × g, 15 min, 4 °C). The cell pellet was resuspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 2 mM benzamidine, and the cells were subsequently lysed by sonication. The lysate was centrifuged (25,000 × g, 30 min, 4 °C) and the insoluble material was resuspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 2% (v/v) Triton X-100, before being incubated for 1 h at room temperature, with gentle agitation. The insoluble material was pelleted (25,000 × g, 30 min, 4 °C) and the inclusion bodies washed twice by resuspending in 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0 followed by incubation for 1 h at room temperature with gentle agitation, and then collected by centrifugation (25,000 × g, 30 min, 4 °C). For the OmpX, tOmpA, OmpF, and tBamA constructs, the inclusion bodies were solubilised in 25 mM Tris-HCl, 6 M Gdn-HCl, pH 8.0 and centrifuged (20,000 × g, 20 min, 4 °C). The supernatant was filtered (0.2 µM syringe filter, Sartorius) and the protein was purified using a Superdex 75 HiLoad 26/60 gel filtration column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with 25 mM Tris-HCl, 6 M Gdn-HCl, pH 8.0. Peak fractions were concentrated to 500 μM using Vivaspin 20 (5 kDa MWCO) concentrators (Sartorius), and the protein solution was snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. Protein concentrations were determined spectrophotometrically (Supplementary Table 4).

NMR spectroscopy

All NMR experiments were performed on a 950-MHz Bruker Ascend Avance III HD NMR spectrometer equipped with either a Bruker 3 mm TCI or 5 mm TXO triple-resonance cryogenically cooled probe. Peptide binding experiments were performed in 5 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0 with 5 % (v/v) D2O at 25 °C. Binding experiments using full-length OMP sequences also contained 0.8 M urea. Data was acquired for ~16 h with the exception of OMP-containing experiments which were acquired for ~5 h. Methyl-TROSY NMR experiments used a band-selective optimised-flip-angle short-transient experiment112 (2D 1H-13C SOFAST-HMQC)70. Pulse sequences were obtained using the NMRlib113 plugin for TopSpin. Data was processed with NMRPipe114 and analysed with CcpNmr Analysis v2.5115. Further analysis and all plotting was carried out using in-house Python 3 scripts using the Matplotlib (v3.2.2)116, NumPy (v1.18.5)117, Nmrglue (v0.8)118, and Biopython (v1.79)94,95 libraries. Signal to noise ratios were used for the calculation of errors in peak intensities, with the noise floor obtained for each spectrum using NMRPipe (specStat.com)114. Errors in the intensity ratios for each peak between two spectra were obtained by propagating the errors according to:1 δR=R*δXX+δYY

where δR is the error in the intensity ratio, |R| is the value of the intensity ratio, X and Y are the intensity values for the peak in the first and second spectrum, respectively, and δX and δY are the noise floor values for the first and second spectrum, respectively.

For the calculation of CSPs, the shifts in the proton and carbon dimensions were scaled according to the relative gyromagnetic ratios of the nuclei:2 CSP=ΔH2+(0.251×ΔC)2

where ∆H and ∆C are the changes in proton and carbon chemical shift, respectively. Z-scores for intensity ratio and CSP data were calculated using:3 Zi=xi−μσ

where xi is the value for a particular peak, and µ and σ are the mean and standard deviation for all peaks, respectively.

Assignment of SurA Ile-Cδ1 and Met-Cε resonances in NMR spectra

For assignment of SurA-WT Ile and Met residues (43 in total) each residue was individually mutated (Supplementary Table 3), and the effect of the mutation assessed by methyl-TROSY NMR. Samples contained 5–70 µM SurA variant. Assignment experiments (2D 1H-13C SOFAST-HMQCs) for Ile or Met variants were performed in 20 mM sodium phosphate, 50 mM NaCl, pH 7.5 (at 35 °C), or 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8 (at 25 °C), respectively. Two pairs of peaks (I70/I280, I100/I103) were overlapped. One pair of peaks in the P1 domain (I202/I259) could not be unambiguously assigned. One pair of severely broadened peaks in the core domain (M46/M400) could also not be unambiguously assigned. Further one peak in the P1 domain (I217) was also severely broadened and not included in analysis. Finally, the peak for I75 could not be separated from that for I202/I259 in many experiments, so it was also not included in analyses. Peaks for I70 and M400 appear in new locations in experiments in which core-P1 open states are populated (SurA-WT + WEYIPNV and SurA-S220A) or the P1 domain is deleted (SurA-core and SurA-∆P1). These were assigned by performing experiments in which WEYIPNV (50 µM) was added to the I70V and M400A SurA variants. The 1H chemical shift assignments were referenced using 2,2-dimethyl-2-silapentane-5-sulphonic acid (DSS) at 25 °C as a standard. The 13C chemical shifts were referenced indirectly to DSS. NMR assignments have been deposited in the Biological Magnetic Resonance Bank (BMRB) with Entry ID 52180.

Peptide synthesis

Peptides from internal regions of OMPs were modified with N-terminal acetylation and C-terminal amidation and were either ordered from GenScript (USA) or produced in-house. All amino acids, Rink amide resin, N,N’-diisopropylcarbodiimide (DIC), 2-cyano-2-(hydroxyimino)acetate (Oxyma), trifluoroacetic acid, triisopropylsilane and 2,2′-(Ethylenedioxy)diethanethiol (DODT) were purchased from Fluorochem or Merck. All amino acids were N-Fmoc protected and side chains were protected with either tBu (Asp, Glu, Ser, Thr, Tyr), Trt (Asn, Gln, Cys, His), Boc (Lys, Trp) or Pbf (Arg). Piperidine and acetic anhydride were purchased from Fisher. ACS grade N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) and HPLC grade Acetonitrile from Merck were used during the synthesis and analysis. The identity of the peptide was confirmed by high-resolution mass spectrometry on Bruker Maxis Impact spectrometer using electrospray ionisation. The purity was determined on Agilent 1290 Infinity II system using Ascentis peptide column and gradient 5–95% of acetonitrile in water with 0.1% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid additive at 0.5 ml/min for 10 min. The peptide synthesis was performed in microwave assisted Liberty Blue CEM peptide synthesiser equipped with HT loader at 0.1 mmol scale on Rink-amide resin (loading 0.48 mmol/g). Standard preprogramed coupling and deprotection cycles were applied. The deprotection was achieved using 20% (v/v) piperidine in DMF with microwave heating at 90 °C for 100 s, followed by three DMF washing steps. The couplings were performed using 5 eq. of Fmoc-protected amino acid, 5 eq. DI and 5 eq. Oxyma in DMF with microwave heating at 90 °C for 3 min followed by two DMF washing steps. The N-terminal acetylation was performed using 10% (v/v) acetic anhydride in DMF with microwave heating at 60 °C for 3 min followed by two DMF washing steps. The resin with synthesised peptide was then transferred to SPS tube, washed three times with 10 Ll dichloromethane, two times with 10 mL of diethylether and dried under vacuum for 30 min. To deprotect the side chains and cleave the peptide from the resin, the resin was incubated on a rotator for 3 h with 10 ml of cleavage mix (92.5% (v/v) trifluoroacetic acid, 2.5% (v/v) water, 2.5% (v/v) triisopropylsilane, 2.5% (v/v) DODT) and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated to ca. 1 mL under a stream of nitrogen and the peptide was precipitated by addition of 10 mL of ice-cold diethylether and isolated by centrifugation (4226 × g for 5 min). The precipitate was resuspended in 10 mL of ice-cold diethylether and isolated by repeating the centrifugation step. After decanting the diethylether, the precipitate was allowed to dry for 30 min, dissolved in 5Ll of 1% (v/v) acetic acid and freeze dried.

Peptide purification

Peptides were dissolved in 4–10 mL of 1:1 mixture of acetonitrile and water and purified using Agilent 1260 infinity system equipped with UV detector and fraction collector on Kinetex EVO 5 µm C18 100 Å 21.2 × 250 mm reverse phase column. 1–4 mL of the peptide solution was injected and 25 min gradient of 10–40% (v/v) acetonitrile in water with 0.1% (v/v) formic acid additive was run at 10 ml/min. The fractions containing peptide were pooled and freeze dried.

Isothermal calorimetry (ITC)

ITC experiments were performed on a MicroCal iTC200 instrument in duplicate at 25 °C. The buffer used in all experiments was 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8. For binding experiments between SurA-WT and the peptide WEYIPNV, concentrations of 20 µM SurA-WT and 200 µM in the sample cell and syringe were used, respectively. For binding experiments between SurA-WT and OmpX-derived peptides QMN and KHD, concentrations of 100 µM SurA-WT and 1000 µM QMN/KHD in the sample cell and syringe were used, respectively. Other Ar-X-Ar containing OmpX-derived peptides were not soluble at these concentrations. 20 injections (1 × 0.5 µL and 19 × 2 µL) of peptides were added successively to the sample cell with a spacing of 150 s and a stirring rate of 750 rpm. Reference experiments in which SurA-WT was absent from the sample cell were performed and subtracted from the corresponding peptide binding data. The first data point was discarded in all experiments. Data were processed, analysed and fitted using OriginLab ITC v1.25.5.

Labelling of Cys-tBamA with Alexa Fluor 488

Purified Cys-tBamA was covalently labelled with Alexa Fluor 488 dye via maleimide chemistry. A sample containing 153 μM Cys-tBamA in 25 mM Tris-HCl, 6 M Gdn-HCl, pH 7.2, was incubated with 10 mM DTT for 30 min. This sample was subsequently buffer exchanged into 25 mM Tris-HCl, 6 M Gdn-HCl, pH 7.2 (that had been sparged for 15 min with nitrogen gas) using Zeba spin desalting columns (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Alexa Fluor 488 C5 maleimide (Thermo Fisher Scientific) (10 mg/mL dissolved in DMSO) was immediately added to the Cys-tBamA sample at a final concentration of 1.5 mM. The total sample volume was 260 µL. The labelling reaction was kept at 25 °C for 1 h then left overnight at 4 °C. The reaction was then loaded onto a Superdex Peptide 10/300 column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with 6 M Gdn-HCl, 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.2 to remove the excess free dye. Samples were collected every 1 mL and peak protein fractions tested for dye labelling using a Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Samples containing labelled tBamA were snap-frozen using liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until required.

Microscale thermophoresis (MST)

Alexa Fluor 488-labelled tBamA or OmpX was buffer exchanged into 8 M urea and 20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0. A stock of 200 μM SurA-WT or SurA-core in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0 was used to create a serial dilution for tBamA (40 μM–1.2 nM) and for OmpX (12.5 μM–3 nM). A 1 µM stock of Alexa Fluor 488-labelled tBamA or OmpX was first diluted to 200 nM with 20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0, then added to SurA variant samples to give final concentrations of 100 nM tBamA/OmpX and 0.8 M urea in 20 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.0. The samples were loaded into premium-coated capillaries (NanoTemper Technologies GmbH, Germany) and measured using a Monolith NT.115 (NanoTemper Tech.) at 25 °C. Data were fitted to a Hill equation:4 Sobs=SU+SB−SU1+Kd,appLn

where Sobs is the observed signal; SU and SB are the signal of the unbound and bound state, respectively; Kd,app is the apparent Kd; L is the ligand, which in these experiments is SurA-WT or SurA-core, and n is the Hill coefficient. Fits and plots were made with in-house Python 3 scripts and made use of the SciPy (v1.5.0) and Matplotlib (v3.2.2)116 libraries.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Reporting Summary

Source data

Source Data

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-024-52021-1.

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the Zhuravleva, Radford and Brockwell laboratories for helpful discussions. We also thank Arnout Kalverda for excellent technical support and Roman Tuma for helping with developing smFRET and its analysis. We acknowledge Wellcome for funding the Chirascan CD spectrometer was (094232/Z/10/Z), the Monolith NT.115 MST (105615/Z/14/Z) and ITC instruments (094232/Z/10/Z). We acknowledge Astbury Biostructrure Laboratory for access to the 950-MHz spectrometer which was funded by the University of Leeds. B.S. acknowledges support from the BBSRC (BB/T000635/1). A.N.C. acknowledges the support of a Sir Henry Dale Fellowship jointly funded by Wellcome and the Royal Society (Grant Number 220628/Z/20/Z) and a University Academic Fellowship from the University of Leeds. S.E.R. holds a Royal Society Professorial Fellowship (RSRP/R1/211057). We acknowledge funding from BBSRC for J.A.C. (BB/T008059/1) and M.W. (BB/ V003577/1). J.M.M. was funded by Wellcome (222373/Z/21/Z). We thank EPSRC (EP/N013573/1) and BBSRC (BB/V003577/1) for funding peptide synthesis. T.F. is supported by the European Regional Development Fund-Project (CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000441) and the Czech Science Foundation (20-11563Y). For the purpose of Open Access, the authors have applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.

Author contributions

B.S. and J.A.C. designed, performed, and analysed the data for NMR and smFRET experiments, respectively. M.W. designed and synthesised peptides. J.M.M. generated SurA models. G.N.K. performed control experiments and provided laboratory support. I.W.M. performed and analysed ITC experiments. T.F. assisted with software for smFRET data analysis. A.J.W., D.J.B., A.N.C., S.E.R. and A.Z. supervised the research. The paper was written by B.S., J.A.C., S.E.R. and A.Z. with input and comments from all authors.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks Stefan Rüdiger and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.

Data availability

Assignments for Ile and Met peaks in the 2D 1H-13C methyl-TROSY NMR spectrum of SurA-WT have been deposited in the Biological Magnetic Resonance Bank (BMRB Entry ID: 52180). Raw smFRET data are available at the University of Leeds data repository (10.5518/1423). AlphaFold 2 generated models of SurA homologues are available at 10.5281/zenodo.13150730. The source data underlying Figs. 1–5, and Supplementary Figs. 1–3, 5–11, and 13–17 are provided as a Source Data file. All other data are available from the corresponding author on request. Reference structures used in the work are 2PV1, 2PV2, 2PV3, 1M5Y, and 1QJ8. Source data are provided with this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Bob Schiffrin, Joel A. Crossley.
==== Refs
References

1. Nikaido H Molecular basis of bacterial outer membrane permeability revisited Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2003 67 593 656 10.1128/MMBR.67.4.593-656.2003 14665678
Nikaido, H. Molecular basis of bacterial outer membrane permeability revisited. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 67, 593–656 (2003).14665678 10.1128/MMBR.67.4.593-656.2003
2. Rojas ER The outer membrane is an essential load-bearing element in Gram-negative bacteria Nature 2018 559 617 621 10.1038/s41586-018-0344-3 30022160
Rojas, E. R. et al. The outer membrane is an essential load-bearing element in Gram-negative bacteria. Nature 559, 617–621 (2018).30022160 10.1038/s41586-018-0344-3
3. Jarosławski S Duquesne K Sturgis JN Scheuring S High‐resolution architecture of the outer membrane of the Gram‐negative bacteria Roseobacter denitrificans Mol. Microbiol. 2009 74 1211 1222 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06926.x 19843216
Jarosławski, S., Duquesne, K., Sturgis, J. N. & Scheuring, S. High‐resolution architecture of the outer membrane of the Gram‐negative bacteria Roseobacter denitrificans. Mol. Microbiol. 74, 1211–1222 (2009).19843216 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06926.x
4. Benn G Phase separation in the outer membrane of Escherichia coli Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2021 118 e2112237118 10.1073/pnas.2112237118 34716276
Benn, G. et al. Phase separation in the outer membrane of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2112237118 (2021).34716276 10.1073/pnas.2112237118
5. Webby MN Lipids mediate supramolecular outer membrane protein assembly in bacteria Sci. Adv. 2022 8 eadc9566 10.1126/sciadv.adc9566 36322653
Webby, M. N. et al. Lipids mediate supramolecular outer membrane protein assembly in bacteria. Sci. Adv. 8, eadc9566 (2022).36322653 10.1126/sciadv.adc9566
6. Koebnik R Locher KP Van Gelder P Structure and function of bacterial outer membrane proteins: barrels in a nutshell Mol. Microbiol. 2000 37 239 253 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01983.x 10931321
Koebnik, R., Locher, K. P. & Van Gelder, P. Structure and function of bacterial outer membrane proteins: barrels in a nutshell. Mol. Microbiol. 37, 239–253 (2000).10931321 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01983.x
7. Schiffrin B Brockwell DJ Radford SE Outer membrane protein folding from an energy landscape perspective BMC Biol. 2017 15 123 10.1186/s12915-017-0464-5 29268734
Schiffrin, B., Brockwell, D. J. & Radford, S. E. Outer membrane protein folding from an energy landscape perspective. BMC Biol. 15, 123 (2017).29268734 10.1186/s12915-017-0464-5
8. Horne JE Brockwell DJ Radford SE Role of the lipid bilayer in outer membrane protein folding in Gram-negative bacteria J. Biol. Chem. 2020 295 10340 10367 10.1074/jbc.REV120.011473 32499369
Horne, J. E., Brockwell, D. J. & Radford, S. E. Role of the lipid bilayer in outer membrane protein folding in Gram-negative bacteria. J. Biol. Chem. 295, 10340–10367 (2020).32499369 10.1074/jbc.REV120.011473
9. Hagan CL Silhavy TJ Kahne D β-Barrel membrane protein assembly by the Bam complex Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2011 80 189 210 10.1146/annurev-biochem-061408-144611 21370981
Hagan, C. L., Silhavy, T. J. & Kahne, D. β-Barrel membrane protein assembly by the Bam complex. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 80, 189–210 (2011).21370981 10.1146/annurev-biochem-061408-144611
10. Goemans C Denoncin K Collet JF Folding mechanisms of periplasmic proteins Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2014 1843 1517 1528 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.10.014
Goemans, C., Denoncin, K. & Collet, J. F. Folding mechanisms of periplasmic proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 1843, 1517–1528 (2014).10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.10.014
11. He W Chaperone Spy protects outer membrane proteins from folding stress via dynamic complex formation mBio 2021 12 e0213021 10.1128/mBio.02130-21 34607455
He, W. et al. Chaperone Spy protects outer membrane proteins from folding stress via dynamic complex formation. mBio 12, e0213021 (2021).34607455 10.1128/mBio.02130-21
12. Plummer AM Fleming KG From chaperones to the membrane with a BAM! Trends Biochem. Sci. 2016 41 872 882 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.06.005 27450425
Plummer, A. M. & Fleming, K. G. From chaperones to the membrane with a BAM! Trends Biochem. Sci. 41, 872–882 (2016).27450425 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.06.005
13. Konovalova A Kahne DE Silhavy TJ Outer membrane biogenesis Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2017 71 539 556 10.1146/annurev-micro-090816-093754 28886680
Konovalova, A., Kahne, D. E. & Silhavy, T. J. Outer membrane biogenesis. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 71, 539–556 (2017).28886680 10.1146/annurev-micro-090816-093754
14. Wu R Stephenson R Gichaba A Noinaj N The big BAM theory: an open and closed case? Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2020 1862 183062 10.1016/j.bbamem.2019.183062 31520605
Wu, R., Stephenson, R., Gichaba, A. & Noinaj, N. The big BAM theory: an open and closed case? Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 1862, 183062 (2020).31520605 10.1016/j.bbamem.2019.183062
15. Bakelar J Buchanan SK Noinaj N The structure of the β-barrel assembly machinery complex Science 2016 351 180 186 10.1126/science.aad3460 26744406
Bakelar, J., Buchanan, S. K. & Noinaj, N. The structure of the β-barrel assembly machinery complex. Science 351, 180–186 (2016).26744406 10.1126/science.aad3460
16. Gu Y Structural basis of outer membrane protein insertion by the BAM complex Nature 2016 531 64 69 10.1038/nature17199 26901871
Gu, Y. et al. Structural basis of outer membrane protein insertion by the BAM complex. Nature 531, 64–69 (2016).26901871 10.1038/nature17199
17. Han L Structure of the BAM complex and its implications for biogenesis of outer-membrane proteins Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2016 23 192 196 10.1038/nsmb.3181 26900875
Han, L. et al. Structure of the BAM complex and its implications for biogenesis of outer-membrane proteins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23, 192–196 (2016).26900875 10.1038/nsmb.3181
18. Iadanza MG Lateral opening in the intact β-barrel assembly machinery captured by cryo-EM Nat. Commun. 2016 7 12865 10.1038/ncomms12865 27686148
Iadanza, M. G. et al. Lateral opening in the intact β-barrel assembly machinery captured by cryo-EM. Nat. Commun. 7, 12865 (2016).27686148 10.1038/ncomms12865
19. Doyle MT Bernstein HD Bacterial outer membrane proteins assemble via asymmetric interactions with the BamA β-barrel Nat. Commun. 2019 10 3358 10.1038/s41467-019-11230-9 31350400
Doyle, M. T. & Bernstein, H. D. Bacterial outer membrane proteins assemble via asymmetric interactions with the BamA β-barrel. Nat. Commun. 10, 3358 (2019).31350400 10.1038/s41467-019-11230-9
20. Tomasek D Structure of a nascent membrane protein as it folds on the BAM complex Nature 2020 583 473 478 10.1038/s41586-020-2370-1 32528179
Tomasek, D. et al. Structure of a nascent membrane protein as it folds on the BAM complex. Nature 583, 473–478 (2020).32528179 10.1038/s41586-020-2370-1
21. Wu R Plasticity within the barrel domain of BamA mediates a hybrid-barrel mechanism by BAM Nat. Commun. 2021 12 7131 10.1038/s41467-021-27449-4 34880256
Wu, R. et al. Plasticity within the barrel domain of BamA mediates a hybrid-barrel mechanism by BAM. Nat. Commun. 12, 7131 (2021).34880256 10.1038/s41467-021-27449-4
22. Doyle MT Cryo-EM structures reveal multiple stages of bacterial outer membrane protein folding Cell 2022 185 1105 1260 10.1016/j.cell.2022.02.016
Doyle, M. T. et al. Cryo-EM structures reveal multiple stages of bacterial outer membrane protein folding. Cell 185, 1105–1260 (2022).10.1016/j.cell.2022.02.016
23. Struyvé M Moons M Tommassen J Carboxy-terminal phenylalanine is essential for the correct assembly of a bacterial outer membrane protein J. Mol. Biol. 1991 218 141 148 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90880-F 1848301
Struyvé, M., Moons, M. & Tommassen, J. Carboxy-terminal phenylalanine is essential for the correct assembly of a bacterial outer membrane protein. J. Mol. Biol. 218, 141–148 (1991).1848301 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90880-F
24. Wang, X., Peterson, J. H. & Bernstein, H. D. Bacterial outer membrane proteins are targeted to the Bam complex by two parallel mechanisms. mBio 12, 10–1128 (2021).
25. Robert V Assembly factor Omp85 recognizes its outer membrane protein substrates by a species-specific C-terminal motif PLoS Biol. 2006 4 e377 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040377 17090219
Robert, V. et al. Assembly factor Omp85 recognizes its outer membrane protein substrates by a species-specific C-terminal motif. PLoS Biol. 4, e377 (2006).17090219 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040377
26. Gessmann D Outer membrane β-barrel protein folding is physically controlled by periplasmic lipid head groups and BamA Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2014 111 5878 5883 10.1073/pnas.1322473111 24715731
Gessmann, D. et al. Outer membrane β-barrel protein folding is physically controlled by periplasmic lipid head groups and BamA. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 5878–5883 (2014).24715731 10.1073/pnas.1322473111
27. Imai Y A new antibiotic selectively kills Gram-negative pathogens Nature 2019 576 459 464 10.1038/s41586-019-1791-1 31747680
Imai, Y. et al. A new antibiotic selectively kills Gram-negative pathogens. Nature 576, 459–464 (2019).31747680 10.1038/s41586-019-1791-1
28. Kaur H The antibiotic darobactin mimics a β-strand to inhibit outer membrane insertase Nature 2021 593 125 129 10.1038/s41586-021-03455-w 33854236
Kaur, H. et al. The antibiotic darobactin mimics a β-strand to inhibit outer membrane insertase. Nature 593, 125–129 (2021).33854236 10.1038/s41586-021-03455-w
29. Haysom SF Darobactin B stabilises a lateral-closed conformation of the BAM complex in E. coli cells Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2023 62 e202218783 10.1002/anie.202218783 37162386
Haysom, S. F. et al. Darobactin B stabilises a lateral-closed conformation of the BAM complex in E. coli cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 62, e202218783 (2023).37162386 10.1002/anie.202218783
30. Rizzitello AE Harper JR Silhavy TJ Genetic evidence for parallel pathways of chaperone activity in the periplasm of Escherichia coli J. Bacteriol. 2001 183 6794 6800 10.1128/JB.183.23.6794-6800.2001 11698367
Rizzitello, A. E., Harper, J. R. & Silhavy, T. J. Genetic evidence for parallel pathways of chaperone activity in the periplasm of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 183, 6794–6800 (2001).11698367 10.1128/JB.183.23.6794-6800.2001
31. Sklar JG Wu T Kahne D Silhavy TJ Defining the roles of the periplasmic chaperones SurA, Skp, and DegP in Escherichia coli Genes Dev. 2007 21 2473 2484 10.1101/gad.1581007 17908933
Sklar, J. G., Wu, T., Kahne, D. & Silhavy, T. J. Defining the roles of the periplasmic chaperones SurA, Skp, and DegP in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev. 21, 2473–2484 (2007).17908933 10.1101/gad.1581007
32. Missiakas D Betton J-M Raina S New components of protein folding in extracytoplasmic compartments of Escherichia coli SurA, FkpA and Skp/OmpH Mol. Microbiol. 1996 21 871 884 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.561412.x 8878048
Missiakas, D., Betton, J.-M. & Raina, S. New components of protein folding in extracytoplasmic compartments of Escherichia coli SurA, FkpA and Skp/OmpH. Mol. Microbiol. 21, 871–884 (1996).8878048 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.561412.x
33. Lazar SW Kolter R SurA assists the folding of Escherichia coli outer membrane proteins J. Bacteriol. 1996 178 1770 1773 10.1128/jb.178.6.1770-1773.1996 8626309
Lazar, S. W. & Kolter, R. SurA assists the folding of Escherichia coli outer membrane proteins. J. Bacteriol. 178, 1770–1773 (1996).8626309 10.1128/jb.178.6.1770-1773.1996
34. Rouvière PE Gross CA SurA, a periplasmic protein with peptidyl-prolyl isomerase activity, participates in the assembly of outer membrane porins Genes Dev. 1996 10 3170 3182 10.1101/gad.10.24.3170 8985185
Rouvière, P. E. & Gross, C. A. SurA, a periplasmic protein with peptidyl-prolyl isomerase activity, participates in the assembly of outer membrane porins. Genes Dev. 10, 3170–3182 (1996).8985185 10.1101/gad.10.24.3170
35. Behrens S Maier R de Cock H Schmid FX Gross CA The SurA periplasmic PPIase lacking its parvulin domains functions in vivo and has chaperone activity EMBO J. 2001 20 285 294 10.1093/emboj/20.1.285 11226178
Behrens, S., Maier, R., de Cock, H., Schmid, F. X. & Gross, C. A. The SurA periplasmic PPIase lacking its parvulin domains functions in vivo and has chaperone activity. EMBO J. 20, 285–294 (2001).11226178 10.1093/emboj/20.1.285
36. Vertommen D Ruiz N Leverrier P Silhavy TJ Collet JF Characterization of the role of the Escherichia coli periplasmic chaperone SurA using differential proteomics Proteomics 2009 9 2432 2443 10.1002/pmic.200800794 19343722
Vertommen, D., Ruiz, N., Leverrier, P., Silhavy, T. J. & Collet, J. F. Characterization of the role of the Escherichia coli periplasmic chaperone SurA using differential proteomics. Proteomics 9, 2432–2443 (2009).19343722 10.1002/pmic.200800794
37. Obi IR Francis MS Demarcating SurA activities required for outer membrane targeting of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis adhesins Infect. Immun. 2013 81 2296 2308 10.1128/IAI.01208-12 23589578
Obi, I. R. & Francis, M. S. Demarcating SurA activities required for outer membrane targeting of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis adhesins. Infect. Immun. 81, 2296–2308 (2013).23589578 10.1128/IAI.01208-12
38. Justice SS Periplasmic peptidyl prolyl cis-trans isomerases are not essential for viability, but SurA is required for pilus biogenesis in Escherichia coli J. Bacteriol. 2005 187 7680 7686 10.1128/JB.187.22.7680-7686.2005 16267292
Justice, S. S. et al. Periplasmic peptidyl prolyl cis-trans isomerases are not essential for viability, but SurA is required for pilus biogenesis in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 187, 7680–7686 (2005).16267292 10.1128/JB.187.22.7680-7686.2005
39. Justice SS Lauer SR Hultgren SJ Hunstad DA Maturation of intracellular Escherichia coli communities requires SurA Infect. Immun. 2006 74 4793 4800 10.1128/IAI.00355-06 16861667
Justice, S. S., Lauer, S. R., Hultgren, S. J. & Hunstad, D. A. Maturation of intracellular Escherichia coli communities requires SurA. Infect. Immun. 74, 4793–4800 (2006).16861667 10.1128/IAI.00355-06
40. Palomino C Marín E Fernández LÁ The fimbrial usher FimD follows the SurA-BamB pathway for its assembly in the outer membrane of Escherichia coli J. Bacteriol. 2011 193 5222 5230 10.1128/JB.05585-11 21784935
Palomino, C., Marín, E. & Fernández, L. Á. The fimbrial usher FimD follows the SurA-BamB pathway for its assembly in the outer membrane of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 193, 5222–5230 (2011).21784935 10.1128/JB.05585-11
41. Watts KM Hunstad DA Components of SurA required for outer membrane biogenesis in uropathogenic Escherichia coli PLoS ONE 2008 3 e3359 10.1371/journal.pone.0003359 18836534
Watts, K. M. & Hunstad, D. A. Components of SurA required for outer membrane biogenesis in uropathogenic Escherichia coli. PLoS ONE 3, e3359 (2008).18836534 10.1371/journal.pone.0003359
42. Purdy GE Fisher CR Payne SM IcsA surface presentation in Shigella flexneri requires the periplasmic chaperones DegP, Skp, and SurA J. Bacteriol. 2007 189 5566 5573 10.1128/JB.00483-07 17526712
Purdy, G. E., Fisher, C. R. & Payne, S. M. IcsA surface presentation in Shigella flexneri requires the periplasmic chaperones DegP, Skp, and SurA. J. Bacteriol. 189, 5566–5573 (2007).17526712 10.1128/JB.00483-07
43. Ieva R Bernstein HD Interaction of an autotransporter passenger domain with BamA during its translocation across the bacterial outer membrane Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2009 106 19120 19125 10.1073/pnas.0907912106 19850876
Ieva, R. & Bernstein, H. D. Interaction of an autotransporter passenger domain with BamA during its translocation across the bacterial outer membrane. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 19120–19125 (2009).19850876 10.1073/pnas.0907912106
44. Ruiz-Perez F Roles of periplasmic chaperone proteins in the biogenesis of serine protease autotransporters of Enterobacteriaceae J. Bacteriol. 2009 191 6571 6583 10.1128/JB.00754-09 19734313
Ruiz-Perez, F. et al. Roles of periplasmic chaperone proteins in the biogenesis of serine protease autotransporters of Enterobacteriaceae. J. Bacteriol. 191, 6571–6583 (2009).19734313 10.1128/JB.00754-09
45. Sauri A The Bam (Omp85) complex is involved in secretion of the autotransporter haemoglobin protease Microbiology 2009 155 3982 3991 10.1099/mic.0.034991-0 19815580
Sauri, A. et al. The Bam (Omp85) complex is involved in secretion of the autotransporter haemoglobin protease. Microbiology 155, 3982–3991 (2009).19815580 10.1099/mic.0.034991-0
46. Oberhettinger P Leo JC Linke D Autenrieth IB Schütz MS The inverse autotransporter intimin exports its passenger domain via a hairpin intermediate J. Biol. Chem. 2015 290 1837 1849 10.1074/jbc.M114.604769 25488660
Oberhettinger, P., Leo, J. C., Linke, D., Autenrieth, I. B. & Schütz, M. S. The inverse autotransporter intimin exports its passenger domain via a hairpin intermediate. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 1837–1849 (2015).25488660 10.1074/jbc.M114.604769
47. Klein K Deprivation of the periplasmic chaperone SurA reduces virulence and restores antibiotic susceptibility of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Front. Microbiol. 2019 10 100 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00100 30846971
Klein, K. et al. Deprivation of the periplasmic chaperone SurA reduces virulence and restores antibiotic susceptibility of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front. Microbiol. 10, 100 (2019).30846971 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00100
48. Bitto E McKay DB Crystallographic structure of SurA, a molecular chaperone that facilitates folding of outer membrane porins Structure 2002 10 1489 1498 10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00877-8 12429090
Bitto, E. & McKay, D. B. Crystallographic structure of SurA, a molecular chaperone that facilitates folding of outer membrane porins. Structure 10, 1489–1498 (2002).12429090 10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00877-8
49. Humes JR The role of SurA PPIase domains in preventing aggregation of the outer-membrane proteins tOmpA and OmpT J. Mol. Biol. 2019 431 1267 1283 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.01.032 30716334
Humes, J. R. et al. The role of SurA PPIase domains in preventing aggregation of the outer-membrane proteins tOmpA and OmpT. J. Mol. Biol. 431, 1267–1283 (2019).30716334 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.01.032
50. Schiffrin B Dynamic interplay between the periplasmic chaperone SurA and the BAM complex in outer membrane protein folding Commun. Biol. 2022 5 560 10.1038/s42003-022-03502-w 35676411
Schiffrin, B. et al. Dynamic interplay between the periplasmic chaperone SurA and the BAM complex in outer membrane protein folding. Commun. Biol. 5, 560 (2022).35676411 10.1038/s42003-022-03502-w
51. Ricci DP Schwalm J Gonzales-Cope M Silhavy TJ The activity and specificity of the outer membrane protein chaperone SurA are modulated by a proline isomerase domain mBio 2013 4 e00540 13 10.1128/mBio.00540-13 23943764
Ricci, D. P., Schwalm, J., Gonzales-Cope, M. & Silhavy, T. J. The activity and specificity of the outer membrane protein chaperone SurA are modulated by a proline isomerase domain. mBio 4, e00540–13 (2013).23943764 10.1128/mBio.00540-13
52. Soltes GR Schwalm J Ricci DP Silhavy TJ The activity of Escherichia coli chaperone SurA is regulated by conformational changes involving a parvulin domain J. Bacteriol. 2016 198 921 929 10.1128/JB.00889-15 26728192
Soltes, G. R., Schwalm, J., Ricci, D. P. & Silhavy, T. J. The activity of Escherichia coli chaperone SurA is regulated by conformational changes involving a parvulin domain. J. Bacteriol. 198, 921–929 (2016).26728192 10.1128/JB.00889-15
53. Marx DC Leblanc MJ Plummer AM Krueger S Fleming KG Domain interactions determine the conformational ensemble of the periplasmic chaperone SurA Protein Sci. 2020 29 2043 2053 10.1002/pro.3924 32748422
Marx, D. C., Leblanc, M. J., Plummer, A. M., Krueger, S. & Fleming, K. G. Domain interactions determine the conformational ensemble of the periplasmic chaperone SurA. Protein Sci. 29, 2043–2053 (2020).32748422 10.1002/pro.3924
54. Marx DC SurA is a cryptically grooved chaperone that expands unfolded outer membrane proteins Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2020 117 28026 28035 10.1073/pnas.2008175117 33093201
Marx, D. C. et al. SurA is a cryptically grooved chaperone that expands unfolded outer membrane proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 28026–28035 (2020).33093201 10.1073/pnas.2008175117
55. Jia M Conformational dynamics of the periplasmic chaperone SurA Biochemistry 2020 59 3235 3246 10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00507 32786408
Jia, M. et al. Conformational dynamics of the periplasmic chaperone SurA. Biochemistry 59, 3235–3246 (2020).32786408 10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00507
56. Calabrese AN Inter-domain dynamics in the chaperone SurA and multi-site binding to its outer membrane protein clients Nat. Commun. 2020 11 2155 10.1038/s41467-020-15702-1 32358557
Calabrese, A. N. et al. Inter-domain dynamics in the chaperone SurA and multi-site binding to its outer membrane protein clients. Nat. Commun. 11, 2155 (2020).32358557 10.1038/s41467-020-15702-1
57. Hennecke G Nolte J Volkmer-Engert R Schneider-Mergener J Behrens S The periplasmic chaperone SurA exploits two features characteristic of integral outer membrane proteins for selective substrate recognition J. Biol. Chem. 2005 280 23540 23548 10.1074/jbc.M413742200 15840585
Hennecke, G., Nolte, J., Volkmer-Engert, R., Schneider-Mergener, J. & Behrens, S. The periplasmic chaperone SurA exploits two features characteristic of integral outer membrane proteins for selective substrate recognition. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 23540–23548 (2005).15840585 10.1074/jbc.M413742200
58. Bitto E McKay DB The periplasmic molecular chaperone protein SurA binds a peptide motif that is characteristic of integral outer membrane proteins J. Biol. Chem. 2003 278 49316 49322 10.1074/jbc.M308853200 14506253
Bitto, E. & McKay, D. B. The periplasmic molecular chaperone protein SurA binds a peptide motif that is characteristic of integral outer membrane proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 49316–49322 (2003).14506253 10.1074/jbc.M308853200
59. Xu X Wang S Hu YX McKay DB The periplasmic bacterial molecular chaperone SurA adapts its structure to bind peptides in different conformations to assert a sequence preference for aromatic residues J. Mol. Biol. 2007 373 367 381 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.07.069 17825319
Xu, X., Wang, S., Hu, Y. X. & McKay, D. B. The periplasmic bacterial molecular chaperone SurA adapts its structure to bind peptides in different conformations to assert a sequence preference for aromatic residues. J. Mol. Biol. 373, 367–381 (2007).17825319 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.07.069
60. Jumper J Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold Nature 2021 596 583 589 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 34265844
Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).34265844 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2
61. Varadi M AlphaFold protein structure database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models Nucleic Acids Res. 2021 50 D439 D444 10.1093/nar/gkab1061
Varadi, M. et al. AlphaFold protein structure database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D439–D444 (2021).10.1093/nar/gkab1061
62. Li G Single-molecule detection reveals different roles of Skp and SurA as chaperones ACS Chem. Biol. 2018 13 1082 1089 10.1021/acschembio.8b00097 29543429
Li, G. et al. Single-molecule detection reveals different roles of Skp and SurA as chaperones. ACS Chem. Biol. 13, 1082–1089 (2018).29543429 10.1021/acschembio.8b00097
63. Chamachi N Chaperones Skp and SurA dynamically expand unfolded OmpX and synergistically disassemble oligomeric aggregates Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2022 119 e2118919119 10.1073/pnas.2118919119 35217619
Chamachi, N. et al. Chaperones Skp and SurA dynamically expand unfolded OmpX and synergistically disassemble oligomeric aggregates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2118919119 (2022).35217619 10.1073/pnas.2118919119
64. Vogt J Schulz GE The structure of the outer membrane protein OmpX from Escherichia coli reveals possible mechanisms of virulence Structure 1999 7 1301 1309 10.1016/S0969-2126(00)80063-5 10545325
Vogt, J. & Schulz, G. E. The structure of the outer membrane protein OmpX from Escherichia coli reveals possible mechanisms of virulence. Structure 7, 1301–1309 (1999).10545325 10.1016/S0969-2126(00)80063-5
65. Burmann BM Wang C Hiller S Conformation and dynamics of the periplasmic membrane-protein-chaperone complexes OmpX-Skp and tOmpA-Skp Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2013 20 1265 1272 10.1038/nsmb.2677 24077225
Burmann, B. M., Wang, C. & Hiller, S. Conformation and dynamics of the periplasmic membrane-protein-chaperone complexes OmpX-Skp and tOmpA-Skp. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 1265–1272 (2013).24077225 10.1038/nsmb.2677
66. Krainer G Slow interconversion in a heterogeneous unfolded-state ensemble of outer-membrane phospholipase A Biophys. J. 2017 113 1280 1289 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.05.037 28629619
Krainer, G. et al. Slow interconversion in a heterogeneous unfolded-state ensemble of outer-membrane phospholipase A. Biophys. J. 113, 1280–1289 (2017).28629619 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.05.037
67. Devlin, T., Fleming, P. J., Loza, N. & Fleming, K. G. Generation of unfolded outer membrane protein ensembles defined by hydrodynamic properties. Eur. Biophys. J. 52, 415–425 (2023).
68. Torella JP Holden SJ Santoso Y Hohlbein J Kapanidis AN Identifying molecular dynamics in single-molecule FRET experiments with burst variance analysis Biophys. J. 2011 100 1568 1577 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.01.066 21402040
Torella, J. P., Holden, S. J., Santoso, Y., Hohlbein, J. & Kapanidis, A. N. Identifying molecular dynamics in single-molecule FRET experiments with burst variance analysis. Biophys. J. 100, 1568–1577 (2011).21402040 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.01.066
69. Kalinin S Valeri A Antonik M Felekyan S Seidel CA Detection of structural dynamics by FRET: a photon distribution and fluorescence lifetime analysis of systems with multiple states J. Phys. Chem. B 2010 114 7983 7995 10.1021/jp102156t 20486698
Kalinin, S., Valeri, A., Antonik, M., Felekyan, S. & Seidel, C. A. Detection of structural dynamics by FRET: a photon distribution and fluorescence lifetime analysis of systems with multiple states. J. Phys. Chem. B 114, 7983–7995 (2010).20486698 10.1021/jp102156t
70. Tugarinov V Hwang PM Ollerenshaw JE Kay LE Cross-correlated relaxation enhanced 1H[bond]13C NMR spectroscopy of methyl groups in very high molecular weight proteins and protein complexes J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003 125 10420 10428 10.1021/ja030153x 12926967
Tugarinov, V., Hwang, P. M., Ollerenshaw, J. E. & Kay, L. E. Cross-correlated relaxation enhanced 1H[bond]13C NMR spectroscopy of methyl groups in very high molecular weight proteins and protein complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 10420–10428 (2003).12926967 10.1021/ja030153x
71. Schütz S Sprangers R Methyl TROSY spectroscopy: a versatile NMR approach to study challenging biological systems Prog. Nucl. Magn. 2020 116 56 84 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2019.09.004
Schütz, S. & Sprangers, R. Methyl TROSY spectroscopy: a versatile NMR approach to study challenging biological systems. Prog. Nucl. Magn. 116, 56–84 (2020).10.1016/j.pnmrs.2019.09.004
72. Kleckner IR Foster MP An introduction to NMR-based approaches for measuring protein dynamics Biochim. Biophys. Acta Protein Proteom. 2011 1814 942 968 10.1016/j.bbapap.2010.10.012
Kleckner, I. R. & Foster, M. P. An introduction to NMR-based approaches for measuring protein dynamics. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Protein Proteom. 1814, 942–968 (2011).10.1016/j.bbapap.2010.10.012
73. Williamson MP Using chemical shift perturbation to characterise ligand binding Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2013 73 1 16 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2013.02.001 23962882
Williamson, M. P. Using chemical shift perturbation to characterise ligand binding. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 73, 1–16 (2013).23962882 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2013.02.001
74. Ruschak AM Kay LE Methyl groups as probes of supra-molecular structure, dynamics and function J. Biomol. NMR 2010 46 75 87 10.1007/s10858-009-9376-1 19784810
Ruschak, A. M. & Kay, L. E. Methyl groups as probes of supra-molecular structure, dynamics and function. J. Biomol. NMR 46, 75–87 (2010).19784810 10.1007/s10858-009-9376-1
75. Ebie Tan A Burgess NK DeAndrade DS Marold JD Fleming KG Self-association of unfolded outer membrane proteins Macromol. Biosci. 2010 10 763 10.1002/mabi.200900479 20491126
Ebie Tan, A., Burgess, N. K., DeAndrade, D. S., Marold, J. D. & Fleming, K. G. Self-association of unfolded outer membrane proteins. Macromol. Biosci. 10, 763 (2010).20491126 10.1002/mabi.200900479
76. Weinhäupl K Structural basis of membrane protein chaperoning through the mitochondrial intermembrane space Cell 2018 175 1365 1379.e25 10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.039 30445040
Weinhäupl, K. et al. Structural basis of membrane protein chaperoning through the mitochondrial intermembrane space. Cell 175, 1365–1379.e25 (2018).30445040 10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.039
77. Sučec I Structural basis of client specificity in mitochondrial membrane-protein chaperones Sci. Adv. 2020 6 eabd0263 10.1126/sciadv.abd0263 33355130
Sučec, I. et al. Structural basis of client specificity in mitochondrial membrane-protein chaperones. Sci. Adv. 6, eabd0263 (2020).33355130 10.1126/sciadv.abd0263
78. Burmann BM Regulation of α-synuclein by chaperones in mammalian cells Nature 2020 577 127 132 10.1038/s41586-019-1808-9 31802003
Burmann, B. M. et al. Regulation of α-synuclein by chaperones in mammalian cells. Nature 577, 127–132 (2020).31802003 10.1038/s41586-019-1808-9
79. Foster MP McElroy CA Amero CD Solution NMR of large molecules and assemblies Biochemistry 2007 46 331 340 10.1021/bi0621314 17209543
Foster, M. P., McElroy, C. A. & Amero, C. D. Solution NMR of large molecules and assemblies. Biochemistry 46, 331–340 (2007).17209543 10.1021/bi0621314
80. Bhattacharya S NMR-guided directed evolution Nature 2022 610 389 393 10.1038/s41586-022-05278-9 36198791
Bhattacharya, S. et al. NMR-guided directed evolution. Nature 610, 389–393 (2022).36198791 10.1038/s41586-022-05278-9
81. Bitto E McKay DB Binding of phage-display-selected peptides to the periplasmic chaperone protein SurA mimics binding of unfolded outer membrane proteins FEBS Lett. 2004 568 94 98 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.05.014 15196927
Bitto, E. & McKay, D. B. Binding of phage-display-selected peptides to the periplasmic chaperone protein SurA mimics binding of unfolded outer membrane proteins. FEBS Lett. 568, 94–98 (2004).15196927 10.1016/j.febslet.2004.05.014
82. Vorobieva AA De novo design of transmembrane β barrels Science 2021 371 eabc8182 10.1126/science.abc8182 33602829
Vorobieva, A. A. et al. De novo design of transmembrane β barrels. Science 371, eabc8182 (2021).33602829 10.1126/science.abc8182
83. Behrens-Kneip S The role of SurA factor in outer membrane protein transport and virulence Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2010 300 421 428 10.1016/j.ijmm.2010.04.012 20447864
Behrens-Kneip, S. The role of SurA factor in outer membrane protein transport and virulence. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 300, 421–428 (2010).20447864 10.1016/j.ijmm.2010.04.012
84. Gao M Nakajima An D Skolnick J Deep learning-driven insights into super protein complexes for outer membrane protein biogenesis in bacteria eLife 2022 11 e82885 10.7554/eLife.82885 36576775
Gao, M., Nakajima An, D. & Skolnick, J. Deep learning-driven insights into super protein complexes for outer membrane protein biogenesis in bacteria. eLife 11, e82885 (2022).36576775 10.7554/eLife.82885
85. Schiffrin B Radford SE Brockwell DJ Calabrese AN PyXlinkViewer: a flexible tool for visualization of protein chemical crosslinking data within the PyMOL molecular graphics system Protein Sci. 2020 29 1851 1857 10.1002/pro.3902 32557917
Schiffrin, B., Radford, S. E., Brockwell, D. J. & Calabrese, A. N. PyXlinkViewer: a flexible tool for visualization of protein chemical crosslinking data within the PyMOL molecular graphics system. Protein Sci. 29, 1851–1857 (2020).32557917 10.1002/pro.3902
86. Moon CP Zaccai NR Fleming PJ Gessmann D Fleming KG Membrane protein thermodynamic stability may serve as the energy sink for sorting in the periplasm Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2013 110 4285 4290 10.1073/pnas.1212527110 23440211
Moon, C. P., Zaccai, N. R., Fleming, P. J., Gessmann, D. & Fleming, K. G. Membrane protein thermodynamic stability may serve as the energy sink for sorting in the periplasm. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 4285–4290 (2013).23440211 10.1073/pnas.1212527110
87. Quan S Super Spy variants implicate flexibility in chaperone action eLife 2014 3 e01584 10.7554/eLife.01584 24497545
Quan, S. et al. Super Spy variants implicate flexibility in chaperone action. eLife 3, e01584 (2014).24497545 10.7554/eLife.01584
88. Stirling PC Bakhoum SF Feigl AB Leroux MR Convergent evolution of clamp-like binding sites in diverse chaperones Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2006 13 865 870 10.1038/nsmb1153 17021621
Stirling, P. C., Bakhoum, S. F., Feigl, A. B. & Leroux, M. R. Convergent evolution of clamp-like binding sites in diverse chaperones. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 13, 865–870 (2006).17021621 10.1038/nsmb1153
89. Schiffrin B Skp is a multivalent chaperone of outer-membrane proteins Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2016 23 786 793 10.1038/nsmb.3266 27455461
Schiffrin, B. et al. Skp is a multivalent chaperone of outer-membrane proteins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23, 786–793 (2016).27455461 10.1038/nsmb.3266
90. Suss O Reichmann D Protein plasticity underlines activation and function of ATP-independent chaperones Front Mol. Biosci. 2015 2 43 10.3389/fmolb.2015.00043 26284255
Suss, O. & Reichmann, D. Protein plasticity underlines activation and function of ATP-independent chaperones. Front Mol. Biosci. 2, 43 (2015).26284255 10.3389/fmolb.2015.00043
91. Mitra R Wu K Lee C Bardwell JC ATP-independent chaperones Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2022 51 409 429 10.1146/annurev-biophys-090121-082906 35167761
Mitra, R., Wu, K., Lee, C. & Bardwell, J. C. ATP-independent chaperones. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 51, 409–429 (2022).35167761 10.1146/annurev-biophys-090121-082906
92. Burmann BM Hiller S Chaperones and chaperone–substrate complexes: dynamic playgrounds for NMR spectroscopists Prog. Nucl. Magn. 2015 86 41 64 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2015.02.004
Burmann, B. M. & Hiller, S. Chaperones and chaperone–substrate complexes: dynamic playgrounds for NMR spectroscopists. Prog. Nucl. Magn. 86, 41–64 (2015).10.1016/j.pnmrs.2015.02.004
93. Karamanos TK Clore GM Large chaperone complexes through the lens of nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy Ann. Rev. Biophys. 2022 51 223 246 10.1146/annurev-biophys-090921-120150 35044800
Karamanos, T. K. & Clore, G. M. Large chaperone complexes through the lens of nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Ann. Rev. Biophys. 51, 223–246 (2022).35044800 10.1146/annurev-biophys-090921-120150
94. Cock PJA Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics Bioinformatics 2009 25 1422 1423 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163 19304878
Cock, P. J. A. et al. Biopython: freely available Python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics. Bioinformatics 25, 1422–1423 (2009).19304878 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163
95. Hamelryck T Manderick B PDB file parser and structure class implemented in Python Bioinformatics 2003 19 2308 2310 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg299 14630660
Hamelryck, T. & Manderick, B. PDB file parser and structure class implemented in Python. Bioinformatics 19, 2308–2310 (2003).14630660 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg299
96. Paysan-Lafosse T InterPro in 2022 Nucleic Acids Res. 2022 51 D418 D427 10.1093/nar/gkac993
Paysan-Lafosse, T. et al. InterPro in 2022. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D418–D427 (2022).10.1093/nar/gkac993
97. Fu L Niu B Zhu Z Wu S Li W CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data Bioinformatics 2012 28 3150 3152 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565 23060610
Fu, L., Niu, B., Zhu, Z., Wu, S. & Li, W. CD-HIT: accelerated for clustering the next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics 28, 3150–3152 (2012).23060610 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts565
98. Sievers F Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011 7 539 10.1038/msb.2011.75 21988835
Sievers, F. et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 539 (2011).21988835 10.1038/msb.2011.75
99. Waterhouse AM Procter JB Martin DMA Clamp M Barton GJ Jalview Version 2—a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench Bioinformatics 2009 25 1189 1191 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033 19151095
Waterhouse, A. M., Procter, J. B., Martin, D. M. A., Clamp, M. & Barton, G. J. Jalview Version 2—a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics 25, 1189–1191 (2009).19151095 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033
100. Ashkenazy H ConSurf 2016: an improved methodology to estimate and visualize evolutionary conservation in macromolecules Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 44 W344 W350 10.1093/nar/gkw408 27166375
Ashkenazy, H. et al. ConSurf 2016: an improved methodology to estimate and visualize evolutionary conservation in macromolecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W344–W350 (2016).27166375 10.1093/nar/gkw408
101. Landau M ConSurf 2005: the projection of evolutionary conservation scores of residues on protein structures Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 33 W299 W302 10.1093/nar/gki370 15980475
Landau, M. et al. ConSurf 2005: the projection of evolutionary conservation scores of residues on protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W299–W302 (2005).15980475 10.1093/nar/gki370
102. Hagan CL Kim S Kahne D Reconstitution of outer membrane protein assembly from purified components Science 2010 328 890 892 10.1126/science.1188919 20378773
Hagan, C. L., Kim, S. & Kahne, D. Reconstitution of outer membrane protein assembly from purified components. Science 328, 890–892 (2010).20378773 10.1126/science.1188919
103. Burgess NK Dao TP Stanley AM Fleming KG Beta-barrel proteins that reside in the Escherichia coli outer membrane in vivo demonstrate varied folding behavior in vitro J. Biol. Chem. 2008 283 26748 26758 10.1074/jbc.M802754200 18641391
Burgess, N. K., Dao, T. P., Stanley, A. M. & Fleming, K. G. Beta-barrel proteins that reside in the Escherichia coli outer membrane in vivo demonstrate varied folding behavior in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 26748–26758 (2008).18641391 10.1074/jbc.M802754200
104. Cordes T Vogelsang J Tinnefeld P On the mechanism of trolox as antiblinking and antibleaching reagent J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009 131 5018 5019 10.1021/ja809117z 19301868
Cordes, T., Vogelsang, J. & Tinnefeld, P. On the mechanism of trolox as antiblinking and antibleaching reagent. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 5018–5019 (2009).19301868 10.1021/ja809117z
105. Ingargiola A Lerner E Chung S Weiss S Michalet X FRETBursts: an open source toolkit for analysis of freely-diffusing single-molecule FRET PLoS ONE 2016 11 e0160716 10.1371/journal.pone.0160716 27532626
Ingargiola, A., Lerner, E., Chung, S., Weiss, S. & Michalet, X. FRETBursts: an open source toolkit for analysis of freely-diffusing single-molecule FRET. PLoS ONE 11, e0160716 (2016).27532626 10.1371/journal.pone.0160716
106. Lee NK Accurate FRET measurements within single diffusing biomolecules using alternating-laser excitation Biophys. J. 2005 88 2939 2953 10.1529/biophysj.104.054114 15653725
Lee, N. K. et al. Accurate FRET measurements within single diffusing biomolecules using alternating-laser excitation. Biophys. J. 88, 2939–2953 (2005).15653725 10.1529/biophysj.104.054114
107. Tomov TE Disentangling subpopulations in single-molecule FRET and ALEX experiments with photon distribution analysis Biophys. J. 2012 102 1163 1173 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.11.4025 22404939
Tomov, T. E. et al. Disentangling subpopulations in single-molecule FRET and ALEX experiments with photon distribution analysis. Biophys. J. 102, 1163–1173 (2012).22404939 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.11.4025
108. Hartmann A Krainer G Keller S Schlierf M Quantification of millisecond protein-folding dynamics in membrane-mimetic environments by single-molecule förster resonance energy transfer spectroscopy Anal. Chem. 2015 87 11224 11232 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b03207 26457727
Hartmann, A., Krainer, G., Keller, S. & Schlierf, M. Quantification of millisecond protein-folding dynamics in membrane-mimetic environments by single-molecule förster resonance energy transfer spectroscopy. Anal. Chem. 87, 11224–11232 (2015).26457727 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b03207
109. Kalinin S Valeri A Antonik M Felekyan S Seidel CAM Detection of structural dynamics by FRET: a photon distribution and fluorescence lifetime analysis of systems with multiple states. J. Phys. Chem. B 2010 114 7983 7995 10.1021/jp102156t 20486698
Kalinin, S., Valeri, A., Antonik, M., Felekyan, S. & Seidel, C. A. M. Detection of structural dynamics by FRET: a photon distribution and fluorescence lifetime analysis of systems with multiple states.J. Phys. Chem. B 114, 7983–7995 (2010).20486698 10.1021/jp102156t
110. Azatian SB Kaur N Latham MP Increasing the buffering capacity of minimal media leads to higher protein yield J. Biomol. NMR 2019 73 11 17 10.1007/s10858-018-00222-4 30613903
Azatian, S. B., Kaur, N. & Latham, M. P. Increasing the buffering capacity of minimal media leads to higher protein yield. J. Biomol. NMR 73, 11–17 (2019).30613903 10.1007/s10858-018-00222-4
111. McMorran LM Bartlett AI Huysmans GH Radford SE Brockwell DJ Dissecting the effects of periplasmic chaperones on the in vitro folding of the outer membrane protein PagP J. Mol. Biol. 2013 425 3178 3191 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.06.017 23796519
McMorran, L. M., Bartlett, A. I., Huysmans, G. H., Radford, S. E. & Brockwell, D. J. Dissecting the effects of periplasmic chaperones on the in vitro folding of the outer membrane protein PagP. J. Mol. Biol. 425, 3178–3191 (2013).23796519 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.06.017
112. Schanda P Brutscher B Very fast two-dimensional NMR spectroscopy for real-time investigation of dynamic events in proteins on the time scale of seconds J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005 127 8014 8015 10.1021/ja051306e 15926816
Schanda, P. & Brutscher, B. Very fast two-dimensional NMR spectroscopy for real-time investigation of dynamic events in proteins on the time scale of seconds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 8014–8015 (2005).15926816 10.1021/ja051306e
113. Favier A Brutscher B NMRlib: user-friendly pulse sequence tools for Bruker NMR spectrometers J. Biomol. NMR 2019 73 199 211 10.1007/s10858-019-00249-1 31076970
Favier, A. & Brutscher, B. NMRlib: user-friendly pulse sequence tools for Bruker NMR spectrometers. J. Biomol. NMR 73, 199–211 (2019).31076970 10.1007/s10858-019-00249-1
114. Delaglio F NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes J. Biomol. NMR 1995 6 277 293 10.1007/BF00197809 8520220
Delaglio, F. et al. NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J. Biomol. NMR 6, 277–293 (1995).8520220 10.1007/BF00197809
115. Vranken WF The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: development of a software pipeline Proteins 2005 59 687 696 10.1002/prot.20449 15815974
Vranken, W. F. et al. The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: development of a software pipeline. Proteins 59, 687–696 (2005).15815974 10.1002/prot.20449
116. Hunter JD Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment Comput. Sci. Eng. 2007 9 90 95 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55
Hunter, J. D. Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment. Comput. Sci. Eng. 9, 90–95 (2007).10.1109/MCSE.2007.55
117. Harris CR Array programming with NumPy Nature 2020 585 357 362 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 32939066
Harris, C.R. et al. Array programming with NumPy. Nature 585, 357–362 (2020).32939066 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2
118. Helmus JJ Jaroniec CP Nmrglue an open source Python package for the analysis of multidimensional NMR data J. Biomol. NMR 2013 55 355 367 10.1007/s10858-013-9718-x 23456039
Helmus, J. J. & Jaroniec, C. P. Nmrglue an open source Python package for the analysis of multidimensional NMR data. J. Biomol. NMR 55, 355–367 (2013).23456039 10.1007/s10858-013-9718-x
119. Eswar, N. et al. Comparative protein structure modeling using Modeller. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 54, 5–6 (2006).
