
==== Front
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med
ECAM
Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM
1741-427X
1741-4288
Hindawi

10.1155/2022/6356583
Research Article
Sodium Selenite Regulates the Proliferation and Apoptosis of Gastric Cancer Cells by Suppressing the Expression of LncRNA HOXB-AS1
Jiang Hongsheng 1 2
Hu Lingbo 3
Wu Quanfeng 1 2
Zhang Bitao 1 2
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5026-3907
Sun Jianhua jhsun51@sina.com
2
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5889-2713
Li Xiaoying 510135348@qq.com
1 2
1Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi 445000, Hubei, China
2Hubei Selenium and Human Health Institute, The Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi 445000, Hubei, China
3Department of Health Management Center, The Central Hospital of Enshi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Enshi 445000, Hubei, China
Academic Editor: Jun Yan Tao

2022
21 11 2022
21 11 2022
2022 635658322 6 2022
29 9 2022
12 10 2022
Copyright © 2022 Hongsheng Jiang et al.
2022
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Gastric carcinoma has a high incidence, accounting for approximately 6% of all cancers worldwide. The in vivo antitumor effect of sodium selenite on gastric carcinoma has been demonstrated. This study therefore aimed to further explore its targets in gastric cancer in vitro and elucidate its mechanism of action. The effects of inorganic sodium selenite (Na2SeO3) on apoptosis, proliferation, and invasion of gastric cancer cells were investigated, and the interaction between Na2SeO3 and expression of long noncoding RNA homeobox B cluster antisense RNA 1 (HOXB-AS1) was investigated to elucidate the specific mechanism of action of selenium on gastric cancer cell proliferation through regulation of HOXB-AS1. Na2SeO3 downregulated the expression of HOXB-AS1 in the human gastric cancer (HGC) cell lines, HGC-27, NCI-N87, and KATO III cells, while inhibiting their proliferation and invasion and inducing apoptosis. The upregulation of HOXB-AS1 produced the opposite results. Na2SeO3 was used to stimulate HGC-27 cells, which caused HOXB-AS1 overexpression. The cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay revealed a decrease in cell proliferation, while western blotting, flow cytometry, and transwell migration assays showed the expression of apoptosis-related (Bad, Bcl-2, and cleaved-caspase-3) and invasion-related (MMP2, E-cadherin, and N-cadherin) proteins, indicating increased apoptosis and decreased invasion. We therefore conclude that Na2SeO3 inhibits the malignant progression of gastric cancer by downregulating the expression of HOXB-AS1 and thus could be used as a potential drug for its treatment.
==== Body
pmc1. Introduction

Gastric carcinoma ranks fifth and third in terms of the incidence and mortality rates of malignant tumors worldwide [1]. Although radical surgery is the preferred treatment modality for gastric cancer, standard treatment also involves perioperative chemotherapy [2, 3]. Most chemotherapeutic agents are toxic and exert adverse effects. In addition, 50% of patients with advanced gastric cancer show varying degrees of recurrence after receiving standard adjuvant therapy [4].

Selenium is an essential trace element that plays an important role in various physiological functions of the human body, including health maintenance and disease prevention [5]. Selenium occurs in organic (selenomethionine, selenocysteine, and γ-glutamyl-Se-methyl selenocysteine) and inorganic (sodium selenate and sodium selenite) forms [6, 7]. One study reported that people who consumed a selenium-rich diet had a lower risk of cancer [8]. Selenium can improve immunity and reduce DNA damage and oxidative stress [9]. The results of scientific research in the last century have shown that sodium selenite, sodium selenate, selenomethionine, selenium methylselenocysteine, and methylselenic acid all exert obvious antitumor effects [10, 11].

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) are RNA molecules that are longer than 200 nucleotides but have no protein coding ability [12]. In recent years, substantial evidence has suggested that lncRNAs play an important role in cancer by participating in proliferation, migration, apoptosis, and other tumor cell activities [13, 14]. Yan et al. found that the overexpression of lncRNA-MUF could activate the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and promote epithelial mesenchymal transition by forming a complex with membrane-binding protein A2, thus promoting the development of liver cancer [15]. lncRNA H19 promotes cell proliferation by competitively binding to miR-200a and derepressing β-catenin expression in colorectal cancer [16]. Selenium can further regulate the transcription of genes and affect lncRNA expression [17]. HOXB-AS1, a newly discovered lncRNA, and a similar encoded short peptide, HOXB-AS3, have been reported to inhibit the proliferation and metabolism of colon cancer cells [18, 19]. However, the mechanism underlying the interaction between selenium and HOXB-AS1 in gastric cancer remains unclear.

In this study, the effects of Na2SeO3 and HOXB-AS1 on apoptosis, proliferation, and invasion of gastric cancer cells as well as the interaction between selenium and HOXB-AS1 were investigated. Our results suggest that Na2SeO3 inhibits gastric cancer pathogenesis by downregulating HOXB-AS1 expression.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Culture

Human gastric cancer (HGC) cells (HGC-27, NCI-N87, and KATO III) and a human gastric epithelial cell line (GES-1) were obtained from the Shanghai Cell Bank of the Chinese Academy of Science and cultured at 37°C in 5% CO2. The cells were passaged at a ratio of 1:2–4 after reaching a confluency of >90%. HGC cells were grown in the RPMI-1640 medium (Hyclone) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). GES-1 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) (Hyclone) supplemented with 10% FBS.

2.2. Cell Transfection

HGC-27 cells were transfected with si-HOXB-AS1/si-NC or ov-HOXB-AS1/ov-NC using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). Three different si-HOXB-AS1 sequences were inserted into the plasmid vector: siRNA-1(5′-GTGGAAGAAACCGATAATT-3′),siRNA-2(5′-CTCCGTTTCTCCAGAAAAG-3′), and siRNA-3(5′-CCAGCGAAATTACAGGGAA-3′), all synthesized by Guangzhou Ruibo Biotechnology Co., Ltd. After 48 h of transfection, the cells were collected and used to analyze transfection efficiency by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).

2.3. Cell Treatment

HGC and GES-1 cells were treated with different concentrations of Na2SeO3 (0, 15, 30, and 60 μM) for 48 h. Cells were randomly divided into five groups: control (no treatment, CON), Na2SeO3 (treated with 15 μM Na2SeO3 for 48 h), ov-HOXB-AS1 (transfected with HOXB-AS1), ov-HOXB-AS1 + Na2SeO3 (transfected with HOXB-AS1 and treated with 15 μM Na2SeO3 for 48 h), and ov-NC + Na2SeO3 (transfected with ov-NC and treated with 15 μM Na2SeO3 for 48 h).

2.4. CCK-8 Assay

The CCK-8 (Solarbio) assay was performed to evaluate cell viability. Cells were seeded in 96-well plates (3 × 103 cells/well) and cultured overnight at 37°C in 5% CO2. After treatment, 10 μL of the CCK-8 solution was added to each well and incubated for 4 h. The absorbance of each well was measured at 450 nm with a microplate reader.

2.5. Flow Cytometry

Apoptosis was investigated using flow cytometry. A cell suspension containing 1 × 106 cells was washed and centrifuged with ice-coldphosphate-buffered saline at 800 × g for 5 min. The cells were then stained with 10 μL annexin V-FITC and 10 μL propidium iodide for 20 min in the dark before being subjected to flow cytometry.

2.6. Western Blot

The total protein in the supernatant was quantified using a BCA protein concentration assay kit (Solarbio). Proteins (20 μg/lane) were separated using 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes. After blocking with 5% skimmed milk overnight at 4°C, the membranes were incubated with specific primary antibodies against Bad (Bioswamp, PAB32756, 1 : 1000), B-cell lymphoma (Bcl)-2 (Bioswamp, PAB33482, 1 : 1000), cleaved-caspase-3 (Abcam, ab2302, 1 : 1000), MMP2 (Bioswamp, PAB34434, 1 : 1000), E-cadherin (Bioswamp, PAB33542, 1 : 1000), N-cadherin (Bioswamp, PAB30131, 1 : 1000), and GAPDH (Bioswamp, PAB36269, 1 : 1000) for 1 h at 25 ± 2°C. Next, the membranes were incubated with a goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (Bioswamp, SAB43714, 1 : 20000) at 25°C ± 2°C for 1 h and visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence system.

2.7. Transwell Migration Assay

HGC-27 cells were suspended in a serum-free medium with 1% FBS and seeded (1 × 105 cells/well) in the upper chamber of the transwell; 0.75 mL of the serum-free medium with 10% FBS was then added to the lower chamber. After 48 h of coincubation at 37°C, the HGC-27 cells on the bottom surface of the lower chamber were fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 20 min at room temperature and stained with 0.5% crystal violet for 30 min. Cells that did not migrate to the lower chamber were counted under an optical microscope (200× magnification).

2.8. RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from the collected cells using TRIzol reagent (Ambion) and reverse-transcribed into cDNA using the M-MuLV kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). cDNA was used as a template for qPCR amplification. The PCR conditions were as follows: predenaturation at 95°C for 3 min, denaturation at 95°C for 5 s, annealing at 56°C for 10 s, and extension at 72°C for 25 s. A total of 40 cycles were performed, with glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) used as an internal reference for intersample calibration. The primer sequences were as follows: HOXB-AS1-F, 5′-CTACACCAGTGCCTCACA-3′ HOXB-AS1-R, 5′-CTTCCACGAAACCTAAACGAPDH-F, 5′-GGGAAACTGTGGCGTGAT-3′; GAPDH-R, and 5′-GAGTGGGTGTCGCTGTTGA-3′. The expression of HOXB-AS1 was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method.

2.9. Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the differences between the groups using SPSS 21.0. Statistical significance was set at P ≤ 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Na2SeO3 on Apoptosis, Migration, and Proliferation of HGC-27 Cells

The viability (Figure 1(a)) and migration ability (Figures 1(d) and 1(e)) of HGC-27 cells were significantly decreased in groups treated with the three different doses of Na2SeO3 (15, 30, and 60 μM) compared to the controls (P < 0.01). Apoptosis was significantly increased in HGC-27 cells treated with Na2SeO3 (P < 0.01, Figures 1(b) and 1(c)) compared to the controls. In addition, apoptosis-related and migration-related protein expression (Figures 1(f) and 1(g)) was detected in HGC-27 cells with or without drug treatment. The protein expression of Bad, cleaved-caspase-3, and E-cadherin was significantly upregulated in groups treated with Na2SeO3 compared to that in the control group (P < 0.01). In contrast, the expression of Bcl-2, MMP2, and N-cadherin proteins was significantly downregulated compared to the control group (P < 0.01, Figures 1(d) and 1(e)). In all cases, the effects of Na2SeO3 were dose-dependent.

3.2. Effect of Na2SeO3 on HOXB-AS1 mRNA Expression in Human Gastric Cancer Cells (HGC-27, NCI-N87, and KATO III) and GES-1 Cells

We detected the expression of HOXB-AS1 mRNA in the HGC-27, NCI-N87, and KATO III cells, as well as in GES-1 cells, using qRT-PCR. The mRNA expression of HOXB-AS1 in HGC-27 cells was significantly higher than that in NCI-N87, Kato III, and GES-1 cells (P < 0.01; Figure 2(a)). Next, the four cell types were treated with different concentrations of Na2SeO3 (0, 15, 30, and 60 μM) for 48 h. Compared to controls, the expression of HOXB-AS1 mRNA was significantly downregulated in all cells treated with Na2SeO3 (P < 0.01, Figure 2(b)). HGC-27 cells were selected as the cell model for subsequent experiments.

3.3. Effect of HOXB-AS1 on Apoptosis, Migration, and Proliferation of HGC-27 Cells

After transfection, the expression of HOXB-AS1 was measured using qRT-PCR. Cells transfected with ov-HOXB-AS1 showed significantly higher expression of HOXB-AS1 than the CON group and the corresponding negative control (ov-NC) group (P < 0.01, Figure 3(a)). In contrast, cells transfected with siRNA-3 showed significantly lower expression of HOXB-AS1 than the CON group (P < 0.01, Figure 3(b)). There were no differences in the expression of HOXB-AS1 between the siRNA-1, siRNA-2, si-NC, and CON groups. Compared to the CON group, the viability (Figure 3(c)) and migration ability (Figures 3(f) and 3(g)) of HGC-27 cells had significantly increased in the ov-HOXB-AS1 group (P < 0.01) but significantly decreased in the si-HOXB-AS1 group, transfected with siRNA-3 (P < 0.01). The apoptosis of HGC-27 cells was determined using flow cytometry (Figures 3(d) and 3(e)). Compared to the control group, apoptosis of HGC-27 cells was increased in the si-HOXB-AS1 group and significantly decreased in the ov-HOXB-AS1 group. There were no differences in viability, migration ability, and apoptosis among the siRNA-1, siRNA-2, si-NC, and CON groups.

3.4. Effect of Na2SeO3 on HOXB-AS1-Influenced HGC-27 Cells

CCK-8 (Figure 4(a)) and transwell migration (Figures 4(d) and 4(e)) assays revealed that the viability and migration of HGC-27 cells had significantly increased in the ov-HOXB-AS1 group and decreased in the Na2SeO3 (15 μM) group compared to the CON group (P < 0.01). Compared with the ov-HOXB-AS1 + Na2SeO3 (15 µM) group, viability and migration had significantly increased in the ov-HOXB-AS1 group and decreased in the ov-NC + Na2SeO3 (15 μM) groups (P < 0.01). The opposite trend was observed in the apoptotic ability of HGC-27 cells (Figures 4(b) and 4(c)). HGC-27 cell apoptosis was significantly decreased in the ov-HOXB-AS1 group and increased in the Na2SeO3 (15 μM) group compared with that in the CON group (P < 0.01). Compared to the ov-HOXB-AS1 + Na2SeO3 (15 μM) group, apoptotic ability was significantly decreased in the OV-HOXB-AS1 group and increased in the ov-NC + Na2SeO3 (15 μM) group (P < 0.01). The protein expression levels of Bad, cleaved caspase-3, and E-cadherin were notably higher in the OV-HOXB-AS1 group and lower in the Na2SeO3 (15 μM) group than in the CON group (P < 0.01). Protein expression was upregulated in the ov-HOXB-AS1 + Na2SeO3 (15 μM) and ov-NC + Na2SeO3 (15 μM) groups compared with that in the OV-HOXB-AS1 group (P < 0.01). In contrast, the protein expression levels of Bcl-2, MMP2, and N-cadherin were significantly downregulated in the ov-HOXB-AS1 group and upregulated in the Na2SeO3 (15 μM) group (P < 0.01). Similarly, protein expression was downregulated in the ov-HOXB-AS1 + Na2SeO3 (15 μM) and ov-NC + Na2SeO3 (15 μM) groups compared with that in the ov-HOXB-AS1 group (P < 0.01, Figures 4(f) and 4(g)).

4. Discussion

The incidence of gastric cancer has been increasing in recent years, and mortality remains high due to recurrence and metastasis [20]. The incidence of gastric cancer is related to diet, sex, age, region, Helicobacter pylori infection status, genetic polymorphisms, and other causes [21]. The rate of early diagnosis is only 10%, meaning that most patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage [22]. Although surgical and perioperative techniques are continuously developing and the safety of gastric cancer resection has greatly improved, various postsurgical complications that seriously affect a patient's quality of life remain issues [23]. At present, most anticancer treatments are nonspecific, killing both tumor and normal cells. Therefore, it is of great clinical significance to explore the pathogenesis of gastric cancer and to develop targeted treatments for its prevention and treatment.

Recent studies have shown that noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), including ribosomal RNA, transfer RNA, microRNAs, and lncRNAs, are involved in many biological and pathological processes [24, 25]. Cancer is an inherited disease that involves multiple changes in the genome, and differential expression of lncRNAs has been closely related to the occurrence and development of tumors [20]. Seventy-five percent of the human genome is transcribed into RNA, but only a small portion of these transcripts encode proteins. The number of lncRNA genes is very large, and their potential mechanisms of action in cancer largely remain to be explored [26]. For example, increased expression of lncRNA plasmacytoma-variant translocation 1 (PVT1) is associated with an advanced stage and a poor prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer. PVT1 inhibits the expression of miR-214 in ovarian cancer cells by regulating the epithelial-mesenchymal transition process and its interaction with EZH2, which promotes the progression of ovarian cancer [27]. In addition, lncRNAs have been found to play important roles in the development and progression of various cancers [28]. The expression of lncRNA-141 is decreased in gastric cancer cells, and it plays a tumor suppressor role by targeting signal transduction and transcriptional activator 4 [29]; LncRNA-141 is strongly expressed in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells, where it promotes the proliferation, differentiation, and migration of NSCLC cells by inhibiting the expression of PHLPP1 and PHLPP2 and modulating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway [30]. HOXBAS1 is located on chromosome 17: 48,543,551–48,551,250. Studies have shown that inhibition of miR-885-3p expression can antagonize HOXB-AS1 knockdown and further affect the expression of HOXB2 in human glioblastoma tissues and cells. The proliferation, migration, and invasion of glioblastoma cells are regulated by HOXB-AS1, which modulates the miR-885-3p/HOXB2 axis [31]. Chen et al. previously showed that the inhibition of HOXB-AS1 expression in multiple myeloma (MM) cells blocks the binding between ELAVL1 and FUT4, thereby regulating the FUT4‐mediated Wnt/β-catenin pathway and resulting in decreased proliferation and increased apoptosis of MM cells [32]. Furthermore, HOXB-AS1 plays a key role in several cancers, including glioma and colon cancer, and is presumed to play an oncogenic role in gastric cancer. Moreover, lncRNA HOXB11-AS is overexpressed in gastric cancer and associated with a poor prognosis [33]. Currently, there are no studies on HOXB-AS1 and gastric cancer. Therefore, we hypothesized that HOXB-AS1 is a target for the treatment of gastric cancer. We found that HOXB-AS1 is highly expressed in HGC-27 cells. After HOXB-AS1 silencing, cell proliferation and migration abilities were reduced and the degree of apoptosis increased.

Since the discovery of an inverse relationship between the selenium content of local crops in the United States and the occurrence of cancer in 1969, the anticancer potential of selenium has gradually been discovered [34]. El Bayoumy et al. previously reported several potential actions of selenium in cancer prevention and treatment, including delaying the oxidative damage of DNA, lipids, and proteins; inhibiting the growth of tumor cells; changing the synthesis of DNA, RNA, and proteins; regulating the cell cycle; inducing apoptosis; regulating the expression of p53, COX-2, modified transcription factor-activating protein P, and nuclear factor B [35, 36].

Na2SeO3 can induce apoptosis in tumor cells undergoing oxidative stress [37], and Gazi et al. found that Na2SeO3 can inhibit the activation of androgen receptors mediated by interleukin-6 and inhibit the progression of prostate cancer by upregulating the expression of c-Jun [38]. Na2SeO3 was found to exert antitumor effects by inhibiting tumor angiogenesis in a transplanted canine breast tumor cell model in mice [39]. Na2SeO3 regulates the IDO1/kynurenine, TLR4, NF- κB, and Bcl2/Bax pathways and attenuates acetic acid-induced colitis in rats [40]. Liu et al. further verified that Na2SeO3 can increase ROS levels and inhibit the NF-κB signaling pathway, effectively inhibiting the growth, metastasis, and inducing apoptosis of renal cell carcinoma both in vitro and in vivo [41]. This strongly supports the in vivo antitumor effect of Na2SeO3 and indicates that Na2SeO3 is a promising therapeutic drug. Although it is often used as an anticancer agent for cancer treatment, the exact mechanism underlying the role of Na2SeO3 in the development of a therapeutic response remains unclear [42, 43]. In this study, we found that different concentrations of Na2SeO3 promoted apoptosis in HGC-27 cells and inhibited cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. Na2SeO3 plays an important role in cancer treatment through its important metabolite selenocysteine, a low-molecular-weightselenium-containing amino acid located at the active site of selenocysteine proteins and encoded by the UGA stop codon [44]. It has also been reported that Na2SeO3 can regulate apoptosis and oxidative damage by reducing the generation of free radicals and inhibiting lipid peroxidation [45, 46]. Currently, there are few reports on the role of lncRNAs in the anticancer potential of Na2SeO3. We found that Na2SeO3 inhibited the expression of HOXB-AS1 in gastric cancer cells and regulated the expression of related proteins to inhibit cell proliferation and migration and promote apoptosis after the overexpression of HOXB-AS1 in HGC-27 cells.

In summary, we found that HOXB-AS1 is upregulated in HGC-27, NCI-N87, Kato III, and GES-1 cells. Mechanistic analysis showed that Na2SeO3 inhibited the proliferation and invasion of gastric cancer cells and enhanced cell apoptosis by downregulating HOXB-AS1 expression. Therefore, the findings of this study highlight the potential therapeutic role of Na2SeO3 in gastric cancer and suggest that HOXB-AS1 may be a potential therapeutic target. Further in-depth studies are required to confirm these results.

Data Availability

All data used to support the findings of this study have been included in this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors' Contributions

Hongsheng Jiang and Lingbo Hu are the co-authors of this paper.

Figure 1 Effect of Na2SeO3 on proliferation, apoptosis and migration of HGC-27 cells. (a) The viability of HGC-27 cells was determined using a CCK-8 assay kit. (b, c) The level of apoptosis of HGC-27 cells was assessed using FCM. (d, e) Migration ability of HGC-27 cells was detected by a transwell assay. (f) Relative expression of apoptosis-related proteins was detected using western blotting. (g) Relative expression of migration-related proteins was detected by western blotting. The data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3). ∗∗represents P < 0.01. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation [SD] (n = 3), ∗∗represents P < 0.01 and ∗represents P < 0.01.

Figure 2 Effect of Na2SeO3 on HOXB-AS1 mRNA expression in human gastric cancer cells (HGC-27, NCI-N87 and KATO III) and GES-1 cells. (a) Relative HOXB-AS1 expression in human gastric cancer cells (HGC-27, NCI-N87 and KATO III) and GES-1 cells, as determined by qRT-PCR. (b) Relative HOXB-AS1 expression in human gastric cancer cells (HGC-27, NCI-N87 and KATO III) and GES-1 cells after treatment with different concentrations of Na2SeO3 (0, 15, 30 and 60 μM) for 48 h, as determined by RT-PCR. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation [SD] (n = 3), ∗∗represents P < 0.01 and ∗represents P < 0.01.

Figure 3 Effect of HOXB-AS1 on proliferation, apoptosis and migration of HGC-27 cells. (a) Relative expression of HOXB-AS1 in Huh-7 cells after transfection with ov-HOXB-AS1 or the corresponding negative control (ov-NC), as determined by RT-PCR. (b) Relative expression of HOXB-AS1 in Huh-7 cells after transfection with siRNA-1, siRNA-2, siRNA-3, or the corresponding negative control (si-NC), as determined by RT-PCR. (c) The viability of HGC-27 cells was determined using a CCK-8 kit. (d, e) The level of apoptosis of HGC-27 cells was assessed using FAM. (f, g) The migration ability of HGC-27 cells was detected by a transwell assay. Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation [SD] (n = 3), ∗∗represents P < 0.01 and ∗represents P < 0.01.

Figure 4 Na2SeO3 reverses the effect of HOXB-AS1 on proliferation, apoptosis and migration of HGC-27 cells. (a) The viability of HGC-27 cells was determined using a CCK-8 kit. (b, c) The apoptotic ability of HGC-27 cells was assessed using FCM. (d, e) The migration ability of HGC-27 cells was detected by a transwell assay. (f) Relative expression of apoptosis-related proteins detected using western blotting. (g) Relative expression of migration-related proteins, as detected by western blotting. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation [SD] (n = 3), ∗∗represents P < 0.01 and ∗represents P < 0.01.
==== Refs
1 Torre L. A. Bray F. Siegel R. L. Ferlay J. Lortet-Tieulent J. Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012 CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2015 65 2 87 108 10.3322/caac.21262 2-s2.0-84924271853 25651787
2 Waddell T. Verheij M. Allum W. Cunningham D. Cervantes A. Arnold D. Gastric cancer: ESMO-ESSO-ESTRO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up European Journal of Surgical Oncology 2014 40 5 584 591 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.09.020 2-s2.0-84897147164 24685156
3 Shen L. Shan Y. S. Hu H. M. Management of gastric cancer in Asia: resource-stratified guidelines The Lancet Oncology 2013 14 12 e535 e547 10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70436-4 2-s2.0-84886662730 24176572
4 Chen Y. Lin W. S. Zhu W. F. Tumor MICA status predicts the efficacy of immunotherapy with cytokine-induced killer cells for patients with gastric cancer Immunologic Research 2016 64 1 251 259 10.1007/s12026-015-8743-0 2-s2.0-84955650399 26607264
5 Cui Z. Li C. Li X. Sodium selenite (Na2SeO3) induces apoptosis through the mitochondrial pathway in CNE-2 nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells International Journal of Oncology 2015 46 6 2506 2514 10.3892/ijo.2015.2968 2-s2.0-84928576943 25891011
6 Mazokopakis E. E. Liontiris M. I. Commentary: health concerns of Brazil nut consumption Journal of Alternative & Complementary Medicine 2018 24 1 3 6 10.1089/acm.2017.0159 2-s2.0-85041014112 28805450
7 Fairweather-Tait S. J. Collings R. Hurst R. Selenium bioavailability: current knowledge and future research requirements The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2010 91 5 1484s 1491s 10.3945/ajcn.2010.28674j 2-s2.0-77951946055 20200264
8 Lü J. Zhang J. Jiang C. Deng Y. Özten N. Bosland M. C. Cancer chemoprevention research with selenium in the post-SELECT era: promises and challenges Nutrition and Cancer 2016 68 1 1 17 10.1080/01635581.2016.1105267 2-s2.0-84957977658 26595411
9 Bhuyan A. K. Sarma D. Saikia U. K. Selenium and the thyroid: a close-knit connection Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism 2012 16 8 S354 S355 10.4103/2230-8210.104090 23565426
10 Rayman M. P. Selenium in cancer prevention: a review of the evidence and mechanism of action Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 2005 64 4 527 542 10.1079/pns2005467 2-s2.0-28244462778 16313696
11 Weekley C. M. Harris H. H. Which form is that? The importance of selenium speciation and metabolism in the prevention and treatment of disease Chemical Society Reviews 2013 42 23 8870 8894 10.1039/c3cs60272a 2-s2.0-84887136759 24030774
12 Young R. S. Ponting C. P. Identification and function of long non-coding RNAs Essays in Biochemistry 2013 54 113 126 10.1042/bse0540113 2-s2.0-84879150139 23829531
13 Shi X. Sun M. Liu H. Yao Y. Song Y. Long non-coding RNAs: a new Frontier in the study of human diseases Cancer Letters 2013 339 2 159 166 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.06.013 2-s2.0-84883755139 23791884
14 Gao X. Wen J. Gao P. Zhang G. Zhang G. Overexpression of the long non-coding RNA, linc-UBC1, is associated with poor prognosis and facilitates cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in colorectal cancer OncoTargets and Therapy 2017 10 1017 1026 10.2147/ott.s129343 2-s2.0-85014864475 28260919
15 Yan X. Zhang D. Wu W. Mesenchymal stem cells promote hepatocarcinogenesis via lncRNA-MUF interaction with ANXA2 and miR-34a Cancer Research 2017 77 23 6704 6716 10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-1915 2-s2.0-85037678614 28947421
16 Yang W. Ning N. Jin X. The lncRNA H19 promotes cell proliferation by competitively binding to miR-200a and derepressing β-catenin expression in colorectal cancer BioMed Research International 2017 2017 1 8 10.1155/2017/2767484 2-s2.0-85010703001 2767484
17 Lammi M. J. Qu C. Selenium-related transcriptional regulation of gene expression International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2018 19 9 p. 2665 10.3390/ijms19092665 2-s2.0-85053079645
18 Wang T. Cui Y. Jin J. Translating mRNAs strongly correlate to proteins in a multivariate manner and their translation ratios are phenotype specific Nucleic Acids Research 2013 41 9 4743 4754 10.1093/nar/gkt178 2-s2.0-84877285213 23519614
19 Huang J. Z. Chen M. Chen D. A peptide encoded by a putative lncRNA HOXB-AS3 suppresses colon cancer growth Molecular Cell 2017 68 1 171 184.e6 e176 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.09.015 2-s2.0-85030721831 28985503
20 Feng Y. Jiang J. Hu Z. Yuan J. Zhang T. Pan Y. Methods for the study of long noncoding RNA in cancer cell signaling Methods in Molecular Biology 2021 2174 89 118 32813246
21 Moradi S. L. Eslami G. Goudarzi H. Role of Helicobacter pylori on cancer of human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells and metastasis of tumor cells-an in vitro study Tumor Biology 2016 37 3 3371 3378 10.1007/s13277-015-4137-0 2-s2.0-84944705025 26446460
22 Xu W. Liu N. N. Zhu M. P. Sun M. Y. Progress in prevention and treatment of gastric cancer with traditional Chinese medicine World Chinese Journal of Digestology 2019 27 10 637 642 10.11569/wcjd.v27.i10.637 2-s2.0-85067954766
23 Allum W. H. Griffin S. M. Watson A. Colin-Jones D. On Behalf of the Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, the British Society of Gastroenterology, and the British Association of Surgical Oncology 2011
24 Wapinski O. Chang H. Y. Long noncoding RNAs and human disease Trends in Cell Biology 2011 21 6 354 361 10.1016/j.tcb.2011.04.001 2-s2.0-79957840356 21550244
25 Mattick J. S. Taft R. J. Faulkner G. J. A global view of genomic information--moving beyond the gene and the master regulator Trends in Genetics 2010 26 1 21 28 10.1016/j.tig.2009.11.002 2-s2.0-72449129174 19944475
26 Djebali S. Davis C. A. Merkel A. Landscape of transcription in human cells Nature 2012 489 7414 101 108 10.1038/nature11233 2-s2.0-84865757142 22955620
27 Ying C. Hui D. Lewen B. Wenxin L. LncRNA PVT1 promotes ovarian cancer progression by silencing miR-214 Cancer Biology & Medicine 2018 15 3 238 250 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2017.0174 2-s2.0-85055450755 30197791
28 Liu J. H. Chen G. Dang Y. W. Li C. J. Luo D. Z. Expression and prognostic significance of lncRNA MALAT1 in pancreatic cancer tissues Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention 2014 15 7 2971 2977 10.7314/apjcp.2014.15.7.2971 2-s2.0-84900856471 24815433
29 Zhou X. Xia Y. Su J. Zhang G. Down-regulation of miR-141 induced by helicobacter pylori promotes the invasion of gastric cancer by targeting STAT4 Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry 2014 33 4 1003 1012 10.1159/000358671 2-s2.0-84897967801 24732377
30 Mei Z. He Y. Feng J. MicroRNA-141 promotes the proliferation of non-small cell lung cancer cells by regulating expression of PHLPP1 and PHLPP2 FEBS Letters 2014 588 17 3055 3061 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.06.020 2-s2.0-84906283166 24945731
31 Chen X. Li L. Q. Qiu X. Wu H. Long non-coding RNA HOXB-AS1 promotes proliferation, migration and invasion of glioblastoma cells via HOXB-AS1/miR-885-3p/HOXB2 axis Neoplasma 2019 66 03 386 396 10.4149/neo_2018_180606n377 2-s2.0-85061963126 30784279
32 Chen R. Zhang X. Wang C. LncRNA HOXB-AS1 promotes cell growth in multiple myeloma via FUT4 mRNA stability by ELAVL1 Journal of Cellular Biochemistry 2020 121 10 4043 4051 10.1002/jcb.29573 31886581
33 Sun M. Nie F. Wang Y. LncRNA HOXA11-AS promotes proliferation and invasion of gastric cancer by scaffolding the chromatin modification factors PRC2, LSD1, and DNMT1 Cancer Research 2016 76 21 6299 6310 10.1158/0008-5472.can-16-0356 2-s2.0-84995680603 27651312
34 Schrauzer G. N. Anticarcinogenic effects of selenium Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 2000 57 13 1864 1873 10.1007/pl00000668 2-s2.0-0034485903 11215513
35 El-Bayoumy K. The protective role of selenium on genetic damage and on cancer Mutation Research: Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis 2001 475 1-2 123 139 10.1016/s0027-5107(01)00075-6 2-s2.0-0035906330 11295158
36 Reid M. E. Duffield-Lillico A. J. Garland L. Turnbull B. W. Clark L. C. Marshall J. R. Selenium supplementation and lung cancer incidence: an update of the nutritional prevention of cancer trial Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 2002 11 11 1285 1291
37 Hai-Tao W. Xiang-Liang Y. Zhi-Hong Z. Jing-Ling L. U. Hui-Bi X. U. EFFECT OF REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES ON APOPTOSISINDUCED BY Na_2SeO_3 IN SW480 CELLS Acta Biophysica Sinica 2002 18 1 104 108
38 Gazi M. H. Gong A. Donkena K. V. Young C. Y. Sodium selenite inhibits interleukin-6-mediated androgen receptor activation in prostate cancer cells via upregulation of c-Jun Clinica Chimica Acta 2007 380 1-2 145 150 10.1016/j.cca.2007.01.031 2-s2.0-33947689632
39 Li W. Guo M. Liu Y. Selenium induces an anti-tumor effect via inhibiting intratumoral angiogenesis in a mouse model of transplanted canine mammary tumor cells Biological Trace Element Research 2016 171 2 371 379 10.1007/s12011-015-0554-6 2-s2.0-84945302811 26507439
40 Ala M. Jafari R. M. Nematian H. Shadboorestan A. Dehpour A. R. Sodium selenite modulates Ido1/kynurenine, TLR4, NF-κB and bcl2/bax pathway and mitigates acetic acid-induced colitis in rat Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry 2022 56 S1 24 35 10.33594/000000504 35263537
41 Liu X. Jiang M. Pang C. Wang J. Hu L. Sodium selenite inhibits proliferation and metastasis through ROS-mediated NF-κB signaling in renal cell carcinoma BMC Cancer 2022 22 1 p. 870 10.1186/s12885-022-09965-8
42 Singletary K. Milner J. Milner Diet, autophagy, and cancer: a review Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 2008 17 7 1596 1610 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-2917 2-s2.0-53549098864
43 Sanmartín C. Plano D. Sharma A. K. Palop J. A. Selenium compounds, apoptosis and other types of cell death: an overview for cancer therapy International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2012 13 8 9649 9672 10.3390/ijms13089649 2-s2.0-84865040299 22949823
44 Kong F. Hu B. Gao Y. Fluorescence imaging of selenol in HepG2 cell apoptosis induced by Na2SeO3 Chemical Communications 2015 51 15 3102 3105 10.1039/c4cc06359g 2-s2.0-84930003802 25597534
45 Ebert R. Ulmer M. Zeck S. Selenium supplementation restores the antioxidative capacity and prevents cell damage in bone marrow stromal cells in vitro Stem Cells 2006 24 5 1226 1235 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0117 2-s2.0-33747595991 16424399
46 Zhang J. Robinson D. Salmon P. A novel function for selenium in biological system: selenite as a highly effective iron carrier for Chinese hamster ovary cell growth and monoclonal antibody production Biotechnology and Bioengineering 2006 95 6 1188 1197 10.1002/bit.21081 2-s2.0-33845442172 16937407
