
==== Front
Biomed Res Int
Biomed Res Int
BMRI
BioMed Research International
2314-6133
2314-6141
Hindawi

10.1155/2023/7692726
Research Article
Activation of T Lymphocytes with Anti-PDL1-BiTE in the Presence of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (ASCs)
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2082-1394
Moeinzadeh Leila 1 2
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5655-8722
Ramezani Amin aramezani@sums.ac.ir
2 3
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2888-0930
Mehdipour Fereshteh 2
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8140-380X
Yazdanpanah-Samani Mahsa 3
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0875-2851
Razmkhah Mahboobeh mrazmkhah2@gmail.com
1 2
1Department of Tissue Engineering and Applied Cell Sciences, School of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technologies, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
2Shiraz Institute for Cancer Research, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
3Department of Medical Biotechnology, School of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technologies, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Academic Editor: Mouldy Sioud

2023
7 6 2023
2023 769272612 3 2023
5 5 2023
28 5 2023
Copyright © 2023 Leila Moeinzadeh et al.
2023
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Background

Due to their ability to recruit immune cells to kill tumor cells directly, bispecific T cell engager antibodies (BiTE) hold great potential in T cell redirecting therapies. BiTE is able to activate T cells through CD3 and target them to tumor-expressed antigens. However, there are many components in the tumor microenvironment (TME) such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) that may interfere with BiTE function. Herein, we designed an anti-PDL1-BiTE that targets programmed death ligand 1 (PDL1) and CD3 and investigated its effect on PDL1pos cancer cells in the presence or absence of adipose-derived MSCs (ASCs).

Method

Our anti-PDL1-BiTE comprises of VL and VH chains of anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody (mAb) linked to the VL and VH chains of anti-PDL1 mAb, which simultaneously bind to the CD3ε subunit on T cells and PDL1 on tumor cells. Flow cytometry was employed to assess the strength of binding of anti-PDL1-BiTE to tumor cells and T cells. Cytotoxicity, proliferation, and activation of peripheral blood lymphocyte (PBLs) were evaluated by CFSE assay and flow cytometry after using anti-PDL1-BiTE in the presence or absence of ASCs and their conditioned media (C.M.).

Results

Anti-PDL1-BiTE had the ability to induce selective lysis of PDL1pos U251-MG cancer cells while PDL1neg cells were not affected. Also, anti-PDL1-BiTE significantly stimulated peripheral blood lymphocyte (PBL) proliferation and CD69 expression. ASCs/C.M. did not show a significant effect on the biological activity of anti-PDL1-BiTE.

Conclusion

Overall, anti-PDL1-BiTE selectively depletes PDL1pos cells and represents a new immunotherapeutic approach. It would increase the accumulation of T cells and can improve the prognosis of PDL1pos cancers in spite of the immunomodulatory effects of ASCs and C.M.

Shiraz Institute for Cancer Research, Shiraz University of Medical SciencesICR-100-504
==== Body
pmc1. Introduction

The discovery of efficient anticancer approaches has been impeded by the complexity of malignancies [1, 2]. Certain conventional cancer therapies, such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, are limited due to their associated side effects, off-target effects, and drug resistance [3, 4]. Furthermore, traditional therapies cannot entirely eradicate metastatic tumor cells, and relapse is likely to occur. As a result, researchers are attempting to develop new and effective therapies with low or no toxicity towards normal cells [5]. Now, cancer immunotherapy (CI) is rapidly advancing [6] and is mostly directed on the immune system or the tumor microenvironment (TME) rather than tumor cells themselves [7–9]. In the course of cancer treatment, TME is also a critical issue. TME includes extracellular matrix (ECM), stromal cells such as fibroblasts and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), vascular and lymphatic networks, and cells of the immune system [10–12]. In fact TME is a dynamic heterocellular environment [13]; that is, its cellular component is critical in the development and proliferation of cancer progenitor cells, such as tumor-initiating cells (TICs) and cancer stem cells (CSCs) [14, 15]. Because of their ability to change TME architecture, a wide variety of stem cells known as mesenchymal stem cells have picked the interest of cancer researchers [16–18]. There is a dual relationship between MSCs and tumor cells directly (cell-cell contact) and indirectly (by several soluble factors, exosomes, and other extracellular vesicles (EVs)) [19], so that primary and metastatic tumors actively recruit MSCs from the bone marrow and adipose tissue and develop either tumor inhibition or tumor promotion based on the tumor type [15]. MSCs' paracrine immunoregulatory capabilities through chemokines, cytokines, and growth factors such as stromal cell-derived factor 1 (SDF-1), IL-6, tumor growth factor- (TGF-) β, tumor necrosis factor-inducible gene 6 protein (TSG-6), and metabolites [20] as well as their cell-cell contact impact tumor growth and treatment [21].

Active T lymphocytes recognizing tumors are required for a successful immune response to cancer [22]; however, they cannot be recruited by conventional antibodies [23]. Bispecific T cell engagers (BiTEs) are genetically engineered recombinant proteins [24, 25] and a member of the family of dual antibodies. They have several different binding sites that simultaneously bind to the T cell receptor (TCR) CD3ε subunit on T cells and surface molecules on targeted tumor cells and recruit T cells to mediate cytotoxicity against tumor cells and creating the immunological synapse [22, 26, 27]. T cell activation occurs only in the presence of target cells, independent of TCR specificity, costimulation, or peptide antigen presentation. T cells release cytotoxic chemicals such as perforin and granzymes [28] after synapse formation, which trigger target cell apoptosis by caspases [27]. In the meanwhile, numerous studies in mice and patients with cancer have demonstrated that tumor cells contribute to the immune suppression [29] by recruiting or induction of the distinct cell populations, such as myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and T regulatory cells (Tregs) [30]. Moreover, tumor cells induce anergy or apoptosis in T cells via different immune checkpoint molecules (cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed death 1 (PD1)) [31]. Therefore, clinical trials using immune checkpoint inhibitors like PD1 or programmed death ligand 1 (PDL1) inhibitors significantly increased the survival of the patients and converted the “cold” tumors to “hot” ones [32].

In this study, we investigated whether anti-PDL1-BiTE can affect T cell biological activities like cytotoxicity, proliferation, and activation and also examined the effects of MSCs or their condition media on anti-PDL1-BiTE performance. Based on our results, anti-PDL1-BiTE had the ability to induce selective lysis of PDL1pos U251-MG cancer cells while PDL1neg cells were not affected. Additionally, anti-PDL1-BiTE significantly stimulated peripheral blood lymphocyte (PBL) proliferation and CD69 expression. ASCs/C.M. did not show a significant effect on the biological activity of anti-PDL1-BiTE.

2. Subjects and Methods

2.1. Subjects and Cells

Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) were extracted from adipose tissues which were provided from three patients with liposuction surgery with the age range of 20 to 30 years. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were obtained from five healthy donors with no record of cancer or autoimmunity. Cell lines, including human brain tumor cell line U-251 MG (PDL1-positive cell) and human embryonic kidney tumor cell line, HEK293, and JURKAT cells (PDL1-negative cells), were obtained from Stem Cell Technology Research Center (Bonyakhteh) and Pasteur Institute, Tehran, Iran. The R&D Laboratory (Shiraz Institute for Cancer Research, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran) generously provided the CHO-K1 cell line. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (ethics reference number IR.SUMS.REC.1399.306).

2.2. Antibodies

Antibodies for ASC characterization included mouse anti-human CD14 (clone: M5E2, cat. no. 555397, FITC), CD44 (clone: G44-26, cat. no. 560977, FITC), CD34 (clone: 581, cat. no. 555821, FITC), and CD166 (clone: 3A6, cat. no. 559263, PE) all from BD Biosciences, USA. Antibody to human PDL1 (CD274, B7-H1, clone: 29E.2A3 mAb, cat. no. 329701, concentration: 0.5 mg/mL, PE) was from BioLegend, USA. Fluorescent-conjugated antibodies used for analyzing PBLs were CD4 (clone: RPA-T4, cat. no. 300530, Percp Cy5.5, BioLegend), CD25 (clone: M-A251, cat. no. 555431, FITC, BD), and CD69 (clone: FN50, cat. no. 310910, APC, BioLegend,). Other antibodies were monoclonal anti-polyhistidin-peroxidase antibody (cat. no. A7058, HRP-conjugated, Sigma, USA), mouse monoclonal MMP8 (clone 115-13D2, cat. no. ab77964, Abcam), HRP-conjugated goat anti-human IgG (cat. no. A0170, Sigma, USA) for ELISA test, and goat anti-mouse IgG (cat. no. sc-3738, PE, Santa Cruz Biotechnology).

2.3. Cell Lines and ASCs' Culture

Cell lines were cultured in RPMI1640 medium (Biosera, UK) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, USA) and streptomycin (100 mg/mL) and penicillin (100 U/mL) (Biosera, UK) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. CHO-K1 cells were cultured in CD OptiCHO Medium (Life Technologies) supplemented with 8 mM Glutamax (Gibco, Japan). ASCs were isolated from adipose tissues according to the previously established method [33, 34]. Briefly, adipose tissues were washed with sterile saline buffer, grinded, then treated with 0.2% type I collagenase (Gibco, USA) for enzymatic digestion, and incubated at 37°C. Subsequently, the suspension was centrifuged. The stromal vascular fraction (SVF) was separated using Ficoll (Biosera, UK) and cultured in DMEM (Biosera, UK) supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Following 48 hours culture, nonadherent cells and debris were washed out and new medium was added. Adherent and spindle-shaped ASCs were subcultured, and cells of the third passage was used for the following experiments.

2.4. ASC Characterization

ASCs were stained with fluorochrome-conjugated anti-human antibodies against cell surface antigens including CD14, CD44, CD34 and CD166, according to the previously established method [35]. The negative controls used for cell staining were FITC- and PE-labeled mouse IgG1. ASCs were stained with the aforementioned antibodies for 30 minutes at 4°C in the dark and were washed twice by staining buffer (PBS+2%FBS). The presence of surface markers was then evaluated using FACS Calibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, USA). The flow cytometry data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Version 10.1, Ashland, OR, USA).

2.5. Isolation of Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocyte (PBLs)

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) used in this study were isolated from 5 healthy donors, using Ficoll-Hypaque (Biosera, UK) density gradient centrifugation and then were cultured in complete RPMI1640 medium at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. To remove monocytes, PBMCs were incubated in RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin at 37°C for 45 minutes. After incubation, the suspending cells were harvested as PBLs.

2.6. Harvesting of ASC-Conditioned Medium

To prepare ASC concentrated conditioned medium, ASCs (5 × 103 cells/cm2) were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. Then, the media was changed at day 3 post seeding. When cells were approximately 80% confluent, they were washed twice with Ca- and Mg-free PBS; after that, the medium was replaced with serum-free DMEM. After 72 hours, the supernatant was collected and centrifuged to remove cellular debris at 1000 rpm for 15 minutes and used as ASC-C.M.

2.7. Construct Design and Generation of the Recombinant Protein

Initially, the sequences encoding the light and heavy chains (VL and VH regions) of avelumab, an anti-human PDL1 monoclonal antibody [36], and the VH and VL regions of the OKT3 anti-human CD3 monoclonal antibody [37] were extracted from several databases, such as DrugBank, PDB, and NCBI. The final construct was designed using these sequences along with appropriate linkers, secretory, and kozak sequences and a 6-residue histidine tag at the 3′ end. These fragments were sequence-optimized by GenScript's Multiparameter Gene Optimization algorithm, OptimumGeneTM (NJ, USA) and were synthetized by Biomatik (Ontario, Canada). The fragment was inserted at the AvrII/Bstz17I cloning site in the pCHO1.0 expression vector and transformed into DH5α cells. The anti-PDL1-BiTE construct was transfected into CHO-K1 cells by Gene Pulser Xcell electroporation system (Bio-Rad, CA, USA) (950 μF, 300 V). Then, for selecting stable transfected cell pools based on increasing levels of puromycin (Gibco, Japan) and MTX (Sigma, USA), a two-phase selection strategy was used. Briefly, in selection phase 1, puromycin to a final concentration of 10 μg/mL and MTX to 100 nM were used as selection reagents. Flasks were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2, and the media were exchanged every 4 days until the confluency reached more than 90%. In selection phase 2, each recovered cell pool from selection phase 1 was subjected to puromycin to a final concentration of 30 μg/mL and MTX to 500 nM. To obtain anti-PDL1-BiTE for experiments, transfectants were seeded in serum-free OptiCHO medium supplemented with 8 mM Glutamax (Gibco, Japan) and cultured for 8 days at 30°C. The HIS-tagged anti-PDL1-BiTE secreted by stably transfected cell pools. The supernatant was then collected, centrifuged to remove cellular debris, and stored at 4°C until use.

2.8. Determination of PDL1 Expression Level

The PDL1expression level on tumor cells was determined by flow cytometry. One day before the experiment, 104 U-251 MG and HEK293 cells were plated in T25 flask. PDL1expression on the cell surface was detected by staining cells with PE-conjugated anti-human CD274 (B7-H1, PD-L1) and analyzed using a flow cytometer.

2.9. Physicochemical Properties of Anti-PDL1-BiTE Recombinant Protein

2.9.1. Western Blot Assay

To analyze the purity of anti-PDL1-BiTE, native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Native-PAGE) was used, which was visualized with R250 Coomassie blue (Bio-Rad, UK). The first method was performed as discussed by Ramezani et al. [38]. In brief, mock (as a negative control) and 60 ng/mL of the anti-PDL1-BiTE were loaded on a 12.5% Native-PAGE gel. Separated proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (GE Healthcare) using the Trans-Blot® Turbo™ Blotting System (Bio-Rad, UK) at 20 V for 60 minutes. After transferring to PVDF membrane and blocking with PBS containing 0.15% Tween 20 and 5% nonfat skim milk (Sigma, USA), the membrane was washed with PBS-Tween and incubated with HRP-conjugated anti-6×his antibody (1 : 2000 diluted). Signals were detected with enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) substrate (Bio-Rad, USA), and the bands were visualized with Bio-Rad Chemidoc device (Bio-Rad, USA).

2.9.2. Determining the Anti-PDL1-BiTE Concentration Using Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

The supernatant of an 8-day culture of stably transfected CHO-K1 cells was collected for anti-PDL1-BiTE concentration analysis using direct ELISA. Briefly, a 96-well ELISA plate (PolySorp, NUNC™, Denmark) was coated with 50 μL of serially diluted cell supernatant samples and incubated overnight at 4°C. A serial concentration of mouse monoclonal MMP8 antibody (1 to 1 × 107 ng/l) was used to draw the standard curve. Then, 50 μL HRP-conjugated goat anti-human IgG (1 : 20000) was added and incubated for 1 hour. Then, the plate was washed, and 50 μL of tetramethyl benzidine (TMB) substrate (Invitrogen) was added. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 50 μL of 0.25 M sulfuric acid (Merck, Germany) after 20 minutes. The plate was read on a standard absorbance microplate reader (Biochrom, UK) at 450 and 620 nm.

2.9.3. Binding Assay

The binding ability of anti-PDL1-BiTE to PDL1-positive cells (U251-MG), CD3-positive cells (JURKAT), and PDL1- and CD3-negative cells (HEK293) was assessed. 1 × 106 cells per sample were collected by centrifugation at 1000 rpm for 5 minutes and then washed with 1x PBS containing 0.2% FBS (staining buffer) in separate tubes. The cell pellet was resuspended in 100 μL of ice-cold staining buffer and then incubated with 4 μg/mL anti-PDLI-BiTE as the primary antibody on ice for 1 hour. After washing, the cells were incubated with PE-goat anti-mouse IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) (1 : 1000 diluted) for another 1 hour on ice in the dark. Cells were then washed and resuspended in 300 μL of PBS buffer. Cells were acquired on the FACS Calibur flow cytometer (BD), and data were analyzed using FlowJo.

2.10. Biological Activity of Recombinant Protein Anti-PDL1-BiTE

2.10.1. Cytotoxicity Assay

Cytotoxicity assay was performed to determine the ability of PBL cells to eradicate PDL1pos tumor cells in the presence or absence of anti-PDL1-BiTE, ASCs, and C.M. PBLs, ASCs, and C.M. were used as effectors. Target cells (PDL1pos/neg tumor cells) were labeled using a Cell Trace™ CFSE Cell Proliferation Kit (C34554, Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. One day before coculture, ASCs and CFSE-labeled tumor cells were seeded at a ratio of 1 : 5 (ASCs : tumor cells) in complete RPMI1640 medium and incubated at 37°C for 16 hours, in 24 well plate. Then, ASCs and CFSE-labeled tumor cells were directly cocultured with PBLs at the ratios of 1 : 100 (ASCs : PBLs) and 1 : 20 (tumor cells : PBLs). Anti-PDL1-BiTE (1.5 μg/mL) and C.M. (400 μL) were then added in a total volume of 2000 μL in 24-well flat bottom plates and incubated at 37°C for 72 hours. The control groups contained tumor cells alone and tumor cells cocultured with PBLs/ACS/C.M. without anti-PDL1-BiTE. At the end of the incubation period, CFSE-labeled adherent tumor cells were harvested with 1% trypsin–EDTA, stained with 7AAD (BD Pharmingen™ cat. no. 5168981E), and analyzed for cytotoxicity using flow cytometry (BD Biosciences). The percentage of specific lysis was calculated as follows: %dead tumor cells = [tumor cells (7 − AAD+) − tumor cells (7 − AAD−)] × 100%.

2.10.2. Induction of PBL Proliferation

Proliferation of T cells was detected using the Cell Trace CFSE Cell (Thermo Fisher Scientific) Proliferation Kit. Briefly, one day before coculturing, ASCs and the PDL1pos tumor cell line (U251-MG) were seeded at the ratio of 1 : 5 (ASCs : tumor cells) in complete RPMI1640 medium and incubated at 37°C for 16 hours in a 96 well plate. On the day of coculture, PBLs were stained with 5 μM of CFSE for 15 minutes at 37°C. After washing, 1 × 105 CFSE-labeled cells were directly cocultured with ASCs and tumor cells at the ratio of 1 : 100 (ASCs : PBLs) and 1 : 20 (tumor cells : PBLs) in a total volume of 250 μL in 96-well flat bottom plates. Then, anti-PDL1-BiTE (1.5 μg/mL) and C.M. (50 μL) were added in complete RPMI1640 medium and incubated at 37°C for 72 and 96 hours. The control groups contained PBLs alone and PBLs cocultured with tumor cells/ASC/C.M. without anti-PDL1-BiTE. At the end of the incubation period, PBLs were harvested from the coculture and were analyzed for proliferation, using flow cytometry (BD Biosciences).

2.10.3. Induction of PBL Activation

One day before coculturing, ASCs and PDL1pos tumor cells were seeded at a the ratio of 1 : 5 (ASCs : tumor cells) in complete RPMI1640 medium and incubated at 37°C for 16 hours in 24 well plate. Then, they were directly cocultured with PBLs at the ratios of 1 : 100 (ASCs : PBLs) and 1 : 20 (tumor cells : PBLs). Anti-PDL1-BiTE (1.5 μg/mL) and C.M. (400 μL) were then added in a total volume of 2000 μL in 24-well flat bottom plates and incubated at 37°C for 48 hours. The control groups were PBLs alone and PBLs cocultured with tumor cells/ASC/C.M. without anti-PDL1-BiTE. At the end of incubation period, PBLs were harvested and washed with staining buffer and centrifuged at 4°C for 5 minutes before staining with labeled antibodies. PBLs were incubated with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies to CD4, CD25, and CD69 at 4°C for 30 minutes in the dark. Finally, the stained cells were acquired and analyzed using a four-color FACS Calibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences).

2.11. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 9. Quantitative data are shown as the mean ± standard of deviation (SD). A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied, followed by Tuckey's multiple comparison test and the evaluation of differences. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Each test was done on 5 individuals and repeated once for each condition.

3. Results

3.1. Isolation, Culture, and Characterization of ASCs

ASCs were observed as an adherent cell population with a spindle-shaped appearance (Figure 1(a)). The analysis of the stem cell-specific markers revealed that the majority of ASCs were positive for CD44 and CD166, while they were negative for the expression of hematopoietic cell-specific markers such as CD14 and CD34 (Figure 1(b)).

3.2. Identification of Recombinant Anti-PDL1-BiTE

The anti-PDL1-BiTE was constructed as two single-chain variable fragments (scFv) recombinant protein of the humanized OKT3 anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody and the human avelumab anti-PDL1monoclonal antibody (Figure 2). After anti-PDL1-BiTE gene has been inserted into the pCHO1.0 vector (Supplementary file, Figure 1), the PDL1-BiTE/pCHO.1 construct was transfected into CHO-K1 cells, and stable anti-PDL1-BiTE-producing transfectants were obtained by selection on puromycin. Stable transfectants were grown in serum-free media. Upon expression, these active anti-PDL1-BiTE molecules have one binding site for CD3 and one binding site for PDL1. Native-PAGE showed that fusion proteins were successfully expressed (Figure 3(a)), and a western blot displayed a specific protein band with an approximate molecular weight of anti-PDL1-BiTE (55 kDa) (Figure 3(b)). The amount of anti-PDL1-BiTE released into the culture was measured by ELISA at the indicated time, and the production level was approximately 1.5 μg/mL/8 days. Also, the binding ability of anti-PDL1-BiTE to the PDL1protein in U-251 MG cells, JURKAT cells, and HEK293 cells was evaluated by flow cytometry. First, we confirmed the high PDL1 expression level on U-251 MG cells and low expression on HEK293 cells, which were 93.3% and 1.53%, respectively. Also, expression level of CD3 on JURKAT cells was 60% (Supplementary file, Figure 2). The percentages of anti-PDL1-BiTE binding to CD3 (51.3%) and PDL1pos cell line (92.9%) were much higher than that of the negative cell line (1.37%), indicating that anti-PDL1-BiTE has a high specificity for the CD3 and PDL1protein targets (Figure 4).

3.3. Biological Activity of Recombinant Protein Anti-PDL1-BiTE

3.3.1. Anti-PDL1-BiTE Cytotoxic Activity on Tumor Cells

Anti-PDL1-BiTE treatment caused a significant increase in T cell killing activity. Approximately 33.5 (±8.7)% of tumor cells were killed in the presence of anti-PDL1-BiTE and PBLs, whereas it was 12.5 (±4.6)% in PBLs/tumor condition (P = 0.0001). The killing rate in PBL/BiTE/tumor condition was higher than other conditions that was significant when compared to the tumor only condition (P ≤ 0.0001) (Figure 5). Anti-PDL1-BiTE in combination with PBLs, ASCs, and C.M. kills 35.5 (±8.7)% and 30.6 (±9.8)% of PDL1pos tumor cells, respectively. However, this difference was not statistically significant, when compared to PBL/BiTE/tumor (Figure 5). To ensure that the anti-PDL1-BiTE cytotoxic activity is specific to PDL1pos target cells, PDL1-human HEK293 cells were included in the study, and less than 10% of HEK293 cells were killed in different conditions.

3.3.2. Anti-PDL1-BiTE Effects on PBL Proliferation

We evaluated whether anti-PDL1-BiTE could stimulate PBL proliferation 72 and 96 hours after treatment. According to the findings, the expansion of PBLs began on day 3, when the percentage of cell division was 22.4 (±11.9)% in the presence of tumor and increased to 31.2 (±10.8)% when cocultured with anti-PDL1-BiTE/tumor as compared to 3.9 (±3.0)% in PBLs only (P = 0.0002, Figure 6). On day 4, cell division percentage increased to 47.4 (±12.0)% and 54.4 (±9.5)% (P = 0.0099), as compared to 29.8 (±9.3)% in PBLs only (P = 0.0099, Figure 6). The proliferation of PBLs was in the presence of ASCs and C.M. to 33.5 (±7.9)% and 26.2 (±8.2)% (P > 0.05, Figure 6) on day 3 and reached 58.8 (±8.4)% and 53.3 (±10.4)% (P > 0.05, Figure 6) on day 4, respectively, as compared to PBL/PDL1-BiTE/tumor alone. However, this difference was not statistically significant (Figure 6).

3.3.3. Anti-PDL1-BiTE and Activation of CD3-Positive Lymphocytes

Activation markers CD25 and CD69 were upregulated on CD4+ T cells in the presence of PDL1-BiTE/tumor, rather than PBLs/tumor. As shown in Figures 7(a) and 7(a), CD25 and CD69 increased from 13.2 (±5.6)% and 53.6 (±6.6)% in the condition of PBL/tumor to 19.7 (±2.3)% and 65.4 (±7.8)% in the case of PBL/PDL1-BiTE/tumor, respectively. 17.7 (±4.7)% and 17.1 (±6.5)% of the cells showed the expression of CD25 in PBL/PDL1-BiTE/tumor/ASCs or C.M. (P > 0.05, Figure 7(b)), whereas these percentages were 56.9 (±5.4)% and 64.3 (±8.4)% for CD69, respectively (P > 0.05, Figure 7(a)).

4. Discussion

Cancer immunotherapy boosts immune function to eliminate tumor cells and prevent tumor progression. Of all immune cells, T cells are the most powerful cells for directly killing cancer cells [32]. At the present time, various approaches such as bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) have been established to improve T cell responses and their recruitment [39]. Anti − CD3 × anti − CD19 bispecific antibody is one of the promising immunotherapy tools which can efficiently redirect T cells to lyse patient-derived B-ALL cells [40]. BiTEs, as one of the bsAbs and a new strategy for cancer therapy, create a hot TME and enhance antitumor activity [41]. Moreover, it targets other cell types in the TME, such as MDSCs, and provides an additive effect on the entire microenvironment, so it may reduce the dosage or treatment time compared to a single treatment with decreasing drug side effects [32]. In the present study, we demonstrated the feasibility and potential application of the anti-PDL1-BiTE construct derived from a PDL1 mAb (avelumab) and a CD3 mAb (OKT3), for treating PDL1-expressing tumors with a classic structure such as blinatumomab [42]. The hypothesis is that BiTE, as an immunotherapy agent, can recruit T cells to TME and by suppressing PDL1 activates cytotoxic T cells. Additionally, we demonstrated the effect of ASCs and C.M. on BiTE function in a coculture system.

In our study, the binding specificity of both moieties of anti-PDL1-BiTE was confirmed and examined by flow cytometry analysis on PDL1pos/neg cell lines. The anti-PDL1-BiTE binds strongly to the PDL1 antigen in the PDL1pos cell line but not in the PDL1neg cell line. The fact that there was no binding on a negative PDL1cell line confirmed the specificity of anti-PDL1-BiTE binding. In contrast, binding via the anti-CD3 domain to JURKAT cells was less noticeable. The limited binding ability of anti-PDL1-BiTE to the anti-CD3 domain represents a unique feature of the optimized bispecific antibody construct, which is required for repeated retargeting of T cells. Therefore, it is a prerequisite for an optimal killing effect with minimal nonspecific side effects from T cell hyperactivation.

Anti-PDL1-BiTE is a novel reagent with the potential to be a useful therapeutic strategy due to its ability to activate tumor-reactive T cells and direct them to PDL1pos target cells [43]. PDL1 as the ligand of PD-1 is expressed on a wide range of tumor cells, including lung cancer, breast cancer, and glioma [44]. Our results showed that anti-PDL1-BiTE can mediate effector cell attachment to tumor cells, directing polyclonal T cells to kill PDL1pos tumor cells in vitro. The binding of anti-PDL1-BiTE to PDL1pos cells is linearly proportional to the amount of PDL1expressed by the target cells. This result was observed only in U251-MG cells as a PDL1pos cell line which induced T cell cytotoxicity against tumor cells, whereas at equal concentration of anti-PDL1-BiTE and E : T ratio, HEK293 cells as PDL1neg cells had the lowest number of dead cells. These results determine that anti-PDL1-BiTE in combination with PBLs efficiently kills PDL1pos tumor cells while having negligible off-target effects on PDL1neg tumor cells. In correlation with our results, Horn et al. showed that BiTE cytotoxic activity is specific for PDL1pos target cells vs. PDL1neg tumor cells [24]. They used from difference of cell lines PDL1neg human MEL1011 and C8161 cells as PDL1pos, and their results in a cytotoxicity assay showed that less than 11% of MEL1011 cells were killed vs. >50% of PDL1+ C8161 cells. These results demonstrate that anti-PDL1-BiTE is specific for PDL1+ target cells.

The results of Lu et al. showed that MSCs can play an inhibitory role in the vicinity of U251-MG cells [45]. Despite this inhibitory effect of MSCs, we did not observe a significant negative impact of ASCs/C.M. on the performance of anti-PDL1-BiTE. Therefore, it is possible that anti-PDL1-BiTE can overcome the inhibitory nature of ASCs in the TME. Our findings clearly demonstrated an increase in proliferation of PBLs in the presence of anti-PDL1-BiTE and tumor, as evidenced by binding from both sides and restored T cell proliferation which is increased over time till the fourth day. In line with our study, Wathikthinnakon et al. showed an increase in the proliferation of lymphocytes in the presence of anti-PDL1-BiTE, which was amplified with time [43].

In addition, assessment of the expression of the activation markers of lymphocytes showed the higher expression of CD69 in the presence of anti-PDL1-BiTE though we did not observe any obvious difference in the expression of CD25. Regarding CD69, our results were in line with Choi et al.'s study which showed when T cell is incubated with bscEGFRvIII-CD3 and target cells, T cells upregulated surface expression of CD69 [46]. Also, this is in line with the data published by Koristka et al. who showed that after cross-linking via a bispecific Ab, regulatory T cells upregulate the activation markers CD69 and CD25 as well as Treg markers such as CTLA-4 and Foxp3 [47]. Thus, treatment with a single agent may have a negligible suppressive effect on tumors, whereas cotreatment with other immunotherapy methods such as indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) inhibitors or anti-CTLA-4 can have a synergistic effect on cancer treatment and improve patient survival [48, 49].

Most recently, MSCs were discovered to function as immune modulators, which are relatively supposed to be double-edged sword in TME [50]. However, the current study found that anti-PDL1-BiTE causes T cells to proliferate and activation even in combination with ASCs. Contrary to the predictions, even with immune modulatory properties, ASCs could not have a negative effect on anti-PDL1-BiTE performance. Also, C.M. in our evaluation had no noticeable impact on the anti-PDL1-BiTE activity.

The interactions between PDL1pos cancer cells and PD-1pos immune cells, mostly TILs, in tumor environment are complicated [51]. Additionally, the upregulation of immune checkpoints is one of the major mechanisms involved in resistance to BiTE therapy. For instance, TILs dramatically upregulate the expression of PDL1 in melanoma cells by secreting high amounts of cytokines, such as IFNγ, which results in the suppression of TILs. In fact, IFNγ pathway could be one of feasible pathways, which causes the PDL1 upregulation in cancers [52]. Moreover, the PD-1/PDL1 communication increases IDO in melanoma microenvironment [48] which exhausts T cells of essential tryptophan and suppresses their metabolites, thus leading to CTL inhibition and Treg elevation [53]. Therefore, based on the findings of our study, it is necessary to optimize the BiTE concentration depending on the kind of tumor for a better result. Additionally, as PD-1 and IDO pathway can interfere with PDL1 activity after releasing IFNγ in TME [54], this may eventually result in a decrease in the efficacy of immunotherapy. Accordingly, it is suggested that the concentration of BiTE in the environment should be higher than that of PDL1 to overcome its negative effects on the immune system.

In general, it is indicated that utilizing a costimulator, such as CD28/CD80/41BBL in coculture system, might induce BiTE function for proliferation of T cells and induction of CD25/CD69 in lymphocytes [55]. On the other hand, in agreement with our study, Horn et al. [24] and Dreier et al. [56] have claimed that BiTE is an independent costimulator to activate lymphocytes. According to our findings, anti-PDL1-BiTE is already active in the presence of unstimulated T lymphocytes. However, given the absence of lymphocyte stimulators and the state of the tumor, conditioning PBLs with IL-2 and CD28 may further augment the cytotoxic potential of T cells with anti-PDL1-BiTE.

5. Conclusion

Altogether, anti-PDL1-BiTE may be promising for the treatment of PDL1-positive tumors due to its capability of boosting T cell accumulation and thus improving the prognosis of PDL1pos cancers. Based on our data, this recombinant protein seems to be promising to overcome the immunomodulatory nature of tumor site caused by different cells including MSCs. As a recombinant protein platform, BiTEs can be industrially produced with current advanced protein production technologies. However, they may need readministration due to BiTEs' short half-life which can be improved using different protein modification strategies.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Shiraz Institute for Cancer Research (ICR) for the technical support. This research was accomplished as a commitment for the PH.D. thesis of Applied Cell Sciences by Ms. Leila Moeinzadeh. This study was financially supported by Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran (ethics reference number IR.SUMS.REC.1399.306), and Shiraz Institute for Cancer Research (ICR-100-504).

Abbreviations

BiTE: Bispecific T cell engager antibodies

VL: Variable light chain

VH: Variable heavy chain

MAb: Monoclonal antibody

MDSCs: Myeloid-derived suppressor cells

PD1: Programmed cell death protein

PD-L1: Programmed cell death ligand

TME: Tumor microenvironment

ECM: Extracellular matrix

TICs: Tumor-initiating cells

CSCs: Cancer stem cells

MSCs: Mesenchymal stem cells

ASCs: Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells

PBMCs: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells

HEK293: Human embryonic kidney tumor cell line

FBS: Fetal bovine serum

DMEM: Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium

PBS: Phosphate-buffered saline

FITC: Fluorescein isothiocyanate

PE: Phycoerythrin

PBLs: Peripheral blood lymphocyte

ASC-C.M: ASC-conditioned medium

Native-PAGE: Native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

PVDF: Polyvinylidene difluoride

ECL: Chemiluminescence

ELISA: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

TMB: Tetramethyl benzidine

IDO: Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase

CFSE: Carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester

7AAD: 7-Aminoactinomycin D

CTLA-4: Cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4

41BBL: 4-1BB ligand.

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' Contributions

LM performed all experiments and was involved in the data collection, analysis, interpretation and manuscript drafting. MR and AR conceived the original idea, found acquisition, supervised the project, interpreted the data and critically revised the manuscript. FM analyzed the data and critically revised the manuscript. MY contributed in cloning. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Materials Figure 1: schematic representation of PDL1-BiTE construct inserted into pCHO1 plasmid backbone. Figure 2: U-251 MG and HEK293 cell lines were stained with fluorescent antibodies to PDL1 (29E.2A3 mAb) and Jurkat cells for CD3 or an isotype control mAb and analyzed by flow cytometry. Dark gray shows labeled cells, and light gray shows the isotype or unlabeled.

Figure 1 Morphological and flow cytometry analysis of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs). (a) ASCs were spindle-shaped in culture. (b) More than 95% of ASCs were positive for CD44 and CD166, while they did not express hematopoietic markers including CD14 and CD34. CD markers were selected based on those proposed by International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT) and previous studies. The black color indicates hematopoietic markers, and the gray color indicates unlabeled.

Figure 2 Schematic representation of anti-PDL1-BiTE construct. Each single-chain variable fragment (scFv) was composed of VH and VL domains of avelumab and OKT3, which were linked by a residual peptide linker. Kozak sequence and human serum albumin (HSA) located in 5th and His tag in 3rd.

Figure 3 Physicochemical analysis of produced anti-PDL1-BiTE. (a) Native-PAGE. (b) Western blot. The supernatant from transfected CHO-K1 cells contained a specific ~55 kDa protein. The migration distances of the molecular mass markers are indicated in kilodaltons (kDa). M1: house laboratory ladder; M2: Sinaclon prestained protein ladder, 1 and 5: supernatant from transfected CHO-K1 cells; 2: positive control; 3 and 4: mock cell supernatant.

Figure 4 The histogram demonstrated the ability of anti-PDL1-BiTE to directly bind to PDL1on U-251 MG cells (PDL1-positive) and JURKAT cells (CD3-positive) while unbinding to HEK293 cells (as negative cell line).

Figure 5 Cytotoxic effect of anti-PDL1-BiTE on PDL1pos and PDL1neg cells. The percentage of dead cells increased in PDL1pos tumor cells especially when BiTE was used. Data was presented as mean ± SD (∗∗∗P < 0.001 and ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001). Data are representative of 5 experiments in U251-MG cell lines and 3 experiments in Hek293 cell lines. ASC: adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells; C.M.: condition media; PBL: peripheral blood lymphocyte; BiTE: bispecific T cell engager, “anti-PDL1-BiTE”.

Figure 6 Proliferation of PBLs significantly increased in the presence of anti-PDL1-BiTE/tumor. ASCs and C.M. showed synergistic effects for BiTE. Cell division percentage of PBLs was measured in different conditions, and statistical analysis was performed using a one-way ANOVA test. Data was presented as mean ± SD (∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. Data are representative of 5 experiments. ASC: adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells, C.M.: conditioned media, PBL: peripheral blood lymphocyte; BiTE: bispecific T cell engager, “anti-PDL1-BiTE”.

Figure 7 Expression of CD69 (a) and CD25 (b) activation markers. The percentage of CD69+ cells was significantly higher in PBL/BiTE/tumor condition compared to PBL only and PBL/BiTE. The data was presented as mean ± SD (∗∗P < 0.01 and ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001. Data are representative of 5 experiments. ASC: adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells; C.M.: condition media; PBL: peripheral blood lymphocyte; BiTE: bispecific T cell engager, “anti-PDL1-BiTE”.
==== Refs
1 Liu J. Dang H. Wang X. W. The significance of intertumor and intratumor heterogeneity in liver cancer Experimental & molecular medicine 2018 50 1 p. e416-e 10.1038/emm.2017.165 2-s2.0-85047430251 29303512
2 Grzywa T. M. Paskal W. Włodarski P. K. Intratumor and intertumor heterogeneity in melanoma Translational oncology 2017 10 6 956 975 10.1016/j.tranon.2017.09.007 2-s2.0-85034244799 29078205
3 Li Z. Fan D. Xiong D. Mesenchymal stem cells as delivery vectors for anti-tumor therapy Stem cell investigation 2015 2 10.3978/j.issn.2306-9759.2015.03.01
4 Arruebo M. Vilaboa N. Sáez-Gutierrez B. Assessment of the evolution of cancer treatment therapies Cancers 2011 3 3 3279 3330 10.3390/cancers3033279 2-s2.0-80053217517 24212956
5 Zhang C.-L. Huang T. Wu B.-L. He W.-X. Liu D. Stem cells in cancer therapy: opportunities and challenges Oncotarget 2017 8 43 75756 75766 10.18632/oncotarget.20798 2-s2.0-85030116841 29088907
6 Oiseth S. J. Aziz M. S. Cancer immunotherapy: a brief review of the history, possibilities, and challenges ahead Journal of cancer metastasis and treatment 2017 3 10 250 261 10.20517/2394-4722.2017.41
7 Wargo J. A. Reuben A. Cooper Z. A. Oh K. S. Sullivan R. J. Immune effects of chemotherapy, radiation, and targeted therapy and opportunities for combination with immunotherapy Seminars in oncology 2015 Elsevier
8 Hughes P. E. Caenepeel S. Wu L. C. Targeted therapy and checkpoint immunotherapy combinations for the treatment of cancer Trends in immunology 2016 37 7 462 476 10.1016/j.it.2016.04.010 2-s2.0-84969528858 27216414
9 Tang H. Qiao J. Fu Y.-X. Immunotherapy and tumor microenvironment Cancer letters 2016 370 1 85 90 10.1016/j.canlet.2015.10.009 2-s2.0-84949454830 26477683
10 Wang M. Zhao J. Zhang L. Role of tumor microenvironment in tumorigenesis Journal of Cancer 2017 8 5 761 773 10.7150/jca.17648 2-s2.0-85014760592 28382138
11 Chen F. Zhuang X. Lin L. New horizons in tumor microenvironment biology: challenges and opportunities BMC medicine 2015 13 1 1 14 10.1186/s12916-015-0278-7 2-s2.0-84928749945 25563062
12 Roma-Rodrigues C. Mendes R. Baptista P. V. Fernandes A. R. Targeting tumor microenvironment for cancer therapy International journal of molecular sciences 2019 20 4 p. 840 10.3390/ijms20040840 2-s2.0-85061850608 30781344
13 Najafi M. Goradel N. H. Farhood B. Tumor microenvironment: interactions and therapy Journal of cellular physiology 2019 234 5 5700 5721 10.1002/jcp.27425 2-s2.0-85055861982 30378106
14 Papaccio F. Paino F. Regad T. Papaccio G. Desiderio V. Tirino V. Concise review: cancer cells, cancer stem cells, and mesenchymal stem cells: influence in cancer development Stem cells translational medicine 2017 6 12 2115 2125 10.1002/sctm.17-0138 2-s2.0-85032304187 29072369
15 Bergfeld S. A. DeClerck Y. A. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and the tumor microenvironment Cancer and Metastasis Reviews 2010 29 2 249 261 10.1007/s10555-010-9222-7 2-s2.0-77954564230 20411303
16 Del Fattore A. Luciano R. Saracino R. Differential effects of extracellular vesicles secreted by mesenchymal stem cells from different sources on glioblastoma cells Expert opinion on biological therapy 2015 15 4 495 504 10.1517/14712598.2015.997706 2-s2.0-84925270282 25539575
17 Bruno S. Collino F. Deregibus M. C. Grange C. Tetta C. Camussi G. Microvesicles derived from human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells inhibit tumor growth Stem cells and development 2013 22 5 758 771 10.1089/scd.2012.0304 2-s2.0-84874091042 23034046
18 Karimi-Shahri M. Javid H. Yazdani S. Hashemy S. I. Mesenchymal stem cells in cancer therapy; the art of harnessing a foe to a friend Iranian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences 2021 24 10 1307 1323 10.22038/IJBMS.2021.58227.12934 35096289
19 Whiteside T. L. Exosome and mesenchymal stem cell cross-talk in the tumor microenvironment Seminars in immunology 2018 Elsevier
20 Galland S. Stamenkovic I. Mesenchymal stromal cells in cancer: a review of their immunomodulatory functions and dual effects on tumor progression The Journal of pathology 2020 250 5 555 572 10.1002/path.5357 31608444
21 Hass R. von der Ohe J. Ungefroren H. Impact of the tumor microenvironment on tumor heterogeneity and consequences for cancer cell plasticity and stemness Cancers 2020 12 12 p. 3716 10.3390/cancers12123716 33322354
22 Suryadevara C. M. Gedeon P. C. Sanchez-Perez L. Are BiTEs the “missing link” in cancer therapy? Oncoimmunology 2015 4 6, article e1008339 10.1080/2162402X.2015.1008339 2-s2.0-84944472777 26155413
23 Menon A. P. Moreno B. Meraviglia-Crivelli D. Modulating T cell responses by targeting CD3 Cancers 2023 15 4 p. 1189 10.3390/cancers15041189 36831533
24 Horn L. A. Ciavattone N. G. Atkinson R. CD3xPDL1 bi-specific T cell engager (BiTE) simultaneously activates T cells and NKT cells, kills PDL1+ tumor cells, and extends the survival of tumor-bearing humanized mice Oncotarget 2017 8 35 57964 57980 10.18632/oncotarget.19865 2-s2.0-85029099279 28938530
25 Suurs F. V. Lub-de Hooge M. N. de Vries E. G. de Groot D. J. A. A review of bispecific antibodies and antibody constructs in oncology and clinical challenges Pharmacology & therapeutics 2019 201 103 119 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2019.04.006 2-s2.0-85066237910 31028837
26 Fan G. Wang Z. Hao M. Li J. Bispecific antibodies and their applications Journal of hematology & oncology 2015 8 1 p. 130 10.1186/s13045-015-0227-0 2-s2.0-84950989868 26692321
27 Nagorsen D. Kufer P. Baeuerle P. A. Bargou R. Blinatumomab: a historical perspective Pharmacology & therapeutics 2012 136 3 334 342 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.07.013 2-s2.0-84867858547 22940266
28 Strohl W. R. Naso M. Bispecific T-cell redirection versus chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells as approaches to kill cancer cells Antibodies 2019 8 3 p. 41 10.3390/antib8030041
29 Kalathil S. G. Thanavala Y. High immunosuppressive burden in cancer patients: a major hurdle for cancer immunotherapy Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy 2016 65 7 813 819 10.1007/s00262-016-1810-0 2-s2.0-84959106624 26910314
30 Tanaka A. Sakaguchi S. Regulatory T cells in cancer immunotherapy Cell research 2017 27 1 109 118 10.1038/cr.2016.151 2-s2.0-85006789449 27995907
31 Dyck L. Mills K. H. Immune checkpoints and their inhibition in cancer and infectious diseases European Journal of Immunology 2017 47 5 765 779 10.1002/eji.201646875 2-s2.0-85018516222 28393361
32 Wu M. Huang Q. Xie Y. Improvement of the anticancer efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade via combination therapy and PD-L1 regulation Journal of Hematology & Oncology 2022 15 1 1 58 10.1186/s13045-022-01242-2 34991679
33 Razmkhah M. Abedi N. Hosseini A. Imani M. T. Talei A.-R. Ghaderi A. Induction of T regulatory subsets from Naïve CD4+ T cells after exposure to breast cancer adipose derived stem cells Iranian Journal of Immunology 2015 12 1 1 15 25784093
34 Razmkhah M. Jaberipour M. Erfani N. Habibagahi M. Talei A.-r. Ghaderi A. Adipose derived stem cells (ASCs) isolated from breast cancer tissue express IL-4, IL-10 and TGF-β1 and upregulate expression of regulatory molecules on T cells: do they protect breast cancer cells from the immune response? Cellular immunology 2011 266 2 116 122 10.1016/j.cellimm.2010.09.005 2-s2.0-78649968338 20970781
35 Kangari P. Roshangar L. Iraji A. Talaei-Khozani T. Razmkhah M. Accelerating effect of Shilajit on osteogenic property of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2022 17 1 p. 424 10.1186/s13018-022-03305-z 36153551
36 Liu K. Tan S. Chai Y. Structural basis of anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody avelumab for tumor therapy Cell research 2017 27 1 151 153 10.1038/cr.2016.102 2-s2.0-84984856715 27573173
37 Adair J. R. Athwal D. S. Bodmer M. W. Humanization of the murine anti-human CD3 monoclonal antibody OKT3 Human Antibodies 1994 5 1-2 41 47 10.3233/HAB-1994-51-206 2-s2.0-84974757740 7858182
38 Ramezani A. Maymand E. M. Yazdanpanah-Samani M. Hosseini A. Toghraie F. S. Ghaderi A. Improving pertuzumab production by gene optimization and proper signal peptide selection Protein expression and purification 2017 135 24 32 10.1016/j.pep.2017.04.013 2-s2.0-85018785019 28476488
39 Luo F. Wang Y. Liu J. Chu Y.  BiTE-T Cell: A Novel Design for Solid Tumor Cancer Research 2019 79 13_Supplement p. 2328 10.1158/1538-7445.AM2019-2328
40 Wu J. Fu J. Zhang M. Liu D. Blinatumomab: a bispecific T cell engager (BiTE) antibody against CD19/CD3 for refractory acute lymphoid leukemia Journal of hematology & oncology 2015 8 1 p. 104 10.1186/s13045-015-0195-4 2-s2.0-84938628792 26337639
41 Tkach M. Théry C. Communication by extracellular vesicles: where we are and where we need to go Cell 2016 164 6 1226 1232 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.043 2-s2.0-84960337763 26967288
42 Hoffman L. M. Gore L. Blinatumomab, a bi-specific anti-CD19/CD3 BiTE® antibody for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia: perspectives and current pediatric applications Frontiers in oncology 2014 4 p. 63 10.3389/fonc.2014.00063 2-s2.0-84901041371
43 Wathikthinnakon M. Luangwattananun P. Sawasdee N. Combination gemcitabine and PD-L1xCD3 bispecific T cell engager (BiTE) enhances T lymphocyte cytotoxicity against cholangiocarcinoma cells Scientific Reports 2022 12 1 1 15 10.1038/s41598-022-09964-6 34992227
44 Seidel J. A. Otsuka A. Kabashima K. Anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 therapies in cancer: mechanisms of action, efficacy, and limitations Frontiers in oncology 2018 8 p. 86 10.3389/fonc.2018.00086 2-s2.0-85044932853 29644214
45 Lu L. Chen G. Yang J. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells suppress growth and promote the apoptosis of glioma U251 cells through downregulation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 2019 112, article 108625 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.108625 2-s2.0-85061661002 30784920
46 Choi B. D. Kuan C.-T. Cai M. Systemic administration of a bispecific antibody targeting EGFRvIII successfully treats intracerebral glioma Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2013 110 1 270 275 10.1073/pnas.1219817110 2-s2.0-84871965330 23248284
47 Koristka S. Cartellieri M. Theil A. Retargeting of human regulatory T cells by single-chain bispecific antibodies The Journal of Immunology 2012 188 3 1551 1558 10.4049/jimmunol.1101760 2-s2.0-84856575658 22184723
48 Le Naour J. Galluzzi L. Zitvogel L. Kroemer G. Vacchelli E. Trial watch: IDO inhibitors in cancer therapy Oncoimmunology 2020 9 1 p. 1777625 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1777625 32934882
49 Pandey P. Khan F. Qari H. A. Upadhyay T. K. Alkhateeb A. F. Oves M. Revolutionization in cancer therapeutics via targeting major immune checkpoints PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 Pharmaceuticals 2022 15 3 p. 335 10.3390/ph15030335
50 Razmkhah M. Mansourabadi Z. Mohtasebi M. S. Talei A. R. Ghaderi A. Cancer and normal adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs): do they have differential effects on tumor and immune cells? Cell biology international 2018 42 3 334 343 10.1002/cbin.10905 2-s2.0-85040219541 29076586
51 Barriga V. Kuol N. Nurgali K. Apostolopoulos V. The complex interaction between the tumor micro-environment and immune checkpoints in breast cancer Cancers (Basel) 2019 11 8 p. 1205 10.3390/cancers11081205 2-s2.0-85070513480 31430935
52 Taube J. M. Anders R. A. Young G. D. Colocalization of inflammatory response with B7-h1 expression in human melanocytic lesions supports an adaptive resistance mechanism of immune escape Science translational medicine 2012 4 127 p. 127ra37-ra37 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003689 2-s2.0-84859128199 22461641
53 Chen R. Q. Liu F. Qiu X. Y. Chen X. Q. The prognostic and therapeutic value of PD-L1 in glioma Frontiers in pharmacology 2019 9 p. 1503 10.3389/fphar.2018.01503 2-s2.0-85063898955 30687086
54 Dong Y. Sun Q. Zhang X. PD-1 and its ligands are important immune checkpoints in cancer Oncotarget 2017 8 2 2171 2186 10.18632/oncotarget.13895 2-s2.0-85009754361 27974689
55 Szoor A. Vaidya A. Velasquez M. P. T cell-activating mesenchymal stem cells as a biotherapeutic for HCC Molecular Therapy-Oncolytics 2017 6 69 79 10.1016/j.omto.2017.07.002 2-s2.0-85029289824 28856237
56 Dreier T. Lorenczewski G. Brandl C. Extremely potent, rapid and costimulation-independent cytotoxic T-cell response against lymphoma cells catalyzed by a single-chain bispecific antibody International journal of cancer 2002 100 6 690 697 10.1002/ijc.10557 2-s2.0-0037143806 12209608
