
==== Front
BMC Pulm Med
BMC Pulm Med
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
1471-2466
BioMed Central London

39272068
3262
10.1186/s12890-024-03262-9
Research
Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with interstitial lung diseases
Stoltefuß S. 1
Leuschner G. 1
Milger K. 1
Kauke T. 2
Götschke J. 1
Veit T. 1
Lenoir A. 1
Kneidinger N. 13
Behr Jürgen juergen.behr@med.uni-muenchen.de

1
1 grid.5252.0 0000 0004 1936 973X Department of Medicine V, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marchioninistr. 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
2 grid.5252.0 0000 0004 1936 973X Department of Thoracic Surgery, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
3 https://ror.org/02n0bts35 grid.11598.34 0000 0000 8988 2476 Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
13 9 2024
13 9 2024
2024
24 4527 5 2024
2 9 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Background

The R-Scale-PF was proposed to evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). We generated a German version of the R-Scale-PF (GR-Scale), representing the first translation of the questionnaire into another language and assessed HRQoL longitudinally in various interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) using the R-Scale-PF scoring system at a specialized ILD centre.

Methods

We have translated the questionnaire in accordance with the WHO translation guidelines and applied it to 80 ILD patients of our department, with follow-ups after 3–6 months, assessing its internal consistency, floor and ceiling effects, concurrent validity, known-groups validity, and its responsiveness to changes over time.

Results

At baseline, all 80 patients completed the GR-Scale. In 70 patients (87.5%), follow-up data could be obtained after 4.43 ± 1.2 months. The GR-Scale demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s α 0.749) and slight floor effects. Concurrent validity analysis showed weak but significant correlations with forced vital capacity (FVC; r=-0.282 p = 0.011) and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco; r=-0.254 p = 0.025). In the follow-up analysis, moderate correlations were found with FVC (r=-0.41 p < 0.001) and DLco (r=-0.445 p < 0.001). No significant difference in the total score was found between patients with IPF (n = 10) and with non-IPF ILDs (n = 70). The GR-Scale successfully discriminated between groups of varying disease severity based on lung function parameters and the need for long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT). Furthermore, it was able to distinguish between patients showing improvement, stability or decline of lung function parameters.

Conclusion

Our prospective observational pilot study suggests that the GR-Scales is a simple and quick tool to measure HRQoL in patients with ILDs, thus providing an important additional information for the clinical assessment of ILD patients.

Trial registration

Our study was retrospectively registered in the German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS) on 02.11.2022 (DRKS-ID: DRKS00030599).

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-024-03262-9.

Keywords

ILD
Interstitial lung disease
IPF
HRQoL
Health related quality of life
Survey
Klinikum der Universität München (6933)Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

issue-copyright-statement© BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) impose a substantial burden on patients, affecting multiple aspects of their lives, including physical and emotional well-being. Health related quality of life (HRQoL) is often impaired in patients with ILD, especially as the disease progresses and symptoms increase [1–6]. HRQoL is becoming increasingly relevant as a patient-reported outcome and endpoint in clinical trials [7, 8]. Especially in patients with non-curable ILDs, which also impact life expectancy, enhancing or maintaining quality of life is an important therapeutic goal [9, 10].

To assess the health status of patients or the HRQoL, patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) can be used, which are typically questionnaires. Hereby, direct information about their health status is obtained from the patients themselves. Information is obtained without the interpretation of an additional person, thus authentically determining the patients’ perspective on their symptom burden and daily life with the disease. Other measures of disease severity and activity, such as pulmonary function tests and chest imaging, which are routinely performed during patient follow-up examinations, undoubtedly provide relevant clinical information. However, in contrast to PROs, these measures only provide information about specific aspects of a disease, but a disease affects the patient’s life and leads to symptoms in various ways. Those measures cannot capture the impact on patients and their lives as a whole, they do not fully reflect how patients “feel, function and survive”. Frequently, there is a discrepancy between those measures and the patients’ perceptions. Therefore, relying exclusively on such parameters can lead to misinterpretations. This highlights the importance of PROs in both clinical trials and in clinical practise [2, 9, 11].

Nevertheless, the presence of weak to moderately strong correlations between PROs and follow-up measurements, like lung function parameters, supports the validity of PROs [2, 9].

There are numerous tools to measure HRQoL in patients with ILD. Both disease-unspecific tools like the EuroQol Five-Dimensional Five-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) or the Short Form 36 Health Survey Questionnaire and disease-specific tools like the King’s Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire (K-BILD) or the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire are currently available. To assess the patients’ HRQoL, the K-BILD questionnaire compromises 15 items and the St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire 50 items [6, 12–14]. Due to the length and complexity of these questionnaires, they are only very rarely used in clinical practice [6]. Therefore, Scallan et al. proposed the R-Scale-PF (Raghu scale for pulmonary fibrosis) as a new questionnaire to assess the health status in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). The R-Scale-PF is a numerical rating scale, which briefly and visually questions the severity of five symptoms (cough, shortness of breath, fatigue, depressed mood, overall sense of wellbeing) in the last two weeks. The questionnaire has already been employed and evaluated in 100 patients with IPF and did show moderate to high validity compared to established questionnaires like the K-BILD and EQ-5D-5L [6].

The R-Scale-PF is currently only available in the original English-language version and has not yet been translated into any other language [6]. A translation of the GR-Scale-PF questionnaire could expand its applicability in clinical practice and research, thereby contributing to its further validation. Translating a PRO like the R-Scale-PF involves a multistep procedure, such as forward-backward translation, in accordance with WHO guidelines [15]. Ensuring the accuracy of the translation is crucial for maintaining the questionnaire’s reliability and the validity. Additionally, it is also essential to ensure the comparability of questionnaire results across different languages [15, 16].

The R-Scale-PF was designed to measure HRQoL in patients with IPF and has so far only been used in patients with IPF. Nevertheless, the HRQoL is also limited in patients with other ILD subtypes. In these patients, too, the assessment of HRQoL is becoming increasingly important in clinical studies as well as in everyday clinical practice to capture the impact of the disease on the patients’ lives [3–5, 7].

The aim of our prospective observational pilot study was to develop a German version of the R-Scale (GR-Scale) and to evaluate the validity of this GR-Scale in various ILD entities and during follow-up.

Methods

Translation of the R-Scale-PF

First, we obtained permission from the copyright holders [6, 17] and translated the questionnaire into German. The translation took place as a forward-backward translation with native English and German speakers and subsequent discussion, according to the WHO translations method [15]. The German version of the questionnaire will be referred to as the “GR-Scale” (German version of the R-Scale). The GR-Scale is shown in the additional file 1. Scores range from 0 to 10 for each individual item and from 0 to 50 for the total score, with higher scores indicating greater limitations.

Study population and surveys

The study population was recruited at the LMU University Hospital Munich, Germany. We included consecutive individuals with a consensus diagnosis of ILD, including IPF, connective tissue disease-related ILD (CTD-ILD), chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (cHP), non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), sarcoidosis (with present lung parenchymal involvement type III and IV) and unclassifiable interstitial lung disease (uILD). All diagnoses were made in accordance with current international criteria [18]. Patients with an acute infection or other acute illnesses were not included. The patients were interviewed twice, with the follow-up interview taking place after 3 to 6 months. After a short explanation, all patients completed the GR-Scale as self-assessment, without the help of a health care professional. At baseline and follow-up visits, lung function testing (spirometry and gas transfer) was performed as part of the routine assessment.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were calculated for baseline variables, using mean and standard deviation to describe parametric data. Frequency tables were created for each item to analyse the floor and ceiling effects, with predefined thresholds at 15% of the participants selecting the minimum or maximum of the items’ scores [19]. Cronbach’s α was assessed for internal consistency. Thereby, a Cronbach’s α > 0.7 was considered acceptable [20]. Furthermore, we tested the impact of item removal on Cronbach’s α.

Concurrent validity was evaluated by using the Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) between the GR-Scale total score and the lung function parameters forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco). The percentage values of the patients’ respective predicted values, based on the GLI database, were used and DLco was corrected for haemoglobin. We categorized the correlations based on their Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) as follows: <0.3 were classified as weak, those ⩾0.3 to < 0.7 as moderate and those ≥ 0.7 as strong [21].

The known-groups validity was evaluated to analyse the GR-Scale’s ability to distinguish among distinct groups. The GR-Scale total scores between different categories of the following variables were compared: (1) FVC % predicted (> 75%, 75 to 45%, < 45%); (2) DLco % predicted (> 60%, 40 to 60%, < 40%); (3) use of long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT). We further compared the GR-Scale total score between different ILD subtypes (IPF vs. non-IPF). Therefore, we used the independent two-sample t-test and reported the effect size as Cohen’s d.

Descriptive statistics were also calculated for follow-up variables. After the follow-up interviews, we assessed again the concurrent validity by calculating Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) between the GR-Scale total score and the two lung function parameters and we also compared again the GR-Scale totals between different ILD subtypes (non-IPF vs. IPF). Additionally, the Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) between the changes in the respective lung function parameters and the changes in the GR-Scale total score between the two surveys were calculated. Furthermore, we divided the patient population into three groups based on their lung function parameter changes ( > + 5%, + 5% to -5%, <-5% FVC% predicted and DLco% predicted) and compared the changes in the GR-Scale total score among these groups.

For statistical analysis SPSS 29, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant, was used and the figures were created with both SPSS 29 and Figma desktop version 116.14.7.

Ethical approval

This pilot study was approved by the ethics committee of the medical faculty of LMU Munich (project number 22–0651). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to enrolment.

Results

Between October 2022 and December 2022, the GR-Scale was completed by 80 patients with a multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) based diagnosis of ILD undergoing routine clinical care at our tertiary hospital. All 80 patients filled in the questionnaire without missing information. The patient demographics and baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. The mean age was 61.74 ± 14.04 years, 44% were females. The mean GR-Scale total score was 18.9 ± 9.03 and the mean ± SD for FVC and DLco were 75.36 ± 22% of predicted and 47.75 ± 18.11% of predicted, respectively.

Table 1 Patient demographics and baseline characteristics

Characteristic	Distribution (n = 80)	
Male: female n	45:35	
Age, year	61.74 ± 14.04	
Ever smoker n (%)	37 (46.25)	
ILD subtype n (%)		
CTD-ILD	32 (40)	
cHP	10 (12.5)	
IPF	10 (12.5)	
NSIP	8 (10)	
Sarcoidosis	15 (18.8)	
Stage III	9 (60)	
Stage IV	6 (40)	
uILD	5 (6.3)	
Comorbidities	2.86 ± 2.05	
LTOT n (%)	24 (30)	
GR-Scale total score	18.9 ± 9.03	
FVC, %predicted	75.36 ± 22	
DLco, % predicted	47.75 ± 18.11	
Data are presented as mean ± SD, unless otherwise stated.

Definition of abbreviations: ILD = interstitial lung disease; CTD-ILD = connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease; cHP = chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis; IPF = idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; NSIP = nonspecific interstitial pneumonitis; uILD = unclassifiable interstitial lung disease; LTOT = long-term oxygen therapy; FVC = forced vital capacity; DLco = diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide.

Internal consistency

Cronbach’s α was 0.749 indicating an acceptable internal consistency. Floor and ceiling effects are summarised in Table 2. Two of the five items demonstrated a significant floor effect: “cough” with a floor effect of 21.3% and “depressed mood” with a floor effect of 17.5%. None of the items showed a significant ceiling effect. The analysis of internal consistency by removing individual items showed that excluding any item did not lead to a significant improvement in Cronbach’s α.

Table 2 Floor and ceiling effects

Item		Floor (%)	Ceiling (%)	
Cough		21.3	1.3	
Shortness of breath		2.5	0	
Fatigue		7.5	0	
Depressed mood		17.5	1.3	
Overall sense of wellbeing		1.3	0	
Total Score		0	0	

Concurrent and known-groups validity

The GR-Scale total score and the two lung function parameters showed weak but statistically significant inverse correlations, FVC % predicted (r=-0.282, p = 0.011, 95% confidence interval (CI) [-0.47, -0.07]) and DLco % predicted (r=-0.254, p = 0.025, 95% CI [-0.45, -0.03]).

To analyse the known-groups validity we compared the GR-Scale total scores between different categories of FVC % predicted and DLco % predicted and use of LTOT (Table 3; Fig. 1). GR-Scale total scores were statistically significantly higher in patients with more severe impairment of FVC % predicted. GR-Scale total scores were also statistically significantly higher in patients with more severe impairment of DLco % predicted. Besides, the GR-Scale total scores were statistically significantly higher in patients receiving LTOT. When comparing the GR-Scale total score between the different ILD subtypes (IPF vs. non-IPF), no statistically significantly difference was found.

Table 3 Known-groups validity analysis

Variable	Patients n	Mean ± SD GR-Scale total score	Mean difference (95% CI)	p-value	ES	
FVC						
>75% predicted	43	16.54 ± 8.47	6.58 (0.21–12.94)	0.043	8.64	
<45% predicted	9	23.11 ± 9.49				
DLco						
>60% predicted	17	16.27 ± 7.51	5.41 (0.34–10.48)	0.037	8.23	
<40% predicted	29	21.67 ± 8.62				
LTOT						
No LTOT	55	17.26 ± 8.3	4.42 (0.28–8.57)	0.037	8.51	
LTOT	24	21.69 ± 8.97				
ILD subtype						
non-IPF	70	18.46 ± 9	3.54 (2.52–9.61)	0.248	9.01	
IPF	10	22 ± 9.15				
Definition of abbreviations: FVC = forced vital capacity; DLco = diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide; LTOT = long-term oxygen therapy; non-IPF = non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; IPF = idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; ES: effect size (Cohen’s d).

Fig. 1 Comparison of GR-Scale total scores between (a) forced vital capacity (FVC) % predicted (> 75%, 45–75%, < 45%); (b) diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco) % predicted (> 60%, 40–60%, < 40%); (c) long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) (d) different ILD subtypes (non-IPF vs. IPF). Effect size: ES (reported as Cohen’s d)

Follow-up measurements

Seventy patients (87.5%) completed the GR-Scale questionnaire again after 4.43 ± 1.2months. At follow-up, the mean GR-Scale total score was 18.08 ± 9.92 and the mean values for the lung function parameters were FVC 72.27 ± 22.09% and DLco 48.06 ± 18.61%.

To support the concurrent validity of the baseline, we again calculated Pearson’s correlation coefficients between the GR-Scale total score and the two lung function parameters with the follow-up values. Both lung function parameters showed a moderate inverse correlation, FVC % predicted (r=-0.41, p < 0.001, 95% CI [-0.59, -0.19]) and DLco % predicted (r=-0.445, p < 0.001, 95% CI [-0.62, -0.23]).

During follow-up we observed inverse correlations between the changes in the respective lung function parameters and the changes in the GR-Scale total score, FVC % predicted (r=-0.376, p = 0.001, 95% CI [-0.56, -0.16]) and DLco % predicted (r=-0.242, p = 0.048, 95% CI [-0.46, 0.002]).

We also compared the GR-Scale total scores again between different ILD subtypes (non-IPF vs. IPF) at follow-up. The mean GR-Scale total score of the non-IPF group was 17.93 ± 9.54 and of the IPF group 19.43 ± 13.72. No statistically significant difference was found between those two groups (p = 0.707).

Using a > 5% absolute change of FVC or DLco as cut-off disclosed a statistically significantly difference in GR-Scale total score for both variables (Table 4; Fig. 2).

Table 4 Follow-up measurements analysis

Variable	Patients n	Mean ± SD ΔGR-Scale total score	Mean difference (95% CI)	p-value	ES	
FVC						
> +5%	22	1.5 ± 7.20	5.5 (0.5–10.5)	0.032	6.42	
< -5%	10	-4 ± 4.06				
DLco						
> +5%	18	1.94 ± 5.19	5.83 (0.94–10.73)	0.021	5.82	
< -5%	9	-3.9 ± 6.96				
Definition of abbreviations: FVC = forced vital capacity; DLco = diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide; ES: effect size (Cohen’s d).

Fig. 2 Comparison of the Δ GR-Scale total scores between (a) forced vital capacity (FVC) % predicted ( > + 5%, -5% to + 5%, <-5%) (b) diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide (DLco) % predicted ( > + 5%, -5% to + 5%, <-5%). Effect size: ES (reported as Cohen’s d)

Discussion

In our pilot study we created a German version of the R-Scale [6], the GR-Scale, and evaluated its validity for assessing HRQoL in patients with ILDs. The R-Scale has not yet been translated into another language and this was the first time that the questionnaire was applied and evaluated in a non-English speaking population. Further it has so far only been used in patients with IPF [6], in our study we used the GR-Scale in different ILD subtypes.

The R-Scale, composed of just five items, was created because HRQoL is becoming increasingly relevant in patients with IPF and other ILDs, not only as an endpoint in clinical trials but also in everyday clinical practice, and the existing questionnaires are not used in everyday clinical practice due to their complexity and length [2, 6].

The GR-Scale showed an acceptable internal consistency with slight floor/ceiling effects and a good concurrent validity with the two lung function parameters FVC and DLco. Furthermore, the GR-Scale was able to distinguish between patients with different levels of disease severity, differentiating those with mild and severe limitations in the lung function parameters FVC and DLco, and between patients with and without the need of LTOT. Moreover, all 80 patients were able to complete the questionnaire, unsupported by a health care professional, in a complete and evaluable way. Thus, the questionnaire seems to be easy to understand and to apply and could be a simple and quick tool for daily clinic routine to assess the HRQoL of patients with ILD.

For the floor and ceiling effects we have chosen a threshold of 15%, which is often chosen in validation studies [19, 22]. Taking this threshold into account, we were able to detect mild floor effects. We found two significant floor effects for the items “cough” (21.3%) and “depressed mood” (17.5%). No significant ceiling effects were found. In the study by Scallan et al., the item “depressed mood” also showed a significant floor effect of 36%. The item cough did not show a significant floor effect [6]. Cough is one of the leading symptoms of ILDs and has a significant impact on patients’ HRQoL [1, 23, 24]. However, the prevalence of cough varies between different ILD entities. In the work by Cheng et al., cough was less common in patients with systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD; 68%) than in IPF (87%) or cHP (83%) [25]. Similar prevalence of cough has been reported in other studies in ILD [26, 27]. In our analysis, CTD-ILD represent the largest group of our study population with 40%, compared to IPF with 12.5% and HP with 11.3%. This composition of the patient population could have an influence on the floor effect of the item “cough” and might explain why we found a significant floor effect (21.3% of the patients chose the minimum of the item “cough”) and no significant floor effect was found for the item “cough” in the study by Scallan et al. [6], in which only patients with IPF were included.

„Depressed mood” was the second item with a significant floor effect of 17.5%. Depression is frequently observed in patients with ILD, varying between 14 and 49% in different studies and approaches to depression assessment [28]. Depression also has a significant impact on HRQoL in patients with ILD [28–30]. In the study by Scallan et al., the floor effect of the item “depressed mood” of 36% was more than twice as large as in our study (17.5%). The composition of the study population may also be relevant here, which requires additional investigation. A further explanation for the two significant floor effects could be that all patients were already on active therapy for their disease and that they came to the hospital for a routine follow-up examination and not because of complaints or worsening of the disease. Further studies are needed to assess whether floor effects differ between defined study populations.

For concurrent validity, we observed statistically significant correlation between GR-Scale total score and the lung function parameters FVC and DLco. On the one hand, this shows that patients with more severe symptoms also have a more impaired HRQoL. On the other hand, it emphasizes the importance of PROs providing complementary information.

A moderate statistically significant correlation between the total score and lung function (FVC and DLco) was also found in the follow-up measurement. This indicates that the concurrent validity is consistent across repeated measurements. This presence of weak to moderate correlations between the lung functions parameters and the total score supports the validity of the GR-Scale [2, 9].

In addition, our results support the findings of the study by Scallan et al. study, which found moderate correlations between the R-Scale-PF total score and FVC (% predicted), and weak correlations between R-Scale-PF total score and DLco (% predicted) [6].

The GR-Scale was able to distinguish between groups with different disease severities, which were categorized according to the lung function parameters FVC and DLco, and the need for LTOT.

As the disease progresses and symptoms increase, HRQoL becomes more impaired [1–3]. The need for more therapy in this context also has a negative impact on HRQoL. Here, LTOT plays a particularly important role and is a significant limitation in daily life of patients with ILD. LTOT leads to dependence and is a stigma of the disease; thus it leads to impairment of multiple domains of life, including emotional well-being, social participation, and autonomy [1, 2, 4, 31, 32]. This negative impact of LTOT on HRQoL was clearly reflected by the GR-Scale. These results are consistent with the study by Scallan et al. [6].

When comparing the GR-Scale total scores between patients with IPF and non-IPF ILD, no significant differences were found at baseline nor at follow-up, indicating that this tool is applicable to a broad spectrum of ILDs.

The statistically significant correlation between the GR-Scale total score and FVC and DLco at the follow-up measurement indicates that the concurrent validity is consistent across repeated measurements. Moreover, the GR-Scale has shown sensitivity to changes in patients’ health status, even on short follow-up of 4.4 months. The relatively weak correlations also imply that the GR-Scale provides information beyond the lung function parameters.

The GR-Scale was also able to distinguish between patients who improved, declined, or remained stable in the lung function parameters FVC and DLco.

To obtain additional information beyond the conventional measurements of disease severity, the GR-Scale could be used as both a screening tool to identify patients who need further evaluation (as also mentioned in the work by Scallan et al. [6]) and a longitudinal tool to track the patient’s health status over time. When used longitudinally, it could provide a consistent measure of the patient’s HRQoL and thus could make it possible to monitor the progression of the disease and, for example, the effectiveness of treatments. Here, the GR-Scale would indicate how the progression of the disease and treatments affect how the patient “feels and functions” in daily life. This dual functionality increases its utility and usefulness in clinical practice and provides comprehensive insights into the patient’s condition that go beyond what conventional measurements such as lung function parameters can capture.

In our study, the R-Scale was used for the first time in a non-English speaking population, the GR-Scale allows the assessment also in German speaking populations, thus extending the applicability. It is also the first time that the questionnaire has been used not only in IPF but also in other ILD subtypes. By including HRQoL measurements in clinical practice, we gain valuable insights into patients’ health status that go beyond traditional measures like lung function parameters. This understanding is essential for both IPF and other ILD patients, as their quality of life can also be affected [3–5, 7]. We also found no significant difference in the comparison of GR-Scale total scores between IPF and non-IPF ILDs. Our study is a first step towards the applicability of the GR-Scale in non-IPF ILDs. This extension demonstrates the versatility of the questionnaire and its potential suitability for assessing quality of life in different types of ILD.

There are some limitations to our study. First, the study population was relatively small, heterogenous, enrolled in a single centre, and the interval between the two interviews varied among patients, ranging from 3 to 6 months. Second, we used only the two lung function parameters FVC and DLco, as physiological measures, as these were collected in all patients during routine care. However, it would also be of interest to analyse the relationship between GR-Scale and exercise test such as the 6 min walk test or disease extent on High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Furthermore, in this study we did not compare the GR-Scale with other questionnaires that can determine HRQoL in patients with ILD and which have already been validated. While the validity of the R-Scale in IPF was moderate to high compared to established questionnaires like K-BILD and EQ-5D-5L by Scallan et al. [6], this important aspect needs to be considered for non-IPF ILDs in future studies.

Conclusion

HRQoL plays a crucial role in patients with ILDs, and it is important to measure it not only in studies but also in daily clinical practice in order not to miss important information about the patients’ health status. For this purpose, the GR-Scale is a simple and quick tool to measure HRQoL in patients with ILDs. The GR-Scale showed acceptable internal consistency, good concurrent validity over repeated measurement and a good known-groups validity. It was also sensitive to changes in patients’ health status over time. In conclusion, our study provides preliminary evidence that the GR-Scale is clinically useful by being anchored in lung physiology but providing additional compact clinical information which authentically reflects how patients feel and function in daily life.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1. Additional files: The GR-Scale (German version of the R-Scale) is provided in the additional file 1 (.pdf).

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all patients who participated in our study and the German Centre for Lung Research (DZL) for its support.

Author contributions

JB designed the study. SS, JB, GL, TV, JG and AL collected the data. SS analyzed the data. SS and JB wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the data and revised the manuscript. All authors critical reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Data availability

The data will be made available on request and with consideration of further evaluations of our study team (contact: Direktion.Med5@med.uni-muenchen.de).

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This pilot study was approved by the ethics committee of the medical faculty of LMU Munich (project number 22–0651). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to enrolment.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

SS received support from the Chiesi GmbH for travel and participation in the ERS International Congress 2023. KM received speaker honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, unrelated to the current manuscript. AL received support from the MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH for attending a training course and from the AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals Germany GmbH for travel and participation in a scientific meeting, unrelated to the current manuscript. GL, TK, JG, TV, NK, JB do not have competing interests.

Abbreviations

cHP Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis

CI Confidence interval

CTD-ILD Connective tissue diseases-related ILD

DLco Diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide

EQ-5D-5L EuroQol Five-Dimensional Five-Level questionnaire

FVC Forced vital capacity

GR-Scale German version of the R-Scale

HRCT High-resolution computed tomography

HRQoL Health related quality of life

ILDs Interstitial lung diseases

IPF Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

K-BILD King’s Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire

LTOT Long-term oxygen therapy

MDD Multidisciplinary discussion

NSIP Non-specific interstitial pneumonia

PROs Patient reported outcome measures

R-Scale-PF Raghu scale for pulmonary fibrosis

SSc-ILD Sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease

uILD Unclassifiable interstitial lung disease

WHO World Health Organization

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Swigris JJ Stewart AL Gould MK Patients’ perspectives on how idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis affects the quality of their lives Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005 3 61 10.1186/1477-7525-3-61 16212668
Swigris JJ, Stewart AL, Gould MK, et al. Patients’ perspectives on how idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis affects the quality of their lives. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3:61.16212668 10.1186/1477-7525-3-61
2. Swigris JJ Brown KK Abdulqawi R Patients’ perceptions and patient-reported outcomes in progressive-fibrosing interstitial lung diseases Eur Respir Rev 2018 27 180075 10.1183/16000617.0075-2018 30578334
Swigris JJ, Brown KK, Abdulqawi R, et al. Patients’ perceptions and patient-reported outcomes in progressive-fibrosing interstitial lung diseases. Eur Respir Rev. 2018;27:180075.30578334 10.1183/16000617.0075-2018
3. De Vries J Drent M Quality of life and health status in interstitial lung diseases Curr Opin Pulm Med 2006 12 354 8 10.1097/01.mcp.0000239553.93443.d8 16926651
De Vries J, Drent M. Quality of life and health status in interstitial lung diseases. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2006;12:354–8.16926651 10.1097/01.mcp.0000239553.93443.d8
4. Chang J Curtis JR Patrick DL Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life in patients with interstitial lung disease Chest 1999 116 1175 82 10.1378/chest.116.5.1175 10559073
Chang J, Curtis JR, Patrick DL, et al. Assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life in patients with interstitial lung disease. Chest. 1999;116:1175–82.10559073 10.1378/chest.116.5.1175
5. Szentes BL Kreuter M Bahmer T Quality of life assessment in interstitial lung diseases:a comparison of the disease-specific K-BILD with the generic EQ-5D-5L Respir Res 2018 19 101 10.1186/s12931-018-0808-x 29801506
Szentes BL, Kreuter M, Bahmer T, et al. Quality of life assessment in interstitial lung diseases:a comparison of the disease-specific K-BILD with the generic EQ-5D-5L. Respir Res. 2018;19:101.29801506 10.1186/s12931-018-0808-x
6. Scallan C Strand L Hayes J R-scale for pulmonary fibrosis: a simple, visual tool for the assessment of health-related quality of life Eur Respir J 2022 59 2100917 10.1183/13993003.00917-2021 34112729
Scallan C, Strand L, Hayes J, et al. R-scale for pulmonary fibrosis: a simple, visual tool for the assessment of health-related quality of life. Eur Respir J. 2022;59:2100917.34112729 10.1183/13993003.00917-2021
7. Aronson KI Suzuki A Health Related Quality of Life in interstitial lung disease: can we use the same concepts around the World? Front Med (Lausanne) 2021 8 745908 10.3389/fmed.2021.745908 34692737
Aronson KI, Suzuki A. Health Related Quality of Life in interstitial lung disease: can we use the same concepts around the World? Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:745908.34692737 10.3389/fmed.2021.745908
8. The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41:1403–9.
9. Swigris JJ Fairclough D Patient-reported outcomes in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Research Chest 2012 142 291 7 10.1378/chest.11-2602 22871754
Swigris JJ, Fairclough D. Patient-reported outcomes in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Research. Chest. 2012;142:291–7.22871754 10.1378/chest.11-2602
10. Bajwah S Colquitt J Loveman E Pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions to improve symptom control, functional exercise capacity and quality of life in interstitial lung disease: an evidence synthesis ERJ Open Res 2021 7 00107 2020 10.1183/23120541.00107-2020 33532482
Bajwah S, Colquitt J, Loveman E, et al. Pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions to improve symptom control, functional exercise capacity and quality of life in interstitial lung disease: an evidence synthesis. ERJ Open Res. 2021;7:00107–2020.33532482 10.1183/23120541.00107-2020
11. Raghu G, Ghazipura M, Fleming TR et al. Meaningful Endpoints for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) Clinical Trials: Emphasis on ‘Feels, Functions, Survives’. Report of a Collaborative Discussion in a Symposium with Direct Engagement from Representatives of Patients, Investigators, the National Institutes of Health, a Patient Advocacy Organization, and a Regulatory Agency. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024;209:647–69.
12. Shaw JW Johnson JA Coons SJ US Valuation of the EQ-5D Health states: Development and Testing of the D1 valuation model Med Care 2005 43 203 10.1097/00005650-200503000-00003 15725977
Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ. US Valuation of the EQ-5D Health states: Development and Testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care. 2005;43:203.15725977 10.1097/00005650-200503000-00003
13. Martinez TY Pereira CAC dos Santos ML Evaluation of the short-form 36-Item Questionnaire to measure Health-related quality of life in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis Chest 2000 117 1627 32 10.1378/chest.117.6.1627 10858394
Martinez TY, Pereira CAC, dos Santos ML, et al. Evaluation of the short-form 36-Item Questionnaire to measure Health-related quality of life in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest. 2000;117:1627–32.10858394 10.1378/chest.117.6.1627
14. Jones PW, Quirk FH, Baveystock CM. The St George’s respiratory questionnaire. Respir Med. 1991;85 Suppl B:25–31; discussion 33–37.
15. Castro SS Leite CF Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule - WHODAS 2.0 Fisioter Pesqui 2017 24 385 91 10.1590/1809-2950/17118724042017
Castro SS, Leite CF. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule - WHODAS 2.0. Fisioter Pesqui. 2017;24:385–91.10.1590/1809-2950/17118724042017
16. Danielsen AK Pommergaard H-C Burcharth J Translation of questionnaires Measuring Health Related Quality of Life is not standardized: a literature based Research Study PLoS ONE 2015 10 e0127050 10.1371/journal.pone.0127050 25965447
Danielsen AK, Pommergaard H-C, Burcharth J, et al. Translation of questionnaires Measuring Health Related Quality of Life is not standardized: a literature based Research Study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0127050.25965447 10.1371/journal.pone.0127050
17. Juniper EF Medical questionnaires are copyrighted to ensure that validity is maintained Chest 2009 136 951 2 10.1378/chest.09-1447 19809037
Juniper EF. Medical questionnaires are copyrighted to ensure that validity is maintained. Chest. 2009;136:951–2.19809037 10.1378/chest.09-1447
18. Travis WD Costabel U Hansell DM An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: update of the International Multidisciplinary classification of the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013 188 733 48 10.1164/rccm.201308-1483ST 24032382
Travis WD, Costabel U, Hansell DM, et al. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Statement: update of the International Multidisciplinary classification of the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188:733–48.24032382 10.1164/rccm.201308-1483ST
19. McHorney CA Tarlov AR Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 1995 4 293 307 10.1007/BF01593882 7550178
McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res. 1995;4:293–307.7550178 10.1007/BF01593882
20. Cronbach LJ Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests Psychometrika 1951 16 297 334 10.1007/BF02310555
Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297–334.10.1007/BF02310555
21. Akoglu H User’s guide to correlation coefficients Turk J Emerg Med 2018 18 91 3 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001 30191186
Akoglu H. User’s guide to correlation coefficients. Turk J Emerg Med. 2018;18:91–3.30191186 10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001
22. Terwee CB Bot SDM de Boer MR Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires J Clin Epidemiol 2007 60 34 42 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012 17161752
Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.17161752 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
23. Sato R Handa T Matsumoto H Clinical significance of self-reported cough intensity and frequency in patients with interstitial lung disease: a cross-sectional study BMC Pulm Med 2019 19 247 10.1186/s12890-019-1012-6 31842848
Sato R, Handa T, Matsumoto H, et al. Clinical significance of self-reported cough intensity and frequency in patients with interstitial lung disease: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pulm Med. 2019;19:247.31842848 10.1186/s12890-019-1012-6
24. Mann JMV Holland AE Goh NSL Understanding patient experience of chronic cough in interstitial lung disease ERJ Open Res 2023 9 00039 2023 10.1183/23120541.00039-2023 37228271
Mann JMV, Holland AE, Goh NSL, et al. Understanding patient experience of chronic cough in interstitial lung disease. ERJ Open Res. 2023;9:00039–2023.37228271 10.1183/23120541.00039-2023
25. Cheng JZ Wilcox PG Glaspole I Cough is less common and less severe in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease compared to other fibrotic interstitial lung diseases Respirology 2017 22 1592 7 10.1111/resp.13084 28544079
Cheng JZ, Wilcox PG, Glaspole I, et al. Cough is less common and less severe in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease compared to other fibrotic interstitial lung diseases. Respirology. 2017;22:1592–7.28544079 10.1111/resp.13084
26. Theodore AC Tseng C-H Li N Correlation of Cough with Disease Activity and Treatment with Cyclophosphamide in Scleroderma interstitial lung disease Chest 2012 142 614 21 10.1378/chest.11-0801 22156609
Theodore AC, Tseng C-H, Li N, et al. Correlation of Cough with Disease Activity and Treatment with Cyclophosphamide in Scleroderma interstitial lung disease. Chest. 2012;142:614–21.22156609 10.1378/chest.11-0801
27. Ryerson CJ Abbritti M Ley B Cough predicts prognosis in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis Respirology 2011 16 969 75 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.01996.x 21615619
Ryerson CJ, Abbritti M, Ley B, et al. Cough predicts prognosis in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respirology. 2011;16:969–75.21615619 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.01996.x
28. Yohannes AM Depression and anxiety in patients with interstitial lung disease Expert Rev Respir Med 2020 14 859 62 10.1080/17476348.2020.1776118 32460643
Yohannes AM. Depression and anxiety in patients with interstitial lung disease. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2020;14:859–62.32460643 10.1080/17476348.2020.1776118
29. Matsuda T Taniguchi H Ando M Depression is significantly Associated with the Health Status in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis Intern Med 2017 56 1637 44 10.2169/internalmedicine.56.7019 28674350
Matsuda T, Taniguchi H, Ando M, et al. Depression is significantly Associated with the Health Status in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Intern Med. 2017;56:1637–44.28674350 10.2169/internalmedicine.56.7019
30. Glaspole IN Chapman SA Cooper WA Health-related quality of life in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: data from the Australian IPF Registry Respirology 2017 22 950 6 10.1111/resp.12989 28166611
Glaspole IN, Chapman SA, Cooper WA, et al. Health-related quality of life in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: data from the Australian IPF Registry. Respirology. 2017;22:950–6.28166611 10.1111/resp.12989
31. Swigris JJ Transitions and touchpoints in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis BMJ Open Respir Res 2018 5 e000317 10.1136/bmjresp-2018-000317 30018766
Swigris JJ. Transitions and touchpoints in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2018;5:e000317.30018766 10.1136/bmjresp-2018-000317
32. Cullen DL Stiffler D Long-term oxygen therapy: review from the patients’ perspective Chron Respir Dis 2009 6 141 7 10.1177/1479972309103046 19643828
Cullen DL, Stiffler D. Long-term oxygen therapy: review from the patients’ perspective. Chron Respir Dis. 2009;6:141–7.19643828 10.1177/1479972309103046
