
==== Front
Heliyon
Heliyon
Heliyon
2405-8440
Elsevier

S2405-8440(24)12568-6
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36537
e36537
Research Article
Cross-correlation and multifractality analysis of the Chinese and American stock markets based on the MF-DCCA model
Chen Yijun ae
Zhang Jun-hao b
Lu Lei lucas200846@163.com
c⁎
Xie Zi-miao d
a College of Finance, Guizhou University of Commerce, Avenida 26, 550014, Guiyang, PR China
b Faculty of Finance, City University of Macau, Avenida Xu Risheng Yin Gong, Taipa, 999078, Macao, PR China
c School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Yiheyuan Road, 100871, Beijing, PR China
d School of Finance, Shanghai Lida University, Cheting Road, 201319, Shanghai, PR China
e School of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Avenida Wailong, Taipa, 999078, Macao, PR China
⁎ Corresponding author. lucas200846@163.com
22 8 2024
15 9 2024
22 8 2024
10 17 e3653724 9 2023
12 8 2024
19 8 2024
© 2024 The Authors
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Objective

To compare the multifractal features and factors of the Chinese and American stock markets and their correlation, complexity and uncertainty.

Methods

The paper analyzes the CSI 300 and S&P 500 indices from March 2018 to March 2023 using the MF-DCCA model and removes the long-term memory and nonlinear effects by random reshuffling and phase processing methods.

Results

The paper shows that (1) CSI 300 and S&P 500 have multifractal features, with different long-term memory, complexity and irregularity at different scales; (2) The markets are fractal movements influenced by investors’ irrationality and expectations, not efficient markets; (3) Long-term memory and nonlinear effects cause the multifractal features. The paper offers a new perspective and method for the market investors and regulators.

Keywords

Chinese and American stock markets
Multifractal characteristics
Long-term memory
Nonlinearity
MF-DCCA model
==== Body
pmc1 Introduction

The stock market is an essential part of the national economic development and an indicator reflecting the national economic strength and competitiveness. As the two largest economies in the world, the performance of the Chinese and U.S. stock markets affects domestic investors and enterprises. It significantly impacts global financial stability and economic growth. The relationship between China and U.S. stock markets has undergone significant changes in recent years, affected by domestic and international political, economic, social, and other factors, such as the trade war, COVID-19, monetary policy, etc. On the one hand, the information transmission and capital flow between the two stock markets are increasingly rapid and frequent, showing a certain degree of linkage; on the other hand, there are also apparent differences and disunity between the two stock markets, reflecting the differences in economic structure and development stage between the two countries. Therefore, the relationship between China and U.S. stock markets is not a simple linear relationship but a complex and dynamic nonlinear relationship.

Exploring the correlation between China and U.S. stock markets and analyzing their characteristics, sources, changes, and influencing factors is of great theoretical significance and practical value for understanding the laws of operation of the two stock markets, evaluating the risks and returns of the two stock markets, and formulating reasonable investment strategies and regulatory policies. The cross-correlation between China's and U.S. stock markets is an important research topic involving the two stock markets' linkage, contagion, and risk spillover, which is significant to investors and regulators. Multifractality refers to the different fractal characteristics of a time series at different scales, reflecting the complexity, nonlinearity and non-stationarity. The multifractal detrended cross-correlation analysis method (MF-DCCA) (Podobnik, 2008, 2009, 2011) [[1], [2], [3]] is a method that can simultaneously analyze the cross-correlation and multifractality of two-time series, which can overcome the limitations of traditional linear correlation analysis methods and single fractal analysis methods. MF-DCCA is a combination of the multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis (MF-DFA) and detrended cross-correlation analysis (DCCA) methods, which can simultaneously consider the nonlinear and non-Gaussian characteristics of two-time series, as well as the differences and heterogeneity on different time scales and high-order statistical characteristics (Zhou, 2008) [4]. MF-DCCA has been widely used in the detection of cross-correlations between two financial series in some literature (Wang et al., 2010a, b; He and Chen, 2011a, b, c; Yuan et al., 2012) [[5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]].

This paper takes the two major stock indexes of China and the United States (CSI 300 and S&P 500) as the research objects, uses the MF-DCCA method to conduct cross-correlation analysis and multifractal analysis, and explores the time-varying, asymmetric, peak thickness and other characteristics of the cross-correlation and multifractal characteristics between China and U.S. stock markets from the perspectives of different time scales and high-order statistical characteristics. This paper aims to reveal the complex and dynamic correlation between China's and U.S. stock markets, evaluate the risks and returns of the two stock markets, and provide meaningful guidance and reference for investors and regulators. The research method of this paper is based on the cross-correlation analysis and multifractal analysis of the MF-DCCA method, which can simultaneously consider the nonlinear and non-Gaussian characteristics of two-time series, as well as the differences and heterogeneity on different time scales and high-order statistical characteristics. This paper has the following mainly marginal contributions: First, from the perspective of different time scales, it analyzes the changes of cross-correlation and multifractal characteristics between China and U.S. stock markets over time and reveals that the two stock markets have different degrees and directions of linkage effect at different time scales. Second, from the perspective of different high-order statistical characteristics (such as skewness and kurtosis), it analyzes the cross-correlation and multifractal characteristics between China and U.S. stock markets under positive and negative fluctuations and reveals that the two stock markets have different degrees and directions of asymmetric effect on different high-order statistical characteristics, and reveals that the two stock markets have different degrees and directions of tail thickness effect on different high-order statistical characteristics. Third, from the theoretical and practical perspectives, it provides crucial guidance and reference for investors to grasp the correlation and multifractal characteristics between China and U.S. stock markets, evaluate the risks and returns of the two stock markets, and formulate reasonable investment strategies and regulatory policies.

In light of these considerations, the present study is dedicated to exploring the extant research on the dynamic interactions between these significant markets, with a systematic effort to identify gaps in current understanding. Utilizing the multifractal detrended cross-correlation analysis (MF-DCCA) method, this investigation aims to unveil detailed insights into the multifractal features, driving factors, and their implications for investors and policy-makers. Such an endeavor aspires to contribute to a more sophisticated understanding of global financial stability. The subsequent sections will engage in an in-depth analysis of existing literature, scrutinizing the advancements in research concerning the cross-correlation and multifractal characteristics of the Chinese and U.S. stock markets. Additionally, this examination will highlight how these scholarly contributions enhance our comprehension of the dynamics within global financial markets.

2 Literature review and hypothesis

The cross-correlation and multifractality between Chinese and U.S. stock markets are important and complex issues in finance. Cross-correlation reflects the degree of mutual association between two time series, which can reveal the interaction and information transmission mechanism between two markets and has important guiding significance for investors to grasp market changes and adjust investment strategies; multifractality reflects whether the statistical characteristics of a time series are consistent at different time scales or under different fluctuations, which can reveal the heterogeneity, nonlinearity, non-stationarity and other characteristics within a market, and has essential significance for investors to evaluate market risks and returns. Therefore, an in-depth exploration of the cross-correlation and multifractality between Chinese and U.S. stock markets can enhance investors' and regulators' understanding of the essential laws and dynamic evolution process and provide investors and regulators with more effective investment decisions and regulatory policies.

At present, many scholars at home and abroad have studied the cross-correlation and multifractality between Chinese and U.S. stock markets. According to different research methods, these studies can be roughly divided into the following categories.(1) Studies based on linear vs. nonlinear correlation analysis methods. Research in this domain typically oscillates between employing linear correlation analysis methods, such as cointegration analysis, vector autoregressive models, and Granger causality tests, and nonlinear correlation analysis methods, including mutual information, transfer entropy, and interdependence approaches. Linear methods have been instrumental in uncovering long-term equilibrium relationships, dynamic interactions, and causal relationships between the Chinese and U.S. stock markets. These approaches, rooted in solid theoretical foundations, are adept at parameter estimation but are constrained by assumptions of linear correlation, stationarity, or cointegration, which may not hold in the inherently nonlinear and nonstationary nature of financial time series. They tend to provide an average or overall correlation perspective, potentially overlooking the nuances of correlation at varying time scales or under different market conditions. For instance, Geng Yanqiu et al. (2017) [11], Chen Liu (2013) [12], and Ai Yongfang et al. (2009) [13] identified long-term equilibrium relationships and significant interactions between the Chinese and U.S. stock markets using these linear methods.

Conversely, nonlinear correlation analysis methods excel at detecting nonlinear interactions and information transmission nuances between these markets. These methods offer robustness against the variegated probability distributions and fractal dimensions characteristic of financial time series, although they too have limitations. Primarily, these approaches presuppose identical probability distributions or fractal dimensions across time series, a condition seldom met in financial datasets. Moreover, while capable of capturing the essence of overall or average information transmission, they fall short of delineating the disparities in information transmission across different time scales or during varied market fluctuations. Notably, Gai Wei and Hu Jie (2021) [14] and Wang Xudong (2019) [15] utilized these nonlinear methods to reveal the intricate dynamics of information flow and interaction patterns between the Chinese and U.S. stock markets, particularly highlighting the intensified information transmission during market downturns and the predominance of the U.S. market's influence on its Chinese counterpart.

This juxtaposition of linear and nonlinear methodologies underscores the complexity and multifaceted nature of analyzing correlations between the Chinese and U.S. stock markets. Each approach contributes valuable insights into the intricate web of global financial interactions, yet also underscores the inherent limitations and the necessity for a more integrative and nuanced analytical framework to fully comprehend the dynamism of stock market correlations.(2) Studies based on applications of MF-DCCA in market analysis. This type of research mainly uses the MF-DCCA method or its improved method to explore the cross-correlation and multifractal characteristics between different markets. Further, it analyzes its time-varying characteristics, influencing factors and predictive ability. This type of method has strong nonlinear, nonstationary and non-Gaussian processing ability and good adaptability, but also has some limitations: first, they need to assume that the two-time series have the same trend function or the same detrending method and other characteristics, while in fact, financial time series often have different trend functions or different detrending methods and other characteristics; second, they can only reflect the overall or average multifractal characteristics between the two-time series, and cannot reflect the differences in multifractal characteristics between the two-time series at different time scales or under different fluctuations. For example, Ruan et al. (2018) [16] used MF-DCCA method to find that the cross-correlation and multifractal characteristics between Hong Kong stock market and mainland stock market have significant differences in different volatility-constrained intervals and are affected by essential events in financial market; Li Shuping et al. (2020) [17] used MF-DCCA method based on wavelet transform to find that the cross-correlation and multifractal characteristics between stock market, currency market and foreign exchange market have significant differences at different time scales, and have time-varying characteristics; Huang Jianbai et al. (2013) [18] used MF-DCCA method based on empirical mode decomposition to find that there is a relationship between the quantity and price of metal futures, and it has predictive ability.

(3) Effects of global events on market correlation. In recent years, with significant events such as Sino-U.S. trade frictions and the COVID-19 pandemic, the cross-correlation and multifractal characteristics between Chinese and U.S. stock markets have also changed. Some scholars have used more advanced methods and updated data to conduct updated research on the cross-correlation and multifractal characteristics between Chinese and U.S. stock markets. These methods have strong time-varying processing ability and sound sensitivity but also have some limitations: first, they need to assume that the two-time series have the same structural breakpoints or the same state space model and other characteristics, while in fact, financial time series often have different structural breakpoints or different state space models and other characteristics; second, they can only reflect the overall or average time-varying characteristics between the two-time series, and cannot reflect the differences in time-varying characteristics between the two-time series in different periods or different states. For example, Zhang Hongmei et al. (2023) [19] used the EMD-MF-DCCA method to find that in the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets, the two markets show long-range correlation in large fluctuations and persistent characteristics in small fluctuations, and have an asymmetric multifractal relationship; Zhou Yinggang et al. (2022) [20] derived a spatial autoregressive (SAR) model from the static general equilibrium model, and the results showed that the impact of bilateral exchange rate changes between China and the United States on the stock markets of the two countries was more significant during the trade frictions than before; Li Helong et al. (2019) [21] used the ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) method to find that there are significant differences in the linkage between Chinese and U.S. stock markets in short, medium and long cycles; Duan Daiwei et al. (2022) [22] based on the DCC-MGARCH and TVP-SP-VAR two time-varying coefficient models, found that the linkage between Chinese and U.S. stock markets has significant time-varying characteristics, and is affected by globalization, RMB internationalization and the COVID-19 pandemic.

In summary, many scholars at home and abroad have conducted in-depth studies on the cross-correlation and multifractality between Chinese and U.S. stock markets. However, there are still some problems and deficiencies. First, regarding research methods, most studies only focus on the static cross-correlation or overall cross-correlation between Chinese and U.S. stock markets and ignore the dynamic or local cross-correlation [23]. Dynamic cross-correlation reflects the changes of cross-correlation between two-time series over time, which can reveal the time-varying characteristics of interaction and information transmission between the two time series; local cross-correlation reflects the differences of cross-correlation between two time series at different time scales or under different fluctuations, which can reveal the heterogeneity, nonlinearity, non-stationarity and other characteristics of the two time series. These characteristics have important guiding significance for investors to grasp market changes and adjust investment strategies. Second, regarding research content, most studies only focus on the linear or nonlinear cross-correlation between Chinese and U.S. stock markets and ignore the non-Gaussian cross-correlation. Non-Gaussian cross-correlation reflects the high-order statistical characteristics between two-time series. This can reveal the asymmetry, tail thickness, and other characteristics between the two time series and have important significance for investors in evaluating market risks and returns. Therefore, this paper believes that conducting a more in-depth study on the dynamic and non-Gaussian cross-correlation between Chinese and U.S. stock markets will help obtain more comprehensive and accurate research results.

Drawing from the identified research gaps, particularly the insufficient exploration of non-linear correlations and the impact of global events, this paper proposes the following research hypotheses.Hypothesis 1 There is nonlinear and non-Gaussian cross-correlation between Chinese and U.S. stock markets, which is manifested as asymmetry, sharp-peaked and thick-tailed, and has significant time-varying characteristics;

Hypothesis 2 Chinese and U.S. stock markets do not conform to the efficient market theory hypothesis but rather conform to the fractal market theory hypothesis;

Hypothesis 3 The long memory effect and nonlinear effect between Chinese and U.S. stock markets are the main reasons for their multifractal characteristics.

In order to further explore the cross-correlation and multifractal characteristics between Chinese and U.S. stock markets, this paper will use the MF-DCCA method and its improved methods to analyze the dynamic cross-correlation and non-Gaussian cross-correlation between Chinese and U.S. stock markets. MF-DCCA is a cross-correlation analysis method proposed by Podobnik et al. (2008, 2009, 2011) [[1], [2], [3]] based on sliding window technology and detrending technology, which can simultaneously consider the nonlinear, nonstationary and non-Gaussian characteristics of two-time series, as well as the differences in correlation at different time scales. The strength of this method lies in its ability to analyze the cross-correlation and multifractal characteristics of two time series without the need for assuming that they share the same fractal dimension or probability distribution, thereby overcoming the limitations of traditional linear correlation analysis methods and singular fractal analysis approaches.

3 Research design

With the hypotheses clearly delineated, this paper proceeds to describe the methodology employed in the study. This section explicates the research design, data collection, and analytical techniques, ensuring a rigorous approach to testing the propositions.

3.1 Selecting sample

In the Sino-US securities market, CSI 300 and S&P 500 are the main parameters reflecting the overall performance of the two countries’ stock market Therefore, selecting the CSI 300 and S&P 500 indexes obtained based on daily transaction data as the research objects to examine the volatility characteristics of China-US capital and financial markets is representative. In order to eliminate the impact of price level differences on the calculation of return rates and, at the same time, enhance the stationarity and normality of the return rate sequence, the daily transaction index data sequence is converted into a logarithmic return rate form, which is calculated using Equation (1):(1) rt=ln(pt+1/pt)t=1,2,⋯,N,

In the formula, pt is the stock market index value corresponding to the t trading day, and rt is the return rate at the time t.

3.2 Methodology

In order to explore the cross-correlation and multifractal characteristics between Chinese and U.S. stock markets and to analyze their time-varying, asymmetric, tail thickness and other characteristics from the two perspectives of different time scales and high-order statistical characteristics, this paper uses the MF-DCCA method proposed by Podobnik et al. (2008) [1] and improved by Zhou et al. (2008, 2019) [24,25] to conduct cross-correlation analysis and multifractal analysis on the two-time series.(1) Cross-correlation test. This paper uses the cross-correlation statistic constructed by Podobnik et al. (2009) [2] to test whether there is a cross-correlation between any two-time series of equal length. For two nonstationary time series {xt}、 {yt}, t=1,2,⋯,N, the cross-correlation function ci is demonstrated in Equation (2):

(2) ci=∑k=i+1Nxkyk−i∑k=1Nxk2∑k=1Nyk2

The cross-correlation statistic Qcc(m) is demonstrated in Equation (3):(3) Qcc(m)=N2∑i=1mci2N−i

The null hypothesis of the cross-correlation statistic Qcc(m) test is: as the degree of freedom m changes, the value of Qcc(m) is approximately equal to the chi-square distribution χ2(m), then the two-time series do not have a cross-correlation relationship; otherwise, there is a cross-correlation relationship. The degree of freedom is from 1 to 1000.(2) DCCA Correlation Coefficient [19]。

The calculation formula for the DCCA correlation coefficient is shown in Equation (4):(4) ρDCCA=FDCCA2(s)FDFA(s)FDFA′(s)

In which, FDCCA2(s) is the cross-covariance function of the detrended fluctuations of two columns of time series, FDFA(s) and FDFA′(s) are the variances of the fluctuations of the time series after detrending, respectively. Unlike the traditional Pearson correlation coefficient, the DCCA correlation coefficient does not require a strictly stationary time series to be unbiasedly estimated, and the DCCA coefficient will get different values for different time scales [17].(3) Multifractal analysis. For two nonstationary time series {xt}, {yt}, t=1,2,⋯,N, the MF-DCCA model is applied to study the multifractal characteristics of China-US stock markets. The main steps are as follows [[26], [27], [28], [29]]:

Step 1: To examine the cumulative deviations of original time series {xt}, {yt}, t=1,2,⋯,N, new time series X(i), Y(i) are constructed as shown in Equation (5). Here, x‾ and y‾ represent the mean values of the {xt} and {yt} series, respectively, as described in Equation (6). These new cumulative series are then used to further the analysis, as described in Equation (5).(5) X(i)=∑k=1i(xk−x‾),Y(i)=∑k=1i(yk−y‾),

(6) x‾=1N∑t=1Nxt,y‾=1N∑t=1Nyti=1,2,⋯,N,

Step 2: Divide the two time series X(i), Y(i) into Ns non-overlapping equal-length subintervals v of length s, where Ns=[N/s] (i.e., take an integer). Since the lengths of the sequences X(i), Y(i) are not always an integer multiple of the time length s, a small part of the contour sequence data is not utilized. In order to make full use of this small end sequence, the reverse repetition of this division operation is taken for X(i), Y(i), thus obtaining a total of 2 Ns equal-length subintervals.

Step 3: Use the least squares method to fit the data on each subinterval v (v=1,2,⋯,2Ns) to obtain the local trend function pv(i) of the interval. After filtering out the local trend in the subinterval v (the difference between the original sequence and the fitted value), the time series is denoted as Xs(i)、 Ys(i). The time series is detrended using the fitted polynomial as described in Equation (7):(7) Xs(i)=X(i)−pv(i),Ys(i)=Y(i)−pv(i),i=1,2,⋯,2Ns,

In the formula, pv(i) is the fitted polynomial of the v-th interval. The fitting polynomial pv(i) can adopt linear, quadratic, cubic, or higher-order m polynomials.

Step 4: The variance of each subinterval v after detrending is calculated using the formula provided in Equation (8):F2(v,s)=1s∑i=1s{X[(v−1)s+i]−xv(i)}×{Y[(v−1)s+i]−yv(i)},v=1,2,⋯,Ns,

(8) F2(v,s)=1s∑i=1s{X[N−(v−Ns)s+i]−xv(i)}×{Y[N−(v−Ns)s+i]−yv(i)},v=Ns+1,Ns+2,⋯,2Ns,

Step 5: The q-order MF-DCCA fluctuation function of the time series is calculated using the method outlined in Equation (9):

(9) Fq(s)={[12Ns∑v=12Ns(F2(v,s))q/2]1/q,q≠0;exp[14Ns∑v=12Nsln(F2(v,s))],q=0;

Step 6: For different values of q, analyze the relationship Fq(s)∼shxy(q) between the fluctuation function Fq(s) and the observation scale s. For each s, find the corresponding Fq(s), and use the least squares method to fit ln(Fq(s))∼ln(s), and the obtained slope is the scale index, called the q-order generalized Hurst index hxy(q). If the size of hxy(q) is independent of the parameter q, then the sequences {xt}, {yt} have monofractal characteristics; otherwise, when h(q) changes with the parameter q, the two-time series have multifractal characteristics.

The generalized Hurst index hxy(q) characterizes the correlation characteristics of the two-time series. When the scale index hxy(q)=0.5, it means that the two-time series are uncorrelated and are independent random processes. When 0<hxy(q)<0.5, it indicates that the two time series have anti-persistence characteristics. When 0.5<hxy(q)<1, it indicates that the two time series have long-range correlation (fractal) or persistence. If there is an upward (or downward) trend before time t, it implies that there is generally an upward (or downward) trend after time t. Past events affect the future, and there is a correlation between events across time scales. Its trend enhancement behaviour depends on the degree of hxy(q)>0.5.

According to the multifractal theory [16], the relationship between the Hurst index hxy(q) and the Renyi index τxy(q) is given by Equation (10):(10) τxy(q)=qhxy(q)−1,

Thus, the Holder index αxy and the multifractal spectrum fxy(α) can be obtained through Legendre transform [30], as described in Equation (11):(11) {αxy=dτxy(q)dq=hxy(q)+qhxy′(q),fxy(α)=qαxy(q)−τxy(q)=q[αxy(q)−hxy(q)]+1,

In the formula, αxy is the singularity intensity, which is used to describe the different singularity degrees of each interval in a complex system. Let α0 represent the value of fxy(α) when αxy takes the maximum value, αmin and αmax represent the minimum and maximum values of αxy, respectively. Δαxy=αmax−αmin represents the width of the fractal spectrum, which represents the unevenness of the probability change; that is, the larger the Δαxy, the more uneven the time series distribution, and the more pronounced the multifractal characteristics. fxy(α) is the multifractal spectrum, and its value reflects the fractal dimension of the singularity index α. If the time series under study has monofractal characteristics, then the function fxy(α) is a constant; if the time series under study has multifractal characteristics, then the multifractal spectrum fxy(α) graph is a single-peak bell-shaped curve.

4 Empirical results analysis

Upon applying the outlined methodological framework, this paper presents the findings. This section details the results of the analysis, providing empirical evidence to either support the initial hypotheses.

4.1 Descriptive statistics

The sample data selected in this paper spans from March 15, 2018, to March 15, 2023. The two countries’ days off due to national holidays differed during this period. The Chinese stock market traded for 1217 days, and the U.S. stock market traded for 1259 days. A total of 1217 sample data were selected, and after converting them into logarithmic returns, 1216 sample observations were formed. Data source: Investing.com website (https://www.investing.com/).

It can be seen from Fig. 1 that in the five years from March 2018 to March 2023, the yield of CSI 300 fluctuated wildly, indicating that CSI 300 was affected by multiple factors during this period, including the Sino-US trade war, the COVID-19 pandemic and China's economic policy adjustments. The S&P 500 was relatively stable during the same period, with only a significant fluctuation at around 500 when the COVID-19 pandemic peaked in the United States. In contrast, the CSI 300 and S&P 500 yield trends are somewhat correlated but must be more consistent. The two indices reflect the conditions of their respective markets but also have their characteristics and differences.Fig. 1 CSI 300 and S&P 500 price earnings ratio.

Fig. 1

Table 1 shows the essential statistical characteristics of the two-time series formed by the logarithmic returns of CSI 300 and S&P 500. It can be seen from the table that both time series exhibit negative skewness, −0.327415 and −0.771621 respectively, indicating that both time series have left-skewed characteristics; the logarithmic returns of S&P 500 and CSI 300 are both positively peaked and greater than 3, indicating that both have peaked and thick-tailed characteristics; the Jarque-Bera statistics of the two-time series are both significant, neither of which obeys the normal distribution, indicating that both time series have non-Gaussian characteristics.Table 1 Descriptive statistical characteristics.

Table 1	CSI 300	S&P 500	
Mean	−2.22E-05	0.000305	
Median	3.95E-06	0.000851	
Maximum	0.057774	0.089683	
Minimum	−0.082087	−0.127652	
Std. Dev.	0.012960	0.013897	
Skewness	−0.327415	−0.771621	
Kurtosis	5.953662	16.03408	
Jarque-Bera	463.7481	8782.284	
Probability	0.000000	0.000000	

Table 2 is the unit root test result from the Prob. Column, it can be seen that the P-values of the ADF test of the CSI 300 and S&P 500 time series are both 0.0000 and the statistics are −35.21309 and −10.55667, respectively, which are much smaller than any significance level (1 %, 5 %, 10 %) critical value, which means that the null hypothesis is rejected. The alternative hypothesis is accepted; that is, it is considered that the CSI 300 and S&P 500 time series do not have unit roots and are stationary. This indicates that the two indices’ price and yield changes do not have apparent trends and periodicity, and their historical data cannot be used to predict future trends. This does not mean that the price changes of Chinese and American stock markets are completely random and irregular, but that the price changes of Chinese and American stock markets are influenced by many complex factors, which are difficult to quantify and capture, thus leading to the unpredictability of price changes. Table 1 has shown that the yield distributions of CSI 300 and S&P 500 are generally not distributed but peaked and negatively skewed distributions, which indicates that the data of Chinese and American stock market indices do not conform to the hypothesis of efficient market theory, are not entirely random walks, but have a certain degree of dependence and nonlinearity. The Chinese and American stock markets are more in line with the view of fractal market theory. The Chinese and American stock market price changes are fractal movements affected by investors' irrational behaviour and expectations. Therefore, research hypothesis 2 is established.Table 2 Unit root test.

Table 2	Test statistic	Test critical values	Prob.	
1 %	5 %	10 %	
CSI 300	−35.21309	−3.965617	−3.413514	−3.128804	0.0000	
S&P 500	−10.56667	−3.965667	−3.413539	−3.128819	0.0000	

Table 3, the Pearson correlation coefficient between CSI 300 and S&P 500 is 0.032, and the significance level is 0.271, meaning there is no linear correlation between CSI 300 and S&P 500, or the linear correlation between CSI 300 and S&P 500 is extremely weak. The two should be a nonlinear correlation or a complex dynamic relationship.Table 3 Pearson correlation test.

Table 3	CSI 300	S&P 500	
CSI 300	Pearson Correlation	1	0.032	
Sig. (2-tailed)		0.271	
Sample	1216	1216	
S&P 500	Pearson Correlation	0.032	1	
Sig. (2-tailed)	0.271		
Sample	1216	1216	

According to Table 4, the result of the Granger causality test of CSI 300 on S&P 500 is as follows: F statistic is 0.36716, P value is 0.6928. This means the null hypothesis cannot be rejected; CSI 300 has no Granger causal relationship with S&P 500. The result of the Granger causality test of S&P 500 on CSI 300 is as follows: F statistic is 3.85981, P value is 0.0213. This means the null hypothesis can be rejected; S&P 500 has a Granger causal relationship with CSI 300. It is comprehensively judged that when the lag order is 2, S&P 500 has a linear Granger causal relationship with CSI 300, while CSI300 does not have a linear Granger causal relationship with S&P 500. This shows that the historical information on the S&P 500 can help predict the future value of the CSI 300, while the historical information on the CSI 300 cannot help predict the future value of the S&P 500.Table 4 Granger causality test, sample: 1 1216, lags: 2.

Table 4Null Hypothesis	Obs	F-Statistic	Prob.	
S&P 500 does not Granger Cause CSI 300	1214	0.36716	0.6928	
CSI 300 does not Granger Cause S&P 500		3.85981	0.0213	

4.2 Characteristics analysis

4.2.1 Cross-correlation test result analysis

In Fig. 2, the pink line represents the cross-correlation statistic Qcc(m) of CSI 300 and S&P 500, and the blue line represents the critical value of the χ2 distribution. With degrees of freedom ranging from 1 to 1000, Qcc(m) is always more significant than the critical value of the chi-square distribution with a significance level of 5 % [31], indicating a significant long-term cross-correlation between CSI 300 and S&P 500. Fig. 2 shows that as the degree of freedom m increases, both Qcc(m) and the χ2 distribution show an increasing trend. However, the increase in Qcc(m) is more remarkable, indicating that the cross-correlation between CSI 300 and S&P 500 increases with the increase in the lag order; that is, the impact of the yield changes of CSI 300 and S&P 500 on each other has a longer duration. In general, there is a complex interaction mechanism between CSI 300 and S&P 500, which may involve multiple factors such as market sentiment, policy changes, globalization or de-globalization; this long-range cross-correlation between CSI 300 and S&P 500 may have a significant impact on investors' decision-making and risk management.Fig. 2 Cross-correlation test.

Fig. 2

4.2.2 DCCA correlation coefficient

Calculate the cross-correlation coefficient of CSI 300 and S&P 500 according to the size of different scales.

Table 5 shows that CSI 300 and S&P 500 show weak linear correlation at different scales. This is consistent with the result of the Pearson correlation test in Table 3, which confirms that the long-range cross-correlation between CSI 300 and S&P 500 should be nonlinear or a complex dynamic relationship, which may be affected by multiple nonlinear factors and complex mechanisms such as market efficiency, fractal characteristics, and chaotic phenomena. In general, research hypothesis 1 is established.Table 5 Cross-correlation coefficient.

Table 5Scale	2	4	8	16	32	64	128	256	512	
ρDCCA	0.0000	0.0000	0.0000	0.0001	0.0002	0.0004	0.0009	0.0015	0.0036	
Intensity	very weak	very weak	very weak	very weak	very weak	very weak	weak	weak	weak	
Note: In Table 5, when the scale is 2, 4, and 8, ρDCCA = 0.0000 is due to the retention of 4 decimal places; if more decimal places are taken, ρDCCA is not strictly zero.

4.2.3 Multifractal characteristics analysis

Using the MF-DCCA model to calculate and analyze the logarithmic returns of CSI 300 and S&P 500, respectively, this paper takes the time scale as 4≤s≤N/4, where N is the length of the time series.

It can be seen from Fig. 3 that when q changes, the slope between lnFq(s) and ln(s) also changes, indicating that there are multiple fractal characteristics between CSI 300 and S&P 500; that is, they exhibit different complexity and irregularity at different scales. Specifically, when q = 0, lnFq(s) and ln(s) shows an approximate linear relationship, indicating that there is a long-term memory effect between CSI 300 and S&P 500; when q < 0, the slope between lnFq(s) and ln(s) gradually increases, indicating that the small fluctuations between CSI 300 and S&P 500 have a weak correlation; when q > 0, the slope between lnFq(s) and ln(s) gradually decreases, indicating that the large fluctuations between CSI 300 and S&P 500 have a strong correlation.Fig. 3 CSI 300和S&P 500 fluctuation function graph.

Fig. 3

Fig. 4(a), (b), and (c) illustrate the generalized Hurst index graph, the scaling index, and the multifractal spectrum of CSI 300 and S&P 500, respectively, based on the MF-DCCA model. Fig. 4(a) shows the generalized Hurst index graph of CSI 300 and S&P 500, demonstrating the multifractal characteristics of the indices. Fig. 4(b) presents the scaling index graph, which highlights the nonlinear behaviors under different market conditions. Fig. 4(c) displays the multifractal spectrum, illustrating the complexity and heterogeneity at different scales in the CSI 300 and S&P 500. These figures reveal that both the CSI 300 and S&P 500 exhibit significant multifractal characteristics, indicating that they possess distinct statistical properties across different scales, which reflects their high complexity and heterogeneity. The multifractal spectrum curves of CSI 300 and S&P 500 are relatively broad, indicating that they have strong singularity, which means that they both have high uncertainty and volatility and are difficult to predict with simple models; the curves of CSI 300 and S&P 500 are relatively high, indicating that they have large fractal dimensions, that is, the proportion of regions with the same singularity index is relatively large, which means that they have good robustness and self-organization ability, and can adapt to environmental changes.Fig. 4 Multifractal characteristics graph.

Fig. 4

4.2.4 Causes of multifractal characteristics

In order to explore the source of multifractal characteristics, the original yield time series of CSI 300 and S&P 500 are randomly rearranged and phase processed. These two methods are usually used to test whether the multifractal characteristics of time series are affected by long-term memory effects or nonlinear effects [32]. The random rearrangement method shuffles the time series data, thus eliminating the long-term memory effect in the original series. The phase processing method randomly shuffles the phases after the Fourier transformation of the time series, thus preserving the long-term memory effect in the original series but eliminating the nonlinear effect. Suppose the multifractal characteristics of the time series data are weakened after random rearrangement and phase processing. In that case, it indicates that the long-term memory effect and nonlinear effect are the main reasons for the existence of multifractal characteristics in the original time series.

According to the results in Table 6, when q = 2, the Hurst index hxy(q) = 0.5055 > 0.5 of the original sequence, indicating that there is a long-range correlation between CSI 300 and S&P 500, that is, the price index fluctuation of one market will affect the price index of another market, reflecting the long-term memory effect between Chinese and American stock markets. It can be seen from Fig. 4(b) that the Renyi index τxy(q) of the original sequence is a strictly monotonic increasing convex function of q, and there is an apparent nonlinear relationship between τxy(q) and q, indicating that there is a nonlinear effect between CSI 300 and S&P 500, that is, they exhibit different dynamic behaviours in different situations. In order to further explore the reasons why CSI 300 and S&P 500 exhibit multifractal characteristics, multifractal analysis is performed on the original sequence, randomly shuffled sequence, and phase-processed sequence. It can be seen from Fig. 4 that the randomly shuffled sequence and the phase-processed sequence still exhibit multifractal characteristics. However, their Hurst index hxy(q), Renyi index τxy(q) and multifractal spectrum differ from the original sequences. Specifically, the Hurst index hxy(q) and Renyi index τxy(q) change less, and the width of the multifractal spectrum narrows, indicating that the long-term memory effect and nonlinear effect are the main reasons CSI 300 and S&P 500 exhibit multifractal characteristics. Therefore, research hypothesis 3 is established.Table 6 Hurst index.

Table 6q-order	hxy(q)	
Original data	Phase transformation data	Random shuffled data	
−10	0.6376	0.5603	0.5671	
−8	0.6248	0.5494	0.5552	
−6	0.6079	0.5359	0.5422	
−4	0.5855	0.5195	0.5312	
−2	0.5586	0.5003	0.5257	
0	0.5301	0.4827	0.5201	
2	0.5033	0.4673	0.4994	
4	0.4683	0.4525	0.4737	
6	0.4412	0.4383	0.4415	
8	0.4199	0.4251	0.4150	
10	0.4036	0.4132	0.3952	
Δhxy(q)	0.2340	0.1471	0.1719	

According to Table 6, the Hurst index hxy(q) and the difference Δhxy(q) of the original time series, the randomly shuffled sequence, and the phase-processed sequence are compared. Additionally, Table 7 compares the multifractal spectrum width among the original time series, the randomly shuffled sequence, and the phase-processed sequence. The results indicate that these indicators decrease after random rearrangement and phase processing, suggesting that the multifractal characteristics are weakened. This finding implies that the long-term memory and nonlinear effect in the original time series are the primary reasons for the multifractal characteristics observed in the CSI 300 and S&P 500. Specifically, after random rearrangement, as shown in Table 6, the Hurst index hxy(q) value decreases from 0.5671 to 0.3952, and the difference Δhxy(q) changes from 0.2340 to 0.1719. Meanwhile, as shown in Table 7, the width of the multifractal spectrum decreases from 0.3741 to 0.3327. This shows that random rearrangement disrupts the long-term memory effect in the original time series, thereby weakening the multifractal characteristics between CSI 300 and S&P 500. After phase processing, as highlighted in Table 6, the Hurst index hxy(q) value decreases from 0.5603 to 0.4132, and the difference Δhxy(q) changes from 0.2340 to 0.1471. Similarly, as shown in Table 7, the width of the multifractal spectrum decreases from 0.3741 to 0.3362. This suggests that phase processing disrupts the nonlinear effect in the original time series, thus weakening the multifractal characteristics between the CSI 300 and S&P 500.Table 7 Multifractal spectrum parameters.

Table 7	αmin	αmax	Δαxy	Δfxy(α)	
Original data	0.2847	0.6588	0.3741	0.27620	
Phase transformation data	0.3413	0.6775	0.3362	0.25732	
Random shuffled data	0.3041	0.6368	0.3327	0.19674	

5 Conclusion

This paper analyzes the cross-correlation between Chinese and American stock markets using the multifractal detrended cross-correlation analysis (MF-DCCA) method and explores its multifractal characteristics and influencing factors. This paper's main findings, main contributions, main implications, main limitations and future directions are discussed as follows:

The paper finds that the cross-correlation between Chinese and American stock markets exhibits multifractal characteristics, that is, different long-term memory effects, complexity and irregularity at different scales. The paper also finds that the multifractal characteristics are mainly caused by the long-term memory effect and nonlinear effect, that is, the historical changes and the dynamic behaviours of the two markets. The paper further finds that the data of the two markets do not support the efficient market theory but are more consistent with the fractal market theory.

The main contributions of this paper are:(1)This paper provides a new perspective and method for analyzing the cross-correlation between Chinese and American stock markets, which can capture the nonlinear and non-Gaussian features of the cross-correlation and reveal the multifractal characteristics and influencing factors of the cross-correlation. (2)This paper reveals the multifractal characteristics and influencing factors of the cross-correlation between Chinese and American stock markets, which are rarely studied in the existing literature and provide evidence for the fractal market theory.

This paper has specific implications and significance for investors and regulators in Chinese and American stock markets. Understanding the multifractal characteristics and influencing factors of the cross-correlation can help investors better grasp the market trend and risk and formulate reasonable investment strategies and decisions. Understanding the multifractal characteristics and influencing factors of the cross-correlation can help regulators better monitor and warn of abnormal market fluctuations and crises and formulate effective regulatory policies and measures.

This paper has shortcomings and limitations. For example, this paper only selects two stock indices as sample data. It does not consider other factors that may affect the two markets, such as macroeconomic indicators, political events, market sentiment, etc. This paper also needs to give an in-depth explanation and theoretical support for the multifractal characteristics of cross-correlation. However, it only describes and verifies them from the data analysis perspective. Therefore, future research can be expanded and deepened from the following aspects: (1)Expand the scope and quantity of sample data, including more stock indices or individual stocks and other variables that may affect the two markets, to improve the universality and representativeness of the research. (2)Introduce more multifractal analysis methods, such as the fluctuation function method, generalized dimension method, singular spectrum method, etc., to enhance the reliability and validity of the research. (3)Explore the mechanisms and causes behind the multifractal characteristics of the cross-correlation, such as investor behavior, information transmission, market efficiency, etc., to increase the research's theoretical significance and practical value.

Data availability statement

The datasets/codes are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Ethics declarations

Review and approval by an ethics committee was not needed for this study because it did not involve human subjects, the data used were publicly available, and no personally identifiable information was collected.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Yijun Chen: Conceptualization. Jun-hao Zhang: Formal analysis, Data curation. Lei Lu: Methodology, Formal analysis. Zi-miao Xie: Data curation.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Yijun Chen reports administrative support was provided by 10.13039/501100003459 Guizhou University of Commerce . If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Funding acknowledgments

This paper is supported by the 2023 Guizhou Province Higher Education Teaching Content and Curriculum System Reform Project (No:2023230 ) and the 2023 10.13039/501100010828 Guizhou Provincial Department of Education Humanities and Social Sciences Research Project in Colleges and Universities(No: 2023GZGXRW153 . Research on improving the ability of Guizhou Province to prevent and resolve significant risks).
==== Refs
References

1 Podobnik B. Stanley H. Detrended cross-correlation analysis: a new method for analyzing two nonstationary time series Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 2008 084102 2
2 Podobnik B. Grosse I. Horvatic D. Quantifying cross-correlations using local and global detrended approaches Eur. Phys. J. B 71 2009 243 250. 3
3 Podobnik B. Jiang Z.Q. Zhou W.X. Stanley H.E. Statistical tests for power-law cross-correlated processes Phys. Rev. E 84 2011 066118. 4
4 Zhou W.-X. Multifractal detrended cross-correlation analysis for two nonstationary signals Phys. Rev. E 77 2008 66211 66212
5 Wang Y. Liu L. Gu R. Cao J. Wang H. Analysis of market efficiency for the Shanghai stock market over time Phys. A 389 2010 1635 1642 13
6 Wang Y. Wei Y. Wu C. Cross-correlations between Chinese A-share and B-share markets Phys. A 389 2010 5468 5478 14
7 He L.-Y. Chen S.-P. A new approach to quantify power-law cross-correlation and its application to commodity markets Phys. A 390 2011 3806 3814 15
8 He L.-Y. Chen S.-P. Multifractal detrended cross-correlation analysis of agricultural futures markets, Chaos Solitons Fractals 44 2011 355 361 16
9 He L.-Y. Chen S.-P. Nonlinear bivariate dependency of price-volume relationships in agricultural commodity futures markets: a perspective from Multifractal Detrended Cross-Correlation Analysis Phys. A 390 2011 297 308 17
10 Yuan Y. Zhuang X. Liu Z. Price-volume multifractal analysis and its application in Chinese stock markets Phys. A 2012 18
11 Geng Y.Q. Zou D.W. Tong L. The correlation analysis of China-US stock market J. Changchun Norm. Univ. 36 2017 1 5
12 Chen L. The research on the relationship of stock price volatility between China and the United States J. Tongling Univ. 12 2013 38 40
13 Ai Y.F. Kong T. Lu Q. Changes of correlation between Chinese stock market and American's after China's Accession to the WTO Sci. Technol. Ind. 9 2009 92 96
14 Gai W. Hu J. Application of network vector autoregression model in volatility spillover analysis J. Univ. Sci. Technol. China 51 2021 468 474
15 Wang X.D. Research on the Dependence in Stock Markets Based on Entropy Theory, PhD Dissertation 2019 Harbin Inst. Technol.
16 Ruan Q. Zhang S. Lv D. Lu X. Financial liberalization and stock market cross-correlation: MF-DCCA analysis based on Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect Physica A 491 2018 779 791 10
17 Li S.P. Liu X.H. Xu Y.J. Financial markets cross-correlation and multi-fractal features based on MF-DCCA Stat. Decis. 36 2020 124 129
18 Huang J.B. Cheng H. Guo Y.Q. Shao L.G. Research on multifractal features of the relation between price and volume in China metal futures market: based on MF-DCCA approach Manag. Rev. 25 2013 77 85
19 Zhang H.M. Wang Q. Wang L. Dong X. Asymmetric multifractal correlation based on EMD-MF-DCCA method: a case study of shenzhen and Shanghai stock markets Oper. Res. Manag. Sci. 32 2023 181 186
20 Zhou Y.G. Xiao X. Exchange rate volatility, production networks, and stock market risk during the sino-US trade friction J. Financ. Res. 2022 115 134
21 Li H.L. Liu F.Z. Analysis on the linkage between Chinese and American stock markets based on EEMD J. Guangxi Univ. (Philos. Soc. Sci.) 41 2019 80 86
22 Duan D.W. Sha W.B. The time-varying effects of China and US stock market interaction during the coronavirus epidemic crisis——based on DCC-MGARCH and TVP-SV-VAR models J. Shanghai Lixin Univ. Account. Finance 20 2023 13
23 Li S. Lu X. Liu X. Dynamic relationship between Chinese RMB exchange rate index and market anxiety: a new perspective based on MF-DCCA Physica A 541 2020 123405 123417
24 Zhou W.X. Multifractal detrended cross-correlation analysis for two nonstationary signals Phys. Rev. E 77 2008 66211 66218
25 Jiang Z.Q. Xie W.J. Zhou W.X. Sornette D. Multifractal analysis of financial markets: a review Rep. Prog. Phys. 82 2019 125901 125919 31505468
26 Su F.L. Wang J.T. Jiang W. Cross-correlation and multifractal of Hong Kong stock market and mainland stock market based on MF-DCCA method Math. Pract. Theory 48 2018 119 129
27 Kantelhardt J.W. Zschiegner S.A. Koscielny-Bunde E. Havlin S. Bunde A. Stanley H.E. Multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis of nonstationary time series Physica A 316 2001383–3 2002 87 114
28 Wang J.L. Zhang C.Y. He H.D. Lin G.L. Multifractal analysis of traffic flow based on MF-DFA Comput. Eng. Appl. 52 2016 31 34
29 Tian C. Chen Z.M. Volatility characteristics of Shibor interest rates with different maturities based on DFA model Credit Ref 37 2019 70 73
30 Jiang Z.Q. Xie W.J. Zhou W.X. Sornette D. Multifractal analysis of financial markets: a review Rep. Prog. Phys. 82 2019 125901 125924 31505468
31 Zebende G.F. DCCA cross-correlation coefficient: quantifying level of cross-correlation Physica A 390 2011 614 618 25
32 Cao G. He L.Y. Cao J. Multifractal Detrended Analysis Method and its Application in Financial Markets 2018 Springer Singapore
