
==== Front
Cureus
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus Palo Alto (CA)

10.7759/cureus.66915
Orthopedics
Factors Influencing the Postoperative Flexion Angle in Cruciate-Sacrificing Rotating Platform of Total Knee Arthroplasty
Muacevic Alexander
Adler John R
Matsuoka Daisuke 1
Inagaki Yusuke 2
Mawarikado Yuya 3
Ogawa Munehiro 4
Seko Munehito 1
Fujii Tadashi 1
Tanaka Yasuhito 5
1 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kashiba Asahigaoka Hospital, Nara, JPN
2 Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Nara Medical University, Nara, JPN
3 Department of Medicinal Biology of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Nara Medical University, Nara, JPN
4 Department of Sports Medicine, Nara Medical University, Nara, JPN
5 Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nara Medical University, Nara, JPN
Daisuke Matsuoka dice_mar_9@yahoo.ne.jp
15 8 2024
8 2024
16 8 e6691515 8 2024
Copyright © 2024, Matsuoka et al.
2024
Matsuoka et al.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This article is available from https://www.cureus.com/articles/279799-factors-influencing-the-postoperative-flexion-angle-in-cruciate-sacrificing-rotating-platform-of-total-knee-arthroplasty
Background: Various factors affect the improvement of range of motion (ROM) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there are few reports specific to cruciate-sacrificing rotating platform (CSRP) TKA. In this study, factors affecting postoperative ROM improvement of CSRP TKA were investigated.

Methods: The study included 79 patients with knee osteoarthritis who underwent unilateral CSRP TKA at our institution. The group with an improvement of 5° or more (Δflexion angle) than the preoperative was defined as the good Δflexion group (38 knees), and that with less than 5° was defined as the poor Δflexion group (41 knees). The assessments were performed one day before and one year after surgery. Factors including rest and walking pain, knee flexion and extension angle, isometric knee extension strength, the five subscales of Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), α, β, γ and δ angles, femoro-tibial angle (FTA), and condylar twist angle were assessed. Unpaired t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Chi-square test were used to test differences between the good and poor Δflexion groups. Multiple logistic regression examined the association between each factor and the dependent variables (good Δflexion or poor Δflexion).

Results: Significant differences in the preoperative knee flexion, postoperative knee flexion, preoperative knee extension, and postoperative knee extension angles, postoperative KOOS pain and activity of daily living, β, ɤ angles were observed between the good and poor Δflexion groups. The model Chi-squared test revealed that the ɤ angle was significantly affected by the Δflexion angle.

Conclusions: With the CSRP TKA, flexion insertion of the femoral component was associated with postoperative flexion ROM improvement.

adl (activities of daily living)
knee alignment
proms
knee range of motion (rom)
tka
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Various factors influence patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) [1]. Among these factors, a good postoperative flexion angle is an important factor that contributes to postoperative satisfaction [1]. Conversely, it has been reported that the factors affecting patient satisfaction after TKA surgery are not ROM but the pain and function of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) [2]. Postoperative satisfaction varies according to the postoperative flexion ROM obtained, which depends on the optimal alignment (The α, β, γ, and δ angles, and femoro-tibial angle, FTA), ligament balance, and component design.

It has been reported that there is a correlation between the preoperative flexion angle in posterior stabilized (PS) and postoperative flexion angle in males [3] and that lateral laxity is an important factor in cruciate retention [4]. In general, the cruciate-sacrificing rotating platform (CSRP) is considered to be disadvantageous in terms of postoperative flexion range of motion compared to PS [5]. Previous reports have shown that posterior condylar offset (PCO) is important for obtaining a larger postoperative flexion angle in CSRP and for the stability of the femorotibial joint [6].

With regard to Attune CSRPTM (DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN), which has a GRADIUS curve design on the femur side to ensure stability in the mid-flexion position, there have been no previous reports investigating the factors on the ROM improvement.

The aim of this study was to determine which factors affect the flexion angle improvement one year after Attune CSRP TKA. Moreover, it was hypothesized that patients with good flexion improvement after TKA would show good short-term patient-reported outcomes (PROMs). This article was previously posted to the Research Square preprint server in July 2023.

Materials and methods

Ethics

All participants were fully informed of the study, both verbally and in writing, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and informed consent was obtained from all participants. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Kashiba Asahigaoka Hospital (approval number 03-1-016).

Study design and participants

This retrospective longitudinal study aimed to clarify the factors associated with knee flexion angle improvement at 1 year after the Attune CSRP TKA. We retrospectively reviewed 79 patients with osteoarthritis of the knee who underwent unilateral Attune CSRP TKA at our institution between October 2019 and January 2022. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients who underwent unilateral TKA due to a diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis and were available for follow-up 1 year after surgery; (2) participants using CSRP models; (3) participants who had the ability to ambulate independently or with a T-cane preoperatively and one-year post-operatively; (4) patients scheduled for primary TKA; (5) age 50-90 years; and (6) participants who provided informed consent to participate in the study. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) participants diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis and idiopathic osteonecrosis; (2) participants with neurological or other musculoskeletal diseases that significantly impaired basic movements, such as walking; and (3) participants with severe depression or dementia that would make the evaluation difficult. The 79 included participants were divided into two groups according to the degree to which the knee flexion angle improved postoperatively compared to preoperatively. The group with an improvement in angle of 5° or more from the preoperative value was defined as the good Δflexion group (n=38) and the group with an improvement angle of less than 5° was defined as the poor Δflexion group (n=41).

CSRP and surgical procedures

All patients underwent surgery under general anesthesia following ultrasound-guided sciatic and femoral nerve blocks (20 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine) performed by a trained anesthesiologist [7]. Perioperative antibiotics were administered to patients without renal dysfunction: an intravenous dose of cephazolin 1 g was administered before surgery, followed by an intravenous dose of cephazolin 1 g every eight hours until the day after surgery. Patients with renal impairment with creatinine clearance less than 30 ml/min were given half the dose of cefazolin for the same period as patients without it. To prevent deep vein thrombosis, all patients were wrapped with an elastic bandage from the thigh to the dorsum of the foot after surgery and were encouraged to do plantar dorsiflexion exercises in bed as much as possible. All patients received edoxaban tosilate hydrate 30 mg for one week starting three days after surgery. Preoperative planning was performed using a 3D preoperative-planning software (ZedKnee; Lexi, Tokyo, Japan) in all cases [8]. The coronary alignment of the preoperative plan was mechanical alignment. The osteotomy of the distal femur was flexed along the anterior bowing to avoid anterior notching for sagittal alignment. All patients were placed in the supine position with a tourniquet pressurized at 280 mmHg regardless of blood pressure and deployed using a midline incision and trivector approach. The surgical technique included extension gap first, gap-balancing approach using a spring tensor (Real-Time Knee Balancer®; RTKB;) (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Figure illustrating RTKB

Real-Time Knee Balancer® (RTKB) can be used to measure the medial-lateral balance and distance of the extension and flexion gaps.

A bony cut of the distal femur was performed using an intramedullary rod. The bony cut of the proximal tibia was performed with an extramedullary tibial guide. Computer-assisted surgery, such as a navigation system, was not used in all cases; only existing devices were used. Therefore, for the intraoperative index when the HKA angle was 0°, we determined the valgus angle and the assumed osteotomy amount obtained in the preoperative 3D planning for the femur and determined that there was no significant difference in the actual osteotomy amount. For the sagittal alignment of the tibia, we set the posterior slope angle in all cases to 5° from the line connecting the lateral malleolus and the fibular head (Figure 2).

Figure 2 Confirmation of the tibial posterior slope angle using an extramedullary rod and an alignment rod

The figure illustrates the confirmation of the tibial posterior slope angle using an extramedullary rod and an alignment rod. An extramedullary rod was first applied parallel to the fibular axis and then a posterior slope angle of 5° was set.

After creating the extension gap, we inserted a spacer block and confirmed that the HKA angle was 0° using an alignment rod (Figure 3). Regarding the point through which the alignment rod passes, the reference of the center of the femoral head was two fingers from the iliac crest [9]. If there was no foot deformation, the center of the ankle joint was set at the second toe and one-third of the center of the tibial axis [10]. After visually confirming the alignment during extension with a spacer block, extension, and flexion gaps were also confirmed with RTKB. Each extension gap at the natural extension position and femoral rotation angle at 90° of flexion were determined using the RTKB (Figure 4). A measured sizing and rotation guide was used to perform a four-sided femoral cut at the femoral rotation angle displayed in the RTKB, and the osteotomy was performed by shifting the ready-made cut block anterior and posterior to the femur so that the gap between extension and flexion was as equal as possible. Then, clearance of the posterior condylar osteophytes, which can impinge on the posterior lip, was performed [11]. The femoral and tibial components were then implanted, with no patella replaced. A mobile insert was used in all the cases.

Figure 3 Checking extension alignment using spacer block and alignment rod

The figure illustrates checking the extension alignment using a spacer block and an alignment rod. The tibial axis can be confirmed to pass through the middle one-third of the tibial crest.

Figure 4 Measurement of extension and flexion gaps using RTKB

Measurement of (a) extension gap and (b) flexion gap using Real-Time Knee Balancer® (RTKB). The femur twist angle was also confirmed at 90° of flexion, which is referred to in the subsequent four-sided osteotomy of the femur.

Outcome assessment

The assessments were conducted in a rehabilitation room in the hospital or in patient rooms. Physical function was assessed by a physiotherapist and baseline information and questionnaires were collected and administered, respectively by a nurse. Patients were assessed a day prior to their scheduled TKA and one year after the surgery. The outcome of interest was the degree of improvement in the knee flexion angle (Δflexion angle) from preoperative to one-year postoperatively.

Preoperative factors

Factors including age, height, weight, body mass index, sex, rest and walking pain, knee flexion and extension angle on the affected side, isometric knee extension strength (IKES) on the affected side, five subscales of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and condylar twist angle obtained from preoperative CT transverse view were collected. Rest and walking pain were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). VAS is a measurement tool used to quantify the subjective feeling of pain in patients. The VAS score ranges from 0 to 10 points, with 0 representing no pain and 10 representing excruciating pain. Passive knee angles were measured during maximum flexion and extension using radiography (Figure 5). IKES was measured using a handheld dynamometer (μ-tas F1, ANIMA, Tokyo, Japan) with the participant in a seated position and the knee at 90° flexion [12]. The reliability and validity of this measurement method have been previously demonstrated [13]. The dynamometer was placed perpendicular to the leg, just above the malleolus. Each participant was instructed to push against the dynamometer while attempting to straighten the knee, gradually increasing the force to maximize the voluntary effort. The maximum effort was then maintained for an additional 3 s.

Figure 5 A representative radiographic image (sagittal view) of the knee joint

All patients were imaged in full extension and full flexion of the knee joint in the supine position on the sagittal radiographic view. The angle between the line passing through the center of the tibia and that of the femur was measured. (a) shows the maximum flexion angle and (b) shows the maximum extension angle. For this paper, (b) is represented by an angle of 180 minus (b).

During all tests, the dynamometer was stabilized by a belt and the examiner's hands. The maximum IKES was measured twice, and the mean value (kg) was calculated. The KOOS measures functional outcomes using the following five subscales: symptoms (seven items), pain (nine items), activities of daily living (ADL) function (17 items), sports and recreational function (five items), and quality of life (QOL) (four items). Each of the five subscale scores is calculated as the sum of the included factors. The scores are then converted to a 0-100 scale, with 0 representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no knee problems, as is common in orthopedic scales [14]. A Likert scale was used. All factors had five possible answer options ranging from 0 (no problems) to 4 (extreme problems), with scores between 0 and 100 representing the percentage of the total possible score. In addition to the separate analysis and interpretation of the five subscales, an aggregate score was calculated. The reliability and validity of this assessment have been previously reported [15].

Radiological assessment

The α, β, γ and δ angles and femoro-tibial angle (FTA) were assessed by early postoperative X-ray images (Figure 6). The α angle was measured between the line across the lower edge of the femoral component and the axis of the femoral shaft. The femoral component was typically implanted 5-7° valgus to the anatomical axis of the femur, which is the amount necessary to restore the neutral mechanical axis of the limb [16]. The β angle was measured between the line across the base of the tibial plate and the axis of the tibial shaft. The tibial component was neutrally positioned at 90° [17]. The γ angle was measured between the anterior femoral cortex and the inner anterior part of the femoral component. Because the anterior flange was opened at 5°, the femoral component axis was measured considering the angle in the Attune CSRP. The ideal γ angle recommended in some studies varies between 0-10° [18]. The σ angle was measured between the line across the base of the tibial plate and the axis of the tibial shaft. The ideal σ angle was 86° [19]. The FTA is the lateral angle between the distal femoral and proximal tibial axes (i.e., <180° and >180°, corresponding to valgus and varus alignments, respectively).

Figure 6 Postoperative radiological evaluation images

Postoperative radiological evaluation included (a) α (femoral valgus) angle, β (tibial varus) angle, (b) γ (femoral flexion) angle, δ (tibial posterior slope) angle, and (c) femoro-tibial angle (FTA). Θangle is the angle consisting of the femoral axis and the anterior flange of the femoral component.

Outcomes at one year postoperatively

Factors including rest and walking pain, knee flexion and extension angles on the affected side, IKES on the affected side, and the five KOOS subscales were assessed.

Postoperative protocol

The length of hospital stay was two weeks according to the hospital protocol, with six days of physiotherapy, 40-60 minutes a day. Physiotherapy was started on the first postoperative day, and if possible, gait exercises with a walker and knee flexion exercises were initiated. Once discharged from the hospital, weekly physiotherapy sessions (40 minutes per session) were provided for approximately two to three months. Once physiotherapy was completed at two to three months post-operatively, as agreed upon by the participant and the attending doctor, the patient resumed daily routine activities at home until the one-year postoperative assessment. In this study, only patients who underwent rehabilitation in the same program were selected [20].

Statistics

Descriptive data are presented as the number of cases and mean with standard deviation (SD). For all analyses, the significance level was set at 5%. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to determine the normality of the data distribution.

To test for differences between the good and poor Δflexion groups, the unpaired t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Chi-square test were used. Multiple logistic regression was performed to examine the association between each factor and the dependent variable (i.e., good Δflexion or poor Δflexion). The independent variables were the β angle and the ɤ angle. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test was performed to determine whether the analysis results significantly fit the actual data. To test for differences between the groups preoperatively and at one year postoperatively, the paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used.

Results

Table 1 summarizes the participants’ descriptive characteristics and the results of the unpaired t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Chi-square test. Significant differences in the preoperative knee flexion angle (p=0.001), postoperative knee flexion angle (p=0.021), preoperative knee extension angle (p=0.009), postoperative knee extension angle (p=0.010), postoperative KOOS pain (p=0.028), and postoperative KOOS ADL (p=0.007), β angle (p=0.033), ɤ angle (p=0.006), were observed between the good and poor Δflexion groups.

Table 1 Participant’s demographic characteristics and statistical data

ADL: activities of daily living; BMI: body mass index; FTA: femorotibial angle; IKES: isometric knee extension strength; KOOS: knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score; QOL: quality of life

aunpaired t-test, bMann–Whitney U test, cPearson’s chi-square test.

Characteristics	Good Δflexion group (n = 38)	Poor Δflexion group (n = 41)	p-value	
Age, years	72.37 ± 8.68	73.73 ± 8.70	0.325b	
Height, cm	156.63 ± 9.29	156.44 ± 9.36	0.928ª	
Weight, kg	63.49 ± 11.46	65.49 ± 13.18	0.864b	
BMI, kg/m²	25.71 ± 2.77	26.58 ± 3.52	0.229ª	
Gender	 	 	0.057c	
Female	21	31	 	
Male	17	10	 	
Operative side	 	 	0.552c	
Right	22	20	 	
Left	16	21	 	
α angle, °	96.74 ± 2.43	96.39 ± 2.06	0.535b	
β angle, °	91.11 ± 2.04	90.24 ± 1.55	0.033b	
γ angle, °	4.47 ± 3.27	2.57 ± 2.67	0.006a	
δ angle, °	84.79 ± 2.86	85.20 ± 2.37	0.493ª	
External rotation angle, °	4.45 ± 1.98	4.54 ± 2.26	0.755b	
FTA, °	 	 	 	
Pre-operation	180.42 ± 8.17	182.59 ± 6.12	0.130b	
One year postoperatively	172.08 ± 3.14	173.37 ± 2.86	0.060a	
Rest pain, mm	 	 	 	
Pre-operation	20.63 ± 25.89	16.17 ± 15.41	0.820b	
One year postoperatively	10.97 ± 17.88	9.32 ± 19.96	0.108b	
Walking pain, mm	 	 	 	
Pre-operation	51.97 ± 30.84	48.63 ± 24.78	0.596a	
One year postoperatively	17.74 ± 21.02	13.12 ± 21.16	0.080b	
Knee flexion angle, °	 	 	 	
Pre-operation	127.24 ± 16.09	141.32 ± 9.40	0.001a	
One year postoperatively	130.11 ± 11.97	123.85 ± 11.58	0.021a	
Knee extension angle, °	 	 	 	
Pre-operation	−3.18 ± 5.49	−0.64 ± 8.74	0.009b	
One year postoperatively	1.54 ± 6.07	5.05 ± 7.40	0.010b	
IKES, kgf	 	 	 	
Pre-operation	16.16 ± 10.56	16.10 ± 8.77	0.620b	
One year postoperatively	18.63 ± 8.78	20.12 ± 10.25	0.413b	
KOOS Symptoms, %	 	 	 	
Pre-operation	64.38 ± 19.80	62.20 ± 17.09	0.600a	
One year postoperatively	77.26 ± 12.60	81.18 ± 16.83	0.095b	
KOOS Pain, %	 	 	 	
Pre-operation	54.90 ± 22.81	53.93 ± 16.59	0.831a	
One year postoperatively	78.00 ± 15.80	85.16 ± 14.28	0.028b	
KOOS ADL, %	 	 	 	
Pre-operation	62.89 ± 19.68	63.49 ± 15.77	0.600a	
One year postoperatively	76.01 ± 14.17	84.54 ± 12.78	0.007b	
KOOS Sport/Rec, %	 	 	 	
Pre-operation	28.16 ± 24.89	27.68 ± 24.06	0.832b	
One year postoperatively	43.82 ± 25.51	49.27 ± 29.30	0.340b	
KOOS QOL, %	 	 	 	
Pre-operation	34.54 ± 22.07	33.23 ± 19.64	0.878b	
One year postoperatively	53.62 ± 18.36	60.06 ± 24.76	0.191a	

The results of the multiple logistic regression analyses are shown in Table 2. The model Chi-squared test (significant at p < 0.01) revealed that the ɤ angle (B = -0.187, p=0.037, odds ratio (OR) = 0.830) was significantly associated with Δflexion angle. The result of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test was not significant at p=0.984, and the fit of the regression equation was good.

Table 2 Multiple logistic regression analysis for factors affecting Δflexion angle

Regression equation: ln (p/1−p) = −0.183 (β angle) −0.187 (γ angle) + 17.353. Model x2, p < 0.01.

Hosmer-Lemeshow test, p = 0.982.

Angle	β	Standard error	Wald	p-value	Odds ratio (95% CI)	
β	−0.183	0.150	1.490	0.222	0.832 (0.620–1.117)	
γ	−0.187	0.090	4.352	0.037	0.830 (0.696–0.989)	
Constant	17.353	13.532	1.645	0.200	 	

Comparisons between the groups preoperatively and one year postoperatively are summarized in Table 3. All factors except knee flexion angle in the good Δflexion group illustrated significant improvement from preoperatively to one year postoperatively.

Table 3 Comparisons between the groups preoperatively and one year postoperatively

Abbreviations: ADL: activities of daily living; BMI: body mass index; FTA: femorotibial angle; IKES: isometric knee extension strength; KOOS: knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score; QOL: quality of life

a The paired t-test, b Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Variables	Preoperation	One year postoperatively	p-value	
Good flexion group (n = 38)	 	 	 	
FTA, °	180.42 ± 8.17	172.08 ± 3.14	0.001b	
Rest pain, mm	20.63 ± 25.89	10.97 ± 17.88	0.032b	
Walking pai, mm	51.97 ± 30.84	17.74 ± 21.02	0.001b	
Knee flexion angle, °	127.24 ± 16.09	130.11 ± 11.97	0.053a	
Knee extension angle, °	−3.18 ± 5.49	1.54 ± 6.07	0.001a	
IKES, kgf	16.16 ± 10.56	18.63 ± 8.78	0.019b	
KOOS, %	 	 	 	
Symptoms	64.38 ± 19.8	77.26 ± 12.6	0.001a	
Pain	54.9 ± 22.81	78 ± 15.8	0.001b	
ADL	62.89 ± 19.68	76.01 ± 14.17	0.001a	
Rec/Sports	28.16 ± 24.89	43.82 ± 25.51	0.009b	
QOL	34.54 ± 22.07	53.62 ± 18.36	0.001b	
Poor flexion group (n = 41)	 	 	 	
FTA, °	182.59 ± 6.12	173.37 ± 2.86	0.001b	
Rest pain, mm	16.17 ± 15.41	9.32 ± 19.96	0.002b	
Walking pain, mm	48.63 ± 24.78	13.12 ± 21.16	0.001b	
Knee flexion angle, °	141.32 ± 9.40	123.85 ± 11.58	0.001b	
Knee extension angle, °	−0.64 ± 8.74	5.05 ± 7.40	0.001b	
IKES, kgf	16.10 ± 8.77	20.12 ± 10.25	0.001b	
KOOS, %	 	 	 	
Symptoms	62.2 ± 17.09	81.18 ± 16.83	0.001b	
Pain	53.93 ± 16.59	85.16 ± 14.28	0.001b	
ADL	63.49 ± 15.77	84.54 ± 12.78	0.001b	
Rec/Sports	27.68 ± 24.06	49.27 ± 29.3	0.001b	
QOL	33.23 ± 19.64	60.06 ± 24.76	0.001b	

Discussion

TKA has been increasingly performed as a therapeutic modality for patients with osteoarthritis recently. Among the many implant designs, the Attune CSRP TKA verified in this study demonstrated that the flexion position insertion of the femoral component was the factor that most affected the postoperative flexion angle improvement. By inserting the femoral component in a slightly flexed position, 1) the posterior femoral condyle osteotomy is reduced and the PCO is increased, 2) the bone volume in front of the distal femur is decreased, (Figure 3) the sliding surface between the posterior condyle and the insert is secured even in the deep flexed position. Previous reports that referred to sagittal alignment after TKA did not mention the femoral component; however, various reports have mentioned the PCO [6]. A larger PCO has been reported to be necessary to prevent the paradoxical roll-forward motion during flexion. The Low Contact StressTM (LCS: DePuy Synthes, Warsaw, IN) and Attune CSRP, which have different conformities between the femoral component and insert in flexion, are considered to have different ideal alignments based on the results of this study. The conformity ratio of TKA from extension to flexion gradually decreases [21]. However, this value was assumed to be balanced, including the difference between the medial and lateral sides of the implant gap in the extension and flexion positions. For all subjects in this study, we performed surgery to minimize gap imbalance with the gap balancing technique. Based on the results of this study, the preoperative ROM was worse in the poor Δflexion group than in the good Δflexion group as the patient background. The good Δflexion group included many patients with significant knee joint deformities and osteophytes. Therefore, invasive procedures such as osteophyte removal and soft tissue release were needed during surgery in many cases. As a result, this seems to have led to a decrease in the KOOS one year postoperatively. The second effect of flexion insertion of the femoral component, a decrease in anterior femoral offset, is associated with a decrease in the patellofemoral (PF) pressure from extension to flexion. Tanikawa et al. [22] also reported that PF pressure is not only determined by the thickness of the patella but also by the anterior-posterior positional relationship of the femoral component, and that the anterior flange should be placed in contact with the anterior cortex as much as possible. Because none of the subjects in this study underwent patellar replacement, the PF pressure in the flexed position was considered to be affected only by the thickness of the anterior distal femur. A previous study reported that PF pressure affects the femoral external rotation angle during surgery, and it has been reported that the greater the external rotation angle, the lower the PF pressure and the avoidance of anterior knee pain [23]. In this study, there was no significant difference in the intraoperative external rotation angle between the good and poor Δflexion groups, suggesting that the flexion angle was affected by the sagittal alignment of the femoral component. Scott et al. [24] reported that the insertion of a CR-type single-radius design femoral component in a flexed position reduced the incidence of anterior knee pain even in long-term results after TKA without patellar resurfacing.

Another advantage is the maintenance of the sliding surface between the femoral component and the insert in deep flexion. Regarding tibiofemoral sagittal conformity, it is known that Attune CSRP gradually decreases conformity from extension to flexion [21]. The insertion of the femoral component in the flexion position is considered to provide higher tibiofemoral joint conformity, even in deep flexion. Consequently, stress concentration on the insert is less likely to occur, even in the flexed position, and polyethylene wear is prevented, leading to aseptic loosening and revision [25]. It should be noted that depending on the posterior slope angle of the tibial component, insertion of the femoral component in a flexed position is a technique that can only be handled by CSRP, which does not have a post-cam mechanism like the PS type. The risk of post-delamination or breakage increases when the sum of the flexion angle of the femoral component and the posterior tibial slope angle exceeds the specified hyperextension allowable angle for models with a post-cam mechanism [26]. Laoruengthana et al. [27] reported that even after TKA, the extension ROM gradually widened until two years after surgery. For this reason, we should consider the difference in ideal alignment between the PS and cruciate-sacrificing (CS) types when selecting a model. Although the CSRP type has no particular restrictions on the sagittal alignment of the femoral component, excessive flexion insertion may cause postoperative flexion contracture [28]. In particular, it has been reported that males are significantly more likely to develop postoperative flexion contracture of 5° after TKA than females are [29].

Our findings may be useful for patients who require greater postoperative flexion ROM. In recent years, with increasing healthy life expectancy, the number of patients who require extensive activities, such as walking, cycling, golfing, and swimming, after TKA is increasing [30]. TKA is required not only to alleviate pain but also to maintain higher-order functions. The relationship between ROM after TKA and PROMs in this study is important for enhancing patients’ activity postoperatively.

Limitations

Although there was no difference in FTA between the good and poor Δflexion groups, factors related to intraoperative invasion, such as the level of deformity and the size of the osteophytes, have not been verified. The allowable range of femoral component flexion insertion has not yet been determined. The decrease in PF pressure due to femoral flexion insertion is theoretical only and has not been quantified. It is necessary to compare the thickness of the component with the actual osteotomy thickness from the anterior to the distal femur in the future. These are short-term results 1-year postoperatively; long-term follow-up data are not available. The sample size of 79 is not sufficient for a comparative study, and it is necessary to consider further increases in the number of subjects in the future.

The insertion of the femoral component in a flexed position is difficult to control using conventional techniques and requires computer-assisted surgery, such as navigation and robotics, to obtain a more accurate alignment. Since the grouping in this study was not the absolute value of the postoperative flexion angle but the difference from the preoperative period, there was a significant difference in ROM of the preoperative flexion of good and poor Δflexion groups. All patients underwent postoperative rehabilitation following a similar protocol; however, voluntary training after discharge was not uniform and could not be controlled.

Conclusions

We found that the flexion insertion of the femoral component was an important factor in obtaining a larger flexion angle in the Attune CSRP. However, the hypothesis that the KOOS one year after surgery would be higher with better flexion ROM was overturned. It is necessary to identify factors other than ROM in postoperative satisfaction.

We would like to thank AJE.com for English language editing.

Disclosures

Author Contributions

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. The Institutional Review Board of Kashiba Asahigaoka Hospital issued approval 03-1-016. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kashiba Asahigaoka Hospital (03-1-016). This study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki. Details of the study protocol and the aim of the study were explained to all participants, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants before including them in the study.

Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Concept and design:  Yuya Mawarikado, Daisuke Matsuoka, Yusuke Inagaki, Munehiro Ogawa, Yasuhito Tanaka

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Yuya Mawarikado, Daisuke Matsuoka, Yusuke Inagaki, Munehito Seko, Tadashi Fujii, Yasuhito Tanaka

Drafting of the manuscript:  Yuya Mawarikado, Daisuke Matsuoka, Yusuke Inagaki, Yasuhito Tanaka

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Yusuke Inagaki, Munehiro Ogawa, Munehito Seko, Tadashi Fujii, Yasuhito Tanaka
==== Refs
References

1 Good postoperative flexion angle improves knee function and improvement of flexion angle increases patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty Kubo M Maeda T Kumagai K Amano Y Kawasaki T Imai S 3137 3140 36 2021 34034923
2 Knee range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: how important is this as an outcome measure? J Arthroplasty Miner AL Lingard EA Wright EA Sledge CB Katz JN 286 294 18 2003 12728419
3 Impact of soft tissue imbalance on knee flexion angle after posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty Tsukada S Fujii T Wakui M 2399 2403 32 2017 28390890
4 Postoperative knee flexion angle is affected by lateral laxity in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty Nakano N Matsumoto T Muratsu H Takayama K Kuroda R Kurosaka M 401 405 31 2016 26518359
5 Anterior-stabilized TKA is inferior to posterior-stabilized TKA in terms of postoperative posterior stability and knee flexion in osteoarthritic knees: a prospective randomized controlled trial with bilateral TKA Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Han HS Kang SB 3217 3225 28 2020 31970430
6 Fluoroscopic analysis of the kinematics of deep flexion in total knee arthroplasty. Influence of posterior condylar offset J Bone Joint Surg Br Bellemans J Banks S Victor J Vandenneucker H Moemans A 50 53 84 2002 https://boneandjoint.org.uk/Article/10.1302/0301-620X.84B1.0840050 11837832
7 Peripheral nerve block anesthesia/analgesia for patients undergoing primary hip and knee arthroplasty: recommendations from the International Consensus on Anesthesia-Related Outcomes after Surgery (ICAROS) group based on a systematic review and meta-analysis of current literature Reg Anesth Pain Med Memtsoudis SG Cozowicz C Bekeris J 971 985 46 2021 34433647
8 Improved surgical procedure of primary constrained total knee arthroplasty which enables use of the femoral diaphyseal straight extension stem BMC Musculoskelet Disord Kawahara S Mawatari T Matsui G Hamai S Akasaki Y Tsushima H Nakashima Y 408 23 2022 35501739
9 How precise is the identification of the center of the femoral head during total knee arthroplasty? Acta Orthop Seo JG Moon YW Park SH Kang HM Kim SM 53 58 83 2012 22112153
10 The tibial crest as a practical useful landmark in total knee arthroplasty Knee Tsukeoka T Lee TH Tsuneizumi Y Suzuki M 283 289 21 2014 23154034
11 Effects of posterior condylar osteophytes on gap balancing in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty with posterior cruciate ligament sacrifice Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Sriphirom P Siramanakul C Chanopas B Boonruksa S 677 681 28 2018 29302780
12 Reliability of maximal isometric knee strength testing with modified hand-held dynamometry in patients awaiting total knee arthroplasty: useful in research and individual patient settings? A reliability study BMC Musculoskelet Disord Koblbauer IF Lambrecht Y van der Hulst ML Neeter C Engelbert RH Poolman RW Scholtes VA 249 12 2011 22040119
13 Investigating the test-retest reliability and validity of hand-held dynamometry for measuring knee strength in older women with knee osteoarthritis Physiother Can Chopp-Hurley JN Wiebenga EG Gatti AA Maly MR 231 238 71 2019 31719719
14 Quantitative assessment of functional limitations in normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees Clin Orthop Relat Res Barber SD Noyes FR Mangine RE McCloskey JW Hartman W 204 214 255 1990
15 Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS): systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties Osteoarthritis Cartilage Collins NJ Prinsen CA Christensen R Bartels EM Terwee CB Roos EM 1317 1329 24 2016 27012756
16 Functional outcome and alignment in computer-assisted and conventionally operated total knee replacements: a multicentre parallel-group randomised controlled trial Bone Joint J Gøthesen O Espehaug B Havelin LI 609 618 96-B 2014 24788494
17 Predicting range of movement after knee replacement: the importance of posterior condylar offset and tibial slope Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Malviya A Lingard EA Weir DJ Deehan DJ 491 498 17 2009 19139846
18 Is the use of computer navigation in total knee arthroplasty improving implant positioning and function? A comparative study of 198 knees operated at a Norwegian district hospital BMC Musculoskelet Disord Dyrhovden GS Gøthesen Ø Lygre SH 321 14 2013 24228727
19 Influence of preoperative range of motion on the early clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty (Article in Chinese) Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi Shi MG Lü HS Guan ZP 1101 1105 44 2006 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17081464/ 17081464
20 Do individual differences in physical therapists' skills affect postoperative results of total knee arthroplasty? J Knee Surg Fujii T Nishio N Bandou M 832 837 33 2020 31067587
21 Finite element analysis of contact stress distribution on insert conformity design of total knee arthroplasty Int J Online Biomed Eng Seechaipat T Rooppakhun S Phombut C 96 18 2022 https://online-journals.org/index.php/i-joe/article/view/29355
22 Influence of patella thickness on patellofemoral pressure in total knee arthroplasty BMC Musculoskelet Disord Tanikawa H Tada M Ogawa R Harato K Niki Y Kobayashi S Nagura T 298 22 2021 33757475
23 TKA design-integrated trochlea groove rotation reduces patellofemoral pressure Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Woiczinski M Kistler M Schröder C 1680 1692 27 2019 30564858
24 Association between femoral component sagittal positioning and anterior knee pain in total knee arthroplasty: a 10-year case-control follow-up study of a cruciate-retaining single-radius design J Bone Joint Surg Am Scott CE Clement ND Yapp LZ MacDonald DJ Patton JT Burnett R 1575 1585 101 2019 31483401
25 The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty J Knee Surg Tarazi JM Chen Z Scuderi GR Mont MA 1396 1401 34 2021 34507367
26 In vivo anterior tibial post contact after posterior stabilizing total knee arthroplasty J Orthop Res Hanson GR Suggs JF Kwon YM Freiberg AA Li G 1447 1453 25 2007 17557322
27 Hyperextension following two different designs of fixed-bearing posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Laoruengthana A Rattanaprichavej P Suangyanon P Galassi M Teekaweerakit P Pongpirul K 1641 1650 32 2022 34665293
28 Sagittal alignment of the femoral component and patient height are associated with persisting flexion contracture after primary total knee arthroplasty J Arthroplasty Okamoto Y Otsuki S Nakajima M Jotoku T Wakama H Neo M 1476 1482 34 2019 30905642
29 Gender-specific difference in the recurrence of flexion contracture after total knee arthroplasty J Exp Orthop Kinoshita T Hino K Kutsuna T Watamori K Tsuda T Miura H 87 8 2021 34617136
30 Return to sports and physical activity after total and unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis Sports Med Witjes S Gouttebarge V Kuijer PP van Geenen RC Poolman RW Kerkhoffs GM 269 292 46 2016 26744336
