
==== Front
aBIOTECH
aBIOTECH
aBIOTECH
2096-6326
2662-1738
Springer Nature Singapore Singapore

152
10.1007/s42994-024-00152-w
Editorial
Zig, Zag, and ’Zyme: leveraging structural biology to engineer disease resistance
McClelland Alexander J. alexander.mcclelland@tsl.ac.uk

Ma Wenbo wenbo.ma@tsl.ac.uk

grid.420132.6 The Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7UH UK
11 4 2024
11 4 2024
9 2024
5 3 403407
10 3 2024
12 3 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Dynamic host–pathogen interactions determine whether disease will occur. Pathogen effector proteins are central players in such disease development. On one hand, they improve susceptibility by manipulating host targets; on the other hand, they can trigger immunity after recognition by host immune receptors. A major research direction in the study of molecular plant pathology is to understand effector-host interactions, which has informed the development and breeding of crops with enhanced disease resistance. Recent breakthroughs on experiment- and artificial intelligence-based structure analyses significantly accelerate the development of this research area. Importantly, the detailed molecular insight of effector–host interactions enables precise engineering to mitigate disease. Here, we highlight a recent study by Xiao et al., who describe the structure of an effector-receptor complex that consists of a fungal effector, with polygalacturonase (PG) activity, and a plant-derived polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein (PGIP). PGs weaken the plant cell wall and produce immune-suppressive oligogalacturonides (OGs) as a virulence mechanism; however, PGIPs directly bind to PGs and alter their enzymatic activity. When in a complex with PGIPs, PGs produce OG polymers with longer chains that can trigger immunity. Xiao et al. demonstrate that a PGIP creates a new active site tunnel, together with a PG, which favors the production of long-chain OGs. In this way, the PGIP essentially acts as both a PG receptor and enzymatic manipulator, converting virulence to defense activation. Taking a step forward, the authors used the PG-PGIP complex structure as a guide to generate PGIP variants with enhanced long-chain OG production, likely enabling further improved disease resistance. This study discovered a novel mechanism by which a plant receptor plays a dual role to activate immunity. It also demonstrates how fundamental knowledge, obtained through structural analyses, can be employed to guide the design of proteins with desired functions in agriculture.

Keywords

Plant immunity
Structural biology
Bioengineering
Cell wall-degrading enzymes
Receptor biology
issue-copyright-statement© Agricultural Information Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences 2024
==== Body
pmcThe host–pathogen arms race has been described as a zig-zag process with step-wise co-evolution (Jones and Dangl 2006). While plants have evolved a sophisticated immune system to defend against pathogen invasion, pathogens secrete effector proteins to overcome host defense mechanisms and promote disease. As a counter-counter-defense, some effectors “trip the wire” and are recognized by immune receptors to activate immunity. According to their localizations in plant tissues, pathogen effectors are classified as apoplastic or cytoplasmic. Recognition of apoplastic effectors relies on membrane-bound receptor-like kinases or proteins (RLKs or RLPs), which often involves direct binding to the effector. Meanwhile, cytoplasmic effectors are recognized by intracellular NLR receptors that contain the conserved nucleotide-binding, leucine-rich repeat (NB-LRR) domain. Activation of these receptors may result from direct or indirect recognition of effectors. With indirect recognition, the receptor “guards” specific host proteins or processes that are manipulated by effectors and translates the detected abnormalities into a defense response (Spoel and Dong 2012; van der Hoorn and Kamoun 2008).

This interplay of defense and counter-defense is often centered on enzymes. For example, kinases are important components of immune signaling, and many pathogens produce kinase inhibitors to disrupt the signaling process (Zhou and Chai 2008). Protease inhibitors are also commonly produced by pathogens to overcome plant proteases having functions in defense (Godson and van der Hoorn 2021). Similarly, pathogens employ effectors with various enzymatic activities to manipulate the host. Some of the most important apoplastic effectors are cell wall-degrading enzymes (CWDEs). CWDEs are secreted by a wide range of microbial pathogens and insects (Lagaert et al. 2009). Because the cell wall is a crucial barrier to invading pathogens, CWDEs play a key role in aiding infection by weakening the cell wall of the host. In line with the zig-zag model, one counter-counter-defense mechanism plants have evolved to “guard” the cell wall is to deploy inhibitors of pathogen CWDEs.

A prominent example of CWDEs in the host–pathogen arms race involves pathogen polygalacturonases (PGs) and their plant-derived inhibitors, called PG-inhibiting proteins or PGIPs (De Lorenzo et al. 2001; Juge 2006; Kalunke et al. 2015; Lagaert et al. 2009). Interestingly, PGs have dual functions. In addition to disrupting cell wall integrity, pectin degradation by PGs leads to the accumulation of oligogalacturonides (OGs), which possess immunosuppressive functions and, thus, further promote virulence (Moerschbacher et al. 1999). PGs can be recognized by plant PGIPs, which contain a central LRR domain similar to those present in immune receptors (Di Matteo et al. 2006). In particular, RLPs directly bind to extracellular ligands through their LRR domain (Wan et al. 2019).

Unlike the RLPs, PGIPs lack a transmembrane domain and are not directly associated with the plasma membrane. In addition, although called “inhibitors”, PGIPs can alter the enzymatic activity of pathogen PGs without blocking pectin degradation in a way that the OGs produced have longer chains. Long-chain OGs with 10–15 degrees of polymerization act as signals that indicate cell wall damage and activate defense responses through wall-associated kinases (WAKs) (Brutus et al. 2010). As such, PGIPs confer disease resistance, via a mechanism that is rather unusual compared to other immune receptors and inhibitors in that they “hijack” the enzymatic activity of a pathogen virulence protein to produce immune-eliciting molecules. Although this observation has been made for over 30 years (Cervone et al. 1989), an explanation of how PGIPs alter the enzymatic activity of PGs remained elusive.

The recent publication “A plant mechanism of hijacking pathogen virulence factors to trigger innate immunity” by Xiao et al. (2024) in Science represents a landmark in elucidating the long sought-after mechanism by which PGIPs manipulate PGs to confer resistance (Xiao et al. 2024). Deploying a dynamic approach comprising structural biology, enzyme biochemistry, and functional in planta assays, Xiao et al. investigated the interaction between the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) PGIP2 (PvPGIP2) and the fungal pathogen Fusarium phyllophilum PG (FpPG). In vitro, they confirmed the formation of a PvPGIP2-FpPG complex and the propensity of the complex to produce longer OG polymers than FpPG alone using de-esterified pectin (polygalacturonic acid or PGA) as the substrate. Using pathogen infection and immune activation assays, they demonstrate that FpPG-PvPGIP2 + PGA treatment activates defense, in planta, likely by producing long-chain OGs. Conversely, FpPG + PGA, in the absence of PvPGIP2, produced shorter OGs that can suppress immunity triggered by pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), such as chitin. Together, these results confirm that PvPGIP2 alters the enzymatic activity of FpPG and induces the accumulation of long-chain OGs, boosting plant immunity and mitigating pathogen infection (Xiao et al. 2024).

Excitingly, Xiao et al. solved a high-resolution structure of PvPGIP2 in complex with FpPG. Two regions of FpPG form interacting interfaces with PvPGIP2; however, PvPGIP2 does not directly block the active site of FpPG. Interaction with PvPGIP2 also did not change the overall conformation of FpPG. Instead, PvPGIP2 creates a new active site “tunnel” together with FpPG. Although PvPGIP2 alone does not bind to long-chain OGs, it increased the binding affinity of FpPG to long-chain OGs, but not short-chain OGs, potentially altering the enzymatic specificity. The PvPGIP2-FpPG complex structure revealed a cluster of positively charged residues in PvPGIP2 that forms part of the new active site tunnel. A mutant containing substitutions of these residues to non-charged amino acids exhibited reduced binding affinity to long-chain OGs, and the mutant, when combined with FpPG, resulted in the production of short-chain OGs, similar to FpPG alone. It is worth noting that these positively charged residues are outside of the FpPG-interacting interfaces, thereby decoupling the interaction and manipulation activities of PvPGIP2. Therefore, PvPGIP2 alters the active site of FpPG to induce immunity (Fig. 1) (Xiao et al. 2024).Fig. 1 PvPGIP2 alters FpPG enzymatic activity to induce plant defense. Alone, FpPG degrades host cell wall pectin to weaken the cell wall and produce immunosuppressive oligogalacturonides. PvPGIP2, in complex with FpPG, induces the formation of a new active site tunnel (highlighted by the red-dashed circle), which favors the production of long-chain oligogalacturonides. Instead of suppressing defense, the long-chain oligogalacturonides activate immune signaling through plasma membrane-bound receptors (wall-associated kinases or WAKs). Detailed characterizations of the structure–function relationship of the PvPGIP2-FpPG complex guided the design of PvPGIP2 variants (PvPGIP2N274R and PvPGIP2S276R, the residues are highlighted by the yellow star), which enable the enhanced production of long-chain oligogalacturonides. These modifications hold the promise of further elevating disease resistance. Figure created with BioRender.com

Given the crucial role of the positively charged cluster in PvPGIP2 in long-chain OG binding, the authors next tested whether mutating nearby residues to arginine, a positively charged amino acid, could further increase long-chain OG production. Indeed, two variants, PvPGIP2N274R and PvPGIP2S276R, exhibited increased production of long-chain OGs compared to wildtype PvPGIP2 when combined with FpPG (Fig. 1). Lastly, using the PvPGIP2-FpPG complex structure as a reference, they showed that a predicted structural model of Medicago truncatula PGIP1 (MtPGIP1) contained variant residues at the FpPG interaction interface. Consistent with this sequence variation, MtPGIP1 does not interact with FpPG, in vitro. Substitution of these residues in MtPGIP1 into the structurally equivalent ones in PvPGIP2 enabled FpPG binding and the production of long-chain OGs (Xiao et al. 2024). These experiments showcase how new-to-nature variants of PGIPs, with improved activities, can be generated based on structural information.

This study represents a significant advancement in our understanding of the host–pathogen arms race by shedding new light on a unique effector–receptor interaction. Inhibitors are widely used by both hosts and pathogens to defeat specific enzymatic activities in their counterpart. Often, inhibitors directly bind to the active sites to block or diminish the enzymatic activities. This has been well established for protease inhibitors. For example, many pathogens secrete effectors to inhibit host papain-like cysteine proteases (PLCPs) as an important virulence mechanism to promote infection and disease progression (Clark et al. 2018; Clark et al. 2020; Godson and van der Hoorn 2021; Misas-Villamil et al. 2016). In some cases, direct inhibition of key enzymatic activities can be “guarded” by immune receptors to trigger immunity. For example, the membrane-bound RLP Cf-2 from tomato recognizes inhibition of the PLCP Rcr3 by an apoplastic effector, Avr2, from the fungal pathogen Cladosporium fulvum (Rooney et al. 2005). What is unusual about PGIP-PG interaction is that plant PGIPs combine these principals together to act both as a receptor of PGs and a manipulator of the PG enzymatic activity to induce defense in tandem with WAKs, thereby “guarding” cell wall integrity (Fig. 1).

Although evidence of defense mechanisms involving “hijacking” of a specific activity of the pathogen has just emerged, similar tactics have been observed from pathogens as a robust virulence strategy. A most recent example came from the oomycete pathogen Phytophthora, which employs effectors containing “LWY” tandem repeat units to promote infection. Several LWY effectors are able to form functional holoenzymes with the core enzyme of the host protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) (Li et al. 2023). The crystal structure of the effector-PP2A complex revealed a specific combination of two LWY units that confer PP2A interaction. This PP2A-interacting module is located at the N-terminus of the effectors, whereas their C-terminal LWY units are responsible for recruiting various phosphoproteins to the holoenzyme for dephosphorylation. As such, these LWY effectors hijack a major host protein phosphatase to regulate cellular functions. These recent publications demonstrate that both plants and pathogens have co-evolved “hijacking” mechanisms for their own benefit.

PGIPs have garnered a lot of interest in the development of disease resistant crops. PGIP-based resistance could have far-reaching effects in agriculture, given the prevalence of PGs and PGIPs across pathogens and plants, respectively. PGIPs are ubiquitous in the plant kingdom and have been demonstrated to increase resistance to fungal, oomycete, and bacterial pathogens. (De Lorenzo et al. 2001; Juge 2006; Kalunke et al. 2015; Lagaert et al. 2009). Structural information of the PGIP-PG complex unlocks exciting opportunities to engineer resistance in a targeted, precise manner. For example, the binding capacity of PGIPs to pathogen-produced PGs can be improved. PGs may carry variations from host–pathogen co-evolution, thereby escaping recognition by PGIPs. The interaction interface can be designed to broaden the binding capacity and inhibition spectrum of PGIPs. Moreover, PGIPs may be engineered for more superior PG manipulating activity, such as by modifying the active site tunnel (Fig. 1), elevating resistance efficiency.

Related to these exciting possibilities, an interesting avenue of future research would be to dive deeper into the natural structural and sequence variations that exist in both PGIPs and PGs, which will expand our potential to introduce effective PG monitoring in elite crop cultivars. This analysis will also inform how PGs may evolve to overcome PGIP manipulation, and if PGIPs have concurrently adapted novel PG-binding mechanisms to retain their defense function. Recently, the PGIP-inactivating effector PINE1, from necrotrophic fungi, was shown to block PGIP functions, essentially acting as a pathogen inhibitor of a plant inhibitor of a pathogen effector (Wei et al. 2022). A future area of research could explore the PINE1-PGIP interaction interface to engineer PINE1-insensitive PGIPs. Lastly, plants have evolved independent mechanisms to trigger defense upon the perception of PGs and other CWDEs. For example, a conserved 9-amino-acid fragment from fungal PGs is recognized by a canonical membrane-bound receptor RLP42 in Arabidopsis thaliana, thus triggering defense (Zhang et al. 2021). Further, the Phytophthora sojae CWDE XEG1 is inhibited by the RLP RXEG1, which in turn forms a complex with the co-receptor BAK1 to activate defense (Sun et al. 2022). Such structural insights may be incorporated to engineer novel inhibitors of CWDEs, including PGs.

Xiao et al. demonstrated the power of engineering designer proteins to improve desired activities, via a structure-guided approach. Given the abundance of experimentally validated protein structures, the increasingly accessible nature of protein complex structure predictions (Evans et al. 2021), and the emergence of de novo peptide design tools (Watson et al. 2023), our ability to engineer designer crops is steadily improving. Plant immune receptors are particularly enticing candidates for bioengineering to enhance disease resistance (Cadiou et al. 2023; Contreras et al. 2023a). For example, the crystal structure of the NLR receptor Pikp integrated heavy metal-associated (HMA) domain in complex with the rice blast fungal effector AVR-Pik guided the generation of a Pikp mutant that can recognize previously unrecognized AVR-Pik effectors (De la Concepcion et al. 2019). In another example, structure-guided engineering of the helper NLR, NRC2, blocked its inhibition by a nematode effector, while retaining its immune functions (Contreras et al. 2023b). The emergence of artificial intelligence further facilitates protein engineering by offering guidance through in silico protein structure prediction. In a recent study, AlphaFold multimer was used to identify interacting residues between the tomato cysteine protease Pip1 and EpiC2B, a protease-inhibiting effector from the potato late blight pathogen Phytophthora infestans. Mutagenesis of two targeted amino acids in Pip1 rendered it insensitive to EpiC2B inhibition, and this engineered Pip1 had enhanced resistance to P. infestans (Schuster et al. 2024).

We are unmistakably in the midst of a structure-guided engineering boom. Structural characterizations have played a pivotal role in the advancement of our fundamental understanding of microbial pathogenesis and plant immunity. We expect to witness rapid development in this area, and ultimately, the application of this knowledge to improve crop yield.

Acknowledgements

Research in the Wenbo Ma group is supported by Gatsby Charitable Foundation and UKRI BBSRC Grant BBS/E/J/000PR9797.

Author contributions

All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
==== Refs
References

Brutus A Sicilia F Macone A Cervone F De Lorenzo G A domain swap approach reveals a role of the plant wall-associated kinase 1 (WAK1) as a receptor of oligogalacturonides Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010 107 9452 9457 10.1073/pnas.1000675107 20439716
Brutus A, Sicilia F, Macone A, Cervone F, De Lorenzo G (2010) A domain swap approach reveals a role of the plant wall-associated kinase 1 (WAK1) as a receptor of oligogalacturonides. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:9452–9457. 10.1073/pnas.100067510720439716 10.1073/pnas.1000675107
Cadiou L Brunisholz F Cesari S Kroj T Molecular engineering of plant immune receptors for tailored crop disease resistance Curr Opin Plant Biol 2023 74 102381 10.1016/j.pbi.2023.102381 37192575
Cadiou L, Brunisholz F, Cesari S, Kroj T (2023) Molecular engineering of plant immune receptors for tailored crop disease resistance. Curr Opin Plant Biol 74:102381. 10.1016/j.pbi.2023.10238137192575 10.1016/j.pbi.2023.102381
Cervone F Hahn MG De Lorenzo G Darvill A Albersheim P Host-pathogen interactions: XXXIII. A plant protein converts a fungal pathogenesis factor into an elicitor of plant defense responses Plant Physiol 1989 90 542 548 10.1104/pp.90.2.542 16666805
Cervone F, Hahn MG, De Lorenzo G, Darvill A, Albersheim P (1989) Host-pathogen interactions: XXXIII. A plant protein converts a fungal pathogenesis factor into an elicitor of plant defense responses. Plant Physiol 90:542–548. 10.1104/pp.90.2.54216666805 10.1104/pp.90.2.542
Clark K An effector from the Huanglongbing-associated pathogen targets citrus proteases Nat Commun 2018 9 1718 10.1038/s41467-018-04140-9 29712915
Clark K et al (2018) An effector from the Huanglongbing-associated pathogen targets citrus proteases. Nat Commun 9:1718. 10.1038/s41467-018-04140-929712915 10.1038/s41467-018-04140-9
Clark KJ Pang Z Trinh J Wang N Ma W Sec-delivered effector 1 (SDE1) of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ promotes citrus huanglongbing Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 2020 33 1394 1404 10.1094/MPMI-05-20-0123-R 32986514
Clark KJ, Pang Z, Trinh J, Wang N, Ma W (2020) Sec-delivered effector 1 (SDE1) of ‘Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus’ promotes citrus huanglongbing. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 33:1394–1404. 10.1094/MPMI-05-20-0123-R32986514 10.1094/MPMI-05-20-0123-R
Contreras MP Lüdke D Pai H Toghani A Kamoun S NLR receptors in plant immunity: making sense of the alphabet soup EMBO Rep 2023 24 e57495 10.15252/embr.202357495 37602936
Contreras MP, Lüdke D, Pai H, Toghani A, Kamoun S (2023a) NLR receptors in plant immunity: making sense of the alphabet soup. EMBO Rep 24:e57495. 10.15252/embr.20235749537602936 10.15252/embr.202357495
Contreras MP Resurrection of plant disease resistance proteins via helper NLR bioengineering Sci Adv 2023 9 eadg3861 10.1126/sciadv.adg3861 37134163
Contreras MP et al (2023b) Resurrection of plant disease resistance proteins via helper NLR bioengineering. Sci Adv 9:eadg3861. 10.1126/sciadv.adg386137134163 10.1126/sciadv.adg3861
De Concepcion JC Franceschetti M MacLean D Terauchi R Kamoun S Banfield MJ Protein engineering expands the effector recognition profile of a rice NLR immune receptor Elife 2019 8 e47713 10.7554/eLife.47713 31535976
De Concepcion JC, Franceschetti M, MacLean D, Terauchi R, Kamoun S, Banfield MJ (2019) Protein engineering expands the effector recognition profile of a rice NLR immune receptor. Elife 8:e47713. 10.7554/eLife.4771331535976 10.7554/eLife.47713
De Lorenzo G D'Ovidio R Cervone F The role of polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins (PGIPs) in defense against pathogenic fungi Annu Rev Phytopathol 2001 39 313 335 10.1146/annurev.phyto.39.1.313 11701868
De Lorenzo G, D’Ovidio R, Cervone F (2001) The role of polygalacturonase-inhibiting proteins (PGIPs) in defense against pathogenic fungi. Annu Rev Phytopathol 39:313–335. 10.1146/annurev.phyto.39.1.31311701868 10.1146/annurev.phyto.39.1.313
Di Matteo A Bonivento D Tsernoglou D Federici L Cervone F Polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein (PGIP) in plant defence: a structural view Phytochemistry 2006 67 528 533 10.1016/j.phytochem.2005.12.025 16458942
Di Matteo A, Bonivento D, Tsernoglou D, Federici L, Cervone F (2006) Polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein (PGIP) in plant defence: a structural view. Phytochemistry 67:528–533. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2005.12.02516458942 10.1016/j.phytochem.2005.12.025
Evans R Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer Biorxiv 2021 10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 34981053
Evans R et al (2021) Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. Biorxiv. 10.1101/2021.10.04.46303434981053 10.1101/2021.10.04.463034
Godson A van der Hoorn RA The front line of defence: a meta-analysis of apoplastic proteases in plant immunity J Exp Bot 2021 72 3381 3394 10.1093/jxb/eraa602 33462613
Godson A, van der Hoorn RA (2021) The front line of defence: a meta-analysis of apoplastic proteases in plant immunity. J Exp Bot 72:3381–3394. 10.1093/jxb/eraa60233462613 10.1093/jxb/eraa602
Jones JD Dangl JL The plant immune system Nature 2006 444 323 329 10.1038/nature05286 17108957
Jones JD, Dangl JL (2006) The plant immune system. Nature 444:323–329. 10.1038/nature0528617108957 10.1038/nature05286
Juge N Plant protein inhibitors of cell wall degrading enzymes Trends Plant Sci 2006 11 359 367 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.05.006 16774842
Juge N (2006) Plant protein inhibitors of cell wall degrading enzymes. Trends Plant Sci 11:359–367. 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.05.00616774842 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.05.006
Kalunke RM Tundo S Benedetti M Cervone F De Lorenzo G D'Ovidio R An update on polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein (PGIP), a leucine-rich repeat protein that protects crop plants against pathogens Front Plant Sci 2015 6 146 10.3389/fpls.2015.00146 25852708
Kalunke RM, Tundo S, Benedetti M, Cervone F, De Lorenzo G, D’Ovidio R (2015) An update on polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein (PGIP), a leucine-rich repeat protein that protects crop plants against pathogens. Front Plant Sci 6:146. 10.3389/fpls.2015.0014625852708 10.3389/fpls.2015.00146
Lagaert S Beliën T Volckaert G Plant cell walls: protecting the barrier from degradation by microbial enzymes. In: Seminars in cell & developmental biology 2009 New York Elsevier 1064 1073
Lagaert S, Beliën T, Volckaert G (2009) Plant cell walls: protecting the barrier from degradation by microbial enzymes. In: Seminars in cell & developmental biology. Elsevier, New York, pp 1064–1073. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.05.008
Li H Pathogen protein modularity enables elaborate mimicry of a host phosphatase Cell 2023 186 3196 3207 10.1016/j.cell.2023.05.049 37369204
Li H et al (2023) Pathogen protein modularity enables elaborate mimicry of a host phosphatase. Cell 186:3196–3207. 10.1016/j.cell.2023.05.04937369204 10.1016/j.cell.2023.05.049
Misas-Villamil JC van der Hoorn RAL Doehlemann G Papain-like cysteine proteases as hubs in plant immunity New Phytol 2016 212 902 907 10.1111/nph.14117 27488095
Misas-Villamil JC, van der Hoorn RAL, Doehlemann G (2016) Papain-like cysteine proteases as hubs in plant immunity. New Phytol 212:902–907. 10.1111/nph.1411727488095 10.1111/nph.14117
Moerschbacher BM Mierau M Graeßner B Noll U Mort AJ Small oligomers of galacturonic acid are endogenous suppressors of disease resistance reactions in wheat leaves Jexp Bot 1999 50 605 612 10.1093/jxb/50.334.605
Moerschbacher BM, Mierau M, Graeßner B, Noll U, Mort AJ (1999) Small oligomers of galacturonic acid are endogenous suppressors of disease resistance reactions in wheat leaves. Jexp Bot 50:605–612. 10.1093/jxb/50.334.60510.1093/jxb/50.334.605
Rooney HC Van't Klooster JW van der Hoorn RA Joosten MH Jones JD de Wit PJ Cladosporium Avr2 inhibits tomato Rcr3 protease required for Cf-2-dependent disease resistance Science 2005 308 1783 1786 10.1126/science.1111404 15845874
Rooney HC, Van’t Klooster JW, van der Hoorn RA, Joosten MH, Jones JD, de Wit PJ (2005) Cladosporium Avr2 inhibits tomato Rcr3 protease required for Cf-2-dependent disease resistance. Science 308:1783–1786. 10.1126/science.111140415845874 10.1126/science.1111404
Schuster M Eisele S Armas-Egas L Kessenbrock T Kourelis J Kaiser M van der Hoorn RA Enhanced late blight resistance by engineering an EpiC2B-insensitive immune protease Plant Biotechnol J 2024 22 284 10.1111/pbi.14209 37901958
Schuster M, Eisele S, Armas-Egas L, Kessenbrock T, Kourelis J, Kaiser M, van der Hoorn RA (2024) Enhanced late blight resistance by engineering an EpiC2B-insensitive immune protease. Plant Biotechnol J 22:284. 10.1111/pbi.1420937901958 10.1111/pbi.14209
Spoel SH Dong X How do plants achieve immunity? Defence without specialized immune cells Nat Rev Immunol 2012 12 89 100 10.1038/nri3141 22273771
Spoel SH, Dong X (2012) How do plants achieve immunity? Defence without specialized immune cells. Nat Rev Immunol 12:89–100. 10.1038/nri314122273771 10.1038/nri3141
Sun Y Plant receptor-like protein activation by a microbial glycoside hydrolase Nature 2022 610 335 342 10.1038/s41586-022-05214-x 36131021
Sun Y et al (2022) Plant receptor-like protein activation by a microbial glycoside hydrolase. Nature 610:335–342. 10.1038/s41586-022-05214-x36131021 10.1038/s41586-022-05214-x
van der Hoorn RA Kamoun S From guard to decoy: a new model for perception of plant pathogen effectors Plant Cell 2008 20 2009 2017 10.1105/tpc.108.060194 18723576
van der Hoorn RA, Kamoun S (2008) From guard to decoy: a new model for perception of plant pathogen effectors. Plant Cell 20:2009–2017. 10.1105/tpc.108.06019418723576 10.1105/tpc.108.060194
Wan W-L Froehlich K Pruitt RN Nuernberger T Zhang L Plant cell surface immune receptor complex signaling Curr Opin Plant Biol 2019 50 18 28 10.1016/j.pbi.2019.02.001 30878771
Wan W-L, Froehlich K, Pruitt RN, Nuernberger T, Zhang L (2019) Plant cell surface immune receptor complex signaling. Curr Opin Plant Biol 50:18–28. 10.1016/j.pbi.2019.02.00130878771 10.1016/j.pbi.2019.02.001
Watson JL De novo design of protein structure and function with RF diffusion Nature 2023 620 1089 1100 10.1038/s41586-023-06415-8 37433327
Watson JL et al (2023) De novo design of protein structure and function with RF diffusion. Nature 620:1089–1100. 10.1038/s41586-023-06415-837433327 10.1038/s41586-023-06415-8
Wei W A fungal extracellular effector inactivates plant polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein Nat Commun 2022 13 2213 10.1038/s41467-022-29788-2 35468894
Wei W et al (2022) A fungal extracellular effector inactivates plant polygalacturonase-inhibiting protein. Nat Commun 13:2213. 10.1038/s41467-022-29788-235468894 10.1038/s41467-022-29788-2
Xiao Y A plant mechanism of hijacking pathogen virulence factors to trigger innate immunity Science 2024 383 732 739 10.1126/science.adj9529 38359129
Xiao Y et al (2024) A plant mechanism of hijacking pathogen virulence factors to trigger innate immunity. Science 383:732–739. 10.1126/science.adj952938359129 10.1126/science.adj9529
Zhang L Distinct immune sensor systems for fungal endopolygalacturonases in closely related Brassicaceae Nat Plants 2021 7 1254 1263 10.1038/s41477-021-00982-2 34326531
Zhang L et al (2021) Distinct immune sensor systems for fungal endopolygalacturonases in closely related Brassicaceae. Nat Plants 7:1254–1263. 10.1038/s41477-021-00982-234326531 10.1038/s41477-021-00982-2
Zhou J-M Chai J Plant pathogenic bacterial type III effectors subdue host responses Curr Opin Microbiol 2008 11 179 185 10.1016/j.mib.2008.02.004 18372208
Zhou J-M, Chai J (2008) Plant pathogenic bacterial type III effectors subdue host responses. Curr Opin Microbiol 11:179–185. 10.1016/j.mib.2008.02.00418372208 10.1016/j.mib.2008.02.004
