
==== Front
NPJ Biodivers
NPJ Biodivers
npj Biodiversity
2731-4243
Nature Publishing Group UK London

58
10.1038/s44185-024-00058-2
Article
Enlightening the toxinological dark matter of spider venom enzymes
Dresler Josephine josephine.dresler@ime.fraunhofer.de

12
Herzig Volker 34
Vilcinskas Andreas 125
Lüddecke Tim tim.lueddecke@ime.fraunhofer.de

12
1 https://ror.org/03j85fc72 grid.418010.c 0000 0004 0573 9904 Animal Venomics Lab, Department of Bioresources, Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology, Gießen, Germany
2 https://ror.org/0396gab88 grid.511284.b 0000 0004 8004 5574 LOEWE Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics, Frankfurt a. M., Germany
3 https://ror.org/016gb9e15 grid.1034.6 0000 0001 1555 3415 Centre for Bioinnovation, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD Australia
4 https://ror.org/016gb9e15 grid.1034.6 0000 0001 1555 3415 School of Science, Technology and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, QLD Australia
5 https://ror.org/033eqas34 grid.8664.c 0000 0001 2165 8627 Institute for Insect Biotechnology, Justus-Liebig-University of Giessen, Gießen, Germany
13 9 2024
13 9 2024
2024
3 2519 4 2024
15 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Spiders produce highly adapted venoms featuring a complex mixture of biomolecules used mainly for hunting and defense. The most prominent components are peptidic neurotoxins, a major focus of research and drug development, whereas venom enzymes have been largely neglected. Nevertheless, investigation of venom enzymes not only reveals insights into their biological functions, but also provides templates for future industrial applications. Here we compared spider venom enzymes validated at protein level contained in the VenomZone database and from all publicly available proteo-transcriptomic spider venom datasets. We assigned reported enzymes to cellular processes and known venom functions, including toxicity, prey pre-digestion, venom preservation, venom component activation, and spreading factors. Our study unveiled extensive discrepancy between public databases and publications with regard to enzyme coverage, which impedes the development of novel spider venom enzyme-based applications. Uncovering the previously unrecognized abundance and diversity of venom enzymes will open new avenues for spider venom biodiscovery.

Subject terms

Enzymes
Chemical ecology
Animal physiology
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003495 Hessisches Ministerium für Wissenschaft und Kunst LOEWE-TBG LOEWE-TBG LOEWE-TBG issue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Limited 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Spiders (Araneae) are predatory arthropods that inhabit virtually all terrestrial ecosystems1. During their >300 million years of evolutionary history, they evolved into highly effective predators of insects and other arthropods2. Despite the wide range of ecosystems conquered, their principal body plan has remained largely unchanged and is shared by all extant species across the three spider infraorders (Mesothelae, Mygalomorphae and Araneomorphae)3–5. The astonishing success of spiders in terms of biodiversity, evolutionary age and ecological versatility, is to a large extent rooted in key biomolecular innovations such as pheromone chemistry, silk production, and, in particular, venom2,6–8.

Venoms are complex chemical cocktails that evolved convergently multiple times in the animal kingdom9. They are actively injected from one animal into another, where they disturb vital physiological processes and cause damage or even death10. The bioactive components of venoms are described as toxins and are mostly of proteinaceous nature10. The three major biological functions of venom are hunting, defense and intraspecific competition, but additional minor functions include chemical communication and reproduction among others11.

Spiders are one of the oldest venomous lineages and also one of the most diverse, with ~51,000 described species1. This has led to the widespread recognition of spiders as the world’s most successful group of venomous animals, at least among terrestrial lineages2. The complexity of spider venom is also unmatched, featuring hundreds to thousands of different polypeptide components12. With all spiders except for the family Uloboridae being considered venomous2, spider venoms offer an immense library of bioactive components. Based on extrapolations from the limited number of species studied thus far, it has been estimated that up to 10 million biomolecules can be isolated from all extant species13.

Most known spider venom toxins are short disulfide-rich peptides with an inhibitor cysteine knot (ICK) motif13. These usually have molecular masses <7 kDa and are potent modulators of a wide range of ion channels. Their biological function is primarily trophic and secondarily defensive, and they are used to mount neurochemical attacks on insect prey or potential threats following injection via a cheliceral bite2,14. However, several of these ICK peptides also show promising activity against human ion channels involved in a wide range of neuropathologies. This bioactivity, paired with the extraordinary stability conferred by the ICK fold15, means that spider venom peptides are potent drug leads for the treatment of neurological diseases, including epilepsy, chronic pain and post-stroke brain damage13,16–19. Unsurprisingly, spider venom biodiscovery has focused on novel and potentially druggable ICKs and has typically involved bioactivity-guided screening, where crude venom is fractionated by chromatography and the fractions are analyzed by mass spectrometry to identify peptides with desired activities20. More recently, modern proteomics, transcriptomics and synthetic biology technologies were applied to venom systems and gave rise to a new field of research referred to as “venomics” (i.e. the application of omics and biotechnology to study venoms)21,22. Traditionally, it has been thought that spider venoms are predominantly composed of ICK peptides. Yet, a major insight from modern venomics is that they also contain multiple high-molecular-weight proteins, often with putative enzymatic activity and possible key functionality for the venom2,23.

Enzymes are complex proteins containing domains that catalyze chemical reactions. In general, the classification and nomenclature of enzymes depend on the catalyzed reaction and the substrates involved. In contrast to the frequent in-depth studies of neurotoxic peptides, the bioactivities of spider venom enzymes are almost entirely unknown. The only exceptions are sphingomyelinase D enzymes from sicariid spiders and a few neurotoxin-processing enzymes involved in toxin maturation24–28. However, in certain araneomorph spiders, enzymes may represent the main venom component29,30, which could indicate that they perform important biological functions that have yet to be fully understood. This growing body of evidence suggests that spider venoms contain a vast resource of undiscovered enzymes that can be thought of as toxinological dark matter. This is unfortunate because a better understanding of those molecules might provide further insights into the chemical and evolutionary ecology of spider venoms and could be employed as a valuable resource for translational research31,32. Hence, understanding and unveiling the diversity and biological significance of spider venom enzymes has recently been announced as one of the grand challenges in spider toxinology33.

Here we set out to provide the first holistic, structural assessment of the enzymatic diversity within spider venoms. Specifically, we analyzed the content of a manually curated venom database and mined putative enzymes from modern venomics research. We linked all the enzymes identified from databases and previously published venomics surveys with taxonomic classifications and potential functions. The wealth of data we analyzed shows that spider venoms are a rich source of enzymes and that the diversity of enzyme families rivals the number of known ICK families. Given the strong research bias towards ICK peptides and the recent advent of modern venomics, future studies should include the analysis of venom enzymes in more detail.

Methods

Database search

To investigate the diversity of known spider venom enzymes in public databases, we selected the VenomZone database as a source34. VenomZone is a publicly available database that is manually curated and contains entries of venom components representing six different lineages (snakes, spiders, cnidaria, insects, scorpions and cone snails) that are pre-categorized into distinct toxin families. Based on the pre-categorization we were able to manually screen all 1540 entries (accessed March 2023) of known spider venom components. This allowed us to retrieve all proteins assigned to known enzyme families. The entries including the original research paper in which they have been first described were collected in a master table, which is presented in Supplementary Table 1.

Literature search

To identify spider venom enzymes other than those contained in the VenomZone database, we performed a literature search using Pubmed35. For this, we performed a total of five web searches using different combinations of the same keywords. Initially, we performed a search with the keywords “spider” and “venom” followed by three searches using both paired with one of the following keywords “venomics” or “transcriptomics” or “proteomics”, respectively. To ensure the holistic nature of our web search, we performed a fifth search using all terms simultaneously. This web search yielded >3700 peer-reviewed publications that we manually screened (both, main text and Supplementary Materials if provided) for spider venom enzymes. Identified hits were collected in a master table similarly to our data mining from databases (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3). Due to the assembly of artifacts, purely transcriptome-based studies tend to overestimate venom component diversity36. It is therefore best practice in modern venom research to only consider venom transcripts that have been validated at the protein level36. Thus, we opted to follow this conservative approach and only included enzymes that have been isolated or confirmed by mass spectrometry.

Taxonomic classification

The taxonomy of spiders is in constant flux with hundreds of newly described species and genera each year and reoccurring modifications to the entire systematic system. As a consequence, generic and family-level assignments of spiders can tremendously change over time, especially in mygalomorph spiders which have dominated spider venom research. In order to reliably investigate the occurrence and abundance of venom components over larger taxonomic scales, it is pivotal to update retrieved venomic data to the most recent taxonomic classification. For this purpose, we utilized the World Spider Catalog (WSC), a taxonomic repository for spiders that is manually curated and maintains up-to-date taxonomic data for each known spider taxon across all levels of systematic hierarchy1. For each spider from which we identified enzymatic venom components in databases and/or web searches, we updated its current taxonomic status according to the most recent version of the WSC. Specifically, we curated genus and species names and paid special attention to correct family assignments, because these particularly affect conclusions drawn from larger phylogenetic analyses.

Classification of the identified enzymes

To classify all identified enzymes, we employed the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (IUBMB) enzyme classification. This uses a four-digit numerical system to classify enzymes based on Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers. The first number of this system encodes the type of reaction catalyzed. Until now, seven different enzyme classes are recognized: oxidoreductases (EC 1.-.-.-), transferases (EC 2.-.-.-), hydrolases (EC 3.-.-.-), lyases (EC 4.-.-.-), isomerases (EC 5.-.-.-), ligases (EC 6.-.-.-) and translocases (EC 7.-.-.-)37. The second digit represents the subclass, referring to the type of compound or group involved, while the third digit specifies the type of reaction involved in the sub-subclass. The fourth digit identifies each individual enzyme within the sub-subclass and represents it as a simple serial number37. Oxidoreductases (EC 1.-.-.-) for instance are subdivided into 26 subclasses, which are further classified into a total of 151 sub-subclasses. Each of these sub-subclasses contains individual enzymes which are identified according to a serial number38. As each provided EC number is unique if all digits are employed, the IUBMB system features a precise and simple means to classify and identify enzymes across the natural world.

For enzymes from databases specific EC identifiers usually have been provided and we have retrieved this information during data mining. However, for the enzymes identified during web searches in most cases no EC identifier has been provided. Consequently, we manually classified these following ENZYME38, a nomenclature database hosted by the Expasy bioinformatics portal of the Swiss Institute for Bioinformatics that describes each characterized enzyme type associated with an EC number. Following best practices in modern venomics experiments, full sequences and best BLAST results are usually provided for each identified component in the supplementary material and raw data of each publication. Whenever possible, we retrieved this information for each putative enzyme identified and used it to classify them following the EC system. Our cut-off criterion for classification was sequence similarity and we used the BLAST hit with the highest percentage of sequence similarity to classify presumed venom enzymes. Therefore, we first identified the EC identifier for the most similar BLAST hit for each identified enzyme and then assigned the respective compound the same complete EC number. Whenever no full sequences or sufficient annotation via BLAST searches were provided, we used the available information to assign as many digits of the EC system as possible. Here we retrieved the enzyme name provided by the main text of the manuscript or Supplementary Data and assigned EC identifiers based on protein names to the maximum level of certainty. For instance, all serine proteases that have not been specified in more detail were assigned to the general serine protease EC number 3.4.21.-. To maintain stringency no subgroup assignment was then performed.

To shed further light on the potential functional spectrum of the identified enzymes, we classified their biological functions within venom and the venom gland physiology. Since only a few spider venom enzymes have been studied so far, it is not possible to functionally characterize them based on experimental data. However, a recent study classified enzymes from scorpions based on thorough structural and functional analyses. Spiders and scorpions are closely related members of Arachnida whose venoms follow similar chemical trends and are employed for the same biological functions (i.e. hunting and defense). We therefore employed this functional classification of venom enzymes established for scorpions39 which distinguishes a total of seven global functions to scorpion venom enzymes: toxic, pre-digestion, spreading factor, precursor activation, preservative, multifunctional and undetermined. Accordingly to the classification established by Delgado-Prudencio et al.39, we then assigned a presumed biological function for each of the identified spider venom enzymes.

Besides biological functions within the venom, some spider enzymes have been recently classified for their potential cellular functions in the venom gland. This classification was implemented by Diniz et al.40 and applies gene ontology annotations of the cellular function category from known enzymes deposited in Uniprot which correspond to cellular components and roles in metabolism. Those relate to the production, maturation and secretion of complex toxin components including transcription, protein folding, transport and post-translational modifications, as well as ubiquitination and proteolysis41. We, therefore, employed the classification established by Diniz et al.40 to assign a cellular function for each putative spider venom enzyme. If the enzyme family has previously not been assigned a cellular function, we then refrained from annotating the cellular function. Since biological and cellular functions are not mutually exclusive, we assigned both when applicable. The combination of IUBMB, global venom function and cellular function classifications, allowed us to holistically interpret the identified spider venom enzymes for their chemical reactions and biological relevance in envenoming, venom gland physiology and beyond.

Another challenge besides the heterogeneous availability of classification data was the unclear enzymatic nature of some spider venom components. Prior works have identified some protein groups as potential enzymes, but those have not yet been verified for function, nor have they received any EC classification42,43. In order to represent as much molecular diversity as possible, we herein opted to also collect the distribution of those unclear components (e.g. CAP proteins and some lectins) but are aware that future works need to validate their activity, which might necessitate an update of the assessments provided in our study.

Results

VenomZone

VenomZone is a manually curated database of venom components containing 49 protein families, 17 of which are enzymatic. We found that eight known enzyme families occur in spider venoms, representing two distinct enzyme classes (hydrolases and isomerases). We also considered the potentially enzymatic glycoproteins. The enzymes identified in each class and the number of identified proteins for each family are discussed below and are summarized in Table 1.Table 1 Diversity of spider venom enzymes present in the VenomZone database, showing assigned enzyme classes, families, EC numbers, taxonomic origins and number of proteins for each family

Enzyme class	Enzyme family	EC number	Spider family	No. of proteins	
Hydrolase	Acetylcholinesterase	3.1.1.7	Barychelidae	1	
Phospholipase D	3.1.4.4	Sicariidae	218	
Hyaluronidase	3.2.1.-	Ctenidae

Sicariidae

	1

1

	
Isomerase	Reprolysin (M12B family)	3.4.24.-	Lycosidae	1	
Astacin (M12A family)	3.4.24.21	Sicariidae	5	
Peptidylprolyl isomerase	5.2.1.8	Agelenidae

Ctenidae

	2

1

	
Glycoproteins	CAP		Barychelidae

Ctenidae

Lycosidae

	1

1

1

	
Lectin		Ctenidae	1	
A holistic overview of all components including corresponding references is provided in Supplementary Table 1.

Hydrolases use water to catalyze the cleavage of large proteins into smaller molecules44. Five distinct hydrolase families have been reported in spider venom. One acetylcholinesterase has been described in the Barychelidae (Trittame). The most diverse enzyme family is the arthropod dermonecrotic toxin phospholipase D, also known as sphingomyelinase D25–28 and we found 218 representing the family Sicariidae, specifically 174 from the genus Loxosceles, 22 from the genus Hexophthalma and 22 from the genus Sicarius. Furthermore, two hyaluronidases have been reported, one each from Ctenidae (Phoneutria) and Sicariidae (Loxosceles).

All the remaining hydrolases were metalloproteases. Metalloproteases are a group of proteases that require a metal which is involved in their catalytic mechanism45. We identified six members of the M12 family, comprising five astacins (M12A), all from Sicariidae (Loxosceles), and one partitagin (M12B, reprolysin) from Lycosidae (Hippasa).

Isomerases catalyze the structural conversion of molecules to their isomers44. We identified three peptidylprolyl isomerases, two from Agelenidae (Agelena) and one from Ctenidae (Phoneutria).

We identified four glycoproteins representing the cysteine-rich secretory proteins, antigen 5 and pathogenesis-related protein 1 (CAP) family as well as one lectin. The CAP family is associated with diverse functions. CAPs isolated from snake venom are neurotoxic whereas those from hematophagous species are potentially hemotoxic10, and little is known about spider venom CAPs. However, previous work suggested that based on sequence similarity to Conus CAP proteins they may represent a hitherto unrecognized lineage of proteases29 and we therefore included them in our survey. One CAP has been described thus far from each of the families Barychelidae (Trittame), Lycosidae (Lycosa) and Ctenidae (Phoneutria). The single lectin we identified was present in Ctenidae (Phoneutria). These carbohydrate-specific binding proteins that agglutinate cells or other materials are important for cell adhesion and defense46,47.

Publications

To discover putative enzyme families that were previously overlooked, we collected all published spider venom proteo-transcriptomes from the last 19 years and analyzed them for the presence of enzymatic components. We identified 143 putative enzyme families that occur with varying numbers of identified proteins for each enzyme family in spider venoms (Table 2). The enzymes represent seven distinct classes and are described in more detail below.Table 2 Diversity of spider venom enzymes present in publications, showing assigned enzyme classes, families, EC numbers and taxonomic origins

Enzyme class	Enzyme family	EC number	Spider family	
Oxidoreductases	Synaptic vesicle membrane protein VAT-1 homolog-like	1.-.-.-	Theraphosidae	
Glucose 1-dehydrogenase	1.1.5.9	Eresidae	
3-Hydroxyisobutyrate dehydrogenase	1.1.1.31	Philodromidae	
Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase	1.1.1.49	Theraphosidae	
Phosphoglycerate dehydrogenase	1.1.1.95	Lamponidae, Lycosidae, Theridiidae	
Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase	1.2.1.12	Eresidae, Theraphosidae	
Retinal dehydrogenase	1.2.1.36	Eresidae, Theraphosidae	
Acyl-CoA oxidase	1.3.3.6	Theraphosidae	
Glutamate dehydrogenase	1.4.1.3	Eresidae	
Uricase	1.7.3.3	Theraphosidae	
γ-Interferon-inducible lysosomal thiol reductase	1.8.-.-	Eresidae, Lamponidae, Theraphosidae	
Transferases	Thiol oxidase	1.8.3.2	Theraphosidae	
Peroxidase	1.11.1.-	Lamponidae, Theraphosidae	
Glutathione peroxidase	1.11.1.9	Theraphosidae	
Thioredoxin-dependent peroxiredoxin	1.11.1.24	Theraphosidae	
Cysteine dioxygenase	1.13.11.20	Theraphosidae	
Procollagen-lysine 5-dioxygenase	1.14.11.4	Theraphosidae	
Dopamine β-monooxygenase	1.14.17.1	Ctenidae, Lamponidae, Theraphosidae	
Tyrosinase	1.14.18.1	Theraphosidae	
Superoxide dismutase	1.15.1.1	Ctenidae, Philodromidae, Theraphosidae	
Methyltransferase	2.1.1.-	Philodromidae, Theridiidae	
Trans-aconitate 2-methyltransferase	2.1.1.144	Philodromidae	
Type I protein arginine methyltransferase	2.1.1.319	Philodromidae	
Transketolase	2.2.1.1	Theraphosidae	
Transaldolase	2.2.1.2	Theraphosidae	
Arylamine N-acetyltransferase	2.3.1.5	Theraphosidae	
Phosphatidylcholine-sterol O-acyltransferase	2.3.1.43	Theraphosidae	
Glycylpeptide N-tetradecanoyltransferase	2.3.1.97	Theraphosidae	
cullin-RING-type E3 NEDD8 transferase	2.3.2.32	Philodromidae	
Polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase	2.4.1.41	Lamponidae	
Adenine phosphoribosyltransferase	2.4.2.7	Theraphosidae	
Spermidine synthase	2.5.1.16	Lamponidae, Theraphosidae	
Hydrolases	Glutathione transferase	2.5.1.18	Eresidae, Theraphosidae	
Alanine transaminase	2.6.1.2	Philodromidae	
Kynurenine--oxoglutarate transaminase	2.6.1.7	Theraphosidae	
Protein kinase	2.7.-.-	Theraphosidae	
Glycerate 3-kinase	2.7.1.31	Theraphosidae	
Aminoglycoside 2″-phosphotransferase	2.7.1.190	Philodromidae	
Phosphoglycerate kinase	2.7.2.3	Philodromidae	
Arginine kinase	2.7.3.3	Linyphiidae, Lycosidae, Philodromidae, Theridiidae	
Nucleoside-diphosphate kinase	2.7.4.6	Lamponidae	
Non-specific serine/threonine protein kinase	2.7.11.1	Theraphosidae, Theridiidae	
[Mysosin light-chain] kinase	2.7.11.18	Theraphosidae	
Histidine kinase	2.7.13.3	Philodromidae, Theraphosidae	
Alcohol sulfotransferase	2.8.2.2	Eresidae	
Galactosylceramide sulfotransferase	2.8.2.11	Eresidae	
Nuclease (undetermined)	3.1.-.-	Theridiidae	
Phosphatases (undetermined)	3.1.-.-	Theridiidae	
Phospholipase (undetermined)	3.1.-.-	Theridiidae	
Lipase	3.1.1.-	Ctenidae, Lamponidae, Theraphosidae, Theridiidae	
Triacylglycerol lipase	3.1.1.3	Eresidae, Philodromidae, Tetragnathidae, Theraphosidae	
Phospholipase A2	3.1.1.4	Eresidae, Lamponidae, Linyphiidae, Pholcidae, Tetragnathidae, Theraphosidae, Trechaleidae	
Acetylcholinesterase	3.1.1.7	Barychelidae, Ctenidae, Lamponidae, Tetragnathidae, Theraphosidae	
Phospholipase A1	3.1.1.32	Theraphosidae	
S-formylglutathione hydrolase	3.1.2.12	Theraphosidae	
Palmitoyl-protein hydrolase	3.1.2.22	Theraphosidae	
Alkaline Phosphatase	3.1.3.1	Theridiidae	
5′ Nucleotidase	3.1.3.5	Araneidae, Eresidae, Theraphosidae	
Phosphoglycolate phosphatase	3.1.3.18	Philodromidae	
Protein tyrosine phosphatase	3.1.3.48	Lamponidae, Tetragnathidae, Theraphosidae, Theridiidae	
Phosphatidylinositol-3,4-bisphosphate 4-phosphatase	3.1.3.66	Araneidae	
Phospholipase D	3.1.4.4	Sicariidae, Theraphosidae	
Sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase	3.1.4.12	Sicariidae	
N-acetylgalactosamine-6-sulfatase	3.1.6.4	Theraphosidae	
Deoxyribonuclease 1-like 3	3.1.21.-	Theridiidae	
Hyaluronidase (glycosyl hydrolase 56)	3.2.1.-	Atracidae, Ctenidae, Lamponidae, Lycosidae, Tetragnathidae, Theraphosidae, Theridiidae, Trechaleidae	
Neutral alpha-glucosidase (glycosyl hydrolase 31)	3.2.1.-	Lamponidae	
Glycosyl hydrolase	3.2.1.-	Theraphosidae	
α-Amylase	3.2.1.1	Eresidae, Tetragnathidae, Theridiidae, Trechaleidae	
Chitinase	3.2.1.14	Araneidae, Ctenidae, Eresidae, Lamponidae, Pholcidae, Tetragnathidae, Theridiidae	
Lysozyme	3.2.1.17	Araneidae, Theridiidae	
α-Galactosidase	3.2.1.22	Theraphosidae	
β-Galactosidase	3.2.1.23	Theraphosidae	
α-Mannosidase	3.2.1.24	Eresidae, Theridiidae	
Hexosaminidase (glycosyl hydrolase 20)	3.2.1.52	Lamponidae, Theraphosidae, Theridiidae	
8-Oxoguanine DNA glycosylase	3.2.2.-	Theraphosidae	
Cathepsin	3.4.-.-	Ctenidae, Lamponidae, Theraphosidae, Theridiidae	
SPase	3.4.-.-	Trechaleidae	
Lyases	Metalloproteinase (undetermined)	3.4.-.-	Ctenidae, Theraphosidae	
Peptidase (undetermined)	3.4.-.-	Theraphosidae, Theridiidae	
Phage endopeptidase	3.4.-.-	Theraphosidae	
Aminopeptidase (undetermined)	3.4.11.-	Eresidae, Theraphosidae	
Aminopeptidase O	3.4.11.-	Philodromidae	
Membrane alanyl aminopeptidase	3.4.11.2	Eresidae, Theraphosidae	
Cytosol non-specific dipeptidase	3.4.13.18	Theraphosidae	
Dipeptidyl-peptidase I	3.4.14.1	Theraphosidae	
Angiotensin-converting enzyme	3.4.15.1	Ctenidae, Eresidae, Lamponidae, Linyphiidae, Lycosidae, Theraphosidae, Theridiidae, Trechaleidae	
Carboxypeptidase (undetermined)	3.4.16.-	Theridiidae	
Carboxypeptidase C	3.4.16.5	Araneidae, Lamponidae	
Carboxypeptidase D	3.4.16.6	Eresidae, Theraphosidae, Theridiidae	
Metallocarboxypeptidase (undetermined)	3.4.17.-	Theraphosidae	
Carboxypeptidase A	3.4.17.1	Theraphosidae, Trechaleidae	
Carboxypeptidase B	3.4.17.2	Eresidae, Theridiidae	
Carboxypeptidase E	3.4.17.10	Theraphosidae	
Carboxypeptidase M	3.4.17.12	Tetragnathidae	
Folate gamma-glutamyl hydrolase	3.4.19.9	Theraphosidae	
S1 Protease	3.4.21.-	Araneidae, Ctenidae, Eresidae, Lycosidae, Philodromidae, Pholcidae, Theraphosidae, Theridiidae, Trechaleidae	
Trypsin	3.4.21.4	Lamponidae, Theraphosidae, Theridiidae	
Coagulation Factor Xa	3.4.21.6	Theraphosidae	
Proprotein convertase 1	3.4.21.93	Eresidae, Lamponidae, Pholcidae, Tetragnathidae, Theraphosidae, Theridiidae	
Equine arterivirus serine peptidase	3.4.21.114	Philodromidae	
Cathepsin B	3.4.22.1	Theraphosidae	
Cathepsin L	3.4.22.15	Eresidae, Theridiidae	
legumain	3.4.22.34	Theraphosidae	
Bleomycin hydrolase	3.4.22.40	Araneidae	
Lysosomal aspartic protease	3.4.23.-	Lamponidae	
Metalloendopeptidase (undetermined)	3.4.24.-	Ctenidae, Eresidae, Philodromidae, Theraphosidae, Theridiidae	
Neprilysin	3.4.24.11	Atracidae, Barychelidae, Eresidae, Lamponidae, Pholcidae, Tetragnathidae, Theraphosidae, Theridiidae	
Astacin (M12A family)	3.4.24.21	Araneidae, Ctenidae, Eresidae, Plectreuridae, Pholcidae, Theridiidae	
Endothelin-converting enzyme	3.4.24.71	Eresidae, Lamponidae, Theridiidae	
Proteasome endopeptidase complex	3.4.25.1	Theridiidae	
Arylformamidase	3.5.1.9	Philodromidae, Theraphosidae	
Ceramidase	3.5.1.23	Lamponidae, Theraphosidae	
Pantetheine hydrolase	3.5.1.92	Eresidae, Theraphosidae	
Dihydropyrimidinase	3.5.2.2	Theraphosidae	
2-Iminobutanoate/2-iminopropanoate deaminase	3.5.99.10	Philodromidae	
Helicase	3.6.4.-	Lamponidae	
Aromatic l-amino-acid decarboxylase	4.1.1.28	Araneidae	
Carbonic anhydrase	4.2.1.1	Lamponidae, Theraphosidae	
Enolase	4.2.1.11	Lamponidae	
Aconitate hydrolase	4.2.1.3	Philodromidae	
Dermonecrotic protein 1 LiDl	4.6.1.-	Sicariidae	
Peptidylprolyl isomerase	5.2.1.8	Ctenidae, Lamponidae, Philodromidae	
Isomerases	Triose-phosphate isomerase	5.3.1.1	Theridiidae	
Protein disulfide isomerase	5.3.4.1	Eresidae, Philodromidae, Theraphosidae, Trechaleidae	
Phosphomannomutase	5.4.2.8	Theraphosidae	
Ligase	6.-.-.-	Theraphosidae	
Ligases	Acyl-CoA synthetase	6.2.1.3	Araneidae	
Carbamoyl-phosphate synthase	6.3.4.16	Theraphosidae	
Translocases	ATP synthase	7.1.2.2	Eresidae, Lamponidae, Philodromidae, Theraphosidae, Theridiidae	
Ca2+-transporting ATPase	7.2.2.10	Theridiidae	
Glycoproteins	CAP		Atracidae, Araneidae, Barychelidae, Ctenidae, Linyphiidae, Lycosidae, Philodromidae, Pholcidae, Tetragnathidae, Theraphosidae, Theridiidae, Trechaleidae	
Lectin		Ctenidae, Lamponidae, Theraphosidae	
Superfamily	α/β Hydrolase superfamily	1.-.-.- –6.-.-.-	Theraphosidae	
Peptidylglycine monooxygenase	1.14.17.3	Eresidae, Theraphosidae, Theridiidae, Trechaleidae	
α-Aminoadipic semialdehyde synthase	1.5.1.8/ 1.5.1.9	Philodromidae	
Multidomain enzymes	Histone-lysine N-methyltransferase ASH1L	2.1.1.359/ 2.1.1.367	Theraphosidae	
Cyclin-dependent kinase 9	2.7.11.22/ 2.7.11.23	Philodromidae	
Dual-specificity phosphatase 23	3.1.3.16/ 3.1.3.48	Theraphosidae	
A holistic overview of all components including corresponding references is provided in Supplementary Tables 2 and 3.

Oxidoreductases facilitate the reduction and oxidation of molecules through the transfer of electrons44. We identified 52 oxidoreductases belonging to 20 enzyme families, many from the spider family Theraphosidae. These include the synaptic vesicle membrane protein VAT-1 homolog-like, a thiol oxidase, two cysteine dioxygenases and two glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenases in the genus Acanthoscurria, as well as 13 acyl-CoA oxidases and one uricase in Chilobrachys guangxiensissis. Furthermore, five phosphoglycerate dehydrogenases have been described, one from Lamponidae (genus Lampona), one from Lycosidae (Lycosa tarantula), and the remaining three from Theridiidae (genus Latrodectus). A γ-interferon-inducible lysosomal thiol reductase has been described in Lamponidae (Lampona), one in Theraphosidae (Acanthoscurria) and one in Eresidae (Stegodyphus). A peroxidase has been described in the family Lamponidae (Lampona) and one in the family Eresidae (Stegodyphus) and dopamine β-hydroxylases have been identified in three spider families, one each in Ctenidae (Phoneutria), Lamponidae (Lampona) and Theraphosidae (Acanthoscurria). One tyrosinase was identified in the theraphosid spider Cyriopagopus schmidti (C. schmidti). Finally, a superoxide dismutase has been described twice in the family Ctenidae (Phoneutria), once in the family Philodromidae (Tibellus) and twice in Theraphosidae (Acanthoscurria). Three retinal dehydrogenases have been reported in Theraphosidae (Acanthoscurria) and one in Eresidae (Stegodyphus). In the family Eresidae one glucose 1-dehydrogenase, one glutamate dehydrogenase and one glutathione peroxidase has been reported. A glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase has been described in Theraphosidae (Acanthoscurria) and in Eresidae (Stegodyphus). The latter also features a 3-hydroxyisobutyrate dehydrogenase, a procollagen-lysine 5-dioxygenase and two thioredoxin-dependent peroxiredoxins.

Transferases catalyze the transfer of specific functional groups between molecules44. We identified 49 transferases belonging to 27 enzyme families, spanning a range of diverse activities. Three methyltransferases have been described, one from the family Philodromidae (Tibellus) and two from Theridiidae (Latrodectus). The genus Tibellus also features one cullin-RING-type E3 NEDD8 transferase, one alanine transaminase, one aminoglycoside 2″-phosphotransferase, one phosphoglycerate kinase, one trans-aconitate 2-methyltransferase and one type I protein arginine methyltransferase. Furthermore, two transketolase, one transaldolase, one arylamine N-acetyltransferase, one glycylpeptide N-tetradecanoyltransferase and one adenine phosphoribosyltransferase were identified in spiders from the family Theraphosidae. One polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase has been found in Lamponidae (Lampona) along with a spermidine synthase. Three further spermidine synthases have been found in Theraphosidae (Acanthoscurria) along with three glutathione transferases, two from Theraphosidae (Chilobrachys) and one from Eresidae (Stegodyphus). Additionally, one kynurenine-oxoglutarate transaminase, one protein kinase and one glycerate 3-kinase were reported in the theraphosid spider C. schmidti. Nine arginine kinases have been reported, two from Linyphiidae (Hylyphantes), one from Lycosidae (Lycosa), one from Philodromidae (Tibellus) and five from Theridiidae (Latrodectus). One nucleoside-diphosphate kinase has been described in Lamponidae (Lampona) and six non-specific serine/threonine protein kinases have been identified, four in the family Theraphosidae (two in Cyriopagopus, one in Pamphobeteus and one in Acanthoscurria) and two in Theridiidae (Latrodectus). One galactosylceramide sulfotransferase and one alcohol sulfotransferase have been reported from Eresidae (Stegodyphus) and one phosphatidylcholine-sterol O-acyltransferase from Theraphosidae (Acanthoscurria). Finally, a myosin light-chain kinase has been identified twice in Theraphosidae (Chilobrachys) and a histidine kinase has been found in Philodromidae (Tibellus) and Theraphosidae (Chilobrachys).

The most diverse enzyme class we identified in spider venoms are the hydrolases, with 516 hydrolases belonging to 74 different enzyme families, comprising 21 acting on ester bonds, 12 glycosylases, 35 peptidases, five acting on carbon–nitrogen bonds and one acting on acid anhydrides, which are discussed below.

The group acting on ester bonds includes three undetermined enzymes in the family Theridiidae, three undetermined nucleases, five undetermined phosphatases and one undetermined phospholipase. Others have been assigned more specifically. For example, two lipases have been reported in Ctenidae (Phoneutria), one each in Lamponidae (Lampona), Theraphosidae (Acanthoscurria), and Theridiidae (Parasteatoda), and an unreported number of additional lipases has been found in Theridiidae (Steatoda). The distribution of triacylglycerol lipases, phospholipases, acetylcholinesterases and other ester-specific hydrolases is summarized in Supplementary Table 3.

Among the glycosylases, we found α-amylases in Tetragnathidae (Tetragnatha), Theridiidae, Trechaleidae (Cupiennius) and Eresidae (Stegodyphus), as well as 25 hyaluronidases distributed among eight spider families. We also found one neutral α-glucosidase (Lamponidae), one glycosyl hydrolase (Theraphosidae) and 19 chitinases in seven families. Two lysozymes were identified, one each in Araneidae (Araneus) and Theridiidae (Latrodectus). We also found a α-galactosidase and two β-galactosidases in Theraphosidae (Acanthoscurria) and three α-mannosidases, two in Theridiidae (Parasteatoda) and one in the Eresidae (Stegodyphus). The distribution of these enzymes and other glycosylates is summarized in Supplementary Table 3.

The 35 peptidases we identified included cathepsins in 5 spider families and metalloproteases in Ctenidae (Phoneutria) and Theraphosidae (Acanthoscurria). Twenty-one undetermined peptidases were described in the family Theraphosidae (14 in Acanthoscurria) and Theridiidae (seven in Latrodectus). We identified ten angiotensin-converting enzymes in eight spider families. Carboxypeptidases were also widely represented, including two of the carboxypeptidase C family in Araneidae (Argiope) and Lamponidae (Lampona), one carboxypeptidase D each in Theridiidae (Parasteatoda), Eresidae (Stegodyphus) and Theraphosidae (Acanthoscurria), three of the carboxypeptidase A family two in Theraphosidae (Acanthoscurria) and one in Trechaleidae (Cupiennius), two carboxypeptidases B from Theridiidae (Parasteatoda) and Eresidae (Stegodyphus), one carboxypeptidase E from Theraphosidae (Acanthoscurria) and two carboxypeptidases M from Tetragnathidae (Tetragnatha). We found 19 S1 proteases in 10 spider families, and 8 proprotein convertases in 6 spider families. Neprilysin was represented 46 times in 8 eight spider families, 17 from Pholcidae (Physocyclus). We found 30 astacins in five families and an undefined number of further examples in Theridiidae (Steatoda). The distribution of these enzymes and other glycosylates is summarized in Supplementary Table 3.

The five enzyme families specific for carbon–nitrogen bonds comprised an arylformamidase identified twice in Philodromidae (Tibellus) and once in Theraphosidae (Cyriopagopus), a ceramidase found once each in Lamponidae (Lampona) and Theraphosidae (Acanthoscurria), a pantetheine hydrolase in Theraphosidae (Acanthoscurria) and Eresidae (Stegodyphus), two dihydropyrimidinases from Theraphosidae (Chilobrachys) and one 2-iminobutanoate/2-iminopropanoate deaminase from Philodromidae (Tibellus). The last of the hydrolases is the helicase which acts on acid anhydrides and has been detected in the Lamponidae (Lampona).

Lyases facilitate the cleavage of several chemical bonds other than hydrolysis or oxidation37,44. We identified 12 lyases belonging to 5 enzyme families. These comprised one aromatic l-amino-acid decarboxylase in Araneidae (Araneus) and eight carbonic anhydrases, two in Lamponidae (Lampona) and six in the Theraphosidae (Acanthoscurria), as well as one enolase in Lamponidae (Lampona), one aconitate hydrolase in Philodromidae (Tibellus) and one dermonecrotic protein 1 LiDl in Sicariidae (Loxosceles).

We identified 15 isomerases in 4 enzyme families. Six peptidyl-prolyl cis–trans isomerases have been reported, two each in the families Lamponidae (Lampona), Philodromidae (Tibellus) and Ctenidae (Phoneutria). Two triose-phosphate isomerases have been described from Theridiidae (Latrodectus) as well as six protein disulfide isomerases, one from Trechaleidae (Cupiennius), three from Philodromidae (Tibellus), one from Eresidae (Stegodyphus) and one from Theraphosidae (Acanthoscurria). Finally, a single phosphomannomutase has been identified in the theraphosid spider C. schmidti.

Ligases represent an enzyme class that catalyzes the formation of chemical bonds between two large molecules, usually involving ATP or other high-energy donors44. We identified three ligases belonging to three enzyme families. One of them could only be assigned to the first number of the four-digit EC system (EC 6.-.-.-). This ligase has been reported from Theraphosidae (Cyriopagopus). For the remaining ligases, we were able to identify all four digits of the EC system, describing one acyl-CoA synthetase from Araneidae (Araneus), and one carbamoyl-phosphate synthase from Theraphosidae (Cyriopagopus).

Translocases catalyze the transport of ions or molecules across membranes37. We identified 40 translocases belonging to two enzyme families. This includes 30 ATP synthases that have been reported in five spider families. One is from the family Lamponidae (Lampona), six from Philodromidae (Tibellus), two from Theraphosidae (one each from Chilobrachys and Cyriopagopus), 19 from Theridiidae (Latrodectus) and one from Eresidae (Stegodyphus). Furthermore, ten Ca2+-transporting ATPases have been identified in the theridiid spider Latrodectus tredecimguttatus.

Multidomain enzymes described enzymes which are assigned to one EC number but contain multiple enzymatically active domains. We identified 13 multidomain enzymes belonging to five enzyme families. For example, peptidylglycine monooxygenases contain two separate catalytic domains, but the enzyme is assigned only one EC number48. Eight have been described in four spider families, four in Theraphosidae (Acanthoscurria), one in Theridiidae (Parasteatoda), one in Trechaleidae (Cupiennius), two in Eresidae (Stegadyphus) and more in Theridiidae (Steadoa) but the precise number has not been reported. One α-aminoadipic semialdehyde synthase has been detected in Philodromidae (Tibellus) and one histone-lysine N-methyltransferase ASH1L from Theraphosidae (Acanthoscurria). Two cyclin-dependent kinases have been found in Philodromidae (Tibellus) and one dual-specificity phosphatase 23 in Theraphosidae (Cyriopagopus). In contrast to the peptidylglycine monooxygenase, these enzymes have more than one EC number, each representing a different enzymatically active domain.

We identified 78 glycoproteins belonging to two enzyme families, i.e. 73 CAPs and five lectins distributed throughout the spider phylogenetic tree. Three CAPs were reported in Atracidae (Hadronyche), 26 in Araneidae (12 Argiope and 14 Araneus), one in Barychelidae (Trittame), five in Ctenidae (Phoneutria), three in Linyphiidae (Hylyphantes), four in Lycosidae (Lycosa), two in Philodromidae (Tibellus), two in Pholcidae (Physocyclus), two in Tetragnathidae (Tetragnatha), 14 in Theraphosidae (nine in Acanthoscurria, five in Pamphobeteus), nine in Theridiidae (one in Parasteatoda, eight in Steatoda) and two in Trechaleidae (Cupiennius). Lectin has been found once in the families Ctenidae (Phoneutria) and Lamponidae (Lampona) and twice in Theraphosidae (Acanthoscurria).

One superfamily containing α/β-hydrolases has been detected in spider venom. One member of this superfamily has been identified in Theraphosidae (Cyriopagopus) but given that it contains enzymes representing enzyme classes EC 1.-.-.- –6.-.-.-, no further classification was possible.

Discrepancies between database entries and venomics studies

A comparison of enzymes deposited in databases and those mined from venomic data revealed extensive discrepancies. Only eight enzyme families are described in VenomZone, whereas we identified 143 enzyme families by screening published venomic data. Seven of these enzyme families were found in both sources, revealing that 136 enzyme families identified in the literature are not found in the VenomZone database. Only the partitagins (M12B family) are exclusively found in VenomZone, and even this family may be included among the many undetermined metalloproteases described in the literature that are not specifically identified in the proteo-transcriptomics data.

Biological function of the enzymes

Spiders seem to utilize all distinct enzyme classes with the majority (84.3%) being hydrolases (51.4%), transferases (18.6%) and oxidoreductases (14.3%) (Fig. 1). To develop a deeper understanding of the identified enzymes we sought to assign putative venom functions using the functional classifications.Fig. 1 The diversity of spider venom enzymes.

Relative distribution of spider venom enzyme families from VenomZone entries and proteo-transcriptomic studies per enzyme class. The category “others” includes glycoproteins, multidomain enzymes and the superfamily (α/β-hydrolases).

According to our criteria, we were able to assign 24 of the 144 enzymes to physiological functions. Members of the phospholipase D and acetylcholinesterase families were assigned as toxic enzymes, whereas triacylglycerol lipases, chitinases, α-amylases, α-galactosidases and ceramidases are thought to be involved in the pre-digestion of prey. Furthermore, 5′ nucleotidases, hyaluronidases, angiotensin-converting enzymes and coagulation factor Xa may act as spreading factors, whereas dopamine β-monooxygenase, lysozymes, carboxypeptidases E and peptidylglycine monooxygenases are thought to activate venom components. Peroxidases, superoxide dismutases and carbonic anhydrases putatively have preservative functions whereas thioredoxin-dependent peroxiredoxins, phospholipases A2, carboxypeptidases B, trypsin, neprilysin and astacin have multiple enzymatic functions in venom (Supplementary Table 4). Figure 2 shows enzyme classes linked to physiological functions. Despite the remarkable abundance of hydrolases, only some oxidoreductases and one lyase seem to have known associated venom function. Hydrolases play a role in every function of venom except preservation. Interestingly, the functions assigned to oxidoreductases and the one lyase include preservation, with oxidoreductases also activating venom components.Fig. 2 The spectrum of biological functions of spider venom enzymes.

The radar plot shows the number of identified spider venom enzyme classes for each of the previously established functional classes of arachnid venom enzymes. The category “others” includes glycoproteins, multidomain enzymes and the superfamily (α/β-hydrolases). Counts show the number of enzymes per category.

We also assigned 17 of the enzymes to cellular functions such as metabolism or a contribution to cellular components40. Five of them are oxidoreductases (glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, glucose 1-dehydrogenase, γ-interferon-inducible lysosomal thiol reductase, and dopamine β-monooxygenase, glutathione peroxidase), two are transferases (arginine kinase and nucleoside-diphosphate kinase), five are hydrolases (α-mannosidase, hexosaminidase, proprotein convertase 1, S1 proteases and metalloendopeptidases), one is a lyase (carbonic anhydrase), two are isomerases (peptidyl-prolyl isomerase and protein disulfide isomerase), one is the multidomain enzyme peptidylglycine monooxygenase and lectins (Supplementary Table 4).

Discussion

In this study, we have provided the first systematic analysis of the distribution, abundance and biological significance of spider venom enzymes. Our results show many different enzymes spread across the spider tree of life. Overall, 144 enzyme families have been described from 17 spider families, eight in the VenomZone database whereas 136 are exclusively found in proteo-transcriptome data. These are distributed in all enzyme classes, which highlights the chemical diversity of spider venoms (Fig. 1). Neurotoxins are well-known as the major component of spider venom whereas enzymes are considered to be minor components24–28. Because of this, and given their potential as drug leads, neurotoxins have been the focus of many studies, whereas enzymes have been mostly overlooked. We found that venom enzymes show remarkable diversity, comparable to that of the neurotoxins. In some cases, the number of sequences identified in the proteome data was also comparably high. For example, Phoneutria nigriventer venom proteome consists of ~42% neurotoxins and ~43% enzymes40 whereas the venom of Steatoda nobilis only features ~15% enzymes compared to ~49% neurotoxins, while the remaining proteins possess other functions or unknown biological activities49. The abundance of the identified spider venom enzyme sequences therefore seems to vary depending on the species and further adds to the overall diversity of spider venom composition.

Spiders are mainly investigated if they are large, like many of the mygalomorphs19,20, or if they are medically relevant in humans, such species in the genera Loxosceles or Latrodectus50. Considering the number of enzymes described throughout the phylogenetic tree, we see the greatest abundance in modern spiders from the infraorder Araneomorphae (Araneoidea and RTA clade) and in the more primitive family Theraphosidae which is part of the Mygalomorphae (Fig. 3). This is supported by the number proteo-transcriptomic studies investigating theraphosid (eight), theridiid (five), araneid (three) and ctenid (three) venom. Theraphosid spiders are among the largest spiders, explaining the increased attention they receive from the scientific community. A large proportion of reported toxins are derived from mygalomorph species51, while other spider families have been largely overlooked in venom research50. However, we found that the situation is currently undergoing a change with recent publications focusing on four previously neglected spider families52.Fig. 3 Identified spider venom enzymes in light of biological function and taxonomic origin.

Sankey plot showing the relationship between venom enzymes identified from the VenomZone database and publications (left side), their associated functions (middle part) and presence in spider infraorders (right side). ACE angiotensin-converting enzyme, DBH dopamine β-monooxygenase, PAM peptidylglycine monooxygenase, TRX-dep. peroxiredoxin thioredoxin-dependent peroxiredoxin, G6PDH glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, G1DH glucose 1-dehydrogenase, GILT γ-interferon-inducible lysosomal thiol reductase, NDK nucleoside-diphosphate kinase, PC1 proprotein convertase 1, PPIase peptidylprolyl isomerase, PDI protein disulfide isomerase.

Our study revealed a large difference between databases and publicly available data. We found that the number of identified spider venom enzymes increased in the recent past, including many small araneomorph species, but these data have apparently not yet found their way into the respective databases. The traditional venom characterization pipeline involves bioactivity screening of crude venoms, which is dependent on the often limited venom yield of the chosen source species51. More recently, the characterization of venom has been facilitated by omics technologies particularly transcriptomics and proteomics. These combine bioinformatics tools with existing functional annotations of known toxins from databases to identify proteinaceous components and predict their function from minuscule starting material51,53–55. This enables the examination of venoms that were traditionally not accessible51. The apparent absence of most spider venom enzymes from public databases may therefore reflect the dominance of components identified using the less sensitive methodologies, the restricted range of target species previously examined, and the persistent focus on small neurotoxic peptides from spider venoms. Another explanation could be that public databases have not yet caught up with more recent discoveries in spider venom enzymes.

Our analysis revealed that although many spider venom enzymes have already been discovered, only a small fraction has yet been incorporated into public databases. However, providing easy public access to spider venom enzymes is crucial for facilitating our understanding of spider venom ecology, biochemistry and physiology, and it also underpins some important considerations for spider venom biodiscovery strategies as a whole.

The widespread neglect of enzymatic components in public databases has potential detrimental effects for future biodiscovery programs. In a venomics experiment, lineage-specific databases are the principal means to functionally annotate amino-acid sequences encoding for venom components. If suitable database entries for a given protein class are not present in the chosen database, then functional annotations will not be feasible. As for spiders, the ArachnoServer database has been the repository of choice for the annotation within spider venomics experiments. However, due to an ongoing major refurbishment, this important resource is currently being reduced to a temporary version with only limited functionality33. Since, VenomZone has emerged as the a priori repository and is accordingly the most utilized database in this field. Our analysis shows that the vast majority of enzyme families that have been identified from spider venoms are absent from the VenomZone database. Thus, if only VenomZone is used for venomics experiments, the conducted venom profiling will be blind towards the missing components. Therefore, the absence of spider venom enzymes from databases bears the risk of resulting in incomplete venom profiling that lacks important biological and translational details. Given the pivotal importance of databases, the establishment of a global arachnid venom repository has been recognized as an urgently needed resource, with the new version of ArachnoServer being planned to also include data on venom enzymes33. Based on our findings, we recommend that all arachnid venom repositories need to include data on spider venom enzymes to better reflect the entire molecular diversity within arachnid venoms and to remove a persistent blind spot in the field of spider toxinology. This might not only lead to important discoveries revolving around spider venom biology, but also yield a plethora of useful enzymes for biotechnological applications.

Considering the apparent diversity of spider venom enzymes, the question may arise as to why they have been absent from databases so persistently? For this, a variety of potential explanations come to mind that deserve discussion. The most obvious may be the strong anthropocentric bias towards biomedicine. Most studies have been carried out by isolating peptides with desired activities and therefore other components, including enzymes have been neglected. Accordingly, they were rarely characterized and introduced to databases. In recent works, a larger diversity of hitherto neglected components was reported, but still only rarely included to public repositories. This may be linked to the tendency of venomics studies to not always provide all sequence data to desirably extents. Quite commonly, neither transcriptomic nor proteomic raw data is uploaded to archives such as PRIDE or SRA. Likewise, multiple studies missed the opportunity to provide all relevant information upon identified venom components in their article (or supplements). For including identified proteins into public databases (Uniprot, VenomZone, etc.), these components usually have to be submitted actively by the responsible researcher, which has not yet received the desired priority. As a result, at least a larger fraction of the discrepancy between database entries and literature-derived spider venom enzymes may be explained. This leads us to propose that the spider toxinology community needs to improve on this end and should aim to publish raw data and submit identified components to repositories more actively.

Spiders use their venoms mainly for hunting and/or defense, and thus contain a complex mixture of different components to support these efforts2. In order to gather a better understanding of the functional role of enzymes across spider venoms, we classified all identified enzymes toward their putative chemical reaction, as well as venom- and or cellular function. We were able to assign 24 of 144 enzyme families to different venom functions and 17 to cellular functions. In addition, we further classified some enzyme families based on their catalyzed reaction or given their previously determined function (Supplementary Table 4)10,34,41,56.

The Delgado-Prudencio classification describes six known global venom functions based on physiological effects in relation to the enzymatic activities and their possible role in envenomation: toxic enzymes, prey pre-digestion enzymes, spreading factors, venom component activators, preservatives and multifunctional enzymes39. Toxic enzymes are one of the most relevant enzymatic venom compounds because they are directly related to the toxicity and physiological effects triggered by envenomation39. Enzymes with digestive functions are important for prey pre-digestion, whereas enzymes that compromise tissue integrity help to promote the distribution of other venom components39. Enzymes are also required to activate venom components by proteolysis or other forms of modification39. Enzymes with preservative functions help to eliminate reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are the intermediates or end products of cellular metabolism57. Venom components are susceptible to ROS, which results in a shorter half-life58. Many venom enzymes have multiple functions, and these have been assigned to a “multifunctional enzyme” category rather than specifying the individual functions39.

Oxidoreductases are required for toxin folding. Their diversity in spider venom indicates that the venom gland is highly active, producing many venom peptides/proteins that require assistance to adopt their correct tertiary structures40. This enzyme class is the third most common in our study. Some have been assigned a preservative function, while others are required to activate venom components. Two examples for the protection against oxidative stress are superoxide dismutases and peroxidases39,59.

Transferases modify other proteins by transferring functional groups. For example, kinases in endoparasite venom chemically modify proteins by adding phosphate groups that help to inhibit the host immune system60. We found many transferases, mostly kinases, but we were unable to assign specific venom functions. Because they contribute to the inhibition of the host immune system in endoparasites, they may act as defense toxins in spider venom by suppressing the prey’s immune system during envenomation61. Additionally, the Diniz classification assigned some kinases to cellular functions40, nucleoside-diphosphate kinases, for example, primarily participate in metabolic processes41. The injection of Loxosceles intermedia crude venom into rats increased the plasma levels of several transferases, and induced histopathological changes that indicated hepatic lesions62. Transferases may therefore play a role in the inhibition of the prey’s immune system, or may fulfill cellular functions beyond the function of venom, or may have a direct physiological effect on the prey.

Interestingly, the largest proportion of identified spider venom enzymes stemmed from hydrolases (Fig. 1). Those break down larger biomolecules into smaller units, e.g., for the digestive system63 or to facilitate the metabolism of extracellular matrix components64–66. Many of the biological functions associated with spider venom revolve around such catabolic effects, including pre-digestion, role as spreading factors or venom component activation. Therefore, it is relatively unsurprising that enzyme classes inherently involved in central venom functions are discovered at high abundance. Also, several of those hydrolase activities may serve multiple functions. For instance, the degradation of biomolecular components not only helps with pre-digestion but may also facilitate the diffusion/spreading of other venom components, which explains why many of these enzymes have been assigned as pre-digestive and spreading factors. The occurrence of hydrolases as major enzymes in spider venom also follows a general pattern. Many major compounds in diverse animal venoms are hydrolases, for example, metalloproteases or serine proteases, which participate in the harmful effects of snake (Elapidae, Viperidae) and spider (Sicariidae) venoms67,68. Phospholipase A2 and acetylcholinesterase are hydrolases that are well-known as toxic venom enzymes. Acetylcholinesterases cause neurological alterations, and are responsible for the flaccid paralysis triggered by snake venom69. Protein disulfide isomerases, protein tyrosine phosphatases and trypsin have been associated to cellular functions by supporting the protein folding or post-translation modifying venom components41.

As venom production is an energetically expensive process, venomous animals adjust venom expenditure in a context-dependent manner (“venom-metering”)11,70,71. Spiders use their venom mostly for predation or defense and are well-known to apply venom-metering and to target specific sites for venom injection11,40,70–73. One possibility to supplement the frugal use of venom is to utilize selected venom components for multiple functions and examples of venom enzymes serving multiple functions have been documented. For instance, several enzymes not only occur in the venom but also in the digestive fluids of venomous and non-venomous spiders and may serve a dual function63,74–79. Digestive fluids contain a mixture of hydrolases such as lipases, proteases, carbohydrases and nucleases77–79. The study of the extra-oral digestion by the spider Nephilingis cruentata for instance revealed the presence of astacins, trypsins, chitinases and others79. While the biological activity of these is limited to extraintestinal digestion, their counterparts within the venom system may be involved in intoxication as predicted by the dual prey inactivation strategy sensu Kuhn-Nentwig et al.23, but also serve pre-digestion38,80. Other simultaneously facilitated activities may include precursor activation or a functionality as spreading factors for neurotoxins38,80. Hyaluronidases for example are commonly reported enzymes present in spider venom and are proposed to act as spreading factors by degrading extracellular matrix components such as hyaluronan. As hyaluronan is found only in vertebrates and bacteria81, it is unlikely that hyaluronidases may play a key role in the predation of invertebrates. Therefore spider venom hyaluronidases are probably primarily employed as defensive weapons against vertebrate predators, in which they act as a spreading factor and as an allergen82. Likewise, PLDs are important toxic enzymes that usually have hydrolase activity but sometimes also facilitate transphosphatidylation83. Although the biological significance of this remains unresolved, this implies that at least some PLDs may serve multiple biological functions. This question requires more scientific attention and should be addressed in future studies. A last example for potentially multifunctional components are lysozymes, which are known to be defensive, antibiotic compounds that catalyze the hydrolysis of glycosidic β-(1,4) bonds in peptidoglycans and chitodextrins and exert antioxidant activity38,84. However, some lysozymes have been shown to further display isopeptidase- and chitinase activity85. Their biological function therefore may vary depending on the type and characteristics of the enzyme. The biological activity of spider venom lysozymes, similarly to most spider venom enzymes, needs to be established. However, based on the known activity spectrum and considering their absence from digestive spider secretions, they may be involved in defense and precursor activation74,78,79.

Besides the biological repercussions discussed above, our increased inventory of spider venom enzymes also opens so far untouched avenues for translational research.

In the past, spider venom research was primarily pharmacology-driven51. Thanks to the neurotoxic nature of many components, they were considered a prolific source of drug leads targeting diseases of the central nervous system (e.g. epilepsy, pain or stroke)13,16,19,86. As spider venom neurotoxins evolved to overpower insect prey and owed to their biodegradability, they were further heavily investigated for their potential to serve as eco-friendly insecticides87,88. A last angle taken by spider venom biodiscovery was the anti-infective nature of some venom components, particularly of linear venom peptides from RTA-clade spiders89–91. However, an entirely new area of biodiscovery may emerge through spider venom enzymes.

Enzymes are of utmost biotechnological importance as they facilitate a range of chemical reactions that are employed in industrial processes and every-day goods with efficiency92,93. Further, they perform these at mild reaction conditions, excellent yields with low by product release and are biodegradable92. As such, enzymes represent attractive components for the bioeconomy that can be used in a range of applications and have a particular value for a sustainable transition of industrial production. A range of spider venom enzymes belongs to classes that are particularly attractive, including chitinases (side-stream reduction in insect protein production and aquaculture)94, proteases (waste reduction and detergents) or oxidoreductases (targeted chemical synthesis)92–94. Unfortunately, this breadth of potentially attractive biomolecules remains almost completely unstudied as of yet.

We present the first systematic and comprehensive analysis of enzyme diversity in spider venoms based on database searches and manually screening previously published proteo-transcriptomic datasets. Enzymes have, historically, been considered minor and biologically less important components of spider venoms. However, a growing body of recent works challenged this perception. These studies suggested that spider venom enzymes may be more diverse and more biologically significant, than previously acknowledged. Here, we provide additional evidence for the key role of spider venom enzymes by unveiling an unprecedented chemical diversity, which is comparable to that of neurotoxins. Linked to that hitherto unknown molecular space, we unfolded an array of key biological functions in which these enzymes may be involved. We assembled 144 enzyme families and proteins with putative enzymatic activities representing 17 spider families. Most of the enzymes were hydrolases, oxidoreductases or translocases. We were able to assign 44 enzyme families to different venom functions or associated cellular functions. The venom functions included venom toxicity, spreading factors, venom activation and preservation, or prey pre-digestion, whereas the cellular functions included metabolism and the formation of cellular components. Most of the described enzymes were not previously associated with specific catalytic activities or venom functions. While theoretically annotating enzymes to specific functions is an important first step, extensive future experiments are required to experimentally validate these functions, which then helps in further improving theoretical annotations.

Supplementary information

supplementary_table_1_Dresler_et_al_2024_npjbiodiversity_resubmission

supplementary_table_2_Dresler_et_al_2024_npjbiodiversity_resubmission

supplementary_table_3_Dresler_et_al_2024_npjbiodiversity_resubmission

supplementary_table_4_Dresler_et_al_2024_npjbiodiversity_resubmission_V2

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s44185-024-00058-2.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the authors of “The enzymatic core of scorpion venoms” for being an inspiration, as well as Richard M. Twyman for commenting and editing this manuscript. The authors thank the Hesse Ministry of Science and Art for funding via the LOEWE Centre for Translational Biodiversity Genomics granted to A.V. V.H. was funded by the Australian Research Council (FT190100482).

Author contributions

J.D.—formal analysis, validation, methodology, investigation and writing the original draft. V.H.—methodology, investigation, data curation, writing editing and review. A.V.—conceptualization, investigation, funding, project management, writing editing and review. T.L.—conceptualization, supervision, project management, data curation and writing the original draft.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. World Spider Catalog. World Spider Catalog. Version 25.5. Natural History Museum Bern, online at http://wsc.nmbe.ch (2024).
2. Lüddecke T Herzig V von Reumont BM Vilcinskas A The biology and evolution of spider venoms Biol. Rev. 2022 97 163 178 10.1111/brv.12793 34453398
Lüddecke, T., Herzig, V., von Reumont, B. M. & Vilcinskas, A. The biology and evolution of spider venoms. Biol. Rev. 97, 163–178 (2022).34453398 10.1111/brv.12793
3. Selden PA Penney D Fossil spiders Biol. Rev. 2010 85 171 206 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00099.x 19961468
Selden, P. A. & Penney, D. Fossil spiders. Biol. Rev. 85, 171–206 (2010).19961468 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00099.x
4. Sharma PP Chelicerates Curr. Biol. 2018 28 R774 R778 10.1016/j.cub.2018.05.036 30040933
Sharma, P. P. Chelicerates. Curr. Biol. 28, R774–R778 (2018).30040933 10.1016/j.cub.2018.05.036
5. Dunlop, J. A., Penney, D. & Jekel, D. 2023. A summary list of fossil spiders and their relatives. In World Spider Catalog. Natural History Museum Bern, online at http://wsc.nmbe.ch, version 23.5 (2024).
6. Vollrath F Silk evolution untangled Nature 2010 466 319 319 10.1038/466319a
Vollrath, F. Silk evolution untangled. Nature 466, 319–319 (2010).10.1038/466319a
7. Schulz S Spider pheromones—a structural perspective J. Chem. Ecol. 2013 39 1 14 10.1007/s10886-012-0231-6 23269451
Schulz, S. Spider pheromones—a structural perspective. J. Chem. Ecol. 39, 1–14 (2013).23269451 10.1007/s10886-012-0231-6
8. Fischer A Origin, structure and functional transition of sex pheromone components in a false widow spider Commun. Biol. 2022 5 1 12 10.1038/s42003-022-04072-7 34987157
Fischer, A. et al. Origin, structure and functional transition of sex pheromone components in a false widow spider. Commun. Biol. 5, 1–12 (2022).34987157 10.1038/s42003-022-04072-7
9. Casewell NR Wüster W Vonk FJ Harrison RA Fry BG Complex cocktails: the evolutionary novelty of venoms Trends Ecol. Evol. 2013 28 219 229 10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.020 23219381
Casewell, N. R., Wüster, W., Vonk, F. J., Harrison, R. A. & Fry, B. G. Complex cocktails: the evolutionary novelty of venoms. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 219–229 (2013).23219381 10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.020
10. Fry BG The toxicogenomic multiverse: convergent recruitment of proteins into animal venoms Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 2009 10 483 511 10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164356
Fry, B. G. et al. The toxicogenomic multiverse: convergent recruitment of proteins into animal venoms. Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 10, 483–511 (2009).10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164356
11. Schendel V Rash LD Jenner RA Undheim EAB The diversity of venom: the importance of behavior and venom system morphology in understanding Its ecology and evolution Toxins 2019 11 666 10.3390/toxins11110666 31739590
Schendel, V., Rash, L. D., Jenner, R. A. & Undheim, E. A. B. The diversity of venom: the importance of behavior and venom system morphology in understanding Its ecology and evolution. Toxins 11, 666 (2019).31739590 10.3390/toxins11110666
12. Pineda SS Structural venomics reveals evolution of a complex venom by duplication and diversification of an ancient peptide-encoding gene Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2020 117 11399 11408 10.1073/pnas.1914536117 32398368
Pineda, S. S. et al. Structural venomics reveals evolution of a complex venom by duplication and diversification of an ancient peptide-encoding gene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 11399–11408 (2020).32398368 10.1073/pnas.1914536117
13. Saez NJ Spider-venom peptides as therapeutics Toxins 2010 2 2851 2871 10.3390/toxins2122851 22069579
Saez, N. J. et al. Spider-venom peptides as therapeutics. Toxins 2, 2851–2871 (2010).22069579 10.3390/toxins2122851
14. Schmidtberg H von Reumont BM Lemke S Vilcinskas A Lüddecke T Morphological analysis reveals a compartmentalized duct in the venom apparatus of the wasp spider (Argiope bruennichi) Toxins 2021 13 270 10.3390/toxins13040270 33918654
Schmidtberg, H., von Reumont, B. M., Lemke, S., Vilcinskas, A. & Lüddecke, T. Morphological analysis reveals a compartmentalized duct in the venom apparatus of the wasp spider (Argiope bruennichi). Toxins 13, 270 (2021).33918654 10.3390/toxins13040270
15. Herzig V King GF The cystine knot is responsible for the exceptional stability of the insecticidal spider toxin ω-hexatoxin-Hv1a Toxins 2015 7 4366 4380 10.3390/toxins7104366 26516914
Herzig, V. & King, G. F. The cystine knot is responsible for the exceptional stability of the insecticidal spider toxin ω-hexatoxin-Hv1a. Toxins 7, 4366–4380 (2015).26516914 10.3390/toxins7104366
16. Richards KL Selective NaV1.1 activation rescues Dravet syndrome mice from seizures and premature death Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2018 115 E8077 E8085 10.1073/pnas.1804764115 30076230
Richards, K. L. et al. Selective NaV1.1 activation rescues Dravet syndrome mice from seizures and premature death. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E8077–E8085 (2018).30076230 10.1073/pnas.1804764115
17. Chow CY A selective NaV1.1 activator with potential for treatment of Dravet syndrome epilepsy Biochem. Pharmacol. 2020 181 113991 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.113991 32335140
Chow, C. Y. et al. A selective NaV1.1 activator with potential for treatment of Dravet syndrome epilepsy. Biochem. Pharmacol. 181, 113991 (2020).32335140 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.113991
18. Dongol Y Cardoso FC Lewis RJ Spider knottin pharmacology at voltage-gated sodium channels and their potential to modulate pain pathways Toxins 2019 11 626 10.3390/toxins11110626 31671792
Dongol, Y., Cardoso, F. C. & Lewis, R. J. Spider knottin pharmacology at voltage-gated sodium channels and their potential to modulate pain pathways. Toxins 11, 626 (2019).31671792 10.3390/toxins11110626
19. Chassagnon IR Potent neuroprotection after stroke afforded by a double-knot spider-venom peptide that inhibits acid-sensing ion channel 1a Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2017 114 3750 3755 10.1073/pnas.1614728114 28320941
Chassagnon, I. R. et al. Potent neuroprotection after stroke afforded by a double-knot spider-venom peptide that inhibits acid-sensing ion channel 1a. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 3750–3755 (2017).28320941 10.1073/pnas.1614728114
20. Herzig V Animal toxins—nature’s evolutionary-refined toolkit for basic research and drug discovery Biochem. Pharmacol. 2020 181 114096 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114096 32535105
Herzig, V. et al. Animal toxins—nature’s evolutionary-refined toolkit for basic research and drug discovery. Biochem. Pharmacol. 181, 114096 (2020).32535105 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114096
21. von Reumont BM Modern venomics—current insights, novel methods, and future perspectives in biological and applied animal venom research Gigascience 2022 11 giac048 35640874
von Reumont, B. M. et al. Modern venomics—current insights, novel methods, and future perspectives in biological and applied animal venom research. Gigascience 11, giac048 (2022).35640874
22. Lüddecke, T. et al. Venom biotechnology: casting light on nature’s deadliest weapons using synthetic biology. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 11, 1166601 (2023).
23. Kuhn-Nentwig L Langenegger N Heller M Koua D Nentwig W The dual prey-inactivation strategy of spiders—in-depth venomic analysis of Cupiennius salei Toxins 2019 11 167 10.3390/toxins11030167 30893800
Kuhn-Nentwig, L., Langenegger, N., Heller, M., Koua, D. & Nentwig, W. The dual prey-inactivation strategy of spiders—in-depth venomic analysis of Cupiennius salei. Toxins 11, 167 (2019).30893800 10.3390/toxins11030167
24. Langenegger N Identification of a precursor processing protease from the spider Cupiennius salei essential for venom neurotoxin maturation J. Biol. Chem. 2018 293 2079 2090 10.1074/jbc.M117.810911 29269415
Langenegger, N. et al. Identification of a precursor processing protease from the spider Cupiennius salei essential for venom neurotoxin maturation. J. Biol. Chem. 293, 2079–2090 (2018).29269415 10.1074/jbc.M117.810911
25. Gremski LH Forty years of the description of brown spider venom phospholipases-D Toxins 2020 12 164 10.3390/toxins12030164 32155765
Gremski, L. H. et al. Forty years of the description of brown spider venom phospholipases-D. Toxins 12, 164 (2020).32155765 10.3390/toxins12030164
26. Lajoie DM Variable substrate preference among phospholipase D toxins from sicariid spiders J. Biol. Chem. 2015 290 10994 11007 10.1074/jbc.M115.636951 25752604
Lajoie, D. M. et al. Variable substrate preference among phospholipase D toxins from sicariid spiders. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 10994–11007 (2015).25752604 10.1074/jbc.M115.636951
27. Rojas JM Phospholipase D from Loxosceles laeta spider venom induces IL-6, IL-8, CXCL1/GRO-α, and CCL2/MCP-1 production in human skin fibroblasts and stimulates monocytes migration Toxins 2017 9 125 10.3390/toxins9040125 28379166
Rojas, J. M. et al. Phospholipase D from Loxosceles laeta spider venom induces IL-6, IL-8, CXCL1/GRO-α, and CCL2/MCP-1 production in human skin fibroblasts and stimulates monocytes migration. Toxins 9, 125 (2017).28379166 10.3390/toxins9040125
28. da Justa HC Comparative biochemical, structural, and functional analysis of recombinant phospholipases D from three Loxosceles spider venoms Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023 24 12006 10.3390/ijms241512006 37569382
da Justa, H. C. et al. Comparative biochemical, structural, and functional analysis of recombinant phospholipases D from three Loxosceles spider venoms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24, 12006 (2023).37569382 10.3390/ijms241512006
29. Lüddecke T An economic dilemma between molecular weapon systems may explain an arachno-atypical venom in wasp spiders (Argiope bruennichi) Biomolecules 2020 10 978 10.3390/biom10070978 32630016
Lüddecke, T. et al. An economic dilemma between molecular weapon systems may explain an arachno-atypical venom in wasp spiders (Argiope bruennichi). Biomolecules 10, 978 (2020).32630016 10.3390/biom10070978
30. Zobel-Thropp PA Not so dangerous after all? Venom composition and potency of the pholcid (daddy long-leg) spider Physocyclus mexicanus Front. Ecol. Evol. 2019 7 256 10.3389/fevo.2019.00256 33235882
Zobel-Thropp, P. A. et al. Not so dangerous after all? Venom composition and potency of the pholcid (daddy long-leg) spider Physocyclus mexicanus. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7, 256 (2019).33235882 10.3389/fevo.2019.00256
31. Senff-Ribeiro A Biotechnological applications of brown spider (Loxosceles genus) venom toxins Biotechnol. Adv. 2008 26 210 218 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.12.003 18207690
Senff-Ribeiro, A. et al. Biotechnological applications of brown spider (Loxosceles genus) venom toxins. Biotechnol. Adv. 26, 210–218 (2008).18207690 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.12.003
32. Kirk O Borchert TV Fuglsang CC Industrial enzyme applications Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2002 13 345 351 10.1016/S0958-1669(02)00328-2 12323357
Kirk, O., Borchert, T. V. & Fuglsang, C. C. Industrial enzyme applications. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 13, 345–351 (2002).12323357 10.1016/S0958-1669(02)00328-2
33. Herzig, V. Grand challenges in arachnid toxinology and biochemistry. Front. Arachn. Sci. 2, 1302040 (2023).
34. VenomZone. SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics. Available online at: https://venomzone.expasy.org (2023).
35. White J. PubMed 2.0. Med Ref Serv Q. 39(4):382-387(2020). 10.1080/02763869.2020.1826228
36. Smith JJ Undheim EAB True lies: using proteomics to assess the accuracy of transcriptome-based venomics in centipedes uncovers false positives and reveals startling intraspecific variation in Scolopendra Subspinipes Toxins 2018 10 96 10.3390/toxins10030096 29495554
Smith, J. J. & Undheim, E. A. B. True lies: using proteomics to assess the accuracy of transcriptome-based venomics in centipedes uncovers false positives and reveals startling intraspecific variation in Scolopendra Subspinipes. Toxins 10, 96 (2018).29495554 10.3390/toxins10030096
37. McDonald AG Tipton KF Enzyme nomenclature and classification: the state of the art FEBS J. 2023 290 2214 2231 10.1111/febs.16274 34773359
McDonald, A. G. & Tipton, K. F. Enzyme nomenclature and classification: the state of the art. FEBS J. 290, 2214–2231 (2023).34773359 10.1111/febs.16274
38. Bairoch A The ENZYME database in 2000 Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 28 304 305 10.1093/nar/28.1.304 10592255
Bairoch, A. The ENZYME database in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 304–305 (2000).10592255 10.1093/nar/28.1.304
39. Delgado-Prudencio G The enzymatic core of scorpion venoms Toxins 2022 14 248 10.3390/toxins14040248 35448857
Delgado-Prudencio, G. et al. The enzymatic core of scorpion venoms. Toxins 14, 248 (2022).35448857 10.3390/toxins14040248
40. Diniz MRV An overview of Phoneutria nigriventer spider venom using combined transcriptomic and proteomic approaches PLoS ONE 2018 13 e0200628 10.1371/journal.pone.0200628 30067761
Diniz, M. R. V. et al. An overview of Phoneutria nigriventer spider venom using combined transcriptomic and proteomic approaches. PLoS ONE 13, e0200628 (2018).30067761 10.1371/journal.pone.0200628
41. Zhang Y Transcriptome analysis of the venom glands of the Chinese wolf spider Lycosa singoriensis Zoology 2010 113 10 18 10.1016/j.zool.2009.04.001 19875276
Zhang, Y. et al. Transcriptome analysis of the venom glands of the Chinese wolf spider Lycosa singoriensis. Zoology 113, 10–18 (2010).19875276 10.1016/j.zool.2009.04.001
42. Molina MC Vincente C Correlationships between enzymatic activity of lectins, putrescine content and chloroplast damage in Xanthoria parietina phycobionts Cell Adhes. Commun. 1995 3 1 12 10.3109/15419069509081274 7749719
Molina, M. C. & Vincente, C. Correlationships between enzymatic activity of lectins, putrescine content and chloroplast damage in Xanthoria parietina phycobionts. Cell Adhes. Commun. 3, 1–12 (1995).7749719 10.3109/15419069509081274
43. Olsnes S Kozlov JV Ricin Toxicon 2001 39 1723 1728 10.1016/S0041-0101(01)00158-1 11595634
Olsnes, S. & Kozlov, J. V. Ricin. Toxicon 39, 1723–1728 (2001).11595634 10.1016/S0041-0101(01)00158-1
44. Zhu B Chen Y Wei N Engineering biocatalytic and biosorptive materials for environmental applications Trends Biotechnol. 2019 37 661 676 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.11.005 30527644
Zhu, B., Chen, Y. & Wei, N. Engineering biocatalytic and biosorptive materials for environmental applications. Trends Biotechnol. 37, 661–676 (2019).30527644 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.11.005
45. Rawlings, N. D. & Barrett, A. J. Evolutionary families of metallopeptidases. in Methods in Enzymology Vol. 248, 183–228 (Academic Press, 1995).
46. Lam SK Ng TB Lectins: production and practical applications Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011 89 45 55 10.1007/s00253-010-2892-9 20890754
Lam, S. K. & Ng, T. B. Lectins: production and practical applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 89, 45–55 (2011).20890754 10.1007/s00253-010-2892-9
47. Chettri D Boro M Sarkar L Verma AK Lectins: biological significance to biotechnological application Carbohydr. Res. 2021 506 108367 10.1016/j.carres.2021.108367 34130214
Chettri, D., Boro, M., Sarkar, L. & Verma, A. K. Lectins: biological significance to biotechnological application. Carbohydr. Res. 506, 108367 (2021).34130214 10.1016/j.carres.2021.108367
48. McIntyre NR Evidence for substrate pre-organization in the peptidylglycine α-amidating monooxygenase (PAM) reaction describing the contribution of ground state structure to hydrogen tunneling J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010 132 16393 16402 10.1021/ja1019194 21043511
McIntyre, N. R. et al. Evidence for substrate pre-organization in the peptidylglycine α-amidating monooxygenase (PAM) reaction describing the contribution of ground state structure to hydrogen tunneling. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 16393–16402 (2010).21043511 10.1021/ja1019194
49. Dunbar JP Venomics approach reveals a high proportion of Lactrodectus-like toxins in the venom of the noble false widow spider Steatoda nobilis Toxins 2020 12 402 10.3390/toxins12060402 32570718
Dunbar, J. P. et al. Venomics approach reveals a high proportion of Lactrodectus-like toxins in the venom of the noble false widow spider Steatoda nobilis. Toxins 12, 402 (2020).32570718 10.3390/toxins12060402
50. Kuhn-Nentwig, L., Stöcklin, R. & Nentwig, W. Venom composition and strategies in spiders: is everything possible? in Advances in Insect Physiology Vol. 40 (ed. Casas, J.) 1–86 (Academic Press, 2011).
51. Herzig V King GF Undheim EAB Can we resolve the taxonomic bias in spider venom research? Toxicon 2019 1 100005 10.1016/j.toxcx.2018.100005
Herzig, V., King, G. F. & Undheim, E. A. B. Can we resolve the taxonomic bias in spider venom research? Toxicon 1, 100005 (2019).10.1016/j.toxcx.2018.100005
52. Kuhn-Nentwig, L. et al. Linear peptides—a combinatorial innovation in the venom of some modern spiders. Front. Mol. Biosci. 8, 705141 (2021).
53. Klint JK Production of recombinant disulfide-rich venom peptides for structural and functional analysis via expression in the periplasm of E. coli PLoS ONE 2013 8 e63865 10.1371/journal.pone.0063865 23667680
Klint, J. K. et al. Production of recombinant disulfide-rich venom peptides for structural and functional analysis via expression in the periplasm of E. coli. PLoS ONE 8, e63865 (2013).23667680 10.1371/journal.pone.0063865
54. von Reumont BM Campbell LI Jenner RA Quo vadis venomics? A roadmap to neglected venomous invertebrates Toxins 2014 6 3488 3551 10.3390/toxins6123488 25533518
von Reumont, B. M., Campbell, L. I. & Jenner, R. A. Quo vadis venomics? A roadmap to neglected venomous invertebrates. Toxins 6, 3488–3551 (2014).25533518 10.3390/toxins6123488
55. von Reumont BM Studying smaller and neglected organisms in modern evolutionary venomics implementing RNASeq (transcriptomics)—a critical guide Toxins 2018 10 292 10.3390/toxins10070292 30012955
von Reumont, B. M. Studying smaller and neglected organisms in modern evolutionary venomics implementing RNASeq (transcriptomics)—a critical guide. Toxins 10, 292 (2018).30012955 10.3390/toxins10070292
56. Jiang L Transcriptome analysis of venom glands from a single fishing spider Dolomedes mizhoanus Toxicon 2013 73 23 32 10.1016/j.toxicon.2013.07.005 23851222
Jiang, L. et al. Transcriptome analysis of venom glands from a single fishing spider Dolomedes mizhoanus. Toxicon 73, 23–32 (2013).23851222 10.1016/j.toxicon.2013.07.005
57. Colinet D Cazes D Belghazi M Gatti J-L Poirié M Extracellular superoxide dismutase in insects: characterization, function, and interspecific variation in parasitoid wasp venom J. Biol. Chem. 2011 286 40110 40121 10.1074/jbc.M111.288845 21937434
Colinet, D., Cazes, D., Belghazi, M., Gatti, J.-L. & Poirié, M. Extracellular superoxide dismutase in insects: characterization, function, and interspecific variation in parasitoid wasp venom. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 40110–40121 (2011).21937434 10.1074/jbc.M111.288845
58. Peiren N Proteomic analysis of the honey bee worker venom gland focusing on the mechanisms of protection against tissue damage Toxicon 2008 52 72 83 10.1016/j.toxicon.2008.05.003 18573272
Peiren, N. et al. Proteomic analysis of the honey bee worker venom gland focusing on the mechanisms of protection against tissue damage. Toxicon 52, 72–83 (2008).18573272 10.1016/j.toxicon.2008.05.003
59. Liu N-Y Superoxide dismutase from venom of the ectoparasitoid Scleroderma guani inhibits melanization of hemolymph Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 2018 99 e21503 10.1002/arch.21503 30120804
Liu, N.-Y. et al. Superoxide dismutase from venom of the ectoparasitoid Scleroderma guani inhibits melanization of hemolymph. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 99, e21503 (2018).30120804 10.1002/arch.21503
60. Xin B Liu P Xu X Zhang S Zheng Y Identification of venom proteins of the indigenous endoparasitoid Chouioia cunea (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) J. Econ. Entomol. 2017 110 2022 2030 10.1093/jee/tox200 28981711
Xin, B., Liu, P., Xu, X., Zhang, S. & Zheng, Y. Identification of venom proteins of the indigenous endoparasitoid Chouioia cunea (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 110, 2022–2030 (2017).28981711 10.1093/jee/tox200
61. Vásquez-Escobar J Transcriptomic analysis of the venom gland and enzymatic characterization of the venom of Phoneutria depilata (Ctenidae) from Colombia Toxins 2022 14 295 10.3390/toxins14050295 35622542
Vásquez-Escobar, J. et al. Transcriptomic analysis of the venom gland and enzymatic characterization of the venom of Phoneutria depilata (Ctenidae) from Colombia. Toxins 14, 295 (2022).35622542 10.3390/toxins14050295
62. de Oliveira Christoff A Effects of the venom and the dermonecrotic toxin LiRecDT1 of Loxosceles intermedia in the rat liver Toxicon 2008 52 695 704 10.1016/j.toxicon.2008.08.001 18765244
de Oliveira Christoff, A. et al. Effects of the venom and the dermonecrotic toxin LiRecDT1 of Loxosceles intermedia in the rat liver. Toxicon 52, 695–704 (2008).18765244 10.1016/j.toxicon.2008.08.001
63. Fuzita FJ Biochemical, transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of digestion in the scorpion Tityus serrulatus: insights into function and evolution of digestion in an ancient arthropod PLoS ONE 2015 10 e0123841 10.1371/journal.pone.0123841 25875018
Fuzita, F. J. et al. Biochemical, transcriptomic and proteomic analyses of digestion in the scorpion Tityus serrulatus: insights into function and evolution of digestion in an ancient arthropod. PLoS ONE 10, e0123841 (2015).25875018 10.1371/journal.pone.0123841
64. Duan Z Proteomic analysis of Latrodectus tredecimguttatus venom for uncovering potential latrodectism-related proteins J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2008 22 328 336 10.1002/jbt.20244 18972397
Duan, Z. et al. Proteomic analysis of Latrodectus tredecimguttatus venom for uncovering potential latrodectism-related proteins. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 22, 328–336 (2008).18972397 10.1002/jbt.20244
65. Haney RA Ayoub NA Clarke TH Hayashi CY Garb JE Dramatic expansion of the black widow toxin arsenal uncovered by multi-tissue transcriptomics and venom proteomics BMC Genomics 2014 15 366 10.1186/1471-2164-15-366 24916504
Haney, R. A., Ayoub, N. A., Clarke, T. H., Hayashi, C. Y. & Garb, J. E. Dramatic expansion of the black widow toxin arsenal uncovered by multi-tissue transcriptomics and venom proteomics. BMC Genomics 15, 366 (2014).24916504 10.1186/1471-2164-15-366
66. Morgon AM Expression and immunological cross-reactivity of LALP3, a novel astacin-like metalloprotease from brown spider (Loxosceles intermedia) venom Biochimie 2016 128 8 19 10.1016/j.biochi.2016.06.003 27343628
Morgon, A. M. et al. Expression and immunological cross-reactivity of LALP3, a novel astacin-like metalloprotease from brown spider (Loxosceles intermedia) venom. Biochimie 128–129, 8–19 (2016).27343628 10.1016/j.biochi.2016.06.003
67. Nawarak J Proteomics of snake venoms from Elapidae and Viperidae families by multidimensional chromatographic methods Electrophoresis 2003 24 2838 2854 10.1002/elps.200305552 12929180
Nawarak, J. et al. Proteomics of snake venoms from Elapidae and Viperidae families by multidimensional chromatographic methods. Electrophoresis 24, 2838–2854 (2003).12929180 10.1002/elps.200305552
68. Futrell JM Loxoscelism Am. J. Med. Sci. 1992 304 261 267 10.1097/00000441-199210000-00008 1415323
Futrell, J. M. Loxoscelism. Am. J. Med. Sci. 304, 261–267 (1992).1415323 10.1097/00000441-199210000-00008
69. Gutiérrez JM Snakebite envenoming Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2017 3 1 21
Gutiérrez, J. M. et al. Snakebite envenoming. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 3, 1–21 (2017).
70. Cooper, A. M., Nelsen, D. R. & Hayes, W. K. The strategic use of venom by spiders. in Evolution of Venomous Animals and Their Toxins (eds Gopalakrishnakone, P. & Malhotra, A.) 1–18 (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2015).
71. Nelsen DR Poisons, toxungens, and venoms: redefining and classifying toxic biological secretions and the organisms that employ them Biol. Rev. 2014 89 450 465 10.1111/brv.12062 24102715
Nelsen, D. R. et al. Poisons, toxungens, and venoms: redefining and classifying toxic biological secretions and the organisms that employ them. Biol. Rev. 89, 450–465 (2014).24102715 10.1111/brv.12062
72. Wullschleger B Nentwig W Influence of venom availability on a spider’s prey-choice behaviour Funct. Ecol. 2002 16 802 807 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00686.x
Wullschleger, B. & Nentwig, W. Influence of venom availability on a spider’s prey-choice behaviour. Funct. Ecol. 16, 802–807 (2002).10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00686.x
73. Morgenstern D The bio-logic of venom complexity Toxicon 2012 60 241 242 10.1016/j.toxicon.2012.04.285
Morgenstern, D. et al. The bio-logic of venom complexity. Toxicon 60, 241–242 (2012).10.1016/j.toxicon.2012.04.285
74. Sanggaard KW Spider genomes provide insight into composition and evolution of venom and silk Nat. Commun. 2014 5 3765 10.1038/ncomms4765 24801114
Sanggaard, K. W. et al. Spider genomes provide insight into composition and evolution of venom and silk. Nat. Commun. 5, 3765 (2014).24801114 10.1038/ncomms4765
75. Foradori MJ Keil LM Wells RE Diem M Tillinghast EK An examination of the potential role of spider digestive proteases as a causative factor in spider bite necrosis Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2001 130 209 218 10.1016/S1532-0456(01)00239-3 11574290
Foradori, M. J., Keil, L. M., Wells, R. E., Diem, M. & Tillinghast, E. K. An examination of the potential role of spider digestive proteases as a causative factor in spider bite necrosis. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 130, 209–218 (2001).11574290 10.1016/S1532-0456(01)00239-3
76. Cohen AC Solid-to-liquid feeding: the inside(s) story of extra-oral digestion in predaceous arthropoda Am. Entomol. 1998 44 103 117 10.1093/ae/44.2.103
Cohen, A. C. Solid-to-liquid feeding: the inside(s) story of extra-oral digestion in predaceous arthropoda. Am. Entomol. 44, 103–117 (1998).10.1093/ae/44.2.103
77. Walter A Characterisation of protein families in spider digestive fluids and their role in extra-oral digestion BMC Genomics 2017 18 600 10.1186/s12864-017-3987-9 28797246
Walter, A. et al. Characterisation of protein families in spider digestive fluids and their role in extra-oral digestion. BMC Genomics 18, 600 (2017).28797246 10.1186/s12864-017-3987-9
78. Valladão R Neto OBS de Oliveira Gonzaga M Pimenta DC Lopes AR Digestive enzymes and sphingomyelinase D in spiders without venom (Uloboridae) Sci. Rep. 2023 13 2661 10.1038/s41598-023-29828-x 36792649
Valladão, R., Neto, O. B. S., de Oliveira Gonzaga, M., Pimenta, D. C. & Lopes, A. R. Digestive enzymes and sphingomyelinase D in spiders without venom (Uloboridae). Sci. Rep. 13, 2661 (2023).36792649 10.1038/s41598-023-29828-x
79. Fuzita FJ Pinkse MWH Patane JSL Verhaert PDEM Lopes AR High throughput techniques to reveal the molecular physiology and evolution of digestion in spiders BMC Genomics 2016 17 716 10.1186/s12864-016-3048-9 27604083
Fuzita, F. J., Pinkse, M. W. H., Patane, J. S. L., Verhaert, P. D. E. M. & Lopes, A. R. High throughput techniques to reveal the molecular physiology and evolution of digestion in spiders. BMC Genomics 17, 716 (2016).27604083 10.1186/s12864-016-3048-9
80. Fricker LD Carboxypeptidase E Annu. Rev. Physiol. 1988 50 309 321 10.1146/annurev.ph.50.030188.001521 2897826
Fricker, L. D. Carboxypeptidase E. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 50, 309–321 (1988).2897826 10.1146/annurev.ph.50.030188.001521
81. DeAngelis PL Evolution of glycosaminoglycans and their glycosyltransferases: implications for the extracellular matrices of animals and the capsules of pathogenic bacteria Anat. Rec. 2002 268 317 326 10.1002/ar.10163 12382327
DeAngelis, P. L. Evolution of glycosaminoglycans and their glycosyltransferases: implications for the extracellular matrices of animals and the capsules of pathogenic bacteria. Anat. Rec. 268, 317–326 (2002).12382327 10.1002/ar.10163
82. Girish KS Kemparaju K The magic glue hyaluronan and its eraser hyaluronidase: a biological overview Life Sci. 2007 80 1921 1943 10.1016/j.lfs.2007.02.037 17408700
Girish, K. S. & Kemparaju, K. The magic glue hyaluronan and its eraser hyaluronidase: a biological overview. Life Sci. 80, 1921–1943 (2007).17408700 10.1016/j.lfs.2007.02.037
83. Yu CH Liu SY Panagia V The transphosphatidylation activity of phospholipase D Mol. Cell. Biochem. 1996 157 101 105 10.1007/BF00227886 8739234
Yu, C. H., Liu, S. Y. & Panagia, V. The transphosphatidylation activity of phospholipase D. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 157, 101–105 (1996).8739234 10.1007/BF00227886
84. Leśnierowski G Yang T Lysozyme and its modified forms: a critical appraisal of selected properties and potential Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021 107 333 342 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.11.004
Leśnierowski, G. & Yang, T. Lysozyme and its modified forms: a critical appraisal of selected properties and potential. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 107, 333–342 (2021).10.1016/j.tifs.2020.11.004
85. Callewaert L Michiels CW Lysozymes in the animal kingdom J. Biosci. 2010 35 127 160 10.1007/s12038-010-0015-5 20413917
Callewaert, L. & Michiels, C. W. Lysozymes in the animal kingdom. J. Biosci. 35, 127–160 (2010).20413917 10.1007/s12038-010-0015-5
86. Godoy LD Disease modifying effects of the spider toxin Parawixin2 in the experimental epilepsy model Toxins 2017 9 262 10.3390/toxins9090262 28841161
Godoy, L. D. et al. Disease modifying effects of the spider toxin Parawixin2 in the experimental epilepsy model. Toxins 9, 262 (2017).28841161 10.3390/toxins9090262
87. Windley MJ Spider-venom peptides as bioinsecticides Toxins 2012 4 191 227 10.3390/toxins4030191 22741062
Windley, M. J. et al. Spider-venom peptides as bioinsecticides. Toxins 4, 191–227 (2012).22741062 10.3390/toxins4030191
88. King GF Hardy MC Spider-venom peptides: structure, pharmacology, and potential for control of insect pests Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2013 58 475 496 10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153650 23020618
King, G. F. & Hardy, M. C. Spider-venom peptides: structure, pharmacology, and potential for control of insect pests. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 58, 475–496 (2013).23020618 10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153650
89. Dubovskii PV Latarcins: versatile spider venom peptides Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2015 72 4501 4522 10.1007/s00018-015-2016-x 26286896
Dubovskii, P. V. et al. Latarcins: versatile spider venom peptides. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 72, 4501–4522 (2015).26286896 10.1007/s00018-015-2016-x
90. Segura-Ramírez PJ Silva Júnior PI Loxosceles gaucho spider venom: an untapped source of antimicrobial agents Toxins 2018 10 522 10.3390/toxins10120522 30563217
Segura-Ramírez, P. J. & Silva Júnior, P. I. Loxosceles gaucho spider venom: an untapped source of antimicrobial agents. Toxins 10, 522 (2018).30563217 10.3390/toxins10120522
91. Lüddecke T Functional profiling of the A-family of venom peptides from the wolf spider Lycosa shansia Toxins 2023 15 303 10.3390/toxins15050303 37235338
Lüddecke, T. et al. Functional profiling of the A-family of venom peptides from the wolf spider Lycosa shansia. Toxins 15, 303 (2023).37235338 10.3390/toxins15050303
92. Singh R Kumar M Mittal A Mehta PK Microbial enzymes: industrial progress in 21st century 3 Biotech 2016 6 174 10.1007/s13205-016-0485-8 28330246
Singh, R., Kumar, M., Mittal, A. & Mehta, P. K. Microbial enzymes: industrial progress in 21st century. 3 Biotech 6, 174 (2016).28330246 10.1007/s13205-016-0485-8
93. Mesbah NM Industrial biotechnology based on enzymes from extreme environments Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022 10 870083 10.3389/fbioe.2022.870083 35480975
Mesbah, N. M. Industrial biotechnology based on enzymes from extreme environments. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10, 870083 (2022).35480975 10.3389/fbioe.2022.870083
94. Rathore A Gupta R Chitinases from bacteria to human: properties, applications, and future perspectives Enzyme Res. 2015 2015 1 8 10.1155/2015/791907
Rathore, A. & Gupta, R. Chitinases from bacteria to human: properties, applications, and future perspectives. Enzyme Res. 2015, 1–8 (2015).10.1155/2015/791907
