
==== Front
Commun Biol
Commun Biol
Communications Biology
2399-3642
Nature Publishing Group UK London

6817
10.1038/s42003-024-06817-y
Article
Ligand requirements for immunoreceptor triggering
Barton Michael I. 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6268-5947
Paterson Rachel L. 12
Denham Eleanor M. 13
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1008-1890
Goyette Jesse 14
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9902-6590
van der Merwe Philip Anton anton.vandermerwe@path.ox.ac.uk

1
1 https://ror.org/052gg0110 grid.4991.5 0000 0004 1936 8948 Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
2 https://ror.org/0392txn84 grid.422600.2 0000 0004 6418 9658 Present Address: Stemmatters, Biotecnologia e Medicina Regenerativa SA, Parque de Ciência e Tecnologia Avepark, Zona Industrial da Gandra, Barco, Portugal
3 Present Address: Enara Bio, The Magdalen Centre, Oxford Science Park, 1 Robert Robinson Avenue, Oxford, UK
4 https://ror.org/03r8z3t63 grid.1005.4 0000 0004 4902 0432 Present Address: Department of Molecular Medicine, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW Australia
13 9 2024
13 9 2024
2024
7 113810 1 2024
30 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Leukocytes interact with other cells using cell surface receptors. The largest group of such receptors are non-catalytic tyrosine phosphorylated receptors (NTRs), also called immunoreceptors. NTR signalling requires phosphorylation of cytoplasmic tyrosine residues by SRC-family tyrosine kinases. How ligand binding to NTRs induces this phosphorylation, also called NTR triggering, remains controversial, with roles suggested for size-based segregation, clustering, and mechanical force. Here we exploit a recently developed cell-surface generic ligand system to explore the ligand requirements for NTR triggering. We examine the effect of varying the ligand’s length, mobility and valency on the activation of representative members of four NTR families: SIRPβ1, Siglec 14, NKp44 and TREM-1. Increasing the ligand length impairs activation via NTRs, despite enhancing cell-cell conjugation, while varying ligand mobility has little effect on either conjugation or activation. Increasing the valency of the ligand, while enhancing cell-cell conjugation, does not enhance activation at equivalent levels of conjugation. These findings are more consistent with a role for size-based segregation, rather than mechanical force or clustering, in NTR triggering, suggesting a role for the kinetic-segregation model.

Using a generic ligand system, we show that activation via immunoreceptors is dependent on the size, but not the valency or mobility, of their cell surface ligand. This suggests that they trigger using the kinetic segregation mechanism.

Subject terms

Signal transduction
Cell signalling
https://doi.org/10.13039/100004440 Wellcome Trust (Wellcome) 101799/Z/13/Z van der Merwe Philip Anton issue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Limited 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

The cell surface of an immune cell or leucocyte presents many different receptors, which sense their environment through ligand binding1–3. Many leucocyte receptors bind to ligands on the surface of other cells to mediate adhesion and/or transduce signals which regulate leucocyte function. These signals determine whether the leucocyte ignores or responds to the cell and influence the nature of the response. The largest class of such receptors are non-catalytic tyrosine-phosphorylated receptors (NTRs), which are also called immunoreceptors4. More than one hundred leucocyte receptors, in more than 20 families, can be classified as NTRs4. Because they regulate immune cell function, NTRs have roles in a wide range of diseases, and they are being exploited for therapeutic purposes. For example, synthetic NTRs (e.g. chimeric antigen receptors) and antibodies targeting NTRs or their ligands (e.g. checkpoint inhibitors) have become standard therapies for several forms of cancer5,6.

While NTRs have structurally diverse extracellular regions they all have, or are associated with signalling subunits that have, conserved tyrosine containing motifs in their cytoplasmic domains, such as the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM) and immunoreceptor tyrosine-based switch motif (ITSM)4. These motifs are phosphorylated by SRC-family tyrosine kinases, which are tethered via acyl groups to the inner leaflet of the plasma membrane. This phosphorylation is regulated by the receptor tyrosine phosphatases CD45 and CD148, which act on both SRC-kinases and their substrates. While the extracellular regions of NTRs are structurally diverse, they are typically smaller (4-10 nm) than many abundant cell surface molecules such as CD43, CD44, CD45, CD148 and integrins, which range in size from 21-50 nm. When these size differences were first noted for the TCR and its peptide-MHC (pMHC) ligand it was predicted that, when T cells contacted other cells, there would be segregation of the TCR/pMHC complex from larger molecules like CD451. This observation, together with evidence that constitutive tyrosine phosphatase activity suppresses TCR triggering in resting cells7,8, led to the proposal that TCR binding to pMHC induced tyrosine phosphorylation of the TCR by trapping it in small regions of close contact which exclude large receptor tyrosine phosphatases CD45 and CD148 but not the SRC-kinases9. This mechanism was subsequently termed the kinetic segregation (KS) model10. Subsequent studies from multiple laboratories using a wide range of techniques have demonstrated that the KS mechanism plays a key role in TCR triggering11–21. Recently it has been shown that synthetic receptors based on the TCR, namely chimeric antigen receptors (CARs), also appear to trigger by the KS mechanism, which has important implications for the design of these receptors and selection of their target antigens22. Other mechanisms that been proposed to contribute to TCR triggering are aggregation23 or conformational change, with conformational change being either allosteric24 or induced by mechanical force25,26.

The similarities in signalling between the TCR and other NTRs have led to the hypothesis that the KS mechanism may contribute to triggering by other NTRs4,27. Indeed, evidence for this has been reported for NKG2D in NK cells28, Dectin-129and FcyRs30 in macrophages, and CD28 in T cells31. However, the diversity of NTRs and their ligands, and the fact that many NTR ligands have yet to be identified, has hampered investigation of the triggering mechanism in a wider range of NTRs. We have recently developed a generic ligand system based on the SpyTag/SpyCatcher split protein, which enables cell-surface Streptactin to be used to engage any NTR incorporating a membrane-distal StrepTagII peptide32. Importantly, this generic ligand stimulated TCRs at the same surface density as the native TCR ligand, validating it as a suitable model system for investigating NTR triggering32.

In the present study we used this generic ligand system to explore the ligand requirement for triggering by representative members of 4 distinct NTR families (Fig. 1A): Signal regulatory protein β1 (SIRPβ1), Sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-type lectin 14 (Siglec 14), Natural killer receptor 44 (NKp44) and Triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1 (TREM-1). SIRPβ1 is highly homologous to the inhibitory receptor and therapeutic target SIRPα (Kharitonenkov et al.33). SIRPβ1 and SIRPα are examples of paired activatory/inhibitory NTRs4, with conserved extracellular regions but distinct transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains. The native ligand of SIRPβ1 is unknown but it is thought to promote phagocytosis in macrophages (Hayashi et al.34). Siglec 14 is a member of the sialic acid-binding Siglec family of receptors35,36. Siglec 14 and Siglec 5 are paired activatory and inhibitory NTRs, respectively (Angata et al.36). NKp44 is important for the activation and cytotoxic activity of natural killer cells and reportedly binds a wide range of ligands37. Finally, TREM-1 is an activatory member of a family of NTRs38 that has been reported to bind peptidoglycan recognition protein 1 (PGLYRP1) (Read et al.39) and extracellular actin (Fu et al.40). All four receptors associate with, and presumably signal using, the ITAM-containing adaptor protein DAP12 (Lanier and Bakker41).Fig. 1 Testing the effect of increasing ligand length on NTR activation.

A Schematic depiction of the components of the generic ligand system used to test the effect of increasing ligand length and valency. The shared DAP-12 signalling homodimer is grey. With tetravalent streptactin (not shown) all four of the binding sites are able to bind Steptag II. B Representative flow cytometry data from a conjugation assay between SIRPβ1 expressing THP1 receptor cells and CHO cells expressing short ligands coupled with the indicated concentration of monovalent Strep-Tactin SpyCatcher. Receptor and ligand cells were stained with CellTrace Violet and Far Red, respectively, and events in the upper right quadrant were presumed to be conjugates. C Conjugation of (left panel) and IL-8 secretion by (middle panel) SIRPβ1 expressing THP1 cells incubated with CHO cells expressing the indicated number of short (blue) or long (red) monovalent ligands, measured as described in the “Materials and methods” section using parameters determined in sFig. 1. IL-8 secretion is plotted against conjugation in the right panel. These are representative results from three independent experiments, which are combined in Fig. 2A for statistical analysis. Due to experimental constraints the stimulation and conjugation assays in this (and subsequent) experiment(s) were performed on successive days. The same result was obtained when performed on the same day (sFig. 2).

To investigate the triggering mechanism used by these NTRs we examined the effect of changing ligand size, mobility and valency on activation. In addition to using the same generic ligand, we used the same cell type and readouts for all NTRs, to facilitate comparison. Elongating the ligand inhibited activation via these receptors despite enhancing receptor/ligand mediated cell-cell conjugation. In contrast, changing the ligand mobility had little effect on conjugation or activation. Finally, while increasing the ligand valency increased cell-cell conjugation as well as activation, it decreased the level of activation at equivalent levels of cell-cell conjugation. Taken together, these results are more consistent with a role for the KS mechanism in triggering by these NTRs, and do not support a role for mechanical force or clustering.

Results

Varying ligand length

In the SpyTag-SpyCatcher system a covalent (isopeptide) bond spontaneously forms between Spytag and SpyCatcher when they are mixed together (Zakeri et al.42). In our previously described generic ligand system32, SpyTag is fused to the N-terminus of a transmembrane protein expressed on ligand-presenting CHO cells, forming the ligand anchor, while SpyCatcher is fused to a Strep-Tactin tetramer, which can have from one to four active binding sites, as required (Fig. 1A). The receptor is modified at its membrane-distal N-terminus to contain a Strep-tag II peptide, which binds monovalent Strep-Tactin with a KD of 43 µM32. This is within the affinity range typical of leucocyte cell-cell interactions3,43.

To test the effect of ligand length on activation via NTRs, we produced CHO cells expressing either a short or a long ligand anchor, where the latter includes a ~ 11 nm spacer comprising the four Ig domains of CD4 (Fig. 1A)44. By titrating the monovalent Strep-Tactin SpyCatcher we produced a panel of CHO cells with a range of binding sites. We used a previously described method to accurately quantify the number of Strep-Tactin binding sites presented by these cells32. This involved measuring the maximum number of biotin binding sites and the KD for Strep-Tactin SpyCatcher coupling to cells (sFig. 1) and using these parameters to calculate the number of binding sites, as described in the “Materials and methods” section.

We first measured the impact of ligand elongation on the receptor engagement using a cell-cell conjugation assay as a readout. For receptor cells we used THP-1 cells expressing the SIRPβ1 receptor with an N-terminal Strep-tag II peptide. THP-1 cells are a human monocytic cell line widely used as a model for studying monocyte/macrophage function45. They are a suitable model as SIRPβ, TREM-1, Siglec-14 and NKp44 are all known to be expressed on monocytes. The conjugation assay involves mixing receptor and ligand cells stained with different fluorescent dyes and measuring double positive events by flow cytometry (Fig. 1B, upper right quadrants). As expected, reducing the number of binding sites resulted in a decrease in the percentage of receptor cells in conjugates (Fig. 1B).

We then compared the conjugation efficacy of SIRPβ1 THP-1 cells mixed with short or long CHO cells presenting different numbers of binding sites. When plotting conjugates against binding sites, cells presenting the long ligand produced more conjugates (Fig. 1C, left panel). This suggests that increasing the ligand length promotes conjugate formation, which is consistent with other studies suggesting that increasing the length of short (< 8 nm) cell surface ligands improves receptor engagement11,31,46.

We next examined the effect of ligand length on SIRPβ1 mediated interleukin 8 (IL-8) production. IL-8 is inflammatory chemokine produced monocytes in response to a wide variety of activation signals47. It is widely used a convenient and reliable readout of THP-1 activation, with low levels of basal release and a rapid increase following stimulation48. Interestingly the long ligand stimulated less IL-8 production than the short ligand (Fig. 1C, middle panel), despite mediating improved conjugate formation. To normalise for differences in conjugate formation we plotted the functional IL-8 response against the percentage of receptor cells in conjugates (Fig. 1C, right panel). This confirmed that, at equivalent levels of conjugate formation, the long ligand induced lower levels of IL-8 production.

We performed conjugation and stimulation assays on other NTRs (Siglec 14, NKp44 and TREM-1) using the short or long generic ligand (Fig. 2). As in the case of SIRPβ1, the results for NKp44 and TREM-1 show an increase in conjugation efficacy when binding to the long ligand compared to the short ligand (Fig. 2, left data panels). This was not the case for Siglec 14, where no difference was seen (Fig. 2B, left data panel). Elongation of the ligand impaired activation of IL-8 release via all four NTRs, both before and after normalising for conjugate formation (Fig. 2, centre and right data panels, respectively).Fig. 2 The effect of NTR ligand length on activation via four NTRs.

THP-1 cells expressing (A) SIRPβ1, (B) Siglec 14, (C) NKp44 or (D) TREM-1 with N-terminal StrepTagII peptides were incubated with CHO cells expressing the indicated numbers of short (blue) or long (red) monovalent generic ligand binding sites and conjugate formation (left data panel) and IL-8 release (middle data panel) measured. Ligand binding sites were determined as described in the Materials and Methods using parameters determined in sFig. 1. The IL-8 release versus conjugation level is plotted in the right panels. The data from three biological replicates (including one SIRPβ1 replicate shown in Fig. 1) are plotted with the data normalised to the level of conjugation or stimulation achieved with the short ligand within each replicate. The data were fitted as described in the “Materials and methods” section and an F test was used to test the significance of differences between the fits.

One likely explanation for the effect of ligand length on activation efficiency is that increasing the ligand length increases the length of the NTR/ligand complex. If this is the case, activation should also be reduced by increasing the length of the NTRs. The extracellular regions of SIRPβ1 and Siglec 14 each contain 3 immunoglobulin superfamily (IgSF) domains, whereas the extracellular regions of NKp44 and TREM-1 only have 1 IgSF domain (Fig. 1A). To examine whether this size difference had a measurable impact we reanalysed the data in Fig. 2 to enable comparison of conjugation and activation via NTRs exposed to the same ligand (sFig. 3). Short NTRs (NKp44 and TREM-1) mediated lower levels of conjugation (sFig. 3, left panels) but high levels of stimulation when normalised for conjugation (sFig. 3, right panels), and this was observed with both short (sFig. 3A) and long (sFig. 3B) ligands. Taken together, these data show that elongation of these NTR/ligand complexes attentuates activation via these four NTRs.

Varying ligand mobility

We next examined the effect of varying the ligand anchor on NTR activation. We compared ligand anchors based on the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of CD80, CD43 and the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor of CD52. The CD43 cytoplasmic domain interacts with the actin cytoskeleton though Ezrin/Radixin/Moesin (ERM) proteins (Yonemura et al.49), and so is likely to be more firmly anchored. In contrast, CD52 is a GPI anchored protein and thus less firmly anchored, and presumably more mobile (Fig. 3A). To examine mobility, SpyCatcher-GFP was coupled to ligand anchors and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) performed (sFig. 4A). As expected, the CD52 anchor conferred greater mobility than the CD80 or CD43 anchor, which were similar (sFig. 4A and Fig. 3B).Fig. 3 Effect of ligand anchor on SIRPβ1 stimulation.

A Schematic depiction of the components of the generic ligand system used to test the effect of varying the ligand anchor. B The diffusion coefficients of the different ligand anchors were measured by FRAP after coupling GFP-Spycatcher. The mean and SD from three independent experiments were compared by ANOVA. C THP-1 cells expressing SIRPβ1 with an N-terminal StrepTagII peptide were incubated with CHO cells expressing the indicated number of ligand binding sites with CD80 (blue), CD43 (orange) or CD52 (green) anchors, and conjugate formation (top panel) and IL-8 release (middle panel) measured. Ligand binding sites were determined as described in the “Materials and methods” section using parameters determined in sFig. 4. The IL-8 release versus conjugation level is plotted in the bottom panel. The data from three biological replicates are plotted with the data normalised to the level of conjugation or stimulation achieved with the CD52 ligand anchor within each replicate. These data were fitted as described in the “Materials and methods” section and an F test was used to test the significance of differences between the fits collectively and pairwise (Tables).

We next compared the effect of changing the ligand mobility on conjugation with and stimulation of SIRPβ1 expressing THP-1 cells. It was not possible to attain as high a level of binding sites on the CD43 and CD52 ligand anchor cells but comparison was possible over a reasonable range. CD52 and CD43 anchored ligands induced similar levels of conjugate formation (Fig. 3C, top panel) and IL-8 release (Fig. 3C, middle panel) at comparable levels of binding sites. CD52 anchored ligand induced slightly less IL-8 release than CD43 anchored ligands when plotted against levels of conjugation (Fig. 3C, bottom panel). However this difference was small and could be the result of faster turnover of the CD52 anchored ligand (sFig. 5), which would reduce engagement during the 20 h stimulation. While the CD80 anchored ligand was less potent at mediating conjugation and IL-8 release, this was not a consequence of differences in lateral mobility which was similar to the lateral mobility of the CD43 anchored ligand (Fig. 3B). Taken together, these results suggest that changes in the ligand mobility do not affect SIRPβ1 mediated conjugation or triggering.

Varying ligand valency

Since ligand-induced clustering of receptors is often assumed to be the mechanism of receptor-activation, we next examined the effect of increasing the valency of the ligand from 1 to 4 by using a tetravalent form of Strep-Tactin Spycatcher. As expected, conjugation with tetravalent instead of monovalent Strep-Tactin Spycatcher resulted in a four-fold increase in the number of binding sites (sFig. 6). We then compared the ability of monovalent and tetravalent ligand to mediate conjugation and induce IL-8 secretion from THP-1 cells expressing the 4 different NTRs. Tetravalent ligand induced conjugation via all 4 NTRs at lower ligand binding site numbers than monovalent ligand (Fig. 4, left data panels), indicating that increasing the ligand valency increases NTR binding, presumably by increasing avidity. Increasing the valency enabled activation of all four receptors, as measured by IL-8 release, at much lower ligand binding sites (Fig. 4, middle data panels). However, after controlling for increased conjugate formation, tetravalent ligand was actually less effective than monovalent ligand at stimulating IL-8 release at equivalent levels of conjugation (Fig. 4, right panels). The same result was observed with the CD80, CD43 and CD52 ligand anchors (sFig. 7 and 8). These results indicate that, while increasing the valency of a cell surface-associated ligand enhances binding to NTRs, it does not increase activation via NTRs.Fig. 4 Effect of ligand valency on NTR stimulation.

THP-1 cells expressing (A) SIRPβ1, (B) Siglec 14, (C) NKp44 or (D) TREM-1 with N-terminal StrepTagII peptides were incubated with CHO cells expressing the indicated numbers of monovalent (filled circles) or tetravalent (open circles) short generic ligand binding sites and conjugate formation (left data panel) and IL-8 release (middle data panel) measured. Ligand binding sites were determined as described in the Materials and Methods using parameters determined in sFig. 6. The IL-8 release versus conjugation level is plotted in the right panels. The data from three biological replicates are plotted with the data normalised to the level of conjugation or stimulation achieved with the short tetravalent ligand within each replicate. These data were fitted as described in the “Materials and methods” section and an F test was used to test the significance of differences between the fits.

We next investigated whether activation of NTR by the high avidity tetravalent Strep-Tactin SpyCatcher was sensitive to ligand length. THP-1 cells expressing four representative NTRs were exposed to CHO cells presenting tetravalent Strep-Tactin SpyCatcher on either short or long CD80 anchors (Fig. 5). The short ligands were less effective at mediating conjugation than the long ligand for two (SIRPβ1 & NKp44) of the four NTRs (Fig. 5, left panels), but more effective at stimulating IL-8 production for three of the four NTRs (SIRPβ1, NKp44 and TREM-1), both before (Fig. 5, centre panels) and after (Fig. 5, right panels) controlling for conjugate formation. These results show that even high avidity NTR/ligand interactions remain sensitive to ligand length for three of the four NTRs studied here.Fig. 5 The effect of NTR ligand length on activation by tetravalent ligands.

THP-1 cells expressing (A) SIRPβ1, (B) Siglec 14, (C) NKp44 or (D) TREM-1 with N-terminal StrepTagII peptides were incubated with CHO cells expressing the indicated numbers of short (blue) or long (red) tetravalent ligand binding sites and conjugate formation (left panel) and IL-8 release (middle panel) measured. Ligand binding sites were determined as described in the Materials and Methods using parameters determined in sFig. 9. The IL-8 release versus conjugation level is plotted in the right panels. The data from three biological replicates are plotted with the data normalised to the level of conjugation or stimulation achieved with the short tetravalent ligand within each replicate. These data were fitted as described in the “Materials and methods” section and an F test was used to test the significance of differences between the fits.

Discussion

We have exploited our previously described generic cell surface ligand system32 to explore the effects of varying ligand length, mobility, and valency on activation of four NTRs, SIRPβ1, Siglec-14, NKp44 and TREM-1. One advantage of this system is that it enables titration of ligand surface density, enabling detection of quantitative differences in the ability of cell-surface ligands to mediate conjugation and stimulation. A second advantage is that it enables multiple NTRs to be assessed using the same set of ligands, increasing throughput and facilitating comparisons between NTRs. Comparison was also enabled by expressing them in the same cell type and using the same functional readout. A third advantage is that it enables analysis of orphan NTRs, such as SIRPβ1, whose ligands have yet to be identified.

Our first key finding is that elongation of generic ligands abrogated activation of all four NTRs. This was not a consequence of decreased binding as elongated ligands mediate enhanced cell-cell conjugation. While this contrasted with results in a supported lipid bilayer (SLB) system, in which elongation of CD48 abrogated CD2 binding50, it is consistent with results obtained with cell surface expressed ligands, including CD4811,28,31,46. A likely explanation for this is that ligands on cell surfaces, unlike ligands on SLBs, are crowded by the larger molecules present at high densities. Our finding that long NTRs were less effectively activated than short NTRs suggest that the increased NTR/ligand length abrogates NTR signalling. These data are most consistent with the KS mechanism of NTR triggering27, since increasing the NTR/ligand length would be expected to increase the intermembrane distance and thus reduce segregation of inhibitory receptor tyrosine phosphatases such as CD45 from the engaged NTR11. Numerous studies have confirmed that increasing receptor/ligand length abrogates CD45 segregation from engaged NTRs11,22,30,31,51,52. In one of these studies an elongated high affinity TCR ligand, derived from the OKT3 monoclonal antibody, was able to activate TCRs despite less efficient exclusion of CD4551. However, no titration of the ligand number was performed, and a lower affinity variant of the same ligand was unable to activate T cells51.

An alternative explanation for our finding that elongation abrogates activation through NTRs is that this could decrease the level of force experienced by the NTR upon ligand engagement53. These data are therefore also consistent with models of NTR triggering postulating that a mechanical force imposed upon ligand binding alters the conformation of the NTR25,26. However, whether changing ligand length affects the force experienced by an NTR has yet to be confirmed, and it remains unclear how such a conformational change of NTRs could be transmitted through the membrane to enhance phosphorylation of their cytoplasmic domains. Such a mechanism is difficult to reconcile with enormous structural variability of NTRs4 and the fact that chimeric NTRs such as CARs tolerate extensive variation in the regions (hinge, transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains) that couple their ligand binding domains with their tyrosine-containing signalling motifs54,55.

A second key finding is that changing the mobility of the ligand anchor had little impact on its ability to mediate activation via NTRs. The CD52 anchor comprises a lipid (GPI) which we show confers greater lateral mobility. While there is only a ~ 2 fold change in mobility, it should be noted that membrane diffusion in cells is far slower than in model membranes, likely because it is impaired by membrane proteins that associate with the cortical actin cytoskeleton, which have been termed ‘picket fences’56,57. A lipid anchor also allows a ligand to be more easily extracted from the plasma membrane by force. It follows that the amount of force that can be exerted on an NTR, both tangential and perpendicular to the membrane, should be lower with lipid-anchored than a transmembrane-anchored ligand, such as CD43, able to bind to the actin cytoskeleton through ERM proteins. Thus, our finding that CD43 and CD52 anchors were similarly effective at activating an NTR does not support a role for mechanical force in triggering for these NTRs. We note, however, that we did not directly measured force. Much stronger evidence against a role for force was reported by Göhring et al. 58, who showed that changing the lateral mobility of the TCR ligand in an SLB system by ~1000 fold had no effect on TCR triggering despite substantially changing the force experienced by the TCR58.

The third key finding is that increasing the valency of the NTR ligand did not increase activation of the NTR after controlling for enhanced NTR binding, as assessed by cell-cell conjugation. This result contrasts with the findings obtained with soluble NTR ligands such as cross-linked antibodies and natural ligands engineered to be multivalent, where increasing the valency is required for NTR triggering59,60. One possible explanation for this discrepancy between the effect of valency with soluble and surface associated ligand is that a soluble multivalent ligand could, by forming clusters of NTRs, exclude molecules with bulky ectodomain, such as CD45, from clustered NTRs, whereas soluble monovalent ligands are unable to do this. In contrast, even a monovalent surface-associated ligand can trap the NTR in zones of a close intermembrane contact from which CD45 and CD148 are excluded. While our finding that tetravalent ligands are less effective at activating NTRs than monovalent ligands at equivalent levels of NTR binding requires confirmation and further analysis, the fact that increased valency does not enhance NTR triggering argues against aggregation as the primary mechanism of physiological NTR triggering. Further evidence against this model is that almost all cell surface NTR ligands that have been identified to date are monovalent4. In contrast, cell surface receptors known to signal by binding induced multimerisation, such as class III tyrosine kinase receptors61 and TNF receptor superfamily members62, typically have multivalent ligands.

Our finding that elongation of a tetravalent generic ligand did not impair activation via Siglec 14, while it did impair activation via the three other NTRs, suggests that, for some NTRs, increasing ligand valency can bypass the need for the KS mechanism. It is noteworthy that some Siglec family members, including the Siglec-14 paired receptor Siglec-563, are able to form disulfide linked dimers. Dimeric Siglec-14 would allow formation of large ‘zipper-like’ aggregates with tetravalent generic ligand, enabling exclusion of CD45 and CD148 without needing the KS mechanism.

Taken together, our finding that activation via NTRs is abrogated by ligand elongation and aggregation and unaffected by the mobility of the ligand anchor supports our hypothesis that NTRs signal by the KS mechanism. While our results focus only on four representative NTRs, these results are likely to apply to a larger number of NTRs, including other members of the Siglec and TREM families and NTRs from other families that signal via the DAP-12 adaptor64. As reviewed in the Introduction, there is already evidence that many NTRs that do not associate with DAP12, including the TCR, NKG2D, CD28, and FcγR, exploit the KS mechanism for triggering. Taken together with the results presented in this paper, this suggests that the KS mechanism is used by NTRs which signal through intrinsic tyrosine motifs (CD28, FcγRI and FcγRII) and a variety of signalling subunits (DAP12, DAP10, CD3δεγ, CD247, and FcRγ).

One limitation of the present work is that we used artificial ligands rather than native ligands. While we have previously validated the generic ligand system for the T cell receptor32, this is more challenging for other NTRs, as their ligands cannot easily be titrated. Our recent development of Combicells65, which exploit the SpyCatcher/SpyTag system to present native ligand on antigen-presenting cells, should enable our key results to be confirmed with native ligands, where known. A second limitation, which is a consequence of the system used, is lack of imaging data of the interface between THP-1 cells and CHO cells. Advanced microscopy, beyond the scope of this study, is likely needed to image the molecular events in the microvilli-like structures and close contact areas involved in NTR triggering at cell-cell interfaces18,66,67. A third limitation is that we only test one prediction of the KS model, that elongation of the receptor/ligand complex will abrogate NTR triggering. Other predictions of the KS model should be tested in future work. A final limitation is that we did not examine early signalling steps, such as tyrosine phosphorylation of DAP-12. Such studies are very difficult to perform in the high-throughtput manner required for our titration-based analysis, and are unlikely to provide further insights into the the ligand requirements for activation of these NTRs.

Methods

Constructs

Receptor sequences for SIRPβ1, Siglec 14, NKp44 and TREM-1 were inserted into the pHR-SIN-BX-Strep-tag II plasmid as described by (Denham et al., 32). The same constructs containing the DAP12 adaptor protein was also used.

For the ligand anchors DNA encoding the Igk leader sequence (bold), HA tag (italics), SpyTag (underlined) bracketed by GGS linkers, and the hinge, transmembrane and intracellular regions of mouse CD80, mouse CD43, or human CD52 (italics underlined) was inserted into the vector pEE14. To express the long ligand anchor DNA encoding human CD4 (italics bold) was inserted between the SpyTag and CD80 hinge. This included an R to D point mutation (underlined) to prevent CD4 binding MHC class II. After expression CD52 anchor is cleaved and linked to GPI anchor at the serine residue marked in bold.

CD80 anchor (short)

M E T D T L L L W V L L L W V P G S T G D Y P Y D V P D Y A T G G S A H I V M V D A Y K P T K G G S G G S H V S E D F T W E K P P E D P P D S K N T L V L F G A G F G A V I T V V V I V V I I K C F C K H R S C F R R N E A S R E T N N S L T F G P E E A L A E Q T V F L

CD80 anchor (long)

M E T D T L L L W V L L L W V P G S T G D Y P Y D V P D Y A T G G S A H I V M V D A Y K P T K G G S G G S K V V L G K K G D T V E L T C T A S Q K K S I Q F H W K N S N Q I K I L G N Q G S F L T K G P S K L N D D A D S R R S L W D Q G N F P L I I K N L K I E D S D T Y I C E V E D Q K E E V Q L L V F G L T A N S D T H L L Q G Q S L T L T L E S P P G S S P S V Q C R S P R G K N I Q G G K T L S V S Q L E L Q D S G T W T C T V L Q N Q K K V E F K I D I V V L A F Q K A S S I V Y K K E G E Q V E F S F P L A F T V E K L T G S G E L W W Q A E R A S S S K S W I T F D L K N K E V S V K R V T Q D P K L Q M G K K L P L H L T L P Q A L P Q Y A G S G N L T L A L E A K T G K L H Q E V N L V V M R A T Q L Q K N L T C E V W G P T S P K L M L S L K L E N K E A K V S K R E K A V W V L N P E A G M W Q C L L S D S G Q V L L E S N I K V L P T R S H V S E D F T W E K P P E D P P D S K N T L V L F G A G F G A V I T V V V I V V I I K C F C K H R S C F R R N E A S R E T N N S L T F G P E E A L A E Q T V F L

CD43 anchor

M E T D T L L L W V L L L W V P G S T G D Y P Y D V P D Y A T G G S A H I V M V D A Y K P T K G G S G G S Q E S S G M L L V P M L I A L V V V L A L V A L L L L W R Q R Q K R R T G A L T L S G G G K R N G V V D A W A G P A R V P D E E A T T T S G A G G N K G S E V L E T E G S G Q R P T L T T F F S R R K S R Q G S L V L E E L K P G S G P N L K G E E E P L V G S E D E A V E T P T S D G P Q A K D E A A P Q S L

CD52 anchor

M E T D T L L L W V L L L W V P G S T G D Y P Y D V P D Y A T G G S A H I V M V D A Y K P T K G G S G G S D T S Q T S S P S A S S N I S G G I F L F F V A N A I I H L F C F S

Strep-Tactin-SpyCatcher sequence

Strep-Tactin is underlined, SpyCatcher is in italics and the polyaspartate sequence is in bold.

M A E A G I T G T W Y N Q L G S T F I V T A G A D G A L T G T Y V T A R G N A E S R Y V L T G R Y D S A P A T D G S G T A L G W T V A W K N N Y R N A H S A T T W S G Q Y V G G A E A R I N T Q W L L T S G T T E A N A W K S T L V G H D T F T K V K P S A A S D D D G D D D G D D D D S A T H I K F S K R D E D G K E L A G A T M E L R D S S G K T I S T W I S D G Q V K D F Y L Y P G K Y T F V E T A A P D G Y E V A T A I T F T V N E Q G Q V T V N G K A T K G D A H I

Strep-Tactin sequence

M A E A G I T G T W Y N Q L G S T F I V T A G A D G A L T G T Y V T A R G N A E S R Y V L T G R Y D S A P A T D G S G T A L G W T V A W K N N Y R N A H S A T T W S G Q Y V G G A E A R I N T Q W L L T S G T T E A N A W K S T L V G H D T F T K V K P S A A S

Dead Streptavidin sequence

Bold amino acids mark substitutions in order to prevent binding to Strep tag II or biotin.

M A E A G I T G T W Y A Q L G D T F I V T A G A D G A L T G T Y E A A V G A E S R Y V L T G R Y D S A P A T D G S G T A L G W T V A W K N N Y R N A H S A T T W S G Q Y V G G A E A R I N T Q W L L T S G T T E A N A W K S T L V G H D T F T K V K P S A A S

The GFP-SpyCatcher construct was described in (Denham et al., 32).

THP-1 cell lines

THP-1 cells (ATCC #TIB 202) were maintained in RPMI-1640 media (Sigma-Aldrich #R8758) supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1 in 100 penicillin/streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific #15140122) at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 containing incubator.

CHO cell lines

Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) mock cells were maintained in DMEM (Sigma-Aldrich #D6429) supplemented with 5% FBS and 1 in 100 penicillin/streptomycin. CHO ligand anchor cells (short and long) were maintained in L-Glutamine-free DMEM (Sigma-Aldrich #D6546) supplemented with 10% dialysed FBS (dialysed three times against 10 L PBS), 1 in 100 penicillin/streptomycin, 1x GSEM supplement (Sigma-Aldrich #G9785) and 50 μM L-Methionine sulfoximine (Sigma-Aldrich #M5379).

Lentiviral transduction of THP-1 cells

Either receptor-expressing lentivector alone, or with the DAP12 adaptor-expressing lentivector, was co-transfected with the lentiviral packaging plasmids pRSV-Rev (Addgene plasmd #12253), pMDLg/pRRE (Addgene plasmd #12251) and pMD2.g (Addgene plasmd #12259) into HEK293T cells using X-tremeGENETM HP (Sigma-Aldrich 6366546001) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Two days after transfection, viral supernatants were harvested, filtered (0.45 µM syringe filter) and used for the transduction of THP-1 cells in the presence of 5 µg mL−1 Polybrene.

Analysing receptor and adaptor expression using flow cytometry and cell sorting by fluorescence-activated cell sorting

Cells were analysed for receptor surface expression by flow cytometry using anti-Strep-tag II antibody StrepMAB™ directly conjugated to Oyster 645 (IBA Lifesciences #2-1555-050), or unconjugated StrepMAB™ (IBA Lifesciences #2-1507-001) with anti-mouse IgG1 antibody Alexa Fluor 647 (Thermo Fisher Scientific #A-21240), on a Cytek DxP8. Introduced adaptor expression was tested via expression of EmGFP encoded on the adaptor lentivector. Cells were sorted for matched high expression of receptor plus introduced adaptor by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) (MoFlo Astrios, Beckman Coulter).

Transfection of CHO cells with various ligand anchors

CHO cells were transfected with either pEE14 (CHO mock) or pEE14-ligand anchor (CHO ligand anchor) using Xtreme-GENE 9TM as per the manufacturer’s instructions. Transfected lines were cultured in the appropriate selection media after 48 h.

Checking ligand anchor expression by flow cytometry

CHO Cells were analysed for ligand anchor surface expression by flow cytometry using anti-HA-Tag antibody Alexa Fluor 647 (6E2; Cell Signalling Technology). Alternatively, cells were coupled with saturating concentration of monovalent StrepTactin SpyCatcher. Biotin ATTO 647 was then added at 2 μM for 30 min. The cells were washed 3 times in PBS 1%BSA before they were fixed in PBS 1% formaldehyde and analysed via flow cytometry.

Expression and purification of monovalent and tetravalent Strep-Tactin-SpyCatcher

Strep-Tactin SpyCatcher and dead streptavidin (monovalent) or Strep-Tactin SpyCatcher and Strep-Tactin (tetravalent) expressed in Escherichia coli BL21-CodonPlus (DE3)-RIPL cells (Agilent Technologies #230280) were combined and refolded from inclusion bodies. Inclusion bodies were washed in BugBuster (Merck Millipore #70921) supplemented with lysozyme, protease inhibitors, DNase I and magnesium sulfate as per the manufacturers’ instructions. Subunits were then mixed at a 3:1 molar ratio to improve the yield of the desired tetramer. The subunits were refolded by rapid dilution in cold PBS and contaminates removed via precipitation using ammonium sulfate before additional ammonium sulfate was added to precipitate the desired tetramer. Precipitated protein was resuspended in 20 mM Tris pH 8.0, filtered (0.22 µm syringe filter), and loaded onto a Mono Q HR 5/5 column (GE Healthcare Life Sciences). Desired tetramers were eluted using a linear gradient of 0-0.5 M NaCl in 20 mM Tris pH 8.0, concentrated, and buffer exchanged into 20 mM MES, 140 mM NaCl pH 6.0 (Denham et al., 32).

Coupling CHO generic ligand cells

Ligand anchor expressing or mock transduced CHO cells were incubated with various concentrations of monovalent or tetravalent Strep-Tactin SpyCatcher in 20 mM MES, 140 mM NaCl, pH 6.0 and 1% BSA for 10 min at RT. Unbound Strep-Tactin SpyCatcher was removed by washing three times with PBS 1% BSA.

FACS sorting of ligand anchor expressing CHO cells

CHO short and long cells were coupled with a saturating concentration of monovalent Strep-Tactin SpyCatcher. Biotin ATTO 647 (ATTO-TEC #AD 647-71) was then added at 2 µM for one hour and the excess washed off with PBS 1% BSA. The short and long CHO cells were then sorted for matched expression of atto 647 signal corresponding to the expression level of ligand anchor using FACS (MoFlo Astrios, Beckman Coulter).

Biotin-4-fluorescein quenching assay

The valency of purified monovalent and tetravalent Strep-Tactin SpyCatcher was measured using biotin-4-fluorescein (Sigma-Aldrich #B9431-5MG) which when bound to Strep-Tactin become quenched. Monovalent and tetravalent Strep-Tactin SpyCatcher was incubated with a titration of biotin-4-fluorescein in black, opaque plates for 30 min at RT in PBS 1% BSA. Fluorescence was measured (λex 485 nm, λex 520 nm) using a plate reader. Fluorescence values were corrected for background fluorescence before analysis. Negative control (buffer alone) data were fitted with the linear regression. Sample data was fitted with a segmental linear regression, equation below, where X is the biotin-4-fluorescein concentration, Y is fluorescence (AU), X0 is the biotin-4-fluorescein concentration at which the line segments intersect. Slope1 was constrained to zero and is the gradient of the first line segment, slope2 is the gradient of the second line segment. Intercept1 was constrained to zero and is the Y value at which the first line segment intersects the Y axis. Slope2 was constrained to the gradient given by the linear regression of the negative control.Y1=Intercept1+Slope1*X

YatX0=Slope1*X0+Intercept1

Y2=YatX0+Slope2*(X−X0)

Y=IF(X<X0,Y1,Y2)

The X0 value was converted into an estimate of the number of biotin-binding sites per tetramer using the concentration of Strep-Tactin SpyCatcher added and assuming complete binding of biotin-4-fluorescein.

Measurement of ligand binding sites on cells

Ligand-anchor expressing or mock transduced CHO cells (3 × 106) were pre-incubated with a saturating concentration of monovalent or tetravalent Strep-Tactin SpyCatcher. The above biotin-4-fluorescein quenching assay was performed in the same manner but with a known number of cells. The X0 term (calculated from the curve fit using equations above) was converted to the average number of binding sites per cell using the equation below, where N is the average number of ligands per cell, X0 is the saturation concentration of biotin-4-fluorescein extracted (M), V is the sample volume (L), NA is Avogadro’s constant and C is the number of cells in the sample.N=X0*V*NAC

To measure relative levels of coupled SpyCatcher per cell, ligand cells were pre-incubated with a range of concentrations of monovalent or tetravalent Strep-Tactin SpyCatcher or buffer alone (as a negative control) before being incubated with 2 μM biotin ATTO 488 (ATTO-TEC #AD 488-71) pre-mixed with 40 μM biotin for 30 min at RT. The presence of biotin minimises the self-quenching activity of ATTO dye observed with tetravalent Strep-Tactin. Cells were analysed by flow cytometry and the gMFI when cells were incubated with buffer alone instead of Strep-Tactin SpyCatcher was subtracted from all corresponding sample gMFI values. These values were then fitted with the single site binding model, equation below, where Y is the gMFI (AU), Bmax is the maximum specific SpyCatcher binding indicated by gMFI in AU, X is the [Streptactin-SpyCatcher] added (M) and KD is the [SpyCatcher] that yields 50% maximal binding to CHO cells (M).Y=Bmax*XKd+X

To convert Y values into the average number of binding sites per ligand cell, the number of binding sites per cell at saturating monovalent/tetravalent Strep-Tactin SpyCatcher concentration calculated in the biotin-4-fluorescein assay was substituted into the equation above as Bmax. Y values were then re-calculated following this adjustment. This method was followed in each independent experiment and then an average value for the KD and Bmax was used when combining replicates.

Fluorescent recovery after photobleaching

CHO cells (1 × 105) expressing the three ligand anchors (CD80, CD43 and CD52) were transferred to a 35 mm glass bottom dish one day before imaging. To prepare cells for imaging each dish was washed 3 times with coupling buffer plus 10% FBS. SpyCatcher-GFP was then added in excess (approximately 10 μM) and left for 10 min. Before washing the cells three times in PBS 1% BSA 10% FBS. Cells were transferred to the Olympus FV1200 laser scanning microscope with 37 °C chamber for equilibration. The 60X magnification lens was used to locate cells spread over the glass coverslip. A small area of the cell (approximately 10%) was selected a few control images were taken before a 20 s bleach performed. A time lapse series of images was then taken to track the recovery of the GFP signal.

Time lapse image series were imported into ImageJ for analysis. For each time lapse the bleach area was selected (bleach) along with a control area which was taken to be the rest of the cell contact with the glass (control area) and a negative control area around the outside of the cell (negative). Firstly, the intensity from the negative area was subtracted from the bleach and control area. The bleach area was then divided by the control area for each time frame and these values were normalised to the control image before the bleach was performed. These values were then plotted against time and the equation below used to find the half time for each ligand anchor.Y=Y0+(Plateau−Y0)*(1−e−K*x)

Where Y0 is the value when X (time) is zero, Plateau is the Y value at infinite times and K is the rate constant from which the half time is derived.

The half time value could then be converted into the diffusion coefficient using the equation below (Soumpasis, 1983).Diffusioncoefficient=0.224*r2/halftime

Where 0.224 is a constant for a circular bleach area, r is the radius of the bleach area, and the half time is the derived from fitting the one phase association equation to the bleach recovery above.

Ligand turnover

CHO ligand anchor cells were incubated with 15 μM monovalent Strep-Tactin SpyCatcher (or buffer alone) as described above and incubated at 37 °C to match stimulation assays for the time points indicated. Cells were analysed for generic ligand surface expression using ATTO 488 biotin as above and normalised to the geometric fluorescence intensity value at time 0. To calculate the decay, the gMFI values were fitted with the equation below where Y0 is the Y value when X = 0, Plateau is the Y value at which the curve reaches a plateau, X is time in minutes, and K is the rate constant in inverse minutes.Y=Y0−Plateau.e−K.X+Plateau

IL-8 production

CHO ligand anchor cells (2 ×105) coupled with either monovalent/tetravalent Strep-Tactin SpyCatcher or buffer alone were mixed with single Strep-tag II tagged receptor and adaptor expressing THP-1 or untransduced THP-1 cells (1 ×105) in DMEM 5% FBS, 1 in 100 penicillin/streptomycin, 2 μg mL−1 avidin. Cells were incubated in a 37 °C 10% CO2 containing incubator for 20 h. Supernatants were harvested and assayed for IL-8 by ELISA following manufacturer’s instructions (Thermo Fisher Scientific #88808688).

Conjugation assays

Ligand cells were stained with CellTrace Far Red (Thermo Fisher Scientific #C34564) at a final concentration of 1 μM in PBS at a density of 1 × 106 cells per ml. THP-1 receptor cells were stained with CellTrace Violet (Thermo Fisher Scientific #C34557) at a final concentration of 1 μM in PBS for 20 min. CHO Ligand cells (4 ×105) coupled with either monovalent/tetravalent Strep-Tactin SpyCatcher were mixed with (2 ×105) THP-1 cells in PBS 1% BSA on Ice for 1 h. Conjugation efficacy was analysed by flow cytometry.

Due to experimental constraints stimulation and conjugation assays were completed on successive days. However, we confirmed that the same result was observed when the stimulation and conjugation assays were performed in parallel on the same day by splitting the cells in half for each assay (Supplementary Fig. 2).

Data analysis, statistics and reproducibility

For receptor stimulation assays, IL-8 concentrations in negative controls (where CHO cells were pre-incubated with buffer alone instead of Strep-Tactin SpyCatcher) were subtracted from corresponding sample IL-8 concentrations to correct for background levels. Dose-response curves were then fitted with the below equation where Y is the measured cell response (pg mL−1), Bottom and Top are the minimum and maximum cell response respectively (pg mL−1), EC50 is the number of binding sites per cell that yields a half maximal response, X is the number of binding sites per cell and Hill slope relates to the steepness of the curve.Y=Bottom+(XHillslope)(Top−Bottom)XHillslope+EC50Hillslope

For conjugate assays the percentage of THP-1 cells forming conjugates was calculated using the formula below. The data was then fit using the same dose response equation above except with X being the percentage of THP-1 cells in conjugates, normalised where indicated.ReceptorcellsinConjugates(%)=DoublepositiveeventsReceptoronlyevents+Doublepositiveevents*100

To plot stimulation as a function of conjugation the average number of binding sites used in the stimulation assay were interpolated from the fit of the conjugation data using the four parameter dose response model. The IL-8 values from the stimulation were then plotted against the interpolated values of conjugate formation.

To enable the results from multiple experiments to be included in single plots data were normalised. This increased the statistical power of the experiments by increasing the number of data points for each fit. For statistical analysis F tests, t tests ANOVA were performed as appropriate and results presented with the following symbols: ns, not significant ; *p < 0.05; **p  < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary information

Peer Review File

Supplementary Information

Description of Additional Supplementary File

Supplementary Data

Reporting Summary

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s42003-024-06817-y.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge Mark Howarth for providing Strep-Tactin, streptavidin, SpyTag and SpyCatcher constructs and for helpful discussions and advice. We thank Marion H Brown and Omer Dushek and their groups for helpful discussion. This work was supported by a Wellcome Trust Senior Investigator Award (P.A.v.d.M., grant reference101799/Z/13:/Z) and a Nuffield Medical Fellowship from the Australian Academy of Science (J.G., grant reference: #1016848).

Author contributions

The study was conceived by P.A.v.d.M. and J.G., the experiments were performed by M.I.B. with reagents prepared by R.L.P. and E.M.D., the paper was drafted by M.I.B. and P.A.v.d.M. and finalised by all authors.

Peer review

Peer review information

Communications Biology thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Primary Handling Editors: Dr Huan Bao and Dr Ophelia Bu. A peer review file is available.

Data availability

The source data underlying the graphs in the study can be found in Supplementary Data.

Competing interests

PAvdM is a founder and consultant for MatchBio Limited.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Jesse Goyette, Philip Anton van der Merwe.
==== Refs
References

1. Springer TA Adhesion receptors of the immune system Nature 1990 346 425 434 10.1038/346425a0 1974032
Springer, T. A. Adhesion receptors of the immune system. Nature 346, 425–434 (1990).1974032 10.1038/346425a0
2. Barclay, A. N. et al. The Leucocyte Antigen Factsbook. (Academic Press, 1997).
3. Shilts J A physical wiring diagram for the human immune system Nature 2022 608 397 404 10.1038/s41586-022-05028-x 35922511
Shilts, J. et al. A physical wiring diagram for the human immune system. Nature 608, 397–404 (2022).35922511 10.1038/s41586-022-05028-x
4. Dushek O Goyette J van der Merwe PA Non‐catalytic tyrosine‐phosphorylated receptors Immunol. Rev. 2012 250 258 276 10.1111/imr.12008 23046135
Dushek, O., Goyette, J. & van der Merwe, P. A. Non‐catalytic tyrosine‐phosphorylated receptors. Immunol. Rev. 250, 258–276 (2012).23046135 10.1111/imr.12008
5. Sharma P Allison JP The future of immune checkpoint therapy Science 2015 348 56 61 10.1126/science.aaa8172 25838373
Sharma, P. & Allison, J. P. The future of immune checkpoint therapy. Science 348, 56–61 (2015).25838373 10.1126/science.aaa8172
6. June CH Sadelain M Chimeric antigen receptor therapy N. Engl. J. Med. 2018 379 64 73 10.1056/NEJMra1706169 29972754
June, C. H. & Sadelain, M. Chimeric antigen receptor therapy. N. Engl. J. Med. 379, 64–73 (2018).29972754 10.1056/NEJMra1706169
7. Secrist JP Burns LA Karnitz L Koretzky GA Abraham RT Stimulatory effects of the protein tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor, pervanadate, on T-cell activation events J. Biol. Chem. 1993 268 5886 5893 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)53403-7 8383678
Secrist, J. P., Burns, L. A., Karnitz, L., Koretzky, G. A. & Abraham, R. T. Stimulatory effects of the protein tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor, pervanadate, on T-cell activation events. J. Biol. Chem. 268, 5886–5893 (1993).8383678 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)53403-7
8. O’Shea JJ McVicar DW Bailey TL Burns C Smyth MJ Activation of human peripheral blood T lymphocytes by pharmacological induction of protein-tyrosine phosphorylation Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 1992 89 10306 10310 10.1073/pnas.89.21.10306 1279675
O’Shea, J. J., McVicar, D. W., Bailey, T. L., Burns, C. & Smyth, M. J. Activation of human peripheral blood T lymphocytes by pharmacological induction of protein-tyrosine phosphorylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 10306–10310 (1992).1279675 10.1073/pnas.89.21.10306
9. Davis SJ van der Merwe PA The structure and ligand interactions of CD2: implications for T-cell function Immunol. Today 1996 17 177 187 10.1016/0167-5699(96)80617-7 8871350
Davis, S. J. & van der Merwe, P. A. The structure and ligand interactions of CD2: implications for T-cell function. Immunol. Today 17, 177–187 (1996).8871350 10.1016/0167-5699(96)80617-7
10. van der Merwe PA Davis SJ Shaw AS Dustin ML Cytoskeletal polarization and redistribution of cell-surface molecules during T cell antigen recognition Semin. Immunol. 2000 12 5 21 10.1006/smim.2000.0203 10723794
van der Merwe, P. A., Davis, S. J., Shaw, A. S. & Dustin, M. L. Cytoskeletal polarization and redistribution of cell-surface molecules during T cell antigen recognition. Semin. Immunol. 12, 5–21 (2000).10723794 10.1006/smim.2000.0203
11. Choudhuri K Wiseman D Brown MH Gould K van der Merwe PA T-cell receptor triggering is critically dependent on the dimensions of its peptide-MHC ligand Nature 2005 436 578 582 10.1038/nature03843 16049493
Choudhuri, K., Wiseman, D., Brown, M. H., Gould, K. & van der Merwe, P. A. T-cell receptor triggering is critically dependent on the dimensions of its peptide-MHC ligand. Nature 436, 578–582 (2005).16049493 10.1038/nature03843
12. Varma R Campi G Yokosuka T Saito T Dustin ML T cell receptor-proximal signals are sustained in peripheral microclusters and terminated in the central supramolecular activation cluster Immunity 2006 25 117 127 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.04.010 16860761
Varma, R., Campi, G., Yokosuka, T., Saito, T. & Dustin, M. L. T cell receptor-proximal signals are sustained in peripheral microclusters and terminated in the central supramolecular activation cluster. Immunity 25, 117–127 (2006).16860761 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.04.010
13. James JR Vale RD Biophysical mechanism of T-cell receptor triggering in a reconstituted system Nature 2012 487 64 69 10.1038/nature11220 22763440
James, J. R. & Vale, R. D. Biophysical mechanism of T-cell receptor triggering in a reconstituted system. Nature 487, 64–69 (2012).22763440 10.1038/nature11220
14. Cordoba S-P The large ectodomains of CD45 and CD148 regulate their segregation from and inhibition of ligated T-cell receptor Blood 2013 121 4295 4302 10.1182/blood-2012-07-442251 23580664
Cordoba, S.-P. et al. The large ectodomains of CD45 and CD148 regulate their segregation from and inhibition of ligated T-cell receptor. Blood 121, 4295–4302 (2013).23580664 10.1182/blood-2012-07-442251
15. Chang VT Initiation of T cell signaling by CD45 segregation at “close contacts.” Nat. Immunol. 2016 17 574 582 10.1038/ni.3392 26998761
Chang, V. T. et al. Initiation of T cell signaling by CD45 segregation at “close contacts.”. Nat. Immunol. 17, 574–582 (2016).26998761 10.1038/ni.3392
16. Schmid EM Size-dependent protein segregation at membrane interfaces Nat. Phys. 2016 12 704 711 10.1038/nphys3678 27980602
Schmid, E. M. et al. Size-dependent protein segregation at membrane interfaces. Nat. Phys. 12, 704–711 (2016).27980602 10.1038/nphys3678
17. Chen KY Trapping or slowing the diffusion of T cell receptors at close contacts initiates T cell signaling Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2021 118 e2024250118 10.1073/pnas.2024250118 34526387
Chen, K. Y. et al. Trapping or slowing the diffusion of T cell receptors at close contacts initiates T cell signaling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2024250118 (2021).34526387 10.1073/pnas.2024250118
18. Jenkins E Antigen discrimination by T cells relies on size-constrained microvillar contact Nat. Commun. 2023 14 1611 10.1038/s41467-023-36855-9 36959206
Jenkins, E. et al. Antigen discrimination by T cells relies on size-constrained microvillar contact. Nat. Commun. 14, 1611 (2023).36959206 10.1038/s41467-023-36855-9
19. Razvag Y Neve-Oz Y Sajman J Reches M Sherman E Nanoscale kinetic segregation of TCR and CD45 in engaged microvilli facilitates early T cell activation Nat. Commun. 2018 9 732 10.1038/s41467-018-03127-w 29467364
Razvag, Y., Neve-Oz, Y., Sajman, J., Reches, M. & Sherman, E. Nanoscale kinetic segregation of TCR and CD45 in engaged microvilli facilitates early T cell activation. Nat. Commun. 9, 732 (2018).29467364 10.1038/s41467-018-03127-w
20. Burroughs NJ Lazic Z van der Merwe PA Ligand detection and discrimination by spatial relocalization: a kinase-phosphatase segregation model of TCR activation Biophys. J. 2006 91 1619 1629 10.1529/biophysj.105.080044 16751250
Burroughs, N. J., Lazic, Z. & van der Merwe, P. A. Ligand detection and discrimination by spatial relocalization: a kinase-phosphatase segregation model of TCR activation. Biophys. J. 91, 1619–1629 (2006).16751250 10.1529/biophysj.105.080044
21. Wilhelm KB Height, but not binding epitope, affects the potency of synthetic TCR agonists Biophys. J. 2021 120 3869 3880 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.08.027 34453921
Wilhelm, K. B. et al. Height, but not binding epitope, affects the potency of synthetic TCR agonists. Biophys. J. 120, 3869–3880 (2021).34453921 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.08.027
22. Xiao Q Size-dependent activation of CAR-T cells Sci. Immunol. 2022 7 eabl3995 10.1126/sciimmunol.abl3995 35930653
Xiao, Q. et al. Size-dependent activation of CAR-T cells. Sci. Immunol. 7, eabl3995 (2022).35930653 10.1126/sciimmunol.abl3995
23. Goyette J Nieves DJ Ma Y Gaus K How does T cell receptor clustering impact on signal transduction? J. cell Sci. 2019 132 jcs226423 10.1242/jcs.226423 30745330
Goyette, J., Nieves, D. J., Ma, Y. & Gaus, K. How does T cell receptor clustering impact on signal transduction? J. cell Sci. 132, jcs226423 (2019).30745330 10.1242/jcs.226423
24. Schamel WW Alarcón B Minguet S The TCR is an allosterically regulated macromolecular machinery changing its conformation while working Immunol. Rev. 2019 291 8 25 10.1111/imr.12788 31402501
Schamel, W. W., Alarcón, B. & Minguet, S. The TCR is an allosterically regulated macromolecular machinery changing its conformation while working. Immunol. Rev. 291, 8–25 (2019).31402501 10.1111/imr.12788
25. Zhu C Chen W Lou J Rittase W Li K Mechanosensing through immunoreceptors Nat. Immunol. 2019 20 1269 1278 10.1038/s41590-019-0491-1 31534240
Zhu, C., Chen, W., Lou, J., Rittase, W. & Li, K. Mechanosensing through immunoreceptors. Nat. Immunol. 20, 1269–1278 (2019).31534240 10.1038/s41590-019-0491-1
26. Ma Z Janmey PA Finkel TH The receptor deformation model of TCR triggering FASEB J. 2008 22 1002 1008 10.1096/fj.07-9331hyp 17984179
Ma, Z., Janmey, P. A. & Finkel, T. H. The receptor deformation model of TCR triggering. FASEB J. 22, 1002–1008 (2008).17984179 10.1096/fj.07-9331hyp
27. Davis SJ van der Merwe PA The kinetic-segregation model: TCR triggering and beyond Nat. Immunol. 2006 7 803 809 10.1038/ni1369 16855606
Davis, S. J. & van der Merwe, P. A. The kinetic-segregation model: TCR triggering and beyond. Nat. Immunol. 7, 803–809 (2006).16855606 10.1038/ni1369
28. Köhler K Matched sizes of activating and inhibitory receptor/ligand pairs are required for optimal signal integration by human natural killer cells PLoS ONE 2010 5 e15374 10.1371/journal.pone.0015374 21179506
Köhler, K. et al. Matched sizes of activating and inhibitory receptor/ligand pairs are required for optimal signal integration by human natural killer cells. PLoS ONE 5, e15374 (2010).21179506 10.1371/journal.pone.0015374
29. Goodridge HS Activation of the innate immune receptor Dectin-1 upon formation of a ‘phagocytic synapse Nature 2011 472 471 475 10.1038/nature10071 21525931
Goodridge, H. S. et al. Activation of the innate immune receptor Dectin-1 upon formation of a ‘phagocytic synapse. Nature 472, 471–475 (2011).21525931 10.1038/nature10071
30. Bakalar MH Size-dependent segregation controls macrophage phagocytosis of antibody-opsonized targets Cell 2018 174 131 142 10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.059 29958103
Bakalar, M. H. et al. Size-dependent segregation controls macrophage phagocytosis of antibody-opsonized targets. Cell 174, 131–142 (2018).29958103 10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.059
31. Lim H-S Costimulation of IL-2 production through CD28 is dependent on the size of its ligand J. Immunol. 2015 195 5432 5439 10.4049/jimmunol.1500707 26500347
Lim, H.-S. et al. Costimulation of IL-2 production through CD28 is dependent on the size of its ligand. J. Immunol. 195, 5432–5439 (2015).26500347 10.4049/jimmunol.1500707
32. Denham EM A generic cell surface ligand system for studying cell–cell recognition PLoS Biol. 2019 17 e3000549 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000549 31815943
Denham, E. M. et al. A generic cell surface ligand system for studying cell–cell recognition. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000549 (2019).31815943 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000549
33. Kharitonenkov A A family of proteins that inhibit signalling through tyrosine kinase receptors Nature 1997 386 181 186 10.1038/386181a0 9062191
Kharitonenkov, A. et al. A family of proteins that inhibit signalling through tyrosine kinase receptors. Nature 386, 181–186 (1997).9062191 10.1038/386181a0
34. Hayashi A Positive Regulation of Phagocytosis by SIRPβ and Its Signaling Mechanism in Macrophages* J. Biol. Chem. 2004 279 29450 29460 10.1074/jbc.M400950200 15123631
Hayashi, A. et al. Positive Regulation of Phagocytosis by SIRPβ and Its Signaling Mechanism in Macrophages*. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 29450–29460 (2004).15123631 10.1074/jbc.M400950200
35. Crocker PR Paulson JC Varki A Siglecs and their roles in the immune system Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2007 7 255 266 10.1038/nri2056 17380156
Crocker, P. R., Paulson, J. C. & Varki, A. Siglecs and their roles in the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 7, 255–266 (2007).17380156 10.1038/nri2056
36. Angata T Hayakawa T Yamanaka M Varki A Nakamura M Discovery of Siglec‐14, a novel sialic acid receptor undergoing concerted evolution with Siglec‐5 in primates FASEB J. 2006 20 1964 1973 10.1096/fj.06-5800com 17012248
Angata, T., Hayakawa, T., Yamanaka, M., Varki, A. & Nakamura, M. Discovery of Siglec‐14, a novel sialic acid receptor undergoing concerted evolution with Siglec‐5 in primates. FASEB J. 20, 1964–1973 (2006).17012248 10.1096/fj.06-5800com
37. Parodi M NKp44-NKp44 ligand interactions in the regulation of natural killer cells and other innate lymphoid cells in humans Front. Immunol. 2019 10 719 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00719 31024551
Parodi, M. et al. NKp44-NKp44 ligand interactions in the regulation of natural killer cells and other innate lymphoid cells in humans. Front. Immunol. 10, 719 (2019).31024551 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00719
38. Ford JW McVicar DW TREM and TREM-like receptors in inflammation and disease Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2009 21 38 46 10.1016/j.coi.2009.01.009 19230638
Ford, J. W. & McVicar, D. W. TREM and TREM-like receptors in inflammation and disease. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 21, 38–46 (2009).19230638 10.1016/j.coi.2009.01.009
39. Read CB Cutting Edge: Identification of Neutrophil PGLYRP1 as a Ligand for TREM-1 J. Immunol. 2015 194 1417 1421 10.4049/jimmunol.1402303 25595774
Read, C. B. et al. Cutting Edge: Identification of Neutrophil PGLYRP1 as a Ligand for TREM-1. J. Immunol. 194, 1417–1421 (2015).25595774 10.4049/jimmunol.1402303
40. Fu L Identification of Extracellular Actin As a Ligand for Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells-1 Signaling Front. Immunol. 2017 8 917 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00917 28824642
Fu, L. et al. Identification of Extracellular Actin As a Ligand for Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cells-1 Signaling. Front. Immunol. 8, 917 (2017).28824642 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00917
41. Lanier LL Bakker ABH The ITAM-bearing transmembrane adaptor DAP12 in lymphoid and myeloid cell function Immunol. Today 2000 21 611 614 10.1016/S0167-5699(00)01745-X 11114420
Lanier, L. L. & Bakker, A. B. H. The ITAM-bearing transmembrane adaptor DAP12 in lymphoid and myeloid cell function. Immunol. Today 21, 611–614 (2000).11114420 10.1016/S0167-5699(00)01745-X
42. Zakeri B Peptide tag forming a rapid covalent bond to a protein, through engineering a bacterial adhesin Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2012 109 E690 E697 10.1073/pnas.1115485109 22366317
Zakeri, B. et al. Peptide tag forming a rapid covalent bond to a protein, through engineering a bacterial adhesin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, E690–E697 (2012).22366317 10.1073/pnas.1115485109
43. van der Merwe PA Barclay AN Transient intercellular adhesion: the importance of weak protein-protein interactions Trends Biochem. Sci. 1994 19 354 358 10.1016/0968-0004(94)90109-0 7985226
van der Merwe, P. A. & Barclay, A. N. Transient intercellular adhesion: the importance of weak protein-protein interactions. Trends Biochem. Sci. 19, 354–358 (1994).7985226 10.1016/0968-0004(94)90109-0
44. Wu H Kwong PD Hendrickson WA Dimeric association and segmental variability in the structure of human CD4 Nature 1997 387 527 530 10.1038/387527a0 9168119
Wu, H., Kwong, P. D. & Hendrickson, W. A. Dimeric association and segmental variability in the structure of human CD4. Nature 387, 527–530 (1997).9168119 10.1038/387527a0
45. Auwerx J The human leukemia cell line, THP-1: a multifacetted model for the study of monocyte-macrophage differentiation Experientia 1991 47 22 31 10.1007/BF02041244 1999239
Auwerx, J. The human leukemia cell line, THP-1: a multifacetted model for the study of monocyte-macrophage differentiation. Experientia 47, 22–31 (1991).1999239 10.1007/BF02041244
46. Wild MK Dependence of T cell antigen recognition on the dimensions of an accessory receptor–ligand complex J. Exp. Med. 1999 190 31 42 10.1084/jem.190.1.31 10429668
Wild, M. K. et al. Dependence of T cell antigen recognition on the dimensions of an accessory receptor–ligand complex. J. Exp. Med. 190, 31–42 (1999).10429668 10.1084/jem.190.1.31
47. Baggiolini M Clark-Lewis I Interleukin‐8, a chemotactic and inflammatory cytokine FEBS Lett. 1992 307 97 101 10.1016/0014-5793(92)80909-Z 1639201
Baggiolini, M. & Clark-Lewis, I. Interleukin‐8, a chemotactic and inflammatory cytokine. FEBS Lett. 307, 97–101 (1992).1639201 10.1016/0014-5793(92)80909-Z
48. Baqui AAMA Meiller TF Falkler WA Enhanced interleukin‐8 production in THP‐1 human monocytic cells by lipopolysaccharide from oral microorganisms and granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor Oral. Microbiol. Immunol. 1999 14 275 280 10.1034/j.1399-302X.1999.140502.x 10551153
Baqui, A. A. M. A., Meiller, T. F. & Falkler, W. A. Enhanced interleukin‐8 production in THP‐1 human monocytic cells by lipopolysaccharide from oral microorganisms and granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor. Oral. Microbiol. Immunol. 14, 275–280 (1999).10551153 10.1034/j.1399-302X.1999.140502.x
49. Yonemura S Ezrin/Radixin/Moesin (ERM) Proteins Bind to a Positively Charged Amino Acid Cluster in the Juxta-Membrane Cytoplasmic Domain of CD44, CD43, and ICAM-2 J. Cell Biol. 1998 140 885 895 10.1083/jcb.140.4.885 9472040
Yonemura, S. et al. Ezrin/Radixin/Moesin (ERM) Proteins Bind to a Positively Charged Amino Acid Cluster in the Juxta-Membrane Cytoplasmic Domain of CD44, CD43, and ICAM-2. J. Cell Biol. 140, 885–895 (1998).9472040 10.1083/jcb.140.4.885
50. Milstein O Nanoscale increases in CD2-CD48-mediated Intermembrane Spacing Decrease Adhesion and Reorganize the Immunological Synapse* J. Biol. Chem. 2008 283 34414 34422 10.1074/jbc.M804756200 18826951
Milstein, O. et al. Nanoscale increases in CD2-CD48-mediated Intermembrane Spacing Decrease Adhesion and Reorganize the Immunological Synapse*. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 34414–34422 (2008).18826951 10.1074/jbc.M804756200
51. Al-Aghbar MA Chu Y-S Chen B-M Roffler SR High-affinity ligands can trigger T cell receptor signaling without CD45 segregation Front. Immunol. 2018 9 523 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00713 29616032
Al-Aghbar, M. A., Chu, Y.-S., Chen, B.-M. & Roffler, S. R. High-affinity ligands can trigger T cell receptor signaling without CD45 segregation. Front. Immunol. 9, 523 (2018).29616032 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00713
52. Chen B-M The affinity of elongated membrane-tethered ligands determines potency of T cell receptor triggering Front. Immunol. 2017 8 793 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00793 28740495
Chen, B.-M. et al. The affinity of elongated membrane-tethered ligands determines potency of T cell receptor triggering. Front. Immunol. 8, 793 (2017).28740495 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00793
53. Li Y-C Cutting edge: mechanical forces acting on T cells immobilized via the TCR complex can trigger TCR signaling J. Immunol. 2010 184 5959 5963 10.4049/jimmunol.0900775 20435924
Li, Y.-C. et al. Cutting edge: mechanical forces acting on T cells immobilized via the TCR complex can trigger TCR signaling. J. Immunol. 184, 5959–5963 (2010).20435924 10.4049/jimmunol.0900775
54. Sadelain M Chimeric antigen receptors: driving immunology towards synthetic biology Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2016 41 68 76 10.1016/j.coi.2016.06.004 27372731
Sadelain, M. Chimeric antigen receptors: driving immunology towards synthetic biology. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 41, 68–76 (2016).27372731 10.1016/j.coi.2016.06.004
55. Yarmarkovich M CAR immune cells: design principles, resistance and the next generation Nature 2023 614 635 648 10.1038/s41586-023-05707-3 36813894
Yarmarkovich, M. et al. CAR immune cells: design principles, resistance and the next generation. Nature 614, 635–648 (2023).36813894 10.1038/s41586-023-05707-3
56. Kusumi A Suzuki KGN Kasai RS Ritchie K Fujiwara TK Hierarchical mesoscale domain organization of the plasma membrane Trends Biochem. Sci. 2011 36 604 615 10.1016/j.tibs.2011.08.001 21917465
Kusumi, A., Suzuki, K. G. N., Kasai, R. S., Ritchie, K. & Fujiwara, T. K. Hierarchical mesoscale domain organization of the plasma membrane. Trends Biochem. Sci. 36, 604–615 (2011).21917465 10.1016/j.tibs.2011.08.001
57. Jacobson K Liu P Lagerholm BC The lateral organization and mobility of plasma membrane components Cell 2019 177 806 819 10.1016/j.cell.2019.04.018 31051105
Jacobson, K., Liu, P. & Lagerholm, B. C. The lateral organization and mobility of plasma membrane components. Cell 177, 806–819 (2019).31051105 10.1016/j.cell.2019.04.018
58. Göhring J Temporal analysis of T-cell receptor-imposed forces via quantitative single molecule FRET measurements Nat. Commun. 2021 12 2502 10.1038/s41467-021-22775-z 33947864
Göhring, J. et al. Temporal analysis of T-cell receptor-imposed forces via quantitative single molecule FRET measurements. Nat. Commun. 12, 2502 (2021).33947864 10.1038/s41467-021-22775-z
59. Boniface JJ Initiation of signal transduction through the T cell receptor requires the multivalent engagement of peptide/MHC ligands [corrected] Immunity 1998 9 459 466 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80629-9 9806632
Boniface, J. J. et al. Initiation of signal transduction through the T cell receptor requires the multivalent engagement of peptide/MHC ligands [corrected]. Immunity 9, 459–466 (1998).9806632 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80629-9
60. Cochran JR Cameron TO Stern LJ The relationship of MHC-peptide binding and T cell activation probed using chemically defined MHC class II oligomers Immunity 2000 12 241 250 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80177-6 10755611
Cochran, J. R., Cameron, T. O. & Stern, L. J. The relationship of MHC-peptide binding and T cell activation probed using chemically defined MHC class II oligomers. Immunity 12, 241–250 (2000).10755611 10.1016/S1074-7613(00)80177-6
61. Ullrich A Schlessinger J Signal transduction by receptors with tyrosine kinase activity Cell 1990 61 203 212 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90801-K 2158859
Ullrich, A. & Schlessinger, J. Signal transduction by receptors with tyrosine kinase activity. Cell 61, 203–212 (1990).2158859 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90801-K
62. Locksley RM Killeen N Lenardo MJ The TNF and TNF receptor superfamilies integrating mammalian biology Cell 2001 104 487 501 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00237-9 11239407
Locksley, R. M., Killeen, N. & Lenardo, M. J. The TNF and TNF receptor superfamilies integrating mammalian biology. Cell 104, 487–501 (2001).11239407 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00237-9
63. Cornish AL Characterization of siglec-5, a novel glycoprotein expressed on myeloid cells related to CD33 Blood 1998 92 2123 2132 10.1182/blood.V92.6.2123 9731071
Cornish, A. L. et al. Characterization of siglec-5, a novel glycoprotein expressed on myeloid cells related to CD33. Blood 92, 2123–2132 (1998).9731071 10.1182/blood.V92.6.2123
64. Lanier LL DAP10- and DAP12-associated receptors in innate immunity Immunol. Rev. 2008 227 150 160 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00720.x
Lanier, L. L. DAP10- and DAP12-associated receptors in innate immunity. Immunol. Rev. 227, 150–160 (2008).10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00720.x
65. Patel, A. et al. Using CombiCells, a platform for titration and combinatorial display of cell surface ligands, to study T-cell antigen sensitivity modulation by accessory receptors. EMBO J. 43, 132–150 (2024).
66. Stinchcombe JC Ectocytosis renders T cell receptor signaling self-limiting at the immune synapse Science 2023 380 818 823 10.1126/science.abp8933 37228189
Stinchcombe, J. C. et al. Ectocytosis renders T cell receptor signaling self-limiting at the immune synapse. Science 380, 818–823 (2023).37228189 10.1126/science.abp8933
67. Jung Y Wen L Altman A Ley K CD45 pre-exclusion from the tips of T cell microvilli prior to antigen recognition Nat. Commun. 2021 12 3872 10.1038/s41467-021-23792-8 34162836
Jung, Y., Wen, L., Altman, A. & Ley, K. CD45 pre-exclusion from the tips of T cell microvilli prior to antigen recognition. Nat. Commun. 12, 3872 (2021).34162836 10.1038/s41467-021-23792-8
