
==== Front
Environ Monit Assess
Environ Monit Assess
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
0167-6369
1573-2959
Springer International Publishing Cham

39192155
12986
10.1007/s10661-024-12986-4
Research
Land use land cover change in the African Great Lakes Region: a spatial–temporal analysis and future predictions
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5328-089X
Kayitesi Naomie M. naomie.kayitesi@unil.ch

1
Guzha Alphonce C. 2
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3592-8920
Tonini Marj 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8820-2808
Mariethoz Gregoire 1
1 https://ror.org/019whta54 grid.9851.5 0000 0001 2165 4204 Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics, Faculty of Geosciences and Environment, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
2 International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), East and Southern Africa Region, KN 16 Ave, Kigali, Rwanda
27 8 2024
27 8 2024
2024
196 9 85213 3 2024
8 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
The African Great Lakes Region has experienced substantial land use land cover change (LULCC) over the last decades, driven by a complex interplay of various factors. However, a comprehensive analysis exploring the relationships between LULCC, and its explanatory variables remains unexplored. This study focused on the Lake Kivu catchment in Rwanda, analysing LULCC from 1990 to 2020, identifying major variables, and predicting future LULC scenarios under different development trajectories. Image classification was conducted in Google Earth Engine using random forest classifier, by incorporating seasonal composites Landsat images, spectral indices, and topographic features, to enhance discrimination and capture seasonal variations. The results demonstrated an overall accuracy exceeding 83%. Historical analysis revealed significant changes, including forest loss (26.6 to 18.7%) and agricultural land expansion (27.7 to 43%) in the 1990–2000 decade, attributed to political conflicts and population movements. Forest recovery (24.8% by 2020) was observed in subsequent decades, driven by Rwanda’s sustainable development initiatives. A Multi-Layer Perceptron neural network from Land Change Modeler predicted distinct 2030 and 2050 LULC scenarios based on natural, socio-economic variables, and historical transitions. Analysis of explanatory variables highlighted the significant role of proximity to urban centers, population density, and terrain in LULCC. Predictions indicate distinct trajectories influenced by demographic and socio-economic trends. The study recommends adopting the Green Growth Economy scenario aligned with ongoing conservation measures. The findings contribute to identifying opportunities for land restoration and conservation efforts, promoting the preservation of Lake Kivu catchment’s ecological integrity, in alignment with national and global goals.

Graphical Abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10661-024-12986-4.

Keywords

Lake Kivu catchment; Explanatory variables; Seasonal composites; Future scenarios
Machin learning
Green growth economy
Swiss Government Excellence Scholarships for Foreign Scholars2021.0666 / Rwanda / Uni LA Kayitesi Naomie M. Faculty for the Future Program, Schlumberger FoundationUniversity of LausanneOpen access funding provided by University of Lausanne

issue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Rwanda has initiated various environmental measures to restore the landscape’s ecological functionality, in recognition of the value of landscapes and ecosystems to national development. The Country became an early adopter of the global Bonn Challenge Initiative in 2011, committing to restore 2 million hectares of land, in addition to the Paris Agreement, Sustainable Development Goals, and Africa Agenda 2063 commitments (Dave et al., 2018). These efforts align with Rwanda’s Vision 2020 and 2050, the Economic Development and Poverty Reduction Strategy, and the Green Growth and Climate Resilience Strategy, to enhance the environmental sustainability in the country’s development (Banerjee et al., 2020). The 2019 forest cover mapping report indicates that about 30.4% of the country’s land is forested, an increase from 25% in 2009 (MoE, 2019). These statistics indicate progress in enhancing environmental sustainability within the country’s development agenda.

However, landscapes and ecosystems continue to face major threats primarily due to land use land cover change (LULCC) and exacerbated by climate change. LULCC, a process that alters the earth’s surface, is a pressing global environmental issue. Since the post-1950 era, anthropogenic activities are transforming the earth’s ecosystem structure and processes at a “great acceleration” (Steffen et al., 2015). The African Great Lakes Region is also undergoing these changes, facing substantial impacts due to human activities (Cohen et al., 2019). The main contributors to LULCC in this region are a complex interplay of political, demographic, and socio-economic factors arising, in part, from post-colonial actions. In particular, the Lake Kivu (LKV) catchment, located between Rwanda and Democratic Republic of Congo, has undergone extensive LULCC in recent decades. This is partly attributed to the conflicts and civil wars that happened in the region in the 1990s (Bagalwa et al., 2016; Plumptre, 2003). These changes contributed significantly to landscape’s destruction and changes, mainly deforestation, land degradation, and uncontrolled development activities. Rwanda, as a developing country with limited land resources and high population density, has recently experienced rapid population growth and economic development, leading to further significant landscape transformations (Li et al., 2021; Mugiraneza et al., 2019).

The LKV catchment occupies the country’s highest and wettest mountainous area, with steep topography (Kayitesi et al., 2022). The expansion of settlements, pastureland, and farmlands in forested areas, combined with heavy rainfall, has made this catchment prone to several environmental disasters (Karamage et al., 2017; Muhire et al., 2021; Uwihirwe et al., 2020). For example, the catchment experiences the highest level of landslides in the country (Nsengiyumva et al., 2018), and is highly susceptible to flooding (Bizimana & Sönmez, 2015). Additionally, it is at high risk of soil erosion, sediment transport, mass movement, and formation of gullies (Rukundo et al., 2018). According to the IUCN (2022) report, Rwanda experiences an annual loss of about 27 million tons of fertile soil, primarily affecting the districts in the western province. Notably, the LKV catchment is estimated to undergo a soil loss of approximately 116 t/ha/year (GIZ, 2020). Several studies in the literature have found a correlation between environmental disasters and LULCC (Foley et al., 2005; Guzha et al., 2018; Kayitesi et al., 2022; Mariye et al., 2022).

Understanding and identifying historical and future LULC dynamics over time, especially in rapidly evolving landscapes influenced by anthropogenic and natural factors, plays an important role in land development decision-making and planning (Selmy et al., 2023). Previous LULCC studies in Rwanda have predominantly utilized national data from the Regional Centre for Mapping of Resources for Development (RCMRD) to understand the landscape changes in the last decades (Arakwiye et al., 2021; Bagstad et al., 2020; Kulimushi et al., 2021; Li et al., 2021).

The lack of reliable or comprehensive data, along with the low resolution and quality of national datasets, underscores the need for improved and updated data to analyse LULC dynamics across different landscapes (Nedd et al., 2021). Namely, while the RCMRD dataset provides useful insights into LULCC in the catchment, finer-resolution studies are necessary to capture recent changes, including ongoing landscape restoration measures. These studies are required to provide detailed information for local-scale implementation, such as landscape rehabilitation and restoration measures. In addition, a deep investigation of the complex relationships linking LULCC and explanatory variables in the region remains unexplored, necessitating a comprehensive analysis. Comprehensive information on LULC transitions and their causes is important for regulatory purposes and the design of appropriate land management approaches (Mariye et al., 2022). However, in Rwanda, as in other parts of the world, basic data on LULC trends is still scarce, as a result, the consequences of this ongoing process are not clearly understood.

Research has shown that integrating remote sensing, Geographic Information System, and simulation modelling, offers a cost-effective approach for both qualitative and quantitative analysis of historical LULC patterns and the simulation of potential future LULC scenarios (Faruque et al., 2022; Mariye et al., 2022; Shafie et al., 2023). Cloud computing platforms like Google Earth Engine, which provide access to a wide range of remote sensing data, offer high computation power for time-series analysis (Adepoju & Adelabu, 2020; Nasiri et al., 2022). Various machine learning classification algorithms have been increasingly developed and widely used for image classification, with random forest identified as achieving higher mapping accuracy (Mellor et al., 2013; Sibanda & Ahmed, 2021; Talukdar et al., 2020). Additionally, specific band combinations and spectral indices have been recognized for enhancing feature identification in heterogenous landscapes (Ibrahim, 2023; Onyango & Opiyo, 2022). Moreover, several models and software packages have been developed to assess the relationship between historical LULCC and their explanatory variables, enabling the prediction of potential future scenarios (Gaur et al., 2020; Li et al., 2020). Among these, the Land Change Modeler (LCM), leveraging Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) artificial neural network, stands out as a robust tool for change analysis and predict future LULC scenarios by incorporating explanatory variables (Bakr et al., 2022; Hasan et al., 2020; Shafie et al., 2023; Sibanda & Ahmed, 2021).

This study aims to bridge the research gaps by (i) using remote sensing technology coupled with predictive learning to reconstruct historical LULC from 1990 to 2020 and analyse changes over time; (ii) examining the explanatory variables underlying landscape changes; and (iii) predicting potential future LULC scenarios for 2030 and 2050, based on three different development pathways. Namely, in the LKV catchment, various forms of LULCC are inevitable, due to the high population increase and socio-economic developments. In this context, the present study proposes a robust methodology for the detailed assessment of LULCC at the local scale offering valuable insights to support the planning of future land use, to adapt to anticipated environmental and socio-economic changes, aligned with national and international development goals and strategies.

Materials and methods

Study area

Lake Kivu is one of the African Great Lakes, located in the western branch of the East African Rift within the Albertine Rift region. The lake, covering an area of 2370 km2, has a watershed drainage area of 4940 km2. This is a transboundary region of Rwanda and Democratic Republic of Congo (Fig. 1c), part of the larger Congo basin. In Rwanda, the LKV catchment lies on the western part of the Congo-Nile Divide, spanning latitudes 1°30′S and 2°32′S, and longitudes 28°52′E and 29°31′E. The catchment covers 2425 km2 in Rwanda, including the lake surface.Fig. 1 Study area: a Lake Kivu catchment on the Rwandan side; b the geographical location of Rwanda; and c the drainage basin of Lake Kivu spanning both Rwanda and Democratic Republic of Congo (GCS: WGS 84)

The LKV catchment is characterized by mountainous and hilly terrain, interrupted by river valleys. Elevation in the catchment rises from 1461 at the lake shore, to 4475 m.a.s.l. in the northern mountains (Fig. 1a). The topography exhibits significant variations in slope (ranging from 0.13 to 86.3%), with most slopes exceeding 40%. The catchment experiences a humid tropical climate with average temperatures ranging from 16 to 20 °C, with little seasonal variation. The area is renowned for high precipitation and low temperatures, making it the wettest and coldest region in Rwanda. Rainfall is characterized by both spatial and temporal irregularities, with the driest part of the catchment receiving around 1200 mm of annual rainfall, while the wettest areas, particularly the natural forest parks, receive as much as 2300 mm (Balagizi et al., 2022). The rainfall follows a bimodal pattern, with two distinct rainy seasons from March to May and from September to December, alternating with two dry seasons.

Rwanda’s soils, resulting from physico-chemical alteration of granite, gneiss, quartz, schist, and volcanic rocks, are naturally fragile (Nambajimana et al., 2019). According to FAO soil classification, the dominant soil types in the LKV catchment are Acrisols with scattered occurrences of Cambisols. Andosols are found in the northern region, which are relatively fertile and suitable for intensive farming, but are also susceptible to erosion (Mwanjalolo et al., 2015). Luvisols are predominant in the central part of the catchment. These fertile soils and the high annual rainfall make this region a prominent agricultural area, with major crops being maize, wheat, beans, irish potatoes, and sweet potatoes (Akinyemi, 2017; Ekise et al., 2013). The LKV catchment is renowned for its rich biodiversity, encompassing three of Rwanda’s four national parks. Gishwati-Mukura National Park is known for its diverse ecosystems including several endangered species. Nyungwe National Park, in the south, is one of Africa’s largest protected mountain rainforests, sheltering a wide range of plants and animals. The Volcanoes National Park in the north is known for its population of critically endangered mountain gorillas, as well as other wildlife species (Kanyamibwa, 1998).

Input data

Satellite images analysed in the present study come from Landsat imagery, chosen because of their long operational periods, the large spectral sensitivity, and good resolution (30 by 30 m). Images cover the period of 1988–2020 with time span for the acquisition each 10 years (Fig. 3). The Digital Elevation Model (DEM), with a resolution of 90 by 90 m, was provided by the (RCMRD, n.d.). Other geospatial datasets, namely the road networks, the river networks, and national parks boundaries, were acquired from the Africa Geoportal hosted by the Rwanda Land Management and use Authority (RLMA, n.d.). Population density information with 100 by 100 m grid cell, was downloaded from (WorldPop, n.d.). Soil data, such as soil texture layers (clay, sand, and silt content) and organic carbon, were acquired from the Africa Soil Information Service at 250 m resolution (ISRIC, n.d.). To ensure a consistent geospatial reference and seamless integration, all the digital geographical layers were geo-referenced to UTM Zone 35S and rescaled to a uniform resolution of 30 by 30 m, establishing a harmonized geospatial framework for the analysis.

Methods

The methodology implemented in the present study includes two main steps: the first part encompasses the image classification carried out in Google Earth Engine (Fig. 2a) performed using random forest, an ensemble learning method. The second part involves predicting future LULC scenarios achieved by combining the observed LULC class transitions with explanatory variables into a predictive learning system based on MLP (Fig. 2b).Fig. 2 Methodological workflow applied for a LULC classification, and b prediction of future LULC scenarios

Image classification and change detection

A supervised classification approach was adopted, utilizing random forest classifier. The process was conducted using the Code Editor of Google Earth Engine, a cloud-based platform that provides access to a wide range of remote sensing datasets. Due to the limited availability and cloud cover of images in 1990, the LULC for 1990 was derived from images taken between 1988 and 1992. To maintain consistency, the same approach was applied to subsequent periods, each corresponding to different Landsat sensors. Change detection was then performed in three decades. Figure 3 illustrates the Landsat images used during each period, the corresponding years they represent, and the change decades they encompass.Fig. 3 Timeline of image classification periods with corresponding Landsat sensors

Image pre-processing

The accuracy of supervised classification in remote sensing heavily relies on factors like the quality of training, image resolution, and the choice of classifier (Chen & Stow, 2002; Foody & Mathur, 2004). However, satellite images are often subjected to distortion caused by sensor, solar, atmospheric, and topographic effects (Young et al., 2017). While some studies suggest using surface reflectance to account for atmospheric effects, top of atmosphere reflectance has proven more consistent in mountainous regions (Chen & Zhu, 2022; Flood, 2014). Therefore, this study utilized calibrated top of atmosphere reflectance from collection 1 Tier-1 Landsat scenes, which are known for their high-quality data and suitability for time-series analysis.

It is crucial to use cloud-free images to ensure reliable results. However, given that the study region is located in mountainous region near the equator, cloud cover is a persistent challenge, making the classification process more difficult (Zaidi et al., 2017). To mitigate this issue, the cloud score algorithm was employed to selectively filter images, retaining only those with a cloud cover of less than 20%. This threshold was chosen to balance the preservation of data integrity with the need of minimizing the influence of clouds on the analysis. This specific threshold value was determined through experimentation, considering the trade-offs between data retention and cloud removal. In tropical regions, especially for data from earlier years like the 1980s and 1990s, acquiring cloud-free images presents a significant challenge (Akinyemi, 2017). Consequently, for the initial study period, the permissible cloud cover threshold was raised to 30% to accommodate these constraints.

To enhance landscape feature identification based on unique spectral characteristics, three spectral indices were added to the Landsat bands. These are (1) Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), used to detect the presence of vegetation and evaluate its health by comparing the red band (absorption of chlorophyll), and near infrared band (reflectance of the vegetation canopy); (2) Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI), applied to differentiate water from dry land, based on difference in reflectance between the near infrared and green bands; and (3) Normal Difference Build-up Index (NDBI), designed to highlight the presence of built-up areas, that reflects more short-wave infrared than in the near infrared (Faruque et al., 2022; Lee et al., 2018; Onyango & Opiyo, 2022; Triscowati et al., 2019). Additionally, slope and elevation bands were incorporated to further distinguish various LULC patterns. These features have been identified as crucial for LULC classification, offering insights into terrain features and associated landscape patterns (Adepoju & Adelabu, 2020; Ibrahim, 2023).

For the training process of supervised classification, reference points were directly gathered within the Google Earth Engine platform. This involved strategically making point markers across all eight classes (Fig. 4). The process was supplemented by historical Landsat imagery and Airbus archived images in Google Earth Pro for previous periods. About 1500 training points were gathered each year to ensure a robust training dataset.Fig. 4 Pictures taken from the field showing examples of the 8 LULC classes considered

The Landsat image collection was filtered over a 5-year span for each study period (as specified in Fig. 3), in alignment with Rwanda’s climatic seasons. The dry season was defined as June to August, while September to May was considered as the rainy season. A short dry season in December and January, often with occasional rainfall, was not included as part of the dry season. To represent each season, the composition method was employed to aggregate multiple Landsat images into a single image that represents the entire collection (Nasiri et al., 2022). This aggregation process enhances image quality by addressing cloud and shadow effects, filling data gaps, and compensating for irregular observations in Landsat images (Adepoju & Adelabu, 2020). The median reducer, chosen for its accuracy in synthetizing pixel values from multiple images, was used as the composite method. Images from both the dry and rainy seasons were aggregated separately before merging them to create seasonal composites that represent the characteristics of both seasons. This process helped to capture the unique features of each season, such as differentiating bare land from agriculture in dry season or delineating rivers during the rainy season. By merging images from both seasons, a wider range of spectral information is captured, enhancing feature discrimination and extraction of different LULC classes (Xu, 2007).

Classification and validation

The random forest machine learning algorithm, an ensemble model consisting of multiple decision trees, was trained using pre-defined training samples. The trained classifier was then applied to perform the classification of the entire image. This model was chosen for its effectiveness in managing the complex variability of the study area, enhancing prediction accuracy, and reducing the likelihood of overfitting (Mellor et al., 2013; Sibanda & Ahmed, 2021; Talukdar et al., 2020).

Evaluating the accuracy of remote sensing results is a crucial step. To this end, ground truth data provides reliable on-site information for validating the results. Consequently, an extensive field survey was undertaken from June to July 2023, to collect Ground Control Points (GCPs) within the LKV catchment. GPS coordinates were systematically recorded across all eight LULC classes (Fig. 4). The collected dataset first underwent a cleaning process to identify the most representative class per pixel, remove neighbouring GCPs that did not match the same LULC class, and eliminate duplicated GCPs to avoid over-representation. Additionally, quality control was conducted on the ground control points to ensure only those with stable LULC were considered, such as areas with older trees, while excluding points with recent changes. To create validation datasets for historical periods, the same approach as for training was used. This involved cross-referencing the collected data with archived Airbus images in Google Earth Pro and consulting local communities. Gathering historical evidence through discussions with local people provided valuable insights. Only data with high confidence were retained, resulting in a small dataset over time.

Table 1 presents the collected dataset, the cleaned validation dataset for 2020, and the retroactively validated datasets for 2010, 2000, and 1990. These GCPs were then used to generate an error matrix and calculate user, producer, and overall accuracies, as well as Kappa coefficients. Table 1 Validation data per LULC classes

LULC/Years	Collected GCPs	Validation dataset	
2020	2010	2000	1990	
Agriculture	1523	463	225	166	129	
Bare land	101	59	22	23	25	
Built-up	489	146	93	52	43	
Grass	351	150	77	66	72	
Forest	985	347	136	68	65	
River	130	67	43	17	17	
Tea plantation	316	79	66	41	39	
Lake	54	54	25	25	25	
Total	2426	1,365	687	458	415	

The classified images were then exported to GIS software for post-processing, where sieve filters were applied to remove noise and isolated misclassified pixels. Subsequently, statistical analysis was conducted to identify patterns and trends in LULC over time, and thematic maps were generated for further analysis.

Change detection and prediction of future LULC scenarios

This study utilized the LCM-TerrSet, an integrated geospatial monitoring and modelling system for change detection and prediction of future LULC predictions. The Change Analysis tool within LCM was used to evaluate statistics and generate maps illustrating transitions that have occurred in the landscape over two successive time periods. Additionally, the Change Prediction tool was used to predict future LULC scenarios, incorporating statistical functions and algorithms that account for explanatory variables to understand their relationship with the observed class-transitions. The model considers historical images and incorporates prior knowledge of the study area to predict the future scenario based on change demands. This modelling approach has been widely applied, particularly in the context of land and water management (Bakr et al., 2022; Chuenchum et al., 2020; Gibson et al., 2018), wildfires management (Amato et al., 2018), and biodiversity and carbon emissions (Leta et al., 2021; Sangermano et al., 2012).

Explanatory variables for LULC changes

Explanatory variables represent potential drivers responsible for observed changes in LULC. Their selection is crucial for ensuring the predictive performance of the model, as the forces that influenced past changes can be expected to influence future changes (Leta et al., 2021). In this study, explanatory variables encompassed diverse variables. Natural variables consisted of elevation, slope, soil texture (clay, sand, and silt), and soil organic carbon. Additionally, proximity-based variables, such as distance to roads, river networks, and urban centers, were incorporated. Urban centers were derived from the major urban areas using the classified 2020 Landsat image. Moreover, demographic variables such as population density, and specific land cover drivers, namely national parks and Lake Kivu, were also considered. Figure 5 shows graphically all the potential explanatory variables used in this study.Fig. 5 LULCC potential explanatory variables

Model calibration and validation

LULC predictive modelling utilizes the spatially explicit variables that have driven past changes for model calibration. The calibration process involves systematically adjusting model parameters to improve the agreement between the predicted and observed transitions (Mandal et al., 2023). Multi-Layer Perception (MLP) neural network, recognized for its ability to simulate non-linear relationships and interactions within complex datasets (Gaur et al., 2020; Talukdar et al., 2020), was utilized to identify the rules governing the likelihood of transitions between LULC classes, referred to as transition potentials (Megahed et al., 2015). The MLP uses back propagation, iteratively adjusting variable importance by keeping each variable constant to assess its impact on the model’s predictive skill. This process is documented in the Backwards stepwise constant forcing report (Girma et al., 2022).

To accurately calibrate and validate the model, three maps at different time periods (T1, T2, T3) are required. The study incorporated classified LULC maps from 2000 and 2010, along with potential explanatory variables, to establish an empirical change model. By integrating the MLP neural network, the model captured the transition potentials and predicted the 2020 LULC map using transition probability matrix. These probability maps provide estimates of the likelihood that each pixel will either convert to another class or persist (Hasan et al., 2020). The validation process plays an important role in gauging the model’s reliability and its effectiveness in predicting future LULC trends. To validate the model, the output predicted 2020 map was compared with the 2020 classified map. The LCM provides a built-in validation tool that generates a cross-tabulation map with three scenarios: “hits” areas where the model accurately predicted changes; “false alarms” areas where the model predicted changes that did not occur; and “misses” where the model failed to predict changes. This validation procedure was iteratively repeated until achieving a satisfactory agreement between the predicted and reference LULC map.

Prediction of future LULC scenarios

The calibrated hyper-parameters for MLP, determined through the validation process, were subsequently employed to predict future LULC scenarios. In LCM, transitions between two LULC maps are organized into transition sub-models, each representing a specific class transition. Transitions sharing similar underlying explanatory variables can be grouped into the same sub-model. Each sub-model is executed separately with its explanatory variables to generate transition potentials. In this study, transitions with a total area less than 300 ha were deemed negligible and excluded to avoid noise in the predictions. Initially, similar transitions (for instance, various sub-models leading to “Forest expansion”) were consolidated into a single sub-model. However, this approach often reduced the model’s accuracy and the skill measures. Consequently, each transition sub-model was evaluated individually.

The Markov Chain is implemented into LCM, to estimate the expected change rates for each pair of LULC classes. Subsequently, the change demand is applied, incorporating transition potentials, and considering planning strategies to allocate changes in the predicted LULC map. This process resulted in future LULC scenarios at T4, based on the LULC at T3 and the transition probability matrix from T2 to T3 (Pij). The probability is calculated based on Bayes theory that describes the probability of an event in the future based on prior knowledge (Mandal et al., 2023), as shown in the following equations:T4=Pi,j∗T3

Pi,j=P1,1P1,2⋯P1,nP2,1P2,2⋯P2,n⋯⋯⋯⋯Pn,1Pn,2⋯Pn,n0≤Pi,j≤1

The model generates two predictions, the soft prediction indicating vulnerability scores ranging from 0 to 1; the hard prediction assigning each pixel to a specific LULC category based on a given threshold (Hasan et al., 2020; Sangermano et al., 2012). Table 2 presents the three LULC development scenarios predicted in this study, outlining their guiding principles, and associated policy measures or limitations influencing land transitions, referred to as incentives and constraints in LCM context. The scenarios include (1) Green Growth Economy (GGE), representing a continuation of ongoing LULCC patterns without considering negative impacts or mitigation measures; (2) Development of Anthropogenic Activities (DDA), focusing on urban and agricultural expansion to address population growth: and (3) Enhanced Forest Protection (EFP), prioritizing forest conservation and expansion. Table 2 Future LULC SCENARIOS development

LULC scenarios	Description	Incentives/Constraints	
Green Growth Economy (GGE)	This scenario is in line with the ongoing land use trend, aiming for the sustainable land use practices	It is driven solely by 2010–2020 land transitions without imposing any constraints or incentives	
Development of Anthropogenic Activities (DAA)	This scenario considers ongoing human activities, with a focus on expanding urban and agricultural land to cope with population growth	It is consistent with land transition trends for 2010–2020, maintaining the existing urban and agricultural areas. Transitions from Built-up and Agriculture to other classes are excluded in the end-point generation	
Enhanced Forest Protection (EFP)	This scenario prioritizes measures to increase forested areas, aiming to protect and enhance forest growth	It emphasizes preserving existing forests, excluding transitions from forest to other classes in endpoint generation. Additionally, it imposes constraint on National Parks to prevent any further land conversion	

Results

Accuracy assessment

To validate the classification results, independently gathered ground truthing data from field surveys were used to compute an error matrix. This facilitated the evaluation of user (UA), producer (PA), and overall accuracies. Additionally, the Kappa index was computed to assess the classifier performance. The resulting accuracy for the respective study periods and LULC classes is presented in Table 3. Table 3 Accuracy assessment

LULC/Classes accuracy	1990	2000	2010	2020	
UA (%)	PA (%)	UA (%)	PA (%)	UA (%)	PA (%)	UA (%)	PA (%)	
Agriculture	81	87	87	82	84	89	88	81	
Bare land	72	90	83	83	82	90	78	75	
Built-up	98	93	94	89	96	97	75	89	
Grass	93	84	86	92	99	88	81	95	
Forest	86	79	91	86	98	90	89	88	
River	82	93	53	100	63	93	88	100	
Tea plantation	95	95	80	94	100	87	95	86	
Lake	100	100	100	100	100	100	100	100	
Overall accuracy	87	87	91	87	
Kappa	0.83	0.84	0.88	0.83	

As expected, the Lake class showed the best accuracy, with 100% for both UA and PA across all study periods. In contrast, River class showed the lowest accuracy, particularly under UA, with 53% and 63% in 2000 and 2010, respectively. This low accuracy can be attributed to the turbidity of the river water in the region, which potentially leads to misrepresentation as bare land. Despite some inconsistency and fluctuations in the accuracies across different LULC classes and study periods, the overall accuracy and Kappa index are high, especially in 2010 with 91% and 88% respectively, demonstrating the reliability of the classification results.

LULC classification

This section presents the results of the LULC classification. Figure 6 illustrates the LULC classified maps for the four consecutive periods investigated in this study. Concurrently, Fig. 7 provides a summary of statistics, depicting the percentage of each LULC class relative to the total study area.Fig. 6 LULC maps for the four investigated periods: 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2020

Fig. 7 Comparative chart of the percentage of LULC classes across the study period

During the first decade (1990–2000), the LKV catchment experienced a substantial increase in agriculture throughout the catchment, contributing to a significant loss of forest cover, particularly in the northern and some southern parts of the catchment. Statistical analysis indicates a significant increase in agricultural land, rising from 27.76% in 1990 to 43.17% in 2000 (a net increase of 565 km2). Concurrently, there was a considerable decrease in forest cover from 26.6 to 18.78% (a net decrease 244 km2), with similar trends in grassland and bare land. Additionally, built-up areas nearly doubled, expanding from 32 to 62 km2.

In the subsequent decade (2000–2010), there was a decline in agricultural land expansion, primarily in the central and southern parts, along with a slowdown in forest loss and some gains in the central catchment area. The forest trend exhibited a 5% increase (a net gain of 154 km2), whereas agriculture experienced a 6% decrease (a net decline of 184 km2), with concurrent gains in grassland and tea plantations. Similarly, the last decade (2010–2020) portrayed a continuation of ongoing forest regrowth and a dynamic balance between expansion and reduction of agricultural land. This period witnessed a notable growth in built-up areas, expanding by 37 km2, representing a 160% increase compared to the previous decade. Additionally, there was an increase in forest cover and agricultural land, by 54 km2 and 11 km2, respectively, along with a decrease in tea plantation and grassland by 54 km2 and 44 km2, respectively.

These reciprocal changes between forested and agricultural land underscore a dynamic interplay between these two LULC classes, emphasizing their important role in shaping the region’s landscape. Moreover, the built-up class exhibited a consistent increase throughout the study period. The corresponding change maps can be found in the supplementary materials.

Future LULC predictions

LULC transition potentials and explanatory variables

The LCM identified 18 distinct transition sub-models between 2010 and 2020, which were subsequently used to calculate the transition potentials. Consequently, the MLP neural network highlighted explanatory drivers responsible for each sub-model and their corresponding weights. Table 4 presents a detailed information on the 18 transition sub-models found in this study, with their respective accuracy and skill measures. It highlights also the top six explanatory variables responsible for each transition sub-model. Additionally, Fig. 8 spatially illustrates the transition potentials and associated probabilities (ranging from 0 to 0.99), providing insights into the likelihood of transitions between various LULC classes. Table 4 LULC transition sub-models, accuracy and skill measures, and their driving variables

Transition sub-model	AE1 (Bare to Agriculture)	AE2 (Built to Agriculture)	AE3 (Grass to Agriculture)	AE4 (Forest to Agriculture)	AE5 (River to Agriculture)	AE6 (Tea to Agriculture)	
Accuracy rate	71.08%	71.28%	73.63%	74.5%	71.88%	79%	
Skill measure	0.42	0.62	0.47	0.5	0.44	0.6	
Top 6 driving variables	1. Population density	1. Population density	1. Population density	1. Slope	1. Soil-organic	1. Population density	
2. Soil- organic	2. Slope	2. Soil-organic	2. Distance to rivers	2. Soil-clay content	2. Distance to rivers	
3. Distance to rivers	3. Parks	3. Distance to rivers	3. Distance to urban	3. Population density	3. Slope	
4. Distance to urban	4. Distance to urban	4. Distance to urban	4. Population density	4. Soil-Sand content	4. Soil-organic	
5. Slope	5. Distance to rivers	5. Slope	5. Soil- organic	5. Slope	5. Distance to urban	
6. Soil-clay content	6. Elevation	6. Parks	6. Soil- clay content	6. Distance to rivers	6. Soil-organic	
Transition sub-model	UE1 (Agriculture to Built)	UE2 (Bare to Built)	UE3 (Tea to Built)	GE1 (Agriculture to Grass)	GE2 (Forest to Grass)	GE3 (Tea to Grass)	
Accuracy rate	66.82%	67.74%	88.65%	83%	79.64%	83.25%	
Skill measure	0.4	0.4	0.77	0.66	0.6	0.67	
Top 6 driving variables	1. Distance to rivers	1. Slope	1. Distance to rivers	1. Distance to rivers	1. Population density	1. Soil-organic	
2. Distance to urban	2. Distance to rivers	2. Distance to urban	2. Distance to urban	2. Soil-organic	2. Distance to rivers	
3. Population density	3. Distance to urban	3. Population density	3. Population density	3. Distance to rivers	3. Distance to urban	
4. Slope	4. Population density	4. Slope	4. Slope	4. Distance to urban	4. Population density	
5. Soil-organic	5. Soil-organic	5. Soil-organic	5. Parks	5. Slope	5. Slope	
6. Elevation	6. Roads	6. Elevation	6. Elevation	6. Elevation	6. Elevation	
Transition sub-model	FE1 (Agriculture to Forest)	FE2 (Grass to Forest)	FE3 (Tea to Forest)	TE1 (Agriculture to Tea)	TE2 (Grass to Tea)	TE3 (Forest to Tea)	
Accuracy rate	61.7%	77.07%	77.64%	63.46%	93.37%	75.43%	
Skill measure	0.5	0.54	0.55	0.27	0.87	0.51	
Top 6 driving variables	1. Population density	1. Population density	1. Population density	1. Population density	1. Distance to rivers	1. Distance to rivers	
2. Distance to rivers	2. Distance to urban	2. Slope	2. Slope	2. Distance to urban	2. Parks	
3. Slope	3. Distance to rivers	3. Distance to urban	3. Distance to urban	3. Population density	3. Distance to urban	
4. Distance to urban	4. Slope	4. Distance to rivers	4. Distance to rivers	4. Slope	4. Population density	
5. Soil-organic	5. Parks	5. Soil-organic	5. Soil-organic	5. Elevation	5. Slope	
6. Soil-silt content	6. Soil- organic	6. Distance to roads	6. Parks	6. Soil-organic	6. Elevation	

Fig. 8 Representation of transition potentials derived from the 2010–2020 trend, and their respective probabilities

Future LULC scenarios

Figure 9 illustrates the predicted LULC maps, representing three development scenarios for the years 2030 and 2050. Additionally, Fig. 10 offers a detailed view of a heterogenous region within the northern catchment, to illustrate the distinct LULC patterns across the three LULC scenarios. For a comprehensive overview, Table 5 provides statistical information corresponding to each scenario.Fig. 9 Predicted LULC scenarios for 2030 and 2050 under Green Growth Economy (GGE), Development of Anthropogenic Activities (DAA), and Enhanced Forest Protection (EFP)

Fig. 10 Exploring diverse LULC scenarios in a small heterogeneous area

Table 5 Statistics on future LULC Scenarios for 2030 and 2050

LULC categories/ scenarios	2030	2050	
GGE	DAA	EFP	GGE	DAA	EFP	
km2	%	km2	%	km2	%	km2	%	km2	%	km2	%	
Agriculture	127,725	36.82	143,369	41.33	111,066	32.02	123,720	35.67	155,412	44.8	90,702	26.15	
Bare land	489	0.14	489	0.14	489	0.14	468	0.13	468	0.13	468	0.13	
Built-up	11,281	3.25	14,502	4.18	11,281	3.25	12,466	3.59	17,589	5.07	12,466	3.59	
Grass	14,661	4.23	16,177	4.66	13,492	3.89	15,413	4.44	18,637	5.37	13,161	3.79	
Forest	88,594	25.54	67,531	19.47	107,024	30.85	91,134	26.27	49,711	14.33	127,384	36.72	
River	135	0.04	135	0.04	135	0.04	163	0.05	163	0.05	163	0.05	
Tea plantation	3,839	1.11	4,522	1.3	3,237	0.93	3,359	0.97	4,743	1.37	2,379	0.69	
Lake	100,139	28.87	100,139	28.87	100,139	28.87	100,139	28.87	100,139	28.87	100,139	28.87	

The future LULC scenarios for the periods of 2030 and 2050 will likely reveal significant variations in agricultural land, built-up and forest area. Minor alterations are expected in the tea plantation, river, and grass classes. The EFP scenario indicates a notable increase in forest cover compared to other scenarios. In contrast, the DAA scenario anticipates substantial growth in built-up and agricultural land. While the GGE scenario represents a moderate projection, maintaining the existing status quo without drastic shifts.

Agriculture is predicted to remain the largest LULC class in the catchment, with fluctuations depending on the scenario. The EFP is expected to result in a significant reduction in agricultural areas, by almost 10% compared to DAA for both 2030 and 2050. Additionally, human activities are expected to have a profound impact on forested area, leading to a substantial difference in forest cover predictions between DAA and EFP scenarios. For 2030, the forest cover is predicted to be 19% under DAA compared to 30% under EFP, and for 2050, it is expected to be 14% under DAA versus 37% under EFP.

Discussion

Historical LULCC

Over the last three decades, the LKV catchment has witnessed considerable LULCC, driven by political, socio-economic, and demographic variables. Notably, the initial decade considered in this study (1990–2000) revealed the most substantial changes, characterized by a significant forest loss, and marked rise in urban and agricultural land. These changes are partly attributed to the early 1990s conflicts in the region, when forests became battle zones due to their strategic locations (Arakwiye et al., 2021; Plumptre, 2003). Additionally, the region witnessed major population movements in the aftermath of the 1994 genocide against Tutsis in Rwanda. This includes the return to Rwanda of people who had fled during the war and genocide periods from 1959 as wells as the influx of refugees due to the civil wars in the Democratic Republic of Congo in the late 1990s and early 2000s (Bagalwa et al., 2016; Mugiraneza et al., 2019). These pressures led to an extensive conversion of forested land for settlement and agricultural expansion, to meet the growing demands for food and energy (Munanura et al., 2018; Rukundo et al., 2018). This period was defined by the fragmentation of natural forest parks, with Gishwati-Mukura in the LKV catchment losing more than half of its original land during the period (Kanyamibwa, 1998; Muhire et al., 2021).

In the second (2000–2010) and third (2010–2020) decades considered in this study, the region experienced contrasting trends in LULCC. The findings revealed a regrowth of forest cover and an equilibrium between expansion and reduction of agricultural land. This shift mirrors Rwanda’s strategic initiatives aiming at fostering sustainable environmental and natural resource management, transitioning towards a green economy. This commitment is reflected in the country’s Green Growth Strategy, focusing on addressing environmental challenges and land degradation. The increase in forest cover aligns with several of the country’s policies and strategic goals. These include the increasing forest cover to 30% by 2020 (Akinyemi, 2017) and developing the Rwanda National Land Use Development Master Plan (NLUDMP), which further optimized the land use across the landscape (Banerjee et al., 2020). Rwanda’s Environment and Natural Resources (ENR) sector proposes rational use of natural resources to optimize future land use management as per the country’s NLUDMP, anchored in a detailed understanding of LULC at high resolution. Results of the present study also indicate the expansion of larger forest and grassland patches, particularly in the third decade, with occasional forest fragmentation amid agricultural land. This can be interpreted as a consequence of the country’s policy on land consolidation (Bizoza, 2021), following the initiation of soil and water conservation measures such as agroforestry and terracing, to sustain the agricultural land.

Furthermore, results showed a continuous increase in built-up areas, with a peak of about 160% in the last decade compared to the second decade. The LULC maps along time highlight this urban growth, particularly in the North and Southern parts of the catchment. This trend coincides with the observed urban sprawl. Factors contributing to this expansion include rapid population growth, infrastructure development, and overall urbanization processes in these areas (Amisi et al., 2022). Additionally, there is a consistent decrease in the area covered by the river, which can be attributed to measures taken for riverbank protection such as the planting of trees. It is important to note, however, that the results may not entirely reflect the reality, given that rivers within the LKV catchment are too narrow to be accurately detected using 30 m satellite image resolution.

The results of LULCC patterns in LKV align with the global trends observed in tropical catchments, where widespread deforestation and the expansion of anthropogenic activities were predominant in the decades leading up to the 2000s. However, a noticeable reverse trend have been observed in the post-2000, with afforestation and reforestation efforts gaining momentum (Kayitesi et al., 2022). This change in direction is largely due to the implementation of various global and regional initiatives aimed at forest restoration and the promotion of sustainable land use practices including New York Declaration on Forests, Bonn Challenge, and African Forest Landscape Restoration Initiative (Dave et al., 2018).

Explanatory variables and future LULC scenarios

The analysis of explanatory variables for LULCC revealed that factors including proximity to urban centres and population density play a significant role in most LULC transitions. This aligns with other studies, mainly in developing countries (Bongasie et al., 2024; Khwarahm et al., 2021; Mariye et al., 2024), highlighting the role of urbanization and population growth in influencing LULC dynamics. Terrain slope emerges as another key factor, especially in transitions between agriculture, grassland, and forest categories, confirming the significant role of the physical landscape in determining LULCC patterns, as supported by other studies (Akintuyi et al., 2021; Mandal et al., 2023).

In terms of agricultural land expansion, proximity to rivers stands as one of the primary drivers, underscoring the dependence on river water for irrigation, and the subsequent growth in agricultural areas along these water sources. This factor was also found to be influential for grassland expansion, associated primarily with pastureland, underlying the significance of water access for grazing and livestock needs, in agreement with findings from various studies (Najmuddin et al., 2018; Wassenaar et al., 2007). As revealed by (Li et al., 2021) soil organic content was specifically distinguished as a significant factor for agricultural land extension, while soil texture categories played a role for other LULC classes, though with less impact. While the presence of parks did not show a significant impact on forest expansion, implying that factors other than their presence may shape forest changes, it is important to highlight that these protected areas effectively discourage encroachment by nearby communities (Riggio et al., 2019).

The predicted future LULCC based on three scenarios indicates distinct trajectories in the LKV catchment for both 2030 and 2050. The GGE scenario envisions a continuation of the existing land use trends in line with ongoing forest conservation efforts. It highlights evidence of positive environmental outcomes, notably in the promotion and protection of forests. This suggests that the existing policy framework in Rwanda is already effective in influencing LULC outcomes favourably (Bullock et al., 2021), which may not be as pronounced in other developing countries, as showcased by various case studies (Dietz et al., 2023; Khwarahm et al., 2021; Mungai et al., 2022). The EFP scenario further enhances these outcomes, aiming for increased environmental sustainability by preserving existing forested land and actively fostering forest expansion on other lands, alongside the protection of national parks. However, this scenario may pose a challenge to agriculture, which is crucial for food security (Bullock et al., 2021). Conversely, the DAA scenario presents the opposite situation, emphasizing the growth of urban and agricultural lands, potentially conflicting with ongoing forest conservation. Therefore, the GGE scenario emerges as an intermediate option, advocating for a balance between economic progress and environmental conservation.

Future LULC scenarios are anticipated to interact significantly with various environmental hazards. Rwanda has experienced a 2.3% annual population growth rate between 2012 and 2022. According to the National Institute of Statistics Rwanda, the population is projected to reach 16.4 million by 2032 and 23.6 million by 2052 (NICR, 2023). Accommodating this increase in population will necessitate more space for settlement and agricultural land, potentially leading to the predicted DAA scenario. Such expansion could intensify environmental hazards, including floods, landslides, and soil erosion (Avashia & Garg, 2020; Remondi et al., 2016). Therefore, strategic measures are needed to mitigate these effects. Concurrently, research has demonstrated the effectiveness of green strategies like GGE and EFP in managing environmental hazards like floods and landslides (Locatelli et al., 2020; Nickel et al., 2014). However, these scenarios emphasizing sustainable development and conservation measures, could serve as counterbalance to the pressures of demographic expansion and urbanization. Moreover, the direction of future LULC will depend on a variety of different factors, including demographic trends, socio-economic developments, and the ongoing climate change.

Methodological considerations

This study employed an integrated approach, combining the capabilities of Google Earth Engine for LULC classification, coupled with Land Change Modeler for change detection and prediction of future LULC scenarios in LKV catchment. The methodology involved the use of merged seasonal composites to capture the dynamic seasonal variations of the landscape. This, combined with the use of spectral indices such as NDVI, NDWI, and NDBI, along with topographic features like slope and elevation, significantly improved the discrimination and extraction of different LULC classes (Onyango & Opiyo, 2022; Triscowati et al., 2019). This was particularly effective in the heterogenous and seasonally variable landscape of the LKV catchment. Nevertheless, getting a sufficient number of satellite images, was a challenge, particularly in the 1990s and 2000s where the few available images were mostly clouded. To address this, Landsat images with a 5-year span have been aggregated to represent each study period using a median composite. This approach may compromise the capture of short-term LULC dynamics, reflecting a trade-off between image availability and the ability to capture temporal changes over shorter periods.

Future LULC scenarios were predicted based on the influence of natural and socio-economic explanatory variables on historical LULC class transitions. The Multi-Layer Perceptron neural network allowed the model to efficiently estimate the potential for various land use transitions, enabling predictions of future land use patterns. However, the LKV catchment faces various uncertainties in terms of population change and increased demand for land. Nevertheless, this study presents a methodology for quantifying future LULC scenarios with different development pathways (Bakr et al., 2022; Shafie et al., 2023). Thereby providing a comprehensive assessment of potential outcomes under different conditions. One potential way for enhancing the future prediction of LULC scenarios is to incorporate the Rwanda master plan for 2050, a document that was not accessible during the research phase. This master plan is a crucial policy document intended to guide the LULC development and could significantly shape future landscape transformations. The integration of this plan into future LULC scenario modelling would substantially enhance the accuracy and applicability of future LULC scenarios.

Conclusion and recommendations

This study conducted image classification in Google Earth Engine using random forest classifier by incorporating merged seasonal composites Landsat images acquired across dry and rainy seasons, topographic features, and three spectral indices (NDVI, NDWI, and NDBI). This approach significantly enhanced the feature discrimination and extraction of different LULC classes, making it particularly effective for detailed and accurate LULC analysis. In addition, by integrating MLP neural network from LCM toolset, this study simulated potential future LULC scenarios based on classified images coupled with demographic, natural, and socio-economic explanatory variables.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on LKV catchment that has applied an advanced geo-processing approach coupling remote sensing and machine learning for LULC assessment and prediction. This approach has been utilized both for image classification and the development of future scenarios. In a broader context, these modern methodological improvements need to be more extensively applied in Earth studies, especially in developing countries in the Global South.

The comprehensive analysis of LULC dynamics within the LKV catchment revealed significant changes over the past three decades. Despite forest cover losses in the 1990s, a post-conflict period, there has been a remarkable forest regrowth since the 2000s, largely attributed to Rwanda’s drive towards a green economy. The study recommends adopting the Green Growth Economy scenario aligned with ongoing conservation measures. It advocates for sustainable land use and change management to balance conservation goals with the needs of Rwanda’s increasing population.

This research highlights existing environmental challenges in the catchment due to LULCC, emphasizing the need for more in-depth studies to understand the impacts of LULCC on environmental hazards in LKV catchment. The study also recommends further research to include analysis of future LULC scenarios, especially considering population growth and migration trends, along with the integration of 2050 national development master plans, to enhance LULC projections.

The findings of this study can potentially support the planning and implementation of sustainable natural resource management, aimed at preserving the ecological integrity of the lake and its surrounding landscapes. Future LULC scenarios provide insights into the potential environmental and socio-economic implications of different development pathways. Finally, this research contributes to identifying opportunities for land restoration, and conservation efforts in LKV catchment, in alignment with national goals including Rwanda’s Green Growth Strategy, Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC), among others, and global goals, including Bonn Challenge, Sustainable Development Goals, and Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) targets by enhancing land management, biodiversity conservation, and climate resilience.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.Supplementary file1 (DOCX 14 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 733 KB)

Acknowledgements

This work is funded by the Swiss Government Excellence Scholarships for Foreign Scholars [2021.0666 / Rwanda / Uni LA] and the Faculty for the Future Program, Schlumberger Foundation. We also thank the International Union for Conservation of Nature Rwanda (IUCN) and the Rwanda Water Resources Board (RWB) for facilitating data collection.

Author contribution

Naomie M. Kayitesi: Funding acquisition, Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Writing—Original Draft, and Review & Editing. Alphonce C. Guzha: Formal analysis, Investigation, Data Curation, and Writing—Review & Editing. Marj Tonini: Methodology, Formal analysis, Data Curation, and Writing—Review & Editing. Gregoire Mariethoz: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Data Curation, Writing—Review & Editing, and Supervision.

Funding

Open access funding provided by University of Lausanne This work is funded by the Swiss Government Excellence Scholarships for Foreign Scholars [2021.0666/Rwanda/Uni LA] and the Faculty for the Future Program, Schlumberger Foundation.

Data availability

Data will be made available on request.

Declarations

Ethics approval

All authors have read, understood, and have complied as applicable with the statement on “Ethical responsibilities of Authors” as found in the Instructions for Authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

Adepoju KA Adelabu SA Improving accuracy of Landsat-8 OLI classification using image composite and multisource data with Google Earth Engine Remote Sensing Letters 2020 11 2 107 116 10.1080/2150704X.2019.1690792
Adepoju, K. A., & Adelabu, S. A. (2020). Improving accuracy of Landsat-8 OLI classification using image composite and multisource data with Google Earth Engine. Remote Sensing Letters, 11(2), 107–116.10.1080/2150704X.2019.1690792
Akintuyi AO Fasona MJ Ayeni AO Soneye ASO Land use/land cover and climate change interaction in the derived savannah region of Nigeria Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2021 193 12 848 10.1007/s10661-021-09642-6 34839397
Akintuyi, A. O., Fasona, M. J., Ayeni, A. O., & Soneye, A. S. O. (2021). Land use/land cover and climate change interaction in the derived savannah region of Nigeria. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 193(12), 848. 10.1007/s10661-021-09642-634839397 10.1007/s10661-021-09642-6
Akinyemi FO Land change in the central Albertine rift: Insights from analysis and mapping of land use-land cover change in north-western Rwanda Applied Geography 2017 87 127 138 10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.07.016
Akinyemi, F. O. (2017). Land change in the central Albertine rift: Insights from analysis and mapping of land use-land cover change in north-western Rwanda. Applied Geography, 87, 127–138.10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.07.016
Amato F Tonini M Murgante B Kanevski M Fuzzy definition of Rural Urban Interface: An application based on land use change scenarios in Portugal Environmental Modelling & Software 2018 104 171 187 10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.03.016
Amato, F., Tonini, M., Murgante, B., & Kanevski, M. (2018). Fuzzy definition of Rural Urban Interface: An application based on land use change scenarios in Portugal. Environmental Modelling & Software, 104, 171–187.10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.03.016
Amisi MF Mulungula MP Kisse KT Muhigirwa BC Natacha P Lwikitcha HB Eric MR Désiré AB Déo N Migeni AZ Current status and strategic way forward for long-term management of Lake Kivu (East Africa) Journal of Great Lakes Research 2022 10.1016/j.jglr.2022.04.004
Amisi, M. F., Mulungula, M. P., Kisse, K. T., Muhigirwa, B. C., Natacha, P., Lwikitcha, H. B., Eric, M. R., Désiré, A. B., Déo, N., & Migeni, A. Z. (2022). Current status and strategic way forward for long-term management of Lake Kivu (East Africa). Journal of Great Lakes Research. 10.1016/j.jglr.2022.04.00410.1016/j.jglr.2022.04.004
Arakwiye B Rogan J Eastman JR Thirty years of forest-cover change in Western Rwanda during periods of wars and environmental policy shifts Regional Environmental Change 2021 21 1 15 10.1007/s10113-020-01744-0 33362432
Arakwiye, B., Rogan, J., & Eastman, J. R. (2021). Thirty years of forest-cover change in Western Rwanda during periods of wars and environmental policy shifts. Regional Environmental Change, 21, 1–15.33362432 10.1007/s10113-020-01744-0
Avashia V Garg A Implications of land use transitions and climate change on local flooding in urban areas: An assessment of 42 Indian cities Land Use Policy 2020 95 104571 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104571
Avashia, V., & Garg, A. (2020). Implications of land use transitions and climate change on local flooding in urban areas: An assessment of 42 Indian cities. Land Use Policy, 95, 104571. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.10457110.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104571
Bagalwa M Majaliwa J Kansiime F Bashwira S Tenywa M Karume K Adipala E Land use and land cover change detection in rural areas of river Lwiro micro-catchment, Lake Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo Journal of Scientific Research & Reports 2016 9 2 1 10 10.9734/JSRR/2016/15850
Bagalwa, M., Majaliwa, J., Kansiime, F., Bashwira, S., Tenywa, M., Karume, K., & Adipala, E. (2016). Land use and land cover change detection in rural areas of river Lwiro micro-catchment, Lake Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo. Journal of Scientific Research & Reports, 9(2), 1–10.10.9734/JSRR/2016/15850
Bagstad KJ Ingram JC Lange GM Masozera M Ancona ZH Bana M Kagabo D Musana B Nabahungu NL Rukundo E Towards ecosystem accounts for Rwanda: Tracking 25 years of change in flows and potential supply of ecosystem services People and Nature 2020 2 1 163 188 10.1002/pan3.10062
Bagstad, K. J., Ingram, J. C., Lange, G. M., Masozera, M., Ancona, Z. H., Bana, M., Kagabo, D., Musana, B., Nabahungu, N. L., & Rukundo, E. (2020). Towards ecosystem accounts for Rwanda: Tracking 25 years of change in flows and potential supply of ecosystem services. People and Nature, 2(1), 163–188.10.1002/pan3.10062
Bakr N Morsy I Yehia HA Spatio-temporal land use/cover detection and prediction in Mediterranean region: A case study in Idku ecosystem, Egypt Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment 2022 25 100673 10.1016/j.rsase.2021.100673
Bakr, N., Morsy, I., & Yehia, H. A. (2022). Spatio-temporal land use/cover detection and prediction in Mediterranean region: A case study in Idku ecosystem, Egypt. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 25, 100673. 10.1016/j.rsase.2021.10067310.1016/j.rsase.2021.100673
Balagizi CM Kasereka MM Kyambikwa AM Cuoco E Arienzo I Liotta M Characterizing groundwater recharge sources using water stable isotopes in the North Basin of Lake Kivu, East Africa Chemical Geology 2022 594 120778 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2022.120778
Balagizi, C. M., Kasereka, M. M., Kyambikwa, A. M., Cuoco, E., Arienzo, I., & Liotta, M. (2022). Characterizing groundwater recharge sources using water stable isotopes in the North Basin of Lake Kivu, East Africa. Chemical Geology, 594, 120778. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2022.12077810.1016/j.chemgeo.2022.120778
Banerjee O Bagstad KJ Cicowiez M Dudek S Horridge M Alavalapati JR Masozera M Rukundo E Rutebuka E Economic, land use, and ecosystem services impacts of Rwanda’s Green Growth Strategy: An application of the IEEM+ ESM platform Science of the Total Environment 2020 729 138779 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138779 32380323
Banerjee, O., Bagstad, K. J., Cicowiez, M., Dudek, S., Horridge, M., Alavalapati, J. R., Masozera, M., Rukundo, E., & Rutebuka, E. (2020). Economic, land use, and ecosystem services impacts of Rwanda’s Green Growth Strategy: An application of the IEEM+ ESM platform. Science of the Total Environment, 729, 138779.32380323 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138779
Bizimana H Sönmez O Landslide occurrences in the hilly areas of Rwanda, their causes and protection measures Disaster Science and Engineering 2015 1 1 1 7
Bizimana, H., & Sönmez, O. (2015). Landslide occurrences in the hilly areas of Rwanda, their causes and protection measures. Disaster Science and Engineering, 1(1), 1–7.
Bizoza AR Investigating the effectiveness of land use consolidation–A component of the crop intensification programme in Rwanda Journal of Rural Studies 2021 87 213 225 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.09.018
Bizoza, A. R. (2021). Investigating the effectiveness of land use consolidation–A component of the crop intensification programme in Rwanda. Journal of Rural Studies, 87, 213–225.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.09.018
Bongasie A Dhakal T Ayalew A Kim T-S Lee Y Jang G-S Analysis of forest cover change and its driving factors in Senan district, Amhara Region, Ethiopia Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2024 196 4 339 10.1007/s10661-024-12392-w 38436740
Bongasie, A., Dhakal, T., Ayalew, A., Kim, T.-S., Lee, Y., & Jang, G.-S. (2024). Analysis of forest cover change and its driving factors in Senan district, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 196(4), 339. 10.1007/s10661-024-12392-w38436740 10.1007/s10661-024-12392-w
Bullock EL Healey SP Yang Z Oduor P Gorelick N Omondi S Ouko E Cohen WB Three decades of land cover change in East Africa Land 2021 10 2 150 10.3390/land10020150
Bullock, E. L., Healey, S. P., Yang, Z., Oduor, P., Gorelick, N., Omondi, S., Ouko, E., & Cohen, W. B. (2021). Three decades of land cover change in East Africa. Land, 10(2), 150. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/2/150.10.3390/land10020150
Chen, D., & Stow, D. (2002). The effect of training strategies on supervised classification at different spatial resolutions. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 68.
Chen J Zhu W Comparing Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 top of atmosphere and surface reflectance in high latitude regions: Case study in Alaska Geocarto International 2022 37 20 6052 6071 10.1080/10106049.2021.1924295
Chen, J., & Zhu, W. (2022). Comparing Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 top of atmosphere and surface reflectance in high latitude regions: Case study in Alaska. Geocarto International, 37(20), 6052–6071.10.1080/10106049.2021.1924295
Chuenchum P Xu M Tang W Predicted trends of soil erosion and sediment yield from future land use and climate change scenarios in the Lancang-Mekong River by using the modified RUSLE model International Soil and Water Conservation Research 2020 8 3 213 227 10.1016/j.iswcr.2020.06.006
Chuenchum, P., Xu, M., & Tang, W. (2020). Predicted trends of soil erosion and sediment yield from future land use and climate change scenarios in the Lancang-Mekong River by using the modified RUSLE model. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 8(3), 213–227.10.1016/j.iswcr.2020.06.006
Cohen, A. S., Kaufman, L., & Ogutu-Ohwayo, R. (2019). Anthropogenic threats, impacts and conservation strategies in the African Great Lakes: A review. The limnology, climatology and paleoclimatology of the East African lakes, 575–624. 10.1201/9780203748978-33
Dave, R., Saint-Laurent, C., Murray, L., Antunes, G., Brouwer, R., Scaramuzza, C. A. d. M., Raes, L., Simonit, S., Gerardo, M. C., Contreras, G., Ndoli, A., Karangwa, C., Perera, N., Hingorani, S., & Pearson, T. (2018). Second Bonn challenge progress report. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, 2018, 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2019.06.en
Dietz J Treydte AC Lippe M Exploring the future of Kafue National Park, Zambia: Scenario-based land use and land cover modelling to understand drivers and impacts of deforestation Land Use Policy 2023 126 106535 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106535
Dietz, J., Treydte, A. C., & Lippe, M. (2023). Exploring the future of Kafue National Park, Zambia: Scenario-based land use and land cover modelling to understand drivers and impacts of deforestation. Land Use Policy, 126, 106535. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.10653510.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106535
Ekise IE Nahayo A Mirukiro J Mukamugema B The impact of land use consolidation program on agricultural productivity: A case study of maize (Zea mays L.) production among households in Nyabihu district, Western Rwanda Nature and Science 2013 11 12 21 27
Ekise, I. E., Nahayo, A., Mirukiro, J., & Mukamugema, B. (2013). The impact of land use consolidation program on agricultural productivity: A case study of maize (Zea mays L.) production among households in Nyabihu district, Western Rwanda. Nature and Science, 11(12), 21–27.
Faruque MJ Vekerdy Z Hasan MY Islam KZ Young B Ahmed MT Monir MU Shovon SM Kakon JF Kundu P Monitoring of land use and land cover changes by using remote sensing and GIS techniques at human-induced mangrove forests areas in Bangladesh Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment 2022 25 100699 10.1016/j.rsase.2022.100699
Faruque, M. J., Vekerdy, Z., Hasan, M. Y., Islam, K. Z., Young, B., Ahmed, M. T., Monir, M. U., Shovon, S. M., Kakon, J. F., & Kundu, P. (2022). Monitoring of land use and land cover changes by using remote sensing and GIS techniques at human-induced mangrove forests areas in Bangladesh. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 25, 100699. 10.1016/j.rsase.2022.10069910.1016/j.rsase.2022.100699
Flood N Continuity of reflectance data between Landsat-7 ETM+ and Landsat-8 OLI, for both top-of-atmosphere and surface reflectance: A study in the Australian landscape Remote sensing 2014 6 9 7952 7970 10.3390/rs6097952
Flood, N. (2014). Continuity of reflectance data between Landsat-7 ETM+ and Landsat-8 OLI, for both top-of-atmosphere and surface reflectance: A study in the Australian landscape. Remote sensing, 6(9), 7952–7970. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/6/9/7952.10.3390/rs6097952
Foley JA DeFries R Asner GP Barford C Bonan G Carpenter SR Chapin FS Coe MT Daily GC Gibbs HK Global consequences of land use Science 2005 309 5734 570 574 10.1126/science.1111772 16040698
Foley, J. A., DeFries, R., Asner, G. P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., Coe, M. T., Daily, G. C., & Gibbs, H. K. (2005). Global consequences of land use. Science, 309(5734), 570–574.16040698 10.1126/science.1111772
Foody GM Mathur A Toward intelligent training of supervised image classifications: Directing training data acquisition for SVM classification Remote Sensing of Environment 2004 93 1 107 117 10.1016/j.rse.2004.06.017
Foody, G. M., & Mathur, A. (2004). Toward intelligent training of supervised image classifications: Directing training data acquisition for SVM classification. Remote Sensing of Environment, 93(1), 107–117. 10.1016/j.rse.2004.06.01710.1016/j.rse.2004.06.017
Gaur S Mittal A Bandyopadhyay A Holman I Singh R Spatio-temporal analysis of land use and land cover change: A systematic model inter-comparison driven by integrated modelling techniques International Journal of Remote Sensing 2020 41 23 9229 9255 10.1080/01431161.2020.1815890
Gaur, S., Mittal, A., Bandyopadhyay, A., Holman, I., & Singh, R. (2020). Spatio-temporal analysis of land use and land cover change: A systematic model inter-comparison driven by integrated modelling techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 41(23), 9229–9255.10.1080/01431161.2020.1815890
Gibson L Münch Z Palmer A Mantel S Future land cover change scenarios in South African grasslands–Implications of altered biophysical drivers on land management Heliyon 2018 4 7 e00693 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00693 30035238
Gibson, L., Münch, Z., Palmer, A., & Mantel, S. (2018). Future land cover change scenarios in South African grasslands–Implications of altered biophysical drivers on land management. Heliyon, 4(7), e00693.30035238 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00693
Girma R Fürst C Moges A Land use land cover change modeling by integrating artificial neural network with cellular Automata-Markov chain model in Gidabo river basin, main Ethiopian rift Environmental Challenges 2022 6 100419 10.1016/j.envc.2021.100419
Girma, R., Fürst, C., & Moges, A. (2022). Land use land cover change modeling by integrating artificial neural network with cellular Automata-Markov chain model in Gidabo river basin, main Ethiopian rift. Environmental Challenges, 6, 100419.10.1016/j.envc.2021.100419
Giz, & Sher. (2020). Baseline study of the Lake Kivu basin and the Ruzizi River basin. SHER Consult Ltd. Retrieved August, 2023 from https://uploads.water-energy-food.org/resources/1.ABAKIR_SCR16_WP1_WP2_A4_EN_20210312.pdf
Guzha AC Rufino MC Okoth S Jacobs S Nóbrega RLB Impacts of land use and land cover change on surface runoff, discharge and low flows: Evidence from East Africa Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 2018 15 49 67 10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.11.005
Guzha, A. C., Rufino, M. C., Okoth, S., Jacobs, S., & Nóbrega, R. L. B. (2018). Impacts of land use and land cover change on surface runoff, discharge and low flows: Evidence from East Africa. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 15, 49–67. 10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.11.00510.1016/j.ejrh.2017.11.005
Hasan S Shi W Zhu X Abbas S Khan HUA Future simulation of land use changes in rapidly urbanizing South China based on Land Change Modeler and remote sensing data Sustainability 2020 12 11 4350 10.3390/su12114350
Hasan, S., Shi, W., Zhu, X., Abbas, S., & Khan, H. U. A. (2020). Future simulation of land use changes in rapidly urbanizing South China based on Land Change Modeler and remote sensing data. Sustainability, 12(11), 4350.10.3390/su12114350
Ibrahim SA Improving land use/cover classification accuracy from random forest feature importance selection based on synergistic use of sentinel data and digital elevation model in agriculturally dominated landscape Agriculture 2023 13 1 98 10.3390/agriculture13010098
Ibrahim, S. A. (2023). Improving land use/cover classification accuracy from random forest feature importance selection based on synergistic use of sentinel data and digital elevation model in agriculturally dominated landscape. Agriculture, 13(1), 98. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/1/98.10.3390/agriculture13010098
ISRIC. (n.d.). World Soil Information. International Soil Reference and Information Centre. Retrieved November 2023, from https://data.isric.org/geonetwork
IUCN, EKN, SNV, RWARRI, & GoR. (2022). The State of Soil Erosion Control in Rwanda. Kigali, Rwanda: Rwanda Water Resoures Board. Retrieved from https://waterportal.rwb.rw/sites/default/files/2022-08/The%20State%20of%20Soil%20Erosion%20Control%20in%20Rwanda.pdf
Kanyamibwa S Impact of war on conservation: Rwandan environment and wildlife in agony Biodiversity & Conservation 1998 7 11 1399 1406 10.1023/A:1008880113990
Kanyamibwa, S. (1998). Impact of war on conservation: Rwandan environment and wildlife in agony. Biodiversity & Conservation, 7(11), 1399–1406. 10.1023/A:100888011399010.1023/A:1008880113990
Karamage F Zhang C Fang X Liu T Ndayisaba F Nahayo L Kayiranga A Nsengiyumva JB Modeling rainfall-runoff response to land use and land cover change in Rwanda (1990–2016) Water 2017 9 2 147 10.3390/w9020147
Karamage, F., Zhang, C., Fang, X., Liu, T., Ndayisaba, F., Nahayo, L., Kayiranga, A., & Nsengiyumva, J. B. (2017). Modeling rainfall-runoff response to land use and land cover change in Rwanda (1990–2016). Water, 9(2), 147.10.3390/w9020147
Kayitesi NM Guzha AC Mariethoz G Impacts of land use land cover change and climate change on river hydro-morphology- A review of research studies in tropical regions Journal of Hydrology 2022 615 128702 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128702
Kayitesi, N. M., Guzha, A. C., & Mariethoz, G. (2022). Impacts of land use land cover change and climate change on river hydro-morphology- A review of research studies in tropical regions. Journal of Hydrology, 615, 128702. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.12870210.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128702
Khwarahm NR Najmaddin PM Ararat K Qader S Past and future prediction of land cover land use change based on earth observation data by the CA–Markov model: A case study from Duhok governorate Iraq. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 2021 14 15 1544 10.1007/s12517-021-07984-6
Khwarahm, N. R., Najmaddin, P. M., Ararat, K., & Qader, S. (2021). Past and future prediction of land cover land use change based on earth observation data by the CA–Markov model: A case study from Duhok governorate. Iraq. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14(15), 1544. 10.1007/s12517-021-07984-610.1007/s12517-021-07984-6
Kulimushi LC Maniragaba A Choudhari P Elbeltagi A Uwemeye J Rushema E Singh SK Evaluation of soil erosion and sediment yield spatio-temporal pattern during 1990–2019 Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk 2021 12 1 2676 2707 10.1080/19475705.2021.1973118
Kulimushi, L. C., Maniragaba, A., Choudhari, P., Elbeltagi, A., Uwemeye, J., Rushema, E., & Singh, S. K. (2021). Evaluation of soil erosion and sediment yield spatio-temporal pattern during 1990–2019. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 12(1), 2676–2707.10.1080/19475705.2021.1973118
Lee JK Acharya TD Lee DH Exploring land cover classification accuracy of Landsat 8 image using spectral index layer stacking in hilly region of South Korea Sensors and Materials 2018 30 12 2927 2941 10.18494/SAM.2018.1934
Lee, J. K., Acharya, T. D., & Lee, D. H. (2018). Exploring land cover classification accuracy of Landsat 8 image using spectral index layer stacking in hilly region of South Korea. Sensors and Materials, 30(12), 2927–2941.10.18494/SAM.2018.1934
Leta MK Demissie TA Tränckner J Modeling and prediction of land use land cover change dynamics based on Land Change Modeler (LCM) in nashe watershed, upper blue nile basin Ethiopia. Sustainability 2021 13 7 3740 10.3390/su13073740
Leta, M. K., Demissie, T. A., & Tränckner, J. (2021). Modeling and prediction of land use land cover change dynamics based on Land Change Modeler (LCM) in nashe watershed, upper blue nile basin. Ethiopia. Sustainability, 13(7), 3740.10.3390/su13073740
Li K Feng M Biswas A Su H Niu Y Cao J Driving factors and future prediction of land use and cover change based on satellite remote sensing data by the LCM model: A case study from Gansu Province, China Sensors 2020 20 10 2757 10.3390/s20102757 32408569
Li, K., Feng, M., Biswas, A., Su, H., Niu, Y., & Cao, J. (2020). Driving factors and future prediction of land use and cover change based on satellite remote sensing data by the LCM model: A case study from Gansu Province, China. Sensors, 20(10), 2757. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/10/2757.32408569 10.3390/s20102757
Li C Yang M Li Z Wang B How will rwandan land use/land cover change under high population pressure and changing climate? Applied Sciences 2021 11 12 5376 10.3390/app11125376
Li, C., Yang, M., Li, Z., & Wang, B. (2021). How will rwandan land use/land cover change under high population pressure and changing climate? Applied Sciences, 11(12), 5376.10.3390/app11125376
Locatelli L Guerrero M Russo B Martínez-Gomariz E Sunyer D Martínez M Socio-economic assessment of green infrastructure for climate change adaptation in the context of urban drainage planning Sustainability 2020 12 9 3792 10.3390/su12093792
Locatelli, L., Guerrero, M., Russo, B., Martínez-Gomariz, E., Sunyer, D., & Martínez, M. (2020). Socio-economic assessment of green infrastructure for climate change adaptation in the context of urban drainage planning. Sustainability, 12(9), 3792.10.3390/su12093792
Mandal S Bandyopadhyay A Bhadra A Dynamics and future prediction of LULC on Pare River basin of Arunachal Pradesh using machine learning techniques Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2023 195 6 709 10.1007/s10661-023-11280-z 37212900
Mandal, S., Bandyopadhyay, A., & Bhadra, A. (2023). Dynamics and future prediction of LULC on Pare River basin of Arunachal Pradesh using machine learning techniques. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 195(6), 709.37212900 10.1007/s10661-023-11280-z
Mariye M Mariyo M Changming Y Teffera ZL Weldegebrial B Effects of land use and land cover change on soil erosion potential in Berhe district: A case study of Legedadi watershed, Ethiopia International Journal of River Basin Management 2022 20 1 79 91 10.1080/15715124.2020.1767636
Mariye, M., Mariyo, M., Changming, Y., Teffera, Z. L., & Weldegebrial, B. (2022). Effects of land use and land cover change on soil erosion potential in Berhe district: A case study of Legedadi watershed, Ethiopia. International Journal of River Basin Management, 20(1), 79–91. 10.1080/15715124.2020.176763610.1080/15715124.2020.1767636
Mariye M Jianhua L Maryo M Tsegaye G Aletaye E Remote sensing and GIS-based study of land use/cover dynamics, driving factors, and implications in southern Ethiopia, with special reference to the Legabora watershed Heliyon 2024 10 1 e23380 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23380 38148827
Mariye, M., Jianhua, L., Maryo, M., Tsegaye, G., & Aletaye, E. (2024). Remote sensing and GIS-based study of land use/cover dynamics, driving factors, and implications in southern Ethiopia, with special reference to the Legabora watershed. Heliyon, 10(1), e23380.38148827 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23380
Megahed Y Cabral P Silva J Caetano M Land cover mapping analysis and urban growth modelling using remote sensing techniques in Greater Cairo Region—Egypt ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 2015 4 3 1750 1769 10.3390/ijgi4031750
Megahed, Y., Cabral, P., Silva, J., & Caetano, M. (2015). Land cover mapping analysis and urban growth modelling using remote sensing techniques in Greater Cairo Region—Egypt. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 4(3), 1750–1769.10.3390/ijgi4031750
Mellor A Haywood A Stone C Jones S The performance of random forests in an operational setting for large area sclerophyll forest classification Remote sensing 2013 5 6 2838 2856 10.3390/rs5062838
Mellor, A., Haywood, A., Stone, C., & Jones, S. (2013). The performance of random forests in an operational setting for large area sclerophyll forest classification. Remote sensing, 5(6), 2838–2856. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/5/6/2838.10.3390/rs5062838
MoE, N., Enabel, BMU, IUCN. (2019). Rwanda forest cover mapping. Retrieved from https://www.environment.gov.rw/fileadmin/user_upload/Moe/Publications/Reports/Forest_cover_report_2019.pdf
Mugiraneza T Ban Y Haas J Urban land cover dynamics and their impact on ecosystem services in Kigali, Rwanda using multi-temporal Landsat data Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment 2019 13 234 246 10.1016/j.rsase.2018.11.001
Mugiraneza, T., Ban, Y., & Haas, J. (2019). Urban land cover dynamics and their impact on ecosystem services in Kigali, Rwanda using multi-temporal Landsat data. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 13, 234–246. 10.1016/j.rsase.2018.11.00110.1016/j.rsase.2018.11.001
Muhire I Manirakiza V Nsanganwimana F Nyiratuza M Inzirayineza TA Uworwabayeho A The environmental impacts of mining on Gishwati Protected Reserve in Rwanda Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2021 193 9 600 10.1007/s10661-021-09372-9 34435259
Muhire, I., Manirakiza, V., Nsanganwimana, F., Nyiratuza, M., Inzirayineza, T. A., & Uworwabayeho, A. (2021). The environmental impacts of mining on Gishwati Protected Reserve in Rwanda. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 193(9), 600. 10.1007/s10661-021-09372-934435259 10.1007/s10661-021-09372-9
Munanura IE Backman KF Sabuhoro E Powell RB Hallo JC The perceived forms and drivers of forest dependence at Volcanoes National Park, Rwanda Environmental Sociology 2018 4 3 343 357 10.1080/23251042.2017.1414661
Munanura, I. E., Backman, K. F., Sabuhoro, E., Powell, R. B., & Hallo, J. C. (2018). The perceived forms and drivers of forest dependence at Volcanoes National Park, Rwanda. Environmental Sociology, 4(3), 343–357. 10.1080/23251042.2017.141466110.1080/23251042.2017.1414661
Mungai LM Messina JP Zulu LC Qi J Snapp S Modeling spatiotemporal patterns of land use/land cover change in Central Malawi using a neural network model Remote Sensing 2022 14 14 3477 10.3390/rs14143477
Mungai, L. M., Messina, J. P., Zulu, L. C., Qi, J., & Snapp, S. (2022). Modeling spatiotemporal patterns of land use/land cover change in Central Malawi using a neural network model. Remote Sensing, 14(14), 3477.10.3390/rs14143477
Mwanjalolo J-GM Makooma Moses T Rao KP Musana B Bernard F Leblanc B Mkangya J Muke K Rick K Luswata KC Soil fertility in relation to landscape position and land use/cover types: A case study of the Lake Kivu pilot learning site Advances in Agriculture 2015 2015 1 8 10.1155/2015/752936
Mwanjalolo, J.-G.M., Makooma Moses, T., Rao, K. P., Musana, B., Bernard, F., Leblanc, B., Mkangya, J., Muke, K., Rick, K., & Luswata, K. C. (2015). Soil fertility in relation to landscape position and land use/cover types: A case study of the Lake Kivu pilot learning site. Advances in Agriculture, 2015, 1–8.10.1155/2015/752936
Najmuddin O Deng X Bhattacharya R The dynamics of land use/cover and the statistical assessment of cropland change drivers in the Kabul River Basin, Afghanistan Sustainability 2018 10 2 423 10.3390/su10020423
Najmuddin, O., Deng, X., & Bhattacharya, R. (2018). The dynamics of land use/cover and the statistical assessment of cropland change drivers in the Kabul River Basin, Afghanistan. Sustainability, 10(2), 423.10.3390/su10020423
Nambajimana JDD He X Zhou J Justine MF Li J Khurram D Mind’je R Nsabimana G Land use change impacts on water erosion in Rwanda Sustainability 2019 12 1 50 10.3390/su12010050
Nambajimana, J. D. D., He, X., Zhou, J., Justine, M. F., Li, J., Khurram, D., Mind’je, R., & Nsabimana, G. (2019). Land use change impacts on water erosion in Rwanda. Sustainability, 12(1), 50.10.3390/su12010050
Nasiri V Deljouei A Moradi F Sadeghi SMM Borz SA Land use and land cover mapping using Sentinel-2, Landsat-8 Satellite Images, and Google Earth Engine: A comparison of two composition methods Remote Sensing 2022 14 9 1977 10.3390/rs14091977
Nasiri, V., Deljouei, A., Moradi, F., Sadeghi, S. M. M., & Borz, S. A. (2022). Land use and land cover mapping using Sentinel-2, Landsat-8 Satellite Images, and Google Earth Engine: A comparison of two composition methods. Remote Sensing, 14(9), 1977.10.3390/rs14091977
Nedd R Light K Owens M James N Johnson E Anandhi A A synthesis of land use/land cover studies: Definitions, classification systems, meta-studies, challenges and knowledge gaps on a global landscape Land 2021 10 9 994 10.3390/land10090994
Nedd, R., Light, K., Owens, M., James, N., Johnson, E., & Anandhi, A. (2021). A synthesis of land use/land cover studies: Definitions, classification systems, meta-studies, challenges and knowledge gaps on a global landscape. Land, 10(9), 994. https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/9/994.10.3390/land10090994
Nickel D Schoenfelder W Medearis D Dolowitz DP Keeley M Shuster W German experience in managing stormwater with green infrastructure Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2014 57 3 403 423 10.1080/09640568.2012.748652
Nickel, D., Schoenfelder, W., Medearis, D., Dolowitz, D. P., Keeley, M., & Shuster, W. (2014). German experience in managing stormwater with green infrastructure. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57(3), 403–423. 10.1080/09640568.2012.74865210.1080/09640568.2012.748652
NISR. (2023). The Fifth Rwanda Population and Housing Census, Main Indicators Report. Kigali, Rwanda: National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda. Retrieved from https://www.statistics.gov.rw/publication/main_indicators_2022
Nsengiyumva JB Luo G Nahayo L Huang X Cai P Landslide susceptibility assessment using spatial multi-criteria evaluation model in Rwanda International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2018 15 2 243 10.3390/ijerph15020243 29385096
Nsengiyumva, J. B., Luo, G., Nahayo, L., Huang, X., & Cai, P. (2018). Landslide susceptibility assessment using spatial multi-criteria evaluation model in Rwanda. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(2), 243.29385096 10.3390/ijerph15020243
Onyango DO Opiyo SB Detection of historical landscape changes in Lake Victoria Basin, Kenya, using remote sensing multi-spectral indices Watershed Ecology and the Environment 2022 4 1 11 10.1016/j.wsee.2021.12.001
Onyango, D. O., & Opiyo, S. B. (2022). Detection of historical landscape changes in Lake Victoria Basin, Kenya, using remote sensing multi-spectral indices. Watershed Ecology and the Environment, 4, 1–11.10.1016/j.wsee.2021.12.001
Plumptre AJ Lessons learned from on-the-ground conservation in Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo Journal of Sustainable Forestry 2003 16 3–4 69 88 10.1300/J091v16n03_04
Plumptre, A. J. (2003). Lessons learned from on-the-ground conservation in Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 16(3–4), 69–88.10.1300/J091v16n03_04
RCMRD. (n.d.). Rwanda 90 meters Digital Elevation Model. Regional Centre for Mapping of Resources for Development. Retrieved September 2023, from https://www.rcmrd.org/en/
Remondi F Burlando P Vollmer D Exploring the hydrological impact of increasing urbanisation on a tropical river catchment of the metropolitan Jakarta Indonesia Sustainable Cities and Society 2016 20 210 221 10.1016/j.scs.2015.10.001
Remondi, F., Burlando, P., & Vollmer, D. (2016). Exploring the hydrological impact of increasing urbanisation on a tropical river catchment of the metropolitan Jakarta Indonesia. Sustainable Cities and Society, 20, 210–221. 10.1016/j.scs.2015.10.00110.1016/j.scs.2015.10.001
Riggio J Jacobson AP Hijmans RJ Caro T How effective are the protected areas of East Africa? Global Ecology and Conservation 2019 17 e00573 10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00573
Riggio, J., Jacobson, A. P., Hijmans, R. J., & Caro, T. (2019). How effective are the protected areas of East Africa? Global Ecology and Conservation, 17, e00573.10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00573
RLMA. (n.d.). Geo-information in Rwanda. Rwanda Land Management and Use Authority. Retrieved September 2023, from https://rwanda.africageoportal.com/
Rukundo E Liu S Dong Y Rutebuka E Asamoah EF Xu J Wu X Spatio-temporal dynamics of critical ecosystem services in response to agricultural expansion in Rwanda, East Africa Ecological Indicators 2018 89 696 705 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.02.032
Rukundo, E., Liu, S., Dong, Y., Rutebuka, E., Asamoah, E. F., Xu, J., & Wu, X. (2018). Spatio-temporal dynamics of critical ecosystem services in response to agricultural expansion in Rwanda, East Africa. Ecological Indicators, 89, 696–705.10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.02.032
Sangermano F Toledano J Eastman JR Land cover change in the Bolivian Amazon and its implications for REDD+ and endemic biodiversity Landscape Ecology 2012 27 571 584 10.1007/s10980-012-9710-y
Sangermano, F., Toledano, J., & Eastman, J. R. (2012). Land cover change in the Bolivian Amazon and its implications for REDD+ and endemic biodiversity. Landscape Ecology, 27, 571–584.10.1007/s10980-012-9710-y
Selmy SAH Kucher DE Mozgeris G Moursy ARA Jimenez-Ballesta R Kucher OD Fadl ME Mustafa A-RA Detecting, analyzing, and predicting land use/land cover (LULC) changes in arid regions using Landsat images, CA-Markov Hybrid Model, and GIS Techniques Remote sensing 2023 15 23 5522 10.3390/rs15235522
Selmy, S. A. H., Kucher, D. E., Mozgeris, G., Moursy, A. R. A., Jimenez-Ballesta, R., Kucher, O. D., Fadl, M. E., & Mustafa, A.-R.A. (2023). Detecting, analyzing, and predicting land use/land cover (LULC) changes in arid regions using Landsat images, CA-Markov Hybrid Model, and GIS Techniques. Remote sensing, 15(23), 5522. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/23/5522.10.3390/rs15235522
Shafie B Javid AH Behbahani HI Darabi H Lotfi FH Modeling land use/cover change based on LCM model for a semi-arid area in the Latian Dam Watershed (Iran) Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2023 195 3 363 10.1007/s10661-022-10876-1 36738365
Shafie, B., Javid, A. H., Behbahani, H. I., Darabi, H., & Lotfi, F. H. (2023). Modeling land use/cover change based on LCM model for a semi-arid area in the Latian Dam Watershed (Iran). Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 195(3), 363. 10.1007/s10661-022-10876-136738365 10.1007/s10661-022-10876-1
Sibanda S Ahmed F Modelling historic and future land use/land cover changes and their impact on wetland area in Shashe sub-catchment, Zimbabwe Modeling Earth Systems and Environment 2021 7 1 57 70 10.1007/s40808-020-00963-y
Sibanda, S., & Ahmed, F. (2021). Modelling historic and future land use/land cover changes and their impact on wetland area in Shashe sub-catchment, Zimbabwe. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 7(1), 57–70. 10.1007/s40808-020-00963-y10.1007/s40808-020-00963-y
Steffen W Broadgate W Deutsch L Gaffney O Ludwig C The trajectory of the anthropocene: The great acceleration The Anthropocene Review 2015 2 1 81 98 10.1177/2053019614564785
Steffen, W., Broadgate, W., Deutsch, L., Gaffney, O., & Ludwig, C. (2015). The trajectory of the anthropocene: The great acceleration. The Anthropocene Review, 2(1), 81–98. 10.1177/205301961456478510.1177/2053019614564785
Talukdar S Singha P Mahato S Shahfahad Pal S Liou Y-A Rahman A Land-use land-cover classification by machine learning classifiers for satellite observations—A review Remote sensing 2020 12 7 1135 10.3390/rs12071135
Talukdar, S., Singha, P., Mahato, S., Shahfahad, Pal, S., Liou, Y.-A., & Rahman, A. (2020). Land-use land-cover classification by machine learning classifiers for satellite observations—A review. Remote sensing, 12(7), 1135.10.3390/rs12071135
Triscowati DW Sartono B Kurnia A Dirgahayu D Wijayanto AW Classification of rice-plant growth phase using supervised random forest method based on Landsat-8 multitemporal data International Journal of Remote Sensing and Earth Sciences 2019 16 2 187 196
Triscowati, D. W., Sartono, B., Kurnia, A., Dirgahayu, D., & Wijayanto, A. W. (2019). Classification of rice-plant growth phase using supervised random forest method based on Landsat-8 multitemporal data. International Journal of Remote Sensing and Earth Sciences, 16(2), 187–196.
Uwihirwe J Hrachowitz M Bogaard TA Landslide precipitation thresholds in Rwanda Landslides 2020 17 10 2469 2481 10.1007/s10346-020-01457-9
Uwihirwe, J., Hrachowitz, M., & Bogaard, T. A. (2020). Landslide precipitation thresholds in Rwanda. Landslides, 17(10), 2469–2481. 10.1007/s10346-020-01457-910.1007/s10346-020-01457-9
Wassenaar T Gerber P Verburg PH Rosales M Ibrahim M Steinfeld H Projecting land use changes in the neotropics: The geography of pasture expansion into forest Global Environmental Change 2007 17 1 86 104 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.007
Wassenaar, T., Gerber, P., Verburg, P. H., Rosales, M., Ibrahim, M., & Steinfeld, H. (2007). Projecting land use changes in the neotropics: The geography of pasture expansion into forest. Global Environmental Change, 17(1), 86–104.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.007
WorldPop. (n.d.). Open Spatial Demographic Data and Research. Retrieved October 2023, from https://www.worldpop.org/
Xu H Extraction of urban built-up land features from Landsat imagery using a thematicoriented index combination technique Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 2007 73 12 1381 1391 10.14358/PERS.73.12.1381
Xu, H. (2007). Extraction of urban built-up land features from Landsat imagery using a thematicoriented index combination technique. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 73(12), 1381–1391.10.14358/PERS.73.12.1381
Young NE Anderson RS Chignell SM Vorster AG Lawrence R Evangelista PH A survival guide to Landsat preprocessing Ecology 2017 98 4 920 932 10.1002/ecy.1730 28072449
Young, N. E., Anderson, R. S., Chignell, S. M., Vorster, A. G., Lawrence, R., & Evangelista, P. H. (2017). A survival guide to Landsat preprocessing. Ecology, 98(4), 920–932.28072449 10.1002/ecy.1730
Zaidi SM Akbari A Abu Samah A Kong NS Gisen A Isabella J Landsat-5 time series analysis for land use/land cover change detection using NDVI and SEMI-SUPERVISED CLASSIFICATION TECHNIQues Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 2017 26 6 2833 2840 10.15244/pjoes/68878
Zaidi, S. M., Akbari, A., Abu Samah, A., Kong, N. S., Gisen, A., & Isabella, J. (2017). Landsat-5 time series analysis for land use/land cover change detection using NDVI and SEMI-SUPERVISED CLASSIFICATION TECHNIQues. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 26(6), 2833–2840.10.15244/pjoes/68878
