
==== Front
Ecol Evol
Ecol Evol
10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7758
ECE3
Ecology and Evolution
2045-7758
John Wiley and Sons Inc. Hoboken

10.1002/ece3.70251
ECE370251
ECE-2024-01-00127.R2
Microbiomics
Research Article
Research Article
Comparative analysis of the gut microbiome of ungulate species from Qinghai–Xizang plateau
Wang et al.
Wang Xibao 1
Gao Xiaodong 1
Chen Yao 1
Wu Xiaoyang 1
Shang Yongquan 1
Zhang Zhihao 1
Zhou Shengyang 1
Zhang Honghai https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5010-2502
1 zhanghonghai67@126.com

1 College of Life Sciences Qufu Normal University Qufu Shandong China
* Correspondence
Honghai Zhang, College of Life Sciences, Qufu Normal University, Jingxuan West Street No. 57, Qufu, Shandong 273165, China.
Email: zhanghonghai67@126.com

10 9 2024
9 2024
14 9 10.1002/ece3.v14.9 e7025109 8 2024
30 1 2024
16 8 2024
© 2024 The Author(s). Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Several studies have investigated the gut bacterial composition of wild ungulates in the Qinghai–Xizang Plateau. However, the relationship between their gut microbiome dendrograms and their phylogenetic tree remains unclear. In this study, we analyzed 45 amplicons (V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene) from five wild ungulates—Pseudois nayaur, Pantholops hodgsonii, Gazella subgutturosa, Bos grunniens, and Equus kiang—from the Qinghai–Xizang Plateau to clarify the relationship between their phylogenies and gut microbiome dendrograms. The unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean analysis and hierarchical clustering analysis indicated that G. subgutturosa is closely related to P. nayaur; however, these results were inconsistent with their phylogenetic trees. Additionally, the indicator genera in the microbiome of each wild ungulate showed strong associations with the diets and habitats of their host. Thus, diet and space niche differentiation may primarily account for the differences between the gut microbiome characteristics of these wild ungulates and their phylogeny. In summary, our research provides insights into the evolutionary factors influencing the gut microbiome of wild ungulates in the Qinghai–Xizang Plateau.

This study investigated the relationship between the gut bacterial community and the phylogeny of five wild ungulates (Pseudois nayaur, Pantholops hodgsonii, Gazella subgutturosa, Bos mutus, and Equus kiang) inhabiting the Qinghai‐Tibetan Plateau using 16S rRNA gene data. The results of UPGMA and HCA were inconsistent with those of IQ‐TREE, indicating that host phylogeny is not the only factor influencing the gut microbiota, and other factors, such as diet and habitat, may also have an impact. There were significant differences in gut bacterial composition among the five wild ungulates, and each species had distinctive bacterial features, primarily associated with fiber and cellulose breakdown, contributing to gastrointestinal homeostasis.

gut microbiome
niche
phylogeny
wild ungulates
National Natural Science Foundation of China 10.13039/501100001809 32001228 32070405 32270444 Youth Innovation Team in Colleges and Universities of Shandong Province2022KJ177 Graduate Dissertation Research Innovation Fund Project of Qufu Normal University, ChinaLWCXS202313 source-schema-version-number2.0
cover-dateSeptember 2024
details-of-publishers-convertorConverter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.4.8 mode:remove_FC converted:10.09.2024
Wang, X. , Gao, X. , Chen, Y. , Wu, X. , Shang, Y. , Zhang, Z. , Zhou, S. , & Zhang, H. (2024). Comparative analysis of the gut microbiome of ungulate species from Qinghai–Xizang plateau. Ecology and Evolution, 14 , e70251. 10.1002/ece3.70251

Xibao Wang and Xiaodong Gao Shared first authorship.
==== Body
pmc1 INTRODUCTION

Vertebrates harbor vast and complex communities of microorganisms in their gastrointestinal tract, including archaea, bacteria, fungi, protozoa, and viruses. Among these, bacteria constitute the highest proportion of these microorganisms (Suchodolski, 2011; Wang, Shang, Wei, Wu, et al., 2022; Xu et al., 2015; Zhu et al., 2022). Several studies on the bacterial communities in vertebrate guts have shown that these microorganisms are crucial in the overall health and well‐being of their host (Muñoz et al., 2024; Spencer et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2023). The bacterial community maintains gut homeostasis (Singh, 2019; Zmora et al., 2019), digests nutrients (Greene et al., 2020; Shang et al., 2023; Wu et al., 2016), and provides energy (Tremaroli & Bäckhed, 2012; Zhang et al., 2016). For example, the bacterial community in giant pandas can absorb and convert 70% of the flavonoid monomers present in bamboo leaves and shoots (Wang et al., 2021).

The gut microbiome is influenced by various factors such as diet (Brunetti et al., 2023; Huang et al., 2021; Yao et al., 2021; Yarlagadda et al., 2021), temperature (Bo et al., 2019; Koziol et al., 2023; Sepulveda & Moeller, 2020), niche (Sadeghi et al., 2023; Shankregowda et al., 2023; Wang, Shang, Wei, Wu, et al., 2022; Wang, Wu, Shang, Mei, et al., 2022), and phylogeny (Cortes‐Ortiz & Amato, 2021; Hird et al., 2015; Laviad‐Shitrit et al., 2019). Additionally, a previous study indicated that the correlation between gut microbiome and host phylogeny is stronger in mammals than that in birds, reptiles, or amphibians (Song et al., 2020). For example, Brown et al. (2023) observed topological congruence between the phylogenies and microbiome dendrograms of 14 sympatric small mammal species at or above the family level. Conversely, some studies have shown that below the family level, the phylogenies of the subfamilies Cervinae and Caprinae are inconsistent with their gut microbiome dendrograms (Gregor et al., 2022; Li et al., 2018; Sun et al., 2021). Similarly, at the species level, Grond et al. (2020) observed inconsistencies between the gut microbiome dendrograms and phylogenies of six chipmunk species from the western United States. This can be attributed to species with close phylogenetic relationships exhibiting differences in diet and spatial niches to avoid competition. Therefore, at finer phylogenetic scales, spatial and diet niche differentiation among host species can explain inconsistencies between gut microbiome dendrograms and host phylogenies of different species (Brown et al., 2023; Greene et al., 2020).

Previous studies have provided a wealth of data on the 16S rRNA genes of wild ungulates from the Qinghai‐Xizang Plateau (Fu et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2021; Ma et al., 2019; Wang, Wu, Shang, Gao, et al., 2022) that can be used to enhance our understanding of the relationship between their phylogeny and gut microbiome. Therefore, we tested this relationship using 16S rRNA genes. The findings of this study may explain the evolutionary factors affecting the gut microbiome of wild ungulates from the Qinghai‐Xizang Plateau.

2 MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1 The 16S rRNA gene data selection

Given the significant differences in captive environments across different regions, we chose wild ungulates to avoid the influence of captivity on the results of our analyses. We used two criteria for selecting data: (1) the sampling period was summer (May–June), and (2) the habitat of the sampled species was the Qinghai‐Xizang Plateau. The sampling environment and 16S rRNA gene data for the five wild ungulates (E. kiang, B. grunniens, P. hodgsonii, P. nayaur, and G. subgutturosa) were obtained from relevant articles (Qin et al., 2020; Wang, Wu, Shang, Gao, et al., 2022). These wild ungulates belong to two orders, four subfamilies, and five genera. The 16S rRNA gene datasets for E. kiang (10 samples named EK), B. grunniens (7 samples named BG), P. hodgsonii (4 samples named PH), P. nayaur (4 samples named PN), and G. subgutturosa (20 samples named GS) were downloaded from the SRA database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI; www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) (Qin et al., 2022; Wang, Wu, Shang, Gao, et al., 2022). Detailed information for the 45 samples is listed in Table S1.

2.2 Phylogenetic reconstructions

The mitochondrial genome of wild ungulates, characterized by structural conservation and maternal heredity, is extensively used for identifying phylogenetic relationships among organisms. To reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships of the five wild ungulates, we downloaded the 12 mitochondrial protein‐coding genes (excluding the ND6 gene) of the five species from the Nucleotide database of NCBI (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). We used MEGA7 software (Kumar et al., 2016) to align the 12 genes. To select the optimal model for the IQ‐tree, we used the model‐defined modules in PhyloSuite software (V1.2.3) (Zhang, Gao, et al., 2020). The IQ‐tree settings were as follows: the optimal model was TIM2; bootstrap ultrafast; bootstrap number was 200,000; maximum number of iterations (max_iter) was 1000; and the minimum correlation coefficient (min_cor_coef) was 0.9. The IQ‐tree was visualized using the Interactive Tree of Life (ITOL) website (https://itol.embl.de/) (Letunic & Bork, 2021).

2.3 Sequence processing and analyses

The sequencing region of all samples was the V3–V4 high‐variance region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene, and all were paired‐end reads using the Illumina platform (San Diego, CA, USA). We used EasyAmplicon software (V1.18.1; Liu et al., 2023) to merge the 45 samples and remove primers. Sequence denoising (Callahan et al., 2017) and chimera removal (Edgar et al., 2011) were performed using the Parallel‐Meta Suite (PMS, V3.7; Chen, Li, et al., 2022). Following the 97% conventional sequence criterion, we used the vsearch tool (Rognes et al., 2016) to obtain the operational taxonomic unit (OTU) table for each sample. Based on the OTU tables and the SILVA database (V123), we obtained each taxon's relative abundance table from the kingdom to species level. At the OTU level, rarefaction curves, species accumulation boxplots, alpha analyses, and analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) were generated using the Tutools platform (http://www.cloudtutu.com). Hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) and unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean analysis (UPGMA) were performed using OmicShare (https://www.omicshare.com/tools) and SRplot (http://www.bioinformatics.com.cn/SRplot), respectively. Additionally, we compared the structures of the graphs obtained from UPGMA, HCA, and IQ‐tree testing to determine the relationships between the phylogeny of wild ungulates and their gut microbiome. At the phylum and genus levels, we used the ggplot2 package in R software (V4.2.1) to generate relative abundance column cumulative plots of the top 10 bacteria. Furthermore, to select the indicator genus with the highest contribution to interspecies variation, we performed random forest analysis using the Wekemo Bioincloud platform (https://www.bioincloud.tech).

2.4 Metabolite prediction

Based on OTU tables and sequences, we used the microbiome metabolome integration platform (MMIP; http://bioinfo.jisiasr.org/mmip/index.html) (Gautam et al., 2023) to predict the gut microbiome metabolites of the 45 samples (Module‐I). Detailed information on the metabolites is listed in Table S2. To clarify the role of indicator genera, we used OmicShare tools (https://www.omicshare.com/tools) to explore the correlation between indicator genera and gut metabolites using Spearman correlation analysis (threshold: R ≥ 05, p ≤ .001).

3 RESULTS

3.1 Alpha diversity

The total number of OTUs did not increase significantly when the number of samples exceeded 40 (Figure 1a). The 45 rarefaction curves of the samples gradually flattened at more than 10,000 sampled sequences (Figure 1b). These results indicate that the number of samples and sequencing depth were sufficient for subsequent analyses. All the samples had Good's coverage indices above 0.97 (Figure 2), indicating that our analyses effectively represented the gut microbiome of the five wild ungulates. Our results also showed significantly higher (p < .05) Shannon and Simpson indices for PN compared to those of other species. Additionally, the alpha diversity indices of PH were the lowest among the five species (Figure 2).

FIGURE 1 Species accumulation (a) and rarefaction (b) curves. The curves reached a plateau, indicating that the experimental samples were suitable for subsequent analyses.

FIGURE 2 Boxplot of alpha diversity (Kruskal–Wallis test) among the five wild ungulates. p < .05 and p < .001 indicate significant and extremely significant differences between species, respectively.

3.2 Gut microbiome composition

At the phylum level (Figure 3a), Firmicutes was the most abundant phylum in the gut microbiome of the five wild ungulates (GS, 77.97%; EK, 53.83%; PN, 58.25%; PH, 68.36%; BG, 66.46%), followed by Bacteroidetes (GS, 18.36%; EK, 25.42%; PN, 30.37%; PH, 17.77%; BG 19.09%). The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio was the highest in GS and lowest in PN (GS, 4.24; EK, 2.12; PN, 1.92; PH, 3.85; BG, 3.48). At the genus level (Figure 3b), Ruminococcaceae_UCG‐005 was the most abundant genus in four ungulates (GS, 17.80%; PN, 10.19%; PH, 16.87%; BG, 14.48%), except in EK, where the most abundant genus was Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group (12.44%).

FIGURE 3 Relative abundances of the top 10 abundant bacteria in the gut of ungulate species at the phylum (a) and genus (b) levels.

3.3 Phylogenetic analysis and cluster analyses

The IQ‐tree showed that P. nayaur (PN) and P. hodgsonii (PH) clustered into one branch, whereas E. kiang (EK) formed the outermost branch (Figure 4a). At the OTU level, HCA and UPGMA showed that GS and PN clustered into one branch, while EK formed the outermost branch (Figure 4b,c). Therefore, the gut microbiome dendrograms of the five ungulates were inconsistent with their phylogenies.

FIGURE 4 (a) Phylogenetic tree analysis (IQ‐tree; MZ337617.1, KR106993.1, MW285638.1, NC_020632.1, and NC_007441.1 are the mitogenome numbers of the five wild ungulates), (b) hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA), and (c) unweighted pair‐group method with arithmetic mean analysis (UPGMA).

3.4 Discrepancies in gut microbiome between species

ANOSIM demonstrated significant differences in gut bacterial composition among the five species (R = 0.993, p = .001). Consequently, we performed random forest analysis to select indicator genera for the five wild ungulates. At the genus level, Shuttleworthia, Ruminococcaceae_UCG‐005, and Tyzzerella_4 were identified as the main bacterial features of GS. For EK, the main bacterial features were Candidatus_Soleaferrea, Lachnospiraceae_UCG‐009, and Lachnospiraceae_XPB1014_group. For PH, they were Acinetobacter and Arthrobacter, while for PN and BG, they were Alistipes and Dorea, respectively (Figure 5).

FIGURE 5 Random forest analysis at the genus level between species. The red squares represent indicator genera.

3.5 Relationship between the indicator genus and metabolites

Ruminococcaceae_UCG‐005 and Tyzzerella_4 showed strong and significantly positive correlations with C00031 (D‐Glucose) and C00014 (Ammonia), while Shuttleworthia showed a strong and significantly positive correlation with C00031 (R > 0.5, p < .001, Figure 6). Lachnospiraceae_XPB1014_group, an indicator genus in EK, showed strong and significantly positive correlations with C00019 (S‐Adenosyl‐L‐methionine), C00032 (Protoheme), and C00091 (Succinyl‐CoA). Candidatus_Soleaferrea, another indicator genus in EK, also showed a strong and significantly positive correlation with C00019 (R > 0.5, p < .001, Figure 6). Acinetobacter and Arthrobacter, indicator genera in PH, showed very strong and significantly positive correlations with C00042 (Succinate), C00032, C00019, and C00091 (R > 0.5, p < .001, Figure 6). Additionally, Alistipes, an indicator genus in PN, showed strong and significantly positive correlations with four metabolites: C00144 (Guanosine 5′‐phosphate), C00036 (Oxaloacetate), C00031, and C00014 (R ≥ 0.5, p < .001, Figure 6). The indicator genus of BG, Dorea, only showed a strong and significantly positive correlation (R = 0.7, p < .001) with C00046 (Ribonucleic acid, Figure 6).

FIGURE 6 Spearman correlation heatmap showing correlations between indicator genera and metabolites. *p < .05, **p < .01, and ***p < .001. R > 0 and R < 0 indicate positive and negative correlations between indicator genera and metabolites, respectively.

4 DISCUSSION

Based on the 16S rRNA gene data from the NCBI database, we investigated the gut bacterial community of five wild ungulates from Qinghai Province, China. We established the phylogenetic relationships among these ungulates based on their gut bacterial communities and mitochondrial genes. The results of cluster analyses were inconsistent with those of the IQ‐tree. Our findings were similar to those previously reported for captive family Cervidae and subfamily Caprinae (Li et al., 2018; Sun et al., 2021). Above the family level, researchers observed a good correlation between gut microbiome dendrograms and host phylogenies (Ley et al., 2008; Rojas et al., 2021). At or below the genus level, the gut microbiome dendrograms of the species were inconsistent with their respective phylogenies (Liu et al., 2019; Sanders et al., 2014). Sun et al. (2021) observed that the gut microbiome dendrograms of P. nayaur, Hemitragus jemlahicus, and Ovis orientalis in the same captive environment were inconsistent with their phylogenetic structures. It is reported that the differentiation of spatial and dietary ecological niches is primarily responsible for ensuring the survival of species with close phylogenetic relationships (Schoener, 1974). During summer, succulent forbs, such as Allium polyrhizum, Zygophyllum rosovii, and Astragalus, constitute the main components of the diet of G. subgutturosa (Xu et al., 2012). Carex spp. and Kobresia spp. have been identified as the dominant components of the summer diet of B. grunniens. Graminoids (Calamagrostis spp., Poa spp., and Stipa spp.) and forbs (Oxytropis spp.) dominate the summer diet of P. hodgsoni and E. kiang, respectively (Shi et al., 2016). Stipa orientalis, Elymus longearistatus, and Festuca olgae are the main components of the summer diet of P. nayaur (Mishra et al., 2004). These findings highlight the differentiation of dietary ecological niches among wild ungulates. Therefore, niche differences may be one of the factors responsible for the observed inconsistency between gut microbiome dendrograms and host phylogenies in wild ungulates.

In this study, the Shannon and Simpson indices of P. nayaur (PN) were significantly higher (p < .05) than those of B. grunniens (BG), P. hodgsoni (PH), E. kiang (EK), and G. subgutturosa (GS). A higher gut bacteria alpha diversity is associated with a more complex and stable host gut ecology, which is beneficial for overall host health (Chen et al., 2021; Jiang et al., 2021; Stoffel et al., 2020). Unlike the other four species, P. nayaur can climb and forage on rock faces. The high alpha diversity of P. nayaur indicates a high resistance and adaptability to external disturbances relative to the other species. Alistipes showed a strong and significantly positive correlation with oxaloacetate and D‐glucose. Oxaloacetate is a precursor for generating aspartic (Doctor & Oro', 1972) and citric acid (Comte et al., 1997); aspartic acid is positively associated with intramuscular fat content (Chen, Sun, et al., 2022) and participates in host glycolysis regulation via nicotinate and nicotinamide metabolism (Hwang & Song, 2017). Pyruvate, generated from glucose via glycolysis, participates in the citric acid cycle and gradually generates energy substances such as ATP (adenosine triphosphate) and citric acid (Dashty, 2013). Alistipes can help P. nayaur obtain energy from food to adapt to its unique spatial niches.

In this study, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were identified as the two most abundant phyla in the gut bacterial communities of the ungulates, together accounting for more than 78% of the gut bacterial composition. This observation is consistent with previous studies (Bai et al., 2018; Wang, Wu, Shang, Gao, et al., 2022; Zhang, Chen, et al., 2020). Furthermore, it has been reported that Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes decompose cellulose and carbohydrates in food, respectively (Bai et al., 2021; Bird et al., 2019; Zhao et al., 2018). Several studies have indicated that a high abundance of Firmicutes and a high F/B ratio are beneficial for efficient cellulose and fiber breakdown and energy harvesting in wild ungulates (Lan et al., 2017; Wang, Wu, Shang, Gao, et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2016). Subgutturosa, Shuttleworthia, Ruminococcaceae_UCG‐005, and Tyzzerella_4 showed strong and significantly positive correlations with D‐glucose. The result indicated that four genera can digest fiber to generate D‐glucose (Hara et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2017). D‐glucose is an important energy substance that is easily absorbed by intestinal epithelial cells (Thorens, 1996). Thus, G. subgutturosa has a greater ability to break down cellulose and fiber in its diet to absorb and store energy.

Acinetobacter and Arthrobacter, indicator genera of P. hodgsoni, showed strong and significantly positive correlations with succinate, succinyl‐CoA, and protoheme. Succinate and succinyl‐CoA participate in the tricarboxylic acid cycle, producing large amounts of ATP, which enables the host to survive on the plateau (MacLean et al., 2023). Hypoxia can cause a significant decrease in protoheme synthesis (Edwards et al., 2014). In this study, we observed that Acinetobacter and Arthrobacter, which can produce sufficient amounts of protoheme to help their host adapt to hypoxic environments, were significantly enriched in the gut of P. hodgsoni.

Oxytropis spp. is the main component of the summer diet of E. kiang (Shi et al., 2016). Furthermore, swainsonine, a secondary alkaloid compound in Oxytropis spp., induces hepatic inflammation by altering bile acid metabolism in mice (Fu et al., 2023; Lu et al., 2014). Ren et al. (2023) observed that diet supplementation with swainsonine significantly increases the relative abundance of species belonging to the family Lachnospiraceae in the gut of captive pikas. Members of this family are involved in secondary bile acid biotransformation to regulate swainsonine‐induced hepatic inflammation. Lachnospiraceae_XPB1014_group, belonging to the family Lachnospiraceae, are known for their cellulolytic capacity (Biddle et al., 2013; Schwarz., 2001). In this study, Lachnospiraceae_XPB1014_group, an indicator genus in E. kiang, also showed strong and significantly positive correlations with protoheme and succinyl‐CoA contents. Thus, Lachnospiraceae_XPB1014_group can cope with cellulose and swainsonine present in plants belonging to the genus Oxytropis spp., helping E. kiang obtain energy and maintain a healthy state.

In summer, resistant starch is one of the main nutritional components in the diet of B. grunniens (Guo et al., 2024). It has been shown that mice on a resistant starch‐rich diet show increased proportions of Dorea and ‘heavy’ RNA in their guts (Herrmann et al., 2018; Taras et al., 2002). In this study, the indicator genus of B. grunniens, Dorea, showed a strong and significantly positive correlation with ribonucleic acid. Therefore, this indicator genus can help B. grunniens break down resistant starch and generate short‐chain fatty acids (Champ, 2004; Herrmann et al., 2018). Thus, Dorea, associated with short‐chain fatty acids, is beneficial for B. grunniens to obtain energy and maintain gut homeostatic balance (Byrne et al., 2015; den Besten et al., 2013; Xu et al., 2020).

The results of this study showed an association between the indicator genera of the different wild ungulate species and their distinct diets and nutrient compositions. Therefore, niche differences may be one of the factors responsible for the inconsistency between gut microbiome dendrograms and wild ungulate phylogeny. However, 16S rRNA gene sequencing has some limitations. For example, it does not effectively elucidate the functions of indicator genera. Future studies should perform dietary (nutritional) niche association analyses to explain the inconsistency between gut microbiome dendrograms and host phylogeny for wild ungulates. Furthermore, the species investigated in this study are generally endemic to the Qinghai–Xizang Plateau. Therefore, our results may not be applicable to ungulates in other ecological environments.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Xibao Wang: Data curation (equal); formal analysis (equal); project administration (equal); writing – original draft (equal). Xiaodong Gao: Formal analysis (equal). Yao Chen: Project administration (equal). Xiaoyang Wu: Formal analysis (equal). Yongquan Shang: Formal analysis (equal). Zhihao Zhang: Formal analysis (equal). Shengyang Zhou: Project administration (equal). Honghai Zhang: Funding acquisition (equal); project administration (equal).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Supporting information

Table S1.

Table S2.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32070405, 32001228, and 32270444), the Youth Innovation Team in Colleges and Universities of Shandong Province (2022KJ177), and the Graduate Dissertation Research Innovation Fund Project of Qufu Normal University, China (LWCXS202313).

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

All information about 16S rRNA gene data (e.g., accession numbers and DOI numbers) is listed in Table S1.
==== Refs
REFERENCES

Bai, D. , Lin, X. , Hu, Y. , Chen, Z. , Chen, L. , Huang, Y. , Huang, X. , & Li, J. (2021). Metagenomics approach to identify lignocellulose‐degrading enzymes in the gut microbiota of the Chinese bamboo rat cecum. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 50 , 29–36. 10.1016/j.ejbt.2020.12.001
Bai, X. , Lu, S. , Yang, J. , Jin, D. , Pu, J. , Moya, S. , Xiong, Y. , Rossello‐Mora, R. , & Xu, J. (2018). Precise fecal microbiome of the herbivorous Tibetan antelope inhabiting high‐altitude alpine plateau. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9 , 2321. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02321 30323800
Biddle, A. , Stewart, L. , Blanchard, J. , & Leschine, S. (2013). Untangling the genetic basis of fibrolytic specialization by Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae in diverse gut communities. Diversity, 5 (3 ), 627–640. 10.3390/d5030627
Bird, S. , Prewer, E. , Kutz, S. , Leclerc, L. M. , Vilaça, S. T. , & Kyle, C. J. (2019). Geography, seasonality, and host‐associated population structure influence the fecal microbiome of a genetically depauparate Arctic mammal. Ecology and Evolution, 9 (23 ), 13202–13217. 10.1002/ece3.5768 31871639
Bo, T. , Zhang, X. , Wen, J. , Deng, K. , Qin, X. , & Wang, D. H. (2019). The microbiota‐gut‐brain interaction in regulating host metabolic adaptation to cold in male Brandt's voles (Lasiopodomys brandtii). ISME Journal, 13 (12 ), 3037–3053. 10.1038/s41396-019-0492-y 31455805
Brown, B. R. P. , Goheen, J. R. , Newsome, S. D. , Pringle, R. M. , Palmer, T. M. , Khasoha, L. M. , & Kartzinel, T. R. (2023). Host phylogeny and functional traits differentiate gut microbiomes in a diverse natural community of small mammals. Molecular Ecology, 32 , 2320–2334. 10.1111/mec.16874 36740909
Brunetti, A. E. , Lyra, M. L. , Monteiro, J. P. C. , Zurano, J. P. , Baldo, D. , Haddad, C. F. B. , & Moeller, A. H. (2023). Convergence of gut microbiota in myrmecophagous amphibians. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 290 , 20232223. 10.1098/rspb.2023.2223
Byrne, C. S. , Chambers, E. S. , Morrison, D. J. , & Frost, G. (2015). The role of short chain fatty acids in appetite regulation and energy homeostasis. International Journal of Obesity, 39 (9 ), 1331–1338. 10.1038/ijo.2015.84 25971927
Callahan, B. J. , McMurdie, P. J. , & Holmes, S. P. (2017). Exact sequence variants should replace operational taxonomic units in marker‐gene data analysis. ISME Journal, 11 , 2639–2643. 10.1038/ismej.2017.119 28731476
Champ, M. M. (2004). Physiological aspects of resistant starch and in vivo measurements. Journal of AOAC International, 87 (3 ), 749–755.15287675
Chen, S. , Luo, S. , & Yan, C. (2021). Gut microbiota implications for health and welfare in farm animals: A review. Animals, 12 (1 ), 93. 10.3390/ani12010093 35011199
Chen, Y. , Li, J. , Zhang, Y. , Zhang, M. , Sun, Z. , Jing, G. , Huang, S. , & Su, X. (2022). Parallel‐meta suite: Interactive and rapid microbiome data analysis on multiple platforms. iMeta, 1 (1 ), e1. 10.1002/imt2.1 38867729
Chen, Z. , Sun, Y. , Chen, L. , Zhang, Y. , Wang, J. , Li, H. , Yan, X. , Xia, L. , & Yao, G. (2022). Differences in meat quality between Angus cattle and Xinjiang brown cattle in association with gut microbiota and its lipid metabolism. Frontiers in Microbiology, 13 , 988984. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.988984 36560955
Comte, B. , Vincent, G. , Bouchard, B. , & Des Rosiers, C. (1997). Probing the origin of acetyl‐CoA and oxaloacetate entering the citric acid cycle from the 13C labeling of citrate released by perfused rat hearts. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 272 (42 ), 26117–26124. 10.1074/jbc.272.42.26117 9334176
Cortes‐Ortiz, L. , & Amato, R. (2021). Host genetics influence the gut microbiome. Science, 373 (6551 ), 159–160. 10.1126/science.abj5287 34244398
Dashty, M. (2013). A quick look at biochemistry: Carbohydrate metabolism. Clinical Biochemistry, 46 (15 ), 1339–1352. 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.04.027 23680095
den Besten, G. , van Eunen, K. , Groen, A. K. , Venema, K. , Reijngoud, D. J. , & Bakker, B. M. (2013). The role of short‐chain fatty acids in the interplay between diet, gut microbiota, and host energy metabolism. Journal of Lipid Research, 54 (9 ), 2325–2340. 10.1194/jlr.R036012 23821742
Doctor, V. M. , & Oro', J. (1972). Non‐enzymic β‐decarboxylation of aspartic acid. Journal of Molecular Evolution, 1 (4 ), 326–333. 10.1007/bf01653961
Edgar, R. C. , Haas, B. J. , Clemente, J. C. , Quince, C. , & Knight, R. (2011). UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics, 27 (16 ), 2194–2200. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381 21700674
Edwards, L. M. , Sigurdsson, M. I. , Robbins, P. A. , Weale, M. E. , Cavalleri, G. L. , Montgomery, H. E. , & Thiele, I. (2014). Genome‐scale methods converge on key mitochondrial genes for the survival of human cardiomyocytes in hypoxia. Circulation. Cardiovascular Genetics, 7 (4 ), 407–415. 10.1161/circgenetics.113.000269 24873932
Fu, H. , Zhang, L. , Fan, C. , Liu, C. , Li, W. , Cheng, Q. , Zhao, X. , Jia, S. , & Zhang, Y. (2021). Environment and host species identity shape gut microbiota diversity in sympatric herbivorous mammals. Microbial Biotechnology, 14 (4 ), 1300–1315. 10.1111/1751-7915.13687 33369229
Fu, K. , Chen, X. , Shou, N. , Wang, Z. , Yuan, X. , Wu, D. , Wang, Q. , Cheng, Y. , Ling, N. , & Shi, Z. (2023). Swainsonine induces liver inflammation in mice via disturbance of gut microbiota and bile acid metabolism. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 71 (3 ), 1758–1767. 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c08519 36638362
Gautam, A. , Bhowmik, D. , Basu, S. , Zeng, W. , Lahiri, A. , Huson, D. H. , & Paul, S. (2023). Microbiome metabolome integration platform (MMIP): A web‐based platform for microbiome and metabolome data integration and feature identification. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 24 (6 ), bbad325. 10.1093/bib/bbad325 37771003
Greene, L. K. , Williams, C. V. , Junge, R. E. , Mahefarisoa, K. L. , Rajaonarivelo, T. , Rakotondrainibe, H. , O'Connell, T. M. , & Drea, C. M. (2020). A role for gut microbiota in host niche differentiation. ISME Journal, 14 (7 ), 1675–1687. 10.1038/s41396-020-0640-4 32238913
Gregor, R. , Probst, M. , Eyal, S. , Aksenov, A. , Sasson, G. , Horovitz, I. , Dorrestein, P. C. , Meijler, M. M. , & Mizrahi, I. (2022). Mammalian gut metabolomes mirror microbiome composition and host phylogeny. ISME Journal, 16 (5 ), 1262–1274. 10.1038/s41396-021-01152-0 34903850
Grond, K. , Bell, K. C. , Demboski, J. R. , Santos, M. , Sullivan, J. M. , & Hird, S. M. (2020). No evidence for phylosymbiosis in western chipmunk species. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 96 (1 ), fiz182. 10.1093/femsec/fiz182 31730167
Guo, T. , Wang, X. , Zhang, Q. , Jia, Y. , Wang, Y. , Wei, L. , Li, N. , Xu, X. , Liu, H. , Hu, L. , Zhao, N. , & Xu, S. (2024). Effects of the alpine meadow in different phenological periods on rumen fermentation and gastrointestinal tract bacteria community in grazing yak on the Qinghai‐Tibetan plateau. BMC Microbiology, 24 (1 ), 62. 10.1186/s12866-024-03182-y 38373936
Hara, O. E. , Kelly, A. , McCabe, M. , Kenny, D. , Guan, L. , & Waters, S. (2018). Examining the effect of a butyrate‐fortified milk replacer on gastrointestinal microbiota and fermentation in dairy calves at weaning. Journal of Animal Science, 96 , 174–175. 10.1093/jas/sky404.380
Herrmann, E. , Young, W. , Reichert‐Grimm, V. , Weis, S. , Riedel, U. , Rosendale, D. , Stoklosinski, H. , Hunt, M. , & Egert, M. (2018). In vivo assessment of resistant starch degradation by the caecal microbiota of mice using RNA‐based stable Ilsotope probing‐a proof‐of‐principle study. Nutrients, 10 (2 ), 179. 10.3390/nu10020179 29415499
Hird, S. M. , Sánchez, C. , Carstens, B. C. , & Brumfield, R. T. (2015). Comparative gut microbiota of 59 neotropical bird species. Frontiers in Microbiology, 6 , 1403. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01403 26733954
Huang, G. , Wang, X. , Hu, Y. , Wu, Q. , Nie, Y. , Dong, J. , Ding, Y. , Yan, L. , & Wei, F. (2021). Diet drives convergent evolution of gut microbiomes in bamboo‐eating species. Science China Life Sciences, 64 (1 ), 88–95. 10.1007/s11427-020-1750-7 32617829
Hwang, E. S. , & Song, S. B. (2017). Nicotinamide is an inhibitor of SIRT1 in vitro, but can be a stimulator in cells. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 74 (18 ), 3347–3362. 10.1007/s00018-017-2527-8 28417163
Jiang, F. , Gao, M. , Qin, W. , Song, F. , Wang, H. , Zhang, J. , Liu, D. , Wang, D. , & Zhang, T. (2021). Marked seasonal variation in structure and function of gut microbiota in forest and alpine musk deer. Frontiers in Microbiology, 12 , 99797. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.699797
Koziol, A. , Odriozola, I. , Leonard, A. , Eisenhofer, R. , San José, C. , Aizpurua, O. , & Alberdi, A. (2023). Mammals show distinct functional gut microbiome dynamics to identical series of environmental stressors. MBio, 14 (5 ), e0160623. 10.1128/mbio.01606-23 37650630
Kumar, S. , Stecher, G. , & Tamura, K. (2016). MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 33 (7 ), 1870–1874. 10.1093/molbev/msw054 27004904
Lan, D. , Ji, W. , Lin, B. , Chen, Y. , Huang, C. , Xiong, X. , Fu, M. , Mipam, T. D. , Ai, Y. , Zeng, B. , Li, Y. , Cai, Z. , Zhu, J. , Zhang, D. , & Li, J. (2017). Correlations between gut microbiota community structures of Tibetans and geography. Scientific Reports, 7 (1 ), 16982. 10.1038/s41598-017-17194-4 29209019
Laviad‐Shitrit, S. , Izhaki, I. , Lalzar, M. , & Halpern, M. (2019). Comparative analysis of intestine microbiota of four wild Waterbird species. Frontiers in Microbiology, 10 , 1911. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01911 31481943
Letunic, I. , & Bork, P. (2021). Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v5: An online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Research, 49 (W1 ), W293–W296. 10.1093/nar/gkab301 33885785
Ley, E. R. , Hamady, M. , Lozupone, C. , Turnbaugh, P. J. , Ramey, R. R. , Bircher, J. S. , Schlegel, M. L. , Tucker, T. A. , Schrenzel, M. D. , Knight, R. , & Gordon, I. (2008). Evolution of mammals and their gut microbes. Science, 320 (5883 ), 1647–1651. 10.1126/science.1155725 18497261
Li, J. , Zhan, S. , Liu, X. , Lin, Q. , Jiang, J. , & Li, X. (2018). Divergence of fecal microbiota and their associations with host phylogeny in Cervinae. Frontiers in Microbiology, 9 , 1823. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01823 30214431
Liu, H. , Chen, Z. , Gao, G. , Sun, C. , Li, Y. , & Zhu, Y. (2019). Characterization and comparison of gut microbiomes in nine species of parrots in captivity. Symbiosis, 78 (3 ), 241–250. 10.1007/s13199-019-00613-7
Liu, R. , Shi, J. , Shultz, S. , Guo, D. , & Liu, D. (2021). Fecal bacterial community of allopatric przewalski's gazelles and their sympatric relatives. Frontiers in Microbiology, 12 , 737042. 10.3389/fmicb.2021.737042 34630362
Liu, X. , Chen, L. , Ma, T. , Li, X. , Zheng, M. , Zhou, X. , Chen, L. , Qian, X. , Xi, J. , Lu, H. , Cao, H. , Ma, X. , Bian, B. , Zhang, P. , Wu, J. , Gan, R. , Jia, B. , Sun, L. , Ju, Z. , … Chen, T. (2023). EasyAmplicon: An easy‐to‐use, open‐source, reproducible, and community‐based pipeline for amplicon data analysis in microbiome research. iMeta, 2 (1 ), e83. 10.1002/imt2.83 38868346
Lu, H. , Wang, S. , Wang, W. , Zhang, L. , & Zhao, B. (2014). Effect of swainsonine in Oxytropis kansuensis on Golgi α‐mannosidase II expression in the brain tissues of Sprague–Dawley rats. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 62 (30 ), 7407–7412. 10.1021/jf501299d 24741992
Ma, Y. , Ma, S. , Chang, L. , Wang, H. , Ga, Q. , Ma, L. , Bai, Z. , Shen, Y. , & Ge, R. (2019). Gut microbiota adaptation to high altitude in indigenous animals. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 516 (1 ), 120–126. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.05.085 31196622
MacLean, A. , Legendre, F. , & Appanna, V. D. (2023). The tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle: A malleable metabolic network to counter cellular stress. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 58 (1 ), 81–97. 10.1080/10409238.2023.2201945 37125817
Mishra, C. , Van Wieren, S. E. , Ketner, P. , Heitkönig, A. I. M. , & Prins, H. H. T. (2004). Competition between domestic livestock and wild bharal Pseudois nayaur in the Indian trans‐Himalaya. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41 (2 ), 344–354. 10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00885.x
Muñoz, K. A. , Ulrich, R. J. , Vasan, A. K. , Sinclair, M. , Wen, P. C. , Holmes, J. R. , Lee, H. Y. , Hung, C. C. , Fields, C. J. , Tajkhorshid, E. , Lau, G. W. , & Hergenrother, P. J. (2024). A gram‐negative‐selective antibiotic that spares the gut microbiome. Nature, 630 (8016 ), 429–436. 10.1038/s41586-024-07502-0 38811738
Qin, W. , Song, P. , Lin, G. , Huang, Y. , Wang, L. , Zhou, X. , Li, S. , & Zhang, T. (2020). Gut microbiota plasticity influences the adaptability of wild and domestic animals in co‐inhabited areas. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11 , 125. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00125 32117147
Qin, W. , Song, P. , & Zhang, S. (2022). Seasonal and soil microbiota effects on the adaptive strategies of wild goitered gazelles based on the gut microbiota. Frontiers in Microbiology, 13 , 918090. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.918090 35859737
Ren, S. , Zhang, L. , Tang, X. , Fan, C. , Zhao, Y. , Cheng, Q. , & Zhang, Y. (2023). Plant secondary compounds promote white adipose tissue browning via modulation of the gut microbiota in small mammals. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24 (24 ), 7420. 10.3390/ijms242417420 37108583
Rognes, T. , Flouri, T. , Nichols, B. , Quince, C. , & Mahé, F. (2016). VSEARCH: A versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ, 4 , e2584. 10.7717/peerj.2584 27781170
Rojas, C. A. , Ramírez‐Barahona, S. , Holekamp, K. E. , & Theis, K. R. (2021). Host phylogeny and host ecology structure the mammalian gut microbiota at different taxonomic scales. Animal Microbiome, 3 (1 ), 33. 10.1186/s42523-021-00094-4 33892813
Sadeghi, J. , Chaganti, S. R. , Johnson, T. B. , & Heath, D. D. (2023). Host species and habitat shape fish‐associated bacterial communities: Phylosymbiosis between fish and their microbiome. Microbiome, 11 (1 ), 258. 10.1186/s40168-023-01697-6 37981701
Sanders, J. G. , Powell, S. , Kronauer, D. J. C. , Vasconcelos, H. L. , Frederickson, M. E. , & Pierce, N. E. (2014). Stability and phylogenetic correlation in gut microbiota: Lessons from ants and apes. Molecular Ecology, 23 (6 ), 1268–1283. 10.1111/mec.12611 24304129
Schoener, T. W. (1974). Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science, 185 (4145 ), 27–39. 10.1126/science.185.4145.27 17779277
Schwarz, W. H. (2001). The cellulosome and cellulose degradation by anaerobic bacteria. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 56 (5–6 ), 634–649. 10.1007/s002530100710 11601609
Sepulveda, J. , & Moeller, A. H. (2020). The effects of temperature on animal gut microbiomes. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11 , 384. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00384 32210948
Shang, Y. , Zhong, H. , Liu, G. , Wang, X. , Wu, X. , Wei, Q. , Shi, L. , & Zhang, H. (2023). Characteristics of microbiota in different segments of the digestive tract of Lycodon rufozonatus . Animals, 13 (4 ), 731. 10.3390/ani13040731 36830518
Shankregowda, A. M. , Siriyappagouder, P. , Kuizenga, M. , Bal, T. M. P. , Abdelhafiz, Y. , Eizaguirre, C. , Fernandes, J. M. O. , Kiron, V. , & Raeymaekers, M. (2023). Host habitat rather than evolutionary history explains gut microbiome diversity in sympatric stickleback species. Fronteirs in Microbiology, 14 , 1232358. 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1232358
Shi, J. , Lu, F. , Li, X. , Zhang, Z. , Su, X. , Dong, S. , Xu, H. , & Zhang, X. (2016). Dietary overlap and co‐existence of sympatric wild yak, Tibetan wild ass and Tibetan antelope in Arjin Shan National Nature Reserve, Xinjiang Province, China. Wildlife Research, 43 (4 ), 323–331. 10.1071/wr16045
Singh, R. P. (2019). Glycan utilisation system in Bacteroides and Bifidobacteria and their roles in gut stability and health. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 103 (18 ), 7287–7315. 10.1007/s00253-019-10012-z 31332487
Song, S. J. , Sanders, J. G. , Delsuc, F. , Metcalf, J. , Amato, K. , Taylor, M. W. , Mazel, F. , Lutz, H. L. , Winker, K. , Graves, G. R. , Humphrey, G. , Gilbert, J. A. , Hackett, S. J. , White, K. P. , Skeen, H. R. , Kurtis, S. M. , Withrow, J. , Braile, T. , Miller, M. , … Knight, R. (2020). Comparative analyses of vertebrate gut microbiomes reveal convergence between birds and bats. mBio, 11 (1 ), e02901–e02919.
Spencer, C. N. , McQuade, J. L. , Gopalakrishnan, V. , McCulloch, J. A. , Vetizou, M. , Cogdill, A. P. , Khan, M. A. W. , Zhang, X. , White, M. G. , Peterson, C. B. , Wong, M. C. , Morad, G. , Rodgers, T. , Badger, J. H. , Helmink, B. A. , Andrews, M. C. , Rodrigues, R. R. , Morgun, A. , Kim, Y. S. , … Wargo, A. (2021). Dietary fiber and probiotics influence the gut microbiome and melanoma immunotherapy response. Science, 374 (6575 ), 1632–1640. 10.1126/science.aaz7015 34941392
Stoffel, M. A. , Acevedo‐Whitehouse, K. , Morales‐Durán, N. , Grosser, S. , Chakarov, N. , Krüger, O. , Nichols, H. J. , Elorriaga‐Verplancken, F. R. , & Hoffman, J. I. (2020). Early sexual dimorphism in the developing gut microbiome of northern elephant seals. Molecular Ecology, 29 (11 ), 2109–2122. 10.1111/mec.15385 32060961
Suchodolski, J. S. (2011). Intestinal microbiota of dogs and cats: A bigger world than we thought. The Veterinary Clinics of North America. Small Animal Practice, 41 (2 ), 261–272. 10.1016/j.cvsm.2010.12.006 21486635
Sun, G. , Xia, T. , Wei, Q. , Dong, Y. , Zhao, C. , Yang, X. , Zhang, L. , Wang, X. , Sha, W. , & Zhang, H. (2021). Analysis of gut microbiota in three species belonging to different genera (Hemitragus, Pseudois, and Ovis) from the subfamily Caprinae in the absence of environmental variance. Ecology and Evolution, 11 (17 ), 12129–12140. 10.1002/ece3.7976 34522365
Taras, D. , Simmering, R. , Collins, M. D. , Lawson, P. A. , & Blaut, M. (2002). Reclassification of Eubacterium formicigenerans Holdeman and Moore 1974 as Dorea formicigenerans gen. Nov., comb. nov., and description of Dorea longicatena sp. nov., isolated from human faeces. International Journal of Systemic Evolutionary Microbiology, 52 (Pt 2 ), 423–428. 10.1099/00207713-52-2-423
Thorens, B. (1996). Glucose transporters in the regulation of intestinal, renal, and liver glucose fluxes. The American Journal of Physiology, 270 (4 Pt 1 ), G541–G553. 10.1152/ajpgi.1996.270.4.G541 8928783
Tremaroli, V. , & Bäckhed, F. (2012). Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Nature, 489 (7415 ), 242–249. 10.1038/nature11552 22972297
Wang, L. , Huang, G. , Hou, R. , Qi, D. , Wu, Q. , Nie, Y. , Zuo, Z. , Ma, R. , Zhou, W. , Ma, Y. , Hu, Y. , Yang, Z. , Yan, L. , & Wei, F. (2021). Multi‐omics reveals the positive leverage of plant secondary metabolites on the gut microbiota in a non‐model mammal. Microbiome, 9 (1 ), 192. 10.1186/s40168-021-01142-6 34548111
Wang, X. , Chen, Y. , Shang, Y. , Wu, X. , Wei, Q. , Chen, J. , Yana, J. , & Zhang, H. (2019). Comparison of the gut microbiome in red deer (Cervus elaphus) and fallow deer (Dama dama) by high‐throughput sequencing of the V3‐V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. ScienceAsia, 45 (6 ), 515–524. 10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2019.45.515
Wang, X. , Shang, Y. , Wei, Q. , Wu, X. , Dou, H. , Zhang, H. , Zhou, S. , Sha, W. , Sun, G. , Ma, S. , & Zhang, H. (2022). Comparative analyses of the gut microbiome of two fox species, the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and corsac fox (Vulpes corsac), that occupy different ecological niches. Microbial Ecology, 83 (3 ), 753–765. 10.1007/s00248-021-01806-8 34189610
Wang, X. , Wu, X. , Shang, Y. , Gao, Y. , Li, Y. , Wei, Q. , Dong, Y. , Mei, X. , Zhou, S. , Sun, G. , Liu, L. , Lige, B. , Zhang, Z. , & Zhang, H. (2022). High‐altitude drives the convergent evolution of alpha diversity and indicator microbiota in the gut microbiomes of ungulates. Frontiers in Microbiology, 13 , 953234. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.953234 35875556
Wang, X. , Wu, X. , Shang, Y. , Mei, X. , Zhou, S. , Wei, Q. , Sun, G. , Dong, Y. , & Zhang, H. (2022). Convergent evolution of the gut microbiome in marine carnivores. Ecology and Evolution, 12 (10 ), e9373. 10.1002/ece3.9373 36203637
Wu, X. , Zhang, H. , Chen, J. , Shang, S. , Wei, Q. , Yan, J. , & Tu, X. (2016). Comparison of the fecal microbiota of dholes high‐throughput Illumina sequencing of the V3–V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 100 (8 ), 3577–3586. 10.1007/s00253-015-7257-y 26728019
Xu, B. , Xu, W. , Li, J. , Dai, L. , Xiong, C. , Tang, X. , Yang, Y. , Mu, Y. , Zhou, J. , Ding, J. , Wu, Q. , & Huang, Z. (2015). Metagenomic analysis of the Rhinopithecus bieti fecal microbiome reveals a broad diversity of bacterial and glycoside hydrolase profiles related to lignocellulose degradation. BMC Genomics, 16 (1 ), 174. 10.1186/s12864-015-1378-7 25887697
Xu, W. , Xia, C. , Lin, J. , Yang, W. , Blank, A. , Qiao, J. , & Liu, W. (2012). Diet of Gazella subgutturosa (Güldenstaedt, 1780) and food overlap with domestic sheep in Xinjiang, China. Folia Zoologica, 61 (1 ), 54–60. 10.25225/fozo.v61.i1.a9.2012
Xu, X. , Li, G. , Zhang, D. , Zhu, H. , Liu, G. H. , & Zhang, Z. (2023). Gut microbiota is associated with aging‐related processes of a small mammal species under high‐density crowding stress. Advanced Science, 10 (14 ), e2205346. 10.1002/advs.202205346 36965140
Xu, Y. , Zhu, Y. , Li, X. , & Sun, B. (2020). Dynamic balancing of intestinal short‐chain fatty acids: The crucial role of bacterial metabolism. Trends in Food Science and Technology, 100 , 118–130. 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.02.026
Yao, R. , Dai, Q. , Wu, T. , Yang, Z. , Chen, H. , Liu, G. , Zhu, Y. , Qi, D. , Yang, X. , Luo, W. , Gu, X. , Yang, X. , & Zhu, L. (2021). Fly‐over phylogeny across invertebrate to vertebrate: The giant panda and insects share a highly similar gut microbiota. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 19 , 4676–4683. 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.08.025 34504662
Yarlagadda, K. , Razik, I. , Malhi, R. S. , & Carter, G. G. (2021). Social convergence of gut microbiomes in vampire bats. Biology Letters, 17 (11 ), 20210389. 10.1098/rsbl.2021.0389 34727703
Zhang, D. , Gao, F. , Jakovlić, I. , Zou, H. , Zhang, J. , Li, W. X. , & Wang, G. T. (2020). PhyloSuite: An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Molecular Ecology Resources, 20 (1 ), 348–355. 10.1111/1755-0998.13096 31599058
Zhang, H. , Chen, Y. , Wu, X. , Shang, S. , Chen, J. , Yan, J. , Wei, Q. , Wang, X. , Lu, Y. , & Zhang, H. (2020). Comparison of the gut microbiota in the Tibetan wild ass (Equus kiang) collected from high and low altitude. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 52 (6 ), 2281–2291. 10.17582/journal.pjz/20180522070505
Zhang, R. , Ye, H. , Liu, J. , & Mao, S. (2017). High‐grain diets altered rumen fermentation and epithelial bacterial community and resulted in rumen epithelial injuries of goats. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 101 (18 ), 6981–6992. 10.1007/s00253-017-8427-x 28762001
Zhang, Z. , Xu, D. , Wang, L. , Hao, J. , Wang, J. , Zhou, X. , Wang, W. , Qiu, Q. , Huang, X. , Zhou, J. , Long, R. , Zhao, F. , & Shi, P. (2016). Convergent evolution of rumen microbiomes in high‐altitude mammals. Current Biology, 26 (14 ), 1873–1879. 10.1016/j.cub.2016.05.012 27321997
Zhao, J. , Yao, Y. , Li, D. , Xu, H. , Wu, J. , Wen, A. , Xie, M. , Ni, Q. , Zhang, M. , Peng, G. , & Xu, H. (2018). Characterization of the gut microbiota in six geographical populations of Chinese rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta), implying an adaptation to high‐altitude environment. Microbial Ecology, 76 (2 ), 565–577. 10.1007/s00248-018-1146-8 29372281
Zhu, H. , Li, G. , Liu, J. , Xu, X. , & Zhang, Z. (2022). Gut microbiota is associated with the effect of photoperiod on seasonal breeding in male Brandt's voles (Lasiopodomys brandtii). Microbiome, 10 (1 ), 194. 10.1186/s40168-022-01381-1 36376894
Zmora, N. , Suez, J. , & Elinav, E. (2019). You are what you eat: Diet, health and the gut microbiota. Nature Reviews. Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 16 (1 ), 35–56. 10.1038/s41575-018-0061-2 30262901
