
==== Front
Microbiol Resour Announc
Microbiol Resour Announc
mra
Microbiology Resource Announcements
2576-098X
American Society for Microbiology 1752 N St., N.W., Washington, DC

39083689
mra00446-24
10.1128/mra.00446-24
mra.00446-24
Genome Sequences
bacteriologyBacteriologyGenomic sequencing of 10 spore-forming Bacilli strains isolated from zoo-dwelling mice
Hashuel Rachel 1 Conceptualization Investigation Methodology Project administration Writing – review and editing
https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9058-8980
Gutman Eran 1 Data curation Formal analysis Investigation Writing – original draft Writing – review and editing
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0183-2816
Litvak Yael 1 Conceptualization Funding acquisition Supervision Writing – original draft Writing – review and editing yael.litvak@mail.huji.ac.il

1 Department of Biological Chemistry, The Alexander Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Edmond J. Safra Campus Givat-Ram , Jerusalem, Israel
Editor Stedman Kenneth M. Portland State University , Portland, Oregon, USA

Address correspondence to Yael Litvak, yael.litvak@mail.huji.ac.il
The authors declare no conflict of interest.

9 2024
31 7 2024
31 7 2024
13 9 e00446-2402 5 2024
03 7 2024
Copyright © 2024 Hashuel et al.
2024
Hashuel et al.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

ABSTRACT

We present the genomic sequences of 10 spore-forming bacteria from the Bacillaceae family isolated from fecal samples of mice residing in the Tisch Family Biblical Zoo, Jerusalem. These isolates suggest Bacillus bacteria are a native component of rodent gut flora, facilitating further research into gut colonization and microbiome diversity.

KEYWORDS

Bacillus
endospores
gut microbiome
soil microbiology
cover-dateSeptember 2024
==== Body
pmcANNOUNCEMENT

The vast microbial landscape inhabiting the animal gut, known as the microbiome, plays a vital role in digestion and overall health (1). Environmental factors like diet and habitat significantly shape its composition (2–4). Rodents housed in a city Zoo are exposed to a broad spectrum of microbes from various animal species, providing an opportunity to explore gut microbiome diversity. Our study focused on the isolation and characterization of spore-forming Bacilli bacteria from fresh feces of mice in the Tisch Family Biblical Zoo in Jerusalem, Israel. These robust microorganisms, renowned for their resistant spores that can withstand extreme temperatures and harsh environmental conditions, are primarily known as inhabitants of soil (5). However, our work reveals their surprising prevalence and potential adaptations within the mammalian gut, opening avenues for studying their contribution to host health and potentially novel functions within this niche.

Provenance and isolation

In July 2020, fresh feces from zoo-dwelling mice, used for reptile feeding and not for exhibition, were collected (sample collection coordinates: 31.748047 and 35.177728). Animals were observed, and when fresh feces were produced, the content was carefully sampled using sterile instruments, avoiding any material that had come into contact with the soil. The content was homogenized with 1 mL of phosphate-buffered saline and was subjected to 65°C heat for 60 minutes to eliminate vegetative cells and to select for spores (6). Two hundred microliter of the heat-treated sample was then plated onto Lysogeny broth (LB) agar (7) and incubated at 37°C for 18 hours, allowing the spores to germinate and form colonies. Colonies were re-streaked onto fresh LB agar to ensure purity and also onto MacConkey plates, which are selective for Gram-negative bacteria, to confirm the Gram-positive nature of the colonies (8, 9). Single isolated colonies were cultured in liquid LB media at 37°C, and genomic DNA was extracted from a 2 mL overnight culture using the Wizard kit (Promega, Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Genomic DNA was sequenced by MicrobesNG (Birmingham, UK) using an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 instrument and following their standard workflow for library preparation and read trimming. This workflow uses the Nextera XT Library Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol with the following modifications: input DNA was increased twofold, and PCR elongation time was increased to 45 seconds. DNA quantification and library preparation were carried out on a Hamilton Microlab STAR automated liquid handling system (Hamilton Bonaduz AG, Switzerland). Libraries were sequenced using a 250 bp paired-end protocol. Reads were adapter trimmed using Trimmomatic version 0.30 (10) with a sliding window quality cutoff of Q15. Read quality was assessed using MicrobesNG in-house scripts combined with Samtools, BedTools, and bwa-mem software (11–13). De novo assembly was performed on samples using SPAdes version 3.14.1, and contigs are annotated using PGAP version 6.5 (14, 15). All tools were run with default parameters unless otherwise specified. Table 1 lists the genome assembly statistics, number of reads, and other parameters for the 10 Bacilli strains. Taxonomic labels were assigned using Kraken v1 (16).

TABLE 1 Summary of genomic features

Strain	Isolate identifier	Total length (bp)	No. of contigs	GC content (%)	Number of coding sequences	Mean coverage	Number of reads	N50	Number of tRNA	Assembly	GenBank WGS accession no.	SRA accession no.	
Priestia megaterium	RU281	6,212,340	112	37.4	6,406	191.5	2,507,337	4,212,224	126	GCA_030676525.1	JAUUTN000000000	SRR27759687	
P. megaterium	RU282	5,760,607	63	37.5	5,968	213.8	2,553,692	4,126,778	126	GCA_030676555.1	JAUUTO000000000	SRR27759688	
Peribacillus simplex	RU283	5,788,502	220	39.5	5,666	137.2	1,671,331	125,747	84	GCA_030676475.1	JAUUTP000000000	SRR27759689	
Lysinibacillus capsici	RU284	4,653,943	60	37.5	4,593	168.2	1,633,080	410,664	85	GCA_030676485.1	JAUUTQ000000000	SRR27759690	
L. capsici	RU285	4,654,572	59	37.5	4,615	214.8	2,102,191	410,664	84	GCA_030676425.1	JAUUTR000000000	SRR27759691	
P. megaterium	RU286	5,592,861	79	37.5	5,765	187.5	2,185,810	4,126,778	124	GCA_030676395.1	JAUUTS000000000	SRR27759692	
P. megaterium	RU287	6,087,749	105	37.5	6,264	103.1	1,314,731	4,212,224	127	GCA_030676515.1	JAUUTT000000000	SRR27759693	
L. capsici	RU291	4,651,476	53	37.5	4,605	99.1	1,085,146	410,664	86	GCA_030676375.1	JAUUTU000000000	SRR27759694	
Bacillus wiedmannii	RU292	5,365,704	204	35.5	5,534	180.2	2,077,025	104,638	96	GCA_030676405.1	JAUUTV000000000	SRR27759695	
Peribacillus frigoritolerans	RU293	5,787,954	190	39.5	5,659	175.8	2,114,695	130,873	83	GCA_030676415.1	JAUUTW000000000	SRR27759696	

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Work in Y.L.’s laboratory is supported by Israel Science Foundation grant 2350/20, Ministry of Innovation, Science and Technology award 0002246 and award 0005996, and also by the U.S.-Israel Binational Science Foundation grant 2019136.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The standardized strain descriptions and accession numbers are presented in Table 1; the genomic data are publicly available in GenBank under BioProject no. PRJNA1000183.
==== Refs
REFERENCES

1 Rowland I, Gibson G, Heinken A, Scott K, Swann J, Thiele I, Tuohy K. 2018. Gut microbiota functions: metabolism of nutrients and other food components. Eur J Nutr 57 :1–24. doi:10.1007/s00394-017-1445-8
2 Gacesa R, Kurilshikov A, Vich Vila A, Sinha T, Klaassen MAY, Bolte LA, Andreu-Sánchez S, Chen L, Collij V, Hu S, et al. . 2022. Environmental factors shaping the gut microbiome in a Dutch population. Nature 604 :732–739. doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04567-7 35418674
3 Deschasaux M, Bouter KE, Prodan A, Levin E, Groen AK, Herrema H, Tremaroli V, Bakker GJ, Attaye I, Pinto-Sietsma S-J, van Raalte DH, Snijder MB, Nicolaou M, Peters R, Zwinderman AH, Bäckhed F, Nieuwdorp M. 2018. Depicting the composition of gut microbiota in a population with varied ethnic origins but shared geography. Nat Med 24 :1526–1531. doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0160-1 30150717
4 Rothschild D, Weissbrod O, Barkan E, Kurilshikov A, Korem T, Zeevi D, Costea PI, Godneva A, Kalka IN, Bar N, et al. . 2018. Environment dominates over host genetics in shaping human gut microbiota. Nature 555 :210–215. doi:10.1038/nature25973 29489753
5 Hong HA, To E, Fakhry S, Baccigalupi L, Ricca E, Cutting SM. 2009. Defining the natural habitat of Bacillus spore-formers. Res Microbiol 160 :375–379. doi:10.1016/j.resmic.2009.06.006 19589385
6 Wen J, Smelt J, Vischer NOE, de Vos AL, Setlow P, Brul S. 2022. Heat activation and inactivation of bacterial spores: is there an overlap?. Appl Environ Microbiol 88 :e0232421. doi:10.1128/aem.02324-21 35020450
7 Bertani G. 1951. Studies on lysogenesis. I. the mode of phage liberation by lysogenic Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 62 :293–300. doi:10.1128/jb.62.3.293-300.1951 14888646
8 Mossel DA, Mengerink WH, Scholts HH. 1962. Use of a modified Macconkey agar medium for the. J Bacteriol 84 :381. doi:10.1128/jb.84.2.381-381.1962 14476554
9 MacConkey A. 1905. Lactose-fermenting bacteria in faeces. J Hyg (Lond) 5 :333–379. doi:10.1017/s002217240000259x 20474229
10 Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30 :2114–2120. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 24695404
11 Li H. 2011. A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data. Bioinformatics 27 :2987–2993. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr509 21903627
12 Quinlan AR, Hall IM. 2010. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 26 :841–842. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033 20110278
13 Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25 :1754–1760. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 19451168
14 Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19 :455–477. doi:10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 22506599
15 Li W, O’Neill KR, Haft DH, DiCuccio M, Chetvernin V, Badretdin A, Coulouris G, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, Durkin AS, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M, Lanczycki CJ, Song JS, Thanki N, Wang J, Yamashita RA, Yang M, Zheng C, Marchler-Bauer A, Thibaud-Nissen F. 2021. RefSeq: expanding the prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline reach with protein family model curation. Nucleic Acids Res 49 :D1020–D1028. doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa1105 33270901
16 Wood DE, Salzberg SL. 2014. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol 15 :R46. doi:10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r46 24580807
