
==== Front
Orphanet J Rare Dis
Orphanet J Rare Dis
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
1750-1172
BioMed Central London

39252105
3342
10.1186/s13023-024-03342-3
Review
A systematic review of studies that estimated the burden of chronic non-communicable rare diseases using disability-adjusted life years
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3385-290X
Oliveira Claudia Cruz c.cruzoliveira@erasmusmc.nl

111
Charalampous Periklis 1
Delaye Julien 2
Grad Diana Alecsandra 3
Kolkhir Pavel 45
Mechili Enkeleint A. 67
Unim Brigid 8
Devleesschauwer Brecht 910
Haagsma Juanita A. 1
1 https://ror.org/018906e22 grid.5645.2 0000 0004 0459 992X Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
2 https://ror.org/019w4mg02 grid.433753.5 0000 0005 0282 9880 European Organisation for Rare Diseases (EURORDIS), Paris, France
3 https://ror.org/02rmd1t30 grid.7399.4 0000 0004 1937 1397 Department of Public Health, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
4 grid.6363.0 0000 0001 2218 4662 Institute of Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
5 https://ror.org/01s1h3j07 grid.510864.e Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Allergology and Immunology, Berlin, Germany
6 https://ror.org/00dr28g20 grid.8127.c 0000 0004 0576 3437 Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Crete, Greece
7 https://ror.org/05ger6s34 grid.449798.f 0000 0004 0506 1080 Department of Healthcare, Faculty of Public Health, University of Vlora, Vlora, Albania
8 https://ror.org/02hssy432 grid.416651.1 0000 0000 9120 6856 Department of Cardiovascular, Endocrine-Metabolic Diseases and Aging, Istituto Superiore Di Sanità, Rome, Italy
9 https://ror.org/04ejags36 grid.508031.f Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium
10 https://ror.org/00cv9y106 grid.5342.0 0000 0001 2069 7798 Department of Translational Physiology, Infectiology and Public Health, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium
11 https://ror.org/057w15z03 grid.6906.9 0000 0000 9262 1349 Netherlands Institute for Health Sciences, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
9 9 2024
9 9 2024
2024
19 3332 2 2023
26 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Background

Initiatives aiming to assess the impact of rare diseases on population health might be hampered due to the complexity of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) estimation. This study aimed to give insight into the epidemiological data sources and methodological approaches used in studies that estimated DALYs for chronic non-communicable rare diseases (CNCRD), and compare its results.

Methods

A literature strategy was developed for peer-review search in Embase and Medline, and also performed on grey literature databases and population health and/or rare disease-focused websites. We included studies that determined the burden of CNCRD listed on the Orphanet’s and/or the Genetic and Rare Diseases information center (GARD) websites. We excluded communicable and occupational diseases, rare cancers, and cost-effectiveness/benefit studies. Two researchers independently screened the identified records and extracted data from the final included studies. We used the Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting (GATHER) statement to assess the quality of reporting of the included studies. The data synthesis depicted the studies’ characteristics, their distribution by geographic coverage and the group of disease(s) they focused on, the methods and data input sources used and estimated DALY per case.

Results

In total, 533 titles were screened, and 18 studies were included. These studies covered 19 different CNCRDs, of which most fell in the disease category “Diseases of the nervous system”. Diverse methodological approaches and data input sources were observed among burden of CNCRD studies. A wide range of DALY per case was observed across the different studies and diseases included.

Conclusions

A low number of burden of CNCRD studies was observed and most estimates resulted from multi-country studies, underlining the importance of international cooperation to further CNCRD research. This study revealed a lack of epidemiological data and harmonization of methods which hampers comparisons across burden of CNCRD studies.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13023-024-03342-3.

Keywords

Disability-adjusted life years
Rare diseases
Methods
Population health
Review
issue-copyright-statement© Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) 2024
==== Body
pmcBackground

Rare diseases are a heterogeneous group of diseases that affect a small proportion of the population. The criteria that are used to define a rare disease vary worldwide. In the European Union (EU), a disease is defined as rare if less than 5 in 10,000 people are affected, in China when it affects less than 1 in 10,000 people, and in the United States (US) when it affects fewer than 200,000 people in the country (around 6 in 10,000) [1–3]. Currently, after combining different sources, more than 10,000 rare diseases have been identified globally, including communicable and non-communicable diseases (NCDs). However, most of these diseases are chronic non-communicable diseases and are often progressive and/or degenerative, life-threatening, and often associated with significantly reduced quality of life [4–7]. For this reason, estimates of prevalence, incidence and mortality might not fully capture the population health impact of chronic non-communicable rare diseases, as they do not reflect their associated morbidity and disability.

The concept of disability-adjusted life year (DALY) was introduced by Murray in 1994 [8]. The DALY is a population health metric that summarizes healthy time lost due to morbidity, disability, and premature mortality into a single metric [9, 10]. Because of this key feature, the DALY metric allows comparison of the health impact of causes of diseases across populations, and as such provides imperative information for priority setting, equitable resource allocation, and monitoring population health [11]. Moreover, DALYs might go beyond other health metrics by enabling the representation of the individual health impact of a disease through the average DALY per affected individual, namely, DALY per case. Specifically, expressing the DALY per individual case provides a more equitable opportunity for comparing the health impact between rare diseases and with other common diseases as it is not influenced by the prevalence of the disease.

The DALY consists of two components, namely Years of Life Lost due to premature mortality (YLL), reflecting the mortality component, and Years Lived with Disability (YLD), reflecting the morbidity component. To calculate YLL, data on mortality, cause of death and age at death per sex are required. On the other hand, the calculation of YLD requires information on the incidence or prevalence of the disease and its disease stages and patterns over time by age and sex [11–13].

Initiatives aiming to assess DALYs of a rare disease might be hampered due to the difficulty to find the required epidemiological data and the complexities of the approach to calculate DALYs. Since the 1990s, the DALY has been used in the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study [14]. The GBD 2019 study provides the most recent epidemiological estimates and DALY calculations for 369 causes of disease and injuries and 87 risk factors for 204 countries and territories [13, 15]. However, estimates for rare diseases are frequently not reported separately, as most are reported in broader GBD cause of disease categories, such as the category “Other neurological disorders” or “Other chronic respiratory diseases” [15]. Additionally, the GBD study provides estimates for common causes of disease, including its variants. However, these variants might affect populations at a different scale and differ in aetiology, clinical presentation and progression, and/or clinical management (e.g., urticaria and myocarditis) [16, 17].

An overview of studies that have estimated DALYs for rare diseases can give insight into the epidemiological data sources and methodological approaches that have been used to assess the burden of rare diseases. Therefore, the aim of this systematic literature review was to provide an overview of the studies that estimated DALYs resulting from chronic non-communicable rare diseases (CNCRD). The following research questions were addressed:

How many burden of CNCRD studies have been conducted since 1990, and in which region/country and for which CNCRDs have these studies been performed?

Which mortality and morbidity data input sources have been used in burden of CNCRD studies?

Which methodological approaches have been used in order to calculate YLL, YLD, and/or DALY for burden of CNCRD?

What was the DALY per case estimated in each burden of CNCRD study?

Methods

This systematic literature review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [18]. We registered the protocol of the present systematic review in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database [19], under the ID number CRD42022324960.

Search strategy and data sources

A librarian from the Erasmus MC medical library was involved in the development of the search strategy, on 10 March 2022. We performed the search in two electronic bibliographic databases, namely, Embase and Medline. The search strategy and its search strings can be found in the supplementary materials.

In addition, we performed a grey literature search on 24 March 2022. The grey literature search involved databases and websites based on literature recommendations [20] as well as organization’s websites focused on population health and/or rare diseases, namely the World Health Organization (WHO), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the National Organization for Rare Diseases (NORD), Genetic and Rare Diseases information center (GARD), European Organisation for Rare Diseases (Eurordis) and the European Reference Network for Hereditary Metabolic Rare Diseases (MetabERN). Finally, we screened the references of the included papers and the references of studies that determined the impact of all rare diseases, including communicable and non-communicable diseases, in a certain region.

Conference and paper abstracts, editorials, and general correspondence presenting disease burden findings from CNCRD were also included. For the identified abstracts, we searched for the corresponding full-text. If the same study was both recognized as an abstract and full text, we only included the full-text of the study. Furthermore, no geographic and language restrictions were applied. We included studies if they had been published between January 1990, the decade that the DALY concept was introduced, and 10 March 2022, when the search strategy was developed.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

In this systematic literature review we included studies that assessed the burden of rare diseases using DALY, and/or YLD and YLL as defined within the DALY framework. We considered studies in which the rare disease was listed on the Orphanet’s and/or GARD’s websites as a recognized rare disease. We limited this systematic literature review to studies that assessed the burden of CNCRD. We included chronic diseases that matched the chronic disease definition according to the Friedman et al., 2008 study [21], which defined chronic diseases as “lasting 12 months or longer, imposing limitations on self-care, independent living and social interactions, and/or resulting in the need for ongoing medical intervention”. We excluded studies that assessed the burden of communicable or occupational diseases, and diseases related to injuries or risk factors, because the affected proportion of the population, and consequently meeting the definition of rare diseases, may vary widely over time and by geographical region. We excluded studies estimating the burden of rare cancers as most of them have a sub-acute clinical course (characterized by a rapid progression and high mortality rates) due to the lack of treatments and delayed diagnosis [22, 23], not matching Friedman’s et al. definition of a chronic disease. However, proliferative but non-malignant disorders were included. In total, 3,888 diseases met our eligibility criterion and were included in the search strategy.

We included cost of illness studies that followed the burden of disease approach, assessing DALYs for rare diseases. However, we excluded cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analysis due to insufficient information on burden of disease methods. We also excluded studies that assessed DALYs due to delayed or lack of healthcare access, as those were beyond the scope of this study. Finally, we excluded studies that mentioned DALY, YLL or YLD but did not follow the burden of disease approach, using other formulae to obtain their estimates.

Data screening and extraction

The screening of titles, abstracts, and full texts was carried out by two independent researchers, (CCO and PC). The same researchers (CCO and PC) extracted data independently from the included studies using an adjusted data extraction excel spreadsheet form based on a previous systematic literature review [24]. Finally, the completed data extraction forms were compared, and the final version of the data extraction form was obtained, in mutual agreement. Any disagreements regarding the selection and extraction steps were solved through debate and, if needed, by the study supervisor (JAH). The data extraction form, including the extracted data, and the definitions of each extracted item are provided as supplementary material. The software used for compiling, screening, and selecting the studies to be included for data synthesis was EndNote version 20.0.1.

Data synthesis

The data synthesis of the included studies depicts the study characteristics, methods and data input sources using tables. Moreover, figures were presented to capture the studies distribution by geographic coverage, publication year, and group of disease(s) it focused on, according to the chapter names of the 11th revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-11) [25]. The extracted information on the general study characteristics that was not displayed in the data synthesis was included in the supplementary material (e.g. related to study design, study population and detailed methodological choices). Studies were classified as independent or linked studies. The term ‘independent study’ reflects a single or multi-country study for which researchers independently calculated and analyzed YLL, YLD and/or DALY caused by CNCRDs. On the other hand, ‘linked studies’ refers to any single or multi-country study that presented estimates or secondary analyses from collaborative initiatives, such as the GBD study.

The data extraction and synthesis were managed with Microsoft Excel 2016. The figure displaying the geographical distribution of the included studies was created using the online tool, Datawrapper [26].

DALY per case calculation

For each study, we determined the DALY per incident or prevalent case and displayed these in a figure.

The DALY per case was calculated by using information provided in the methods and/or results section of the study. If the study provided references for further consultation on sample size and/or prevalence/incidence estimates on which the study was based on, we extracted that information for our DALY per case estimation. To following formulas were used to calculate DALY per case, depending on the information provided:\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:\frac{Crude\:DALY}{Number\:of\:affected\:individuals}=DALY\:per\:case$$\end{document}

OR\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\:\frac{DALY\:rate\:\left(per\:100\:000\right)}{Prevalence\:or\:Incidence\:rate\:\left(per\:100\:000\right)}=DALY\:per\:case$$\end{document}

If the same study reported DALYs for multiple years separately, then only the most recent DALY estimates were used for the DALY per case calculation. Additionally, if estimates for multiple diseases were provided separately, DALY per case was calculated per each disease included in the study.

Quality of reporting assessment

We used the Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health Estimates Reporting (GATHER) statement to assess the quality of reporting of the included full-text studies. The GATHER statement was developed to motivate best reporting practices for studies that calculate health estimates [27]. The quality assessment table can be found in the supplementary material.

Results

Literature search

Figure 1 presents an overview of the search and screening strategy performed in this systematic literature review, including the main reasons for exclusion based on eligibility criteria. We identified a total of 641 records via searches in databases Embase and Medline and 71 records via other methods. We screened 533 titles and abstracts. We then assessed 85 studies for eligibility according to the study inclusion and exclusion criteria. The main reasons for exclusion were due to duplicates, publication date previous than 1990 (“timeframe”) [28–33], burden of disease studies not focused in CNCRDs (“Not CNCRD specific”) [34–39], and studies that reported different metrics than DALY, or YLD and YLL according to the DALY framework (“Not DALYs, YLL or YLD”) [40–49]. In total, we included 18 peer-reviewed studies [13, 50–66]. Out of the 18 included studies, five did not have the full-text available at the at the inclusion time criteria and thus, these were included as abstracts [50–52, 56, 60].

Fig. 1 Flowchart of the literature search (PRISMA)

Study characteristics

Table 1 presents an overview of the characteristics of the 18 included studies that provided 26 different DALY and/or YLD and YLL estimates. Two out of the 18 studies were limited to YLLs [60, 61]. On the other hand, five studies provided DALYs, but not YLLs or YLDs [52, 55, 57, 63, 65]. Furthermore, the GBD study reported DALYs, YLLs and YLDs for two non-fatal CNCRD diseases (Klinefelter and Turner syndrome), meaning YLL was provided as a null estimate. Out of 18 studies, 16 were independent studies while only two were linked studies [13, 55]. However, out of 26 DALY and/or YLD and YLL estimates, 10 (38.5%) were the result of linked studies, while 16 were derived by independent studies.

Table 1 Overview of burden of CNCRD studies

Author(s)	Reference time period	Geographic coverage	Disease(s) included	Reported metric(s)		
Name(s)		
Abolhassani et al. [50]	1985–2008	Iran	Common variable immunodeficiency disorders	YLL, YLD, DALY		
Acuna et al. [51]	August 2015 to mid-December 2016	Roxas City Capiz, Philippines	X-Linked dystonia-parkinsonism	YLL, YLD, DALY		
Café et al. [52]	2017	Portugal	Hemophilia A	YLL, YLD, DALY		
Chung et al. [54]	2008	Korea	Multiple sclerosis	YLL, YLD, DALY		
Costa et al. [56]	2019	Portugal	Spinal Muscular Atrophy	YLL, YLD, DALY		
GBD 2016 Motor Neuron Disease collaborators [55]	2016	Global	Motor neuron diseases*	DALY		
	2019*¹	Global	Down syndrome	YLL, YLD, DALY		
2019*¹	Global	Klinefelter syndrome	YLD, DALY		
2019*¹	Global	Motor Neuron Disease	YLL, YLD, DALY		
2019*¹	Global	Multiple sclerosis	YLL, YLD, DALY		
2019*¹	Global	Neural tube defects	YLL, YLD, DALY		
2019*¹	Global	Orofacial cleft	YLL, YLD, DALY		
2019*¹	Global	Sickle cell disease	YLL, YLD, DALY		
2019*¹	Global	Thalassemia	YLL, YLD, DALY		
2019*¹	Global	Turner syndrome	YLD, DALY		
Guojun et al. [57]	2017–2018	China	Multiple sclerosis	DALY		
Henrard et al. [58]	2011	Belgium	Hemophilia (A and B)	YLL, YLD, DALY		
Inês et al. [59]	2016	Portugal	Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis polyneuropathy	YLL, YLD, DALY		
Janphram et al. [60]	2011–2020	Thailand	Glomerulonephritis *²	YLL		
Kansal et al. [61]	NA	Global	Frontotemporal dementia	YLL		
Liu et al. [62]	2013	Shandong Province, China	Multiple sclerosis	YLL, YLD, DALY		
Odnoletkova et al. [63]	2004–2014	Western Europe	Common variable immunodeficiency disorders	DALY		
Pinto et al. [52]	2018	Brazil	Sickle cell disease	DALY		
Siddiqi et al. [64]	2007	USA	Hemophilia (A and B)	YLL, YLD, DALY		
Villaquiran-Torres et al. [65]	NR	Colombia	Pulmonary arterial hypertension	DALY		
NR	Colombia	Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension	DALY		
Villaverde-Hueso et al. [66]	2001	Spain	Scleroderma	YLL, YLD, DALY		
*Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, spinal muscular atrophy, hereditary spastic paraplegia, primary lateral sclerosis, progressive muscular atrophy and pseudobulbar palsy

*¹ Only the latest estimates were included (yearly measures are available from 1990). However, GBD 2016 study was also included in the analysis as it provided additional systematic analysis on severity and YLD estimations, which are rare disease-specific

*²Primary glomerulonephritis (IgA nephropathy, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, membranous nephropathy and minimal change disease) and secondary GN (Lupus nephritis and Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated glomerulonephritis)

Note1: Reference time period refers to the months/year(s) the information used in the study was collected. Geographic coverage refers to where the information used in the study was collected

Note2: YLL (Years of Life Lost); YLD (Years Lived with Disability); DALY (Disability-Adjusted Life Year); NA (Not applicable)

Seven of the 13 studies with full-text available reported receiving funding. Out of these, six relied on non-profit organizations (NPO) as a funding source [13, 55, 61, 63] and/or research fellowships [61, 62] and one was funded by pharmaceutical industries [53].

Most of the studies were performed as observational studies, with three exceptions: two studies estimated DALYs through simulation studies [58, 65] and another study was a Delphi study [53].

Number of studies over time

Figure 2 depicts the number of studies by year of publication, aggregated into 4-year time-periods. The time intervals displayed in Fig. 2 start in 2007, as no independent CNCRD studies were published before this date, till early 2022, when the search was conducted. Overall, the number of studies estimating DALYs associated with CNCRD has increased over time, varying from the lowest number from 2007 to 2010 and 2011–2014 (n = 3) to the highest, from 2019 to 2022 period (n = 7).

Fig. 2 Number of burden of CNCRD disease studies, per 4-year time interval*

*Only independent studies are presented in the figure

Number of studies per geographical region

Figure 3 shows the geographic distribution of the included CNCRD studies. Of the 18 studies included in this review, four studies were multi-country studies [13, 55, 61, 63]. The remaining studies (n = 14) were performed across 11 countries, namely Belgium, Brazil, China, Colombia, Iran, Korea, Philippines, Portugal, Spain, Thailand and the United States of America [50–54, 56–60, 62, 64–66]. The country with highest number of studies was Portugal (n = 3) [51, 53, 59]. Additionally, all single country studies were performed in middle (n = 7) [50, 52, 54, 57, 60, 62, 65] or high (n = 7) [51, 53, 56, 58, 59, 64, 66] income countries.

Fig. 3 Number of burden of CNCRD disease studies, per geographic region*

*Solely single country studies are presented in the figure

Rare disease categories

The 18 included studies covered 19 different rare diseases (see Table 1). Common variable immunodeficiency disorders [50, 63], hemophilia [53, 58, 64], sickle cell disease [13, 52], motor neuron diseases [13, 55] and multiple sclerosis [54, 55, 62] were covered in more than one study. Figure 4 shows that rare diseases falling in the disease category “Diseases of the nervous system” were most frequently studied (n = 7) [13, 51, 54–56, 62], followed by “Diseases of the blood or blood-forming organs” (n = 6) [13, 52, 53, 58, 64] and ‘Developmental anomalies” (n = 5) [13, 56].

Fig. 4 Number of burden of CNCRD disease studies e, per cause of disease category

*According to the chapters of the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)

Data input sources

Table 2 presents the data input sources used to inform on incidence/prevalence and morbidity, and mortality associated with the rare disease. According to our findings, independent studies relied on a lower number of data sources than linked studies (Table 2). Literature was the most common input source to inform on incidence/prevalence and mortality (n = 10) [13, 52, 54, 55, 58, 59, 61, 64–66], followed by population-based registries (patient or diseases registries) (n = 8) [13, 50, 55, 58–60, 62, 63], national vital statistics/census (n = 8) [13, 52, 55, 60, 64–66], expert opinion (n = 5) [52, 53, 56, 57, 66] and convenience samples (hospital records or surveys) (n = 4) [51, 56, 57, 62].

Table 2 Data input sources used to calculate YLL, YLD and DALY in burden of CNCRD studies

Author(s)	Disease(s) included	Data input sources	
For prevalence/incidence and morbidity	For mortality	
Abolhassani et al. [50]	Common variable immunodeficiency disorders	Disease Registry (Iranian Primary

Immunodeficiency Registry at the Children’s Medical Center)

	Disease Registry (Iranian Primary

Immunodeficiency Registry at the Children’s Medical Center)

	
Acuna et al. [51]	X-Linked dystonia-parkinsonism	Hospital Records (Health Centrum,

Movement Disorders Clinic)

	Hospital Records (Health Centrum,

Movement Disorders Clinic)

	
Café et al. [53]	Hemophilia A	Delphi method (Expert Delbecq panel) and Survey	Delphi method (Expert Delbecq panel)	
Chung et al. [54]	Multiple sclerosis	Literature (Kim et al. 2010; Torisu et al. 2010, Granieri et al. 2007)	Literature (Ekestern et al. 2004)	
Costa et al. [56]	Spinal Muscular Atrophy	Hospital Records (NR) and expert’s opinion	Hospital Records (NR) and expert’s opinion	
GBD 2016 Motor Neuron Disease collaborators [55]	Motor neuron diseases *	Literature (systematic review), Insurance claims (USA), disease registry (ALS Clinical Trials (PRO-ACT))	National vital statistics and verbal autopsy (GBD)	
GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators [13]	Down syndrome, klinefelter syndrome, motor neuron diseases*, multiple sclerosis, neural tube defects, orofacial cleft, thalassemia and sickle cell disease	Literature, censuses, national vital statistics, disease registries, health service use, satellite imaging, disease notifications	Literature, censuses, national vital vital statistics, disease registries, satellite imaging, disease notifications	
Guojun et al. [57]	Multiple sclerosis	Surveys (50 centers across China) and expert’s opinion	NR	
Henrard et al. [58]	Hemophilia (A and B)	Disease Registry (Belgian Haemophilia Association) and Literature (Taruscio et al. 1990, Soucie et al. 1998, Stonebrakeret al 2010 and Stonebraker et al. 2012)	Literature (Plug et al. 2006)	
Inês et al. [59]	Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis polyneuropathy	Literature (Ines et al. 2018, Coelho et al. 2018) and Disease Registries (2 national reference centers)	Literature (Ines et al. 2018, Coelho et al. 2018)	
Janphram et al. [60]	Glomerulonephritis *1	Disease Registry (Ramathibodi Hospital Glomerular Registry)	Disease Registry (Ramathibodi Hospital Glomerular Registry) and National vital statistics	
Kansal et al. [61]	Frontotemporal dementia	Literature (systematic review)	Literature (systematic review)	
Liu et al. [62]	Multiple sclerosis	Hospital Records (university-affiliated hospitals, and hospitals from 17 cities in Shandong Province)	Patient Registry (Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention)	
Odnoletkova et al. [63]	Common variable immunodeficiency disorders	Disease Registry (European Society for Immunodeficiencies registry data- ESID)	Disease Registry (European Society for Immunodeficiencies registry data- ESID)	
Pinto et al. [52]	Sickle cell disease	Literature, National vital statistics (Brazilian governmental healthcare public database) and expert’s opinion	National vital statistics (Brazilian governmental healthcare public database)	
Siddiqi et al. [64]	Hemophilia (A and B)	Literature (Soucie et al. 1998), Patient Registry (CDC) and censuses (U.S. Census Bureau)	Literature (Soucie et al. 1998)	
Villaquiran-Torres et al. [65]	Pulmonary arterial hypertension and Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension	Literature (NR), GBD 2015 and National vital statistics	Literature (NR), GBD 2015 and National vital statistics	
Villaverde-Hueso et al. [66]	Scleroderma	Literature (Silman et al. 1988), National Vital Statistics and expert’s opinion	National Statistics Institute	
* Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, spinal muscular atrophy, hereditary spastic paraplegia, primary lateral sclerosis, progressive muscular atrophy and pseudobulbar palsy

*1 Primary glomerulonephritis (IgA nephropathy, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, membranous nephropathy and minimal change disease) and secondary GN (Lupus nephritis and Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated glomerulonephritis)

Note: NR (Not Reported)

Some studies that covered the same disease used the same type of data input sources. This is the case for studies that have estimated DALYs for common variable immunodeficiency disorders as both used data from disease registries. Moreover, both motor neuron diseases and sickle cell diseases studies used multiple data sources. These studies were conducted more recently (from 2016) and/or correspond to linked studies [13, 52, 55]. On the contrary, burden of disease studies for multiple sclerosis and hemophilia relied on distinct data sources, namely hospital records, a disease registry and surveys [13, 54, 57, 62], and literature, experts and a disease registry [53, 58, 64], respectively.

Methodological design choices

Table 3 provides an overview of the methodological design choices made to estimate YLL, YLD and/or DALYs in the included CNCRD studies.

Table 3 Methods used to calculate YLL, YLD and DALY in Burden of CNCRD disease studies

Author(s)	Disease(s) included	Full-text	YLL methods	YLD methods	Age weighting	Time discounting	
Life expectancy source	Perspective of YLD estimates	Study developed own DWs: Yes/No [Source]	Severity distribution	
Abolhassani et al. [50]	Common variable immunodeficiency disorders	✓	National Life Table	Incidence-based	No [Dutch DWs]	☓	✓	3%	
Acuna et al. [51]	X-Linked dystonia-parkinsonism	☓	NR	Prevalence-based	No [NR]	☓	NR	NR	
Café et al. [53]	Hemophilia A	✓	Aspirational table (West level 26 standard life table)	Incidence-based	Yes [SF-36 (Carvalhosa et al. 2014)]	National	✓	☓/3%	
Chung et al. [54]	Multiple sclerosis	✓	NR	Incidence-based	No [Korean DWs]	National	✓	3%	
Costa et al. [56]	Spinal Muscular Atrophy	☓	NR	Prevalence-based	NR	NR	NR	NR	
GBD 2016 Motor Neuron Disease collaborators [55]	Motor neuron diseases *	✓	Aspirational table (GBD model life table)	Prevalence-based	Yes [ALSFRS-R]	Global	☓	☓	
GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators [13]	Down syndrome, klinefelter syndrome, motor neuron diseases*, multiple sclerosis, neural tube defects, orofacial cleft, thalassemia and sickle cell disease	✓	Aspirational table (GBD model life table)	Prevalence-based	Yes [GBD DWs]	Global	☓	☓	
Guojun et al. [57]	Multiple sclerosis	✓	Aspirational table (WHO standard life expectancy)	Incidence-based	No [GBD DWs]	☓	✓	3%	
Henrard et al. [58]	Hemophilia (A and B)	✓	Aspirational table (Coale-Demeny West model

life table)

	Incidence-based	Yes [SF-36 (carvalhosa et al. 2014) and KINDL score (khair et al. 2012)]	National	✓/ ☓*2	1,5%/ 3%*2	
Inês et al. [59]	Hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis polyneuropathy	✓	National Life Table	Prevalence-based	Yes [EQ-5D-3 L (Monica et al. 2015)]	☓	☓	☓	
Janphram et al. [60]	Glomerulonephritis *3	☓	National Life Table	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	
Kansal et al. [61]	Frontotemporal dementia	✓	National and Aspirational tables (Human Life-Table Database; WHO life tables; National Life table (Canada and India))	NA	NA	NA	NA	NA	
Liu et al. [62]	Multiple sclerosis	✓	Aspirational table (Coale-Demeny West model

life table)

	Incidence-based	No [Korean DWs]	☓	✓	3%	
Odnoletkova et al. [63]	Common variable immunodeficiency disorders	✓	Aspirational table (GBD model life table)	Prevalence-based	No [GBD DWs]	☓	☓	☓	
Pinto et al. [52]	Sickle cell disease	☓	NR	Prevalence-based	NR	NR	NR	NR	
Siddiqi et al. [64]	Hemophilia (A and B)	✓	NR	Incidence-based	Yes [EQ-5D (Universal Data

Collection project (UDC))]

	National	✓	3%	
Villaquiran-Torres et al. [65]	Pulmonary arterial hypertension and Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension	☓	NR	Incidence-based	No [GBD DWs]	NR	NR	NR	
Villaverde-Hueso et al. [66]	Scleroderma	✓	Aspirational table (Princeton Model

Life Table with Level West 26 modified)

	Incidence-based	No [Dutch DWs]	National	✓	3%	
* Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, spinal muscular atrophy, hereditary spastic paraplegia, primary lateral sclerosis, progressive muscular atrophy and pseudobulbar palsy

*1 The study provided estimates with and without age weighing and with different time discounting rates (scenario analysis)

*2 Primary glomerulonephritis (IgA nephropathy, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, membranous nephropathy and minimal change disease) and secondary GN (Lupus nephritis and Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated glomerulonephritis)

Note1: Age-weighing places a lower weight on a year of healthy life lived at younger and older ages, and a higher value on working ages, implying the value of life is age-dependent. Similarly, time discounting places a higher value on life years closer to the present than the life years lived in the future [14, 87, 88].

Note2: YLL (Years of Life Lost); YLD (Years Lived with Disability); DALY (Disability-Adjusted Life Year); DW (Disability-Weights); GBD (Global Burden of Disease); NR (Not Reported); NA (Not applicable)

Years of life lost

From 18 studies, four studies performed their YLL calculations using national life tables (representative of the corresponding population) [50, 59–61], while nine studies used aspirational life tables (representing the ideal standard) [13, 53, 55, 57, 58, 61–63, 66]. Exceptionally, one multiple-country study used different types of life tables to estimate YLL per included country [61]. Life tables were not reported in six out of the 18 included for YLL estimation However, of these studies, four were abstracts [51, 52, 56, 65] and two full-text studies failed to report the life table used for their calculations [54, 64].

Years lived with disability

Of the 18 studies, 16 calculated YLDs. In nine studies (56.3%), incidence data were used to calculate YLDs [50, 53, 54, 57, 58, 62, 64–66], whereas in seven studies (43.7%) prevalence data were used [13, 51, 52, 55, 56, 59, 63]. Out of these 16 studies, two abstracts did not include any further methodological information used for YLD calculation [52, 65]. Of the remaining 14 studies, six developed their own disability weights, based on health-related quality of life data [13, 53, 55, 58, 59, 64]. Eight studies used existing disability weights, such as the GBD disability weights (n = 3) [57, 63, 65], the Dutch disability weights (n = 2) [50, 66] or Korean disability weights (n = 2) [54, 62]. The remaining study was an abstract that did not report the disability weight source used [51]. Out of the 14 studies which have reported YLD methods, seven used severity distributions, taking into account different levels of severity of the disease and using disability weights that reflected these difference in severity level [13, 53–55, 64, 66].

Age-weighting and time discounting

Age-weighting and time discounting was applied in eight of the 16 studies [50, 53, 54, 57, 58, 62, 64, 66]. Moreover, of these eight studies, two reported both DALY estimates with and without age weighting and/or with different time discounting rates (0% and 3% or 1.5% and 3%) [53, 58].

DALY per case

Figure 5 displays the DALY per incident case (A) and prevalent case (B) of each study. The DALY per case varied from 5.2 to 23.1 in studies that used incidence data to determine DALYs, and from 0.005 to 7.8 in studies that used a prevalence data to determine DALYs. Some studies calculated DALYs for the same disease using the similar methods, yet DALY per cases varied, namely for multiple sclerosis (10.9, 21,7 and 22.9 DALY per incident case) [54, 57, 62], hemophilia (5.2, 5.4 and 10.4 DALY per incident case) [53, 58, 64], motor neuron diseases (2.8 and 3.7 DALY per prevalent case) [13, 55] and sickle cell disease (0.6 and 0.8 DALY per prevalent case) [13, 52].

Fig. 5 DALY per case*¹

*¹ (A) DALY per incident case (lifetime); (B) DALY per prevalent case (annual)

The diseases with the highest DALY per incident case (higher than 20 DALY per affected individual) were common variable immune disorders (23.1 DALY per case) [50] and multiple sclerosis (22.9 and 21.7 DALY per case) [54, 62], using an incidence-based approach.

The diseases with the highest estimated DALY per prevalent case were neural tube defects disorders, accounting for almost 8 DALY per year [13], followed by motor neuron diseases (3.7 DALY per case) [13] and linked dystonia-parkinsonism (3.6 DALY per case) [51].

Quality of the reporting assessment

Six out of the 12 included studies with full text available have covered between 55% and 70% of all the recommended GATHER items. Additionally, four studies have achieved around 72% of the reporting requirements. Two studies covered between 75 and 85% of all items. Finally, two studies have reported all the items in the list, both were linked to the GBD study. We observed that the items most frequently not reported were related to providing secondary data sources (life tables for YLL calculation and disability weights data source for YLD calculation), file formats that could be efficiently extracted and methods and estimates of uncertainty analysis.

Discussion

This systematic literature review provided an overview of the number of burden of CNCRD studies and their studies’ characteristics, data input sources and methodological approaches. It was found that the number of burden of disease studies for rare diseases is low as compared with the number of studies observed in previous systematic reviews of burden of non-communicable diseases, infectious diseases or injuries [67–69]. Furthermore, the distribution of rare diseases per disease group showed that many cause of disease categories were not represented in the included studies. This finding may indicate the predominance of rare diseases in certain disease groups, but could also be an indication of greater awareness of certain rare diseases. Reasons for the low number of studies may be the lack of epidemiological data collection, challenges in rare disease case reporting, lack of knowledge regarding the rare disease clinical presentation and progression, patients’ quality of life, lack of familiarity of researchers in the field of rare disease with the DALY concept, and lack of funding for rare disease research [70–72]. Foremost, challenges in case reporting and data collection have been linked to the lack of disease codes (e.g., ICD codes) as basis to classify and record diseases in medical records or registries references [73]. For these reasons, data on incidence and prevalence of rare diseases might be difficult to obtain. On the other hand, the lack of knowledge among medical professionals regarding the existence and/or clinical presentation of a rare disease may lead to the underdiagnoses of rare disease patients which, in its turn, may lead to underestimation of incidence or prevalence of a rare disease, which can then result in underestimation of DALY rates for rare diseases in the population [73–76]. Possible strategies to tackle the low number of burden of CNCRD studies are the harmonization of rare disease terminology and case reporting, and the systematic collection of health-related quality of life data through scaled assessments (e.g., patient reported outcome measurements-PROMs) [77].

The majority of the studies identified in this systematic literature review were performed in middle or high income countries, while the remaining were performed at a global level. Moreover, some diseases included in this study met the definition of a rare disease in high/middle income regions but not in lower income regions. This is the case for sickle cell disease with a prevalence that ranges from 50 to 990 cases per 100,000 individuals in lower income countries, which is almost three times higher than the prevalence of Parkinson’s disease around the world [15]. Thus, these findings may reflect that researchers from low income countries face even more challenges in performing research on rare or uncommon diseases compared with researchers from middle and high income countries [78]. In this study, 12 out of 26 CNCRD DALY estimates (46%) covered multiple countries (Global or Western Europe). This finding may be explained by the fact that for research on rare diseases, the availability of a sample of rare disease patients which represents its rare disease population might require the recruitment of patients from multiple countries and/or the involvement of rare disease experts that are spread across different countries [79]. Even though the DALY calculation does not require a minimum sample size, it is important to achieve generalizable and relevant DALY estimates of rare diseases, suitable for comparisons between countries and over time, economic evaluations, and other outputs. For all the reasons mentioned above, this study’s finding underlines the importance of international cooperation to further rare disease research, globally [80, 81]. At the basis of this is the need to facilitate data sharing across borders [71, 82].

The overview of data input sources revealed that, unlike burden of disease studies for common diseases, determination of the burden of rare disease relies more on literature and expert opinion, which could lead to inaccurate estimations [68, 83]. This conclusion is consistent with previous reports on the difficulty of gathering data in the field of rare diseases [71, 75].

In contrast to data input sources, we observed considerable variations across CNCRD studies estimating YLL, and/or YLD and DALY. Different life tables were used to calculate YLL. Most studies used aspirational life tables (e.g. GBD or WHO life tables) which assume an ideal standard for life expectancy [84]. This ideal standard is derived from the highest life expectancy achieved, approximating the potential biological life expectancy per population [85]. In contrast, national life tables reflect current mortality and reflective of a country’s past and current circumstances. However, YLL refer to the future years lost due to past or current premature mortality [68, 84]. In addition, the use of different life tables hampers international comparisons of DALYs due to rare disease. Therefore we recommend the use of aspirational life tables when calculating YLLs, in order to facilitate international comparisons, and calculate YLL that reflect future years of life lost.

Different methodologies were observed for YLD calculations. To start, the disability weights may influence the accuracy of YLD estimates whenever they do not reflect the health problems that are experienced across life or at different stages [86]. Furthermore, YLD can either assume an incidence perspective or a prevalence perspective, while YLL always assume an incidence perspective (inform on years lost in the future). These YLD and YLL perspectives influence the information provided in DALY estimates. Namely, while the DALY per incident case informs on the average healthy life years a person loses in a lifetime, the DALY per prevalent case provides an overview of healthy life year(s) that a person with the disease loses per year, on average. Thus, the DALY per prevalent case (yearly estimate) can account for values higher than one as they include information on time lost in the future (YLL).

When it comes to DALY calculations, these can be heavily influenced by applying age weighting and/or time discounting. Age weighting was initially used by the GBD study after studies demonstrating a social preference to value a year lived by a young adult more highly than a year lived by a young child or an older adult [14, 87, 88]. Additionally, previous experts have argued in favor of using future time discounting to prevent the current generation from making excessive sacrifices to the point of dedicating all available resources to future health [14, 87, 88]. However, both methods were criticized, as it was argued that the DALY was defined as quantifying loss of health, rather than the social value of loss of health and that health cannot be measured with money or reinvested elsewhere [14, 87, 88]. For these reasons and to avoid extra complexity, in 2013 both methods were discontinued by the GBD [83, 89]. In the studies identified in this systematic review, the application of age weighing or time discounting was common, which is explained either by the year of publication - before 2013 - or the fact that the authors aimed to determine both health as economic burden. Nevertheless, whenever applying such methods, unweighted and undiscounted DALY estimates must also be presented in addition, to ensure comparability with other estimates/studies.

Ultimately, the heterogeneity of methodological choices observed in burden of CNCRD studies highlight the need to improve and harmonize burden of rare disease research, by developing a framework and a suitable checklist for assessing the quality of reporting of these studies. Such measures might improve the relevance of DALY estimates which can then be used for comparisons and be retrieved by policymakers and researchers.

In this study, we determined DALYs per case to facilitate comparison of findings across studies and diseases, including common diseases. According to the GBD 2019 study, DALY per case estimates for Diabetes mellitus type 2 are around 0.15 DALY per prevalent case, annually [15]. In this systematic review, however, most of the annual DALY per prevalent case estimates for rare diseases largely surpassed the DALY per prevalent diabetes case with up to 52 times higher for neural tube defects. Notably, some differences were observed for different studies that have calculated DALYs for the same rare diseases using the same method. Namely, both multiple sclerosis and hemophilia include different DALY estimates from three different initiatives. The same was observed for two studies that focused on sickle cell disease. As mentioned in previous sections, the difference in disease burden estimates between studies can be explained by differences in data sources and disease variants distribution and methods used and/or progress of knowledge of the disease, screening and new treatments. This was the case for Hemophilia, as two studies focused in both disease types A and B, while the third study focused merely on type A. Additionally, another likely explanation for hemophilia’s different estimates might be that two studies decided to apply different time discount rates (1.5% versus 3%) while another decided not to apply time discount rates. For multiple sclerosis, progress in new treatments might present a possible explanation for the different estimates obtained, as lower DALYs are observed in most recent studies.

Strength and limitations

To the best of our knowledge, this systematic literature review is the first of its kind in assembling existing burden of CNCRD studies and identifying methodological design choices that have been used to estimate YLL, YLD, and DALY in these studies over the period from 1990 to 2022.

A limitation of our study was that it was limited to CNCDs and excluded cancer and occupational diseases. Similarly, we excluded studies which focused on diseases that did not meet Friedman’s chronicity criteria [21]. As the definition on chronicity might change per medical field, some diseases labeled as chronic to some professionals might not be present in this review. Another limitation of this study stands with the lack of harmonization of terminology of rare diseases which might have led to the omission of some rare disease names in the search strategy. At last, due to the extension of the search terms, the search was only performed in Medline and Embase, which might have led to missing studies present in different databases.

Conclusion

In our systematic literature review a low number of burden of CNCRD studies was observed, most estimates resulted from multi-country studies, and a lack of epidemiological data and harmonization of data input sources and methodological choices was observed. These results highlight the importance of international cooperation to further CNCRD research, especially in low and middle income countries. Moreover, collaborative initiatives should structure rare diseases focus groups and develop a framework on the burden of rare disease research. Such actions might improve the visibility of the DALY concept among rare disease experts, allowing for more burden of rare disease studies. Consequently, more DALY estimates might raise awareness to the need of funding rare disease research and social support, reducing rare disease patients burden and inequalities.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1: The file includes further information on the search strategy (such as search terms and grey literature search procedure), the definitions of each included extracted item, a table including the result of the quality of reporting assessment of included studies with full-text available, the PRISMA checklist stating the locations of the reported items, and references to the included studies and additional sources

Supplementary Material 2: The excel file named “CNCRD list” contains the eligible diseases to the present study that were included in the search strategy

Supplementary Material 3: The excel file named “complete version of the data extraction” presents all the information extracted from the included studies

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Maarten Engel from the Erasmus MC Medical Library for developing the search strategies. The authors would also like to acknowledge the networking support from COST Action CA18218 (European Burden of Disease Network; www.burden-eu.net), supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology; www.cost.eu) and especially the members of the Burden of Rare Diseases Task Force (www.burden-eu.net/rare-diseases).

Author contributions

All authors contributed to the conception and design of the study. CCO and PC performed the data screening and extractions. CCO, PC, BD, BU, DAG, EAM, JD, PK, and JAH analyzed and interpreted the data. CCO wrote the initial draft of the paper. All authors reviewed and critically revised the manuscript. CCO, PC, BD, BU, DAG, EAM, JD, PK, and JAH read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This study did not receive any funding nor were any of the authors financially supported.

Data availability

Not applicable.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

PK was a speaker/consultant for Novartis, Roche and ValenzaBio. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Center GaRDI. What is a rare disease? National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), Institutes of Health (NIH). 2002 https://rarediseases.info.nih.gov/about
2. Richter T Nestler-Parr S Babela R Khan ZM Tesoro T Molsen E Rare disease terminology and Definitions-A systematic global review: report of the ISPOR Rare Disease Special Interest Group Value Health 2015 18 6 906 14 10.1016/j.jval.2015.05.008 26409619
Richter T, Nestler-Parr S, Babela R, Khan ZM, Tesoro T, Molsen E, et al. Rare disease terminology and Definitions-A systematic global review: report of the ISPOR Rare Disease Special Interest Group. Value Health. 2015;18(6):906–14.26409619 10.1016/j.jval.2015.05.008
3. Lu Y Han J The definition of rare disease in China and its prospects Intractable Rare Dis Res 2022 11 1 29 30 10.5582/irdr.2022.01034 35261848
Lu Y, Han J. The definition of rare disease in China and its prospects. Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2022;11(1):29–30.35261848 10.5582/irdr.2022.01034
4. Haendel M Vasilevsky N Unni D Bologa C Harris N Rehm H How many rare diseases are there? Nat Rev Drug Discov 2020 19 2 77 8 10.1038/d41573-019-00180-y 32020066
Haendel M, Vasilevsky N, Unni D, Bologa C, Harris N, Rehm H, et al. How many rare diseases are there? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2020;19(2):77–8.32020066 10.1038/d41573-019-00180-y
5. Nguengang Wakap S Lambert DM Olry A Rodwell C Gueydan C Lanneau V Estimating cumulative point prevalence of rare diseases: analysis of the Orphanet database Eur J Hum Genet 2020 28 2 165 73 10.1038/s41431-019-0508-0 31527858
Nguengang Wakap S, Lambert DM, Olry A, Rodwell C, Gueydan C, Lanneau V, et al. Estimating cumulative point prevalence of rare diseases: analysis of the Orphanet database. Eur J Hum Genet. 2020;28(2):165–73.31527858 10.1038/s41431-019-0508-0
6. Tisdale A Cutillo CM Nathan R Russo P Laraway B Haendel M The IDeaS initiative: pilot study to assess the impact of rare diseases on patients and healthcare systems Orphanet J Rare Dis 2021 16 1 429 10.1186/s13023-021-02061-3 34674728
Tisdale A, Cutillo CM, Nathan R, Russo P, Laraway B, Haendel M, et al. The IDeaS initiative: pilot study to assess the impact of rare diseases on patients and healthcare systems. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021;16(1):429.34674728 10.1186/s13023-021-02061-3
7. von der Lippe C Diesen PS Feragen KB Living with a rare disorder: a systematic review of the qualitative literature Mol Genet Genomic Med 2017 5 6 758 73 10.1002/mgg3.315 29178638
von der Lippe C, Diesen PS, Feragen KB. Living with a rare disorder: a systematic review of the qualitative literature. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2017;5(6):758–73.29178638 10.1002/mgg3.315
8. Murray CJ Quantifying the burden of disease: the technical basis for disability-adjusted life years Bull World Health Organ 1994 72 3 429 45 8062401
Murray CJ. Quantifying the burden of disease: the technical basis for disability-adjusted life years. Bull World Health Organ. 1994;72(3):429–45.8062401
9. Grosse SD Lollar DJ Campbell VA Chamie M Disability and disability-adjusted life years: not the same Public Health Rep 2009 124 2 197 202 10.1177/003335490912400206 19320360
Grosse SD, Lollar DJ, Campbell VA, Chamie M. Disability and disability-adjusted life years: not the same. Public Health Rep. 2009;124(2):197–202.19320360 10.1177/003335490912400206
10. Murray CJ Acharya AK Understanding DALYs (disability-adjusted life years) J Health Econ 1997 16 6 703 30 10.1016/S0167-6296(97)00004-0 10176780
Murray CJ, Acharya AK. Understanding DALYs (disability-adjusted life years). J Health Econ. 1997;16(6):703–30.10176780 10.1016/S0167-6296(97)00004-0
11. Murray CJ Lopez AD Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: global burden of Disease Study Lancet 1997 349 9063 1436 42 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07495-8 9164317
Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Global mortality, disability, and the contribution of risk factors: global burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 1997;349(9063):1436–42.9164317 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07495-8
12. Murray CJ Lopez AD Jamison DT The global burden of disease in 1990: summary results, sensitivity analysis and future directions Bull World Health Organ 1994 72 3 495 509 8062404
Murray CJ, Lopez AD, Jamison DT. The global burden of disease in 1990: summary results, sensitivity analysis and future directions. Bull World Health Organ. 1994;72(3):495–509.8062404
13. GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2019 Lancet 2020 396 10258 1204 22 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9 33069326
GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204–22.33069326 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9
14. Mathers CD History of global burden of disease assessment at the World Health Organization Arch Public Health 2020 78 77 10.1186/s13690-020-00458-3 32850124
Mathers CD. History of global burden of disease assessment at the World Health Organization. Arch Public Health. 2020;78:77.32850124 10.1186/s13690-020-00458-3
15. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. GBD 2019 causes of disease and injuries. Seattle: University of Washington. 2020 https://www.healthdata.org/gbd/2019
16. Blauwet LA Cooper LT Myocarditis Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2010 52 4 274 88 10.1016/j.pcad.2009.11.006 20109598
Blauwet LA, Cooper LT, Myocarditis. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2010;52(4):274–88.20109598 10.1016/j.pcad.2009.11.006
17. Kolkhir P Gimenez-Arnau AM Kulthanan K Peter J Metz M Maurer M Urticaria Nat Rev Dis Primers 2022 8 1 61 10.1038/s41572-022-00389-z 36109590
Kolkhir P, Gimenez-Arnau AM, Kulthanan K, Peter J, Metz M, Maurer M, Urticaria. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022;8(1):61.36109590 10.1038/s41572-022-00389-z
18. Page MJ McKenzie JE Bossuyt PM Boutron I Hoffmann TC Mulrow CD The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Declaracion PRISMA 2020: una guia actualizada para la publicacion de revisiones sistematicas Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 2021 74 9 790 9 10.1016/j.recesp.2021.06.016 34446261
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Declaracion PRISMA 2020: una guia actualizada para la publicacion de revisiones sistematicas. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2021;74(9):790–9.34446261 10.1016/j.recesp.2021.06.016
19. Research NIfH, About PROSPERO. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#aboutpage
20. Paez A Gray literature: an important resource in systematic reviews J Evid Based Med 2017 10 3 233 40 10.1111/jebm.12266 28857505
Paez A. Gray literature: an important resource in systematic reviews. J Evid Based Med. 2017;10(3):233–40.28857505 10.1111/jebm.12266
21. Friedman B Jiang HJ Elixhauser A Costly hospital readmissions and complex chronic illness Inquiry 2008 45 4 408 21 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_45.04.408 19209836
Friedman B, Jiang HJ, Elixhauser A. Costly hospital readmissions and complex chronic illness. Inquiry. 2008;45(4):408–21.19209836 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_45.04.408
22. Gatta G van der Zwan JM Casali PG Siesling S Dei Tos AP Kunkler I Rare cancers are not so rare: the rare cancer burden in Europe Eur J Cancer 2011 47 17 2493 511 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.08.008 22033323
Gatta G, van der Zwan JM, Casali PG, Siesling S, Dei Tos AP, Kunkler I, et al. Rare cancers are not so rare: the rare cancer burden in Europe. Eur J Cancer. 2011;47(17):2493–511.22033323 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.08.008
23. Pillai RK Jayasree K Rare cancers: challenges & issues Indian J Med Res 2017 145 1 17 27 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_915_14 28574010
Pillai RK, Jayasree K. Rare cancers: challenges & issues. Indian J Med Res. 2017;145(1):17–27.28574010 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_915_14
24. Charalampous P Gorasso V Plass D Pires SM von der Lippe E Mereke A Burden of non-communicable disease studies in Europe: a systematic review of data sources and methodological choices Eur J Public Health 2022 32 2 289 96 10.1093/eurpub/ckab218 35015851
Charalampous P, Gorasso V, Plass D, Pires SM, von der Lippe E, Mereke A, et al. Burden of non-communicable disease studies in Europe: a systematic review of data sources and methodological choices. Eur J Public Health. 2022;32(2):289–96.35015851 10.1093/eurpub/ckab218
25. Revision, ICoDt. ICD-11 for Mortality and Morbidity Statistics 2022 https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en#/http%3a//id.who.int/icd/entity/1997348476
26. Datawrapper. Datawrapper https://www.datawrapper.de/
27. Stevens GA Alkema L Black RE Boerma JT Collins GS Ezzati M Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health estimates reporting: the GATHER statement PLoS Med 2016 13 6 e1002056 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002056 27351744
Stevens GA, Alkema L, Black RE, Boerma JT, Collins GS, Ezzati M, et al. Guidelines for Accurate and Transparent Health estimates reporting: the GATHER statement. PLoS Med. 2016;13(6):e1002056.27351744 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002056
28. Breslau N Siblings of disabled children: birth order and age-spacing effects J Abnorm Child Psychol 1982 10 1 85 96 10.1007/BF00915953 6213696
Breslau N. Siblings of disabled children: birth order and age-spacing effects. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1982;10(1):85–96.6213696 10.1007/BF00915953
29. Jones MB Years of life lost due to Huntington disease AM J HUM GENET 1979 31 6 711 7 160199
Jones MB. Years of life lost due to Huntington disease. AM J HUM GENET. 1979;31(6):711–7.160199
30. Jones MB Years of life lost due to cystic fibrosis J CHRONIC DIS 1980 33 11–12 697 701 10.1016/0021-9681(80)90056-9 7430321
Jones MB. Years of life lost due to cystic fibrosis. J CHRONIC DIS. 1980;33(11–12):697–701.7430321 10.1016/0021-9681(80)90056-9
31. Shafer S Mapping bone cancer death rates in Pennsylvania counties SOC SCI MED 1980 14 D 1 11 5
Shafer S. Mapping bone cancer death rates in Pennsylvania counties. SOC SCI MED. 1980;14 D(1):11–5.
32. Soldatos CR Kales A Cadieux RJ Treatment of sleep disorders II: Narcolepsy Ration DRUG THER 1983 17 3 1 7 6665123
Soldatos CR, Kales A, Cadieux RJ. Treatment of sleep disorders II: Narcolepsy. Ration DRUG THER. 1983;17(3):1–7.6665123
33. Vignaendra V Narcolepsy: clinical features, pathophysiology of symptoms and treatment ANN ACAD MED Singap 1975 4 2 208 12
Vignaendra V. Narcolepsy: clinical features, pathophysiology of symptoms and treatment. ANN ACAD MED Singap. 1975;4(2):208–12.
34. Anushiravani A Sepanlou SG Burden of liver diseases: a review from Iran Middle East J Dig Dis 2019 11 4 189 92 10.15171/mejdd.2019.147 31824620
Anushiravani A, Sepanlou SG. Burden of liver diseases: a review from Iran. Middle East J Dig Dis. 2019;11(4):189–92.31824620 10.15171/mejdd.2019.147
35. Gaskin J Gomes J Darshan S Krewski D Burden of neurological conditions in Canada Neurotoxicology 2017 61 2 10 10.1016/j.neuro.2016.05.001 27153747
Gaskin J, Gomes J, Darshan S, Krewski D. Burden of neurological conditions in Canada. Neurotoxicology. 2017;61:2–10.27153747 10.1016/j.neuro.2016.05.001
36. Kariuki SM Chengo E Ibinda F Odhiambo R Etyang A Ngugi AK Burden, causes, and outcomes of people with epilepsy admitted to a rural hospital in Kenya Epilepsia 2015 56 4 577 84 10.1111/epi.12935 25689574
Kariuki SM, Chengo E, Ibinda F, Odhiambo R, Etyang A, Ngugi AK, et al. Burden, causes, and outcomes of people with epilepsy admitted to a rural hospital in Kenya. Epilepsia. 2015;56(4):577–84.25689574 10.1111/epi.12935
37. Mazzucato M, Visonà Dalla Pozza L, Manea S, Minichiello C, Facchin P. A population-based registry as a source of health indicators for rare diseases: The ten-year experience of the Veneto Region’s rare diseases registry. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2014;9(1).
38. Shillcutt SD Lefevre AE Lee AC Baqui AH Black RE Darmstadt GL Forecasting burden of long-term disability from neonatal conditions: results from the Projahnmo I trial, Sylhet, Bangladesh Health Policy Plan 2013 28 4 435 52 10.1093/heapol/czs075 23002251
Shillcutt SD, Lefevre AE, Lee AC, Baqui AH, Black RE, Darmstadt GL. Forecasting burden of long-term disability from neonatal conditions: results from the Projahnmo I trial, Sylhet, Bangladesh. Health Policy Plan. 2013;28(4):435–52.23002251 10.1093/heapol/czs075
39. Boyle B Addor MC Arriola L Barisic I Bianchi F Csaky-Szunyogh M Estimating global Burden of Disease due to congenital anomaly: an analysis of European data Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2018 103 1 F22 8 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311845 28667189
Boyle B, Addor MC, Arriola L, Barisic I, Bianchi F, Csaky-Szunyogh M, et al. Estimating global Burden of Disease due to congenital anomaly: an analysis of European data. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018;103(1):F22–8.28667189 10.1136/archdischild-2016-311845
40. Abeykoon JP, Hobbs M, Paludo J, Larson DR, Dispenzieri A, Gertz MA et al. Outcome of very young (≤ 40 years) patients with immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis (AL): a case control study. Blood. 2016;128(22).
41. Basic C Rosengren A Alehagen U Dahlstrom U Edner M Fu M Young patients with heart failure: clinical characteristics and outcomes. Data from the Swedish Heart Failure, National Patient, Population and cause of death registers Eur J Heart Fail 2020 22 7 1125 32 10.1002/ejhf.1952 32613768
Basic C, Rosengren A, Alehagen U, Dahlstrom U, Edner M, Fu M, et al. Young patients with heart failure: clinical characteristics and outcomes. Data from the Swedish Heart Failure, National Patient, Population and cause of death registers. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020;22(7):1125–32.32613768 10.1002/ejhf.1952
42. Hao Y Hudson M Baron M Carreira P Stevens W Rabusa C Early Mortality in a multinational systemic sclerosis inception cohort Arthritis Rheum 2017 69 5 1067 77 10.1002/art.40027
Hao Y, Hudson M, Baron M, Carreira P, Stevens W, Rabusa C, et al. Early Mortality in a multinational systemic sclerosis inception cohort. Arthritis Rheum. 2017;69(5):1067–77.10.1002/art.40027
43. Kathleen M Molla H Wendy S Candice R Susanna P Mandana N Survival in systemic sclerosis-related pulmonary arterial hypertension in the modern treatment era Intern Med J 2016 46 5 6
Kathleen M, Molla H, Wendy S, Candice R, Susanna P, Mandana N. Survival in systemic sclerosis-related pulmonary arterial hypertension in the modern treatment era. Intern Med J. 2016;46:5–6.
44. Morrisroe K Huq M Stevens W Rabusa C Proudman S Nikpour M Survival in systemic sclerosis related pulmonary arterial hypertension in the modern treatment era: results from a multicentre Australian cohort study Ann Rheum Dis 2016 75 753 4 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-eular.5368
Morrisroe K, Huq M, Stevens W, Rabusa C, Proudman S, Nikpour M. Survival in systemic sclerosis related pulmonary arterial hypertension in the modern treatment era: results from a multicentre Australian cohort study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75:753–4.10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-eular.5368
45. Mu L Hao Y Fan Y Huang H Yang X Xie A Mortality and prognostic factors in Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus Lupus 2018 27 10 1742 52 10.1177/0961203318789788 30060721
Mu L, Hao Y, Fan Y, Huang H, Yang X, Xie A, et al. Mortality and prognostic factors in Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus. 2018;27(10):1742–52.30060721 10.1177/0961203318789788
46. Mu L Hao Y Huang H Xie A Zhang X Ji L Mortality in Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus Lupus Sci Med 2017 4 A192 4
Mu L, Hao Y, Huang H, Xie A, Zhang X, Ji L, et al. Mortality in Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus Sci Med. 2017;4:A192–4.
47. Poenaru D Pemberton J Cameron BH The burden of waiting: DALYs accrued from delayed access to pediatric surgery in Kenya and Canada J Pediatr Surg 2015 50 5 765 70 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.02.033 25783371
Poenaru D, Pemberton J, Cameron BH. The burden of waiting: DALYs accrued from delayed access to pediatric surgery in Kenya and Canada. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50(5):765–70.25783371 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.02.033
48. Poenaru D Pemberton J Frankfurter C Cameron BH Quantifying the disability from congenital anomalies averted through Pediatric surgery: a cross-sectional comparison of a Pediatric Surgical Unit in Kenya and Canada World J Surg 2015 39 9 2198 206 10.1007/s00268-015-3103-8 26037026
Poenaru D, Pemberton J, Frankfurter C, Cameron BH. Quantifying the disability from congenital anomalies averted through Pediatric surgery: a cross-sectional comparison of a Pediatric Surgical Unit in Kenya and Canada. World J Surg. 2015;39(9):2198–206.26037026 10.1007/s00268-015-3103-8
49. Yang X Mortality in patients with dermatomyositis/polymyositis in a Chinese medical centre Ann Rheum Dis 2017 76 104 5
Yang X. Mortality in patients with dermatomyositis/polymyositis in a Chinese medical centre. Ann Rheum Dis. 2017;76:104–5.
50. Abolhassani H Aghamohammadi A Abolhassani F Eftekhar H Heidarnia M Rezaei N Health policy for common variable immunodeficiency: Burden of the disease J Invest Allergol Clin Immunol 2011 21 6 454 8
Abolhassani H, Aghamohammadi A, Abolhassani F, Eftekhar H, Heidarnia M, Rezaei N. Health policy for common variable immunodeficiency: Burden of the disease. J Invest Allergol Clin Immunol. 2011;21(6):454–8.
51. Acuna P Go C Disability-adjusted life years (DALY) in x-linked dystonia parkinsonism Mov Disord 2017 32 789 28218413
Acuna P, Go C. Disability-adjusted life years (DALY) in x-linked dystonia parkinsonism. Mov Disord. 2017;32:789.28218413
52. Ana Cristina Silva Pinto M, PhD FF, Costa MD, PhD SF. Menosi Gualandro, MD, PhD, Patricia Belintani Blum Fonseca, Carolina Tosin Bueno, Cançado PaRD. 3409 Burden of Sickle Cell Disease. A Brazilian Societal Perspective Analysis; 2020.
53. Café A, Carvalho M, Crato M, Faria M, Kjollerstrom P, Oliveira C et al. Haemophilia A: Health and economic burden of a rare disease in Portugal. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019;14(1).
54. Chung SE Cheong HK Park JH Kim HJ Burden of disease of multiple sclerosis in Korea Epidemiol Health 2012 34 e2012008 10.4178/epih/e2012008 23251838
Chung SE, Cheong HK, Park JH, Kim HJ. Burden of disease of multiple sclerosis in Korea. Epidemiol Health. 2012;34:e2012008.23251838 10.4178/epih/e2012008
55. GBD 2016 Motor Neuron Disease Collaborators Global, regional, and national burden of motor neuron diseases 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2016 Lancet Neurol 2018 17 12 1083 97 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30404-6 30409709
GBD 2016 Motor Neuron Disease Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of motor neuron diseases 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17(12):1083–97.30409709 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30404-6
56. Costa J Coelho T Moreno T Negrão L Ribeiro J Santos M POSA102 burden of Disease and cost of illness of spinal muscular atrophy in Portugal Value Health 2022 25 1 S53 10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.246
Costa J, Coelho T, Moreno T, Negrão L, Ribeiro J, Santos M, et al. POSA102 burden of Disease and cost of illness of spinal muscular atrophy in Portugal. Value Health. 2022;25(1):S53.10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.246
57. Guojun T Yan X Weizhi W Lihua W Chunyang L Xinghu Z A multicenter study to evaluate the disease burden and health economics of inpatients with multiple sclerosis in China Mult Scler Relat Disord 2022 60 103732 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103732 35325723
Guojun T, Yan X, Weizhi W, Lihua W, Chunyang L, Xinghu Z, et al. A multicenter study to evaluate the disease burden and health economics of inpatients with multiple sclerosis in China. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022;60:103732.35325723 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103732
58. Henrard S, Devleesschauwer B, Beutels P, Callens M, De Smet F, Hermans C et al. The health and economic burden of haemophilia in Belgium: a rare, expensive and challenging disease. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2014;9(1).
59. Inês M Coelho T Conceição I Landeiro F de Carvalho M Costa J Societal costs and burden of hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis polyneuropathy Amyloid 2020 27 2 89 96 10.1080/13506129.2019.1701429 31854198
Inês M, Coelho T, Conceição I, Landeiro F, de Carvalho M, Costa J. Societal costs and burden of hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis polyneuropathy. Amyloid. 2020;27(2):89–96.31854198 10.1080/13506129.2019.1701429
60. Janphram C Worawichawong S Boongird S Udomsubpayakul U Assanatham M Kitiyakara C Year of life lost due to premature death from glomerulonephritis in Thailand J Am Soc Nephrol 2021 32 491 2 10.1681/ASN.20213210S1491d
Janphram C, Worawichawong S, Boongird S, Udomsubpayakul U, Assanatham M, Kitiyakara C. Year of life lost due to premature death from glomerulonephritis in Thailand. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021;32:491–2.10.1681/ASN.20213210S1491d
61. Kansal K, Mareddy M, Sloane K, Minc A, Rabins P, McGready J et al. Meta-analysis of survival duration and years of life lost in frontotemporal dementia. 2015;27:S138–9.
62. Liu X, Cui Y, Han J. Estimating epidemiological data of multiple sclerosis using hospitalized data in Shandong Province, China Dr. Segolene Ayme. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016;11(1).
63. Odnoletkova I, Kindle G, Quinti I, Grimbacher B, Knerr V, Gathmann B et al. The burden of common variable immunodeficiency disorders: a retrospective analysis of the European Society for Immunodeficiency (ESID) registry data 11 Medical and Health Sciences 1117 Public Health and Health Services. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2018;13(1).
64. Siddiqi AA Ebrahim SH Soucie JM Parker CS Atrash HK Burden of Disease resulting from Hemophilia in the U.S Am J Prev Med 2010 38 4 SUPPL S482 8 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.12.016 20331947
Siddiqi AA, Ebrahim SH, Soucie JM, Parker CS, Atrash HK. Burden of Disease resulting from Hemophilia in the U.S. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38(4 SUPPL):S482–8.20331947 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.12.016
65. Villaquiran-Torres C, Dueñas-Villamil R, Taborda-Restrepo A, Rojas-López K, Chamorro-Velásquez C, Londoño-Trujillo D. Burden of pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension in a developing country (colombia-south America). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021;203(9).
66. Villaverde-Hueso A Sánchez-Valle E Álvarez E Morant C Carreira PE Martín-Arribas MC Estimating the burden of scleroderma disease in Spain J Rheumatol 2007 34 11 2236 42 17918783
Villaverde-Hueso A, Sánchez-Valle E, Álvarez E, Morant C, Carreira PE, Martín-Arribas MC, et al. Estimating the burden of scleroderma disease in Spain. J Rheumatol. 2007;34(11):2236–42.17918783
67. Charalampous P Pallari E Gorasso V von der Lippe E Devleesschauwer B Pires SM Methodological considerations in injury burden of disease studies across Europe: a systematic literature review BMC Public Health 2022 22 1 1564 10.1186/s12889-022-13925-z 35978333
Charalampous P, Pallari E, Gorasso V, von der Lippe E, Devleesschauwer B, Pires SM, et al. Methodological considerations in injury burden of disease studies across Europe: a systematic literature review. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1564.35978333 10.1186/s12889-022-13925-z
68. Polinder S Haagsma JA Stein C Havelaar AH Systematic review of general burden of disease studies using disability-adjusted life years Popul Health Metr 2012 10 1 21 10.1186/1478-7954-10-21 23113929
Polinder S, Haagsma JA, Stein C, Havelaar AH. Systematic review of general burden of disease studies using disability-adjusted life years. Popul Health Metr. 2012;10(1):21.23113929 10.1186/1478-7954-10-21
69. Charalampous P, Haagsma JA, Jakobsen LS, Gorasso V, Noguer I, Padron-Monedero A et al. Burden of infectious disease studies in Europe and the United Kingdom: a review of methodological design choices. Epidemiol Infect. 2023:1–32.
70. Groft SC de la Paz MP Rare diseases - avoiding misperceptions and establishing realities: the need for reliable epidemiological data Adv Exp Med Biol 2010 686 3 14 10.1007/978-90-481-9485-8_1 20824436
Groft SC, de la Paz MP. Rare diseases - avoiding misperceptions and establishing realities: the need for reliable epidemiological data. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2010;686:3–14.20824436 10.1007/978-90-481-9485-8_1
71. Lochmuller H Torrent IFJ Le Cam Y Jonker AH Lau LP Baynam G The International Rare Diseases Research Consortium: policies and guidelines to maximize impact Eur J Hum Genet 2017 25 12 1293 302 10.1038/s41431-017-0008-z 29158551
Lochmuller H, Torrent IFJ, Le Cam Y, Jonker AH, Lau LP, Baynam G, et al. The International Rare Diseases Research Consortium: policies and guidelines to maximize impact. Eur J Hum Genet. 2017;25(12):1293–302.29158551 10.1038/s41431-017-0008-z
72. Uhlenbusch N Lowe B Depping MK Perceived burden in dealing with different rare diseases: a qualitative focus group study BMJ Open 2019 9 12 e033353 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033353 31888936
Uhlenbusch N, Lowe B, Depping MK. Perceived burden in dealing with different rare diseases: a qualitative focus group study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(12):e033353.31888936 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033353
73. National Organization for Rare Disorders. Barriers to Rare Disease Diagnosis, Care and Treatment in the US: A 30-Year Comparative Analysis. 2020 https://rarediseases.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/NRD-2088-Barriers-30-Yr-Survey-Report_FNL-2.pdf
74. Faviez C Chen X Garcelon N Neuraz A Knebelmann B Salomon R Diagnosis support systems for rare diseases: a scoping review Orphanet J Rare Dis 2020 15 1 94 10.1186/s13023-020-01374-z 32299466
Faviez C, Chen X, Garcelon N, Neuraz A, Knebelmann B, Salomon R, et al. Diagnosis support systems for rare diseases: a scoping review. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2020;15(1):94.32299466 10.1186/s13023-020-01374-z
75. Haematology TL. Rare diseases: not so out of the ordinary. Lancet Haematol. 2020.
76. Iorio A Stonebraker JS Chambost H Makris M Coffin D Herr C Establishing the prevalence and prevalence at birth of hemophilia in males a meta-analytic approach using national registries Ann Intern Med 2019 171 8 542 6 10.7326/M19-1208
Iorio A, Stonebraker JS, Chambost H, Makris M, Coffin D, Herr C, et al. Establishing the prevalence and prevalence at birth of hemophilia in males a meta-analytic approach using national registries. Ann Intern Med. 2019;171(8):542–6.10.7326/M19-1208
77. Slade A Isa F Kyte D Pankhurst T Kerecuk L Ferguson J Patient reported outcome measures in rare diseases: a narrative review Orphanet J Rare Dis 2018 13 1 61 10.1186/s13023-018-0810-x 29688860
Slade A, Isa F, Kyte D, Pankhurst T, Kerecuk L, Ferguson J, et al. Patient reported outcome measures in rare diseases: a narrative review. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2018;13(1):61.29688860 10.1186/s13023-018-0810-x
78. Forman J Taruscio D Llera VA Barrera LA Cote TR Edfjall C The need for worldwide policy and action plans for rare diseases Acta Paediatr 2012 101 8 805 7 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2012.02705.x 22519914
Forman J, Taruscio D, Llera VA, Barrera LA, Cote TR, Edfjall C, et al. The need for worldwide policy and action plans for rare diseases. Acta Paediatr. 2012;101(8):805–7.22519914 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2012.02705.x
79. Nguyen CQ Alba-Concepcion K Palmer EE Scully JL Millis N Farrar MA The involvement of rare disease patient organisations in therapeutic innovation across rare paediatric neurological conditions: a narrative review Orphanet J Rare Dis 2022 17 1 167 10.1186/s13023-022-02317-6 35436886
Nguyen CQ, Alba-Concepcion K, Palmer EE, Scully JL, Millis N, Farrar MA. The involvement of rare disease patient organisations in therapeutic innovation across rare paediatric neurological conditions: a narrative review. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022;17(1):167.35436886 10.1186/s13023-022-02317-6
80. Boycott KM, Lau LP, Cutillo CM, Austin CP. International collaborative actions and transparency to understand, diagnose, and develop therapies for rare diseases. EMBO Mol Med. 2019;11(5).
81. Groft SC Posada de la Paz M Rare diseases: joining Mainstream Research and Treatment Based on Reliable Epidemiological Data Adv Exp Med Biol 2017 1031 3 21 10.1007/978-3-319-67144-4_1 29214563
Groft SC, Posada de la Paz M. Rare diseases: joining Mainstream Research and Treatment Based on Reliable Epidemiological Data. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1031:3–21.29214563 10.1007/978-3-319-67144-4_1
82. Mascalzoni D Paradiso A Hansson M Rare disease research: breaking the privacy barrier Appl Transl Genom 2014 3 2 23 9 27275410
Mascalzoni D, Paradiso A, Hansson M. Rare disease research: breaking the privacy barrier. Appl Transl Genom. 2014;3(2):23–9.27275410
83. Kaufmann M Puhan MA Kuhle J Yaldizli O Magnusson T Kamm CP A Framework for estimating the Burden of Chronic diseases: design and application in the context of multiple sclerosis Front Neurol 2019 10 953 10.3389/fneur.2019.00953 31555205
Kaufmann M, Puhan MA, Kuhle J, Yaldizli O, Magnusson T, Kamm CP, et al. A Framework for estimating the Burden of Chronic diseases: design and application in the context of multiple sclerosis. Front Neurol. 2019;10:953.31555205 10.3389/fneur.2019.00953
84. von der Lippe E Devleesschauwer B Gourley M Haagsma J Hilderink H Porst M Reflections on key methodological decisions in national burden of disease assessments Arch Public Health 2020 78 1 137 10.1186/s13690-020-00519-7 33384020
von der Lippe E, Devleesschauwer B, Gourley M, Haagsma J, Hilderink H, Porst M, et al. Reflections on key methodological decisions in national burden of disease assessments. Arch Public Health. 2020;78(1):137.33384020 10.1186/s13690-020-00519-7
85. Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network. Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. (GBD 2019) Reference Life Table: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), Seattle, United States; 2021 https://ghdx.healthdata.org/record/ihme-data/gbd-2019-life-tables-1950-2019
86. Charalampous P Polinder S Wothge J von der Lippe E Haagsma JA A systematic literature review of disability weights measurement studies: evolution of methodological choices Arch Public Health 2022 80 1 91 10.1186/s13690-022-00860-z 35331325
Charalampous P, Polinder S, Wothge J, von der Lippe E, Haagsma JA. A systematic literature review of disability weights measurement studies: evolution of methodological choices. Arch Public Health. 2022;80(1):91.35331325 10.1186/s13690-022-00860-z
87. Egunsola O Raubenheimer J Buckley N Variability in the burden of disease estimates with or without age weighting and discounting: a methodological study BMJ Open 2019 9 8 e027825 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027825 31427320
Egunsola O, Raubenheimer J, Buckley N. Variability in the burden of disease estimates with or without age weighting and discounting: a methodological study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(8):e027825.31427320 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027825
88. Colin D Mathers JAS Ezzati M Begg S Hoorn SV Alan D Lopez CDM Majid Ezzati, Dean T Jamison, Christopher JL Murray Lopez. Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses for Burden of Disease and risk factor estimates Global burden of Disease and Risk factors 2006 Washington (DC) The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank
Colin D, Mathers JAS, Ezzati M, Begg S, Hoorn SV. Lopez. Sensitivity and uncertainty analyses for Burden of Disease and risk factor estimates. In: Alan D, Lopez CDM, Majid Ezzati, Dean T, Jamison, Christopher JL, Murray, editors. Global burden of Disease and Risk factors. Washington (DC): The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank; 2006.
89. World Health Organization. WHO methods and data sources for global burden of disease estimates 2000–2019. World Health Organization. 2020 https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/gho-documents/global-health-estimates/ghe2019_daly-methods.pdf
