
==== Front
Sci Rep
Sci Rep
Scientific Reports
2045-2322
Nature Publishing Group UK London

39251677
70965
10.1038/s41598-024-70965-8
Author Correction
Author Correction: Visual search patterns during exploration of naturalistic scenes are driven by saliency cues in individuals with cerebral visual impairment
Walter Kerri 1
Manley Claire E. 2
Bex Peter J. 1
Merabet Lotfi B. lotf_merabet@meei.harvard.edu

2
1 https://ror.org/04t5xt781 grid.261112.7 0000 0001 2173 3359 Translational Vision Lab, Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA USA
2 grid.38142.3c 000000041936754X The Laboratory for Visual Neuroplasticity, Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, 20 Staniford Street, Boston, MA 02114 USA
9 9 2024
9 9 2024
2024
14 20984© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
issue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Limited 2024
==== Body
pmcCorrection to: Scientific Reports 10.1038/s41598-024-53642-8, published online 06 February 2024

The original version of this Article contained errors in the Results, under the subheading ‘ROC analysis’, where incorrect values were stated.

As a result,

“For the semantic model prediction, controls had higher ROC scores compared to the CVI group for both the image (controls: 1201.33 ms ± 131.55 SD, CVI: 1792.18 ms ± 332.84 SD; t(27.005) = 5.144, p < 0.001, d = 1.862) and text (controls: 1356.83 ms ± 149.62 SD, CVI: 2011.50 ms ± 544.33 SD; t(27.926) = 6.08, p < 0.001, d = 2.212) cue conditions (Fig. 3F).”

now reads:

“For the semantic model prediction, controls had higher ROC scores compared to the CVI group for both the image (controls: 0.80 ± 0.08 SD, CVI: 0.65 ± 0.09 SD; t(27.005)  = 5.144, p < 0.001, d = 1.862) and text (controls: 0.77 ± 0.08, CVI: 0.60 ± 0.07 SD; t(27.926) = 6.08, p < 0.001, d = 2.212) cue conditions (Fig. 3F).”

The original Article has been corrected.
