
==== Front
Int J Food Sci
Int J Food Sci
IJFS
International Journal of Food Science
2356-7015
2314-5765
Wiley

10.1155/2024/8923217
Review Article
Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacterium Exopolysaccharide, Biological, and Nutritional Evaluation of Probiotic Formulated Fermented Coconut Beverage
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2404-1686
Adebayo-Tayo Bukola Christianah bukola.tayo@gmail.com
1
https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4301-6237
Ogundele Bukola Rachael 1
https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7703-2882
Ajani Oladeji Aderibigbe 2
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5811-2270
Olaniyi Olusola Ademola 3
1 Department of Microbiology University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria
2 Federal Bureau of Prisons United States Department of Justice Federal Medical Center, Old N. North Carolina HWY 75, Butner, North Carolina 27509, USA
3 Department of Mathematics and Computer Science University of North Carolina, Pembroke, North Carolina, USA
Academic Editor: Zheng-Fei Yan

2024
2 9 2024
2024 89232177 12 2023
4 6 2024
9 7 2024
Copyright © 2024 Bukola Christianah Adebayo-Tayo et al.
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Exopolysaccharides (EPSs), produced by lactic acid bacteria (LAB), play a crucial role in enhancing the texture and stability of yoghurt by forming a protective matrix that helps to maintain its rheological and sensory characteristics. The search for a dairy alternative for the lactose-intolerant populace is a necessity, and the use of probiotic LAB and their EPS to formulate fermented coconut beverage (FFCB) will be of added advantage. The production and characterization of EPS from a LAB strain isolated from yoghurt, its probiotic and antioxidant potential, and its application in the production of probiotic FFCB were investigated. The EPS produced by the isolate was characterized using a scanning electron microscope (SEM), high-performance liquid chromatography, Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy, and energy-dispersive X-ray. The antioxidant potential of the EPS was determined. The isolate probiotic potential, such as tolerance to low pH, bile salts, gastric pH, autoaggregation, coaggregation, antimicrobial potential, and antibacterial activity, was evaluated, and the isolate was identified using 16S rRNA. The LAB strain and the EPS were used for the formulation of probiotic FFCB, and the proximate mineral composition of the enriched yoghurt was determined. Isolate W3 produced 6204.50 mg/L EPS. The EPS produced by the LAB was spherical with a coarse surface. Hydroxyl, carboxyl, and α-pyranose were the major functional groups present in the EPS. Eight monosaccharides were present in glucose, which has the highest molar ratio. The EDX spectra ascertain the presence of carbon, oxygen (carbohydrate), and other elements. The purified EPS exhibited antioxidant activity in a dose-dependent manner. DPPH, FRAP, TAC, and TPC of the EPS ranged from 42.36% to 75.88%, 2.48 to 5.31 μg/mL, 1.66 to 3.57 μg/mL, and 1.42 to 2.03 μg/mL, respectively. The LAB strain exhibited moderate tolerance to low pH, bile salts, gastric juice, good autoaggregation (13.33%), coaggregation (0%–59.09%) with E. coli, and varied sensitivity to different antibiotics used. The isolate is hemolysis, deoxyribonuclease (DNase), and lecithinase negative, possesses characteristics of probiotics, and could have the ability to confer health benefits. The LAB strain has a 100.0% pairwise identity to Pediococcus acidilactici. The FFCB has pH, lactic acid, specific gravity, total soluble solids (TSSs), and vitamin C content ranging from 5.81 to 6.8, 10.8 to 55.8 mg/L, 0.910 to 1.394 kg/m3, 0.136 to 0.196 °Bx, and 0.26% to 0.66%. The formulated beverage fermented with a commercial starter had the highest lactic acid at Day 7 of storage. The FFCB sample with the commercial starter and the probiotic strain had the highest ash and crude fiber content (1.3%, 0.68%). The FFCB fortified with EPS showed the highest protein content (4.6%). The formulated yogurt samples fortified with the highest concentration of EPS had the highest calcium content after 7 days of storage (162.31 ± 0.01a). In conclusion, EPS produced by Pediococcus acidilactici was a heteropolymeric EPS with good antioxidant activity, and the LAB strain exhibited a good starter for producing FFCB enriched with EPS. The FFCB has good nutritional characteristics and could serve as a functional and natural nutraceutical food for the lactose intolerance population.

Keywords

antioxidant
exopolysaccharide
fermented coconut beverage
nutritional
probiotic lactic acid bacteria
==== Body
pmc1. Introduction

Exopolysaccharides (EPS) are complex carbohydrates that are produced by a variety of microorganisms, including bacteria, most especially lactic acid bacteria (LAB), archaea, and fungi [1]. Microbial EPS refers to all forms of bacterial polysaccharide, both slime and capsule, found outside the cell wall [2]. EPS produced by LAB has been known to have probiotic effects as well as therapeutic, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory effects, as a natural thickener, stabilizer, emulsifier, and viscosifying agent in the food industry [3–5].

LABs are a nonpathogenic group of Gram-positive bacteria that produce lactic acid as an end product of fermentation. They are commonly used in dairy industries, most especially in cheese and yogurt production, sauerkraut, and pickles. It has the potential to change the intestinal environment, reduce lactose intolerance, and enhance the immune system [6]. Different strains of LAB that are capable of producing EPS are Streptococcus, Lactococcus, Pediococcus, Lactobacillus, Leuconostoc, and Weissella species [7]. Zaghloul and Ibrahim [8] reported the chemical composition and in vitro healing potential of EPS from probiotic Lactiplantibacillus plantarum EI6 isolated from a marine environment. EPSs produced by microorganisms are biodegradable and nontoxic compared to synthetic polymers [9–11]. LABs are being investigated for their potential health benefits, such as improving digestion, boosting the immune system, and preventing infections (probiotics) [12].

Probiotics are living microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit to the host [13]. They are a live microbial food ingredient that beneficially affects the host by improving its intestinal microbial balance [14]. Probiotics are present in fermented dairy products such as yogurt, cheese, and buttermilk. LABs are the highest source of probiotics. However, not all LABs are probiotics, and LAB should be evaluated for their probiotic attributes and safety profile.

Yoghurt is a fermented product obtained from the catabolism of milk lactose through anaerobic fermentation by some probiotic LAB [15]. Yoghurts are commonly obtained from cow milk and other substrates such as evaporated whole milk or skimmed solid milk [16]. Yoghurt, as a fermented dairy product, is regarded as a probiotic carrier with nutritional benefits beyond those of milk and can be consumed moderately by lactose-intolerant individuals without ill effects [17, 18].

As a result of the high cost of cow milk and the limitations of vegetarians and lactose intolerance in their quest for probiotic yogurt consumption, the search for alternative substrates like coconut milk will be of added advantage. Production of yoghurt using coconut milk and other milk from legumes has been reported to be delicious and nutritious [19, 20].

Coconut (Cocos nucifera) milk has been used as a flavor and taste enhancer in many products, such as ice cream, biscuits, and bakeries [21, 22]. Coconut milk has been reported to be rich in minerals such as calcium and Vitamin A, and the total saturated fat is above 10% of the total energy [23, 24].

The desire to have functional and natural food is on the increase. Lactose intolerance and the use of chemical additives as viscosifiers, thickeners, stabilizers, and texturing agents in yogurt production are of great concern because of the side effects. The search for a dairy alternative for the lactose-intolerant populace is a necessity. The use of coconut milk as an alternative to dairy milk, LAB, and their EPS to improve the nutritional, texture, and rheological properties of fermented coconut beverage will be of added advantage, which necessitates this study.

This study is aimed at the production and characterization of EPS from LAB, the evaluation of the probiotic potential of the isolate, and the production of fermented coconut beverage using the EPS and the probiotic LAB strain.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Samples and Culture Collection

Tall coconut varieties with matured fruit, commercial powdered full cream (Dano) milk, and commercial freeze-dried yoghurt starter (Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus) were obtained from Sango Market and Supermarket in Ojoo, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria.

Pediococcus acidilactici strain was previously isolated from Wara (a traditional African fermented milk product, typically made by adding a coagulant to fresh milk, which curdles the milk protein and whey, resulting in a soft, jiggly, and high-protein food). Foodborne pathogens (Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, Aeromonas hydrophila, Klebsiella pneumonia, and Bacillus subtilis) were collected from the Department of Microbiology, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

2.2. EPS Production and Quantification

Pediococcus acidilactici strain was used for EPS production using a modified EPS selection medium (mESM) containing 5% skimmed milk, 0.35% yeast extract, 0.35% peptone, and 5% sucrose [25]. The pure culture of the isolate from the stock culture was subculture using sterile MRS broth incubated at 37°C for 48 h. Ten milliliters of the isolate (containing 1.5 × 106 CFU/mL standardized inoculum using 0.5 McFarland standards) was inoculated into the sterile mESM and incubated at 35°C for 72 h. The fermentation medium was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 20 min to remove the cells. The supernatant was boiled in a water bath at 90°C for 10 min to stop enzymatic degradation by phosphoglucomutase. Two hundred fifty micrograms of 80% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid was added (as a precipitating agent to precipitate the EPS and allow easy separation of the EPS) and then mixed with cold ethanol (to purify the EPS) and stored at 4°C overnight to prevent degradation process. The stored sample was centrifuged (12,000 rpm) for 15 min to recover the EPS, and the EPS was air-dried [26, 27]. The experiment was performed in triplicate. The total sugar concentration was determined using the phenol-sulfuric acid method, the EPS was expressed in milligrams per liter, and glucose was used as a standard [28].

2.3. Characterization of EPS

The EPS monosaccharide composition was determined using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) [29]. The EPS sample was hydrolyzed using 1 mL of trifluoroacetic acid (2 M) at 120°C for 2 h. Hydrolyzed samples were derivatized using 1-phenyl-3-methyl-5-pyrazolone, and the sample was analyzed using an HPLC system containing a four-unit pump (Agilent Technologies, Wilmington, United States) and a Shim-pak VPODS column (4.6 × 150 mm). Sodium phosphate (50 mM, pH 7.0) and acetonitrile (82% and 18%) (V/v) were used as the mobile phase. The sample elution was done at a 1.0 mL/min flow rate using a refractive index detector at 245 nm. The area under the curves was measured using an integrator, and the different sugar standards were compared with the known retention times of the EPS samples. The EPS production was expressed as milligrams per liter.

Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy is used to determine the functional groups present in the EPS samples. The KBr method was used to determine the spectrum of the EPS. The dried EPS samples were pressed into KBr pellets (1:100). The FT-IR spectra of the pelleted samples were measured at 4 cm1 in the region of 4000–400 cm1 using the Bruker Tensor 27 instrument [30].

Scanning electron microscopy was used to determine the surface morphological structure of the EPS samples. The purified EPS's microstructure and surface morphology were examined using a Carl Zeiss Supra 55 Gemini Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) from German Technology Jena, Germany, operating at an accelerating voltage of 20 keV. The EPS was mounted to the metal stub and coated with a layer of gold via sputtering. Micrographs were captured at increased magnification to guarantee sharp images. The EPS's elemental composition was analyzed using an energy-dispersive X-ray analyzer, namely, the Oxford Instruments (EDX) attached to a SEM. The X-ray spectra of the elements were acquired using an accelerating voltage of 15 keV.

2.4. In Vitro Antioxidant Potential of the EPS

In vitro antioxidant potential of the EPS sample as determined using the 2-diphenyl-1-picyryl-hydrazyl-hydrate (DPPH) assay, ferric ion-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), total antioxidant activity, and total phenolic (TP) content.

The DPPH radical scavenging activity of the EPS was determined using the modified method of Gülçin [31]. Two milliliters of DPPH solution (0.1 mM DPPH in 500 mM ethanol) was added to 2 mL of different concentrations (50, 200, and 1000 μg/mL) of the EPS samples, respectively. The reaction mixture was incubated in the dark at room temperature for 30 min. The absorbance of the mixture was taken at 517 nm. Ethanol was used as a blank, while a DPPH solution in ethanol served as the control. A reduction in absorbance indicates DPPH radical scavenging activity. The DPPH radical scavenging activity of the samples was expressed as follows:   %inhibition of DPPH absorbance:inhibition=A control−A testA control×100

where A control is the absorbance of the control sample (DPPH solution without an EPS sample) and A test is the absorbance of the test sample (DPPH solution plus an EPS sample).

The FRAP of the EPS samples was measured according to the method of Oyaizu [32], with slight modifications by Gülçin et al. [33]. Different concentrations of the EPS sample (200–1000 μg/mL) were mixed with 2.5 mL of phosphate buffer (20 mM) and 2.5 mL of potassium ferricyanide (1%). The mixture was incubated at 50°C for 30 min, and 2.5 mL of trichloroacetic acid (10%) and 0.5 mL of ferric chloride (0.1%) were added to the mixture. It was then kept for 10 min. The absorbance was taken at 700 nm, and ascorbic acid was used as a positive reference standard. All assays were done in triplicate and averaged.

The total antioxidant activity of EPS was determined using the method of Mitsuda, Yasumoto, and Iwami [34], as reported by Kanamarlapudi and Muddada [35]. A total antioxidant solution containing a mixture of 1.235 g of ammonium molybdate (4 mM), 0.6 M sulfuric acid (45 mL), 0.9942 g of sodium sulfate (28 mM), and 250 mL of distilled water was used as the total antioxidant capacity. About 0.1 mL of different concentrations (200–1000 μg) of the EPS sample was added to 1 mL of total antioxidant solution, and absorbance was taken at 695 nm after 15 min of incubation. Ascorbic acid was used as a standard.

The TP contents of the EPS sample were determined spectrophotometrically [36]. In brief, 0.5 mL of each extract was made up to 3 mL of a different concentration of EPS solution and mixed with 0.5 mL of Folin–Ciocalteu's phenol reagent. After 5 min, 2 mL of Na2CO3 (2%) solution was added to the reaction mixture, mixed thoroughly, and then kept at 30°C for 60 min in a dark place. The absorbance was taken at 650 nm. The TP was determined from the extrapolation of a calibration curve constructed using standard concentrations of gallic acid solution. The estimation of phenolic compounds was carried out in triplicate. The TP was expressed as milligrams of gallic acid equivalents (GAEs) per gram of dried sample. Gallic acid was used as a standard [37].

2.5. Probiotic Potential of the LAB Strain

Tolerance of the isolate to an acidic environment was determined by culturing the 1 mL (containing 1.5 × 106 CFU/mL standardized inocum using 0.5 McFarland standard) of the isolate in acidified MRS broth at pH 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, and 4.0 and nonacidified MRS broth at pH 6.4. for 24 h at 37°C under anaerobic conditions. The absorbance of the samples was taken using a spectrophotometer at 600 nm after 0 and 24 h of incubation. The survival rate was calculated as   Survival%=OD600 24 hOD600 0 h×100

where OD600 (24 h) is the growth value of cultures at pH 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, and 4.0 and OD600 (0 h) is the growth value of cultures at pH 6.2.

Tolerance of the isolate to bile salt was determined by culturing the isolate in MRS containing different bile salt concentrations (0.1%, 0.3%, and 0.5% bile salt). MRS without the addition of bile salt serves as a control. The inoculated samples were incubated at 37°C for 4 h. The growth was evaluated by measuring the absorbance at 600 nm using a spectrophotometer.   Bile salt tolerance was expressed as:Survival%=Log N1Log No×100

Gastrointestinal transit tolerance of the LAB strain was determined by using Electrolyte A (containing NaCl, 6.2 g/L; KCl, 2.2 g/L; CaCl2, 0.22 g/L; NaHCO3, 1.2 g/L, w/v, pH 6.2) label G1, which is the control. Electrolyte A was adjusted to different pHs (4.0, 3.5, 3.0, and 2.5) labeled G2–G5 which was used for in vitro mimicry of the gastrointestinal tract. One milliliter of the LAB suspension was inoculated on the pH-adjusted G1–G5 electrolyte and incubated at 37°C for 120 min. The cell pellet, after centrifugation at 8000 rpm at 4°C for 5 min, was suspended in a sterile saline solution (0.85% NaCl) and then plated on MRS agar. The survival rate was calculated using the following equation:   Survival%=Log N1Log No×100

where N1 is the growth value of cultures at pH 4.0, 3.5, 3.0, and 2.5 and No is the growth values of cultures at pH 6.2.

The autoaggregation of the isolates was determined using the method of Khalil et al. [38]. Harvested cells were washed twice with phosphate buffer solution (PBS) (pH 7.2). The cells were resuspended in PBS (McFarland standard 0.5), vortexed thoroughly, and incubated at 37°C for 5 h. Aliquots (1 mL) were taken from each sample at 0 and 5 h, and the absorbance was measured at OD 660 nm. Autoaggregation was calculated using   Ao−AsAo×100

where As is the absorbance at 5 h of incubation and Ao is the absorbance at 0 h.

The coaggregation assay of the isolates determined using the method of Khalil et al. [38]. The suspension of the LAB strain as well as individual pathogenic bacteria (namely, Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, Aeromonas hydrophila, Klebsiella pneumonia, and Bacillus subtilis) cells was washed twice with PBS (pH 7.2). The cells were resuspended in PBS (McFarland standard 0.5), vortexed thoroughly, and incubated at 37°C for 5 h. Aliquots (1 mL) were taken from each sample at 0 and 5 h, and the absorbance was measured at OD 660 nm. Coaggregation was calculated using   Ao−AsAo×100

where Ao is the absorbance of the mixed bacteria suspension at 0 h of incubation.

What is the absorbance of the mixed bacteria suspension after 5 h?

The antibiotic resistance potential of the isolate was determined using the method of Khalil et al. [38]. The antibiotics are as follows: amoxicillin (30 μg/mL), ampilin (10 μg/mL), sulphamethoxazole (25 μg/mL), vancomycin (30 μg/mL), cefpodoxime (10 μg/mL), chloramphenicol (30 μg/mL), oxacilin (1 μg/mL), entrapenin (10 μg/mL), azithromycin (30 μg/mL), gentamicin (10 μg/mL), ciprofloxacin (30 μg/mL), erythromycin (16 μg/mL), tetracycline (30 μg/mL), and nitrofurantoin (300 μg/mL). About 0.2 mL of the bacterial suspension (equivalent to the McFarland standard value of 0.5 containing 2.5 × 107 CFU/mL) was spread onto Muller–Hinton agar (MHA) plates using a sterile cotton swab. The antibiotic discs were placed on the surface of the agar plates, which were maintained at 400°C for 2 h for diffusion. The diameter (millimeter) of the inhibition zone was measured after incubation at 370°C for 48 h.

The antibacterial activity of culture-free supernatant (CFS) from the LAB strain against some test pathogens (Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, Aeromonas hydrophila, Klebsiella pneumonia, Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Proteus sp.) was done using the agar-well diffusion method [38]. The sterile nutrient agar was seeded with 0.2 mL of the tested pathogens (containing 1.5 × 107 CFU/mL), allowed to solidify, and 6 mm wells were bored on the agar with a sterile cork borer. About 40 μL of filtered sterilized CFS was added to each well and allowed to diffuse for 1 h, followed by incubation at 370°C for 24 h. The diameter of the zone of inhibition around each well was measured. The experiment was performed in triplicate.

2.5.1. Safety Evaluation of Isolate

2.5.2. Determination of Haemolysis, Deoxyribonuclease (DNase), and Lecithinase Activity of the Isolate

The haemolytic activity of the isolate was evaluated using a method adapted from Yadav, Puniya, and Shukla [39]. The isolates were plated onto blood agar plates containing 5% sheep blood and incubated at 37°C for 48 h. Following incubation, the plates were examined for beta, alpha, and nonhaemolytic activities.

The isolate was cultured on DNase agar medium to assess its ability to produce the DNase enzyme. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 h and then examined for a clear pinkish zone around the colonies, which indicated positive DNase activity, as described by Shuhadha et al. [40].

The isolate was cultured on lecithinase agar medium to evaluate their ability to break down lecithin. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 h and then examined for a clear white opaque zone of precipitation that extended beyond the edge of the colony, indicating positive lecithin activity, as described by Cappuccino and Sherman [41].

2.6. Application of the EPS Produced From the LAB Strain for the Production of Probiotic Fermented Coconut Beverage

2.6.1. Substrate Preparation, Formulation, and Production of Enriched Coconut Yogurt

The EPS produced was used in the formulation of coconut yogurt samples. The five coconut kernels were shelled and peeled to remove the outer brown skin and washed with portable water to remove all the dirt. One kilogram of the washed coconut was chopped into pieces before grating into fine particles (0.2 mm) [42, 43].

Substrates such as milk, grated coconut, and 3% (1.5 g) of starter culture, EPS, and 1.5% of LAB strain were added in varied concentrations for the formulation of probiotic fermented coconut beverage. Twelve formulations containing varied substrate concentrations labeled A1, A2, A3, and A4; B1, B2, B3, and B4; and CI, C2, C3, and C4, respectively, as shown in Table 1, were used (substrate formulation).

The formulated samples were pasteurized at 90°C for 30 min; the samples and the control samples were allowed to ferment at 44°C for 6 h and stored at 4°C over a period of 14 days. The samples were kept for further analysis.

2.7. Physicochemical Characterization of the Formulated Probiotic Coconut Yogurt Samples

The fermented probiotic samples were analyzed for pH, lactic acid (TTA), color, total soluble solid (TSS), specific gravity, and Vitamin C.

Determination of Lactic acid, pH, Colour, Total Soluble Solids and Vitamin C content of the stored Formulated Probiotic Coconut Yogurt Samples.

The lactic acid content of the stored, formulated probiotic fermented coconut beverage samples was determined by titrating 10 mL of the homogenized sample against 0.25 mol−1 NaOH using phenolphthalein as an indicator. Each milliliter of 1 N NaOH is equivalent to 90.08 mg of lactic acid [44].

The color of the stored formulated probiotic coconut yogurt samples was determined using a colorimeter. The color parameters (Hunter L∗, lightness; a∗, redness; and b∗, yellowness) were determined for each sample using a colorimeter (CM-2500D Minolta, Japan) [45].

TSSs of the stored formulated probiotic fermented coconut beverage samples were evaluated using a hand refractometer (Erma, Japan) in terms of °Bx (°Brix) [46].

The Vitamin C content of the stored formulated probiotic fermented coconut beverage samples was determined by titrating 10 mL of filtered samples against 0.01% blue 2,6-dichloro-phenolindophenol solution [40]. The final point was considered when the solution reached a pink color for 30 s. The calibration curve was performed with a Vitamin C solution, and the results were expressed as milligrams/100 mL ascorbic acid.

2.8. Determination of the Proximate Mineral Composition of the Stored, Formulated Probiotic Fermented Coconut Beverage Samples

The proximate composition (moisture, fat, crude fiber, crude protein, ash, and carbohydrate contents) of the stored formulated probiotic fermented coconut beverage samples was determined [47]. The determination was done in duplicate.

The mineral composition (Mg, K, and Ca content) of the stored formulated probiotic fermented coconut beverage samples was determined using the absorption spectrometer method of AOAC [47] and Kirk and Sawyer [48].

2.9. Determination of the Shelf-Life Extension of the Formulated Coconut Yogurt

The shelf-life extension of the stored formulated fermented coconut beverage samples was done by pour plating them at intervals of 7 days [49]. Serially diluted samples were pour-plated on nutrient agar for total heterotrophic count, MacConkey agar for total coliform count, and MRS for LAB count. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 h; distinct colonies were counted and reported as colony-forming units, while hazy colonies were designated as too numerous to count (TNTC).

2.10. Molecular Characterization

The selected probiotic strains were identified using 16S rRNA [50]. The genomic DNA was extracted using ZR Bacterial DNA MiniPrep (manufactured by Zymo Research). The DNA was PCR amplified using 27F-1492R primers under standard conditions. PCR amplification was done using an automated thermal cycler (Biometra, Germany) using Taq polymerase (TaKaRa Bio, Inc., Shiga, Japan). The amplified products were sequenced and analyzed using BLAST (NCBI, Bethesda, MD, United States). The neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 5.05.

2.11. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were carried out in triplicate, and each sample was analyzed in duplicate. The results are expressed as mean ± S.D. (standard deviation).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Production and Characterization of EPS Produced by Isolate W3

The EPS produced by the isolate was 6204.50 mg/L. The scanning electron micrograph of the EPS produced by the LAB strain is shown in Figure 1(a). The EPS was a highly compacted flake-like structure. Yadav et al. [51] had similar report on novel EPS from Lactobacillus fermentum. SEM analysis provides detailed insights into the morphological structure of the EPS.

Figure 1(b) shows the chemical composition of the EPS, which was determined by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. The elemental analysis revealed the predominance of oxygen and carbon with a mass ratio of 10.20–72.20 (w/w) for the EPS. The high mass of these two elements emphasized that the purified EPS is comprised mainly of carbohydrates [52]. The EDX spectrum also revealed the presence of other elements such as P, Ca, S, K, Na, and N. The elemental composition of the EPS was similar to the EPS produced by Rhodobacter johrii CDR-SL 7Cii [52]. Such elements present on the EPS surface may play a role in binding with the carboxyl and hydroxyl groups of monosaccharides [53]. EPSs that contain carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen are called glycoproteins, as they are composed of polysaccharides covalently linked to proteins.

The FT-IR spectra of the LAB EPS are shown in Figure 1(c). Eight peaks were observed, starting from 3466.50 to 515.46 cm1. The peaks at 3466.50, 2081.69, and 1634.99 cm1 could be attributed to the hydroxy group, H-bonded OH stretch, transition metal carbonyls, and the presence of Amide II band. The peak at 1412.60, 1077.60, and 1046.80 cm1 corresponds to vinyl C-H in-plane bend, primary amine (C-N) stretch, and P III polysaccharide band C-O-C group. The peaks at 646.71 and 515.46 cm1 correspond to aliphatic bromo compounds (C-Br) stretching. The IR spectrum revealed characteristic signatures and distinctive functional groups of carbohydrates. The assignments of the IR bands were mainly based on the previously reported polysaccharide spectra [54, 55].

The HPLC chromatogram of the EPS is shown in Figure 1(d). Table 2 shows the monosaccharide composition of the EPS produced by the isolate. EPS contains eight monosaccharaides, which include rhamnose, D-ribose, arabinose, xylose, inositol, mannose, glucose, and galactose in a varied molar ratio. The monosaccharides had varying concentrations, with glucose having the highest and inositol having the lowest. EPSs produced by LAB are composed of various monosaccharides, including glucose, galactose, rhamnose, mannose, and N-acetylgalactosamine [54–56]. The specific monosaccharide composition can vary depending on the LAB strain. For example, EPS from Streptococcus thermophilus strains typically contains glucose and galactose [56]. S. thermophilus CC30 EPS is composed of glucose and galactose, while S. thermophilus LY03 EPS contains glucose, galactose, and N-acetylgalactosamine [56]. The occurrence of different saccharide moieties suggests that the EPS produced is a heteropolysaccharide.

Figures 2(a), 2(b), and 2(c) show the in vitro antioxidant activity of the EPS in terms of DPPH radical scavenging activity, ferric ion-reducing property, total antioxidant capacity, and the TP content of the EPS. The DPPH and FRAP ranged from 42.36% to 75.88% and 2.48 to 5.31 μg/mL, respectively. The DPPH has IC50 of 27.299. The TAC and TPC ranged from 1.66 to 3.57 μg/mL and 1.42 to 2.03 μg/mL, respectively, in which the highest activity was recorded at highest concentration. The antioxidant activity increased in a dose-dependent manner. As the concentration increased, the antioxidant potential increased. The in vitro antioxidant assay showed that EPS has strong antioxidant properties. EPSs produced by LAB have been studied for their antioxidant properties, which can be assessed through various in vitro methods. These methods include evaluating the EPS's ability to scavenge DPPH radicals, reduce ferric ions, exhibit total antioxidant capacity, and contain TP compounds. Ability of the EPS to effectively neutralized free radicals as evidenced by its significant DPPH radical scavenging activity, with values ranging from 42.36% to 75.88%, indicates the potential of EPS to combat oxidative stress. Studies have shown that EPS extracted from spent media wastewater can effectively neutralize free radicals, 71.6%–79.1% [57]. The FRAP values of the EPS, ranging from 2.48 to 5.31 μg/mL, demonstrate its capacity to act as an electron donor and react with free radicals, thereby terminating free radical chain reactions. This property is crucial for protecting cells from oxidative damage. The total antioxidant capacity and TPC of the EPS, with concentrations ranging from 1.66 to 3.57 μg/mL and 1.42 to 2.03 μg/mL, further highlight its substantial antioxidant potential. The presence of phenolic compounds in EPS can contribute to its antioxidant properties. Phenolic compounds are known for their ability to scavenge free radicals and exhibit antioxidant effects. EPSs derived from various sources, such as Lactobacillus plantarum C88 and Lysobacter soyae sp. nov, have shown promising antioxidant activities, making them valuable candidates for applications in functional foods and other industries [57, 58]. The antioxidant properties of EPS can vary based on their monosaccharide composition and structural characteristics, emphasizing their potential as natural antioxidants with high thermal stability and dose-dependent antioxidant effects.

3.1.1. Probiotic Evaluation of the LAB Strain

The survival rate of the LAB strain to acid, gastric juice, and bile salt is shown in Figures 3(a), 3(b), and 3(c), respectively. There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the survival rate of the isolate at different acid levels. The survival rate of the isolate at different acid concentrations ranged from 45% - 80%, with the highest survivability recorded at pH 4.0.

There was a significant difference in the survival rate of the isolate to gastric juice. The survival rate to gastric acid ranged from 55% to 75% OD. The highest survivability was recorded at pH 3.5 for gastric acid. One of the major stress factors facing ingested probiotics is their passage through the stomach and being subjected to gastric acids with a low pH value [59].

Probiotic microorganisms should be tolerant of gastric pH 3 [60, 61]. A study conducted by Zielińska et al. [62] reported a 30%–100% survival rate of probiotic Lactobacillus strains when inoculated in gastric juice at pH 3. The viability of the isolate at pH 3 and acidic gastric juice was found to be similar to other reported probiotic strains that are commonly reported in traditional food products [63, 64].

The isolate was able to survive at different concentrations of bile salt. The survival rate ranged from 14.99% to 20.25%, with the highest recorded at 0.1% bile salt concentration. The isolate had low survivability to high bile salt concentrations which may be due to the presence of a low specific enzyme called bile salt hydrolase (BSH), which helps to hydrolyze conjugated bile salts and minimize their toxicity [65].

The survival of LAB in stomach acidic conditions, gastric juice, and bile salts is essential for their potential as probiotics. LAB strains exhibit diverse levels of tolerance to these environments. For instance, Lactobacillus plantarum TDM41 and other isolates have shown survival rates exceeding 85% in acidic pH settings [66]. Some Pediococcus acidilactici isolates can endure gastric juice at pH 3 with a survival rate of 68%. LAB strains have been evaluated for their survival in bile salts, with selected isolates demonstrating resistance to 0.3% bile salt concentration [67, 68]. While a specific minimum survival rate for LAB to qualify as probiotics is not explicitly defined, a survival rate of at least 50% in acidic conditions, gastric juice, and bile salts is generally considered favorable. The minimum survival threshold may vary based on the intended application and desired probiotic effects [67].

Figure 3(d) shows the autoaggregation of Isolate W3 after 5 h. The autoaggregation increased with an average of 13.34 ± 0.01%, which signifies a lower ability to colonize and attach to the intestinal epithelium [58], which corroborates previous studies that reported that the LAB strains isolated from raw milk showed no or low autoaggregation [59, 60]. LAB strains with a reduced capacity to colonize and adhere to epithelial cells are considered probiotic because their efficacy as probiotics is not solely reliant on these abilities [69, 70]. Probiotic strains can deliver health benefits through various mechanisms beyond colonization, such as modulating the immune response, generating antimicrobial substances, and influencing the gut microbiota composition. Even if a LAB strain exhibits limited colonization and attachment capabilities, it can still provide positive effects in the gut by interacting with the host's immune system and fostering a healthy gut environment. Hence, the probiotic potential of LAB strains should be assessed based on a range of factors beyond their ability to colonize and adhere to epithelial cells [69, 70].

Autoaggregation experiments help in studying the colonization and adhesion of probiotic bacteria to epithelial cells in the gastrointestinal tract, which leads to the prevention of colonization by pathogens through their interaction [69].

Figure 3(e) shows the coaggregation of Isolate W3 with some test pathogens. The coaggregation ranged from 37.14% to 59.09%. Isolate W3 had the highest coaggregation with E. coli (59.09%) but was unable to coaggregate with B. subtilis. According to Solieri et al. [71], coaggregation values lower than 20% correspond to strains that have weak coaggregation ability, and based on this criterion, Isolate W3 possesses high coaggregating ability. This ability of strains prevents pathogens from colonizing the GI tract [72] and could help constitute an important defense mechanism against infection [73].

Table 3 shows the susceptibility of the probiotic isolate to some antibiotics. The susceptibility of the isolate ranged from 10.0 to 26 mm. It had the highest susceptibility to chloramphenicol (26.0 mm) and the lowest susceptibility to gentamicin (10.0 mm). The isolate was resistant to amoxicillin, ampilin, sulphamethoxazole, vancomycin, cefpodoxime, oxacilin, entrapenin, and azithromycin. The antibiotic resistance may be attributed to the cell wall structure, membrane permeability, and efflux mechanisms. Susceptibility to chloramphenicol, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, tetracycline, and nitrofurantoin is in accordance with the work of Sukumar and Ghosh [74].

Figure 4 shows the antibacterial potential of the CFS or metabolites of Isolate W3 against some test pathogens. The antibacterial potential of the metabolite of the Probiotic Strain W3 ranged from 2.0 to 8.0 mm. About 50% of the pathogenic bacteria were susceptible to the Metabolite W3. The Probiotic Strain W3 had the highest zone of inhibition against Staphylococcus aureus and E. coli (6.0 mm), and the lowest zone of inhibition was observed against Salmonella typhi and Proteus (2.0 mm). The result showed that Isolate W3 had potent antimicrobial activity with different inhibitory potentials. This antagonistic activity can be attributed to the antimicrobial substances produced by this LAB strain, which include organic acids (e.g., lactic acid and acetic acid), fatty acids, hydrogen peroxide, acetoin, diacetyl, and most importantly, inhibitory peptides known as bacteriocins [75]. Lack of antagonistic activity against some of the test isolates may be due to low concentration of the antimicrobial compounds in the CFS. The isolates are resistance to 8 out of the14 antibiotics tested. Probiotic LAB can exhibit resistance to antibiotics through various mechanisms, including efflux pumps and enzymatic inactivation. LAB can possess multidrug-resistant (MDR) efflux pumps that actively expel antibiotics from the bacterial cells, conferring resistance. Some LAB strains can produce enzymes that directly inactivate certain antibiotics, such as beta-lactams, rendering them ineffective.

The safety assessment of Isolate W3 for hemolysis, DNase, and lecithinase activity is shown in Table 4. The isolate was negative to all the hemolysis, DNase, and lecithinase negative. This indicates the safety of this isolate as a probiotic candidate. LABs that are negative to hemolysis, DNase, and lecithinase are considered safer for use in various applications, including food production and human health. The absence of these enzymes suggests a lower risk of harm to humans and the environment. These enzymes are associated with virulence factors that can contribute to the pathogenicity of bacteria, and their absence reduces the potential for adverse reactions in humans.

Figure 5 shows the molecular identification and phylogenetic tree of the isolated genomic DNA amplified by PCR when analyzed using agarose gel electrophoresis. The isolate was identified to have a molecular weight of 1.5 k base pairs when compared with the standard markers. The phylogenetic tree was determined by comparing the homology with the existing GenBank database, and the comparative analysis revealed their closest neighbors. Isolate W3 was identified to have 100% pairwise identity to Pediococcus acidilactici strain NST-Sarhadi with NCBI accession number MK478892.1.

3.2. Physicochemical Property of the Stored Probioticated Fermented Coconut Beverage Samples Produced by the Isolate

Table 5(a) shows the physicochemical properties, such as pH, specific gravity, TSSs, lactic acid, and Vitamin C content, of the stored formulated probiotic yogurt sample.

There was a significant increase in pH during storage. On Days 0 and 7, the pH ranged from 5.31 to 5.53 and 6.1 to 6.8. Samples A2 and B1 had the highest pH on Days 0 and 7, respectively. It was observed that the pH of the formulated fermented coconut beverage samples increased during storage, which is in contrast to the work of Eke et al. [76, 77] and the food standard code that requires that the pH of yoghurt be a maximum of 4.50 to prevent the growth of any pathogenic microorganisms [78]. The increase in pH may be attributed to the metabolic activity of the LAB in the fermented medium which resulted in a reduction in acidity of the medium with a concomitant increase in pH. During LAB fermentation, pH can increase due to various factors. LAB consumes sugars, converting them into lactic acid, initially lowering pH. However, as sugar depletion slows lactic acid production, other metabolites like acetic acid and ethanol can mildly decrease pH. Some LAB strains can metabolize lactic acid, leading to slower pH decline or even an increase. Growth phase, substrate buffering capacity, and environmental factors such as temperature and oxygen availability also affect pH. Also, pH changes in LAB fermentation result from a complex interplay of metabolic processes, substrate composition, and environmental conditions. Understanding these factors is crucial for fermentation optimization.

Specific gravity is an important parameter to monitor during yogurt fermentation as it provides valuable information about the progress and completion of the process. This specific gravity range is essential for achieving the desired texture, body, and mouth feel of the final yogurt product. The normal value of specific gravity of coconut yoghurt typically ranges from 1.017 to 1.034. The specific gravity of the fermented probiotic coconut beverage samples ranged from 0.763 to 1.2743 kg/m3 and 0.910 to 1.573 kg/m3 at Days 0 and 7. There were significant changes in all the yogurt samples during storage. There was an increase in the specific gravity of some samples during storage for 7 days. There was a reduction in the specific gravity of Samples A2, A4, and B4 during storage for 7 days. The significant increase in the specific gravity (p ≤ 0.05) after storage could be attributed to increased total solids (soluble and insoluble). This is in agreement with the work of Imele and Atemnkeng [20], who reported an increase in fat content, specific gravity, and total solids with the addition of coconut milk to plain yoghurt. The specific gravity is mainly due to the presence of water contents and small concentrations of fats, proteins, vitamins, enzymes, and minerals in the sample [79].

The TSSs ranged from 0.099 to 0.194 °Bx and 0.104 to 0.196 °Bx at Days 0 and 7, respectively. Sample C2 had the highest TSS at Days 0 and 7 of storage. There was variation in the TSS during storage in which an increase in TTS was observed in all the samples except Samples B4 and C3. There was a reduction in TSS in some samples. The decrease can be related to the probiotic microorganisms that use up the sugars for fermentation. The increase may be due to the contribution of monosaccharide sugars from the addition of coconut [80, 81]. Falade et al. [80] reported a similar trend of increase in the TSSs for soy and Bambara plain yoghurt stored at 7°C. In contrast, Rasdhari et al. [81] reported that the TSSs of some probiotic yogurt products decreased during storage at 4°C for 7 days.

The lactic acid content of the stored formulated probioticated fermented coconut beverage samples ranged from 10.8096 to 27.9248 mg/L and 12.6112 to 55.8496 mg/L after Day 7. There was a significant difference in lactic acid content in all the formulated yogurt samples. Sample A2 with commercial starter had the highest lactic acid content at Day 7 of storage, while Sample C1 enriched with 0.5% EPS had the lowest lactic acid content at Day 7 of storage.

The increase in lactic acid content of the yogurt products during the storage period could be attributed to the starter culture's activity, such as postacidification due to the formation of lactic acid or the growth of the bacteria used during fermentation [82, 83]. Falade et al. [80] reported a similar trend in the total titratable acidity of plain soy and Bambara yoghurts stored at 7°C for 9 days.

The increase in pH and lactic acid content occurring simultaneously could be attributed to the metabolic activity of the probiotic and the commercial LAB starter during substrate fermentation. These bacteria convert lactose into lactic acid, leading to a decrease in pH, but variations in the fermentation process, such as the specific strains of LAB used, incubation conditions, and the presence of EPS, could potentially result in a temporary increase in pH alongside lactic acid production [84, 85]. The increase can equally be attributed to longer fermentation time.

The Vitamin C content ranged from 0.40% to 0.92% and 0.31% to 0.66% at Days 0 and 7. There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the Vitamin C content in all the formulated samples across the days. Samples B4 and A4 with the highest concentration of coconut had the highest Vitamin C content at Days 0 and 7, while Sample B1 without coconut milk had the lowest Vitamin C content at Day 7. Reduction in Vitamin C could be attributed to the heating process involved in yogurt making, which can lead to the degradation of Vitamin C content in the milk used for fermentation, as well as the utilization of Vitamin C by the bacterial culture used in the production of yogurt.

Table 5(b) shows the proximate composition of the stored formulated probiotic fermented coconut beverage samples at Days 0 and 7. The ash content, crude fiber content, and fat content ranged from 0.55% to 1.6% (Day 0) and 0.4% to 1.35% (Day 7), 0.125% to 0.68% (Day 0) and 0.15% to 0.45% (Day 7), 0.1% to 0.4% (Day 0), and 0.1% to 0.35% (Day 7), respectively. The moisture content, crude protein content, and carbohydrate content ranged from 30.6% to 89.8% (Day 0) and 61.1% to 94.9% (Day 7), 0.08% to 5.61% (Day 0), 0.23% to 4.26% (Day 7), 7.465% to 65.00% (Day 0), and 0.785% to 35.615% (Day 7). Sample C1 had the highest fat and protein content during storage.

An increase in ash content is often linked to the metabolic processes of the starter cultures and probiotic LAB, resulting in higher mineral levels, while a reduction in ash content, though less common, could occur if the balance between starter cultures and milk components is suboptimal, potentially limiting LAB activity. This agreed with the variation in the formulation of the samples. The absence of significant changes in ash content during yogurt fermentation may stem from the minimal impact of the starter cultures and LAB on the milk's mineral composition [86–88].

A decrease in crude fiber and moisture content during coconut yogurt fermentation using commercial starter and probiotic LAB with EPS is likely due to the metabolic activity of the cultures, which may break down some of the fiber components and utilize moisture for growth. An increase in crude fat and carbohydrate content could be attributed to the addition of ingredients like EPS, which can elevate the fat and carbohydrate levels in the final yogurt product. The production of EPS by the probiotic LAB may also contribute to an increase in carbohydrate content. Reduction in fat content may be attributed to the lipolytic activity of the starter during fermentation.

A reduction in protein could be due to the breakdown of proteins by LAB, while an increase in protein content could result from the utilization of protein-rich ingredients like coconut milk in the fermentation process. The specific changes in protein content are influenced by the metabolic activity of the cultures, the composition of the milk used, and the presence of additional protein sources in the yogurt mixture [89].

Table 5(c) shows the mineral composition of the stored, formulated probiotic yogurt samples at Days 0 and 7. The Ca, K, and Mg content ranged from 43.678–87.863 mg/100 g (Day 0) to 55.832–162.302 mg/100 g (Day 7), 12.079–15.121 mg/100 g (Day 0), and 10.259–13.536 mg/100 g (Day 7) to 32.04–70.32 mg/100 g (Day 0) and 36.11–61.12 mg/100 g (Day 7). Sample B1 had the highest Ca and Mg content at Day 0, while Sample B4 had the highest K content at Day 0. On Day 7, Sample C4 had the highest Ca and K content, while Sample A4 had the highest Mg content.

An increase in calcium, magnesium, and potassium content during fermented probiotic coconut beverage production may be attributed to some factors such as the following: an addition of mineral-rich ingredients such as coconut milk, which is a good source of minerals, which can increase the calcium, magnesium, and potassium content in the final yogurt product; metabolic activity of probiotic LAB for the production process which may release minerals like potassium into the yogurt mixture; and the fermentation conditions such as temperature and duration which may affect the availability and solubility of minerals in the yogurt mixture [90]. Reduction in Ca, Mg, and K may be attributed to the anabolic activity of the isolates during fermentation process, which make use of the minerals for biosynthetic activities such as growth and catalytic processes [91].

Table 6 shows the viability/survivability of the probiotic strain in the stored yoghurt samples which indicates a decrease in the viability after 7 days of storage compared to Day 0 except for Samples A2 and A3. The increase observed in Samples A2 and A3 could be a result of the interaction between the probiotic strain and some components in the yoghurt resulting in an increase in metabolic activity and promoting its viability over time. No observable growth was recorded in Samples A2, A4, and B2. This could be a result of nutrient exhaustion which inhibits metabolic activity resulting in loss of viability of probiotic strain over time.

Higher growth rate recorded in Sample A2 at Day 7 with a lower initial load at Day 0 may be as a result of less competition for nutrients and resources, allowing the starter to proliferate more rapidly. Conversely, in the Sample A4 with a higher initial load at Day 0, competition for nutrient may inhibit the growth of LAB, resulting in slower growth rates. In Sample A4, the isolate might have used up the available substrate which resulted into nutrients in availability and reduction in growth.

4. Conclusion

The LAB isolated from Wara was an EPS producer. The EPS produced by the isolate was a flake-like heteropolymeric substance. The LAB metabolites had antibacterial activity against some of the test pathogens. FT-IR spectrum analysis revealed characteristic signatures and distinctive functional groups of carbohydrates in the EPS. HPLC analysis identified eight monosaccharides in the EPS, indicating a heteropolysaccharide composition. In vitro antioxidant assays demonstrated strong antioxidant properties of the EPS, as evidenced by DPPH radical scavenging activity, ferric ion-reducing property, total antioxidant capacity, and TP content. The LAB strain exhibited some level of significant tolerance to acid, gastric juice, and bile salt, indicating its potential to survive the gastrointestinal tract environment and, hence, has good probiotic properties. Autoaggregation and coaggregation assays showed moderate autoaggregation and high coaggregation abilities, respectively, which could aid in pathogen exclusion and colonization. Antibiotic susceptibility testing revealed varying degrees of susceptibility to different antibiotics, along with potent antibacterial activity against some of the pathogens tested. The LAB strain has 100% relatedness to Pediococcus acidilactici and exhibited a good starter for the production of fermented probiotic coconut beverage enriched with EPS. The probioticated fermented coconut beverage samples had significant pH development, varying lactic acid production, specific gravity, TSSs, Vitamin C content, proximate, and mineral composition during storage. Proximate analysis revealed variations in ash, crude fiber, fat, moisture, protein, and carbohydrate content, which could be influenced by the composition of the yogurt samples and storage conditions. Mineral composition analysis indicated fluctuations in calcium, magnesium, and potassium content during storage, highlighting the dynamic nature of these fermented probiotic coconut beverage samples. The fermented probiotic coconut beverage samples have good nutritional characteristics, which could serve as a functional and natural nutraceutical food for lactose-intolerant populations and dairy-allergic individuals.

Acknowledgments

The research was self-funded by the authors.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author Contributions

The conception, design, and execution of the study were a collaborative effort by all authors. Bukola Rachel Ogundele, Oladeji Aderibigbe Ajani, Olusola Ademola Olaniyi, and Bukola and Christianah Adebayo-Tayo performed material preparation, data collection, and analysis. The initial manuscript draft was written by Bukola Rachel Ogundele, and all authors provided feedback on previous versions. The final manuscript was read and approved by all authors.

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Figure 1 (a) Scanning electron micrograph of the EPS produced by Isolate W3. (b) Energy-dispersive X-ray spectra of W3 EPS sample. (c) Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra of W3 EPS samples. (d) High-performance liquid chromatogram (HPLC) of W3 EPS samples.

Figure 2 Antioxidant: (a) DPPH; (b) FRAP; (c) TAC and TPC potential of the EPS sample produced by Isolate W3.

Figure 3 Tolerance of the Isolate W3 to (a) acid, (b) gastric juice, and (c) bile salt. LAB strain: (d) autoaggregation and (e) coaggregation with some selected microorganisms.

Figure 4 Antibacterial potential of the CFS or metabolites of Isolate W3 against some test pathogens.

Figure 5 Phylogenetic tree of Pediococcus acidilactici.

Table 1 Substrate formulation.

Ingredients	Sample code	
A1	A2	A3	A4	B1	B2	B3	B4	C1	C2	C3	C4	
Milk (%)	70	70	70	70	100	90	80	70	70	70	70	70	
Coconut (%)	30	30	30	30	0	10	20	30	30	30	30	30	
Starter culture (%)	0	1.5	0	0	1.5	1.5	1.5	1.5	1.5	1.5	1.5	1.5	
Exopolysaccharide (%)	0	0	1.5	0	0	0	0	0	0.5	1.0	1.5	2.0	
LAB (%)	1.5	0	0	0	1.5	1.5	1.5	1.5	1.5	1.5	1.5	1.5	

Table 2 The monosaccharide composition of the EPS produced by Isolate W3.

S/N	Retention time	Peak area (%)	Name of compound	Molecular weight	
1	4.09	100	Ribose	80	
2	15.3	200	Mannose	160	
3	22.5	10	Rhamnose	88	
4	23.1	10	Glucose	95	
5	27.2	240	Galactose	150	
6	32.6	370	Glucose	164	
7	37.9	50	Galactose	132	
8	38.7	30	Xylose	166	
9	40.1	20	Arabinose	220	
10	44.2	15	Inositol	150	

Table 3 Antibiotic susceptibility of Isolate W3 to some selected antibiotics.

Antibiotics (μg)	Zone of inhibition (mm)	
Amoxicillin (30)	0.00	
Ampilin (10)	0.00	
Sulphamethoxazole (25)	0.00	
Vancomycin (30)	0.00	
Cefpodoxime (10)	0.00	
Chloramphenicol (30)	26.0	
Oxacilin (1)	0.00	
Entrapenin (10)	0.00	
Azithromycin(30)	0.00	
Gentamicin (10)	10.0	
Ciprofloxacin (30)	12.0	
Erythromycin (16)	24.0	
Tetracycline (30)	14.0	
Nitrofurantoin (300)	20.0	

Table 4 Safety assessment of Isolate W3.

	Safety evaluation	
Safety test	Isolate W3	
Hemolysis	—	
DNase	—	
Lecithinase	—	

Table 5 (a) Physicochemical property of the stored probioticated fermented coconut beverage samples produced by the isolate. (b) Proximate composition of the stored probioticated fermented coconut beverage samples produced by the isolate. (c) Mineral composition of the stored formulated probioticated yoghurt samples.

(a) Sample code	pH	Specific gravity (kg/m 3 )	Total soluble solid (Brix)	Lactic acid content (mg/L)	Vitamin C content (%)	
Day 0	Day 7	Day 0	Day 7	Day 0	Day 7	Day 0	Day 7	Day 0	Day 7	
A1	5.48 ± 0.01b	6.05 ± 0.07a	0.975 ± 0.00b	1.157 ± 0.00a	0.135 ± 0.00a	0.136 ± 0.00a	17.13 ± 0.01b	30.52 ± 0.02a	0.76 ± 0.01a	0.53 ± 0.00b	
A2	5.52 ± 0.02b	6.40 ± 0.14a	1.127 ± 0.00b	1.143 ± 0.00a	0.131 ± 0.00b	0.137 ± 0.00a	15.32 ± 0.01b	55.87 ± 0.02a	0.78 ± 0.02a	0.61 ± 0.01b	
A3	5.40 ± 0.01b	6.45 ± 0.21a	1.245 ± 0.00b	1.414 ± 0.00a	0.135 ± 0.00b	0.141 ± 0.00a	18.91 ± 0.01b	32.44 ± 0.01a	0.62 ± 0.01a	0.54 ± 0.01b	
A4	5.48 ± 0.01b	6.40 ± 0.00a	1.247 ± 0.00a	1.136 ± 0.00b	0.147 ± 0.00b	0.149 ± 0.00a	10.80 ± 0.01b	41.44 ± 0.01a	0.88 ± 0.00a	0.65 ± 0.01b	
B1	5.38 ± 0.01b	6.85 ± 0.07a	1.275 ± 0.00b	1.573 ± 0.01a	0.173 ± 0.00a	0.176 ± 0.00a	18.01 ± 0.01b	3.60 ± 0.01a	0.53 ± 0.00a	0.26 ± 0.00b	
B2	5.36 ± 0.00b	6.65 ± 0.07a	0.763 ± 0.00b	0.910 ± 0.00a	0.101 ± 0.00a	0.104 ± 0.00a	19.83 ± 0.01a	13.49 ± 0.03b	0.45 ± 0.01a	0.30 ± 0.01b	
B3	5.35 ± 0.01b	6.50 ± 0.00a	0.930 ± 0.00b	1.129 ± 0.00a	0.176 ± 0.00a	0.179 ± 0.00a	24.33 ± 0.01a	20.71 ± 0.01b	0.75 ± 0.01a	0.44 ± 0.00b	
B4	5.46 ± 0.00b	6.10 ± 0.14a	1.262 ± 0.00a	1.065 ± 0.01b	0.172 ± 0.00a	0.168 ± 0.00a	21.64 ± 0.02b	27.04 ± 0.03a	0.91 ± 0.01a	0.67 ± 0.01b	
C1	5.41 ± 0.01b	6.50 ± 0.00a	1.128 ± 0.00b	1.215 ± 0.00a	0.175 ± 0.00a	0.177 ± 0.00a	18.03 ± 0.01a	12.62 ± 0.01b	0.44 ± 0.00a	0.32 ± 0.01b	
C2	5.44 ± 0.00b	6.30 ± 0.00a	1.245 ± 0.00b	1.397 ± 0.00a	0.193 ± 0.00a	0.197 ± 0.00a	18.91 ± 0.02b	24.30 ± 0.03a	0.62 ± 0.01a	0.41 ± 0.01b	
C3	5.32 ± 0.01b	6.55 ± 0.07a	1.192 ± 0.00b	1.286 ± 0.00a	0.177 ± 0.00a	0.137 ± 0.00b	27.94 ± 0.01a	13.51 ± 0.00b	0.41 ± 0.01a	0.39 ± 0.01a	
C4	5.37 ± 0.01b	6.30 ± 0.00a	1.206 ± 0.00b	1.294 ± 0.00a	0.171 ± 0.00a	0.176 ± 0.00a	21.64 ± 0.02b	23.42 ± 0.00a	0.54 ± 0.01a	0.44 ± 0.01b	
Note: Each value is a mean ± standard error of three replicates. Values in the same row with different letters are significantly different by Duncan multiple range test (p < 0.05).

Abbreviations: A: milk = 70%, coconut = 30%; A1: A + 1.5% LAB; A2: A + 1.5% C.S; A3: A + 1.5% EPS; A4: A; B1: 100%milk + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S; B2: 90%milk + 10%coconut + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S; B3: 80%milk + 20%coconut + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S; B4: 70%milk + 30%coconut + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S; C1: A + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S + 0.5%EPS; C2: A + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S + 1.0%EPS; C3: A + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S + 1.5%EPS; C4: A + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S + 2.0%EPS.

(b) Sample code	Proximate composition (%)/parameter	
Ash content	Crude fiber	Fat content	Moisture content	Crude protein	Carbohydrate	
Day 0	Day 7	Day 0	Day 7	Day 0	Day 7	Day 0	Day 7	Day 0	Day 7	Day 0	Day 7	
A1	1.2a	1.05b	0.53a	0.43a	0.1a	0.1a	61.6a	61.1a	1.65b	1.71a	34.93a	35.62a	
A2	1.25a	1.1b	0.35a	0.45a	0.25a	0.1b	67.1b	75.6a	1.56a	1.5a	29.49a	21.25a	
A3	1.6a	1.3b	0.28a	0.28a	0.3a	0.25a	75.5b	88.5a	0.08b	0.23a	22.25a	9.46b	
A4	0.65a	1.0b	0.25a	0.23a	0.1a	0.1a	81.8a	74.4b	1.18a	1.11a	16.02a	23.17b	
B1	1.1b	1.35a	0.68a	0.38b	0.1a	0.1a	30.6b	94.9a	2.52a	2.49a	65.05a	0.79b	
B2	0.9a	0.7b	0.55a	0.4a	0.1a	0.1a	53.6a	54.3a	3.88b	4.0a	40.97a	40.5b	
B3	1.05b	1.2a	0.13a	0.13a	0.1a	0.1a	89.8a	90.3a	1.23a	1.25a	7.69a	7.03b	
B4	1.45a	1.0b	0.23a	0.18a	0.15a	0.2a	78.4b	80.0a	5.29a	4.2b	14.49a	14.43b	
C1	0.6a	0.4b	0.35a	0.28a	0.45a	0.35b	70.3a	77.7a	5.61a	4.26b	22.69a	17.02b	
C2	0.55a	0.5a	0.33a	0.23a	0.35a	0.25b	75.2a	68.6a	4.91a	4.19a	18.67a	26.24b	
C3	0.7b	0.9a	0.23a	0.2a	0.3a	0.25a	90.0a	91.7a	1.31a	1.32a	7.47a	5.63b	
C4	0.65a	0.65a	0.13a	0.15a	0.3a	0.25a	68.8b	80.7a	3.57a	2.75b	26.56a	15.5b	
Note: Values in the same row with different letters are significantly different by Duncan's multiple range test (p < 0.05).

Abbreviations: A: milk = 70%, coconut = 30%; A1: A + 1.5%LAB; A2: A + 1.5%C.S; A3: A + 1.5%EPS; A4: A; B1: 100%milk + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S; B2: 90%milk + 10%coconut + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S; B3: 80%milk + 20%coconut + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S; B4: 70%milk + 30%coconut + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S; C1: A + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S + 0.5%EPS; C2: A + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S + 1.0%EPS; C3: A + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S + 1.5%EPS; C4: A + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S + 2.0%EPS.

(c) Sample code	Mineral composition (mg)/storage time (days)	
Ca	Mg	K	
0	7	0	7	0	7	
A1	62.51 ± 0.01a	55.84 ± 0.01b	14.39 ± 0.00a	11.52 ± 0.01b	41.12 ± 0.01a	36.11 ± 0.00b	
A2	68.96 ± 0.01b	73.11 ± 0.01a	14.25 ± 0.01a	12.54 ± 0.01b	43.25 ± 0.00b	49.53 ± 0.00a	
A3	73.65 ± 0.00b	81.13 ± 0.01a	14.23 ± 0.01a	13.23 ± 0.01b	49.07 ± 0.01b	56.04 ± 0.01a	
A4	68.01 ± 0.00b	77.26 ± 0.01a	14.14 ± 0.00a	13.54 ± 0.00b	41.12 ± 0.01b	54.49 ± 0.01a	
B1	87.86 ± 0.00a	67.40 ± 0.01b	15.14 ± 0.02a	10.77 ± 0.01b	63.59 ± 0.01a	43.11 ± 0.01b	
B2	79.89 ± 0.02a	77.05 ± 0.00b	14.68 ± 0.00a	12.12 ± 0.01b	50.37 ± 0.01b	52.26 ± 0.03a	
B3	65.11 ± 0.01b	91.80 ± 0.01a	14.60 ± 0.01a	12.82 ± 0.00b	47.10 ± 0.01b	62.49 ± 0.02a	
B4	74.39 ± 0.02b	139.30 ± 0.00a	14.00 ± 0.01a	12.85 ± 0.01b	70.32 ± 0.00a	55.02 ± 0.01b	
C1	61.66 ± 0.01b	84.46 ± 0.00a	13.79 ± 0.01a	12.06 ± 0.01b	33.43 ± 0.02b	57.63 ± 0.00a	
C2	71.78 ± 0.02b	85.11 ± 0.01a	12.75 ± 0.02a	12.31 ± 0.01b	34.58 ± 0.02b	57.63 ± 0.00a	
C3	43.68 ± 0.00b	86.38 ± 0.00a	12.10 ± 0.02b	12.38 ± 0.02a	32.05 ± 0.01b	55.09 ± 0.01a	
C4	49.25 ± 0.01b	162.31 ± 0.01a	14.29 ± 0.01a	13.00 ± 0.01b	37.53 ± 0.01a	61.13 ± 0.01a	
Note: Each value is a mean ± standard error of three replicates. Values in the same row with different letters are significantly different by Duncan's multiple range test (p < 0.05).

Abbreviations: A: milk = 70%, coconut = 30%; A1: A + 1.5%LAB; A2: A + 1.5%C.S; A3: A + 1.5%EPS; A4: A; B1: 100%milk + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S; B2: 90%milk + 10%coconut + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S; B3: 80%milk + 20%coconut + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S; B4: 70%milk + 30%coconut + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S; C1: A + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S + 0.5%EPS; C2: A + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S + 1.0%EPS; C3: A + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S + 1.5%EPS; C4: A + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S + 2.0%EPS.

Table 6 Viability of the isolate in the stored formulated probioticated yoghurt samples.

Survivability (× 10 CFU/mL)/storage time (days)	
Sample code	Day 0	Day 7	
MRS	MAC	EMB	NA	MRS	MAC	EMB	NA	
A1	1.4 × 107	—	—	—	3.0 × 101	—	—	—	
A2	1.2 × 101	—	—	—	5.0 × 101	—	—	—	
A3	1.8 × 101	—	—	—	2.0 × 101	—	—	—	
A4	1.7 × 107	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	
B1	2.2 × 107	—	—	—	2.0 × 101	—	—	—	
B2	2.1 × 107	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	
B3	1.8 × 107	—	—	—	3.0 × 101	—	—	—	
B4	1.9 × 107	—	—	—	6.0 × 101	—	—	—	
C1	2.1 × 107	—	—	—	2.0 × 101	—	—	—	
C2	2.0 × 107	—	—	—	3.0 × 101	—	—	—	
C3	2.2 × 107	—	—	—	2.0 × 101	—	—	—	
C4	1.6 × 107	—	—	—	2.0 × 101	—	—	—	
Abbreviations: —: no growth; A: milk = 70%, coconut = 30%; A1: A + 1.5%LAB; A2: A + 1.5%C.S; A3: A + 1.5%EPS; A4: A; B1: 100%milk + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S; B2: 90%milk + 10%coconut + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S; B3: 80%milk + 20%coconut + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S; B4: 70%milk + 30%coconut + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S; C1: A + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S + 0.5%EPS; C2: A + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S + 1.0%EPS; C3: A + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S + 1.5%EPS; C4: A + 1.5%LAB + 1.5%C.S + 2.0%EPS.
==== Refs
1 De Vuyst L. De Vin F. Vaningelgem F. Degeest B. Recent developments in the biosynthesis and applications of heteropolysaccharides from lactic acid bacteria International Dairy Journal 2001 11 9 687 707 10.1016/S0958-6946(01)00114-5 2-s2.0-0034798702
2 Prathima P. C. Lule V. V. K. Tomar S. K. Singh A. K. Optimization of exopolysaccharide by Lactococcus lactis 191 by response surface methodology International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2001 3 5 835 854
3 Schmid J. Sieber V. Rehm B. Bacterial exopolysaccharides: biosynthesis pathways and engineering strategies Frontiers in Microbiology 2015 6 p. 496 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00496 2-s2.0-84931270989
4 Huang C.-H. Shen C. C. Liang Y. C. Jan T. R. The probiotic activity of lactobacillus murinus against food allergy Journal of Functional Foods 2016 25 231 241 10.1016/j.jff.2016.06.006 2-s2.0-84974589217
5 Lahtinen S. J. Ouwehand A. C. Salminen S. J. Exopolysaccharide of probiotic bacteria: occurrence and potential applications Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 2017 81 4, article e00027
6 Piard J. C. Desmazeaud M. Inhibiting factors produced by lactic acid bacteria. 2. Bacteriocins and other antibacterial substances Lait 1992 72 2 113 142 10.1051/lait:199229
7 Patel A. Prajapati J. B. Food and health applications of exopolysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria Advances in Dairy Research 2013 1 2 p. 107 10.4172/2329-888X.1000107
8 Zaghloul E. H. Ibrahim M. I. A. Production and characterization of exopolysaccharide from newly isolated marine probiotic Lactiplantibacillus plantarum EI6 with in vitro wound healing activity Frontiers in Microbiology 2022 13, article 903363 10.3389/fmicb.2022.903363 35668753
9 Boudjeko T. Megnekou R. Woguia A. L. Antioxidant and immunomodulatory properties of polysaccharides from Allanblackia floribunda Oliv stem bark and Chromolaena odorata (L.) King and H.E. Robins leaves BMC Research Notes 2015 8 1 p. 759 10.1186/s13104-015-1703-x 2-s2.0-84949642448 26651330
10 Wang K. Li W. Rui X. Chen X. Jiang M. Dong M. Characterization of a novel exopolysaccharide with antitumor activity from lactobacillus plantarum 70810 International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 2014 63 133 139 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.10.036 2-s2.0-84888112427 24189393
11 Loong N. C. Basri M. Lye F. F. Comparison of Box–Behnken and central composite designs in optimization of fullerene loaded palm-based nano-emulsions for cosmeceutical application Industrial Crops and Products 2014 59 309 317 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.05.042 2-s2.0-84902464171
12 Adebayo-Tayo B. Ishola R. Oyewunmi T. Characterization, antioxidant and immunomodulatory potential on exopolysaccharide produced by wild type and mutant Weissella confusa strains Biotechnology Reports 2018 19, article e00271 10.1016/j.btre.2018.e00271 2-s2.0-85049472862 29992104
13 FAO/WHO Health and Nutritional Properties of Probiotics in Food including Powder Milk with Live Lactic Acid Bacteria 2001 Cordoba, Argentina Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization. Working Group Report
14 Lourens-Hattingh A. Viljoen B. C. Yogurt as probiotic carrier food International Dairy Journal 2001 11 1-2 1 17 10.1016/S0958-6946(01)00036-X 2-s2.0-0034948172
15 Tull A. Food and Nutrition 1996 Oxford University Press
16 Sackey-Addaquay S. Promoting the Use of Coconut in the Production of Yoghurt 2008 Cape Coast, Ghana HND Dissertation, Cape Coast Polytechnic
17 Heyman M. Desjeux J. F. Cytokine-induced alteration of the epithelial barrier to food antigens in disease Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2000 915 1 304 311 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb05258.x 11193593
18 Vesa T. H. Marteau P. Korpela R. Lactose intolerance Journal of the American College of Nutrition 2000 19 Supplement 2 165S 175S 10.1080/07315724.2000.10718086 2-s2.0-0034110722 10759141
19 Belewu M. A. Belewu K. Y. Comparative physico-evaluation of tiger-nut, soybean and coconut milk sources International Journal of Agriculture & Biology 2007 9 785 787
20 Imele H. Atemnkeng A. Preliminary study of the utilisation of coconut in yoghurt production Journal of Food Technology in Africa 2001 6 1 11 12 10.4314/jfta.v6i1.19276
21 Persley J. G. Replanting of the Tree of Life 1992 Wallingford Oxon CAB International
22 Tetteh E. Promoting the Use of Coconut in Yoghurt Production 2007 Cape Coast, Ghana HND Dissertation, Cape Coast Polytechnic
23 Nieuwentus R. Nieuwelink J. Agrodok Series No. 10 2002 The Netherlands CTA
24 Judprasong K. Puwastien P. Rojroongwasinkul N. Nitithamyong A. Sridonpai P. Somjai A. Thai Food Composition 2004 Thailand Institute of Nutrition Mahidol University (INMU)
25 van den Berg D. J. C. Smits A. Pot B. Isolation, screening and identification of lactic acid bacteria from traditional food fermentation processes and culture collections Food Biotechnology 1993 7 3 189 205 10.1080/08905439309549857 2-s2.0-0027131644
26 Gancel F. Novel G. Exopolysaccharide production by Streptococcus salivarius ssp. thermophilus cultures. 1. Conditions of production Journal of Dairy Science 1994 77 3 685 688 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77000-4 2-s2.0-85025357638
27 Adebayo-Tayo B. C. Onilude A. A. Screening of lactic acid bacteria strains isolated from some Nigerian fermented foods for EPS production World Applied Sciences Journal 2008 4 5 741 747
28 DuBois M. Gilles K. A. Hamilton J. K. Rebers P. A. Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances Analytical Chemistry 1956 28 3 350 356 10.1021/ac60111a017 2-s2.0-33749946901
29 Yang X. Zhao Y. Wang Q. Wang H. Mei Q. Analysis of the monosaccharide components in angelica polysaccharides by high performance liquid chromatography Analytical Science 2005 21 10 1177 1180 10.2116/analsci.21.1177 2-s2.0-27644576506 16270574
30 Fontana S. Li Z. Yang G. Widmalm G. structural studies of the exopolysaccharide from Lactobacillus plantarum C88 using NMR spectroscopy and the program CASPER Carbohydrate Research 2015 402 87 94 10.1016/j.carres.2014.09.003 2-s2.0-84915747290 25497338
31 Gülçin İ. Antioxidant activity of L-adrenaline: a structure–activity insight Chemistry and Biology Interactions 2009 179 2-3 71 80 10.1016/j.cbi.2008.09.023 2-s2.0-62549115291 18929549
32 Oyaizu M. Studies on products of browning reaction. antioxidative activities of products of browning reaction prepared from glucosamine Japanese Journal of Nutrition 1986 44 6 307 315 10.5264/eiyogakuzashi.44.307
33 Gülçin E. Bursal E. Şehitoğlu M. H. Bilsel M. Gören A. C. Polyphenol contents and antioxidant activity of lyophilized aqueous extract of propolis from Erzurum, Turkey Food and Chemical Toxicology 2010 48 8-9 2227 2238 10.1016/j.fct.2010.05.053 2-s2.0-77955057094 20685228
34 Mitsuda H. Yasumoto K. Iwami K. Antioxidative action of indole compounds during the autoxidation of linoleic acid Eiyo to Shokuryo 1966 19 3 210 214 10.4327/jsnfs1949.19.210
35 Kanamarlapudi S. L. R. K. Muddada S. Characterization of exopolysaccharide produced by Streptococcus thermophilus CC30 Biomed Research International 2017 2017 11 4201809 10.1155/2017/4201809 2-s2.0-85027384413
36 Slinkard K. Singleton V. L. Total phenol analysis: automation and comparison with manual methods American Journal of Enology and Viticulture 1977 28 1 49 55 10.5344/ajev.1977.28.1.49
37 Singleton V. L. Orthofer R. Lamuela-Raventós R. M. [14] Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent Methods in Enzymology 1999 299 152 178 10.1016/S0076-6879(99)99017-1 2-s2.0-0031790242
38 Khalil S. E. Manap M. Y. Mustafa S. Amid M. Alhelli A. M. Aljoubori A. Probiotic characteristics of exopolysaccharides-producing Lactobacillus isolated from some traditional Malaysian fermented foods CyTa - Journal of Food 2018 16 1 287 298 10.1080/19476337.2017.1401007 2-s2.0-85048128089
39 Yadav R. Puniya A. K. Shukla P. Probiotic properties of Lactobacillus plantarum RYPR1 from an indigenous fermented beverage Raabadi Frontiers in Microbiology 2016 7 p. 1683 27818658
40 Shuhadha M. F. F. Panagoda G. J. Madhujith T. Jayawardana N. W. I. A. Evaluation of probiotic attributes of Lactobacillus sp. isolated from cow and buffalo curd samples collected from Kandy The Ceylon Medical Journal 2017 62 3 159 166 10.4038/cmj.v62i3.8519 29076707
41 Cappuccino J. G. Sherman N. Microbiology: A Laboratory Manual 2008 9th New York Pearson Education Inc.
42 Ndife J. Idoko F. Garba R. Production and quality assessment of functional yoghurt enriched with coconut International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences 2014 3 6 545 550 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20140306.19
43 Matin A. Rahman N. Islam T. Ahmed F. B. H. Effect of adding coconut milk on the physicochemical, proximate, microbial and sensory attributes of Dahi Ukrainian Journal of Food Science 2020 8 1 49 57 10.24263/2310-1008-2020-8-1-6
44 Spicher G. Stephen H. S. Hanbuch Sauerteig: Biologie, Biochemie, Technologies, B 1982 Hamburg Behrs Verlag
45 Maskan M. Production of pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) juice concentrate by various heating methods: colour degradation and kinetics Journal of Food Engineering 2006 72 3 218 224 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.11.012 2-s2.0-24144453154
46 Osborne D. R. Voogt P. The Analysis of Nutrients in Foods 1978 London Academic Press
47 AOAC Official Methods of Analysis 2012 19th Arlington Association of Official Analytical Chemists
48 Kirk S. Sawyer R. Pearson's Composition and Analysis of Foods 1991 9 Longman Group Ltd.
49 Alzate A. Fernández-Fernández A. Pérez-Conde M. C. Gutiérrez A. M. Cámara C. Comparison of biotransformation of inorganic selenium by Lactobacillus and Saccharomyces in lactic fermentation process of yogurt and kefir Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2008 56 18 8728 8736 10.1021/jf8013519 2-s2.0-53649097109 18729458
50 Wang W. Ma H. Yu H. Screening of Lactobacillus plantarum subsp. plantarum with potential probiotic activities for inhibiting ETEC K88 in weaned piglets Molecules 2020 25 19 p. 4481 10.3390/molecules25194481 33003556
51 Yadav V. Prappulla S. G. Jha A. Poonia A. A novel exopolysaccharide from probiotic Lactobacillus fermentum CFR 2195: production, purification and characterization Biotechnology, Bioinformatics and Bioengineering 2011 1 4 415 421
52 Sirin S. Aslim B. Characterization of lactic acid bacteria derived exopolysaccharides for use as a defined neuroprotective agent against amyloid beta1–42-induced apoptosis in SH-SY5Y cells Scientific Reports 2020 10 1 p. 8124 10.1038/s41598-020-65147-1 32415207
53 Sran K. S. Sundharam S. S. Krishnamurthi S. Roy Choudhury A. Production, characterization and bio-emulsifying activity of a novel thermostable exopolysaccharide produced by a marine strain of Rhodobacter johrii CDR-SL 7Cii International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 2019 127 240 249 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.01.045 2-s2.0-85060024876 30641192
54 Salami F. Farrokh P. Recent advances in the biological activities of microbial exopolysaccharides World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2023 39 8 p. 213 10.1007/s11274-023-03660-x 37256348
55 Sørensen H. M. Rochfort K. D. Maye S. Exopolysaccharides of lactic acid bacteria: production, purification and health benefits towards functional food Nutrients 2022 14 14 p. 2938 10.3390/nu14142938
56 Jurášková D. Ribeiro S. C. Silva C. C. G. Exopolysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria: from biosynthesis to health-promoting properties Foods 2022 11 2 p. 156 10.3390/foods11020156 35053888
57 Choi I. S. Ko S. H. Lee M. E. Production, characterization, and antioxidant activities of an exopolysaccharide extracted from spent media wastewater after Leuconostoc mesenteroides WiKim32 fermentation ACS Omega 2021 6 12 8171 8178 10.1021/acsomega.0c06095 33817476
58 Kim I. Chhetri G. So Y. Characterization and antioxidant activity of exopolysaccharides produced by Lysobacter soyae sp. nov isolated from the root of Glycine max L Microorganisms 2023 11 8 p. 1900 10.3390/microorganisms11081900 37630460
59 Rani R. P. Anandharaj M. Sabhapathy P. Ravindran A. D. Physiochemical and biological characterization of novel exopolysaccharide produced by Bacillus tequilensis FR9 isolated from chicken International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 2017 96 1 10 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.11.122 2-s2.0-85006168505 27979726
60 Amer M. S. Zaghloul E. H. Ibrahim M. I. A. Characterization of exopolysaccharide produced from marine-derived Aspergillus terreus SEI with prominent biological activities Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research 2020 46 4 363 369 10.1016/j.ejar.2020.08.008
61 Choudhuri K. Khanra P. Pariya G. N. structural characterization of an exopolysaccharide isolated from Enterococcus faecalis, and study on its antioxidant activity, and cytotoxicity against HeLa cells Current Microbiology 2020 77 10 3125 3135 10.1007/s00284-020-02130-z 32725340
62 Zielińska D. Rzepkowska A. Radawska A. Zieliński K. In vitro screening of selected probiotic properties of Lactobacillus strains isolated from traditional fermented cabbage and cucumber Current Microbiology 2015 70 2 183 194 10.1007/s00284-014-0699-0 2-s2.0-84926663293 25270682
63 Berrada N. Lemeland J. F. Laroche G. Thouvenot P. Piaia M. Bifidobacterium from fermented milks: survival during gastric transit Journal of Dairy Science 1991 74 2 409 413 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78183-6 2-s2.0-0026111454 2045548
64 Sanhueza E. Paredes-Osses E. González C. L. García A. Effect of pH in the survival of Lactobacillus salivarius strain UCO_979C wild type and the pH acid acclimated variant Electronic Journal of Biotechnology 2015 18 5 343 346 10.1016/j.ejbt.2015.06.005 2-s2.0-84944270339
65 Montoro B. P. Benomar N. Caballero Gómez N. Proteomic analysis of Lactobacillus pentosus for the identification of potential markers involved in acid resistance and their influence on other probiotic features Food Microbiology 2018 72 31 38 10.1016/j.fm.2017.11.006 2-s2.0-85034437190 29407403
66 Sakoui S. Derdak R. Addoum B. The first study of probiotic properties and biological activities of lactic acid bacteria isolated from bat guano from Er-rachidia, Morocco LWT 2022 159, article 113224 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113224
67 Amenu D. Bacha K. Probiotic potential and safety analysis of lactic acid bacteria isolated from Ethiopian traditional fermented foods and beverages Annals of Microbiology 2023 73 1 p. 37 10.1186/s13213-023-01740-9
68 Farhangfar A. Gandomi H. Akhondzadeh Basti A. Misaghi A. Noori N. Study of growth kinetic and gastrointestinal stability of acid-bile resistant Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from Siahmazgi traditional cheese Veterinary Research Forum 2021 12 2 235 240 10.30466/vrf.2019.101880.2428 34345392
69 Zhang X. Ali Esmail G. Fahad Alzeer A. Probiotic characteristics of Lactobacillus strains isolated from cheese and their antibacterial properties against gastrointestinal tract pathogens Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 2020 27 12 3505 3513 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.10.022 33304162
70 Han S. Lu Y. Xie J. Probiotic gastrointestinal transit and colonization after oral administration: a long journey Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 2021 11, article 609722 10.3389/fcimb.2021.609722 33791234
71 Solieri L. Bianchi A. Mottolese G. Lemmetti F. Giudici P. Tailoring the probiotic potential of non-starter Lactobacillus strains from ripened Parmigiano Reggiano cheese by in vitro screening and principal component analysis Food Microbiology 2014 38 240 249 10.1016/j.fm.2013.10.003 2-s2.0-84886620821 24290648
72 Haghshenas Y. Nami Y. Abdullah N. Potentially probiotic acetic acid bacteria isolation and identification from traditional dairies microbiota International Journal of Food Science & Technology 2015 50 4 1056 1064 10.1111/ijfs.12718 2-s2.0-84925119590
73 Mortuza T. Isolation and Identification of Microbes from Various Fruit Juices Made and Sold for Immediate Consumption at Home and in the Market of Dhaka City 2016 Doctoral dissertation, BRAC University
74 Sukumar G. Ghosh A. R. Pediococcus spp. –a potential probiotic isolated from Khadi (an Indian fermented food) and identified by 16S rDNA sequence analysis African Journal of Food Science 2010 4 9 597 602
75 du Toit M. Franz C. M. A. P. Dicks L. M. T. Characterisation and selection of probiotic lactobacilli for a preliminary minipig feeding trial and their effect on serum cholesterol levels, faeces pH and faeces moisture content International Journal of Food Microbiology 1998 40 1-2 93 104 10.1016/S0168-1605(98)00024-5 2-s2.0-0032478228 9600615
76 Eke M. O. Olaitan N. I. Sule H. I. Nutritional evaluation of yoghurt-like product from baobab (Adansonia digitata) fruit pulp emulsion and the micronutrient content of baobab leaves Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology 2013 5 10 1266 1270 10.19026/ajfst.5.3094 2-s2.0-84887532618
77 Montoro B. P. Benomar N. Lavilla Lerma L. Castillo Gutiérrez S. Gálvez A. Abriouel H. Fermented Aloreña table olives as a source of potential probiotic Lactobacillus pentosus strains Frontiers in Microbiology 2016 7 7 p. 1583 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01583 2-s2.0-84996619195
78 Espeche M. C. Otero M. C. Sesma F. Nader-Macias M. E. Screening of surface properties and antagonistic substances production by lactic acid bacteria isolated from the mammary gland of healthy and mastitic cows Veterinary Microbiology 2009 135 3-4 346 357 10.1016/j.vetmic.2008.09.078 2-s2.0-61849107068 19041199
79 Espeche M. C. Pellegrino M. Frola I. Larriestra A. Bogni C. Nader-Macías M. E. F. Lactic acid bacteria from raw milk as potentially beneficial strains to prevent bovine mastitis Anaerobe 2012 18 1 103 109 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2012.01.002 2-s2.0-84856781008 22261519
80 Falade K. O. Ogundele O. M. Ogunshe A. O. Fayemi O. E. Ocloo F. C. K. Physico-chemical, sensory and microbiological characteristics of plain yoghurt from bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea) and soybeans (Glycine max) Journal of Food Science and Technology 2015 52 9 5858 5865 10.1007/s13197-014-1657-3 2-s2.0-84940451640 26345001
81 Rasdhari M. Parekh T. Dave N. Patel V. Subhash R. Evaluation of various physico-chemical properties of Hibiscus sabdariffa and L. casei incorporated probiotic yoghurt Pakistan Journal of Biology Science 2008 11 17 2101 2108 10.3923/pjbs.2008.2101.2108 2-s2.0-57749117077 19266923
82 Abushelaibi A. Al-Mahadin S. El-Tarabily K. Shah N. P. Ayyash M. Characterization of potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria isolated from camel milk LWT - Food Science and Technology 2017 79 316 325 10.1016/j.lwt.2017.01.041 2-s2.0-85010402363
83 Shori A. B. Albalawi A. Al Zahrani A. J. Al-sulbi O. S. Baba A. S. Microbial analysis, antioxidant activity, and sensory properties of yoghurt with different starter cultures during storage International Dairy Journal 2022 126, article 105267 10.1016/j.idairyj.2021.105267
84 Han X. Yang Z. Jing X. Improvement of the texture of yogurt by use of exopolysaccharide producing lactic acid bacteria Biomedical Research International 2016 2016, article 7945675 1 6 10.1155/2016/7945675 2-s2.0-84973352308
85 Ripari V. Techno-functional role of exopolysaccharides in cereal-based, yogurt-like beverages Beverages 2019 5 1 p. 16 10.3390/beverages5010016
86 Ayad A. A. Gad El-Rab D. A. Ibrahim S. A. Williams L. L. Nitrogen sources effect on Lactobacillus reuteri growth and performance cultivated in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) by-products Fermentation 2020 6 3 p. 64 10.3390/fermentation6030064
87 Alhamdan A. M. al Juhaimi F. Y. Hassan B. H. Ehmed K. A. Mohamed Ahmed I. A. Physicochemical, microbiological, and sensorial quality attributes of a fermented milk drink (Laban) fortified with date syrup (Dibs) during cold storage Foods 2021 10 12 p. 3157 10.3390/foods10123157 34945708
88 Damayanti A. Putri R. D. A. Salim T. S. Sriwijaya H. A. Bajuri D. D. A. Characterization of red beans yogurt (Phaseolus vulgaris L) with addition of dates (Phoenix dactylifera) IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2023 1203, article 012004 10.1088/1755-1315/1203/1/012004
89 Harper A. R. Dobson R. C. J. Morris V. K. Moggré G. J. Fermentation of plant-based dairy alternatives by lactic acid bacteria Microbial Biotechnology 2022 15 5 1404 1421 10.1111/1751-7915.14008 35393728
90 Sanful R. E. Promotion of coconut in the production of yoghurt African Journal of Food Science 2009 3 5 147 149
91 Peters O. O. Afolabi M. O. Makinde F. M. Chemical, physicochemical and sensory properties of yoghurt and yoghurt simulates produced from the blends of cow milk and coconut milk IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2023 1219, article 012020 10.1088/1755-1315/1219/1/012020
