
==== Front
Wellcome Open Res
Wellcome Open Res
Wellcome Open Research
2398-502X
F1000 Research Limited London, UK

39211808
10.12688/wellcomeopenres.22825.1
Data Note
Articles
The genome sequence of the blonde ray, Raja brachyura Lafont, 1871
[version 1; peer review: 3 approved]

Adkins Patrick Investigation Resources Writing – Original Draft Preparation Writing – Review & Editing 1
Brittain Rachel Investigation Resources 1
Scott-Somme Kesella Investigation Resources 1
Marine Biological Association Genome Acquisition Lab
Darwin Tree of Life Barcoding collective
Wellcome Sanger Institute Tree of Life Management, Samples and Laboratory team
Wellcome Sanger Institute Scientific Operations: Sequencing Operations
Wellcome Sanger Institute Tree of Life Core Informatics team
Tree of Life Core Informatics collective
Darwin Tree of Life Consortiuma
1 The Marine Biological Association, Plymouth, England, UK
a mark.blaxter@sanger.ac.uk
No competing interests were disclosed.

8 8 2024
2024
9 43624 7 2024
Copyright: © 2024 Adkins P et al.
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

We present a genome assembly from an individual female Raja brachyura (Blonde Ray; Chordata; Chondrichthyes; Rajiformes; Rajidae). The genome sequence spans 2,700.50 megabases. Most of the assembly is scaffolded into 49 chromosomal pseudomolecules, including the X sex chromosome. The mitochondrial genome has also been assembled and is 17.12 kilobases in length. Gene annotation of this assembly on Ensembl identified 24,252 protein-coding genes.

Raja brachyura
blonde ray
genome sequence
chromosomal
Rajiformes
Wellcome Trust206194 218328 This work was supported by Wellcome through core funding to the Wellcome Sanger Institute [206194, <a href=https://doi.org/10.35802/206194>https://doi.org/10.35802/206194</a>] and the Darwin Tree of Life Discretionary Award [218328, <a href=https://doi.org/10.35802/218328>https://doi.org/10.35802/218328 </a>]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
==== Body
pmcSpecies taxonomy

Eukaryota; Opisthokonta; Metazoa; Eumetazoa; Bilateria; Deuterostomia; Chordata; Craniata; Vertebrata; Gnathostomata; Chondrichthyes; Elasmobranchii; Batoidea; Rajiformes; Rajidae; Raja; Raja brachyura, Lafont, 1871 (NCBI:txid223862).

Background

The Blonde Ray ( Raja brachyura, Lafont, 1871), is a benthic species of elasmobranch found in coastal waters around the north-east Atlantic. In UK waters it is more commonly found along the west and south coasts and typically shows a preference for sandy bottoms ( Serena, 2005). It is light brown with creamy-white patches and numerous dark brown/black spots which reach the edges of the of the wing and onto the tail ( Wheeler & Stebbing, 1978). It can reach sizes of 120cm from nose to tail and weigh up to 18 kg ( Stehmann et al., 1984). The Blonde Ray has a varied diet of crustaceans, annelids and fish, with larger, more active crustaceans and fish becoming a more important component of the diet as the fish grows in size ( Ellis et al., 1996; Holden & Tucker, 1974). The Blonde Ray mature between ages 4 and 6, and at around 80 cm in length (typically later and larger in females) ( Gallagher et al., 2004). As with other Skates, Blond Rays are oviparous typically laying around 30 to 40 eggs in a season ( Holden et al., 1971; Porcu et al., 2015).

Raja brachyura is a commercially important species throughout its range ( Thys et al., 2022). Its low fecundity, coupled with sexual maturity not being reached until the ray is large and several years old, makes the Blonde Ray vulnerable to fisheries pressure (both targeted and bycatch) ( Silva et al., 2012; Thys et al., 2022, Thys et al., 2023). As such it is currently listed as near threatened with a decreasing population trend by the IUCN Redlist ( McCully et al., 2015). Here we present the first chromosomally complete genome for this species and genus.

Genome sequence report

The genome of an adult female Raja brachyura ( Figure 1) was sequenced using Pacific Biosciences single-molecule HiFi long reads, generating a total of 24.00 Gb (gigabases) from 1.92 million reads, providing approximately 33-fold coverage. Primary assembly contigs were scaffolded with chromosome conformation Hi-C data, which produced 630.99 Gbp from 4,178.75 million reads, yielding an approximate coverage of 234-fold. Specimen and sequencing information is summarised in Table 1.

Figure 1. Photograph of the Raja brachyura (sRajBra1) specimen used for genome sequencing: A. Dorsal view, B. Ventral view.

Table 1. Specimen and sequencing data for Raja brachyura.

Project information	
Study title	Raja brachyura (blonde ray)	
Umbrella BioProject	PRJEB61690	
Species	Raja brachyura	
BioSample	SAMEA110450105	
NCBI taxonomy ID	223862	
Specimen information	
Technology	ToLID	BioSample accession	Organism part	
PacBio long read sequencing	sRajBra1	SAMEA110450975	gill	
Hi-C sequencing	sRajBra1	SAMEA110450974	gill	
RNA sequencing	sRajBra1	SAMEA110450975	gill	
Sequencing information	
Platform	Run accession	Read count	Base count
(Gb)	
Hi-C Illumina NovaSeq 6000	ERR11439618	4.18e+09	630.99	
PacBio Sequel IIe	ERR11279096	1.70e+06	21.17	
PacBio Sequel IIe	ERR11279097	1.69e+06	20.64	
PacBio Sequel IIe	ERR11279098	1.94e+06	23.23	
PacBio Sequel IIe	ERR11279099	1.92e+06	24.0	
RNA Illumina NovaSeq 6000	ERR11837490	5.61e+07	8.47	

Manual assembly curation corrected 119 missing joins or mis-joins and one haplotypic duplications, reducing the scaffold number by 5.24%, and increasing the scaffold N50 by 0.57%. The final assembly has a total length of 2,700.50 Mb in 1,646 sequence scaffolds with a scaffold N50 of 68.4 Mb ( Table 2). The total count of gaps in the scaffolds is 2,269. The snail plot in Figure 2 provides a summary of the assembly statistics, while the distribution of assembly scaffolds on GC proportion and coverage is shown in Figure 3. The cumulative assembly plot in Figure 4 shows curves for subsets of scaffolds assigned to different phyla. Most (96.03%) of the assembly sequence was assigned to 49 chromosomal-level scaffolds, representing 48 autosomes and the X sex chromosome. Chromosome-scale scaffolds confirmed by the Hi-C data are named in order of size ( Figure 5; Table 3). The X chromosome was identified based on synteny with Carcharodon carcharias (GCA_017639515.1) and Hypanus sabinus (GCA_030144855.1). While not fully phased, the assembly deposited is of one haplotype. Contigs corresponding to the second haplotype have also been deposited. The mitochondrial genome was also assembled and can be found as a contig within the multifasta file of the genome submission.

Table 2. Genome assembly data for Raja brachyura, sRajBra1.1.

Genome assembly	
Assembly name	sRajBra1.1	
Assembly accession	GCA_963514005.1	
Accession of alternate haplotype	GCA_963513955.1	
Span (Mb)	2,700.50	
Number of contigs	3,916	
Contig N50 length (Mb)	2.0	
Number of scaffolds	1,646	
Scaffold N50 length (Mb)	68.4	
Longest scaffold (Mb)	187.44	
Assembly metrics *	Benchmark	
Consensus quality (QV)	57.8	≥ 50	
k-mer completeness	99.99%	≥ 95%	
BUSCO **	C:91.7%[S:89.8%,D:1.9%],F:3.1%,
M:5.2%,n:3,354	C ≥ 95%	
Percentage of assembly mapped
to chromosomes	96.03%	≥ 95%	
Sex chromosomes	X	localised homologous pairs	
Organelles	Mitochondrial genome: 17.12 kb	complete single alleles	
Genome annotation of assembly GCA_963514005.1 at Ensembl	
Number of protein-coding genes	24,252	
Number of non-coding genes	2,564	
Number of gene transcripts	61,067	
* Assembly metric benchmarks are adapted from column VGP-2020 of “Table 1: Proposed standards and metrics for defining genome assembly quality” from Rhie et al. (2021).

** BUSCO scores based on the vertebrata_odb10 BUSCO set using version 5.4.3. C = complete [S = single copy, D = duplicated], F = fragmented, M = missing, n = number of orthologues in comparison. A full set of BUSCO scores is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/Raja%20brachyura/dataset/CAUPSL01/busco.

Figure 2. Genome assembly of Raja brachyura, sRajBra1.1: metrics.

The BlobToolKit snail plot shows N50 metrics and BUSCO gene completeness. The main plot is divided into 1,000 size-ordered bins around the circumference with each bin representing 0.1% of the 2,700,467,673 bp assembly. The distribution of scaffold lengths is shown in dark grey with the plot radius scaled to the longest scaffold present in the assembly (187,439,314 bp, shown in red). Orange and pale-orange arcs show the N50 and N90 scaffold lengths (68,366,687 and 26,303,439 bp), respectively. The pale grey spiral shows the cumulative scaffold count on a log scale with white scale lines showing successive orders of magnitude. The blue and pale-blue area around the outside of the plot shows the distribution of GC, AT and N percentages in the same bins as the inner plot. A summary of complete, fragmented, duplicated and missing BUSCO genes in the vertebrata_odb10 set is shown in the top right. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/Raja%20brachyura/dataset/CAUPSL01/snail.

Figure 3. Genome assembly of Raja brachyura, sRajBra1.1: BlobToolKit GC-coverage plot.

Sequences are coloured by phylum. Circles are sized in proportion to sequence length. Histograms show the distribution of sequence length sum along each axis. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/Raja%20brachyura/dataset/CAUPSL01/blob.

Figure 4. Genome assembly of Raja brachyura sRajBra1.1: BlobToolKit cumulative sequence plot.

The grey line shows cumulative length for all sequences. Coloured lines show cumulative lengths of sequences assigned to each phylum using the buscogenes taxrule. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/Raja%20brachyura/dataset/CAUPSL01/cumulative.

Figure 5. Genome assembly of Raja brachyura sRajBra1.1: Hi-C contact map of the sRajBra1.1 assembly, visualised using HiGlass.

Chromosomes are shown in order of size from left to right and top to bottom. An interactive version of this figure may be viewed at https://genome-note-higlass.tol.sanger.ac.uk/l/?d=DS9CH9xQRVC81LrwHEfXaQ.

Table 3. Chromosomal pseudomolecules in the genome assembly of Raja brachyura, sRajBra1.

INSDC accession	Name	Length (Mb)	GC%	
OY740781.1	1	187.44	43.5	
OY740782.1	2	156.67	43.5	
OY740783.1	3	135.09	44.0	
OY740784.1	4	124.79	43.5	
OY740785.1	5	122.43	44.0	
OY740786.1	6	113.6	44.0	
OY740787.1	7	95.33	43.5	
OY740788.1	8	89.42	44.0	
OY740789.1	9	82.82	44.0	
OY740790.1	10	77.23	43.5	
OY740791.1	11	70.46	44.0	
OY740792.1	12	69.07	44.0	
OY740793.1	13	68.37	44.0	
OY740794.1	14	67.98	44.0	
OY740795.1	15	59.78	44.5	
OY740796.1	16	56.13	44.0	
OY740797.1	17	53.96	44.0	
OY740798.1	18	53.24	44.5	
OY740799.1	19	49.69	44.5	
OY740800.1	20	48.88	44.0	
OY740801.1	21	48.0	45.0	
OY740802.1	22	47.17	44.0	
OY740803.1	23	45.74	44.0	
OY740804.1	24	44.59	45.0	
OY740805.1	25	43.39	49.5	
OY740806.1	26	37.6	46.0	
OY740807.1	27	41.72	45.0	
OY740808.1	28	40.02	44.5	
OY740809.1	29	38.76	45.0	
OY740810.1	30	36.02	45.0	
OY740811.1	31	35.16	46.0	
OY740812.1	32	33.72	44.5	
OY740813.1	33	31.87	44.5	
OY740814.1	34	30.16	45.0	
OY740815.1	35	29.07	50.5	
OY740816.1	36	26.73	49.5	
OY740818.1	37	26.3	45.0	
OY740819.1	38	24.54	52.0	
OY740820.1	39	24.5	50.5	
OY740821.1	40	15.58	51.5	
OY740822.1	41	14.02	51.5	
OY740823.1	42	13.32	50.5	
OY740824.1	43	11.17	50.0	
OY740825.1	44	9.95	48.5	
OY740826.1	45	8.55	46.5	
OY740827.1	46	6.63	47.5	
OY740828.1	47	4.4	48.5	
OY740829.1	48	4.15	52.5	
OY740817.1	X	26.66	51.0	
OY740830.1	MT	0.02	41.0	

The estimated Quality Value (QV) of the final assembly is 57.8 with k-mer completeness of 99.99%, and the assembly has a BUSCO v5.4.3 completeness of 91.7% (single = 89.8%, duplicated = 1.9%), using the vertebrata_odb10 reference set ( n = 3,354).

Metadata for specimens, BOLD barcode results, spectra estimates, sequencing runs, contaminants and pre-curation assembly statistics are given at https://tolqc.cog.sanger.ac.uk/darwin/sharks/Raja_brachyura/.

Genome annotation report

The Raja brachyura genome assembly (GCA_963514005.1) was annotated at the European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI) on Ensembl Rapid Release. The resulting annotation includes 61,067 transcribed mRNAs from 24,252 protein-coding and 2,564 non-coding genes ( Table 2; https://rapid.ensembl.org/Raja_brachyura_GCA_963514005.1/Info/Index). The average transcript length is 68,391.85. There are 2.28 coding transcripts per gene and 13.47 exons per transcript.

Methods

Sample acquisition

A Raja brachyura specimen (specimen ID MBA-211013-003A, ToLID sRajBra1) was collected from Whitsand Bay, English Channel, UK (latitude 50.33, longitude –4.24) on 13th October 2021. The specimen was taken from its habitat of shell and sand using an otter trawl deployed from RV Sepia. The specimen was identified by Rachel Brittain (Marine Biological Association) based on gross morphology. The fish was first anaesthetised and then overdosed using Aquased (2-phenoxyethanol). Destruction of the brain was used as a secondary method to ensure the animal was deceased before tissue sampling took place as in accordance with Schedule 1 methodology under the home office licence. Samples taken from the animal were preserved on dry ice.

The initial identification was verified by an additional DNA barcoding process according to the framework developed by Twyford et al. (2024). A small sample was dissected from the specimen and stored in ethanol, while the remaining parts of the specimen were shipped on dry ice to the Wellcome Sanger Institute (WSI). The tissue was lysed, the COI marker region was amplified by PCR, and amplicons were sequenced and compared to the BOLD database, confirming the species identification ( Crowley et al., 2023). Following whole genome sequence generation, the relevant DNA barcode region was also used alongside the initial barcoding data for sample tracking at the WSI ( Twyford et al., 2024). The standard operating procedures for Darwin Tree of Life barcoding have been deposited on protocols.io ( Beasley et al., 2023).

Nucleic acid extraction

The workflow for high molecular weight (HMW) DNA extraction at the Wellcome Sanger Institute (WSI) Tree of Life Core Laboratory includes a sequence of core procedures: sample preparation; sample homogenisation, DNA extraction, fragmentation, and clean-up. In sample preparation, the sRajBra1 sample was weighed and dissected on dry ice ( Jay et al., 2023). Gill tissue was homogenised using a PowerMasher II tissue disruptor ( Denton et al., 2023a). HMW DNA was extracted using the Nanobind Blood extraction protocol ( Denton et al., 2023b). DNA was sheared into an average fragment size of 12–20 kb in a Megaruptor 3 system ( Todorovic et al., 2023). Sheared DNA was purified by solid-phase reversible immobilisation ( Strickland et al., 2023): in brief, the method employs AMPure PB beads to eliminate shorter fragments and concentrate the DNA. The concentration of the sheared and purified DNA was assessed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer and Qubit Fluorometer using the Qubit dsDNA High Sensitivity Assay kit. Fragment size distribution was evaluated by running the sample on the FemtoPulse system.

RNA was extracted from gill tissue of sRajBra1 in the Tree of Life Laboratory at the WSI using the RNA Extraction: Automated MagMax™ mirVana protocol ( do Amaral et al., 2023). The RNA concentration was assessed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer and a Qubit Fluorometer using the Qubit RNA Broad-Range Assay kit. Analysis of the integrity of the RNA was done using the Agilent RNA 6000 Pico Kit and Eukaryotic Total RNA assay.

Protocols developed by the WSI Tree of Life laboratory are publicly available on protocols.io ( Denton et al., 2023c).

Sequencing

Pacific Biosciences HiFi circular consensus DNA sequencing libraries were constructed according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Poly(A) RNA-Seq libraries were constructed using the NEB Ultra II RNA Library Prep kit. DNA and RNA sequencing was performed by the Scientific Operations core at the WSI on Pacific Biosciences Sequel IIe (HiFi) and Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (RNA-Seq) instruments. Hi-C data were also generated from gill tissue of sRajBra1 using the Arima-HiC v2 kit. The Hi-C sequencing was performed using paired-end sequencing with a read length of 150 bp on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 instrument.

Genome assembly, curation and evaluation

Assembly

The original assembly of HiFi reads was performed using Hifiasm ( Cheng et al., 2021) with the --primary option. Haplotypic duplications were identified and removed with purge_dups ( Guan et al., 2020). Hi-C reads are further mapped with bwa-mem2 ( Vasimuddin et al., 2019) to the primary contigs, which are further scaffolded using the provided Hi-C data ( Rao et al., 2014) in YaHS ( Zhou et al., 2023) using the --break option. Scaffolded assemblies are evaluated using Gfastats ( Formenti et al., 2022), BUSCO ( Manni et al., 2021) and MERQURY.FK ( Rhie et al., 2020).

The mitochondrial genome was assembled using MitoHiFi ( Uliano-Silva et al., 2023), which runs MitoFinder ( Allio et al., 2020) and uses these annotations to select the final mitochondrial contig and to ensure the general quality of the sequence.

Assembly curation

The assembly was decontaminated using the Assembly Screen for Cobionts and Contaminants (ASCC) pipeline (article in preparation). Flat files and maps used in curation were generated in TreeVal ( Pointon et al., 2023). Manual curation was primarily conducted using PretextView ( Harry, 2022), with additional insights provided by JBrowse2 ( Diesh et al., 2023) and HiGlass ( Kerpedjiev et al., 2018). Scaffolds were visually inspected and corrected as described by Howe et al. (2021). Any identified contamination, missed joins, and mis-joins were corrected, and duplicate sequences were tagged and removed. Sex chromosomes were identified by synteny. The entire process is documented at https://gitlab.com/wtsi-grit/rapid-curation (article in preparation).

Evaluation of the final assembly

A Hi-C map for the final assembly was produced using bwa-mem2 ( Vasimuddin et al., 2019) in the Cooler file format ( Abdennur & Mirny, 2020). To assess the assembly metrics, the k-mer completeness and QV consensus quality values were calculated in Merqury ( Rhie et al., 2020). This work was done using Nextflow ( Di Tommaso et al., 2017) DSL2 pipelines “sanger-tol/readmapping” ( Surana et al., 2023a) and “sanger-tol/genomenote” ( Surana et al., 2023b). The genome was analysed within the BlobToolKit environment ( Challis et al., 2020) and BUSCO scores ( Manni et al., 2021; Simão et al., 2015) were calculated.

The genome assembly and evaluation pipelines were developed using the nf-core tooling ( Ewels et al., 2020), use MultiQC ( Ewels et al., 2016), and make extensive use of the Conda package manager, the Bioconda initiative ( Grüning et al., 2018), the Biocontainers infrastructure ( da Veiga Leprevost et al., 2017), and the Docker ( Merkel, 2014) and Singularity ( Kurtzer et al., 2017) containerisation solutions.

Table 4 contains a list of relevant software tool versions and sources.

Table 4. Software tools: versions and sources.

Software tool	Version	Source	
BEDTools	2.30.0	https://github.com/arq5x/bedtools2	
BLAST	2.14.0	ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/executables/blast+/	
BlobToolKit	4.3.7	https://github.com/blobtoolkit/blobtoolkit	
BUSCO	5.4.3 and 5.5.0	https://gitlab.com/ezlab/busco	
bwa-mem2	2.2.1	https://github.com/bwa-mem2/bwa-mem2	
Cooler	0.8.11	https://github.com/open2c/cooler	
DIAMOND	2.1.8	https://github.com/bbuchfink/diamond	
fasta_windows	0.2.4	https://github.com/tolkit/fasta_windows	
FastK	427104ea91c78c3b8b8b49f1a7d6bbeaa869ba1c	https://github.com/thegenemyers/FASTK	
Gfastats	1.3.6	https://github.com/vgl-hub/gfastats	
GoaT CLI	0.2.5	https://github.com/genomehubs/goat-cli	
Hifiasm	0.16.1-r375	https://github.com/chhylp123/hifiasm	
HiGlass	44086069ee7d4d3f6f3f0012569789ec138f42b84
aa44357826c0b6753eb28de	https://github.com/higlass/higlass	
Merqury.FK	d00d98157618f4e8d1a9190026b19b471055b22e	https://github.com/thegenemyers/MERQURY.FK	
MitoHiFi	3	https://github.com/marcelauliano/MitoHiFi	
MultiQC	1.14, 1.17, and 1.18	https://github.com/MultiQC/MultiQC	
NCBI Datasets	15.12.0	https://github.com/ncbi/datasets	
Nextflow	23.04.0-5857	https://github.com/nextflow-io/nextflow	
PretextView	0.2	https://github.com/sanger-tol/PretextView	
purge_dups	1.2.5	https://github.com/dfguan/purge_dups	
samtools	1.16.1, 1.17, and 1.18	https://github.com/samtools/samtools	
sanger-tol/ascc	-	https://github.com/sanger-tol/ascc	
sanger-tol/genomenote	1.1.1	https://github.com/sanger-tol/genomenote	
sanger-tol/readmapping	1.2.1	https://github.com/sanger-tol/redmapping	
Seqtk	1.3	https://github.com/lh3/seqtk	
Singularity	3.9.0	https://github.com/sylabs/singularity	
TreeVal	1.0.0	https://github.com/sanger-tol/treeval	
YaHS	1.2a.2	https://github.com/c-zhou/yahs	

Genome annotation

The Ensembl Genebuild annotation system ( Aken et al., 2016) was used to generate annotation for the Raja brachyura assembly (GCA_963514005.1) in Ensembl Rapid Release at the EBI. Annotation was created primarily through alignment of transcriptomic data to the genome, with gap filling via protein-to-genome alignments of a select set of proteins from UniProt ( UniProt Consortium, 2019).

Wellcome Sanger Institute – Legal and Governance

The materials that have contributed to this genome note have been supplied by a Darwin Tree of Life Partner. The submission of materials by a Darwin Tree of Life Partner is subject to the ‘Darwin Tree of Life Project Sampling Code of Practice’, which can be found in full on the Darwin Tree of Life website here. By agreeing with and signing up to the Sampling Code of Practice, the Darwin Tree of Life Partner agrees they will meet the legal and ethical requirements and standards set out within this document in respect of all samples acquired for, and supplied to, the Darwin Tree of Life Project.

Further, the Wellcome Sanger Institute employs a process whereby due diligence is carried out proportionate to the nature of the materials themselves, and the circumstances under which they have been/are to be collected and provided for use. The purpose of this is to address and mitigate any potential legal and/or ethical implications of receipt and use of the materials as part of the research project, and to ensure that in doing so we align with best practice wherever possible. The overarching areas of consideration are:

●   Ethical review of provenance and sourcing of the material

●   Legality of collection, transfer and use (national and international)

Each transfer of samples is further undertaken according to a Research Collaboration Agreement or Material Transfer Agreement entered into by the Darwin Tree of Life Partner, Genome Research Limited (operating as the Wellcome Sanger Institute), and in some circumstances other Darwin Tree of Life collaborators.

Data availability

European Nucleotide Archive: Raja brachyura (blonde ray). Accession number PRJEB61690; https://identifiers.org/ena.embl/PRJEB61690 ( Wellcome Sanger Institute, 2023). The genome sequence is released openly for reuse. The Raja brachyura genome sequencing initiative is part of the Darwin Tree of Life (DToL) project. All raw sequence data and the assembly have been deposited in INSDC databases. Raw data and assembly accession identifiers are reported in Table 1 and Table 2.

Author information

Members of the Marine Biological Association Genome Acquisition Lab are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8382513.

Members of the Darwin Tree of Life Barcoding collective are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4893703.

Members of the Wellcome Sanger Institute Tree of Life Management, Samples and Laboratory team are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10066175.

Members of Wellcome Sanger Institute Scientific Operations: Sequencing Operations are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10043364.

Members of the Wellcome Sanger Institute Tree of Life Core Informatics team are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10066637.

Members of the Tree of Life Core Informatics collective are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5013541.

Members of the Darwin Tree of Life Consortium are listed here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4783558.

10.21956/wellcomeopenres.25132.r93541
Reviewer response for version 1
Burgess Shawn M. 1Referee
1 National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, USA
11 9 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Burgess SM
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The author(s) is/are employees of the US Government and therefore domestic copyright protection in USA does not apply to this work. The work may be protected under the copyright laws of other jurisdictions when used in those jurisdictions.
Version 1recommendationapprove
The authors have submitted a good quality assembly of the blond ray, Raja brachyura. The assembly was done with PacBio HiFi and HiC using the Hifiasm assembler which is a standard approach at this point for good draft assemblies. I do not have any major concerns with the approach or results. It would be interesting to see a comparison between the primary haplotype and the secondary contigs. What is the snv rate between the two chromosomes? How much genetic diversity is stored in the shrinking populations of blond rays? 

These are not essential points, but are potentially of interest.

Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described?

Yes

Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?

Yes

Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Zebrafish genomics, fish genome assembly, tissue regeneration.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

10.21956/wellcomeopenres.25132.r93546
Reviewer response for version 1
Koblmüller Stephan 1Referee https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1024-3220

1 University of Graz, Graz, Austria
28 8 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Koblmüller S
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Version 1recommendationapprove
Adkins et al. present the genome assembly of the blonde ray, Raja brachyura. The data are clear and the approaches are well described and I have no objections to any of the data presented. As far as I can tell, the datasets are deposited in publicly accessible repositories.

The background section gives a concise, but nonetheless pretty comprehensive introduction to the study species. Though it is clear to me that providing a high-quality reference genome for this species will serve as basis for numerous other studies, the rationale of why actually sequencing a high-quality reference genome for this species is missing in the background section. In my opinion, one to two sentences on the rationale are required.

In addition, I think, one sentence needs to be rephrased: The Blonde Ray mature between ages 4 and 6, and at around 80 cm in length (typically later and larger in females) (Gallagher et al. 2004) Here “mature” should be replaced by “matures” and I guess with “between ages 4 and 6” you mean between 4 and 6 years, right? I suggest you rephrase this so that it’s clear for the reader what you mean.

Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described?

Partly

Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?

Yes

Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

phylogenetics-/genomics, population genetics/genomics

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

10.21956/wellcomeopenres.25132.r93550
Reviewer response for version 1
Senevirathna Jayan D.M 1Referee https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9800-1962

1 Uva Wellassa University, Badulla, Uva Province, Sri Lanka
28 8 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Senevirathna JDM
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access peer review report distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Version 1recommendationapprove
I accept this article for indexing in Open research.

However, the followings are suggested to improve the article: In keywords;  Raja brachyura should be italic.

In background; north-east Atlantic > north-east Atlantic Ocean.

In Genome annotation report; Recheck the number of non-coding genes in the text and the given link.

In methods; For HMW DNA extraction, why did you specifically select the gill tissue instead of a muscle...?

Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described?

Yes

Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format?

Yes

Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Genetics and biotechnology

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.

Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
==== Refs
Abdennur N Mirny LA : Cooler: scalable storage for Hi-C data and other genomically labeled arrays. Bioinformatics. 2020;36 (1 ):311–316. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz540 31290943
Aken BL Ayling S Barrell D : The ensembl gene annotation system. Database (Oxford). 2016;2016 : baw093. 10.1093/database/baw093 27337980
Allio R Schomaker-Bastos A Romiguier J : MitoFinder: efficient automated large-scale extraction of mitogenomic data in target enrichment phylogenomics. Mol Ecol Resour. 2020;20 (4 ):892–905. 10.1111/1755-0998.13160 32243090
Beasley J Uhl R Forrest LL : DNA barcoding SOPs for the Darwin Tree of Life Project. protocols.io. 2023; [Accessed 25 June 2024]. 10.17504/protocols.io.261ged91jv47/v1
Challis R Richards E Rajan J : BlobToolKit – interactive quality assessment of genome assemblies. G3 (Bethesda). 2020;10 (4 ):1361–1374. 10.1534/g3.119.400908 32071071
Cheng H Concepcion GT Feng X : Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat Methods. 2021;18 (2 ):170–175. 10.1038/s41592-020-01056-5 33526886
Crowley L Allen H Barnes I : A sampling strategy for genome sequencing the British terrestrial arthropod fauna [version 1; peer review: 2 approved]. Wellcome Open Res. 2023;8 :123. 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.18925.1 37408610
da Veiga Leprevost F Grüning BA Alves Aflitos S : BioContainers: an open-source and community-driven framework for software standardization. Bioinformatics. 2017;33 (16 ):2580–2582. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx192 28379341
Denton A Oatley G Cornwell C : Sanger Tree of Life sample homogenisation: PowerMash. Protocols.Io. 2023a. 10.17504/protocols.io.5qpvo3r19v4o/v1
Denton A Oatley G Pacific Biosciences, : Sanger Tree of Life HMW DNA extraction: manual nucleated blood Nanobind®. protocols.io. 2023b; [Accessed 5 January 2024]. 10.17504/protocols.io.5jyl8p2w8g2w/v1
Denton A Yatsenko H Jay J : Sanger Tree of Life wet laboratory protocol collection V.1. protocols.io. 2023c. 10.17504/protocols.io.8epv5xxy6g1b/v1
Di Tommaso P Chatzou M Floden EW : Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35 (4 ):316–319. 10.1038/nbt.3820 28398311
Diesh C Stevens GJ Xie P : JBrowse 2: a modular genome browser with views of synteny and structural variation. Genome Biol. 2023;24 (1 ): 74. 10.1186/s13059-023-02914-z 37069644
do Amaral RJV Bates A Denton A : Sanger Tree of Life RNA extraction: automated MagMax TM mirVana. protocols.io. 2023. 10.17504/protocols.io.6qpvr36n3vmk/v1
Ellis JR Pawson MG Shackley SE : The comparative feeding ecology of six species of shark and four species of ray (Elasmobranchii) in the north-east Atlantic. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 1996;76 (1 ):89–106. 10.1017/S0025315400029039
Ewels P Magnusson M Lundin S : MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics. 2016;32 (19 ):3047–3048. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354 27312411
Ewels PA Peltzer A Fillinger S : The nf-core framework for community-curated bioinformatics pipelines. Nat Biotechnol. 2020;38 (3 ):276–278. 10.1038/s41587-020-0439-x 32055031
Formenti G Abueg L Brajuka A : Gfastats: conversion, evaluation and manipulation of genome sequences using assembly graphs. Bioinformatics. 2022;38 (17 ):4214–4216. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac460 35799367
Gallagher MJ Nolan CP Jeal F : Age, growth and maturity of the commercial ray species from the Irish Sea. J Northwest Atl Fish Sci. 2004;35 (17 ):47–66. 10.2960/J.v35.m527
Grüning B Dale R Sjödin A : Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences. Nat Methods. 2018;15 (7 ):475–476. 10.1038/s41592-018-0046-7 29967506
Guan D McCarthy SA Wood J : Identifying and removing haplotypic duplication in primary genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2020;36 (9 ):2896–2898. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa025 31971576
Harry E : PretextView (Paired REad TEXTure Viewer): a desktop application for viewing pretext contact maps.2022; [Accessed 19 October 2022]. Reference Source
Holden MJ Rout DW Humphreys CN : The rate of egg laying by three species of ray. ICES J Mar Sci. 1971;33 (3 ):335–339. 10.1093/icesjms/33.3.335
Holden MJ Tucker RN : The food of Raja clavata Linnaeus 1758, Raja montagui Fowler 1910, Raja naevus Muller and Henle 1841 and Raja brachyura Lafont 1873 in British waters. ICES J Mar Sci. 1974;35 (2 ):189–193. 10.1093/icesjms/35.2.189
Howe K Chow W Collins J : Significantly improving the quality of genome assemblies through curation. GigaScience. 2021;10 (1 ): giaa153. 10.1093/gigascience/giaa153 33420778
Jay J Yatsenko H Narváez-Gómez JP : Sanger Tree of Life sample preparation: triage and dissection. protocols.io. 2023. 10.17504/protocols.io.x54v9prmqg3e/v1
Kerpedjiev P Abdennur N Lekschas F : HiGlass: web-based visual exploration and analysis of genome interaction maps. Genome Biol. 2018;19 (1 ): 125. 10.1186/s13059-018-1486-1 30143029
Kurtzer GM Sochat V Bauer MW : Singularity: scientific containers for mobility of compute. PLoS One. 2017;12 (5 ): e0177459. 10.1371/journal.pone.0177459 28494014
Manni M Berkeley MR Seppey M : BUSCO update: novel and streamlined workflows along with broader and deeper phylogenetic coverage for scoring of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38 (10 ):4647–4654. 10.1093/molbev/msab199 34320186
McCully S Serena F Walls RHL : Raja brachyura (Europe assessment) e.T161691A48907330.2015. Reference Source
Merkel D : Docker: lightweight Linux containers for consistent development and deployment. Linux J. 2014;2014 (239 ):2. Reference Source
Pointon DL Eagles W Sims Y : sanger-tol/treeval v1.0.0 – Ancient Atlantis.2023. 10.5281/zenodo.10047654
Porcu C Bellodi A Cannas R : Life-history traits of a commercial ray, Raja brachyura from the central western Mediterranean Sea. Mediterr Mar Sci. 2015;16 (1 ):90. 10.12681/mms.898
Rao SSP Huntley MH Durand NC : A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell. 2014;159 (7 ):1665–1680. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.11.021 25497547
Rhie A McCarthy SA Fedrigo O : Towards complete and error-free genome assemblies of all vertebrate species. Nature. 2021;592 (7856 ):737–746. 10.1038/s41586-021-03451-0 33911273
Rhie A Walenz BP Koren S : Merqury: reference-free quality, completeness, and phasing assessment for genome assemblies. Genome Biol. 2020;21 (1 ): 245. 10.1186/s13059-020-02134-9 32928274
Serena F : Field identification guide to the sharks and rays of the mediterranean and black sea. Rome: FAO,2005. Reference Source
Silva JF Ellis JR Catchpole TL : Species composition of skates (Rajidae) in commercial fisheries around the British Isles and their discarding patterns. J Fish Biol. 2012;80 (5 ):1678–1703. 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2012.03247.x 22497403
Simão FA Waterhouse RM Ioannidis P : BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics. 2015;31 (19 ):3210–3212. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351 26059717
Stehmann MFW Bürkel DL Whitehead PJ : Rajidae. Fishes of the North-Eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean.1984;1 :163–196.
Strickland M Cornwell C Howard C : Sanger Tree of Life fragmented DNA clean up: manual SPRI. protocols.io. 2023. 10.17504/protocols.io.kxygx3y1dg8j/v1
Surana P Muffato M Qi G : sanger-tol/readmapping: sanger-tol/readmapping v1.1.0 - Hebridean Black (1.1.0). Zenodo. 2023a. 10.5281/zenodo.7755669
Surana P Muffato M Sadasivan Baby C : sanger-tol/genomenote (v1.0.dev). Zenodo. 2023b. 10.5281/zenodo.6785935
Thys KJM Lemey L Van Bogaert N : Addressing caveats in current skate fisheries management: a comparative study on the morphometry and life history traits of commercially important skates blonde ray Raja brachyura and thornback ray Raja clavata.2022. 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1277646/v1
Thys KJM Lemey L Van Bogaert N : Blondes do it better? A comparative study on the morphometry and life-history traits of commercially important skates blonde ray Raja brachyura, thornback ray Raja clavata, and spotted ray Raja montagui, with management implications. Fish Res. 2023;263 : 106679. 10.1016/j.fishres.2023.106679
Todorovic M Sampaio F Howard C : Sanger Tree of Life HMW DNA fragmentation: diagenode Megaruptor ®3 for PacBio HiFi. Protocols.Io. 2023. 10.17504/protocols.io.8epv5x2zjg1b/v1
Twyford AD Beasley J Barnes I : A DNA barcoding framework for taxonomic verification in the Darwin Tree of Life Project [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review]. Wellcome Open Res. 2024;9 :339. 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.21143.1
Uliano-Silva M Ferreira JGRN Krasheninnikova K : MitoHiFi: a python pipeline for mitochondrial genome assembly from PacBio high fidelity reads. BMC Bioinformatics. 2023;24 (1 ): 288. 10.1186/s12859-023-05385-y 37464285
UniProt Consortium: UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47 (D1 ):D506–D515. 10.1093/nar/gky1049 30395287
Vasimuddin M Misra S Li H : Efficient architecture-aware acceleration of BWA-MEM for multicore systems.In: 2019 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS).IEEE,2019;314–324. 10.1109/IPDPS.2019.00041
Wheeler A Stebbing P : Key to the fishes of Northern Europe; a guide to the identification of more than 350 species. London, UK: Frederick Warne,1978. Reference Source
Wellcome Sanger Institute: The genome sequence of the blonde ray, Raja brachyura Lafont, 1871. European Nucleotide Archive.[dataset]. accession number PRJEB61690.2023.
Zhou C McCarthy SA Durbin R : YaHS: yet another Hi-C scaffolding tool. Bioinformatics. 2023;39 (1 ): btac808. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac808 36525368
