
==== Front
PLoS One
PLoS One
plos
PLOS ONE
1932-6203
Public Library of Science San Francisco, CA USA

10.1371/journal.pone.0301918
PONE-D-23-42418
Research Article
People and places
Geographical locations
Asia
Saudi Arabia
Medicine and Health Sciences
Health Care
Health Care Facilities
Medicine and Health Sciences
Health Care
Medical Services
Medicine and Health Sciences
Health Care
Health Care Policy
Medicine and Health Sciences
Health Care
Primary Care
Social Sciences
Economics
Health Economics
Health Care Sector
Medicine and Health Sciences
Health Care
Health Economics
Health Care Sector
Biology and Life Sciences
Population Biology
Population Metrics
Population Size
Biology and Life Sciences
Population Biology
Population Metrics
Population Growth
The state of primary healthcare centers in Saudi Arabia: A regional analysis for 2022
Primary healthcare in Saudi Arabia: 2022 regional analysis
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3710-5730
Kattan Waleed Conceptualization Data curation Formal analysis Funding acquisition Investigation Methodology Project administration Resources Software Supervision Validation Visualization Writing – original draft Writing – review & editing *
Department of Health Services and Hospitals Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administration, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Behzadifar Masoud Editor
Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

* E-mail: wmkattan@kau.edu.sa
9 9 2024
2024
19 9 e030191818 12 2023
25 3 2024
© 2024 Waleed Kattan
2024
Waleed Kattan
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Objective

This study examines the 2022 distribution of primary healthcare centers across Saudi Arabia’s 20 regions, focusing on disparities and healthcare accessibility.

Methods

A quantitative analysis of the Ministry of Health’s data was conducted. Primary healthcare centers distribution was evaluated by calculating the number of primary healthcare centers per 100,000 population across different administrative regions.

Results

The study uncovered regional disparities, with the PHCs-per-100,000-people ratio showing significant variance. Regions like Riyadh had an above-average ratio with 7.5 PHCs-per-100,000-people, while Jeddah lagged behind with a concerning 3.2 PHCs-per-100,000-people despite being a populous city. The PHC-per-capita ratio declined to 6.6 in 2022 from 8.0 in 2017. The data also revealed that the Eastern Province showed an increase in the number of primary healthcare centers.

Conclusion

Disparities in the distribution of primary healthcare centers in 2022 highlight a critical need for equitable healthcare access across Saudi Arabia. Many regions require increased primary healthcare center allocation to match population needs. The findings underscore the urgency of integrating these insights into policy frameworks to achieve the goals of Vision 2030, emphasizing the development of a sustainable and equitable healthcare system.

Implications

Policymakers need to consider these disparities to guide the strategic placement of primary healthcare centers and ensure an equitable healthcare system. This study provides a basis for targeted policy interventions to improve healthcare equity and prepare the health system for future demographic and epidemiological transitions.

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work. Data AvailabilityAll relevant data are within the paper.
Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper.
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Importance of primary healthcare in Saudi Arabia

Primary healthcare centers (PHCs) play a crucial role in health systems by providing essential services to populations [1]. In Saudi Arabia, primary healthcare refers to basic health services delivered at the community level through PHCs, representing the first point of contact with the healthcare system [2, 3]. Studies show that primary care reduces illness and mortality by promoting prevention and accessibility of continuity care [4]. The multifaceted nature of primary care emphasizing prevention underscores its importance in comprehensive healthcare systems [5]. In recent years, Saudi Arabia has invested significantly in developing its primary healthcare infrastructure [6]. As the frontline for common health issues, PHCs will be integral to managing growing disease burdens [7].

Regional distribution of PHCs in Saudi Arabia

The equitable regional distribution of PHCs is pivotal in ensuring accessible and comprehensive healthcare services in Saudi Arabia [8]. A thorough understanding of the current landscape of PHC distribution is instrumental in pinpointing areas that require enhancement, thereby addressing healthcare disparities effectively [9]. Countries that give precedence to primary healthcare by distributing resources equitably are more likely to accomplish their health and development objectives [10]. In Saudi Arabia, the way PHCs are spread across regions significantly influences the health outcomes and overall well-being of the population [11]. It is essential to ensure an equitable distribution of these centers to adequately respond to the growing population’s needs [12]. Numerous studies underscore the necessity of continuously monitoring PHC distribution at the regional level to guarantee that healthcare services are uniformly accessible nationwide [2, 3, 13, 14].

Saudi Arabia’s healthcare transformation

In the context of Saudi Arabia’s healthcare transformation, significant reforms have been implemented under the guidance of Vision 2030 and the National Transformation Program (NTP) 2020, with a particular focus on primary care enhancement [15]. Vision 2030 seeks to boost primary healthcare utilization [16], whereas NTP 2020 aims at fostering service integration and ensuring continuity of care [17]. Reflecting on the progress since the adoption of the Alma Ata Declaration in 1978, Asmri et al. [5] note the substantial expansion of the primary healthcare infrastructure, which has been instrumental in improving access to services via PHCs [18]. This infrastructure development is a key component in the broader strategy to optimize healthcare service provision across Saudi Arabia. A thorough analysis of the distribution of PHCs will facilitate more effective planning, ultimately contributing to the realization of the objectives set by Vision 2030 and NTP 2020 [4].

Addressing regional disparities

The distribution of PHCs is intrinsically linked to regional disparities in healthcare access and outcomes [2]. Extensive research indicates that the way PHCs are distributed across regions significantly influences the accessibility of healthcare services in Saudi Arabia[2, 19, 20]. Achieving an equitable distribution of these centers is crucial not only for meeting the population’s diverse needs but also for alleviating the burden of overcrowding in hospitals through the effective integration of primary care services [21, 22]. As the population continues to grow, strategically distributing healthcare resources becomes increasingly vital [23]. Regional disparities pose a significant challenge to the realization of healthcare goals, highlighting the need for a comprehensive understanding of these disparities and the implementation of targeted interventions to address them [1, 24].

Current study

This study examines regional PHC distribution across Saudi Arabia’s 20 health regions. The overall PHC to population ratio and variation in provision across regions will be assessed. Findings provide policy-relevant insights regarding equitable service planning nationally under Vision 2030 strategies. Together with the reviewed literature, this study characterizes primary care development as foundational to Saudi Arabia’s success in comprehensive, cost-effective, digitally-enhanced population healthcare nationwide.

This paper analyzes the regional distribution of PHCs in Saudi Arabia using 2022 Saudi Ministry of Health (MOH) data to characterize the progress of primary healthcare transformation. Comprehensive literature contextualizes primary care, strengthening centrality to Saudi national health system reforms targeting sustainable development goals through Vision 2030 strategies. Findings aim to guide efforts optimizing accessibility and advancing health equity objectives. This timely study contributes to understanding and informing Saudi Arabia’s continued success in revolutionizing population health nationally through preventative, community-centered models empowering residents with equitable wellness nationwide.

Materials and methods

This study compared the regional distribution of PHCs in Saudi Arabia for 2022 [25]. A secondary data analysis approach was employed using data from the MOH Statistical Yearbook. Data from the Saudi MOH Statistical Yearbook 2022, accessed on November 12, 2023, from the MOH website, was used for this study. This publicly accessible dataset provided aggregated and anonymized health-related statistics, with no identifiable information about individual participants, ensuring adherence to ethical standards for privacy and confidentiality in research.

The primary data used in this analysis was the number of PHCs available in each region. This information was extracted from the MOH Statistical Yearbook, which reported the total count of primary healthcare facilities at the end of the year. In addition to the PHC data, population estimates for each region were obtained from the demographic section of the MOH Statistical Yearbook.

The calculation of the number of PHCs per-100,000-people served as a measure for comparing the availability of primary healthcare services across regions. This metric considers the regions’ varying population sizes, allowing for a fair and meaningful comparison of PHC distribution.

Results

Overview of hospital PHC capacity distribution (2017–2022)

Table 1 encapsulates a five-year overview of the dynamics between the population size and the availability of PHCs. Starting in 2017, the PHC count per-100,000-people began at 8.0 and showed a gradual decline to 6.6 by 2022. The population has expanded from approximately 29.65 million in 2017 to over 32.17 million in 2022, while the total number of PHCs has fluctuated slightly, resulting in a decreased PHC-per-capita ratio. This trend signals a relative decline in the per capita availability of primary healthcare resources against a steadily growing population.

10.1371/journal.pone.0301918.t001 Table 1 PHC availability vs. population growth in KSA, 2017–2022.

Year	Population	Total PHCs	Average PHC-per-100,000-people	
2017	29,647,968	2,361	8.0	
2018	30,196,281	2,390	7.9	
2019	30,063,799	2,261	7.5	
2020	31,552,510	2,257	7.2	
2021	30,784,383	2,121	6.9	
2022	32,175,224	2,120	6.6	

The findings in the above table indicate that the total number of PHCs in Saudi Arabia remained relatively stable throughout the years, ranging from 2,120 to 2,390. However, the PHC-to-population ratio showed a gradual decline over the same period. In 2017, there were 8.0 PHCs-per-100,000-people, which decreased to 6.6 in 2022.

These results suggest that while the total number of PHCs did not significantly change, the growing population in Saudi Arabia has decreased the availability of PHCs per capita. This trend highlights the need for continued efforts to ensure adequate access to primary healthcare services across all regions in the country, considering the increasing population and their healthcare needs.

Regional disparities in PHC allocation

In 2022, the total number of PHCs evaluated in this study amounted to 2,120 facilities, serving an aggregate population of 32,175,220 individuals. The national average stood at 6.6 PHCs-per-100,000-people, which provides a baseline for assessing the sufficiency and distribution of healthcare services across the country.

Table 2. shows that the distribution of PHCs is notably uneven when examined on a regional level. Al-Bahah, with a population of 465,779, boasts the highest ratio of PHCs-per-100,000-people at 20.0, significantly surpassing the national average. This indicates a more favorable healthcare landscape for residents of Al-Bahah, with easier access to primary healthcare facilities compared to other regions. Conversely, Jeddah, despite being one of the most populous cities with 4,623,940 inhabitants, has a markedly lower ratio of 2.1 PHCs-per-100,000-people, which is the lowest among all regions studied. This stark contrast elucidates a potential concern regarding healthcare accessibility in highly populated regions.

10.1371/journal.pone.0301918.t002 Table 2 PHC distribution versus regional populations in KSA, 2022*.

Rank	Region	Total Number of PHCs	Population	PHCs-per-100,000-people	
1	Al-Bahah	93	465,779	20.0	
2	Bishah	63	380,622	16.6	
3	Ha`il	109	685,571	15.9	
4	Qunfudah	37	302,597	12.2	
5	Al-Jouf	40	333,189	12.0	
6	Najran	68	570,698	11.9	
7	Aseer	211	1,782,856	11.8	
8	Northern	41	358,989	11.4	
9	Qaseem	152	1,397,187	10.9	
10	Jazan	165	1,535,152	10.7	
11	Tabouk	85	889,914	9.6	
12	Qurayyat	16	165,804	9.6	
13	Hafr Al-Baten	38	437,822	8.7	
14	Ta`if	106	1,275,200	8.3	
15	Medinah	146	2,105,376	6.9	
16	Al -Ahsa	61	1,199,375	5.1	
17	Riyadh	390	8,153,488	4.8	
18	Eastern	120	3,202,857	3.7	
19	Makkah	80	2,308,801	3.5	
20	Jeddah	99	4,623,940	2.1	
 	 	Total = 2,120	Total = 32,175,220	KSA average = 6.6	
*Table ranks regions by PHCs-per-100,000-people.

The data reveal a gradient in healthcare center distribution, with regions such as Bishah, Ha’il, and Qunfudah exhibiting PHC ratios of 16.6, 15.9, and 12.2, respectively, well above the national average. In contrast, more populous regions, including Riyadh, the Eastern region, and Makkah, present lower ratios of 4.8, 3.7, and 3.5, respectively, which could indicate a strain on healthcare resources and possible overcrowding in PHCs.

Further dissecting the data, Aseer, despite having a considerable population of 1,782,856, has managed to maintain a relatively high ratio of PHCs (11.8), suggesting a proactive approach to healthcare provisioning in this region. This starkly contrasts with the Eastern region, which shows a significantly lower ratio despite having a larger population size.

Visualization of population distribution vs. PHC allocation

Fig 1 demonstrates the actual count of PHCs against the backdrop of the population size across various regions of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia in 2022. Riyadh, being the most populous region, naturally has the highest number of PHCs. This could be seen as a direct response to the high demand for healthcare services in densely populated areas. However, the PHC count alone does not provide a complete understanding of healthcare accessibility. Regions like Al-Bahah, despite having a smaller population, have a comparatively high number of PHCs, which may indicate a strategic emphasis on healthcare distribution in less populous regions. The bar and line graph together highlight the raw numerical distribution of PHCs, allowing us to identify regions where the number of healthcare facilities may exceed or not meet the needs of the population based solely on population counts.

10.1371/journal.pone.0301918.g001 Fig 1 Population versus PHC count by region in KSA for 2022.

In contrast to Figs 1 and 2 offers a more nuanced view of healthcare distribution by illustrating the PHC density per-100,000-people in relation to the population size in KSA for the year 2022. This figure provides a per capita analysis, giving insight into the relative availability of healthcare facilities to the population in each region. It is evident that while Riyadh has the most PHCs, its PHC density per capita is relatively low compared to other regions, suggesting a potential underservice relative to its population size. Conversely, regions such as Al-Bahah have fewer PHCs but a higher density per capita, indicating a higher accessibility of healthcare services on a per-person basis. This figure underscores the importance of considering both the absolute and relative measures of healthcare availability to understand the actual landscape of healthcare accessibility across the regions.

10.1371/journal.pone.0301918.g002 Fig 2 Regional PHC density versus population in KSA, 2022.

Together, these two figures suggest that while some regions may appear well-served when considering the absolute number of healthcare facilities, a per capita perspective may reveal inequalities in healthcare distribution that could be addressed to improve the overall efficiency and equity of healthcare services in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Discussion

The regional divide in PHC distribution

The disparity in the distribution of PHCs between regions in Saudi Arabia is a significant concern. Some regions have better healthcare facilities than others, leading to unequal access to care and varying health outcomes [26, 27]. This regional divide is not unique to Saudi Arabia but is a common challenge in many countries, impacting the overall quality of life and health of the population [14, 27].

Impact of population growth on PHC accessibility

The healthcare infrastructure in Saudi Arabia, particularly the availability of Primary Health Centers (PHCs), is being significantly influenced by the rapid population growth observed in recent years. In 2017, the PHC-per-capita ratio stood at 8.0 per 100,000 people, a figure that has since declined to 6.6 in 2022, signaling a potential gap in healthcare service provision [25]. This downward trend in PHC accessibility per capita is a matter of concern, indicating that the increase in PHC numbers has not been proportional to population growth. Moreover, this pattern highlights a critical oversight in the planning and development of healthcare facilities, which may not have adequately accounted for the demographic shifts and evolving healthcare demands of the population [7].

The declining PHC-per-capita ratio amidst Saudi Arabia’s population increase necessitates a proactive reevaluation of PHC distribution strategies. Although the healthcare system was once adequate, it is evidently struggling to keep pace with current demographic and healthcare requirements. Strategic placement of new PHCs should be guided by comprehensive data analysis, considering geographic, demographic, and health trend variables to ensure equitable access. The diminishing ratio also risks increased strain on secondary and tertiary healthcare services, potentially leading to overcrowded hospitals and higher costs. Prompt, data-driven action is required to realign PHC infrastructure growth with population dynamics, securing a healthcare system that is both accessible and resilient for the future.

Economic and policy factors influencing PHC distribution

The distribution pattern of PHCs can be attributed to various factors, including economic conditions, market dynamics, and government policies focusing on private sector development [18, 28]. However, this approach has resulted in an uneven distribution of PHCs, with some regions like Al-Bahah exceeding the national average of PHCs per capita, while populous cities like Jeddah have the lowest ratios [18, 23]. This indicates a need for a reassessment of allocation strategies to prioritize high-density areas with low PHC ratios.

The variance in the distribution of PHCs may be attributed to several factors, including but not limited to regional policies, geographical challenges, population growth rates, and the allocation of governmental healthcare funding. Regions with higher PHC-per-population ratios may benefit from strategic placement of healthcare facilities, effective regional health policies, or a combination of both. The lower-than-average ratios observed in some regions suggest an opportunity for policy interventions to enhance the accessibility and distribution of primary healthcare services.

Investment in PHCs and healthcare outcomes

Investment in PHCs is essential for delivering cost-effective, patient-centered care [17, 29]. Establishing PHCs in underserved regions can enhance preventive care, reduce healthcare costs, and improve health outcomes [7, 12]. However, the current distribution suggests that the goals of Vision 2030, particularly those related to optimizing healthcare expenditure and transitioning to patient-centric care, are not fully realized [16].

Challenges in access and quality of PHC services

Despite infrastructure development, issues such as the physical environment, waiting times, and location of centers continue to be barriers to access and use of PHCs [5, 27, 30]. The variation in services offered by PHCs in different regions suggests a need for a more standardized approach to healthcare provision across the country [21, 31].

Enhancing primary healthcare in alignment with vision 2030

Vision 2030 is a strategic framework that focuses on revolutionizing the quality and accessibility of healthcare services through comprehensive sector reforms [15, 16]. Central to this vision is the Health Sector Transformation Program, which aims to restructure the healthcare system, thereby bolstering its capabilities and enhancing service provision [17]. A key focus of these reforms is improving quality, efficiency, and geographical coverage of healthcare services, ensuring universal access for all [16]. This initiative involves adopting value-based healthcare paradigms and aligning Saudi Arabia’s strategies with global best practices to optimize the delivery of PHCs [16]. Furthermore, integrating digital innovations is seen as a pivotal step toward enhancing the efficiency and accessibility of healthcare services nationwide [32]. By strengthening primary care through this comprehensive transformation, Vision 2030 lays the groundwork for achieving its broader objectives of fostering a vibrant society [16].

Advancing healthcare through privatization and expansion

Under the Vision 2030 framework, a key strategy involves the privatization of 290 hospitals and 2,300 PHCs by 2030, aiming to elevate the private sector’s contribution to the healthcare system from 25% to 35% [15]. This move towards public-private partnerships is expected to significantly enhance both infrastructure and service delivery within the healthcare sector [33]. Also, it is expected to significantly enhance both infrastructure and service delivery within the healthcare sector [7]. The Ministry of Health’s plans underscore a growing commitment to developing the primary care sector, recognizing its critical role in the health system [18]. The flexibility offered by the private sector is seen as a complementary force in expanding healthcare facilities, particularly in underserved regions [18]. Moreover, collaborations among various stakeholders are crucial for addressing the challenges associated with resource distribution and enhancing the reach and quality of primary care nationwide [18].

Advancing towards universal healthcare coverage

The implementation of insurance schemes is a strategic step towards ensuring universal access to primary healthcare services [27]. However, it is crucial to consider the implications of these insurance models on PHCs, particularly in terms of the pressures they may exert on the primary care system [34]. Adequate and equitable distribution of PHCs across regions is a crucial factor in the successful achievement of universal healthcare coverage [34]. This approach aligns with the principles outlined in the Astana Declaration, which advocates for the provision of comprehensive healthcare services throughout an individual’s life course [10]. To realize this goal, it is essential to address the challenges posed by insurance schemes while simultaneously enhancing the capacity and reach of PHCs. This dual focus will help ensure that all individuals, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status, have access to the essential healthcare services they need.

Digital health transformation

The deployment of digital health solutions has seen a significant acceleration in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, with telemedicine becoming an integral part of healthcare delivery nationwide [18, 35]. The advent of eHealth and digital innovations plays a crucial role in bridging the disparities between different areas, offering remote access to healthcare services [17, 36, 37]. As part of the Health Sector Transformation Program, there is a concerted effort to expand these digital services, recognizing their potential to enhance healthcare delivery [16]. Post-pandemic research underscores Saudi Arabia’s notable strides in digital transformation, particularly in the realms of efficient disease surveillance and treatment [32] These digital solutions, optimized and promoted under Vision 2030, are pivotal in supporting equitable healthcare delivery across different regions. This digital shift not only improves accessibility but also ensures that healthcare services are more responsive and tailored to the population’s evolving needs [4, 14]. By leveraging technology, Saudi Arabia is poised to create a more resilient and inclusive healthcare system, aligning with its broader goals of healthcare excellence and innovation [38, 39].

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study has highlighted critical disparities in healthcare accessibility across different regions. Despite notable advancements in healthcare infrastructure, the findings underscore a pressing need for equitable distribution of PHCs, particularly in urban areas and densely populated cities. The decreasing PHC-per-capita ratio amidst a growing population signals an urgent call for strategic planning and resource allocation. As Saudi Arabia strides towards achieving the ambitious goals of Vision 2030, it is imperative to address these disparities through informed policy interventions. The study’s insights offer a valuable foundation for shaping a more robust, equitable, and sustainable primary healthcare system in the Kingdom that is responsive to its population’s evolving demographic and health needs and sets a benchmark for future healthcare planning and implementation.

I extend our sincere thanks to the Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia, for making the essential data from their Statistical Yearbook publicly available, enabling this research.

10.1371/journal.pone.0301918.r001
Decision Letter 0
Behzadifar Masoud Academic Editor
© 2024 Masoud Behzadifar
2024
Masoud Behzadifar
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Submission Version0
16 Feb 2024

PONE-D-23-42418The State of Primary Healthcare Centers in Saudi Arabia: A Regional Analysis for 2022PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Kattan,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 01 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Masoud Behzadifar

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that your Data Availability Statement is currently as follows: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files

Please confirm at this time whether or not your submission contains all raw data required to replicate the results of your study. Authors must share the “minimal data set” for their submission. PLOS defines the minimal data set to consist of the data required to replicate all study findings reported in the article, as well as related metadata and methods (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-minimal-data-set-definition).

For example, authors should submit the following data:

- The values behind the means, standard deviations and other measures reported;

- The values used to build graphs;

- The points extracted from images for analysis.

Authors do not need to submit their entire data set if only a portion of the data was used in the reported study.

If your submission does not contain these data, please either upload them as Supporting Information files or deposit them to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of recommended repositories, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories.

If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. If data are owned by a third party, please indicate how others may request data access.

3. When completing the data availability statement of the submission form, you indicated that you will make your data available on acceptance. We strongly recommend all authors decide on a data sharing plan before acceptance, as the process can be lengthy and hold up publication timelines. Please note that, though access restrictions are acceptable now, your entire data will need to be made freely accessible if your manuscript is accepted for publication. This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If you are unable to adhere to our open data policy, please kindly revise your statement to explain your reasoning and we will seek the editor's input on an exemption. Please be assured that, once you have provided your new statement, the assessment of your exemption will not hold up the peer review process.

4. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The flow of the manuscript was excellent. The secondary data was suffice and the paper will get citations that will raise the impact factor of the Journal, due to the importance of the healthcare transformation which is part of the Kingdom's 2030 vision and strategic plan to improve the quality of healthcare services provided. Excellent job

Reviewer #2: Abstract- methods- spelling - primary-> Primary

Abstract- results- Urban regions like Riyadh - I recommend avoid using Urban / rural since Riyadh and Jeddah both Urban cities

Abstract- results- suggesting regional development efforts. - I dont see this to be included in results

Author waleed--> Waleed

Page 3- line 56 - burdens (7) -- add .

page 4 - line 65 - to cater - find a better word

PAge 4 - line 66- Numerous studies - in KSA ? or where? - it seems you are citing 13 ORCD - So I recommend some clarifications

Page 4 - line 69 - Saudi Arabia's Healthcare Transformation - the paragraph needs flow improvement

PAge 5 - line 89 - title Enhancing Healthcare in Alignment with Vision 2030 - add Primary

page 5 and 6 - 89 Enhancing Healthcare in Alignment with Vision 2030, 113 Advancing Towards Universal Healthcare Coverage, Digital Health Transformation - I believe to be moved to discussion

Page 8 Line 147- MOH - define - see line 157

Page 8 - 158 - which is a reliable and authoritative source for health-related statistics in the country - remove

159 - Ministry of Health (MOH) - --> MOH

166- This data was crucial for assessing the - ?? remove?

170- standardized remove

159- A critical metric derived from the data was the

196 number of PHCs-per-100,000-people, facilitating a comparative analysis between regions with varying population densities ---- remove

Table 2 - PHCs - improve label - Number or Total number of PHCs, also Rank - *clarify footnote table

line 206- merge paragraph with above

206- (11.8 PHCs-per-100,000-people) --> 11.8

219-225 - move to discussion

233- initial- -remove

245-250 - I recommend improve the fig1, fig2 analysis

261 - 262- urban and rural - remove- this section as mentioned above

267- 267 Impact of Population Growth on PHC Accessibility - expand a little

290 Addressing Non-Communicable Diseases and Health Promotion - beyond the scope of the paper and the data - I recommend remove

296- this comprehensive study on the distribution of PHCs in Saudi Arabia in 2022 - this study

conclusion: These should focus on increasing the number of PHCs, enhancing the quality of care, and ensuring a standardized healthcare provision nationwide ( beyond the scope- replace)

Overall good findings and good study - er really need such papers on the Saudi system

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Dr. Asaad A. Abduljawad

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

10.1371/journal.pone.0301918.r002
Author response to Decision Letter 0
Submission Version1
21 Feb 2024

Dear Editor,

I have meticulously addressed the feedback provided by Reviewer #2. Changes, as suggested, have been implemented throughout the manuscript, including terminological precision in the abstract, clarification of the data's context, and restructuring for enhanced readability and focus. The revised manuscript now more accurately reflects the study's scope and strengthens its contribution to the literature on Saudi Arabia's healthcare transformation.

Warm regards,

Waleed

Attachment Submitted filename: Rresponse Letter.docx

10.1371/journal.pone.0301918.r003
Decision Letter 1
Behzadifar Masoud Academic Editor
© 2024 Masoud Behzadifar
2024
Masoud Behzadifar
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Submission Version1
26 Mar 2024

The State of Primary Healthcare Centers in Saudi Arabia: A Regional Analysis for 2022

PONE-D-23-42418R1

Dear Dr. Kattan,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Masoud Behzadifar

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Everything is completed and the author has successfully addressed the reviewers requested items and the manuscript fulfilled the PLOS ONE requirements

Reviewer #2: I have reviewed the revised manuscript and am pleased to report that the authors have addressed all my previous comments comprehensively, enhancing both the methodological clarity and the depth of the analysis. The manuscript now presents a more robust and insightful contribution to the field. I commend the authors for their diligent revisions and believe the manuscript is ready for publication. Their efforts have significantly elevated the quality of the work, making it a valuable addition to the scientific community.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Asaad A. Abduljawad

Reviewer #2: No

**********

10.1371/journal.pone.0301918.r004
Acceptance letter
Behzadifar Masoud Academic Editor
© 2024 Masoud Behzadifar
2024
Masoud Behzadifar
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
8 Apr 2024

PONE-D-23-42418R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Kattan,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Masoud Behzadifar

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE
==== Refs
References

1 OECD. Realising the Potential of Primary Health Care. OECD; 2020 May. doi: 10.1787/A92ADEE4-EN
2 Al-Sheddi A , Kamel S , Almeshal AS , Assiri AM . Distribution of Primary Healthcare Centers Between 2017 and 2021 Across Saudi Arabia. Cureus. 2023;15 . doi: 10.7759/cureus.41932 37583734
3 Al Khashan H , Abogazalah F , Alomary S , Nahhas M , Alwadey A , Al-Khudhair B , et al . Primary health care reform in Saudi Arabia: progress, challenges and prospects. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2021;27 : 1016–1026. doi: 10.26719/emhj.21.042 34766328
4 Bawazir A , Al-Surimi K , Suwaidan SD , Alshehri AM , Alfarhan AI , Abolfotouh MA . Capacity and readiness of primary health care centers for implementation of the basic strategy for prevention and control of non-communicable diseases in Saudi Arabia. A case study from the ministry of national guard-health affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2019;40 : 614–618. doi: 10.15537/smj.2019.6.24164 31219498
5 Asmri M Al , Almalki MJ , Fitzgerald G , Clark M . The public health care system and primary care services in Saudi Arabia: A system in transition. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2020;26 : 468–476. doi: 10.26719/emhj.19.049 32338366
6 Trevor J. Saudi Arabia Healthcare. In: trade.gov—The International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce [Internet]. 2022 [cited 25 Nov 2023]. Available: https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/saudi-arabia-healthcare
7 Boettiger DC , Lin TK , Almansour M , Hamza MM , Alsukait R , Herbst CH , et al . Projected impact of population aging on non-communicable disease burden and costs in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, 2020–2030. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023;23 : 1381. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10309-w 38066590
8 Khatami F , Khatami F , Shariati M , Shariati M , Khedmat L , Bahmani M . Patients’ preferences in selecting family physician in primary health centers: A qualitative-quantitative approach. BMC Fam Pract. 2020;21 . doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01181-2 32527224
9 OECD/European Union. Health at a Glance: Europe 2022: State of Health in the EU. OECD Publishing. 2022. Available: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/health-at-a-glance-europe-2022_507433b0-en
10 Walraven G . The 2018 Astana Declaration on primary health care, is it useful? J Glob Health. 2019;9 : 10313. doi: 10.7189/jogh.09.010313 30992983
11 MOH. Health Sector Transformation Strategy. MOHGOVSA. 2017; 265–267.
12 Al-Hanawi MK , Khan SA , Al-Borie HM . Healthcare human resource development in Saudi Arabia: emerging challenges and opportunities—a critical review. Public Health Rev. 2019;40 : 1. doi: 10.1186/s40985-019-0112-4 30858991
13 OECD. Health for Everyone? OECD. OECD; 2019 Sep. doi: 10.1787/3c8385d0-en
14 Caswell A , Kenkre J . Primary Healthcare in Saudi Arabia: An Evaluation of Emergent Health Trends. Global Journal on Quality and Safety in Healthcare. 2021;4 : 96–104. doi: 10.36401/JQSH-20-33 37261060
15 GOV.SA. Health Care in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. In: Unified National Platform GOV.SA [Internet]. 2022 [cited 24 Nov 2023]. Available: https://www.my.gov.sa/wps/portal/snp/aboutksa/HealthCareInKSA
16 MOH. Health Sector Transformation Plan. MOHGOVSA. 2020. Available: Moh.gov.sa
17 Chowdhury S , Mok D , Leenen L . Transformation of health care and the new model of care in Saudi Arabia: Kingdom’s Vision 2030. J Med Life. 2021;2021 : 347–354. doi: 10.25122/jml-2021-0070 34377200
18 Showstack J , Lurie N , Larson EB , Rothman AA , Hassmiller SB . The future of primary care in KSA: WHY KSA IS RIPE FOR THE NEXT GENERATION OF PRIMARY CARE. 2022. Available: https://www.rolandberger.com/en/Insights/Publications/The-future-of-primary-care-in-the-Kingdom-of-Saudi-Arabia.html#:~:text=Why the Kingdom of Saudi,high levels of chronic disease.
19 Banjar FM , Karar HMO , Elamin F , Informatics H , Informatics H , Al- U , et al . Distribution of Selected Health Facilities and Resources in Saudi. The Egyptian Journal of Environmental Change. 2017;4 : 209–215. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316991735_DISTRIBUTION_OF_SELECTED_HEALTH_FACILITIES_AND_RESOURCES_IN_SAUDI_ARABIA_A_GRAPHICAL_AND_CARTOGRAPHICAL_PRESENTATION_EUROPEAN_JOURNAL_OF_PHARMACEUTICAL_AND_MEDICAL_RESEARCH
20 El-Farouk AE , Karar H , Banjar F . Geographical Distribution of Health Resources in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Is it Equitable? The Egyptian Journal of Environmental Change. 2016;8 .
21 Public Health England. An evidence summary of health inequalities in older populations in coastal and rural areas: Executive Summary and main messages. Public Health England. 2019. Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5d517ce3ed915d7646dea423/Health_Inequalities_in_Ageing_in_Rural_and_Coastal_Areas-Full_report.pdf
22 Jahan S , Al-Saigul AM . Primary health care research in Saudi Arabia: A quantitative analysis. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2017;11 : 9–15. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28539857%0Ahttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC5426411 28539857
23 Al Saffer Q , Al-Ghaith T , Alshehri A , Al-Mohammed R , Al Homidi S , Hamza MM , et al . The capacity of primary health care facilities in Saudi Arabia: infrastructure, services, drug availability, and human resources. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21 . doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06355-x 33879136
24 Saeed A , Bin Saeed A , AlAhmri FA . Saudi Arabia Health Systems Challenging and Future Transformation With Artificial Intelligence. Cureus. 2023;15 : 37826. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37826 37214025
25 MOH. MOH Statistical Yearbook—2022. In: MOH.GOV.SA [Internet]. 2022. Available: https://www.moh.gov.sa/en/Ministry/Statistics/book/Pages/default.aspx
26 Almalki M , Fitzgerald G , Clark M . Health care system in Saudi Arabia: an overview. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2011;17 : 784–793. doi: 10.26719/2011.17.10.784 22256414
27 Alshareef N , Angawi K , Moonesar IA . The State of Saudi Arabi Healthcare Service Delivery: Public Perceptions. J Health Inform Dev Ctries. 2020;14 : 1–13. Available: http://sdl.edu.sa/middleware/Default.aspx?USESDL=true&PublisherID=AllPublishers&BookURL=https://sdl.idm.oclc.org/login?url= http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=awr&AN=145251039&site=eds-live
28 Rahman R , Alsharqi OZ . What drove the health system reforms in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia? An analysis. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2019;34 : 100–110. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2584 30146763
29 Hone T , Macinko J , Millett C . Revisiting Alma-Ata: what is the role of primary health care in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals? The Lancet. 2018;392 : 1461–1472. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31829-4 30343860
30 Helal SMA , Elimam HA . Measuring the Efficiency of Health Services Areas in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA): A Comparative Study between the Years 2014 and 2006. Int J Econ Finance. 2017;9 : 172. doi: 10.5539/ijef.v9n4p172
31 Rahman R. The Privatization of Health Care System in Saudi Arabia. Health Serv Insights. 2020;13 : 117863292093449. doi: 10.1177/1178632920934497 32636636
32 MOH. Saudi Arabia’s digital healthcare landscape post-COVID-19. In: GHE Team [Internet]. 2021 [cited 29 Nov 2023]. Available: https://www.globalhealthsaudi.com/en/overview/saudi-news/Saudi-Arabias-digital-healthcare-landscape-post-COVID-19.html
33 Al-Hanawi MK . The healthcare system in Saudi Arabia: How can we best move forward with funding to protect equitable and accessible care for all? Int J Healthc. 2017;3 : 78. doi: 10.5430/ijh.v3n2p78
34 Chowdhury S , Chakraborty P pratim . Universal health coverage - There is more to it than meets the eye. J Family Med Prim Care. 2017;6 : 169–170. Available: http://www.jfmpc.com/article.asp?issn=2249-4863;year=2017;volume=6;issue=1;spage=169;epage=170;aulast=Faizi doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_13_17 29026777
35 AlSadrah SA . Electronic medical records and health care promotion in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2020;41 : 583–589. doi: 10.15537/smj.2020.6.25115 32518923
36 Balkhair A. National eHealth Program Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. 2022. Available: https://www.itu.int/ITU-D/cyb/events/2012/e-health/Nat_eH_Dev/Session 4/KSA-MOH-Presentation-SaudiArabia FINAL.pdf
37 The World Bank. Healthcare Market Assessment of the KSA. 2022.
38 Khalil MKM , Al-Eidi S , Al-Qaed M , AlSanad S . The future of integrative health and medicine in Saudi Arabia. Integr Med Res. 2018;7 : 316–321. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2018.06.004 30591884
39 Walston SL , Al-Harbi Y , Al-Omar B . The changing face of healthcare in Saudi Arabia. Ann Saudi Med. 2008;28 : 243–250. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2008.243 18596400
