
==== Front
Int Biomech
Int Biomech
International Biomechanics
2333-5432
Taylor & Francis

39244511
10.1080/23335432.2024.2396277
2396277
Version of Record
Research Article
Research Article
Accelerometer‐based daily physical activity monitoring in patients with postpartum sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a case–control study
S. M. M. HERMANS ET AL.
INTERNATIONAL BIOMECHANICS
Hermans Sem M. M. a b
Most Jasper a
Schotanus Martijn G.M. a b
van Santbrink Henk b c d
Curfs Inez a
van Hemert Wouter L. W. a
a Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center , Heerlen, the Netherlands
b Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University , Maastricht, the Netherlands
c Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center , Maastricht, the Netherlands
d Department of Neurosurgery, Zuyderland Medical Center , Heerlen, the Netherlands
CONTACT Sem M. M. Hermans semhermans@hotmail.com Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, 6130 MB SITTARD-GELEEN, Heerlen, The Netherlands
7 9 2024
2024
7 9 2024
11 1 611
Integra06 9 2024
Integra06 9 2024
02 1 2024
19 8 2024
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
2024
The Author(s)
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.

ABSTRACT

Patients with low back pain caused by sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction have an impaired quality of life, due to reported pain, disability and activity limitations. There is increasing evidence that minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion (MISJF) results in improvement in pain, disability and quality of life in these patients. Some studies have reported improvements in daily physical activity following MISJF but based on bias-prone self-reports. Our aim was to provide objective data on daily physical activity in patients with SIJ dysfunction. Daily physical activity in daily life of participants was measured using a triaxial accelerometer for seven consecutive days, before surgery and 3 months after surgery. Recorded daily activities were the daily number of events and total time spent sitting or lying, standing, walking, cycling, high-activity and number of steps and sit-to-stand transfers. The quality of life was assessed by the validated Dutch EQ-5D-5 L-questionnaire. No statistical differences were observed between daily physical activity in patients with SIJ dysfunction before and 3 months after MISJF. As compared to matched controls, high-intensity physical activity was lower in both the pre- and postoperative period (p = 0.007) for patients with SIJ dysfunction. The quality of life improved significantly in patients after MSIJF, from 0.418 to 0.797 (p = 0.021) but did not reach the level of controls (1.000). Daily physical activity in patients with postpartum SIJ dysfunction does not improve 3 months following MISJF, while quality of life does improve significantly. The discrepancy between these two observations is food for new research.

KEYWORDS

Sacroiliac joint
sacroiliac joint dysfunction
minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion
activity monitoring
spine
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction, a chronic musculoskeletal disease, leads to physical dysfunction and inactivity, negatively impacting quality of life (QoL) due to pain, disability, and activity limitations (Westerterp 2014). Daily physical activity is associated with improved physical and cognitive function, and reduces the risk of falls and even the risk of death (Powell et al. 2011; Warburton and Bredin 2017). To evaluate treatment efficacy for musculoskeletal diseases, it is important to monitor daily physical activity in individuals. Following other orthopedic treatments, e.g. hip and knee arthroplasties, daily physical activity improvement is surprisingly negligible, despite significant improvements in self-reported outcomes relating to daily physical activity (Elfving et al. 2007; Vitztum and Kelly 2015; Arnold et al. 2016; Almeida et al. 2018). This dissimilarity can potentially be explained by a large variability between patients, and by the fact that questionnaires are insensitive and prone to overestimation, due to subjectivity (Dunlop et al. 2011).

Current literature indicates that minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion (MISJF) is associated with improvements in pain, disability, and QoL for patients with SIJ dysfunction (Hermans et al. 2022; Chang et al. 2022). One can postulate that daily physical activity might also improve following MISJF. Studies on self-reported daily physical activity suggest improvements in daily physical activity (Darr et al. 2018; Martin et al. 2020), but objective data, of daily physical activity collected using gold-standard methodology in patients with SIJ dysfunction are unavailable.

In this case-controlled study, daily physical activity was measured in patients with postpartum SIJ dysfunction before and after MISJF and compared to age-, BMI-, gender- and postpartum-matched controls.

Material & methods

Participants

Between January 2021 and October 2021 10 patients scheduled for MISJF because of unilateral or bilateral SIJ dysfunction agreed to participate in this study. A case-controlled age and gender-matched healthy, postpartum control group (n = 11) was used for comparison (Table 1). All participants were informed about the study, and written informed consent was obtained prior to participation. This research has been approved by the IRB of the authors’ affiliated institution. Healthy participants were post-partum females aged 25 to 45 without history of SIJ dysfunction or other lower back related illness. All participants were asked to function according to their normal habits during daily physical activity monitoring.Table 1. Characteristics of subjects.

 	Patients (N = 8)	Controls (N = 11)	P-value	
Age (years)	43.0 (33.5:46.3)	35.0 (33.0:36.5)	0.138	
BMI (kg/m2)	25.4 (23.0:30.1)	23.1 (22.2:23.9)	0.09	
Number of previous pregnancies
1
2
3
4	1
4
2
1	6
4
1
-	0.173	
Years postpartum	5.5 (4.1:17.0)	4.7 (3.3:5.5)	0.258	
All values are median with interquartile range (1:3). P-value refers to Mann – Whitney U test or Chi-Square test for categorical variable (N pregnancies).

Outcome

For the patient group, daily physical activity tracking was performed between 12 and 1 week(s) before surgery and 3 months following surgery. Control patients were measured at least 6-month postpartum. Daily physical activity in the daily life of participants was measured using triaxial accelerometer (AM; GC Dataconcepts LLC, Waveland, USA) for seven consecutive days. The AM was attached onto the lateral side of the upper leg, left or right as preferred by the participant. Based on previously published principles, accelerometer data were processed and analysed using self-constructed algorithms for feature detection and activity classification written in Matlab (MATLAB R2010a, The MathWorks Inc., Natick, Massachusetts, USA) (Mathie et al. 2004; Preece et al. 2009; Verlaan et al. 2015). Activity parameters calculated were percentages of total time (duration) spent sitting or lying (inactive), standing, walking, cycling, high-activity (active) and number of steps and sit-to-stand transfers. The AM was only worn during waking hours with a minimum of 8 h a day and removed at night and during showering or other water activities. The quality of life was assessed by the validated Dutch EQ-5D-5 L-questionnaire (‘best health state’) and the EQ self-reported health status visual analogue scale (VAS) that records the respondent’s self-rated health (0–100, 100 being ‘best imaginable health state’) (Versteegh et al. 2016). EQ-5D-5 L-questionnaires were completed before the start of daily physical activity monitoring.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were carried out using IBM SPSS statistics 27. Descriptive data (means, SD, proportions) were generated for all variables. Statistically significant differences between both groups were analyzed with nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test, since the group sizes were small. To compare activity parameters between groups, Independent Samples Kruskal Wallis test was used. The chi-square test was used for categorical variables. A p-value ≤0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Eight patients completed this study. Two patients were excluded as the data were incomplete. The patient and control groups were statistically comparable regarding demographic characteristics (Table 1).

When comparing the patient group to the control group, patients exhibited a significantly lower quality of life prior to surgery. However, daily total physical activity and low-to-medium intensity physical activity did not differ significantly between the two groups (Figure 1). Only high-intensity physical activity was notably reduced in patients before surgery. Figure 1. Average daily physical activity (of more than 1% of total daily physical activity) across groups.

CTRL: controls

Following surgery, quality of life improved in patients 3 months postoperatively compared to preoperatively, from 0.460 to 0.797 (p = 0.021). EQ-5D-5 L VAS also improved from 53 to 70 (p = 0.011). These postoperative scores did not reach comparable levels to that of healthy controls (Table 2).Table 2. Quality of life results.

 	Preoperative (1)	Postoperative (2)	Controls (3)	P-value	
EQ-5D-5 L score	0.460
(0,291:0.516)	0.797 (0.691:0.818)	1.000 (1.000:1.000)	1-2: 0.021
1-3: < 0.001
2-3: < 0.001	
EQ-5D-5 L VAS	53
(35:61)	70
(58:85)	90
(85:93)	1-2: 0.011
1-3: < 0.001
2-3: 0.007	
All values are median with interquartile range (1:3). P-value refers to Mann – Whitney U test.

The percentage of each physical activity type contributing to total physical activity did not change significantly between pre- and post-operative groups (Figure 1). Activities accounting for less than 1% of total daily physical activity, such as slow walking, stair climbing, cycling, and high-intensity training (HIT), are not included in the figure. Additionally, daily physical activity varied greatly between individual patients (Figure 2).Figure 2. Detailed daily physical activity among individuals.

In patients, the changes before and after surgery are depicted. CTRL: controls, Op: operative

Discussion

This observational case-controlled cohort study showed that daily physical activity levels of patients with postpartum SIJ dysfunction did not increase 3 months after MISJF. This objective data also revealed that, during the study period, patients perform no high-intensity physical activity. Quality of life improved during the study period but did not reach level of healthy controls.

Currently, no literature exists on objective daily physical activity in patients with SIJ dysfunction. In a recent randomized trial, (Dengler et al. 2019) investigated several clinical outcomes of MISJF through questionnaires, including pain, walking distance, disability level and work status. All outcomes improved over the 24-month follow-up period. However, only pain, walking distance and disability level were already statistically significantly improved 3 months following MISJF. In contrast to work status, which was decreased 3 months postoperatively compared to preoperatively. Walking distance and work status further improved at 6-, 12- and 24-months follow-up, while pain and disability score remained stable at further follow-up moments. These data suggest that further functional improvement is expected beyond 3 months.

As QoL in patients with SIJ dysfunction is comparably low to that of patients with lumbar spinal conditions, comparing available objective data on daily physical activity might be insightful (Cher and Reckling 2015). A recent study by (Coronado et al. 2020) investigated daily physical activity in 53 patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery, 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months after surgery and found significant improvements over this time period. Another study by (Gilmore et al. 2019) stated that walking time in the first week after lumbar surgery is a predictor of significant improvement in function at 6 months postoperatively. In both studies, no preoperative comparison was available. In patients with osteoarthritis (e.g. hip and knee) requiring arthroplasty, pre- and postoperative data are available, and we know that daily physical activity does often not improve following surgery, while health-related QoL and social mobility do (Ethgen et al. 2004; Vogel et al. 2011; Stevens-Lapsley et al. 2011). These findings are in line with the findings of this study, as no statistically significant improvement in daily physical activity was observed in patients with SIJ dysfunction following MISJF, while EQ-5D-5 L score improved, however, not to the level of healthy controls. As enhanced QoL is a motivator for daily physical activity, one may expect that both improve (Gill et al. 2013). Potentially, the discrepancy between self-reported improvement and actual health-gain following surgery is overestimated by patients. Or perhaps the increase in QoL is a result of fewer pain complaints and not directly in enhanced daily physical activity.

In the current study group, mean daily physical activity parameters for patients did not differ pre- and postoperatively. This not only means that no improvement is observed, but to the contrary, no deterioration is observed either. This indicates that patients with SIJ dysfunction return to their preoperative daily physical activity level 3 months following surgery, thus recovered from surgery. These daily physical activity levels are no different from matched controls, except for high-intensity physical activity. The latter was the only parameter that differed between patients and matched controls. High-intensity physical activity comprises sport activities. The findings of this study therefore suggest that patients with postpartum SIJ dysfunction tend to avoid participating in sports. This observation prompts us to consider the intricate relationship between pain, physical activity, and lifestyle choices. It is plausible that pain and physical limitations play a significant role in this avoidance behavior, highlighting the profound impact of musculoskeletal conditions on daily functioning. Exploring participants’ engagement in sports activities before the onset of dysfunction could provide valuable insights into their current behavior.

Strength & limitations

A strength of our study is the sensor-based measurements, which gives a more reliable representation of daily physical activity compared to previous studies with self-reported outcomes (Dengler et al. 2019). The small sample size is a limitation of the current study, and therefore, this study is not appropriate for responder and non-responder analyses. The small sample size is mainly caused by strict inclusion criteria and because this study serves as a pilot study. To reduce heterogeneity, only patients with SIJ dysfunction, as a cause of previous pregnancy, were included. SIJ dysfunction of post-partum origin is a prevalent cause of SIJ dysfunction, as noted in our previously published cohort study (Raj et al. 2021). Another limitation to the current study is the short follow-up period. Three months postoperatively might be too early to expect large improvements in daily physical activity. Patients are still in their rehabilitation process at this time point. Furthermore, in a large number of patients, bilateral SIJ complaints are present, for which a second surgery is needed, where the contralateral SIJ is fused to further alleviate complaints. In these patients, further improvement can still be expected following a second surgery. Figure 2 also indicates that changes in daily physical activity individually differed following MISJF. Therefore, it might be interesting to further investigate associations between patient characteristics (e.g. BMI, age, duration of complaints) and daily physical activity response to MISJF. Regardless of these limitations, we were able to detect differences in daily physical activity between patients with post-partum SIJ dysfunction and matched controls, in terms of high-intensity activity.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that daily physical activity of patients with SIJ dysfunction is comparable to that of healthy matched controls, except for high-intensity physical activity which is lower in patients. Preoperative QoL is significantly lower in patients compared with matched controls. Postoperative daily physical activity in patients does not improve, while QoL does improve significantly, however not to the level of healthy individuals.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Mr Leon Weem and Mr Ivo Buil for their work in analyzing the raw data from the activity monitor.

Disclosure statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).

Authors’ contributions

SMMH: concept and design, writing. JM: data analysis, writing. MGMS: data analysis. HvS critical revision, supervision. IC: concept and design, critical revision, supervision. WLWvH: concept and design, critical revision, supervision.

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval for testing the participants was obtained by the Medical Ethics Committee (METC) of the Zuyderland Medical Center, the Netherlands (registration number: METCZ20210010).

Informed consent

All participants were informed about the study, and written informed consent was obtained prior to participation.
==== Refs
References

Almeida GJ, Khoja SS, Piva SR. 2018. Physical activity after total joint arthroplasty: a narrative review. OAJSM. 9 :55–68. doi: 10.2147/OAJSM.S124439.29588622
Arnold JB, Walters JL, Ferrar KE. 2016. Does physical activity increase after total hip or knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis? A systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 46 (6 ):431–442. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6449.27117726
Chang E, Rains C, Ali R, Wines RC, Kahwati LC. 2022. Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion for chronic sacroiliac joint pain: a systematic review. Spine J. 22 (8 ):1240–1253. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.01.005.35017057
Cher DJ, Reckling WC. 2015. Quality of life in preoperative patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction is at least as depressed as in other lumbar spinal conditions. MDER. 8 :395–403. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S92070.
Coronado RA, Master H, White DK, Pennings JS, Bird ML, Devin CJ, Buchowski MS, Mathis SL, McGirt MJ, Cheng JS, et al. 2020. Early postoperative physical activity and function: a descriptive case series study of 53 patients after lumbar spine surgery. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 21 (1 ):783. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03816-y.33246446
Darr E, Meyer SC, Whang PG, Kovalsky D, Frank C, Lockstadt H, Limoni R, Redmond A, Ploska P, Oh M, et al. 2018. Long-term prospective outcomes after minimally invasive trans-iliac sacroiliac joint fusion using triangular titanium implants. Med Dev. 11 :113–121. Published online 2018. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S160989.
Dengler J, Kools D, Pflugmacher R, Gasbarrini A, Prestamburgo D, Gaetani P, Cher D, Van Eeckhoven E, Annertz M, Sturesson B, et al. 2019. Randomized trial of sacroiliac joint arthrodesis compared with conservative management for chronic low back pain attributed to the sacroiliac joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 101 (5 ):400–411. Published online 2019. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00022.
Dunlop DD, Song J, Semanik PA, Chang RW, Sharma L, Bathon JM, Eaton CB, Hochberg MC, Jackson RD, Kwoh CK, et al. 2011. Objective physical activity measurement in the osteoarthritis initiative: are guidelines being met? Arthritis Rheumatism. 63 (11 ):3372–3382. doi: 10.1002/art.30562.21792835
Elfving B, Andersson T, Grooten WJA. 2007. Low levels of physical activity in back pain patients are associated with high levels of fear-avoidance beliefs and pain catastrophizing. Physiother Res Int. 12 (1 ):14–24. doi: 10.1002/pri.355.17432390
Ethgen O, Bruyère O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster JY. 2004. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am Vol. 86 (5 ):963–974. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200405000-00012.
Gill DL, Hammond CC, Reifsteck EJ, Jehu CM, Williams RA, Adams MM, Lange EH, Becofsky K, Rodriguez E, Shang Y-T. 2013. Physical activity and quality of life. J Prev Med Public Health. 46 (Suppl 1 ):S28–34. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.2013.46.S.S28.23412703
Gilmore SJ, Hahne AJ, Davidson M, McClelland JA. 2019. Predictors of substantial improvement in physical function six months after lumbar surgery: is early post-operative walking important? A prospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 20 (1 ):418. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2806-7.31506099
Hermans SMM, Knoef RJH, Schuermans VNE, Schotanus MGM, Nellensteijn JM, van Santbrink H, Curfs I, van Hemert WLW. 2022. Double-center observational study of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion for sacroiliac joint dysfunction: one-year results. J Orthop Surg Res. 17 (1 ). doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03466-x.
Martin CT, Haase L, Lender PA, Polly DW. 2020. Minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: the current evidence. Int J Spine Surg. 14 (s1 ):S20–S29. Published online 2020. doi: 10.14444/6072.
Mathie MJ, Celler BG, Lovell NH, Coster ACF. 2004. Classification of basic daily movements using a triaxial accelerometer. Med Biol Eng Comput. 42 (5 ):679–687. doi: 10.1007/BF02347551.15503970
Powell KE, Paluch AE, Blair SN. 2011. Physical activity for health: what kind? How much? How intense? On top of what?. Annu Rev Public Health. 32 (1 ):349–365. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-101151.21128761
Preece SJ, Goulermas JY, Kenney LPJ, Howard D, Meijer K, Crompton R. 2009. Activity identification using body-mounted sensors—a review of classification techniques. Physiol. Meas. 30 (4 ):R1–33. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/30/4/R01.19342767
Raj MA, Ampat G, Varacallo M. 2021. Sacroiliac Joint Pain. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2022 Jan. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470299/.
Stevens-Lapsley JE, Schenkman ML, Dayton MR. 2011. Comparison of self-reported knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score to performance measures in patients after total knee arthroplasty. PM & R. 3 (6 ):541–549. quiz 549. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2011.03.002.21665167
Verlaan L, Bolink SAAN, Van Laarhoven SN, Lipperts M, Heyligers IC, Grimm B, Senden R. 2015. Accelerometer-based physical activity monitoring in patients with knee osteoarthritis: objective and ambulatory assessment of actual physical activity during daily life circumstances. TOBEJ. 9 :157–163. doi: 10.2174/1874120701509010157.26312077
Versteegh MM, Vermeulen KM, Evers SMAA, de Wit GA, Prenger R, Stolk EA. 2016. Dutch tariff for the five-level version of EQ-5D. Value Health. 19 (4 ):343–352. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.01.003.27325326
Vitztum C, Kelly P. 2015. Physical activity in adolescents with an orthopaedic limitation: a review of the literature. Orthop Nurs. 34 (3 ):137–138. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000142.
Vogel LA, Carotenuto G, Basti JJ, Levine WN. 2011. Physical activity after total joint arthroplasty. Sports Health. 3 (5 ):441–450. doi: 10.1177/1941738111415826.23016041
Warburton DER, Bredin SSD. 2017. Health benefits of physical activity: a systematic review of current systematic reviews. Curr Opin Cardiol. 32 (5 ):541–556. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000437.28708630
Westerterp KR. 2014. Reliable assessment of physical activity in disease: an update on activity monitors. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 17 (5 ):401–406. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000080.25105926
