
==== Front
J Exp Orthop
J Exp Orthop
10.1002/(ISSN)2197-1153
JEO2
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
2197-1153
John Wiley and Sons Inc. Hoboken

10.1002/jeo2.70012
JEO270012
Original Paper
Original Paper
Knee temperature remains abnormal in patients successfully treated with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: An infrared thermography analysis
De Marziani Luca http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3714-058X
1
Orazi Simone 1
Boffa Angelo http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1523-6900
1 angeloboffa@libero.it

Andriolo Luca 1
Di Martino Alessandro http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2411-7508
1
Zaffagnini Stefano 1
Filardo Giuseppe 2 3
1 Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2 IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli Bologna Italy
2 Applied and Translational Research (ATR) Center IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli Bologna Italy
3 Faculty of Biomedical Sciences Università della Svizzera Italiana Lugano Switzerland
* Correspondence Angelo Boffa, Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica 2, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Giulio Cesare Pupilli, 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy.
Email: angeloboffa@libero.it

09 9 2024
7 2024
11 3 10.1002/jeo2.v11.3 e7001226 6 2024
01 7 2024
© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate if the operated knee environment remains abnormal in patients successfully treated with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL‐R).

Methods

Thirty asymptomatic patients were enrolled (28 men, 2 women, age 28.6 ± 6.54 years, body mass index: 24.9 ± 3.0 kg/m2) and evaluated at 42.2 ± 12.5 months after surgery. Patients were assessed with patient‐reported outcome measurements and with a triaxial accelerometer. The temperature of the knees as well as four regions of interest were evaluated with an infrared thermographic camera FLIR T1020 (FLIR® Systems) according to a standardised protocol including a baseline evaluation and further evaluations immediately after exercise and after 5, 10 and 20 min. The temperature of the ACL‐R knee was compared to that of the contralateral healthy knee for the purpose of the study.

Results

The mean temperature of the knee was higher (p = 0.010) for the ACL‐R knees (31.4 ± 1.4°C) compared to the healthy knees (31.1 ± 1.6°C), as well as for the patellar area (p = 0.005), the lateral area (p = 0.016) and the medial area (p = 0.014). The analysis of the response to the exercises of the ACL‐R knees showed similar trends to the healthy knees but higher temperature values at all time points (p < 0.05). Patients who underwent ACL‐R with concomitant meniscal treatment showed higher knee temperatures compared to ACL‐R knees without concomitant meniscal treatment after 5 (p = 0.047), 10 (p = 0.027) and 20 min (p = 0.048).

Conclusions

The temperature of asymptomatic knees previously treated with ACL‐R is higher than the contralateral healthy knee, both at rest and after exercise, with a further increase in knees that underwent both ACL‐R and meniscal treatment. These results suggest an inflammatory state persisting years after the surgery, which could predispose to the early onset of knee degeneration.

Level of Evidence

III, Case–control study.

ACL
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
inflammation
infrared thermography
knee
None source-schema-version-number2.0
cover-dateJuly 2024
details-of-publishers-convertorConverter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.4.8 mode:remove_FC converted:09.09.2024
De Marziani, L. , Orazi, S. , Boffa, A. , Andriolo, L. , Di Martino, A. , Zaffagnini, S. et al. (2024) Knee temperature remains abnormal in patients successfully treated with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: An infrared thermography analysis. Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, 11 , e70012. 10.1002/jeo2.70012
==== Body
pmcAbbreviations

ACL anterior cruciate ligament

ACL‐R anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction;

BMI body mass index

EQ‐VAS EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale

IKDC International Knee Documentation Committee

KOOS Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score

OA osteoarthritis

PROM patient‐reported outcome measurement

ROI region of interest

VAS visual analogue scale

INTRODUCTION

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) treatment results improved over the years, leading to overall satisfying results both in terms of symptom resolution and functional activity recovery [9, 25, 63]. Nonetheless, an increased risk of early knee osteoarthritis (OA) can remain [1, 11]. The presence of cartilage lesions as well as concurrent or subsequent meniscal lesions are considered possible aspects leading to a worse outcome and joint degeneration [21]. Moreover, the ACL injury triggers an increase of inflammatory cytokines in the joint [38] and ACL reconstruction (ACL‐R) constitutes a further insult to the already compromised joint [38]. While the specific reasons leading to the high prevalence of joint degeneration remain debated and are likely multifactorial, detecting early stages of joint environment abnormalities could be useful to understand the evolution of ACL reconstructed knees, and possibly to better manage these patients based on their joint status.

Infrared thermography is a valuable method for non‐invasively assessing body temperature, enabling the evaluation of specific thermal patterns in body parts that could be affected by conditions activating the inflammatory cascade [47]. Recent technical advancements led to extended thermography use across several medical fields, ranging from wound and ulcer monitoring to breast cancer screening [45]. In orthopaedics, thermography has proven to be a useful tool for studying musculoskeletal pathologies, such as tendon disorders, inflammatory joint conditions, and even infection in total knee arthroplasty [16, 42, 46, 50, 57, 59]. Previous studies demonstrated thermography's ability to highlight joint inflammation and early knee OA stages [13, 15]. However, there is currently no evidence on thermographic patterns of knees successfully treated with ACL‐R. The assessment of knees treated with ACL‐R using infrared thermography could be of clinical relevance by detecting an increase in temperature due to underlying inflammation, bringing to light a possibly neglected inflammatory process that could potentially contribute to early onset knee OA.

The aim of this study was to evaluate patients successfully treated with ACL‐R to investigate if the operated knee environment remains abnormal as detected by a temperature increase using infrared thermography. The hypothesis of this study was that the joint environment remains altered even in young asymptomatic patients successfully treated with ACL‐R.

METHODS

Study design and selection criteria

Male or female patients aged between 18 and 40, with a previous unilateral ACL‐R between 2 and 5 years before the evaluation, without a history of subjective instability or pain in the treated knee after surgery, with a subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) value ≥90, and with a contralateral healthy knee (no history of trauma or previous surgery and a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain = 0) were included in the study. The following exclusion criteria were used: body mass index (BMI) <18.5 or >30 kg/m2, presence of neoplasms, dermatological and vascular conditions, metabolic disorders of the thyroid, cardiovascular diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory arthropathy, haematological diseases, infections, immunodepression, antidepressant, anticoagulants or antiaggregant therapy, and use of nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs in the 5 days before the investigation. Patients were recruited through an institutional announcement. A total of 102 patients received the information about the study. Among these patients, 72 were excluded because they did not match the inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Ethical aspects

This study was approved by the local Ethics Committee of the IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Italy (no. 359/2023/Sper/IOR). Patients previously treated with ACL‐R were enroled and evaluated by orthopaedic physicians between July 2023 and February 2024 in a research outpatient clinic focused on sports medicine and knee osteoarthritis. Informed consent was obtained from each patient for study participation.

Patients' characteristics and evaluation

Thirty consecutive patients previously treated with ACL‐R were enroled according to the inclusion/exclusion criteria and evaluated at a mean time after surgery of 42.2 ± 12.5 months. Among them, 2 were women and 28 were men, with a mean age of 28.6 ± 6.48 years and a mean BMI of 24.9 ± 3.0 Kg/m2. After enrolment in the study and before the infrared thermography acquisition of the ACL‐R and contralateral healthy knee, patients were clinically evaluated through knee‐specific patient‐reported outcome measurements (PROMs) including the IKDC subjective and objective scores [29], the Marx Activity Rating Scale [40], the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) sub‐scales [48], the VAS for pain, the EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ‐VAS) [20] and the Tegner score [58]. Subjective clinical questionnaires were compiled by patients with the support of the clinician, while the IKDC objective score was evaluated by the clinician. In addition, knee laxity differences between the ACL‐R knee and contralateral healthy knee were assessed in all patients through the Lachman and pivot shift tests using a triaxial accelerometer, the Kinematic Rapid Assessment (KiRA– OrthoKey). Finally, the temperature of the knees was evaluated with thermography imaging as reported below. All demographic and clinical patients’ characteristics are reported in Table 1.

Table 1 Included patients' characteristics.

Demographic characteristics	
Sex (W/M)	2/28	
Age (years)	28.6 ± 6.4	
BMI (kg/m2)	24.9 ± 3.0	
Smoke (yes/no)	14/16	
Time injury to surgery (months)	13.4 ± 11.1	
Time after surgery (months)	42.2 ± 12.5	
Concomitant meniscal tear (yes/no)	20/10	
Meniscal treatment	Meniscal repair: 18

Partial meniscectomy: 2

	
Clinical characteristics	
IKDC Subjective score	95.1 ± 3.4	
IKDC Objective score	A: 30	
VAS pain	0.1 ± 0.3	
KOOS Pain	94.2 ± 6.5	
KOOS Symptoms	84.5 ± 10.7	
KOOS ADL	98.4 ± 2.8	
KOOS QoL	89.9 ± 7.4	
KOOS Sport/Rec	87.3 ± 12.3	
Marx Activity Rating Scale	9.8 ± 4.9	
Tegner score	5.6 ± 1.7	
Laxity evaluation	
Lachman (mm) difference (ACL‐R vs. healthy knee)	0.5 ± 2.1	
Pivot shift (m/s2) difference (ACL‐R vs. healthy knee)	0.1 ± 1.3	
Note: Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.

Abbreviations: ACL‐R, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; ADL, activities of daily living; BMI, body mass index; IKDC, International Knee Documentation Committee; KOOS, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; M, male; QoL, quality of life; Sport/Rec, function in sport and recreation; VAS, visual analogue scale; W, women.

John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Infrared thermography procedure and analysis

Infrared imaging evaluation was acquired in a dedicated outpatient clinic shielded from direct sunlight and with a temperature controlled and set at 23.0°C and a mean humidity of 45 ± 3% [13]. In order to minimise the circadian variation of the temperature, image acquisition was always performed in the same time slot between 15:00 and 18:00. According to the American Academy of Thermology guidelines [52], patients were asked to sit for 15 min with light clothing on the top to speed up the thermalisation and without touching their knee before the thermal image acquisition. The participants were asked to stand on a designated floor map. The thermograms of knees were conducted using a thermographic camera FLIR T1020 (FLIR® Systems), which has 1024 × 768 pixels of resolution and a thermal sensitivity of 0.02°C. The camera was positioned at a 1‐m distance from the subject, positioned perpendicular to the knee and adjusted to their patellar height. An anterior view image was obtained for each patient using the autofocus modality (T0).

To explore the behaviour of the skin temperature of both ACL‐R and contralateral healthy knees in response to exercise, an alternating single‐leg squat exercise with a distance of 70 cm was performed for 2 min at the rate of one eccentric and one concentric phase of the single leg every 2 s (1 s eccentric phase and 1 s concentric phase). A metronome was used to standardise pacing. Immediately after performing this exercise, the patient was positioned on the floor map and a second anterior view image was acquired (T1). Afterwards, the patient waited in the room for 5 min in a sitting position without touching or moving the lower limbs. At the end of this resting period, the patient was positioned on the floor map and a third anterior view image was acquired (T2). The same protocol was executed 10 min (T3) and 20 min (T4) after the exercise. Finally, maintaining the same position of the knee, an anatomical marker (circular adhesive of 2 cm in diameter) was placed at the centre of the patella to obtain a further image in the anterior view to facilitate the precise subsequent location of the patella in the analysis of the previous infrared images.

For the image analysis process, the five anterior images acquired at T0, T1, T2, T3 and T4 were aligned side by side with the image with the patellar marker on the computer screen, and, using the marked image as a guide, a template indicating the regions of interest (ROIs) was centred over the patella of each unmarked image. The ROIs were defined as follows: the patellar area was a square of 6 cm in width centred on the patella, the ‘suprapatellar’ area was the area 3 cm over the patella; and the ‘medial’ and ‘lateral’ areas were the regions 3 cm under the patella and on its medial and lateral sides, respectively [13]. The sum of the four ROIs has been defined as the ‘total knee temperature’. The mean temperatures were extracted using the software ResearchIR (FLIR® Systems) for the overall knee area and for the four ROIs: patella, suprapatellar, medial and lateral.

The thermographic images obtained for both the ACL‐R and contralateral healthy knees were compared to analyse differences between the operated and non‐operated joints. Moreover, correlations between the thermographic images and patient and joint characteristics were investigated.

Statistical analysis

All quantitative data were expressed in terms of the mean and the standard deviation of the mean; the categorical data were expressed as frequency and percentages. The Shapiro–Wilk test was performed to test the normality of continuous variables. The Levene test was used to assess the homogeneity of the variances. The Paired T test was performed to assess the temperature differences between the operated and non‐operated joints. The ANOVA repeated measures followed by the Sidak post hoc pairwise comparisons were performed to assess the temperature differences along the follow‐up after the exercises. One‐way ANOVA with the Scheffé post hoc pairwise analysis was performed to assess the temperature differences among the areas when the Levene test for homogeneity of variances was not significant (p < 0.05); otherwise, the Kruskal−Wallis test with the non‐parametric post hoc pairwise Dunnet test was used. For all tests, p < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

The mean temperature of the total joint was 31.4 ± 1.4°C for the ACL‐R knees and 31.1 ± 1.6°C for the healthy knees. The mean temperature of the total knee was significantly higher for the ACL‐R knee compared to the healthy knee (p = 0.010) (Figure 1). Analysing the mean temperature of the different areas, the mean temperature of the ACL‐R knee was significantly higher compared to the healthy knee for the patellar area (31.0 ± 1.6°C vs. 30.7 ± 1.8°C; p = 0.005), the lateral area (31.2 ± 1.2°C vs. 30.9 ± 1.4°C; p = 0.016) and the medial area (31.5 ± 1.5°C vs. 31.2 ± 1.7°C; p = 0.014), while no statistically significant differences were found for the suprapatellar area (31.6 ± 1.4 vs. 31.5 ± 1.5; n.s.).

Figure 1 Twenty‐four‐year‐old female patient, 30 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (Tegner 7, 93 IKDC): the treated knee (left image) presents a higher temperature compared to the contralateral healthy knee. Both knees were analysed through the same regions of interest: L, lateral; M, medial; P, patella; S, suprapatellar. IKDC, International Knee Documentation Committee.

The analysis of the response to the exercises showed a significant reduction of the total knee temperature of the ACL‐R knee from the baseline value of 31.4 ± 1.4 to 30.5 ± 1.2 at T1 (p < 0.0005). After 5 min (T2), the total knee temperature of the ACL‐R knee significantly increased compared to T1 (31.0 ± 1.2; p < 0.0005), returning to values comparable to baseline (n.s.). After 10 and 20 min (T3 and T4), the total knee temperature remained stable compared to T2 (n.s.) and with values comparable to baseline (n.s.). The analysis of the four ROIs showed similar trends for all areas, as reported in Table 2. A similar trend for the total knee temperature and the four ROIs has been observed for the contralateral healthy knee, as reported in Figure 2.

Table 2 Temperatures of the evaluated knee areas at baseline and after exercise.

 	Area	ACL‐R knee	Healthy knee	p Value	
T0 (baseline)	Total knee	31.4 ± 1.4b	31.1 ± 1.6b	0.010	
Patella	31.0 ± 1.6b	30.7 ± 1.8b	0.005	
Lateral	31.2 ± 1.2b	30.9 ± 1.4b	0.016	
Medial	31.5 ± 1.5b	31.2 ± 1.7b	0.014	
Suprapatellar	31.6 ± 1.4b	31.5 ± 1.5b	n.s.	
T1 (post‐exercise)	Total knee	30.5 ± 1.2a	30.3 ± 1.4a	0.012	
Patella	30.2 ± 1.4a	29.9 ± 1.6a	0.008	
Lateral	30.3 ± 1.1a	30.1 ± 1.2a	0.049	
Medial	30.6 ± 1.3a	30.4 ± 1.4a	n.s.	
Suprapatellar	30.7 ± 1.2a	30.6 ± 1.2a	n.s.	
T2 (5 min)	Total knee	31.0 ± 1.2b	30.8 ± 1.3b	0.032	
Patella	30.7 ± 1.4b	30.4 ± 1.6b	0.002	
Lateral	30.6 ± 0.9a,b	30.5 ± 1.1a,b	n.s.	
Medial	31.0 ± 1.3a,b	30.8 ± 1.4a,b	0.003	
Suprapatellar	30.5 ± 1.3b	30.6 ± 1.1b	n.s.	
T3 (10 min)	Total knee	31.1 ± 1.1b	30.9 ± 1.4b	0.006	
Patella	30.8 ± 1.4b	30.4 ± 1.6b	0.001	
Lateral	30.7 ± 1.2a,b	30.6 ± 1.4b	n.s.	
Medial	31.0 ± 1.3a,b	30.7 ± 1.5a,b	0.012	
Suprapatellar	31.7 ± 1.1b	31.6 ± 1.2b	n.s.	
T4 (20 min)	Total knee	31.1 ± 1.8b	30.9 ± 1.4b	0.006	
Patella	30.9 ± 1.4b	30.4 ± 1.7b	0.001	
Lateral	30.8 ± 1.0a,b	30.6 ± 1.2b	n.s.	
Medial	31.1 ± 1.3a,b	30.8 ± 1.5a,b	0.012	
Suprapatellar	31.7 ± 1.9b	31.6 ± 2.0b	n.s.	
Note: T0 (baseline), T1 (immediately after the exercise), T2 (after 5 min), T3 (after 10 min) and T4 (after 20 min).

Abbreviation: ACL‐R, anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

a p < 0.05 compared to T0.

b p < 0.05 compared to T1.

John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Figure 2 Mean total knee temperature in response to exercise for the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL‐R) knee and the contralateral healthy knee at T0 (baseline), T1 (immediately after the exercise), T2 (after 5 min), T3 (after 10 min) and T4 (after 20 min). Presented as mean values and 95% CI of the mean. CI, confidence interval.

The analysis of the response to the exercise at different times confirmed the higher temperatures in ACL‐R knees compared to the contralateral healthy knees. Moreover, the ACL‐R knees had a higher mean total temperature at all evaluations post‐exercise compared to the healthy knee at T1 (30.5 ± 1.2 vs. 30.3 ± 1.4; p = 0.012), T2 (31.0 ± 1.2 vs. 30.8 ± 1.3; p = 0.032), T3 (31.1 ± 1.1 vs. 30.9 ± 1.4; p = 0.006) and T4 (31.1 ± 1.8 vs. 30.9 ± 1.4; p = 0.006). More details on the mean temperatures of the four ROIs at the different evaluations post‐exercise are reported in Table 2.

The concomitant treatment of meniscal lesions at ACL‐R time was shown to influence the total knee temperature of the ACL‐R knees after exercise (Figure 3). Although there were no significant differences at baseline and T1 (all p = n.s.), ACL‐R knees with concomitant meniscal treatment showed higher total knee temperatures compared to ACL‐R knees without concomitant meniscal treatment at T2 (30.3 ± 1.1 vs. 31.3 ± 1.2; p = 0.047), T3 (30.4 ± 0.9 vs. 31.4 ± 1.1; p = 0.027) and T4 (30.5 ± 1.0 vs. 31.4 ± 1.2; p = 0.048).

Figure 3 Mean total knee temperature in response to exercise for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL‐R) knees with concomitant meniscal lesions and ACL‐R knees without concomitant meniscal lesions at T0 (baseline), T1 (immediately after the exercise), T2 (after 5 min), T3 (after 10 min) and T4 (after 20 min). Presented as mean values and 95% CI of the mean. CI, confidence interval.

DISCUSSION

The main finding of this study is that the temperature of asymptomatic knees previously treated with ACL‐R is higher than that of the contralateral healthy knee. The temperature response to exercise is similar between ACL‐R knees and healthy knees, although the temperature remains higher in ACL‐R knees, and the presence of concomitant meniscal lesions further increases the temperature after the exercise. These results could indicate an inflammatory state persisting years after the ACL surgery, which could predispose patients to the early onset of knee OA.

The use of infrared thermography for the assessment of musculoskeletal diseases is increasing due to the ease of assessing the temperature of a specific body region [37, 51]. In recent years, infrared thermography has been proposed in clinical research as a new method to assess joint inflammation in several joints including the knee [13, 14, 15]. Articular inflammation also plays a role in patients undergoing ACL‐R surgery. Several studies documented an increase in biomarkers of inflammation and cartilage degradation products following ACL‐R [7, 34]. After the procedure, joint inflammation increases immediately and, although concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines begin to decrease 4 weeks later, they do not return to normal preoperative levels after the first month [27, 34]. This inflammatory state could be detected not only in the first post‐operative period but even years later. Larsson et al. [38] found an increase in proinflammatory cytokines in synovial fluid up to 5 years after reconstruction, demonstrating a persisting joint homoeostasis alteration following ACL‐R surgery.

The main aim of ACL‐R is to restore the biomechanics of the knee, since restoring normal kinematics reduces aberrant loading and stress on the joint structures [3, 28, 53]. Nevertheless, some studies reported partial restoration, while others observed continued persistent abnormalities, especially in terms of tibia position and rotation [2, 33]. Biomechanical alterations can cause increased stress to the cartilage layer, resulting in the production of proinflammatory cytokines and cartilage degradation products [5, 44]. In a study by Pietrosimone et al. on ACL‐R patients, the altered joint load has been linked to higher levels of degenerative enzymes and proinflammatory cytokines [44]. In another study by Erhart‐Hledik et al., ACL‐R patients showed how after exercise the levels of cartilage degradation products were similar to those of patients with OA, hence suggesting an alteration in the metabolic activity of chondrocytes following physical exercise [17]. Furthermore, biomechanical alterations after ACL‐R have been found not only in the tibiofemoral but also in the patellofemoral joint [62]. These altered patellofemoral joint loads can lead to cartilage thinning and softening, thus making it more susceptible to degeneration [12, 35]. This constitutes an unfavourable combination that could play a role in initiating or accelerating joint degenerative processes [49]. Therefore, the prolonged inflammatory state after ACL‐R could contribute to the cartilage degeneration observed following ACL‐R and promote the progression of OA [16, 39, 48, 55]. In this scenario, the early identification of the presence of inflammation and joint degeneration in asymptomatic patients previously treated with ACL‐R could provide useful information, and infrared thermography can represent a valid tool to indirectly detect joint inflammation in these patients.

The current study demonstrated that the temperature of knees previously treated with ACL‐R assessed with infrared thermography is 0.3°C higher than the contralateral healthy knees. It is known that the human healthy body tends to thermal symmetry and some preliminary studies reported asymmetries of 0.3°C as significant, even though the clinical relevance of this difference has yet to be established [24]. In this light, the higher temperature over two years after surgery of knees previously treated with ACL‐R is of particular interest, as it could underline persisting homoeostatic alterations even in a selected group of patients who did not exhibit any symptoms and had returned to their sports activities after the surgery. Despite the absence of symptoms in the operated knee, the higher temperature compared to the healthy contralateral knee supports the presence of an underlying inflammatory state, although not clinically detectable. In fact, all evaluated ACL‐R knees had an IKDC objective score graded as A, besides presenting no symptoms and allowing patients to perform their functional activities. While the increase in skin temperature of the knee could support the hypothesis of an underlying inflammatory state, future research should confirm this aspect.

The temperature difference was also confirmed in response to physical exercise, which could provide interesting information on the behaviour of operated joints after physical activity. The current study demonstrated that the skin temperature of knees with ACL‐R had a similar response to exercise compared to the healthy one after 2 min of exercise, with an initial decrease in temperature immediately following exercise, followed by a subsequent gradual return to the baseline temperature value, but always with higher temperature values. This trend confirmed the skin temperature response to the exercise already demonstrated in previous studies, due to redistribution of the blood circulation with consequent cutaneous vasoconstriction and vasodilation at the muscular level, which causes an initial reduction in skin temperature, followed by a slow return to the baseline values [14, 30]. In this regard, this response to exercise was found in a previous study on 13 healthy young volunteers (average age 25 years) [22]. The authors analysed the response to physical exercise using infrared thermography, showing a peak reduction in temperature between 2 and 3 min from the start of exercise and a subsequent gradual increase in temperature. While the trend over time in ACL‐R patients was similar to the healthy volunteers, some differences can be observed when comparing it with those found in 60 patients with knee OA (average age 61.4 years) [14]. In fact, while in the current study, the temperature of the ACL‐R and healthy knees returned to baseline values 5 min after the end of the exercise, the temperature of knee OA patients remained lower at the same time compared to baseline values. This difference between the studies could be justified by the different ages of the participants and the different activity levels performed, as well as by possible differences in the vascular response to exercise, and of the inflammatory and degenerative processes characterising ACL‐R patients from those with established OA, leading to different skin temperatures [18, 31, 36].

The analysis of the response to exercise in ACL‐R knees also demonstrated an influence of previously treated meniscal lesions on the knee temperature. Concomitant meniscal lesions further increased the skin temperature in ACL‐R knees after exercise. Patients with previously treated meniscal tears demonstrated higher skin temperatures at 5, 10 and 20 min after the end of the exercise. This could be related to the altered intra‐articular environment with consequent joint inflammation [43]. When the integrity of the meniscus is compromised, the contact pressure on the cartilage increases and the contact area decreases [10, 56]. Cartilage overload induces morphological, molecular and mechanical changes in cells and cartilage matrix leading to softening, fibrillation, ulceration and cartilage loss [6, 41]. It has also been shown that these biomechanical changes cause an alteration of the joint environment with the production of proinflammatory cytokines that contribute to further cartilage degeneration and structural damage [6, 23, 26, 32]. Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that the meniscus plays not only a biomechanical role but also a biological role [19, 54] through the increase in the production of proinflammatory mediators and enzymes capable of degrading the matrix [43]. This, together with the lack of cartilage protection, could be detrimental for the knee, especially during sporting activity due to the greater stress on the articular surface, which could favour joint inflammation and consequently early joint degeneration, as detected by the thermographic analysis [4, 8, 60].

This study presents some limitations. Although this is the first study evaluating the thermal pattern and response to exercise in knees previously treated with ACL‐R, the sample size is low and heterogeneous, and factors like sex and others may influence the obtained findings, and thus future studies with larger populations are needed to confirm the observed results. However, healthy contralateral knees were used as a reference, thus providing internal control and reducing the variability of the analysed sample. Moreover, the small patient cohort could impair the statistical power to detect the specific influence of different meniscal procedures on knee temperature. Future studies should better investigate these aspects and evaluate how the presence of previous meniscal lesions and their specific treatment can influence patients' knee temperature. Furthermore, objective and subjective clinical evaluations and knee laxity analysis with an accelerometer have been performed, showing an optimal clinical knee condition and good neo‐ligament retention, thus restricting the analysis to a homogeneous population with successful ACL‐R, where the detection of persisting changes is therefore even more meaningful. Another limitation is the lack of biomarker or imaging assessments, such as X‐rays and magnetic resonance, which can allow to directly evaluate the cytokines responsible for driving the inflammatory status of the ACL‐R knee and the presence of early degenerative changes. Future studies should confirm the usefulness of infrared thermography in detecting joint inflammation correlating its results with those obtained with biomarker evaluations or imaging analysis. Finally, the method of acquiring and evaluating thermographic images was based on previous literature, but nowadays, no method has been established as the gold standard in this field, and controversial results have been reported on the potential of this technology to properly document joint disease‐related findings, as in the study of Vargas et al. who reported no correlation between OA level and skin temperature [61]. It is possible that different settings, different cameras, lenses and devices may be more suitable for these evaluations in clinical practice. Therefore, future studies should help to further standardise the use of thermography for the evaluation of patients with ACL‐R to confirm its potential in identifying different patterns both in the research context and in clinical practice. This could have the potential of favouring better management of ACL‐R patient rehabilitation and return to sport to identify early degenerative joint changes and possibly to help develop and target treatments to interrupt inflammatory processes and early degenerative changes after ACL‐R surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that the temperature of asymptomatic knees previously treated with ACL‐R is higher than that of the contralateral healthy knee. The temperature response trend to exercise is similar between ACL‐R knees and healthy knees, although the temperature remains higher in ACL‐R knees. The presence of concomitant meniscal lesions further increases the temperature after the exercise. These results could indicate an inflammatory state persisting years after the ACL surgery. Future studies should investigate the clinical relevance of these findings in terms of clinical outcomes and early onset of knee OA.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conceptualisation: Giuseppe Filardo. Methodology: Luca De Marziani, Simone Orazi, Luca Andriolo and Alessandro Di Martino. Data curation: Luca De Marziani and Angelo Boffa. Writing—original draft preparation: Luca De Marziani and Angelo Boffa. Writing—review and editing: Alessandro Di Martino, Luca Andriolo and Giuseppe Filardo. Supervision: Giuseppe Filardo and Stefano Zaffagnini. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

Stefano Zaffagnini reports non‐financial support from personal fees from I+SRL and grants from Fidia Farmaceutici SPA, Cartiheal Ltd., IGEA clinical biophysics, BIOMET and Kensey Nash outside the submitted work. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

ETHICS STATEMENT

The study was approved by the hospital Ethics Committee of the IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy (protocol number 359/2023/Sper/IOR). Informed consent of all patients was obtained.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to acknowledge Elettra Pignotti for her contribution to the statistical analysis. Open access funding provided by BIBLIOSAN.
==== Refs
REFERENCES

1 Ajuied, A. , Wong, F. , Smith, C. , Norris, M. , Earnshaw, P. , Back, D. et al. (2014) Anterior cruciate ligament injury and radiologic progression of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 42 (9 ), 2242–2252. Available from: 10.1177/0363546513508376 24214929
2 Amano, K. , Pedoia, V. , Su, F. , Souza, R.B. , Li, X. & Ma, C.B. (2016) Persistent biomechanical alterations after ACL reconstruction are associated with early cartilage matrix changes detected by quantitative MR. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 4 (4 ), 2325967116644421. Available from: 10.1177/2325967116644421 27169133
3 Andriacchi, T.P. & Mündermann, A. (2006) The role of ambulatory mechanics in the initiation and progression of knee osteoarthritis. Current Opinion in Rheumatology, 18 (5 ), 514–518. Available from: 10.1097/01.bor.0000240365.16842.4e 16896293
4 Arakawa, K. , Takahata, K. , Enomoto, S. , Oka, Y. , Ozone, K. , Nakagaki, S. et al. (2022) The difference in joint instability affects the onset of cartilage degeneration or subchondral bone changes. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 30 (3 ), 451–460. Available from: 10.1016/j.joca.2021.12.002 34906679
5 Armitano‐Lago, C. , Evans‐Pickett, A. , Davis‐Wilson, H. , Munsch, A. , Longobardi, L. , Willcockson, H. et al. (2024) Modifying loading during gait leads to biochemical changes in serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein concentrations in a subgroup of individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clinical Rheumatology, 43 (4 ), 1363–1373. Available from: 10.1007/s10067-024-06898-4 38358589
6 Bader, D.L. , Salter, D.M. & Chowdhury, T.T. (2011) Biomechanical influence of cartilage homeostasis in health and disease. Arthritis, 2011 , 979032. Available from: 10.1155/2011/979032 22046527
7 Bigoni, M. , Turati, M. , Gandolla, M. , Sacerdote, P. , Piatti, M. , Castelnuovo, A. et al. (2016) Effects of ACL reconstructive surgery on temporal variations of cytokine levels in synovial fluid. Mediators of Inflammation, 2016 , 1–7. Available from: 10.1155/2016/8243601
8 Blalock, D. , Miller, A. , Tilley, M. & Wang, J. (2015) Joint instability and osteoarthritis. Clinical Medicine Insights: Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders, 8 , CMAMD.S22147. Available from: 10.4137/CMAMD.S22147
9 Brown, C.A. , McAdams, T.R. , Harris, A.H.S. , Maffulli, N. & Safran, M.R. (2013) ACL reconstruction in patients aged 40 years and older: a systematic review and introduction of a new methodology score for ACL studies. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 41 (9 ), 2181–2190. Available from: 10.1177/0363546513481947 23548805
10 Brown, M.J. , Farrell, J.P. , Kluczynski, M.A. & Marzo, J.M. (2016) Biomechanical effects of a horizontal medial meniscal tear and subsequent leaflet resection. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 44 (4 ), 850–854. Available from: 10.1177/0363546515623782 26818450
11 Cuzzolin, M. , Previtali, D. , Zaffagnini, S. , Deabate, L. , Candrian, C. & Filardo, G. (2021) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction versus nonoperative treatment: better function and less secondary meniscectomies but no difference in knee osteoarthritis—a meta‐analysis. Cartilage, 13 (1_suppl ), 1658S–1670S. Available from: 10.1177/19476035211046041 34929763
12 De Marziani, L. , Boffa, A. , Andriolo, L. , Di Martino, A. , Filardo, G. & Zaffagnini, S. (2024) Chitosan‐based scaffold augmentation to microfractures: stable results at mid‐term follow‐up in patients with patellar cartilage lesions. Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, 11 (3 ), e12065. Available from: 10.1002/jeo2.12065 38911189
13 De Marziani, L. , Boffa, A. , Angelelli, L. , Andriolo, L. , Di Martino, A. , Zaffagnini, S. et al. (2023) Infrared thermography in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis: joint temperature differs based on patient and pain characteristics. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12 (6 ), 2319. Available from: 10.3390/jcm12062319 36983319
14 De Marziani, L. , Boffa, A. , Orazi, S. , Andriolo, L. , Di Martino, A. , Zaffagnini, S. et al. (2023) Joint response to exercise is affected by knee osteoarthritis: an infrared thermography analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12 (10 ), 3399. Available from: 10.3390/jcm12103399 37240505
15 Denoble, A.E. , Hall, N. , Pieper, C.F. & Kraus, V.B. (2010) Patellar skin surface temperature by thermography reflects knee osteoarthritis severity. Clinical Medicine Insights: Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders, 3 , CMAMD.S5916. Available from: 10.4137/CMAMD.S5916
16 Dias de Lacerda, A.P. , Rodrigues de Andrade, P. , Kamonseki, D.H. , Parizotto, N.A. , Alves da Silva, A.S. , Bernardo de Medeiros, L. et al. (2022) Accuracy of infrared thermography in detecting tendinopathy: a systematic review with meta‐analysis. Physical Therapy in Sport, 58 , 117–125. Available from: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2022.10.005 36274313
17 Erhart‐Hledik, J.C. , Titchenal, M.R. , Migliore, E. , Asay, J.L. , Andriacchi, T.P. & Chu, C.R. (2022) Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein responses to a mechanical stimulus associate with ambulatory loading in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 40 (4 ), 791–798. Available from: 10.1002/jor.25121 34185322
18 Escamilla‐Galindo, V.L. , Estal‐Martínez, A. , Adamczyk, J.G. , Brito, C.J. , Arnaiz‐Lastras, J. & Sillero‐Quintana, M. (2017) Skin temperature response to unilateral training measured with infrared thermography. Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation, 13 (5 ), 526–534. Available from: 10.12965/jer.1735046.523 29114526
19 Favero, M. , Belluzzi, E. , Trisolino, G. , Goldring, M.B. , Goldring, S.R. , Cigolotti, A. et al. (2019) Inflammatory molecules produced by meniscus and synovium in early and end‐stage osteoarthritis: a coculture study. Journal of Cellular Physiology, 234 (7 ), 11176–11187. Available from: 10.1002/jcp.27766 30456760
20 Feng, Y. , Parkin, D. & Devlin, N.J. (2014) Assessing the performance of the EQ‐VAS in the NHS PROMs programme. Quality of Life Research, 23 (3 ), 977–989. Available from: 10.1007/s11136-013-0537-z 24081873
21 Filardo, G. , de Caro, F. , Andriolo, L. , Kon, E. , Zaffagnini, S. & Marcacci, M. (2017) Do cartilage lesions affect the clinical outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A systematic review. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 25 (10 ), 3061–3075. Available from: 10.1007/s00167-016-4097-y
22 Formenti, D. , Ludwig, N. , Trecroci, A. , Gargano, M. , Michielon, G. , Caumo, A. et al. (2016) Dynamics of thermographic skin temperature response during squat exercise at two different speeds. Journal of Thermal Biology, 59 , 58–63. Available from: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2016.04.013 27264889
23 Franceschini, M. , Reale, D. , Boffa, A. , Andriolo, L. , Tortorella, F. , Grassi, A. et al. (2024) Medial meniscal lesions increase antero‐posterior laxity in knees with anterior cruciate ligament injury. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 32 (1 ), 135–142. Available from: 10.1002/ksa.12036
24 Gómez‐Carmona, P. , Fernández‐Cuevas, I. , Sillero‐Quintana, M. , Arnaiz‐Lastras, J. & Navandar, A. (2020) Infrared thermography protocol on reducing the incidence of soccer injuries. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 29 (8 ), 1222–1227. Available from: 10.1123/jsr.2019-0056 32188790
25 Grassi, A. , Pizza, N. , Macchiarola, L. , Lucidi, G.A. , Stefanelli, F. , Dal Fabbro, G. et al. (2021) Over‐the‐top anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction plus lateral plasty with hamstrings in high‐school athletes: results at 10 years. The Knee, 33 , 226–233. Available from: 10.1016/j.knee.2021.10.004 34717094
26 Guo, D. , Ding, L. & Homandberg, G.A. (2009) Telopeptides of type II collagen upregulate proteinases and damage cartilage but are less effective than highly active fibronectin fragments. Inflammation Research, 58 (3 ), 161–169. Available from: 10.1007/s00011-009-8090-5 19190855
27 Harkey, M.S. , Luc, B.A. , Golightly, Y.M. , Thomas, A.C. , Driban, J.B. , Hackney, A.C. et al. (2015) Osteoarthritis‐related biomarkers following anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction: a systematic review. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 23 (1 ), 1–12. Available from: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.09.004 25219671
28 Heijink, A. , Gomoll, A.H. , Madry, H. , Drobnič, M. , Filardo, G. , Espregueira‐Mendes, J. et al. (2012) Biomechanical considerations in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis of the knee. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 20 (3 ), 423–435. Available from: 10.1007/s00167-011-1818-0
29 Higgins, L.D. , Taylor, M.K. , Park, D. , Ghodadra, N. , Marchant, M. , Pietrobon, R. et al. (2007) Reliability and validity of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form. Joint, Bone, Spine, 74 (6 ), 594–599. Available from: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2007.01.036 17888709
30 Hillen, B. , Pfirrmann, D. , Nägele, M. & Simon, P. (2020) Infrared thermography in exercise physiology: the dawning of exercise radiomics. Sports Medicine, 50 (2 ), 263–282. Available from: 10.1007/s40279-019-01210-w 31734882
31 Holowatz, L.A. & Kenney, W.L. (2010) Peripheral mechanisms of thermoregulatory control of skin blood flow in aged humans. Journal of Applied Physiology (1985), 109 (5 ), 1538–1544. Available from: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00338.2010.
32 Homandberg, A. (1999) Potential regulation of cartilage metabolism in osteoarthritis by fibronectin fragments. Frontiers in Bioscience, 4 , d713. Available from: 10.2741/Homandberg 10525477
33 Hoshino, Y. , Fu, F.H. , Irrgang, J.J. & Tashman, S. (2013) Can joint contact dynamics be restored by anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 471 (9 ), 2924–2931. Available from: 10.1007/s11999-012-2761-1 23283673
34 Hunt, E.R. , Jacobs, C.A. , Conley, C.E.W. , Ireland, M.L. , Johnson, D.L. & Lattermann, C. (2021) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction reinitiates an inflammatory and chondrodegenerative process in the knee joint. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 39 (6 ), 1281–1288. Available from: 10.1002/jor.24783 32558951
35 Jørgensen, A.E.M. , Kjær, M. & Heinemeier, K.M. (2017) The effect of aging and mechanical loading on the metabolism of articular cartilage. The Journal of Rheumatology, 44 (4 ), 410–417. Available from: 10.3899/jrheum.160226 28250141
36 Kenney, W.L. & Armstrong, C.G. (1996) Reflex peripheral vasoconstriction is diminished in older men. Journal of Applied Physiology (1985), 80 (2 ), 512–515. Available from: 10.1152/jappl.1996.80.2.512.
37 Kumar, P. , Gaurav, A. , Rajnish, R.K. , Sharma, S. , Kumar, V. , Aggarwal, S. et al. (2022) Applications of thermal imaging with infrared thermography in Orthopaedics. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 24 , 101722. Available from: 10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101722 34926152
38 Larsson, S. , Struglics, A. , Lohmander, L.S. & Frobell, R. (2017) Surgical reconstruction of ruptured anterior cruciate ligament prolongs trauma‐induced increase of inflammatory cytokines in synovial fluid: an exploratory analysis in the KANON trial. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 25 (9 ), 1443–1451. Available from: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.05.009 28522220
39 Ma, W. , Pan, C.Y. , Diehl, L.H. , Wittstein, J.R. , Riboh, J.C. , Toth, A.P. et al. (2022) Altered lower extremity biomechanics following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during single‐leg and double‐leg stop‐jump tasks: a bilateral total support moment analysis. Clinical Biomechanics, 91 , 105533. Available from: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2021.105533 34847471
40 Marx, R.G. , Stump, T.J. , Jones, E.C. , Wickiewicz, T.L. & Warren, R.F. (2001) Development and evaluation of an activity rating scale for disorders of the knee. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 29 (2 ), 213–218. Available from: 10.1177/03635465010290021601 11292048
41 Muehleman, C. , Bareither, D. , Huch, K. , Cole, A.A. & Kuettner, K.E. (1997) Prevalence of degenerative morphological changes in the joints of the lower extremity. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 5 (1 ), 23–37. Available from: 10.1016/S1063-4584(97)80029-5 9010876
42 Yishake, M. , Xindie, Z. & Rongxin, H. (2014) Value of knee skin temperature measured by infrared thermography and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule‐1 in the diagnosis of peri‐prosthetic knee infection in Chinese individuals following total knee arthroplasty. Chinese Medical Journal, 127 (17 ), 3105–3109. Available from: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20140482 25189954
43 Olivotto, E. , Belluzzi, E. , Pozzuoli, A. , Cigolotti, A. , Scioni, M. , Goldring, S.R. et al. (2022) Do synovial inflammation and meniscal degeneration impact clinical outcomes of patients undergoing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy? A histological study. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 23 (7 ), 3903. Available from: 10.3390/ijms23073903 35409262
44 Pietrosimone, B. , Loeser, R.F. , Blackburn, J.T. , Padua, D.A. , Harkey, M.S. , Stanley, L.E. et al. (2017) Biochemical markers of cartilage metabolism are associated with walking biomechanics 6‐months following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 35 (10 ), 2288–2297. Available from: 10.1002/jor.23534 28150869
45 Ramirez‐GarciaLuna, J.L. , Bartlett, R. , Arriaga‐Caballero, J.E. , Fraser, R.D.J. & Saiko, G. (2022) Infrared thermography in wound care, surgery, and sports medicine: a review. Frontiers in Physiology, 13 , 838528. Available from: 10.3389/fphys.2022.838528 35309080
46 Romanò, C.L. , D'Anchise, R. , Calamita, M. , Manzi, G. , Romanò, D. & Sansone, V. (2013) Value of digital telethermography for the diagnosis of septic knee prosthesis: a prospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 14 , 7. Available from: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-7 23289768
47 Romanò, C.L. , Logoluso, N. , Dell'Oro, F. , Elia, A. & Drago, L. (2012) Telethermographic findings after uncomplicated and septic total knee replacement. The Knee, 19 (3 ), 193–197. Available from: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.02.012 21441031
48 Roos, E.M. , Roos, H.P. , Lohmander, L.S. , Ekdahl, C. & Beynnon, B.D. (1998) Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)—development of a self‐administered outcome measure. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 28 (2 ), 88–96. Available from: 10.2519/jospt.1998.28.2.88 9699158
49 Schache, A.G. , Sritharan, P. , Culvenor, A.G. , Patterson, B.E. , Perraton, L.G. , Bryant, A.L. et al. (2023) Patellofemoral joint loading and early osteoarthritis after ACL reconstruction. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 41 (7 ), 1419–1429. Available from: 10.1002/jor.25504 36751892
50 Scheidt, S. , Rüwald, J. , Schildberg, F.A. , Mahlein, A.K. , Seuser, A. , Wirtz, D.C. et al. (2020) A systematic review on the value of infrared thermography in the early detection of periprosthetic joint infections. Zeitschrift für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, 158 (4 ), 397–405. Available from: 10.1055/a-0969-8675 31525794
51 Schiavon, G. , Capone, G. , Frize, M. , Zaffagnini, S. , Candrian, C. & Filardo, G. (2021) Infrared thermography for the evaluation of inflammatory and degenerative joint diseases: a systematic review. Cartilage, 13 (2_suppl ), 1790S–1801S. Available from: 10.1177/19476035211063862 34933442
52 Schwartz, R.G. , Getson, P. , O'Young, B. , Bernton, T. , Brioschi, M. , Schakaraschwilli, G. et al. (2021) Guidelines for neuro‐musculoskeletal infrared medical thermology & sympathetic skin response (SSR) studies.
53 Signorelli, C. , Bonanzinga, T. , Lopomo, N. , Marcheggiani Muccioli, G.M. , Bignozzi, S. , Filardo, G. et al. (2013) Do pre‐operative knee laxity values influence post‐operative ones after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 23 (4 ), e219–e224. Available from: 10.1111/sms.12059 23438253
54 Stone, A.V. , Loeser, R.F. , Vanderman, K.S. , Long, D.L. , Clark, S.C. & Ferguson, C.M. (2014) Pro‐inflammatory stimulation of meniscus cells increases production of matrix metalloproteinases and additional catabolic factors involved in osteoarthritis pathogenesis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 22 (2 ), 264–274. Available from: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.11.002 24315792
55 Struglics, A. , Larsson, S. , Kumahashi, N. , Frobell, R. & Lohmander, L.S. (2015) Changes in cytokines and Aggrecan ARGS neoepitope in synovial fluid and serum and in C‐terminal crosslinking telopeptide of type II collagen and N‐terminal crosslinking telopeptide of type I collagen in urine over five years after anterior cruciate ligament rupture: an exploratory analysis in the knee anterior cruciate ligament, nonsurgical versus surgical treatment trial. Arthritis & Rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 67 (7 ), 1816–1825. Available from: 10.1002/art.39146 25914389
56 Tachibana, Y. , Mae, T. , Fujie, H. , Shino, K. , Ohori, T. , Yoshikawa, H. et al. (2017) Effect of radial meniscal tear on in situ forces of meniscus and tibiofemoral relationship. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 25 (2 ), 355–361. Available from: 10.1007/s00167-016-4395-4
57 Tan, Y.K. , Hong, C. , Li, H. , Allen, J.C. & Thumboo, J. (2020) Thermography in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with ultrasonography and clinical joint assessment. Clinical Radiology, 75 (12 ), 963.e17–963.e22. Available from: 10.1016/j.crad.2020.08.017
58 Tegner, Y. & Lysholm, J. (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 198 , 43–49.
59 Umapathy, S. , Thulasi, R. , Gupta, N. & Sivanadhan, S. (2020) Thermography and colour Doppler ultrasound: a potential complementary diagnostic tool in evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis in the knee region. Biomedical Engineering/Biomedizinische Technik, 65 (3 ), 289–299. Available from: 10.1515/bmt-2019-0051 31821162
60 Vannini, F. , Spalding, T. , Andriolo, L. , Berruto, M. , Denti, M. , Espregueira‐Mendes, J. et al. (2016) Sport and early osteoarthritis: the role of sport in aetiology, progression and treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 24 (6 ), 1786–1796. Available from: 10.1007/s00167-016-4090-5
61 de Oliveira Vargas e Silva, N.C. , dos Anjos, R.L. , Campos Santana, M.M. , Rizzo Battistella, L. & Marcon Alfieri, F. (2020) Discordance between radiographic findings, pain, and superficial temperature in knee osteoarthritis. Rheumatology, 58 (6 ), 375–380. Available from: 10.5114/reum.2020.102002 33456080
62 Williams, J.R. , Neal, K. , Alfayyadh, A. , Capin, J.J. , Khandha, A. , Manal, K. et al. (2023) Patellofemoral contact forces and knee gait mechanics 3 months after ACL reconstruction are associated with cartilage degradation 24 months after surgery. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 31 (1 ), 96–105. Available from: 10.1016/j.joca.2022.10.007 36252943
63 Zaffagnini, S. , Lucidi, G.A. , Macchiarola, L. , Agostinone, P. , Neri, M.P. , Marcacci, M. et al. (2023) The 25‐year experience of over‐the‐top ACL reconstruction plus extra‐articular lateral tenodesis with hamstring tendon grafts: the story so far. Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, 10 (1 ), 36. Available from: 10.1186/s40634-023-00599-8 37005946
