
==== Front
Heliyon
Heliyon
Heliyon
2405-8440
Elsevier

S2405-8440(24)12127-5
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36096
e36096
Research Article
Multistoried woodlot based agroforestry system for improved resource utilization and incomes for farmer
Ali M.M. manikbari0849@gmail.com
⁎
Bari M.S.
Rahman M.T.
Sarmin I.J.
Department of Agroforestry and Environment, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur-5200, Bangladesh
⁎ Corresponding author. manikbari0849@gmail.com
14 8 2024
30 8 2024
14 8 2024
10 16 e3609621 1 2024
6 8 2024
9 8 2024
© 2024 The Authors
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Diversification of cropping pattern coupled with the development of suitable technology packages is crucial to meet the ever-increasing demand for diversified products and sustained farmers’ incomes. We evaluated different woodlot-based multistoried agroforestry systems for their effectiveness to mitigate the devastating effects of climate change by offering multifaceted benefits. Specifically, the present study aimed to assess the yield and probability of woodlot based multistoried agroforestry system with two vegetables, i.e., potato and brinjal during the period of 2019–2020. The vegetables were planted on the floor of the orchard where pineapple were planted in the same row with the trees. The experiment was laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. The results revealed that the upper-storied woody plants and sole vegetables received 100 % Photosynthetically Active Radiation (PAR) but incident light gradually decreased for brinjal and potato, which were grown at the floor of woody trees. The vegetables experienced 55.85(T3), 60.70(T2), 66.38(T1), and 100 (T4) % PAR under different tree crop combinations respectively. In both cases the highest BCR (3.75) and (3.09) was obtained in the ghoraneem + pineapple based multistoried agroforestry system for potato and brinjal production, respectively, which may considered as the best technique for higher production, crop diversification, and maximization of land use efficiency.

Keywords

Multistoried agroforestry
Sustainable landuse
Economics
Brinjal (Solanum melongena)
Potato (Solanum tuberosum)
==== Body
pmc1 Introduction

The population of Bangladesh is projected to reach 192.6 million by 2050, within a land area of 147,570 square kilometers [1,2]. This rapid population growth exerts tremendous pressure on the country's forestland, with approximately 7300 ha lost annually due to the increasing demand for agricultural land, aquaculture, and homesteads [[3], [4], [5]]. As a result, the forest area covers a mere 13.6 % of the country, significantly below the recommended 25 % required for maintaining ecological balance [6]. These circumstances highlight the urgent need to explore novel approaches for enhancing agricultural productivity and preserving forest resources. Agroforestry, characterized by intercropping between annual crops and permanent trees, has gained attention as a dynamic option for production, especially in response to changing climate conditions [7,[8], [9]]. This system offers numerous socio-ecological advantages, including poverty reduction, employment generation, erosion control, and improved soil health [[10], [11], [12]]. The practice of agroforestry dates back to ancient times in Bangladesh, where farmers planted various trees within their homesteads and agricultural lands. More recently, the adoption of multistoried agroforestry production systems has transformed arable areas into productive landscapes, providing goods for both commercial and domestic use, financial security, and the potential to restore degraded land, thus increasing soil fertility [[13], [14], [15], [16]].

Multistoried agroforestry systems, with optimized resource utilization and enhanced income generation, contribute to sustainable land use and improved livelihoods for farmers [17]. By integrating different tree species, crops, and livestock, these systems create a vertically layered structure that maximizes resource utilization and productivity [18]. The upper layers of trees provide shade, support diverse flora and fauna, and contribute to timber production. Meanwhile, the lower layers can accommodate cash crops, vegetables, or forage for livestock, thereby diversifying income sources and enhancing resource efficiency [19,[20], [21]]. The integration of livestock enables the recycling of organic matter and nutrient cycling, leading to improved soil fertility [22]. In contrast to traditional woodlot management practices, which primarily focus on monoculture timber production, multistoried agroforestry systems maximize resource utilization and improve overall productivity [23]. These systems offer a range of benefits, including enhanced soil fertility [22], improved water retention [24], diversified crop production, increased biodiversity [25], and additional income streams [[26], [27]]. These systems provide a pathway towards sustainable land use and improved livelihoods, while simultaneously addressing the challenges posed by population growth, market fluctuations, and climate variability. However, there is limited research on the impact of multistoried agroforestry on productivity and economic performance of land uses in Bangladesh as a subtropical agrarian country. This study aims to assess the potential of multistoried agroforestry systems in three woodlots, aiming to contribute to the sustainable development of Bangladesh's agricultural sector by increasing production from limited land resources and maximizing agricultural land use.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Experimental design

The experiment was conducted at the Agroforestry Farm of Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur, during the 2019–2020 season. This farm is located between 25° 13′ latitude and 88° 23′ longitude and about 37.5 m above sea level. The experimental plot was on medium-high land belonging to the Old Himalayan Piedmont Plain area and the soil texture was sandy loam with soil pH of 5.1. The research was conducted in the three 7-year-old woodlot of Ghoraneem (Melia azedarach), Kalokoroi (Albizia lebbeck), and Ipilipil (Leucaenia leucocephala) trees, spaced 4 m × 4 m apart that occupied the upper layer. These excellent multipurpose and deciduous species were chosen for their diverse benefits. As the middle- or second-layer plant, pineapples (var. Honey queen) were planted along the tree rows (Fig. 1) that were one year old and in fruit bearing condition. Brinjal and potato vegetables, considered lower-story crops, were grown in the alleys between the trees. The experiment was laid out in a single factor Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. The plot size for vegetable cultivation of each treatment was 3 m width x 6 m long with adjacent plots separated by respective tree lines and 0.5 m space remaining free from the tree base. All the tree woodlots had an adjacent open field to its west where brinjal, potato and pine apple was grown as sole crop maintaining same plot size. The sole stand of ipil-ipil, goraneem and kalokoroi were present to the north of multistoried field. The treatments were applied as shown below (Table 1 and Fig. 1).Fig. 1 Details layout of the experimental plot with brinjal (A) and potato (B).

Fig. 1

Table 1 Details of the experimental treatments.

Table 1System 1 (Brinjal as lower-story crops)	System 2 (Potato as lower-story crops)	
T1 = Ipilipil + Pineapple + Brinjal	T1= Ipilipil + Pineapple + Potato	
T2 = Goraneem + Pineapple + Brinjal	T2= Goraneem + Pineapple + Potato	
T3 = Kala Koroi + Pineapple + Brinjal	T3= Kalokoroi + Pineapple + Potato	
T4 = Brinjal sole cropping	T4 = Potato sole cropping	

Schematic layout of the Experimental plot.

2.2 Data collection

Harvesting of brinjal and potato was done from 15 February to 22 March and 24 February. Data in respect of various parameters such as plant height, number of leaves, primary branch per plant, fruit per plant, fruit weight, tuber weight, etc., were recorded as per the vegetable's yield. Ten plants were collected randomly from each plot. Yield per plot was converted to t/ha. Plants in the outer rows and at the end of the middle rows were excluded from the random selection to avoid a border effect. Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) was measured on each vegetable row using LP-80 Accu PAR Ceptometer to determine the extent of shading by the tree species. Such measurement was done at 9.30 a.m., 12.30 p.m., and 3.30 p.m. each day at a one-week interval.

Benefit-cost ratio (BCR) and Land equivalent ratio (LER) calculation:

Benefit-cost ratio (BCR) and land equivalent ratio (LER) were determined according to the equations described present the equation by Alam (2018) in a woodlot-based multistoried agroforestry system.

Benefit-cost ratio (BCR) = Gross return/Total cost of production.

Land equivalent ratio (LER) = Ci/Cs + Ti/Ts.

where,

Ci is crop yield under agroforestry,

Cs is crop yield under sole cropping,

Ti is fruit yield under agroforestry, and.

Ts is fruit yield under sole cropping.

2.3 Statistical analysis

The data on statistically analyzed to determine the significant variations of the results due to different multilayered agroforestry systems. The analysis of variance for each of the studied characters was done by the F (variance ratio). These data were analyzed statistically following the ANOVA and means were adjudged by LSD test at 1 % and 5 % levels of significance and a regression analysis was carried out to get an insight into the PAR-induced influence on crop yields. All data were processed, calculated, and analyzed using computer software MS Excel and STATISTIX 10.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Availability of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) in different multistoried agroforestry systems

The highest photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) was observed in open field conditions (T4), with 980.15 μmol m−2 S−1 at 9:30 a.m., 1245.92 μmol m−2 S−1 at 12:30 p.m., and 874.71 μmol m−2 S−1at 3:30. Light interception by the tree canopy and competition for light pose limitations to the success of component crops in any agroforestry systems. This is evident in Table 2, which presents light incidence in different combinations of ipil-ipil, goraneem, kalokoroi, pineapple, brinjal, and potato. The lowest PAR occurred in the kalokoroi, pineapple, and potato/brinjal combination (T3), with 451.05 μmol m−2 S−1at 9:30 a.m., 898.76 μmol m−2 S−1 at 12:30 p.m., and 381.03 μmol m−2 S−1at 3:30 p.m. Consequently, the highest average daily PAR (1033.61 μmol m−2 S−1) was also observed in open field conditions. The upper-storied woody plants received 100 % PAR, but the light incidence gradually decreased for brinjal and potato in multistoried arrangements. Vegetables in open fields received 100 % PAR. As canopy coverage increased, light intensity decreased. The overstory canopy's varying sizes and shapes led to different light levels in different systems [28]. Among the three trees, the ipil-ipil has the lightest canopy due to its smaller leaves, allowing more light to penetrate to the ground. In contrast, the kalakoroi has a denser canopy, which hinders light penetration.Table 2 Photosynthetically Active Radiation (PAR) in different combinations of multistoried agroforestry systems.

Table 2Treatments	PAR Average	Daily Average light (μmol m−2 S−1)	% PAR compared to open field	
9:30 a.m.	12:30 a.m.	3:30 a.m.	
T1 = Ipilipil + pineapple + potato/brinjal	665.31b	893.57b	498.28b	658.72b	66.38 %	
T2 = Goraneem + pineapple + potato/brinjal	556.01c	875.13b	450.2c	627.11b	60.70 %	
T3 = Kala Koroi + pineapple + potato/brinjal	451.05d	898.76b	381.03d	576.94c	55.85 %	
T4= Brinjal and potato open field	980.15a	1245.92a	874.71a	1033.61a	100 %	
LSD (0.01)	25.93	44.15	16.30	33.67	–	
CV (%)	1.96	2.26	1.48	2.23	–	

3.2 Performance of brinjal under different multistoried agroforestry systems

The impact of different tree-crop combinations on the yield-contributing characters of brinjal is shown in Table 3. The greatest number of fruits per plant (23.78) was seen in an open field setting and gradually declined as the light levels decreased. This was observed in treatment T2 (21.77). Treatment T3 had the lowest number of fruits (16.46), which was significantly lower compared to other treatments. Under open field conditions, brinjal produced the largest fruits (15.28 cm) compared to other production systems. Fruits of medium size (14.06 cm) were produced under treatment T2, which was significantly smaller than those produced in the open field. The shortest fruits (11.96 cm) were recorded under treatment T3, which was significantly shorter than other production systems. As the light levels decreased, the individual fruit weight was also declined. The maximum fruit weight (73.50 g) was found under the open field production system, followed closely by treatment T2 (71.28 g). Treatment T3 had the lowest fruit weight (56.38g), which was significantly lower. Similarly, the dry fruit weight gradually declined with the decrease in light levels. The maximum dry weight (5.52g) was observed under open field conditions and was similar to treatment T2 (5.06g). The minimum dry weight (3.82g) was recorded under treatment T3, which was significantly lower than the rest of the treatments. The highest yield per plant (1.792 kg) was seen under open field conditions and was like treatment T2 (1.588 kg). The lowest yield (0.953 kg) was recorded under treatment T3, which was significantly lower than other treatments. A similar trend in brinjal yield was noted by Miah (2000) [29] This situation manifests as stunted growth, fewer branches, and smaller leaves, all of which contribute to lower fruit production. Furthermore, light plays a significant role in the flowering and fruit set processes in brinjal. Reduced light intensity disrupts these processes, resulting in fewer flowers, poor pollination, and ultimately, fewer fruits. Hossain et al. [18] showed a significant decrease in brinjal yield with increasing canopy size and decreasing light intensity no yield was obtained when brinjal was cultivated under 12-year-old litchi trees, indicating the critical role of light in brinjal production. Kabir [30] investigated the effect of different light levels on the growth and yield of brinjal and the findings revealed a clear negative correlation between light intensity and yield. Brinjal varieties grown under full sunlight (100 % Photosynthetically Active Radiation - PAR) produced the highest yield, while yields decreased significantly under reduced light conditions.Table 3 Yield and yield contributing characters of brinjal under multistoried agroforestry systems.

Table 3Treatments	BRINJAL	
No. fruit/plant	Length of fruit (cm)	Fresh wt. of fruit (g)	Dry wt. of fruit (g)	Yield/plant (kg)	Yield (ton/ha)	
T1 = Ipilipil + Pineapple + Brinjal	18.90	13.24	67.48	4.74	1.389	17.83	
T2 = Goraneem + Pineapple + Brinjal	21.77	14.06	71.28	5.06	1.588	20.61	
T3 = Kalo koroi + Pineappl + Brinjal	16.46	11.96	56.38	3.82	0.953	10.71	
T4= Brinjal as sole cropping	23.78	15.28	73.50	5.52	1.792	23.51	
LSD (0.01)	3.84	0.98	6.08	0.47	0.294	2.89	
CV (%)	15.88	10.05	11.32	15.02	25.04	14.86	

3.3 Performance of potato under different multistoried agroforestry system

The highest yield (29.20 ton/ha) of potato was seen in the Ghoraneem + Pineapple + Potato (T2) based agroforestry system, which was statistically the same as the sole cropping (28.42 ton/ha) of potatoes (Table 4). On the other hand, the lowest yield (18.76 ton/ha) was recorded in the Kalakoroi + Pineapple + Potato (T3) based agroforestry system. The production of potatoes increased by 2.75 % under the Ghoraneem + Pineapple + Potato (T2) based agroforestry system over control the yield of potatoes decreased by 34 % under the Kalakoroi + Pineapple + Potato (T3) based agroforestry system compared to sole cropping of potatoes. The highest yield was due to the maximum rate of photosynthesis under Ghoraneem trees, which may have been due to the deciduous nature of these trees, allowing light to penetrate the canopy and provide adequate light for maximum photosynthesis. Additionally, the decomposition of tree litter added organic matter to the soil, ensuring maximum production. This result agrees with the findings of Malik et al. [31] who noted a higher yield of potatoes under eucalyptus trees. Singh [32] also reported that the potato yield was 22 tons/ha under a guava-based agroforestry system.Table 4 Growth and final tuber yield of potatoes under different tree-crop patterns.

Table 4
Treatments	POTATO	
Fresh wt. of haulm per hill (g)	Number tuber per hill	Weight of tuber of per hill (g)	Yield (ton/ha)	
T1 = Ipilipil + Pineapple + Potato	66.87	8.37	257.7	18.68	
T2 = Goraneem + Pineapple + Potato	70.80	10.10	353.3	29.20	
T3 = Kalo koroi + Pineapple + Potato	80.60	6.67	144.3	18.76	
T4= Potato as sole cropping	57.33	8.00	403.3	28.42	
LSD (0.01)	7.45	1.62	58.98	4.21	
CV (%)	4.27	11.71	17.06	8.97	

3.4 Performance of pineapple as sole and second story crop

The cultivation of pineapples as a sole crop and as a second-story crop, offering insights into several key parameters. In the sole crop scenario, pineapples have more leaves (27.2) compared to the second-story crop (23.5), indicating potentially better vegetative growth in the former. However, pine apple as the second-story crop exhibits slightly smaller leaf size (278 cm2) compared to the sole crop (311 cm2). The fruit characteristics in the second-story crop are notably different, with smaller fruit dimensions (11.30 cm in length and 9.15 cm in breadth and 872.60 g in weight) compared to the sole crop (13.88 cm, 11.60 cm, and 1.07 kg, respectively). Because of these differences, the yield for the second-story crop (27.9 tons/ha) was lower than that of the sole crop (41.45 tons/ha), which is around 33 % less compare to the sole crop (Table-5). These results suggest that the second-story approach led to smaller individual fruits, and had a lower overall yield compared to the traditional sole crop method. Rana et al.,[33] also found this type of result in an experiment of mango-pineapple based agroforestry systems in madhupur, Bangladesh.Table 5 Performance of pineapple as sole and second story crop in multistoried agroforestry.

Table 5Cultivation process	No. of leaves	Leaf size (cm2)	Fruit length (cm)	Fruit breath (cm)	Fruit weight(kg)	Yield (ton/ha)	
Sole	27.20	311.00	13.88	11.60	1.07	41.45	
Second story crop	23.50	278.00	11.30	9.15	0.87	27.90	
LSD (0.01)	3.50	5.50	0.90	1.40	0.11	3.50	
Cv (%)	6.97	13.12	9.51	4.98	13.26	9.67	

3.5 Relationship between light intensity (% PAR) of agroforestry system and yield of brinjal and potato

The correlations between photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and the yield of brinjal and potato in different agroforestry systems based on woodlots was analyzed and illustrated in Fig. 2 (A and B). A positive linear relationship was found between PAR and the yield of both crops. The relationship between brinjal yield and PAR was represented by equation Y = 0.0136x + 0.4694, with a high and significant R2 value of 0.5747, indicating that PAR could explain 57.47 % of the variation in brinjal yield. The equation also showed that the maximum yield of brinjal occurred at 60.70 % PAR and that beyond this level, the yield decreased by 0.0136 kg per plant for every unit change in PAR. These findings are consistent with the findings of Kabir et al. [34]. The relationship between PAR and potato yield and expressed as Y = 0.0044x - 0.0297, with a high and significant R2 value of 0.6103, suggesting that PAR accounted for 61.03 % of the variation in potato yield. The equation also indicated that the maximum yield of potato was achieved at 63.01 % PAR, and beyond this level, the yield decreased by 0.0044 kg per plant for every unit change in PAR. Schulz et al. [35] also found that availability of PAR increase potato yield.Fig. 2 Relationship between PAR (%) and yield of Brinjal (A) and Potato (B) in woodlot-based multistoried Agroforestry systems.

Fig. 2

3.6 Benefit-cost ratio of agroforestry production

The highest benefit-cost ratio of 3.63 was recorded form the Ghoraneem + Pineapple + Potato (T2) system, followed by the Ipil-Ipil + Pineapple + Potato (T1) based system and the Kala koroi + Pineapple + Potato (T3) system. The lowest benefit-cost ratio of 2.14 was observed in the sole cropping of potato (T4). For brinjals, Ghoraneem + Pineapple + Potato (T2) was the most profitable treatment with a BCR of 3.07, driven by a high gross return of 577114 Tk./ha (Table-6). These findings are similar to those of [36] who reported benefit-cost ratios ranging from 2.35 to 3.73 in a poplar + potato-based agroforestry system.Table 6 Economics of potato and brinjal production under the different tree based agroforestry system.

Table 6Treatments	Return (Tk./ha)	Gross Return (Tk./ha)	Total cost of Production (Tk./ha)	Net
Return (Tk./ha)	BCR	
Potato
/Brinjal	Ipil-Ipil	Ghora neem	Kala koroi	Pine apple	
Potato field	T1	140100	83438	–	–	218700	442238	138939	303299	3.18	
T2	219000	–	70312	–	214530	503842	138687	365155	3.63	
T3	140700	–	–	93750	211870	446320	139758	306562	3.19	
T4	284200	–	–	–	–	284200	132651	151549	2.14	
Brinjal field	T1	267450	83438	–	–	209812	560700	186399	374301	3.01	
T2	309150	–	70312	–	197652	577114	188062	389052	3.07	
T3	160650	–	–	93750	185230	439630	191476	248154	2.30	
T4	470200	–	–	–	–	470200	183870	286330	2.56	

N.B. Potato 10 Tk./kg, Brinjal 20 Tk./kg, Pineapple 30 tk/kg Ipil-Ipil 267 Tk./Tree/Year, Ghoraneem 225 Tk./Tree/Year, Kala koroi 300 Tk./Tree/Year. For Potato T1 = Ipilipil + Pineapple + Potato, T2 = Goraneem + Pineapple + Potato, T3 = Kalo koroi + Pineapple + Potato and T4= Potato as sole cropping. For Brinjal T1 = Ipilipil + Pineapple + Brinjal, T2 = Goraneem + Pineapple + Brinjal, T3 = Kalo koroi + Pineappl + Brinjal and T4= Brinjal as sole cropping. The vegetable production season was considered for six months. Therefore, return from trees and pineapple was divided by two. Moreover, for vegetable production under multistoried agroforestry systems as ground layer crops, 75 % land of 1 ha was considered in return calculation.

4 Conclusion

In this study, it is evident that light availability, plays a crucial role in shaping crop performance. The research reveals that open field conditions consistently provide the highest PAR levels, leading to superior crop yields. As the canopy coverage and the complexity of the agroforestry systems increase, PAR decreases, impacting annual crop growth. Brinjal and potato, two key crops under investigation, exhibited notable reductions in yield and fruit size as PAR levels diminished. But these systems offer higher returns due to diversified products compared to sole cropping. The Ghoraneem + Pineapple + Potato and Ghoraneem + Pineapple + Brinjal combinations emerged as particularly promising, demonstrating the potential for optimizing land use and income generation within these systems. Further research is needed to explore the long-term sustainability and socioeconomic effects of multistoried agroforestry systems in Bangladesh in order to develop a vertical agriculture policy tosupport sustainable agricultural development.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

M.M. Ali: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Supervision, Software, Resources, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. M.S. Bari: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Methodology, Investigation, Conceptualization. M.T. Rahman: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Software, Methodology, Formal analysis, Data curation. I.J. Sarmin: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Software, Resources, Methodology, Formal analysis, Data curation.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest in conducting and presenting the above-mentioned research article titled "Multistoried Woodlot Based Agroforestry System for Better Resource Utilization and More Income Generation for Farmer." There are no financial, personal, or professional relationships with organizations or individuals that could bias or be perceived to influence the research findings and interpretations. The study is undertaken with scientific integrity, and the authors have no competing interests that may impact the objectivity or impartiality of the reported results. This declaration is made to ensure transparency and uphold ethical standards in the presentation of the research outcomes.
==== Refs
References

1 BBS Statistical yearbook Bangladesh Ministry of Planning, Govt. Of Peoples Republic of Bangladesh 2018 Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics Dhaka
2 United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division World population prospects and probabilistic population projections based on the world population prospects http://population.un.org/wpp/ 2019
3 Khan S. The financial express online desk https://www.thedailystar.net/backpage/un-report-says-242m-underfed-bangladesh-1772470 2019
4 Muhsin N. Ahamed T. Noguchi R. GIS-based multi-criteria analysis modeling used to locate suitable sites for industries in suburban areas in Bangladesh to ensure the sustainability of agricultural lands Asia Pac. J. Reg. Sci. 2 2018 35 64
5 Rahman M.M. Haque M.A. Nihad S.A.I. Howlader N.M. H. Akandand M.R. A. Morpho-physiological response of Acacia auriculiformisas influenced by seawater induced salinity stress Off. Syst. 25 2016 e071
6 BBS Statistical Pocket Book of Bangladesh 2009 Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of Planning, Govt. of Peoples’ Republic of Bangladesh
7 Campanhola C. Pandey S. Agroforestry Campanhola C. Pandey S. Sustainable Food and Agriculture 2019 Academic Press 237 240
8 Ali M.M. Ahmad B. Bari M.S. Pal A.C. Rahman M.L. Sarmin I.J. An assessment of agroforestry as a climate‐smart practice: evidences from farmers of northwestern region of Bangladesh Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment 7 2 2024 e20501 10.1002/agg2.20501
9 Djanibekov U. Dzhakypbekova K. Chamberlain J. Weyerhaeuser H. Zomer R. Villamor G. Xu J. Agroforestry for Landscape Restoration and Livelihood Development in Central Asia ICRAF Working Paper 186 2016 World Agroforestry Centre East and Central Asia Kunming, China 1 31 2015
10 Singh S.K. Sharma M. Singh P.K. Combined approach of intercropping and INM to improve availability of soil and leaf nutrients in fruit trees J. Chem. Pharm. Sci. 9 2016 823 829
11 Udawatta R.P. Gantzer C.J. Jose S. Agroforestry practices and soil ecosystem services Al-Kaisi M.M. Lowery B. Soil Health and Intensification of Agroecosystems 2017 Academic press 305 333
12 Miah M.G. Islam M.M. Rahman M.A. Ahamed T. Islam M.R. Jose S. Transformation of jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.) orchard into multistory agroforestry increases system productivity Agrofor. Syst. 92 2018 1687 1697
13 Adane F. Legesse A. Weldeamanuel T. The contribution of a fruit-tree-based agroforestry for household income to smallholder farmers in Dale district, Sidama zone, Southern Ethiopia Adv. Plants. Agric. Res. 9 2019 78 84
14 Gomes C. Garcia E. Alves E. Queiroz M. Oliveira andF.P. Cocoa agroforestry system as an alternative for degraded pastureland restoration, food security and livelihoods development among smallholders in a Brazilian Amazon agricultural frontier Gupta R.K. Ajay-Gulati P.K. 2004.Viable Agroforestry Models and Their Economics in Yamunanagar District of Haryana and Haridwar District of Uttaranchal. Indian J.for. vol. 130 2015 131 148 2
15 Qiao X. Sai L. Chen X. Xue L. Lei L. Impact of fruit-tree shade intensity on the growth, yield, and quality of intercropped wheat PLoS One 14 2019
16 Rahman M.S. Roy P.R. Ali M.M. Bari M.S. Sarmin I.J. Rahman M.A. Cost-benefit analysis of different agroforestry systems and practices of Kaharole Upazila of Dinajpur District, Bangladesh South Asian Journal of Social Studies and Economics 8 4 2020 87 97 10.9734/sajsse/2020/v8i430221
17 Ali M.M. Islam M.A. Islam M.R. Dipto S.S. Bari M.S. Assessing the cropland changes into agroforestry and its livelihood outcomes: evidence from northern Bangladesh Trees, Forests and People 15 2024 100497 10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100497
18 Hossain S. Rahman M.S. Kona K.N. Bari M.S. Akter N. Ali M.M. Growth performance of two ginger (zingiber officinale roscoe) varieties under different agroforestry systems in Bangladesh Asian Plant Research Journal 3 3–4 2019 1 10 10.9734/aprj/2019/v3i3-430074
19 Ali M.M. Rahman M.M. Islam S. Islam M.A. Alam M.R. Bari M.S. Nahar M.N. Varietal performance of turmeric under mango based agroforestry system Am. J. Plant Sci. 9 5 2018 995 10.4236/ajps.2018.95076
20 Bari M.S. Roshetko J.M. Ali M.M. Hasan M.F. Potential of agroforestry practices in multifunctional landscapes for enhancing the livelihoods of local dwellers in the north-western charlands of Bangladesh Forest and Society 8 1 2024 195 217 10.24259/fs.v8i1.26769
21 Abedin M.Z. Quddus M.A. Household Fuel Situation, Home Gardens and Agroforestry Practices at Six Agro-Ecologically Different Locations of Bangladesh. BRRI 1990 Winrock International and BARC 19 53
22 Kumar, C., C. Saint-Laurent, S. Begeladze and M.Calmon(ed.) Enhancing Food Security through Forest Landscape Restoration: Lessons from Burkina Faso, Brazil, Guatemala, Viet Nam, Ghana, Ethiopia and Philippines. IUCN: Gland, Switzerland. 42–69.
23 Sileshi G.W. Dagar J.C. Nath A.J. Kuntashula E. Agroforestry as a climate-smart agriculture: strategic interventions, current practices and policies Dagar J.C. Gupta S.R. Sileshi G.W. Agroforestry for Sustainable Intensification of Agriculture in Asia and Africa. Sustainability Sciences in Asia and Africa 2023 Springer Singapore 10.1007/978-981-19-4602-8_18
24 Nair P.R. Kumar B.M. Nair V.D. Nair P.R. Kumar B.M. Nair V.D. Other ecosystem services of agroforestry. An introduction to agroforestry: four decades of scientific developments 2021 563 581
25 Van Noordwijk Agroforestry options for degraded landscapes in Southeast Asia Dagar J.C. Gupta S.R. Teketay D. Agroforestry for Degraded Landscapes 2020 Springer Singapore 10.1007/978-981-15-4136-0_11
26 Das A.K. Rahman M. Keya S.S. Saha S.R. Malta-based agroforestry system: an emerging option for improving productivity, profitability and land use efficiency Environmental Sustainability 3 4 2020 521 532
27 Jose S. Udawatta R.P. Agroforestry for ecosystem services: an introduction Udawatta R.P. Jose S. Agroforestry and Ecosystem Services 2021 Springer Cham 10.1007/978-3-030-80060-4_1
28 Ferdous J. Performance of Radish Varieties in Anola Based Multistoried Agroforestry System (MS Thesis) 2021 Bangladesh Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University Gazipur
29 Miah M.M. Performance of five winter vegetables under different light conditions for agroforestry systems MS thesis 2000 Dept. of Agroforestry and environment, BSMRAU, Salna, Gazipur
30 Kabir M. Effect of different levels of light intensity on morphophysiology and yield of brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) [Master's thesis, Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University] SAU Institutional Repository 2020 http://archive.saulibrary.edu.bd:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/3738
31 Malik M.S. Surendran C. Kailasham K. Predicting growth of Eucalyptus globulus under agroforestry plantation IndianJ.For. 7 1 2005 57 61
32 Singh R.A. Productivity and employment generation through guava based agroforestry system in gangetic area of U.P. Range-Management-and-Agroforestry 28 2B 2007 348 349
33 Rana M. Productivity analysis of mango based agroforestry systems in the madhupur sal forest of Bangladesh European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences 2022 10.24018/ejfood.2022.4.2.464
34 Kabir M. Hossain M.F. Hasanuzzaman M. Habib Z.F.B. Mahmud J.A. Effect of different levels of light intensity on morphophysiology and yield of brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) J. Sher-e-Bangla Agric. Univ. 11 1 & 2 2020 9 16 ISSN 1997-6038
35 Schulz V.S. Munz S. Stolzenburg K. Hartung J. Weisenburger S. Graeff-Hönninger S. Impact of different shading levels on growth, yield and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) Agronomy 9 6 2019 330 10.3390/agronomy9060330
36 Mbow C. Van Noordwijk M. Luedeling E. Neufeldt H. Minang P.A. Kowero G. Agroforestry solutions to address food security and climate change challenges in Africa Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 6 2014 61 67
