
==== Front
PeerJ
PeerJ
PeerJ
PeerJ
2167-8359
PeerJ Inc. San Diego, USA

17984
10.7717/peerj.17984
Agricultural Science
Plant Science
Soil Science
Biogeochemistry
Effect of combined application of inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus to an organic-matter poor soil on soil organic matter cycling
Anwar Faiza 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9842-077X
Sanaullah Muhammad 2
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6801-4263
Ali Hayssam M. 3
Hussain Sabir 1
Mahmood Faisal 1
Zahid Zubda 4
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7703-4669
Shahzad Tanvir 1tanvirshahzad@gcuf.edu.pk

1 Department of Environmental Sciences, Government College University, Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan
2 Institute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan
3 Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
4 Department of Agroenvironmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food, and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
Mueller Kevin
5 9 2024
2024
12 e1798417 1 2024
6 8 2024
© 2024 Anwar et al.
2024
Anwar et al.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.

Background

Sequestering carbon dioxide (CO2) in agricultural soils promises climate change mitigation as well as sustainable ecosystem services. In order to stabilize crop residues as soil carbon (C), addition of mineral nutrients in excess to crop needs is suggested as an inevitable practice. However, the effect of two macronutrients i.e., nitrogen (N) & phosphorus (P), on C cycling has been found contradictory. Mineral N usually decreases whereas mineral P increases the soil organic C (SOC) mineralization and microbial biomass. How the addition of these macronutrients in inorganic form to an organic-matter poor soil affect C cycling remains to be investigated.

Methods

To reconcile this contradiction, we tested the effect of mineral N (120 kg N ha−1) and/or P (60 kg N ha−1) in presence or absence of maize litter (1 g C kg−1 soil) on C cycling in an organic-matter poor soil (0.87% SOC) in a laboratory incubation. Soil respiration was measured periodically during the incubation whereas various soil variables were measured at the end of the incubation.

Results

Contrary to literature, P addition stimulated soil C mineralization very briefly at start of incubation period and released similar total cumulative CO2-C as in control soil. We attributed this to low organic C content of the soil as P addition could desorb very low amounts of labile C for microbial use. Adding N with litter built up the largest microbial biomass (144% higher) without inducing any further increase in CO2-C release compared to litter only addition. However, adding P with litter did not induce any increase in microbial biomass. Co-application of inorganic N and P significantly increased C mineralization in presence (19% with respect to only litter amended) as well as absence (41% with respect to control soil) of litter. Overall, our study indicates that the combined application of inorganic N and P stabilizes added organic matter while depletes the already unamended soil.

Soil C sequestration
Microbial biomass
Soil respiration
Alkaline phosphatase
β-glucosidase
King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaRSP2024R123 This work was funded by the Researchers Supporting Project number (RSP2024R123), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

The world’s soils hold the largest terrestrial reserves of C, which is two times higher than that in living biomass and three times than that in the atmosphere (Batjes, 1996, 2016; Lal et al., 2021). Moreover, it is one end of the second largest exchange of C with the atmosphere after the one between oceans and the atmosphere (Schlesinger & Andrews, 2000). Consequently, small changes in this stock and the rate at which it exchanges with atmosphere entails large effects for global C cycle and the attendant global warming (Guenet et al., 2018).

There is a dual interest in storing soil organic C (SOC) in agroecosystems. First, enhancing SOC stocks by soaking up atmospheric CO2 and keeping it in soils for long term may help in mitigating climate changes (Janzen, 2004; Burney, Davis & Lobell, 2010; Powlson, Whitmore & Goulding, 2011; Minasny et al., 2017). Second, higher SOC improves soils’ physical, chemical and biological properties in a way that increases the agricultural and ecosystem services on sustainable basis (Lal, 2011; Bagnall et al., 2021). Addition of crop residues like rice and wheat stubbles or maize stalks is an important strategy to enhance SOC content as billions of tones of these are produced annually (Chenu et al., 2018; Goswami, Mondal & Mandi, 2020; Korav et al., 2022). However, numerous studies have indicated that repeated addition of crop residues does not necessarily increase SOC content as expected (Kirkby et al., 2014; Crowther et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2021). There is a mineral nutrient cost of increasing SOC content that needs to be met for storing the added residues in soils (Kirkby et al., 2013; Richardson et al., 2014). However, the interaction of two major mineral nutrients added in agroecosystems i.e., N & P, in terms of C cycling is not clear.

For instance, numerous studies have shown that the mineral N addition reduces soil respiration (Treseder, 2008; Janssens et al., 2010; Ward et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2021). This reduction in soil respiration is also linked with corresponding decrease in soil microbial biomass across biomes as shown in a meta-analysis of field studies (Treseder, 2008). In contradiction to mineral N effects, addition of inorganic P has been shown to increase soil respiration and microbial biomass in many studies (Cleveland & Townsend, 2006; Fisk, Santangelo & Minick, 2015; Luo et al., 2019; Spohn & Schleuss, 2019). For instance, supply of inorganic P increased soil respiration from surface layers of volcanic ash soil (Munevar & Wollum, 1977; Zagal et al., 2003). Moreover, addition of inorganic P increased soil respiration in Oxisols under the forest in Costa Rica (Cleveland & Townsend, 2006), in tropical forests on red soils in China (Liu et al., 2012) and in beech forest soils of Germany (Spohn & Schleuss, 2019). Most of these studies have attributed this increase in respiration and microbial biomass to the microbial alleviation of P limitation. However, desorption of soluble organic compounds by inorganic P, because of stronger sorptive capacity of the latter, makes greater amounts of substrate available for microbes thereby inducing higher respiration (Spohn & Schleuss, 2019). Whatever the mechanism is, the contradictory response of soil respiration (i.e., soil C cycling) to addition of inorganic forms of N and P needs further exploration.

In addition to modifying soil respiration and microbial biomass in opposite directions, the addition of inorganic N and P also differ vis-à-vis the decomposition of native SOC in response to external C inputs i.e., priming of the extant SOC. Briefly, when N is added along with labile organic C, the decomposition of extant SOC is suppressed when compared to C only addition treatments (Fontaine et al., 2011; Shahzad, 2012; Shahzad et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2014; Perveen et al., 2019a). This indicates that the mineral N addition could help stabilize the external C inputs in the soil in addition to suppressing the extant SOC. However, addition of inorganic P along with labile C has been found to enhance mineralization of the extant SOC. For instance, Mehnaz et al. (2019) found that addition of inorganic P along with glucose, phenol and oxalic acid further enhanced mineralization of the extant SOC than addition of labile C treatments. Similarly, in a four-year field experiment, inorganic P addition stimulated loss of the extant SOC via priming effect (Luo et al., 2019). Given this contradiction, the application of inorganic N and P, at rates higher than are required, for the sake of soil C sequestration cannot be a given.

N and P are essential nutrients that, when applied together with litter especially in an organic matter poor soil, would provide a balanced nutrient environment for microbial communities. Increased or imbalanced nutrient availability for microbial growth and activity, desorption of organic matter from soil particles and pH alterations are immediate mechanisms known to influence SOM cycling in short-term studies. Hence, it is hypothesized that there is a significant role of nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry in switching between SOM mineralization and immobilization in soils naturally poor in soil organic matter. So, this study aims to explore, how do these aforementioned mechanisms differ between nitrogen and phosphorus addition in SOM poor soil? And is there any synergistic or antagonistic effect when both nutrients are applied together? Additionally, how does this system respond when fresh organic matter is supplied along with or without nutrients?

We designed this study to explore the effects of addition of mineral N, P alone or in combination, in presence or absence of maize litter in an organic matter poor, calcareous soil. We hypothesized that N addition would suppress the soil C mineralization irrespective of litter addition, whereas P addition would suppress it in absence of litter owing to limited desorption of labile C from thin SOC contents while it may stimulate it in presence of litter.

Materials and Methods

Soil sampling and initial physico-chemical analyses

Soil was collected from a field located at Ayub Agriculture Research Institute, Faisalabad, Pakistan (31°23′41″N, 73°3′0″E). The field is under wheat-fallow rotation for 12 years and irrigation agriculture is practiced. The wheat productivity stands at 3.95 ± 0.28 tons ha−1. This area has a subtropical monsoon climate with 200 mm yearly average rainfall and soil type in an Aridisol. The effect of precipitation on soil processes is minimum owing to regular irrigation. Surface soil (0–15 cm) was collected randomly from five points with an auger (internal diameter 4.8 cm) and homogenized to make a composite sample. All the dead or live roots, plant debris and visible rocks were removed from the soil. After sieving with 2 mm mesh, it was stored at 4 °C in an airtight polythene bag. Soil pH was determined in 1:5 (soil: water, w/v) suspensions with a pre-calibrated pH meter (Model HANNA 210). Soil texture was determined by hydrometer method (Bouyoucos, 1962).

Water holding capacity (WHC) of the soil was determined by the method of Jarrell et al. (1999). For this, 50 g of air-dried and sieved soil was packed in plastic columns or containers that were closed with porous fabric to allow water to move up into the soil column through capillary action. They were placed in a tray filled with distilled water until soil saturation was achieved. Wet weight of the soil column was recorded after a period of drainage of excess water under gravity. Subsequently, the soil was oven dried and dry weight was recorded. WHC was calculated as the difference between dry and wet weights and expressed in percentage of dry weight of soil.

Initial SOC was determined by Walkley Black method (Walkley & Black, 1934). For this, 1.0 g of fresh soil was digested with 1 N K2Cr2O7 solution. A continuous stirring of 2 min was performed after addition of 20 mL of concentrated H2SO4. After a cooling off phase of about 30 mins, 200mL of distilled water was added to the mixture followed by addition of 10 mL of concentrated orthophosphoric acid after a gentle mixing. The remaining K2Cr2O7 in the mixture was determined by titrating it against 0.5 M ferrous ammonium sulphate after addition of 10–15 drops of ferroin indicator. The titration was terminated when the color turned from blue to red. End point was achieved as violet blue to green. Experiment was performed in triplicates and triplicate blanks without soil were run in the same way. The SOC was estimated using the following formulae.

SOC(%)=1.334×[Vblank−Vsample]×0.3×10Wt×Vblank

where Vblank and Vsample are the volume of ferrous ammonium sulphate used for blank and samples respectively, and Wt is the dry weight of the soil digested for the analysis.

After physico-chemical analyses described above it was found that the soil was a sandy clay loam and of alkaline nature (pH 8.32) with 31.7 percent water holding capacity (Table 1). Moreover, soil was found to have 8.66 g C kg−1 soil, 600 mg N kg−1 soil, and 7.71 mg P kg−1 soil. The C: N of soil was 14.43 (Table 1).

10.7717/peerj.17984/table-1 Table 1 Physiochemical characteristics of soil & litter.

Parameter	Value	
A. Soil properties	
Depth	0–15 cm	
Sand (%)	53.64	
Silt (%)	21.08	
Clay (%)	25.28	
Textural class	Sandy clay loam	
pH	8.32	
SOC (g C Kg−1 soil)	8.66	
Total nitrogen (mg N kg−1)	600	
Available phosphorus (mg P kg−1)	7.71	
WHC (%)	31.7	
B. Litter properties	
Carbon (%)	26.76	
Nitrogen (%)	1.25	
C/N ratio	21	

Maize litter

Fresh maize leaves were dried in an oven at 50 °C for three days. These were crushed and sieved through 1 mm mesh to be used for mixing with soils before incubation. The litter had 26.76% C and 1.25% N with a C: N of 21 (Table 1).

Soil incubation and respiration measurement

Seventy grams of dry equivalent of soil were packed in a beaker at 60% WHC before placing it in a 1 L Mason jar. Twenty-four such microcosms were prepared and placed in an incubator at 25 °C for a week. This period of pre-incubation was meant for stabilizing and acclimatizing microbial activity before introducing experimental treatments.

After pre-incubation, soil was amended with litter (1 g C kg−1 soil), N (120 kg N ha−1 in the form of (NH4)2SO4), and P (60 kg.P ha−1 in form of single super phosphate). This amount of mineral nutrients is recommended for wheat in the Faisalabad region from where the soil was sampled, whereas the amount of C added corresponds to the organic C entering in soil via below and aboveground residues at this site in one crop cycle. A completely randomized block design was used. Treatments were in triplicate and included nitrogen alone (N), phosphorus alone (P), nitrogen + phosphorus (NP), litter alone (L), nitrogen + litter (NL), phosphorus + litter (PL) and nitrogen + phosphorus + litter (NPL). Un-amended soil was used as control. While mixing the salts and/or litter in the soil, control soils were also mixed to mimic the similar disturbance to microbial activity. Amended and control soils at 60% WHC were kept in airtight 1 L mason jars along with 10 mL 1 N NaOH to capture CO2-C released from soils. A glass vial filled with 10 mL distilled water was also placed in jars to keep the inside atmosphere moist. Jars with 10 mL NaOH and 10 mL distilled water only served as blanks. Sealed airtight jars were incubated at 25 °C in the dark. The NaOH traps were harvested at appropriate time intervals ensuring that CO2 absorption is below 10% of its total capacity of CO2 absorption at the time of each harvest. The traps were replaced at days, 2, 3, 7, 9, 13, 16, 20, 23. The total amount of CO2 trapped in NaOH was determined by titrating 5 mL of it against 1 N HCl after precipitating with excess BaCl2 and using phenolphthalein as indicator (Isermeyer, 1952; Kaneez-e-Batool et al., 2016). Soil moisture was adjusted at 60% WHC and fresh NaOH was placed after each respiration measure. Cumulative CO2 evolution represents the total amount of CO2 respired from soil over the entire incubation period and calculated by simply adding the daily measurements of CO2 evolved.

Water extractable organic C and microbial biomass

At the end of the incubation period, soil from the incubation jars was collected and stored at 4 °C for further analyses. Water extractable organic carbon (WEOC) was determined using the method of Ghani, Dexter & Perrott (2003). Briefly, WEOC was extracted by shaking 5 g soil from each replicate with 25 mL of distilled water at 150 rpm for 90 min. The mixture was then centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 5 min and supernatant was filtered through a Whatman filter # 42. The total organic C concentration in the extract was determined by following the modified Walkley-Black method (Walkley & Black, 1934; Jackson, 1962).

Microbial biomass carbon (MBC) was measured by chloroform fumigation extraction method (Vance, Brookes & Jenkinson, 1987). Briefly, 5 g of fresh soil from each replicate was fumigated in a desiccator under vacuum conditions for 24 h. Fumigated samples were extracted with 0.5 M K2SO4 solution in 1:5 (soil: water) ratio. Another set of non-fumigated samples each containing 5 g soil from each replicate was also extracted following the same procedure. The total organic C concentration in the extract was determined following a modified Walkley-Black method (Walkley & Black, 1934; Jackson, 1962). The difference of C concentrations between fumigated and non-fumigated samples after adjusting with the extraction factor of 0.35 was considered as microbial biomass. The microbial metabolic quotient (qCO2) was determined by dividing cumulative CO2 evolution by MBC (Anderson & Domsch, 1993). Microbial metabolic quotient is an important metric to assess how efficiently microbes are utilizing soil organic matter for their growth and energy needs. Monitoring qCO2 together with nutrient cycling aids us to study and predict equilibrium between immobilization and mineralization of soil organic matter that is crucial for soil organic matter storage (Anderson & Domsch, 1993; Shemawar et al., 2021).

Enzymatic activity in soils

Extracellular enzymes serve as a biomarker for microbial activity in soil. Studying enzyme activity allows estimation of rate and efficiency of SOM decomposition and nutrient release from SOM. Dehydrogenase activity was determined as reported by Mina & Anita Chaudhary (2012). Briefly, 5 g soil from each treatment was added to triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) solution (prepared by mixing 5 g of TTC in 0.2 M tris-HCl buffer, (pH 7.4)). The mixture was incubated for 12 h at 37 °C. Immediately after incubation, two drops of concentrated H2SO4 were added to cease the reaction. This mixture was shaken at 250 rpm for 30 min after adding 5 mL of toluene. The resultant mixture was centrifuged at 4,500 rpm for 5 min for the extraction of 1,3,5-triphenylformazan (TPF). The absorbance of supernatant was measured at 492 nm with UV-vis spectrophotometer. The soil dehydrogenase activity was stated as µg TPF g−112 h−1.

Alkaline phosphatase activity was determined spectrophotometrically (Tabatabai & Bremner, 1969). A total of 1 g soil was mixed with 0.25 mL of toluene, 1 mL of p-nitrophenol phosphate solution and 4 mL MUB buffer (pH 11). The mixture was incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. One mL of CaCl2 (0.5 M) and 4 mL of NaOH (0.5 M) were added to the mixture after incubation. This suspension was filtered with Whatman filter paper no. 42. Absorbance of filtrate was measured at 400 nm. The phosphatase activity was expressed as µg p-nitrophenol g−1 h−1.

Urease activity was estimated according to “urea remaining” method by Tabatabai (1994). For this, 5 g soil was incubated with 5 mL of urea solution (10 mg urea/mL) for 5 h at 37 °C. After incubation, mixture was added with 50 mL of 2 M KC1-PMA. Suspension was shaken for 1 h and filtered with Whatman filter paper no. 42. Two mL of filtrate was added with 10 mL 2 M KC1-PMA and 30 mL coloring reagent (10 mL of 0.25% TSC in 500 mL acid reagent + 25 mL 2.5% DAM). For color development, this mixture was kept in water bath for 30 min followed by ice cold water bath for 15 min. Absorbance of this mixture was observed at 527 nm with UV-Vis spectrophotometer. Soil urease activity is expressed as μg. g−1 soil. h−1.

β-glucosidase activity was measured as described by Hayano (1973). For this, 0.5 g soil was mixed with 0.1 mL of toluene. 10 mL distilled water was added after 10 min followed by addition of 1.5 mL of Mcilvain buffer and 0.6 mL of PNG. This mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 1 h after vortex for few seconds. After incubation, 8 mL of ethanol was added and swirled for few seconds. The mixture was filtered, and filtrate was added with 2 mL of tris-solution. The intensity of yellow color was measured at 400 nm on UV-Vis spectrophotometer. The p-nitrophenol content of treatments were calculated by standard calibration curve method with standards containing 0, 0.2, 10.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 μ M of p-nitrophenol.

Statistical analysis

One-way ANOVA was carried out to compare the effects of treatments on SOC mineralization (cumulative CO2 and per day CO2 evolution), water-extractable organic C, microbial biomass C, metabolic quotient and enzymatic activities of dehydrogenase, urease, β-glucosidase, and alkaline phosphatase. In case of a significant difference, a post-hoc least significant difference test was applied to determine the significantly different means (n = 3) at 95% confidence interval. Data were assessed for normality before applying the ANOVA and log-transformed to acquire normality in case needed. All the statistical analysis was conducted using Statgraphics Plus.

Results

Soil carbon mineralization

Carbon mineralization rate (mg CO2-C kg−1 soil d−1) was modified by nutrient (N, P) and litter addition alone as well as in different combinations (P < 0.05, Fig. 1A). Moreover, it varied over the course of incubation. Similarly, the cumulative CO2-C release (mg CO2-C kg−1 soil) was significantly modified by nutrients and litter addition (P < 0.05, Fig. 1B).

10.7717/peerj.17984/fig-1 Figure 1 Soil C mineralization in response to addition of mineral nutrients and litter addition.

Soil C mineralization rate (mg CO2-C kg−1 soil d−1) (A) and cumulative CO2-C release from control and amended soils over 23 days of incubation. Values are means of three replicates and error bars represent standard error of means (n = 3). The small letters in (B) show significant different among means based on one way ANOVA followed by a post hoc least significant difference (P < 0.05).

The N addition (N treatment) significantly lowered the C mineralization rate (Fig. 1A) resulting in the lowest total cumulative CO2-C release by the end of the experiment (Fig. 1B). Phosphorus addition (P treatment) induced ~3 times increase in C mineralization rate two days after incubation (Fig. 1A). However, afterwards, the C mineralization rate in P treatment declined to that in control treatment for the entire duration of incubation. The total cumulative CO2-C released from P treatment was similar to that in control (Fig. 1B). Combined addition of N & P (NP treatment) induced higher (at times three-fold) release of CO2-C in the earlier stages of incubation (Fig. 1A) leading to higher total cumulative CO2-C from NP treatment than control (41%) (Fig. 1B).

The litter addition (L treatment) alone or in combination with one or both the nutrients significantly increased the C mineralization rate than control treatment (Fig. 1A). Until the 13th day of incubation, the C mineralization rate in L treatment was significantly higher than in control, N, P or NP treatments. Afterwards, the C mineralization in L treatment declined towards those in control, P and NP treatments. Overall, the total cumulative CO2-C release was significantly higher in L treatment than N, P, NP and control treatments.

Adding N along with L (NL treatment) did not influence C mineralization rate when compared to litter alone (L) treatment (Fig. 1A). Moreover, total cumulative CO2-C release was similar in NL and L treatments (Fig. 1B).

Although adding P along with L (PL treatment) increased C mineralization rate in the early days of incubation (Fig. 1A), the total cumulative CO2-C release was similar in L and PL treatments by the end of the experiment (Fig. 1B). Adding two nutrients i.e., N & P with L (NPL treatment) significantly increased the C mineralization rate on 2nd day by 153%, 83% and 68% in comparison to PL, NL and L treatments respectively (Fig. 1A). It was still significantly higher on the third day by 39%, 26% & 26% in NPL treatment than PL, NL and L treatments respectively. Afterwards, NPL treatment showed a similar C mineralization rate as in PL, NL & L treatments. On the final day, all the litter amended soils (irrespective of the nutrient type and presence) showed similar C mineralization including NPL treatment. By the end of the experiment, the highest amount of cumulative CO2-C was released from the NPL treatment, which was 19% and 187% higher than L & control treatments, respectively (Fig. 1B).

Water extractable organic C, microbial biomass C & metabolic quotient

The treatments significantly modified the water extractable organic C (WEOC) content in soils (Fig. 2A). The N only treatment tended to lower the WEOC content although it was not significantly lower than that in control. On the contrary, addition of L with N (NL) treatment tended to increase WEOC. The three treatments i.e., P, NP, & NPL maintained the WEOC content similar to those in control. However, the PL and L treatments significantly increased the WEOC content with respect to control whereby the highest increase, which was recorded in L treatment, was 76% higher than that in the control treatment.

10.7717/peerj.17984/fig-2 Figure 2 Water extractable organic carbon, microbial biomass carbon and metabolic quotient in response to inorganic nutrients and litter addition.

Water extractable organic carbon (WEOC, mg C kg−1 soil) (A) Microbial biomass (mg C kg−1 soil) (B) Metabolic quotient (C) for control and amended soils at the end of the incubation. Letters of top of bars represent significant difference among means (n = 3) based on post hoc LSD at P < 0.05. Error bars show standard errors of means (n = 3).

The microbial biomass carbon (MBC) was significantly influenced by the experimental treatments (Fig. 2B). The highest MBC was found in NL treatment that was 144% higher than control, whereas the N only treatment showed a non-significant increase of 22% only. The P only treatment significantly increased the MBC by 53% in comparison to control. However, the addition of L along with P (PL treatment) did not change the MBC. Addition of both the nutrients (i.e., NP) did not influence the MBC although it tended to increase. However, addition of L in combination with NP (i.e., NPL treatment) significantly increased the MBC by 105% with respect to control. The L treatment significantly increased the MBC by 59% in comparison to control.

Metabolic quotient (qCO2) decreased significantly in response to N or P only additions (P < 0.05, Fig. 2C). It remained similar to control treatment in NP, L, NL and NPL treatments. However, it was significantly higher in PL treatment.

Extracellular enzymatic assays

The treatments significantly changed the activity of all the four enzymes assayed in the experiment (Fig. 3). Briefly, dehydrogenase activity significantly decreased in response to N or P and NP additions as well as when phosphorus was added with litter (PL treatment). However, it increased significantly in L, NL and NPL treatments. It was highest in NL and NPL treatments.

10.7717/peerj.17984/fig-3 Figure 3 Enzymatic activity in soil in response to addition of mineral nutrients litter.

Dehydrogenase (DHA) (A) β-glucosidase (BAG) (B) Urease (UA) (C) and alkaline phosphatase (APA) (D) activities in control and amended soils. Letters on top of bars indicate a significant difference among means based on post hoc LSD at P < 0.05. Error bars show standard errors of means (n = 3).

The N addition slightly but significantly increased the β-glucosidase activity whereas β-glucosidase activity remained unchanged in response to P or NP addition. It was 1.9, 2.1, 1.6 and 2.3 times higher in L, NL, PL and NPL treatments respectively when compared to control.

N addition significantly reduced the urease activity when added alone (N), or in combination with phosphorus and/or litter (P, L & NPL treatments) (Fig. 3C). Addition of P and L (P & L treatments) significantly increased the urease activity by 1.46 and 1.11 times respectively, with respect to control. However, the combined addition of P and L (PL treatment) did not change urease activity.

The alkaline phosphatase activity significantly decreased in response to P addition alone or in combination with N and/or L (i.e., NP, PL & NPL treatments). However, adding nitrogen and litter alone or in combination significantly increased the alkaline phosphatase activity.

Discussion

Soil carbon mineralization and C pools

Addition of inorganic P significantly stimulated soil C mineralization rate for a very brief duration followed by similar C mineralization rate as in control soils for most part of the incubation. Consequently, the total cumulative CO2-C release from P treatment was similar to that in control (Fig. 1). This result is in partial contradiction to previous findings where inorganic P addition have been found to induce decrease in SOC by stimulating its mineralization (Ehlers et al., 2010; Poeplau et al., 2016; Poeplau, Herrmann & Kätterer, 2016; Li et al., 2022). According to recent research, addition of P leads to desorption of simple organic compounds making them available for microorganisms thereby leading to higher soil respiration (Spohn & Schleuss, 2019; Spohn et al., 2022; Xia et al., 2024). Most of the studies reporting higher C mineralization in response to addition of inorganic P used soils having high SOC content (i.e., >1.5%) suggesting that high amounts of labile organic compounds were available for desorption in response to addition of inorganic P. However, our soil is poor in organic C (i.e., 0.87%, Table 1) which explains the transitory stimulation in C mineralization after P addition. Later on, the labile compounds that could be desorbed from soil particles were most likely too low to sustain higher C mineralization rates. This is evident by the similar water extractable organic C (Fig. 2A). Moreover, increase in microbial biomass in P treatment indicates that the microbes used most of the desorbed organic compounds as well as the extra available P for growth (Fig. 2B). This suggests that P addition in this soil could build up microbial biomass thereby improving soil health.

Mineral N addition significantly suppressed the total cumulative CO2-C release as well as the soil C mineralization rate for most part of the incubation (Fig. 1). These results correspond to previous findings (Treseder, 2008; Janssens et al., 2010; Kaneez-e-Batool et al., 2016; Poeplau, Herrmann & Kätterer, 2016; Perveen et al., 2019a; Wende et al., 2020; Fernández-Alonso, Díaz-Pinés & Rubio, 2021; Treseder, 2008; Fernández-Alonso, Díaz-Pinés & Rubio, 2021). However, in our study, there was rather an increase, albeit an insignificant one, in microbial biomass after N addition. We assume that the soil microbes were N-limited and switched to growth instead of C mineralization as soon as the mineral N was available. However, combined addition of N & P (i.e., NP treatment) induced significantly higher C mineralization whereas microbial biomass was higher (though not significantly) than control (Figs. 1, 2). Apparently, P presence in NP treatment made labile C available for microbial consumption as is shown by higher WEOC content in NP treatment than in N or P alone treatments thereby leading to higher C mineralization (Fig. 2A).

Litter addition enhanced C mineralization since it ensures provision of labile substrates for soil microbes which are C limited in general due to lower accessibility of the SOC (Fontaine et al., 2007; Dungait et al., 2012; Shahzad et al., 2018). Moreover, the studied soil is particularly poor in organic matter thereby increase in C mineralization in response to litter is intuitive. However, provision of N with litter (i.e. NL treatment) did not cause an additional increase in C mineralization rate and cumulative CO2-C release in comparison to L only treatment, although this soil is N-deficient (Fig. 1). Evidently, the microorganisms used extra available mineral N and labile C in NL treatment to build their biomass as shown by the highest microbial biomass in the said treatment (Fig. 2B). Moreover, as shown by the unchanged metabolic quotient in NL treatment, it is confirmed that microbes were more inclined to growth than decomposition. Indeed, mineral N availability in the presence of relatively labile substrate has been found to increase microbial biomass and suppress C mineralization (Fontaine et al., 2004, 2011; Dijkstra et al., 2013; Shahzad et al., 2015; Liao, Tian & Liu, 2021).

Addition of P with litter (i.e. PL treatment) initially reduced C mineralization when compared to L only treatment, which is counterintuitive (Poeplau, Herrmann & Kätterer, 2016; Meyer et al., 2018; Spohn & Schleuss, 2019). Interestingly, microbial biomass in PL treatment decreased significantly when compared to L only treatment. Moreover, it was also significantly lower than that in P only treatment (Fig. 2B). The question is why microbial biomass decreased in response to combined addition of P and L where litter is a rich source of labile C, when addition of alone inorganic P stimulated microbial biomass? Apparently, the acute N limitation induced by excess availability of inorganic P in presence of litter can explain this result. Because, when N was also added i.e., NPL treatment, this limitation was alleviated leading to the highest C mineralization and cumulative CO2-C release. These results indicate that addition of both nutrients in the recommended quantities alongside organic matter stimulates microbial activity.

Litter addition significantly increased microbial biomass (Fig. 2B). However, addition of N (i.e., NL and NPL treatments) further increased this living component of SOC. This shows that microbes were facing N limitation and grew their biomass when it was available. This hypothesis is confirmed by the highest WEOC content in L treatment though the MBC in the same was significantly lower than NL & NPL treatments indicating incapacity of microbes to assimilate the extra available WEOC. Overall, the results of microbial biomass show that addition of nitrogen along with litter increases the living pool of SOC.

Enzymatic activity

Activity of C, N and P acquiring extracellular enzymes, i.e., β-glucosidase, urease, and alkaline phosphatase respectively, was determined to link the effect of addition of litter, N, and P on soil processes involving cycling of these elements. Moreover, dehydrogenase activity was measured because it is linked with the active part of the microbial biomass given that it is an intracellular enzyme (Xiang et al., 2008).

Litter addition significantly stimulated dehydrogenase activity, except in PL treatment, evidently because the substrate availability activates microorganisms towards decomposition and growth. However, nutrient addition suppressed dehydrogenase activity presumably due to lowering of soil pH (Wang et al., 2014; Tian et al., 2020). We did not measure the soil pH post incubation. However, the salts we used to add inorganic N and P i.e., ammonium sulphate and single super phosphate respectively, are highly acidic indicating the reduction in pH in these soils.

Labile C input, litter input in our study, stimulates microbial activity and growth leading to higher microbial C demand (Hernández & Hobbie, 2010; Zhou et al., 2021). This enhances the enzyme production for co-metabolizing the SOC thereby leading to higher C degrading enzymatic activity as indicated by high β-glucosidase activity in all litter amended soils (Fig. 3B, Perveen et al., 2019b; Zhou et al., 2021). Among all litter amended soils, PL showed the lowest β-glucosidase activity which corresponds to lower microbial biomass found in this treatment (Fig. 2B). Activity of C acquiring enzyme not only increased in the presence of litter but also in the presence of mineral N (Fig. 3). Indeed, higher N availability allows microbes to invest N into enzyme synthesis thereby mining C for microbial growth (Allison & Vitousek, 2005; Sinsabaugh & Follstad Shah, 2012; Zheng et al., 2024). This is also confirmed by higher microbial biomass found in N treatment (Fig. 2B). An unchanged β-glucosidase activity in P treatment further confirms that the increase in microbial biomass in this treatment is because of desorption of labile organic compounds from soil particles instead of alleviation of microbial P limitation. Overall, β-glucosidase activity confirmed that adding mineral nutrients alongside organic matter (litter) in this organic matter poor soil promotes the growth soil C pools i.e., microbial biomass in addition to stimulating the microbial activity.

All the treatments where mineral N was added showed significantly lower urease activity than control (Fig. 3C). This indicates that the microbes were not investing in synthesis of enzymes aimed at N mining because they were getting mineral N from outside source (Haase et al., 2008; Bhaduri et al., 2016). Instead, they were more focused on assimilating it along with labile C to increase their biomass (Fig. 2B). In all the other treatments where N was not added, except PL, urease activity was significantly higher than control indicating that microbes were investing on N acquisition because their C: N stoichiometry was highly imbalanced in the presence of excess C. A similar activity for meeting stoichiometric needs was observed in the case of P-acquiring enzyme i.e. where inorganic P was added, alkaline phosphatase activity was lower and vice versa (Fig. 3C). When a nutrient is limiting while other nutrients and substrate are available, it is common for microbes to synthesize enzymes to acquire the limiting nutrient (Allison & Vitousek, 2005; Loeppmann et al., 2016; Stock et al., 2019). This stoichiometric response by the enzymes indicates that the provided nutrient contents in the soil were sufficient to fulfil the needs of the microorganisms thereby facilitating them in their activity and growth.

Conclusion

We conducted this study to find out the reason behind contradictory response of soil C mineralization and microbial biomass to addition of inorganic N and P. We found that increased C mineralization in response to addition of inorganic P, often found in literature, is indeed attributed to relatively high intrinsic SOC content from which labile desorbs thereby stimulating C mineralization. However, in an organic matter poor soil, like the one used in this study, limited desorption of labile C precludes stimulated C mineralization in response to inorganic P addition. Moreover, our study confirms that the mineral N addition could stabilize the existing as well as externally added organic carbon as shown by suppressed mineralization and increased microbial biomass. Moreover, our study reveals that co-application of inorganic N and P in SOC poor soils can lead to loss of the soil C. However, if they are coapplied alongside external organic matter, which is the case in natural as well as most managed ecosystems, they may improve the microbial activity that’s vital for soil health as well as help enhance soil C.

Supplemental Information

10.7717/peerj.17984/supp-1 Supplemental Information 1 The raw values and their calculations.

Additional Information and Declarations

Competing Interests

Author Contributions

Data Availability

Tanvir Shahzad and Sabir Hussain are Academic Editors for PeerJ.

Faiza Anwar conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Muhammad Sanaullah performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Hayssam M. Ali conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Sabir Hussain performed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Faisal Mahmood analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Zubda Zahid performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

Tanvir Shahzad conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data are available in the Supplemental File.
==== Refs
References

Allison & Vitousek (2005) Allison SD Vitousek PM Responses of extracellular enzymes to simple and complex nutrient inputs Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2005 37 5 937 944 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.09.014
Anderson & Domsch (1993) Anderson T-H Domsch KH The metabolic quotient for CO2 (qCO2) as a specific activity parameter to assess the effects of environmental conditions, such as pH, on the microbial biomass of forest soils Soil Biology and Biochemistry 1993 25 3 393 395 10.1016/0038-0717(93)90140-7
Bagnall et al. (2021) Bagnall DK Shanahan JF Flanders A Morgan CLS Honeycutt CW Soil health considerations for global food security Agronomy Journal 2021 113 6 4581 4589 10.1002/agj2.20783
Batjes (1996) Batjes NH Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world Journal of Soil Science 1996 47 2 151 163 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01386.x
Batjes (2016) Batjes NH Harmonized soil property values for broad-scale modelling (WISE30sec) with estimates of global soil carbon stocks Geoderma 2016 269 5 61 68 10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.01.034
Bhaduri et al. (2016) Bhaduri D Saha A Desai D Meena HN Restoration of carbon and microbial activity in salt-induced soil by application of peanut shell biochar during short-term incubation study Chemosphere 2016 148 2 86 98 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.12.130 26802267
Bouyoucos (1962) Bouyoucos GJ Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils 1 Agronomy Journal 1962 54 464 465 10.2134/agronj1962.00021962005400050028x
Burney, Davis & Lobell (2010) Burney JA Davis SJ Lobell DB Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2010 107 12052 12057 10.1073/pnas.0914216107 20551223
Chen et al. (2014) Chen R Senbayram M Blagodatsky S Myachina O Dittert K Lin X Blagodatskaya E Kuzyakov Y Soil C and N availability determine the priming effect: microbial N mining and stoichiometric decomposition theories Global Change Biology 2014 20 7 2356 2367 10.1111/gcb.12475 24273056
Chenu et al. (2018) Chenu C Angers DA Barré P Derrien D Arrouays D Increasing organic stocks in agricultural soils: knowledge gaps and potential innovations Soil & Tillage Research 2018 188 41 10.1016/j.still.2018.04.011
Cleveland & Townsend (2006) Cleveland CC Townsend AR Nutrient additions to a tropical rain forest drive substantial soil carbon dioxide losses to the atmosphere Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006 103 27 10316 10321 10.1073/pnas.0600989103 16793925
Crowther et al. (2019) Crowther TW Riggs C Lind EM Borer ET Seabloom EW Hobbie SE Wubs J Adler PB Firn J Gherardi L Sensitivity of global soil carbon stocks to combined nutrient enrichment Ecology Letters 2019 22 6 936 945 10.1111/ele.13258 30884085
Dijkstra et al. (2013) Dijkstra FA Carrillo Y Pendall E Morgan JA Rhizosphere priming: a nutrient perspective Frontiers in Microbiology 2013 4 1 8 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00216 23346082
Dungait et al. (2012) Dungait JAJ Hopkins DW Gregory AS Whitmore AP Soil organic matter turnover is governed by accessibility not recalcitrance Global Change Biology 2012 18 6 1781 1796 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02665.x
Ehlers et al. (2010) Ehlers K Bakken LR Frostegård Å. Frossard E Bünemann EK Phosphorus limitation in a ferralsol: impact on microbial activity and cell internal P pools Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2010 42 4 558 566 10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.025
Fernández-Alonso, Díaz-Pinés & Rubio (2021) Fernández-Alonso MJ Díaz-Pinés E Rubio A Drivers of soil respiration in response to nitrogen addition in a Mediterranean mountain forest Biogeochemistry 2021 155 3 305 321 10.1007/s10533-021-00827-2
Fisk, Santangelo & Minick (2015) Fisk M Santangelo S Minick K Carbon mineralization is promoted by phosphorus and reduced by nitrogen addition in the organic horizon of northern hardwood forests Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2015 81 212 218 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.11.022
Fontaine et al. (2004) Fontaine S Bardoux G Abbadie L Mariotti A Carbon input to soil may decrease soil carbon content Ecology Letters 2004 7 4 314 320 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00579.x
Fontaine et al. (2007) Fontaine S Barot S Barré P Bdioui N Mary B Rumpel C Stability of organic carbon in deep soil layers controlled by fresh carbon supply Nature 2007 450 7167 277 280 10.1038/nature06275 17994095
Fontaine et al. (2011) Fontaine S Henault C Aamor A Bdioui N Bloor JMG Maire V Mary B Revaillot S Maron PA Fungi mediate long term sequestration of carbon and nitrogen in soil through their priming effect Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2011 43 1 86 96 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.09.017
Ghani, Dexter & Perrott (2003) Ghani A Dexter M Perrott KW Hot-water extractable carbon in soils: a sensitive measurement for determining impacts of fertilisation, grazing and cultivation Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2003 35 9 1231 1243 10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00186-X
Goswami, Mondal & Mandi (2020) Goswami SB Mondal R Mandi SK Crop residue management options in rice-rice system: a review Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 2020 66 9 1218 1234 10.1080/03650340.2019.1661994
Guenet et al. (2018) Guenet B Camino-Serrano M Ciais P Tifafi M Maignan F Soong JL Janssens IA Impact of priming on global soil carbon stocks Global Change Biology 2018 24 5 1873 1883 10.1111/gcb.14069 29365210
Haase et al. (2008) Haase S Philippot L Neumann G Marhan S Kandeler E Local response of bacterial densities and enzyme activities to elevated atmospheric CO2 and different N supply in the rhizosphere of Phaseolus vulgaris L Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2008 40 5 1225 1234 10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.12.025
Hayano (1973) Hayano K A method for the determination of β-glucosidase activity in soil Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 1973 19 2 103 108 10.1080/00380768.1973.10432524
Hernández & Hobbie (2010) Hernández DL Hobbie SE The effects of substrate composition, quantity, and diversity on microbial activity Plant and Soil 2010 335 1–2 397 411 10.1007/s11104-010-0428-9
Isermeyer (1952) Isermeyer H Estimation of soil respiration in closed jars Method in Applied Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry 1952 London Academy 214 216
Jackson (1962) Jackson ML Soil chemical analysis 1962 Englewood Cliffs Prentice Hall Inc
Janssens et al. (2010) Janssens IA Dieleman W Luyssaert S Subke J-A Reichstein M Ceulemans R Ciais P Dolman AJ Grace J Matteucci G Reduction of forest soil respiration in response to nitrogen deposition Nature Geoscience 2010 3 5 315 322 10.1038/ngeo844
Janzen (2004) Janzen HH Carbon cycling in earth systems—a soil science perspective Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 2004 104 3 399 417 10.1016/j.agee.2004.01.040
Jarrell et al. (1999) Jarrell WM Armstrong DE Grigal DF Kelly EF Monger HC Wedin DA Soil water and temperature status Standard Soil Methods for Long-Term Ecological Research 1999 New York, NY Oxford University Press 55 73
Kaneez-e-Batool et al. (2016) Kaneez-e-Batool N Shahzad T Mahmood F Hussain S Riaz M Maqbool Z Anwar F Rehman K Rashid MI Carbon mineralization in response to nitrogen and litter addition in surface and subsoils in an agroecosystem Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 2016 62 9 1285 1292 10.1080/03650340.2016.1145792
Kirkby et al. (2013) Kirkby CA Richardson AE Wade LJ Batten GD Blanchard C Kirkegaard JA Carbon-nutrient stoichiometry to increase soil carbon sequestration Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2013 60 8 77 86 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.01.011
Kirkby et al. (2014) Kirkby CA Richardson AE Wade LJ Passioura JB Batten GD Blanchard C Kirkegaard JA Nutrient availability limits carbon sequestration in arable soils Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2014 68 34 402 409 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.09.032
Korav et al. (2022) Korav S Rajanna GA Yadav DB Paramesha V Mehta CM Jha PK Singh S Singh S Impacts of mechanized crop residue management on rice-wheat cropping system—A review Sustainability 2022 14 23 15641 10.3390/su142315641
Lal (2011) Lal R Sequestering carbon in soils of agro-ecosystems Food Policy 2011 36 2 S33 S39 10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.12.001
Lal et al. (2021) Lal R Monger C Nave L Smith P The role of soil in regulation of climate Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2021 376 1834 20210084 10.1098/rstb.2021.0084
Li et al. (2022) Li J Han G Wang G Liu X Zhang Q Chen Y Song W Qu W Chu X Li P Imbalanced nitrogen-phosphorus input alters soil organic carbon storage and mineralisation in a salt marsh Catena 2022 208 105720 10.1016/j.catena.2021.105720
Liao, Tian & Liu (2021) Liao C Tian Q Liu F Nitrogen availability regulates deep soil priming effect by changing microbial metabolic efficiency in a subtropical forest Journal of Forestry Research 2021 32 2 713 723 10.1007/s11676-020-01148-0
Liu et al. (2012) Liu L Gundersen P Zhang T Mo J Effects of phosphorus addition on soil microbial biomass and community composition in three forest types in tropical China Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2012 44 1 31 38 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.08.017
Loeppmann et al. (2016) Loeppmann S Blagodatskaya E Pausch J Kuzyakov Y Enzyme properties down the soil profile-A matter of substrate quality in rhizosphere and detritusphere Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2016 103 5 274 283 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.08.023
Luo et al. (2019) Luo R Fan J Wang W Luo J Kuzyakov Y He JS Chu H Ding W Nitrogen and phosphorus enrichment accelerates soil organic carbon loss in alpine grassland on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Science of the Total Environment 2019 650 303 312 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.038 30199676
Mehnaz et al. (2019) Mehnaz KR Corneo PE Keitel C Dijkstra FA Carbon and phosphorus addition effects on microbial carbon use efficiency, soil organic matter priming, gross nitrogen mineralization and nitrous oxide emission from soil Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2019 134 175 186 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.04.003
Meyer et al. (2018) Meyer N Welp G Rodionov A Borchard N Martius C Nitrogen and phosphorus supply controls soil organic carbon mineralization in tropical topsoil and subsoil Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2018 119 152 161 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.024
Mina & Anita Chaudhary (2012) Mina U Anita Chaudhary A Impact of transgenic cotton varieties on activity of enzymes in their rhizosphere Indian Journal of Biochemistry & Biophysics 2012 49 195 201 22803335
Minasny et al. (2017) Minasny B Malone BP McBratney AB Angers DA Arrouays D Chambers A Chaplot V Chen Z-S Cheng K Das BS Soil carbon 4 per mille Geoderma 2017 292 5 59 86 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.01.002
Munevar & Wollum (1977) Munevar F Wollum AG Effects of the addition of phosphorus and inorganic nitrogen on carbon and nitrogen mineralization in andepts from Colombia 1 Soil Science Society of America Journal 1977 41 3 540 545 10.2136/sssaj1977.03615995004100030023x
Perveen et al. (2019a) Perveen N Ayub M Shahzad T Siddiq MR Memon MS Barot S Saeed H Xu M Soil carbon mineralization in response to nitrogen enrichment in surface and subsurface layers in two land use types PeerJ 2019a 7 2 e7130 10.7717/peerj.7130 31328029
Perveen et al. (2019b) Perveen N Barot S Maire V Cotrufo MF Shahzad T Blagodatskaya E Stewart CE Ding W Siddiq MR Dimassi B Mary B Fontaine S Universality of priming effect: an analysis using thirty five soils with contrasted properties sampled from five continents Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2019b 134 1 162 171 10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.03.027
Poeplau et al. (2016) Poeplau C Bolinder MA Kirchmann H Kätterer T Phosphorus fertilisation under nitrogen limitation can deplete soil carbon stocks: evidence from Swedish meta-replicated long-term field experiments Biogeosciences 2016 13 4 1119 1127 10.5194/bg-13-1119-2016
Poeplau, Herrmann & Kätterer (2016) Poeplau C Herrmann AM Kätterer T Opposing effects of nitrogen and phosphorus on soil microbial metabolism and the implications for soil carbon storage Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2016 100 83 91 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.05.021
Powlson, Whitmore & Goulding (2011) Powlson DS Whitmore AP Goulding KWT Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change: a critical re-examination to identify the true and the false European Journal of Soil Science 2011 62 1 42 55 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01342.x
Richardson et al. (2014) Richardson AE Kirkby CA Banerjee S Kirkegaard JA The inorganic nutrient cost of building soil carbon Carbon Management 2014 5 3 265 268 10.1080/17583004.2014.923226
Schlesinger & Andrews (2000) Schlesinger W Andrews J Soil respiration and the global carbon cycle Biogeochemistry 2000 48 1 7 20 10.1023/A:1006247623877
Shahzad (2012) Shahzad T Role of plant rhizosphere across multiple species, grassland management and temperature on microbial communities and long term soil organic matter dynamics 2012 France AgroParisTech
Shahzad et al. (2015) Shahzad T Chenu C Genet P Barot S Perveen N Mougin C Fontaine S Contribution of exudates, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and litter depositions to the rhizosphere priming effect induced by grassland species Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2015 80 146 155 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.09.023
Shahzad et al. (2012) Shahzad T Chenu C Repinçay C Mougin C Ollier J-L Fontaine S Plant clipping decelerates the mineralization of recalcitrant soil organic matter under multiple grassland species Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2012 51 73 80 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.04.014
Shahzad et al. (2018) Shahzad T Rashid MI Maire V Barot S Perveen N Alvarez G Mougin C Fontaine S Root penetration in deep soil layers stimulates mineralization of millennia-old organic carbon Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2018 124 150 160 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.06.010
Shemawar et al. (2021) Shemawar Mahmood A Hussain S Mahmood F Iqbal M Shahid M Ibrahim M Ali MA Shahzad T Toxicity of biogenic zinc oxide nanoparticles to soil organic matter cycling and their interaction with rice-straw derived biochar Scientific Reports 2021 11 1 1 12 10.1038/s41598-021-88016-x 33414495
Sinsabaugh & Follstad Shah (2012) Sinsabaugh RL Follstad Shah JJ Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry a nd ecological theory Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 2012 43 1 120913143848009 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-071112-124414
Spohn et al. (2022) Spohn M Diáková K Aburto F Doetterl S Borovec J Sorption and desorption of organic matter in soils as affected by phosphate Geoderma 2022 405 3 115377 10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115377
Spohn & Schleuss (2019) Spohn M Schleuss P Addition of inorganic phosphorus to soil leads to desorption of organic compounds and thus to increased soil respiration Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2019 130 220 226 10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.12.018
Stock et al. (2019) Stock SC Köster M Dippold MA Nájera F Matus F Merino C Boy J Spielvogel S Gorbushina A Kuzyakov Y Environmental drivers and stoichiometric constraints on enzyme activities in soils from rhizosphere to continental scale Geoderma 2019 337 973 982 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.10.030
Tabatabai (1994) Tabatabai MA Weaver RW Angel JS Bottomley PS Soil enzymes Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2 1994 Madison, WI Soil Science Society of America
Tabatabai & Bremner (1969) Tabatabai MA Bremner JM Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity Soil Biology and Biochemistry 1969 1 4 301 307 10.1016/0038-0717(69)90012-1
Tian et al. (2020) Tian M-Y Yu C-J Wang J-K Ding F Chen Z-H Jiang N Jiang H Chen L-J Effect of nitrogen additions on soil pH, phosphorus contents and phosphatase activities in grassland Ying Yong Sheng tai xue bao= The Journal of Applied Ecology 2020 31 2985 2992 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202009.034 33345499
Treseder (2008) Treseder KK Nitrogen additions and microbial biomass: a meta-analysis of ecosystem studies Ecology Letters 2008 11 10 1111 1120 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01230.x 18673384
Vance, Brookes & Jenkinson (1987) Vance ED Brookes PC Jenkinson DS An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C Soil Biology and Biochemistry 1987 19 6 703 707 10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6
Walkley & Black (1934) Walkley A Black IA An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method Soil Science 1934 37 1 29 38 10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
Wang et al. (2014) Wang R Filley TR Xu Z Wang X Li M-H Zhang Y Luo W Jiang Y Coupled response of soil carbon and nitrogen pools and enzyme activities to nitrogen and water addition in a semi-arid grassland of inner Mongolia Plant and Soil 2014 381 1–2 323 336 10.1007/s11104-014-2129-2
Ward et al. (2017) Ward D Kirkman K Hagenah N Tsvuura Z Soil respiration declines with increasing nitrogen fertilization and is not related to productivity in long-term grassland experiments Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2017 115 415 422 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.08.035
Wende et al. (2020) Wende YAN Xiaoyong C Yuanying P Fan ZHU Wei Z Zhang X Response of soil respiration to nitrogen addition in two subtropical forest types Pedosphere 2020 30 4 478 486 10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60471-5
Xia et al. (2024) Xia Y Peñuelas J Sardans J Zhong X Xu L Yang Z Yang Y Yang L Yue K Fan Y Phosphorus addition accelerates soil organic carbon mineralization by desorbing organic carbon and increasing microbial activity in subtropical forest soils Applied Soil Ecology 2024 193 3 105166 10.1016/j.apsoil.2023.105166
Xiang et al. (2008) Xiang S-R Doyle A Holden PA Schimel JP Drying and rewetting effects on C and N mineralization and microbial activity in surface and subsurface California grassland soils Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2008 40 9 2281 2289 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.05.004
Zagal et al. (2003) Zagal E Longeri L Vidal I Hoffman G González R Influence of nitrogen and phosphorous addition on the decomposition of wheat straw in a soil derived from volcanic ash Agricultura Técnica 2003 63 403 415
Zhang et al. (2021) Zhang J Li Y Wang J Chen W Tian D Niu S Different responses of soil respiration and its components to nitrogen and phosphorus addition in a subtropical secondary forest Forest Ecosystems 2021 8 1 1 13 10.1186/s40663-021-00313-z
Zheng et al. (2024) Zheng Y Jin J Wang X Kopittke PM O’Sullivan JB Tang C Disentangling the effect of nitrogen supply on the priming of soil organic matter: a critical review Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 2024 54 8 676 697 10.1080/10643389.2023.2266312
Zhou et al. (2021) Zhou J Wen Y Shi L Marshall MR Kuzyakov Y Blagodatskaya E Zang H Strong priming of soil organic matter induced by frequent input of labile carbon Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2021 152 108069 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.108069
