
==== Front
Orphanet J Rare Dis
Orphanet J Rare Dis
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
1750-1172
BioMed Central London

3331
10.1186/s13023-024-03331-6
Research
Genetic profiling and diagnostic strategies for patients with ectodermal dysplasias in Korea
Kim Man Jin 1
Lee Jee-Soo 2
Chae Seung Won 23
Cho Sung Im 2
Moon Jangsup 1
Ko Jung Min 4
Chae Jong-Hee 14
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2954-3677
Seong Moon-Woo mwseong@snu.ac.kr

23
1 https://ror.org/01z4nnt86 grid.412484.f 0000 0001 0302 820X Department of Genomic Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
2 https://ror.org/01z4nnt86 grid.412484.f 0000 0001 0302 820X Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, 101, Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, 110-744 Korea
3 https://ror.org/04h9pn542 grid.31501.36 0000 0004 0470 5905 Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
4 grid.412484.f 0000 0001 0302 820X Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
7 9 2024
7 9 2024
2024
19 3296 9 2023
21 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Background

Ectodermal dysplasia (ED) is a rare genetic disorder that affects structures derived from the ectodermal germ layer.

Results

In this study, we analyzed the genetic profiles of 27 Korean patients with ED. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed on 23 patients, and targeted panel sequencing was conducted on the remaining 4 patients. Among the patients in the cohort, 74.1% (20/27) tested positive for ED. Of these positive cases, EDA and EDAR mutations were found in 80% (16/20). Notably, 23.1% (3/13) of EDA-positive cases exhibited copy number variations. Among the 23 patients who underwent WES, we conducted a virtual panel analysis of eight well-known genes, resulting in diagnoses for 56.5% (13/23) of the cases. Additionally, further analysis of approximately 5,000 OMIM genes identified four more cases, increasing the overall positivity rate by approximately 17%. These findings underscore the potential of WES for improving the diagnostic yield of ED. Remarkably, 94.1% of the patients manifesting the complete triad of ED symptoms (hair/skin/dental) displayed detectable EDA/EDAR mutations. In contrast, none of the 7 patients without these three symptoms exhibited EDA/EDAR mutations.

Conclusions

When conducting molecular diagnostics for ED, opting for targeted sequencing of EDA/EDAR mutations is advisable for cases with classical symptoms, while WES is deemed an effective strategy for cases in which these symptoms are absent.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13023-024-03331-6.

Keywords

Ectodermal dysplasia
Genetic diseases
Inborn
High-throughput nucleotide sequencing
Exome sequencing
Korea
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003669 Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 6500-6534-306, 4860-306-320 Seong Moon-Woo issue-copyright-statement© Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) 2024
==== Body
pmcBackground

Historically, conditions classified as ectodermal dysplasia (ED) have exhibited genetic and clinical heterogeneity. A unifying factor among these conditions is the genetic basis of developmental anomalies in tissues originating from the ectoderm [1]. The ectoderm gives rise to various structures, including the epidermis, central and peripheral nervous systems, placodes (including cranial placodes), and neural crest cells [2]. Early classification systems, such as those formulated by Dr. Newton Freire-Maia, categorized EDs based on their inheritance patterns and phenotypic characteristics. The Freire-Maia classification has significantly contributed to our understanding of these disorders and directed approaches to their management. The conditions were classified into two groups based on the extent of tissue involvement: group A, characterized by cases where at least two critical ectodermal tissues, such as hair, teeth, nails, eccrine and other glands, were affected, and group B, encompassing conditions that involved one of the aforementioned tissues along with at least one other ectodermal derivative [2].

Advancements in our understanding of the human genome have revealed molecular correlations among certain ED conditions beyond their traditional categorization based on phenotypes. The identification of causative genetic mutations in genes such as EDA, EDAR, EDARADD, TRAF6, and NFkB pathway-related genes has provided insights into the genetic foundation of EDs [3, 4]. These genetic mutations can yield comparable clinical phenotypes, and heterozygosity, compound heterozygosity, and homozygosity can contribute to these disorders. Almost 50% of historically classified EDs are now recognized to have causative genetic mutations encompassing those underlying more common ED conditions. Over the last decade, significant developments have been made in molecular methodologies that facilitate diagnostic differentiation for EDs [5]. Given the expanding therapeutic possibilities, these diagnoses have significant clinical value. Therefore, it is crucial to establish effective strategies for molecular diagnosis tailored to each patient. The choice between targeted panel sequencing (TPS) and whole exome sequencing (WES) should be guided by specific phenotypes observed in ED cases, emphasizing the need for a well-defined strategy.

Materials and methods

Patients and enrolment criteria

We enrolled 27 patients with ED between August 2018 and October 2022. We obtained 15 samples from 11 clinical sites throughout South Korea, which were sent to the coordinating center of the Korean Genetic Diagnosis Program for Rare Diseases (KGDP) Phase II, Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gtr/labs/320228/). The remaining 12 samples were obtained from patients with ED who were seen at the Seoul National University Hospital. The inclusion criteria encompassed the enrollment of individuals manifesting at least one of the symptoms associated with ectodermal dysplasia. All genetic tests were conducted at the Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, and the results were interpreted by clinical pathologists with expertise in molecular diagnostics. All study procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board of SNUH (IRB number: 2212-114-1389), and the study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki for biomedical research involving human subjects.

Workflow of the mutation screening

Among the 27 patients, all 15 patients enrolled by KGDP underwent WES. Additionally, among the remaining 12 patients, those referred before September 2021 underwent TPS, while those referred after October 2021 underwent WES. Furthermore, two patients (ED4, ED26) who showed copy number variations (CNVs) by bioinformatics tool for global normalization (as suggested by NextGENe; SoftGenetics) underwent multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA).

Targeted panel sequencing (TPS)

Of the 27 patients, 4 (14.8%) underwent TPS to analyze representative genes (EDA, EDAR, EDARADD, LTBP3, MSX1, NFKBIA, PAX9, WNT10A) associated with ED. TPS was performed as described below. DNA was extracted from peripheral blood using a Chemagic 360 instrument (Perkin Elmer, Baesweiler, Germany). Library preparation was performed according to the SureSelect QXT target enrichment protocol (Agilent Technologies). Paired-end 150 bp sequencing was performed using the MiSeq Dx platform (Illumina, San Diego, California, USA). The generated sequencing data were then aligned to the human reference genome sequence (GRCh37/hg19), with subsequent identification and annotation of qualified variants using NextGENe V.2.4.0.1 (SoftGenetics). The detected variants were subjected to variant classification in accordance with the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) guidelines [6]. Furthermore, to predict CNVs from the targeted NGS data, a bioinformatics tool for global normalization (as suggested by NextGENe; SoftGenetics) was employed for the log2 ratio calculation.

Whole exome sequencing

DNA was isolated from the peripheral blood of the remaining 23 patients (85.2%) for WES using a Chemagic 360 instrument (Perkin Elmer, Baesweiler, Germany). The extracted DNA was fragmented using a Covaris E220 focused ultrasonicator (Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA). DNA fragments were targeted and captured using the Agilent SureSelect All Exon V8 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). A total of 500 ng of genomic DNA was used as the input. Library preparation was performed using the SureSelect XT Target Enrichment Protocol (Agilent Technologies). Paired-end 150 bp sequencing was conducted using the NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina). Bioinformatics processes from alignment to annotation were performed using NextGene (Version 2.4.0.1; Software Genetics, State College, PA, USA).

Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA)

DNA denaturation, probe hybridization, ligation, and PCR of the ligated probes were conducted in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The amplified products were subsequently analyzed using an ABI 3130xl capillary sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The GeneMarker V.1.51 software (SoftGenetics) was employed for the determination of fragment length and copy number for each fragment.

Variant interpretation

All identified variants were categorized according to the five-tier system delineated by the ACMG, which encompasses pathogenic, likely pathogenic, variants of uncertain significance (VUS), likely benign, and benign classifications. Variants falling into the pathogenic or likely pathogenic categories were deemed clinically significant. Multiple databases, including HGMD (www.hgmd.org), ClinVar (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/intro/), and OMIM (https://www.omim.org/), were consulted for reference [6].

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were presented as counts and percentages (%) and analyzed using the χ2 test. All statistical analyses were performed using the R V.4.0.0 (The R Foundation; www.r-project.org). Statistical significance was established for p-values less than 0.05.

Results

Descriptive analysis of mutation-positive ED cases

Descriptive statistics for the 20 positive cases are presented in Table 1. Hypotrichosis was observed in all but one case (ED16), and anhidrosis/hypohidrosis was present in all but two cases (ED16 and ED23). Hypodontia/anodontia was observed in all cases except three (ED6, 9, and 23). For ED23, accurate tooth assessment is challenging because of delayed dentition. Altogether cases carrying mutations in the EDA and EDAR genes were 16, accounting for 80% (16/20) of the total positive cases. Among these, EDA accounted for the majority (13 cases), and notably, CNVs were responsible for three cases (23.1%). The remaining genes in which mutations were detected included one case each of ERCC2, DSG4, LRP6, and LIPH.

Table 1 Descriptive statistics of positive ectodermal dysplasia cases (n = 20)

Pts.	Age at testing (yr)	Sex	Clinical Characteristics	Other phenotypes	Gene	MANE
transcript	Disease	MIM	Mode
of inheritance	Variant	Classification	
Hypotrichosis	Hypohidrosis	Hypodontia/Anodontia	
ED2	39	M	Yes	Yes	Yes	eczema	EDA	NM_001399.5	XLHED	305,100	XLR	c.252del, p.Gly85Alafs*6, hem	P	
ED3	20	M	Yes	Yes	Yes		EDAR	NM_022336.4	Ectodermal dysplasia 10 A	129,490	AD	c.1043T > C, p.Leu348Pro, het	LP	
ED4	1	M	Yes	Yes	Yes	facial asymmetry, hemivertebra, atopic dermatitis	EDA	NM_001399.5	XLHED	305,100	XLR	exon 2 deletion, hem	P	
ED6	5	M	Yes	Yes	No*	frequent febrile episode, micropenis, adrenal hemorrhage	ERCC2	NM_000400.4	Trichothiodystrophy 1, photosensitive	601,675	AR	c.591_594del, p.Tyr197*, het	P	
c.1004G > A, p.Arg335Gln, het	LP	
ED7	28	M	Yes	Yes	Yes	depressed nasal dorsum, oriental eyelid	EDA	NM_001399.5	XLHED	305,100	XLR	c.572del, p.Pro191Glnfs*89, hem	P	
ED9	0†	F	Yes	Yes	No	skin tag of anus	DSG4	NM_177986.5	Hypotrichosis 6	607,903	AR	c.574T > C, p.Ser192Pro, hom	LP	
ED10	3	M	Yes	Yes	Yes		EDA	NM_001399.5	XLHED	305,100	XLR	c.599dup, p.Gly201Argfs*39, hem	P	
ED11	1	M	Yes	Yes	Yes		EDA	NM_001399.5	XLHED	305,100	XLR	c.1142G > A, p.Gly381Glu, hem	LP	
ED12	8	M	Yes	Yes	Yes	atopic dermatitis	EDAR	NM_022336.4	Ectodermal dysplasia 10 A	129,490	AD	c.1258 C > T, p.Arg420Trp, het	LP	
ED13	19	M	Yes	Yes	Yes	atopic dermatitis	EDA	NM_001399.5	XLHED	305,100	XLR	c.1049G > A, p.Gly350Asp, hem	LP	
ED14	19	M	Yes	Yes	Yes		EDA	NM_001399.5	XLHED	305,100	XLR	c.1133 C > T, p.Thr378Met, hem	LP	
ED15	1	M	Yes	Yes	Yes		EDA	NM_001399.5	XLHED	305,100	XLR	exon 1–2 deletion, hem	P	
ED16	4	M	No	No	Yes		LRP6	NM_002336.3	Tooth agenesis, selective, 7	616,724	AD	c.94 C > T, p.Arg32*, het	P	
ED19	40	M	Yes	Yes	Yes		EDA	NM_001399.5	XLHED	305,100	XLR	c.707del, p.Gly236Valfs*44, hem	LP	
ED20	17	M	Yes	Yes	Yes	nail dystrophy, atopic dermatitis	EDA	NM_001399.5	XLHED	305,100	XLR	c.599dup, p.Gly201Argfs*39, hem	P	
ED21	2	M	Yes	Yes	Yes		EDA	NM_001399.5	XLHED	305,100	XLR	c.457 C > T, p.Arg153Cys, hem	P	
ED23	7	M	Yes	No	NA‡		LIPH	NM_139248.3	Hypotrichosis 7	604,379	AR	c.736T > A, p.Cys246Ser, het	P	
c.928del, p.Asp310Ilefs*4, het	LP	
ED25	1	M	Yes	Yes	Yes		EDA	NM_001399.5	XLHED	305,100	XLR	c.463 C > T, p.Arg155Cys, hem	P	
ED26	32	M	Yes	Yes	Yes		EDA	NM_001399.5	XLHED	305,100	XLR	exon 2 duplication, hem	P	
ED27	17	F	Yes	Yes	Yes		EDAR	NM_022336.4	Ectodermal dysplasia 10 A	129,490	AD	c.1259G > A, p.Arg420Gln, het	LP	
* Dystrophic teeth are observed

† 3 days

‡ Not assessed due to delayed dentition

XLHED: X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia; XLR: X-linked recessive; AD: autosomal dominant; AR: autosomal recessive; NA: not assessed; hem: hemizygote; Het: heterozygote; P: pathogenic; LP: likely pathogenic

Cases with EDA/EDAR mutations

EDA and EDAR mutations were detected in 16 cases, including 15 male patients and 1 female patient, who tested positive for EDAR. The average patient age was 15.5 years. In positive cases, mutation sites within EDA and EDAR were annotated in the functional domains. (Fig. 1). Missense mutations were localized toward the termini of the established furin and TNF domains, whereas loss-of-function (LOF) mutations were predominantly clustered within the COL domain. Concerning EDAR mutations, three alterations were detected in the death domain. Notably, a novel missense mutation in EDAR gene (NM_022336 c.1043T > C, p.L348P) was confirmed as a de novo mutation based on parental testing results (Supplementary Figure S1).

Fig. 1 Genetic variants of EDA/EDAR in positive ectodermal dysplasia cases. Among 16 cases, 15 sequence variants were identified (p.G201Rfs*39 was detected in both ED10 and ED20). Three EDA CNVs are shown at the top left. Among the four frameshift mutations, three were located in the COL domain of the EDA gene, two missense mutations were in the furin domain, and three were at the end of the TNF domain. Three missense EDAR mutations were identified: two in the C-terminal end of the DD and one slightly upstream of the DD domain. COL, collagen-like domain; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; DD, death domain

Cases with mutations in genes other than EDA/EDAR

ED6 had biallelic mutations on ERCC2. He is a 5-year-old boy who exhibited classic symptoms including hypotrichosis and hypohidrosis. Hypodontia was not prominent; instead, dysmorphic teeth were observed. Notably, he had a history of frequent febrile episodes, along with the presence of micropenis accompanied by underdeveloped scrotum, and adrenal hemorrhage during the neonatal period (Table 1). ERCC2 is associated with xeroderma pigmentosum group D (MIM: 278730) in an autosomal recessive manner. Moreover, biallelic mutations in ERCC2 can also lead to photosensitive trichothiodystrophy. Two mutations in ERCC2 were identified: a frameshift mutation and a missense mutation that was initially categorized as VUS. However, subsequent parental testing led to the segregation and reclassification of these two mutations as likely pathogenic, thereby confirming the genetic basis of the disease.

ED9 had a homozygous mutation, c.574T > C, p.Ser192Pro, in the DSG4 gene. DSG4 is the causal gene of autosomal recessive hypotrichosis 6 (MIM: 607903), which is inherited in an autosomal recessive manner. Interestingly, ED9 exhibited hypohidrosis, whereas typically DSG4-mutation positive patients show normal sweating.

ED16, a 4-year-old boy, presented with a normal complement of 20 deciduous teeth; however, routine X-rays revealed multiple missing permanent teeth (more than half absent). A de novo mutation in LRP6 was detected. This variant is a heterozygous pathogenic nonsense mutation (c.94 C > T, p.Arg32*) in the LRP6 gene. LRP6 is associated with the autosomal dominant tooth agenesis-selective 7 (MIM: 616724).

Lastly, ED23, a 7-year-old boy, exhibited hypotrichosis, although hypohidrosis was not observed. Hypodontia could not be confirmed due to delayed dentition. ED23 patient harbored a pathogenic mutation (c.736T > A, p.Cys246Ser, heterozygous) and a likely pathogenic frameshift variant (c.928del, p.Asp310Ilefs*4, heterozygous) in the LIPH gene. LIPH is associated with autosomal recessive hypotrichosis 7 (MIM: 604379).

Analysis of negative cases with ED symptoms

Table 2 displays 7 negative cases. Among these, all seven patients were male, with dental issues evident in six cases (85.7%), hypohidrosis/anhidrosis in two cases (28.6%), and hypotrichosis in three cases (42.9%). Furthermore, three patients exhibited symptoms unrelated to the ectodermal origin, such as optic neuropathy and failure to thrive. Novel VUS were identified in four patients. Specifically, WNT10A variants were observed in 2 cases, and EDA and KDF1 were present in 1 case. Except for the WNT10A c.511 C > T variant, the remaining three variants were predicted to be deleterious based on all three in silico prediction tools. The sequence variants identified in EDA and KDF1 are not annotated in the GnomAD database of human variations. Parental testing was only feasible for the KDF1 case, where the mother was found to be a carrier and had few permanent teeth.

Table 2 Descriptive statistics of negative ectodermal dysplasia cases (n = 7)

Pts.	Age at testing (yr)	Sex	Clinical characteristics	Other phenotypes	Gene	MANE
transcript	Disease	MIM	Mode
of inheritance	Variant	gnomAD (%)	SIFT	Polyphen	MutationTaster	Classification	
Hair	Skin	Dental	
ED1	10	M	brown colored hair, no eyebrows or eyelashes	normal sweating	normal	optic neuropathy, DD, low set ear, microcephaly, spastic gait												
ED5	7	M	hypotrichosis	normal sweating	hypodontia	failure to thrive, hydrocele												
ED8	11	M	hypotrichosis	anhidrosis	anodontia	nail dystrophy, hypothyroidism, obesity, osteoporosis, lightly pigmented eyes, limping gait	EDA	NM_001399.5	XLHED	305,100	XLR	c.410 A > T, p.Asn137Ile, hem	None	Deleterious	Probably damaging	Deleterious	VUS	
ED17	9	M	normal	normal	hypodontia													
ED18	12	M	normal	hypohidrosis	hypodontia		KDF1	NM_152365.3	Ectodermal dysplasia 12	617,337	AD	c.911T > G, p.Ile304Ser, het	None	Deleterious	Probably damaging	Deleterious	VUS	
ED22	7	M	hypotrichosis	NA	hypodontia		WNT10A	NM_025216.3	Tooth agenesis, selective, 4	150,400	AD	c.511 C > T, p.Arg171Cys, het	0.19	Deleterious	Probably damaging	Deleterious	VUS	
ED24	39	M	normal	normal	hypodontia		WNT10A	NM_025216.3	Tooth agenesis, selective, 4	150,400	AD	c.364 A > T, p.Ile122Phe, het	0.004	Deleterious	Benign	Deleterious	VUS	
Pts, patients; DD, developmental delay; NA, not assessed; XLHED, X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia; XLR, X-linked recessive; AD, autosomal dominant; AR, autosomal recessive; hem, hemizygote; Het, heterozygote; VUS, variant of uncertain significance

Correlation between EDA/EDAR mutation detection and classic symptom presentation

Table 3 illustrates the mutation detection rates of EDA and EDAR based on the presence of hair, skin, or dental symptoms. Notably, of patients exhibiting all three symptoms, 94.1% had EDA/EDAR mutations; of those who did not show these three symptoms, none had EDA/EDAR mutations.

Table 3 Detection rate of EDA/EDAR mutations according to symptoms

Clinical characteristics	Positive yield in EDA, EDAR genes	P	
Hair/ Skin/ Dental	
All present	94.1% (16/17)	< 0.0001	
Not all present	0% (0/10)		

Discussion

To date, this is the largest molecular study conducted in a Korean population with suspected ED. The EDA and EDAR genes constitute the molecular basis of 74.1% of patients with ED. The detection of mutations in relatively novel genes, including DSG4, ERCC2, LIPH, and LRP6, which elucidate disorders characterized by only one or two classic symptoms of ED, underscores the efficacy of WES [7].

The number of genome-wide methods capable of diagnosing rare diseases has been increasing. However, to optimize the allocation of the limited funds available for clinical NGS diagnostics, it is essential to utilize existing resources in an efficient and economically viable manner [8]. Therefore, selecting an appropriate genetic test based on the phenotype of a rare disease is an efficient strategy. We demonstrated the presence of EDA and EDAR mutations in over 90% of patients exhibiting the three classical ectodermal symptoms.

In the case of one patient with VUS on EDA, the c.410 A > T variant was reported as a VUS with “insufficient evidence” in ClinVar. For EDA patients, this variant has been previously reported to be absent in the normal population and has been predicted to be deleterious by in silico prediction tools such as Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant (SIFT) [9], Polymorphism Phenotyping version 2 (PolyPhen-2) [10], and Combined Annotation-Dependent Depletion (CADD) [11]. Therefore, there is a possibility that it may be reclassified as likely pathogenic based on additional evidence, such as segregation study data, in the future.

However, in cases where classical ED symptoms are not fully exhibited, or when other tissue symptoms are present, such as in Group B, WES may be a favorable strategy. Furthermore, in cases of atypical ED, various genes have sporadically been observed to have mutations, and new genes continue to be discovered [12, 13]. Conversely, in cases where patients exhibit typical ED symptoms but test negative, techniques such as MLPA or WGS should be considered because of the possibility of mutations that are not easily detected by conventional NGS methods, such as CNVs or structural variations in EDA and EDAR.

Promising therapeutic avenues have emerged for patients with ED [14]. A drug-targeting strategy involving the neonatal Fc receptor has shown potential in addressing sweating deficiency associated with X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia, especially when administered during fetal development [15, 16]. Ongoing clinical trials of fetal therapy aim to validate the observed enhancements in male fetuses undergoing in utero treatment. Moreover, there are ongoing advancements in translational research on regenerative therapies for skin and corneal lesions using patient-derived stem cells, and dental interventions are being devised to enhance oral function in patients with EDs [5]. Thus, establishing diagnostic strategies for ED is becoming increasingly important. Our study sheds light on effective diagnostic strategies based on ED phenotype.

Conclusions

In conclusion, when performing molecular diagnostics for ED, it is recommended to choose targeted sequencing of EDA/EDAR mutations in cases with classical symptoms. In contrast, WES is considered an effective approach for cases lacking these typical symptoms.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Author contributions

MK and MS conceived the study. MK drafted the manuscript and designed the figure. MS supervised the findings of this work. MK, MS, JL, SWC, SIC, JM, JK and JC reviewed the manuscript. MK, MS, JL, SWC, SIC, JM, JK and JC approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the grant 03-2023-0420 from the Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH) Research Fund.

Data availability

We are unable to provide the requested data due to privacy concerns, and therefore cannot offer the URL. It can be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All study procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board of SNUH (IRB number: 2212-114-1389), and the study adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki for biomedical research involving human subjects.

Consent for publication

The patients or their legal guardians provided written informed consent for the publication of this study.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

ED Ectodermal dysplasia

WES Whole exome sequencing

TPS Targeted panel sequencing

KGDP Korean Genetic Diagnosis Program for Rare Diseases

SNUH Seoul National University Hospital

CNVs Copy number variations

MLPA Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification

ACMG American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics

VUS Variants of uncertain significance

LOF Loss-of-function

SIFT Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant

PolyPhen-2 Polymorphism Phenotyping version 2

CADD Combined Annotation-Dependent Depletion

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Deshmukh S Prashanth S Ectodermal dysplasia: a genetic review Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2012 5 197 202 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1165 25206167
Deshmukh S, Prashanth S. Ectodermal dysplasia: a genetic review. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012;5:197–202.25206167 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1165
2. Wright JT Fete M Schneider H Zinser M Koster MI Clarke AJ Ectodermal dysplasias: classification and organization by phenotype, genotype and molecular pathway Am J Med Genet A 2019 179 442 7 10.1002/ajmg.a.61045 30703280
Wright JT, Fete M, Schneider H, Zinser M, Koster MI, Clarke AJ, et al. Ectodermal dysplasias: classification and organization by phenotype, genotype and molecular pathway. Am J Med Genet A. 2019;179:442–7.30703280 10.1002/ajmg.a.61045
3. Naito A Yoshida H Nishioka E Satoh M Azuma S Yamamoto T TRAF6-deficient mice display hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002 99 8766 71 10.1073/pnas.132636999 12060722
Naito A, Yoshida H, Nishioka E, Satoh M, Azuma S, Yamamoto T, et al. TRAF6-deficient mice display hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:8766–71.12060722 10.1073/pnas.132636999
4. Smahi A Courtois G Rabia SH Döffinger R Bodemer C Munnich A The NF-kappaB signalling pathway in human diseases: from incontinentia pigmenti to ectodermal dysplasias and immune-deficiency syndromes Hum Mol Genet 2002 11 2371 5 10.1093/hmg/11.20.2371 12351572
Smahi A, Courtois G, Rabia SH, Döffinger R, Bodemer C, Munnich A, et al. The NF-kappaB signalling pathway in human diseases: from incontinentia pigmenti to ectodermal dysplasias and immune-deficiency syndromes. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11:2371–5.12351572 10.1093/hmg/11.20.2371
5. Schneider H Ectodermal dysplasias: new perspectives on the treatment of so far immedicable genetic disorders Front Genet 2022 13 1000744 10.3389/fgene.2022.1000744 36147498
Schneider H. Ectodermal dysplasias: new perspectives on the treatment of so far immedicable genetic disorders. Front Genet. 2022;13:1000744.36147498 10.3389/fgene.2022.1000744
6. Richards S Aziz N Bale S Bick D Das S Gastier-Foster J Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology Genet Med 2015 17 405 24 10.1038/gim.2015.30 25741868
Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17:405–24.25741868 10.1038/gim.2015.30
7. Martínez-Romero MC, Ballesta-Martínez MJ, López-González V, Sánchez-Soler MJ, Serrano-Antón AT, Barreda-Sánchez M, et al. EDA, EDAR, EDARADD and WNT10A allelic variants in patients with ectodermal derivative impairment in the Spanish population. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019;14:281.
8. Jezkova J Shaw S Taverner NV Williams HJ Rapid genome sequencing for pediatrics Hum Mutat 2022 43 1507 18 10.1002/humu.24466 36086948
Jezkova J, Shaw S, Taverner NV, Williams HJ. Rapid genome sequencing for pediatrics. Hum Mutat. 2022;43:1507–18.36086948 10.1002/humu.24466
9. Sim NL Kumar P Hu J Henikoff S Schneider G Ng PC SIFT web server: predicting effects of amino acid substitutions on proteins Nucleic Acids Res 2012 40 W452 7 10.1093/nar/gks539 22689647
Sim NL, Kumar P, Hu J, Henikoff S, Schneider G, Ng PC. SIFT web server: predicting effects of amino acid substitutions on proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:W452–7. (Web Server issue).22689647 10.1093/nar/gks539
10. Adzhubei I, Jordan DM, Sunyaev SR. Predicting functional effect of human missense mutations using PolyPhen-2. Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2013;Chap. 7:Unit7.20.
11. Rentzsch P Witten D Cooper GM Shendure J Kircher M CADD: predicting the deleteriousness of variants throughout the human genome Nucleic Acids Res 2019 47 D886 94 10.1093/nar/gky1016 30371827
Rentzsch P, Witten D, Cooper GM, Shendure J, Kircher M. CADD: predicting the deleteriousness of variants throughout the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D886–94.30371827 10.1093/nar/gky1016
12. Lévy J, Capri Y, Rachid M, Dupont C, Vermeesch JR, Devriendt K, et al. LEF1 haploinsufficiency causes ectodermal dysplasia. Clin Genet. 2020;97:595–600.
13. Yu M Fan Z Wong SW Sun K Zhang L Liu H Lrp6 dynamic expression in tooth development and mutations in oligodontia J Dent Res 2021 100 415 22 10.1177/0022034520970459 33164649
Yu M, Fan Z, Wong SW, Sun K, Zhang L, Liu H, et al. Lrp6 dynamic expression in tooth development and mutations in oligodontia. J Dent Res. 2021;100:415–22.33164649 10.1177/0022034520970459
14. Schneider H Faschingbauer F Schuepbach-Mallepell S Körber I Wohlfart S Dick A Prenatal correction of X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia N Engl J Med 2018 378 1604 10 10.1056/NEJMoa1714322 29694819
Schneider H, Faschingbauer F, Schuepbach-Mallepell S, Körber I, Wohlfart S, Dick A, et al. Prenatal correction of X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1604–10.29694819 10.1056/NEJMoa1714322
15. Schneider H Hadj-Rabia S Faschingbauer F Bodemer C Grange DK Norton ME Protocol for the phase 2 EDELIFE trial investigating the efficacy and safety of intra-amniotic ER004 administration to male subjects with X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia Genes (Basel) 2023 14 153 10.3390/genes14010153 36672894
Schneider H, Hadj-Rabia S, Faschingbauer F, Bodemer C, Grange DK, Norton ME, et al. Protocol for the phase 2 EDELIFE trial investigating the efficacy and safety of intra-amniotic ER004 administration to male subjects with X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. Genes (Basel). 2023;14:153.36672894 10.3390/genes14010153
16. Schneider H, Schweikl C, Faschingbauer F, Hadj-Rabia S, Schneider P. A causal treatment for X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia: long-term results of short-term perinatal ectodysplasin A1 replacement. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24.
