
==== Front
Tob Induc Dis
Tob Induc Dis
TID
Tobacco Induced Diseases
2070-7266
1617-9625
European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID)

TID-22-153
10.18332/tid/191994
Research Paper
E-cigarette use and associated factors among adults aged 18–44 years in China: Findings from an online survey
Yang Xiaochen 1*
Zhang Xiaoyue 1*
Zhang Lanchao 1
Cao Wangnan 1
Zhang Chengqian 1
Wang Xiangsu 2
Wang Shiyuan 3
Chang Chun 1
1 School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
2 Jiangsu Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China
3 School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
CORRESPONDENCE TO Chun Chang. Department of Social Medicine and Health Education, School of Public Health, Peking University, 38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China. E-mail: changchun@bjmu.edu.cn ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3337-678X
* Contributed equally

07 9 2024
2024
22 10.18332/tid/19199416 6 2024
03 8 2024
06 8 2024
© 2024 Yang X. et al.
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
INTRODUCTION

There needs to be more up-to-date evidence on the prevalence of e-cigarette use among Chinese adults. This study aims to investigate the prevalence and associated factors of e-cigarette use among adults aged 18–44 years in China.

METHODS

Cross-sectional design and convenience sampling were used. The data for this study were obtained from an online survey conducted in mainland China from April to May 2023. The target population was adults aged 18–44 years. Descriptive analysis was employed to report the prevalence of e-cigarette use, while adjusted multivariable logistic regression was performed to examine the association between e-cigarette use and related factors.

RESULTS

A total of 4256 participants were included in this study; 12.9% were current e-cigarette users, 5.9% were frequent users, and 7.0% were occasional users. The descriptive analysis results indicated that males and cigarette users had a higher prevalence of e-cigarette use. Multivariable analysis showed that e-cigarette use was significantly associated with female gender (AOR=0.76, 95% CI: 0.60–0.96), those aged 25–34 years with monthly income 6000–8999 CNY (AOR=2.01; 95% CI: 1.18–3.41), those aged 25–34 years with monthly income ≥9000 CNY (AOR=2.20; 95% CI: 1.26–3.82), college or undergraduate degree (AOR=1.91; 95% CI: 1.22–3.00), urban residence (AOR=1.72; 95% CI: 1.34–2.20), being a current smoker (AOR=3.32; 95% CI: 2.64–4.16), perception of harm (AOR=0.66; 95% CI: 0.60–0.73), and perception of benefit (AOR=2.31; 95% CI: 2.04–2.61).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of current e-cigarette use among adults in China was 12.9% within our sample. In addition to sociodemographic factors, individuals with a higher perception of the harm associated with e-cigarettes were less likely to engage in e-cigarette consumption. Conversely, individuals who perceive the ‘benefits’ of e-cigarettes more favorably use them. Targeted interventions, such as health education, are recommended to help adults develop a correct understanding of e-cigarettes and lower the prevalence of e-cigarette use.

e-cigarettes
prevalence
perception
cross-sectional survey
FUNDING The work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 82173637].
==== Body
pmcINTRODUCTION

Tobacco use remains a major public health challenge in China, as the prevalence of current smoking was 26.6% in 20181. The consumption of tobacco increases the risk of chronic diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cancer, and diabetes2,3. Evidence suggests that the risk of developing at least one chronic disease is approximately 3.86 times higher among heavy smokers than among non-smokers4. The Chinese government aims to reduce smoking prevalence among people aged ≥15 years to 20% by 2030, as outlined in the Healthy China 2030 Action Plan, recognizing the urgency of tobacco control5.

Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have become increasingly popular worldwide6. According to the China Adult Tobacco Survey, the proportion of adults aged ≥15 years who used e-cigarettes increased from 3.1% in 2015 to 5.0% in 2018, with a higher prevalence among males (9.3%)1,7. The increasing prevalence of e-cigarettes has prompted concerns among the general public regarding their potential health effects. For example, the consumption of sweet-flavored e-cigarettes could increase the likelihood of starting smoking, leading to dual use or greater nicotine addiction8.

The WHO 8th report on the global tobacco epidemic9, published in 2021, provided new data on e-cigarettes, emphasizing the harmful effects of e-cigarettes and the need for effective regulation. A study analyzing e-cigarette policies across 68 countries revealed that approximately a third of countries have no regulations specific to e-cigarettes10. In 2022, the Chinese government enacted the Regulation on the Administration Measures of E-cigarettes, which integrated e-cigarettes into the tobacco product regulatory framework, in line with the global trend of e-cigarette regulation11.

Previous studies suggested that sociodemographic factors such as age, income and education were associated with e-cigarette use patterns and preferences12,13. Evidence from some surveys conducted in China found that young adults, high-income groups, individuals with higher level of education, and urban residents were more likely to use e-cigarettes14,15. With the updated regulations for e-cigarettes in China16, including restrictions on sales channels and increased public awareness, the demographic characteristics of e-cigarette users may change. For example, Zhao et al.14 found that the use of e-cigarettes increased in both urban and rural areas from 2015 to 2016 as annual household income rose. However, individuals with low household income also showed a high prevalence of e-cigarette use in both areas from 2018 to 2019. Additionally, perceptions and attitudes towards e-cigarettes, including perceived harm or benefit, impact the decision to use them or abstain17.

Several surveys on e-cigarette use have been conducted in China, including the China Chronic Disease and Nutrition Surveillance Program14 and the China Tobacco-Free Cities Program in 2017–201815. Due to the rapid economic development and increasing popularity of e-cigarettes, up-to-date data are necessary. According to the 2018 China Adult Tobacco Survey Report1, those aged 15–44 years had the highest percentage of e-cigarette users, which is consistent with previous studies18,19. Thus, this study aims to estimate the prevalence of e-cigarette use among adults aged 18–44 years in China and identify the factors associated with e-cigarette use.

METHODS

Study design and sample

This cross-sectional study was conducted online in mainland China from April to May 2023. We used the convenience sampling method to select participants, but we also applied probability sampling principles to determine the sample size20. The criteria of participation were: 1) adults aged 18–44 years, and 2) able to independently complete the questionnaire. This study was reviewed and approved by the Biomedical Ethics Committee of Peking University (Approval number: IRB00001052-23091), and all participants provided informed consent.

We anticipated that the e-cigarette use rate was 9.5%, with α (significance level) set at 0.05 and a presumed standard error of 10%, a sample size of 3659 was required. To avoid biased sample selection, we conducted sampling according to the age and sex proportion of the national population in 2020. Considering the additional bias of the convenience sampling method, we expanded the sample size to >4000 participants. Data were collected through online anonymous questionnaires. We utilized the Wenjuanxing platform, a large online survey company in China, for participant recruitment in this study. Various studies have utilized the Wenjuanxing platform for data collection, indicating its widespread use21,22. We utilized the sample services of Wenjuanxing, where the sample pool was selected based on research requirements to conduct surveys, ensuring the sample was representative.

Initially, a pre-survey was distributed to assess potential interest in participation in the survey. Subsequently, the formal questionnaire was distributed to those interested in participating. Before participants answered the questionnaire, they were presented with an informed consent page. If participants agreed to participate in the study, they could click on the ‘Agree’ option and proceed to answer the questionnaire. The Wenjuanxing platform’s self-check function identified unqualified responses, such as those with random responses or excessively short completion times (<300 s). Finally, the submitted questionnaires were reviewed by researchers at Peking University, and any questionnaires with identified issues (such as discrepancies between birthdate and age) were promptly rechecked on the platform.

Measures

E-cigarette and cigarette use

We measured the smoking status based on the following questions: ‘Do you currently smoke? (Including traditional cigarettes and e-cigarettes)’. There were three response options: ‘Yes, currently smoking’, ‘Used to smoke, but not anymore’, and ‘Never smoked’. Participants who chose the first two options were asked a second question: ‘Which do you smoke, cigarettes or e-cigarettes?’. Response options were: ‘cigarettes,’ ‘e-cigarettes,’ or ‘both’. Current e-cigarette users were then asked: ‘Do you use it regularly or occasionally?’. Response options were: ‘frequent use’ or ‘occasional use’. Additionally, we defined current e-cigarette users and former e-cigarette users as ‘ever e-cigarette users’.

Sociodemographic characteristics

The main demographic characteristics in this study include age, gender, marital status, education level, residence, and income. Age was categorized into age groups of 18–24, 25–34, and 35–44 years. Education level was divided into three categories: high school or lower, college or undergraduate degree, and Master’s or higher. Marital status included unmarried, married, and widowed/divorced/separated. Monthly income in CNY (1000 Chinese Yuan about US$140) was divided into four categories: <3000 , 3000–5999, 6000–8999, and ≥9000. Residence was defined as either living in urban areas, or living in rural towns or villages.

Perception of harm and benefit regarding e-cigarette use

The perception of the benefit and harm of e-cigarette use was measured using 12 questions. The design of these questions was based on previous studies on e-cigarette perception17,19 and tailored to our study objectives. Each question had five response options (strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, strongly agree), and scores were assigned from 0 to 4. All participants in this study were required to respond (Cronbach’s alpha=0.86). In addition, to calculate participants’ perception rates of each question in the study, we categorized scores from 3 to 4 as ‘Agree’ and scores from 0 to 2 as ‘Disagree/Neutral’.

The following six questions were used to measure the perception of harm: 1) ‘Do you agree that e-cigarettes are harmful to your health?’; 2) ‘Do you agree that e-cigarette users are more likely to smoke cigarettes?’; 3) ‘Do you agree that using e-cigarettes can have a negative impact on your life?’; 4) ‘Do you agree that e-cigarette users are more likely to get addicted?’; 5) ‘Do you agree that e-cigarette users are more likely to have cardiovascular and lung diseases?’; and 6) ‘Do you agree that e-cigarette users are more likely to be anxious?’.

The variable of perception of benefit was also measured by six questions: 1) ‘Do you agree that using e-cigarettes can help to refresh yourself?’; 2) ‘Do you agree that using e-cigarettes can bring pleasure and enjoyment?’; 3) ‘Do you agree that smoking e-cigarettes helps you concentrate better?’; 4) ‘Do you agree that using e-cigarettes is fashionable?’; 5) ‘Do you agree that using e-cigarettes will not bother others?’; and 6) ‘Do you agree that e-cigarettes can facilitate socialization?’.

Statistical analysis

We assessed the characteristics of participants stratified by e-cigarette use status. The characteristics of participants according to e-cigarette use status were compared using chi-squared tests for categorical variables. We calculated perception rates for each question on e-cigarette use and conducted chi-squared tests to compare differences between subgroups by e-cigarette use status. To assess the effectiveness of the questions in measuring the perception of harm and benefit of using e-cigarettes and to calculate the scores for each indicator more scientifically, we employed principal component analysis (PCA) with varimax rotation by the R package psych. This analysis method linearly combines the original variables to create new composite variables and achieves dimensionality reduction. Additionally, we used a scree plot to determine the number of principal components, and component loadings to reflect each question’s contribution to the principal components. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) or t-tests were used to compare differences in principal component scores between different subgroups. The principal component scores from PCA, representing perceptions of e-cigarette harm and benefit, were included in subsequent multivariable logistic regression models to evaluate factors associated with current and ever use of e-cigarettes in the study population. Both models adjusted for age, gender, marital status, education level, residence, income, current cigarette use status, and perceptions of using e-cigarettes. All tests were two-sided with a significance level of p<0.05. Data analysis and visualizations were conducted using R-4.3.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

RESULTS

Basic characteristics

This study ultimately included 4256 participants, and the basic characteristics are presented in Table 1. Among the participants, 51.6% were male, 42.3% were aged 25–34 years, 64.6% were married, and 63.0% resided in urban areas. Additionally, 32.3% were cigarette smokers, 12.9% were current e-cigarette users (5.9% frequent users, 7% occasional users), and 16.7% were ever e-cigarette users.

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of the study participants by e-cigarette use status, among Chinese adults aged 18–44 years, 2023 (N=4256)

Characteristics	All n (%)	Current e-cigarette user	Ever e-cigarette user	
Yes n (%)	Non (%)	χ2	p	Yes n (%)	Non (%)	χ2	p	
Age (years)				60.67	<0.01			65.22	<0.01	
18–24	864 (20.3)	56 (6.5)	808 (93.5)			83 (9.6)	781 (90.4)			
25–34	1801 (42.3)	306 (17.0)	1495 (83.0)			389 (21.6)	1412 (78.4)			
35–44	1591 (37.4)	186 (11.7)	1405 (88.3)			240 (15.1)	1351 (84.9)			
Gender				102.86	<0.01			73.22	<0.01	
Male	2196 (51.6)	394 (17.9)	1802 (82.1)			472 (21.5)	1724 (78.5)			
Female	2060 (48.4)	154 (7.5)	1906 (92.5)			240 (11.7)	1820 (88.3)			
Marital status				36.69	<0.01			38.70	<0.01	
Never married	1438 (33.8)	126 (8.8)	1312 (91.2)			176 (12.2)	1262 (87.8)			
Married	2748 (64.6)	417 (15.2)	2331 (84.8)			531 (19.3)	2217 (80.7)			
Widowed/divorced/separated	70 (1.6)	5 (7.1)	65 (92.9)			5 (7.1)	65 (92.9)			
Education level				23.29	<0.01			17.59	<0.01	
High school or lower	465 (10.9)	27 (5.8)	438 (94.2)			46 (9.9)	419 (90.1)			
College or undergraduate degree	3471 (81.6)	478 (13.8)	2993 (86.2)			608 (17.5)	2863 (82.5)			
Master’s or higher	320 (7.5)	43 (13.4)	277 (86.6)			58 (18.1)	262 (81.9)			
Residence				64.02	<0.01			69.69	<0.01	
Rural	1576 (37.0)	118 (7.5)	1458 (92.5)			165 (10.5)	1411 (89.5)			
Urban	2680 (63.0)	430 (16.0)	2250 (84.0)			547 (20.4)	2133 (79.6)			
Monthly income (CNY)				151.21	<0.01			143.86	<0.01	
<3000	734 (17.2)	29 (4.0)	705 (96.0)			46 (6.3)	688 (93.7)			
3000–5999	1140 (26.8)	84 (7.4)	1056 (92.6)			130 (11.4)	1010 (88.6)			
6000–8999	1325 (31.1)	221 (16.7)	1104 (83.3)			276 (20.8)	1049 (79.2)			
≥9000	1057 (24.8)	214 (20.2)	843 (79.8)			260 (24.6)	797 (75.4)			
Cigarette smoker				357.82	<0.01			151.76	<0.01	
Yes	1376 (32.3)	371 (27.0)	1005 (73.0)			371 (27.0)	1005 (73.0)			
No	2880 (67.7)	177 (6.1)	2703 (93.9)			341 (11.8)	2539 (88.2)			
CNY: 1000 Chinese Yuan about US$140.

Perception rates and scores of harm and benefit of e-cigarette use

Regarding the perception of harm of e-cigarette use, over half of all respondents believed ‘e-cigarettes are harmful to your health’ and ‘using e-cigarettes can have a negative impact on your life’. These perceptions differed by e-cigarette use status (Table 2). Current and ever users were less likely than non-users to perceive e-cigarettes as harmful. For the perception of benefit, more than 40% of all participants believed using e-cigarettes ‘can help to refresh yourself’, ‘can bring pleasure and enjoyment’, and ‘will not bother others’. Only 15% of the participants reported that ‘e-cigarettes can facilitate socialization’. These beliefs also differed by e-cigarette use status. Both current and ever users were more likely than non-users to perceive e-cigarettes as having varying degrees of benefits (Table 2).

Table 2 Perception rates of harm and benefit of e-cigarettes in the study participants by e-cigarette use status, among Chinese adults aged 18–44 years, 2023 (N=4256)

Items	All %	Current e-cigarette user	Ever e-cigarette user	
Yes %	No %	χ2	p	Yes %	No %	χ2	p	
Perception of harm of e-cigarettes										
Harmful to your health	53.36	37.04	55.77	66.53	<0.01	37.22	56.60	88.73	<0.01	
Users are more likely to smoke cigarettes	37.08	25.55	38.78	35.27	<0.01	25.84	39.33	45.68	<0.01	
Using them can have a negative impact on your life	50.21	33.76	52.64	67.35	<0.01	35.53	53.16	72.98	<0.01	
Users are more likely to get addicted	44.45	27.19	47.01	75.13	<0.01	26.54	48.05	110.20	<0.01	
Users are more likely to have cardiovascular and lung diseases	46.55	32.66	48.60	48.08	<0.01	34.55	48.96	48.87	<0.01	
Users are more likely to be anxious	44.13	27.92	46.52	66.25	<0.01	28.93	47.18	79.32	<0.01	
Perception of benefit of e-cigarette use										
Can help to refresh yourself	48.05	78.47	43.55	231.74	<0.01	75.98	42.44	265.93	<0.01	
Can bring pleasure and enjoyment	41.99	73.72	37.30	258.57	<0.01	71.07	36.15	295.41	<0.01	
Can help to concentrate better	27.75	54.01	23.87	214.93	<0.01	52.67	22.74	263.34	<0.01	
Fashionable	35.62	54.20	32.87	93.73	<0.01	50.84	32.56	85.60	<0.01	
Will not bother others	42.27	60.40	39.59	83.89	<0.01	58.15	39.08	87.54	<0.01	
Can facilitate socialization	15.06	29.56	12.92	102.09	<0.01	27.39	12.58	100.40	<0.01	
The data in the table represent the percentage of individuals who agree with the statement. For analysis purposes, responses were dichotomized (score of 3 or 4=agree, and score of 0, 1, or 2=disagree/neutral).

The scree plot (Supplementary file Figure 1) of the principal component analysis indicated that two principal components (with eigenvalues greater than 1) can explained most variations among the 12 questions. The factor loadings indicated that the first principal component primarily measured perception of harm of e-cigarette use, while the second principal component primarily measured perception of benefit of e-cigarette use (Supplementary file Table 1). Table 3 presents the principal component scores among various subgroups. Both current and ever e-cigarette users exhibited lower scores in principal component-1 (perception of harm) compared with their counterparts, while scoring higher in principal component-2 (perception of benefit).

Table 3 Principal component scores of the study participants, among Chinese adults aged 18–44 years, 2023 (N=4256)

Characteristics	Principal component 1: perception of harm	Principal component 2: perception of benefit	
Mean ± SD	F/t	p	Mean ± SD	F/t	p	
Age (years)		58.03	<0.01		101.30	<0.01	
18–24	0.30 ± 0.91			-0.42 ± 0.97			
25–34	-0.01 ± 1.01			0.07 ± 1.00			
35–44	-0.15 ± 1.00			0.15 ± 0.95			
Gender		4.60	<0.01		9.06	<0.01	
Male	-0.07 ± 1.00			0.13 ± 0.99			
Female	0.07 ± 0.99			-0.14 ± 0.99			
Marital status		103.20	<0.01		146.80	<0.01	
Never married	0.23 ± 0.93			-0.28 ± 0.97			
Married	-0.12 ± 1.02			0.15 ± 0.99			
Widowed/divorced/separated	0.00 ± 0.95			-0.10 ± 0.96			
Education level		4.53	0.03		4.28	0.04	
High school or lower	-0.10 ± 1.01			-0.10 ± 0.99			
College or undergraduate degree	0.01 ± 1.00			0.01 ± 1.01			
Master’s or higher	0.04 ± 0.99			0.03 ± 0.95			
Residence		3.63	<0.01		8.01	<0.01	
Rural	0.07 ± 0.99			-0.17 ± 0.98			
Urban	-0.04 ± 1.01			0.10 ± 1.00			
Monthly income (CNY)		72.11	<0.01		199.40	<0.01	
<3000	0.29 ± 0.90			-0.38 ± 0.94			
3000–5999	0.04 ± 0.99			-0.11 ± 0.97			
6000–8999	-0.14 ± 1.01			0.13 ± 1.00			
≥9000	-0.06 ± 1.02			0.22 ± 0.98			
Cigarette smoker		9.74	<0.01		17.21	<0.01	
Yes	-0.22 ± 1.02			0.36 ± 0.93			
No	0.10 ± 0.97			-0.17 ± 0.98			
Current e-cigarette user		8.97	<0.01		21.29	<0.01	
Yes	-0.35 ± 0.97			0.70 ± 0.80			
No	0.05 ± 0.99			-0.10 ± 0.98			
Ever e-cigarette user		9.78	<0.01		22.15	<0.01	
Yes	-0.32 ± 0.96			0.64 ± 0.81			
No	0.07 ± 0.99			-0.13 ± 0.99			
CNY: 1000 Chinese Yuan about US$140.

Current e-cigarette use

Table 1 shows the prevalence of current e-cigarette use in the overall study population and subgroups. The prevalence of current e-cigarette use was higher among males (17.9%) compared to females (7.5%). The age group with the highest proportion of e-cigarette use was 25–34 years, with a prevalence of 17.0%. The prevalence of current e-cigarette use increased with income, with the highest percentage (20.2%) observed among individuals with a monthly income ≥9000 CNY. Additionally, being married and having a college or undergraduate degree, as well as a Master’s degree or higher, were associated with a higher percentage of e-cigarette use. In terms of cigarette use status, current cigarette smokers were more likely to use e-cigarettes (27.0%) compared to non-smokers (6.1%).

Figure 1 illustrates the prevalence of current e-cigarette use based on residence and income. Among the urban population, the prevalence of current e-cigarette use increased with higher income. However, in rural areas, the prevalence of current e-cigarette use initially increased with income and then decreased.

Figure 1 Prevalence of current e-cigarette use by residence and income, among Chinese adults aged 18-44 years, 2023 (N=4256)

Figure 2 displays the prevalence of current e-cigarette use stratified by age and income. In the low-income group (<3000 and 3000–5999 CNY per month), the age group of 18–24 years had the highest e-cigarette use rate, while in the high-income group (6000–8999 and ≥9000 CNY per month), the age group of 25–34 years had the highest e-cigarette use rate.

Figure 2 Prevalence of current e-cigarette use by age and income, among Chinese adults aged 18-44 years, 2023 (N=4256)

Figure 3 Factors associated with current e-cigarette use, among Chinese adults aged 18-44 years, 2023 (N=4256)

We included age and income as two independent variables in the multivariable logistic model. The results showed that the odds ratios (ORs) for the age groups of 25–34 and 35–44 years were <1, indicating that older age groups were less likely to use e-cigarettes (Supplementary file Figure 2). Furthermore, we replaced the variables of age and income with their interaction term and conducted the multivariable analysis (Table 3). Participants aged 25–34 years with a monthly income of 6000–8999 CNY (AOR=2.01; 95% CI: 1.18–3.41) and those aged 25–34 years with a monthly income of ≥9000 CNY (AOR=2.20; 95% CI: 1.26–3.82) had higher ORs of current e-cigarette use compared to the reference group (aged 18–24 years with a monthly income of <3000 CNY). Females had a lower likelihood of using e-cigarettes compared to males (AOR=0.76; 95% CI: 0.60–0.96). The association of marital status with e-cigarette use was no longer significant. Individuals with an education level of college or undergraduate degree were more likely to use e-cigarettes than those with a high school or lower (AOR=1.91; 95% CI: 1.22–3.00). Additionally, living in urban areas (AOR=1.72; 95% CI: 1.34–2.20) and being current cigarette smokers (AOR=3.32; 95% CI: 2.64–4.16) were associated with a higher likelihood of current e-cigarette use. It is worth noting that there was a statistically significant association between perceptions of e-cigarettes and current e-cigarette use. Individuals with higher levels of perceived harm regarding e-cigarettes were less likely to use them (AOR=0.66; 95% CI: 0.60–0.73), while those who perceived higher benefit from e-cigarette use were more likely to use them (AOR=2.31; 95% CI: 2.04–2.61).

Ever e-cigarette use

The subgroup differences in the prevalence of ever e-cigarette use were similar to those observed in current e-cigarette use (Table 1). For example, the prevalence of ever e-cigarette use was higher among males compared to females (21.5% vs 11.7%), and the highest prevalence of ever e-cigarette use was observed in those aged 25–34 years (21.6%). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, we first constructed a model including age and income. The results showed that older age group (35–44 years) had lower odds of ever using e-cigarettes, whereas higher income was associated with higher odds of ever using e-cigarettes (Supplementary file Figure 3). Furthermore, we included the interaction term between age and income in the model, and the results indicated that e-cigarette ever use was found to be significantly associated with gender, the interaction of age and income, residence, current cigarette use, and perception of harm and benefit (Supplementary file Figure 4).

DISCUSSION

This study provides up-to-date evidence for e-cigarette use among adults in China, showing that the prevalence of current, frequent, and occasional e-cigarette use within our sample was 12.9%, 5.9%, and 7.0%, respectively. The prevalence was higher than those reported in previous studies14,23, possibly due to the focus of this study on the age group of 18–44 years. A similar study targeting Chinese young adults (aged 18–29 years) indicated an e-cigarette use rate of 24.45%, with only 2.34% reporting frequent use (≥20 times/week)24. Findings reported in another Chinese survey showed that young adults aged 15–24 years (8.5% and 4.1%) and 25–44 years (7.8% and 1.3%) had a higher prevalence of both ever and current e-cigarette use compared with other age groups18.

A complex relationship between age, income, and e-cigarette use was observed in this study. E-cigarette use was more prevalent among young adults, which is consistent with previous studies12,25. The age group of 25–34 years had the highest rate of e-cigarette use in our findings. The multivariable analysis indicated that individuals in the age group of 25–35 years with higher income levels had a higher likelihood of using e-cigarettes. This could be attributed to the strong correlation between age and income, and e-cigarette use may be influenced by both age and income rather than a single factor alone. The price of e-cigarettes is generally higher than that of cigarettes26. Individual’s purchasing power, which is related to their income, may affect their decision to use e-cigarettes.

Individuals with a higher level of education were more likely to be current e-cigarette users in our study, but this link was not observed among ever e-cigarette users. The study conducted by Adkison et al.27 also found similar results. E-cigarettes are often considered a less harmful alternative to cigarettes and can be used to quit smoking6,28. Individuals with a higher level of education were more aware of the harmful effects of smoking and were more positive about using e-cigarettes13. Considering that ever users include individuals who have quit e-cigarettes, unmeasured confounding factors such as changes in e-cigarette regulations may explain this result. From the residence perspective, there was a higher prevalence of e-cigarette use in urban areas compared to rural areas. This difference may be related to the fact that e-cigarettes are sold only in authorized stores in China, which makes them more accessible to urban residents11.

This study also showed a relatively high prevalence of dual use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes. Coleman et al.29 found that 44.3% of the participants maintained dual smoking status during the study period. The prevalence of e-cigarette use was higher among cigarette smokers. For cigarette smokers, e-cigarettes play a role in substituting conventional cigarettes, fulfilling similar needs with fewer health risks28. Previous evidence revealed that quitting cigarette use was among the primary reasons for using e-cigarettes30. The effectiveness of e-cigarettes for cigarette cessation remains controversial. Recent studies indicated that e-cigarettes were detrimental to health despite the difficulty in observing the harm in a short period31. Transiting to e-cigarette users may reduce the health risks associated with cigarette use, but becoming a dual user could increase the health hazards32.

The perception of harm and benefit of e-cigarette use differed between users and non-users. Previous studies suggested that many users believe e-cigarettes are less harmful than cigarettes and could provide benefits such as stress relief and pleasure for themselves, which was consistent with our findings33,34. Personal perceptions often precede the formation of behaviors and are closely associated with subsequent changes in behavior. Perceptions of e-cigarettes play a role in the adoption of use behaviors. A study conducted by Sanders-Jackson et al.35 suggested that the public, especially young adults, had inaccurate knowledge of e-cigarettes. With increasing evidence of the health risks associated with e-cigarettes, public perceptions of the harm of e-cigarettes also increase36.

Despite increased regulation of e-cigarettes by the Chinese government and society over the years, the current situation of e-cigarettes still requires further efforts. China’s regulatory authorities implemented e-cigarette management measures on 1 May 2022, and mandatory national standards for e-cigarettes on 1 October 202216. These policies prohibit the sale of e-cigarettes to individuals under the age of 18 years and restrict the flavors and ingredients that can be added to e-cigarette products11. This represents a new phase in the management of e-cigarettes in China. Perhaps the effects of these measures will be gradually revealed.

Limitations

This study has some limitations. First, we used convenience sampling instead of random sampling, which may have introduced selection bias. However, we tried to minimize this bias by increasing the sample size and matching it to the national age-sex distribution. Second, the participants self-reported their e-cigarette use and associated factors, which may have led to recall errors. Thirdly, as this study relied on an online survey, it is crucial to acknowledge the potential for residual confounding caused by unmeasured variables that could impact e-cigarette use. Finally, the findings may have limited generalizability to other countries or regions with different socio-cultural contexts and regulatory environments. Longitudinal studies are warranted to monitor e-cigarette use and perception in the population and to evaluate the long-term effects of relevant policies and interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides timely and important evidence for understanding the current status of e-cigarette perceptions and use among Chinese population. The high prevalence of e-cigarette use among young people in China needs more attention. Factors associated with e-cigarette use include gender, age, income, education level, smoking status, and perceptions of using e-cigarettes. Future research and investigations on e-cigarettes are crucial to understanding the trends of e-cigarette use within the Chinese population. It is recommended to promote the perceptions of e-cigarettes and provide health education to high-risk e-cigarette user groups.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to express our gratitude to Wenjuanxing platform for their valuable contribution to the data collection process. The platform provided a reliable and efficient means of gathering the necessary information for this study.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and none was reported.

ETHICAL APPROVAL AND INFORMED CONSENT

Ethical approval was obtained from the Biomedical Ethics Committee of Peking University (Approval number: IRB00001052-23091; Date: 14 March 2023). Participants provided informed consent.

DATA AVAILABILITY

The data supporting this research are available from the authors on reasonable request.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

XY and XZ: contributed to the study design, data analysis, and writing up of results. LZ and WC: assisted with data analysis. CZ, XW and SW: assisted with data cleaning and writing up of results. CC: guided the study design and interpretation of results. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

PROVENANCE AND PEER REVIEW

Not commissioned; externally peer-reviewed.
==== Refs
REFERENCES

1 Li XH. China Adult tobacco survey 2018 report. In Chinese. People’s Medical Publishing House; 2020. Accessed August 6, 2024. http://books.ipmph.com/books/detail/2044500.shtml
2 Malhotra J, Malvezzi M, Negri E, La Vecchia C, Boffetta P. Risk factors for lung cancer worldwide. Eur Respir J. 2016;48 (3 ):889-902. doi:10.1183/13993003.00359-2016 27174888
3 Wang M, Luo X, Xu S, et al . Trends in smoking prevalence and implication for chronic diseases in China: serial national cross-sectional surveys from 2003 to 2013. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7 (1 ):35-45. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30432-6 30482646
4 Ng R, Sutradhar R, Yao Z, Wodchis WP, Rosella LC. Smoking, drinking, diet and physical activity-modifiable lifestyle risk factors and their associations with age to first chronic disease. Int J Epidemiol. 2020;49 (1 ):113-130. doi:10.1093/ije/dyz078 31329872
5 Chen P, Li F, Harmer P. Healthy China 2030: moving from blueprint to action with a new focus on public health. Lancet Public Health. 2019;4 (9 ):e447. doi:10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30160-4 31493840
6 Glantz SA, Bareham DW. E-cigarettes: use, effects on smoking, risks, and policy implications. Annu Rev Public Health. 2018;39 :215-235. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040617-013757 29323609
7 Yan Y, Yi N, Mengwu T, Jijiang W, Lili W, Yuan J. Major finding of 2015 China adults tobacco survery. Chinese Journal of Health Management. 2016;(2 ):85-87.
8 Soneji SS, Knutzen KE, Villanti AC. Use of flavored e-cigarettes among adolescents, young adults, and older adults: findings from the population assessment for Tobacco and Health Study. Public Health Rep. 2019;134 (3 ):282-292. doi:10.1177/0033354919830967 30857471
9 World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2021: Addressing new and emerging products; 2021. Accessed August 6, 2024. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/343287/9789240032095-eng.pdf?sequence=1
10 Kennedy RD, Awopegba A, De León E, Cohen JE. Global approaches to regulating electronic cigarettes. Tob Control. 2017;26 (4 ):440-445. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053179 27903958
11 Jiang J, Zheng Z. A critical review of e-cigarette regulation in China: challenges and prospects for youth prevention and tobacco control. Nicotine Tob Res. 2024;26 (2 ):126-134. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntad180 37718628
12 Wilson FA, Wang Y. Recent findings on the prevalence of e-cigarette use among adults in the U.S. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52 (3 ):385-390. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.029 27988090
13 Ooms GI, Bosdriesz JR, Portrait FR, Kunst AE. Sociodemographic differences in the use of electronic nicotine delivery systems in the European Union. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016;18 (5 ):724-729. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntv215 26438649
14 Zhao Z, Zhang M, Wu J, et al . E-cigarette use among adults in China: findings from repeated cross-sectional surveys in 2015-16 and 2018-19. Lancet Public Health. 2020;5 (12 ):e639-e649. doi:10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30145-6 33271077
15 Huang J, Duan Z, Wang Y, Redmon PB, Eriksen MP. Use of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) in China: evidence from citywide representative surveys from five Chinese cities in 2018. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17 (7 ):2541. doi:10.3390/ijerph17072541 32276336
16 Zhong S, Wang Y, Chen R, Zhou L. E-cigarette use among youth in China. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022;24 :100504. doi:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100504 35789735
17 Ambrose BK, Rostron BL, Johnson SE, et al . Perceptions of the relative harm of cigarettes and e-cigarettes among U.S. youth. Am J Prev Med. 2014;47 (2 )(suppl 1 ):S53-S60. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2014.04.016 25044196
18 Wang J, Xie CC, Jia XX, et al . E-cigarette awareness and use, among adult residents in Shanghai, China. Tob Induc Dis. 2023;21 (August ):104. doi:10.18332/tid/169559 37581174
19 Pettigrew S, Santos JA, Li Y, et al . E-cigarette-related beliefs, behaviors, and policy support among young people in China. Tob Induc Dis. 2023;21 (January ):09. doi:10.18332/tid/156836 36741540
20 Campbell MJ, Julious SA, Altman DG. Estimating sample sizes for binary, ordered categorical, and continuous outcomes in two group comparisons. BMJ. 1995;311 (7013 ):1145-1148. doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7013.1145 7580713
21 Yu M, Tian F, Cui Q, Wu H. Prevalence and its associated factors of depressive symptoms among Chinese college students during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Psychiatry. 2021;21 (1 ):66. doi:10.1186/s12888-021-03066-9 33514336
22 Ning L, Niu J, Bi X, et al . The impacts of knowledge, risk perception, emotion and information on citizens’ protective behaviors during the outbreak of COVID-19: a cross-sectional study in China. BMC Public Health. 2020;20 (1 ):1751. doi:10.1186/s12889-020-09892-y 33225934
23 Wang W, He Z, Feng N, Cai Y. Electronic cigarette use in China: awareness, prevalence and regulation. Tob Induc Dis. 2019;17 (April ):30. doi:10.18332/tid/105393 31516473
24 Wang X, Zhang X, Xu X, Gao Y. Perceptions and use of electronic cigarettes among young adults in China. Tob Induc Dis. 2019;17 (March ):17. doi:10.18332/tid/102788 31582928
25 Hartwell G, Thomas S, Egan M, Gilmore A, Petticrew M. E-cigarettes and equity: a systematic review of differences in awareness and use between sociodemographic groups. Tob Control. 2017;26 (e2 ):e85-e91. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053222 28003324
26 Liber AC, Drope JM, Stoklosa M. Combustible cigarettes cost less to use than e-cigarettes: global evidence and tax policy implications. Tob Control. 2017;26 (2 ):158-163. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052874 27022059
27 Adkison SE, O’Connor RJ, Bansal-Travers M, et al . Electronic nicotine delivery systems: international tobacco control four-country survey. Am J Prev Med. 2013;44 (3 ):207-215. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.10.018 23415116
28 Cheney MK, Gowin M, Wann TF. Electronic cigarette use in straight-to-work young adults. Am J Health Behav. 2016;40 (2 ):268-279. doi:10.5993/AJHB.40.2.12 26931759
29 Coleman B, Rostron B, Johnson SE, et al . Transitions in electronic cigarette use among adults in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study, Waves 1 and 2 (2013-2015). Tob Control. 2019;28 (1 ):50-59. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054174 29695458
30 Rass O, Pacek LR, Johnson PS, Johnson MW. Characterizing use patterns and perceptions of relative harm in dual users of electronic and tobacco cigarettes. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015;23 (6 ):494-503. doi:10.1037/pha0000050 26389638
31 Gotts JE, Jordt SE, McConnell R, Tarran R. What are the respiratory effects of e-cigarettes? BMJ. 2019;366 :l5275. doi:10.1136/bmj.l5275 31570493
32 Kim CY, Paek YJ, Seo HG, et al . Dual use of electronic and conventional cigarettes is associated with higher cardiovascular risk factors in Korean men. Sci Rep. 2020;10 (1 ):5612. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-62545-3 32221375
33 Pepper JK, Brewer NT. Electronic nicotine delivery system (electronic cigarette) awareness, use, reactions and beliefs: a systematic review. Tob Control. 2014;23 (5 ):375-384. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051122 24259045
34 Jongenelis MI, Kameron C, Rudaizky D, Slevin T, Pettigrew S. Perceptions of the harm, addictiveness, and smoking cessation effectiveness of e-cigarettes among Australian young adults. Addict Behav. 2019;90 :217-221. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.11.004 30447513
35 Sanders-Jackson AN, Tan AS, Bigman CA, Henriksen L. Knowledge about e-cigarette constituents and regulation: results from a National Survey of U.S. Young Adults. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17 (10 ):1247-1254. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntu276 25542915
36 Filippidis FT, Laverty AA, Gerovasili V, Vardavas CI. Two-year trends and predictors of e-cigarette use in 27 European Union member states. Tob Control. 2017;26 (1 ):98-104. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052771 27220621
