
==== Front
Sci Rep
Sci Rep
Scientific Reports
2045-2322
Nature Publishing Group UK London

71622
10.1038/s41598-024-71622-w
Article
Highly resolved taphonomic variations within the Early Ordovician Fezouata Biota
Saleh Farid farid.nassim.saleh@gmail.com

1
Antcliffe Jonathan B. 1
Birolini Enzo 2
Candela Yves 3
Corthésy Nora 1
Daley Allison C. 1
Dupichaud Christophe 2
Gibert Corentin 4
Guenser Pauline 2
Laibl Lukáš 5
Lefebvre Bertrand 2
Michel Soline 2
Potin Gaëtan J.-M. 1
1 https://ror.org/019whta54 grid.9851.5 0000 0001 2165 4204 Institute of Earth Sciences, University of Lausanne, Géopolis, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
2 grid.7849.2 0000 0001 2150 7757 Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, École Normale Supérieure de Lyon, CNRS, UMR5276 LGL‑TPE, Villeurbanne, France
3 https://ror.org/00pxfwe85 grid.422302.5 0000 0001 0943 6159 Department of Natural Sciences, National Museums Scotland, Edinburgh, EH1 1JF UK
4 https://ror.org/01zkghx44 grid.213917.f 0000 0001 2097 4943 Spatial Ecology and Paleontology Laboratory (SEPL), School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA USA
5 https://ror.org/053avzc18 grid.418095.1 0000 0001 1015 3316 Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geology, Rozvojová 269, 165 00 Prague 6, Czech Republic
6 9 2024
6 9 2024
2024
14 2080721 6 2024
29 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
The Fezouata Biota (Morocco) is a Burgess Shale-type (BST) assemblage that provides a wealth of information on Early Ordovician ecosystems. Much work has been done to compare the preservation of the Fezouata Biota to other BSTs. However, studies investigating preservation variations within the Fezouata Biota are rare. Here, we use probabilities to investigate the preservation of various ecological categories of Fezouata eumetazoans. Complex taphonomic processes and phylum-specific constraints have led to the better preservation of predators/scavengers in this biota. However, no differences in preservation are observed between vagile and sessile taxa. Importantly, Tremadocian taxa are better preserved than Floian ones. As such, this study highlights the gradual closure of the BST window of preservation in the Zagora region of Morocco and constitutes a benchmark for future palaeoecological and evolutionary studies on the Fezouata Biota.

Keywords

Statistics
Invertebrates
Early Palaeozoic
Gondwana
Subject terms

Palaeontology
Palaeoecology
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001711 Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung PZ00P2_209102 CRSII5_198691 Czech Academy of SciencesStrategieAV21/30 Laibl Lukáš Institute of Geology of the Czech Academy of SciencesRVO 67985831 Laibl Lukáš issue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Limited 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

The Early Ordovician Fezouata Biota offers unparalleled views into marine ecosystems over 470 million years ago. Discovered in Morocco's Draa Valley, this fossil treasure trove boasts an extraordinary diversity of well-preserved organisms, from soft-bodied animals to fossilized biomineralized organisms. The Fezouata Biota contains animals such as annelids1; arthropods2–19; brachiopods20; echinoderms21–28; hemichordates29,30; hyoliths31,32; molluscs33–37; scalidophorans38, among other taxa39–43 (Fig. 1a–i). Two fossiliferous sedimentary intervals have yielded the most exceptionally preserved Fezouata Biota fossils. The first is late Tremadocian in age45–48, and the second dates from the middle to late Floian49. The Fezouata Biota environment was dominated by wave/processes and modulated by tides50–52. However, most exceptionally preserved animals were preserved in distal settings below the storm-weather wave base52.Fig. 1 Selected animals from the Early Ordovician Fezouata Biota and the contextualization of the current work. Arthropods (a–e): (a) trilobite Anacheirurus YPM.530933, (b) marrellid MGL.102397, (c) nektaspidid Tariccoia tazagurtensis MGL.102155a, (d) chelicerate Setapedites abundantis MGL.102872, and (e) frontal appendage of radiodont Pseudoangustidontus izdigua MGL.103606. (f) The brachiopod Orbithele UCBL.FSL711960. Echinoderms (g, h): (g) Nimchacystis agterbosi UCBL.FSL713120; (h) Villebrunaster fezouataensis UCBL.FSL424961. (i) The graptolite Sagenograptus murrayi AA.BIZ3.OI.35. AA: Cadi-Ayyad University (Morocco); MGL: Musée de Géologie de Lausanne (Switzerland); UCBL: Université Claude Bernard (France); and YPM: Yale Peabody Museum (USA).

Fossils from the Fezouata Biota show that animal groups characteristic of Cambrian Burgess Shale-type (BST) communities, such as radiodonts, lived into the Early Ordovician, highlighting a gradual transition between the Cambrian and the Ordovician44,45. When they were originally discovered, fossils from the Fezouata Biota also indicated that the BST mode of preservation was operational at least until the Early Ordovician. In fact, the Fezouata Biota fossils share many preservational similarities with Cambrian BST communities. The primary mode of preservation of Fezouata Biota exceptionally preserved fossils is carbonaceous compressions with accessory pyritization52–55. However, most carbon was leached due to weathering processes and replaced by iron oxides, giving the fossils their red colour39,52 (Fig. 1a–i).

The Fezouata Biota provided, and continues to provide, a wealth of information on the ecology of ancient ecosystems. However, as in other BSTs, taphonomic constraints must be accounted for to extract robust ecological information56. Ecology and taphonomy are connected in Lagerstätten, as the ecological context of an organism profoundly influences its preservation potential in the fossil record. Probabilistic methods have proven to be a valuable tool to investigate how ecology influences preservation in Lagerstätten (Fig. 1j). Using such methods, the Fezouata Biota was shown to differ significantly from other Cambrian BSTs, because entirely soft non-cuticularized organisms are lacking and because internal soft cellular structures are mostly preserved in association with a sclerotized or partially mineralized external surface of the body56. It was however shown that the Fezouata Biota equally preserves epibenthic, nektobenthic, and nektonic communities57,58. Yet, detailed taphonomic investigations on the preservation potential of other ecological and evolutionary traits, such as feeding strategies, motility, and age categories, remain unexplored and many open questions persist: Are sessile taxa better preserved than vagile ones? Are suspension feeders better captured than predators? Are there variations in preservation between Tremadocian and Floian taxa?

Here, we answer these questions by highlighting that significant preservation variations exist within all categories (except motility). This is likely due to a complex interplay between preservation mechanisms and phylum-specific constraints.

Material and methods

Probabilistic methodological details have been previously published56–60. The dataset consists of a list of preserved eumetazoan genera in the Fezouata Biota (see Supplementary Material), together with information on the preserved biological structures in each genus. Biological structures were divided into five types of tissues (noted A, B, C, D, and E) based on their resistance to the decay process in general (Table 1). The five tissue types describe the original anatomical composition of organisms rather than the result of a specific taphonomic pathway. For example, a pyritized digestive system would be classified under “E”, which encompasses internal organs, rather than “A”, which is for biomineralized structures. To determine the occurrences of tissues for each genus, the best-preserved specimen of the genus or a combination of specimens is taken into account. For instance, if there are 99 fragmentary samples and only one complete specimen for a certain genus, the complete specimen is used to fill in the database. If another genus has two specimens, one shows a biomineralized structure and a gut, while the other preserves a non-sclerotized cuticle, this genus is considered to preserve biominerals, non-sclerotized cuticles, and internal organs. Table 1 Preservation data tabulated for Fezouata Biota genera.

Biological structures	Defintions	Examples	
A	Biomineralised structures, regardless of the nature or degree of mineralization	Trilobite and echinoderm exoskeletal elements	
B	Sclerotized structures that are hard or plate-like	Rhabdosome/tubarium of graptolites and the carapaces of many bivalved arthropods	
C	Non-sclerotized cuticularized bodies formed of polysaccharides	Body walls of annelids and parts of non-biomineralized arthropods (e.g., arthrodial membranes)	
D	Composed solely of cells and are in direct contact with the surrounding environment	Tentacles of cnidarians, brachiopods, and hyoliths	
E	Internal organs and systems	Digestive, respiratory, and nervous systems	
Note that any given genus can preserve one or more types of tissues concurrently.

Genera were then divided into three different categories and seven subcategories according to their ecological characteristics (Table 2). Classifying genera within these categories and subcategories is based on the adult morphology of each genus, whenever known. For example, if a genus has motile larvae and sessile adults, it is coded as sessile in the database. A certain overlap exists between the ecological categories (Table 2). In theory, six ecological combinations exist (e.g., sessile predators/scavengers; sessile suspension feeders; sessile organisms that are neither predators nor suspension feeders; vagile predators/scavengers; vagile suspension feeders; vagile organisms that are neither predators nor suspension feeders). In the Fezouata Biota, all sessile animals are suspension feeders. Nonetheless, this does not imply that all suspension feeders are sessile. Table 2 Ecological characteristics tabulated for Fezouata Biota genera.

Categories	Definitions	Subcategories	Definitions	Examples	
Motility	The quality of being able to move or not	Sessile	Not free to move	brachiopods, bivalves	
Vagile	Move on the seafloor or free swimmers	annelids, cephalopods, panarthropods	
Feeding strategy	The type of behaviour best suited to gather food	Predators/scavengers	Actively hunt and kill prey; or feed on carrion	chelicerates; annelids	
Suspension feeders	Capture food particles suspended in water	echinoderms, brachiopods	
Other strategies	Grazing among others	some gastropods	
Age	The age of sedimentary layers where taxa are found	Strictly Tremadocian	Found only in Tremadocian layers	Procothurnocystis	
Strictly Floian	Found only in Floian layers	Milonicystis	
These include motility, feeding strategy, and age. The examples presented are not exclusive, and other animal groups could belong or have at least some of their genera in each of the below categories (detailed examples are given in the Supplementary Material).

All previous ecological categories have representatives in both Floian and Tremadocian intervals. Note that taxa present in both the Tremadocian and Floian were not accounted for when comparing the preservation potential of these intervals to avoid any overlap between them (Table 2). In other words, including a category with taxa present in both the Floian and Tremadocian intervals when investigating preservation differences between these intervals is misleading because a sedimentary layer cannot be both Tremadocian and Floian at the same time. For taxa present in both Tremadocian and Floian intervals, we have information on the best-preserved specimen overall, without knowing the preservation state of other representatives of this taxon in the other interval. This information would be necessary to understand preservational differences between the Floian and Tremadocian for taxa present in both intervals. However, all taxa including those present in both Floian and Tremadocian intervals were considered when comparing the preservation potential of various ecological categories (i.e., differences between motilities and feeding strategies; Table 2 and Supplementary Material).

The proportions of different tissue occurrences and co-occurrences within each subcategory (Table 2) were plotted and numerous preservational indices were then calculated. For a certain subcategory in Table 2, probabilities of genera with one [P(1s); i.e., A, or B, or C, or D, or E], two [P(2s); e.g., AB], three [P(3s); e.g., ABC], or four [P(4s); e.g., ABCE] tissues in addition to the probabilities of biomineralized P(A); sclerotized P(B); cuticularized P(C); cellular structures in contact with water P(D); and internal organs P(E) were calculated. The average number of tissues per taxon was also calculated. Note that most of the obtained values could be impacted by anatomical heterogeneities between taxa (i.e., not all genera have the same type of tissues in life). For example, a trilobite does not have cellular sheets in contact with the seawater. This is not true for P(E) because all eumetazoans have internal organs. As such, P(E) is considered the baseline to understand preservation variations.

To investigate how the different phyla influence the calculated indices, the proportions of phyla in each subcategory (Table 2) were plotted. Then, to examine whether preservation variations could be observed within a certain phylum, the aforementioned indices were recomputed for all subcategories, based solely on panarthropod data rather than the complete dataset. Finally, to determine whether the probabilities of internal organ preservation between subcategories show significant differences, a binomial model was used, following the methodology of56–60. Raw data are provided in the Supplementary Material file.

Results and discussion

In the Fezouata Biota, Tremadocian organisms, predators/scavengers and vagile genera show the highest diversity of tissue-assemblage associations (Table 3, Fig. 2a). These are also the only subcategories preserving associations of four tissue types (Fig. 2b). Internal organs are the most prevalent in Tremadocian, predators/scavengers and vagile taxa (Fig. 2c). The average number of tissues per taxon (Fig. 2d) shows more or less a similar pattern to the probability of internal organs (Fig. 2c). In summary, it is possible to differentiate the preservation of Tremadocian versus Floian animals (Fig. 2a,b,c), predators/scavengers and non-predators/non-scavengers (Fig. 2a,b,d), and vagile versus sessile taxa (Fig. 2a,c,d). Table 3 Summary statistics of the raw data.

	Age	Feeding strategy	Motility	
Tremadocian	Floian	Predators/scavengers	Suspension feeders	Other	Vagile	Sessile	
Number of taxa	83	51	48	109	21	118	60	
A	38	42	24	74	15	64	50	
B	22	5	5	22	3	27	3	
AB	2	2	2	3	0	3	2	
AC	1	0	1	0	0	1	0	
AD	1	0	0	0	1	1	0	
AE	3	1	0	6	0	2	4	
BC	3	1	2	2	0	4	0	
BE	2	0	2	0	0	2	0	
ABE	2	0	3	1	1	4	1	
ACE	1	0	1	0	0	1	0	
BCE	5	0	4	1	1	6	0	
ABCE	3	0	3	0	0	3	0	
1 s	60	47	29	96	18	91	53	
2 s	12	4	7	11	1	13	6	
3 s	8	0	8	2	2	11	1	
4 s	3	0	3	0	0	3	0	
The different tissues: “A” biomineralized; “B” sclerotized; “C” cuticularized; “D” cellular sheets in contact with the water column; and “E” internal organs. Note that tissue associations not present in any category (e.g., BD) were removed from the table. Additionally, the total number of taxa in the age category is lower than in the feeding strategy and motility categories because taxa present in both Tremadocian and Floian layers were excluded from the analyses. The raw data showing the taxa belonging to each age, feeding strategy and motility categories are provided in the Supplementary Material.

Fig. 2 Probabilistic framework for understanding preservation in the Fezouata Biota. (a) Diversity of tissue type associations within various age, feeding, and motility categories. The different tissues: “A” biomineralized; “B” sclerotized; “C” cuticularized; “D” cellular sheets in contact with the water column; and “E” internal organs. (b) Probabilities of taxa preserving one (1 s), two (2 s), three (3 s), and four (4 s) tissue types. (c) Probabilities of preserved tissue types [P(E); P(B); P(C); P(D) and P(E)]. (d) Average number of tissue types per taxon.

The difference in the proportions of internal organs between strictly Tremadoian and strictly Floian taxa is significant. It is not possible to replicate P(E) value of Tremadocian taxa using the Floian dataset (i.e., binomial distribution p-value = 0.000238077). It was also not possible to replicate the P(E) value of predators/scavengers using the dataset of other feeding strategies (i.e., binomial distribution p-value = 0.000000011). However, no significant difference could be observed between vagile and sessile taxa. It was possible to replicate the P(E) value of vagile taxa using the dataset of sessile genera (i.e., binomial distribution p-value = 0.088182652). This essentially means that, within their respective categories, Tremadocian taxa and predators/scavengers are better preserved than other subcategories, while no differences in preservation could be observed between sessile and vagile taxa.

The non-significant differences between vagile and sessile taxa make sense in the context of the Fezouata Biota. In the Fezouata Biota, most animals were dead and decaying prior to their burial by storm-induced deposits61 and a carcass of a motile animal does not behave differently from that of a sessile organism. To explore taphonomic differences within other categories (i.e., age and feeding strategy), the proportions of phyla for each subcategory are plotted (Fig. 3a).Fig. 3 Further probabilistic information on preservation within the Fezouata Biota. (a) Distribution of phyla within various age, feeding, and motility categories. (b) Variations in the probability of panarthropods' internal organs P(E). (c) Variations in the average number of tissues per taxon in panarthropods. Note that a correlation exists between (b) and (c), although variations are more clearly visible in (b).

The major difference between Tremadocian and Floian taxa is the high panarthropod and hemichordate diversity, and the low diversity of molluscs in the Tremadocian (Fig. 3a). These observations could explain why Tremadocian taxa are better preserved than Floian ones (i.e., high internal organ probability and high average number of tissues per taxon in the Tremadocian; Fig. 2c,d). It has been previously shown that soft tissues in direct contact with the water column, such as those of molluscs and the tentacles of hyoliths, are the fastest to decay in the Fezouata Biota56,57 because they are exposed to internal and external bacteria and scavengers following death, often leading to their rapid loss prior to the stabilization of the carcass. In contrast, rigid body walls formed of mineralized and sclerotized material, fully encapsulating soft internal tissues such as those of panarthropods like trilobites, are key for exceptional fossil preservation in the Fezouata Biota, as they often lead to reducing internal conditions during decay56. These reducing conditions are favourable for the stabilization of internal structures through the precipitation of minerals like pyrite56. This could be a reason why panarthropods in general show high P(E) values in the Fezouata Biota56. Note that these processes are mainly operational in the Fezouata Biota, where preservation consists of dead organisms that suffered from decay before their stabilization. Sites such as the Chengjiang Biota and the Walcott Quarry have different processes than those observed here, as obrution events in these sites managed to capture living taxa56–58. For instance, in the Chengjiang Biota, preservation potential increased between nektonic animals such as radiodonts that could avoid obrution events and endobenthic taxa that are easily captured by event flows and sediments58. This is not the case in the Fezouata Biota, where all modes of life (i.e., endobiotic, epibenthic, nektobenthic and nektonic) are equally preserved57.

The higher preservation potential of panarthropods and the lower preservation potential of animals like molluscs and brachiopods in the Fezouata Biota means that any subcategory with a considerable amount of arthropods and a minimal amount of molluscs and brachiopods tends to show a higher preservation potential than other subcategories. This could explain why predators/scavengers, which are mainly arthropods in the Fezouata Biota (Fig. 3a), are better preserved than other feeding strategies that have a considerable proportion of brachiopods and echinoderms (Fig. 2c,d). Echinoderms decay and disarticulate very rapidly after death. This rapid degradation and disarticulation of echinoderms is well documented in the Fezouata Biota61. For instance, exceptional preservation of echinoderms in the Fezouata Biota is observed only in a 1 cm-thick sedimentary layer, which has yielded around 300 specimens of stylophorans in total61. Among these hundreds of specimens, around 10 show soft-tissue remains, and only one provides a more or less complete view of the soft tissues. In other words, among the thousands of echinoderm specimens in the Fezouata Biota, only one managed to escape pronounced decay, likely because this organism had not been dead much earlier than the arrival of the burial event61.

Considering that the aforementioned phylum-specific anatomical constraints dictate the preservation potential of ecological subcategories, one would expect a significant difference in the preservation of vagile taxa, which are dominated by panarthropods, and sessile taxa, which are dominated by brachiopods (Fig. 3a). However, as indicated earlier, this is not the case as no significant difference is observed between both subcategories (i.e., binomial distribution p-value > 0.05). In other words, there must be other taphonomic explanations related to the feeding strategy, and age of different taxa, regardless of whether these taxa are panarthropods, brachiopods, or echinoderms.

To understand the control of feeding strategy and age on exceptional fossil preservation, we focused on the variations in the probability of internal organ preservation P(E), and the average number of tissues per taxon in panarthropods (Fig. 3b,c). Within panarthropods, Tremadocian taxa preserve more tissues per taxon than Floian genera, and predators preserve more tissues per taxon than other feeding strategies (Fig. 3c). A similar pattern is observed for P(E) (Fig. 3b). However, significant differences in P(E) are only observed between Tremadocian and Floian genera. It was not possible to replicate Tremadocian P(E) values using the Floian dataset (binomial distribution p-value = 0.018851802). A non-significant difference is calculated for predators/scavengers versus non-predatory/non-scavenging panarthropods, as it was possible to replicate the P(E) value of predators/scavengers using the non-predators/non-scavenging dataset (binomial distribution p-value = 0.222745916). This essentially means that the temporal distribution of the taxon controls its preservation within the Fezouata Biota with Tremadocian taxa being better preserved than Floian ones.

The higher preservation potential of Tremadocian taxa could reflect that Tremadocian levels have been more extensively sampled and studied than Floian ones1–49. However, there is also a shallowing trend observed between the Tremadocian and the Floian in the Zagora region of Morocco, where the Fezouata Biota is found50–52. Additionally, the facies in which most Fezouata Biota fossils are found become rarer in the Floian48. In other words, the patterns observed here for the Fezouata Biota suggest that favourable environmental conditions for exceptional fossil preservation were more prevalent in the Tremadocian compared to the Floian, which could also mean the gradual closure of the BST window of preservation in the Zagora region in Morocco. This suggestion does not imply the complete closure of this window in the Ordovician, as exceptional fossil preservation continues to occur in other places late in the Early Ordovician62, and animals characteristic of BST communities continue to be discovered later in the Ordovician63,64.

Conclusion

This study explores preservation variations in the Early Ordovician Fezouata Biota. It shows that predators/scavengers are better preserved than suspension feeders and other feeding strategies such as grazers. No significant difference is observed between vagile and sessile organisms. The observed patterns of preservation result from complex taphonomic processes, and are also influenced by phylum-specific constraints. It is also shown that Tremadocian taxa in the Fezouata Biota are better preserved than Floian ones, which could reflect the gradual closure of the BST preservation window in the Zagora region of Morocco. In brief, there are many preservational variations in the Fezouata Biota (Fig. 4), similar to other Lagerstätten recording the rise of eumetazoans56–58. Acknowledging and understanding these preservational variations is key for coherently interpreting ancient snapshots of animal life on Earth.Fig. 4 Artistic Reconstruction of the Fezouata Biota by Christian McCall (Prehistorica Art). An annotated figure is provided in the Supplementary Material.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-024-71622-w.

Acknowledgements

Anna Żylińska and an anonymous reviewer are thanked for their helpful comments on the manuscript. Daniel Blake, Marika Polechová, and Jan Ove Ebbestad are thanked for helpful discussions. F.S. and N.C. work is supported by an SNF Ambizione Grant (No. PZ00P2_209102). This paper is a contribution to the International Geoscience Programme (IGCP) Project 735 – Rocks and the Rise of Ordovician Life (Rocks n'ROL) and to the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) under reference ANR-22-CE01-0003 (project ECO-BOOST). L.L was supported by the program Dynamic Planet Earth of the Czech Academy of Sciences (StrategieAV21/30) and by the institutional support RVO 67985831 of the Institute of Geology of the Czech Academy of Sciences. J.B.A. is funded by a Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) Sinergia Grant (No. CRSII5_198691) awarded to A.C.D. and three other PIs. G.J.-M.P. is supported by the Canton of Vaud.

Author contributions

All co-authors collected data. F.S. analyzed data, wrote the manuscript, and made the figures with inputs from all co-authors.

Data availability

All the data needed to reproduce this paper are available in the main text and supplementary material.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Vinther J Van Roy P Briggs DE Machaeridians are Palaeozoic armoured annelids Nature 2008 451 7175 185 188 10.1038/nature06474 18185586
Vinther, J., Van Roy, P. & Briggs, D. E. Machaeridians are Palaeozoic armoured annelids. Nature 451(7175), 185–188 (2008).18185586 10.1038/nature06474
2. Van Roy P Orr PJ Botting JP Muir LA Vinther J Lefebvre B Hariri KE Briggs DE Ordovician faunas of Burgess Shale type Nature 2010 465 7295 215 218 10.1038/nature09038 20463737
Van Roy, P. et al. Ordovician faunas of Burgess Shale type. Nature 465(7295), 215–218 (2010).20463737 10.1038/nature09038
3. Van Roy P Briggs DE A giant Ordovician anomalocaridid Nature 2011 473 7348 510 513 10.1038/nature09920 21614078
Van Roy, P. & Briggs, D. E. A giant Ordovician anomalocaridid. Nature 473(7348), 510–513 (2011).21614078 10.1038/nature09920
4. Van Roy P Briggs DE Gaines RR The Fezouata fossils of Morocco; an extraordinary record of marine life in the Early Ordovician J. Geol. Soc. 2015 172 5 541 549 10.1144/jgs2015-017
Van Roy, P., Briggs, D. E. & Gaines, R. R. The Fezouata fossils of Morocco; an extraordinary record of marine life in the Early Ordovician. J. Geol. Soc. 172(5), 541–549 (2015).10.1144/jgs2015-017
5. Van Roy P Daley AC Briggs DE Anomalocaridid trunk limb homology revealed by a giant filter-feeder with paired flaps Nature 2015 522 7554 77 80 10.1038/nature14256 25762145
Van Roy, P., Daley, A. C. & Briggs, D. E. Anomalocaridid trunk limb homology revealed by a giant filter-feeder with paired flaps. Nature 522(7554), 77–80 (2015).25762145 10.1038/nature14256
6. Potin GJM Gueriau P Daley AC Radiodont frontal appendages from the Fezouata Biota (Morocco) reveal high diversity and ecological adaptations to suspension-feeding during the Early Ordovician Front. Ecol. Evol. 2023 11 1214109 10.3389/fevo.2023.1214109
Potin, G. J. M., Gueriau, P. & Daley, A. C. Radiodont frontal appendages from the Fezouata Biota (Morocco) reveal high diversity and ecological adaptations to suspension-feeding during the Early Ordovician. Front. Ecol. Evol. 11, 1214109 (2023).10.3389/fevo.2023.1214109
7. Potin GJM Daley AC The significance of Anomalocaris and other Radiodonta for understanding paleoecology and evolution during the Cambrian explosion Front. Earth Sci. 2023 11 1160285 10.3389/feart.2023.1160285
Potin, G. J. M. & Daley, A. C. The significance of Anomalocaris and other Radiodonta for understanding paleoecology and evolution during the Cambrian explosion. Front. Earth Sci. 11, 1160285 (2023).10.3389/feart.2023.1160285
8. Perez-Peris F Laibl L Vidal M Daley A Systematics, morphology, and appendages of an Early Ordovician pilekiine trilobite Anacheirurus from Fezouata Shale and the early diversification of Cheiruridae Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 2021 66 4 857 877
Perez-Peris, F., Laibl, L., Vidal, M. & Daley, A. Systematics, morphology, and appendages of an Early Ordovician pilekiine trilobite Anacheirurus from Fezouata Shale and the early diversification of Cheiruridae. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 66(4), 857–877 (2021).
9. Pérez-Peris F Laibl L Lustri L Gueriau P Antcliffe JB Enright OGB Daley AC A new nektaspid euarthropod from the Lower Ordovician strata of Morocco Geol. Mag. 2021 158 3 509 517 10.1017/S001675682000062X
Pérez-Peris, F. et al. A new nektaspid euarthropod from the Lower Ordovician strata of Morocco. Geol. Mag. 158(3), 509–517 (2021).10.1017/S001675682000062X
10. Laibl L Drage HB Pérez-Peris F Schöder S Saleh F Daley AC Babies from the Fezouata Biota: Early developmental trilobite stages and their adaptation to high latitudes Geobios 2023 81 31 50 10.1016/j.geobios.2023.06.005
Laibl, L. et al. Babies from the Fezouata Biota: Early developmental trilobite stages and their adaptation to high latitudes. Geobios 81, 31–50 (2023).10.1016/j.geobios.2023.06.005
11. Laibl L Gueriau P Saleh F Pérez-Peris F Lustri L Drage HB Bath Enright OG Potin GJM Daley AC Early developmental stages of a Lower Ordovician marrellid from Morocco suggest simple ontogenetic niche differentiation in early euarthropods Front. Ecol. Evol. 2023 11 1232612 10.3389/fevo.2023.1232612
Laibl, L. et al. Early developmental stages of a Lower Ordovician marrellid from Morocco suggest simple ontogenetic niche differentiation in early euarthropods. Front. Ecol. Evol. 11, 1232612 (2023).10.3389/fevo.2023.1232612
12. Lustri L Gueriau P Daley AC Lower Ordovician synziphosurine reveals early euchelicerate diversity and evolution Nat. Commun. 2024 15 1 3808 10.1038/s41467-024-48013-w 38714651
Lustri, L., Gueriau, P. & Daley, A. C. Lower Ordovician synziphosurine reveals early euchelicerate diversity and evolution. Nat. Commun. 15(1), 3808 (2024).38714651 10.1038/s41467-024-48013-w
13. Lustri L Antcliffe JB Saleh F Haug C Laibl L Garwood RJ Haug JT Daley AC New perspectives on the evolutionary history of xiphosuran development through comparison with other fossil euchelicerates Front. Ecol. Evol. 2023 11 1270429 10.3389/fevo.2023.1270429
Lustri, L. et al. New perspectives on the evolutionary history of xiphosuran development through comparison with other fossil euchelicerates. Front. Ecol. Evol. 11, 1270429 (2023).10.3389/fevo.2023.1270429
14. Drage HB Legg DA Daley AC Novel marrellomorph moulting behaviour preserved in the Lower Ordovician Fezouata Shale, Morocco Front. Ecol. Evol. 2023 11 1226924 10.3389/fevo.2023.1226924
Drage, H. B., Legg, D. A. & Daley, A. C. Novel marrellomorph moulting behaviour preserved in the Lower Ordovician Fezouata Shale, Morocco. Front. Ecol. Evol. 11, 1226924 (2023).10.3389/fevo.2023.1226924
15. Saleh F Vidal M Laibl L Sansjofre P Gueriau P Pérez-Peris F Lustri L Lucas V Lefebvre B Pittet B El Hariri K Large trilobites in a stress-free Early Ordovician environment Geol. Mag. 2021 158 2 261 270 10.1017/S0016756820000448
Saleh, F. et al. Large trilobites in a stress-free Early Ordovician environment. Geol. Mag. 158(2), 261–270 (2021).10.1017/S0016756820000448
16. Martin EL Vidal M Vizcaïno D Vaucher R Sansjofre P Lefebvre B Destombes J Biostratigraphic and palaeoenvironmental controls on the trilobite associations from the Lower Ordovician Fezouata Shale of the central Anti-Atlas, Morocco Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2016 460 142 154 10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.06.003
Martin, E. L. et al. Biostratigraphic and palaeoenvironmental controls on the trilobite associations from the Lower Ordovician Fezouata Shale of the central Anti-Atlas, Morocco. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 460, 142–154 (2016).10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.06.003
17. Ortega-Hernández J Van Roy P Lerosey-Aubril R A new aglaspidid euarthropod with a six-segmented trunk from the Lower Ordovician Fezouata Konservat-Lagerstätte, Morocco Geol. Mag. 2016 153 3 524 536 10.1017/S0016756815000710
Ortega-Hernández, J., Van Roy, P. & Lerosey-Aubril, R. A new aglaspidid euarthropod with a six-segmented trunk from the Lower Ordovician Fezouata Konservat-Lagerstätte, Morocco. Geol. Mag. 153(3), 524–536 (2016).10.1017/S0016756815000710
18. Gutiérrez-Marco JC García-Bellido DC Rábano I Sá AA Digestive and appendicular soft-parts, with behavioural implications, in a large Ordovician trilobite from the Fezouata Lagerstätte, Morocco Sci. Rep. 2017 7 1 39728 10.1038/srep39728 28071705
Gutiérrez-Marco, J. C., García-Bellido, D. C., Rábano, I. & Sá, A. A. Digestive and appendicular soft-parts, with behavioural implications, in a large Ordovician trilobite from the Fezouata Lagerstätte, Morocco. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 39728 (2017).28071705 10.1038/srep39728
19. Saleh F Daley AC Lefebvre B El Hariri K Insights on the rise of animal life from Cambrian and Ordovician Lagerstätten Front. Earth Sci. 2023 11 1343862 10.3389/feart.2023.1343862
Saleh, F., Daley, A. C., Lefebvre, B. & El Hariri, K. Insights on the rise of animal life from Cambrian and Ordovician Lagerstätten. Front. Earth Sci. 11, 1343862 (2023).10.3389/feart.2023.1343862
20. Saleh F Candela Y Harper DA Polechová M Lefebvre B Pittet B Storm-induced community dynamics in the Fezouata Biota (Lower Ordovician, Morocco) Palaios 2018 33 12 535 541 10.2110/palo.2018.055
Saleh, F. et al. Storm-induced community dynamics in the Fezouata Biota (Lower Ordovician, Morocco). Palaios 33(12), 535–541 (2018).10.2110/palo.2018.055
21. Sumrall CD Zamora S Ordovician edrioasteroids from Morocco: Faunal exchanges across the Rheic Ocean J. Syst. Palaeontol. 2011 9 3 425 454 10.1080/14772019.2010.499137
Sumrall, C. D. & Zamora, S. Ordovician edrioasteroids from Morocco: Faunal exchanges across the Rheic Ocean. J. Syst. Palaeontol. 9(3), 425–454 (2011).10.1080/14772019.2010.499137
22. Lefebvre B Allaire N Guensburg TE Hunter AW Kouraïss K Martin EL Nardin E Noailles F Pittet B Sumrall CD Zamora S Palaeoecological aspects of the diversification of echinoderms in the Lower Ordovician of central Anti-Atlas, Morocco Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2016 460 97 121 10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.02.039
Lefebvre, B. et al. Palaeoecological aspects of the diversification of echinoderms in the Lower Ordovician of central Anti-Atlas, Morocco. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 460, 97–121 (2016).10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.02.039
23. Lefebvre B Guensburg TE Martin EL Mooi R Nardin E Nohejlová M Saleh F Kouraïss K El Hariri K David B Exceptionally preserved soft parts in fossils from the Lower Ordovician of Morocco clarify stylophoran affinities within basal deuterostomes Geobios 2019 52 27 36 10.1016/j.geobios.2018.11.001
Lefebvre, B. et al. Exceptionally preserved soft parts in fossils from the Lower Ordovician of Morocco clarify stylophoran affinities within basal deuterostomes. Geobios 52, 27–36 (2019).10.1016/j.geobios.2018.11.001
24. Allaire N Lefebvre B Nardin E Martin ELO Vaucher R Escarguel G Morphological disparity analysis and systematic revision of the eocrinoid genus Rhopalocystis (Echinodermata, Blastozoa) from the Lower Ordovician of the central Anti-Atlas (Morocco) J. Paleontol. 2017 91 685 714 10.1017/jpa.2017.6
Allaire, N. et al. Morphological disparity analysis and systematic revision of the eocrinoid genus Rhopalocystis (Echinodermata, Blastozoa) from the Lower Ordovician of the central Anti-Atlas (Morocco). J. Paleontol. 91, 685–714 (2017).10.1017/jpa.2017.6
25. Saleh F Lefebvre B Hunter AW Nohejlová M Fossil weathering and preparation mimic soft tissues in eocrinoid and somasteroid echinoderms from the Lower Ordovician of Morocco Microsc. Today 2020 28 1 24 28 10.1017/S1551929519001238
Saleh, F., Lefebvre, B., Hunter, A. W. & Nohejlová, M. Fossil weathering and preparation mimic soft tissues in eocrinoid and somasteroid echinoderms from the Lower Ordovician of Morocco. Microsc. Today 28(1), 24–28 (2020).10.1017/S1551929519001238
26. Dupichaud C Lefebvre B Milne CH Mooi R Nohejlová M Roch R Saleh F Zamora S Solutan echinoderms from the Fezouata Shale Lagerstätte (Lower Ordovician, Morocco): Diversity, exceptional preservation, and palaeoecological implications Front. Ecol. Evol. 2023 11 1290063 10.3389/fevo.2023.1290063
Dupichaud, C. et al. Solutan echinoderms from the Fezouata Shale Lagerstätte (Lower Ordovician, Morocco): Diversity, exceptional preservation, and palaeoecological implications. Front. Ecol. Evol. 11, 1290063 (2023).10.3389/fevo.2023.1290063
27. Hunter AW Ortega-Hernández J A new somasteroid from the Fezouata Lagerstätte in Morocco and the Early Ordovician origin of Asterozoa Biol. Lett. 2021 17 1 20200809 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0809 33465330
Hunter, A. W. & Ortega-Hernández, J. A new somasteroid from the Fezouata Lagerstätte in Morocco and the Early Ordovician origin of Asterozoa. Biol. Lett. 17(1), 20200809 (2021).33465330 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0809
28. Blake DB Hotchkiss FH Origin of the subphylum Asterozoa and redescription of a Moroccan Ordovician somasteroid Geobios 2022 72 22 36 10.1016/j.geobios.2022.07.002
Blake, D. B. & Hotchkiss, F. H. Origin of the subphylum Asterozoa and redescription of a Moroccan Ordovician somasteroid. Geobios 72, 22–36 (2022).10.1016/j.geobios.2022.07.002
29. Gutiérrez-Marco JC Martin EL Biostratigraphy and palaeoecology of Lower Ordovician graptolites from the Fezouata Shale (Moroccan Anti-Atlas) Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2016 460 35 49 10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.07.026
Gutiérrez-Marco, J. C. & Martin, E. L. Biostratigraphy and palaeoecology of Lower Ordovician graptolites from the Fezouata Shale (Moroccan Anti-Atlas). Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 460, 35–49 (2016).10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.07.026
30. Nanglu K Waskom ME Richards JC Ortega-Hernández J Rhabdopleurid epibionts from the Ordovician Fezouata Shale biota and the longevity of cross-phylum interactions Commun. Biol. 2023 6 1 1002 10.1038/s42003-023-05377-x 37821659
Nanglu, K., Waskom, M. E., Richards, J. C. & Ortega-Hernández, J. Rhabdopleurid epibionts from the Ordovician Fezouata Shale biota and the longevity of cross-phylum interactions. Commun. Biol. 6(1), 1002 (2023).37821659 10.1038/s42003-023-05377-x
31. Marek L The Ordovician Hyolitha of Anti-Atlas (Morocco) Sborník Národního muzea v Praze Řada B, Přírodní vědy 1983 39 1 36
Marek, L. The Ordovician Hyolitha of Anti-Atlas (Morocco). Sborník Národního muzea v Praze Řada B, Přírodní vědy 39, 1–36 (1983).
32. Mus MM A hyolithid with preserved soft parts from the Ordovician Fezouata Konservat-Lagerstätte of Morocco Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2016 460 122 129 10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.04.048
Mus, M. M. A hyolithid with preserved soft parts from the Ordovician Fezouata Konservat-Lagerstätte of Morocco. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 460, 122–129 (2016).10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.04.048
33. Kröger B Lefebvre B Palaeogeography and palaeoecology of early Floian (Early Ordovician) cephalopods from the Upper Fezouata Formation, Anti-Atlas, Morocco Foss Rec. 2012 15 2 61 75 10.1002/mmng.201200004
Kröger, B. & Lefebvre, B. Palaeogeography and palaeoecology of early Floian (Early Ordovician) cephalopods from the Upper Fezouata Formation, Anti-Atlas, Morocco. Foss Rec. 15(2), 61–75 (2012).10.1002/mmng.201200004
34. Polechová M The bivalve fauna from the Fezouata Formation (Lower Ordovician) of Morocco and its significance for palaeobiogeography, palaeoecology and early diversification of bivalves Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2016 460 155 169 10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.12.016
Polechová, M. The bivalve fauna from the Fezouata Formation (Lower Ordovician) of Morocco and its significance for palaeobiogeography, palaeoecology and early diversification of bivalves. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 460, 155–169 (2016).10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.12.016
35. Ebbestad JOR Lefebvre B An unusual onychochilid mollusc from the Ordovician (Tremadocian) Fezouata formation, Morocco Geobios 2015 48 6 427 438 10.1016/j.geobios.2015.09.004
Ebbestad, J. O. R. & Lefebvre, B. An unusual onychochilid mollusc from the Ordovician (Tremadocian) Fezouata formation, Morocco. Geobios 48(6), 427–438 (2015).10.1016/j.geobios.2015.09.004
36. Ebbestad JOR Gastropoda, Tergomya and Paragastropoda (Mollusca) from the Lower Ordovician Fezouata Formation, Morocco Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2016 460 87 96 10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.01.003
Ebbestad, J. O. R. Gastropoda, Tergomya and Paragastropoda (Mollusca) from the Lower Ordovician Fezouata Formation, Morocco. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 460, 87–96 (2016).10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.01.003
37. Vinther J Parry L Briggs DE Van Roy P Ancestral morphology of crown-group molluscs revealed by a new Ordovician stem aculiferan Nature 2017 542 7642 471 474 10.1038/nature21055 28166536
Vinther, J., Parry, L., Briggs, D. E. & Van Roy, P. Ancestral morphology of crown-group molluscs revealed by a new Ordovician stem aculiferan. Nature 542(7642), 471–474 (2017).28166536 10.1038/nature21055
38. Nanglu K Ortega-Hernández J Post-Cambrian survival of the tubicolous scalidophoran Selkirkia Biol. Lett. 2024 20 3 20240042 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0042 38531414
Nanglu, K. & Ortega-Hernández, J. Post-Cambrian survival of the tubicolous scalidophoran Selkirkia. Biol. Lett. 20(3), 20240042 (2024).38531414 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0042
39. Saleh F Vaucher R Antcliffe JB Daley AC El Hariri K Kouraiss K Lefebvre B Martin EL Perrillat JP Sansjofre P Vidal M Insights into soft-part preservation from the Early Ordovician Fezouata Biota Earth-Sci. Rev. 2021 213 103464 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103464
Saleh, F. et al. Insights into soft-part preservation from the Early Ordovician Fezouata Biota. Earth-Sci. Rev. 213, 103464 (2021).10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103464
40. Richards JC Nanglu K Ortega-Hernández J The Fezouata Shale Formation biota is typical for the high latitudes of the Early Ordovician: a quantitative approach Paleobiology 2024 50 226 238 10.1017/pab.2024.7
Richards, J. C., Nanglu, K. & Ortega-Hernández, J. The Fezouata Shale Formation biota is typical for the high latitudes of the Early Ordovician: a quantitative approach. Paleobiology 50, 226–238 (2024).10.1017/pab.2024.7
41. Botting JP Diversity and ecology of sponges in the Early Ordovician Fezouata Biota, Morocco Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2016 460 75 86 10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.05.018
Botting, J. P. Diversity and ecology of sponges in the Early Ordovician Fezouata Biota, Morocco. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 460, 75–86 (2016).10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.05.018
42. Van Iten H Muir L Simões MG Leme JM Marques AC Yoder N Palaeobiogeography, palaeoecology and evolution of Lower Ordovician conulariids and Sphenothallus (Medusozoa, Cnidaria), with emphasis on the Fezouata Shale of southeastern Morocco Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2016 460 170 178 10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.03.008
Van Iten, H. et al. Palaeobiogeography, palaeoecology and evolution of Lower Ordovician conulariids and Sphenothallus (Medusozoa, Cnidaria), with emphasis on the Fezouata Shale of southeastern Morocco. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 460, 170–178 (2016).10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.03.008
43. Martin EL Lerosey-Aubril R Vannier J Palaeoscolecid worms from the Lower Ordovician Fezouata Lagerstätte, Morocco: Palaeoecological and palaeogeographical implications Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2016 460 130 141 10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.04.009
Martin, E. L., Lerosey-Aubril, R. & Vannier, J. Palaeoscolecid worms from the Lower Ordovician Fezouata Lagerstätte, Morocco: Palaeoecological and palaeogeographical implications. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 460, 130–141 (2016).10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.04.009
44. Saleh F Guenser P Gibert C Balseiro D Serra F Waisfeld BG Antcliffe JB Daley AC Mángano MG Buatois LA Ma X Contrasting Early Ordovician assembly patterns highlight the complex initial stages of the Ordovician Radiation Sci. Rep. 2022 12 1 3852 10.1038/s41598-022-07822-z 35264650
Saleh, F. et al. Contrasting Early Ordovician assembly patterns highlight the complex initial stages of the Ordovician Radiation. Sci. Rep. 12(1), 3852 (2022).35264650 10.1038/s41598-022-07822-z
45. Saleh F Antcliffe JB Lustri L Daley AC Gibert C Cambrian and Ordovician diversity fluctuations could be resolved through a single ecological hypothesis Lethaia 2023 56 3 1 13 10.18261/let.56.3.7
Saleh, F., Antcliffe, J. B., Lustri, L., Daley, A. C. & Gibert, C. Cambrian and Ordovician diversity fluctuations could be resolved through a single ecological hypothesis. Lethaia 56(3), 1–13 (2023).10.18261/let.56.3.7
46. Martin EL Pittet B Gutiérrez-Marco JC Vannier J El Hariri K Lerosey-Aubril R Masrour M Nowak H Servais T Vandenbroucke TR Van Roy P The Lower Ordovician Fezouata Konservat-Lagerstätte from Morocco: Age, environment and evolutionary perspectives Gondwana Res. 2016 34 274 283 10.1016/j.gr.2015.03.009
Martin, E. L. et al. The Lower Ordovician Fezouata Konservat-Lagerstätte from Morocco: Age, environment and evolutionary perspectives. Gondwana Res. 34, 274–283 (2016).10.1016/j.gr.2015.03.009
47. Lefebvre B Gutiérrez-Marco JC Lehnert O Martin EL Nowak H Akodad M El Hariri K Servais T Age calibration of the Lower Ordovician Fezouata Lagerstätte, Morocco Lethaia 2018 51 2 296 311 10.1111/let.12240
Lefebvre, B. et al. Age calibration of the Lower Ordovician Fezouata Lagerstätte, Morocco. Lethaia 51(2), 296–311 (2018).10.1111/let.12240
48. Saleh F Pittet B Perrillat JP Lefebvre B Orbital control on exceptional fossil preservation Geology 2019 47 2 103 106 10.1130/G45598.1
Saleh, F., Pittet, B., Perrillat, J. P. & Lefebvre, B. Orbital control on exceptional fossil preservation. Geology 47(2), 103–106 (2019).10.1130/G45598.1
49. Saleh F Vaucher R Vidal M Hariri KE Laibl L Daley AC Gutiérrez-Marco JC Candela Y Harper DA Ortega-Hernández J Ma X New fossil assemblages from the Early Ordovician Fezouata biota Sci. Rep. 2022 12 1 20773 10.1038/s41598-022-25000-z 36513689
Saleh, F. et al. New fossil assemblages from the Early Ordovician Fezouata biota. Sci. Rep. 12(1), 20773 (2022).36513689 10.1038/s41598-022-25000-z
50. Vaucher R Martin EL Hormière H Pittet B A genetic link between Konzentrat-and Konservat-Lagerstätten in the Fezouata Shale (lower Ordovician, Morocco) Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2016 460 24 34 10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.05.020
Vaucher, R., Martin, E. L., Hormière, H. & Pittet, B. A genetic link between Konzentrat-and Konservat-Lagerstätten in the Fezouata Shale (lower Ordovician, Morocco). Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 460, 24–34 (2016).10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.05.020
51. Vaucher R Pittet B Hormière H Martin EL Lefebvre B A wave-dominated, tide-modulated model for the Lower Ordovician of the Anti-Atlas, Morocco Sedimentology 2017 64 3 777 807 10.1111/sed.12327
Vaucher, R., Pittet, B., Hormière, H., Martin, E. L. & Lefebvre, B. A wave-dominated, tide-modulated model for the Lower Ordovician of the Anti-Atlas, Morocco. Sedimentology 64(3), 777–807 (2017).10.1111/sed.12327
52. Saleh F Pittet B Sansjofre P Guériau P Lalonde S Perrillat JP Vidal M Lucas V El Hariri K Kouraiss K Lefebvre B Taphonomic pathway of exceptionally preserved fossils in the Lower Ordovician of Morocco Geobios 2020 60 99 115 10.1016/j.geobios.2020.04.001
Saleh, F. et al. Taphonomic pathway of exceptionally preserved fossils in the Lower Ordovician of Morocco. Geobios 60, 99–115 (2020).10.1016/j.geobios.2020.04.001
53. Saleh F Daley AC Lefebvre B Pittet B Perrillat JP Biogenic iron preserves structures during fossilization: A hypothesis: iron from decaying tissues may stabilize their morphology in the fossil record BioEssays 2020 42 6 1900243 10.1002/bies.201900243
Saleh, F., Daley, A. C., Lefebvre, B., Pittet, B. & Perrillat, J. P. Biogenic iron preserves structures during fossilization: A hypothesis: iron from decaying tissues may stabilize their morphology in the fossil record. BioEssays 42(6), 1900243 (2020).10.1002/bies.201900243
54. Saleh F Lucas V Pittet B Lefebvre B Lalonde SV Sansjofre P Iron from continental weathering dictated soft-part preservation during the Early Ordovician Terra Nova 2022 34 3 163 168 10.1111/ter.12572
Saleh, F. et al. Iron from continental weathering dictated soft-part preservation during the Early Ordovician. Terra Nova 34(3), 163–168 (2022).10.1111/ter.12572
55. Gueriau, P., Saleh, F., Laibl, L., Peris, F.P., Lustri, L., Mocuta, C., Réguer, S., Cohen, S. X., Bertrand, L. & Daley, A. C. Trace elements discriminate between tissues in highly weathered fossils (2023).
56. Saleh F Antcliffe JB Lefebvre B Pittet B Laibl L Peris FP Lustri L Gueriau P Daley AC Taphonomic bias in exceptionally preserved biotas Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2020 529 115873 10.1016/j.epsl.2019.115873
Saleh, F. et al. Taphonomic bias in exceptionally preserved biotas. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 529, 115873 (2020).10.1016/j.epsl.2019.115873
57. Saleh F Bath-Enright OG Daley AC Lefebvre B Pittet B Vite A Ma X Mángano MG Buatois LA Antcliffe JB A novel tool to untangle the ecology and fossil preservation knot in exceptionally preserved biotas Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2021 569 117061 10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117061
Saleh, F. et al. A novel tool to untangle the ecology and fossil preservation knot in exceptionally preserved biotas. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 569, 117061 (2021).10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117061
58. Saleh F Ma X Guenser P Mángano MG Buatois LA Antcliffe JB Probability-based preservational variations within the early Cambrian Chengjiang biota (China) PeerJ 2022 10 e13869 10.7717/peerj.13869 36032952
Saleh, F. et al. Probability-based preservational variations within the early Cambrian Chengjiang biota (China). PeerJ 10, e13869 (2022).36032952 10.7717/peerj.13869
59. Saleh F Clements T Perrier V Daley AC Antcliffe JB Variations in preservation of exceptional fossils within concretions Swiss J. Palaeontol. 2023 142 1 20 10.1186/s13358-023-00284-4 37719137
Saleh, F., Clements, T., Perrier, V., Daley, A. C. & Antcliffe, J. B. Variations in preservation of exceptional fossils within concretions. Swiss J. Palaeontol. 142(1), 20 (2023).37719137 10.1186/s13358-023-00284-4
60. Whitaker AF Schiffbauer JD Briggs DE Leibach WW Kimmig J Preservation and diagenesis of soft-bodied fossils and the occurrence of phosphate-associated rare earth elements in the Cambrian (Wuliuan) Spence Shale Lagerstätte Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 2022 592 110909 10.1016/j.palaeo.2022.110909
Whitaker, A. F., Schiffbauer, J. D., Briggs, D. E., Leibach, W. W. & Kimmig, J. Preservation and diagenesis of soft-bodied fossils and the occurrence of phosphate-associated rare earth elements in the Cambrian (Wuliuan) Spence Shale Lagerstätte. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 592, 110909 (2022).10.1016/j.palaeo.2022.110909
61. Saleh F Lefebvre B Dupichaud C Martin EL Nohejlová M Spaccesi L Skeletal elements controlled soft-tissue preservation in echinoderms from the Early Ordovician Fezouata Biota Geobios 2023 81 51 66 10.1016/j.geobios.2023.08.001
Saleh, F. et al. Skeletal elements controlled soft-tissue preservation in echinoderms from the Early Ordovician Fezouata Biota. Geobios 81, 51–66 (2023).10.1016/j.geobios.2023.08.001
62. Saleh F Lustri L Gueriau P Potin GJM Pérez-Peris F Laibl L Jamart V Vite A Antcliffe JB Daley AC Nohejlová M The Cabrières Biota (France) provides insights into Ordovician polar ecosystems Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2024 8 651 662 10.1038/s41559-024-02331-w 38337049
Saleh, F. et al. The Cabrières Biota (France) provides insights into Ordovician polar ecosystems. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 8, 651–662 (2024).38337049 10.1038/s41559-024-02331-w
63. Botting JP Muir LA Pates S McCobb LM Wallet E Willman S Zhang Y Ma J A Middle Ordovician Burgess Shale-type fauna from Castle Bank, Wales (UK) Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2023 7 5 666 674 10.1038/s41559-023-02038-4 37127766
Botting, J. P. et al. A Middle Ordovician Burgess Shale-type fauna from Castle Bank, Wales (UK). Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7(5), 666–674 (2023).37127766 10.1038/s41559-023-02038-4
64. Hearing TW Legg DA Botting JP Muir LA McDermott P Faulkner S Taylor AC Brasier MD Survival of Burgess Shale-type animals in a Middle Ordovician deep-water setting J. Geol. Soc. 2016 173 4 628 633 10.1144/jgs2015-131
Hearing, T. W. et al. Survival of Burgess Shale-type animals in a Middle Ordovician deep-water setting. J. Geol. Soc. 173(4), 628–633 (2016).10.1144/jgs2015-131
