
==== Front
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int
Environmental Science and Pollution Research International
0944-1344
1614-7499
Springer Berlin Heidelberg Berlin/Heidelberg

39164561
34668
10.1007/s11356-024-34668-x
Research Article
An assessment of latrine front-end characteristics and associated surface E. coli indicated faecal contamination in rural Fiji
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6388-6644
Adhikari Sabita sabita.adhikari@sydney.edu.au

1
Anthony Shylett 2
Baleinamau Ponipate 2
Coriakula Jeremaia 2
http://orcid.org/0009-0005-1164-0534
Daurewa Thompson 2
Devi Rachel 2
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4454-5902
Gavidi Sikeli 2
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8689-7888
Horwitz Pierre 3
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6073-8646
Hunter Erin C. 4
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5079-0045
Jenkins Aaron 35
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9742-1677
Jupiter Stacy 6
Lalamacuata Maria 2
Mailautoka Kinikoto 2
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4728-4421
Mangubhai Sangeeta 78
http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7479-7987
Naivalu Kelera 2
http://orcid.org/0009-0006-8217-6596
Naivalulevu Timoci 2
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5135-0228
Naivalulevu Vilisi 2
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6965-8511
Nasim Nabeela 1
Naucunivanua Sikeli 7
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2016-311X
Negin Joel 5
van Nimwegen Paul 7
Ratu Anaseini 5
http://orcid.org/0009-0003-7407-685X
Ravoka Mereia 7
Tukana Andrew 7
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4497-6155
van de Vossenberg Jack 9
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1047-1669
Wilson Donald 2
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0520-7564
Thomas Jacqueline 1
1 https://ror.org/0384j8v12 grid.1013.3 0000 0004 1936 834X School of Civil Engineering, The University of Sydney, Darlington, NSW 2006 Australia
2 https://ror.org/00qk2nf71 grid.417863.f 0000 0004 0455 8044 Fiji Institute of Pacific Health Research, College of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Fiji National University, Hoodless House, Suva, Fiji
3 https://ror.org/05jhnwe22 grid.1038.a 0000 0004 0389 4302 Centre for People, Place, and Planet, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA Australia
4 https://ror.org/037s24f05 grid.26090.3d 0000 0001 0665 0280 Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Behavioural, Social and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, USA
5 https://ror.org/0384j8v12 grid.1013.3 0000 0004 1936 834X School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006 Australia
6 https://ror.org/05s9cjr09 grid.511476.0 Wildlife Conservation Society, Melanesia Program, Suva, Fiji
7 https://ror.org/05s9cjr09 grid.511476.0 Wildlife Conservation Society, Fiji Program, Suva, Fiji
8 Talanoa Consulting, 42 Knollys Street, Suva, Fiji
9 https://ror.org/030deh410 grid.420326.1 0000 0004 0624 5658 Water Supply, Sanitation and Environmental Engineering Department, IHE Delft Institute of Water Education, Delft, The Netherlands
Responsible Editor: Diane Purchase

21 8 2024
21 8 2024
2024
31 40 5294852962
12 3 2024
5 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
In Fiji, 90% of the population has access to basic sanitation; however, there are still persistent health risks from endemic faecal-oral diseases such as typhoid fever. There is a need to assess the contribution of existing sanitation facilities in the faecal pathogen transmission pathway. This study was conducted as part of a larger planetary health study across 29 rural communities within five river catchments. This specific research aimed to characterise latrine front-ends, both infrastructure and usage behaviour, and to assess the faecal contamination levels on various frequently contacted latrine surfaces in rural Fiji. A sanitation survey, along with observation and latrine swab sampling, was conducted in households over three phases: baseline (n = 311) (Aug–Dec 2019), endline (n = 262) (Jun–Sep 2022) and an in-depth front-end study (n = 12) (Oct–Nov 2022). Of 311 households, almost all had pedestal-type latrines, predominately cistern-flush (83%), followed by pour-flush (13%), and then hole-type (pit) latrines (4%). Washable latrine floors had significantly higher E. coli densities (6.7 × 102 CFU/25 cm2) compared to non-washable floors (1.3 × 102 CFU/25 cm2) (p = 0.05), despite washable floors indicating improved latrines. The in-depth front-end analysis found that moist latrine surfaces had significantly elevated E. coli densities (1.2 × 103 CFU/25 cm2) compared to the dry ones (14.3 CFU/25 cm2) (p < 0.001), highlighting the importance of maintaining dry latrine surfaces. Latrine floors and mid-walls were the most frequently contaminated surfaces, emphasising the need to clean and disinfect these surfaces. Only 46% of the households reported always using soap for handwashing after defecation, exacerbating the risk of transmitting faecal pathogens. This study highlights that latrine cleanliness and hygiene are as crucial as latrine infrastructures for the effective disruption of faecal pathogens transmission during latrine use.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11356-024-34668-x.

Keywords

Faecal pathogen transmission pathways
Frequent human contact surfaces
Latrine surfaces
Latrine usage behaviour
Microbial risks
Pacific Islands
Sustainable Development Goal 6
http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000996 Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Australian Government SSHS 74427 http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100015283 Bloomberg Philanthropies 53006 University of SydneyOpen Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions

issue-copyright-statement© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Inadequate sanitation remains a global health challenge contributing to the transmission of several infectious diseases, accounting for an estimated 432,000 deaths annually (WHO 2022). While most sanitation-related diseases are transmitted through faecal-oral pathways (such as typhoid), some can be transmitted via skin contact with faecally contaminated soil (such as hookworm) and poor hygiene (such as trachoma) (Hutton and Chase 2016; WHO 2022). The microbial pathogens causing these diseases spread through various pathways including water, flies, soil, hands, surfaces and contaminated food (Curtis et al. 2000; Navab-Daneshmand et al. 2018). Improving sanitation infrastructures and hygiene practices remains crucial to break these transmission pathways and reduce microbial risks (Adhikari et al. 2023).

The WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Program (JMP) defines the sanitation ladder with five service levels ranging from open defecation at the bottom to unimproved, limited, basic and safely managed sanitation (WHO and UNICEF 2021). Achieving basic sanitation involves using improved sanitation facilities, such as flush or pour-flush latrines and pit latrines with slabs, that hygienically separate the users from faeces and are not shared with other households. Safely managed sanitation is defined as using private improved sanitation facilities where human excreta is treated safely onsite or safely transported and treated offsite, which is the key indicator of progress for the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6. While significant progress has been made globally in achieving access to improved sanitation facilities since the Millennium Development Goals (Weststrate et al. 2019; WHO 2015), the persistence of sanitation-related diseases underscores that access to improved sanitation infrastructure alone cannot effectively break pathogen transmission (Behera et al. 2021; Odagiri et al. 2016). Therefore, it is essential to assess the safe use of latrines and hygiene practices such as handwashing with soap alongside efforts to expand sanitation coverage (Behera et al. 2021; Dey et al. 2019).

Onsite sanitation systems (non-sewered sanitation), such as pit latrines with slabs and septic systems, are the primary form of improved sanitation in rural and peri-urban communities (Gwenzi et al. 2023; Twinomucunguzi et al. 2020; WHO and UNICEF 2017). Latrine front-ends or user interface is the first step of the sanitation service chain which includes options such as pedestals, squat plates, or holes in the ground, with flush systems depending on water availability (Thomas and Gold 2020). Non-technical factors such as latrine usage behaviours and socio-cultural aspects can influence the extent of microbial risks and transmission from latrines (Mahdavinejad et al. 2011; Stenström et al. 2011). Frequent interactions between latrine front-ends and users create an ideal environment for pathogen transmission via contaminated hands and surfaces leading to skin, gastrointestinal or respiratory infections among household members (Abney et al. 2021; Bloomfield et al. 2017, 2012).

While the risk of pathogen transmission from contaminated surfaces including latrine surfaces is long known, the recent COVID-19 pandemic brought this to significant attention, highlighting the need to study contaminated latrine surfaces (Sharma et al. 2023; Sivamuni et al. 2022), particularly given the lack of field data on latrine front-end infrastructures and usage behaviours in the sanitation literature (Adhikari et al. 2023). The knowledge gap is even more pronounced in Pacific Island countries where there are variations in latrine front-end types. Cistern flush latrines are predominantly reported in countries such as Fiji (Nasim et al. 2023) and Tonga (White et al. 2020), whereas hole-type (without water seal) latrines are commonly reported in Papua New Guinea (Seidahmed et al. 2021). Furthermore, only ten studies globally reported field measurements of microbial densities on various front-end surfaces of household latrines; with none from Pacific Island countries (Adhikari et al. 2023). A thorough assessment of latrine front-end characteristics and usage behaviours in the Pacific is thus warranted to assess microbial risks and potential contamination of the latrine surfaces.

Fiji is well positioned for an in-depth investigation given the high coverage of improved sanitation coupled with the high incidence of faecal-oral diseases. Recent JMP statistics report a 93% overall coverage for improved sanitation facilities that are not shared in Fiji, which includes access to basic (44%) and safely managed sanitation service levels (49%) (WHO and UNICEF 2022). This coverage of improved sanitation facilities in Fiji is evenly distributed between urban and rural areas, with both reporting a consistent 93% coverage rate. Fiji still has a significant burden of faecal-oral diseases such as typhoid fever, with inadequate sanitation identified as one of the risk factors (Prasad et al. 2018; Watson et al. 2017). Previous studies assessing the risk factors of faecal-oral diseases in Fiji commonly highlight the transmission routes, including consumption of contaminated surface or groundwater and unwashed produce exposed to contamination due to leaching or flooding through unsafe latrine back-ends (Jenkins et al. 2016, 2019; Prasad et al. 2018; Thompson et al. 2014). However, there is limited information on latrine front-end infrastructures and usage behaviours from Fiji, and no studies have measured the faecal contamination levels on latrine front-end surfaces. Further, the association between latrine front-end types and usage behaviours with the faecal contamination levels on latrine surfaces has not yet been explored.

This study aims to address these gaps by assessing faecal contamination levels (Escherichia coli densities) on latrine front-end surfaces across 29 rural communities in Fiji. The specific objectives are to (a) investigate variability in the existing latrine front-end types and associated usage behaviours; (b) identify the latrine front-end types with the highest faecal contamination levels on latrine floors; (c) assess the faecal contamination levels on frequent human contact surfaces within latrine front-end; and (d) identify the factors that impact the faecal contamination levels on these identified surfaces.

Materials and methods

Study location

The latrine front-end analysis presented in this study is part of a broader programme of work under the Watershed Interventions for Systems Health in Fiji (WISH Fiji) project designed specifically to identify and address multiple drivers of negative health impacts on people and the environment that operate and interact at nested scales within watersheds (Jupiter et al. 2024). Fiji has an estimated population of 930,000 (The World Bank 2022) and has been classified as a high human development index (HDI) country (UNDP 2022). Fiji consists of over 330 islands, with the majority of the population located on the two major islands: Viti Levu and Vanua Levu. The WISH Fiji project covered five river catchments: Dawasamu, Upper Navua and Waibula (located on Viti Levu), Dama (located on Vanua Levu) and Bureta (located on Ovalau Island). A total of 29 communities were selected from these catchments, which included seven from Bureta, six from Dama, five from Dawasamu, five from Upper Navua and six from Waibula. The selection of these communities was primarily based on their geographical positioning along the existing major rivers and the prevalence of faecal-oral diseases such as typhoid fever, as previously described by Jupiter et al. 2024.

The Natadradave community in the Dawasamu catchment was selected to conduct an in-depth front-end analysis of the faecal contamination levels on the contact surfaces of latrines. Natadradave is situated around 60 km north of the capital, Suva. It was selected for the front-end sampling due to its proximity to the laboratory in Suva and the availability of a wide range of latrine front-end types compared to other communities in Dawasamu.

Sanitation and household survey

Sanitation surveys, observations and latrine swab sampling were carried out in three phases: baseline (Aug–Dec 2019), endline (Jun–Sep 2022) and in-depth front-end study (Oct–Nov 2022) (Fig. 1). For baseline and endline, household surveys and infrastructure observations were carried out by trained enumerators covering 311 households in baseline and 262 households in endline. The same households surveyed from baseline were revisited for endline but with some cases of no one being home, leading to lower responses in the endline survey. This random sample of households represented 21% and 17% of the total households in the 29 selected communities (1502 households), respectively. An adult member of each household was interviewed using structured questionnaires that covered socio-economic status, demographics of latrine users, usage behaviours such as anal cleansing methods and handwashing and reported diseases. Further, latrines were visually inspected by the enumerators using sanitation observation checklists for the type of latrine front-ends, latrine floors, presence of anal cleansing materials and handwashing facilities. GPS coordinates and photos of the latrine front and back-ends were also captured. In addition, community-level sanitation information was also collected through the process of sanitation safety planning (SSP) from 2020 to 2021 (Nasim et al. 2023). The SSP approach involved the engagement and active participation of community leaders, community health workers, water safety committees and key residents to gather the required community-wide sanitation data. It also included educating these community leaders on sanitation infrastructures and their maintenance. For the in-depth front-end study, more detailed sanitation surveys and observations were carried out in 12 households. The survey questionnaires and observation checklists were adapted from baseline and endline surveys, including additional questions focused on the characteristics and maintenance of the latrine front-ends and usage behaviours, such as frequency of cleaning latrines, materials used for cleaning and menstrual hygiene management practices (Table S1). Visual assessment was also conducted to record the presence of moisture, dirt, material type and texture for each sampling surface of latrines.Fig. 1 Overview of latrine swab collection process for assessing faecal contamination levels on latrine front-end surfaces in rural Fiji included in this study

Latrine swab sample collection

The latrine swab samples were collected in three phases following the same timeline as sanitation and household surveys. Latrine floor swab samples were collected from a random selection of 96 out of 311 households in baseline and 46 out of 262 households in endline (Fig. 1). Sterile dry cotton swabs with wooden handles (Puritan®, USA) were used to collect the samples from an approximately 5 cm × 5 cm area for around 30 s on the latrine floor around the pedestal or squat plate where a user would place their feet. The swabs were collected in labelled 15-ml falcon tubes (Biologix®, USA), cold stored in cool boxes and transported back to the laboratory for processing and analysis within 24 h.

During the in-depth front-end study, swab samples were collected from several surfaces from 12 private household latrines in Natadradave, Dawasamu. Latrines were selected to include different front-end types that are representative of those found within the catchment, including cistern flush, pour-flush and hole-type (pit) latrines. Surface swab samples were collected from nine frequent human contact surfaces, such as outside and inside door handles, outside and inside lock handles, latrine floor, latrine seat, latrine cover, flush button and mid-wall (wall area around the pedestal that is likely to be touched during latrine use (Fig. 2, Table S2).Fig. 2 In-depth front-end sampling locations of a cistern-flush latrine at Natadradave, Dawasamu, catchment. The yellow circles with numbers represent the sampling locations

Furthermore, swab samples were also collected from the lower wall (control), as users are less likely to touch this area. The E. coli density on frequent contact surfaces was compared for the 12 private latrines. In total, 97 swab samples were taken from the 12 latrines. Sterile cotton swabs pre-moistened with sterile distilled water were used to collect the samples, as described by Exley et al. (2015). A sterile 25-cm2 aluminium foil template (5 cm × 5 cm) was placed over the sampling area, and the swab was held at a slight angle and moved 20 times horizontally and perpendicularly. For small surfaces such as lock handles, the whole area was swabbed. Swabs were cold transported on ice to the field laboratory located nearby (a 10-min drive) and processed within 6 h.

Sample analysis

Each swab sample was vortexed in 10 ml of sterile distilled water for 1 min. The swab tip was then squeezed against the tube wall to extract maximum moisture and removed aseptically. The volume of sample solution used for filtration ranged between 1 and 10 ml, depending on the surface contamination. For example, two volumes were plated (1 ml and 10 ml) for samples taken from surfaces with expected high faecal contamination such as latrine floors and seats. The swab liquid was then filtered through a 47-mm filter with a pore size of 0.45-µm filter using the membrane filtration technique. The filter was placed onto the petri dish with m-ColiBlue24® (HACH, USA) and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h (HACH 2023). Blue colonies of E. coli were counted, and the density was reported as a colony-forming unit (CFU) per 25 cm2 of the surface swabbed. For the inside and outside lock handles, E. coli density was reported as CFU per swab. The lower limit of detection was one CFU per plate, equivalent to 1 CFU/ 25 cm2. For non-detects or samples below the detection limit, half of the lower limit of detection value was substituted as in similar previous studies (Mraz et al. 2023; Pickering et al. 2018).

Quality control

The sample collection, processing and quality control measures were optimised for the limited laboratory and logistic conditions. Daily negative controls were plated by filtering sterile distilled water. Using laboratory-maintained E. coli was not feasible for positive control in rural Fiji. Thus, latrine floor samples with expected E. coli presence were used, confirming at least 10% positive samples in each batch of daily collected samples (30 samples). A similar method of swabbing latrine surfaces was undertaken for positive control in rural settings (Uprety et al. 2020). The filtration unit was dried and sterilised by burning methanol following WagTech® Potalab + M protocol (Palintest 2023). Samples from visibly clean surfaces were processed before those from dirty surfaces. Working surfaces and hands were frequently sterilised with ethanol to prevent cross-contamination.

Data analysis

Visual assessment of latrine front-end photos

The latrine front-ends were classified primarily by existing flush type (cistern-flush, pour-flush and hole-type) and sitting positions (pedestal or squat types). The presence of moisture and dirt on latrine floors was visually assessed using latrine front-end photos captured during the sanitation observations into three categories: “yes”, “no” and “not differentiated” (Fig. S1). The latrine floors were classified as “yes” if they were visually moist and were classified as “no” if they appeared visually dry, and “not differentiated” if it was not possible to visually differentiate the condition of the floors, either due to inappropriate lighting or photo angles. If the latrine front-end photos were not captured, they were regarded as missing data. Similar classification criteria were applied to assess the presence of dirt on the latrine floors.

Statistical analysis

Latrine floor swab samples included in this study were collected during different periods and with no sanitation interventions applied on household levels between these periods. The variability in the mean E. coli densities was assessed across the baseline and endline sampling rounds. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to assess the normality of E. coli densities data. Both continuous and log-transformed E. coli densities data (p < 0.001) were not normally distributed. Therefore, non-parametric tests were used to test the statistical difference between the E. coli densities on the latrine surfaces with different latrine characteristics. Specifically, the Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare two independent variables, while the Kruskal–Wallis test was used for multiple independent variables. Results were considered statistically significant when p ≤ 0.05. All the data analyses were performed using R Studio version 2022.12.0 (RStudio Team 2022). The continuous E. coli densities data were purposefully chosen for data visualisation to facilitate easier access and interpretation by a broader non-scientific audience.

Results

General characteristics of latrines

Table 1 summarises the latrine front-end characteristics using the survey data from a larger sample size of 311 households from the baseline survey, as similar trends were observed in the endline survey (Table S3). Of 311 households, 216 (69%) had latrines located outside their dwelling, while 95 (31%) had indoor latrines (Table 1). Among the catchments, Dawasamu had the highest percentage of households with latrines located outside (89%), whereas Waibula with the highest for indoor latrines (46%). Regarding latrine ownership, 265 (85%) households had private latrines, while 46 (15%) had shared latrines. Waibula had the highest percentage of private latrines (94%), while Dawasamu had the highest shared latrines (30%). Table 1 Characteristics of latrine front-ends within the five catchments in the baseline survey (311 households)

Catchments	Bureta
(55 households)	Dama
(65 households)	Dawasamu
(56 households)	Upper Navua
(65 households)	Waibula
(70 households)	Total
(311 households)1	
Latrine location	
Inside	23 (42%)	19 (29%)	6 (11%)	15 (23%)	32 (46%)	95 (31%)	
Outside	32 (58%)	46 (71%)	50 (89%)	50 (77%)	38 (54%)	216 (69%)	
Latrine ownership	
Private	43 (78%)	58 (89%)	39 (70%)	59 (91%)	66 (94%)	265 (85%)	
Shared	12 (22%)	7 (11%)	17 (30%)	6 (9%)	4 (6%)	46 (15%)	
Front-end flush type	
Cistern Flush	53 (96%)	38 (58%)	43 (77%)	64 (98%)	61 (87%)	260 (83%)	
Pour flush	0 (0%)	23 (35%)	10 (18%)	0 (0%)	6 (9%)	39 (13%)	
Hole type (without water seal)	1 (2%)	4 (6%)	3 (5%)	1 (2%)	3 (4%)	12 (4%)	
Latrine floor type	
Washable floor	52 (95%)	61 (94%)	50 (89%)	63 (97%)	61 (87%)	287 (92%)	
Non-washable floor	3 (5%)	4 (6%)	6 (11%)	2 (3%)	9 (13%)	24 (8%)	
Front-end broken	
Yes	22 (40%)	26 (40%)	30 (54%)	23 (35%)	20 (29%)	121 (39%)	
No	33 (60%)	39 (60%)	26 (46%)	42 (65%)	50 (71%)	190 (60%)	
Anal cleansing material type reported by households2	
Toilet paper	29 (53%)	16 (25%)	38 (68%)	28 (43%)	57 (81%)	168 (54%)	
Newspaper	0 (0%)	1 (2%)	7 (13%)	0 (0%)	1 (1%)	9 (3%)	
Toilet paper and newspaper	24 (44%)	24 (37%)	11 (20%)	37 (57%)	9 (13%)	105 (34%)	
Toilet paper and water	0 (0%)	23 (35%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	3 (4%)	26 (8%)	
Observation of handwashing facilities inside latrines3	
Yes	5 (9%)	9 (14%)	1 (2%)	5 (8%)	4 (6%)	24 (8%)	
No	49 (89%)	56 (86%)	55 (98%)	60 (92%)	66 (94%)	286 (91%)	
1Sum of households does not add up to the total number of households as some households had shared latrines

2Two missing data

3One missing data

The most common front-end flush type observed was Category A—cistern flush latrines in 260 (83%) households, followed by Category B—pour-flush latrines in 39 (13%) and Category C—hole-type latrines in 12 (4%) households (Fig. 3). Upper Navua had the highest percentage of cistern-flush latrines (98%), while Dama had the highest percentage of pour-flush (35%) and hole-type latrines (5%). Almost all latrines were pedestal-type, except for one squat-type latrine in Upper Navua. For latrine floor type, 287 (92%) households had latrines with washable floors such as coarse concrete and tiles, while 24 (8%) had non-washable latrine floors made of wood and dirt.Fig. 3 Latrine front-end types based on flush mechanisms observed in rural Fiji

Considering latrine front-end maintenance, 121 (39%) households had a broken front-end (broken flush, pipe, seat, or floor), with the highest percentage in Dawasamu (54%) and the lowest in Waibula (29%). Overall, broken front-ends decreased by 12% across all catchments between the baseline and endline survey, with a notable 27% reduction in Dama. The visual assessment of latrine front-end photos showed 130 (42%) with moist latrine floors and 91 (29%) with dry floors, and 89 (21%) could not be differentiated (Table S3). Similarly, 118 (47%) had visible dirt on the latrine floor, 91 (29%) did not have visible dirt and 89 (21%) could not be differentiated.

For anal cleansing materials, 168 (54%) reported using toilet paper only, nine (3%) newspaper only, 105 (34%) both toilet paper and newspaper and 26 (8%) both toilet paper and water. The visual assessment of front-end photos showed 43 (14%) households using latrines to store agricultural tools such as insecticide sprays and jerry cans. Faeces were observed in or around the latrines of 13 (4%) households, of which 12 (92%) had human faeces and 1 (8%) had animal faeces. In terms of child faeces management, 173 (56%) households reported disposing of faeces in the latrines, 38 (12%) threw them together with other solid waste and seven (2%) threw them in rivers. Handwashing facilities were observed inside the latrines of only 24 (8%) households, while 286 (91%) lacked them. However, handwashing facilities were observed elsewhere in 266 (86%) households, with 144 (54%) households with a running water tap and a sink and 71 (21%) with a bucket of water. No handwashing facilities were observed in 45 (14%) households. Regarding handwashing after defecation, 302 (97%) reported washing their hands, but only 142 (46%) reported always using soap. Similarly, only 35 (11%) households reported always wearing shoes outdoors, while 62 (20%) never used them. Considering that 69% of the latrines are located outside households, it is likely that at least some members of these households use latrines without wearing shoes. Only 48 (15%) households reported a household member having diarrhoea in the past month.

During the in-depth front-end study including 12 households, latrine cleaning materials were observed in only four (33%) households, with three having only a brush, and one using a commercial liquid cleaner. None of the latrine cleaning materials were observed in the remaining eight (67%) households. For the latrine cleaning frequency, three (25%) households reported cleaning daily, two (17%) cleaned once a week, six (50%) cleaned twice a week, and one (8%) cleaned thrice a week. The latrine cleaning materials used varied: seven (58%) reported using laundry detergent; one (8%) used a commercial liquid cleaner; two (17%) used ash and water; and two (17%) used only water. For child faeces management, only six (50%) had children, and all of them reported to use diaper. Of these households, three reported washing the diapers in the standpipe and using the remaining diaper plastic to ignite the cooking places, while one reported disposing of diapers in the latrine pit, one burying them in the pit, and one disposing in a rubbish bin with other solid waste. For menstrual hygiene management practices, information was obtained from eight (67%) households, as the remaining four (33%) had male respondents. Among those, four (50%) reported using commercially available disposable pads, one (13%) used reusable folded cloth, and three (37%) used both. Similarly, for disposal of menstrual hygiene materials, 4 (50%) households reported throwing them in a rubbish bin with other solid waste, 3 (37%) threw them in the pit of a hole-type latrine, and one (13%) threw away in the bush.

Comparison of latrine floor E. coli density with latrine front-end characteristics and maintenance in baseline and endline studies

A total of 142 latrine floor swab samples were collected from baseline (96 samples) and endline (46 samples) sampling rounds. The mean E. coli density on the latrine floors was found to be comparable with 5.8 × 102 CFU/25 cm2 in baseline and 6.6 × 102 CFU/25 cm2 in endline (p = 0.24) (Fig. S2). Latrines with washable floors were found to have significantly higher E. coli density (6.7 × 102 CFU/25 cm2) than those with non-washable floors (1.3 × 102 CFU/25 cm2) (p = 0.05) (Fig. 4a). There were slight variations between the mean E. coli densities on the latrine floor by latrine type: pour-flush 8.4 × 102 CFU/25 cm2, cistern-flush 5.6 × 102 CFU/25 cm2 and hole-type 4.3 × 102 CFU/25 cm2 (Fig. 4b). These differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.77), likely due to the large range in values. Similarly, there was no statistical difference in the mean E. coli densities on the latrine floor for variables such as latrine ownership, latrine location, number of latrine users and reported diarrhoea by households (Fig. 4c to f). There was no statistical difference in the overall mean E. coli densities on the latrine floor for the highest education level attained by the households; primary (9.0 × 102 CFU/25 cm2), secondary (5.3 × 102 CFU/25 cm2) and tertiary level (5.4 × 102 CFU/25 cm2) (p = 0.07) (Table S4). However, pair-wise comparisons revealed that households with primary education had significantly higher E. coli densities on latrine floors than those with secondary (p = 0.04) and tertiary education levels (p = 0.04). There was no statistical difference in mean E. coli densities on the latrine floor with front-end maintenance variables such as visible moisture, visible dirt, broken front-ends and the observation of faeces in or around the latrines (Table S4).Fig. 4 E. coli density on latrine floors (CFU/25 cm2) with a total of 142 latrine floor swabs from baseline and endline study compared to latrine front-end characteristics. The box plot represents the median, quartiles, outlier (grey dots) and mean ( ×). a E. coli and type of latrine floors; b E. coli and latrine front-end flush type; c E. coli and latrine ownership (one missing data); d E. coli and latrine location with reference to households (one missing data); e E. coli and the number of users per latrine (one missing data); f E. coli and reported diarrhoea by the household in the previous month (two missing data). The lower limit of detection is 1.0 CFU/25 cm2. Non-detects were substituted with half of the lower limit of detection values. The E. coli densities data presented are raw continuous data

In-depth front-end study

Comparison of E. coli density on frequent contact surfaces of latrine front-ends

A total of 97 swab samples were taken from 10 sampling locations within 12 private household latrines in Natadradave, Dawasamu. All latrines were pedestal types, including six cistern-flush, three pour-flush and three hole-type latrines. Latrine floors had the highest frequency of positive E. coli samples, with 83% (10 out of 12 samples) testing positive. Similarly, 75% of mid-wall samples (nine out of 12 samples), 58% of latrine seat samples (seven out of 12 samples), 44% of latrine cover samples (four of nine samples), 20% of outside lock handle samples (four out of five samples) and 8% of inside door samples (one out of 12 samples) were positive for E. coli (Table S5). None of the 12 outside door and five inside lock handle samples was positive for E. coli. Figure 5 shows E. coli densities in all sampling locations, except for outside and inside locks which are provided in Table S5. The latrine floor had significantly high E. coli densities (1.1 × 103 CFU/25 cm2) compared to the latrine seat (60.0 CFU/25 cm2) (p = 0.02), latrine cover (7.8 CFU/25 cm2) (p = 0.007) and mid-wall (7.8 CFU/25 cm2) (p = 0.004) (Fig. 5).Fig. 5 E. coli density (CFU/ 25 cm2) on various sampling locations of 12 household latrines, including outside door (n = 12), inside door (n = 12), latrine floor (n = 12), latrine cover (n = 9), latrine seat (n = 12), flush button (n = 6), mid-wall (n = 12) and lower wall (n = 12). The mean is represented by ( ×) for each surface. The lower limit of detection is 1.0 CFU/25 cm2. Non-detects were substituted with half of the lower limit of detection values. The E. coli density data presented are raw continuous data

Within the front-end types, the floors of pour-flush latrines were significantly contaminated with E. coli (3.8 × 103 CFU/25 cm2) compared to cistern flush (94.0 CFU/25 cm2) and hole-type latrines (91.0 CFU/25 cm2) (p = 0.05) (Table S5). For mid-wall samples, cistern-flush and pour-flush latrines had the same E. coli densities (10.0 CFU/25 cm2), whereas hole-type latrines had lower densities (1.3 CFU/25 cm2), but not statistically significant (p = 0.17). There was no significant difference (p = 0.46) in E. coli densities from the seats of cistern-flush latrines (97.5 CFU/25 cm2), hole-type (26.0 CFU/25 cm2) and pour-flush latrines (18.5 CFU/25 cm2) (Table S5).

Comparison of E. coli density on frequent contact surfaces with latrine front-end maintenance

Out of the 97 surface samples, only 10 (10%) had visible moisture, and 87 (90%) were dry. Surfaces with visible moisture had significantly higher E. coli densities (1.2 × 103 CFU/25 cm2) compared to the dry surfaces (14.3 CFU/25 cm2) (p < 0.001) (Fig. S3 a). Similarly, 15 out of 97 surfaces (15%) had visible dirt. Surfaces with visible dirt had significantly higher E. coli densities (8.5 × 102 CFU/25 cm2) compared to the clean surfaces (16.5 CFU/25 cm2) (p < 0.001) (Fig. S3 b). These results highlight that moisture and dirt on latrine surfaces could influence E. coli densities on the latrine surfaces.

For surface materials, 54 out of 97 surfaces (56%) were rough (coarse concrete and wood), and 44 (44%) were smooth (plastic, tiles, galvanised iron sheets and rubber). Rough surfaces had significantly higher E. coli densities (280.0 CFU/25 cm2) compared to smooth surfaces (26.4 CFU/25 cm2) (p = 0.008) (Fig. S3 c). This underscores that the surface properties of the materials within the latrine front-ends can impact the E. coli densities on these surfaces. Similarly, 68 out of 97 surfaces (70%) were washable (including plastic, tiles, rubber, galvanised iron sheets and coarse concrete), and 29 (30%) were non-washable surfaces (wooden and dirt). Washable surfaces exhibited higher E. coli densities (223.0 CFU/25 cm2) as opposed to non-washable surfaces (6.8 CFU/25 cm2), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.42) (Fig. S3 d).

Discussion

Latrine usage behaviour and associated faecal contamination levels

This study attempts for the first time to investigate the detailed characteristics of latrine front-ends and latrine usage behaviours in rural Fiji. The latrine infrastructure summary for households was private latrines (85%), located outside the main house (69%), predominantly pedestal-type with mostly cistern-flush latrines (83%) and few hole-type latrines (4%). High water availability supports pedestal cistern flush latrines as detailed in six Fijian community focus group findings by Nelson et al. (2022b). Further, cistern flush pedestal latrines are the predominant sanitation preference in the Pacific as people upgrade from pit latrines (Fleming et al. 2019; White et al. 2020). One challenge with cistern flush pedestal latrines is a potential mechanical failure as observed in this study, with 27% of households still reporting issues during the endline surveys. Notably, Sanitation Safety Planning effectively catalysed a 12% reduction in latrine front-end dysfunction across all communities with a notable reduction of 27% in Dama from baseline to endline survey. Considering that this project could not complete contracted latrine infrastructure work, all reductions were due to households’ investment and skills.

Our study found significant five-times higher E. coli densities on washable floors compared to non-washable floors. In contrast, Pickering et al. (2012) reported lower (not statistically significant) E. coli densities on washable concrete slabs compared to non-washable dirt floors in Tanzania. While Pickering et al. (2012) did not mention the moisture condition of latrine floors, they found a positive correlation between E. coli density and moisture content on overall surfaces and soil. Moisture availability is favourable for the survival of microorganisms in environments such as soil and surfaces (Scoullos et al. 2019; Sinclair and Gerba 2011). Thus, the elevated E. coli densities on washable floors in Fiji can be attributed to moisture and accumulated dirt, particularly prevalent as 69% of latrines are located outside, increasing the likelihood of dirt and water introduced through user’s feet or footwears, especially in rainy conditions. Also, nearly half of the latrine floors showed visible moisture and dirt during baseline and endline surveys, resulting to higher E. coli densities compared to dry and clean floors (Table S4).

The in-depth study revealed significantly higher E. coli densities on pour-flush latrine floors compared to cistern-flush and hole-type floors. However, no significant difference was found across different front-end types when comparing 142 latrine floor samples from baseline and endline studies, possibly due to large variations in sample sizes among the front-end types. While comprehensive research with a larger sample size is needed to confirm this association, it can be deduced that pour-flush floors are likely to be moist from manual flushing from buckets, irrespective of pedestal or squat types. This aligns with findings from rural Cambodia reporting elevated E. coli on pour-flush floors and squat plates (75.0 CFU/25 cm2) (Sinclair and Gerba 2011). Furthermore, water leakages were common in cistern flush latrines in Fiji, with some households using them as pour-flush without repairing the flush system (Fig. S4 a). Moist latrine fabric floor mats beneath the cistern and pour-flush pedestals further contributed to moisture retention (Fig. S4 b).

The elevated E. coli levels on washable latrine floors in Fiji could also be from child defecation practices. This is deducted as 56% of the households reported disposing of the child faeces in latrines, and faeces were observed in or around latrines of some households (4%). Although it was not captured in the survey, co-authors confirmed it as a common practice in rural Fiji where children initially defecate on the latrine floor, which is then scooped by mothers using toilet paper and disposed of in latrines. Similar practices have been documented in Indonesia (Agestika et al. 2022) and India (Routray et al. 2015). Thus, inadequate cleaning and disinfection of latrine floors can exacerbate E. coli levels. Also, cleaning rough latrine surfaces such as coarse concrete floors commonly used in rural Fiji can be challenging. These surfaces can easily accumulate dirt and moisture in small cavities which is evident by significantly higher E. coli densities compared to smooth surfaces in our study (Fig. S3 c). Without consistent use of effective cleaning products, disinfecting these surfaces becomes challenging. Previous studies have also highlighted the difficulty of cleaning rough surfaces, resulting in unhygienic and unpleasant odours in latrine front-ends (Crofts and Fisher 2012; Ishida et al. 2021; Stenström et al. 2011). Thus, ensuring that latrine surfaces are user-friendly, easy to clean and disinfected is crucial (Jaglarz 2020).

The significant variation in E. coli densities on the latrine floor between households with primary education and those with secondary or tertiary education in our study aligns with Exley et al. (2015) in Tanzania, where higher household education levels were associated with lower E. coli densities on frequent contact surfaces of latrines. While higher household education levels could lead to cleaner latrines due to increased awareness of the disease burden of poor sanitation and hygiene (Exley et al. 2015; Temesgen et al. 2021), other socio-economic variables such as household income and occupation could also influence this outcome. Regarding the frequent hand contact surfaces, mid-wall areas were more frequently contaminated (75% of samples positive) compared to latrine seats and covers, suggesting potential contamination through hand contact with the mid-wall area while fetching anal cleansing papers. It could also be linked to less attention given to mid-wall areas while cleaning latrines. Latrine surfaces such as door handles, lock handles and flush buttons showed low to no E. coli detection. Fijian households commonly used dry anal cleaning (toilet paper and newspapers), and the majority lacked handwashing facilities inside latrines, reducing moisture on these surfaces. This aligns with a previous study in the UK (Mendes and Lynch 1976). The E. coli contamination on the cistern and pour-flush latrine surfaces could also be from the deposition of flush-generated aerosols (Luo et al. 2023). Although we did not sample the surfaces of containers and agricultural tools stored in latrines (Fig. S4 c), their proximity to the latrine pedestal suggests potential contamination from flush-generated aerosols (Goforth et al. 2024).

Latrine surfaces contamination and its implication for infection risks in rural Fiji

The absence of the recommended surface hygiene standards for bacterial densities on latrine surfaces creates challenges on what to consider a clean surface (Hambraeus and Malmborg 1980; Leas et al. 2015). E. coli densities observed on different latrine surfaces in our study heighten the infection risks to rural Fijians as poorly maintained latrine infrastructures and cleanliness have previously been linked to significant infection risks (Adane et al. 2017; Beyene and Melku 2018; Dumba et al. 2008). There was no significant association between latrine floor E. coli densities and households reporting diarrhoea, suggesting that latrine floors might not be the primary route for diarrheal transmission in Fiji. Other factors such as food hygiene, contaminated water and poor hygiene might contribute to faecal-oral diseases in Fiji (Nelson et al. 2022a; Prasad et al. 2018). However, there is a significant risk of the pathogen transfer from latrine floors to other areas of households such as the yard and kitchen (Stenström et al. 2011). Latrine floors, with substantial moisture and dirt, facilitate pathogen survival and growth, including soil-transmitted helminths (STHs) (Dumba et al. 2008; Hassan and Oyebamiji 2018). While our study did not measure STH densities, prior research has reported them on (Schulz and Kroeger 1992) latrine floors (Baker and Ensink 2012; Exley et al. 2015). This risk is further exacerbated considering that only 11% of households in our study reported always wearing shoes outdoors, and inconsistent outdoor shoe usage has been associated with an increased risk of STHs in Fiji (Kim et al. 2020).

Previous studies highlight the efficient transfer of pathogens from contaminated hard and non-porous surfaces to hands, with elevated transfer rates from moist surfaces (Lopez et al. 2013; Rusin et al. 2002). This is relevant in Fiji, where latrine seats and mid-wall surfaces are made of hard and non-porous surfaces such as plastic and corrugated galvanised sheets. Properly cleaned latrine surfaces generally pose lower risks; however, circumstances such as the illness of family members or surfaces with visible faeces increase the infection risk significantly (Bloomfield et al. 2012). Surfaces such as latrine seats pose transmission risks not only through hand contact but also from the exposed skin during latrine usage (Jeon et al. 2013). Therefore, regular cleaning and disinfection of latrine surfaces, even with low contamination levels, are vital for protecting vulnerable household members, such as younger children, pregnant women, the elderly and individuals with compromised immune systems (Ojima et al. 2002; Potgieter et al. 2020). Given that 92% of the households in our study lack handwashing facilities within the latrines and 14% have no handwashing facilities available, this further increases the microbial risk from latrine surfaces via unwashed hands. Only 46% of households reported always using soap during handwashing after defecation, which reveals a major gap in hygiene practices. Considering the evidence that frequent handwashing after defecation lowers the risk of typhoid fever in Fiji (Prasad et al. 2018), more interventions are needed to promote proper and sustainable handwashing practices.

This study addresses a significant data gap in sanitation literature for the Pacific regions by quantifying the field-based microbial densities on latrine surfaces in rural Fiji. The current literature lacks quantitative risk assessment approaches for potential health risks from latrines (Gwenzi et al. 2023). Previous studies have consistently emphasised the paucity of published data on pathogen density on latrine surfaces, limiting the application of quantitative microbial risk assessments (Abney 2022; Adhikari et al. 2023; Bloomfield et al. 2012). While we only measured E. coli, other studies have reported various pathogens on household latrine surfaces, including bacteria; Clostridium difficile (Kim et al. 1981), Staphylococcus aureus (Medrano‐Félix et al. 2011), Salmonella spp. (Barker and Bloomfield 2000); and viruses such as influenza A (Boone and Gerba 2007) and helminth eggs (Schulz and Kroeger 1992). Some pathogens have extremely low infective doses such as pathogenic strains of E. coli and Shigella spp. (less than 10 CFU) (Kothary and Babu 2001; Schmid-Hempel and Frank 2007) and norovirus (10 to 100 particles) (Yezli and Otter 2011), highlighting the potential transmission risk via contaminated latrine surfaces (Barker and Bloomfield 2000; Hossain et al. 2021). Therefore, our findings are important in guiding the subsequent quantitative risk assessment steps in determining the probability of microbial infection risk from latrine surfaces.

Study limitations

In the baseline survey, the random sampling approach for selecting 311 households across 29 communities might not have represented all latrine front-end types in proportion to their actual distribution. Moisture on the latrine floor was visually assessed through front-end photos in the baseline and endline survey; thus, some could not be differentiated due to improper photo angle and missing photos. However, these factors were considered during the in-depth front-end study. Latrine floor samples in the baseline and endline study were collected over 4 months, covering dry and wet seasons. Despite this difference, the mean E. coli densities across both sampling rounds were consistent, allowing for comparative analysis, likely due to minimal seasonal variations in temperature and rain days in our study locations in Fiji (Kumar et al. 2014; Sharma et al. 2021). Future studies should control for environmental variables such as temperature, moisture and rainfall to understand their impact on E. coli densities on latrine surfaces, particularly in regions with pronounced seasonal variations. In addition, investigations of E. coli recovery efficiency from different material surfaces, which was beyond the scope and feasibility of this study, may be warranted to inform future comparisons of latrine front-end types. Regardless of those results, the current observed high E. coli densities on latrine surfaces still pose potential health risks to households. While household education level was analysed, this study did not analyse or control for other socio-economic variables, such as household income level and occupation, which might have influenced the results. Household income data were not collected across all the studied households, and the majority of the rural Fijian in studied households engaged in agriculture as their main occupation.

The in-depth front-end study was limited to one community with a small sample size, so it might not represent all other rural Fijian communities. Our study included only one sample from each latrine surface and was limited to conducting serial dilutions; thus, sample results included non-detects. This can be improved by collecting duplicates or triplicates, if not limited by resources and logistics. We only measured E. coli as a faecal indicator organism using the traditional culture method, which can have both human and animal sources. Future exploration using molecular microbiology is warranted to identify the sources of E. coli on latrine surfaces. Potential bias exists as households might have cleaned their latrines in anticipation of sampling visits, influencing the observed E. coli densities. For the statistical analysis, while we used non-parametric tests, the sample size varied largely across the categories that need to be considered when interpreting the results.

Conclusion and recommendations

This is the first study to assess faecal contamination levels on latrine front-end surfaces in rural Fiji. Our findings highlight that the surfaces of latrines considered more protective on the sanitation ladder (cistern-flush or pour-flush latrines) and with washable floors had higher faecal contamination compared to surfaces of latrines at a lower position of the sanitation ladder (hole-type latrines) and non-washable floors. It is imperative to stress consistent cleaning, disinfection and maintaining dry latrine floors, even when washable surfaces are used. Despite the commendable coverage of flush latrines in rural Fiji, our study emphasises that latrine cleanliness and hygiene are as critical as latrine infrastructure for effectively disrupting faecal pathogens and reducing faecal-oral diseases such as typhoid in Fiji. Therefore, the availability of appropriate and affordable cleaning agents should be ensured in communities. Safe child faeces management practices such as using portable potties to dispose of faeces in latrines, need to be promoted. Designated footwear for latrine usage can minimise pathogen transmission from latrine floors. This study emphasises the urgency of educating communities on handwashing with soap and the infrastructure maintenance of the latrine front-end. These recommendations can reduce the overall health risk associated with sanitation in Fiji and hold relevance to other Pacific regions and countries with similar challenges in sanitation globally.

Future research could quantify microbial densities of specific pathogens (such as viral, bacterial and helminths) on latrine surfaces, considering material properties such as surface roughness and porosity. Such details can inform the design of user-friendly front-end components that are easy to clean and disinfect. Further research can keep the latrine front-end type constant with varying moisture and dirt on latrine surfaces to determine the direct relationship between latrine front-end types and E. coli densities. Studies with larger sample sizes covering diverse geographical regions can better control for environmental and household socio-economic variables. Additional research can quantify the contribution of contaminated latrine surfaces to faecal-oral disease transmission compared to other pathways, such as flies, contaminated drinking water and other environmental factors. Extending this research to different countries with distinct front-end types (for example, squat-type latrines) and anal cleansing methods (for example, anal washing) can inform targeted interventions to effectively reduce the microbial risks from latrines.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.Supplementary file1 (DOC 1.02 MB)

Author contribution

Funding acquisition: Pierre Horwitz, Aaron Jenkins, Stacy Jupiter, Sangeeta Mangubhai, Joel Negin, Donald Wilson, Jacqueline Thomas; methodology: Sabita Adhikari, Erin Hunter, Aaron Jenkins, Jack van de Vossenberg, Jacqueline Thomas; project administration: Rachel Devi, Pierre Horwitz, Aaron Jenkins, Sangeeta Mangubhai, Timoci Naivalulevu, Joel Negin, Paul van Nimwegen, Andrew Tukana, Jacqueline Thomas; investigation: Sabita Adhikari, Shylett Anthony, Ponipate Baleinamau, Jeremaia Coriakula, Thompson Daurewa, Rachel Devi, Sikeli Gavidi, Maria Lalamacuata, Kinikoto Mailautoka, Kelera Naivalu, Timoci Naivalulevu, Vilisi Naivalulevu, Sikeli Naucunivanua, Anaseini Ratu, Mereia Ravoka, Andrew Tukana; supervision: Erin Hunter, Jack van de Vossenberg, Jacqueline Thomas; conceptualisation: Sabita Adhikari and Jacqueline Thomas; data curation: Sabita Adhikari, Nabeela Nasim, Jacqueline Thomas; formal analysis: Sabita Adhikari; visualisation: Sabita Adhikari; writing—original draft preparation: Sabita Adhikari; writing—review and editing: all authors.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions This study is funded by the Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) (grant number SSHS 74427) and Bloomberg Philanthropies (grant number 53006).

Data availability

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper's supplementary materials.

Declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participants

This study received ethical clearance from the Human Research Ethics Committee at the University of Sydney (2019/588) and Fiji National Health Research Ethics Review Committee (CHRED ID: 003.19). The participation of the communities and households was voluntary with free and informed consent (via consent forms). Local language was used to inform the households about the objectives of the study. The research findings were disseminated among the communities and relevant government stakeholders through feedback and training sessions, conducted by the local catchment coordinators.

Consent for publication

All authors have read and agreed to the current version of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

Abney SE Bright KR McKinney J Ijaz MK Gerba CP Toilet hygiene—review and research needs J Appl Microbiol 2021 131 6 2705 2714 10.1111/jam.15121 33899991
Abney SE, Bright KR, McKinney J, Ijaz MK, Gerba CP (2021) Toilet hygiene—review and research needs. J Appl Microbiol 131(6):2705–271433899991 10.1111/jam.15121
Abney SE (2022) Application of quantitative microbial risk assessment to domestic hygiene. PhD thesis, The University of Arizona
Adane M Mengistie B Kloos H Medhin G Mulat W Sanitation facilities, hygienic conditions, and prevalence of acute diarrhea among under-five children in slums of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: baseline survey of a longitudinal study PLoS One 2017 12 8 e0182783 10.1371/journal.pone.0182783 28854200
Adane M, Mengistie B, Kloos H, Medhin G, Mulat W (2017) Sanitation facilities, hygienic conditions, and prevalence of acute diarrhea among under-five children in slums of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: baseline survey of a longitudinal study. PLoS One 12(8):e0182783. 10.1371/journal.pone.018278328854200 10.1371/journal.pone.0182783
Adhikari S Hunter E Jvd V Thomas J A review of latrine front-end characteristics associated with microbial infection risk; reveals a lack of pathogen density data Int J Hyg Environ Health 2023 254 114261 10.1016/j.ijheh.2023.114261 37734133
Adhikari S, Hunter E, Jvd V, Thomas J (2023) A review of latrine front-end characteristics associated with microbial infection risk; reveals a lack of pathogen density data. Int J Hyg Environ Health 254:114261. 10.1016/j.ijheh.2023.11426137734133 10.1016/j.ijheh.2023.114261
Agestika L Sintawardani N Hamidah U Nyambe S Yamauchi T Pattern of child faeces management and disposable diaper usage among under-fives in an urban slum of Bandung, Indonesia J Water Sanit Hyg Dev 2022 12 1 32 40 10.2166/washdev.2021.099
Agestika L, Sintawardani N, Hamidah U, Nyambe S, Yamauchi T (2022) Pattern of child faeces management and disposable diaper usage among under-fives in an urban slum of Bandung, Indonesia. J Water Sanit Hyg Dev 12(1):32–4010.2166/washdev.2021.099
Baker SM Ensink JHJ Helminth transmission in simple pit latrines Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2012 106 11 709 710 10.1016/j.trstmh.2012.08.002 22939710
Baker SM, Ensink JHJ (2012) Helminth transmission in simple pit latrines. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 106(11):709–71022939710 10.1016/j.trstmh.2012.08.002
Barker J Bloomfield S Survival of Salmonella in bathrooms and toilets in domestic homes following salmonellosis J Appl Microbiol 2000 89 1 137 144 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01091.x 10945790
Barker J, Bloomfield S (2000) Survival of Salmonella in bathrooms and toilets in domestic homes following salmonellosis. J Appl Microbiol 89(1):137–14410945790 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.01091.x
Behera MR Pradhan HS Behera D Jena D Satpathy SK Achievements and challenges of India’s sanitation campaign under clean India mission: a commentary J Educ Health Promot 2021 10 350 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1658_20 34761036
Behera MR, Pradhan HS, Behera D, Jena D, Satpathy SK (2021) Achievements and challenges of India’s sanitation campaign under clean India mission: a commentary. J Educ Health Promot 10:35034761036 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1658_20
Beyene SG Melku AT Prevalence of diarrhea and associated factors among under five years children in Harena Buluk Woreda Oromia region, south East Ethiopia, 2018 J Public Health Int 2018 1 2 9 26 10.14302/issn.2641-4538.jphi-18-2470
Beyene SG, Melku AT (2018) Prevalence of diarrhea and associated factors among under five years children in Harena Buluk Woreda Oromia region, south East Ethiopia, 2018. J Public Health Int 1(2):9–2610.14302/issn.2641-4538.jphi-18-2470
Bloomfield SF Carling PC Exner M A unified framework for developing effective hygiene procedures for hands, environmental surfaces and laundry in healthcare, domestic, food handling and other settings GMS Hyg Infect Control 2017 12 Doc08 10.3205/dgkh000293.eCollection2017 28670508
Bloomfield SF, Carling PC, Exner M (2017) A unified framework for developing effective hygiene procedures for hands, environmental surfaces and laundry in healthcare, domestic, food handling and other settings. GMS Hyg Infect Control 12:Doc08. 10.3205/dgkh000293.eCollection201728670508 10.3205/dgkh000293.eCollection2017
Bloomfield SF, Martin E, Carlo S, Nath KJ, Scott EA (2012) The chain of infection transmission in the home and everyday life settings, and the role of hygiene in reducing the risk of infection https://ifh-homehygiene.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/IFHinfectiontransmissionreviewFINAL.pdf. Accessed. 2023.06.07
Boone SA Gerba CP Significance of fomites in the spread of respiratory and enteric viral disease Appl Environ Microbiol 2007 73 6 1687 1696 10.1128/AEM.02051-06 17220247
Boone SA, Gerba CP (2007) Significance of fomites in the spread of respiratory and enteric viral disease. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(6):1687–169617220247 10.1128/AEM.02051-06
Crofts T Fisher J Menstrual hygiene in Ugandan schools: an investigation of low-cost sanitary pads J Water Sanit Hyg Dev 2012 2 1 50 58 10.2166/washdev.2012.067
Crofts T, Fisher J (2012) Menstrual hygiene in Ugandan schools: an investigation of low-cost sanitary pads. J Water Sanit Hyg Dev 2(1):50–5810.2166/washdev.2012.067
Curtis V Cairncross S Yonli R Domestic hygiene and diarrhoea–pinpointing the problem Trop Med Int Health 2000 5 1 22 32 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2000.00512.x 10672202
Curtis V, Cairncross S, Yonli R (2000) Domestic hygiene and diarrhoea–pinpointing the problem. Trop Med Int Health 5(1):22–3210672202 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2000.00512.x
Dey NC Parvez M Islam MR Mistry SK Levine DI Effectiveness of a community-based water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) intervention in reduction of diarrhoea among under-five children: evidence from a repeated cross-sectional study (2007–2015) in rural Bangladesh Int J Hyg Environ Health 2019 222 8 1098 1108 10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.08.006 31439422
Dey NC, Parvez M, Islam MR, Mistry SK, Levine DI (2019) Effectiveness of a community-based water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) intervention in reduction of diarrhoea among under-five children: evidence from a repeated cross-sectional study (2007–2015) in rural Bangladesh. Int J Hyg Environ Health 222(8):1098–110831439422 10.1016/j.ijheh.2019.08.006
Dumba R Kaddu JB Mangen FW Intestinal helminths in Luweero district, Uganda Afr Health Sci 2008 8 2 90 96 19357757
Dumba R, Kaddu JB, Mangen FW (2008) Intestinal helminths in Luweero district, Uganda. Afr Health Sci 8(2):90–9619357757
Exley JLR Liseka B Cumming O Ensink JHJ The sanitation ladder, what constitutes an improved form of sanitation? Environ Sci Technol 2015 49 2 1086 1094 10.1021/es503945x 25513885
Exley JLR, Liseka B, Cumming O, Ensink JHJ (2015) The sanitation ladder, what constitutes an improved form of sanitation? Environ Sci Technol 49(2):1086–109425513885 10.1021/es503945x
Fleming L Anthonj C Thakkar MB Tikoisuva WM Manga M Howard G Shields KF Kelly E Overmars M Bartram J Urban and rural sanitation in the Solomon Islands: how resilient are these to extreme weather events? Sci Total Environ 2019 683 331 340 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.253 31132712
Fleming L, Anthonj C, Thakkar MB, Tikoisuva WM, Manga M, Howard G, Shields KF, Kelly E, Overmars M, Bartram J (2019) Urban and rural sanitation in the Solomon Islands: how resilient are these to extreme weather events? Sci Total Environ 683:331–34031132712 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.253
Goforth MP Boone SA Clark J Valenzuela PB McKinney J Ijaz MK Gerba CP Impacts of lid closure during toilet flushing and of toilet bowl cleaning on viral contamination of surfaces in United States restrooms Am J Infect Control 2024 52 2 141 146 10.1016/j.ajic.2023.11.020
Goforth MP, Boone SA, Clark J, Valenzuela PB, McKinney J, Ijaz MK, Gerba CP (2024) Impacts of lid closure during toilet flushing and of toilet bowl cleaning on viral contamination of surfaces in United States restrooms. Am J Infect Control 52(2):141–14610.1016/j.ajic.2023.11.020
Gwenzi W Marumure J Makuvara Z Simbanegavi TT Njomou-Ngounou EL Nya EL Kaetzl K Noubactep C Rzymski P The pit latrine paradox in low-income settings: a sanitation technology of choice or a pollution hotspot? Sci Total Environ 2023 879 163179 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163179 37003330
Gwenzi W, Marumure J, Makuvara Z, Simbanegavi TT, Njomou-Ngounou EL, Nya EL, Kaetzl K, Noubactep C, Rzymski P (2023) The pit latrine paradox in low-income settings: a sanitation technology of choice or a pollution hotspot? Sci Total Environ 879:16317937003330 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163179
HACH (2023) Water analysis handbook https://www.hach.com/resources/water-analysis-handbook. Accessed. 2023.06.19
Hambraeus A Malmborg AS Disinfection or cleaning of hospital toilets—an evaluation of different routines J Hosp Infect 1980 1 2 159 163 10.1016/0195-6701(80)90048-1 6182206
Hambraeus A, Malmborg AS (1980) Disinfection or cleaning of hospital toilets—an evaluation of different routines. J Hosp Infect 1(2):159–1636182206 10.1016/0195-6701(80)90048-1
Hassan A Oyebamiji D Intensity of soil transmitted helminths in relation to soil profile in selected public schools in Ibadan metropolis J Epidemiol Infect Dis 2018 1 2 73 77
Hassan A, Oyebamiji D (2018) Intensity of soil transmitted helminths in relation to soil profile in selected public schools in Ibadan metropolis. J Epidemiol Infect Dis 1(2):73–77
Hossain ZZ Sultana R Begum A Jensen PKM Investigation of the domestic reservoirs of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli in diarrhea case households of urban Bangladesh Curr Microbiol 2021 78 7 2534 2547 10.1007/s00284-021-02506-9 33956228
Hossain ZZ, Sultana R, Begum A, Jensen PKM (2021) Investigation of the domestic reservoirs of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli in diarrhea case households of urban Bangladesh. Curr Microbiol 78(7):2534–254733956228 10.1007/s00284-021-02506-9
Hutton G Chase C The knowledge base for achieving the sustainable development goal targets on water supply, sanitation and hygiene Int J Environ Res Public Health 2016 13 6 536 10.3390/ijerph13060536 27240389
Hutton G, Chase C (2016) The knowledge base for achieving the sustainable development goal targets on water supply, sanitation and hygiene. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13(6):53627240389 10.3390/ijerph13060536
Ishida Y Vyas R Chauhan G Delgado L Kourai H Bacterial contamination analysis of residential toilet room environment and delivery of residual bacterial growth prevention efficacy on residential toilet permeable surfaces using toilet air freshener product Biocontrol Sci 2021 26 2 85 93 10.4265/bio.26.85 34092718
Ishida Y, Vyas R, Chauhan G, Delgado L, Kourai H (2021) Bacterial contamination analysis of residential toilet room environment and delivery of residual bacterial growth prevention efficacy on residential toilet permeable surfaces using toilet air freshener product. Biocontrol Sci 26(2):85–9334092718 10.4265/bio.26.85
Jaglarz A Ergonomic criteria for bathroom and toilet design with consideration to potential health and hygiene hazards for users Tech Trans 2020 117 1 1 18 10.37705/TechTrans/e2020041
Jaglarz A (2020) Ergonomic criteria for bathroom and toilet design with consideration to potential health and hygiene hazards for users. Tech Trans 117(1):1–18. 10.37705/TechTrans/e202004110.37705/TechTrans/e2020041
Jenkins AP Jupiter S Mueller U Jenney A Vosaki G Rosa V Naucukidi A Mulholland K Strugnell R Kama M Health at the sub-catchment scale: typhoid and its environmental determinants in Central Division, Fiji Ecohealth 2016 13 633 651 10.1007/s10393-016-1152-6 27557784
Jenkins AP, Jupiter S, Mueller U, Jenney A, Vosaki G, Rosa V, Naucukidi A, Mulholland K, Strugnell R, Kama M (2016) Health at the sub-catchment scale: typhoid and its environmental determinants in Central Division, Fiji. Ecohealth 13:633–65127557784 10.1007/s10393-016-1152-6
Jenkins AP Jupiter SD Jenney A Rosa V Naucukidi A Prasad N Vosaki G Mulholland K Strugnell R Kama M Environmental foundations of typhoid fever in the Fijian residential setting Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019 16 13 2407 10.3390/ijerph16132407 31284613
Jenkins AP, Jupiter SD, Jenney A, Rosa V, Naucukidi A, Prasad N, Vosaki G, Mulholland K, Strugnell R, Kama M (2019) Environmental foundations of typhoid fever in the Fijian residential setting. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(13):240731284613 10.3390/ijerph16132407
Jeon Y-S Chun J Kim B-S Identification of household bacterial community and analysis of species shared with human microbiome Curr Microbiol 2013 67 5 557 563 10.1007/s00284-013-0401-y 23743600
Jeon Y-S, Chun J, Kim B-S (2013) Identification of household bacterial community and analysis of species shared with human microbiome. Curr Microbiol 67(5):557–56323743600 10.1007/s00284-013-0401-y
Jupiter SD Jenkins AP Negin J Anthony S Baleinamau P Devi R Gavidi S Latinne A Mailautoka KK Mangubhai S Naivalu K Naivalulevu T Naivalulevu V Nasim N Naucunivanua S Nelson S Qauqau I Ratu A Ravoka M Thomas J Tukana A Nimwegen Pv Wakwella A Wenger A Wilson D Horwitz P Transforming place-based management within watersheds in Fiji: the Watershed Interventions for Systems Health project PLoS Water 2024 3 7 e0000102 10.1371/journal.pwat.0000102
Jupiter SD, Jenkins AP, Negin J, Anthony S, Baleinamau P, Devi R, Gavidi S, Latinne A, Mailautoka KK, Mangubhai S, Naivalu K, Naivalulevu T, Naivalulevu V, Nasim N, Naucunivanua S, Nelson S, Qauqau I, Ratu A, Ravoka M, Thomas J, Tukana A, Nimwegen Pv, Wakwella A, Wenger A, Wilson D, Horwitz P (2024) Transforming place-based management within watersheds in Fiji: the Watershed Interventions for Systems Health project. PLoS Water 3(7):e0000102. 10.1371/journal.pwat.000010210.1371/journal.pwat.0000102
Kim K-H Fekety R Batts DH Brown D Cudmore M Silva J Jr Waters D Isolation of Clostridium difficile from the environment and contacts of patients with antibiotic-associated colitis J Infect Dis 1981 143 1 42 50 10.1093/infdis/143.1.42 7217711
Kim K-H, Fekety R, Batts DH, Brown D, Cudmore M, Silva J Jr, Waters D (1981) Isolation of Clostridium difficile from the environment and contacts of patients with antibiotic-associated colitis. J Infect Dis 143(1):42–507217711 10.1093/infdis/143.1.42
Kim SH Stothard JR Rinamalo M Rainima-Qaniuci M Talemaitoga N Kama M Rafai E Jang S Kim JY Oh YM A first nation-wide assessment of soil-transmitted helminthiasis in Fijian primary schools, and factors associated with the infection, using a lymphatic filariasis transmission assessment survey as surveillance platform PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2020 14 9 e0008511 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008511 32976499
Kim SH, Stothard JR, Rinamalo M, Rainima-Qaniuci M, Talemaitoga N, Kama M, Rafai E, Jang S, Kim JY, Oh YM (2020) A first nation-wide assessment of soil-transmitted helminthiasis in Fijian primary schools, and factors associated with the infection, using a lymphatic filariasis transmission assessment survey as surveillance platform. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 14(9):e000851132976499 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008511
Kothary MH Babu US Infective dose of foodborne pathogens in volunteers: a review J Food Saf 2001 21 1 49 68 10.1111/j.1745-4565.2001.tb00307.x
Kothary MH, Babu US (2001) Infective dose of foodborne pathogens in volunteers: a review. J Food Saf 21(1):49–6810.1111/j.1745-4565.2001.tb00307.x
Kumar R Stephens M Weir T Rainfall trends in Fiji Inte J Climatol 2014 34 5 1501 1510 10.1002/joc.3779
Kumar R, Stephens M, Weir T (2014) Rainfall trends in Fiji. Inte J Climatol 34(5):1501–1510. 10.1002/joc.377910.1002/joc.3779
Leas B, Sullivan N, Han J, Pegues D, Kaczmarek J, Umscheid C (2015) Environmental cleaning for the prevention of healthcare-associated infections. Technical brief no. 22 (prepared by the ECRI Institute-Penn Medicine Evidence-Based Practice Center under contract no. 290–2012–00011-i.) AHRQ Publication no. 15-EHC020-EF, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Rockville, MD
Lopez GU Gerba CP Tamimi AH Kitajima M Maxwell SL Rose JB Transfer efficiency of bacteria and viruses from porous and non-porous fomites to fingers under different relative humidity conditions Appl Environ Microbiol 2013 79 18 5728 5734 10.1128/AEM.01030-13 23851098
Lopez GU, Gerba CP, Tamimi AH, Kitajima M, Maxwell SL, Rose JB (2013) Transfer efficiency of bacteria and viruses from porous and non-porous fomites to fingers under different relative humidity conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 79(18):5728–573423851098 10.1128/AEM.01030-13
Luo D Huang J Zheng X Liu F Li Y Wang Y Qian H Spread of flushing-generated fecal aerosols in a squat toilet cubicle: implication for infection risk Sci Total Environ 2023 859 160212 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160212 36395842
Luo D, Huang J, Zheng X, Liu F, Li Y, Wang Y, Qian H (2023) Spread of flushing-generated fecal aerosols in a squat toilet cubicle: implication for infection risk. Sci Total Environ 859:16021236395842 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160212
Mahdavinejad M Bemanian M Farahani SF Tajik A Role of toilet type in transmission of infections A R Int 2011 1 2 110 113
Mahdavinejad M, Bemanian M, Farahani SF, Tajik A (2011) Role of toilet type in transmission of infections. A R Int 1(2):110–113
Medrano-Félix A Martínez C Castro-del Campo N León-Félix J Peraza-Garay F Gerba C Chaidez C Impact of prescribed cleaning and disinfectant use on microbial contamination in the home J Appl Microbiol 2011 110 2 463 471 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04901.x 21143709
Medrano-Félix A, Martínez C, Castro-del Campo N, León-Félix J, Peraza-Garay F, Gerba C, Chaidez C (2011) Impact of prescribed cleaning and disinfectant use on microbial contamination in the home. J Appl Microbiol 110(2):463–47121143709 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2010.04901.x
Mendes MP Lynch DJ A bacteriological survey of washrooms and toilets J Hyg (lond) 1976 76 2 183 190 10.1017/S002217240005508X 1063213
Mendes MP, Lynch DJ (1976) A bacteriological survey of washrooms and toilets. J Hyg (lond) 76(2):183–1901063213 10.1017/S002217240005508X
Mraz AL McGinnis SM Marini D Amatya P Murphy HM Impact of usership on bacterial contamination of public latrine surfaces in Kathmandu, Nepal PLoS Water 2023 2 2 e0000091 10.1371/journal.pwat.0000091
Mraz AL, McGinnis SM, Marini D, Amatya P, Murphy HM (2023) Impact of usership on bacterial contamination of public latrine surfaces in Kathmandu, Nepal. PLoS Water 2(2):e000009110.1371/journal.pwat.0000091
Nasim N Anthony S Daurewa T Gavidi S Horwitz P Jenkins A Jupiter S Liu S Mailautoka K Mangubhai S Naivalu K Naivalulevu T Naivalulevu V Naucunivanua S Negin J Ravoka M Tukana A Wilson D Thomas J Understanding on-site sanitation in rural Fiji: where definitions of sanitation back-ends differ Environ Sci: Water Res Technol 2023 9 1913 1931 10.1039/d2ew00685e
Nasim N, Anthony S, Daurewa T, Gavidi S, Horwitz P, Jenkins A, Jupiter S, Liu S, Mailautoka K, Mangubhai S, Naivalu K, Naivalulevu T, Naivalulevu V, Naucunivanua S, Negin J, Ravoka M, Tukana A, Wilson D, Thomas J (2023) Understanding on-site sanitation in rural Fiji: where definitions of sanitation back-ends differ. Environ Sci: Water Res Technol 9:1913–193110.1039/d2ew00685e
Navab-Daneshmand T Friedrich MN Gächter M Montealegre MC Mlambo LS Nhiwatiwa T Mosler H-J Julian TR Escherichia coli contamination across multiple environmental compartments (soil, hands, drinking water, and handwashing water) in urban Harare: correlations and risk factors Am J Trop Med Hyg 2018 98 3 803 10.4269/ajtmh.17-0521 29363444
Navab-Daneshmand T, Friedrich MN, Gächter M, Montealegre MC, Mlambo LS, Nhiwatiwa T, Mosler H-J, Julian TR (2018) Escherichia coli contamination across multiple environmental compartments (soil, hands, drinking water, and handwashing water) in urban Harare: correlations and risk factors. Am J Trop Med Hyg 98(3):80329363444 10.4269/ajtmh.17-0521
Nelson S Jenkins A Jupiter SD Horwitz P Mangubhai S Abimbola S Ratu A Naivalulevu T Negin J Predicting climate-sensitive water-related disease trends based on health, seasonality and weather data in Fiji J Clim Chang Health 2022 6 100112 10.1016/j.joclim.2022.100112
Nelson S, Jenkins A, Jupiter SD, Horwitz P, Mangubhai S, Abimbola S, Ratu A, Naivalulevu T, Negin J (2022a) Predicting climate-sensitive water-related disease trends based on health, seasonality and weather data in Fiji. J Clim Chang Health 6:10011210.1016/j.joclim.2022.100112
Nelson S Thomas J Jenkins A Naivalu K Naivalulevu T Naivalulevu V Mailautoka K Anthony S Ravoka M Jupiter SD Perceptions of drinking water access and quality in rural indigenous villages in Fiji Water Pract Technol 2022 17 3 719 730 10.2166/wpt.2022.022
Nelson S, Thomas J, Jenkins A, Naivalu K, Naivalulevu T, Naivalulevu V, Mailautoka K, Anthony S, Ravoka M, Jupiter SD (2022b) Perceptions of drinking water access and quality in rural indigenous villages in Fiji. Water Pract Technol 17(3):719–73010.2166/wpt.2022.022
Odagiri M Schriewer A Daniels ME Wuertz S Smith WA Clasen T Schmidt W-P Jin Y Torondel B Misra PR Panigrahi P Jenkins MW Human fecal and pathogen exposure pathways in rural Indian villages and the effect of increased latrine coverage Water Res 2016 100 232 244 10.1016/j.watres.2016.05.015 27192358
Odagiri M, Schriewer A, Daniels ME, Wuertz S, Smith WA, Clasen T, Schmidt W-P, Jin Y, Torondel B, Misra PR, Panigrahi P, Jenkins MW (2016) Human fecal and pathogen exposure pathways in rural Indian villages and the effect of increased latrine coverage. Water Res 100:232–24427192358 10.1016/j.watres.2016.05.015
Ojima M Toshima Y Koya E Ara K Kawai S Ueda N Bacterial contamination of Japanese households and related concern about sanitation Int J Environ Health Res 2002 12 1 41 52 10.1080/09603120120110040 11970814
Ojima M, Toshima Y, Koya E, Ara K, Kawai S, Ueda N (2002) Bacterial contamination of Japanese households and related concern about sanitation. Int J Environ Health Res 12(1):41–5211970814 10.1080/09603120120110040
Palintest (2023) Wagtech ®Potalab + (M) ®Advanced Portable Water Quality Laboratory (Microbiological)
Pickering AJ Julian TR Marks SJ Mattioli MC Boehm AB Schwab KJ Davis J Fecal contamination and diarrheal pathogens on surfaces and in soils among Tanzanian households with and without improved sanitation Environ Sci Technol 2012 46 11 5736 5743 10.1021/es300022c 22545817
Pickering AJ, Julian TR, Marks SJ, Mattioli MC, Boehm AB, Schwab KJ, Davis J (2012) Fecal contamination and diarrheal pathogens on surfaces and in soils among Tanzanian households with and without improved sanitation. Environ Sci Technol 46(11):5736–574322545817 10.1021/es300022c
Pickering AJ Ercumen A Arnold BF Kwong LH Parvez SM Alam M Sen D Islam S Kullmann C Chase C Ahmed R Unicomb L Colford JM Luby SP Fecal indicator bacteria along multiple environmental transmission pathways (water, hands, food, soil, flies) and subsequent child diarrhea in rural Bangladesh Environ Sci Technol 2018 52 14 7928 7936 10.1021/acs.est.8b00928 29902374
Pickering AJ, Ercumen A, Arnold BF, Kwong LH, Parvez SM, Alam M, Sen D, Islam S, Kullmann C, Chase C, Ahmed R, Unicomb L, Colford JM, Luby SP (2018) Fecal indicator bacteria along multiple environmental transmission pathways (water, hands, food, soil, flies) and subsequent child diarrhea in rural Bangladesh. Environ Sci Technol 52(14):7928–793629902374 10.1021/acs.est.8b00928
Potgieter N Aja-Okorie U Mbedzi RL Abia ALK Lanza GR Traore-Hoffman AN (2020) Bacterial contamination on household latrine surfaces: a case study in rural and peri-urban communities in South Africa Current microbiological research in Africa: selected applications for sustainable environmental management 2020 Cham Springer Nature Switzerland AG 175 183
Potgieter N, Aja-Okorie U, Mbedzi RL (2020) Traore-Hoffman AN (2020) Bacterial contamination on household latrine surfaces: a case study in rural and peri-urban communities in South Africa. In: Abia ALK, Lanza GR (eds) Current microbiological research in Africa: selected applications for sustainable environmental management. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Cham, pp 175–183
Prasad N Jenkins AP Naucukidi L Rosa V Sahu-Khan A Kama M Jenkins KM Jenney AW Jack SJ Saha D Epidemiology and risk factors for typhoid fever in Central Division, Fiji, 2014–2017: a case-control study PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2018 12 6 e0006571 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006571 29883448
Prasad N, Jenkins AP, Naucukidi L, Rosa V, Sahu-Khan A, Kama M, Jenkins KM, Jenney AW, Jack SJ, Saha D (2018) Epidemiology and risk factors for typhoid fever in Central Division, Fiji, 2014–2017: a case-control study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 12(6):e000657129883448 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006571
Routray P Schmidt W-P Boisson S Clasen T Jenkins MW Socio-cultural and behavioural factors constraining latrine adoption in rural coastal Odisha: an exploratory qualitative study BMC Public Health 2015 15 1 1 19 10.1186/s12889-015-2206-3 25563658
Routray P, Schmidt W-P, Boisson S, Clasen T, Jenkins MW (2015) Socio-cultural and behavioural factors constraining latrine adoption in rural coastal Odisha: an exploratory qualitative study. BMC Public Health 15(1):1–1925563658 10.1186/s12889-015-2206-3
RStudio Team (2022) Rstudio: integrated development environment for R https://posit.co/
Rusin P Maxwell S Gerba C Comparative surface-to-hand and fingertip-to-mouth transfer efficiency of gram-positive bacteria, gram-negative bacteria, and phage J Appl Microbiol 2002 93 4 585 592 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01734.x 12234341
Rusin P, Maxwell S, Gerba C (2002) Comparative surface-to-hand and fingertip-to-mouth transfer efficiency of gram-positive bacteria, gram-negative bacteria, and phage. J Appl Microbiol 93(4):585–59212234341 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01734.x
Schmid-Hempel P Frank SA Pathogenesis, virulence, and infective dose PLoS Pathog 2007 3 10 e147 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030147 17967057
Schmid-Hempel P, Frank SA (2007) Pathogenesis, virulence, and infective dose. PLoS Pathog 3(10):e14717967057 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030147
Schulz S Kroeger A Soil contamination with Ascaris lumbricoides eggs as an indicator of environmental hygiene in urban areas of north-east Brazil J Trop Med Hyg 1992 95 2 95 103 1560490
Schulz S, Kroeger A (1992) Soil contamination with Ascaris lumbricoides eggs as an indicator of environmental hygiene in urban areas of north-east Brazil. J Trop Med Hyg 95(2):95–1031560490
Scoullos IM Lopez Vazquez CM Jvd Vossenberg Brdjanovic D Die-off of E. coli as fecal indicator organism on different surfaces after urban floods J Environ Manag 2019 250 109516 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109516
Scoullos IM, Lopez Vazquez CM, Jvd Vossenberg, Brdjanovic D (2019) Die-off of E. coli as fecal indicator organism on different surfaces after urban floods. J Environ Manag 250:10951610.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109516
Seidahmed O, Kurumop S, Jamea-Maiasa S, Timbi D, Tandrapah A, Hetzel M, Pomat W (2021) Papua New Guinea malaria indicator survey 2019–2020: final report on malaria prevention, infection prevalence, and treatment-seeking
Sharma KK Verdon-Kidd DC Magee AD A decision tree approach to identify predictors of extreme rainfall events – a case study for the Fiji Islands Weather Clim Extremes 2021 34 100405 10.1016/j.wace.2021.100405
Sharma KK, Verdon-Kidd DC, Magee AD (2021) A decision tree approach to identify predictors of extreme rainfall events – a case study for the Fiji Islands. Weather Clim Extremes 34:10040510.1016/j.wace.2021.100405
Sharma K, Kesharwani P, Jain A, Mody N, Sharma G, Sharma S, Hussain CM (2023) Challenges and preventive interventions in COVID‐19 transmission through domestic chemistry hygiene: a critical assessment. In: Rawtani D,Hussain CM (eds.), The Environmental Impact of COVID‐19. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp. 111–126. 10.1002/9781119777403.ch8
Sinclair RG Gerba CP Microbial contamination in kitchens and bathrooms of rural Cambodian village households Lett Appl Microbiol 2011 52 2 144 149 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2010.02978.x 21198693
Sinclair RG, Gerba CP (2011) Microbial contamination in kitchens and bathrooms of rural Cambodian village households. Lett Appl Microbiol 52(2):144–14921198693 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2010.02978.x
Sivamuni SS Ngeow WC Wong RCW Postdefecation cleansing in the asian population and the spread of COVID-19 Asia Pac J Public Health 2022 34 2–3 312 313 10.1177/10105395211052181 34696621
Sivamuni SS, Ngeow WC, Wong RCW (2022) Postdefecation cleansing in the asian population and the spread of COVID-19. Asia Pac J Public Health 34(2–3):312–31334696621 10.1177/10105395211052181
Stenström TA, Seidu R, Ekane N, Zurbrügg C (2011) Microbial exposure and health assessments in sanitation technologies and systems, Stockholm Environment Institute Stockholm
Temesgen A Molla Adane M Birara A Shibabaw T Having a latrine facility is not a guarantee for eliminating open defecation owing to socio-demographic and environmental factors: the case of Machakel district in Ethiopia PLoS One 2021 16 9 e0257813 10.1371/journal.pone.0257813 34591873
Temesgen A, Molla Adane M, Birara A, Shibabaw T (2021) Having a latrine facility is not a guarantee for eliminating open defecation owing to socio-demographic and environmental factors: the case of Machakel district in Ethiopia. PLoS One 16(9):e025781334591873 10.1371/journal.pone.0257813
The World Bank (2022) Fiji http://data.worldbank.org/country/fiji. Accessed. 2022.02.17
Thomas J, Gold M (2020) Resource recovery from human excreta in urban and regional settlements, The Palgrave encyclopedia of urban and regional futures. Springer International Publishing, pp 1–13. 10.1007/978-3-030-87745-3_227
Thompson CN Kama M Acharya S Bera U Clemens J Crump JA Dawainavesi A Dougan G Edmunds WJ Fox K Typhoid fever in Fiji: a reversible plague? Trop Med Int Health 2014 19 10 1284 1292 10.1111/tmi.12367 25066005
Thompson CN, Kama M, Acharya S, Bera U, Clemens J, Crump JA, Dawainavesi A, Dougan G, Edmunds WJ, Fox K (2014) Typhoid fever in Fiji: a reversible plague? Trop Med Int Health 19(10):1284–129225066005 10.1111/tmi.12367
Twinomucunguzi FRB Nyenje PM Kulabako RN Semiyaga S Foppen JW Kansiime F Reducing groundwater contamination from on-site sanitation in peri-urban sub-saharan africa: reviewing transition management attributes towards implementation of water safety plans Sustainability 2020 12 10 4210 10.3390/su12104210
Twinomucunguzi FRB, Nyenje PM, Kulabako RN, Semiyaga S, Foppen JW, Kansiime F (2020) Reducing groundwater contamination from on-site sanitation in peri-urban sub-saharan africa: reviewing transition management attributes towards implementation of water safety plans. Sustainability 12(10):421010.3390/su12104210
UNDP (2022) Human development index (HDI) https://hdr.undp.org/data-center/human-development-index#/indicies/HDI. Accessed. 2022.06.22
Uprety S Dangol B Nakarmi P Dhakal I Sherchan SP Shisler JL Jutla A Amarasiri M Sano D Nguyen TH Assessment of microbial risks by characterization of Escherichia coli presence to analyze the public health risks from poor water quality in Nepal Int J Hyg Environ Health 2020 226 113484 10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113484 32097888
Uprety S, Dangol B, Nakarmi P, Dhakal I, Sherchan SP, Shisler JL, Jutla A, Amarasiri M, Sano D, Nguyen TH (2020) Assessment of microbial risks by characterization of Escherichia coli presence to analyze the public health risks from poor water quality in Nepal. Int J Hyg Environ Health 226:11348432097888 10.1016/j.ijheh.2020.113484
Watson CH Baker S Lau CL Rawalai K Taufa M Coriakula J Nga Tran VuT Tan Trinh V Dung Tran Thi N Hens N Lowry JH de Alwis R Cano J Jenkins K Mulholland EK Nilles EJ Kama M Edmunds WJ A cross-sectional seroepidemiological survey of typhoid fever in Fiji PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2017 11 7 e0005786 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005786 28727726
Watson CH, Baker S, Lau CL, Rawalai K, Taufa M, Coriakula J, Nga Tran VuT, Tan Trinh V, Dung Tran Thi N, Hens N, Lowry JH, de Alwis R, Cano J, Jenkins K, Mulholland EK, Nilles EJ, Kama M, Edmunds WJ (2017) A cross-sectional seroepidemiological survey of typhoid fever in Fiji. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 11(7):e0005786. 10.1371/journal.pntd.000578628727726 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005786
Weststrate J Dijkstra G Eshuis J Gianoli A Rusca M The sustainable development goal on water and sanitation: learning from the millennium development goals Soc Indic Res 2019 143 795 810 10.1007/s11205-018-1965-5
Weststrate J, Dijkstra G, Eshuis J, Gianoli A, Rusca M (2019) The sustainable development goal on water and sanitation: learning from the millennium development goals. Soc Indic Res 143:795–81010.1007/s11205-018-1965-5
White I Falkland T Kula T National versus local sustainable development plans and island priorities in sanitation: examples from The Kingdom of Tonga Sustainability 2020 12 22 9379 10.3390/su12229379
White I, Falkland T, Kula T (2020) National versus local sustainable development plans and island priorities in sanitation: examples from The Kingdom of Tonga. Sustainability 12(22):937910.3390/su12229379
WHO and UNICEF (2017) Progress on drinking water, sanitation and hygiene: 2017 update and SDG baselines https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/258617/9?sequence=1. Accessed. 2023.08.08
WHO and UNICEF (2021). Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2000–2020: five years into the SDGs https://washdata.org/sites/default/files/2022-01/jmp-2021-wash-households_3.pdf. Accessed. 2022.06.02
WHO and UNICEF (2022) JMP Rural and urban sanitation service levels, 2015 and 2022 https://washdata.org/data/household#!/dashboard/new. Accessed. 2023.08.07
WHO (2015). Health in 2015: from MDGs, millennium development goals to SDGs, sustainable development goals
WHO (2022) Sanitation https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/sanitation. Accessed. 2023.08.16
Yezli S Otter JA Minimum infective dose of the major human respiratory and enteric viruses transmitted through food and the environment Food Environ Virol 2011 3 1 1 30 10.1007/s12560-011-9056-7 35255645
Yezli S, Otter JA (2011) Minimum infective dose of the major human respiratory and enteric viruses transmitted through food and the environment. Food Environ Virol 3(1):1–3035255645 10.1007/s12560-011-9056-7
