
==== Front
Med Biol Eng Comput
Med Biol Eng Comput
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
0140-0118
1741-0444
Springer Berlin Heidelberg Berlin/Heidelberg

38722478
3111
10.1007/s11517-024-03111-1
Original Article
PSFHSP-Net: an efficient lightweight network for identifying pubic symphysis-fetal head standard plane from intrapartum ultrasound images
Qiu Ruiyu 1Ruiyu Qiu

obtained her bachelor’s degree in Electronic Engineering from Jinan University, Guangzhou, China, in 2021. Currently, she is pursuing a master’s degree in the Department of Electronic Engineering at Jinan University, Guangzhou, China. Her research interests primarily lie in the fields of image processing and deep learning.

Zhou Mengqiang 1Mengqiang Zhou

earned his bachelor’s degree in Electronic Information Engineering from Hubei University of Arts and Sciences in Xiangyang, China, in 2020. Subsequently, he completed his master’s degree in the Department of Electronic Engineering at Jinan University, Guangzhou, China. His research focuses on image processing and deep learning.

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2847-350X
Bai Jieyun jbai996@aucklanduni.ac.nz
bai_jieyun@126.com

12Jieyun Bai

completed a PhD in Computer Science at the Harbin Institute of Technology. From 2018 to 2019, he joined the Auckland Bioengineering Institute as a Research Assistant/Fellow. From 2019 to now, he has worked at Jinan University and Guangzhou Lianyin Medical Technology Co., Ltd. From 2023 to now, he does research with Jichao Zhao at the Auckland Bioengineering Institute. His research interests include medical image analysis, digital twin, application of deep learning to biomedical image processing, and modelling and simulation. He was the lead organizer of the PSFHS (https://ps-fh-aop-2023.grand-challenge.org/
) and IUGC (https://codalab.lisn.upsaclay.fr/competitions/18413
) Challenges about domain generalization across scanners and centers.

Lu Yaosheng 12Yaosheng Lu

earned his Ph.D. from Jinan University in 2012. Presently, he serves as a professor at the College of Information Science and Technology, Jinan University. His academic pursuits revolve around signal processing, image processing, and medical apparatus and instruments.

Wang Huijin 3Huijin Wang

obtained his master’s degree from Zhejiang University in 1990. Currently, he holds the position of professor at the College of Information Science and Technology, Jinan University. His academic focus encompasses artificial intelligence, machine learning, and signal processing.

1 https://ror.org/02xe5ns62 grid.258164.c 0000 0004 1790 3548 Department of Electronic Engineering, College of Information Science and Technology, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510632 China
2 https://ror.org/02xe5ns62 grid.258164.c 0000 0004 1790 3548 Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Information Technology, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510632 China
3 https://ror.org/02xe5ns62 grid.258164.c 0000 0004 1790 3548 Department of Computer Science, College of Information Science and Technology, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510632 China
9 5 2024
9 5 2024
2024
62 10 29752986
1 4 2023
25 4 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
The accurate selection of the ultrasound plane for the fetal head and pubic symphysis is critical for precisely measuring the angle of progression. The traditional method depends heavily on sonographers manually selecting the imaging plane. This process is not only time-intensive and laborious but also prone to variability based on the clinicians’ expertise. Consequently, there is a significant need for an automated method driven by artificial intelligence. To enhance the efficiency and accuracy of identifying the pubic symphysis-fetal head standard plane (PSFHSP), we proposed a streamlined neural network, PSFHSP-Net, based on a modified version of ResNet-18. This network comprises a single convolutional layer and three residual blocks designed to mitigate noise interference and bolster feature extraction capabilities. The model’s adaptability was further refined by expanding the shared feature layer into task-specific layers. We assessed its performance against both traditional heavyweight and other lightweight models by evaluating metrics such as F1-score, accuracy (ACC), recall, precision, area under the ROC curve (AUC), model parameter count, and frames per second (FPS). The PSFHSP-Net recorded an ACC of 0.8995, an F1-score of 0.9075, a recall of 0.9191, and a precision of 0.9022. This model surpassed other heavyweight and lightweight models in these metrics. Notably, it featured the smallest model size (1.48 MB) and the highest processing speed (65.7909 FPS), meeting the real-time processing criterion of over 24 images per second. While the AUC of our model was 0.930, slightly lower than that of ResNet34 (0.935), it showed a marked improvement over ResNet-18 in testing, with increases in ACC and F1-score of 0.0435 and 0.0306, respectively. However, precision saw a slight decrease from 0.9184 to 0.9022, a reduction of 0.0162. Despite these trade-offs, the compression of the model significantly reduced its size from 42.64 to 1.48 MB and increased its inference speed by 4.4753 to 65.7909 FPS. The results confirm that the PSFHSP-Net is capable of swiftly and effectively identifying the PSFHSP, thereby facilitating accurate measurements of the angle of progression. This development represents a significant advancement in automating fetal imaging analysis, promising enhanced consistency and reduced operator dependency in clinical settings.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Intrapartum ultrasound
Lightweight network
Ultrasound standard plane detection
Classification
Angle of progression
Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou2023B03J1297 http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100021171 Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province 2023A1515012833 Bai Jieyun http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003453 Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2024A1515011886 Bai Jieyun Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Bureau Guangzhou Key Research and Development Program2024B03J1283 Bai Jieyun Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Bureau Guangzhou Key Research and Development Program 2024B03J1289 Lu Yaosheng http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001809 National Natural Science Foundation of China 61901192 Bai Jieyun National Key Research and Development Project2019YFC0120100 and 2019YFC0121907 Lu Yaosheng Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou20220101544 Bai Jieyun Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Informatization2021B1212040007 Lu Yaosheng http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100010890 Chinese Government Scholarship University of AucklandOpen Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions

issue-copyright-statement© International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Ultrasound (US) imaging is extensively utilized in obstetric assessments due to its non-invasive nature, absence of radiation, affordability, and capability for real-time imaging [1]. US imaging offers a clear advantage over traditional vaginal digital examinations by providing immediate, detailed visual insights into labor progression, including cervical dilation, fetal orientation, descent of the fetal head, and the rate of labor progression [2]. These details are critical for physicians to make informed decisions about delivery management, potentially reducing neonatal mortality rates. The process of intrapartum US imaging is typically segmented into five steps: scanning, identification of the standard plane, observation of structures, measurement of parameters, and diagnosis [3]. Among these, identifying the standard plane is vital, as it must include all critical structures necessary for accurate parameter measurements, directly impacting labor evaluation [4].

For instance, the angle of progression (AoP) is an essential metric in assessing the cephalopelvic fit during labor [5]. Accurate AoP measurement requires clear visualization of the longitudinal sagittal plane of the pubic symphysis (PS) and the fetal head in US images [3]. Real-time AoP monitoring is instrumental in predicting the mode of delivery, guiding clinical interventions, and minimizing risks to both mother and infant [2]. Consequently, accurate identification of the pubic symphysis-fetal head standard plane (PSFHSP), defined as the intrapartum US image that distinctly portrays the fetal head and PS structures, is crucial for precise AoP measurements.

However, pinpointing the PSFHSP can be a complex and laborious task for even the most skilled sonographers, heavily reliant on their expertise and practical experience [6]. The challenge is compounded by the subtle differences between PSFHSP (Fig. 1a) and non-PSFHSP images (Fig. 1b), where the high similarity between such images often complicates the determination process [7, 8]. Therefore, developing an effective, automatic, and comprehensive method to assist sonographers in swiftly and accurately identifying PSFHSP is of great importance.Fig. 1 Examples of PSFHSP (a) and non- PSFHSP (b). The structure of the PS is not clear in the non-standard plane, and its location cannot be determined; PSFHSP, pubic symphysis-fetal head standard plane; PS, pubic symphysis

Related works

Recent discussions on the automatic identification of standard planes in ultrasound (US) imaging have highlighted various methodologies and their limitations. Yeh et al. utilized a gray-level co-occurrence matrix along with wavelet decomposition for feature extraction, followed by a support vector machine for feature classification [9]. Lei et al. examined the automatic recognition of fetal facial standard planes using Fisher vectors combined with a support vector machine on a small dataset [10]. Furthermore, Ni et al. introduced a novel method to automatically locate the fetal abdominal standard plane in sequential two-dimensional US images, initially using an AdaBoost classifier to identify the abdominal region, thereby narrowing the search area for crucial anatomical structures, followed by employing specific selection strategies for potential detection sites [11]. The primary constraints of these conventional methods are threefold: (1) feature extraction often relies heavily on manual expertise and scientific insight, (2) the scope and variety of extracted features are restricted due to manual selection processes, and (3) the necessity to reselect and re-extract features whenever the dataset is altered.

However, advancements in computational power and the accumulation of medical imaging data have facilitated the integration of deep learning technologies into the recognition of standard US images. These approaches excel at learning features from extensive datasets. For instance, Qu et al. developed a differential convolutional neural network (differential-CNN) to discern between fetal brain standard planes and non-standard planes [12]. Pu et al. crafted an automatic fetal ultrasound standard plane recognition (FUSPR) model suited for the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) environment, incorporating CNN and RNN fusion techniques to enhance spatial and motion analysis within video streams [13]. Zhang et al. leveraged state-of-the-art GANs for fetal brain image generation, enhancing data augmentation techniques for classifiers [14]. Moshfegh et al. presented a novel method employing a CNN to automatically detect and locate 13 standard fetal views through bounding boxes [15].

Despite these advancements, several challenges persist, primarily the small size of datasets used for training—often fewer than 1000 images, and in some instances, less than 300. Additionally, the computational costs associated with training and deploying deep learning models are seldom reported, which restricts the practical implementation of these algorithms on edge computing devices [16].

In response, we propose PSFHSP-Net, a streamlined, efficient, and end-to-end network for PSFHSP identification. By compressing ResNet18, we managed to decrease the model size without sacrificing performance, enabling deployment on edge devices for real-time applications. Moreover, we utilized the intrapartum US dataset from the Intelligent Fetal Monitoring Laboratory at Jinan University (JNU-IFM), which contains 6224 2D ultrasound images, to enhance the robustness of our model. Our method outperformed existing techniques, demonstrating superior accuracy in PSFHSP recognition.

Materials and methods

Using the JNU-IFM dataset [7] (Section 3.2), we trained our proposed network, as detailed in Section 3.3, which is based on a compressed ResNet-18 architecture for the identification of PSFHSP.

General

The study received ethical approval from the Medical Ethics Committee of NanFang Hospital of Southern Medical University (NFCE-2019-024). Patient data were collected under a standard-of-care clinical protocol approved by the Institutional Review Board, which waived the requirement for informed consent from all participants. This research adhered to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki, ensuring the ethical standards and integrity of the study.

Dataset

The JNU-IFM dataset, employed in this experiment, comprises intrapartum ultrasound (US) images along with corresponding segmentation labels of the pubic symphysis (PS) and fetal head. It categorizes images into four distinct groups: images featuring both PS and fetal head (PS & Head), images without PS and fetal head (None), images with only PS (Only PS), and images with only the fetal head (Only Head) as illustrated in Fig. 2a–d. For image acquisition, the ultrasound transducer was prepared by enveloping it with a surgical latex glove filled with coupling gel. This prepared transducer was then positioned between the labia below the PS to capture a sagittal plane. Fine adjustments, such as lateral movements of the probe, were made until images clearly displaying maternal pelvic and fetal landmarks without shadows from the pubic rami were obtained.Fig. 2 Four types of images in the JNU-IFM dataset. a PSFHSP: Head & PS; b Non-PSFHSP: Only Head; c Non-PSFHSP: Only PS; d Non-PSFHSP: None. PSFHSP, pubic symphysis-fetal head standard plane; PS, pubic symphysis

A total of 78 videos from 51 pregnant women were collected at the NanFang Hospital of Southern Medical University between 2019 and early 2020. From these videos, 6224 images were extracted at 10 frames per video and labeled using the Pair software. To facilitate balanced training and evaluation, the images were divided into training, validation, and test groups in an approximate ratio of 4:1:1, using a strategy of five-fold cross-validation to ensure each fold was as equal as possible in data amount, despite variances in individual patient data contributions.

The number distribution of images in the JNU-IFM dataset is detailed in Table 1. Given GPU memory constraints, all data were resized to 224 × 224 pixels before training. Additionally, to leverage pre-trained models effectively, which typically require three-channel input, the grayscale images were converted to RGB format for the experiments. Table 1 The numbers of PSFHSP and Non-PSFHSP in training, validation, and testing datasets

	Train + validate	Test	Train + validate + test	
PSFHSP	3170	413	3583	
Non-PSFHSP	2068	573	2641	
Sum	5238	986	6224	

PSFHSP-Net

Addressing the challenges presented by image quality in ultrasound (US) imaging, we have developed a novel convolutional neural network (CNN) that builds on the foundational architecture of ResNet-18 (Fig. 3a). Our model incorporates a simplified structure aimed at reducing noise interference and improving analytical accuracy. Unlike the traditional ResNet-18, which might lose crucial data through repeated convolutions and downsampling—such as the lower edge of the fetal head—our design makes strategic alterations to preserve important features. Our model, designated as PSFHSP-Net, includes a 7 × 7 convolutional layer (Conv 7 × 7), two basic residual building blocks (BasicBlock0), and one modified residual building block (BasicBlock1) with only one downsampling module. A significant adjustment in our approach is the omission of three-dimension reduction (DR) modules between the BasicBlock0s, which is depicted in the schematic framework shown in Fig. 3b. The initial step involves cropping the original US image to 224 × 224 × 3 and feeding it into the network where the residual blocks extract image features before passing them to a fully connected layer. During the training phase, we compute the loss between the output of the fully connected layer and the image category label. The network parameters are then fine-tuned through gradient backpropagation [17]. In the testing phase, the fully connected layer sends the output to a classifier that determines whether an image qualifies as PSFHSP, and this result is outputted accordingly.Fig. 3 Schematic of the PSFHSP-Net architecture based on ResNet-18. a Structure of ResNet-18. b Structure of PSFHSP-Net. c Structure of BasicBlock0. d Structure of BasicBlock1. BN, batch-normalization; Conv, convolution; ReLU, Rectified Linear Unit

The early stages of the network involve a 7 × 7 convolutional layer used to downsample the input image, followed by batch normalization (BN) to stabilize the data distribution [18]. Non-linear activation is performed using the ReLU function to prevent vanishing gradients and reduce overfitting. Subsequently, the MaxPool operation expands the field of perception, removes redundant information, and highlights critical structures such as the fetal head and pubic symphysis, aiding in feature extraction.

The core feature extraction comprises two layers: Layer1 contains two BasicBlock0 units (Fig. 3c), and Layer2 consists of one BasicBlock1 (Fig. 3d). The design utilizes the principle of residual blocks [19], which involves direct mappings between different network layers to transfer lower-layer features to higher layers, effectively addressing the issue of deep network degradation. The residual block is to connect different layers of the network by direct mapping and transfer the features of the lower layer to the higher layer to solve the problem of deep network degradation. In terms of computational principles, the desired underlying mapping is represented as H(x), and the stacked nonlinear layers are represented as another mapping of F(x) = H(x) − x; then, the original mapping is recast as F(x) + x. If the learning effect of the new layer is very poor, then, we can “skip” this part directly by a residual edge. In this way, no matter how many layers there are in the network, we keep the ones that work well and skip the ones that do not, ensuring that they are at least as good as the original ones. This structure is called a short connection, and these short connections can skip two or more layers and perform the mapping directly. The residual unit equation is defined as:1 Xl+1=fXl+FXl,kl

where Xl and Xl + 1 represent the input and output of the l-th residual unit, respectively, f represents the activation function, F represents the residual function, and kl represents the convolution kernel in the l-th residual unit.

BasicBlock0 features two 3 × 3 convolutional layers connected by a ReLU function and a BN layer, with a residual connection after the second BN layer. Unlike BasicBlock0, BasicBlock1 incorporates a 1 × 1 convolutional layer (Conv 1 × 1) in the downsampling module after reactivation, which serves as a projection layer to manage the proliferation of parameters in deeper networks and focus on retaining relevant information [20].

Post-feature extraction, an AvgPool operation, consolidates global information from the last convolutional layer into the feature map, enhancing model robustness and category correspondence. The fully connected layer then converts this two-dimensional feature map into a one-dimensional vector to facilitate end-to-end learning. Finally, a softmax classifier [21] interprets this vector to classify the input US image as PSFHSP or non-PSFHSP, ensuring precise identification of standard planes.

Experimental settings

Our experiments were conducted using the PyTorch framework on an NVIDIA GTX 3090 GPU. We employed the Adam optimizer, with an initial learning rate set at 0.001. The model training was configured for 200 epochs with a batch size of 64. To enhance the model’s generalization and feature representation capabilities, we initialized our network with pre-trained ImageNet weights and employed a five-fold cross-validation strategy. To prevent overfitting, an early stopping mechanism was utilized, actively monitoring the loss on the validation set to adjust parameters and halt training when loss was minimized, thereby optimizing the model’s generalization.

Given the unique patient characteristics, the training-to-validation set ratio was set at 1:4. Every five epochs constituted a cycle of the cross-validation experiments. During each cycle, the average accuracy, F1-score, and loss were calculated, and weights achieving the highest F1-score were preserved. The best F1-score obtained on the validation set was selected as the final model representation.

During the training phase, data augmentation techniques were strategically applied. These included random horizontal and vertical flips, fixed-size cropping, and rotations. Due to the class imbalance in the PSFHSP US images and the essential nature of the depicted structures, care was taken to ensure that cropping did not omit critical features. Additionally, considering the inherent speckle noise and artifacts in US images, these augmentations were chosen to avoid exacerbating the difficulty of feature learning. The original grayscale ultrasound images were converted to RGB format for two reasons: to utilize pre-trained model weights more effectively and as a form of data enhancement, allowing the model to discern more image details through color gamut transformation.

In the testing stage, the performance of the PSFHSP-Net was assessed using a dataset of 986 images. To benchmark our model’s efficacy, we compared it against a range of established classification models under identical experimental conditions. These models included non-residual networks such as AlexNet and ZFNet; residual networks like ResNet-18, ResNet-34, ResNet-50, ResNet-101, and ResNet-152; and lightweight networks such as MobileNet [22], SqueezeNet [23], and ShuffleNet [24]. Comparative evaluation focused on metrics such as accuracy (ACC), precision, recall, F1-score, the number of model parameters, and inference time, enabling a comprehensive analysis of model performance across different architectures.

Evaluation metrics

To evaluate the classification performance of the PSFHSP-Net and compare it with other models, several key metrics were utilized, including F1-score, accuracy (ACC), recall, precision, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), as well as the number of model parameters and inference time. Here is a detailed explanation of each metric and the formulas used to calculate them:2 ACC=TP+TNTP+FP+TN+FN

3 Precision=TPTP+FP

4 Recall=TPTP+FN

5 F1=2*Precision*RecallPrecision+Recall

where TP, FN, FP, and TN represent the number of actually positive samples predicted to be positive samples, the number of positive samples predicted to be negative, the number of samples that are negative but predicted to be positive, and the number of actually negative samples predicted to be negative samples, respectively. TP + FN is the number of all actual positive samples, while TP + FP is the number of all predicted positive samples.

Statistical analysis

Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were employed to compare the proposed PSFHSP-Net and other models. A p value less than 0.05 is considered significant. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

In this section, we utilized a test dataset comprising 986 images to evaluate and analyze the classification performance of various pre-trained networks. The metrics used for assessment included accuracy (ACC), precision, recall, F1-score, the number of parameters, and inference time. The comparative performance of the different models is detailed in Table 2, where our PSFHSP-Net was benchmarked against non-residual networks such as AlexNet and its variant ZFNet, residual networks including ResNet-18, ResNet-34, ResNet-50, ResNet-101, and ResNet-152, and lightweight networks like MobileNetV2, MobileNetV3, SqueezeNet, and ShuffleNetV2. Table 2 The performance of different models on the test dataset. The best results are in bold

Model	ACC	F1-score	Recall	Precision	Parameters (MB)	Frames per second (FPS)	
AlexNet	0.7002 ± 0.0211	0.7464 ± 0.0489	0.6394 ± 0.1578	0.7711 ± 0.0632	217.48	56.6334 ± 2.5036	
ZFNet	0.7252 ± 0.0963	0.7530 ± 0.0507	0.7231 ± 0.08620	0.7915 ± 0.1164	55.60	61.8182 ± 4.9260	
ResNet-18	0.8560 ± 0.0418	0.8769 ± 0.0480	0.8586 ± 0.0643	0.9184 ± 0.2120	42.64	61.3156 ± 3.1925	
ResNet-34	0.8412 ± 0.0724	0.8126 ± 0.1035	0.0.7211 ± 0.1433	0.8616 ± 0.0159	81.20	60.8507 ± 2.6219	
ResNet-50	0.7626 ± 0.0288	0.7850 ± 0.0315	0.7219 ± 0.0518	0.8522 ± 0.0089	89.69	59.6525 ± 1.7396	
ResNet101	0.7571 ± 0.0561	0.7687 ± 0.0734	0.6984 ± 0.1219	0.8721 ± 0.0227	162.14	58.3739 ± 7.4722	
ResNet152	0.7657 ± 0.0648	0.7834 ± 0.0751	0.7394 ± 0.1437	0.8515 ± 0.0213	221.82	56.1523 ± 7.2858	
MobileNetV2	0.7048 ± 0.0203	0.7271 ± 0.0151	0.6578 ± 0.0172	0.8141 ± 0.0328	8.49	63.8746 ± 5.4228	
MobileNetV3	0.7526 ± 0.0100	0.7704 ± 0.0045	0.7212 ± 0.0016	0.8824 ± 0.0064	5.80	64.3324 ± 2.1226	
SqueezeNet	0.7755 ± 0.0371	0.7924 ± 0.0504	0.7386 ± 0.1213	0.8737 ± 0.0367	2.81	64.3553 ± 3.1159	
ShuffleNetV2	0.8388 ± 0.0373	0.8773 ± 0.0444	0.9812 ± 0.0743	0.8532 ± 0.0197	4.79	65.1489 ± 4.3679	
PSFHSP-Net	0.8995 ± 0.0226	0.9075 ± 0.0282	0.9181 ± 0.0880	0.9022 ± 0.0857	1.51	65.7909 ± 1.9000	

As shown in Table 2, the performance of our proposed model on the test dataset demonstrated a mean ACC of 0.8995 and an F1-score of 0.9075, significantly surpassing the other models. The recall of PSFHSP-Net, at 0.9181, was lower than that of ShuffleNetV2 (0.9812), and its precision, at 0.9022, was slightly lower than ResNet-18’s 0.9184; however, both metrics were consistently above 0.90. Notably, the parameter size of PSFHSP-Net (1.51 MB) is smaller than that of the ultra-lightweight SqueezeNet (2.81 MB), commonly used on mobile devices, indicating significant advantages in terms of hardware resource consumption. Additionally, the frame rate of PSFHSP-Net (65.7909 frames per second) surpasses other models, thereby fulfilling the real-time requirement of more than 24 images per second.

For a more quantitative comparison, ROC curves for all models, both non-lightweight and lightweight networks, regarding the PSFHSP recognition task are depicted in Fig. 4. Relative to non-lightweight models (Fig. 4a), the AUC value of PSFHSP-Net (0.933) is superior to those of ResNet-18, ResNet-50, ResNet-101, and ResNet-152. When compared with lightweight models (Fig. 4b), PSFHSP-Net’s AUC also exceeds those of AlexNet, ZFNet, MobileNetV3, SqueezeNet, and ShuffleNetV2. An AUC of 0.933 and a corresponding recall of 0.9181 indicate that PSFHSP-Net can effectively identify most standard planes, demonstrating excellent generalization capability to meet clinical requirements and showcasing its potential applicability and clinical value.Fig. 4 ROC curves of different methods. a AUC of PSFHSP-Net is compared with those of non-lightweight models. b AUC of PSFHSP-Net is compared with those of lightweight models. ROC, receiver operating characteristic

To verify the effectiveness of PSFHSP-Net, we employed the Grad-CAM algorithm to visualize the weights of feature maps in the form of heatmaps. Based on the red areas in the heatmaps, we analyzed whether the network had accurately learned the critical features or information. Figure 5 displays the PSFHSP image and its corresponding heatmap. The heatmap for PS & Head shows that the model’s focus is appropriately on the pubic symphysis structure and the lower edge of the fetal head. The heatmap for Only Head reveals that the model does not detect the pubic symphysis, concentrating instead on the lower edge of the fetal head. Conversely, in the heatmap for Only PS, the model detects the fetal head but not the pubic symphysis. These results are consistent with their respective ground truths, confirming that the model effectively learns essential structures. Figure 6 illustrates the PSFHSP image and thermal maps for models with performance similar to PSFHSP-Net, showing that PSFHSP-Net accurately detects both the fetal head and the pubic symphysis, unlike other models that detect only one of these structures.Fig. 5 Examples of correctly classified images and their heatmaps. For PSFHSP: Head & PS, the model’s attention is focused on the PS structure and the lower edge of the fetal head. For Non-PSFHSP: Only Head and Only PS, the model could detect the lower edge of the fetal head and the pubic symphysis, respectively

Fig. 6 Examples of PSFHSP image and predictive heat maps of some models

To further demonstrate the effectiveness of our modifications, we conducted ablation experiments. ResNet-18 comprises a four-tier structure, while PSFHSP-Net utilizes the first tier of ResNet, as well as the first block in the second layer. Our experiments explored structures containing three layers, two complete layers, and a single layer. A downsampling module was added at the end of the second layer in PSFHSP-Net, and ablation studies on this modification were also performed. As listed in Table 3, PSFHSP-Net achieved ACC, F1-score, and recall of 0.8995, 0.9075, and 0.9181, respectively, with variances in these metrics during five-fold cross-validation lower than in other configurations. The average recall rate was 0.9022 with a variance of 0.0857, slightly lower than that of the single-layer model (mean of 0.9142 and variance of 0.0185) but not significantly so. Despite the single-layer model’s smaller size, PSFHSP-Net demonstrated superior performance in all other metrics and comparable frame rates. The inclusion of a downsampling module significantly improved all aspects of PSFHSP-Net compared to PSFHSP-Net without the downsampling module. Comprehensive comparisons confirm that PSFHSP-Net is the most suitable compression method for PSFHSP classification within the ResNet-18 framework. Table 3 The performance of different compressions for ResNet18 on the test dataset. The best results are in bold

Model	ACC	F1-score	Recall	Precision	Parameters (MB)	Frames per second (FPS)	
With_onelayer	0.8371 ± 0.0485	0.8701 ± 0.0393	0.9171 ± 0.0880	0.8313 ± 0.0471	0.60	67.8785 ± 3.9073	
With_twolayers	0.8217 ± 0.0440	0.8431 ± 0.0460	0.8179 ± 0.0943	0.8773 ± 0.0256	2.61	64.7592 ± 6.7393	
With_threelayers	0.7998 ± 0.0482	0.8109 ± 0.0570	0.7355 ± 0.0976	0.9142 ± 0.0185	10.62	63.3086 ± 3.0739	
PSFHSP-Net_w/oDS	0.8551 ± 0.0426	0.8538 ± 0.0351	0.8264 ± 0.0872	0.8425 ± 0.0416	1.48	65.8664 ± 2.2310	
PSFHSP-Net	0.8995 ± 0.0426	0.9075 ± 0.0282	0.9181 ± 0.0679	0.9022 ± 0.0857	1.51	65.7909 ± 1.9000	
With_onelayer, the model consisting of the first layer of ResNet18; With_twolayers, the model consisting of the first two layers of ResNet-18; With_threelayers, the model consisting of the first three layers of ResNet18; and PSFHSP-Net_w/oDS, the model is PSFHSP-Net without the downsampling module

Discussion

In this study, we introduce an innovative automatic PSFHSP recognition method that simplifies model depth and modifies residual modules to enhance classification precision. The proposed PSFHSP-Net is a lightweight, end-to-end solution designed to facilitate the quick and effective screening of the PSFHSP, thereby supporting accurate AoP measurements. With fewer parameters and rapid inference speeds, our model enables sonographers to efficiently identify PSFHSP, providing a reliable foundation for subsequent AoP evaluation.

PSFHSP recognition is technically straightforward in terms of model complexity. Deep learning techniques are proficient at detecting key structures such as the pubic symphysis and fetal head in ultrasound images, determining the presence of PSFHSP [25]. In these images, features like the fetal head and the marginal structure of the pubic symphysis are relatively superficial and easily discernible to the human eye [26]. Consequently, these features can be extracted with just a few convolutional layers. In contrast, models with excessive depth, such as ResNet101 or ResNet152, may not only capture these superficial features but also learn to recognize insignificant, irrelevant, or even detrimental features. Given the relationship between these extraneous features and noise artifacts in ultrasound images, increasing model depth does not necessarily correlate with enhanced performance [27]; indeed, as models deepen from ResNet-18 to ResNet-101, classification accuracy has been observed to decline from 0.8560 to 0.7571, as shown in Table 2. Notably, our proposed PSFHSP-Net, with only three layers, achieved the highest accuracy of 0.8995.

The effectiveness of PSFHSP-Net can be attributed to the inclusion of residual blocks, which prevent network degradation—a common issue in non-residual models like AlexNet and ZFNet, where performance typically stagnates (Fig. 7a, b). In contrast, the residual model ResNet-18, with just 18 layers, saw a classification accuracy improvement of over 19% compared to non-residual models. PSFHSP-Net utilizes three residual blocks, a pooling layer, and a fully connected layer. Compared to ResNet-18, PSFHSP-Net has significantly fewer parameters, approximately 2800% less, which contributes to a 4% increase in classification accuracy and a 7% increase in inference speed.Fig. 7 Training loss (a) and validation loss (b) of the network versus the number of epochs. There is no overfitting, because the early stop strategy was used during the training

PSFHSP-Net’s streamlined architecture not only reduces parameter count but also enhances inference speed, allowing it to process over 65 images per second and meet real-time requirements. This makes it suitable for deployment on mobile ultrasound devices. The automatic nature of the model simplifies the clinical workflow by directly processing scanned video into images that are immediately analyzed for PSFHSP, eliminating the manual screening process and improving productivity in AoP measurements.

Despite its strengths, PSFHSP-Net can still be improved. Ultrasound images often contain speckles, noise, and artifacts that degrade image quality and can mislead the learning process [28]. For instance, tests have shown that parts of the model’s weights may focus erroneously on artifact areas, misidentifying irrelevant bright spots as key structural edges (Fig. 8). To address these challenges, future developments will include integrating a dedicated denoising module into the model's architecture to cleanse the images before feature extraction and classification. This enhancement is expected to refine the model’s performance and robustness against noise interference [29, 30]. Additionally, we plan to implement an attention mechanism that prioritizes critical information (i.e., fetal head and pubic symphysis) while disregarding irrelevant details (such as noise and shadows) [31]. This approach will adaptively adjust weights to continuously select essential data under varying conditions, thereby improving the model’s robustness and accuracy and reducing the impact of noise and artifacts on classification performance [32, 33].Fig. 8 The impact of shadows and noise on the performance of PSFHSP-Net. Due to the influence of the inherent mechanism of imaging in medical US images, there are many speckles, noise, and artifacts, which affect the image quality. Therefore, in the training process, the model was prone to mistake some shadows and noise as key results for learning

Conclusions

In summary, this study presents an innovative approach to automatically recognizing the PSFHSP in ultrasound imaging. By compressing the depth and modifying the residual modules of the model, we have enhanced its classification precision. Unlike traditional deep learning models, which typically require significant computational resources and substantial energy consumption, our proposed model is optimized for real-time classification on resource-constrained and low-energy edge devices. This makes it particularly well-suited for use with portable, handheld intrapartum ultrasound machines, offering a significant advancement in the field by facilitating efficient and reliable diagnostic assessments in various clinical environments.

Abbreviations

US Ultrasound

AoP Angle of progression

CNN Convolutional neural network

PSFHSP Pubic symphysis-fetal head standard plane

PS Pubic symphysis

PSFHSP-Net Pubic symphysis-fetal head standard plane-network

BN Batch normalization

ACC Accuracy

ROC Receiver operating characteristic

AUC The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve

Data and material availability

The whole dataset used for the PSFHS challenge of MICCAI2023 (https://ps-fh-aop-2023.grand-challenge.org/) includes two parts: one is this PSFHS dataset (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10969427) and another is from the JNU-IFM dataset (10.6084/m9.figshare.14371652). These images can also be used for the Intrapartum Ultrasound Grand Challenge (IUGC) 2024 of MICCAI 2024 (https://codalab.lisn.upsaclay.fr/competitions/18413). For transparency and reproducibility, the source code of our model has been made publicly accessible at https://github.com/Yaucleo/HPSSPNet.

Author contribution

(I) Conception and design: R.Q. and J.B.; (II) administrative support: Y.L.; (III) provision of study materials or patients: Y.L.; (IV) collection and assembly of data: Y.L. and J.B.; (V) data analysis and interpretation: R.Q.; (VI) manuscript writing: all authors; (VII) final approval of manuscript: all authors.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions. This research was funded by the Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou (2023B03J1297), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2024A1515011886 and 2023A1515012833), Guangzhou Municipal Science and Technology Bureau Guangzhou Key Research and Development Program (2024B03J1283 and 2024B03J1289), the Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou (202201010544), the China Scholarship Council, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61901192), Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Informatization (2021B1212040007), and National Key Research and Development Project (2019YFC0120100 and 2019YFC0121907).

Declarations

Ethics approval

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). The study was approved by Medical Ethics Committee board of NanFang Hospital of Southern Medical University (No.: NFCE-2019-024).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Carson PL Ultrasound: imaging, development, application Med Phys 2023 50 Suppl 1 35 39 10.1002/mp.16293 36928605
Carson PL (2023) Ultrasound: imaging, development, application. Med Phys 50(Suppl 1):35–3936928605 10.1002/mp.16293
2. Chan VYT Lau WL Intrapartum ultrasound and the choice between assisted vaginal and cesarean delivery Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 2021 3 100439 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100439 34216834
Chan VYT, Lau WL (2021) Intrapartum ultrasound and the choice between assisted vaginal and cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM 3:10043934216834 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100439
3. Ghi T Eggebø T Lees C Kalache K Rozenberg P Youssef A Salomon LJ Tutschek B ISUOG Practice Guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018 52 128 139 10.1002/uog.19072 29974596
Ghi T, Eggebø T, Lees C, Kalache K, Rozenberg P, Youssef A, Salomon LJ, Tutschek B (2018) ISUOG Practice Guidelines: intrapartum ultrasound, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 52:128–13929974596 10.1002/uog.19072
4. Chen H Wu L Dou Q Qin J Li S Cheng JZ Ni D Heng PA Ultrasound standard plane detection using a composite neural network framework IEEE Trans Cybernet 2017 47 1576 1586 10.1109/TCYB.2017.2685080
Chen H, Wu L, Dou Q, Qin J, Li S, Cheng JZ, Ni D, Heng PA (2017) Ultrasound standard plane detection using a composite neural network framework. IEEE Trans Cybernet 47:1576–158610.1109/TCYB.2017.2685080
5. Tormen M Dareggi E Morrone S Stefanizzi L Salvioli S Association between ultrasound measured angle of progression and remaining time in labor: a systematic review The J Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Med 2022 35 9006 9013 10.1080/14767058.2021.2011200
Tormen M, Dareggi E, Morrone S, Stefanizzi L, Salvioli S (2022) Association between ultrasound measured angle of progression and remaining time in labor: a systematic review. The J Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Med 35:9006–901310.1080/14767058.2021.2011200
6. Slimani S Hounka S Mahmoudi A Rehah T Laoudiyi D Saadi H Bouziyane A Lamrissi A Jalal M Bouhya S Akiki M Bouyakhf Y Badaoui B Radgui A Mhlanga M Bouyakhf EH Fetal biometry and amniotic fluid volume assessment end-to-end automation using Deep Learning Nat Commun 2023 14 7047 10.1038/s41467-023-42438-5 37923713
Slimani S, Hounka S, Mahmoudi A, Rehah T, Laoudiyi D, Saadi H, Bouziyane A, Lamrissi A, Jalal M, Bouhya S, Akiki M, Bouyakhf Y, Badaoui B, Radgui A, Mhlanga M, Bouyakhf EH (2023) Fetal biometry and amniotic fluid volume assessment end-to-end automation using Deep Learning. Nat Commun 14:704737923713 10.1038/s41467-023-42438-5
7. Lu Y Zhou M Zhi D Zhou M Jiang X Qiu R Ou Z Wang H Qiu D Zhong M Lu X Chen G Bai J The JNU-IFM dataset for segmenting pubic symphysis-fetal head Data Brief 2022 41 107904 10.1016/j.dib.2022.107904 35198683
Lu Y, Zhou M, Zhi D, Zhou M, Jiang X, Qiu R, Ou Z, Wang H, Qiu D, Zhong M, Lu X, Chen G, Bai J (2022) The JNU-IFM dataset for segmenting pubic symphysis-fetal head. Data Brief 41:10790435198683 10.1016/j.dib.2022.107904
8. Bai J Sun Z Yu S Lu Y Long S Wang H Qiu R Ou Z Zhou M Zhi D Zhou M Jiang X Chen G A framework for computing angle of progression from transperineal ultrasound images for evaluating fetal head descent using a novel double branch network Front Physiol 2022 13 940150 10.3389/fphys.2022.940150 36531181
Bai J, Sun Z, Yu S, Lu Y, Long S, Wang H, Qiu R, Ou Z, Zhou M, Zhi D, Zhou M, Jiang X, Chen G (2022) A framework for computing angle of progression from transperineal ultrasound images for evaluating fetal head descent using a novel double branch network. Front Physiol 13:94015036531181 10.3389/fphys.2022.940150
9. Yeh WC Huang SW Li PC Liver fibrosis grade classification with B-mode ultrasound Ultrasound Med Biol 2003 29 1229 1235 10.1016/S0301-5629(03)01010-X 14553797
Yeh WC, Huang SW, Li PC (2003) Liver fibrosis grade classification with B-mode ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 29:1229–123514553797 10.1016/S0301-5629(03)01010-X
10. Lei B Tan EL Chen S Zhuo L Li S Ni D Wang T Automatic recognition of fetal facial standard plane in ultrasound image via fisher vector PLoS One 2015 10 e0121838 10.1371/journal.pone.0121838 25933215
Lei B, Tan EL, Chen S, Zhuo L, Li S, Ni D, Wang T (2015) Automatic recognition of fetal facial standard plane in ultrasound image via fisher vector. PLoS One 10:e012183825933215 10.1371/journal.pone.0121838
11. Ni D Li T Yang X Qin J Li S Chin C-T Ouyang S Wang T Chen S Selective search and sequential detection for standard plane localization in ultrasound, Abdominal Imaging Computation and Clinical Applications: 5th International Workshop, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2013, Nagoya, Japan, September 22, 2013. Proceedings 5 2013 Springer 203 211
Ni D, Li T, Yang X, Qin J, Li S, Chin C-T, Ouyang S, Wang T, Chen S (2013) Selective search and sequential detection for standard plane localization in ultrasound, Abdominal Imaging. In: Computation and Clinical Applications: 5th International Workshop, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2013, Nagoya, Japan, September 22, 2013. Proceedings 5. Springer, pp 203–211
12. Qu R Xu G Ding C Jia W Sun M Standard plane identification in fetal brain ultrasound scans using a differential convolutional neural network IEEE Access 2020 8 83821 83830 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2991845
Qu R, Xu G, Ding C, Jia W, Sun M (2020) Standard plane identification in fetal brain ultrasound scans using a differential convolutional neural network. IEEE Access 8:83821–8383010.1109/ACCESS.2020.2991845
13. Pu B Li K Li S Zhu N Automatic fetal ultrasound standard plane recognition based on deep learning and IIoT IEEE Trans Industr Inform 2021 17 7771 7780 10.1109/TII.2021.3069470
Pu B, Li K, Li S, Zhu N (2021) Automatic fetal ultrasound standard plane recognition based on deep learning and IIoT. IEEE Trans Industr Inform 17:7771–778010.1109/TII.2021.3069470
14. Montero A Bonet-Carne E Burgos-Artizzu XP Generative adversarial networks to improve fetal brain fine-grained plane classification Sensors 2021 21 23 7975 10.3390/s21237975 34883977
Montero A, Bonet-Carne E, Burgos-Artizzu XP (2021) Generative adversarial networks to improve fetal brain fine-grained plane classification. Sensors 21(23):797534883977 10.3390/s21237975
15. Moshfegh A Javadzadegan A Mohammadi M Ravipudi L Cheng S Martins R Development of an innovative technology to segment luminal borders of intravascular ultrasound image sequences in a fully automated manner Comput Biol Med 2019 108 111 121 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.03.008 31003174
Moshfegh A, Javadzadegan A, Mohammadi M, Ravipudi L, Cheng S, Martins R (2019) Development of an innovative technology to segment luminal borders of intravascular ultrasound image sequences in a fully automated manner. Comput Biol Med 108:111–12131003174 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.03.008
16. Fiorentino MC Villani FP Di Cosmo M Frontoni E Moccia S A review on deep-learning algorithms for fetal ultrasound-image analysis Med Image Anal 2023 83 102629 10.1016/j.media.2022.102629 36308861
Fiorentino MC, Villani FP, Di Cosmo M, Frontoni E, Moccia S (2023) A review on deep-learning algorithms for fetal ultrasound-image analysis. Med Image Anal 83:10262936308861 10.1016/j.media.2022.102629
17. Chen Z Ou Z Lu Y Bai J Direction-guided and multi-scale feature screening for fetal head–pubic symphysis segmentation and angle of progression calculation Expert Syst Appl 2024 245 123096 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.123096
Chen Z, Ou Z, Lu Y, Bai J (2024) Direction-guided and multi-scale feature screening for fetal head–pubic symphysis segmentation and angle of progression calculation. Expert Syst Appl 245:12309610.1016/j.eswa.2023.123096
18. Ma Y Klabjan D Diminishing batch normalization 2022 IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems
Y. Ma, D. Klabjan, Diminishing batch normalization, IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, (2022) 10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3210840.
19. Ji L Zhu Q Zhang Y Yin J Wei R Xiao J Xiao D Zhao G Cross-domain heterogeneous residual network for single image super-resolution Neural Netw 2022 149 84 94 10.1016/j.neunet.2022.02.008 35217397
Ji L, Zhu Q, Zhang Y, Yin J, Wei R, Xiao J, Xiao D, Zhao G (2022) Cross-domain heterogeneous residual network for single image super-resolution. Neural Netw 149:84–9435217397 10.1016/j.neunet.2022.02.008
20. Duan H Long Y Wang S Zhang H Willcocks CG Shao L Dynamic unary convolution in transformers IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2023 45 12747 12759 37018310
Duan H, Long Y, Wang S, Zhang H, Willcocks CG, Shao L (2023) Dynamic unary convolution in transformers. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 45:12747–1275937018310
21. Zhang W Chen Y Yang W Wang G Xue JH Liao Q Class-variant margin normalized softmax loss for deep face recognition IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 2021 32 4742 4747 10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3017528 32857706
Zhang W, Chen Y, Yang W, Wang G, Xue JH, Liao Q (2021) Class-variant margin normalized softmax loss for deep face recognition. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst 32:4742–474732857706 10.1109/TNNLS.2020.3017528
22. Kaya Y Gürsoy E A MobileNet-based CNN model with a novel fine-tuning mechanism for COVID-19 infection detection Soft Comput 2023 27 5521 5535 10.1007/s00500-022-07798-y 36618761
Kaya Y, Gürsoy E (2023) A MobileNet-based CNN model with a novel fine-tuning mechanism for COVID-19 infection detection. Soft Comput 27:5521–553536618761 10.1007/s00500-022-07798-y
23. Wang J Khan MA Wang S Zhang Y SNSVM: SqueezeNet-guided SVM for breast cancer diagnosis Comput Mater Continua 2023 76 2201 2216 10.32604/cmc.2023.041191
Wang J, Khan MA, Wang S, Zhang Y (2023) SNSVM: SqueezeNet-guided SVM for breast cancer diagnosis. Comput Mater Continua 76:2201–221610.32604/cmc.2023.041191
24. Fang S Yang J Wang M Liu C Liu S An improved image classification method for cervical precancerous lesions based on ShuffleNet Comput Intell Neurosci 2022 2022 9675628 10.1155/2022/9675628 36148422
Fang S, Yang J, Wang M, Liu C, Liu S (2022) An improved image classification method for cervical precancerous lesions based on ShuffleNet. Comput Intell Neurosci 2022:967562836148422 10.1155/2022/9675628
25. Chen H Ni D Qin J Li S Yang X Wang T Heng PA Standard plane localization in fetal ultrasound via domain transferred deep neural networks IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2015 19 1627 1636 10.1109/JBHI.2015.2425041 25910262
Chen H, Ni D, Qin J, Li S, Yang X, Wang T, Heng PA (2015) Standard plane localization in fetal ultrasound via domain transferred deep neural networks. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 19:1627–163625910262 10.1109/JBHI.2015.2425041
26. Sun T Ding S Guo L Low-degree term first in ResNet, its variants and the whole neural network family Neural Netw 2022 148 155 165 10.1016/j.neunet.2022.01.012 35134597
Sun T, Ding S, Guo L (2022) Low-degree term first in ResNet, its variants and the whole neural network family. Neural Netw 148:155–16535134597 10.1016/j.neunet.2022.01.012
27. Montaha S Azam S Rafid A Hasan MZ Karim A Hasib KM Patel SK Jonkman M Mannan ZI MNet-10: a robust shallow convolutional neural network model performing ablation study on medical images assessing the effectiveness of applying optimal data augmentation technique Front Med 2022 9 924979 10.3389/fmed.2022.924979
Montaha S, Azam S, Rafid A, Hasan MZ, Karim A, Hasib KM, Patel SK, Jonkman M, Mannan ZI (2022) MNet-10: a robust shallow convolutional neural network model performing ablation study on medical images assessing the effectiveness of applying optimal data augmentation technique. Front Med 9:92497910.3389/fmed.2022.924979
28. Guo J Tan G Wu F Wen H Li K Fetal ultrasound standard plane detection with coarse-to-fine multi-task learning IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 2023 27 5023 5031 10.1109/JBHI.2022.3209589 36173776
Guo J, Tan G, Wu F, Wen H, Li K (2023) Fetal ultrasound standard plane detection with coarse-to-fine multi-task learning. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 27:5023–503136173776 10.1109/JBHI.2022.3209589
29. Tian C Xu Y Li Z Zuo W Fei L Liu H Attention-guided CNN for image denoising Neural Netw 2020 124 117 129 10.1016/j.neunet.2019.12.024 31991307
Tian C, Xu Y, Li Z, Zuo W, Fei L, Liu H (2020) Attention-guided CNN for image denoising. Neural Netw 124:117–12931991307 10.1016/j.neunet.2019.12.024
30. Tian C Xu Y Zuo W Image denoising using deep CNN with batch renormalization Neural Netw 2020 121 461 473 10.1016/j.neunet.2019.08.022 31629201
Tian C, Xu Y, Zuo W (2020) Image denoising using deep CNN with batch renormalization. Neural Netw 121:461–47331629201 10.1016/j.neunet.2019.08.022
31. Zhou M Wang C Lu Y Qiu R Zeng R Zhi D Jiang X Ou Z Wang H Chen G Bai J The segmentation effect of style transfer on fetal head ultrasound image: a study of multi-source data Med Biol Eng Comput 2023 61 1017 1031 10.1007/s11517-022-02747-1 36645647
Zhou M, Wang C, Lu Y, Qiu R, Zeng R, Zhi D, Jiang X, Ou Z, Wang H, Chen G, Bai J (2023) The segmentation effect of style transfer on fetal head ultrasound image: a study of multi-source data. Med Biol Eng Comput 61:1017–103136645647 10.1007/s11517-022-02747-1
32. Chen G Bai J Ou Z Lu Y Wang H PSFHS: intrapartum ultrasound image dataset for AI-based segmentation of pubic symphysis and fetal head 2024 Scientific Data
Chen G, Bai J, Ou Z, Lu Y, Wang H (2024) PSFHS: intrapartum ultrasound image dataset for AI-based segmentation of pubic symphysis and fetal head. Scientific Data
33. Ou Z, Bai J, Chen Z, Lu Y, Wang H, Long S, Chen G (2024) RTSeg-Net: a lightweight network for real-time segmentation of fetal head and pubic symphysis from intrapartum ultrasound images. Comput Biol Med:108501. 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108501
