
==== Front
Radiol Med
Radiol Med
La Radiologia Medica
0033-8362
1826-6983
Springer Milan Milan

39117936
1862
10.1007/s11547-024-01862-3
Diagnostic Imaging in Oncology
ASL, DSC, DCE perfusion MRI and 18F-DOPA PET/CT in differentiating glioma recurrence from post-treatment changes
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0149-9918
Moltoni Giulia giulia.moltoni@uniroma1.it

1
Romano Andrea 1
Capriotti Gabriela 2
Campagna Giuseppe 2
Ascolese Anna Maria 3
Romano Allegra 1
Dellepiane Francesco 1
Minniti Giuseppe 45
Signore Alberto 2
Bozzao Alessandro 1
1 grid.7841.a NESMOS, Department of Neuroradiology, S. Andrea Hospital, University Sapienza, Via di Grottarossa 1035/1039, 00189 Rome, Italy
2 grid.7841.a Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, University of Rome “Sapienza”, Rome, Italy
3 grid.7841.a SMCMT Department, Radiotherapy Oncology, S. Andrea Hospital, University Sapienza, Rome, Italy
4 https://ror.org/02be6w209 grid.7841.a Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00138 Rome, Italy
5 https://ror.org/00cpb6264 grid.419543.e 0000 0004 1760 3561 IRCCS Neuromed, 86077 Pozzilli, Italy
8 8 2024
8 8 2024
2024
129 9 13821393
17 4 2024
25 7 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Objectives

To discriminate between post-treatment changes and tumor recurrence in patients affected by glioma undergoing surgery and chemoradiation with a new enhancing lesion is challenging. We aimed to evaluate the role of ASL, DSC, DCE perfusion MRI, and 18F-DOPA PET/CT in distinguishing tumor recurrence from post-treatment changes in patients with glioma.

Materials and methods

We prospectively enrolled patients with treated glioma (surgery plus chemoradiation) and a new enhancing lesion doubtful for recurrence or post-treatment changes. Each patient underwent a 1.5T MRI examination, including ASL, DSC, and DCE PWI, and an 18F-DOPA PET/CT examination. For each lesion, we measured ASL-derived CBF and normalized CBF, DSC-derived rCBV, DCE-derived Ktrans, Vp, Ve, Kep, and PET/CT-derived SUV maximum. Clinical and radiological follow-up determined the diagnosis of tumor recurrence or post-treatment changes.

Results

We evaluated 29 lesions (5 low-grade gliomas and 24 high-grade gliomas); 14 were malignancies, and 15 were post-treatment changes.

CBF ASL, nCBF ASL, rCBV DSC, and PET SUVmax were associated with tumor recurrence from post-treatment changes in patients with glioma through an univariable logistic regression.

Whereas the multivariable logistic regression results showed only nCBF ASL (p = 0.008) was associated with tumor recurrence from post-treatment changes in patients with glioma with OR = 22.85, CI95%: (2.28–228.77).

Conclusion

In our study, ASL was the best technique, among the other two MRI PWI and the 18F-DOPA PET/CT PET, in distinguishing disease recurrence from post-treatment changes in treated glioma.

Keywords

Glioma
Post-treatment changes
Tumor recurrence
PET
MRI perfusion
Università degli Studi di Roma La SapienzaOpen access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza within the CRUI-CARE Agreement.

issue-copyright-statement© Italian Society of Medical Radiology 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Glioma is the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults, with dismal overall survival for high-grade glioma and risk for recurrence and transformation into high-grade tumors for low-grade glioma. The current therapeutic protocol is based on surgery followed by chemotherapy and radiotherapy [1, 2].

The combined and adjuvant use of chemotherapy and radiation therapy improves survival but, on the other hand, increases the risk of developing post-treatment changes (PTC).

One of the most challenging differential diagnoses for neuroradiologists is distinguishing tumor recurrence (TR) from PTC. Indeed, even if these conditions are completely different in terms of pathophysiology [3, 4], they may appear similar on conventional MRI images showing edema and contrast enhancement [5]. To reach this goal, recent literature has focused on advanced imaging techniques [6].

Perfusion-weighted MRI (PWI) techniques have shown promising results [7], and to date, the most studied PWI sequence is dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC)-enhanced perfusion [8–11]. DSC allows for the estimation of tissue microvascular density, especially through the measurement of cerebral blood volume (CBV) [12, 13], but it has issues such as the T1-relaxation effect, susceptibility artifacts, and the difficulty of evaluating small cortical lesions close to cortical vessels [14].

Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) perfusion mainly investigates microvascular permeability [14]. Despite information from different DCE-derived parameters, it is still debated which of these parameters is most useful for the differential diagnosis between TR and PTC [15].

Compared to the other two PWI techniques, arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion has the advantage of not requiring the administration of contrast media, using arterial blood flow as an endogenous tracer, and allowing for tissue perfusion measurements through the measurement of cerebral blood flow (CBF) [14]. With the advent of the newer three-dimensional pseudocontinuous ASL (3D PCASL) [16, 17], this PWI may become a promising perfusion MRI technique in distinguishing recurrent neoplasm from treatment effects [18–27].

Parallel to advanced MRI sequences, PET examination with amino acid radiopharmaceutical may be helpful in differentiating TR from PTC [27], particularly 6-[18F]-fluoro-L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (18F-DOPA), which seems to be a valid tool to diagnose glioma recurrence [28, 29].

The purpose of our study is to evaluate the role of the three different PWI techniques (DSC, DCE, and ASL) and 18F-DOPA PET/CT in distinguishing TR from PTC in patients with glioma treated with standard-of-care surgery and chemoradiation. To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive study of all three PWI methods and 18F-DOPA-PET/CT examination in a group of patients with glioma.

Materials and methods

This study was approved by an institutional review board. Written informed consent was obtained from patients, and all clinical investigations were conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Study design and patients

From January 2021 to September 2023, 21 patients (11 men and 10 women; age range 28–76 years) who were being treated for glioma were prospectively and consecutively enrolled. Inclusion criteria were:Completion of standardized treatment, including gross total resection followed by radiation therapy and temozolomide chemotherapy.

Presence of a contrast-enhanced lesion with findings inconclusive of TR or PTC on follow-up MRI performed at least 3 months after radiation treatment.

No contraindications to undergo an MRI with contrast medium administration and an 18F-DOPA PET/CT examination.

The final diagnosis of TR or PTC was made based on radiologic and clinical evaluation with a final consensus decision made by a neuroradiologist (A.R. 15 years of experience) and a neurooncologist (A.M.A. 15 years of experience), both blinded to perfusion MRI and 18F-DOPA PET/CT data. Tumor recurrence was defined as a progressive increase in size, contrast enhancement, and mass effect despite steroid therapy in at least three subsequent MRI follow-up studies in an observational period of at least 9 months, in combination with deteriorating neurologic symptoms. Non-recurrence was defined on imaging as stable or resolving regions of enhancement over at least a 9-month observational period, accompanied by neurologic improvement during the follow-up period.

Imaging acquisition

Each patient underwent an MRI and a PET/CT examination within 15 days of each other.

MRI

All MRI examinations were performed using a 1.5 T (Signa Voyager, GE) with a 32-channel array head coil. Along with conventional sequences (T1- and T2-weighted images, FLAIR, DWI with ADC map, and post-contrast 3D T1-weighted fast spoiled gradient-echo (FSPGR) images), the three PWI sequences were performed as follows:3D PCASL before contrast-medium administration, labeling with a 3D stack-of-spirals fast spin echo readout (labeling duration: 1800 ms; post-labeling delay: 2025 ms; spiral interleaves: 8; points per spiral: 512; slice thickness: 4.0 mm; FOV: 24–26 cm; in-plane resolution: 3.64–4.53 mm2; bandwidth: 62.5 kHz; TE/TR:10.9/4840 ms; scan time: 4–5 min).

DCE acquired before, during, and after the administration of a bolus of gadolinium-based MRI contrast agent (GBCA) followed by a saline flush using a 3D radial volumetric interpolated examination sequence (TR/TE: 4.5/1.6 ms; flip angle: 12°; slice thickness: 2.20 mm; FOV: 24–26 cm; bandwidth = 41.67 kHz; scan time: 8 min)

DSC performed after DCE using the contrast medium agent previously administered for the DCE acquisition as a preload to correct the T1-relaxation effect. DSC was acquired before, during, and after the administration of a second bolus of GBCA followed by a saline flush using a single-shot gradient-echo echo planar imaging sequence (TR/TE, 1500/40 ms; flip angle: 60°; slice thickness: 4 mm; FOV 24–26 cm; bandwidth = 250 kHz; scan time: 90 s).

Gadoteric acid, with a total volume of 0.2 ml/kg of body weight and a flow of 3.5 ml/s, was used to accomplish both DCE and DSC, respectively, using 40% of the contrast volume for DCE acquisition and the remaining 60% for DSC scanning.

PET/CT

Patients underwent a protein fast for at least 4 hours. Patients did not receive pre-scanning Carbidopa administration. Twenty minutes after the injection of 2 MBq/kg of 18F-DOPA, a dedicated CT scan of the brain (120 kV, 80 mAs, 3 mm slice collimation) was performed, followed by a brain-centered static 3D PET (Biograph mCT, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) acquisition time of 15 min.

Imaging analysis

MRI

Maps of ASL-derived CBF were generated from the 3D PCASL images using ReadyView ASL (GE Healthcare); maps of DSC-derived rCBV were generated from the DSC-MRI images using ReadyView BrainStat AIF (GE Healthcare); maps of DCE-derived transfer constant (Ktrans), fractional volume of the plasma space (Vp), fractional volume of the extravascular extracellular space (Ve), and reverse transfer rate constant (Kep) were generated from the DCE-MRI images using ReadyView GeniQ (GE Healthcare) with automatic computation of the Arterial Input Function. The ASL CBF, DSC rCBV, DCE Ktrans, DCE Vp, DCE Ve, and DCE Kep maps were co-registered with 3D post-contrast T1-weighted images using Volume Viewer (GE Healthcare), generating fused perfusion and contrast-enhanced images.

Using the co-registered images, distinct circular ROIs corresponding to the regions of contrast enhancement with the highest perfusion signal were put on each perfusion map by a board-certified neuroradiologist with 5 years of experience (G.M.), who was blinded to patient clinical information and PET/CT data. Susceptibility artifacts and vessels were avoided.

The normalized values (ASL nCBF) for the ASL perfusion were obtained by placing an extra ROI on the contralateral normal cerebral cortex. This ROI was created by dividing the mean signal intensity within the ROI at the region of contrast-enhancement by the mean signal intensity within the contralateral ROI.

PET/CT

Using scatter and attenuation correction, PET/CT images were rebuilt using the OSEM iterative technique (5 iterations, 24 subsets). Using Siemens SyngoVia software, 18F-DOPA PET was methodically merged to contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI sequences for visual reading. A qualified nuclear medicine physician (G.C., 15 years of experience) quantitatively examined the images. To calculate the maximum standardized uptake values (PET SUVmax), a spherical ROI was placed on the maximum lesion uptake.

The ROIs of the possible residual tumor were positioned at the location of the greatest MRI anomalies using a fused display of PET and post-contrast 3D T1-weighted imaging when no abnormal 18F-DOPA uptake was seen.

Statistical analysis

Brunner Munzel test was performed to compare perfusion and 18F-DOPA PET/CT values in tumor recurrence and post-treatment changes. The symmetry/normality of these parameters was tested by Shapiro–Wilk test and checking of Q–Q plot.

A violin and box plots were performed to represent eventual differences between perfusion and 18F-DOPA PET/CT values in tumor recurrence and post-treatment changes.

Association between tumor recurrence from post-treatment changes in patients with glioma (dependent parameter) and ASL, DSC, DCE perfusion MRI, and 18F-DOPA PET/CT (independent parameters) was evaluated by univariable and multivariable logistic regression; in the latter the selection method was backward.

Univariable regression was performed to individually evaluate which independent parameters were associated with the dependent parameter.

Statistical analysis was performed using SAS version 9.4 TS Level 1 M8 and JMP PRO version 17 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically detectable.

Results

Our inclusion criteria were met by 31 lesions (4 with low-grade gliomas and 17 with high-grade gliomas) in 21 patients. Two lesions (low-grade glioma) were excluded due to a change in patient treatment to a second-line option during follow-up. Out of the remaining 29 lesions that were part of the study, 15 turned out to be PTC and 14 turned out to be TR (5 low-grade gliomas and 24 high-grade gliomas) (see Table 1 for demographic characteristics).Table 1 Demographic characteristics

Patient No.	Age (Years)	Sex	Lesion No.	Tumor type	WHO grade	Lesion site	RT dose (Gy)	Time from RT to imaging (months)	ChT	Lesion classification	
1	63	F	1	GBM IDH-WT	IV	Right frontal	60	8	TMZ	PTC	
2	71	M	2	GBM IDH-WT	IV	Left temporal	60	7	TMZ	TR	
3	47	M	3	GBM IDH-MUT	IV	Right temporal	60	4	TMZ	TR	
			4	GBM IDH-MUT	IV	Right temporal	60	4	TMZ	TR	
4	58	M	5	Astrocytoma	II	Left parietal	60	7	TMZ	PTC	
			6	Astrocytoma	II	Left parietal	60	7	TMZ	PTC	
5	75	M	7	GBM IDH-WT	IV	Left parietal	40.5	8	TMZ	PTC	
6	60	M	8	GBM IDH-WT	IV	Right temporal	37.5	6	TMZ	TR	
			9	GBM IDH-WT	IV	Right parietal	37.5	6	TMZ	PTC	
7	57	F	10	GBM IDH-WT	IV	Left temporo-parietal	60	12	TMZ	PTC	
8	48	M	11	GBM IDH-WT	IV	Left frontal	60	6	TMZ	TR	
			12	GBM IDH-WT	IV	Left frontal	60	6	TMZ	TR	
9	60	F	13	GBM IDH-WT	IV	Left frontal	60	13	TMZ	PTC	
			14	GBM IDH-WT	IV	Left frontal	60	13	TMZ	PTC	
			15	GBM IDH-WT	IV	Callosal	60	20	TMZ	TR	
10	60	M	16	GBM IDH-WT	IV	Right temporal	60	3	TMZ	TR	
11	76	M	17	GBM IDH-WT	IV	Right parietal	60	10	TMZ	TR	
12	28	F	18	Pleomorphic Xantho-astrocytoma	III	Left frontal	60	12	TMZ	PTC	
13	54	M	19	Oligodendroglioma	II	Left frontal	50.4	24	TMZ	TR	
			20	Oligodendroglioma	II	Left parietal	50.4	24	TMZ	TR	
14	47	F	21	Oligodendroglioma	II	Right frontal	60	15	TMZ	PTC	
15	34	M	22	Astrocytoma IDH-Mut	III	Right frontal	60	5	TMZ	TR	
			23	Astrocytoma IDH-Mut	III	Right frontal	60	5	TMZ	TR	
			24	Astrocytoma IDH-Mut	III	Right frontal	60	5	TMZ	PTC	
16	60	F	25	GBM IDH-WT	IV	Left temporal	60	6	TMZ	PTC	
17	32	F	26	Astrocytoma IDH-Mut	III	Left temporal	60	6	TMZ	PTC	
18	52	F	27	Astrocytoma IDH-Mut	III	Left frontal	60	13	TMZ	PTC	
19	56	F	28	Astrocytoma IDH-Mut	III	Left temporal	60	5	TMZ	TR	
20	63	M	29	GBM IDH-WT	IV	Right parietal	60	7	TMZ	PTC	
RT, radiation therapy; ChT, chemotherapy; GBM, glioblastoma, IDH-WT, isocitrate dehydrogenase-wild type; IDH-Mut, isocitrate dehydrogenase-mutant; TMZ, Temozolomide; TR, tumor recurrence; PTC, post-treatment changes

We found detectable differences concerning ASL, DSC, DEC_Ve, and 18F-DOPA PET/CT comparing TR and PTC (Fig. 1). No similar results were obtained for the other DCE parameters.Fig. 1 Box-plot comparing different parameters at post-treatment changes and tumor recurrence. a CBF_ASL, b nCBF_ASL, c rCBV_DSC, d SUVmax_PET; e Vp_DCE, f Ktrans_DCE, g Ve_DCE, h Kep_DCE). ASL = Arterial Spin Labeling; CBF = Cerebral Blood Flow; DSC = dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion; DCE = Dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion; rCBV = relative cerebral blood volume; Kep = rate constant; Ktrans = transfer constant; Ve = fractional volume of the extravascular extracellular space; Vp = fractional volume of the plasma space; SUVmax = maximum standardized uptake values

Table 2, on the left side, showed univariable logistic regression results. Four parameters (CBF ASL, nCBF ASL, rCBV DSC, and PET SUVmax) were associated with tumor recurrence from post-treatment changes in patients with glioma (Figs. 2, 3)Table 2 Univariable and multivariable logistic regression of tumor recurrence from post-treatment changes in patients with glioma according to MRI perfusion and PET parameters

Variable	Univariable logistic regression Odds Ratio (95%CI) (Beta ± SE)	p	Multivariable logistic regression Odds Ratio (95%CI) (Beta ± SE)	p	
CBF ASL	1.05 (1.01 to 1.08)

(0.05 ± 0.02)

	0.01	0.41 (0.008 to 20.39)

(− 0.88 ± 1.99)

	0.66	
nCBF ASL	22.85 (2.28 to 228.77)

(3.13 ± 1.18)

	0.008	22.85 (2.28 to 228.77)

(3.13 ± 1.18)

	0.008	
Ktrans DCE	0.42 (0.02 to 7.28)

(− 0.87 ± 1.46)

	0.55	39.67 (− ∞ to + ∞)

(3.69 ± 12.61)

	0.77	
Ve DCE	14.51 (0.95 to 222.59)

(2.67 ± 1.39)

	0.055	0.009 (− ∞ to + ∞)

(− 4.69 ± 8.31)

	0.57	
Kep DCE	2.02 (0.81 to 5.06)

(0.70 ± 0.47)

	0.13	0.02 (− ∞ to 73.77)

(− 4.01 ± 4.24)

	0.34	
Vp DCE	 + ∞ (0.22 to + ∞)

(11.37 ± 6.57)

	0.08	− ∞ (− ∞ to + ∞)

(− 22.62 ± 25.84)

	0.38	
rCBV DSC	1.76 (1.11 to 2.78)

(0.56 to 0.23)

	0.016	17.45 (0.07 to + ∞)

(2.86 to 2.82)

	0.31	
SUVmax	3.38 (1.39 to 8.24)

(1.22 ± 0.45)

	0.007	2.80 (0.08 to 103.36)

(1.03 ± 1.84)

	0.58	
Statistically significant results are in bold (p < 0.05)

ASL = arterial spin labeling; CBF = cerebral blood flow; DSC = dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion; DCE = dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion; rCBV = relative cerebral blood volume; Kep = rate constant; Ktrans = transfer constant; Ve = fractional volume of the extravascular extracellular space; Vp = fractional volume of the plasma space; SUVmax = maximum standardized uptake values

Fig. 2 A representative case of high-grade glioma with two enhancing lesions in the left frontal lobe (a, arrows) appeared 6 months after radiation therapy. Lesions showed increased ASL_CBF (b, arrows), increased 18F-DOPA uptake (c, arrows), increased DSC_rCBV, particularly evident in the posterior lesion (d, arrows), doubtful DCE_Ve increase in the posterior lesion (e, arrowhead) and increased DCE_Ve values in the anterior lesion (f arrow). f 6-month follow-up MRI showing progression in lesion contrast enhancement and size, and a new lesion (arrowhead) as the expression of the disease recurrence. ASL, PET, and DSC correctly identify the tumoral nature of the lesions; Ve misclassified the posterior lesion. ASL = arterial spin labeling; CBF = cerebral blood flow; DSC = dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion; DCE = dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion; CBV = cerebral blood volume; Ve = fractional volume of the extravascular extracellular space

Fig. 3 A representative case of a high-grade glioma with an enhancing lesion in the left parietal lobe (a, arrow) occurring 8 months after radiation therapy. The lesion did not show high values of ASL_CBF (b, arrowhead), DSC_rCBV (d, arrowhead), or a significant increase in 18F-DOPA PET uptake (c, arrowhead). DCE_Ve showed foci of increased values (e, arrow). Nine-month MRI follow-up showed the stability of the lesion with a slight reduction in contrast enhancement (f, arrow). The lesion was classified as post-treatment changes, and ASL, DSC, and PET were concordant and negative, whereas DCE_Ve misclassified the lesion. ASL = arterial spin labeling; CBF = cerebral blood flow; DSC = dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion; DCE = dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion; CBV = cerebral blood volume; Ve = fractional volume of the extravascular extracellular space

Table 2, on the right side, reported the results of the multivariable logistic regression. Only nCBF ASL (p = 0.008) was associated with tumor recurrence from post-treatment changes in patients with glioma with OR = 22.85, CI95%: (2.28–228.77) (Figs. 4, 5). Particularly, patients who showed an increase in this parameter had a risk of recurrence of approximately 23 times compared to subjects who did not experience it.Fig. 4 A representative case of high-grade glioma with a linear enhancing lesion in the left front-basal region, close to the surgical site, occurred 8 months after radiation therapy (a, arrow). The enhancing lesion did not show an increase in ASL_CBF (b, arrow); DSC-rCBV evaluation was difficult because of the proximity to bone structures (d, circle); and DCE_Ve was slightly increased (e, arrow). The uptake of 18F-DOPA was high (c, arrow). Six months of MRI follow-up showed a massive reduction in contrast enhancement (f, arrow). ASL correctly classified the lesion, whereas the linear 18F-DOPA uptake close to the surgical site could be the expression of macrophages activation. ASL = arterial spin labeling; CBF = cerebral blood flow; DSC = dynamic susceptibility contrast enhanced perfusion; DCE = dynamic contrast enhanced perfusion; CBV = cerebral blood volume; Ve = fractional volume of the extravascular extracellular space

Fig. 5 A representative case of high-grade glioma with a new enhancing lesion appeared 3 months after radiation therapy (a, arrow); the patient was included in our study, and after 2 months he underwent MRI and PET examination following study protocol (b, squared images). On T1 post-contrast WI, the lesion was increased in size (b, arrow), the ASL_CBF map showed no increment of CBF (b, arrowhead), and 18F-DOPA PET/TC showed an increased uptake (b, circle). T1 post-contrast WI acquired, respectively, after 3 (c) and 6 (d) months, showed a progressive reduction of contrast enhancement and lesion size until, after 9 months (e), the lesion was no longer present. This is a case of pseudoprogression with a false positive PET/CT and a true negative ASL classification. ASL = arterial spin labeling; CBF = cerebral blood flow; DSC = dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion; DCE = dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion; CBV = cerebral blood volume; Ve = fractional volume of the extravascular extracellular space; WI = weighted imaging

Discussion

To differentiate disease recurrence from PTC in the follow-up MRI examination of patients with treated glioma is challenging and, at the same time, crucial in terms of patient management and prognosis.

In order to distinguish PTC from glioma recurrence, we assessed the diagnostic predictivity of ASL-PWI, DSC-PWI, DCE-PWI, and 18F-DOPA PET/CT in this investigation.

To date, only Seeger et al. [30] and Nguyen et al. [24] have compared all three PWI sequences; nobody all three PWI methods and 18F-DOPA-PET/CT in a group of patients with glioma.

Our results have highlighted that when the diagnostic techniques were individually assessed through a univariable analysis, three of them showed association in assessing recurrence compared to post-treatment changes in glioma: ASL-PWI (both the absolute and the normalized CBF), DSC-PWI, and 18F-DOPA PET/CT. On the other hand DCE-PWI did not show statistically detectable results.

Anyway, when the examined parameters were assessed through a multivariate analysis, the only statistically detectable parameter was the nCBF ASL, with a 23 times higher risk of disease recurrence in case of elevated nCBF values.

ASL superior performance to the other two PWI sequences is in concordance with the most recent literature.

DSC-PWI seems to be a quite useful technique for differentiating between glioma recurrence and radio-induced sequelae, as demonstrated by our univariable analysis, and has largely been described in the literature [16, 31]. However, when compared with PCASL, DSC-PWI loses its diagnostic power probably due to some issues intrinsic to the sequence such as the susceptibility artifacts when blood products are present, and the difficulty of identification of small or close to cortical vessels lesions. Manning et al. affirmed that ASL-nCBF has a higher AUC than DSC-derived parameters in differentiating progressive disease from pseudo-progression in treated glioblastoma [32], Wang et al. confirmed that 3D PCASL is a suitable substitute for DSC in separating radiation-induced brain injury from glioma recurrence [19], and Xu et al. found that PCASL is superior to DSC in discriminating between PTC and glioma recurrences [20]. Whereas Seeger et al. reported poor ASL performance [30]; anyway, this could be related to the use of a pulsed ASL (PASL) rather than the newest and recommended 3D PCASL [18, 33].

Concerning DCE-PWI, our results showed that only Ve was statistically significant when referring to box-plot graphics. Anyway in univariate and multivariate analysis none of DCE-derived parameters were useful in the predictivity of TR from PTC in treated glioma. In the literature, DCE results are not robust on this topic [34], with some authors reporting the best performance for Ktrans [35, 36], others for Ve [37], and others affirming the inferiority of DCE to DSC [3, 38]. We can speculate that the poor performance of DCE can be explained by the presence of permeability damages both in recurrences and in PTC.

Conversely, an increased CBF in glioma recurrences is easily explained by the abundant neoangiogenesis occurring in recurrences to supply the metabolic demand of tumoral tissue, whereas in radiation-induced brain injury, there is vascular dilation and endothelial injury without an increase in vascular density and consequently without an increased CBF. One of the most known ASL-PWI limits concerns inter-subject and intra-subject variability of CBF measurements, which could be influenced by multiple variables some patient-related (i.e., patient age, patient atherosclerotic condition) and others depending on sequence setting (i.e., labeling duration, post-labeling delay). Normalizing the CBF value for the contralateral cortex may help mitigate all these variables, and we believe that this is the reason why in the multivariate analysis the only statistically detectable parameter is the normalized CBF and not the absolute CBF value.

Concerning 18F-DOPA PET/CT, in concordance with previous research [29], our study reported good performance for PET SUVmax in univariate analysis and plot graphics. In the literature, it has been described the efficacy of 18F-DOPA PET for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment evaluation of patients with low and high-grade glioma, especially when compared with not advanced MRI sequences [39]. Particularly, 18F-DOPA could be extremely useful when MRI findings are negative or inconclusive in naive or recurrent neoplastic lesions [39].

Anyway, 18F-DOPA PET/CT is not statistically detectable when compared to the other techniques in multivariate analysis. We can speculate that this is imputable to some limits of this technique. Some authors reported cases of false positive uptake along surgical margins, caused by post-operative inflammatory changes and expression of amino acid transporter in activated macrophages [40, 41]

More recently, Chiaravalloti et al. [42] found that a high 18F-DOPA uptake soon after radiotherapy may be treatment-related and advised to be careful in this cohort of patients. A more recent systematic review [43] confirmed these limits, affirming that 18F-DOPA PET specificity for detecting recurrent gliomas was not optimal due to increased false positive rates caused by treatment responses such as edema and inflammatory tissue. Finally, Pellerin et al. [44] showed that 18F-DOPA PET is more inclined to misdiagnose pseudo-progression than ASL, reporting 5 false positives out of 58 cases by analyzing SUVmax compared to zero false positives based on ASL CBF [44]. In concordance with those studies, we found a few 18F-DOPA PET/CT false positive cases in our sample related to an uptake along surgical margins (Fig. 4), and to pseudo-progression (Fig. 5).

Berteaux et al. analyzed the role of the hybrid PET/MRI scanners using 18F-DOPA in treated glioma [45], showing how ASL sequences may help mitigate the lower specificity of 18F-DOPA PET in hemorrhagic lesions with macrophage activation with an AUC curve of 0.93 in the combined ASL/PET analysis, which is very similar to our ASL nCBF AUC curve (0.926) and superior to our PET SUVmax AUC curve (0.882) [45].

So, the hybrid PET/MRI scanners using 18F-DOPA seem to be not so superior to ASL MRI alone, in comparison with the great advantage of using a noninvasive MRI perfusion without the use of exogenous tracers, with possible positive repercussions on patient safety and health costs. For the same reasons, ASL MRI in the routine follow-up of patients with treated gliomas may avoid additional PET/CT examinations, sparing in terms of patient ionizing radiation exposure and health costs.

Our study has several limitations. First, the small and heterogeneous sample of patients, including high-grade and low-grade gliomas, could have affected the performance we reported. Thus, a study with a large and homogeneous sample is needed to validate the imaging techniques on the object. Second, a pathology examination was not available for confirmation of the diagnosis. Third, the use of a 1.5T MRI scanner rather than a 3T could have had an impact on ASL and DCE evaluation. Particularly, we cannot exclude that the poor DCE performance in our study could be related to the 1.5T scanner. Anyway, a recent meta-analysis on DCE, including studies performed at a 3T scanner, confirmed the moderate diagnostic accuracy of DCE in discriminating recurrent lesions from treatment-related changes in glioma [46]. Concerning ASL, no significant differences have been reported in the emerging literature when comparing PCASL acquired at 1.5T versus 3T [47, 48]. Indeed, Baas et al. affirmed that ASL imaging is reproducible at both field strengths, and even if scanning at 3T has the advantage of having a higher signal-to-noise ratio and allowing more extensive acquisition parameter optimization, ASL is a cost-effective and safe alternative to contrast agent-based perfusion at both field strengths [47]. Moreover, our ASL results, with particular regard to normalized CBF, are robust and in agreement with the literature suggesting that even a PCASL acquired at 1.5 T is a valid and helpful tool in discriminating glioma recurrence from radiation-induced changes.

Conclusion

With higher values in tumor recurrences as the expression of neoangiogenesis, PCASL seems to be the imaging modality that best predicts TC from PTC among the three MRI-PWI sequences and 18F-DOPA PET/CT.

nCBF ASL-derived parameter resulted to be the best parameter correlated to tumor recurrence.

DSC and 18F-DOPA PET/CT are valid tools with some limits such as susceptibility artifacts, difficult evaluation of cortical lesions for DSC, and possible false positives in case of pseudo-progression or uptake alongside surgical margins for 18F-DOPA PET/CT. DCE does not reach a good diagnostic performance.

In summary, ASL outperformed the other methods under investigation, and it also had the advantages of being simple to acquire and not requiring contrast medium injection.

Abbreviations

ASL Arterial spin labeling

CBF Cerebral blood flow

nCBF Normalized cerebral blood flow

rCBV Relative cerebral blood volume

DCE Dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion

DSC Dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion

Kep Rate constant

Ktrans Transfer constant

PTC Post-treatment changes

SUV_max Maximum standardized uptake values

TR Tumor recurrence

Ve Fractional volume of the extravascular extracellular space

Vp Fractional volume of the plasma space18F-DOPA=6-[18F]-fluoro-L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine

Author contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Giulia Moltoni, Andrea Romano, Gabriela Capriotti, Giuseppe Campagna, Anna Maria Ascolese, Allegra Romano, and Giuseppe Minniti. The study was supervised by Alberto Signore e Alessandro Bozzao. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Giulia Moltoni, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. Giulia Moltoni and Andrea Romano equally contributed to the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Data availability

Data generated or analyzed during the study are available from the corresponding author by request.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of our Institute.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Giulia Moltoni and Andrea Romano who equally contributed to the manuscript.
==== Refs
References

1. Stupp R Hegi ME Mason WP Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTCNCICtrial Lancet Oncol 2009 10 459 466 3 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70025-7 19269895
Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP et al (2009) Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTCNCICtrial. Lancet Oncol 10:459-466 319269895 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70025-7
2. Stupp R Mason WP van den Bent MJ Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma N Engl J Med 2005 352 10 987 996 10.1056/NEJMoa043330 15758009
Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352(10):987–99615758009 10.1056/NEJMoa043330
3. Nael K Bauer AH Hormigo A Multiparametric MRI for differentiation of radiation necrosis from recurrent tumor in patients with treated glioblastoma AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018 210 18 23 10.2214/AJR.17.18003 28952810
Nael K, Bauer AH, Hormigo A et al (2018) Multiparametric MRI for differentiation of radiation necrosis from recurrent tumor in patients with treated glioblastoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 210:18–2328952810 10.2214/AJR.17.18003
4. Brandsma D Stalpers L Taal W Sminia P van den Bent MJ Clinical features, mechanisms, and management of pseudoprogression in malignant gliomas Lancet Oncol 2008 9 453 461 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70125-6 18452856
Brandsma D, Stalpers L, Taal W, Sminia P, van den Bent MJ (2008) Clinical features, mechanisms, and management of pseudoprogression in malignant gliomas. Lancet Oncol 9:453–46118452856 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70125-6
5. Ellingson BM Wen PY Cloughesy TF Modified criteria for radiographic response assessment in glioblastoma clinical trials Neurother J Am Soc Exp Neurother 2017 14 307 320
Ellingson BM, Wen PY, Cloughesy TF (2017) Modified criteria for radiographic response assessment in glioblastoma clinical trials. Neurother J Am Soc Exp Neurother 14:307–320
6. Weller M Cloughesy T Perry JR Wick W Standards of care for treatment of recurrent glioblastoma—Are we there yet? Neuro Oncol 2013 15 4 27 10.1093/neuonc/nos273 23136223
Weller M, Cloughesy T, Perry JR, Wick W (2013) Standards of care for treatment of recurrent glioblastoma—Are we there yet? Neuro Oncol 15:4–2723136223 10.1093/neuonc/nos273
7. Lee J Chen MM Liu HL Ucisik FE Wintermark M Kumar VA Mr perfusion imaging for gliomas Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2024 32 73 83 10.1016/j.mric.2023.07.003 38007284
Lee J, Chen MM, Liu HL, Ucisik FE, Wintermark M, Kumar VA (2024) Mr perfusion imaging for gliomas. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 32:73–8338007284 10.1016/j.mric.2023.07.003
8. Feng A Yuan P Huang T Li L Lyu J Distinguishing tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis in treated glioblastoma using multiparametric MRI Acad Radiol 2022 29 1320 1331 10.1016/j.acra.2021.11.008 34896001
Feng A, Yuan P, Huang T, Li L, Lyu J (2022) Distinguishing tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis in treated glioblastoma using multiparametric MRI. Acad Radiol 29:1320–133134896001 10.1016/j.acra.2021.11.008
9. Bobek-Billewicz B Heinze S Awramienko-Wloczek A Majchrzak K Nowicka E Hebda A The use of MR perfusion parameters in differentiation between glioblastoma recurrence and radiation necrosis Folia Neuropathol 2023 61 371 378 10.5114/fn.2023.134180 38282486
Bobek-Billewicz B, Heinze S, Awramienko-Wloczek A, Majchrzak K, Nowicka E, Hebda A (2023) The use of MR perfusion parameters in differentiation between glioblastoma recurrence and radiation necrosis. Folia Neuropathol 61:371–37838282486 10.5114/fn.2023.134180
10. Panholzer J Malsiner-Walli G Grün B Kalev O Sonnberger M Pichler R Multiparametric analysis combining DSC-MR perfusion and [18F]FET-PET is superior to a single parameter approach for differentiation of progressive glioma from radiation necrosis Clin Neuroradiol 2024 34 351 360 10.1007/s00062-023-01372-1 38157019
Panholzer J, Malsiner-Walli G, Grün B, Kalev O, Sonnberger M, Pichler R (2024) Multiparametric analysis combining DSC-MR perfusion and [18F]FET-PET is superior to a single parameter approach for differentiation of progressive glioma from radiation necrosis. Clin Neuroradiol 34:351–36038157019 10.1007/s00062-023-01372-1
11. Gu X He X Wang H Li J Chen R Liu H Dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion-weighted imaging in differentiation between recurrence and pseudoprogression in high-grade glioma: a meta-analysis J Comput Assist Tomogr 2024 48 303 310 37654056
Gu X, He X, Wang H, Li J, Chen R, Liu H (2024) Dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion-weighted imaging in differentiation between recurrence and pseudoprogression in high-grade glioma: a meta-analysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 48:303–31037654056
12. Rempp KA Brix G Wenz F Becker CR Gückel F Lorenz WJ Quantification of regional cerebral blood flow and volume with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging Radiology 1994 193 637 641 10.1148/radiology.193.3.7972800 7972800
Rempp KA, Brix G, Wenz F, Becker CR, Gückel F, Lorenz WJ (1994) Quantification of regional cerebral blood flow and volume with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 193:637–6417972800 10.1148/radiology.193.3.7972800
13. Barajas RF Jr Chang JS Segal MR Differentiation of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme from radiation necrosis after external beam radiation therapy with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging Radiology 2009 253 486 496 10.1148/radiol.2532090007 19789240
Barajas RF Jr, Chang JS, Segal MR et al (2009) Differentiation of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme from radiation necrosis after external beam radiation therapy with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging. Radiology 253:486–49619789240 10.1148/radiol.2532090007
14. Welker K Boxerman J Kalnin A Kaufmann T Shiroishi M Wintermark M ASFNR recommendations for clinical performance of MR dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging of the brain Am J Neuroradiol 2015 36 E41 E51 10.3174/ajnr.A4341 25907520
Welker K, Boxerman J, Kalnin A, Kaufmann T, Shiroishi M, Wintermark M (2015) ASFNR recommendations for clinical performance of MR dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging of the brain. Am J Neuroradiol 36:E41–E5125907520 10.3174/ajnr.A4341
15. Essig M Nguyen TB Shiroishi MS Perfusion MRI: the five most frequently asked clinical questions AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013 201 W495 510 10.2214/AJR.12.9544 23971482
Essig M, Nguyen TB, Shiroishi MS et al (2013) Perfusion MRI: the five most frequently asked clinical questions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:W495-51023971482 10.2214/AJR.12.9544
16. Zhang J Wang Y Wang Y Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation between glioma recurrence and pseudoprogression: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression Quant Imaging Med Surg 2022 12 4805 4822 10.21037/qims-22-32 36185045
Zhang J, Wang Y, Wang Y et al (2022) Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in the differentiation between glioma recurrence and pseudoprogression: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Quant Imaging Med Surg 12:4805–482236185045 10.21037/qims-22-32
17. Alsop DC Detre JA Golay X Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: a consensus of the SMRM Perfusion Study Group and the European Consortium for ASL in dementia Magn Reson Med 2015 73 102 116 10.1002/mrm.25197 24715426
Alsop DC, Detre JA, Golay X et al (2015) Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: a consensus of the SMRM Perfusion Study Group and the European Consortium for ASL in dementia. Magn Reson Med 73:102–11624715426 10.1002/mrm.25197
18. Lindner T Bolar DS Achten E Current state and guidance on arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI in clinical neuroimaging Magn Reson Med 2023 89 2024 2047 10.1002/mrm.29572 36695294
Lindner T, Bolar DS, Achten E et al (2023) Current state and guidance on arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI in clinical neuroimaging. Magn Reson Med 89:2024–204736695294 10.1002/mrm.29572
19. Wang Y-L Chen S Xiao H-F Differentiation between radiation-induced brain injury and glioma recurrence using 3D PCASL and dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion-weighted imaging Radiother Oncol 2018 129 68–74 33
Wang Y-L, Chen S, Xiao H-F et al (2018) Differentiation between radiation-induced brain injury and glioma recurrence using 3D PCASL and dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion-weighted imaging. Radiother Oncol 129(68–74):33
20. Xu Q Liu Q Ge H Tumor recurrence versus treatment effects in glioma: a comparative study of three dimensional pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging Medicine 2017 96 50 e9332 10.1097/MD.0000000000009332 29390403
Xu Q, Liu Q, Ge H et al (2017) Tumor recurrence versus treatment effects in glioma: a comparative study of three dimensional pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging. Medicine 96(50):e933229390403 10.1097/MD.0000000000009332
21. Ye J Bhagat SK Li H Differentiation between recurrent gliomas and radiation necrosis using arterial spin labeling perfusion imaging Exp Ther Med 2016 11 2432 243635 10.3892/etm.2016.3225 27284331
Ye J, Bhagat SK, Li H et al (2016) Differentiation between recurrent gliomas and radiation necrosis using arterial spin labeling perfusion imaging. Exp Ther Med 11:2432–24363527284331 10.3892/etm.2016.3225
22. Jovanovic M Radenkovic S Stosic-Opincal T Differentiation between progression and pseudoprogression by arterial spin labeling MRI in patients with glioblastoma multiforme J BUON 2017 22 1061 1067 28952228
Jovanovic M, Radenkovic S, Stosic-Opincal T et al (2017) Differentiation between progression and pseudoprogression by arterial spin labeling MRI in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. J BUON 22:1061–106728952228
23. Choi YJ Kim HS Jahng G-H Kim SJ Suh DC Pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma: added value of arterial spin labeling to dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging Acta Radiol 2013 54 448 454 10.1177/0284185112474916 23592805
Choi YJ, Kim HS, Jahng G-H, Kim SJ, Suh DC (2013) Pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma: added value of arterial spin labeling to dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging. Acta Radiol 54:448–45423592805 10.1177/0284185112474916
24. Nguyen TB Zakhari N Velasco Sandoval S Diagnostic accuracy of arterial spin-labeling, dynamic contrast-enhanced, and DSC perfusion imaging in the diagnosis of recurrent high-grade gliomas: a prospective study AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2023 44 134 142 10.3174/ajnr.A7771 36702501
Nguyen TB, Zakhari N, Velasco Sandoval S et al (2023) Diagnostic accuracy of arterial spin-labeling, dynamic contrast-enhanced, and DSC perfusion imaging in the diagnosis of recurrent high-grade gliomas: a prospective study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 44:134–14236702501 10.3174/ajnr.A7771
25. Soni N Ora M Mohindra N Menda Y Bathla G Diagnostic performance of PET and perfusion-weighted imaging in differentiating tumor recurrence or progression from radiation necrosis in posttreatment gliomas: a review of literature AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2020 41 1550 1557 32855194
Soni N, Ora M, Mohindra N, Menda Y, Bathla G (2020) Diagnostic performance of PET and perfusion-weighted imaging in differentiating tumor recurrence or progression from radiation necrosis in posttreatment gliomas: a review of literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 41:1550–155732855194
26. Zhang J Wu Y Wang Y Zhang X Lei Y Zhu G Mao C Zhang L Ma L Diffusion-weighted imaging and arterial spin labeling radiomics features may improve differentiation between radiation-induced brain injury and glioma recurrence Eur Radiol 2023 33 3332 3342 10.1007/s00330-022-09365-3 36576544
Zhang J, Wu Y, Wang Y, Zhang X, Lei Y, Zhu G, Mao C, Zhang L, Ma L (2023) Diffusion-weighted imaging and arterial spin labeling radiomics features may improve differentiation between radiation-induced brain injury and glioma recurrence. Eur Radiol 33:3332–334236576544 10.1007/s00330-022-09365-3
27. Hou H Diao Y Yu J Xu M Wang L Li Z Song T Liu Y Yuan Z Differentiation of true progression from treatment response in high-grade glioma treated with chemoradiation: a comparison study of 3D-APTW and 3D-PcASL imaging and DWI NMR Biomed 2023 36 e4821 10.1002/nbm.4821 36031734
Hou H, Diao Y, Yu J, Xu M, Wang L, Li Z, Song T, Liu Y, Yuan Z (2023) Differentiation of true progression from treatment response in high-grade glioma treated with chemoradiation: a comparison study of 3D-APTW and 3D-PcASL imaging and DWI. NMR Biomed 36:e482136031734 10.1002/nbm.4821
28. Herrmann K Czernin J Cloughesy T Comparison of visual and semiquantitative analysis of 18F-FDOPA-PET/CT for recurrence detection in glioblastoma patients Neuro-Oncol 2014 16 603 609 10.1093/neuonc/not166 24305722
Herrmann K, Czernin J, Cloughesy T et al (2014) Comparison of visual and semiquantitative analysis of 18F-FDOPA-PET/CT for recurrence detection in glioblastoma patients. Neuro-Oncol 16:603–60924305722 10.1093/neuonc/not166
29. Zaragori T Ginet M Marie PY Use of static and dynamic [18F]-F-DOPA PET parameters for detecting patients with glioma recurrence or progression EJNMMI Res 2020 29 10 56 10.1186/s13550-020-00645-x
Zaragori T, Ginet M, Marie PY et al (2020) Use of static and dynamic [18F]-F-DOPA PET parameters for detecting patients with glioma recurrence or progression. EJNMMI Res 29(10):5610.1186/s13550-020-00645-x
30. Seeger A Braun C Skardelly M Comparison of three different MR perfusion techniques and MR spectroscopy for multiparametric assessment in distinguishing recurrent high-grade gliomas from stable disease Acad Radiol 2013 20 1557 1565 10.1016/j.acra.2013.09.003 24200483
Seeger A, Braun C, Skardelly M et al (2013) Comparison of three different MR perfusion techniques and MR spectroscopy for multiparametric assessment in distinguishing recurrent high-grade gliomas from stable disease. Acad Radiol 20:1557–156524200483 10.1016/j.acra.2013.09.003
31. Morabito R Alafaci C Pergolizzi S DCE and DSC perfusion MRI diagnostic accuracy in the follow-up of primary and metastatic intra-axial brain tumors treated by radiosurgery with cyberknife Radiat Oncol 2019 15 14 65 10.1186/s13014-019-1271-7
Morabito R, Alafaci C, Pergolizzi S et al (2019) DCE and DSC perfusion MRI diagnostic accuracy in the follow-up of primary and metastatic intra-axial brain tumors treated by radiosurgery with cyberknife. Radiat Oncol 15(14):6510.1186/s13014-019-1271-7
32. Manning P Daghighi S Rajaratnam MK Differentiation of progressive disease from pseudoprogression using 3D PCASL and DSC perfusion MRI in patients with glioblastoma J Neurooncol 2020 147 681 690 10.1007/s11060-020-03475-y 32239431
Manning P, Daghighi S, Rajaratnam MK et al (2020) Differentiation of progressive disease from pseudoprogression using 3D PCASL and DSC perfusion MRI in patients with glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 147:681–69032239431 10.1007/s11060-020-03475-y
33. Haller S Zaharchuk G Thomas DL Lovblad K Barkhof F Golay X Arterial spin labeling perfusion of the brain: emerging clinical applications Radiology 2016 281 337 356 10.1148/radiol.2016150789 27755938
Haller S, Zaharchuk G, Thomas DL, Lovblad K, Barkhof F, Golay X (2016) Arterial spin labeling perfusion of the brain: emerging clinical applications. Radiology 281:337–35627755938 10.1148/radiol.2016150789
34. Henriksen OM Del Mar Á-T Figueiredo P Hangel G Keil VC Nechifor RE Riemer F Schmainda KM Warnert EAH Wiegers EC Booth TC High-grade glioma treatment response monitoring biomarkers: a position statement on the evidence supporting the use of advanced MRI techniques in the clinic, and the latest bench-to-bedside developments. Part 1: perfusion and diffusion techniques Front Oncol 2022 12 810263 10.3389/fonc.2022.810263 35359414
Henriksen OM, Del Mar Á-T, Figueiredo P, Hangel G, Keil VC, Nechifor RE, Riemer F, Schmainda KM, Warnert EAH, Wiegers EC, Booth TC (2022) High-grade glioma treatment response monitoring biomarkers: a position statement on the evidence supporting the use of advanced MRI techniques in the clinic, and the latest bench-to-bedside developments. Part 1: perfusion and diffusion techniques. Front Oncol 12:81026335359414 10.3389/fonc.2022.810263
35. Bisdas S Naegele T Ritz R Distinguishing recurrent high-grade gliomas from radiation injury: a pilot study using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging Acad Radiol 2011 18 575 583 10.1016/j.acra.2011.01.018 21419671
Bisdas S, Naegele T, Ritz R et al (2011) Distinguishing recurrent high-grade gliomas from radiation injury: a pilot study using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Acad Radiol 18:575–58321419671 10.1016/j.acra.2011.01.018
36. Shin KE Ahn KJ Choi HS DCE and DSC MR perfusion imaging in the differentiation of recurrent tumour from treatment-related changes in patients with glioma Clin Radiol 2014 69 e264 e272 10.1016/j.crad.2014.01.016 24594379
Shin KE, Ahn KJ, Choi HS et al (2014) DCE and DSC MR perfusion imaging in the differentiation of recurrent tumour from treatment-related changes in patients with glioma. Clin Radiol 69:e264–e27224594379 10.1016/j.crad.2014.01.016
37. Yun TJ Park CK Kim TM Glioblastoma treated with concurrent radiation therapy and temozolomide chemotherapy: differentiation of true progression from pseudoprogression with quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging Radiology 2015 274 830 840 10.1148/radiol.14132632 25333475
Yun TJ, Park CK, Kim TM et al (2015) Glioblastoma treated with concurrent radiation therapy and temozolomide chemotherapy: differentiation of true progression from pseudoprogression with quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 274:830–84025333475 10.1148/radiol.14132632
38. Zakhari N Taccone MS Torres CH Prospective comparative diagnostic accuracy evaluation of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) vs. dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR perfusion in differentiating tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis in treated high-grade gliomas J Magn Reson Imaging 2019 50 573 582 10.1002/jmri.26621 30614146
Zakhari N, Taccone MS, Torres CH et al (2019) Prospective comparative diagnostic accuracy evaluation of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) vs. dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR perfusion in differentiating tumor recurrence from radiation necrosis in treated high-grade gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 50:573–58230614146 10.1002/jmri.26621
39. Bell C Dowson N Puttick S Increasing feasibility and utility of (18)F-FDOPA PET for the management of glioma Nucl Med Biol 2015 42 788 795 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2015.06.001 26162582
Bell C, Dowson N, Puttick S et al (2015) Increasing feasibility and utility of (18)F-FDOPA PET for the management of glioma. Nucl Med Biol 42:788–79526162582 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2015.06.001
40. Moreau A Febvey O Mognetti T Frappaz D Kryza D Contribution of different positron emission tomography tracers in glioma management: focus on glioblastoma Front Oncol 2019 9 1134 10.3389/fonc.2019.01134 31737567
Moreau A, Febvey O, Mognetti T, Frappaz D, Kryza D (2019) Contribution of different positron emission tomography tracers in glioma management: focus on glioblastoma. Front Oncol 9:113431737567 10.3389/fonc.2019.01134
41. Karunanithi S Bandopadhyaya GP Sharma P Prospective comparison of (99m)Tc-GH SPECT/CT and (18)F-FDOPA PET/CT for detection of recurrent glioma: a pilot study Clin Nucl Med 2014 39 e121 e128 10.1097/RLU.0b013e318279bcd8 23579970
Karunanithi S, Bandopadhyaya GP, Sharma P et al (2014) Prospective comparison of (99m)Tc-GH SPECT/CT and (18)F-FDOPA PET/CT for detection of recurrent glioma: a pilot study. Clin Nucl Med 39:e121–e12823579970 10.1097/RLU.0b013e318279bcd8
42. Chiaravalloti A Fiorentini A Villani V Factors affecting 1⁸F FDOPA standardized uptake value in patients with primary brain tumors after treatment Nucl Med Biol 2015 42 355 359 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2015.01.002 25624151
Chiaravalloti A, Fiorentini A, Villani V et al (2015) Factors affecting 1⁸F FDOPA standardized uptake value in patients with primary brain tumors after treatment. Nucl Med Biol 42:355–35925624151 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2015.01.002
43. Xiao J Jin Y Nie J Chen F Ma X Diagnostic and grading accuracy of 18F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT in patients with gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis BMC Cancer 2019 19 767 10.1186/s12885-019-5938-0 31382920
Xiao J, Jin Y, Nie J, Chen F, Ma X (2019) Diagnostic and grading accuracy of 18F-FDOPA PET and PET/CT in patients with gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 19:76731382920 10.1186/s12885-019-5938-0
44. Pellerin A Khalifé M Sanson M Simultaneously acquired PET and ASL imaging biomarkers may be helpful in differentiating progression from pseudo-progression in treated gliomas Eur Radiol 2021 31 7395 7405 10.1007/s00330-021-07732-0 33787971
Pellerin A, Khalifé M, Sanson M et al (2021) Simultaneously acquired PET and ASL imaging biomarkers may be helpful in differentiating progression from pseudo-progression in treated gliomas. Eur Radiol 31:7395–740533787971 10.1007/s00330-021-07732-0
45. Bertaux M Berenbaum A Di Stefano AL Hybrid [18F]-F-DOPA PET/MRI interpretation criteria and scores for glioma follow-up after radiotherapy Clin Neuroradiol 2022 32 735 747 10.1007/s00062-022-01139-0 35147721
Bertaux M, Berenbaum A, Di Stefano AL et al (2022) Hybrid [18F]-F-DOPA PET/MRI interpretation criteria and scores for glioma follow-up after radiotherapy. Clin Neuroradiol 32:735–74735147721 10.1007/s00062-022-01139-0
46. Okuchi S Rojas-Garcia A Ulyte A Diagnostic accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI in stratifying gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis Cancer Med 2019 8 12 5564 5573 10.1002/cam4.2369 31389669
Okuchi S, Rojas-Garcia A, Ulyte A et al (2019) Diagnostic accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI in stratifying gliomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Med 8(12):5564–557331389669 10.1002/cam4.2369
47. Baas KPA Petr J Kuijer JPA Nederveen AJ Mutsaerts HJMM van de Ven KCC Effects of acquisition parameter modifications and field strength on the reproducibility of brain perfusion measurements using arterial spin-labeling AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2021 42 109 115 10.3174/ajnr.A6856 33184068
Baas KPA, Petr J, Kuijer JPA, Nederveen AJ, Mutsaerts HJMM, van de Ven KCC (2021) Effects of acquisition parameter modifications and field strength on the reproducibility of brain perfusion measurements using arterial spin-labeling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 42:109–11533184068 10.3174/ajnr.A6856
48. Ukisu R Inoue Y Hata H Tanaka Y Iwasaki R Effects of post-labeling delay on MRI assessment of brain tumor blood flow using arterial spin labeling Tomography 2023 9 439 448 10.3390/tomography9010036 36828388
Ukisu R, Inoue Y, Hata H, Tanaka Y, Iwasaki R (2023) Effects of post-labeling delay on MRI assessment of brain tumor blood flow using arterial spin labeling. Tomography 9:439–44836828388 10.3390/tomography9010036
