
==== Front
Inj Epidemiol
Inj Epidemiol
Injury Epidemiology
2197-1714
BioMed Central London

39238064
533
10.1186/s40621-024-00533-1
Research
A national study of firearm exposure and safety training among rural youth
Koopman Jamie L. 1
Linden Benjamin M. 2
Sinik Megan R. 3
Wetjen Kristel M. 4
Hoogerwerf Pam J. 5
Liao Junlin 6
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2484-1213
Jennissen Charles A. charles-jennissen@uiowa.edu

78
1 grid.417599.7 0000 0004 0434 6279 Department of Emergency Medicine, Franciscan Health-Olympia Fields, 20201 Crawford Ave, Olympia Fields, Illinois, 60461 USA
2 grid.17635.36 0000000419368657 Department of General Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, University of Minnesota, 500 SE Harvard St, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
3 grid.38142.3c 000000041936754X Department of Internal Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School - Harvard University, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02415 USA
4 https://ror.org/0431j1t39 grid.412984.2 0000 0004 0434 3211 Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Health Care Stead Family Children’s Hospital, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
5 https://ror.org/0431j1t39 grid.412984.2 0000 0004 0434 3211 Injury Prevention and Community Outreach Program, University of Iowa Health Care Stead Family Children’s Hospital, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
6 https://ror.org/036jqmy94 grid.214572.7 0000 0004 1936 8294 Department of Surgery, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
7 https://ror.org/036jqmy94 grid.214572.7 0000 0004 1936 8294 Department of Emergency Medicine, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA
8 https://ror.org/036jqmy94 grid.214572.7 0000 0004 1936 8294 Stead Family Department of Pediatrics, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA
5 9 2024
5 9 2024
2024
11 Suppl 1 Publication of this supplement has been supported by the Injury Free Coalition for Kids. The articles have undergone the journal's standard peer review process for supplements. The Supplement Editors declare that they have no competing interests. 4715 3 2024
20 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Background

Data regarding rural youths’ experience with firearms, including safety training, is highly limited despite their frequent presence in homes. Our objective was to investigate rural adolescents’ use of firearms and whether they had received formal firearm training.

Methods

A convenience sample of 2021 National FFA (formerly Future Farmers of America) Convention & Expo attendees were given an anonymous survey at the University of Iowa Stead Family Children’s Hospital injury prevention booth. The survey explored their use of rifles/shotguns and handguns and whether they had completed a certified firearm safety course. Descriptive and comparative analyses, including multivariable logistic regression analyses, were performed on compiled data.

Results

3206 adolescents ages 13–18 years participated with 45% reporting they lived on a farm or ranch. The vast majority of participants (85%) had fired a rifle/shotgun; 43% reported firing them > 100 times. Of those that had fired rifles/shotguns, 41% had done so before 9 years old. Most had also fired a handgun (69%), with 23% having fired handguns > 100 times. Of those that had fired handguns, 44% had done so before 11 years. Average age for first firing rifles/shotguns was 9.5 (SD 3.1) years, and 11.1 (SD 3.0) years for handguns. Males, non-Hispanic Whites, and those living on farms or in the country had significantly greater percentages who had fired a rifle/shotgun or a handgun. Significant differences were also seen by U.S. census region. Over half (64%) reported having gone hunting. Of those that had used a firearm, 67% had completed a firearm safety training course. Overall, 23% were/had been members of a school or club shooting team and of these, 87% had taken a safety course.

Conclusions

Most FFA member participants had fired both rifles/shotguns and handguns, many at very young ages. Significant differences in firearm use were noted by demographic factors including the home setting (i.e., farms and ranches) and their U.S. census region. Nearly one-third of adolescent firearm users had not received formal safety training. Promoting firearm safety should include advising families on when it is developmentally appropriate to introduce youth to firearms and on the importance of firearm safety training.

Keywords

Adolescent
Farms
Firearm
Handgun
Hunting
Rifle
Rural
Shooting
Shotgun
Training
Youth
University of Iowa Stead Family Children's HospitalInjury Free Coalition for Kids28th Annual Injury Free Coalition for Kids® Conference: Forging New Frontiers: Secure for Safety Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA 1-3 December 2023 issue-copyright-statement© Columbia University Center for Injury Epidemiology and Prevention 2024
==== Body
pmcBackground

Firearm injuries in children and adolescents are a rising concern across the U.S. and have become the leading cause of death for those 19 years of age and younger (Goldstick et al. 2022). According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), there were 18,800 non-fatal injuries and 2601 deaths in youth under 18 years due to firearms in 2021 (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2021). This was a 50% increase in firearm mortality as compared to 2019 (Gramlich 2021). In the U.S., more than 40% of households with children have firearms with 15% of those households storing them loaded and unlocked, potentially allowing anyone within the home access (Miller and Azrael 2024). In addition, in households with children and firearms, nearly two-thirds do not store the firearms both locked and unloaded which means approximately 16 million U.S. children live in a household with a firearm unsafely stored (Miller and Azrael 2024; Azrael et al. 2015).

Firearm ownership in the U.S. is higher than any other country (Gun Ownership By Country 2024; Karp 2018), and the proportion of homes with firearms in rural settings is significantly greater than urban communities (Sadowski and Munoz 1996; Senturia et al. 1994; Shaughnessy et al. 1999; Smith 2001; Azrael et al. 2017; Nordstrom et al. 2001; Jennissen et al. 2021). Studies have also found a higher prevalence of handgun carrying among rural teenagers than their urban counterparts (Rowhani-Rahbar et al. 2020; Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 2023). While the number and rates of homicide deaths due to firearms are much greater in urban settings, rural areas have higher rates of both firearm-related suicides and unintentional deaths (Branas et al. 2004; Fontanella et al. 2015; Nestadt et al. 2017). As for pediatric firearm-related injuries, the hospitalization rate for those under 15 years is higher for rural than urban youth with unintentional injuries being the most common cause (Herrin et al. 2018).

We previously surveyed nearly 1400 rural adolescents who were attendees of a state FFA conference in Iowa (Miller et al. 2024). FFA is a national organization associated with schools that focuses on agricultural education and leadership development. The vast majority (85%) of respondents had fired a rifle/shotgun and over three-fifths (62%) had fired a handgun. Many used firearms frequently and they had started at very young ages. Of those that had used a firearm, only about 60% had completed a firearm safety certification course.

With the recent dramatic rise in pediatric firearm-related injuries and deaths, there has been an increase in firearm-related research (Miller and Azrael 2024; Jennissen et al. 2021), but few studies that have focused on the use of firearms by youth. Given that our previous study was limited to the state of Iowa, we wanted to determine firearm use using a national sampling of rural adolescents. Our study’s objectives were to explore rural adolescents’ use of firearms and whether they had completed a certified firearm safety course. We also wanted to determine if there were differences by demographic factors including the region of the country where youth lived.

Methods

Study population

A cross-sectional survey study involving a convenience sample of attendees at the 2021 National FFA Convention & Exposition in Indianapolis, Indiana, was performed at the University of Iowa Stead Family Children’s Hospital injury prevention booth. As of 2024, there were nearly 950,000 FFA members in over 9000 local chapters across all 50 states, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands (National FFA Organization 2024). FFA members are in grades 5–12 and there are some collegiate chapters as well. Conference attendees were recruited to complete the anonymous survey on paper or by cell phone linking via a QR code to an electronic survey on Qualtrics (Qualtrics International, Inc, Provo, UT). Staff reviewed the written surveys for completeness. Participants received a modest prize (e.g., lip balm, trucker hat) determined via Plinko board as an incentive to complete the survey. Study inclusion was restricted to English speakers 13–18 years old.

Survey

The survey was created by the members of the University of Iowa Stead Family Children’s Hospital’s Injury Prevention Program, along with staff and students interested in firearm injury prevention at the study institution. The written survey was administered to 20 young persons aged 11–22 years for validation. After completion, these individuals were verbally asked for their input and clarification of their responses for any survey questions not easily understood. All responses provided from the validation were compared for consistency and were utilized in improving the survey’s final design. After being used for the state Iowa FFA conference (Jennissen et al. 2021; Miller et al. 2024; Jennissen et al. 2021), the survey was modified slightly for the national conference.

Demographic variables included age (years), gender (female, male, other, choose not to respond), race/ethnicity (Asian, Black/African American, Hispanic/Latinx, Native American/Alaska, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, White/Caucasian, Mixed, Other), where they lived (on a farm, in the country/not on a farm, in town), and the US state of residence. Participants could select all that apply for race/ethnicity. In the questionnaire, members were asked how many separate occasions they had fired rifles/shotguns and handguns. Response choices included: Never, < 10 times, 10–100 times, > 100 times. If they had fired a rifle/shotgun or a handgun, they were asked to specify at what age in years they had first fired one.

Participating individuals were asked if they had ever gone hunting and, if so, at what age they first went hunting with a rifle/shotgun. They were asked whether they had ever been a member of a school or club shooting team. In addition, participants were queried whether they had ever taken a formal/certified hunter or firearm safety training course and, if so, at what age had they first completed it.

Data analysis

Written and electronic surveys were provided to the research team. The Institutional Review Board regarded the study exempt as the analysis was completed on an existing, anonymously gathered dataset. The written surveys were inputted into Qualtrics™ with those of participants who had completed the survey by cell phone. Aggregated data was exported via Excel (Microsoft Corp, Redmond, Washington) and imported into Stata 15.1 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas).

Descriptive (frequencies), bivariate (chi-square, Fisher’s exact test) and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Sixteen respondents (0.5%) noted their gender as “other” and were not included in the comparative analysis regarding sex. The race/ethnicity variable was divided into “non-Hispanic (NH) White” and “other races/ethnicities” due to the limited diversity in the participant population. This resulted in significant heterogeneity within the other races/ethnicities group; however, it allowed for use of the variable in the data analysis. The states in which the participants lived were grouped by U.S. census region which are West, South, Midwest and Northeast. All p-values were two-tailed and a value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Fisher’s exact test was utilized for any comparison in which a cell had a predicted value of < 5. Missing data were not included in analyses.

Results

Subject demographics

Completed surveys were obtained from 3296 adolescents (13–18 years old). See Table 1. The percentage of males and females was similar and about three-quarters of participants were 15–17 years old. Nearly half lived on a farm, one-third lived in the country/not on a farm, and one-fifth lived in town. Ninety-two percent were NH White. Participants were from Puerto Rico and every U.S. state except Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont and Massachusetts. Two-thirds of participants were from the Midwest, just over one-fifth were from the South, and 9% and 3% were from the West and Northeast U.S. census regions, respectively.Table 1 Demographics, firearm use and safety training among adolescent survey respondents at the 2021 National FFA Convention & Expo

	n (Col %)a	
Group N	3296	
Sex	
 Male	1623 (49)	
 Female	1639 (50)	
 Other	16 (< 1)	
Age	
 13 years	60 (2)	
 14 years	327 (10)	
 15 years	710 (22)	
 16 years	890 (27)	
 17 years	947 (29)	
 18 years	353 (11)	
Residence	
 Farm	1495 (45)	
 Country/not farm	1116 (34)	
 Town	679 (21)	
Race/ethnicity	
 Non-Hispanic White	3025 (92)	
 Other races/ethnicities	261 (8)	
US census region	
 Midwest	2173 (66)	
 South	692 (21)	
 Northeast	111 (3)	
 West	294 (9)	
Fired a rifle/shotgun	
 > 100 times	1411 (43)	
 10–100 times	873 (27)	
 < 10 times	502 (15)	
 Never	401 (15)	
Fired a Handgun	
 > 100 times	736 (23)	
 10–100 times	845 (26)	
 < 10 times	659 (20)	
 Never	1014 (31)	
Have been hunting	
 Yes	2089 (64)	
 No	1161 (36)	
School/club shooting team member	
 Yes	730 (23)	
 No	2491 (77)	
Firearm safety training	
 Yes	1945 (60)	
 No	1321 (40)	
aThe sum of n may not equal the total Group N due to missing values

Firearm use and safety training

Eighty-five percent of participants reported having fired a rifle/shotgun, with over 40% reporting having fired one > 100 times. See Table 1. Additionally, over two-thirds reported having fired a handgun; approximately one-fifth had done so > 100 times. Nearly two-thirds of respondents reported having gone hunting with firearms, and more than one fifth stated they were or had been a member of a school or club shooting team. Overall, six in ten reported having completed a certified firearm safety training course.

Comparisons of rifle/shotgun use

Among those who had fired a rifle/shotgun, almost half (1244/2657, 47%) had done so before they were 10 years old and over four-fifths (2198/2657, 83%) before 13 years. The average age participants had first fired a rifle/shotgun was 9.4 years (SD 3.1 years).

Males as compared to females, those living on farms or in the country/not on a farm as compared to those from towns, and NH Whites as compared to other races/ethnicities all had greater proportions that had fired a rifle/shotgun. See Table 2. Those from the West, South and Midwest U.S. census regions had similar but higher percentages than those from the Northeast.Table 2 Demographic comparisons of rifle/shotgun use among survey respondents at the 2021 National FFA Convention & Expo

Variables	Cross tab analysis	Logistic regression analysisa	
Yes	No	p value	OR	95% CI	
n (Row %)b	n (Row %)b	
Fired a rifle/shotgunc	
 Sex	
  Male	1513 (94)	99 (6)	< 0.001	4.52	3.55–5.75	
  Female	1249 (77)	382 (23)		1.0 (ref)		
 Age	
  16–18 years	1849 (85)	329 (15)	0.695	1.04	0.83–1.30	
  13–15 years	931 (85)	159 (15)		1.0 (ref)		
 Residence	
  Farm	1341 (90)	145 (10)	< 0.001	3.44	2.67–4.45	
  Country/not farm	959 (86)	151 (14)		2.44	1.89–3.16	
  Town	483 (72)	192 (28)		1.0 (ref)		
 Race/ethnicity	
  Non-Hispanic White	2597 (86)	412 (14)	< 0.001	2.5	1.82–3.45	
  Other races/ethnicities	181 (70)	78 (30)		1.0 (ref)		
 U.S. census region	
  Midwest	1835 (85)	324 (15)	0.003	1.97	1.23–3.15	
  South	591 (86)	99 (14)		2.37	1.42–3.95	
  West	258 (88)	34 (12)		3.24	1.78–5.91	
  Northeast	82 (74)	29 (26)		1.0 (ref)		
Frequent firing of rifles/shotguns (defined as > 100 times)d	
 Sex	
  Male	1011 (63)	601 (37)	< 0.001	5.32	4.54–6.22	
  Female	396 (24)	1235 (76)		1.0 (ref)		
 Age	
  16–18 years	962 (44)	1216 (56)	0.085	1.24	1.05–1.47	
  13–15 years	447 (41)	643 (59)		1.0 (ref)		
 Residence	
  Farm	768 (52)	718 (48)	< 0.001	2.84	2.29–3.53	
  Country/not farm	460 (41)	650 (59)		1.90	1.51–2.38	
  Town	182 (27)	493 (73)		1.0 (ref)		
 Race/ethnicity	
  Non-Hispanic White	1335 (44)	1674 (56)	< 0.001	1.96	1.43–2.70	
  Other races/ethnities	72 (28)	187 (72)		1.0 (ref)		
 U.S. census region	
  Midwest	902 (42)	1257 (58)	< 0.001	1.41	0.89–2.22	
  South	315 (46)	375 (54)		1.81	1.12–2.92	
  West	154 (53)	138 (47)		2.56	1.52–4.29	
  Northeast	33 (30)	78 (70)		1.0 (ref)		
First time firing a rifle/shotgun < 10 years olde	
 Sex	
  Male	788 (54)	680 (46)	< 0.001	1.84	1.57–2.16	
  Female	448 (38)	721 (62)		1.0 (ref)		
 Age	
  16–18	801 (45)	967 (55)	0.028	0.83	0.70–0.99	
  13–15 years	441 (50)	444 (50)		1.0 (ref)		
 Residence	
  Farm	656 (51)	625 (49)	< 0.001	2.12	1.68–2.67	
  Country/not farm	431 (48)	476 (53)		1.75	1.37–2.23	
  Town	155 (33)	312 (67)		1.0 (ref)		
 Race/ethnicity	
  Non-Hispanic White	1171 (47)	1310 (53)	0.215	0.72	0.98–1.39	
  Other races/ethnicities	71 (42)	97 (58)		1.0 (ref)		
 U.S. census region	
  Midwest	741 (42)	1014 (58)	< 0.001	1.62	0.97–2.69	
  South	334 (59)	231 (41)		3.32	1.96–5.63	
  West	139 (57)	103 (43)		3.08	1.75–5.42	
  Northeast	24 (31)	54 (69)		1.0 (ref)		
aThe analyses performed controlled for all other listed variables in the models

bThe sum of n for a variable may not equal the total Group N due to missing values

cThe total number of cases used in the logistic regression model was 3199

dThe total number of cases used in the logistic regression model was 3199

eThe total number of cases used in the logistic regression model was 2607

With respect to having fired a rifle/shotgun, multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that males had 4.5 times greater odds than females. Individuals who lived on a farm or in the country/not on a farm had 3.4 and 2.4 times greater odds, respectively, than participants who lived in town. NH Whites had 2.5 times greater odds than other races/ethnicities; and FFA members from the Midwest, South and West had 2.0, 2.4 and 3.2 times higher odds, respectively, than those in the Northeast.

Among those who had fired rifles/shotguns frequently (defined as > 100 times) males, those living on a farm, NH Whites, and individuals from the West had the highest percentages. Males had odds over 5 times higher than females of frequent use. Participants who lived on farms and in the country/not on a farm had 2.8 and 1.9 times greater odds, respectively, than those from town. The odds of NH Whites having fired a rifle/shotgun > 100 times was about twice that of other races/ethnicities. Individuals living in the Midwest, South and West regions had 1.4, 1.8 and 2.6 times greater odds, respectively than those from the Northeast.

As compared to their peers, males, younger teenagers, those living on farms, and respondents from the South and West had significantly higher percentages that had fired a rifle/shotgun for the first time before 10 years of age. Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated males having odds nearly twice that of females for having fired a rifle/shotgun before 10 years of age. The odds of first firing a rifle/shotgun before 10 years of age for those living on a farm or in the country/not a farm were 2.1 and 1.8 times higher, respectively, than those living in town. Participants from the West and the South had 3.1 and 3.3 times greater odds, respectively, as compared to those from the Northeast.

Comparisons of handgun use

Over two-fifths (956/2168, 44%) of participants had fired a handgun before they were 11 years old and more than two thirds (1463/2168, 67%) had done so before the age of 13. The mean age members had first fired a handgun was 11.1 years (SD 3.0 years).

Males, NH Whites, and those living on farms or in the country/not on a farm, all had greater percentages who had fired a handgun relative to their peers. See Table 3. Participants from the West and South had significantly higher proportions that had fired a handgun than those from the Midwest with the lowest proportion having fired a handgun from the Northeast.Table 3 Demographic comparisons of handgun use among survey respondents at the 2021 National FFA Convention & Expo

Variables	Cross tab analysis	Logistic regression analysisa	
Yes	No	p value	OR	95% CI	
n (Row %)b	n (Row %)b	
Fired a handgunc	
 Sex	
  Male	1320 (82)	281 (18)	< 0.001	3.72	3.15–4.39	
  Female	903 (56)	717 (44)		1.0 (ref)		
 Age	
  16–18 years	1498 (69)	667 (31)	0.477 	1.11	0.94–1.32	
  13–15 years	734 (68)	346 (32)		1.0 (ref)		
 Residence	
  Farm	1080 (73)	395 (27)	< 0.001	1.80	1.46–2.21	
  Country/not farm	765 (69)	337 (31)		1.55	1.25–1.92	
  Town	393 (59)	278 (41)		1.0 (ref)		
 Race/ethnicity	
  Non-Hispanic White	2077 (70)	911 (30)	0.008	1.39	1.03–1.85	
  Other races/ethnicities	158 (61)	99 (39)		1.0 (ref)		
 U.S. census region	
  Midwest	1435 (67)	709 (33)	< 0.001	2.06	1.36–3.11	
  South	509 (74)	176 (26)		3.13	2.01–4.87	
  West	229 (78)	63 (22)		3.97	2.41–6.55	
  Northeast	52 (48)	57 (52)		1.0 (ref)		
Frequent firing of handguns (defined as > 100 times)d	
 Sex						
  Male	566 (35)	1035 (65)	< 0.001	4.78	3.94–5.81	
  Female	165 (10)	1455 (90)		1.0 (ref)		
 Age	
  16–18 years	503 (23)	1662 (77)	0.288	1.15	0.96–1.39	
  13–15 years	233 (22)	847 (78)		1.0 (ref)		
 Residence	
  Farm	380 (26)	1095 (74)	< 0.001	1.91	1.47–2.48	
  Country/not farm	260 (24)	842 (76)		1.79	1.36–2.35	
  Town	95 (14)	576 (86)		1.0 (ref)		
 Race/ethnicity	
  Non-Hispanic White	685 (23)	2303 (77)	0.118	1.28	0.90–1.85	
  Other races/ethnicities	48 (19)	209 (81)		1.0 (ref)		
 U.S. census region	
  Midwest	442 (21)	1702 (79)	< 0.001	1.80	0.95–3.38	
  South	181 (26)	504 (74)		2.62	1.37–5.02	
  West	98 (34)	194 (66)		3.65	1.86–7.18	
  Northeast	12 (11)	97 (89)		1.0 (ref)		
First time firing a handgun < 12 years olde	
 Sex	
  Male	701 (54)	601 (46)	< 0.001	1.37	1.15–1.64	
  Female	385 (45)	468 (55)		1.0 (ref)		
 Age	
  16–18	669 (46)	782 (54)	< 0.001	0.57	0.47–0.69	
  13–15 years	423 (59)	289 (41)		1.0 (ref)		
 Residence	
  Farm	537 (51)	508 (49)	0.426 	1.14	0.90–1.45	
  Country	375 (51)	364 (49)		1.07	0.83–1.38	
  Town	182 (48)	201 (52)		1.0 (ref)		
 Race/ethnicity	
  Non-Hispanic White	78 (52)	73 (48)	0.766	1.10	0.78–1.56	
  Other races/ethnicities	1014 (50)	998 (50)		1.0 (ref)		
 U.S. census region	
  Midwest	662 (48)	730 (52)	< 0.001	1.92	1.03–3.57	
  South	285 (58)	206 (42)		3.08	1.63–5.82	
  West	128 (58)	94 (42)		3.06	1.57–5.98	
  Northeast	16 (31)	35 (69)		1.0 (ref)		
aThe analyses performed controlled for all other listed variables in the models

bThe sum of n for a variable may not equal the total Group N due to missing values

cThe total number of cases used in the logistic regression model was 3178

dThe total number of cases used in the logistic regression model was 3178

eThe total number of cases used in the logistic regression model was 2132

Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed males had odds 3.7 times greater than females of having fired a handgun. Individuals living on a farm and those from the country/not a farm had odds 1.8 and 1.6 times higher, respectively, than those living in town, and NH Whites had odds 1.3 times greater than other races/ethnicities. The odds of having fired a handgun were 2.1, 3.1 and 4.0 times greater for those from the Midwest, South and West, respectively, as compared to the Northeast.

Groups with higher percentages of more frequent use of handguns as compared to their peers included males, those who lived on farms or in the country/not on a farm, and those from the South and West. The odds of males reporting firing a handgun > 100 times was nearly 5 times greater than females. Participants living on a farm or in the country/not on a farm had odds of frequent use that were 1.9 and 1.8 times higher, respectively, than those from towns. Members from the South and the West had 2.6 and 3.7 times greater odds, respectively, of frequent use that those from the Northeast.

With regards to having first fired a handgun before 12 years of age, males and younger teenagers had higher proportions as compared to females and older teenagers. Those from the South and West had higher percentages than the Midwest, who subsequently had greater percentages than the Northeast. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed males had odds 1.4 times greater than females and younger teens had odds 1.8 times greater than older teens of having first fired a handgun at < 12 years of age. Those from the Midwest, West and South had odds that were 1.9, 3.1 and 3.1 times higher, respectively, than members from the Northeast.

Hunting

A greater proportion of males had hunted as compared to females. See Table 4. Those from farms or from the country/not on a farm, NH Whites and participants from the South all had greater proportions that reported hunting relative to their counterparts. Males had odds 2.9 times greater than females of having gone hunting. Those from farms had 3.0 times and those from the country/not a farm had 2.3 times the odds of having gone hunting as compared to participants from towns. The odds of having gone hunting were 1.9 times higher for both NH Whites versus other races/ethnicities and those from the South versus the Northeast.Table 4 Demographic comparisons of hunting behaviors among survey respondents at the 2021 National FFA Convention & Expo

Variables	Cross tab analysis	Logistic regression analysisa	
Yes	No	p value	OR	95% CI	
n (Row %)b	n (Row %)b	
Had gone huntingc	
 Sex	
  Male	1229 (77)	377 (23)	< 0.001	2.90	2.47–3.39	
  Female	848 (53)	765 (47)		1.0 (ref)		
 Age	
  16–18 years	1391 (64)	770 (36)	0.966	1.06	0.90–1.25	
  13–15 years	695 (64)	386 (36)		1.0 (ref)		
 Residence	
  Farm	1066 (72)	408 (28)	< 0.001	3.01	2.46–3.68	
  Country/not farm	722 (66)	379 (34)		2.24	1.82–2.76	
  Town	300 (45)	369 (55)		1.0 (ref)		
 Race/ethnicity	
  Non-Hispanic White	1954 (65)	1030 (35)	< 0.001	1.89	1.41–2.50	
  Other races/ethnicites	128 (50)	129 (50)		1.0 (ref)		
 U.S. census region	
  Midwest	1335 (62)	808 (38)	 < 0.001	1.08	0.71–1.63	
  South	488 (71)	195 (29)		1.85	1.19–2.87	
  West	191 (66)	99 (34)		1.40	0.87–2.27	
  Northwest	64 (58)	46 (42)		1.0 (ref)		
Went hunting the first time when < 10 years oldd	
 Sex	
  Male	498 (41)	721 (59)	< 0.001	1.34	1.11–1.62	
  Female	275 (33)	561 (67)		1.0 (ref)		
 Age	
  16–18 years	493 (36)	885 (64)	0.022	0.79	0.65–0.96	
  13–15 years	281 (41)	405 (59)		1.0 (ref)		
  Residence	
  Farm	419 (40)	632 (60)	0.002	1.75	1.31–2.34	
  Country/not farm	272 (38)	444 (62)		1.48	1.09–2.01	
  Town	85 (29)	213 (71)		1.0 (ref)		
 Race/ethnicity	
  Non-Hispanic White	728 (38)	1203 (62)	0.690	1.16	0.78–1.75	
  Other races/ethnicities	46 (36)	82 (64)		1.0 (ref)		
 U.S. census region	
  Midwest	449 (34)	872 (66)	< 0.001	3.38	1.59–7.19	
  South	273 (57)	206 (43)		9.07	4.21–19.55	
  West	43 (23)	148 (77)		1.90	0.84–4.32	
  Northeast	9 (14)	55 (86)		1.0 (ref)		
aThe analyses performed controlled for all other listed variables in the models

bThe sum of n for a variable may not equal the total Group N due to missing values

cThe total number of cases used in the logistic regression model was 3175

dIncludes only those that had gone hunting. The total number of cases used in the logistic regression model was 2034

Nearly one third (667/2066, 32%) of those that went hunting stated they first did so at < 9 years old, 55% (1142/2066) at < 11 years old, and 76% (1575/2066) < 13 years of age. Of those who had gone hunting with a rifle/shotgun, the average age they first participated was 10.2 years (SD 3.0).

Males, younger teenagers, and those from farms and from the country/not a farm had higher percentages as compared to their peers of having first hunted at < 10 years old. The South and Midwest both had higher percentages as compared to the West and Northeast. Males and younger teens had odds 1.3 times greater than females and older teens, respectively, of having first gone hunting at < 10 years of age. Those from farms had 1.8 times and those from the country/not a farm had 1.5 times higher odds of having first gone hunting at < 10 years than participants from towns. The odds of having first gone hunting at < 10 years was 3.4 and 9.1 times greater for those from the Midwest and South, respectively, as compared to those from the Northeast.

School or club shooting teams

Those with higher proportions reporting having been a shooting team member included males as compared to females, and those living on farms or in the country/not a farm as compared to those from towns. See Table 5. The Midwest, South and West had higher percentages as compared to the Northeast. The odds of being or having been a shooting team member was 2.5 times greater for males as compared to females, 1.9 times greater for those from farms as compared to towns, and 1.4 times greater for those from the county/not a farm as compared to towns. The South, West and Midwest all had odds greater than twice that of those from the Northeast of being or having been a member of a shooting team.Table 5 Demographic comparisons related to membership in a school or club shooting team among survey respondents at the 2021 National FFA Convention & Expo

Variables	Cross tab analysis	Logistic regression analysisa	
Yes	No	p value	OR	CI	
n (Row %)b	n (Row %)b	
Member of a school or club shooting team	
 Sex	
  Male	489 (31)	1094 (69)	< 0.001	2.52	2.11–3.01	
  Female	234 (15)	1370 (85)		1.0 (ref)		
 Age	
  16–18 years	484 (23)	1656 (77)	0.927	1.03	0.86–1.23	
  13–15 years	244 (23)	828 (77)		1.0 (ref)		
 Residence	
  Farm	404 (28)	1062 (72)	< 0.001	1.94	1.52–2.50	
  Country/not farm	224 (21)	863 (79)		1.37	1.05–1.78	
  Town	100 (15)	562 (85)		1.0 (ref)		
 Race/ethnicity	
  Non-Hispanic White	680 (23)	2280 (77)	1.250	1.05	0.87–1.80	
  Other races/ethnicities	48 (19)	203 (81)		1.0 (ref)		
 U.S. census region	
  Midwest	501 (24)	1617 (76)	0.010	2.39	1.26–4.53	
  South	149 (22)	529 (78)		2.27	1.17–4.38	
  West	63 (22)	227 (78)		2.17	1.08–4.34	
  Northeast	11 (10)	98 (90)		1.0 (ref)		
aThe analysis performed controlled for all other listed variables in the model. The n = 3142 for the analysis

bThe sum of n for a variable may not equal the total Group N due to missing values

Firearm safety education

Of adolescents that had taken a certified hunter or firearm safety course, 12% (228/1920) took the course at < 10 years, 33% (640/1920) at 11 or 12 years, 27% (520/1920) at 13 or 14 years, and 28% (532/1920) when ≥ 15 years of age. The average age they completed safety training was 11.9 years (SD 2.4).

Demographic groups with higher proportions that reported taking a firearm safety course included males, those living on farms or in the country/not on a farm, NH Whites, and those living in the West. See Table 6. The odds of having taken a firearm safety course was 1.6 times greater for males as compared to females, 1.3 times greater for older teens as compared to younger teens, and 1.6 and 1.3 times greater for those from farms and from the country/not a farm, respectively, as compared to those from towns.Table 6 Demographic comparisons related to firearm safety training among survey respondents at the 2021 National FFA Convention & Expo

Variables	Cross tab analysis	Logistic regression analysisa	
Yes	No	p value	OR	CI	
n (Row %)b	n (Row %)b	
Completed firearm safety course	
 Sex	
  Male	1154 (72)	455 (28)	< 0.001	1.61	1.35–1.92	
  Female	777 (48)	848 (52)		1.0 (ref)		
 Age	
  16–18 years	1313 (60)	861 (40)	0.168	1.28	1.06–1.53	
  13–15 years	628 (58)	457 (42)		1.0 (ref)		
 Residence	
  Farm	1001 (67)	483 (33)	< 0.001	1.64	1.29–2.08	
  Country/not farm	651 (59)	455 (41)		1.28	1.00–1.63	
  Town	292 (44)	379 (56)		1.0 (ref)		
 Race/ethnicity	
  Non-Hispanic White	1821 (61)	1185 (39)	< 0.001	1.10	0.78–1.56	
  Other races/ethnicities	119 (47)	134 (53)		1.0 (ref)		
 U.S. census region	
  Midwest	1265 (59)	884 (41)	0.025	0.78	0.48–1.28	
  South	418 (60)	274 (40)		0.84	0.50–1.41	
  West	196 (67)	96 (33)		1.15	0.66–2.03	
  Northeast	58 (53)	51 (47)		1.0 ref)		
 School/club shooting team member	
  Yes	630 (87)	95 (13)	< 0.001	4.20	3.25–5.43	
  No	1279 (52)	1199 (48)		1.0 (ref)		
 Firearm usage	
  Never Used a Firearm	35 (8)	401 (92)	< 0.001	0.14	0.09–0.21	
  Both rifle and handgun	1583 (72)	604 (28)		1.80	1.43–2.25	
  Rifle or handgun only	309 (50)	305 (50)		1.0 (ref)		
aThe analysis performed controlled for all other listed variables in the model

bThe sum of n for a variable may not equal the total Group N due to missing values

A higher percentage of participants who had belonged to a school or club shooting team had completed a firearm safety course as compared to respondents who had not, and shooting team members had a 4.2 times greater odds of having taken a course than their peers. Only half of those that had fired a rifle/shotgun or a handgun (but not both) had taken a formal firearm safety course, while nearly three-quarters that had fired both rifles/shotguns and handguns had completed a course. Those who had used both a rifle/shotgun and a handgun had 1.8 times higher odds of having completed a firearm safety course as compared to those who had used a rifle/shotgun or a handgun only.

Discussion

Investigations regarding the use of firearms by adolescents are generally lacking, making this study a valuable addition to the current literature. Our study of a national sampling of adolescent FFA members found that a marked majority had fired both rifles/shotguns and handguns, and that many used them frequently. We also found that rural children are using firearms at very young ages. When comparing the U.S. census regions, study participants who resided in the Northeast had the least experience with firearms, whereas, respondents from the West and the South had used rifle/shotguns and handguns more frequently and at younger ages. Of the FFA members who had used a firearm, only around two-thirds had taken a certified firearm safety course.

More than one-fifth of participants had been a member of a school or club shooting team. According to the Scholastic Shooting Sports Foundation, youth participation in shooting events in 2015 had increased by 146% in 6 years (National Shooting Sports Foundation 2016). Additionally, the USA High School Clay Target League grew in membership from 1700 to over 43,000 adolescents from 2012 to 2022 (Karp 2018). The League reports that it is the “fastest growing high-school extracurricular activity in the country” (USA High School Clay Target League 2024).

Hunting was also common among our study population across all regions and the majority had done so before 11 years of age. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service estimated 14.4 million people hunted in 2022 with 500,000 being 16 and 17 years old—an increase of 66% since 2016 (U.S. Department of the Interior et al. 2016; U.S. Department of the Interior and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2022). There are 29 states that allow children at any age to hunt if supervised by an adult and 6 states that have no age limit specified to hunt unsupervised (Outdoor Empire 2023). A national study of unintentional firearm deaths in children 0–14 years found 11% were hunting-related (Hemenway and Solnick 2015).

Firearm use varied significantly by where participants lived being more common in rural areas, and safety training was more common among rural youth. This is similar to our study of Iowa FFA members (Jennissen et al. 2021), and is consistent with other studies investigating urban and rural differences (Branas et al. 2004; Herrin et al. 2018). Study adolescents that lived outside of towns also had higher percentages that had gone hunting which may help explain their higher proportions that received training as it is often required to obtain a hunting license (Huntin’ Fool 2024).

Our study showed regional patterns of more frequent and earlier firearm use by youth that had some similarities to regional patterns seen for firearm-related injuries. For example, the risk of self-inflicted firearm hospitalization in those < 21 years of age has been highest in the South, followed by the West and then the Midwest, with all three having significantly greater risk odds than the Northeast (McLoughlin et al. 2019). Another study found that for those 0–17 years, Southern states and parts of the Midwest had higher rates for firearm homicides and some of the highest firearm suicide rates were in Western states (Fowler et al. 2017).

Participants in our study reported very young ages at which they first used firearms (means of < 9 ½ years for rifles/shotguns and ~ 11 years for handguns). Given the extremely young ages many rural children in the study were allowed to use firearms, it is likely that their cognitive and physical development were inadequate to assure safe firearm use.

Limitations

Our study consisted primarily of a rural NH White population. Thus, our findings may not be generalizable to urban areas and populations with more racial and ethnic diversity. Another limitation was that the specific type of firearm safety training participants had received (e.g., in-person vs. online) was not asked in the survey. Additionally, all collected information was self-reported and may be subject to recall bias and social desirability. Surveys were performed independently and anonymously which should have decreased the social desirability effect.

Conclusions

A large majority of participating FFA members had fired both handguns and rifles/shotguns, many at very young ages. Significant differences in firearm use were noted by demographic factors including the youth’s home setting and their U.S. census region. Nearly a third that had used a firearm had not received formal training. Legislation that requires firearm safety training certification prior to firearm use by youth would help decrease this proportion. Parents and caregivers should receive targeted education regarding firearm safety including advisement when it is developmentally appropriate to introduce youth to firearms and on the importance of safe storage, professional training and the direct supervision of youth when using firearms.

Abbreviations

CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

e.g. Exempli gratia (for example)

FFA Formerly stood for Future Farmers of America

TM Trademark

U.S. United States

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge and thank the University of Iowa Health Care Stead Family Children’s Hospital’s Injury Prevention Program and other individuals interested in firearm injury prevention at the University of Iowa who participated in developing and administering the survey that was used in this study. Special thanks to Lauren Mulford, Michael Hartley, Carolyn Finley and Joel Shilyansky, MD, for their help on this project, and to Molly Byrnes, Alexis Moore and Paige Batten for entering some of the data into Qualtrics. We are grateful for Gerene Denning, PhD, and her assistance in editing the manuscript. We also want to acknowledge and thank the University of Iowa Health Care Stead Family Department of Pediatrics and Stead Family Children’s Hospital for its support of the Injury Prevention and Outreach Program.

About this supplement

This article has been published as part of Injury Epidemiology Volume 11 Supplement 1, 2024: Proceedings of the 28th Annual Injury Free Coalition for Kids® Conference: Forging New Frontiers: Secure for Safety. The full contents of the supplement are available online at https://injepijournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/supplements/volume-11-supplement-1.

Author contributions

All authors have read and approved the final manuscript. Each author significantly contributed to and takes public responsibility for one or more aspects of the study. Specifically: JLK was involved with interpretation and analysis of the results, literature review, and writing and preparation of the manuscript. BML participated in survey development, validation processes, data collection and revision of the manuscript. MRS performed survey development, validation processes, data collection and revision of the manuscript. KMW was involved with survey development, validation processes, data collection and revision of the manuscript. PJH was involved with survey development, validation processes, data collection and electronic entry, and revision of the manuscript. JL helped develop the analysis plan, completed analysis and interpretation of the results, and helped revise the manuscript. CAJ was the primary investigator of the study and had overall responsibility for interpretation and analysis of the results, and final writing and preparation of the manuscript for submission.

Funding

Support for this study was provided by the University of Iowa Health Care Stead Family Children’s Hospital Discretionary Fund Grant. Publication costs were funded by the Injury Free Coalition for Kids™. These entities had no specific role in the research performed.

Availability of data and materials

Data and materials are available to other parties for research purposes after a data sharing agreement plan is agreed to and signed. Those interested should contact the corresponding author.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The University of Iowa Institutional Review Board considered this study exempt as the analysis was performed on an existing dataset that had been collected anonymously.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests or financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Jamie L. Koopman, Benjamin M. Linden, Megan R. Sinik, Kristel M. Wetjen, Pamela J. Hoogerwerf, Junlin Liao and Charles A. Jennissen have equally contributed to this work.
==== Refs
References

Azrael D Cohen J Salhi C Miller M Firearm storage in gun-owning households with children: results of a 2015 national survey J Urban Health. 2018 95 3 295 304 10.1007/s11524-018-0261-7 29748766
Azrael D, Cohen J, Salhi C, Miller M. Firearm storage in gun-owning households with children: results of a 2015 national survey. J Urban Health. 2018;95(3):295–304.29748766 10.1007/s11524-018-0261-7
Azrael D Hepburn L Hemenway D Miller M The stock and flow of US firearms: results from the 2015 national firearms survey RSF 2017 3 5 38 57 10.7758/rsf.2017.3.5.02
Azrael D, Hepburn L, Hemenway D, Miller M. The stock and flow of US firearms: results from the 2015 national firearms survey. RSF. 2017;3(5):38–57.10.7758/rsf.2017.3.5.02
Branas CC Nance ML Elliott MR Urban-rural shifts in intentional firearm death: different causes, same results Am J Public Health 2004 94 10 1750 1755 10.2105/AJPH.94.10.1750 15451745
Branas CC, Nance ML, Elliott MR, et al. Urban-rural shifts in intentional firearm death: different causes, same results. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(10):1750–5.15451745 10.2105/AJPH.94.10.1750
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Injury Counts and Rates. WISQARS (web-based injury statistics query and reporting system)Fatal and Nonfatal Injury Reports . 2021. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/ Accessed January 22, 2024.
Fontanella CA Hiance-Steelesmith DL Phillips GS Widening rural-urban disparities in youth suicides, United States, 1996–2010 JAMA Pediatr 2015 169 5 466 473 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3561 25751611
Fontanella CA, Hiance-Steelesmith DL, Phillips GS, et al. Widening rural-urban disparities in youth suicides, United States, 1996–2010. JAMA Pediatr. 2015;169(5):466–73.25751611 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3561
Fowler KA Dahlberg LL Haileyesus T Gutierrez C Bacon S Childhood firearm injuries in the United States Pediatrics 2017 140 1 e20163486 10.1542/peds.2016-3486 28630118
Fowler KA, Dahlberg LL, Haileyesus T, Gutierrez C, Bacon S. Childhood firearm injuries in the United States. Pediatrics. 2017;140(1): e20163486.28630118 10.1542/peds.2016-3486
Goldstick JE Cunningham RM Carter PM Current causes of death in children and adolescents in the United States N Engl J Med 2022 386 20 1955 1956 10.1056/NEJMc2201761 35443104
Goldstick JE, Cunningham RM, Carter PM. Current causes of death in children and adolescents in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(20):1955–6.35443104 10.1056/NEJMc2201761
Gramlich J. Gun deaths among U.S. children and teens rose 50% in two years. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C. (April, 6 2021). Available at https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2023/04/06/gun-deaths-among-us-kids-rose-50-percent-in-two-years/. Accessed on December 10, 2023.
Gun Ownership By Country. 2024. Available at https://wisevoter.com/country-rankings/gun-ownership-by-country/. Accessed January 29, 2024.
Hemenway D Solnick SJ Children and unintentional firearm death Inj Epidemiol 2015 2 1 26 10.1186/s40621-015-0057-0 26478854
Hemenway D, Solnick SJ. Children and unintentional firearm death. Inj Epidemiol. 2015;2(1):26.26478854 10.1186/s40621-015-0057-0
Herrin BR Gaither JR Leventhal JM Dodington J Rural versus urban hospitalizations for firearm injuries in children and adolescents Pediatrics 2018 142 2 e20173318 10.1542/peds.2017-3318 29967056
Herrin BR, Gaither JR, Leventhal JM, Dodington J. Rural versus urban hospitalizations for firearm injuries in children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2018;142(2): e20173318.29967056 10.1542/peds.2017-3318
Huntin’ Fool. Youth hunting guide. 2024. https://www.huntinfool.com/resources/youth Accessed January 29, 2024.
Jennissen CA King RP Wetjen KM Denning GM Wymore CC Stange NR Hoogerwerf PJ Liao J Wood KE Rural youth’s exposure to firearm violence and their attitudes regarding firearm safety measures Inj Epidemiol 2021 8 Suppl 1 29 10.1186/s40621-021-00317-x 34517921
Jennissen CA, King RP, Wetjen KM, Denning GM, Wymore CC, Stange NR, Hoogerwerf PJ, Liao J, Wood KE. Rural youth’s exposure to firearm violence and their attitudes regarding firearm safety measures. Inj Epidemiol. 2021;8(Suppl 1):29.34517921 10.1186/s40621-021-00317-x
Jennissen CA Wetjen KM Wymore CC Firearm exposure and storage practices in the homes of rural adolescent West J Emerg Med 2021 22 3 498 509 10.5811/westjem.2021.3.50263 34125019
Jennissen CA, Wetjen KM, Wymore CC, et al. Firearm exposure and storage practices in the homes of rural adolescent. West J Emerg Med. 2021;22(3):498–509.34125019 10.5811/westjem.2021.3.50263
Karp A. Estimating global civilian-held firearms numbers. Small arms survey. June 2018. Available at https://www.smallarmssurvey.org/sites/default/files/resources/SAS-BP-Civilian-Firearms-Numbers.pdf. Accessed January 29, 2024.
McLoughlin RJ Hazeltine M Dacier BM Hirsh MP Cleary MA Aidlen JT Young lives cut short: the relationship between firearms and pediatric suicide J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2019 87 1 161 167 10.1097/TA.0000000000002257 30882762
McLoughlin RJ, Hazeltine M, Dacier BM, Hirsh MP, Cleary MA, Aidlen JT. Young lives cut short: the relationship between firearms and pediatric suicide. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2019;87(1):161–7.30882762 10.1097/TA.0000000000002257
Miller M Azrael D Firearm storage in US households with children JAMA Netw Open 2022 5 2 e2148823 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48823 35191973
Miller M, Azrael D. Firearm storage in US households with children. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(2):e2148823.35191973 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48823
Miller JL. Linden B, Sinik M, et al. Firearm exposure and safety training among rural youth across the United States. Journal of Rural Health. 2024:1–11.
National FFA Organization. Our membership: who we are. 2024. Available at: https://www.ffa.org/our-membership/. Accessed January 23, 2024.
National Shooting Sports Foundation. Scholastic Shooting Sports Foundation. Industry Intelligence Reports: Helping Our Members Make Informed Decisions. 2016 Edition. Available at: https://sssfonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/SCTP_IIR_2016_lo-res.pdf Accessed January 22, 2024
Nestadt PS Triplett P Fowler DR Mojtabai R Urban-rural differences in suicide in the state of Maryland: the role of firearms Am J Public Health 2017 107 10 1548 1553 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303865 28817331
Nestadt PS, Triplett P, Fowler DR, Mojtabai R. Urban-rural differences in suicide in the state of Maryland: the role of firearms. Am J Public Health. 2017;107(10):1548–53.28817331 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303865
Nordstrom DL Zwerling C Stromquist AM Rural population survey of behavioral and demographic risk factors for loaded firearms Inj Prev 2001 7 2 112 116 10.1136/ip.7.2.112 11428557
Nordstrom DL, Zwerling C, Stromquist AM, et al. Rural population survey of behavioral and demographic risk factors for loaded firearms. Inj Prev. 2001;7(2):112–6.11428557 10.1136/ip.7.2.112
Outdoor Empire. Most youth friendly hunting states: hunting age limits by state. 5 August 2023. Available at: https://outdoorempire.com/youth-hunting-age-limits/ Accessed January 22, 2024
Rowhani-Rahbar A Oesterle S Skinner ML Initiation age, cumulative prevalence, and longitudinal patterns of handgun carrying among rural adolescents: A multistate study J Adolesc Health 2020 66 4 416 422 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.11.313 31987724
Rowhani-Rahbar A, Oesterle S, Skinner ML. Initiation age, cumulative prevalence, and longitudinal patterns of handgun carrying among rural adolescents: A multistate study. J Adolesc Health. 2020;66(4):416–22.31987724 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.11.313
Sadowski LS Munoz SR Nonfatal and fatal firearm injuries in a rural country JAMA 1996 275 1762 1764 10.1001/jama.1996.03530460066034 8637176
Sadowski LS, Munoz SR. Nonfatal and fatal firearm injuries in a rural country. JAMA. 1996;275:1762–4.8637176 10.1001/jama.1996.03530460066034
Senturia YD Christoffel KK Donovan M Children’s household exposure to guns: a pediatric practice-based survey Pediatrics 1994 93 469 475 10.1542/peds.93.3.469 8115207
Senturia YD, Christoffel KK, Donovan M. Children’s household exposure to guns: a pediatric practice-based survey. Pediatrics. 1994;93:469–75.8115207 10.1542/peds.93.3.469
Shaughnessy AF Cincotta JA Adelman A Family practice patients’ attitudes toward firearm safety as a preventive medicine issue: a HARNET study J Am Board Fam Pract 1999 12 354 359 10.3122/jabfm.12.5.354 10534083
Shaughnessy AF, Cincotta JA, Adelman A. Family practice patients’ attitudes toward firearm safety as a preventive medicine issue: a HARNET study. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1999;12:354–9.10534083 10.3122/jabfm.12.5.354
Smith TW 2001 National gun policy survey of the national opinion research center: research findings: National Opinion Research Center 2001 Chicago University of Chicago
Smith TW. 2001 National gun policy survey of the national opinion research center: research findings: National Opinion Research Center. Chicago: University of Chicago; 2001.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Results from the 2017 national survey on drug use and health: detailed tables. September 14, 2018. Available at: https://www.samhsa.gov/data/report/2017-nsduh-detailed-tables. Accessed January, 22 2023.
U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2022 National survey of fishing, hunting, and wildlife-associated recreation. September 2023. Available at: https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Final_2022-National-Survey_101223-accessible-single-page.pdf. Accessed January 22, 2024.
U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau. 2016 National survey of fishing, hunting, and wildlife-associated recreation. April 2018. Available at: https://www.fws.gov/sites/default/files/documents/news-attached-files/nat_survey2016.pdf Accessed January 22, 2024.
USA High School Clay Target League. History. 2024. Available at: http://txclaytarget.com/about-us/history/ Accessed January 22, 2024.
