
==== Front
J Am Chem Soc
J Am Chem Soc
ja
jacsat
Journal of the American Chemical Society
0002-7863
1520-5126
American Chemical Society

39177513
10.1021/jacs.4c06340
Article
Orthogonal Electrochemical Stability of Bulk and Surface in Lead Halide Perovskite Thin Films and Nanocrystals
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4397-1347
Mulder Jence T. †∥
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3228-2386
Monchen Julius O. V. †∥
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1975-7292
Vogel Yan B. †
Lin Cheng Tai †
Drago Filippo ‡
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3730-5241
Caselli Valentina M. †
Saikumar Niranjan §
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1435-9885
Savenije Tom J. †
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8328-443X
Houtepen Arjan J. *†
† Optoelectronic Materials Section, Faculty of Applied Sciences, Delft University of Technology, Van der Maasweg 9, 2629 HZ Delft, The Netherlands
‡ Chemistry Facility, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia (IIT), Via Morego 30, 16163 Genova, Italy
§ Department of Precision and Microsystems Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands
* Email: A.J.Houtepen@tudelft.nl.
23 08 2024
04 09 2024
146 35 2441524425
09 05 2024
13 08 2024
13 08 2024
© 2024 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society
2024
The Authors
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Lead halide perovskites have attracted significant attention for their wide-ranging applications in optoelectronic devices. A ubiquitous element in these applications is that charging of the perovskite is involved, which can trigger electrochemical degradation reactions. Understanding the underlying factors governing these degradation processes is crucial for improving the stability of perovskite-based devices. For bulk semiconductors, the electrochemical decomposition potentials depend on the stabilization of atoms in the lattice–a parameter linked to the material’s solubility. For perovskite nanocrystals (NCs), electrochemical surface reactions are strongly influenced by the binding equilibrium of passivating ligands. Here, we report a spectro-electrochemical study on CsPbBr3 NCs and bulk thin films in contact with various electrolytes, aimed at understanding the factors that control cathodic degradation. These measurements reveal that the cathodic decomposition of NCs is primarily determined by the solubility of surface ligands, with diminished cathodic degradation for NCs in high-polarity electrolyte solvents where ligand solubilities are lower. However, the solubility of the surface ligands and bulk lattice of NCs are orthogonal, such that no electrolyte could be identified where both the surface and bulk are stabilized against cathodic decomposition. This poses inherent challenges for electrochemical applications: (i) The electrochemical stability window of CsPbBr3 NCs is constrained by the reduction potential of dissolved Pb2+ complexes, and (ii) cathodic decomposition occurs well before the conduction band can be populated with electrons. Our findings provide insights to enhance the electrochemical stability of perovskite thin films and NCs, emphasizing the importance of a combined selection of surface passivation and electrolyte.

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 10.13039/100010661 766900 document-id-old-9ja4c06340
document-id-new-14ja4c06340
ccc-price
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Lead halide perovskite materials have emerged as a major area of research for optoelectronic applications due to their strong absorbance and intrinsic defect tolerance.1−9 Perovskite nanocrystals (NCs) further enhance optical properties and offer tunability through quantum size-effects.10−15 Notably, all-inorganic cesium lead halide perovskite NCs (CsPbX3, X = Cl–, Br–, I–) exhibit bright photoluminescence (PL) characterized by narrow emission line widths, which is an essential attribute for high color purity lighting and wide color gamut displays.10,11,16 In addition, a variety of facile NC synthesis methods exist, offering versatility in surface chemistry and solution-processability.10,11,17−20 As such, CsPbX3 NCs are promising materials for various optoelectronic applications, including light-emitting devices,11,21−26 photocatalysis,27−35 and solar cells.36−38

A ubiquitous element in all these applications is that charging of the perovskite NCs is involved, either through charge injection, intentional electronic doping, or photoexcitation followed by charge separation.21,39−42 Charging can however lead to electrochemical degradation reactions that deteriorate the device’s performance.43−46 For example, in the case of CsPbBr3 NCs, reduction of Pb2+ and oxidation of Br– ions can occur, resulting in cathodic decomposition (eq 1) and anodic decomposition (eq 2), respectively.45,461

2

The formal potentials of these reactions, and , depend on the solubility product (Ksp) of the perovskite in the electrolyte solution, as expressed by eqs 3 and 4.463

4

Here, and represent the formal potentials for the reduction of free Pb2+ ions and the oxidation of free Br– ions in the same electrolyte solution, R is the gas constant, T temperature and F the Faraday constant. When CsPbBr3 is sparingly soluble in the electrolyte, i.e. Ksp ≪ 1, cathodic decomposition will take place at more negative potentials than the reduction of free Pb2+ ions, whereas anodic decomposition will occur at more positive potentials than the oxidation of free Br– ions.

The positions of the formal potentials of these decomposition reactions relative to the conduction band (CB) and valence band (VB) determine the limits for stable charging of the perovskite by electrons and holes.43,45,46 This implies that the stable electrochemical window for charging should widen with decreasing CsPbBr3 solubility. In our previous work, we reported quasi-reversible electrochemical charging by holes for CsPbBr3 NCs in propylene carbonate (PC), but observed that injection of electrons resulted in cathodic decomposition of the NCs before the CB edge could be reached.46 We tentatively attributed the limited cathodic stability of these NCs to the in-gap potential of , whereas is positioned inside the VB. This implies that CsPbBr3 NCs could be reversibly charged by electrons only in electrolytes with a sufficiently low solubility product for CsPbBr3, pushing the cathodic decomposition potential into the CB. In continuation to these findings, the present work investigates the relation between the solubility equilibria of CsPbBr3 NCs in various electrolytes and their electrochemical stability against cathodic decomposition (eq 1).

Recently a number of scientific publications have addressed the (spectro-)electrochemical characterization of perovskite bulk and NC films.14,44−55 These measurements provide information about the optoelectronic properties, such as the location and nature of trap states and the energy levels of the CB and VB.44−47,49,50,55 However, unintended electrochemical side reactions can introduce numerous features to the cyclic voltammograms (CVs), thereby adding complexity to the analysis of these measurements.44−46,55,56 In relation to this, it is important to note that electrochemistry on perovskites is complicated by their high solubility in nearly all common electrolyte solutions.45,49,50

For electrochemical measurements on CsPbBr3, this has two important consequences: (i) Dissolved Pb2+-complexes in the electrolyte are reduced at electrochemical potentials inside the bandgap, thereby constraining the nonfaradaic electrochemical window, and (ii) cathodic decomposition of CsPbBr3 (eq 1) occurs before the CB can be populated with electrons. In the case of NCs, these two effects are further modulated by the presence of surface ligands, such as oleate complexes. The binding equilibrium of these ligands strongly influences the energetics of electrochemical surface reactions and the dissolution of the NCs in the electrolyte. The solubility of Cs+ and Pb2+ in low polarity solvents will be strongly enhanced by their coordination to oleate ligands commonly employed in perovskite NC synthesis, while Br– ions will be solubilized by oleylammonium ions. It is evident that comprehending the solubility of both the CsPbBr3 lattice and the surface ligands is indispensable to obtain a solid understanding of electrochemical processes on CsPbBr3 NCs.

In this work, we systematically investigate the cathodic decomposition of CsPbBr3 NCs and bulk thin films in various electrolytes through a series of spectro-electrochemical experiments, which combine cyclic voltammetry with measurements of the optical density (OD) and PL. To identify the observed electrochemical features in the CVs, we compare these measurements with the CVs obtained from solutions of Pb2+-containing salts, such as PbBr2 and Pb-oleate (Pb(OA)2). Furthermore, we determined the solubility of bulk CsPbBr3 in 26 solvents, along with the solubility of CsOA and Pb(OA)2 in the five most pertinent electrolyte solvents. Since the exact nature of the ligand–ion complexes that are involved in the dissolution of CsPbBr3 is complex and unknown, we use the solubility of CsOA and Pb(OA)2 as a proxy for the relative solubility of surface ligand complexes across different media. For clarity, throughout this text, we refer to general Pb2+-surface ligand complexes as Pb-ligand complexes, while using Pb(OA)2 to denote the isolatable compound. The solubility analysis contributes to understanding the observed trends in the electrochemical response of CsPbBr3 NCs in these electrolytes.

The results show that CsPbBr3 is fairly soluble in high-polarity solvents like PC (Ksp = 10–12 mol5/L5), but only sparingly soluble in lower polarity solvents such as dichloromethane (DCM, Ksp ≤ 10–37 mol5/L5). The solubility of the surface ligand complexes is, however, orthogonal to CsPbBr3, displaying the highest solubility in DCM and only limited solubility in PC. We find that for bulk CsPbBr3 films in DCM, the cathodic decomposition potential of −1.7 V vs Fc/Fc+ is indeed determined by Ksp of the ions. In contrast, the electrochemical response of NC films consistently exhibits features around −1.2 V vs Fc/Fc+ in all electrolytes; the same is observed for bulk thin films in high-polarity solvents. We attribute these cathodic features at −1.2 V vs Fc/Fc+ to the reduction of Pb2+-complexes in solution. This is in line with the orthogonal solubility of bulk CsPbBr3 and Pb-ligand complexes, which implies that for CsPbBr3 NCs a significant amount of dissolved Pb2+-complexes is present in all electrolytes.

Ex situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements, combined with in situ spectro-electrochemical measurements are used to verify the assignment of the different electrochemical features. These measurements confirm that both cathodic features, observed at −1.7 and −1.2 V vs Fc/Fc+, lead to the formation of metallic Pb0. The cathodic feature at −1.7 V is accompanied by a swift dissolution of the CsPbBr3 lattice, with the decrease of the perovskite OD proportional to the current, indicative of cathodic decomposition. Conversely, the cathodic features around −1.2 V stem from the reduction of dissolved Pb2+-complexes at the electrode. Nonetheless, a noticeable rise in dissolution of the CsPbBr3 NCs is associated with this electrochemical feature. This observation suggests a correlation between the reduction of Pb2+-complexes in solution and the dissolution of the CsPbBr3 NCs, by influencing the dissolution equilibrium.

In addition to this, we observe strong changes to the PL of the CsPbBr3 NCs. The PL intensity shows an initial increase as the potential is swept to values negative of the formal potential of the Pb2+-complexes in solution, suggesting that significant electrochemical restructuring occurs on the NC surface. Beyond the cathodic decomposition potential of bulk CsPbBr3, a rapid and irreversible decline of the PL is observed. These changes in the PL are more pronounced in lower-polarity electrolyte solvents like DCM, where the solubility of Pb-ligand complexes is comparatively higher. Spectro-electrochemical measurements in these electrolytes show a highly irreversible electrochemical response with rapid cathodic decomposition of the NCs. Contrastingly, measurements in higher-polarity electrolytes like PC demonstrate relative stability and reversibility.

Altogether, our spectro-electrochemical experiments indicate that a high Pb(OA)2 solubility, which is associated with an increased dissolution of Pb-ligand complexes of the NCs, diminishes their cathodic stability. The current work unravels the electrochemical signatures of CsPbBr3 NCs and offers insights to improve their electrochemical stability via a combination of surface ligands and electrolytes. This is particularly relevant for applications that involve a CsPbBr3 electrode–electrolyte interface, such as light-emitting electrochemical cells (LECs),22,23 photocatalysis,27−34 and electrochemical doping.46

Results

In this work we investigate the electrochemical stability of CsPbBr3 NCs and bulk crystals, both deposited as thin films on conductive indium tin oxide (ITO) coated glass substrates. Details on the experimental methods are provided in the Supporting Information. Briefly, the NCs were synthesized following a protocol of Imran et al.,12 and the NC thin film electrodes were prepared through our previously reported procedure.46 The CsPbBr3 bulk films were made using a layer-by-layer thermal evaporation method, following Xie et al.57 The optical characteristics of the CsPbBr3 NC dispersion, NC film and bulk film are shown in Figure 1a, with additional information available in the Supporting Information, Sections SI-7 and SI-8. For electrochemical measurements, an important difference between these two films lies in their microstructure (see electron microscopy images in Figure 1b,c). Simultaneous with the injection of charges, electrolyte ions permeate into the voids of the porous NC film to provide nanoscale charge compensation. In contrast, the charge compensation of the bulk film is limited to the surface of the macroscopic CsPbBr3 crystals. The bulk films are consequently expected to function as 2D electrodes, whereas NC films behave as 3D nanoporous electrodes.

Figure 1 (a) OD (dashed lines) and PL (solid lines) spectra of a CsPbBr3 NC dispersion in toluene (red lines), a CsPbBr3 NC thin film (blue lines), and a bulk CsPbBr3 thin film (black lines) used in this work. (b) A scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the thermally evaporated bulk film. (c) Transmission electron microscope (TEM) image of the colloidal NCs. (d) The spectro-electrochemical cell used in this work, featuring a CsPbBr3 NC film electrode in a three-electrode arrangement.

Electrochemical Signatures of CsPbBr3 NCs and Bulk Films

The electrodes were mounted in a three-electrode electrochemical cell (Figure 1d), and CV measurements were performed in an electrolyte solution of 0.1 M tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate (TBAPF6) in either PC or DCM. The resulting CVs are shown in Figure 2. The potential is swept from the open circuit potential (VOC, indicated by the green triangle) in the negative direction, decreasing to −2.0 V vs Fc/Fc+, and then in the positive direction to −0.2 V vs Fc/Fc+. All CVs show three cycles to distinguish between reversible and irreversible electrochemical waves. A dashed line indicates the estimated potential of the CB edge, which is established by referencing the VB potential at +0.5 V vs Fc/Fc+ as determined in our previous research,46 and subtracting the optical bandgap. The position of the CB edge implies that all electrochemical features observed in the CVs occur within the CsPbBr3 bandgap.

Figure 2 Three CV cycles of a CsPbBr3 NC film electrode in (a) PC and (b) DCM, as well as (c) a blank ITO electrode in an undersaturated ionic solution of CsPbBr3 in PC, and (d) a bulk CsPbBr3 film electrode in DCM. The scan direction is indicated by the black arrows, and Roman numerals denote specific electrochemical features discussed in the text. All CVs begin at the VOC, indicated by a green triangle, with the potential swept in the negative direction at a scan rate of 10 mV/s. The supporting electrolyte used in all measurements is 0.1 M TBAPF6. Circled numbers are referenced for the discussion of the optical effects (vide infra). The sparse dashed lines indicate the corresponding potentials. The dense dashed line indicates the estimated potential of the CB edge.

As displayed in Figure 2, CV measurements of the NC electrodes in PC (Figure 2a) and DCM (Figure 2b) show both similarities and distinct differences. Several key observations can be made.(1) The CVs for both PC and DCM contain a first cathodic peak (labeled IA) starting at approximately −1.2 V vs Fc/Fc+ (potential ①) in the first cycle, which shifts to less negative potentials in the subsequent cycles (labeled IB).

(2) A second cathodic wave (labeled II) commences at −1.7 V vs Fc/Fc+ (potential ②) and shows a steady increase of the current within the scanned potential range in both measurements.

(3) In the reverse scan, multiple anodic waves (labeled IIIA,B,C) are observed, commencing around −1.0 to −1.1 V vs Fc/Fc+ (potential ③) in both measurements.

(4) The CVs display a chemically irreversible reduction reaction in both measurements, where the integrated cathodic current (Qcat) surpasses the integrated anodic current (Qan) in the reverse scan. Notably, this irreversibility is more pronounced in DCM (Qan/Qcat = 0.03) than in PC (Qan/Qcat = 0.33).

To understand the nature of the observed electrochemical features in these CVs, we conducted identical measurements using a blank ITO working electrode in an undersaturated solution of Cs+, Pb2+ and Br– ions in PC, obtained by dissolving equimolar amounts of CsBr and PbBr2 in the electrolyte. The resulting CV, displayed in Figure 2c, shows striking similarities with the CV of the NC film in PC from Figure 2a. Clearly, both the cathodic peak positions (waves IA,B) and the anodic peak positions (waves IIIA,B,C) coincide in the CVs for both measurements. This shows that the origin of these peaks in the CV of the NC film is the reduction of Pb2+ ions in solution and the oxidation of metallic Pb0 back to Pb2+, rather than the cathodic decomposition and reformation of CsPbBr3. The electrochemical reduction to metallic Pb0 is confirmed by XRD and XPS measurements, as shown in SI-9 and SI-10. In addition, the electrodes visibly exhibit the formation of a dark metallic layer, as is also observed from increased light scattering in the OD measurements (vide infra). Consistent with classical nucleation theory and chronoamperometry measurements described in SI-9, we attribute the potential shift between cathodic waves IA and IB to a nucleation overpotential in the first cycle, which facilitates the formation of Pb0-nuclei on the electrode.58−60 Since not all Pb0 is oxidized in the anodic wave (Qan/Qcat = 0.33), some of the Pb0 domains persist throughout the subsequent cycles, such that this nucleation overpotential is observed only in the first cycle. The primary difference between the CVs of the NC films and the blank ITO electrode in a solution of Cs+, Pb2+ and Br– ions in PC, is the absence of the cathodic wave II in the latter measurement. Hence, we tentatively attribute cathodic wave II to cathodic decomposition of the NCs involving reaction 1 (vide infra).

Cathodic wave II commences at approximately −1.7 V vs Fc/Fc+ (potential ②) for both measurements of the NC films (Figure 2a,b). However, the current associated with this wave is roughly four times larger in DCM than in PC. As discussed in more detail below, low-polarity solvents (e.g., DCM) are expected to exhibit much lower CsPbBr3 solubilities than high-polarity solvents (e.g., PC), which consequently should lead to a more negative cathodic decomposition potential in the former case. Given this, it is surprising at first glance that the NC film displays a much larger cathodic decomposition current in DCM than in PC. Additionally, wave I, associated with the reduction of Pb2+ ions in solution, shows a 2.5-fold larger current in DCM than in PC. We find that both observations can be explained by the orthogonal solubility of CsPbBr3 and the Pb-ligand complexes (vide infra), which implies that a significant amount of dissolved Pb2+-complexes is present in all electrolytes. We tentatively attribute cathodic wave I in the measurement of the NC film in DCM to the reduction of dissolved Pb-ligand complexes, as CV measurements of a solution of Pb(OA)2 in DCM show a cathodic peak at −1.4 V vs Fc/Fc+ (see SI-11), similar to the position of wave I in the CV of the NC film.

To investigate the electrochemical response of CsPbBr3 in the absence of surface ligands, we performed identical CV measurements on thermally evaporated bulk CsPbBr3 films in DCM. The resulting CV is displayed in Figure 2d. Like the CV measurement of the NC film in DCM, the bulk film displays a large cathodic current at approximately −1.7 V vs Fc/Fc+, i.e. wave II. Since this wave is consistently present in all CVs involving CsPbBr3 electrodes, but not in the CV of a solution of Cs+, Pb2+ and Br– ions, this reinforces our assignment of wave II as the cathodic decomposition reaction. The cathodic current of wave II in the CV of the bulk film in DCM is ∼3.5 times larger than for the NC film in DCM, and ∼17 times larger compared to that of NC film in PC. This suggests that the cathodic reactivity of bare CsPbBr3 surfaces is substantially larger than for passivated NCs, as demonstrated by the rapidly diminishing current in the second cycle and its near disappearance in the third cycle of the CV for the bulk film, indicating that the CsPbBr3 has fully decomposed. A key difference between the CVs of the bulk film and NC film is the absence of wave I in the first cycle of the bulk film. This is again a strong indication that wave I is associated with the reduction of Pb2+-complexes in solution, which are absent (or present at much lower concentration) for the bulk film in DCM.

Solubility of CsPbBr3 and Ligand Complexes in Various Electrolyte Solvents

To quantify the solubility of CsPbBr3 and oleate surface ligand complexes in different electrolyte solvents, we conducted inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) measurements using saturated solutions of CsPbBr3, Pb(OA)2 and CsOA in PC, DCM, and a large number of other common electrolyte solvents. A full overview of the CsPbBr3 solubility in 26 different solvents, along with the solubility of Pb(OA)2 and CsOA in a selection of five solvents, can be found in SI-12 to SI-16. In this discussion, we will focus on the solubility of CsPbBr3 and Pb(OA)2 in five representative electrolyte solvents: PC, DCM, acetonitrile (MeCN), benzonitrile (PhCN) and tetrahydrofuran (THF).

Figure 3a displays the Pb2+ concentration of the CsPbBr3 (solid circles) and Pb(OA)2 (open circles) solutions at saturation, as determined by ICP-OES measurements (see SI-6 for the measurement details). Assuming a full ionic dissociation of CsPbBr3 in these solutions, we approximate its solubility product Following eq 3, the expected electrochemical stabilization potential of CsPbBr3, , is displayed in Figure 3b. As observed, the CsPbBr3 solubility in DCM (≤2.03 × 10–5 mM) is at least 5 orders of magnitude lower than in PC (∼2.38 mM). The solubility in DCM is so low that no Pb-signal could be recorded above the background noise (<50 ppb) in ICP-OES. The determined molar solubility and Ksp of ≤10–37 mol5/L5 therefore represent upper limits. In contrast, the measured Ksp in PC is ∼10–12 mol5/L5. This implies a ≥0.75 V difference for the cathodic decomposition potential of CsPbBr3 in PC and DCM. Generally, the solubility of CsPbBr3 tends to increase with the relative permittivity of the solvents, as is expected for ionic solutes. The divergence of the CsPbBr3 solubility in THF and DCM, despite their similar relative permittivity, might be attributed to the mild Lewis basicity of THF, allowing it to coordinate with Pb2+ and Cs+ ions in solution.

Figure 3 (a) [Pb2+] in solutions of CsPbBr3 and Pb(OA)2 in PC, acetonitrile (MeCN), benzonitrile (PhCN), THF and DCM at saturation, as determined by ICP-OES elemental analysis. (b) The solubility product Ksp of CsPbBr3, estimated from the measured [Pb2+] displayed in (a). The right axis shows the expected electrochemical stabilization based on Ksp, as calculated through eq 3. (c) The ratio of the determined molar Pb(OA)2 solubility and the molar CsPbBr3 solubility. This ratio indicates whether CsPbBr3 NCs are stabilized against dissolution primarily by their surface ligands (<1), or by the bulk CsPbBr3 solubility (>1). For all subfigures, the data points are plotted versus the relative permittivity of the solvents used.

The opposite trend is observed for the solubility of Pb(OA)2 in the same solvents (indicated by the open circles in Figure 3a), serving as a proxy for the relative solubility of Pb-ligand complexes in these media. Pb(OA)2 is highly soluble in DCM (∼33 mM) and only sparingly soluble in PC (∼50 μM). This implies that the solubility of CsPbBr3 and the Pb-ligand complexes is orthogonal. Figure 3c summarizes these trends by displaying the ratio of the molar solubilities of Pb(OA)2 and CsPbBr3 in the examined solvents.

This highlights an important complication for electrochemical measurements on ligand-passivated CsPbBr3 NCs: In low-polarity solvents (e.g., DCM), the NCs are prone to dissolution of Pb and Cs ligand complexes. Conversely, dissolution of the CsPbBr3 lattice occurs in high-polarity solvents (e.g., PC). While the presence of poorly soluble surface ligands hampers the dissolution of the CsPbBr3 NC core, we consider that these surface ligands are dynamically bound, allowing the underlying CsPbBr3 lattice to dissolve gradually. In other words, Pb2+-complexes are inherently introduced in all electrolyte solvents during measurements on NC films. This analysis explains the appearance of wave I in the CVs of the NC films, which we tentatively attributed to the reduction of dissolved Pb2+-complexes, and its absence in the case of a bulk film in DCM.

Following these solubility trends, low-polarity electrolyte solvents like DCM have lower CsPbBr3 solubilities and, consequently, more negative cathodic decomposition potentials than high-polarity solvents like PC. However, as discussed earlier, the CVs show an increased cathodic reactivity for the NC film in DCM compared to PC. We propose that the cathodic stability of NC films can be severely influenced by dissimilar ligand surface coverages, as a consequence of the varying solubility of oleate ligand complexes in these media. To investigate this further, we recorded the OD and PL spectra of the films in situ during electrochemical cycling. We focus our discussion on the results in PC and DCM, i.e. the two extremes in terms of the solubility of the bulk and surface. Similar experiments were performed in MeCN, PhCN and THF, as reported in SI-22 to SI-24.

In Situ Spectro-electrochemical Measurement of the OD

Figure 4a–c show false-color images of the change to the OD of the NC- and bulk-films as a function of the applied potential, measured during the CVs displayed in Figure 2. Absorption spectra at selected potentials (horizontal slices of the 2D images shown in Figure 4a–c) are shown in Section SI-27. The bulk CsPbBr3 film (Figure 4a) exhibits swift changes in the OD at potentials negative of −1.7 V vs Fc/Fc+, coinciding with the onset of cathodic wave II at potential ②. Below the band edge (>550 nm), the OD strongly increases due to scattering by the metallic Pb0 that is deposited on the electrode. Simultaneously, a rapid decrease of the OD above the band edge is observed as the CsPbBr3 undergoes near-complete cathodic dissolution. The same effects are observed for the NC film in DCM (Figure 4b). The absolute changes in the OD are smaller as the film is thinner, yet the CsPbBr3 NC absorption is entirely gone after three CV cycles, similar to the behavior of the bulk film. This is in sharp contrast to the small and relatively reversible changes of the OD for the NC film in PC (Figure 4c). The band edge absorption has decreased by only 20% after three CV cycles, indicating that the cathodic decomposition of the NCs occurs more sluggish. These differences are further highlighted in SI-17 and SI-27, showing the change in OD spectra during and after the CVs.

Figure 4 False-color images showing the changes to the OD of (a) a bulk CsPbBr3 film in DCM, (b) an NC film in DCM and (c) an NC film in PC, measured in situ during the three CV cycles displayed in Figure 2. Each figure includes an overlay of the initial OD spectrum, along with the wavelength regions (dotted lines) used for averaging the band-edge and sub-bandgap changes. Horizontal dotted lines indicate the turning points of the CV scans. (d) Shows the dOD/dV spectrum (black) and the corresponding first CV cycle (red) for the bulk CsPbBr3 film in DCM and (e) the NC film in DCM, and (f) the NC film in PC. The dOD/dV spectra are specific for changes to the perovskite absorbance, by correcting the OD at the band-edge for shifts in the baseline at sub-bandgap wavelength. The starting point of the CV at VOC (green triangle), the scan direction (black arrows), and the potentials discussed in the text (circled numbers) are indicated in each figure.

The onset of the cathodic decomposition reaction should coincide with a decrease in the band-edge absorbance of the CsPbBr3 film. No significant changes in the band-edge absorbance are expected at more positive potentials, in the absence of film dissolution. Nonetheless, the analysis of the OD spectra is complicated by shifts in the baseline, as the electrodeposition of metallic Pb0 on the electrode results in increased light scattering. To this end, we correct the measured changes in the perovskite band-edge absorbance by subtracting the sub-bandgap changes from the OD, as indicated in Figure 4a–c. For example, for the bulk film in DCM, shown in Figure 4a, we subtract the ΔOD signal averaged between 550 and 600 nm from the ΔOD signal averaged between 500 and 550 nm (dashed vertical lines in Figure 4a). This correction yields a ΔOD signal that is specific for changes in the perovskite absorbance only, as shown in SI-18. Here, we work under the assumption that the baseline offset at sub-bandgap wavelengths is similar at the band-edge of the perovskite.

Figures 4d–f display dOD/dV vs the applied potential (black lines) and the corresponding CVs (red lines). Both curves show a strong similarity, especially for the bulk CsPbBr3 film in DCM. This is because the change in the absorption of the CsPbBr3 film should be proportional to the injected charge Q as each injected electron leads to the cathodic dissolution of a consistent amount of CsPbBr3, i.e. ΔOD ∝ Q. Since the current I = dQ/dt = 1/v·dQ/dV, where v represents the scan rate in V/s, this implies that I should have the same potential dependence as dOD/dV. Hence the change in OD with potential serves as an independent measurement of cathodic dissolution of the CsPbBr3 material.

For the bulk film in DCM (Figure 4d), no changes in the perovskite OD are observed until −1.5 V vs Fc/Fc+ (potential ⓪). The CV shows charge injection when more negative potentials are applied, leading to a gradual decrease of the perovskite OD (dOD/dV < 0). Beyond −1.7 V vs Fc/Fc+ (potential ②), cathodic decomposition leads to a swift dissolution of the entire film. The observation of some cathodic decomposition in the dOD/dV signal beginning between potentials ⓪ and ② could be linked to the reduction of undercoordinated CsPbBr3 sites at the grain boundaries, which experience less electrochemical stabilization from neighboring atoms. The cathodic current and dOD/dV exhibit similar behavior, indicating that all injected charges are directly used for the cathodic decomposition of the bulk perovskite. This confirms the assignment of wave II as the cathodic decomposition reaction and shows that no prior side reactions take place, consistent with the absence of Pb2+-complexes in solution. Interestingly, the reverse scan shows a minor increase in the CsPbBr3 band-edge absorption (dOD/dV > 0) from −0.75 V vs Fc/Fc+, suggesting the anodic formation of CsPbBr3 from electrodeposited Pb0 and dissolved Cs+ and Br– ions. However, the amount of CsPbBr3 formed during the anodic scan is considerably less than the amount lost in cathodic decomposition, in line with the irreversible character of the CV.

The measurements of the NC films in DCM (Figure 4e) and PC (Figure 4f) display similar behavior, but with important differences. In both systems, a continuous decrease of the OD (dOD/dV < 0) is observed even at VOC, which implies that the NCs dissolve gradually in both solvents without an applied potential. Furthermore, the reduction of Pb2+-complexes in solution at −1.2 V vs Fc/Fc+ (potential ①) leads to increased perovskite dissolution in both PC and DCM, although the effect is more pronounced in the latter case. This suggests an interplay between the NC film and the reduction of dissolved Pb2+-complexes. The release of free OA– or Br– ions from this reduction reaction may affect the solubility equilibria of the NCs, potentially promoting their dissolution. This remains speculative at present. Nonetheless, the reduction potential of the cathodic decomposition reaction is clearly reached at −1.7 V vs Fc/Fc+ (potential ②), as observed from the accelerated dissolution of the NCs, with dOD/dV becoming roughly proportional to the current.

In Situ Spectro-electrochemical Measurement of the PL

The differences between the electrochemical behavior of the NC films in PC and DCM are further highlighted by examining the potential-dependent changes of the PL, as shown in Figure 5. Since the bulk film shows no detectable PL, our discussion focuses on the NC films.

Figure 5 (a) False-color image of the change to the PL spectra of NC films in DCM and (b) in PC, measured in situ during the CVs shown in Figure 2a,b. The initial (solid lines) and final (dotted lines) PL spectra are overlaid on each figure. Horizontal dotted lines indicate the turning points of the CV scans. (c) PL spectra of an NC film in DCM during the CV, displaying an increase in PL intensity, along with a blueshift and broadening of the PL peak (inset). (d) PL spectra of the NC film in PC during the CV, displaying a gradual decrease of the PL intensity over time, but without a blueshift or broadening of the PL peak (inset) as observed in (c). Colored lines represent the PL spectra at specific potentials during the first cathodic cycle (1C), first anodic cycle (1A), and second cathodic cycle (2C). (e) The average PL counts of NC films in DCM and (f) in PC between 450 and 600 nm as a function of applied potential, with circled numbers indicating the potentials discussed in the text.

The NC film in DCM (Figure 5a,c,e) displays a sharp initial increase in PL intensity, coinciding with the onset of wave I at −1.1 V vs Fc/Fc+ (potential ③). The PL intensity roughly doubles as the potential is swept to more negative values during the first cathodic scan, and is accompanied by a blue shift and broadening of the PL peak (inset Figure 5c). This suggests that the NCs are etched due to an electrochemical surface reaction, i.e. decreasing the NC size results in an increase of the bandgap energy through quantum confinement. This is further supported by similar observed blue shifts in the OD spectra of the film during the first cycle, as shown in SI-27. The broadening of the PL peak is a result of NCs becoming more polydisperse. A swift collapse of the PL intensity is observed during the reverse scan, consistent with substantial degradation of the NCs due to cathodic decomposition in wave II.

In contrast, the PL changes of the NC film in PC (Figure 5b,d,f) show a more gradual pattern. The PL intensity exhibits a moderate decrease starting at VOC, which we attribute to the slow dissolution of the NCs, independent of the applied potential. The decline in PL intensity clearly increases as the potential is swept negative of −1.7 V vs Fc/Fc+ (potential ②), consistent with cathodic decomposition occurring in wave II. An increase in PL intensity is observed only in the second and third cycles, albeit to a much lesser extent. Furthermore, no blue shift or broadening of the PL peak is observed, as etched NCs will fully dissolve immediately in PC due to their high solubility. The PL retains over 40% of its original intensity after three CV cycles. The subtle PL changes are consistent with the relatively small cathodic currents and minor changes to the perovskite OD.

Altogether, these findings show that the CsPbBr3 NC film in PC exhibits a higher stability against cathodic decomposition compared to the films in DCM. This suggests that the electrochemical stability of CsPbBr3 NCs is primarily governed by surface passivation, rather than Ksp of CsPbBr3 in the electrolyte. We note that electrochemical measurements of NC films in MeCN, PhCN and THF yield similar results, as shown in SI-22 to SI-24. In PhCN and THF, we observe a strong initial gain in PL intensity, followed by an irreversible collapse. In contrast, the measurement in MeCN exhibits more gradual PL changes, similar to the case of PC. Overall, we note a positive correlation between the extent of the changes in PL intensity and the solubility of Pb-ligand complexes in the electrolyte (Figure 3a). This supports our notion that increasing the ligands’ surface coverage protects the NCs against cathodic decomposition.

For the NC film in DCM, the initial increase in PL intensity, the blue shift and the broadening of the PL peak all coincide with the onset of cathodic wave I (potential ③). This suggests a complex interplay between the NCs and the reduction of dissolved Pb2+-complexes. Potential-dependent changes of the PL intensity have been reported for various NC systems. For instance, in CdTe NCs, a strong increase in the PL quantum yield at negative potentials was attributed to the filling of trap states formed by undercoordinated Te surface atoms.61,62 Brovelli et al. previously observed similar PL increases of CsPbBr3 NC films at negative potentials and attributed the effect to a filling of static trap states.16 While such mechanisms cannot be ruled out, it is clear that significant electrochemical restructuring occurs during our CVs of NC films and it is likely that this is responsible for the gain in PL intensity. Since we observe that the PL increase correlates with the onset of Pb2+ reduction and NC etching we propose that the formation of metallic Pb0 domains on the electrode, or alterations in ligand surface coverage of the NCs (e.g., loss of surface Br– ions which could act as trap states), can influence the electronic structure by removing trap states from the bandgap, leading to an initial increase in PLQY in the case of CsPbBr3 NC films in DCM.

The orthogonal solubility of CsPbBr3 and the Pb-ligand complexes prevents stable electrochemical measurements of CsPbBr3 NCs in common electrolytes. An open question remains whether an electrolyte can be found in which both the CsPbBr3 lattice and the surface ligand complexes exhibit a sufficiently low solubility. Hydrofluoroethers have been proposed as a promising class of electrolyte solvents for perovskite electrochemistry in literature.47,50 Although we measured the bulk CsPbBr3 solubility in methoxyperfluorobutane and found it to be very low, we did not manage to obtain electrolytes with satisfactory ionic conductivity for electrochemical measurements, i.e., without experiencing significant Ohmic overpotentials. A more promising approach for stable electrochemical measurements would be to engineer CsPbBr3 NCs with different surface ligands that exhibit much lower solubility in low-polarity solvents like DCM, such as zwitterionic ligands that coordinate to multiple ions on the NC surface. Alternatively, the use of core–shell CsPbBr3 NCs with an insoluble shell could be an interesting avenue.

Conclusions

The results presented in this work show that the cathodic electrochemical response of CsPbBr3 NC films is dominated by the reduction (and oxidation) of Pb2+-complexes in solution. Using ICP-OES, we demonstrate that this originates from the orthogonal solubility of the CsPbBr3 lattice and NC surface ligand complexes in high- and low-polarity solvents. This poses an inherent challenge for electrochemical applications and measurements of CsPbBr3 NC films. Measurements on ligand-free CsPbBr3 bulk films in low-polar DCM, which are not complicated by this orthogonality, indeed show cleaner CV measurements, influenced solely by the cathodic bulk decomposition at −1.7 V vs Fc/Fc+. However, as we show with in situ optical measurements, NC films can be relatively stable in high-polarity solvents due to the insolubility of the ligand shell, preventing the NCs from rapid and complete degradation, and allowing for swift electrochemical measurements. When performing these measurements, we therefore, suggest a careful selection of the electrolyte solvent: low-polarity for ligand-free bulk perovskites and high-polarity for ligand-passivated NCs.

Nevertheless, cathodic decomposition occurs before the CB can be populated with electrons in all electrochemical experiments on CsPbBr3 NC and bulk films. This limited cathodic stability forms an inherent complication for applications that involve a semiconductor–electrolyte interface, such as in LECs or photocatalysis.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.4c06340.Experimental methods (used materials, synthesis of CsPbBr3 NCs, Pb(OA)2 and CsOA, preparation of thin film electrodes, and equipment and measurement details); characterization of CsPbBr3 NCs and thin films (absorbance, PL, TEM and SEM images, XRD); spectro-electrochemical measurements of CsPbBr3 NC electrodes in additional electrolyte solvents, or combined with supplementary characterization techniques (CV, chronoamperometry, in situ absorbance and PL measurements, XPS, XRD); solubility data of CsPbBr3, Pb(OA)2 and CsOA in a variety of solvents (ICP-OES, XRD); extended analysis of the presented spectro-electrochemical data (PDF)

Supplementary Material

ja4c06340_si_001.pdf

Author Contributions

∥ J.T.M. and J.O.V.M. contributed equally.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgments

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement no. 766900 (Testing the large-scale limit of quantum mechanics). The authors gratefully acknowledge Liberato Manna and Luca de Trizio (IIT Genova) for their valuable advice and fruitful discussions.
==== Refs
References

Al Ghaithi A. O. ; Aravindh S. A. ; Hedhili M. N. ; Ng T. K. ; Ooi B. S. ; Najar A. Optical Properties and First-Principles Study of CH3NH3PbBr3 Perovskite Structures. ACS Omega 2020, 5 (21 ), 12313–12319. 10.1021/acsomega.0c01044.32548414
Zhao S. ; Wu J. ; Chi X. ; Sui N. ; Kang Z. ; Zhou Q. ; Zhang H. z. ; Zhao B. ; Wang Y. Optical Properties of Inorganic Halide Perovskite Nanorods: Role of Anisotropy, Temperature, Pressure, and Nonlinearity. J. Phys. Chem. C 2022, 126 (4 ), 2003–2012. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c06331.
Yokoyama M. ; Sato R. ; Enomoto J. ; Oshita N. ; Kimura T. ; Kikuchi K. ; Asakura S. ; Umemoto K. ; Masuhara A. Water-Assisted Perovskite Quantum Dots with High Optical Properties. Technologies 2022, 10 (1 ), 11 10.3390/technologies10010011.
Guan X. ; Lei Z. ; Yu X. ; Lin C.-H. ; Huang J.-K. ; Huang C.-Y. ; Hu L. ; Li F. ; Vinu A. ; Yi J. ; Wu T. Low-Dimensional Metal-Halide Perovskites as High-Performance Materials for Memory Applications. Small 2022, 18 (38 ), 2203311 10.1002/smll.202203311.
Ren X. ; Zhang X. ; Xie H. ; Cai J. ; Wang C. ; Chen E. ; Xu S. ; Ye Y. ; Sun J. ; Yan Q. ; Guo T. Perovskite Quantum Dots for Emerging Displays: Recent Progress and Perspectives. Nanomaterials 2022, 12 (13 ), 2243 10.3390/nano12132243.35808081
Umemoto K. ; Yokoyama M. ; Kikuchi K. ; Kimura T. ; Oshita N. ; Sato R. ; Asakura S. ; Masuhara A. Continuous-flow synthesis of ultrahigh luminescent perovskite nanocrystals using forced thin film reactor and application for light-emitting diodes. Appl. Phys. Express 2022, 15 (2 ), 025503 10.35848/1882-0786/ac4a0b.
Lee Y. J. ; Han J. S. ; Lee D. E. ; Lee T. H. ; Kim J. Y. ; Suh J. M. ; Lee J. H. ; Im I. H. ; Kim S. J. ; Kwak K. J. ; Jang H. W. High Hole Mobility Inorganic Halide Perovskite Field-Effect Transistors with Enhanced Phase Stability and Interfacial Defect Tolerance. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2022, 8 (1 ), 2100624 10.1002/aelm.202100624.
Zhang X. ; Turiansky M. E. ; Van de Walle C. G. Correctly Assessing Defect Tolerance in Halide Perovskites. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124 (11 ), 6022–6027. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c01324.
du Fossé I. ; Mulder J. T. ; Almeida G. ; Spruit A. G. M. ; Infante I. ; Grozema F. C. ; Houtepen A. J. Limits of Defect Tolerance in Perovskite Nanocrystals: Effect of Local Electrostatic Potential on Trap States. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144 (25 ), 11059–11063. 10.1021/jacs.2c02027.35765828
Protesescu L. ; Yakunin S. ; Bodnarchuk M. I. ; Krieg F. ; Caputo R. ; Hendon C. H. ; Yang R. X. ; Walsh A. ; Kovalenko M. V. Nanocrystals of Cesium Lead Halide Perovskites (CsPbX3, X = Cl, Br, and I): Novel Optoelectronic Materials Showing Bright Emission with Wide Color Gamut. Nano Lett. 2015, 15 (6 ), 3692–3696. 10.1021/nl5048779.25633588
Kovalenko M. V. ; Protesescu L. ; Bodnarchuk M. I. Properties and potential optoelectronic applications of lead halide perovskite nanocrystals. Science 2017, 358 (6364 ), 745–750. 10.1126/science.aam7093.29123061
Imran M. ; Caligiuri V. ; Wang M. ; Goldoni L. ; Prato M. ; Krahne R. ; De Trizio L. ; Manna L. Benzoyl Halides as Alternative Precursors for the Colloidal Synthesis of Lead-Based Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140 (7 ), 2656–2664. 10.1021/jacs.7b13477.29378131
Akkerman Q. A. ; Nguyen T. P. T. ; Boehme S. C. ; Montanarella F. ; Dirin D. N. ; Wechsler P. ; Beiglböck F. ; Rainò G. ; Erni R. ; Katan C. ; Even J. ; Kovalenko M. V. Controlling the nucleation and growth kinetics of lead halide perovskite quantum dots. Science 2022, 377 (6613 ), 1406–1412. 10.1126/science.abq3616.36074820
Roy M. ; Sykora M. ; Aslam M. Chemical Aspects of Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals. Top. Curr. Chem. 2024, 382 (1 ), 9 10.1007/s41061-024-00453-0.
Zhu C. ; Feld L. G. ; Svyrydenko M. ; Cherniukh I. ; Dirin D. N. ; Bodnarchuk M. I. ; Wood V. ; Yazdani N. ; Boehme S. C. ; Kovalenko M. V. ; Rainò G. Quantifying the Size-Dependent Exciton-Phonon Coupling Strength in Single Lead-Halide Perovskite Quantum Dots. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2024, 12 (8 ), 2301534 10.1002/adom.202301534.
Lorenzon M. ; Sortino L. ; Akkerman Q. ; Accornero S. ; Pedrini J. ; Prato M. ; Pinchetti V. ; Meinardi F. ; Manna L. ; Brovelli S. Role of Nonradiative Defects and Environmental Oxygen on Exciton Recombination Processes in CsPbBr3 Perovskite Nanocrystals. Nano Lett. 2017, 17 (6 ), 3844–3853. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01253.28480698
Imran M. ; Ijaz P. ; Goldoni L. ; Maggioni D. ; Petralanda U. ; Prato M. ; Almeida G. ; Infante I. ; Manna L. Simultaneous Cationic and Anionic Ligand Exchange For Colloidally Stable CsPbBr3 Nanocrystals. ACS Energy Lett. 2019, 4 (4 ), 819–824. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b00140.
Zaccaria F. ; Zhang B. ; Goldoni L. ; Imran M. ; Zito J. ; van Beek B. ; Lauciello S. ; De Trizio L. ; Manna L. ; Infante I. The Reactivity of CsPbBr3 Nanocrystals toward Acid/Base Ligands. ACS Nano 2022, 16 (1 ), 1444–1455. 10.1021/acsnano.1c09603.35005882
Morad V. ; Stelmakh A. ; Svyrydenko M. ; Feld L. G. ; Boehme S. C. ; Aebli M. ; Affolter J. ; Kaul C. J. ; Schrenker N. J. ; Bals S. ; Sahin Y. ; Dirin D. N. ; Cherniukh I. ; Raino G. ; Baumketner A. ; Kovalenko M. V. Designer phospholipid capping ligands for soft metal halide nanocrystals. Nature 2024, 626 (7999 ), 542–548. 10.1038/s41586-023-06932-6.38109940
De Trizio L. ; Infante I. ; Manna L. Surface Chemistry of Lead Halide Perovskite Colloidal Nanocrystals. Acc. Chem. Res. 2023, 56 (13 ), 1815–1825. 10.1021/acs.accounts.3c00174.37347953
Yan F. ; Tan S. T. ; Li X. ; Demir H. V. Light Generation in Lead Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals: LEDs, Color Converters, Lasers, and Other Applications. Small 2019, 15 (47 ), 1902079 10.1002/smll.201902079.
Alahbakhshi M. ; Mishra A. ; Haroldson R. ; Ishteev A. ; Moon J. ; Gu Q. ; Slinker J. D. ; Zakhidov A. A. Bright and Effectual Perovskite Light-Emitting Electrochemical Cells Leveraging Ionic Additives. ACS Energy Lett. 2019, 4 (12 ), 2922–2928. 10.1021/acsenergylett.9b01925.
Liu Y. ; Tang S. ; Fan J. ; Gracia-Espino E. ; Yang J. ; Liu X. ; Kera S. ; Fahlman M. ; Larsen C. ; Wågberg T. ; Edman L. ; Wang J. Highly Soluble CsPbBr3 Perovskite Quantum Dots for Solution-Processed Light-Emission Devices. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021, 4 (2 ), 1162–1174. 10.1021/acsanm.0c02797.
Kang W.-L. ; Tsai Y.-T. ; Ji Y.-C. ; Yi R.-H. ; Wang Y.-X. ; Shen H.-L. ; Chen X.-J. ; Hsu Y.-C. ; Lu C.-W. ; Yang Z.-P. ; Su H.-C. Perovskite Light-Emitting Electrochemical Cells Employing Electron Injection/Transport Layers of Ionic Transition Metal Complexes. Chem.—Eur. J. 2021, 27 (71 ), 17785–17793. 10.1002/chem.202103739.34747069
Dong Q. ; Lei L. ; Mendes J. ; So F. Operational stability of perovskite light emitting diodes. Journal of Physics: Materials 2020, 3 (1 ), 012002 10.1088/2515-7639/ab60c4.
Liu Z. ; Sinatra L. ; Lutfullin M. ; Ivanov Y. P. ; Divitini G. ; De Trizio L. ; Manna L. One Hundred-Nanometer-Sized CsPbBr3/m-SiO2 Composites Prepared via Molten-Salts Synthesis are Optimal Green Phosphors for LCD Display Devices. Adv. Energy Mater. 2022, 12 (38 ), 2201948 10.1002/aenm.202201948.
Xu Y.-F. ; Yang M.-Z. ; Chen B.-X. ; Wang X.-D. ; Chen H.-Y. ; Kuang D.-B. ; Su C.-Y. A CsPbBr3 Perovskite Quantum Dot/Graphene Oxide Composite for Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139 (16 ), 5660–5663. 10.1021/jacs.7b00489.28385017
Wang Q. ; Tao L. ; Jiang X. ; Wang M. ; Shen Y. Graphene oxide wrapped CH3NH3PbBr3 perovskite quantum dots hybrid for photoelectrochemical CO2 reduction in organic solvents. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 465 , 607–613. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.09.215.
Li L. ; Gan L. ; Zhang Z. Encapsulation Strategy on All Inorganic Perovskites for Stable and Efficient Photoelectrocatalytic Water Splitting. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 8 (13 ), 2100202 10.1002/admi.202100202.
Wang X.-D. ; Huang Y.-H. ; Liao J.-F. ; Wei Z.-F. ; Li W.-G. ; Xu Y.-F. ; Chen H.-Y. ; Kuang D.-B. Surface passivated halide perovskite single-crystal for efficient photoelectrochemical synthesis of dimethoxydihydrofuran. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12 (1 ), 1202 10.1038/s41467-021-21487-8.33619252
Qian X. ; Chen Z. ; Yang X. ; Zhao W. ; Liu C. ; Sun T. ; Zhou D. ; Yang Q. ; Wei G. ; Fan M. Perovskite cesium lead bromide quantum dots: A new efficient photocatalyst for degrading antibiotic residues in organic system. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 249 , 119335 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119335.
Chen K. ; Qi K. ; Zhou T. ; Yang T. ; Zhang Y. ; Guo Z. ; Lim C.-K. ; Zhang J. ; Žutic I. ; Zhang H. ; Prasad P. N. Water-Dispersible CsPbBr3 Perovskite Nanocrystals with Ultra-Stability and its Application in Electrochemical CO2 Reduction. Nano-Micro Lett. 2021, 13 (1 ), 172 10.1007/s40820-021-00690-8.
Gualdrón-Reyes A. F. ; Mesa C. A. ; Giménez S. ; Mora-Seró I. Application of Halide Perovskite Nanocrystals in Solar-Driven Photo(electro)Catalysis. Sol. RRL 2022, 6 (7 ), 2200012 10.1002/solr.202200012.
Bergamini L. ; Sangiorgi N. ; Gondolini A. ; Sanson A. CsPbBr3 for photoelectrochemical cells. Sol. Energy 2020, 212 , 62–72. 10.1016/j.solener.2020.10.047.
Huang Y. ; Yu J. ; Wu Z. ; Li B. ; Li M. All-inorganic lead halide perovskites for photocatalysis: a review. RSC Adv. 2024, 14 (7 ), 4946–4965. 10.1039/D3RA07998H.38327811
Ling X. ; Zhou S. ; Yuan J. ; Shi J. ; Qian Y. ; Larson B. W. ; Zhao Q. ; Qin C. ; Li F. ; Shi G. ; Stewart C. ; Hu J. ; Zhang X. ; Luther J. M. ; Duhm S. ; Ma W. 14.1% CsPbI3 Perovskite Quantum Dot Solar Cells via Cesium Cation Passivation. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9 (28 ), 1900721 10.1002/aenm.201900721.
Scalon L. ; Freitas F. S. ; Marques F. d. C. ; Nogueira A. F. Tiny spots to light the future: advances in synthesis, properties, and application of perovskite nanocrystals in solar cells. Nanoscale 2023, 15 (3 ), 907–941. 10.1039/D2NR05043A.36629010
Fu J. ; Liu J. ; Yuan L. ; Pan Q. ; Chen S. ; Hu Y. ; Chen J. ; Ma W. ; Zhang Q. ; Liu Z. ; Cao M. 3D/2D Core/Shell Perovskite Nanocrystals for High-Performance Solar Cells. Small 2023, 19 (17 ), 2207312 10.1002/smll.202207312.
du Fossé I. ; ten Brinck S. ; Infante I. ; Houtepen A. J. Role of Surface Reduction in the Formation of Traps in n-Doped II–VI Semiconductor Nanocrystals: How to Charge without Reducing the Surface. Chem. Mater. 2019, 31 (12 ), 4575–4583. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01395.31274957
du Fossé I. ; Lal S. ; Hossaini A. N. ; Infante I. ; Houtepen A. J. Effect of Ligands and Solvents on the Stability of Electron Charged CdSe Colloidal Quantum Dots. J. Phys. Chem. C 2021, 125 (43 ), 23968–23975. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c07464.
Asaithambi A. ; Kazemi Tofighi N. ; Curreli N. ; De Franco M. ; Patra A. ; Petrini N. ; Baranov D. ; Manna L. ; Stasio F. D. ; Kriegel I. Generation of Free Carriers in MoSe2 Monolayers Via Energy Transfer from CsPbBr3 Nanocrystals. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2022, 10 (14 ), 2200638 10.1002/adom.202200638.
Wei Z. ; Mulder J. T. ; Dubey R. K. ; Evers W. H. ; Jager W. F. ; Houtepen A. J. ; Grozema F. C. Tuning the Driving Force for Charge Transfer in Perovskite–Chromophore Systems. J. Phys. Chem. C 2023, 127 (31 ), 15406–15415. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c03815.
Gerischer H. On the stability of semiconductor electrodes against photodecomposition. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 1977, 82 (1–2 ), 133–143. 10.1016/S0022-0728(77)80253-2.
Heo S. ; Roh K. ; Zhang F. ; Tignor S. E. ; Bocarsly A. B. ; Kahn A. ; Rand B. P. Electrochemically n-Doped CsPbBr3 Nanocrystal Thin Films. ACS Energy Lett. 2022, 7 (1 ), 211–216. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c02554.
Samu G. F. ; Scheidt R. A. ; Kamat P. V. ; Janáky C. Electrochemistry and Spectroelectrochemistry of Lead Halide Perovskite Films: Materials Science Aspects and Boundary Conditions. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30 (3 ), 561–569. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b04321.29503507
Mulder J. T. ; du Fossé I. ; Alimoradi Jazi M. ; Manna L. ; Houtepen A. J. Electrochemical p-Doping of CsPbBr3 Perovskite Nanocrystals. ACS Energy Lett. 2021, 6 (7 ), 2519–2525. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c00970.34307881
Jha S. ; Hasan M. ; Khakurel N. ; Ryan C. A. ; McMullen R. ; Mishra A. ; Malko A. V. ; Zakhidov A. A. ; Slinker J. D. Electrochemical characterization of halide perovskites: Stability & doping. Mater. Today Adv. 2022, 13 , 100213 10.1016/j.mtadv.2022.100213.
Jeong H. W. ; Zsigmond T. S. ; Samu G. F. ; Janáky C. Sacrificial Agent Gone Rogue: Electron-Acceptor-Induced Degradation of CsPbBr3 Photocathodes. ACS Energy Lett. 2022, 7 (1 ), 417–424. 10.1021/acsenergylett.1c02130.35059504
Shallcross R. C. ; Zheng Y. ; Saavedra S. S. ; Armstrong N. R. Determining Band-Edge Energies and Morphology-Dependent Stability of Formamidinium Lead Perovskite Films Using Spectroelectrochemistry and Photoelectron Spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139 (13 ), 4866–4878. 10.1021/jacs.7b00516.28292175
Hasan M. ; Venkatesan S. ; Lyashenko D. ; Slinker J. D. ; Zakhidov A. Solvent Toolkit for Electrochemical Characterization of Hybrid Perovskite Films. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89 (18 ), 9649–9653. 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b02800.28819972
Kerner R. A. ; Cohen A. V. ; Xu Z. ; Kirmani A. R. ; Park S. Y. ; Harvey S. P. ; Murphy J. P. ; Cawthorn R. C. ; Giebink N. C. ; Luther J. M. ; Zhu K. ; Berry J. J. ; Kronik L. ; Rand B. P. Electrochemical Doping of Halide Perovskites by Noble Metal Interstitial Cations. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35 (29 ), 2302206 10.1002/adma.202302206.
Jha S. ; Haroldson R. ; Zakhidov A. A. ; Slinker J. D. The Synergetic Ionic and Electronic Features of MAPbI3 Perovskite Films Revealed by Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2024, 12 (4 ), 2301677 10.1002/adom.202301677.
Tang Y. ; Mak C. H. ; Zhang J. ; Jia G. ; Cheng K.-C. ; Song H. ; Yuan M. ; Zhao S. ; Kai J.-J. ; Colmenares J. C. ; Hsu H.-Y. Unravelling the Interfacial Dynamics of Bandgap Funneling in Bismuth-Based Halide Perovskites. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35 (2 ), 2207835 10.1002/adma.202207835.
Vasylkovskyi V. ; Skrypnyk T. ; Zholudov Y. ; Bespalova I. ; Sorokin A. ; Snizhko D. ; Slipchenko O. ; Chichkov B. ; Slipchenko M. Electrochemiluminescence and stability of cesium lead halide perovskite nanocrystals. J. Lumin. 2023, 261 , 119932 10.1016/j.jlumin.2023.119932.
Samu G. F. ; Balog A. ´. ; De Angelis F. ; Meggiolaro D. ; Kamat P. V. ; Janáky C. Electrochemical Hole Injection Selectively Expels Iodide from Mixed Halide Perovskite Films. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141 (27 ), 10812–10820. 10.1021/jacs.9b04568.31259546
Kavan L. Electrochemistry and perovskite photovoltaics. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2018, 11 , 122–129. 10.1016/j.coelec.2018.10.003.
Xie S. ; Osherov A. ; Bulović V. All-vacuum-deposited inorganic cesium lead halide perovskite light-emitting diodes. APL Mater. 2020, 8 (5 ), 051113 10.1063/1.5144103.
Guo L. ; Searson P. C. On the influence of the nucleation overpotential on island growth in electrodeposition. Electrochim. Acta 2010, 55 (13 ), 4086–4091. 10.1016/j.electacta.2010.02.038.
Pei A. ; Zheng G. ; Shi F. ; Li Y. ; Cui Y. Nanoscale Nucleation and Growth of Electrodeposited Lithium Metal. Nano Lett. 2017, 17 , 1132–1139. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b04755.28072543
Vogel Y. B. ; Darwish N. ; Kashi M. B. ; Gooding J. J. ; Ciampi S. Hydrogen evolution during the electrodeposition of gold nanoparticles at Si(100) photoelectrodes impairs the analysis of current-time transients. Electrochim. Acta 2017, 247 , 200–206. 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.06.126.
Boehme S. C. ; Vanmaekelbergh D. ; Evers W. H. ; Siebbeles L. D. A. ; Houtepen A. J. In Situ Spectroelectrochemical Determination of Energy Levels and Energy Level Offsets in Quantum-Dot Heterojunctions. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120 (9 ), 5164–5173. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b12016.
van der Stam W. ; du Fossé I. ; Grimaldi G. ; Monchen J. O. V. ; Kirkwood N. ; Houtepen A. J. Spectroelectrochemical Signatures of Surface Trap Passivation on CdTe Nanocrystals. Chem. Mater. 2018, 30 (21 ), 8052–8061. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03893.30487664
