
==== Front
NPJ Sci Food
NPJ Sci Food
NPJ Science of Food
2396-8370
Nature Publishing Group UK London

39237595
286
10.1038/s41538-024-00286-7
Review Article
Opportunities and challenges for global food safety in advancing circular policies and practices in agrifood systems
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8984-6517
Pearson Andrew J. apearson@tonkintaylor.co.nz

12
Mukherjee Keya 1
Fattori Vittorio 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3432-5300
Lipp Markus 1
1 https://ror.org/00pe0tf51 grid.420153.1 0000 0004 1937 0300 Agrifood Systems and Food Safety Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy
2 Tonkin + Taylor Ltd, Wellington, New Zealand
5 9 2024
5 9 2024
2024
8 6024 10 2023
21 6 2024
© Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ Open Access This article is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 IGO License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence and indicate if changes were made. The use of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations name, and the use of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations logo, shall be subject to a separate written licence agreement between the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the user and is not authorized as part of this CC-IGO licence. Note that the link provided below includes additional terms and conditions of the licence. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/.
Sustainable agrifood systems are needed to provide safe and nutritious food for the growing world’s population. To improve sustainability, transforming linear policies and practices in agrifood systems into circularity will be critical, with food safety considerations key for the success of this shift. This review provides a synthesis of the current and emerging risks, data gaps, and opportunities for food safety in agrifood initiatives aiming to advance circular economy models.

Subject terms

Policy and public health in microbiology
Sustainability
Agriculture
issue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Limited 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Working towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) is committed to support the transformation to more efficient, inclusive, resilient, and sustainable agrifood systems1. Food safety is a key consideration in the transformation process. Food safety is linked with several critical aspects of agrifood systems. Firstly, ensuring food safety is fundamental to better health and improved nutrition. Over 600 million people worldwide fall ill every year from consuming contaminated food, with children under the age of five accounting for a third of all deaths from foodborne diseases2. Secondly, by preventing food contamination issues food safety enhances food security by minimising waste in the supply chain1. Thirdly, foodborne diseases exact an economic toll. In low- and middle-income countries the consequences of lost productivity from premature death and disability, as well as treating foodborne illness, mean unsafe food has a cost of about USD 110 billion a year3. Assurance of food safety facilitates international trade and is one of the foundations of economic development of agrifood systems worldwide4.

Global agrifood systems today face a poly crisis triggered by population growth, resource constraints, conflicts, climate change, biodiversity loss, food insecurity, and malnutrition1. Responding to these challenges requires re-thinking the existing economic model of agrifood systems to ensure that continued food security is balanced against resource efficiency, socioeconomic growth, and environmental sustainability5. Current policies and practices in agrifood systems typically operate along linear principles contingent on reliance on finite resources and high waste generation. For example, agriculture is reliant on high volumes of water, but water is used inefficiently, heavily abstracted from natural freshwater sources, in many cases above replenishing capacity, and post-use nutrient-rich wastewater is discharged into the environment6. Additionally, materials designed for single or limited use, with little potential for recovery, are used throughout the agrifood systems, including in food cultivation, collection, packaging, laboratory testing, and utensils for consuming food7.

A shift from linear practices in agrifood systems to circularity aims to do ‘more with less’ while reducing waste by closing material and processing loops. This change means value is derived in the reclamation and reuse of resources from waste and on the other hand products are redesigned to limit waste and enable upgrading and refurbishment to prolong their use. Further measures are taken to increase the efficiency of use and consumption to reduce the wastage in processing chains. Key outputs evaluated in the adoption of circular practices in agrifood systems tend to be sustainability in all dimensions - economic, environmental, and social8. However, adoption of circular practices is rarely preceded by the full understanding of the food safety hazards the changed approaches will present and the critical points that will see them emerge as risks9.

Circular practices in agrifood systems differ from those in other sectors, due to the perishable nature and short shelf-life of agrifood products. However, our current understanding and management of food safety is typically based upon the methods and systems used in a linear system. Considering these factors there is a need for detailed analyses of vulnerable points of entry and the types of potential risks within circular practices in agrifood systems to ensure the continued reliability of food safety risk management.

The established and emerging implications for food safety in circular practices were explored by undertaking a review across three themes where scientific and social initiatives on circularity offer promise in advancing sustainable agrifood systems (Table 1). The literature search strategy is reported in the Supplementary Information (Supplementary Note 1 and Supplementary Table 1). Studies were selected based on the hazards reported in circular feedstocks of interest that could transfer to food. This review also identifies common data gaps limiting food safety characterisation across the three themes and outlines a way forward on how to advance food safety in tandem with the adoption of circular practices.Table 1 Summary of reviewed themes and initiatives for advancing circular practices and policies in the agrifood system with overview of risks and benefits to food safety

Theme	Water re-use	Food loss and waste	Packaging waste	
Problem summary	Limited clean freshwater resources.

Inefficiency of water use.

Increasing water stress.

	High avoidable food loss and waste at production, retail and household levels.

Poor utilisation of food by-product waste

	Finite virgin resources.

Design for single use.

High waste generation.

	
Initiatives considered in the review	Reuse in-system or in closed loops.

Recycling alternative water sources.

	Valorisation and conversion.

Nutrient or energy recovery.

Consumer education.

	Reuse.

Recycling materials.

Redesign to reduce waste.

	
Risks to food safety	Persistence of pathogens, parasites and chemical contaminants.

Anti-microbial resistance.

	Persistence of pathogens, parasites and chemical contaminants.

Anti-microbial resistance.

Micro and nano-plastics.

Compromised food handling.

	Transfer of pathogens or contaminants from prior uses.

Migration of non-intentionally added substances.

Loss of integrity

	
Benefits to food safety	Phase out or segregation of persistent contaminants.

Increased treatment efficacy.

	Use of materials with reduced risk profiles.

Phase out or segregation of persistent contaminants.

Increased treatment efficacy.

Improved education on household food safety.

	Use of materials with reduced risk profiles.

Improved integrity of packaging.

	

Water re-use

Although water is a renewable resource, the demand for fit-for-purpose freshwater in the food production and processing sectors exceeds in many places the natural replenishment capacities of water sources6. Given the challenges of environmental impacts, stresses from the changing climate, and rising demand from a growing global population, sustainably managing water resources requires prioritising the allocation of freshwater, while limiting the impacts of overextraction. A range of initiatives are exploring the reuse and recycling of water in agrifood systems10. However, depending on the source of the reused or recycled water a number of food safety hazards can be present.

Pathogen presence, such as through contamination of water sources with faecal matter is a key quality concern for recycled water use (Table 2). Temperature variation and extreme weather events have also been linked to increased microbial loading of surface waters11,12. Irrigation of crops with pathogen-contaminated water is an established pathway for microbial contamination, a particular risk for crops eaten raw necessitating a high level of water quality13,14. Non-contact irrigation methods for recycled water, such as sub-surface drip, are reported to minimise the percentage transfer of pathogens to edible components and reduce the water quality requirements15. A study of aquaponics system confirmed that Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli was present in the recirculating water and could contaminate root surfaces of vegetables, although it was not reported to internalise into leaves or fruit16 An emerging concern is the potential for root uptake of viruses (norovirus and hepatitis A virus) from soil or in hydroponic systems using inoculated water17,18. Even without evident human or animal waste sources, risks remain, for example, pathogens have been reported in produce wash waters and cleaning waters which persist in closed loop systems, particularly when treatment facilities are inadequate (Table 219,20;). In crops and produce that are to be further processed or cooked the microbial risks are lower and the treatment requirements for irrigation water are less14. Similarly, lower quality water may be fit-for-purpose for recycling into non-contact uses, such as in heat transfer systems21.Table 2 Examples of hazards reported in water sources with potential to be recycled

Water source	Reported hazards	Source	
Microbiological	Chemical & physical	
Food production wash and process water	Bacteria	Sanitisers	19	
Industrial /extractive process water		Heavy metals

PFAS

Dyes

	85,86	
Agricultural run-off	Bacteria

Protozoa

	Pesticides

Veterinary medicines

	87–89	
Greywater	Bacteria

Viruses

Protozoa

	Narcotics

Personal care products

	90,91	
Stormwater	Viruses

Bacteria

Protozoa

	Heavy metals

Surfactants

Plasticizers

Pesticides

Hydrocarbons and PAHs

Tyre wear particles

	92,93	
Treated wastewater	Viruses

Bacteria

Antimicrobial resistance genes

Protozoa

Helminths

	Pharmaceuticals

Narcotics

Personal care products

Cleaner/sanitisers

Microplastics

PFAS

	94–98	

There are limited supporting studies on the microbial risks present in recycled water used for stock water. Australian guidance focuses on helminths as a key risk, given the potential for these to transmit to livestock and then be a food safety risk through eating undercooked meat, for example, the risk from Taenia solium in pigs22. A Californian advisory panel on disinfected tertiary recycled water for non-dairy stock water concluded there was insufficient evidence to determine if the use would present a risk to public health, primarily from the uncertainty related to pathogens23.

The specific risk to food safety is dependent on the potential for the hazard to persist in the water source, or on contacted surfaces and soil, and subsequent transfer to livestock or crops. Assessment of recycled water drawn from different sources indicates a range of possible chemical hazards for food safety are present (Table 2). Studies have reported a number of chemicals that accumulate in produce from irrigated soil24–26. For example, the anti-convulsant drug carbamazepine has been reported in field trials to concentrate from wastewater effluent treated soil into wheat grain, tomato, and lettuce27. An emerging concern is the contamination of agricultural soils with per and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFAS) due to irrigation with reused or treated wastewater28.

The possible presence of both human pathogens and levels of pharmaceuticals or biocides in recycled or reused water presents a concern area for resistant organisms. Studies of recycled water sources have shown broad prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), for example, tertiary treated wastewater as well as vegetable processing water containing resistance genes for multiple antibiotic families29.

Acknowledging the importance of characterizing and validating the safety and quality of water the Joint FAO & WHO Expert Meeting on Microbiological Risk Assessment has developed technical reports on the use and reuse of water in different agrifood sectors14,20,21,30.

Food Loss and Waste (FLW)

Between the post-harvest and retail stages of the food chain alone, about 14% of food produced globally is lost, while around 17% of total food produced is wasted at the retail and consumer stages31,32. Stemming FLW is an important component of increasing the sustainability of agrifood systems and their guiding principles and actions that promote various circular initiatives33. Aside from supply chain measures to reduce and redistribute FLW, it can also be valorised, for example through the extraction of bioactives or conversion to new food or feed sources, or have its nutrient content recovered through processes such as composting and application to productive land34. A concern is that contaminants in sources of FLW have the potential to persist and accumulate through these circular practices, presenting food safety risks when the recovered product re-enters the food chain. Surveys of food waste have reported the common presence of foodborne pathogens including Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella spp. and Yersinia spp.35. Transmission of parasites could also be a concern if food waste valorised for feed purposes contains infected tissue, such as encysted Trichinella spp. in wild or domestic pork36. Lastly, ARGs have been found to occur in sources of FLW and increase significantly with storage time; animal product FLW is a particular risk given a higher occurrence of ARGs coupled with the presence of pathogens37,38.

The persistence of pathogens through the processing of food waste is commonly technology or treatment dependant. Correct maturation of food waste composts will sufficiently reduce pathogen loadings39, and many countries have statutory or voluntary standards for time and temperature requirements for compost sanitization40. The abundance of ARGs decreases in the stabilization phase during most composting operations as the host bacteria are reduced41.

Transfer of prions represents an area of potential concern where food waste may be valorized into animal feeds as the level of treatment to denature these proteins may need to exceed that for pathogen deactivation42. Screening for Scrapie prion elimination in food waste cultured yeast, used as a feedstock for animal feed, found reduction in levels occurred, although potentially not to the degree where it could be the sole control43.

Contamination with various fungal species is one of the major factors that lead to FLW. As a consequence, food waste presents a source of mycotoxins that can persist if valorised into food or feed uses. A review of mycotoxins in food by-products identified aflatoxin B1, ochratoxin A, fumonisins, deoxynivalenol and zearalenone as commonly found44. By-products of the vegetable oil industry, including flours and groats had concentrations of deoxynivalenol upto 980 µg/kg, aflatoxins upto 1.5 µg/kg and zearalenone upto 79 µg/kg45.

Digestates from biogas production, which included food wastes, were reported to contain a range of emerging or persistent organic pollutants (POPs), including dioxins, polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), naphthalene, PFAS, phthalates, and nonyl phenol46. Furthermore, biofertilizers from food waste digestates were found to have an array of substances, including high concentrations of nicotine, caffeine, fungicides, parabens and pharmaceuticals47.

Household food waste composts have also been reported to have residual pesticide presence48, while a study of cadmium, arsenic, nickel, copper, and mercury ranges across different foods reported many could exceed regulatory limits for composts, should FLW be directed to this route49. Valorisation of bio-actives from waste fruit peels and rind presents a pathway for surface-bound pesticide residue to concentrate50, while residual pomace, seeds, and extracts also concentrate certain residues51.

A developing area for FLW valorisation is as a substrate for raising insect species. For example, there are opportunities to rear insects on heavily mycotoxin-contaminated crops that would not be acceptable for food or feed52, with some evidence that insects thrive on contaminated feed and do not accumulate the toxins53. It is cautioned, however, that the understanding of detoxification pathways in insects is uncertain and there is a potential risk for masked-mycotoxins or toxic metabolites to be present. Furthermore, insects also accumulate other toxicants such as heavy metals, pharmaceuticals, and mineral oils from food waste54. Raising insects on organic waste streams also presents a potential risk from pathogens, with Salmonella spp. and Bacillus cereus detected in black soldier fly larvae and their environments after rearing55,56. An emerging concern is that insects can also carry bacteria with transferable ARGs57,58.

Commonly food waste is contaminated with packaging if it cannot be separated or is improperly screened35 presenting a risk of migration of packaging contaminants and fragmentation to micro- and nano-plastics7. Composts contaminated with plastic, as established through the presence of microplastics, had high concentrations of plastic additives such as di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) and nonanal, which transferred into agricultural soils59. Occurrence data for nano-plastics is currently constrained by the analytical methods and it is unclear whether their exposure through the diet has negative impacts on human health. However, nano plastics are reported to transfer into crops, as a result presence in food waste composts would present a source into agrifood systems60.

Circular practices for FLW present an opportunity to reduce the dietary contaminant burden if they replace other food or feed sources with comparatively elevated contaminant levels61. For example, valorisation of food waste into animal feed to substitute for feed sources, such as fishmeal, that contain contaminants such as mercury or POPs61. In a study of pelletized food waste intended for animal feeds, mycotoxins, and pesticides were below detection levels, while lead, cadmium, and arsenic complied with regulatory limits62.

Increasing awareness of sustainability issues is also resulting in consumers increasingly making choices considering the environmental aspects of purchased foods in addition to safety and nutrition1,63. Household food waste, much of which is avoidable can present a high proportion of total food waste volumes, so supporting this shift in behaviour will be critical to enact circular systems64. Adoption of certain behaviours to support circularity at home, however, potentially runs in conflict with advised food safety practices by introducing risky actions. As sustainability becomes increasingly important for consumers, it will be important to monitor and prevent fraudulent practice65. Food fraud related to FLW could include adulteration with unsuitable or hazardous feedstocks, or the provision of misleading information as to the use of sustainable practices66. While the former can lead to potential food safety risks in the consumed product, the latter can derail efforts to shift to more sustainable food practices and erode consumer trust.

A measure to limit food wastage is to avoid throwing out food that is still fit for consumption. However, this presents a challenge for food safety as consumers often have a poor understanding of when the expiry of shelf-life is a food safety concern or solely a quality issue67. Attempts to limit home food waste may cause risky behaviours such as consuming spoiled foods, saving leftovers incorrectly or for too long, or consuming rinds, peels, and other low-edibility parts of food to limit these going to waste68. If guidance is not available consumers commonly draw on unproven or unsafe techniques to support reducing food waste, for example relying on smell or taste to determine safety, or cutting off mouldy parts of food despite the risk that mycotoxin can be diffused into areas without visible contamination69,70.

Packaging waste

Packaging plays a key role in food safety and food security, through protecting food from contamination and, thus, reducing food waste. However, the high waste burden from current packaging materials necessitates innovation to improve sustainability71. Among other food packaging materials (metals, glass, plastics, paper, cardboard, etc.), plastics account for significant food packaging-related waste due to large production volumes, much of which are of non-biodegradable chemistry. An estimated 37.3 Mt of plastics was used globally in food packaging in 20197.

Recycling is seen as key to improving the circularity of food-related plastics. However, recycled plastics contain a broad range of non-intentionally added substances (NIAS) that present as potential contamination risks for food packaging uses and a challenge to identify and risk assess (Table 372;). NIAS commonly results from the retention of plastic additives from recycling feedstock and the inability to segregate non-food plastics. There are also limits to the recyclability of certain materials, for example, polypropylene shows degradation through reprocessing73, which restricts future applications of recycled plastics, or leads to them having unpredictable performance or NIAS migration risks.Table 3 Summary of non-intentionally added substances reported in recycled plastics

Material	Non-intentionally added substances	Reference	
Recycled HDPE and LDPE pellets	Volatile and semi-volatile organic substances, including surfactants, antioxidants, and odours from decayed food. PBDEs and benzotriazole UV stabilizers	99,100	
Recycled pellets and flakes for various recycled plastic types	Organophosphate esters	101	
PET	Ethanol and ethylene glycol; and flavourings such as anethole and limonene	102	
Marine and riverine recovered plastics	PAHs, PBDEs, and PCBs	103	

Designing packaging for reuse offers the ability to extend the lifecycle of plastics or other food contact materials and reduce the amount of waste. Successful reuse relies on avoiding cross-contamination between uses and ensuring the product retains integrity. Adequate cleaning is critical as pathogens are reported to survive in packaging reuse, for example, polypropylene used in reusable produce crates was reported to have a higher risk of Salmonella spp. cross-contamination in cauliflower than single-use materials74. Proper decontamination of any chemical contaminants before reuse is also important, particularly where the prior user has stored non-food materials. Misuse (storage of alcohol, cleaning products, and fuels) of refillable PET bottles was identified as a potential source for organoleptic impacts in mineral water and soft drinks75. A greater concern is that unsafe storage of hazardous chemicals in reusable or refillable containers could lead to toxicity if not decontaminated.

Degradation is a risk with long-term reuse of packaging causing the migration of contaminants in the container as well as release of physical fragments, such as microplastics. A study of polyethylene bottles reused for one year indicated a range of different migrated substances, including plasticisers, antioxidants, and photoinitiators, with migration rates enhanced following dishwashing76.

Food waste-sourced polymers, as a biodegradable replacement to plastics, are subject to potential concerns over contaminant loading of food waste and the potential for these to cycle into the food packaging77. Hazards could include myco- and phyto-toxins, POPs, heavy metals, process contaminants such as acrylamide that are formed in cooked foods, as well as allergenic proteins from plant materials77. As packaging waste circularity becomes a draw for consumer decision making there can be economic incentive for fraud in the use of unsuitable materials. Recent examples of food contact materials marketed as biobased resulted in recalls due to the use of, and migration risk from, melamine78.

Packaging plays an important role in managing food waste, consequently, there are opportunities for innovation streams to focus on improving shelf life, losses in storage/transport, minimizing contamination, and helping retailers/consumers better identify spoilage. However, utilizing plastics-based packaging to reduce food waste often necessitates a trade-off against packaging reusability or recyclability. For example, multilayer packaging has applications that increase the longevity of food while also providing a barrier to the migration of NIAS. However, such materials are at present difficult to recycle79. Adding packaging material, such as incorporating measuring tools or seals, or packaging smaller quantities of food, may also be justified if it decreases food waste by supporting consumers to better use or store the food80.

A way forward: Challenges and opportunities

Adopting circular economy models is a step many countries have begun, or will need to begin, to manage the sustainability of the agrifood sector and maintain food security. Transformation to models that utilise waste products, be they wastewater, food waste, organic material, or packaging presents risks due to the safety hazards these may contain, and/or generate. Contemporary food safety has developed in association with the linear processes of agrifood systems. Consequently, food safety also must adapt to characterise circular practices, from which existent and emerging hazards can generate risk.

While precaution should not hinder efforts to advance circularity in agrifood systems, the failure to suitably address risks that increase the foodborne disease burden will likely be detrimental to progress, as producers, consumers, and trading partners lose trust in the produced food. Addressing food safety as a core component in innovation and adoption of circular practices will ensure that risks are characterised, and risk management controls are validated concurrently with the change.

Advancing circular policies and practices, in particular repurposing what is waste in a linear model to a feedstock resource, changes the pathways by which food safety hazards lead to risk. Transforming agrifood systems to increase circularity must contend with and address many uncertainties in relation to impacts on food safety. Innovations in adopting circularity into agrifood systems have often been supported with limited research into food safety77 and there has been little focus on hazards that can emerge and accumulate in adopting circular practices9. Table 4 identifies data gaps that limit robust risk assessment and risk management of food safety in a circular agrifood system.Table 4 Identified data gaps for food safety risk in adopting circular agrifood policies and practices

Microbiological	Chemical	Other	
Survival and internalisation of pathogens into crops from environmental applications.	Identification and characterization of NIAS in packaging materials and migration to food in reuse	Risks related to ARGs, particularly where antimicrobials co-occur in the feedstock	
Potential exposure to emerging or opportunistic pathogens.	Emerging contaminant hazard characterisation and quantifying uptake into food crops and species	Characterizing the hazard of micro- and nano-plastics	
Survival of pathogens through valorisation, such as in insect feed.	Natural toxin persistence and transformation in circular systems.	Vulnerability to food fraud from use of unsuitable feedstocks, or misrepresenting circular processes.	
Significance of parasites	Allergenic potential of biopolymers as well as retention of allergens through circular systems		
Efficacy of decontamination techniques	

Ensuring that food safety hazards are characterised throughout researching and adopting circular policies and practices underpins the assurance that the resulting food is safe when produced or packaged using these new approaches. Figure 1 illustrates the roles for researchers, farmers, food manufacturers, regulators, and consumers in supporting the transformation to a safe circular agrifood system. Sustainability initiatives and national research funding should ensure food safety is considered by all actors in the agrifood system.Fig. 1 Focus points for food safety in transforming to circular practices and policies in agrifood systems.

To successfully advance circular policies and practices all agrifood system actors have a role to play in ensuring sustainability in all its dimensions, while also focusing on producing safe food. Adopting a “safe-by-design” approach in innovating ensures that food safety risks are characterized throughout the research and adoption of circular processes. Food safety hazards in circular agrifood systems can be present in feedstock, processed material, and final products and these hazards have varying implications for food safety. Characterization of the risk to consumers from these hazards, and if required development and validation of risk management, enables a proactive approach to maintaining food safety. Food safety regulation must enable and support agrifood systems transformation and must also align with chemical approval and waste legislation to support life cycle assessment and good management of waste infrastructure and treatment.

Although this publication places the onus on characterising food safety risks, there are also opportunities in developing and adopting circular policies and practices to improve food safety outcomes. Either directly through the introduction of new materials with reduced risk profiles or treatment processes that produce a safer food product, or indirectly through the economic or societal pressure to phase-out contaminants that persist in circular systems.

Ensuring clear guidelines are established to assess and manage food safety risks and that regulations adequately cover the new uses of waste materials in agrifood systems ensure a proactive approach to maintaining food safety while advancing circularity. Agricultural and food safety legislation also must interface well with chemical and waste legislation to support lifecycle assessment and management of waste treatment infrastructure. An emphasis could be placed on reviewing food safety regulatory approaches with the aim to limit food wastage where eventuation of a risk is unlikely33. Operating within and harmonising with Codex Alimentarius standards ensures a level and transparent approach to food safety regulation and consequently limits wastage in trade33.

Outcomes focusing on one aspect of waste, e.g., reduction in packaging waste may have unforeseen impacts on increasing food waste if solutions do not maintain integrity and result in quicker spoilage81. There are opportunities for initiatives that increase waste in one area, such as changing packaging attributes, to have a net benefit on waste if they support informed decision-making for avoiding purchasing or using too much food, or identifying when food is spoiled or unsafe in retail and in-home storage82.

With the reuse of waste, it is possible that consumers may have a disgust factor linked to consuming foods from circular agrifood practices83. To avoid food loss, transparency in how any food is produced is important, particularly if environmental sustainability is important for consumer choices. Overcoming disgust further reinforces the need for strong food safety messaging to provide assurance that health is not at risk84.

To summarise, various pressures are placed on agrifood systems by the way we currently produce, distribute, and consume food. This pressure is driving global change to be more efficient, inclusive, resilient, and sustainable while realizing multiple United Nations Sustainable Development Goals6. To ensure sustainable agrifood systems that deliver safe, affordable, and healthy diets, against these pressures requires concrete actions. Microbiological, chemical, and physical contaminants are known to persist in certain waste streams and by-products, which through reuse could exacerbate existing food safety issues or cause new risks to emerge. Failure to address food safety in adopting circular systems may lead to an increased disease burden and set back these initiatives.

Going forward innovation can be supported by focusing research efforts on developing and adopting circular policies and practices in agrifood systems, on the impacts to food safety, and on exploring opportunities for improving food safety outcomes. Research and industry initiatives can be supported with clear regulations which can be reviewed as to the flexibility to reduce waste whilst protecting food safety. Transformation to circular agrifood systems offers remarkable promise in achieving goals focused on sustainable, inclusive, and efficient development. All levels of the food chain from farmer to consumer, as well as regulators, have a role to play in protecting food safety while advancing circularity in agrifood systems.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41538-024-00286-7.

Acknowledgements

© FAO, 2024. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Author contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. A.J.P. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. K.M., V.F. and M.L. critically reviewed the article. All authors commented on subsequent versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

the authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Strategic Framework 2022-31. Rome (2021).
2. World Health Organization. WHO estimates of the global burden of foodborne diseases: foodborne disease burden epidemiology reference group 2007-2015. Geneva (2015).
3. Jaffee, S., Henson, S., Unnevehr, L., Grace, D. & Cassou, E. The Safe Food Imperative: Accelerating Progress in Low and Middle-Income Countries. Agriculture and Food Series. Washington, DC: World Bank (2019).
4. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations & World Health Organization. Codex Alimentarius – Understanding Codex. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations & Geneva, World Health Organization (2016).
5. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Transforming Food and Agriculture to Achieve the SDGs: 20 interconnected actions to guide decision-makers. Rome (2019).
6. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The state of the world’s land and water resources for food and agriculture – Systems at breaking point. Synthesis report 2021. Rome (2021).
7. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Assessment of agricultural plastics and their sustainability. A call for action. Rome (2021).
8. Rico Lugo SD Kimita K Nishino N Characteristics of decision process towards circular food economy: A review Clean. Logist. Supply Chain. 2023 7 100104 10.1016/j.clscn.2023.100104
Rico Lugo, S. D., Kimita, K. & Nishino, N. Characteristics of decision process towards circular food economy: A review. Clean. Logist. Supply Chain. 7, 100104 (2023).10.1016/j.clscn.2023.100104
9. Focker M Review of food safety hazards in circular food systems in Europe Food Res. Int. 2022 158 111505 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111505 35840214
Focker, M. et al. Review of food safety hazards in circular food systems in Europe. Food Res. Int. 158, 111505 (2022).35840214 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111505
10. Bailone RL Borra RC Fukushima HCS Aguiar LK Water reuse in the food industry Discover Food 2022 2 5 10.1007/s44187-021-00002-4
Bailone, R. L., Borra, R. C., Fukushima, H. C. S. & Aguiar, L. K. Water reuse in the food industry. Discover Food 2, 5 (2022).10.1007/s44187-021-00002-4
11. Favere J Safeguarding the microbial water quality from source to tap npj Clean. Water 2021 4 28 10.1038/s41545-021-00118-1
Favere, J. et al. Safeguarding the microbial water quality from source to tap. npj Clean. Water 4, 28 (2021).10.1038/s41545-021-00118-1
12. Paruch AM Mæhlum T Robertson L Changes in microbial quality of irrigated water under different weather conditions in Southeast Norway Environ. Process. 2015 2 115 10.1007/s40710-014-0054-2
Paruch, A. M., Mæhlum, T. & Robertson, L. Changes in microbial quality of irrigated water under different weather conditions in Southeast Norway. Environ. Process. 2, 115 (2015).10.1007/s40710-014-0054-2
13. Stine SW Song I Choi CY Gerba CP Application of microbial risk assessment to the development of standards for enteric pathogens in water used to irrigate fresh produce J. Food Prot. 2005 68 913 918 10.4315/0362-028X-68.5.913 15895721
Stine, S. W., Song, I., Choi, C. Y. & Gerba, C. P. Application of microbial risk assessment to the development of standards for enteric pathogens in water used to irrigate fresh produce. J. Food Prot. 68, 913–918 (2005).15895721 10.4315/0362-028X-68.5.913
14. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations & World Health Organization. Safety and quality of water used with fresh fruits and vegetables. Microbiological Risk Assessment Series No. 37. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations & Geneva, World Health Organization (2021).
15. Tripathi VK Rajput TBS Patel N Nain L Impact of municipal wastewater reuse through micro-irrigation system on the incidence of coliforms in selected vegetable crops J. Environ. Manag. 2019 251 109532 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109532
Tripathi, V. K., Rajput, T. B. S., Patel, N. & Nain, L. Impact of municipal wastewater reuse through micro-irrigation system on the incidence of coliforms in selected vegetable crops. J. Environ. Manag. 251, 109532 (2019).10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109532
16. Wang Y-J Deering AJ Kim H-J The occurrence of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli in aquaponic and hydroponic systems Horticulturae 2020 6 1 10.3390/horticulturae6010001
Wang, Y.-J., Deering, A. J. & Kim, H.-J. The occurrence of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli in aquaponic and hydroponic systems. Horticulturae 6, 1 (2020).10.3390/horticulturae6010001
17. Bundesinstitut für Risikobewertung. Reclaimed wastewater: preventing viral pathogens on plant foods. BfR Opinion No 019/2022. 10.17590/20220708-132535 (2022).
18. Fernandes LS Galvão A Santos R Monteiro S Impact of water reuse on agricultural practices and human health Environ. Res. 2023 216 11476 10.1016/j.envres.2022.114762
Fernandes, L. S., Galvão, A., Santos, R. & Monteiro, S. Impact of water reuse on agricultural practices and human health. Environ. Res. 216, 11476 (2023).10.1016/j.envres.2022.114762
19. Sharma M Prevalence of Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes in non-traditional irrigation waters in the Mid-Atlantic United States is affected by water type, season, and recovery method PLoS One 2020 15 e0229365 10.1371/journal.pone.0229365 32182252
Sharma, M. et al. Prevalence of Salmonella and Listeria monocytogenes in non-traditional irrigation waters in the Mid-Atlantic United States is affected by water type, season, and recovery method. PLoS One 15, e0229365 (2020).32182252 10.1371/journal.pone.0229365
20. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations & World Health Organization. Safety and quality of water use and reuse in the production and processing of dairy products – Meeting report. Microbiological Risk Assessment Series, No. 40. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations & Geneva, World Health Organization (2023).
21. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations & World Health Organization. Safety and quality of water used with food production and processing. Microbiological Risk Assessment Series No. 33. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations & Geneva, World Health Organization (2019).
22. Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council Environment Protection and Heritage Council Australian Health Ministers’ Conference. National Guidelines for Water Recycling: Managing Health and Environmental Risks. https://www.waterquality.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/water-recycling-guidelines-full-21.pdf (2006).
23. Poppenga, R. et al. Independent Advisory Panel Final Report: Using Disinfected Tertiary Recycled Water for Non-Dairy Livestock Watering: A Human and Animal Health Evaluation for the State of California. Prepared for the California State Water Resources Control Board by the National Water Research Institute, Fountain Valley, CA, USA (2018).
24. Al-Farsi R Ahmed M Al-Busaidi A Choudri BS Assessing the presence of pharmaceuticals in soil and plants irrigated with treated wastewater in Oman Int J. Recycl Org. Waste Agric. 2018 7 165 172 10.1007/s40093-018-0202-1
Al-Farsi, R., Ahmed, M., Al-Busaidi, A. & Choudri, B. S. Assessing the presence of pharmaceuticals in soil and plants irrigated with treated wastewater in Oman. Int J. Recycl Org. Waste Agric. 7, 165–172 (2018).10.1007/s40093-018-0202-1
25. Sunyer-Caldú A Reclaimed water in agriculture: A plot-scale study assessing crop uptake of emerging contaminants and pathogens J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022 10 108831 10.1016/j.jece.2022.108831
Sunyer-Caldú, A. et al. Reclaimed water in agriculture: A plot-scale study assessing crop uptake of emerging contaminants and pathogens. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 10, 108831 (2022).10.1016/j.jece.2022.108831
26. Manasfi R Impact of long-term irrigation with municipal reclaimed wastewater on the uptake and degradation of organic contaminants in lettuce and leek Sci. Total Environ. 2021 765 142742 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142742 33097266
Manasfi, R. et al. Impact of long-term irrigation with municipal reclaimed wastewater on the uptake and degradation of organic contaminants in lettuce and leek. Sci. Total Environ. 765, 142742 (2021).33097266 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142742
27. Ben Mordechay E Tarchitzky J Chen Y Shenker M Chefetz B Composted biosolids and treated wastewater as sources of pharmaceuticals and personal care products for plant uptake: A case study with carbamazepine Environ. Pollut. 2018 232 164 172 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.029 28935405
Ben Mordechay, E., Tarchitzky, J., Chen, Y., Shenker, M. & Chefetz, B. Composted biosolids and treated wastewater as sources of pharmaceuticals and personal care products for plant uptake: A case study with carbamazepine. Environ. Pollut. 232, 164–172 (2018).28935405 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.029
28. Costello, M. C. S. & Lee, L. S. Sources, Fate, and Plant Uptake in Agricultural Systems of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances. Curr. Pollut. Rep. 10.1007/s40726-020-00168-y (2020).
29. Malayil L Variations in Bacterial Communities and Antibiotic Resistance Genes Across Diverse Recycled and Surface Water Irrigation Sources in the Mid-Atlantic and Southwest United States: A CONSERVE Two-Year Field Study Environ. Sci. Technol. 2022 56 15019 15033 10.1021/acs.est.2c02281 36194536
Malayil, L. et al. Variations in Bacterial Communities and Antibiotic Resistance Genes Across Diverse Recycled and Surface Water Irrigation Sources in the Mid-Atlantic and Southwest United States: A CONSERVE Two-Year Field Study. Environ. Sci. Technol. 56, 15019–15033 (2022).36194536 10.1021/acs.est.2c02281
30. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations & World Health Organization. Safety and quality of water used in the production and processing of fish and fishery products – Meeting report. Microbiological Risk Assessment Series, No. 41. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations & Geneva, World Health Organization (2023).
31. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. The State of Food and Agriculture 2019. Moving forward on food loss and waste reduction. Rome (2019).
32. United Nations Environment Programme. Food Waste Index Report 2021. Nairobi (2021).
33. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Voluntary Code of Conduct for Food Loss and Waste Reduction. Rome (2022).
34. Goossens Y Wegner A Schmidt T Sustainability assessment of food waste prevention measures: review of existing evaluation practices Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2019 3 90 10.3389/fsufs.2019.00090
Goossens, Y., Wegner, A. & Schmidt, T. Sustainability assessment of food waste prevention measures: review of existing evaluation practices. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 3, 90 (2019).10.3389/fsufs.2019.00090
35. Thakali A MacRae JD Isenhour C Blackmer T Composition and contamination of source separated food waste from different sources and regulatory environments J. Environ. Manag. 2022 314 115043 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115043
Thakali, A., MacRae, J. D., Isenhour, C. & Blackmer, T. Composition and contamination of source separated food waste from different sources and regulatory environments. J. Environ. Manag. 314, 115043 (2022).10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115043
36. Boumans IJMM Feeding food losses and waste to pigs and poultry: Implications for feed quality and production J. Clean. Prod. 2022 378 134623 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134623
Boumans, I. J. M. M. et al. Feeding food losses and waste to pigs and poultry: Implications for feed quality and production. J. Clean. Prod. 378, 134623 (2022).10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134623
37. Lin WF Temporal variation of antibiotic resistome and pathogens in food waste during short-term storage J. Hazard. Mater. 2022 436 129261 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129261 35739780
Lin, W. F. Temporal variation of antibiotic resistome and pathogens in food waste during short-term storage. J. Hazard. Mater. 436, 129261 (2022).35739780 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129261
38. Periasamy J Food wastes as a potential hotspot of antibiotic resistance: synergistic expression of multidrug resistance and ESBL genes confer antibiotic resistance to microbial communities Environ. Monit. Assess. 2023 195 783 10.1007/s10661-023-11335-1 37261634
Periasamy, J. et al. Food wastes as a potential hotspot of antibiotic resistance: synergistic expression of multidrug resistance and ESBL genes confer antibiotic resistance to microbial communities. Environ. Monit. Assess. 195, 783 (2023).37261634 10.1007/s10661-023-11335-1
39. Lemunier M Long-term survival of pathogenic and sanitation indicator bacteria in experimental biowaste composts Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005 71 10 5779 5786 10.1128/AEM.71.10.5779-5786.2005 16204488
Lemunier, M. et al. Long-term survival of pathogenic and sanitation indicator bacteria in experimental biowaste composts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71(10), 5779–5786 (2005).16204488 10.1128/AEM.71.10.5779-5786.2005
40. Hogg, D. et al. Comparison of compost standards within the EU, North America and Australasia. The Waste and Resources Action Programme, Banbury, UK (2002).
41. Tang Z Mobile genetic elements in potential host microorganisms are the key hindrance for the removal of antibiotic resistance genes in industrial-scale composting with municipal solid waste Bioresour. Technol. 2020 301 122723 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122723 31962245
Tang, Z. Mobile genetic elements in potential host microorganisms are the key hindrance for the removal of antibiotic resistance genes in industrial-scale composting with municipal solid waste. Bioresour. Technol. 301, 122723 (2020).31962245 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122723
42. Chen T Jin Y Shen D A safety analysis of food waste-derived animal feeds from three typical conversion techniques in China Waste Manag. 2015 45 42 50 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.06.041 26188613
Chen, T., Jin, Y. & Shen, D. A safety analysis of food waste-derived animal feeds from three typical conversion techniques in China. Waste Manag. 45, 42–50 (2015).26188613 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.06.041
43. Huyben D Screening of intact yeasts and cell extracts to reduce Scrapie prions during biotransformation of food waste Acta Vet. Scand. 2018 60 9 10.1186/s13028-018-0363-y 29422098
Huyben, D. et al. Screening of intact yeasts and cell extracts to reduce Scrapie prions during biotransformation of food waste. Acta Vet. Scand. 60, 9 (2018).29422098 10.1186/s13028-018-0363-y
44. Lopes P Mycotoxins’ prevalence in food industry by-products: a systematic review Toxins 2023 15 249 10.3390/toxins15040249 37104187
Lopes, P. et al. Mycotoxins’ prevalence in food industry by-products: a systematic review. Toxins 15, 249 (2023).37104187 10.3390/toxins15040249
45. Smeu I Byproducts from the vegetable oil industry: the challenges of safety and sustainability Sustainability 2022 14 2039 10.3390/su14042039
Smeu, I. et al. Byproducts from the vegetable oil industry: the challenges of safety and sustainability. Sustainability 14, 2039 (2022).10.3390/su14042039
46. Suominen K Verta M Marttinen S Hazardous organic compounds in biogas plant end products—Soil burden and risk to food safety Sci. Total Environ. 2014 491–492 192 199 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.036 24593894
Suominen, K., Verta, M. & Marttinen, S. Hazardous organic compounds in biogas plant end products—Soil burden and risk to food safety. Sci. Total Environ. 491–492, 192–199 (2014).24593894 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.02.036
47. Golovko O Organic micropollutants, heavy metals and pathogens in anaerobic digestate based on food waste J. Environ. Manag. 2022 313 114997 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114997
Golovko, O. et al. Organic micropollutants, heavy metals and pathogens in anaerobic digestate based on food waste. J. Environ. Manag. 313, 114997 (2022).10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114997
48. Růžičková J The potential environmental risks of the utilization of composts from household food waste Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res 2021 28 24663 24679 10.1007/s11356-020-09916-5
Růžičková, J. et al. The potential environmental risks of the utilization of composts from household food waste. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res 28, 24663–24679 (2021).10.1007/s11356-020-09916-5
49. Thakali A MacRae JD A review of chemical and microbial contamination in food: What are the threats to a circular food system? Environ. Res. 2021 194 110635 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110635 33347866
Thakali, A. & MacRae, J. D. A review of chemical and microbial contamination in food: What are the threats to a circular food system? Environ. Res. 194, 110635 (2021).33347866 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110635
50. Nguyen TT Rosello C Bélanger R Ratti C Fate of residual pesticides in Fruit and Vegetable Waste (FVW) processing Foods 2020 9 1468 10.3390/foods9101468 33076324
Nguyen, T. T., Rosello, C., Bélanger, R. & Ratti, C. Fate of residual pesticides in Fruit and Vegetable Waste (FVW) processing. Foods 9, 1468 (2020).33076324 10.3390/foods9101468
51. Sójka M Pesticide residue levels in strawberry processing by-products that are rich in ellagitannins and an assessment of their dietary risk to consumers NFS J. 2015 1 31 37 10.1016/j.nfs.2015.09.001
Sójka, M. et al. Pesticide residue levels in strawberry processing by-products that are rich in ellagitannins and an assessment of their dietary risk to consumers. NFS J. 1, 31–37 (2015).10.1016/j.nfs.2015.09.001
52. Evans NM Shao S Mycotoxin metabolism by edible insects Toxins 2022 14 217 10.3390/toxins14030217 35324714
Evans, N. M. & Shao, S. Mycotoxin metabolism by edible insects. Toxins 14, 217 (2022).35324714 10.3390/toxins14030217
53. Camenzuli L Tolerance and excretion of the Mycotoxins Aflatoxin B1, Zearalenone, Deoxynivalenol, and Ochratoxin A by Alphitobius diaperinus and Hermetia illucens from Contaminated Substrates Toxins 2018 10 91 10.3390/toxins10020091 29495278
Camenzuli, L. et al. Tolerance and excretion of the Mycotoxins Aflatoxin B1, Zearalenone, Deoxynivalenol, and Ochratoxin A by Alphitobius diaperinus and Hermetia illucens from Contaminated Substrates. Toxins 10, 91 (2018).29495278 10.3390/toxins10020091
54. Lievens S Chemical safety of black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens), knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research: a critical review J. Insects Food Feed. 2021 7 383 396 10.3920/JIFF2020.0081
Lievens, S. et al. Chemical safety of black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens), knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research: a critical review. J. Insects Food Feed. 7, 383–396 (2021).10.3920/JIFF2020.0081
55. Wynants E Assessing the Microbiota of Black Soldier Fly Larvae (Hermetia illucens) reared on organic waste streams on four different locations at laboratory and large scale Micro. Ecol. 2019 77 13 930 10.1007/s00248-018-1286-x
Wynants, E. et al. Assessing the Microbiota of Black Soldier Fly Larvae (Hermetia illucens) reared on organic waste streams on four different locations at laboratory and large scale. Micro. Ecol. 77, 13–930 (2019).10.1007/s00248-018-1286-x
56. Fazion JP A systematic review of experimental studies on Salmonella persistence in insects npj Sci. Food 2023 7 44 10.1038/s41538-023-00223-0 37640696
Fazion, J. P. et al. A systematic review of experimental studies on Salmonella persistence in insects. npj Sci. Food 7, 44 (2023).37640696 10.1038/s41538-023-00223-0
57. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Looking at edible insects from a food safety perspective. Challenges and opportunities for the sector. Rome (2021).
58. Vandeweyer D Real-time PCR detection and quantification of selected transferable antibiotic resistance genes in fresh edible insects from Belgium and the Netherlands Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019 290 288 295 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.10.027 30412800
Vandeweyer, D. et al. Real-time PCR detection and quantification of selected transferable antibiotic resistance genes in fresh edible insects from Belgium and the Netherlands. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 290, 288–295 (2019).30412800 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.10.027
59. Scopetani C Hazardous contaminants in plastics contained in compost and agricultural soil Chemosphere 2022 293 133645 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133645 35051512
Scopetani, C. et al. Hazardous contaminants in plastics contained in compost and agricultural soil. Chemosphere 293, 133645 (2022).35051512 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133645
60. Azeem I Uptake and accumulation of nano/microplastics in plants: a critical review Nanomaterials 2021 11 2935 10.3390/nano11112935 34835700
Azeem, I. et al. Uptake and accumulation of nano/microplastics in plants: a critical review. Nanomaterials 11, 2935 (2021).34835700 10.3390/nano11112935
61. Man YB Mo WY Zhang F Wong MH Health risk assessments based on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in freshwater fish cultured using food waste-based diets Environ. Pollut. 2020 256 113380 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113380 31662266
Man, Y. B., Mo, W. Y., Zhang, F. & Wong, M. H. Health risk assessments based on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in freshwater fish cultured using food waste-based diets. Environ. Pollut. 256, 113380 (2020).31662266 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113380
62. Cheng Z Replacing fish meal by food waste in feed pellets to culture lower trophic level fish containing acceptable levels of organochlorine pesticides: Health risk assessments Environ. Int. 2014 73 22 27 10.1016/j.envint.2014.07.001 25080070
Cheng, Z. et al. Replacing fish meal by food waste in feed pellets to culture lower trophic level fish containing acceptable levels of organochlorine pesticides: Health risk assessments. Environ. Int. 73, 22–27 (2014).25080070 10.1016/j.envint.2014.07.001
63. Civero G Rusciano V Scarpato D Simeone M Food: Not only safety, but also sustainability. the emerging trend of new social consumers Sustainability 2021 13 12967 10.3390/su132312967
Civero, G., Rusciano, V., Scarpato, D. & Simeone, M. Food: Not only safety, but also sustainability. the emerging trend of new social consumers. Sustainability 13, 12967 (2021).10.3390/su132312967
64. Graham-Rowe E Jessop DC Sparks P Identifying motivations and barriers to minimising household food waste Resour. Conserv Recycl 2014 84 15 23 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.12.005
Graham-Rowe, E., Jessop, D. C. & Sparks, P. Identifying motivations and barriers to minimising household food waste. Resour. Conserv Recycl 84, 15–23 (2014).10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.12.005
65. Traynor A An analysis of emerging food safety and fraud risks of novel insect proteins within complex supply chains npj Sci. Food 2024 8 7 10.1038/s41538-023-00241-y 38245539
Traynor, A. et al. An analysis of emerging food safety and fraud risks of novel insect proteins within complex supply chains. npj Sci. Food 8, 7 (2024).38245539 10.1038/s41538-023-00241-y
66. Manning L Kowalska A Considering fraud vulnerability associated with credence-based products such as organic food Foods 2021 10 1879 10.3390/foods10081879 34441656
Manning, L. & Kowalska, A. Considering fraud vulnerability associated with credence-based products such as organic food. Foods 10, 1879 (2021).34441656 10.3390/foods10081879
67. Kavanaugh M Quinlan JJ Consumer knowledge and behaviors regarding food date labels and food waste Food Control 2020 115 107285 10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107285
Kavanaugh, M. & Quinlan, J. J. Consumer knowledge and behaviors regarding food date labels and food waste. Food Control 115, 107285 (2020).10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107285
68. Kasza G Conflicting issues of sustainable consumption and food safety: risky consumer behaviors in reducing food waste and plastic packaging Foods 2022 11 3520 10.3390/foods11213520 36360133
Kasza, G. et al. Conflicting issues of sustainable consumption and food safety: risky consumer behaviors in reducing food waste and plastic packaging. Foods 11, 3520 (2022).36360133 10.3390/foods11213520
69. Matumba L Knowledge, attitude, and practices concerning presence of molds in foods among members of the general public in Malawi Mycotoxin Res. 2016 32 27 36 10.1007/s12550-015-0237-3 26711441
Matumba, L. et al. Knowledge, attitude, and practices concerning presence of molds in foods among members of the general public in Malawi. Mycotoxin Res. 32, 27–36 (2016).26711441 10.1007/s12550-015-0237-3
70. Olsen M Gidlund A Sulyok M Experimental mould growth and mycotoxin diffusion in different food items World Mycotoxin J. 2017 10 153 161 10.3920/WMJ2016.2163
Olsen, M., Gidlund, A. & Sulyok, M. Experimental mould growth and mycotoxin diffusion in different food items. World Mycotoxin J. 10, 153–161 (2017).10.3920/WMJ2016.2163
71. Guillard, V. et al. The next generation of sustainable food packaging to preserve our environment in a circular economy context. Front. Nutr. 5, 121 (2018).
72. Kato LS Conte-Junior CA Safety of plastic food packaging: the challenges about non-intentionally added substances (NIAS) discovery, identification and risk assessment Polymers 2021 13 2077 10.3390/polym13132077 34202594
Kato, L. S. & Conte-Junior, C. A. Safety of plastic food packaging: the challenges about non-intentionally added substances (NIAS) discovery, identification and risk assessment. Polymers 13, 2077 (2021).34202594 10.3390/polym13132077
73. Eriksen MK Christiansen JD Daugaard AE Astrup TF Closing the loop for PET, PE and PP waste from households: Influence of material properties and product design for plastic recycling Waste Manag. 2019 96 75 85 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.07.005 31376972
Eriksen, M. K., Christiansen, J. D., Daugaard, A. E. & Astrup, T. F. Closing the loop for PET, PE and PP waste from households: Influence of material properties and product design for plastic recycling. Waste Manag. 96, 75–85 (2019).31376972 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.07.005
74. López-Gálvez F Reusable Plastic Crates (RPCs) for fresh produce (case study on cauliflowers): sustainable packaging but potential Salmonella survival and risk of cross-contamination Foods 2021 10 1254 10.3390/foods10061254 34205868
López-Gálvez, F. et al. Reusable Plastic Crates (RPCs) for fresh produce (case study on cauliflowers): sustainable packaging but potential Salmonella survival and risk of cross-contamination. Foods 10, 1254 (2021).34205868 10.3390/foods10061254
75. Widén H Leufvén A Nielsen T Identification of chemicals, possibly originating from misuse of refillable PET bottles, responsible for consumer complaints about off-odours in water and soft drinks Food Addit. Contam 2005 22 681 692 10.1080/02652030500159987 16019844
Widén, H., Leufvén, A. & Nielsen, T. Identification of chemicals, possibly originating from misuse of refillable PET bottles, responsible for consumer complaints about off-odours in water and soft drinks. Food Addit. Contam 22, 681–692 (2005).16019844 10.1080/02652030500159987
76. Tisler S Christensen JH Non-target screening for the identification of migrating compounds from reusable plastic bottles into drinking water J. Hazard. Mater. 2022 429 128331 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128331 35091188
Tisler, S. & Christensen, J. H. Non-target screening for the identification of migrating compounds from reusable plastic bottles into drinking water. J. Hazard. Mater. 429, 128331 (2022).35091188 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128331
77. Bonwick, G., Bradley, E., Lock, I. & Romero, R. Bio-Based Materials For Use In Food Contact Applications - Fera project number FR/001658. Report to the Food Standards Agency (2019).
78. Bouma K Kalsbeek-van Wijk DK Sijm DTHM Migration of formaldehyde from ‘biobased’ bamboo/melamine cups: A Dutch retail survey Chemosphere 2022 292 133439 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133439 34968515
Bouma, K., Kalsbeek-van Wijk, D. K. & Sijm, D. T. H. M. Migration of formaldehyde from ‘biobased’ bamboo/melamine cups: A Dutch retail survey. Chemosphere 292, 133439 (2022).34968515 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133439
79. Soares CTM Ek M Östmark E Gällstedt M Karlsson S Recycling of multi-material multilayer plastic packaging: Current trends and future scenarios Resour. Conserv Recycl 2022 176 105905 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105905
Soares, C. T. M., Ek, M., Östmark, E., Gällstedt, M. & Karlsson, S. Recycling of multi-material multilayer plastic packaging: Current trends and future scenarios. Resour. Conserv Recycl 176, 105905 (2022).10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105905
80. Williams H Lindström A Trischler J Wikström F Rowe Z Avoiding food becoming waste in households – The role of packaging in consumers’ practices across different food categories J. Clean. Prod. 2020 265 121775 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121775
Williams, H., Lindström, A., Trischler, J., Wikström, F. & Rowe, Z. Avoiding food becoming waste in households – The role of packaging in consumers’ practices across different food categories. J. Clean. Prod. 265, 121775 (2020).10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121775
81. Marsh K Bugusu B Food packaging—roles, materials, and environmental Issues J. Food Sci. 2007 72 R39 R55 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00301.x 17995809
Marsh, K. & Bugusu, B. Food packaging—roles, materials, and environmental Issues. J. Food Sci. 72, R39–R55 (2007).17995809 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00301.x
82. Wikström F Williams H Verghese K Clune S The influence of packaging attributes on consumer behaviour in food-packaging life cycle assessment studies - a neglected topic J. Clean. Prod. 2014 73 100 108 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.042
Wikström, F., Williams, H., Verghese, K. & Clune, S. The influence of packaging attributes on consumer behaviour in food-packaging life cycle assessment studies - a neglected topic. J. Clean. Prod. 73, 100–108 (2014).10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.042
83. Savchenko OM Li T Kecinski M Messer KD Does food processing mitigate consumers’ concerns about crops grown with recycled water? Food Policy 2019 88 101748 10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.101748
Savchenko, O. M., Li, T., Kecinski, M. & Messer, K. D. Does food processing mitigate consumers’ concerns about crops grown with recycled water? Food Policy 88, 101748 (2019).10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.101748
84. Aschemann-Witzel J Stangherlin IDC Upcycled by-product use in agri-food systems from a consumer perspective: A review of what we know, and what is missing Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 2021 168 120749 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120749
Aschemann-Witzel, J. & Stangherlin, I. D. C. Upcycled by-product use in agri-food systems from a consumer perspective: A review of what we know, and what is missing. Technol. Forecast Soc. Change 168, 120749 (2021).10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120749
85. Qamar Z Appraisement, source apportionment and health risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in vehicle-wash wastewater, Pakistan Sci. Total Environ. 2017 605–606 106 113 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.152 28662424
Qamar, Z. et al. Appraisement, source apportionment and health risk of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in vehicle-wash wastewater, Pakistan. Sci. Total Environ. 605–606, 106–113 (2017).28662424 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.152
86. Al-Tohamy R A critical review on the treatment of dye-containing wastewater: Ecotoxicological and health concerns of textile dyes and possible remediation approaches for environmental safety Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022 231 113160 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.113160 35026583
Al-Tohamy, R. et al. A critical review on the treatment of dye-containing wastewater: Ecotoxicological and health concerns of textile dyes and possible remediation approaches for environmental safety. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 231, 113160 (2022).35026583 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.113160
87. Thurston-Enriquez JA Gilley JE Eghball B Microbial quality of runoff following land application of cattle manure and swine slurry J. Water Health 2005 3 157 171 10.2166/wh.2005.0015 16075941
Thurston-Enriquez, J. A., Gilley, J. E. & Eghball, B. Microbial quality of runoff following land application of cattle manure and swine slurry. J. Water Health 3, 157–171 (2005).16075941 10.2166/wh.2005.0015
88. Song W Ding Y Chiou CT Li H Selected veterinary pharmaceuticals in agricultural water and soil from land application of animal manure J. Environ. Qual. 2010 39 1211 1217 10.2134/jeq2009.0090 20830908
Song, W., Ding, Y., Chiou, C. T. & Li, H. Selected veterinary pharmaceuticals in agricultural water and soil from land application of animal manure. J. Environ. Qual. 39, 1211–1217 (2010).20830908 10.2134/jeq2009.0090
89. Rad SM Ray AK Barghi S Water pollution and agriculture pesticide Clean. Technol. 2022 4 1088 1102 10.3390/cleantechnol4040066
Rad, S. M., Ray, A. K. & Barghi, S. Water pollution and agriculture pesticide. Clean. Technol. 4, 1088–1102 (2022).10.3390/cleantechnol4040066
90. Garnett, A. Microbial water quality of commercial and residential greywater sources. BRANZ Study Report SR40. Judgeford, New Zealand: BRANZ Ltd (2019).
91. Turner RDR Warne MSJ Dawes LA Thompson K Will GD Greywater irrigation as a source of organic micro-pollutants to shallow groundwater and nearby surface water Sci. Total Environ. 2019 669 570 578 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.073 30889446
Turner, R. D. R., Warne, M. S. J., Dawes, L. A., Thompson, K. & Will, G. D. Greywater irrigation as a source of organic micro-pollutants to shallow groundwater and nearby surface water. Sci. Total Environ. 669, 570–578 (2019).30889446 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.073
92. Jiang SC Lim K-Y Huang X McCarthy D Hamilton AJ Human and environmental health risks and benefits associated with use of urban stormwater WIREs Water 2015 2 683 699 10.1002/wat2.1107
Jiang, S. C., Lim, K.-Y., Huang, X., McCarthy, D. & Hamilton, A. J. Human and environmental health risks and benefits associated with use of urban stormwater. WIREs Water 2, 683–699 (2015).10.1002/wat2.1107
93. Johannessen C Helm P Metcalfe CD Detection of selected tire wear compounds in urban receiving waters Environ. Pollut. 2021 287 117659 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117659 34426371
Johannessen, C., Helm, P. & Metcalfe, C. D. Detection of selected tire wear compounds in urban receiving waters. Environ. Pollut. 287, 117659 (2021).34426371 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117659
94. Stevens DP Surapaneni A Thodupunuri R O’Connor NA Smith D Helminth log reduction values for recycling water from sewage for the protection of human and stock health Water Res. 2017 125 501 511 10.1016/j.watres.2017.08.069 28942117
Stevens, D. P., Surapaneni, A., Thodupunuri, R., O’Connor, N. A. & Smith, D. Helminth log reduction values for recycling water from sewage for the protection of human and stock health. Water Res. 125, 501–511 (2017).28942117 10.1016/j.watres.2017.08.069
95. Styszko K Proctor K Castrignanò E Kasprzyk-Hordern B Occurrence of pharmaceutical residues, personal care products, lifestyle chemicals, illicit drugs and metabolites in wastewater and receiving surface waters of Krakow agglomeration in South Poland Sci. Total Environ. 2021 768 144360 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144360 33450690
Styszko, K., Proctor, K., Castrignanò, E. & Kasprzyk-Hordern, B. Occurrence of pharmaceutical residues, personal care products, lifestyle chemicals, illicit drugs and metabolites in wastewater and receiving surface waters of Krakow agglomeration in South Poland. Sci. Total Environ. 768, 144360 (2021).33450690 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144360
96. Vasilachi IC Asiminicesei DM Fertu DI Gavrilescu M Occurrence and fate of emerging pollutants in water environment and options for their removal Water 2021 13 181 10.3390/w13020181
Vasilachi, I. C., Asiminicesei, D. M., Fertu, D. I. & Gavrilescu, M. Occurrence and fate of emerging pollutants in water environment and options for their removal. Water 13, 181 (2021).10.3390/w13020181
97. Lenka SP Kah M Padhye LP A review of the occurrence, transformation, and removal of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in wastewater treatment plants Water Res. 2021 199 117187 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117187 34010737
Lenka, S. P., Kah, M. & Padhye, L. P. A review of the occurrence, transformation, and removal of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in wastewater treatment plants. Water Res. 199, 117187 (2021).34010737 10.1016/j.watres.2021.117187
98. Weidhaas J Microbial and chemical risk from reclaimed water use for residential irrigation Water Reuse 2022 12 289
Weidhaas, J. et al. Microbial and chemical risk from reclaimed water use for residential irrigation. Water Reuse 12, 289 (2022).
99. Horodytska O Cabanes A Fullana A Non-intentionally added substances (NIAS) in recycled plastics Chemosphere 2020 251 126373 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126373 32163780
Horodytska, O., Cabanes, A. & Fullana, A. Non-intentionally added substances (NIAS) in recycled plastics. Chemosphere 251, 126373 (2020).32163780 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126373
100. Brosché, S., Strakova, J., Bell, L. & Karlsson, T. Widespread chemical contamination of recycled plastic pellets globally. International Pollutants Elimination Network (IPEN), Sweden. (2021).
101. Chibwe L Target and nontarget screening of organic chemicals and metals in recycled plastic materials Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023 57 3380 3390 10.1021/acs.est.2c07254 36787488
Chibwe, L. et al. Target and nontarget screening of organic chemicals and metals in recycled plastic materials. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 3380–3390 (2023).36787488 10.1021/acs.est.2c07254
102. Franz R Welle F Contamination levels in recollected PET bottles from non-food applications and their impact on the safety of recycled PET for food contact Molecules 2020 25 4998 10.3390/molecules25214998 33126687
Franz, R. & Welle, F. Contamination levels in recollected PET bottles from non-food applications and their impact on the safety of recycled PET for food contact. Molecules 25, 4998 (2020).33126687 10.3390/molecules25214998
103. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Food Standards Agency – Committee on Toxicity. Discussion paper on Ocean Bound Plastic TOX/2022/37. FSA, London (2022).
