
==== Front
Eur J Nutr
Eur J Nutr
European Journal of Nutrition
1436-6207
1436-6215
Springer Berlin Heidelberg Berlin/Heidelberg

38700576
3416
10.1007/s00394-024-03416-9
Original Contribution
Association between meal context and meal quality: an ecological momentary assessment in Japanese adults
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8998-5066
Shinozaki Nana 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4189-7753
Murakami Kentaro kenmrkm@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp

1
Kimoto Nana 1
Masayasu Shizuko 2
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5927-2364
Sasaki Satoshi 1
1 https://ror.org/057zh3y96 grid.26999.3d 0000 0001 2169 1048 Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033 Japan
2 Ikurien-naka, Sugaya, Naka-shi, Ibaraki 3799-6, 311–0105 Japan
3 5 2024
3 5 2024
2024
63 6 20812093
25 7 2023
24 4 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Purpose

The purpose was to assess the relationship between the quality of meals and its context.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study of 222 Japanese adults aged 30–76 years in 2021. The following information was obtained from the 4-d weighed dietary records: the recording day (working or not), meal type (breakfast, lunch, or dinner), eating companions (alone or with someone), eating location (at home or away from home), and screen-based activity (yes or no). The nutritional quality of each meal was evaluated using the Healthy Eating Index 2020 (HEI-2020).

Results

The analysis included 1,295 meals for males and 1,317 for females. The mean HEI-2020 ranged from 43.0 (lunch) to 51.9 (dinner) in males and from 45.7 (breakfast) to 52.0 (dinner) in females. Multilevel linear regression showed that, in males, lunch had a significantly lower HEI-2020 score compared to breakfast (β = −1.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −3.42, − 0.20), while dinner had a significantly higher HEI-2020 score (β = 6.77, 95% CI: 5.34, 8.20). Eating with someone was significantly associated with a higher HEI-2020 score (β = 2.22, 95% CI: 0.76, 3.67). Among females, dinner had a higher HEI-2020 score than breakfast (β = 5.21, 95% CI: 3.72, 6.70). Eating away from home was associated with higher HEI-2020 scores (β = 2.14, 95% CI: 0.04, 4.24).

Conclusion

Meal type, location, and eating companions were associated with meal quality in this population, with differences between males and females. Incorporating these factors in nutrition education and interventions can enhance diet quality.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00394-024-03416-9.

Keywords

Meal context
Diet quality
Ecological momentary assessment
Situational factors
Japanese
Dietary record
The University of TokyoOpen Access funding provided by The University of Tokyo.

issue-copyright-statement© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Poor diet quality has been considered as a risk factor for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and type 2 diabetes [1]. Although the Japanese diet is generally perceived as healthier than other diets [2], diet quality in Japan is not as high as expected. In a nationally representative sample of Japanese adults, the mean total score of the Healthy Eating Index-2015, a widely accepted diet quality index, was similar to that of Americans [3]. Thus, there is an urgent need to improve dieta quality, and understanding the factors affecting diet quality is crucial for developing effective interventions to improve public health.

Meal context, such as where, with whom, and in what environment food is consumed, has been recognised as an important determinant of diet quality [4–6]. For instance, available evidence suggests that eating out is associated with an unfavourable dietary intake characterised by a high intake of energy, total fat, and sugars [7–9]. In addition, media use at mealtime [10] and eating dinner with others [11] were associated with lower fruit and vegetable intake. However, previous studies have exclusively focused on identifying the contextual factors contributing to between-individual differences, and little is known about the factors related to within-individual variations in dietary behaviour [12]. Furthermore, previous research has used questionnaires to measure meal contexts [11, 13, 14], which do not provide a detailed description of meal contexts on eating occasions [15]. As contextual factors are dynamic and can fluctuate momentarily, identifying momentary contextual factors associated with within-person variations in dietary intake is important for understanding and improving dietary behaviours [16].

In recent years, the ecological momentary assessment (EMA), which repeatedly samples participants’ current behaviours and experiences in their natural environments in real-time, has been increasingly used in nutritional research [17–19]. EMA can help reduce recall bias, maximise ecological validity (i.e. generalisability to people’s daily lives and the natural environment), and capture experience and behaviour over time and across settings within individuals in real-world contexts [17–19]. The EMA has been used to explore contextual factors related to the healthiness of a diet [15, 20–29], offering a novel framework for studying the determinants of diet quality. However, most studies have focused on selected foods (e.g. fruits and vegetables) [15, 20–26] or specific meal types (e.g. dinner) [27, 28], and only one study has evaluated the associations between various meal contexts and the overall diet quality of meals across different meal types [29]. In addition, because previous studies included only youth with type 1 diabetes mellitus [29], the associations between diet quality and meal contexts should be evaluated in populations with broader participant characteristics.

Therefore, in this study of healthy Japanese adults, we aimed to examine the associations between the overall diet quality of meals and meal context, specifically focusing on meal type (breakfast, lunch, and dinner), eating companions (alone or with someone), eating location (at home or away from home), and screen-based activities (yes or no). We utilised the EMA technique based on detailed dietary data collected from dietary records (DRs) to capture the within-individual level phenomenon. We hypothesised that several contextual factors were associated with meal quality.

Materials and methods

Study participants and procedure

This cross-sectional study was based on data from a validation study of an online diet history questionnaire administered between August and October 2021. Details of the study procedures and participants have been described previously [30]. Briefly, research dietitians (n 66) with experience in DR surveys collected data from 14 of the 47 prefectures. In each prefecture, eight cohabiting couples, consisting of two females each in four age categories (30–39, 40–49, 50–59, and 60–69 years) and their husbands (regardless of age) were recruited, resulting in 112 females and 112 males. The sample size was determined based on the purpose of the original validation study [30]. The inclusion criterion was free-living individuals with Internet access. The exclusion criteria were dietitians, people living with a dietitian, people receiving dietary guidance from a doctor or dietitian, people receiving insulin therapy or dialysis treatment, people who had difficulty completing web questionnaires, people with special dietary habits such as avoiding commonly consumed food for religious or health reasons, and pregnant and breastfeeding women. Because of snowball sampling, the number of people who approached and were excluded from the survey was not recorded. This study is reported according to the adapted STROBE Checklist for Reporting EMA Studies [31].

Dietary record

A total of 111 females aged 30–69 years and 111 males aged 30–76 years completed a 4-non-consecutive-day weighed DR after a couple withdrew. The details of the DR have been previously described [30]. Briefly, the recording days were three weekdays (Monday through Friday) and one weekend day (Saturday or Sunday) for two weeks. Each couple was instructed by the assigned research dietitian, both verbally and in writing. They were given an example of a completed diary sheet and asked to record all foods and beverages they consumed on the provided recording sheet and weigh them using a provided digital cooking scale (KS-274, Dretec, Japan; ±2 g accuracy for 0–500 g, ± 3 g accuracy for 500–2000 g). When weighing was difficult, participants were asked to provide as much information as possible about the food, including the name of the products, brands, or restaurants and the approximate amount consumed or leftover.

The research dietitians retrieved the recording sheets immediately after each DR was completed. The research dietitian checked the content of the records and asked the participants for additional information in person, by phone or email, as needed. The weights of food reported in approximate quantities were estimated as accurately as possible based on information from general recipes, websites, or product labels. Each food was assigned a food code based on the 2015 version of the Standard Tables of Food Composition of Japan [32] using a standard procedure. The recording sheets were sent to the study’s central office and rechecked by trained dieticians.

Nutritional quality of each meal

The DR sheets consisted of sections on breakfast, lunch, dinner, and snacks. In this study, meal types (breakfast, lunch, dinner, and snacks) were determined based on the section in which the meal was written. Snacks were excluded from the main analysis because of our focus on the quality of the three main meals, considering the relatively low frequency of snacks [33] and their low contribution to the total energy and nutrient intake [34] among Japanese adults. The number of meals was 1,295 (425 breakfast, 426 lunch, and 444 dinner) for males and 1,317 (439 breakfast, 436 lunch, and 442 dinner) for females.

The energy and nutrient content of each meal were estimated based on the weight of the food items and their nutrient content using the Standard Tables of Food Composition of Japan [32]. As the database lacks the amount of added sugar for some foods, the added sugar content for such foods was calculated based on the same or similar foods in the 2011–2012 Food Patterns Equivalents Database [35]. Teaspoon equivalents in the Food Patterns Equivalents Database were converted into grams by multiplying with 4.2 (grams of added sugar per teaspoon). The mean daily total energy intake (including snacks) was calculated for each individual.

The nutritional quality of each meal assessed using the Healthy Eating Index 2020 (HEI-2020) [36]. The components and scoring criteria of the HEI-2020 are completely aligned with those of the HEI-2015 [37], which has been used to assess the quality of the total diet [38] and individual meals [34, 39]. The usefulness of the HEI-2020 in Japanese has been previously verified [3]. The HEI-2020 is a 100-point scale used to evaluate adherence to the 2020–2025 Dietary Guidelines for Americans [40], with higher scores indicating better diet quality. The nine adequacy components (maximum score) are total fruits (5), whole fruits (5), total vegetables (5), greens and beans (5), wholegrains (5), dairy (10), total protein foods (5), seafood and plant proteins (5) and fatty acids (the ratio of the sum of polyunsaturated and monounsaturated fatty acids to saturated fatty acids) (10), and the four moderation components include refined grains (10), sodium (10), added sugars (10) and saturated fats (10). We calculated the HEI-2020 score for each meal based on energy-adjusted values (i.e. amount/1000 kcal of energy or percentage of energy) using the 2011–2012 Food Patterns Equivalents Database [40]. The HEI-2020 total and component scores were also calculated for each individual for each meal and overall diet (including snacks) based on the average intake over the four-day period.

Meal context

On each recording day, the participants recorded whether the day was (i) a working or school day, (ii) a non-working or non-school day, or (iii) other schedules (e.g. non-working or non-school days for retirees) on the DR sheet. Because of the low frequency of ‘other schedules’, we combined ‘non-working or non-school days’ and ‘other schedules’ for the analysis. In addition, for each eating occasion, participants were asked to record where they ate (at home, workplace, restaurant, or other places), the number of people they ate with, and whether they ate while watching a monitor, such as TV, computers, or mobile phones. Because the number of people included in each category of the place to eat and the number of people they ate together were unbalanced, the eating location was reclassified into home or away from home, and eating companions were grouped into alone (i.e. ate alone) or with someone (i.e. ate with one or more people).

Basic characteristics

The basic characteristics of the participants (sex, age, body height, body weight, education level, and current smoking status) were collected using web questionnaires. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height squared (m2). Educational level was grouped into three categories (junior high school or high school, junior college or technical school, and university or higher). Smoking status was reported as smoking more than 20 cigarettes per day, 20 cigarettes or less per day, past smoking, or never smoking, and was grouped into ‘current smoker’ and ‘never or former smoker’.

The accuracy of reported energy intake (EI) was assessed using Goldberg’s cut-off for the ratio of EI to basal metabolic rate (BMR) [41]. Participants were categorised as either plausible, under-reporters, or over-reporters of EI based on whether their ratio fell within, below, or above the 95% confidence limits for agreement between EI: BMR and their corresponding physical activity level (PAL). The PAL for sedentary lifestyle (1.55) was used for all participants in this study due to the absence of an objective measure of physical activity. The BMR was calculated using an equation designed for Japanese individuals, which considers height, weight, age, and sex [42, 43].

We calculated the upper and lower cut-off values for the agreement between EI: BMR and PAL with 95% confidence limits. This considered the coefficient of variation in intakes and other components of energy balance. Specifically, we considered the within-subject variation in EI at 23%, the precision of the estimated BMR relative to the measured BMR at 8.5%, and the between-subject variation in PAL at 15% [41]. Based on this, we defined under-reporters, plausible reporters, and over-reporters as those with an EI: BMR of less than 1.02, between 1.02 and less than 2.35, and 2.35 or greater, respectively [41].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, US). Our sample of cohabiting couples was analysed separately according to sex (males and females) [30]. This a priori decision was made because of marked differences in diet quality [44] and eating behaviours [45] between sexes, which may be diluted by combined analyses of cohabiting couples consuming similar diets. Statistical significance was defined as a two-sided P-value of < 0.05. Descriptive statistics are reported as means and standard deviations (SDs) or numbers and percentages. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests were used to assess the normality of the distribution of individual HEI-2020 scores; an unpaired t-test was used to assess sex differences in HEI-2020 total scores. Moreover, to compare means of HEI-2020 total and component scores between meals, multiple comparisons with Bonferroni correction were used.

Multilevel linear modelling was used to account for multiple observations (meals) within each participant. We employed random intercepts and an unstructured covariance matrix with multiple eating occasions (Level 1) nested within individuals (Level 2). The dependent variable was the HEI-2020 score for each meal as the continuous variable. The independent variables included meal context variables (level-1 predictors) and participants’ basic characteristics (level-2 predictors). Level-1 predictors included meal type (breakfast, lunch, or dinner), day type (working or non-working day), eating location (at home or away from home), eating companions (alone or with someone), and screen-based activities while eating (yes or no). Level-2 predictors consisted of age (years, continuous), BMI kg/m2, continuous), education level (junior high school or high school, college or technical school, or university or higher), smoking status (never/former smoker or current smoker), and EI (kcal/d, continuous). All categorical independent variables were dummy-coded. Level-1 variables were group-mean centred, whereas level-2 variables were grand-mean centred for appropriate interpretation of the model parameters [46, 47]. The sample size for each sex was sufficiently large to obtain unbiased estimates of Level 2 standard errors [48]. A power calculation was conducted using G∗Power 3.1.9.7, assuming a small effect size of 0.1, four days of dietary recordings with three meals per day, an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.5, and a two-tailed a of 0.05 [49]. The calculation showed that a sample size of 111 participants for each sex yielded a statistical power of 0.96.

In this study, a step-by-step approach was used to build multilevel linear models. The independent variables at each level were added to the model step by step using PROC MIXED procedure [50, 51]. First, an intercept-only model (model 0) with no independent variables was used to calculate intraclass correlations (ICCs) and design effects [46]. Non-zero ICCs (0.19 for males and 0.21 for females) and design effects greater than 2.0 (3.0 for males and 3.3 for females) indicated variance in the HEI scores of meals across individuals, showing the need for multilevel analysis [46]. Next, Model 1 was fitted to the level-1 variables to evaluate the association between meal context factors and meal quality. Model 2 was then fitted to level-2 variables to evaluate the association between individual-level factors and meal quality, and Model 3 was fitted for both level-1 and level-2 eating factors. The equations for these models are presented in Text S1.

The fixed effects of the independent variables were evaluated using regression coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The regression coefficients and variances were estimated using maximum likelihood, as the regression coefficients are of major interest [50]. Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) was used to assess the goodness of fit of each model [46]. Multicollinearity among the independent variables was checked using the variance inflation factor (VIF) in the final model. None of the variables showed multicollinearity problems (VIF < 5) [52]. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the association between meal quality and meal contextual factors after excluding under- and over-reporters of EI.

Results

Characteristics of the study participants and eating occasions

Table 1 presents the basic characteristics of the study participants. The mean age was 51.7 years (SD: 11.9) for males and 49.9 years (SD: 10.7) for females. The mean BMI was 23.8 kg/m2 (SD: 3.6) for males and 22.7 kg/m2 (SD: 3.3) for females. The most common educational level was university or higher for males (43.2%) and junior college or technical school for females (49.6%). More than two-thirds of males and females were either never smokers or former smokers. There were no over-reporters of EI; over 90% of the participants were classified as plausible reporters of EI, while the remaining individuals were under-reporters. The mean HEI-2020 score for overall diet was higher in females than males (51.6 vs. 49.4, P = 0.01). Compared to breakfast and lunch, dinner was significantly high in HEI-2020 total score and component scores for total vegetables, total protein foods, seafood and plant proteins, and refined grains in both sexes (Table S1).

Table 1 Basic characteristics of the study participants1

Variables	Male (n 111)	Female (n 111)	
Age (years)	51.7 ± 11.9	49.9 ± 10.7	
Body height (cm)	170.2 ± 6.3	158.4 ± 5.4	
Body weight (kg)	68.9 ± 11.9	56.9 ± 8.5	
Body mass index (kg/m2)	23.8 ± 3.6	22.7 ± 3.3	
Education level, n (%)			
 Junior high school or high school	41 (36.9)	28 (25.2)	
 Junior college or technical school	22 (19.8)	55 (49.6)	
 University or higher	48 (43.2)	28 (25.2)	
Smoking status, n (%)			
 Never or former smoker	76 (68.5)	99 (89.2)	
 Current smoker	35 (31.5)	12 (10.8)	
Energy intake (kcal/d)	2067 ± 446	1552 ± 301	
Energy reporting status2, n (%)			
 Underreporting	11 (9.9)	10 (9.0)	
 Plausible reporting	100 (90.1)	101 (91.0)	
 Overreporting	0 (0)	0 (0)	
HEI-2020 score (maximum: 100 points)			
 Breakfast	43.3 ± 12.4	45.7 ± 13.0	
 Lunch	43.0 ± 9.8	46.5 ± 9.7	
 Dinner	51.9 ± 8.2	52.0 ± 8.0	
 Overall diet (including snacks)	49.4 ± 9.2	51.6 ± 9.0	
HEI, Healthy Eating Index

1Values are means ± standard deviations unless otherwise indicated

2Underreporting, plausible reporting, and overreporting were defined as participants having a ratio of reported energy intake to BMR of < 1.02, ≥ 1.02 to < 2.35, and ≥ 2.35, respectively

Table 2 shows the meal context characteristics of the eating occasions. Meals were evenly distributed among breakfast, lunch, and dinner for both sexes. Males had a higher percentage of eating occasions on working or school days (64.3%), whereas females had a higher percentage of eating occasions on non-working days or non-school days (53.7%). The most common eating behaviours among both male and female participants were consuming meals at home, with someone else, and not engaging in screen-based activities.

Table 2 Meal context characteristics (n 1295 for males and n 1317 for females)

		Male	Female	
		N	%	N	%	
Meal type					
	Breakfast	425	32.8	439	33.3	
	Lunch	426	32.9	436	33.1	
	Dinner	444	34.3	442	33.6	
Day type					
	Working or school day	832	64.3	610	46.3	
	Non-working day or non-school day	463	35.8	707	53.7	
Eating location					
	At home	987	76.2	1095	83.1	
	Away from home	308	23.8	222	16.9	
Eating companion					
	Alone	556	42.9	394	29.9	
	With someone	739	57.1	923	70.1	
Screen-based activity while eating					
	No	857	66.2	897	68.1	
	Yes (watching TV, computer, or mobile phone)	438	33.8	420	31.9	

Factors associated with meal quality

Table 3 shows the associations between meal context, individual characteristics, and HEI-2020 meal scores among males. The ICC value of the null model (Model 0) indicated that 19% of the variance in the HEI-2020 scores of meals was explained by between-individual variability, leaving 81% of the variance in the HEI-2020 scores explained by within-individual variability on different eating occasions. The fixed effects of each variable observed in Models 1 and 2 were also observed in Model 3, in the same direction and magnitude. Model 3 showed a lower AIC score than Models 1 and 2, indicating a better goodness-of-fit. The final model revealed that compared to breakfast, lunch had a significantly lower HEI-2020 score (β = 1.81, 95% CI: −3.42, − 0.20), while dinner had a significantly higher HEI-2020 score (β = 6.77, 95% CI: 5.34, 8.20). Eating with someone was associated with a higher HEI-2020 score (β = 2.22, 95% CI: 0.76, 3.67). Regarding individual-level factors, age was positively associated with the HEI-2020 score, and current smokers had a lower HEI-2020 score than never or former smokers.

Table 3 Factors associated with the HEI-2020 score at 1295 eating occasions in 111 males

			Model 0
(null model)	Model 1
(eating occasion-level variables)	Model 2
(individual-level variables)	Model 3
(eating occasion- and individual-level variables)	
Fixed effect						
Intercept		43.25 (42.11, 44.39)***	43.25 (42.11, 44.39)***	43.28 (42.38, 44.18)***	43.28 (42.38, 44.19)***	
Eating occasion-level variables						
	Meal type	Breakfast	-	Ref	-	Ref	
		Lunch	-	-1.81 (-3.42, -0.20)*	-	-1.81 (-3.42, -0.20)*	
		Dinner	-	6.77 (5.34, 8.20)***	-	6.77 (5.34, 8.20)***	
	Day type	Working or school day	-	Ref	-	Ref	
		Non-working day or non-school day	-	-0.20 (-2.17, 1.77)	-	-0.20 (-2.17, 1.77)	
	Eating location	At home	-	Ref	-	Ref	
		Away from home	-	1.89 (-0.05, 3.82)	-	1.89 (-0.05, 3.82)	
	Eating companion	Alone	-	Ref	-	Ref	
		With someone	-	2.22 (0.76, 3.67)**	-	2.22 (0.76, 3.67)**	
	Screen-based activity while eating	No	-	Ref	-	Ref	
		Yes (watching TV, computer, or mobile phone)	-	-0.49 (-2.11, 1.12)	-	-0.49 (-2.11, 1.12)	
Individual-level variables						
	Age (years)		-	-	0.19 (0.11, 0.28)***	0.19 (0.11, 0.28)***	
	BMI (kg/m2)		-	-	-0.12 (-0.39, 0.14)	-0.12 (-0.38, 0.14)	
	Energy intake (kcal/d)				0.004 (0.002, 0.006)***	0.004 (0.002, 0.006)***	
	Education level	Junior high school or high school	-	-	Ref	Ref	
		College or technical school	-	-	-1.00 (-3.65, 1.64)	-1.00 (-3.64, 1.65)	
		University or higher	-	-	0.39 (-1.73, 2.51)	0.40 (-1.72, 2.52)	
	Smoking status	Never or former smoker	-	-	Ref	Ref	
		Current smoker	-	-	-4.13 (-6.24, -2.02)***	-4.13 (-6.23, -2.02)***	
Variance components (random effects)					
	Level-2 Intercept		26.68***	28.05***	12.90***	14.30***	
	Residual		117.41***	101.22***	117.45***	101.25***	
Model Summary						
	AIC		9996.1	9832.4	9956.4	9792.8	
	ICC		0.19	0.22	0.10	0.12	
AIC, Akaike information criterion; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; Ref, reference category; HEI, Healthy Eating Index

The dependent variable was the HEI score for meals (maximum: 100 points). Values for eating occasion-level and individual-level variables show regression coefficients with 95% confidence intervals in parentheses. Other values are parameter estimates, with 95% confidence intervals in parentheses, if any. The regression coefficients represent the change in the HEI-2020 score for a one-unit increase for age and BMI and the difference in HEI-2020 scores compared to the reference category for other independent variables.

*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

Table 4 presents the results of the same analysis for females. According to the ICC value for the null model, 21% of the variance in the HEI-2020 scores of meals was explained by between-individual variability, and the remaining 79% of the variance in the HEI-2020 score was explained by within-individual variability on different eating occasions. Model 3 showed similar associations of meal context variables and individual characteristics with HEI-2020 scores, as in Models 1 and 2. In the final model, dinner had a significantly higher HEI-2020 score than breakfast (β = 5.21, 95% CI: 3.72, 6.70). Eating away from home was associated with a higher HEI-2020 score (β = 2.14, 95% CI: 0.04, 4.24). Regarding individual-level factors, age and BMI were positively associated with the HEI-2020 score, and current smokers had lower HEI-2020 scores than never or former smokers.

Table 4 Factors associated with the HEI-2020 score at 1317 eating occasions in 111 females

			Model 0
(null model)	Model 1
(eating occasion-level variables)	Model 2
(individual-level variables)	Model 3
(eating occasion- and individual-level variables)	
Fixed effect						
Intercept		44.33 (43.12, 45.55)***	44.33 (43.12, 45.55)***	44.33 (43.21, 45.46)***	44.33 (43.21, 45.46)***	
Eating occasion-level variables						
	Meal type	Breakfast	-	Ref	-	Ref	
		Lunch	-	-1.36 (-3.00, 0.27)	-	-1.36 (-3.00, 0.27)	
		Dinner	-	5.21 (3.72, 6.70)***	-	5.21 (3.72, 6.70)***	
	Day type	Working or school day	-	Ref	-	Ref	
		Non-working day or non-school day	-	-1.18 (-3.26, 0.89)	-	-1.18 (-3.26, 0.89)	
	Eating location	At home	-	Ref	-	Ref	
		Away from home	-	2.14 (0.04, 4.24)*	-	2.14 (0.04, 4.24)*	
	Eating companion	Alone	-	Ref	-	Ref	
		With someone	-	-0.57 (-2.08, 0.95)	-	-0.57 (-2.08, 0.95)	
	Screen-based activity while eating	No	-	Ref	-	Ref	
		Yes (watching TV, computer, or mobile phone)	-	-0.34 (-2.06, 1.39)	-	-0.34 (-2.06, 1.39)	
Individual-level variables						
	Age (years)		-	-	0.11 (0, 0.22)	0.11 (0, 0.22)*	
	BMI (kg/m2)		-	-	0.37 (0.02, 0.73)*	0.37 (0.02, 0.73)*	
	Energy intake (kcal/d)				0.001 (-0.002, 0.005)	0.001 (-0.002, 0.005)	
	Education level	Junior high school or high school	-	-	Ref	Ref	
		College or technical school	-	-	0.81 (-2.03, 3.64)	0.80 (-2.03, 3.64)	
		University or higher	-	-	2.92 (-0.35, 6.20)	2.92 (-0.35, 6.19)	
	Smoking status	Never or former smoker	-	-	Ref	Ref	
		Current smoker	-	-	-5.49 (-9.26, -1.72)**	-5.49 (-9.26, -1.71)**	
Variance components (random effects)					
	Level-2 Intercept		31.67***	32.28***	25.65***	26.26***	
	Residual		119.13***	111.89***	119.14***	111.9***	
Model Summary						
	AIC		10197.1	10115.4	10173.9	10098.2	
	ICC		0.21	0.22	0.18	0.19	
AIC, Akaike information criterion; BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; Ref, reference category; HEI, Healthy Eating Index

The dependent variable was the HEI score for meals (maximum: 100 points). Values for eating occasion-level and individual-level variables show regression coefficients with 95% confidence intervals in parentheses. Other values are parameter estimates, with 95% confidence intervals in parentheses, if any. The regression coefficients represent the change in the HEI-2020 score for a one-unit increase for age and BMI and the difference in HEI-2020 scores compared to the reference category for other independent variables.

*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

Tables S1 and S2 show the results of the sensitivity analysis, which included only plausible reporters of EI. The findings were largely consistent with the main analysis, except that BMI was no longer associated with the HEI-2020 score among females.

Discussion

Main findings

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the association between the overall diet quality of meals and various meal contexts in adults using EMA. In this population, meal type, location, and eating companions were found to be associated with meal quality, and these factors differed between males and females. Specifically, compared to breakfast, lunch showed a lower diet quality among males, and dinner showed a higher diet quality among males and females. Moreover, eating with someone for males and eating away from home for females was associated with better meal quality. Regarding individual characteristics, younger age and current smoking were associated with lower meal quality in both sexes.

Comparison with previous studies

Dinner has been reported to have the highest nutritional quality among all meal types in the Japanese population [34, 39]. The results of the present study were similar, indicating that dinner is independently associated with higher nutritional quality, even after considering other contextual factors (e.g. eating with others) and individual characteristics. Previous studies on the Japanese diet have shown that dinner contributed the most to the total EI [34, 39, 53] and was the longest of the three main meals [54]. Furthermore, compared to breakfast and lunch, dinner has a different combination of foods [39] and dishes [55], particularly characterised by a high vegetable intake [34, 39, 53]. In the present study, dinner had high intakes of total vegetables, total protein foods, seafood and plant proteins and low refined grain intake. Therefore, dinners may be considered the predominant meal of the day in Japan, with nutrient-rich main or side dishes consisting of vegetables and protein sources. In contrast, a previous study in the US showed that the nutritional quality of breakfast and dinner was comparable in youths with type 1 diabetes [29]. This discrepancy may be attributed to differences in eating habits and population characteristics. It is also unclear why the nutritional quality of lunch was lower than that of breakfast among males in this population. Given the paucity of studies, further research is needed to clarify the association between the nutritional quality of meals and meal type.

A previous study on young Australian adults found no association between meal quality and social interaction (e.g. with family members and friends) during mealtime [20]. Similarly, among African American females, eating with others was not associated with the consumption of snacks or sugar-sweetened beverages [16]. In this study, eating with someone was associated with higher meal quality only in males. It is well known that eating with others influences food choices and portions, which may be partly explained by the modelling of dietary behaviour (i.e. adjusting food intake to that of eating companions) [56–58]. Thus, the meal quality of the male participants in this study may have been positively affected by eating companions with better diet quality. Given that only cohabiting couples were included in this study and that females had better overall diet quality than males, it is possible that eating with one’s wife may have positively impacted males’ meal quality. However, since information on who was with the participants during the meal was unavailable in this study, further research is needed to examine the association between the nutritional quality of meals and the presence of others.

Previous reviews have suggested that eating out is associated with poorer diet quality, characterised by a higher intake of energy, total and saturated fats, sugars, and sodium, and a lower intake of fibre, dairy, fruit, vegetables, and key micronutrients [7, 9]. This is also supported by several previous studies; when eating outside the home, Italian college students had a lower probability of consuming vegetables, fruits, and legumes, and a higher probability of consuming processed meats, salty snacks, and alcoholic beverages than when eating at home [25]. In addition, among young Australian individuals, eating in a café or restaurant, rather than at home, was associated with higher sugar-sweetened beverage consumption [22]. Interestingly, our results showed that females reported better meal quality when eating away from home. Among this population, the workplace was the most common eating location for meals away from home, accounting for 70% and 78% of meals for males and females, respectively. As this study focused on the places where meals were eaten, workplace meals included boxed lunches prepared at home and brought to work. Given that food prepared at home is more likely to contain nutritious foods, such as fruits and vegetables [20, 26], collecting information on where meals are prepared may provide more insight into the association between meal quality and eating out.

No association was observed between meal quality and mealtime screening-based activities. This is consistent with the results of several studies [6, 20]. In contrast, other studies have reported negative associations between meal healthiness and mealtime screen-based activities, such as watching TV, in children [15] and adults [10, 16, 28]. Furthermore, meal quality was not associated with whether the day was a workday. Prior research on the association between whether it is a workday and meal quality is limited [59]. Further research is needed to understand the relationship between meal quality, screen-based activities, and workdays.

Feature implication

This study showed that the healthiness of meals is influenced by various factors, including where, when, and with whom one eats, as well as by individual characteristics, such as age and smoking status. Therefore, future public health interventions should target not only personal characteristics but also contextual factors, such as developing behavioural strategies for specific eating situations [6, 12]. For example, implementing policies that help males eat healthy meals during lunchtime or when eating alone can improve overall diet quality and lead to significant public health benefits. In addition, inconsistencies between the present and previous studies regarding the relationship between meal quality and some meal context variables, suggest that the determinants of food intake during each eating occasion may not be generalisable across different countries [22]. Hence, further studies are warranted to investigate this aspect.

Strengths and limitations

A strength of this study was the use of a 4-day DR. Detailed information about dietary intake and eating situations repeatedly measured within individuals allowed us to conduct an EMA for the association between meal quality and meal contexts. Moreover, the DR period included weekdays and weekends, enabling us to capture changes in dietary behaviour and meal environments depending on the daily schedule. Nevertheless, this study has several limitations. First, although recruitment was conducted across a wide area in Japan, the study participants were not randomly selected but rather volunteers who may be more health-conscious than the general population. The educational level of the present population was higher than that of a nationally representative sample of males (junior high school or high school: 52.9%; junior college or technical school: 12.9%; university or higher: 33.7%) and females (55.9%, 27.6%, 15.6%, respectively) [60]. However, the percentage of current smokers and the means (SDs) of height, weight and BMI in this population were similar to those in a nationally representative sample (males: 27.1%, 167.7 (6.9) cm, 67.4 (12.0) kg and 23.9 (3.6) kg/m2, respectively; females: 7.6%, 154.3 (6.7) cm, 53.6 (9.2) kg and 22.5 (3.7) kg/m2, respectively) [61]. In addition, because this study only included cohabiting couples, the findings cannot be applied to people with other living conditions (e.g. living alone). Therefore, further investigations should be conducted using a more representative sample of individuals from various backgrounds. Second, because of the cross-sectional design, it was impossible to determine a causal relationship between meal context and meal quality. For instance, in the case of males, it was unclear whether eating with others increases meal quality or if they do not eat with others because the quality of their meals is low. Therefore, further interventional studies are needed to draw clear conclusions. Third, detailed information was not captured for some meal context variables. For example, there was no information on who was with the participant at mealtime (e.g. family, friends, coworkers), which could also be related to diet quality [15]. Additional contextual factors, such as the location of preparing and purchasing foods [20, 22], cognition, mood, and physiological state [12, 18], may also affect the nutritional quality of each meal. In addition, individual characteristics, such as cooking and food skill confidence [62], are potential factors related to diet quality. Therefore, future studies should examine more detailed and broader meal contexts and participant characteristics. Fourth, snacks were not examined in this study. Although most Japanese adults consume snacks infrequently and in small amounts [33, 34], some individuals may consume them more frequently, which could impact their overall dietary intake. To gain a better understanding of how meal context affects the nutritional quality of snacks, larger studies that include snacks should be conducted in the future. Fifth, because the weighed DR is susceptible to measurement errors [63], the diet quality may have been inaccurate. When weighing was difficult, the consumed weight of foods was estimated, which may have resulted in inaccurate estimates of meal quality. Moreover, it is possible that some participants changed their dietary behaviour by recording their diet [63]. However, it is challenging to identify measurement errors at the meal level. Nonetheless, we assessed the quality of the diet by using energy-adjusted values, which can mitigate measurement errors. We also verified that the association between meal context and quality remained consistent even after eliminating individuals who underreported their EI. Finally, four days of DRs may be insufficient to capture habitual dietary behaviours. Recording dietary intake and meal context using mobile device-based technologies such as mobile apps [22, 25, 64] or wearable cameras [20] would effectively extend the recording period while reducing the burden on the participants. However, it should be noted that in addition to the high cost of developing the equipment and software [17, 31], image coding is time-consuming [20].

Conclusion

This study found that the nutritional quality of lunch was lower for males compared to breakfast, whereas the nutritional quality of dinner was higher for both sexes. In addition, eating with someone was associated with higher meal quality in males, whereas eating away from home was linked to better meal quality in females. These findings using EMA techniques shed light on the barriers and facilitators of healthy eating in real-world settings and can inform the development of more effective public health interventions. However, further research is needed to gain a better understand of the relationship between meal context and quality.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Abbreviations

AIC Akaike’s information criterion

BMI body mass index

BMR basal metabolic rate

CI confidence interval

DR dietary record

EI energy intake

EMA ecological momentary assessment

HEI Healthy Eating Index

ICC intraclass correlation

VIF variance inflation factor

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the research dietitians who conducted data collection: Tamotsu Noshiro*, Fuki Kudo, Erika Iwasaki, Kazue Fukushi and Masako Shimooka (Hokkaido); Akiko Sato, Hiromi Kawaguchi, Yuka Takeda and Akiko Matsunaga (Yamagata); Yoko Isaka, Yuka Ota, Hanayo Kadoi, Akiko Seki, Yuko Takano, Toshie Nakayama, Ayami Murakami and Masako Yamaguchi (Ibaraki); Kaoru Goto, Yuka Inaba, Akiko Kato and Miki Hori (Saitama), Hitomi Okahashi, Shinobu Matsui and Yurina Arai (Tokyo); Suzuyo Takeda, Kumiko Ono, Yayoi Hayashi, Kazumi Takagi, Kaori Otomo and Mayuko Sakitsu (Kanagawa); Masako Koike, Reiko Kunimatsu, Keiko Kuribayashi, Keiko Hirayama and Eriko Kiryuu (Niigata); Kazumi Horiguchi, Kotomi Kishikawa, Yasuko Ishii and Miyuki Yokokoji (Yamanashi); Masako Tanaka, Hideko Uchibayashi, Tomoko Suzuki, Ryoko Mizuno and Emi Kajiura (Aichi), Yumiko Noutomi, Atsuko Toyokawa, Yasuka Tabuchi and Junko Ikukawa (Osaka), Sachiko Terao, Mari Matsuda, Mieko Imanaka and Noriyuki Kubota (Okayama); Yoko Fujii, Izumi Hase, Aki Funada and Tomomi Saya (Hiroshima); Kyoko Kaku, Kiyoko Katayama, Miki Hamachi, Yoshiko Yahagi and Chizuru Shibata (Fukuoka); Yuko Soga, Kayoko Iwamoto, Mika Moribe, Miki Hamada and Kaori Nakamura (Oita). The authors also thank Hayato Yamana (Jichi Medical University) for his advice on statistical analysis and the research team staff at the survey centre (University of Tokyo): Akiko Hara, Keika Mine, and Hiroko Onodera. * Deceased.

Author contributions

N.S. formulated the research question, designed and conducted the survey, analysed the data, interpreted the findings, wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and was primarily responsible for the final content. K.M. formulated the research question, designed and conducted the survey, interpreted the findings, and provided critical input to the final draft of the manuscript. N. K. designed and conducted the survey and managed the data. S. M. and S. S. contributed to the survey design and managed to establish the study field, recruitment, and fieldwork. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Open Access funding provided by The University of Tokyo. This work was supported by the Institute for Food and Health Science, Yazuya Co., Ltd (grant number: none). The funders played no role in the design, analysis, interpretation, or writing of this manuscript.

Open Access funding provided by The University of Tokyo.

Data availability

The datasets generated and analysed during the present study are not publicly available due to privacy and ethical restrictions imposed by the Ethics Committee of the University of Tokyo, Faculty of Medicine, but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted according to the guidelines laid out in the Declaration of Helsinki, and all procedures involving human subjects were approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Tokyo Faculty of Medicine (protocol code: 2020326NI; date of approval: 29 January 2021). Written informed consent was obtained from each participant.

Conflict of interest

SM and SS had no conflicts of interest to declare. When this study was conducted, NS, KM, and NK belonged to the Department of Nutritional Epidemiology and Behavioural Nutrition, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, which is a social cooperation program with Ajinomoto, Co., Inc. The authors declare that Ajinomoto, Co., Inc. played no role in the design, analysis, interpretation, or writing of this manuscript.
==== Refs
References

1. Morze J Danielewicz A Hoffmann G Schwingshackl L Diet quality as assessed by the healthy eating index, alternate healthy eating Index, Dietary approaches to stop hypertension score, and health outcomes: a second update of a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies J Acad Nutr Diet 2020 120 12 1998 2031 10.1016/j.jand.2020.08.076 33067162
Morze J, Danielewicz A, Hoffmann G, Schwingshackl L (2020) Diet quality as assessed by the healthy eating index, alternate healthy eating Index, Dietary approaches to stop hypertension score, and health outcomes: a second update of a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. J Acad Nutr Diet 120(12):1998–2031. 10.1016/j.jand.2020.08.076. e1533067162 10.1016/j.jand.2020.08.076
2. Gabriel AS Ninomiya K Uneyama H The role of the Japanese traditional diet in healthy and sustainable dietary patterns around the world Nutrients 2018 10 2 173 10.3390/nu10020173 29401650
Gabriel AS, Ninomiya K, Uneyama H (2018) The role of the Japanese traditional diet in healthy and sustainable dietary patterns around the world. Nutrients 10(2):173. 10.3390/nu1002017329401650 10.3390/nu10020173
3. Murakami K Livingstone MBE Fujiwara A Sasaki S Application of the healthy eating Index-2015 and the nutrient-rich Food Index 9.3 for assessing overall diet quality in the Japanese context: different nutritional concerns from the US PLoS ONE 2020 15 1 e0228318 10.1371/journal.pone.0228318 31999772
Murakami K, Livingstone MBE, Fujiwara A, Sasaki S (2020) Application of the healthy eating Index-2015 and the nutrient-rich Food Index 9.3 for assessing overall diet quality in the Japanese context: different nutritional concerns from the US. PLoS ONE 15(1):e0228318. 10.1371/journal.pone.022831831999772 10.1371/journal.pone.0228318
4. Story M Kaphingst KM Robinson-O’Brien R Glanz K Creating healthy food and eating environments: policy and environmental approaches Annu Rev Public Health 2008 29 253 272 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090926 18031223
Story M, Kaphingst KM, Robinson-O’Brien R, Glanz K (2008) Creating healthy food and eating environments: policy and environmental approaches. Annu Rev Public Health 29:253–272. 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.09092618031223 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090926
5. Leech RM Worsley A Timperio A McNaughton SA Understanding meal patterns: definitions, methodology and impact on nutrient intake and diet quality Nutr Res Rev 2015 28 1 1 21 10.1017/S0954422414000262 25790334
Leech RM, Worsley A, Timperio A, McNaughton SA (2015) Understanding meal patterns: definitions, methodology and impact on nutrient intake and diet quality. Nutr Res Rev 28(1):1–21. 10.1017/S095442241400026225790334 10.1017/S0954422414000262
6. Shams-White MM Korycinski RW Dodd KW Barrett B Jacobs S Subar AF Park Y Bowles HR Examining the association between meal context and diet quality: an observational study of meal context in older adults Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2021 18 1 67 10.1186/s12966-021-01122-x 34016140
Shams-White MM, Korycinski RW, Dodd KW, Barrett B, Jacobs S, Subar AF, Park Y, Bowles HR (2021) Examining the association between meal context and diet quality: an observational study of meal context in older adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 18(1):67. 10.1186/s12966-021-01122-x34016140 10.1186/s12966-021-01122-x
7. Lachat C Nago E Verstraeten R Roberfroid D Van Camp J Kolsteren P Eating out of home and its association with dietary intake: a systematic review of the evidence Obes Rev 2012 13 4 329 346 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00953.x 22106948
Lachat C, Nago E, Verstraeten R, Roberfroid D, Van Camp J, Kolsteren P (2012) Eating out of home and its association with dietary intake: a systematic review of the evidence. Obes Rev 13(4):329–346. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00953.x22106948 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00953.x
8. Myhre JB Loken EB Wandel M Andersen LF Eating location is associated with the nutritional quality of the diet in Norwegian adults Public Health Nutr 2014 17 4 915 923 10.1017/S1368980013000268 23481490
Myhre JB, Loken EB, Wandel M, Andersen LF (2014) Eating location is associated with the nutritional quality of the diet in Norwegian adults. Public Health Nutr 17(4):915–923. 10.1017/S136898001300026823481490 10.1017/S1368980013000268
9. Gesteiro E Garcia-Carro A Aparicio-Ugarriza R Gonzalez-Gross M Eating out of home: influence on nutrition, health, and policies: a scoping review Nutrients 2022 14 6 1265 10.3390/nu14061265 35334920
Gesteiro E, Garcia-Carro A, Aparicio-Ugarriza R, Gonzalez-Gross M (2022) Eating out of home: influence on nutrition, health, and policies: a scoping review. Nutrients 14(6):1265. 10.3390/nu1406126535334920 10.3390/nu14061265
10. Trofholz AC Tate A Loth K Neumark-Sztainer D Berge JM Watching television while eating: associations with dietary intake and weight status among a diverse sample of young children J Acad Nutr Diet 2019 119 9 1462 1469 10.1016/j.jand.2019.02.013 31031108
Trofholz AC, Tate A, Loth K, Neumark-Sztainer D, Berge JM (2019) Watching television while eating: associations with dietary intake and weight status among a diverse sample of young children. J Acad Nutr Diet 119(9):1462–1469. 10.1016/j.jand.2019.02.01331031108 10.1016/j.jand.2019.02.013
11. Larson NI Nelson MC Neumark-Sztainer D Story M Hannan PJ Making time for meals: meal structure and associations with dietary intake in young adults J Am Diet Assoc 2009 109 1 72 79 10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.017 19103325
Larson NI, Nelson MC, Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M, Hannan PJ (2009) Making time for meals: meal structure and associations with dietary intake in young adults. J Am Diet Assoc 109(1):72–79. 10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.01719103325 10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.017
12. Dunton GF Atienza AA The need for time-intensive information in healthful eating and physical activity research: a timely topic J Am Diet Assoc 2009 109 1 30 35 10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.019 19103320
Dunton GF, Atienza AA (2009) The need for time-intensive information in healthful eating and physical activity research: a timely topic. J Am Diet Assoc 109(1):30–35. 10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.01919103320 10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.019
13. Lipsky LM Nansel TR Haynie DL Liu D Li K Pratt CA Iannotti RJ Dempster KW Simons-Morton B Diet quality of US adolescents during the transition to adulthood: changes and predictors Am J Clin Nutr 2017 105 6 1424 1432 10.3945/ajcn.116.150029 28446498
Lipsky LM, Nansel TR, Haynie DL, Liu D, Li K, Pratt CA, Iannotti RJ, Dempster KW, Simons-Morton B (2017) Diet quality of US adolescents during the transition to adulthood: changes and predictors. Am J Clin Nutr 105(6):1424–1432. 10.3945/ajcn.116.15002928446498 10.3945/ajcn.116.150029
14. Fulkerson JA Loth K Bruening M Berge J Eisenberg ME Neumark-Sztainer D Time 2 tlk 2nite: use of electronic media by adolescents during family meals and associations with demographic characteristics, family characteristics, and foods served J Acad Nutr Diet 2014 114 7 1053 1058 10.1016/j.jand.2013.10.015 24361006
Fulkerson JA, Loth K, Bruening M, Berge J, Eisenberg ME, Neumark-Sztainer D (2014) Time 2 tlk 2nite: use of electronic media by adolescents during family meals and associations with demographic characteristics, family characteristics, and foods served. J Acad Nutr Diet 114(7):1053–1058. 10.1016/j.jand.2013.10.01524361006 10.1016/j.jand.2013.10.015
15. Mak TN Prynne CJ Cole D Fitt E Roberts C Bates B Stephen AM Assessing eating context and fruit and vegetable consumption in children: new methods using food diaries in the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey Rolling Programme Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2012 9 126 10.1186/1479-5868-9-126 23078656
Mak TN, Prynne CJ, Cole D, Fitt E, Roberts C, Bates B, Stephen AM (2012) Assessing eating context and fruit and vegetable consumption in children: new methods using food diaries in the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey Rolling Programme. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 9:126. 10.1186/1479-5868-9-12623078656 10.1186/1479-5868-9-126
16. Ghosh Roy P Jones KK Martyn-Nemeth P Zenk SN Contextual correlates of energy-dense snack food and sweetened beverage intake across the day in African American women: an application of ecological momentary assessment Appetite 2019 132 73 81 10.1016/j.appet.2018.09.018 30261234
Ghosh Roy P, Jones KK, Martyn-Nemeth P, Zenk SN (2019) Contextual correlates of energy-dense snack food and sweetened beverage intake across the day in African American women: an application of ecological momentary assessment. Appetite 132:73–81. 10.1016/j.appet.2018.09.01830261234 10.1016/j.appet.2018.09.018
17. Shiffman S Stone AA Hufford MR Ecological momentary assessment Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2008 4 1 32 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415 18509902
Shiffman S, Stone AA, Hufford MR (2008) Ecological momentary assessment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 4:1–32. 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.09141518509902 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415
18. Mason TB Do B Wang S Dunton GF Ecological momentary assessment of eating and dietary intake behaviors in children and adolescents: a systematic review of the literature Appetite 2020 144 104465 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104465 31541670
Mason TB, Do B, Wang S, Dunton GF (2020) Ecological momentary assessment of eating and dietary intake behaviors in children and adolescents: a systematic review of the literature. Appetite 144:104465. 10.1016/j.appet.2019.10446531541670 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104465
19. Maugeri A Barchitta M A systematic review of ecological momentary assessment of diet: implications and perspectives for nutritional epidemiology Nutrients 2019 11 11 2696 10.3390/nu11112696 31703374
Maugeri A, Barchitta M (2019) A systematic review of ecological momentary assessment of diet: implications and perspectives for nutritional epidemiology. Nutrients 11(11):2696. 10.3390/nu1111269631703374 10.3390/nu11112696
20. Chan V Wellard-Cole L Davies A Watson W Hughes C Chapman K Signal L Ni Mhurchu C Wang L D’Souza D Gemming L Rangan A Bauman A Allman-Farinelli M The association of social and food preparation location context with the quality of meals and snacks consumed by young adults: findings from the MYMeals wearable camera study Eur J Nutr 2022 61 7 3407 3422 10.1007/s00394-022-02891-2 35523897
Chan V, Wellard-Cole L, Davies A, Watson W, Hughes C, Chapman K, Signal L, Ni Mhurchu C, Wang L, D’Souza D, Gemming L, Rangan A, Bauman A, Allman-Farinelli M (2022) The association of social and food preparation location context with the quality of meals and snacks consumed by young adults: findings from the MYMeals wearable camera study. Eur J Nutr 61(7):3407–3422. 10.1007/s00394-022-02891-235523897 10.1007/s00394-022-02891-2
21. Zenk SN Horoi I McDonald A Corte C Riley B Odoms-Young AM Ecological momentary assessment of environmental and personal factors and snack food intake in African American women Appetite 2014 83 333 341 10.1016/j.appet.2014.09.008 25239402
Zenk SN, Horoi I, McDonald A, Corte C, Riley B, Odoms-Young AM (2014) Ecological momentary assessment of environmental and personal factors and snack food intake in African American women. Appetite 83:333–341. 10.1016/j.appet.2014.09.00825239402 10.1016/j.appet.2014.09.008
22. McNaughton SA Pendergast FJ Worsley A Leech RM Eating occasion situational factors and sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in young adults Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2020 17 1 71 10.1186/s12966-020-00975-y 32493366
McNaughton SA, Pendergast FJ, Worsley A, Leech RM (2020) Eating occasion situational factors and sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in young adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 17(1):71. 10.1186/s12966-020-00975-y32493366 10.1186/s12966-020-00975-y
23. Grenard JL Stacy AW Shiffman S Baraldi AN MacKinnon DP Lockhart G Kisbu-Sakarya Y Boyle S Beleva Y Koprowski C Ames SL Reynolds KD Sweetened drink and snacking cues in adolescents: a study using ecological momentary assessment Appetite 2013 67 61 73 10.1016/j.appet.2013.03.016 23583312
Grenard JL, Stacy AW, Shiffman S, Baraldi AN, MacKinnon DP, Lockhart G, Kisbu-Sakarya Y, Boyle S, Beleva Y, Koprowski C, Ames SL, Reynolds KD (2013) Sweetened drink and snacking cues in adolescents: a study using ecological momentary assessment. Appetite 67:61–73. 10.1016/j.appet.2013.03.01623583312 10.1016/j.appet.2013.03.016
24. Laska MN Graham D Moe SG Lytle L Fulkerson J Situational characteristics of young adults’ eating occasions: a real-time data collection using Personal Digital assistants Public Health Nutr 2011 14 3 472 479 10.1017/S1368980010003186 21138611
Laska MN, Graham D, Moe SG, Lytle L, Fulkerson J (2011) Situational characteristics of young adults’ eating occasions: a real-time data collection using Personal Digital assistants. Public Health Nutr 14(3):472–479. 10.1017/S136898001000318621138611 10.1017/S1368980010003186
25. Maugeri A Magnano San Lio R Favara G La Rosa MC La Mastra C Riela PM Guarnera L Battiato S Barchitta M Agodi A Impact of eating context on dietary choices of college students: evidence from the HEALTHY-UNICT project Nutrients 2022 14 20 4418 10.3390/nu14204418 36297101
Maugeri A, Magnano San Lio R, Favara G, La Rosa MC, La Mastra C, Riela PM, Guarnera L, Battiato S, Barchitta M, Agodi A (2022) Impact of eating context on dietary choices of college students: evidence from the HEALTHY-UNICT project. Nutrients 14(20):4418. 10.3390/nu1420441836297101 10.3390/nu14204418
26. Fertig AR Loth KA Trofholz AC Tate AD Miner M Neumark-Sztainer D Berge JM Compared to pre-prepared meals, fully and partly home-cooked meals in diverse families with young children are more likely to include nutritious ingredients J Acad Nutr Diet 2019 119 5 818 830 10.1016/j.jand.2018.12.006 30765316
Fertig AR, Loth KA, Trofholz AC, Tate AD, Miner M, Neumark-Sztainer D, Berge JM (2019) Compared to pre-prepared meals, fully and partly home-cooked meals in diverse families with young children are more likely to include nutritious ingredients. J Acad Nutr Diet 119(5):818–830. 10.1016/j.jand.2018.12.00630765316 10.1016/j.jand.2018.12.006
27. O’Connor TM Elias C Thompson RR Arlinghaus KR Vollrath K Hernandez DC Power TG Hughes SO The association of TV viewing during dinner meals with quality of dietary intake and BMI z-scores among low income, ethnic minority preschool children Appetite 2019 140 231 238 10.1016/j.appet.2019.05.023 31121200
O’Connor TM, Elias C, Thompson RR, Arlinghaus KR, Vollrath K, Hernandez DC, Power TG, Hughes SO (2019) The association of TV viewing during dinner meals with quality of dietary intake and BMI z-scores among low income, ethnic minority preschool children. Appetite 140:231–238. 10.1016/j.appet.2019.05.02331121200 10.1016/j.appet.2019.05.023
28. Kasper N Ball SC Halverson K Miller AL Appugliese D Lumeng JC Peterson KE Deconstructing the family meal: are characteristics of the mealtime environment associated with the healthfulness of meals served? J Acad Nutr Diet 2019 119 8 1296 1304 10.1016/j.jand.2019.01.009 30898585
Kasper N, Ball SC, Halverson K, Miller AL, Appugliese D, Lumeng JC, Peterson KE (2019) Deconstructing the family meal: are characteristics of the mealtime environment associated with the healthfulness of meals served? J Acad Nutr Diet 119(8):1296–1304. 10.1016/j.jand.2019.01.00930898585 10.1016/j.jand.2019.01.009
29. Nansel TR Lipsky LM Liu A Laffel LM Mehta SN Contextual factors are associated with diet quality in youth with type 1 diabetes mellitus J Acad Nutr Diet 2014 114 8 1223 1229 10.1016/j.jand.2014.01.012 24651028
Nansel TR, Lipsky LM, Liu A, Laffel LM, Mehta SN (2014) Contextual factors are associated with diet quality in youth with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Acad Nutr Diet 114(8):1223–1229. 10.1016/j.jand.2014.01.01224651028 10.1016/j.jand.2014.01.012
30. Murakami K, Shinozaki N, Kimoto N, Masayasu S, Sasaki S (2022) Relative validity of food intake in each meal type and overall food intake derived using the meal-based Diet History Questionnaire against the 4-day weighed dietary record in Japanese adults. Nutrients 14(15). 10.3390/nu14153193
31. Liao Y Skelton K Dunton G Bruening M A systematic review of methods and procedures used in ecological momentary assessments of Diet and Physical Activity Research in Youth: an adapted STROBE checklist for reporting EMA studies (CREMAS) J Med Internet Res 2016 18 6 e151 10.2196/jmir.4954 27328833
Liao Y, Skelton K, Dunton G, Bruening M (2016) A systematic review of methods and procedures used in ecological momentary assessments of Diet and Physical Activity Research in Youth: an adapted STROBE checklist for reporting EMA studies (CREMAS). J Med Internet Res 18(6):e151. 10.2196/jmir.495427328833 10.2196/jmir.4954
32. Council for Science and Technology Ministry of Education, Culture, sports, Science and Technology, Japan. Standard Tables of Food Composition in Japan 2015 2015 7 Tokyo, Japan Official Gazette Co-operation of Japan
Council for Science and Technology (2015) Ministry of Education, Culture, sports, Science and Technology, Japan. Standard Tables of Food Composition in Japan 2015, 7th edn. Official Gazette Co-operation of Japan, Tokyo, Japan. (In Japanese)
33. Murakami K Shinozaki N Livingstone MBE Fujiwara A Asakura K Masayasu S Sasaki S Meal and snack frequency in relation to diet quality in Japanese adults: a cross-sectional study using different definitions of meals and snacks Br J Nutr 2020 124 11 1219 1228 10.1017/S0007114520002317 32594916
Murakami K, Shinozaki N, Livingstone MBE, Fujiwara A, Asakura K, Masayasu S, Sasaki S (2020) Meal and snack frequency in relation to diet quality in Japanese adults: a cross-sectional study using different definitions of meals and snacks. Br J Nutr 124(11):1219–1228. 10.1017/S000711452000231732594916 10.1017/S0007114520002317
34. Murakami K Shinozaki N Livingstone MBE Fujiwara A Asakura K Masayasu S Sasaki S Characterisation of breakfast, lunch, dinner and snacks in the Japanese context: an exploratory cross-sectional analysis Public Health Nutr 2022 25 3 689 701 10.1017/S1368980020004310 33168120
Murakami K, Shinozaki N, Livingstone MBE, Fujiwara A, Asakura K, Masayasu S, Sasaki S (2022) Characterisation of breakfast, lunch, dinner and snacks in the Japanese context: an exploratory cross-sectional analysis. Public Health Nutr 25(3):689–701. 10.1017/S136898002000431033168120 10.1017/S1368980020004310
35. Bowman SA, Clemens JC, Thoerig RC, Friday JE, Shimizu M, Moshfegh AJ, Food Patterns Equivalents Database 2011–2012: Methodology and user guide. Food Surveys Research Group, Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. https://www.ars.usda.gov/northeast-area/beltsville-md-bhnrc/beltsville-human-nutrition-research-center/food-surveys-research-group/. Accessed 19 April 2023
36. Shams-White MM Pannucci TE Lerman JL Herrick KA Zimmer M Meyers Mathieu K Stoody EE Reedy J Healthy Eating Index-2020: Review and update process to reflect the Dietary Guidelines for Americans,2020-2025 J Acad Nutr Diet 2023 123 9 1280 1288 10.1016/j.jand.2023.05.015 37201748
Shams-White MM, Pannucci TE, Lerman JL, Herrick KA, Zimmer M, Meyers Mathieu K, Stoody EE, Reedy J (2023) Healthy Eating Index-2020: Review and update process to reflect the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020–2025. J Acad Nutr Diet 123(9):1280–1288. 10.1016/j.jand.2023.05.01537201748 10.1016/j.jand.2023.05.015
37. Krebs-Smith SM Pannucci TE Subar AF Kirkpatrick SI Lerman JL Tooze JA Wilson MM Reedy J Update of the healthy eating index: HEI-2015 J Acad Nutr Diet 2018 118 9 1591 1602 10.1016/j.jand.2018.05.021 30146071
Krebs-Smith SM, Pannucci TE, Subar AF, Kirkpatrick SI, Lerman JL, Tooze JA, Wilson MM, Reedy J (2018) Update of the healthy eating index: HEI-2015. J Acad Nutr Diet 118(9):1591–1602. 10.1016/j.jand.2018.05.02130146071 10.1016/j.jand.2018.05.021
38. Drewnowski A, Rehm CD, Vieux F (2018) Breakfast in the United States: Food and nutrient intakes in relation to diet quality in National Health and Examination Survey 2011–2014. A study from the International Breakfast Research Initiative. Nutrients 10(9):1200. 10.3390/nu10091200
39. Murakami K Livingstone MBE Shinozaki N Sugimoto M Fujiwara A Masayasu S Sasaki S Food combinations in relation to the quality of overall diet and individual meals in Japanese adults: a nationwide study Nutrients 2020 12 2 327 10.3390/nu12020327 31991922
Murakami K, Livingstone MBE, Shinozaki N, Sugimoto M, Fujiwara A, Masayasu S, Sasaki S (2020) Food combinations in relation to the quality of overall diet and individual meals in Japanese adults: a nationwide study. Nutrients 12(2):327. 10.3390/nu1202032731991922 10.3390/nu12020327
40. U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020–2025. 9th edn. https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov/. Accessed 10 Apr 2023
41. Black AE Critical evaluation of energy intake using the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake:basal metabolic rate. A practical guide to its calculation, use and limitations Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000 24 9 1119 1130 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801376 11033980
Black AE (2000) Critical evaluation of energy intake using the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake:basal metabolic rate. A practical guide to its calculation, use and limitations. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24(9):1119–1130. 10.1038/sj.ijo.080137611033980 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801376
42. Miyake R Tanaka S Ohkawara K Ishikawa-Takata K Hikihara Y Taguri E Kayashita J Tabata I Validity of predictive equations for basal metabolic rate in Japanese adults J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) 2011 57 3 224 232 10.3177/jnsv.57.224 21908945
Miyake R, Tanaka S, Ohkawara K, Ishikawa-Takata K, Hikihara Y, Taguri E, Kayashita J, Tabata I (2011) Validity of predictive equations for basal metabolic rate in Japanese adults. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) 57(3):224–232. 10.3177/jnsv.57.22421908945 10.3177/jnsv.57.224
43. Ganpule AA Tanaka S Ishikawa-Takata K Tabata I Interindividual variability in sleeping metabolic rate in Japanese subjects Eur J Clin Nutr 2007 61 11 1256 1261 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602645 17299487
Ganpule AA, Tanaka S, Ishikawa-Takata K, Tabata I (2007) Interindividual variability in sleeping metabolic rate in Japanese subjects. Eur J Clin Nutr 61(11):1256–1261. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.160264517299487 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602645
44. Murakami K Shinozaki N Livingstone MBE Kimoto N Masayasu S Sasaki S Relative validity of the online meal-based Diet History Questionnaire for evaluating the overall diet quality and quality of each meal type in Japanese adults Br J Nutr 2023 130 4 679 693 10.1017/S000711452200352X 36326086
Murakami K, Shinozaki N, Livingstone MBE, Kimoto N, Masayasu S, Sasaki S (2023) Relative validity of the online meal-based Diet History Questionnaire for evaluating the overall diet quality and quality of each meal type in Japanese adults. Br J Nutr 130(4):679–693. 10.1017/S000711452200352X36326086 10.1017/S000711452200352X
45. Murakami K Shinozaki N Yuan X Tajima R Matsumoto M Masayasu S Sasaki S Food choice values and food literacy in a nationwide sample of Japanese adults: associations with sex, age, and body mass index Nutrients 2022 14 9 1899 10.3390/nu14091899 35565865
Murakami K, Shinozaki N, Yuan X, Tajima R, Matsumoto M, Masayasu S, Sasaki S (2022) Food choice values and food literacy in a nationwide sample of Japanese adults: associations with sex, age, and body mass index. Nutrients 14(9):1899. 10.3390/nu1409189935565865 10.3390/nu14091899
46. Peugh JL A practical guide to multilevel modeling J Sch Psychol 2010 48 1 85 112 10.1016/j.jsp.2009.09.002 20006989
Peugh JL (2010) A practical guide to multilevel modeling. J Sch Psychol 48(1):85–112. 10.1016/j.jsp.2009.09.00220006989 10.1016/j.jsp.2009.09.002
47. Enders CK Tofighi D Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: a new look at an old issue Psychol Methods 2007 12 2 121 138 10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121 17563168
Enders CK, Tofighi D (2007) Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: a new look at an old issue. Psychol Methods 12(2):121–138. 10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.12117563168 10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121
48. Maas CJM Hox JJ Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling Methodology 2005 1 3 86 92 10.1027/1614-1881.1.3.86
Maas CJM, Hox JJ (2005) Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology 1(3):86–92. 10.1027/1614-1881.1.3.8610.1027/1614-1881.1.3.86
49. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associate
50. Twisk J (2019) Applied mixed model analysis: A practical guide (2nd ed., Practical guides to biostatistics and epidemiology). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 10.1017/9781108635660
51. Leyland AH Groenewegen PP Multilevel modelling for public health and health services research: health in context, 2023 Springer Nat 2020 10.1007/978-3-030-34801-4_9
Leyland AH, Groenewegen PP (2020) Multilevel modelling for public health and health services research: health in context, 2023. Springer Nat. 10.1007/978-3-030-34801-4_910.1007/978-3-030-34801-4_9
52. Kim JH Multicollinearity and misleading statistical results Korean J Anesthesiol 2019 72 6 558 569 10.4097/kja.19087 31304696
Kim JH (2019) Multicollinearity and misleading statistical results. Korean J Anesthesiol 72(6):558–569. 10.4097/kja.1908731304696 10.4097/kja.19087
53. Murakami K Livingstone MBE Sasaki S Meal-specific dietary patterns and their contribution to overall dietary patterns in the Japanese context: findings from the 2012 National Health and Nutrition Survey Japan Nutr 2019 59 108 115 10.1016/j.nut.2018.07.110
Murakami K, Livingstone MBE, Sasaki S (2019) Meal-specific dietary patterns and their contribution to overall dietary patterns in the Japanese context: findings from the 2012 National Health and Nutrition Survey. Japan Nutr 59:108–115. 10.1016/j.nut.2018.07.11010.1016/j.nut.2018.07.110
54. Murakami K Livingstone MBE Masayasu S Sasaki S Eating patterns in a nationwide sample of Japanese aged 1–79 years from MINNADE study: eating frequency, clock time for eating, time spent on eating and variability of eating patterns Public Health Nutr 2021 25 6 1515 1527 10.1017/S1368980021000975 33663632
Murakami K, Livingstone MBE, Masayasu S, Sasaki S (2021) Eating patterns in a nationwide sample of Japanese aged 1–79 years from MINNADE study: eating frequency, clock time for eating, time spent on eating and variability of eating patterns. Public Health Nutr 25(6):1515–1527. 10.1017/S136898002100097533663632 10.1017/S1368980021000975
55. Shinozaki N Murakami K Asakura K Masayasu S Sasaki S Identification of dish-based dietary patterns for breakfast, lunch, and dinner and their diet quality in Japanese adults Nutrients 2020 13 1 67 10.3390/nu13010067 33379273
Shinozaki N, Murakami K, Asakura K, Masayasu S, Sasaki S (2020) Identification of dish-based dietary patterns for breakfast, lunch, and dinner and their diet quality in Japanese adults. Nutrients 13(1):67. 10.3390/nu1301006733379273 10.3390/nu13010067
56. Cruwys T Bevelander KE Hermans RC Social modeling of eating: a review of when and why social influence affects food intake and choice Appetite 2015 86 3 18 10.1016/j.appet.2014.08.035 25174571
Cruwys T, Bevelander KE, Hermans RC (2015) Social modeling of eating: a review of when and why social influence affects food intake and choice. Appetite 86:3–18. 10.1016/j.appet.2014.08.03525174571 10.1016/j.appet.2014.08.035
57. Vartanian LR Spanos S Herman CP Polivy J Modeling of food intake: a meta-analytic review Social Influence 2015 10 3 119 136 10.1080/15534510.2015.1008037
Vartanian LR, Spanos S, Herman CP, Polivy J (2015) Modeling of food intake: a meta-analytic review. Social Influence 10(3):119–136. 10.1080/15534510.2015.100803710.1080/15534510.2015.1008037
58. Higgs S Social norms and their influence on eating behaviours Appetite 2015 86 38 44 10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.021 25451578
Higgs S (2015) Social norms and their influence on eating behaviours. Appetite 86:38–44. 10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.02125451578 10.1016/j.appet.2014.10.021
59. Rebar AL Alfrey KL Gardner B Vandelanotte C Health behaviours of Australian fly-in, fly-out workers and partners during on-shift and off-shift days: an ecological momentary assessment study BMJ Open 2018 8 12 e023631 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023631 30580269
Rebar AL, Alfrey KL, Gardner B, Vandelanotte C (2018) Health behaviours of Australian fly-in, fly-out workers and partners during on-shift and off-shift days: an ecological momentary assessment study. BMJ Open 8(12):e023631. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-02363130580269 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023631
60. Statistics, Bureau (2017) Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Japan. Employment Status Survey. https://www.stat.go.jp/data/shugyou/2017/index2.html Accessed 20 March 2023
61. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. National Health and Nutrition Survey 2019 (2020) https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/kenkou_iryou/kenkou/eiyou/r1-houkoku_00002.html. Accessed 17 Nov 2023 (in Japanese)
62. Lavelle F Bucher T Dean M Brown HM Rollo ME Collins CE Diet quality is more strongly related to food skills rather than cooking skills confidence: results from a national cross-sectional survey Nutr Diet 2020 77 1 112 120 10.1111/1747-0080.12583 31602753
Lavelle F, Bucher T, Dean M, Brown HM, Rollo ME, Collins CE (2020) Diet quality is more strongly related to food skills rather than cooking skills confidence: results from a national cross-sectional survey. Nutr Diet 77(1):112–120. 10.1111/1747-0080.1258331602753 10.1111/1747-0080.12583
63. Subar AF Freedman LS Tooze JA Kirkpatrick SI Boushey C Neuhouser ML Thompson FE Potischman N Guenther PM Tarasuk V Reedy J Krebs-Smith SM Addressing current criticism regarding the value of self-report dietary data J Nutr 2015 145 12 2639 2645 10.3945/jn.115.219634 26468491
Subar AF, Freedman LS, Tooze JA, Kirkpatrick SI, Boushey C, Neuhouser ML, Thompson FE, Potischman N, Guenther PM, Tarasuk V, Reedy J, Krebs-Smith SM (2015) Addressing current criticism regarding the value of self-report dietary data. J Nutr 145(12):2639–2645. 10.3945/jn.115.21963426468491 10.3945/jn.115.219634
64. Schembre SM Liao Y O’Connor SG Hingle MD Shen SE Hamoy KG Huh J Dunton GF Weiss R Thomson CA Boushey CJ Mobile ecological momentary diet assessment methods for behavioral research: systematic review JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018 6 11 e11170 10.2196/11170 30459148
Schembre SM, Liao Y, O’Connor SG, Hingle MD, Shen SE, Hamoy KG, Huh J, Dunton GF, Weiss R, Thomson CA, Boushey CJ (2018) Mobile ecological momentary diet assessment methods for behavioral research: systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 6(11):e11170. 10.2196/1117030459148 10.2196/11170
