
==== Front
Sports Med Open
Sports Med Open
Sports Medicine - Open
2199-1170
2198-9761
Springer International Publishing Cham

39235639
761
10.1186/s40798-024-00761-1
Original Research Article
Training Intensity Distribution of a 7-Day HIIT Shock Microcycle: Is Time in the “Red Zone” Crucial for Maximizing Endurance Performance? A Randomized Controlled Trial
http://orcid.org/0009-0004-7769-4677
Strepp Tilmann tilmann.strepp@plus.ac.at

1
Blumkaitis Julia C. 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8146-0505
Sareban Mahdi 2
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6685-1540
Stöggl Thomas Leonhard 13
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7066-7615
Haller Nils 14
1 https://ror.org/05gs8cd61 grid.7039.d 0000 0001 1015 6330 Department of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Salzburg, Schlossallee 49, 5400 Hallein/Rif, Salzburg Austria
2 https://ror.org/03z3mg085 grid.21604.31 0000 0004 0523 5263 University Institute of Sports Medicine, Prevention and Rehabilitation, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
3 Red Bull Athlete Performance Center, Thalgau, Austria
4 https://ror.org/023b0x485 grid.5802.f 0000 0001 1941 7111 Department of Sport Medicine, Rehabilitation and Disease Prevention, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
5 9 2024
5 9 2024
12 2024
10 9712 4 2024
7 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Background

Various studies have shown that the type of intensity measure affects training intensity distribution (TID) computation. These conclusions arise from studies presenting data from meso- and macrocycles, while microcycles, e.g., high-intensity interval training shock microcycles (HIIT-SM) have been neglected so far. Previous literature has suggested that the time spent in the high-intensity zone, i.e., zone 3 (Z3) or the “red zone”, during HIIT may be important to achieve improvements in endurance performance parameters. Therefore, this randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the TID based on running velocity (TIDV), running power (TIDP) and heart rate (TIDHR) during a 7-day HIIT-SM. Twenty-nine endurance-trained participant were allocated to a HIIT-SM consisting of 10 HIIT sessions without (HSM, n = 9) or with (HSM + LIT, n = 9) additional low-intensity training or a control group (n = 11). Moreover, we explored relationships between time spent in Z3 determined by running velocity (Z3V), running power (Z3P), heart rate (Z3HR), oxygen uptake (Z3V˙O2) and changes in endurance performance.

Results

Both intervention groups revealed a polarized pattern for TIDV (HSM: Z1: 38 ± 17, Z2: 16 ± 17, Z3: 46 ± 2%; HSM + LIT: Z1: 59 ± 18, Z2: 14 ± 18, Z3: 27 ± 2%) and TIDP (Z1: 50 ± 8, Z2: 14 ± 11, Z3: 36 ± 7%; Z1: 62 ± 15, Z2: 12 ± 16, Z3: 26 ± 2%), while TIDHR (Z1: 48 ± 13, Z2: 26 ± 11, Z3: 26 ± 7%; Z1: 65 ± 17, Z2: 22 ± 18, Z3: 13 ± 4%) showed a pyramidal pattern. Time in Z3HR was significantly less compared to Z3V and Z3P in both intervention groups (all p < 0.01). There was a time x intensity measure interaction for time in Z3 across the 10 HIIT sessions for HSM + LIT (p < 0.001, pη2 = 0.30). Time in Z3V and Z3P within each single HIIT session remained stable over the training period for both intervention groups. Time in Z3HR declined in HSM from the first (47%) to the last (28%) session, which was more pronounced in HSM + LIT (45% to 16%). A moderate dose–response relationship was found for time in Z3V and changes in peak power output (rs = 0.52, p = 0.028) as well as time trial performance (rs = − 0.47, p = 0.049) with no such associations regarding time in Z3P, Z3HR, and Z3V˙O2.

Conclusion

The present study reveals that the type of intensity measure strongly affects TID computation during a HIIT-SM. As heart rate tends to underestimate the intensity during HIIT-SM, heart rate-based training decisions should be made cautiously. In addition, time in Z3V was most closely associated with changes in endurance performance. Thus, for evaluating a HIIT-SM, we suggest integrating a comprehensive set of intensity measures.

Trial Registration Trial register: Clinicaltrials.gov, registration number: NCT05067426.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40798-024-00761-1.

Key Points

Using heart rate, running velocity and running power as measures of intensity leads to different patterns of training intensity distribution during a 7-day HIIT shock microcycle. A polarized pattern was observed for velocity and power, whereas a more pyramidal distribution was found for heart rate.

Additional low-intensity training volume during a HIIT shock microcycle led to a more pronounced decline in time in zone 3 measured with heart rate compared to a shock microcycle with HIIT sessions, only.

A moderate dose–response relationship was observed between time in zone 3 measured by velocity and changes in peak power output as well as time-trial performance. No such correlation was found between time in zone 3 measured by power, heart rate, oxygen uptake, and changes in endurance performance parameters.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40798-024-00761-1.

Keywords

Time-in-zone
Running power
Running velocity
Heart rate
Block training
Polarized
Pyramidal
Cardiac remodeling
Athlete’s heart
Red Bull Athlete Performance Centerissue-copyright-statement© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024
==== Body
pmcBackground

Training prescription typically relies on three key variables: frequency, volume, and intensity. The interaction of these variables can be used to quantify the training intensity distribution (TID) of an athlete [1]. To prescribe training intensity and calculate TID, various zones (Z) are typically determined by exercise testing. In this regard, the 3-zone model, i.e., Z1 (low intensity), Z2 (moderate intensity), and Z3 (high intensity) is most widely used in research [2, 3]. Up to 8 different TID patterns have been described in the literature [4, 5], with the most frequently observed patterns being pyramidal training (Z1 > Z2 > Z3), polarized training (Z1 > Z3 > Z2), and threshold training (Z2 > Z1 and Z3) [3, 4, 6]. There is evidence that TID impacts the training outcome [7–9]; however, it is heavily debated which TID is ultimately optimal for endurance athletes and their specific events [10, 11].

Training intensity can be assessed through measurements of external load (e.g., velocity, power output) [12], internal responses (e.g., heart rate (HR), oxygen uptake (V˙O2), blood lactate (La)), and subjective evaluations (e.g., rating of perceived exertion (RPE)) [13]. In cycling, for example, the combination of measuring power output and HR is well established [14, 15], while in running, intensity measures such as running velocity, HR or RPE are commonly used [16]. Methodological challenges like uphill or downhill running, day-to-day variability in internal responses, environmental factors, and overtraining may impact intensity measures and lead to possible over- or underestimations of the actual training intensity [17, 18]. In this respect, footpod devices that calculate running power may thus serve as reliable tools for measuring training intensity [19], yet their association with traditional intensity measures in longitudinal studies has not been sufficiently researched.

Various studies have shown that the type of intensity measure and the zone determination method substantially affects the TID computation [5, 20–22]. For instance, Bellinger et al. [21] collected 8 weeks of training data during the preparation phase from highly trained runners and found a polarized pattern for running velocity (80% Z1, 5% Z2, 15% Z3), a pyramidal pattern for HR (80% Z1, 17% Z2, 3% Z3), and a more uniform pattern for the RPE (40% Z1, 32% Z2, 28% Z3). Understanding these differences is important for athletes and coaches who rely on TID to make informed training decisions. Thus far, these conclusions primarily arise from studies that present data from meso- and macrocycles. However, microcycles play a crucial role in the process of endurance training as they allow to administer a specific stimulus in a short period of time, for example during preparation phase or when using a block periodization approach [23, 24].

High-intensity interval training shock microcycles (HIIT-SM), i.e., congested distribution of HIIT sessions in a short period of time, have been increasingly applied in endurance and team sports [25, 26]. With the aim to improve athlete performance in a time-efficient manner, studies demonstrated beneficial effects of HIIT-SM on maximal oxygen uptake (V˙O2max) [26–28] or time-trial (TT) performance [29], while other findings have been less conclusive [24, 30, 31]. These discrepancies raise the question of what distinguishes an effective HIIT-SM from an ineffective one. Previous literature discussed that time spent in Z3 or the so-called “red zone”, i.e., ≥ 90% V˙O2max/maximal heart rate (HRmax) [32, 33], during HIIT may be important to achieve performance-related enhancements. It is suggested, to spend > 7 min (team sport athletes) or > 10 min (long-distance runners) [25, 32] near V˙O2max per session to elicit relevant changes in V˙O2max. As the understanding of this dose–response relationship is still limited [30, 34, 35], these suggestions must be taken with caution. It is also unclear whether these conclusions are transferable to a HIIT-SM setting with or without additional low-intensity training (LIT). Reducing LIT during HIIT-SM has raised concerns about detrimental impact on performance development among practitioners, as LIT is seen as a crucial factor in an endurance athlete's routine [2]. However, it is unknown how additional LIT volume during HIIT-SM compared to a regular HIIT-SM affects the accumulation of time in Z3. In addition, most studies investigating the dose–response relationship between time in Z3 and increases in endurance performance rely on intensity measures, e.g., V˙O2 or HR, as they reflect the athlete’s responses that activate physiological mechanisms leading to training adaptation, while other measures such as running velocity or power have been neglected so far, although they might be more practical in application [32, 36].

Various factors such as training condition, sex, age or genetic predisposition may influence an athlete’s response to HIIT [32]. Another aspect that remains insufficiently explored is the impact of baseline cardiac geometry, as reflected by dimensions of cardiac chambers and cardiac wall thickness, at rest and endurance performance following a HIIT intervention. Indeed, no studies investigated whether baseline cardiac geometry variables predict HIIT-induced changes in endurance performance, specifically after HIIT-SM, or the time spent in Z3 in general. Considering that exercise-induced cardiac chamber enlargement enhances cardiac output during exercise primarily due to improved cardiac filling [37], and considering that maximal cardiac output is the major determinant of V˙O2max [38], small cardiac chambers at rest might indicate a greater reserve for adaption. Consequently, assessment of chamber geometry could enable more informed and personalized training recommendations.

Therefore, the current study compared the TID based on various intensity measures, i.e., running velocity (TIDV), running power (TIDP), HR (TIDHR), and V˙O2, using a HIIT-SM consisting of 10 HIIT session in 7 days with or without 30 min of additional LIT after each session in endurance-trained athletes. In addition, we explored relationships between time spent in Z3 determined by running velocity (Z3V), running power (Z3P), HR (Z3HR), V˙O2 (Z3V˙O2) and changes in endurance performance. Finally, the influence of cardiac geometry on changes in endurance performance was examined. These findings contribute to identifying a possible dose–response relationship between training intensity and performance changes, thereby optimizing future HIIT-SM.

Methods

This randomized controlled trial was registered (clinical trials identifier: NCT05067426). All procedures underwent approval from the local ethical board of the University of Salzburg (Approval Number: GZ 2/2021) and align with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The comprehensive study protocol with all measures and detailed information is presented elsewhere [39]. The present manuscript was written in accordance with the CONSORT guidelines for randomized trials [40].

Trial Design

This is a parallel assignment intervention study in which participants were randomly assigned to one of two intervention groups or a control group (CG) in a 1:1:1 ratio. Total study duration was four weeks and included an initial baseline phase of 8 to 9 days, followed by a 7-day intervention phase and a 14-day post-intervention phase (Fig. 1).Fig. 1 Outline of the study design with respective time points and the 7-day intervention phase. T0, familiarization and cardiac ultrasound; TT1 and TT2, 5-km time trial on an outdoor track; T1, T4, T5, T6, cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a treadmill; TB, best post measurement, i.e., maximum, or minimum value of each variable measured at post-tests T4, T5, T6, depending on what can be considered as an improvement in endurance performance; black runner, self-directed outdoor session; orange runner, supervised laboratory session; D, day; S, session; R, rest day

At the initial time point (T0), all participants were familiarized with the study design, equipped with wearable devices, and underwent an ultrasound of the heart. Participants maintained their usual training routine throughout the baseline phase and completed a self-directed 5-km TT (TT5km) on a standardized track, either a 400 m running track or a flat course, at self-selected times, 3 to 4 days before their initial cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a treadmill at T1 (= TT1). After T1, participants were randomly allocated to one of 3 groups: (1) HIIT-SM with 10 HIIT sessions in 7 days (HSM), (2) HIIT-SM with 10 HIIT sessions and an additional 30 min of LIT after each session (HSM + LIT), or (3) a CG that maintained their regular training.

Four out of the 10 training sessions, i.e., 2 sessions on the second day (T2) and the final 2 sessions of the HIIT-SM on the last day (T3), were monitored in a laboratory setting. During the post-intervention phase, all participants underwent further cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a treadmill 3 days (T4), 7 days (T5), and 14 days (T6) after the intervention. Self-directed TT5km was repeated on the same track 10 to 11 days (TT2) after the intervention (Fig. 1).

Participants

Forty-three participants were recruited by announcements on social media, local sports clubs, and universities. Eligibility criteria included endurance-trained athletes, either runners or individuals who incorporate a significant amount of running (> 50 km per week) into their regular training. Participants had to be between 18 and 45 years old, with a V˙O2max of  ≥ 50 mL min−1 kg−1 (female) or  ≥ 55 mL min−1 kg−1 (male), or a TT5km performance of  ≤ 20:00 min (female) or  ≤ 18:30 min (male). Supplement 1 provides detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria. All participants were informed about the aims and risks of the study and gave written consent before participating. Data collection took place from February 2021 to December 2022 in the exercise laboratory of the University of Salzburg.

Intervention

HSM and HSM + LIT participants completed a total of 10 running HIIT sessions each consisting of 5 interval bouts of 4 min at an intensity associated with 90–95% HRmax measured at T1, interspersed by 2.5-min recovery periods (1-min passive and 1.5-min active recovery) (Fig. 2B) [41]. Sessions included a 10-min warm-up with two 30-s bouts at speeds associated with 90–95% HRmax measured at T1. Morning sessions took place between 6 and 10 AM. If 2 sessions were scheduled on the same day, the afternoon sessions were held from 3 to 7 PM, with a minimum of 5 h between sessions. Contrary to the HSM group, HSM + LIT participants performed 30 min of LIT after each HIIT session at an intensity that should not exceed the intensity associated with a La concentration of 1.5 mmol L−1 measured at T1. The HSM group was instructed not to perform a cool-down. All HIIT sessions were either self-monitored (6 out of 10) using individually programmed sessions on their watch with intensity guidance, i.e., HR targets, or were conducted under supervision on a treadmill in the laboratory at T2 and T3 (4 out of 10). The treadmill speed for the intervals was based on the velocity associated with 90–95% HRmax measured at T1. If necessary, the researchers increased the speed to achieve the HR targets, but only to a certain extent to ensure completion of the session. Participants in both groups were instructed not to perform any additional training sessions beyond the prescribed regimen. The CG continued with their regular training.Fig. 2 Exemplary data of a participant. A Incremental treadmill test at T1 with heart rate (HR), running power, oxygen uptake (V˙O2), velocity, and blood lactate values for each stage. Zones are separated by 1.5 mmol L−1 and 90% maximal heart rate. Maximal heart rate was determined via ramp test, performed after the incremental test. B Laboratory afternoon session on the second day (D2S3) including 10 min warm-up (WU), 5 × 4 min high-intensity interval training (HIIT), 30 min low-intensity training (LIT). HIIT shock microcycle (HSM) group only performed warm-up (WU) and HIIT, while the other group performed additional LIT after each session (HSM + LIT). Kinetics of each intensity measure and the respective time in zone is illustrated

Cardiac Examination

At T0, all participants underwent resting transthoracic cardiac ultrasound using a commercially available ultrasound system (Philips Epiq CVx, Philips Healthcare, Andover, MA, USA) with a 1.0–5.0 MHz xMatrix phased array transducer for both 2D and 3D imaging (Philips X5-1, Phillips Medical Systems, Andover, MA, USA) performed by a certified cardiologist to exclude relevant cardiac pathologies and to quantify variables of cardiac geometry. 2D- and 3D-derived diameters and volumetric measurements of cardiac chambers were performed according to current recommendations [42]. Volumetric 2D-measurements used the method of discs summation after manual tracing of endocardial boarders from apical 4-chamber view. Volumetric 3D-measurements were obtained by a software (HeartModel, Philips Healthcare, Andover, MA, USA) that involves an automated analysis which simultaneously detects left ventricular (LV) and left atrial (LA) endocardial boarders [43]. All echocardiographic measurements were indexed to body surface area calculated by the Mosteller formula [44]. Accepted cut-offs for normal heart geometry and eccentric hypertrophy, indicating exercise-induced cardiac remodeling, were used [42].

Intensity Measures and Data Analysis

All participants received a Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) watch (Forerunner 935, Garmin, Kansas City, MO, USA), a HR chest strap (HRM Pro, Garmin, Kansas City, MO, USA), and a footpod (Wind v3, Stryd, Boulder, CO, USA) to measure running velocity, HR, and running power respectively during all outdoor and treadmill activities in the study period. The devices were paired and synchronized with the watch and data were sampled at 1 Hz for each intensity measure. Data were stored online (Garmin Connect, Garmin, Kansas City, MO, USA) and then imported into an open-source analysis software (GoldenCheetah v3.5) for further processing. All files were visually inspected for artefacts by an experienced sport scientist (TS). Training sessions with missing or incorrect data due to technical errors, e.g., connection issues or loss of signal, as well as uphill interval sessions were excluded from further analysis, which led to the exclusion of the respective participant (≥ 1 defective session = exclusion). Individual values for each zone and device were imputed into the software to calculate TIDV, TIDP, and TIDHR.

For a total of 4 HIIT sessions (T2 AM/PM & T3 AM/PM), V˙O2 was sampled breath-by-breath using a Quark CPET (Cosmed, Rome, Italy). The system was volume-calibrated with a 3000 mL syringe and gas calibrated with a reference gas (16% O2, 5% CO2) before each session. Breath-by-breath data were processed using a custom code (Matlab v2021b, The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA). V˙O2 data were interpolated to calculate second-by-second values and filtered with a 10 s moving average to determine the time in zone based on V˙O2.

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing conducted at time points T1, T4, T5, and T6 (Fig. 1), were scheduled in the morning between 6 and 10 AM. Participants were instructed to abstain from vigorous exercise and alcohol for 24 h before each test. The testing protocol comprised a 2-phase approach on a treadmill (Saturn, HP Cosmos, Traunstein, Germany), starting with a sub-maximal incremental test (phase 1), followed by a ramp test to voluntary exhaustion (phase 2). Participants started the incremental test at 6.5 (females) and 8.0 km h−1 (males), with an incline of 0%. Speed increased by 1.5 km h−1 every 3 min. Between stages, 30-s pauses were used for capillary blood collection from the earlobe to assess La concentrations (Biosen S-Line, EKF Diagnostics GmbH, Magdeburg, Germany). The incremental test ended if any of the following criteria were met: (1) La increased by ≥ 1 mmol L−1 compared to the previous stage, (2) RPE > 17 on the 6–20 Borg-scale, or (3) the respiratory exchange ratio exceeded 1.0 for two consecutive stages. The ramp test speed was determined by the incremental test results (equal to the speed of the stage prior to the La increase) and remained constant with a steady increase in slope (1.5% per minute, starting at 0%) until voluntary exhaustion. A comprehensive description and illustration of the testing protocol can be found elsewhere [39].

The following endurance parameters were measured via exercise testing: (1) V˙O2max relative to body weight determined as the highest 10 breath rolling average; (2) Running peak power output (PPO) using the WOODWAY formula (1.065 + 0.0511 · %max + 9.322 · 10–4 · %max2) · (v(TM) · 3.6) · BW/4, where the maximal treadmill grade (%max) was calculated by linear interpolation using the formula (%f – 1.5) + 1.5 · t/60, with %f being the treadmill grade of the last stage, v(TM) the velocity of the treadmill, and BW the individual body weight; (3) Lactate threshold (LT) defined as the velocity v where the delta value of La (v + 1.5) and La(v) reaches first time 1 mmol L−1 [39]; (4) Running economy, defined as V˙O2 in mL min−1 kg−1 at 11 km h−1 calculated as the average of the last 30 s of the stage [45].

Intensity Zone Determination

The 3-zone model was based on a combination of La concentration and HR measures obtained during the 2-phase test at T1 (Fig. 2A). The La concentration of 1.5 mmol L−1 separated Z1 from Z2 [3]. 90% of HRmax separated Z2 from Z3 [46]. Corresponding values for each intensity measure, i.e., HR, running power, running velocity, V˙O2, were calculated with simple linear regression [47, 48]. The TID analysis for an exemplary session in the laboratory is illustrated in Fig. 2B.

Sample Size and Randomization

A priori power analysis for repeated measures with a within-between interaction was conducted using G*Power (Version 3.1.9.7, Düsseldorf, Germany). Assuming a power of 0.8 and a medium effect size (Cohen’s f = 0.25) on V˙O2max, in accordance with previous studies [49, 50], a minimum of 27 participants were required. To account for a potential dropout rate of 20–25%, an initial sample size of 36 participants was planned. However, due to a low dropout rate during the study, data collection was stopped after 35 participants were allocated. During the baseline phase and the exercise testing at T1, the participant, TS, and JB were blinded to the participant's individual allocation. Allocation information was disclosed immediately after the exercise testing at T1, provided all inclusion criteria were met, via a telephone call from an unbiased researcher (NH) using a concealed computer-generated allocation sequence (balanced, one block with a 1:1:1 ratio). Blinding was not applicable for participants or researchers after allocation.

Statistics

Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). In addition, the standard error of the mean (SEM) is given for the respected values shown in the figures. A repeated measures analysis of variance was performed to analyze differences between (1) changes in endurance performance parameters from T1 and the best (TB) out of three post-tests (T4, T5, T6) for each parameter (time) and group (HSM, HSM + LIT, CG); (2) zone (Z1, Z2, Z3), intensity measure (HR, velocity, power) and group (HSM, HSM + LIT, CG); (3) time spend in Z3 for all HIIT sessions (time) and intensity (HR, velocity, power) for both HSM and HSM + LIT separately; (4) time spend in Z3 for all laboratory HIIT sessions (time) and intensity (HR, velocity, power, V˙O2) with pooled intervention groups.

Whenever sphericity was not given (Mauchly Test, p < 0.05), Greenhouse–Geisser correction was applied. Alpha level of significance was set to < 0.05. Effect sizes by means of partial eta squared (pη2) are provided. In case of a significant main and/or interaction effect, further post-hoc analysis was performed. All tests were adjusted by Bonferroni correction. For comparison (1) data from all training sessions (including warm-up, HIIT and LIT) during the intervention phase were used, while for comparison (2) and (3) only HIIT sessions were analyzed. It should also be noted that running velocity and running power data was not applicable to CG, as they were allowed to continue with their regular training, which included other sports, e.g., cycling or swimming, besides running.

To estimate dose–response relationships, change scores (Δ %) from baseline performance parameters (T1) and TB for each parameter were calculated (Fig. 1). This was based on the assumption that participants would individually demonstrate time-delayed peaks in various performance parameters [51]. Relationships between baseline performance, change scores in performance, time in Z3 for each intensity measure, and cardiac geometry variables for each group separately and with pooled intervention groups were analyzed using Spearman’s rho (rs) [52]. The Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS, v27.0, IBM, Chicago, IL, USA), R-Studio (v2023.03.0 Build 386) and OriginPro (v2023, OriginLab Corporation, Northampton, MA, USA) were used for statistical analysis and the creation of figures.

Results

Out of a total of 43 recruited participants during February 2021 and December 2022, 8 participants did not meet the inclusion criteria. Of the 35 assigned participants, 29 (23 male and 6 female) were eligible for data analysis after excluding 2 dropouts and 4 participants due to insufficient data quality. Supplement 2 provides a detailed participant flow chart. Anthropometric and cardiac geometry data as well as endurance performance data are presented in Tables 1 and 2. Twenty-six participants (89.7%) had normal cardiac geometry. Three participants (10.3%) showed eccentric hypertrophy. None of the participants showed functional abnormalities of the heart. HSM completed on average 49.9 ± 0.3 (99.8%) and HSM + LIT 49.3 ± 1.3 (98.7%) intervals. Average training time for the intervention phase was 7.4 ± 0.1 h for HSM, 12.3 ± 0.1 h for HSM + LIT, and 8.4 ± 1.1 h for CG. Average running distance was 90.9 ± 8.6 km for HSM, 144.7 ± 17.3 km for HSM + LIT, and 44.6 ± 18.8 km for CG.Table 1 Anthropometric and cardiac geometry data (mean ± SD)

	Anthropometric data	Cardiac geometry	
2D	3D*	
Age
(years)	Height
(cm)	Weight
(kg)	LV internal
EDD
(mm m2)	LV EDV
(mL m2)	LV ESV
(mL m2)	LV mass
(g m2)	LA ESV
(mL m2)	RV basal diameter
(mm m2)	RA ESV
(mL m2)	LV EDV
(mL m2)	LV ESV
(mL m2)	LV mass
(g m2)	LA ESV
(mL m2)	
Participants (n = 29)	30 ± 6	177 ± 8	69.2 ± 8.7	28.8 ± 2.3	55.3 ± 10.2	22.8 ± 6.9	89.3 ± 15.0	27.1 ± 8.2	22.0 ± 2.4	26.4 ± 7.8	99.3 ± 10.6	40.3 ± 7.6	81.8 ± 9.7	35.3 ± 7.0	
HSM (n = 9)	30 ± 5	173 ± 9	63.1 ± 5.5	28.8 ± 2.7	48.7 ± 5.3	19.2 ± 4.4	76.4 ± 10.7	22.6 ± 7.0	22.1 ± 2.2	25.4 ± 6.4	93.0 ± 6.8	38.6 ± 6.1	77.3 ± 7.6	31.9 ± 7.6	
 Female (n = 4)	30 ± 8	167 ± 3	58.4 ± 3.4	29.7 ± 1.7	46.1 ± 3.6	19.2 ± 1.5	73.2 ± 9.7	22.3 ± 4.8	21.7 ± 2.0	24.2 ± 5.5	89.2 ± 6.6	34.7 ± 2.2	77.2 ± 9.7	29.3 ± 5.9	
 Male (n = 5)	30 ± 2	178 ± 8	66.8 ± 3.5	28.0 ± 3.3	50.8 ± 5.6	19.2 ± 6.2	79.1 ± 11.7	22.8 ± 9.1	22.4 ± 2.6	26.4 ± 7.5	95.3 ± 6.5	40.9 ± 6.7	77.3 ± 7.4	33.4 ± 8.7	
HSM + LIT (n = 9)	29 ± 7	179 ± 8	72.1 ± 7.4	28.6 ± 1.9	61.2 ± 13.1	26.1 ± 8.2	95.0 ± 15.7	31.4 ± 9.1	22.1 ± 2.8	24.5 ± 9.1	103.0 ± 10.9	42.7 ± 7.1	82.8 ± 6.8	39.1 ± 5.3	
 Male (n = 9)	29 ± 7	179 ± 8	72.1 ± 7.4	28.6 ± 1.9	61.2 ± 13.1	26.1 ± 8.2	95.0 ± 15.7	31.4 ± 9.1	22.1 ± 2.8	24.5 ± 9.1	103.0 ± 10.9	42.7 ± 7.1	82.8 ± 6.8	39.1 ± 5.3	
CG (n = 11)	30 ± 7	180 ± 8	71.9 ± 9.8	29.2 ± 2.4	56.0 ± 8.0	22.9 ± 6.6	95.0 ± 11.4	27.1 ± 6.9	21.9 ± 2.3	28.8 ± 7.7	101.0 ± 11.4	39.5 ± 9.0	84.6 ± 12.7	34.7 ± 6.9	
 Female (n = 2)	25 ± 1	171 ± 9	60.4 ± 18.5	32.1 ± 3.7	54.2 ± 11.2	17.8 ± 8.9	95.7 ± 22.1	30.2 ± 15.9	22.5 ± 1.0	26.7 ± 5.4	96.8 ± 12.7	36.2 ± 6.0	74.8 ± 13.3	34.5 ± 6.4	
 Male (n = 9)	32 ± 8	181 ± 6	74.4 ± 6.1	28.5 ± 1.7	56.4 ± 8.0	24.1 ± 6.0	94.9 ± 10.1	26.5 ± 5.0	21.7 ± 2.5	29.3 ± 8.3	102.0 ± 11.7	40.3 ± 9.8	87.0 ± 12.1	34.8 ± 7.4	
HSM, high-intensity shock microcycle; HSM + LIT, high-intensity shock microcycle with additional low-intensity training; CG, control group; 2D, two-dimensional; 3D, three-dimensional; LV internal EDD, left ventricular internal end-diastolic diameter; LV EDV, left ventricular end-diastolic volume; LV ESV, left ventricular end-systolic volume; LV mass, left ventricular mass; LA ESV, left atrial end-systolic volume; RV, right ventricular; RA ESV, right atrial end-systolic volume. All cardiac measurements were indexed to body surface area

* Image quality of two participants did not allow software-based 3D-analyses

Table 2 Baseline and change in endurance performance parameters (mean ± SD [range])

HSM (n = 9)	HSM + LIT (n = 9)	CG (n = 11)	ANOVA (p/pη2)	
T1	TB	Δ (%)	T1	TB	Δ (%)	T1	TB	Δ (%)	Time	Time x Group	
V˙O2max (mL min−1 kg−1)	
 59.2 ± 6.5	62.9 ± 5.4*	 + 6.5 ± 7.0	61.5 ± 3.8	64.7 ± 6.4*	 + 5.2 ± 6.2	59.4 ± 2.5	59.8 ± 3.2	 + 0.7 ± 3.8	 < .001/.37	.076/.18	
 [51.2–70.0]	[55.2–71.3]	[− 0.7 to 20.4]	[55.5–66.6]	[56.8–76.5]	[− 2.0 to 14.9]	[54.8–62.4]	[55.9–65.0]	[− 6.4 to 4.9]			
PPO (W kg−1)	
 5.01 ± 0.67	5.26 ± 0.72*	 + 4.9 ± 3.2	5.27 ± 0.33	5.46 ± 0.23*	 + 3.7 ± 2.7	4.99 ± 0.36	5.12 ± 0.46*	 + 2.5 ± 3.2	 < .001/.63	.259/.10	
 [4.04–6.31]	[4.39–6.66]	[− 0.09 to 10.1]	[4.69–5.70]	[4.99–5.75]	[− 0.83 to 6.41]	[4.44–5.60]	[4.30–5.78]	[− 3.18 to 9.42]			
LT (km h−1)	
 12.3 ± 2.0	12.9 ± 1.6*	 + 5.3 ± 4.2	12.7 ± 1.4	13.2 ± 1.2*	 + 4.2 ± 3.7	12.5 ± 1.0	12.7 ± 1.0	 + 1.6 ± 2.6	 < .001/.59	.071/.18	
 [9.7.1–15.6]	[10.6–15.6]	[0.0–12.1]	[9.9–14.2]	[11.0–14.4]	[− 0.8 to 11.1]	[11.0–13.6]	[11.2–14.4]	[− 3.0 to 5.9]			
Economy (mL min−1 kg−1)	
 38.6 ± 5.7	36.0 ± 2.7	− 5.8 ± 8.5	42.1 ± 2.9	39.5 ± 2.5	− 6.1 ± 2.0	39.3 ± 3.0	37.1 ± 2.3	− 5.2 ± 5.8	 < .001/.51	.895/.01	
 [30.8–46.2]	[32.4–40.2]	[− 14.7 to 8.1]	[37.9–45.3]	[36.0–43.0]	[− 9.4 to − 1.9]	[34.7–44.0]	[34.7–41.5]	[− 15.3 to 4.7]			
TT1	TT2	Δ (%)	TT1	TT2	Δ (%)	TT1	TT2	Δ (%)			
TT5km (mm:ss)	
 19:20 ± 2:31	19:02 ± 2:18*	− 1.5 ± 1.6	18:56 ± 1:23	18:27 ± 1:11*	− 2.3 ± 2.7	19:04 ± 1:24	19:07 ± 1:38	 + 0.1 ± 2.1	.007/.25	.053/.20	
 [15:05–23:04]	[14:57–22:15]	[− 4.6 to 0.3]	[17:12–21:56]	[17:20–20:39]	[− 5.9 to 2.8]	[16:48–21:04]	[16:29–22:10]	[− 1.9 to 5.2]			
HSM, high-intensity shock microcycle; HSM + LIT, high-intensity shock microcycle with additional low-intensity training; CG, control group; V˙O2max, maximal oxygen uptake; T1, baseline timepoint; TB, best out of 3 posttests; Δ, changes from pre to best posttest; PPO, peak power output; LT, lactate threshold; TT, 5 km time trial; TT1, pre 5 km time trial; TT2, post 5 km time trial

*Significant (p < 0.05) different to T1; bold font, significant main effect

Training Intensity Distribution

The mean upper limits for Z1 for HR, running power, running velocity, and V˙O2 were 154 ± 9 bpm, 253 ± 52 W, 11.8 ± 1.7 km h−1, and 42.1 ± 5.0 mL min−1 kg−1, whereas the mean upper limits for Z2 were 171 ± 8 bpm, 299 ± 46 W, 14.0 ± 1.3 km h−1, and 49.0 ± 4.4 mL min−1 kg−1. TIDV, TIDP, and TIDHR are presented in Fig. 3 including pairwise comparisons. There was a large effect for zone (p < 0.001, pη2 = 0.64), group (p < 0.001, pη2 = 0.72), zone × group (p < 0.001, pη2 = 0.36), and a medium effect for zone × intensity measure (p = 0.037, pη2 = 0.10). For both intervention groups a polarized pattern for TIDV (HSM: Z1: 38 ± 17, Z2: 16 ± 17, Z3: 46 ± 2%; HSM + LIT: Z1: 59 ± 18, Z2: 14 ± 18, Z3: 27 ± 2%) and TIDP (Z1: 50 ± 8, Z2: 14 ± 11, Z3: 36 ± 7%; Z1: 62 ± 15, Z2: 12 ± 16, Z3: 26 ± 2%) was found, whereas TIDHR was pyramidal (Z1: 48 ± 13, Z2: 26 ± 11, Z3: 26 ± 7%; Z1: 65 ± 17, Z2: 22 ± 18, Z3: 13 ± 4%). TIDHR (Z1: 84 ± 16, Z2: 10 ± 10, Z3: 6 ± 7%) for CG, who continued with their regular training, also showed a pyramidal pattern. TIDV˙O2 measured during the four laboratory HIIT sessions excluding warm-up and LIT showed a polarized pattern for HSM (Z1: 33 ± 7, Z2: 20 ± 12, Z3: 46 ± 14%) and a pyramidal pattern for HSM + LIT (Z1: 39 ± 10, Z2: 31 ± 20, Z3: 30 ± 18%).Fig. 3 Training intensity distribution of the 7-day intervention phase for each group and intensity measure. Mean (bars), individual data (points), and standard error of the mean (whiskers). Zones were identified from exercise testing with corresponding values for 1.5 mmol L−1 blood lactate and 90% maximal heart rate. Pairwise comparisons between groups for each intensity measure within the 3 zones are displayed in the corresponding color. Comparison within each group and zone are displayed with characters. a = heart rate is different (p < 0.05) from running power and velocity within the respective group and zone; b = running power is different (p < 0.05) from velocity within the respective group and zone. HSM, high-intensity interval training shock microcycle; HSM + LIT, high-intensity interval training shock microcycle with additional low-intensity training; CG, control group

Figure 4A presents time in Z3V, Z3P, and Z3HR during the 10 HIIT sessions for both intervention groups. HSM showed a large effect for intensity measure (p < 0.001, pη2 = 0.64), but neither a time (p = 0.132, pη2 = 0.07) nor a time x intensity measure (p = 0.149, pη2 = 0.11) effect. For HSM + LIT, no time effect (p = 0.080, pη2 = 0.08), but large effects for intensity measure (p < 0.001, pη2 = 0.85) and time x intensity measure were found (p < 0.001, pη2 = 0.30). Time in Z3HR was less compared with their counter parts for most sessions and showed a more pronounced decline over the 10 sessions for HSM + LIT compared to HSM. Mean time in Z3HR percentages of the 10 HIIT sessions were ranging between 28 and 47% for HSM and 16 and 45% for HSM + LIT, while time in Z3P percentages were ranging from 45 to 57% and 57 to 63%. Time in Z3V percentages over the intervention phase for both groups were ranging between 62 and 67% (Fig. 4A).Fig. 4 A Line plot with mean (dots) and standard error of the mean (band) presenting the time in zone 3 (Z3) over the 10 HIIT sessions for 3 intensity measures (heart rate (HR), running power (P), velocity (V)) and both groups as session percentages. # = significant interaction effect (time × intensity). Pairwise comparisons between sessions are presented including exact p-values. Pairwise comparisons between intensity measures for each session are marked with lower characters (p < 0.05): a = HR different to P and V, b = P different to V, c = HR different to V, d = V different to P and HR. B Boxplot of Z3 with individual data (circles) over the four laboratory HIIT sessions for HR, P, V, and oxygen uptake with pooled intervention groups

Figure 4B presents time in Z3V, Z3P, Z3HR, Z3V˙O2 as a percentage during the 4 HIIT sessions in the laboratory. Average interval speeds were 14.6 ± 1.3, 14.6 ± 1.4, 14.8 ± 1.4, 14.9 ± 1.4 km h−1 for the 4 sessions, respectively. Analysis revealed no time (p = 0.156, pη2 = 0.03), but a large effect of intensity measure (p < 0.001, pη2 = 0.59) as well as a time × intensity measure (p < 0.001, pη2 = 0.20) effect for the pooled sample. There was a decline in time in Z3HR with an average of 40 ± 16, 34 ± 16, 24 ± 14, and 22 ± 15% for the 4 sessions, respectively. Time in Z3V, Z3P, and Z3V˙O2 showed no significant pairwise comparisons over time. Athletes spent on average 11 ± 6, 10 ± 6, 11 ± 6, and 13 ± 4 min in Z3V˙O2 for the 4 sessions, respectively.

Correlation Analysis

The following correlation matrix (Fig. 5) shows pairwise correlations between selected variables. There were moderate to strong negative and positive correlations within baseline performance measures, except for running economy. Some baseline performance measures also showed moderate to strong correlations with Δ TT, Δ Economy, and Δ LT, while none were found with Δ V˙O2max and Δ PPO. Participants with a lower running economy, i.e., higher relative V˙O2 at 11 km h−1, at T1 showed less time in Z3V˙O2 (rs = − 0.72, p = 0.003). The analysis revealed no significant relationship between time in Z3V, Z3P, Z3HR and changes in performance measures, except for Z3V with Δ TT (rs = − 0.47, p = 0.049) and Δ PPO (rs = 0.52, p = 0.028).Fig. 5 Correlation matrix (spearman rank) with baseline values and changes in performance measures, total time in zone 3 in minutes (Z3) determined with different intensity measures, and cardiac geometry variables with pooled intervention groups. T1, initial cardiopulmonary exercise testing; V˙O2max, maximal oxygen uptake; Δ, changes from pre to best posttest; PPO, peak power output; LT, lactate threshold; TT, 5 km time trial; 2D, two-dimensional; 3D, three-dimensional; LV internal EDD, left ventricular internal end-diastolic diameter; LV EDV, left ventricular end-diastolic volume; LV ESV, left ventricular end-systolic volume; LV mass, left ventricular mass; LA ESV, left atrial end-systolic volume; RV, right ventricular; RA ESV, right atrial end-systolic volume. All cardiac measurements were indexed to body surface area. Image quality of two participants did not allow software-based 3D-analyses

Several correlations were observed among cardiac geometry variables. For instance, there was a strong correlation between LV mass and LV end-diastolic volume (EDV) (rs = 0.79, p < 0.001) and between 2D- with 3D measurements, which is unsurprising given that they derive from similar data sources or measure the same cardiac structure, respectively. Further consistent (2D and 3D results) moderate relationships were found between LA end-systolic volume (ESV) and Δ TT (2D: rs = − 0.48, p = 0.045, 3D: rs = − 0.46, p = 0.066). Supplement 3 provides further detailed correlation analyses for each group separately between the variables.

Discussion

A polarized pattern was revealed for TIDV and TIDP for both intervention groups, whereas TIDHR showed a pyramidal pattern. Time in Z3HR was significantly less compared to time in Z3V and Z3P for HSM and HSM + LIT. In addition, time in Z3V and Z3P remained relatively consistent across the 10 HIIT sessions, whereas Z3HR showed a decline in both groups that was more pronounced in HSM + LIT. More importantly, time in Z3V demonstrated a moderate dose–response relationship with Δ PPO and Δ TT, indicating that athletes who accumulate more time in Z3V tend to improve their PPO and TT performance to a greater extent. In contrast, there were no relationships between time in Z3P, Z3HR, Z3V˙O2 and changes in endurance performance parameters. Finally, there were no relationships between cardiac geometry and baseline endurance performance parameters as well as change scores with the exception of LA ESV and Δ TT.

TID of a HIIT Shock Microcycle

For the first time, we present data on the TID of a 7-day HIIT-SM with or without additional LIT based on various intensity measures. As expected, HSM + LIT participants achieved more time in Z1 for all three intensity measures compared to HSM, while there was no difference between HSM + LIT and CG concerning time in Z1HR (Fig. 3). However, both HSM and HSM + LIT showed a polarized pattern for TIDV and TIDP, whereas TIDHR was rather pyramidal. At the same time, TIDHR for CG, who continued with their regular training, also showed a pyramidal pattern. These differences in TID between intensity measures arise from both intervention groups achieving less time in Z3HR compared to Z3V and Z3P. Subsequently, this has led to an increase in time spent in Z2HR; a shift that can mainly be attributed to slower HR kinetics during the start of each interval compared with running velocity and power kinetics (Fig. 2B). Although comparisons between studies are difficult because most trials report training data of mesocycles (8–10 weeks), similar TID patterns have been observed in cyclists [20], middle-distance runners [21] or kayakers [22]. There is consensus that quantifying TID with different intensity measures will most likely lead to different distributions [3], which needs to be considered when making informed training decisions.

By analyzing Z3 data across all HIIT sessions (Fig. 4A), it can be concluded that the effect of delayed HR kinetics on time in Z3HR was enhanced with an increasing number of HIIT sessions. In contrast, time in Z3V and Z3P remained relatively constant, indicating that most athletes still managed to achieve Z3 work rates based on velocity and power, but that these were underestimated in Z3HR. Interestingly, the decline in time in Z3HR was more pronounced in HSM + LIT compared to HSM, already evident after session 3 (31 ± 4%, compared to session 1 45 ± 4%, p = 0.005). However, from the first to the last session, time in Z3HR was decreased in both, HSM (47 ± 5% to 28 ± 5%, p = 0.034) and HSM + LIT (45 ± 4% to 16 ± 4%, p < 0.001). Differences in HR responses between the groups could be attributed to the additional training load of 300 min of LIT in the HSM + LIT group, increasing the strain in the athlete’s body. Of note, both groups showed a slight upward trend for Z3HR following the rest day for 2 to 3 sessions before declining again, suggesting a potential recovery effect. In addition, athletes reported that towards the end of the HIIT-SM they had reached a limit where they could not run faster to meet the HR targets without risking the completion of the entire session. The decrease in time in Z3HR towards the end is also reflected in a reduced HRmax (4–6 bpm) 3 days after the intervention, which has been presented previously [51]. The observation of a decrease in HRmax after intense training aligns with previous studies [26, 53]. Such observations are attributed to the accumulated fatigue and disruptions in the autonomic nervous system, particularly a decline in sympathetic nervous system activity [54, 55]. It can be argued, whether this reaction is desirable and necessary to induce performance improvements [56]. Interestingly, athletes showed notable discrepancies in time spent in Z3HR, with a 106 min (HSM) and a 78 min difference (HSM + LIT) between those with the longest and shortest durations (Fig. 3). Further research is needed to explore individual factors that may explain why some individuals experience greater declines than others. It is crucial for athletes and coaches to consider these mechanisms when interpreting the TIDHR of a HIIT-SM [57]. Our results also indicate that additional LIT, i.e., long cool-downs, are counterproductive if the goal is to maximize time in Z3HR during HIIT-SM.

Most studies investigating running power data derived by Stryd featured a laboratory setting [19, 47, 58]. Here we present a longitudinal training dataset of running power in a “real-world” setting, with outdoor and indoor training sessions. In line with previous research [47, 59, 60], our results mostly support the linear relationship between running power and running velocity in this applied setting. There were no differences in time in zone between power and velocity within each group and zone, except for Z3 in HSM (Fig. 3). Figure 4A, B outline that especially the sessions in the laboratory resulted in differences between measures. This finding may be due to fixed interval speeds on the treadmill, were some cases partly missed the Z3P threshold, but at the same time accumulated time in Z3V. More importantly, participants were instructed to run their outdoor sessions on a flat course, what benefits the linear power-velocity relationship. In contrast, varying gradients and speeds would likely have resulted in different patterns of TIDP and TIDV which warrants further investigation in future studies.

Analysis of Z3V˙O2, Z3P, and Z3V data from double session days in the laboratory with pooled intervention groups revealed no change over time, whereas Z3HR decreased between T2 and T3 (Fig. 4B). Each intensity measure demonstrated its own characteristics in terms of time in Z3 and response to accumulated load during HIIT-SM. Due to faster kinetics during intervals (also see Fig. 2B) and no response to accumulated load and fatigue during the HIIT-SM, both running velocity and power achieved the most time in Z3 across all laboratory sessions. In contrast, the internal measures HR and V˙O2 achieved on average less time in Z3 with V˙O2 being consistent across the analyzed sessions, indicating comparable amount of metabolic work for the intervals. Contrary, HR was responsive to the accumulated load and showed a decline in Z3HR. It is important to consider these factors when interpreting TID based on different intensity measures, as they primarily influence the outcome. In addition, there was a high variability between athletes in achieving time in Z3V˙O2 (time above V˙O2 at 90% HRmax measured at T1), although associated interval speeds were respected. Diurnal variation in V˙O2 kinetics has been previously observed during moderate-intensity cycling [61], but not during high-intensity running [62]. There is evidence that decreased HRmax due to intensified training is accompanied by a reduction in V˙O2max [53, 63], which could also have affected time in Z3V˙O2. As of yet, there is insufficient research on double HIIT sessions as part of a HIIT-SM in general, and their effect on HR, V˙O2, and their interaction.

Correlation Analysis

It is believed that a dose–response relationship exists between the total time spend in Z3, i.e., at or close to V˙O2max, and improvements in V˙O2max [33, 36, 64]. Interestingly, the current study found no relationships between the time spent in Z3HR, Z3V˙O2, Z3P and changes in performance parameters. Comparisons with previous research are limited as studies in this field mostly focused on interventions with longer periods of time (4–8 weeks), where athletes normally perform 2–3 HIIT sessions per week. To the best of our knowledge, there is only one study investigating a dose–response relationship during a HIIT-SM. Rønnestad et al. [30] performed five HIIT (6 × 5 min) sessions within six days with elite cross-country skiers who accumulated on average between ~ 12 to  ~ 16 min ≥ 90% V˙O2max and ~ 18 to  ~ 23 min ≥ 90% HRmax in sessions one, two, and five. Correlation analysis revealed a tendency that time ≥ 90% V˙O2max could estimate the improvement in V˙O2max (r = 0.54, p = 0.071), while it could not explain changes in other performance parameters, e.g., velocity at 4 mmol L−1 La (r = 0.211, p = 0.511). Our results, with athletes spending on average ~ 11 to  ~ 13 min in Z3V˙O2 during sessions two, three, nine, and ten do not support a clear relationship between time in Z3V˙O2 and Δ V˙O2max (rs = 0.24, p = 0.335). It needs to be mentioned, that the comparison between these two studies should be treated with caution as we opted to utilize V˙O2 at 90% HRmax instead of 90% V˙O2max as a threshold for Z3V˙O2. This was done to comply with the interval intensity prescriptions and to standardize zone determination across all intensity measures.

Previous studies have primarily investigated the dose–response relationship between internal measures (HR, V˙O2) and the development of V˙O2max as a surrogate of actual endurance performance [32, 36], which we cannot confirm with our data. However, there were moderate correlations between time in Z3V and Δ PPO (rs = 0.52, p = 0.028) as well as Δ TT (rs = -0.47, p = 0.049), estimating that athletes who spent more time in Z3V during the HIIT-SM were more likely to improve their PPO and TT5km performance. Therefore, these results illustrate the relationship between an external measure (velocity) and the actual endurance performance, i.e., TT5km. This is another example why measuring intensity based on velocity might be more appropriate compared to HR in a running based HIIT-SM setting. Velocity represents the actual work performed more reliably, at least on flat terrain, while HR tends to underestimate the intensity and load; a discrepancy that becomes even more evident with increased parasympathicotonia and accumulating fatigue (Fig. 4A). These are important implications for athletes and coaches, suggesting that the effectiveness of HIIT-SM should not be evaluated on the basis of time in Z3HR. Since we decided to measure V˙O2 in only 4 out of 10 sessions, it remains to be investigated whether time in Z3V˙O2 accumulated over all HIIT sessions is a better predictor of change in endurance-related parameters, which should be the subject of future studies.

V˙O2max, PPO, and LT measured at baseline turned out to be strong predictors of TT1 performance being in line with previous literature [65, 66]. Although, there is robust evidence that running economy is important for running performance [45], we only found a moderate relationship with TT1 (rs = 0.41, p = 0.094), which aligns with previously results for the same TT distance (r = 0.44 [67], r = 0.39 [68]). Interestingly, baseline running economy turned out to be a good estimate for Δ TT (rs = − 0.68, p = 0.003). This indicates that less efficient participants were more likely to improve their TT5km time through HIIT-SM than those who already had a better running economy. This was also reflected in the relationship between baseline and Δ running economy (rs = − 0.69, p = 0.002). These relationships illustrate the potential for improving key performance parameters using HIIT-SM for endurance-trained athletes. However, it appears that comparatively less trained athletes from our cohort benefit to a greater extent.

It is hypothesized, that cardiac chamber sizes serve as a predictor for a high V˙O2max, suggesting that individuals with smaller cardiac chambers may exhibit greater potential for performance improvement following a HIIT intervention. Several studies have indicated significant, weak to strong correlations, mainly between baseline resting LV EDV or LV mass and V˙O2max [69, 70]. However, we did not find significant correlations between resting cardiac chamber size measurements and baseline endurance performance variables. This might be attributed to the relatively homogenous study population and the small sample size. Another reason for the weak correlation between cardiac chamber sizes and endurance performance could also be that myocardial compliance plays a major role in stroke volume generation and subsequently V˙O2max [71], indicating that chamber sizes at rest are actually less important compared to how they enlarge during exercise.

Furthermore, our analysis revealed no significant correlations between cardiac geometry variables and change scores with the exception of LA ESV and Δ TT, where a negative correlation was observed (2D: rs = − 0.48, p = 0.045, 3D: rs = − 0.46, p = 0.066). This suggests that participants with smaller LA were more likely to improve their TT time through HIIT-SM than those with larger LA. Several studies have indicated the importance of atrial contribution to stroke volume generation but also atrial wall stress during prolonged and intensive endurance exercise bouts [72, 73]. This underscores the potential value of monitoring LA size for guiding exercise recommendations. However, further research with larger sample size and measurements during exercise is needed to comprehensively explore the role of cardiac geometry, particularly size of the LA, which has the potential to improve personalized training recommendations.

Limitations

Although, to date, there seems to be no evidence that biological sex affects TID, the uneven distribution of female participants between the groups needs to be considered. This disparity is mainly attributed to dropouts and data quality checks, which unfortunately reduced the number of female athletes. As the CG was instructed to continue with their regular training, including other sports beside running, comparisons based on velocity and power with the intervention groups were not feasible, potentially missing out on valuable additional information. When interpreting the results of the correlation analysis, it is important to consider that intervention groups were pooled to increase sample size, knowing that one half has performed more LIT than the other half potentially impacting the outcomes. However, to give the reader a more complete picture, we have added a separate analysis for each group in Supplement 3. Finally, there was no detailed monitoring of subjective perception in the form of RPE during the HIIT-SM, potentially missing out on valuable data.

Conclusion

We conclude that the selection of intensity measure strongly affects the quantification of TID for HIIT-SM in endurance-trained athletes. Informed decisions based on TIDHR should be treated with caution as HR underestimates the actual training intensity during a HIIT-SM. Time in Z3V appeared to be valuable in detecting dose–response relationships, indicating that athletes who spent more time in the “red zone” determined by running velocity may achieve higher improvements in PPO and TT performance. We recommend contextualizing a combination of external and internal measures to evaluate the training data of HIIT-SM’s. Cardiac geometry turned out to be insufficient in estimating changes in endurance performance parameters induced by HIIT-SM, except for the relationship between LA ESV and changes in TT performance, which should be investigated in future studies with different designs and populations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

Additional file 2

Additional file 3

Abbreviations

TID Training intensity distribution

Z Zone

LIT Low-intensity training

HR Heart rate

V˙O2 Oxygen uptake

La Blood lactate

RPE Rating of perceived exertion

V˙O2max Maximal oxygen uptake

HIIT High-intensity interval training

HIIT-SM High-intensity interval training shock microcycle

HRmax Maximal heart rate

LV Left ventricle

LA Left atrial

TIDV TID based on running velocity

TIDP TID based on running power

TIDHR TID based on heart rate

Z3V Time in zone 3 based on velocity

Z3P Time in zone 3 based on running power

Z3HR Time in zone 3 based on heart rate

Z3VO˙2 Time in zone 3 based on oxygen uptake

TT5km 5-km time trial

TB Best out of three post measurements

EDD End-diastolic diameter

EDV End-diastolic volume

ESV End-systolic volume

RV Right ventricular

RA Right atrial

PPO Peak power output

LT Lactate threshold

SD Standard deviation

SEM Standard error of the mean

pη2 Partial eta squared

Δ Change score

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Francesca Kilzer, Markus Huthöfer, Anna Schmuttermair, Gianfranco Pocobelli, Katharina Reuschel, Alina Kuhn, Mara Fischer, Matteo Genitrini and Monika Stadlmann for their support during the measurements and the participants for their enthusiasm and cooperation.

Author Contributions

TLS and NH designed and supervised the study. TS, JB and MS conducted the data collection. Data analysis and writing of the first draft were carried out by TS. All authors critically revised and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

Based on the scientific cooperation with no commercial interest, the study has received funding from the Red Bull Athlete Performance Center.

Availability of Data and Materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

Ethical approval was granted through University of Salzburg (Approval Number: GZ 2/2021), both verbal and written consent was obtained from all study participants for this study. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial or non-financial interests.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Fiskerstrand A Seiler KS Training and performance characteristics among Norwegian International Rowers 1970–2001 Scand J Med Sci Sports 2004 14 303 310 10.1046/j.1600-0838.2003.370.x 15387804
Fiskerstrand A, Seiler KS. Training and performance characteristics among Norwegian International Rowers 1970–2001. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2004;14:303–10.15387804 10.1046/j.1600-0838.2003.370.x
2. Seiler KS Kjerland GØ Quantifying training intensity distribution in elite endurance athletes: is there evidence for an “optimal” distribution? Scand J Med Sci Sports 2006 16 49 56 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2004.00418.x 16430681
Seiler KS, Kjerland GØ. Quantifying training intensity distribution in elite endurance athletes: is there evidence for an “optimal” distribution? Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2006;16:49–56.16430681 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2004.00418.x
3. Sperlich B Matzka M Holmberg H-C The proportional distribution of training by elite endurance athletes at different intensities during different phases of the season Front Sports Act Living 2023 5 1258585 10.3389/fspor.2023.1258585 37964776
Sperlich B, Matzka M, Holmberg H-C. The proportional distribution of training by elite endurance athletes at different intensities during different phases of the season. Front Sports Act Living. 2023;5:1258585.37964776 10.3389/fspor.2023.1258585
4. Stöggl TL Sperlich B The training intensity distribution among well-trained and elite endurance athletes Front Physiol 2015 6 295 10.3389/fphys.2015.00295 26578968
Stöggl TL, Sperlich B. The training intensity distribution among well-trained and elite endurance athletes. Front Physiol. 2015;6:295.26578968 10.3389/fphys.2015.00295
5. Stöggl TL What is the best way to train to become a star endurance athlete Front Young Minds. 2018 6 10.3389 10.3389/frym.2018.00017
Stöggl TL. What is the best way to train to become a star endurance athlete. Front Young Minds. 2018;6:10.3389.10.3389/frym.2018.00017
6. Treff G Winkert K Sareban M Steinacker JM Sperlich B The polarization-index: a simple calculation to distinguish polarized from non-polarized training intensity distributions Front Physiol 2019 10 707 10.3389/fphys.2019.00707 31249533
Treff G, Winkert K, Sareban M, Steinacker JM, Sperlich B. The polarization-index: a simple calculation to distinguish polarized from non-polarized training intensity distributions. Front Physiol. 2019;10:707.31249533 10.3389/fphys.2019.00707
7. Kenneally M Casado A Santos-Concejero J The effect of periodization and training intensity distribution on middle-and long-distance running performance: a systematic review Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2018 13 1114 1121 10.1123/ijspp.2017-0327 29182410
Kenneally M, Casado A, Santos-Concejero J. The effect of periodization and training intensity distribution on middle-and long-distance running performance: a systematic review. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018;13:1114–21.29182410 10.1123/ijspp.2017-0327
8. Stöggl T Sperlich B Polarized training has greater impact on key endurance variables than threshold, high intensity, or high volume training Front Physiol 2014 5 33 10.3389/fphys.2014.00033 24550842
Stöggl T, Sperlich B. Polarized training has greater impact on key endurance variables than threshold, high intensity, or high volume training. Front Physiol. 2014;5:33.24550842 10.3389/fphys.2014.00033
9. Filipas L Bonato M Gallo G Codella R Effects of 16 weeks of pyramidal and polarized training intensity distributions in well-trained endurance runners Scand J Med Sci Sports 2022 32 498 511 10.1111/sms.14101 34792817
Filipas L, Bonato M, Gallo G, Codella R. Effects of 16 weeks of pyramidal and polarized training intensity distributions in well-trained endurance runners. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2022;32:498–511.34792817 10.1111/sms.14101
10. Foster C Casado A Esteve-Lanao J Haugen T Seiler S Polarized training is optimal for endurance athletes Med Sci Sports Exerc 2022 54 1028 1031 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002871 35136001
Foster C, Casado A, Esteve-Lanao J, Haugen T, Seiler S. Polarized training is optimal for endurance athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2022;54:1028–31.35136001 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002871
11. Burnley M Bearden SE Jones AM Polarized training is not optimal for endurance athletes Med Sci Sports Exerc 2022 54 1032 1034 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002869 35135998
Burnley M, Bearden SE, Jones AM. Polarized training is not optimal for endurance athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2022;54:1032–4.35135998 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002869
12. Esteve-Lanao J San Juan AF Earnest CP Foster C Lucia A How do endurance runners actually train? Relationship with competition performance Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005 37 496 504 10.1249/01.MSS.0000155393.78744.86 15741850
Esteve-Lanao J, San Juan AF, Earnest CP, Foster C, Lucia A. How do endurance runners actually train? Relationship with competition performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37:496–504.15741850 10.1249/01.MSS.0000155393.78744.86
13. Impellizzeri FM Jeffries AC Weisman A Coutts AJ McCall A McLaren SJ The ‘training load’ construct: why it is appropriate and scientific J Sci Med Sport 2022 25 445 448 10.1016/j.jsams.2021.10.013 35523475
Impellizzeri FM, Jeffries AC, Weisman A, Coutts AJ, McCall A, McLaren SJ, et al. The ‘training load’ construct: why it is appropriate and scientific. J Sci Med Sport. 2022;25:445–8.35523475 10.1016/j.jsams.2021.10.013
14. Jeukendrup A Diemen AV Heart rate monitoring during training and competition in cyclists J Sports Sci 1998 16 91 99 10.1080/026404198366722
Jeukendrup A, Diemen AV. Heart rate monitoring during training and competition in cyclists. J Sports Sci. 1998;16:91–9.10.1080/026404198366722
15. Passfield L Hopker JG Jobson S Friel D Zabala M Knowledge is power: issues of measuring training and performance in cycling J Sports Sci 2017 35 1426 1434 10.1080/02640414.2016.1215504 27686573
Passfield L, Hopker JG, Jobson S, Friel D, Zabala M. Knowledge is power: issues of measuring training and performance in cycling. J Sports Sci. 2017;35:1426–34.27686573 10.1080/02640414.2016.1215504
16. Haugen T Sandbakk Ø Enoksen E Seiler S Tønnessen E Crossing the golden training divide: the science and practice of training world-class 800-and 1500-m runners Sports Med 2021 51 1835 1854 10.1007/s40279-021-01481-2 34021488
Haugen T, Sandbakk Ø, Enoksen E, Seiler S, Tønnessen E. Crossing the golden training divide: the science and practice of training world-class 800-and 1500-m runners. Sports Med. 2021;51:1835–54.34021488 10.1007/s40279-021-01481-2
17. Gilman MB The use of heart rate to monitor the intensity of endurance training Sports Med 1996 21 73 79 10.2165/00007256-199621020-00001 8775514
Gilman MB. The use of heart rate to monitor the intensity of endurance training. Sports Med. 1996;21:73–9.8775514 10.2165/00007256-199621020-00001
18. Achten J Jeukendrup AE Heart rate monitoring Sports Med 2003 33 517 538 10.2165/00007256-200333070-00004 12762827
Achten J, Jeukendrup AE. Heart rate monitoring. Sports Med. 2003;33:517–38.12762827 10.2165/00007256-200333070-00004
19. Cerezuela-Espejo V Hernández-Belmonte A Courel-Ibáñez J Conesa-Ros E Mora-Rodríguez R Pallarés JG Are we ready to measure running power? Repeatability and concurrent validity of five commercial technologies Eur J Sport Sci 2021 21 341 350 10.1080/17461391.2020.1748117 32212955
Cerezuela-Espejo V, Hernández-Belmonte A, Courel-Ibáñez J, Conesa-Ros E, Mora-Rodríguez R, Pallarés JG. Are we ready to measure running power? Repeatability and concurrent validity of five commercial technologies. Eur J Sport Sci. 2021;21:341–50.32212955 10.1080/17461391.2020.1748117
20. Sanders D Myers T Akubat I Training-intensity distribution in road cyclists: objective versus subjective measures Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2017 12 1232 1237 10.1123/ijspp.2016-0523 28253026
Sanders D, Myers T, Akubat I. Training-intensity distribution in road cyclists: objective versus subjective measures. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017;12:1232–7.28253026 10.1123/ijspp.2016-0523
21. Bellinger P Arnold B Minahan C Quantifying the training-intensity distribution in middle-distance runners: the influence of different methods of training-intensity quantification Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2020 15 319 323 10.1123/ijspp.2019-0298 31188692
Bellinger P, Arnold B, Minahan C. Quantifying the training-intensity distribution in middle-distance runners: the influence of different methods of training-intensity quantification. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2020;15:319–23.31188692 10.1123/ijspp.2019-0298
22. Matzka M Leppich R Sperlich B Zinner C Retrospective analysis of training intensity distribution based on race pace versus physiological benchmarks in highly trained sprint kayakers Sports Med Open 2022 8 1 10.1186/s40798-021-00382-y 34989918
Matzka M, Leppich R, Sperlich B, Zinner C. Retrospective analysis of training intensity distribution based on race pace versus physiological benchmarks in highly trained sprint kayakers. Sports Med Open. 2022;8:1.34989918 10.1186/s40798-021-00382-y
23. Issurin VB New horizons for the methodology and physiology of training periodization Sports Med 2010 40 189 206 10.2165/11319770-000000000-00000 20199119
Issurin VB. New horizons for the methodology and physiology of training periodization. Sports Med. 2010;40:189–206.20199119 10.2165/11319770-000000000-00000
24. McGawley K Juudas E Kazior Z Ström K Blomstrand E Hansson O No additional benefits of block-over evenly-distributed high-intensity interval training within a polarized microcycle Front Physiol 2017 8 413 10.3389/fphys.2017.00413 28659826
McGawley K, Juudas E, Kazior Z, Ström K, Blomstrand E, Hansson O, et al. No additional benefits of block-over evenly-distributed high-intensity interval training within a polarized microcycle. Front Physiol. 2017;8:413.28659826 10.3389/fphys.2017.00413
25. Dolci F Kilding AE Chivers P Piggott B Hart NH High-intensity interval training shock microcycle for enhancing sport performance: a brief review J Strength Cond Res 2020 34 1188 1196 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003499 31904712
Dolci F, Kilding AE, Chivers P, Piggott B, Hart NH. High-intensity interval training shock microcycle for enhancing sport performance: a brief review. J Strength Cond Res. 2020;34:1188–96.31904712 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003499
26. Breil FA Weber SN Koller S Hoppeler H Vogt M Block training periodization in alpine skiing: effects of 11-day HIT on VO2max and performance Eur J Appl Physiol 2010 109 1077 1086 10.1007/s00421-010-1455-1 20364385
Breil FA, Weber SN, Koller S, Hoppeler H, Vogt M. Block training periodization in alpine skiing: effects of 11-day HIT on VO2max and performance. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010;109:1077–86.20364385 10.1007/s00421-010-1455-1
27. Stöggl T Stieglbauer R Sageder T Müller E High-intensity interval (HIT) and speed training in soccer Leistungssport 2010 40 43 49
Stöggl T, Stieglbauer R, Sageder T, Müller E. High-intensity interval (HIT) and speed training in soccer. Leistungssport. 2010;40:43–9.
28. Menz V Strobl J Faulhaber M Gatterer H Burtscher M Effect of 3-week high-intensity interval training on VO2max, total haemoglobin mass, plasma and blood volume in well-trained athletes Eur J Appl Physiol 2015 115 2349 2356 10.1007/s00421-015-3211-z 26164709
Menz V, Strobl J, Faulhaber M, Gatterer H, Burtscher M. Effect of 3-week high-intensity interval training on VO2max, total haemoglobin mass, plasma and blood volume in well-trained athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015;115:2349–56.26164709 10.1007/s00421-015-3211-z
29. Wahl P Zinner C Grosskopf C Rossmann R Bloch W Mester J Passive recovery is superior to active recovery during a high-intensity shock microcycle J Strength Cond Res 2013 27 1384 1393 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182653cfa 22744298
Wahl P, Zinner C, Grosskopf C, Rossmann R, Bloch W, Mester J. Passive recovery is superior to active recovery during a high-intensity shock microcycle. J Strength Cond Res. 2013;27:1384–93.22744298 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182653cfa
30. Rønnestad BR Bjerkrheim KA Hansen J Mølmen KS A 6-day high-intensity interval microcycle improves indicators of endurance performance in elite cross-country skiers Front Sports Act Living 2022 4 948127 10.3389/fspor.2022.948127 36439620
Rønnestad BR, Bjerkrheim KA, Hansen J, Mølmen KS. A 6-day high-intensity interval microcycle improves indicators of endurance performance in elite cross-country skiers. Front Sports Act Living. 2022;4:948127.36439620 10.3389/fspor.2022.948127
31. Zinner C Wahl P Achtzehn S Reed J Mester J Acute hormonal responses before and after 2 weeks of HIT in well trained junior triathletes Int J Sports Med 2014 35 316 322 24081622
Zinner C, Wahl P, Achtzehn S, Reed J, Mester J. Acute hormonal responses before and after 2 weeks of HIT in well trained junior triathletes. Int J Sports Med. 2014;35:316–22.24081622
32. Buchheit M Laursen PB High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle. Part I: cardiopulmonary emphasis Sports Med 2013 43 313 338 10.1007/s40279-013-0029-x 23539308
Buchheit M, Laursen PB. High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle. Part I: cardiopulmonary emphasis. Sports Med. 2013;43:313–38.23539308 10.1007/s40279-013-0029-x
33. Wenger HA Bell GJ The interactions of intensity, frequency and duration of exercise training in altering cardiorespiratory fitness Sports Med 1986 3 346 356 10.2165/00007256-198603050-00004 3529283
Wenger HA, Bell GJ. The interactions of intensity, frequency and duration of exercise training in altering cardiorespiratory fitness. Sports Med. 1986;3:346–56.3529283 10.2165/00007256-198603050-00004
34. Vollaard NBJ Constantin-Teodosiu D Fredriksson K Rooyackers O Jansson E Greenhaff PL Systematic analysis of adaptations in aerobic capacity and submaximal energy metabolism provides a unique insight into determinants of human aerobic performance J Appl Physiol 2009 106 1479 1486 10.1152/japplphysiol.91453.2008 19196912
Vollaard NBJ, Constantin-Teodosiu D, Fredriksson K, Rooyackers O, Jansson E, Greenhaff PL, et al. Systematic analysis of adaptations in aerobic capacity and submaximal energy metabolism provides a unique insight into determinants of human aerobic performance. J Appl Physiol. 2009;106:1479–86.19196912 10.1152/japplphysiol.91453.2008
35. Bouchard C Rankinen T Individual differences in response to regular physical activity Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001 33 S446 S451 10.1097/00005768-200106001-00013 11427769
Bouchard C, Rankinen T. Individual differences in response to regular physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33:S446–51.11427769 10.1097/00005768-200106001-00013
36. Midgley AW McNaughton LR Wilkinson M Is there an optimal training intensity for enhancing the maximal oxygen uptake of distance runners? Sports Med 2006 36 117 132 10.2165/00007256-200636020-00003 16464121
Midgley AW, McNaughton LR, Wilkinson M. Is there an optimal training intensity for enhancing the maximal oxygen uptake of distance runners? Sports Med. 2006;36:117–32.16464121 10.2165/00007256-200636020-00003
37. Hellsten Y Nyberg M Cardiovascular adaptations to exercise training Compr Physiol 2015 6 1 32 26756625
Hellsten Y, Nyberg M. Cardiovascular adaptations to exercise training. Compr Physiol. 2015;6:1–32.26756625
38. Skattebo Ø Calbet JAL Rud B Capelli C Hallén J Contribution of oxygen extraction fraction to maximal oxygen uptake in healthy young men Acta Physiol 2020 230 e13486 10.1111/apha.13486
Skattebo Ø, Calbet JAL, Rud B, Capelli C, Hallén J. Contribution of oxygen extraction fraction to maximal oxygen uptake in healthy young men. Acta Physiol. 2020;230:e13486.10.1111/apha.13486
39. Stöggl TL Blumkaitis JC Strepp T Sareban M Simon P Neuberger EWI The Salzburg 10/7 HIIT shock cycle study: the effects of a 7-day high-intensity interval training shock microcycle with or without additional low-intensity training on endurance performance, well-being, stress and recovery in endurance trained athletes—study protocol of a randomized controlled trial BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil 2022 14 84 10.1186/s13102-022-00456-8 35526065
Stöggl TL, Blumkaitis JC, Strepp T, Sareban M, Simon P, Neuberger EWI, et al. The Salzburg 10/7 HIIT shock cycle study: the effects of a 7-day high-intensity interval training shock microcycle with or without additional low-intensity training on endurance performance, well-being, stress and recovery in endurance trained athletes—study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2022;14:84.35526065 10.1186/s13102-022-00456-8
40. Butcher NJ Monsour A Mew EJ Chan A-W Moher D Mayo-Wilson E Guidelines for reporting outcomes in trial reports: the CONSORT-outcomes 2022 extension JAMA 2022 328 2252 2264 10.1001/jama.2022.21022 36511921
Butcher NJ, Monsour A, Mew EJ, Chan A-W, Moher D, Mayo-Wilson E, et al. Guidelines for reporting outcomes in trial reports: the CONSORT-outcomes 2022 extension. JAMA. 2022;328:2252–64.36511921 10.1001/jama.2022.21022
41. Stöggl TL Strepp T Blumkaitis J Schmuttermair A Wahl P Haller N Unraveling the mystery of isocaloric endurance training—influence of exercise modality, biological sex, and physical fitness Metabolism 2023 144 155582 10.1016/j.metabol.2023.155582 37169172
Stöggl TL, Strepp T, Blumkaitis J, Schmuttermair A, Wahl P, Haller N. Unraveling the mystery of isocaloric endurance training—influence of exercise modality, biological sex, and physical fitness. Metabolism. 2023;144: 155582.37169172 10.1016/j.metabol.2023.155582
42. Lang RM Badano LP Mor-Avi V Afilalo J Armstrong A Ernande L Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015 28 1 39.e14 10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003 25559473
Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28:1-39.e14.25559473 10.1016/j.echo.2014.10.003
43. Tsang W Salgo IS Medvedofsky D Takeuchi M Prater D Weinert L Transthoracic 3D echocardiographic left heart chamber quantification using an automated adaptive analytics algorithm JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2016 9 769 782 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.12.020 27318718
Tsang W, Salgo IS, Medvedofsky D, Takeuchi M, Prater D, Weinert L, et al. Transthoracic 3D echocardiographic left heart chamber quantification using an automated adaptive analytics algorithm. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:769–82.27318718 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.12.020
44. Mosteller RD Simplified calculation of body-surface area N Engl J Med 1987 317 1098 10.1056/NEJM198710223171717 3657876
Mosteller RD. Simplified calculation of body-surface area. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:1098.3657876 10.1056/NEJM198710223171717
45. Barnes KR Kilding AE Running economy: measurement, norms, and determining factors Sports Med Open. 2015 1 1 15 10.1186/s40798-015-0007-y 27747838
Barnes KR, Kilding AE. Running economy: measurement, norms, and determining factors. Sports Med Open. 2015;1:1–15.27747838 10.1186/s40798-015-0007-y
46. Wahl P Bloch W Proschinger S The molecular signature of high-intensity training in the human body Int J Sports Med 2021 43 195 205 34265857
Wahl P, Bloch W, Proschinger S. The molecular signature of high-intensity training in the human body. Int J Sports Med. 2021;43:195–20534265857
47. Van Rassel CR Ajayi OO Sales KM Griffiths JK Fletcher JR Edwards WB Is running power a useful metric? Quantifying training intensity and aerobic fitness using stryd running power near the maximal lactate steady state Sensors 2023 23 8729 10.3390/s23218729 37960430
Van Rassel CR, Ajayi OO, Sales KM, Griffiths JK, Fletcher JR, Edwards WB, et al. Is running power a useful metric? Quantifying training intensity and aerobic fitness using stryd running power near the maximal lactate steady state. Sensors. 2023;23:8729.37960430 10.3390/s23218729
48. Stryd. How to lead the pack: running power meters & quality data. 2017. https://blog.stryd.com/2017/12/07/how-to-lead-the-pack-running-power-meters-quality-data/. Accessed 22 Feb 2024
49. Rønnestad BR Vikmoen O A 11-day compressed overload and taper induces larger physiological improvements than a normal taper in elite cyclists Scand J Med Sci Sports 2019 29 1856 1865 10.1111/sms.13536 31410894
Rønnestad BR, Vikmoen O. A 11-day compressed overload and taper induces larger physiological improvements than a normal taper in elite cyclists. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019;29:1856–65.31410894 10.1111/sms.13536
50. Laursen PB Shing CM Peake JM Coombes JS Jenkins DG Interval training program optimization in highly trained endurance cyclists Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002 34 1801 1807 10.1097/00005768-200211000-00017 12439086
Laursen PB, Shing CM, Peake JM, Coombes JS, Jenkins DG. Interval training program optimization in highly trained endurance cyclists. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34:1801–7.12439086 10.1097/00005768-200211000-00017
51. Strepp T Blumkaitis JC Haller N Stöggl TL Adding LIT to HIIT—is low-intensity training vital for endurance-trained athletes during a 7-day HIIT shock microcycle? Med Sci Sports Exerc 2024 56 1408 1421 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003435 38587921
Strepp T, Blumkaitis JC, Haller N, Stöggl TL. Adding LIT to HIIT—is low-intensity training vital for endurance-trained athletes during a 7-day HIIT shock microcycle? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2024;56:1408–2138587921 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003435
52. Schober P Boer C Schwarte LA Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation Anesth Analg 2018 126 1763 1768 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864 29481436
Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA. Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg. 2018;126:1763–8.29481436 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864
53. Halson SL Bridge MW Meeusen R Busschaert B Gleeson M Jones DA Time course of performance changes and fatigue markers during intensified training in trained cyclists J Appl Physiol 2002 93 947 956 10.1152/japplphysiol.01164.2001 12183490
Halson SL, Bridge MW, Meeusen R, Busschaert B, Gleeson M, Jones DA, et al. Time course of performance changes and fatigue markers during intensified training in trained cyclists. J Appl Physiol. 2002;93:947–56.12183490 10.1152/japplphysiol.01164.2001
54. Zavorsky GS Evidence and possible mechanisms of altered maximum heart rate with endurance training and tapering Sports Med 2000 29 13 26 10.2165/00007256-200029010-00002 10688280
Zavorsky GS. Evidence and possible mechanisms of altered maximum heart rate with endurance training and tapering. Sports Med. 2000;29:13–26.10688280 10.2165/00007256-200029010-00002
55. Le Meur Y Pichon A Schaal K Schmitt L Louis J Gueneron J Evidence of parasympathetic hyperactivity in functionally overreached athletes Med Sci Sports Exerc 2013 45 2061 2071 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182980125 24136138
Le Meur Y, Pichon A, Schaal K, Schmitt L, Louis J, Gueneron J, et al. Evidence of parasympathetic hyperactivity in functionally overreached athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45:2061–71.24136138 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182980125
56. Bellinger P Functional overreaching in endurance athletes: a necessity or cause for concern? Sports Med 2020 50 1059 1073 10.1007/s40279-020-01269-w 32064575
Bellinger P. Functional overreaching in endurance athletes: a necessity or cause for concern? Sports Med. 2020;50:1059–73.32064575 10.1007/s40279-020-01269-w
57. Bosquet L Merkari S Arvisais D Aubert AE Is heart rate a convenient tool to monitor over-reaching? A systematic review of the literature Br J Sports Med 2008 42 709 714 10.1136/bjsm.2007.042200 18308872
Bosquet L, Merkari S, Arvisais D, Aubert AE. Is heart rate a convenient tool to monitor over-reaching? A systematic review of the literature. Br J Sports Med. 2008;42:709–14.18308872 10.1136/bjsm.2007.042200
58. García-Pinillos F Roche-Seruendo LE Marcén-Cinca N Marco-Contreras LA Latorre-Román PA Absolute reliability and concurrent validity of the Stryd system for the assessment of running stride kinematics at different velocities J Strength Cond Res 2021 35 78 84 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002595 29781934
García-Pinillos F, Roche-Seruendo LE, Marcén-Cinca N, Marco-Contreras LA, Latorre-Román PA. Absolute reliability and concurrent validity of the Stryd system for the assessment of running stride kinematics at different velocities. J Strength Cond Res. 2021;35:78–84.29781934 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002595
59. Taboga P Giovanelli N Spinazzè E Cuzzolin F Fedele G Zanuso S Running power: lab based vs. portable devices measurements and its relationship with aerobic power Eur J Sport Sci 2022 22 1555 1568 10.1080/17461391.2021.1966104 34420488
Taboga P, Giovanelli N, Spinazzè E, Cuzzolin F, Fedele G, Zanuso S, et al. Running power: lab based vs. portable devices measurements and its relationship with aerobic power. Eur J Sport Sci. 2022;22:1555–68.34420488 10.1080/17461391.2021.1966104
60. García-Pinillos F Latorre-Román PÁ Roche-Seruendo LE García-Ramos A Prediction of power output at different running velocities through the two-point method with the Stryd™ power meter Gait Posture 2019 68 238 243 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.11.037 30528962
García-Pinillos F, Latorre-Román PÁ, Roche-Seruendo LE, García-Ramos A. Prediction of power output at different running velocities through the two-point method with the Stryd™ power meter. Gait Posture. 2019;68:238–43.30528962 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.11.037
61. Brisswalter J Bieuzen F Giacomoni M Tricot V Falgairette G Morning-to-evening differences in oxygen uptake kinetics in short-duration cycling exercise Chronobiol Int 2007 24 495 506 10.1080/07420520701420691 17612947
Brisswalter J, Bieuzen F, Giacomoni M, Tricot V, Falgairette G. Morning-to-evening differences in oxygen uptake kinetics in short-duration cycling exercise. Chronobiol Int. 2007;24:495–506.17612947 10.1080/07420520701420691
62. Carter H Jones AM Maxwell NS Doust JH The effect of interdian and diurnal variation on oxygen uptake kinetics during treadmill running J Sports Sci 2002 20 901 909 10.1080/026404102320761796 12430991
Carter H, Jones AM, Maxwell NS, Doust JH. The effect of interdian and diurnal variation on oxygen uptake kinetics during treadmill running. J Sports Sci. 2002;20:901–9.12430991 10.1080/026404102320761796
63. Hedelin R Kenttä G Wiklund U Bjerle P Henriksson-Larsén K Short-term overtraining: effects on performance, circulatory responses, and heart rate variability Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000 32 1480 1484 10.1097/00005768-200008000-00017 10949015
Hedelin R, Kenttä G, Wiklund U, Bjerle P, Henriksson-Larsén K. Short-term overtraining: effects on performance, circulatory responses, and heart rate variability. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32:1480–4.10949015 10.1097/00005768-200008000-00017
64. Parmar A, Jones TW, Hayes P, R. The dose-response relationship between interval-training and VO2max in well-trained endurance runners: A systematic review. J Sports Sci. 2021;39:1410–27.
65. Bassett DR Howley ET Limiting factors for maximum oxygen uptake and determinants of endurance performance Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000 32 70 84 10.1097/00005768-200001000-00012 10647532
Bassett DR, Howley ET. Limiting factors for maximum oxygen uptake and determinants of endurance performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32:70–84.10647532 10.1097/00005768-200001000-00012
66. Alvero-Cruz JR Carnero EA García MAG Alacid F Correas-Gómez L Rosemann T Predictive performance models in long-distance runners: a narrative review Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020 17 8289 10.3390/ijerph17218289 33182485
Alvero-Cruz JR, Carnero EA, García MAG, Alacid F, Correas-Gómez L, Rosemann T, et al. Predictive performance models in long-distance runners: a narrative review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:8289.33182485 10.3390/ijerph17218289
67. Dellagrana RA Guglielmo LGA Santos BV Hernandez SG da Silva SG de Campos W Physiological, anthropometric, strength, and muscle power characteristics correlates with running performance in young runners J Strength Cond Res 2015 29 1584 1591 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000784 26010795
Dellagrana RA, Guglielmo LGA, Santos BV, Hernandez SG, da Silva SG, de Campos W. Physiological, anthropometric, strength, and muscle power characteristics correlates with running performance in young runners. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29:1584–91.26010795 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000784
68. Ramsbottom R Nute MG Williams C Determinants of five kilometre running performance in active men and women Br J Sports Med 1987 21 9 13 10.1136/bjsm.21.2.9 3620806
Ramsbottom R, Nute MG, Williams C. Determinants of five kilometre running performance in active men and women. Br J Sports Med. 1987;21:9–13.3620806 10.1136/bjsm.21.2.9
69. La Gerche A Burns AT Taylor AJ Macisaac AI Heidbüchel H Prior DL Maximal oxygen consumption is best predicted by measures of cardiac size rather than function in healthy adults Eur J Appl Physiol 2012 112 2139 2147 10.1007/s00421-011-2184-9 21964907
La Gerche A, Burns AT, Taylor AJ, Macisaac AI, Heidbüchel H, Prior DL. Maximal oxygen consumption is best predicted by measures of cardiac size rather than function in healthy adults. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012;112:2139–47.21964907 10.1007/s00421-011-2184-9
70. Letnes JM Nes BM Langlo KAR Aksetøy I-LA Lundgren KM Skovereng K Indexing cardiac volumes for peak oxygen uptake to improve differentiation of physiological and pathological remodeling: from elite athletes to heart failure patients Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2023 24 721 729 10.1093/ehjci/jead034 37073553
Letnes JM, Nes BM, Langlo KAR, Aksetøy I-LA, Lundgren KM, Skovereng K, et al. Indexing cardiac volumes for peak oxygen uptake to improve differentiation of physiological and pathological remodeling: from elite athletes to heart failure patients. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023;24:721–9.37073553 10.1093/ehjci/jead034
71. Arbab-Zadeh A Perhonen M Howden E Peshock RM Zhang R Adams-Huet B Cardiac remodeling in response to 1 year of intensive endurance training Circulation 2014 130 2152 2161 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010775 25281664
Arbab-Zadeh A, Perhonen M, Howden E, Peshock RM, Zhang R, Adams-Huet B, et al. Cardiac remodeling in response to 1 year of intensive endurance training. Circulation. 2014;130:2152–61.25281664 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.010775
72. Sareban M Zügel D Hartveg P Zügel M Gary T Niebauer J Preserved left atrial mechanics following a 5-h laboratory triathlon in euhydrated athletes Int J Sports Med 2019 40 88 94 10.1055/a-0750-5780 30605921
Sareban M, Zügel D, Hartveg P, Zügel M, Gary T, Niebauer J, et al. Preserved left atrial mechanics following a 5-h laboratory triathlon in euhydrated athletes. Int J Sports Med. 2019;40:88–94.30605921 10.1055/a-0750-5780
73. Svedberg N Sundström J James S Hållmarker U Hambraeus K Andersen K Long-term incidence of atrial fibrillation and stroke among cross-country skiers: cohort study of endurance-trained male and female athletes Circulation 2019 140 910 920 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.039461 31446766
Svedberg N, Sundström J, James S, Hållmarker U, Hambraeus K, Andersen K. Long-term incidence of atrial fibrillation and stroke among cross-country skiers: cohort study of endurance-trained male and female athletes. Circulation. 2019;140:910–20.31446766 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.039461
