
==== Front
Surg Case Rep
Surg Case Rep
Surgical Case Reports
2198-7793
Springer Berlin Heidelberg Berlin/Heidelberg

39237794
2005
10.1186/s40792-024-02005-6
Case Report
An actinomycosis infection resembling peritoneal dissemination of rectal cancer: a case report
Fukunaga Yukiko 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7694-8082
Maeda Hiromichi hmaeda@kochi-u.ac.jp

1
Yamaguchi Sachi 1
Tsutsui Miho 3
Okamoto Ken 2
Tanaka Tomoki 1
Maeda Masahiro 1
Marui Akira 1
Namikawa Tsutomu 1
Kobayashi Michiya 2
Seo Satoru 1
1 https://ror.org/01xxp6985 grid.278276.e 0000 0001 0659 9825 Department of Surgery, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Kohasu, Oko-Cho, Nankoku, Kochi, 783-8505 Japan
2 https://ror.org/013rvtk45 grid.415887.7 0000 0004 1769 1768 Cancer Treatment Center, Kochi Medical School Hospital, Nankoku, Japan
3 https://ror.org/013rvtk45 grid.415887.7 0000 0004 1769 1768 Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kochi Medical School Hospital, Nankoku, Japan
6 9 2024
6 9 2024
12 2024
10 20727 3 2024
20 8 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Background

Actinomycosis is a suppurative and granulomatous inflammation commonly caused by Actinomyces israelii. Due to its rarity and the paucity of characteristic clinical features, diagnosis of intra-abdominal actinomycosis is challenging, especially when the patient has a treatment history of abdominal cancer.

Case presentation

The patient is a 72-year-old man who has a history of multiple abdominal surgeries for rectal cancer, including low anterior resection for primary rectal cancer, partial hepatic resection for metachronous liver metastasis, and Hartmann surgery for local recurrence. The patient has also undergone parastomal hernia repair using the Sugarbaker method. One year after hernia repair, computed tomography (CT) identified a mass lesion between the abdominal wall and the mesh, suggesting the possibility of peritoneal recurrence of rectal cancer. The accumulation of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) was evident via positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT), while tumor marker levels were within the normal range. On laparotomy, the small intestine, abdominal wall, mesh, colon, and stoma were observed to be associated with the mass lesion, and en bloc resection was carried out. However, postoperative histopathological examination revealed an actinomyces infection without any cancerous cells.

Conclusions

This case highlights the challenges faced by surgeons regarding preoperative diagnosis of actinomycosis, especially when it occurs after the resection of abdominal cancer. Also, this case reminds us of the importance of a histopathological examination for abdominal masses or nodules before starting chemotherapy.

Keywords

Peritoneal dissemination
Mesh
Hernia
Abdominal actinomycosis
issue-copyright-statement© Japan Surgical Society 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Actinomyces israelii a gram-positive anaerobic rod-shaped bacterium, causes a chronic/subacute suppurative and granulomatous disease that is termed actinomycosis [1]. The most common pathogen of actinomycosis in humans is Actinomyces israelii [1, 2]. Actinomycetes are one of the resident microbiotas of the oral cavity, and the digestive and genital tract, and the most common sites of infection include the face, neck, chest, abdominal wall, and peritoneal cavity [1–4]. Thus, it is speculated that trauma, surgery, inflammation, and perforation of the gastrointestinal tract allow the pathogen to migrate into local tissues. The growth of the microbe is slow, and clinical manifestations of the infection appear gradually as the infection progresses [2, 5, 6], especially when host resistance is compromised. Based on literature review, it is claimed that the time from the initial event or trauma to the onset of actinomycosis varies widely, ranging from a few weeks to several years [4, 7]. Due to the ambiguous nature of the clinical features, diagnosing abdominal actinomycosis is difficult. Herein, we present a case of actinomycosis mimicking the peritoneal dissemination of previously resected rectal cancer.

Case presentation

The patient is a 72-year-old man who previously underwent laparoscopy-assisted low anterior resection for rectal cancer. His medical history includes prostate cancer, hypertension, and spinal fracture, and he is an old stroke survivor. The surgical duration was 305 min with an estimated blood loss of 30 mL. Pathological diagnosis indicated Rb, Type 2, pPM0, pDM0, pT2, stage I, pR0, and pCurA. About 3 months later, stoma closure was performed. Eleven months post-initial surgery, the patient underwent S8 partial resection for metachronous liver metastasis, lasting 324 min with an estimated blood loss of 50 mL. Subsequently, resection of the remnant rectum with permanent stoma creation for local recurrence, including combined resection of the left seminal vesicle and pelvic nerve plexus, was performed laparoscopically, requiring 328 min. Four years after the initial surgery, the patient developed a parastomal hernia that was repaired using the Sugarbaker method under laparoscopy. The operative time for the hernia repair was 238 min. with minimal blood loss. One year after, abdominal enhanced computed tomography (CT) identified a mass near the stoma just below the abdominal wall that showed a substantial enhancement (Fig. 1a). The patient displayed no symptoms. His white blood cell count (6.1 × 103/μL) and C-reactive protein level (0.12 mg/dL) were within the normal range. Tumor marker levels were also within the normal range: carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) concentration was 1.3 ng/mL [normal range < 5.0 ng/mL] and carbohydrate antigen 19–9 (CA19-9) level was 14.7 U/mL [normal range < 37.0 ng/mL]. PET-CT imaging showed that the mass lesion displayed abnormal accumulation with a maximum standardized uptake value of 15.4, suggesting the peritoneal recurrence of rectal cancer (Fig. 1b).Fig. 1 Radiological features of the case. a Abdominal computed tomography (CT) identified a mass near the stoma just below the abdominal wall. b There was no other nodule suggestive of peritoneal dissemination. The abdominal mass was removed along with the stoma, abdominal wall, mesh, and the associated portion of the small intestine

The patient chose to undergo surgical resection of the mass lesion. Due to the sigmoid colon’s proximity to the colostomy, which was previously reinforced with a mesh using the Sugarbaker method (Fig. 2a), we anticipated that removing the mass lesion would require excising the mesh and performing partial resection of the colon, potentially involving the adjacent small intestine. Positioned near the ventral aspect of the abdominal wall, the mass presented challenges for laparoscopic surgery due to limited working space and restricted instrument mobility. Consequently, we opted for open surgery over laparoscopy.Fig. 2 Surgical features. a Hernia repair using the Sugarbaker method was performed by placing a mesh on the dorsal side of the sigmoid and fixing it to the abdominal wall around the colostomy (The white arrow indicates the colon behind the mesh). b The small intestine is also involved in the development of lesions. The white arrow indicates the mass lesion covered by adipose tissue (omentum), while the black arrows indicate the mesh. a and b were rotated 180° from the original version). c The mesh (the black arrows) was removed from the abdominal cavity so that the mass lesion could be resected en bloc

On laparotomy, the mesh for hernia repair and the mass lesion were identified directly below the abdominal wall. However, there was no other nodule suggestive of peritoneal dissemination. Thus, the abdominal mass was removed along with the colostomy, abdominal wall, mesh, and the associated portion of the small intestine, because these structures could not be detached from the lesion (Figs. 2b, c and 3a).Fig. 3 Macroscopic and microscopic features of the mass lesion. a The removed mass lesion is surrounded by the mesh, small intestine, colostomy, and adipose tissue. b Within the resected granulomatous tissue, fibrous structure of the mesh and multiple small holes (the black arrowheads) created by the mesh were observed. c Amorphous bacterial lesions consisting of hematoxylinophilic hyphae, markedly surrounded by neutrophils, were sparsely identified, occupying approximately 30% of the resected mass. Scale bar equals 50 μm. Images (b) and (c) were taken from different sections

On histopathological examination (Fig. 3b and c), no evidence of cancer cells was observed. Most of the mass was composed of granulomatous tissue, infiltrated inflammatory cells, and abscess formation. The fibrous structure of the mesh and artifacts (multiple small holes) created by the mesh were observed within the granulomatous tissue. Amorphous bacterial lesions consisting of hematoxylinophilic hyphae, markedly surrounded by neutrophils, were sparsely identified, occupying approximately 30% of the resected mass. Inside the granulomatous tissue, the fibrous structure of the mesh was observed, suggesting the Actinomycosis of the abdominal wall was finally diagnosed, and based on the surgical and pathological findings, the mesh was considered the primary site of infection. Postoperatively, the wound was partially opened due to wound infection. Blood tests showed a high inflammatory response, and cefmetazole was administered intravenously for 5 days. The patient was discharged on postoperative day 13. No further treatment has been provided so far.

Discussion

Actinomyces israelii, a common pathogen causing actinomycosis in humans, is a gram-positive anaerobic bacterium resident in the oral cavity, gastrointestinal tract, and vagina. Actinomyces israelii enters the visceral organs when the intestinal mucosal barrier is disrupted by trauma, surgery, inflammation, or perforation, and the infection becomes evident when host resistance is compromised [1, 2]. An exceptional incidence involves actinomycosis at the abdominal wall without a history of surgery or trauma where hematogenous infection is the suspected cause [3, 8, 9]. Indwelling medical devices are related to the occurrence of actinomycosis. A retrospective study of 28 cases with abdominopelvic actinomycosis revealed that the majority of cases (17 out of 28) resulted from intra-uterine contraceptive devices, and two cases were caused by the presence of foreign bodies [10]. The authors of this retrospective study stated that the disease characteristics of 17 patients mimicked colon tumors or ovarian tumors, and only two cases had been preoperatively diagnosed as actinomycosis [10]. Notably, the formation of a mass lesion due to actinomycosis is not always solitary [11] nor limited to a single organ but can invade multiple organs [12]. These clinical features add to the difficulty of making a definitive diagnosis.

Regarding the cause of infection in this case, there are at least three conceivable opportunities for mesh infection. First, Actinomyces israelii could have entered the abdominal cavity during the initial and subsequent surgeries due to the disruption of the intestinal wall, remaining in the lower abdomen until it caused clinical symptoms. The considerable interval between potential microbial entry into the abdominal cavity and clinical manifestation may support this hypothesis [4, 7]. Second, Actinomyces israelii might have entered the abdominal cavity during the surgery for local recurrence, which required the creation of a colostomy. Furthermore, the microbes could have entered the space around the colostomy until complete wound healing prevented their migration. This explanation may be plausible as it aligns with the location of the mass. Third, organisms could have entered the bloodstream through injuries to the oral cavity or gastrointestinal tract, unrelated to abdominal surgeries [3, 8, 9]. The mucosa around the colostomy is often compromised due to inadequate stoma care, providing opportunities for organisms to enter the bloodstream. Skin erosion or ulceration around the stoma may yield similar outcomes. However, narrowing down these hypotheses to one in this case is challenging. This case underscores the importance of maintaining a clear surgical field (free from fecal or intestinal content contamination) and appropriate stoma care.

A bacterial culture or histopathologic examination can contribute to diagnosing actinomycosis in the abdomen [13]. However, the rate of diagnosis for actinomycosis from percutaneously collected tissue is low at least for two reasons. First, needle biopsy or aspiration may not reach the site of the bacterial infection because actinomycetes are covered with thick granulomatous tissue. Indeed, in our case, the actinomycetes formed only a tiny part of the whole mass. Second, the growth of Actinomyces is slow and requires an anaerobic, carbon dioxide-rich microenvironment [13], requiring repetitive sampling and/or more than 10 days of bacterial culture to conclude the negative results of culturing [1, 10]. In addition to these diagnostic difficulties, the results of blood tests also cause confusion. Although the disease is a type of infectious inflammation, white blood cell counts are often within normal range. C-reactive protein (CRP) levels are not always high, and in case these concentrations are high, the extent of the increase is slight [14, 15].

In the present case, a previous history of local recurrence of rectal cancer necessitated that peritoneal dissemination be considered first. Furthermore, a recurrence of tumors on the mesh has been reported previously [16, 17], where inflammation caused by the presence of a foreign body may have enhanced the implantation of cancer cells. The results of tumor marker levels may have reduced the possibility of recurrence in the present case. However, the level of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) does not consistently increase in the case of tumor recurrence: only one-third of blood test results in patients with tumor recurrence of colon cancer have demonstrated increased levels of CEA [18].

The nature of treatment after surgical resection remains controversial [2, 13]. A high recurrence rate (three out of four cases) of infection was reported among patients receiving short-term antibiotics [10]. Actinomycetes are, in general, susceptible to penicillin, tetracycline, clindamycin, and cefmetazole [1, 2]: a prolonged administration of these antibiotics is recommended on an empiric basis [6, 19, 20]. Further, lengthy administration of penicillin antibiotics may not always be necessary after the lesion has been extensively resected [13]. In our case, because the mesh that caused the infection was removed and other risk factors associated with a compromised immune system were absent, a long-term administration of antibiotics was not chosen. More than 16 months have passed since the operation without any signs of recurrence. An accumulation of additional cases is required to formulate guidelines that determine the treatment options after complete resection of the lesions.

Conclusions

The present case highlighted the challenges involved in diagnosing actinomycosis, especially after abdominal surgery for malignancy. Although it is rare, actinomycosis should be included as an option in the differential diagnosis of an abdominal mass. The pathological examination of the abdominal mass is required when the diagnosis of tumor recurrence is not definitive.

Abbreviations

CA19-9 Carbohydrate antigen 19–9

CEA Carcinoembryonic antigen

CT Computed tomography

CRP C-reactive protein

FDG Fluorodeoxyglucose

PET Positron emission tomography

WBC White blood cell count

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Editage for English proofreading. A part of this case report was presented at the 48th Annual Meeting of the Japanese College of Surgeons.

Author contributions

All authors discussed the content of the present case report. YF & HM wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

None of the authors received any funding for this study.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Informed consent for publication was obtained from the patient.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Valour F Sénéchal A Dupieux C Karsenty J Lustig S Breton P Actinomycosis: etiology, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment, and management Infect Drug Resist 2014 7 183 197 10.2147/IDR.S39601 25045274
Valour F, Sénéchal A, Dupieux C, Karsenty J, Lustig S, Breton P, et al. Actinomycosis: etiology, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment, and management. Infect Drug Resist. 2014;7:183–97. 10.2147/IDR.S39601.25045274 10.2147/IDR.S39601
2. Wong VK Turmezei TD Weston VC Actinomycosis BMJ 2011 343 d6099 10.1136/bmj.d6099 21990282
Wong VK, Turmezei TD, Weston VC. Actinomycosis. BMJ. 2011;343: d6099. 10.1136/bmj.d6099.21990282 10.1136/bmj.d6099
3. Karateke F Özyazici S Menekşe E Koray DA Özdoğan M Unusual presentations of actinomycosis; anterior abdominal wall and appendix: report of three cases Balk Med J 2013 30 315 317 10.5152/balkanmedj.2012.377
Karateke F, Özyazici S, Menekşe E, Koray DA, Özdoğan M. Unusual presentations of actinomycosis; anterior abdominal wall and appendix: report of three cases. Balk Med J. 2013;30:315–7. 10.5152/balkanmedj.2012.377.10.5152/balkanmedj.2012.377
4. Acquaro P Tagliabue F Confalonieri G Faccioli P Costa M Abdominal wall actinomycosis simulating a malignant neoplasm: case report and review of the literature World J Gastrointest Surg 2010 2 247 250 10.4240/wjgs.v2.i7.247 21160882
Acquaro P, Tagliabue F, Confalonieri G, Faccioli P, Costa M. Abdominal wall actinomycosis simulating a malignant neoplasm: case report and review of the literature. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;2:247–50. 10.4240/wjgs.v2.i7.247.21160882 10.4240/wjgs.v2.i7.247
5. Jabi R Ramdani H Elmir S Elmejjati F Serji B El Harroudi T Pseudotumoral actinomycosis mimicking malignant colic disease: a case report and literature review Visc Med 2020 36 333 337 10.1159/000502895 33005660
Jabi R, Ramdani H, Elmir S, Elmejjati F, Serji B, El Harroudi T, et al. Pseudotumoral actinomycosis mimicking malignant colic disease: a case report and literature review. Visc Med. 2020;36:333–7. 10.1159/000502895.33005660 10.1159/000502895
6. Caplan E Deputy M Arul D Wilson J Case Report: Actinomycosis of the omentum with invasion of the abdominal wall, small bowel and transverse colon mimicking malignancy BMJ Case Reports. 2019 12 bcr-2018-227728 10.1136/bcr-2018-227728 30696650
Caplan E, Deputy M, Arul D, Wilson J. Case Report: Actinomycosis of the omentum with invasion of the abdominal wall, small bowel and transverse colon mimicking malignancy. BMJ Case Reports. 2019;12: bcr-2018-227728.30696650 10.1136/bcr-2018-227728
7. Eskarous H Pingili A Venugopal D Abdominal actinomycosis mimicking malignancy: a case report IDCases 2021 25 e01252 10.1016/j.idcr.2021.e01252 34430205
Eskarous H, Pingili A, Venugopal D. Abdominal actinomycosis mimicking malignancy: a case report. IDCases. 2021;25: e01252. 10.1016/j.idcr.2021.e01252.34430205 10.1016/j.idcr.2021.e01252
8. Hefny AF Joshi S Saadeldin YA Fadlalla H Abu-Zidan FM Primary anterior abdominal wall actinomycosis Singapore Med J 2006 47 419 421 16645694
Hefny AF, Joshi S, Saadeldin YA, Fadlalla H, Abu-Zidan FM. Primary anterior abdominal wall actinomycosis. Singapore Med J. 2006;47:419–21.16645694
9. AlNowaiser NM Almanea AK Al AB Disseminated intra-abdominal actinomycosis mimicking colorectal carcinoma with diffuse intra-abdominal carcinomatosis: a case report Cureus 2022 14 e32582 10.7759/cureus.32582 36654545
AlNowaiser NM, Almanea AK, Al AB. Disseminated intra-abdominal actinomycosis mimicking colorectal carcinoma with diffuse intra-abdominal carcinomatosis: a case report. Cureus. 2022;14: e32582. 10.7759/cureus.32582.36654545 10.7759/cureus.32582
10. Vasilescu AM Târcoveanu E Lupascu C Blaj M Lupascu Ursulescu C Bradea C Abdominopelvic actinomycosis—the diagnostic and therapeutic challenge of the most misdiagnosed disease Life 2022 12 447 10.3390/life12030447 35330198
Vasilescu AM, Târcoveanu E, Lupascu C, Blaj M, Lupascu Ursulescu C, Bradea C. Abdominopelvic actinomycosis—the diagnostic and therapeutic challenge of the most misdiagnosed disease. Life. 2022;12:447. 10.3390/life12030447.35330198 10.3390/life12030447
11. Yang SS Im YC Severe abdominopelvic actinomycosis with colon perforation and hepatic involvement mimicking advanced sigmoid colon cancer with hepatic metastasis: a case study BMC Surg 2018 18 51 10.1186/s12893-018-0386-3 30068330
Yang SS, Im YC. Severe abdominopelvic actinomycosis with colon perforation and hepatic involvement mimicking advanced sigmoid colon cancer with hepatic metastasis: a case study. BMC Surg. 2018;18:51. 10.1186/s12893-018-0386-3.30068330 10.1186/s12893-018-0386-3
12. Masuda T Kobashi K Sugimoto R Ishii H Tsunemitsu K Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with a liver abscess due to hepatic actinomycosis Surg Case Rep 2023 9 43 10.1186/s40792-023-01625-8 36949213
Masuda T, Kobashi K, Sugimoto R, Ishii H, Tsunemitsu K. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with a liver abscess due to hepatic actinomycosis. Surg Case Rep. 2023;9:43. 10.1186/s40792-023-01625-8.36949213 10.1186/s40792-023-01625-8
13. Garner JP Macdonald M Kumar PK Abdominal actinomycosis Int J Surg 2007 5 441 448 10.1016/j.ijsu.2006.06.009 18078685
Garner JP, Macdonald M, Kumar PK. Abdominal actinomycosis. Int J Surg. 2007;5:441–8. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2006.06.009.18078685 10.1016/j.ijsu.2006.06.009
14. Chegini Z Didehdar M Tabaeian SP Khoshbayan A Shariati A A systematic review of case reports of hepatic actinomycosis Orphanet J Rare Dis 2021 16 192 10.1186/s13023-021-01821-5 33931097
Chegini Z, Didehdar M, Tabaeian SP, Khoshbayan A, Shariati A. A systematic review of case reports of hepatic actinomycosis. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021;16:192. 10.1186/s13023-021-01821-5.33931097 10.1186/s13023-021-01821-5
15. Ito T Yoshida T Sakuraba M Tanaka A Hamada K Ito A Insufficient initial treatment but good recovery after diagnosis of pulmonary actinomycosis Oxf Med Case Rep 2019 2019 510 512 10.1093/omcr/omz123
Ito T, Yoshida T, Sakuraba M, Tanaka A, Hamada K, Ito A. Insufficient initial treatment but good recovery after diagnosis of pulmonary actinomycosis. Oxf Med Case Rep. 2019;2019:510–2. 10.1093/omcr/omz123.10.1093/omcr/omz123
16. Kudou M Murayama Y Konishi H Morimura R Komatsu S Shiozaki A Peritoneal colon cancer metastasis to bilateral inguinal hernia repair sites: report of a case Surg Today 2015 45 1053 1057 10.1007/s00595-014-1037-7 25319214
Kudou M, Murayama Y, Konishi H, Morimura R, Komatsu S, Shiozaki A, et al. Peritoneal colon cancer metastasis to bilateral inguinal hernia repair sites: report of a case. Surg Today. 2015;45:1053–7. 10.1007/s00595-014-1037-7.25319214 10.1007/s00595-014-1037-7
17. Shigeyoshi I Komori K Kinoshita T Oshiro T Ito S Abe T Peritoneal cecal cancer metastasis to a mesh-plug prosthesis: a case report J Med Invest 2018 65 142 146 10.2152/jmi.65.142 29593186
Shigeyoshi I, Komori K, Kinoshita T, Oshiro T, Ito S, Abe T, et al. Peritoneal cecal cancer metastasis to a mesh-plug prosthesis: a case report. J Med Invest. 2018;65:142–6. 10.2152/jmi.65.142.29593186 10.2152/jmi.65.142
18. Lee TH Kim JS Baek SJ Kwak JM Kim J Diagnostic accuracy of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in detecting colorectal cancer recurrence depending on its preoperative level J Gastrointest Surg 2023 27 1694 1701 10.1007/s11605-023-05761-2 37407895
Lee TH, Kim JS, Baek SJ, Kwak JM, Kim J. Diagnostic accuracy of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in detecting colorectal cancer recurrence depending on its preoperative level. J Gastrointest Surg. 2023;27:1694–701.37407895 10.1007/s11605-023-05761-2
19. Freire L Santos C Duarte F Tavares C Silva CQ A rare complication of actinomyces abdominal infection: a case report Cureus 2023 15 e36524 10.7759/cureus.36524 37090375
Freire L, Santos C, Duarte F, Tavares C, Silva CQ. A rare complication of actinomyces abdominal infection: a case report. Cureus. 2023;15: e36524. 10.7759/cureus.36524.37090375 10.7759/cureus.36524
20. Liu K Joseph D Lai K Kench J Ngu MC Abdominal actinomycosis presenting as appendicitis: two case reports and review J Surg Case Rep 2016 2016 rjw068 10.1093/jscr/rjw068 27147718
Liu K, Joseph D, Lai K, Kench J, Ngu MC. Abdominal actinomycosis presenting as appendicitis: two case reports and review. J Surg Case Rep. 2016;2016:rjw068. 10.1093/jscr/rjw068.27147718 10.1093/jscr/rjw068
