
==== Front
Eur J Nutr
Eur J Nutr
European Journal of Nutrition
1436-6207
1436-6215
Springer Berlin Heidelberg Berlin/Heidelberg

38652304
3371
10.1007/s00394-024-03371-5
Original Contribution
Interactions between folate metabolism-related nutrients and polymorphisms on colorectal cancer risk: a case-control study in the Basque country
Corchero-Palacios Sara 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6702-9209
Alegria-Lertxundi Iker 1
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8081-0702
de Pancorbo Marian M. 23
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5592-4241
Arroyo-Izaga Marta marta.arroyo@ehu.eus

13
1 https://ror.org/000xsnr85 grid.11480.3c 0000 0001 2167 1098 Department of Pharmacy and Food Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Vitoria-Gasteiz (Araba/Álava), 01006 Spain
2 https://ror.org/000xsnr85 grid.11480.3c 0000 0001 2167 1098 Department of Z. and Cellular Biology A., Faculty of Pharmacy, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Vitoria-Gasteiz (Araba/Álava), 01006 Spain
3 https://ror.org/000xsnr85 grid.11480.3c 0000 0001 2167 1098 BIOMICs Research Group, Microfluidics & BIOMICs Cluster, Lascaray Research Center, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Bioaraba, BA04.03, 01006 Vitoria-Gasteiz (Araba/Álava), Spain
23 4 2024
23 4 2024
2024
63 5 16811693
14 8 2023
1 3 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Folate-mediated one-carbon metabolism (FOCM) plays an important role in colorectal carcinogenesis. Previous studies have assessed the role of folate-mediated one-carbon metabolism (FOCM)-related gene-diet interaction in the aetiology of colorectal cancer (CRC), however, the results remained inconclusive. Thus, this study aimed to investigate dietary factors and genetic variants related to FOCM, as well as potential nutrient-gene and nutrient-lifestyle interactions, on CRC risk. This observational study included 229 patients diagnosed with CRC and 229 age- and sex-matched subjects as controls from a population-based bowel cancer screening program. Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for CRC risk. A Bonferroni-corrected threshold of α = 0.005 was considered significant, and P values less than 0.05 were considered to be suggestive of an association. After Bonferroni correction, a high dietary intake of betaine was associated with a decreased risk of CRC in the adjusted model (OR, 95% CI: 0.21, 0.10–0.40, P < 0.001). Two SNPs, rs1476413 and rs17824591, exhibited significant gene-diet interactions with total choline ad vitamin B12 intakes, respectively, in adjusted models (total choline, tertile 3 vs. 1, OR, 95% CI: 0.25, 0.11–0.66, Pinteraction = 0.012; vitamin B12, tertile 2 vs. tertile 1, OR, 95% CI: 2.48, 1.04-5.00, Pinteraction = 0.003). These findings suggest that betaine intake and interactions between some dietary factors and variants in MTHFR and MTHFD1 genes have an influence on CRC risk in the population studied. If these results are confirmed, specific nutritional intervention strategies could be designed.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00394-024-03371-5.

Keywords

Colorectal cancer
Risk factor
Nutrient
Genetic polymorphism
Gene-nutrient interaction
Case-control study
Universidad del País VascoOpen Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature.

issue-copyright-statement© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024
==== Body
pmc Novelty and Impact – What´s new?

Previous studies have assessed the role of folate-mediated one-carbon metabolism (FOCM)-related gene-diet interaction in the aetiology of colorectal cancer (CRC), however, the results remained inconclusive. Here, the authors investigate this type of interaction. The findings highlight the importance of interactions between total choline and vitamin B12 intakes, and variants in MTHFR and MTHFD1 genes on CRC risk. If these results are confirmed, they may provide valuable risk stratification guidance for diet recommendations.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequent cancer and the second highest mortality in cancer patients worldwide [1]. In Spain, CRC is currently the most frequently diagnosed tumour, with 41,661 new cases (25,415 in men and 16,246 in women) detected in 20222. This incidence is comparable to that found in high-risk zones of Occidental Europe, North America, Australia, and Japan [3].

Although screening for early detection of CRC is effective in decreasing trends in mortality rates, understanding the factors involved in daily life are CRC-diagnosed also important for a proactive approach to prevent this type of cancer [4]. The primary prevention for CRC is mostly associated with diet, lifestyle factors, and metabolic diseases. Regarding dietary factors, one-carbon metabolism (1CM)-related nutrients (such as folate, other B vitamins, methionine (Met), choline, and betaine) have been considered anticarcinogenic and chemotherapeutic agents in the 1 C metabolic network [5], whereas alcohol antagonizes 1CM, and its high consumption has been related to higher CRC risk [6]. In addition, the observed inverse association between folate status and CRC risk was further modified by genetic polymorphisms of the enzymes involved in folate metabolism, most notably methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) [5].

However, not only the influence of polymorphisms but also the influences of 1CM-related nutrients on genetic polymorphisms in relation to interaction CRC risk remain largely unexplored. Most studies on this type of gene-diet interaction have focused on folate, B vitamin, and methionine intake [7]. To date, there are no studies in which the intake of choline and/or betaine has been evaluated. To better elucidate the role of genetic factors and environmental conditions, especially diet, on CRC risk, this study had a triple aim: (i) to investigate dietary factors (dietary methyl donors and dietary components that potentially modulate the bioavailability of methyl groups) and genetic variants in methyl metabolizing enzymes; (ii) to determine the potential nutrient-gene interactions; and (iii) to analyse the potential nutrient-lifestyle interactions, that is, interactions between the consumption of the dietary factors mentioned on the first objective and other lifestyle factors.

These aims refer to the CRC risk, in a sample of cases and controls, matched on age and sex, from the population-based bowel cancer screening program (BCSP) of the Osakidetza/Basque Health Service. In particular, the dietary factors investigated were: intakes of folate, vitamins B2, B6, and B12, Met, choline, betaine, and ethanol; the genetic variants: DNA methyltransferases (DNMT3B and DNMT1), MTHFR, methylene tetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase 1 (MTHFD1), and Met synthase reductase; and the other lifestyle factors: physical exercise (PE), smoking, and alcohol consumption.

Methods

Study participants

Overall, this epidemiologic study is an observational analytic case-control study designed to address possible gene-diet interactions in relation to CRC. Participants in this study were recruited from among patients attending any of the three hospitals of the Osakidetza/Basque Health Service (Basurto, Galdakao, and Donostia) members of the Basque Country’s BCSP. To be eligible for this BCSP, the patients had to be aged between 50 and 69, asymptomatic for colorectal symptoms, and registered with the Osakidetza/Basque Health Service.

These inclusion criteria were applied to both case and control groups; that is, controls fulfilled the same eligibility criteria defined for the cases, except for the disease (outcome). The age- and sex-matched controls were patients with positive results (abnormal) for an immunochemical faecal occult blood test and negative colonoscopy results (normal). Recruitment and data collection through questionnaires were conducted between 2014 and 2016. The start date of the study was 2014 because the BCSP in the Basque Country reached the whole target population (approximately 586,700 people) at the beginning of this year.

The characteristics of the sampling and the cases (pathological staging, location of cancer, tumour grade, and treatments) have been described before [8]. Briefly, 72% were diagnosed with early-stage (I/II) CRC and 76% had a distal location of cancer. The total sample consisted of 308 cases who were diagnosed with CRC and 308 age- and sex-matched controls. However, in the present study, data from 229 CRC patients and 229 controls were analysed, since this is the sample from which biological samples and associated data were obtained. All participants had data on the main dietary factors (folate, vitamin B2, B6, B12, Met, choline, and betaine) and genetic variants that were included in the present study.

This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki, and all procedures involving patients were approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Basque Country (protocol code PI2011006, data of approval 03/23/2012; and PI2014042, data of approval 05/28/2014). Written informed consent was obtained from all the study participants.

Dietary assessment

Diets were assessed using a short food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) that was a modified version of the Rodríguez et al. questionnaire [9]. This adaptation was validated with multiple 24-h recalls in the Basque general population [10] and CRC-diagnosed patients in a pilot of the present study [11]. It consisted of 67 items and requires the subjects to recall the number of times each food item was consumed either per week or per month. Moreover, the respondents could also record the consumption of other foods that were not included on the food list, as well as the use of dietetic products and nutritional supplements (generic and brand-name, dose, and frequency).

Once the completed FFQ was received, it was reviewed by a dietitian. Consumption frequencies were standardised to “per day” and multiplied by standard serving sizes (grams) [12]. For items that included several foods, each food’s contribution was estimated with weighting coefficients that were obtained from the usual consumption data [13]. All food items that were consumed were entered into DIAL 2.12 (2011 ALCE INGENIERIA), a type of dietary assessment software, to estimate energy intake (kcal/day), dietary fibre, and 1CM-related vitamins (B2, B6, folate, and B12). The intakes of other 1CM-related compounds, in particular, Met, total choline, and betaine were estimated using the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food Data central database [14] and from the publication of Zeisel et al. [15].

Assessment of covariates

Potential confounders of CRC risk were selected based on published evidence from European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC), the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), and the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF), which included: overweight or obesity based on self-reported body mass index (BMI), age, sex, PE (expressed as daily minutes of cycling/sports), smoking (never vs. past/currently, and intensity of smoking measured by the number of cigarettes smoked per day), and alcohol consumption (reported as grams of ethanol per day). In addition, the use of drugs related to decreasing CRC risk (antiplatelet, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and anticoagulants) [16] was recorded. These questions were taken from the Spanish Health Questionnaire [17]. BMI, estimated from self-reported height and weight, was classified according to the WHO criteria for those under 65 years of age [18] and according to the criteria proposed by Silva Rodrigues et al. for those 65 and older [19]. The characteristics of the sample is shown in the Supplementary Material (Table S1).

On the other hand, the FFQ used to assess dietary intake included specific questions about the frequency of intake of the following five major types of alcoholic beverages: beer, wine, cider, aperitif with alcohol, and liquor. These consumption frequencies were standardised to “per day” and multiplied by standard serving sizes (ml) [20]. The alcohol consumption data were expressed as grams of ethanol/day that were estimated with the software DIAL 2.12 (2011 ALCE INGENIERIA) and standard drink units [21]. We used the standard drink unit defined for Spain (one standard drink unit is the equivalent of 10 g of ethanol). With this information, the participants were categorised into those who did and did not meet the recommendations [20]. Those participants who did not meet the recommendations were categorised as “high-risk consumption.”

The differences in general characteristics (age, BMI, PE, smoking, and alcohol consumption, among others) between cases and controls were previously described [22]. Briefly, significant differences between cases and controls were found for smoking and weight status, with a higher percentage of cases with past or current smoking status and with overweight/obesity compared to controls (P < 0.01). However, no significant differences were found in alcohol consumption between cases and controls (P > 0.05).

Additionally, in both cases and controls, socioeconomic level, and health status (specifically health resource consumption) data were assessed with two indices that were obtained from the clinical databases developed by the Health Department of the Basque Government, namely the socioeconomic deprivation index (DI) and predictive risk modelling (PRM), respectively. The first one was estimated using the MEDEA project criteria, as has been described elsewhere, [23] and was divided into quintiles, with the first being the least disadvantaged and the fifth being the most disadvantaged. The PRM is an index that is based on Adjusted Clinical Groups [24] and Clinical Risk Groups [25]. This index combines information about diagnoses, prescriptions, previous costs, and the use of specific procedures. It can predict the use of health resources, and it was stratified into four levels: the first included participants with a risk of high health resource consumption, and the fourth included those with low health resource consumption. The differences in these two indices (DI and PRM) between cases and controls were previously described [22].

Biological samples and genotyping

In this study, healthy tissues or saliva samples of cases and controls were collected and genotyped. Samples were provided by the Basque Biobank for Research-OEHUN (www.biobancovasco.org) and were processed following standard operating procedures with appropriate approval of the Ethical and Scientific Committees. DNA was extracted using AllPrep DNA / RNA kit (Qiagen) for paraffin-embedded tissue samples and AutoGenFlex Tissue DNA Extraction kit (Autogen) for mouthwash saliva samples and then was quantified with NanoDrop™ Spectrophotometer (ThermoFisher). Double-stranded DNA was quantified by fluorometry using the Quant-iT™ PicoGreen1 dsDNA Assay Kit (Invitrogen, CA) on a DTX 880 Multimode Detector (Beckman Coulter) to normalize DNA concentration.

After an updated summary of the published genetic variants in methyl metabolizing enzymes related to CRC risk, a total of ten single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified, in particular: DNMT3B (rs2424913, rs406193), [26] DNMT1 (rs2228612), [27] MTHFR (rs1476413, rs1801131, rs1801133), [28, 29] MTHFD1 (rs8003379, rs17824591) and Met synthase reductase (rs1801394, rs10380) [29]. These SNPs were organised in the context of the gene(s) at or near the locus and chromosome locus. The allelic discrimination was assessed using the MassARRAY1 System (Agena Bioscience) on CeGen-PRB2-ISCII (Nodo USC) following the procedure provided by the manufacturer. Quality control samples were included in the genotyping assays.

Statistical analysis

The sample size was estimated to be 286 in each group (cases and controls) to detect an odds ratio (OR) of 2.0 with 80% power at a two-sided level of significance of 5%, under an exposure prevalence of 10%, using the Epidat 3.0 program [30].

Data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and STATA 16.0 (StataCorp LP, Texas, USA). Categorical variables are shown as a percentage, and continuous variables are as the means and standard deviation. Normality was checked using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov–Lilliefors test and since all continuous variables followed a non-normal distribution, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for two related means comparison. The Chi-square test was used to evaluate differences between categorical variables. When expected frequencies were lesser than five, Fisher´s exact test was used. Tests for associations and deviation from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium were performed separately in cases and controls.

Conditional logistic regression was used to calculate ORs and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for CRC risk according to (i) tertiles (T) of dietary compound intake, (ii) dominant and recessive models of SNPs, (iii) nutrient-gene interactions, and (iii) nutrient-lifestyle interactions. The logistic regression models were applied to the total sample and the subgroup of cases with distal location (n = 178) and their respective controls (Tables S2, S7, and S8). When the sample size was small (≤ 10 per group), the conditional exact logistic regression model was applied. The logistic regression model could not be applied to the subgroup of cases with proximal location due to the (too small) sample size. The intake of dietary compounds was categorised into Ts based on the distribution in the control group, taking into account sex differences when they were significant. Specifically, different cutoff points were applied to estimate Ts in men and women when significant sex differences were identified, that is, in the case of folate and Met intake. The lowest T was used as the reference group. The most frequent genotype (homozygous) was considered the reference group to calculate ORs in a dominant model, and the most frequent genotype (homozygous) and the heterozygous genotype containing the risk allele were considered the reference group in the recessive model. The nutrient-gene interaction analyses were carried out using a dominant model for genotypes.

The analyses of logistic regression were done for the unadjusted (model I) and adjusted models (models II and III). Models II and III were adjusted for known risk factors for CRC: [31, 32] age, sex, BMI, PE level, smoking status, the intensity of smoking (in current and past smokers), socio-economic level (DI) and health status (PRM), energy intake, dietary fibre, ethanol intake, and antiplatelet and anticoagulants use. The reference categories were those that, according to the literature, have a lower CRC risk. For the BMI variable, normal weight was considered as the reference category, and underweight was included as a separate category. We included participants with missing data for the covariates as a separate category.

Quantitative covariates such as intensity of smoking (cigarettes/day) were dichotomised by mean or median, according to the normality test. We used the cut-off of Romaguera et al. [33] to create two PE levels expressed in min/day of cycling/sports: sedentary-light (< 15 min/day) and moderate-vigorous (≥ 15 min/day). Age was dichotomised using the same age ranges that were used in the sample selection process (50–59 years old vs. 60–69 years old). Qualitative ones, such as DI and PRM were dichotomised considering the distribution of frequencies to obtain similar sample sizes for each category (DI, quintile 1–3 vs. quintile 4–5; PRM, level 3–4 vs. level 1–2). Energy, dietary fibre, and ethanol intake were included as quantitative variables in the adjusted models.

In model II, dietary compound intake or SNPs were included separately, whereas model III was only used in the analysis of dietary compound intake and, in this case, all the compounds were included at the same time. In addition, to study the possible association between the intake of betaine and total choline, and the CRC risk, model II (adjusted model) of the regression analysis was also applied, including folate as covariate (these data are shown in text form in the Results section). The significance level was corrected using a Bonferroni correction by dividing the standard P value (two-tailed) (α = 0.05) by the total number of SNPs analysed (n = 10), assuming alpha was equal to 0.005 (α = 0.05/10).

Results

Colorectal cancer risk according to nutrient intake

The intakes of folate, vitamins B2 and B6, Met, choline, and betaine were significantly higher in controls than those in cases (P < 0.001), whereas the consumption of vitamin B12 and alcohol was higher in cases than controls (P < 0.001) (Table 1). The ORs for CRC risk by the intake of nutrients are presented in Table 2. The adjusted ORs for CRC risk decreased with higher intakes of choline and betaine (P < 0.005). Although in the case of choline, the association was only significant in the unadjusted model. These results were confirmed in the subgroup of cases with distal tumour location (Table S2). In the total sample, after further adjustment for folate, moderate intake of betaine remained associated with a reduced risk of CRC (Model II including folate as a covariate, ORT2 vs. T1 = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.20–0.65, P = 0.001; ORT3 vs. T1 = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.09–0.40, P < 0.01).

Table 1 Daily intake of nutrients and alcohol in cases and control studied

Nutrient and ethanol intake, mean (SD)	Cases (n = 229)	Controls (n = 229)	P a	
Folate, µg/day	266.5 (81.6)	270.9 (77.8)	< 0.001	
Vitamin B2, mg/day	1.5 (0.5)	1.6 (0.5)	< 0.001	
Vitamin B6, mg/day	1.8 (0.5)	1.9 (0.6)	< 0.001	
B12, µg/day	5.0 (1.8)	4.9 (1.6)	< 0.001	
Met, mg/day	1783.0 (655.9)	1884.0 (756.9)	< 0.001	
Total choline, mg/day	136.6 (87.3)	165.2 (86.9)	< 0.001	
Betaine, mg/day	111.5 (54.8)	149.6 (61.5)	< 0.001	
Ethanol, g/day	8.3 (8.1)	7.4 (8.9)	< 0.001	
Abbreviations: Met, methionine; SD, standard deviation

aWilcoxon test. A value of P < 0.005 was considered significant after the Bonferroni correction (assuming alpha was equal to 0.005, α = 0.05/10). Significant results are highlighted in bold

Table 2 Colorectal cancer risk according to nutrient intake

Nutrient intakea		Model Ib	Model IIc	Model IIId	
Cases/Controls, n	OR (95% CI)	P e	OR (95% CI)	P e	OR (95% CI)	P e	
Folate								
 T1

 T2

 T3

	81/83

80/71

68/75

	1.00

1.15 (0.74–1.79)

0.94 (0.61–1.46)

	-

0.539

0.791

	1.00

1.21 (0.64–2.33)

1.33 (0.54–3.22)

	-

0.563

0.640

	1.00

1.11 (0.49–2.54)

1.82 (0.60–5.57)

	-

0.792

0.299

	
Vitamin B2								
 T1

 T2

 T3

	85/83

91/71

53/75

	1.00

1.24 (0.81–1.89)

0.64 (0.39–1.04)

	-

0.318

0.072

	1.00

0.93 (0.51–1.70)

0.45 (0.20–0.98)

	-

0.798

0.048

	1.00

1.19 (0.51–2.72)

0.56 (0.18–1.77)

	-

0.704

0.324

	
Vitamin B6								
 T1

 T2

 T3

	68/67

99/85

62/77

	1.00

1.11 (0.72–1.70)

0.77 (0.46–1.26)

	-

0.639

0.297

	1.00

0.76 (0.39–1.60)

0.53 (0.24–1.23)

	-

0.477

0.141

	1.00

0.61 (0.25–1.60)

0.60 (0.19–2.21)

	-

0.310

0.454

	
Vitamin B12								
 T1

 T2

 T3

	70/73

74/80

85/76

	1.00

0.95 (0.60–1.48)

1.21 (0.76–1.91)

	-

0.809

0.429

	1.00

0.95 (0.52–1.83)

1.15 (0.51–2.72)

	-

0.895

0.699

	1.00

0.85 (0.40–1.88)

1.73 (0.63–4.79)

	-

0.686

0.287

	
Met								
 T1

 T2

 T3

	72/76

89/78

68/75

	1.00

1.23 (0.77–1.95)

0.96 (0.60–1.53)

	-

0.383

0.864

	1.00

1.13 (0.62–2.11)

0.51 (0.24–0.99)

	-

0.690

0.049

	1.00

0.96 (0.47-2.00)

0.42 (0.22–0.92)

	-

0.922

0.026

	
Choline								
 T1

 T2

 T3

	105/75

75/77

49/77

	1.00

0.72 (0.46–1.11)

0.44 (0.27–0.72)

	-

0.134

0.001

	1.00

0.60 (0.30–0.95)

0.53 (0.29–1.06)

	-

0.030

0.060

	1.00

0.64 (0.32–1.25)

0.84 (0.38–1.84)

	-

0.183

0.656

	
Betaine								
 T1

 T2

 T3

	150/77

41/75

38/77

	1.00

0.27 (0.17–0.46)

0.28 (0.17–0.46)

	-

< 0.001

< 0.001

	1.00

0.30 (0.18–0.64)

0.21 (0.10–0.45)

	-

0.001

< 0.001

	1.00

0.31 (0.14–0.72)

0.21 (0.10–0.40)

	-

0.003

< 0.001

	
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; Met, methionine; OR, odds ratio; T, tertile

aNutrient intake was categorised into tertiles based on the distribution in the control group, taking into account sex differences when they were significant. Specifically, different cutoff points were applied to estimate tertiles in men and women when significant sex differences were identified. Tertiles of nutrient intake: folate (µg/day), for males, T1 ≤ 220.0, T2 220.1–289.0, T3 > 289.0, and females, T1 ≤ 245.0, T2 245.1–300.0, T3: > 300.0; vitamin B2 (mg/day), T1 ≤ 1.3, T2 1.4–1.7, T3 > 1.7; vitamin B6 (mg/day), T1 ≤ 1.5, T2 1.6-2.0, T3 > 2.0; vitamin B12 (µg/day), T1 ≤ 3.9, T2 4.0-5.3, T3 > 5.3; Met (mg/day), for males, T1 ≤ 1324.0, T2 1324.1–1985.0, T3 > 1985.0, and females, T1 ≤ 1564.0, T2 1564.1–2623.0, T3 > 2623.0; choline (mg/day), T1 ≤ 114.0, T2 114.1–190.0, T3 > 190.0; betaine (mg/day), T1 ≤ 119.0, T2 119.1–165.0, T3 > 165.0

bModel I, analysis was performed using crude conditional logistic regression

cModel II, analyses were performed using conditional logistic regression analysis adjusted for the following variables (reference categories are underlined): sex (women; men) age (50–59 y old, 60–69 y old), BMI (normal weight, overweight/obesity), physical exercise (< 15 min/day of cycling/sports, ≥ 15 min/day), smoking status (never, past/currently: smoker: ≤ 15 cigarettes/day, > 15 cigarettes/day), Deprivation Index (quintile 1–3, quintile 4–5), Predictive Risk Modelling (level 1–2, level 3–4), energy intake (kcal/day), dietary fibre (g/day), ethanol intake (g/day), antiplatelet (including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) and anticoagulants use (dichotomised variable, yes vs. no), including nutrients separately; participants with missing data for the confounding variables were included as a separate category for these variables

dModel III, model II including all the nutrients analysed

eA value of P < 0.005 was considered significant after the Bonferroni correction (assuming alpha was equal to 0.005, α = 0.05/10). Significant results are highlighted in bold

Colorectal cancer risk according to polymorphism genotypes

The distribution of genotypes at SNPs selected in the CRC group and in the control group that deviated from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium is shown in the Supplementary Material (Table S3). The SNP that was not following the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in controls was rs1801394 (P < 0.05), however, this SNP showed no significance when the conservative Bonferroni method is used. None of the genotype frequencies for the SNPs analysed reached statistically significant differences between cases and controls, after the Bonferroni correction.

Supplementary Table S4 presents the associations between genotype variants and CRC risk. No significant association was found between the genotype for any SNP analysed and CRC risk, except a decreased risk of CRC among those with rs2424913-TT variant (ORTT vs. CC = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.33–0.96, P < 0.05), even though this association was not significant after the Bonferroni correction.

Colorectal cancer risk according to nutrient-gene interactions

Associations between SNP genotypes and CRC risk, stratified by dietary factors in unadjusted and adjusted models are shown in Supplementary Tables S5 and S6, respectively. A summary of all observed associations between folate metabolism-related nutrients and SNPs on CRC risk is provided in Table 3. In the unadjusted model, the rs1476413-CC genotype was associated with a decreased risk of CRC among individuals with high total choline intake (OR T3 vs. T1 = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.15–0.55) (Pinteraction = 0.002). This result was also confirmed in the adjusted model, although in this case, P-value did not remain significant after applying the Bonferroni correction (Pinteraction = 0.012). Moreover, in the adjusted model, the rs17824591-GG genotype was associated with an increased risk of CRC among individuals with moderate vitamin B12 intake (OR T2 vs. T1 = 2.48, 95% CI: 1.04-5.00) (Pinteraction = 0.003). Although, in the unadjusted model, these results were not confirmed in the subgroup of cases with distal tumour location (Table S7); in the adjusted model, the rs1476413-CC genotype was associated with a decreased risk of CRC among subjects with high betaine intake (OR T3 vs. T1 = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.09–0.49) (Pinteraction = 0.004) (Table S8).

Table 3 Summary of observed associations between nutrients and SNPs on colorectal cancer risk

Model	Genes	SNP ID (rs), genotypes	Nutrients (tertile)	CRC risk (Pinteractiona)	
Unadjustedb	MTHFR (Chr 1)	rs1476413-CC	Choline (T3)	↓ (0.002)	
rs1801131-TT	Choline (T3)	↓ (0.019)	
Adjustedc	MTHFR (Chr 1)	rs1476413-CC	Choline (T3)	↓ (0.012)	
MTHFD1 (Chr 14)	rs17824591-GG	Vitamin B12 (T2)	↑ (0.003)	
Abbreviations: C, cytosine; Chr, chromosome; CRC, colorectal cancer; G, guanine; MTHFD, methylene tetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase; MTHFR, methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase; rs, reference single nucleotide polymorphism; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; T, thymine; T1, first tertile; T2, second tertile; T3, third tertile

Tertiles of nutrient intake: vitamin B12 (µg/day), T1 ≤ 3.9, T2 4.0-5.3, T3 > 5.3; total choline (mg/day), T1 ≤ 114.0, T2 114.1–190.0, T3 > 190.0; betaine (mg/day), T1 ≤ 119.0, T2 119.1–165.0, T3 > 165.0. ↑, increased risk; ↓, decreased risk

aA value of P < 0.005 was considered significant after the Bonferroni correction. Significant results are highlighted in bold

bAnalysis was performed using crude conditional logistic regression

cAnalyses were performed using conditional logistic regression analysis adjusted for the following variables (reference categories are underlined): sex (women; men) age (50–59 y old, 60–69 y old), BMI (normal weight, overweight/obesity), physical exercise (< 15 min/day of cycling/sports, ≥ 15 min/day), smoking status (never, past/currently: smoker: ≤ 15 cigarettes/day, > 15 cigarettes/day), Deprivation Index (quintile 1–3, quintile 4–5), Predictive Risk Modelling (level 1–2, level 3–4), energy intake (kcal/day), dietary fibre (g/day), ethanol intake (g/day), antiplatelet (including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) and anticoagulants use (dichotomised variable, yes vs. no), including SNPs separately; participants with missing data for the confounding variables were included as a separate category for these variables

Additionally, even if the remaining combination of SNPs and nutrient intakes did not show any significant interaction for CRC risk, the following variants were associated with a decreased risk of CRC among individuals with moderate-high betaine and/or total choline intake, in both the unadjusted and adjusted models (Tables S5 and S6): DNMT3B (rs2424913, rs406193), DNMT1 (rs2228612), MTHFR (rs1801131, rs1801133), MTHFD1 (rs8003379, rs17824591), and Met synthase reductase (rs1801394, rs10380). These results were confirmed in the subgroup of cases with distal tumour location (Table S7 and S8).

Colorectal cancer risk according to nutrient-lifestyle interactions

On the other hand, the combined effects of nutrient intake and lifestyle factors (PE, smoking, and alcohol consumption) on CRC risk were also examined. Individuals who reported both a low and a moderate-high level of PE (OR T3 vs. T1 = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.13–0.66; OR T3 vs. T1 = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.07–0.44, respectively) and a low or no alcohol consumption (OR T3 vs. T1 = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.23–0.61) and had high betaine intake showed a low CRC risk, even if no significant interactions were found (Table 4).

Table 4 Associations between lifestyle factors and colorectal cancer risk, stratified by dietary factors (adjusted model)a

Lifestyle factors, stratified by dietary factors	Nutrient intake	P interaction b	
T1	T2	T3	
Cases/
Controls, n	OR
(95%CI)a	P 2	Cases/
Controls, n	OR
(95%CI)a	P 2	Cases/
Controls, n	OR
(95%CI)a	P 2	
Folate		
Physical exercise		
 ≥15 min/day

 <15 min/day

	32/20

49/63

	1.00

0.89 (0.34–2.22)

	0.760	26/15

54/56

	1.45 (0.44–4.78)

0.95 (0.33–2.28)

	0.522

0.916

	21/17

47/58

	1.63 (0.42–6.49)

1.07 (0.34–3.41)

	0.498

0.892

	0.938	
Smoking status		
 Never

 Ever

	23/35

58/48

	1.00

1.42 (0.31–3.48)

	0.464	22/25

58/46

	1.33 (0.42–3.99)

1.51 (0.60–3.81)

	0.539

0.391

	24/29

44/46

	1.56 (0.46–5.16)

1.81 (0.62–5.54)

	0.483

0.322

	0.233	
Alcohol consumptionc		
 Abstemious/low risk

 High risk

	70/73

11/10

	1.00

1.01 (0.31–3.30)

	0.987	68/63

12/8

	1.34 (0.66–2.66)

0.80 (0.24–2.65)

	0.450

0.650

	61/68

7/7

	1.35 (0.53–3.35)

1.32 (0.35–6.01)

	0.543

0.660

	0.891	
Vitamin B2		
Physical exercise		
 ≥15 min/day

 <15 min/day

	34/21

51/62

	1.00

0.72 (0.33–1.61)

	0.389	31/17

60/54

	0.83 (0.29–2.52)

0.69 (0.30–1.60)

	0.719

0.350

	14/14

39/61

	0.55 (0.16–1.89)

0.25 (0.10–0.90)

	0.298

0.031

	0.836	
Smoking status		
 Never

 Ever

	28/33

57/50

	1.00

0.70 (0.32–1.55)

	0.337	22/29

69/42

	0.34 (0.14–0.98)

1.03 (0.44–2.41)

	0.049

0.975

	19/27

34/48

	0.36 (0.11–1.01)

0.35 (0.13-1.00)

	0.051

0.050

	0.400	
Alcohol consumptionc		
 Abstemious/low risk

 High risk

	75/74

10/9

	1.00

0.61 (0.18–2.23)

	0.438	76/64

15/7

	0.81 (0.30–1.47)

1.93 (0.53–8.32)

	0.512

0.422

	48/66

5/9

	0.47 (0.20–1.12)

0.20 (0.09–0.79)

	0.073

0.023

	0.350	
Vitamin B6		
Physical exercise		
 ≥15 min/day

 <15 min/day

	28/16

40/51

	1.00

0.65 (0.23–1.62)

	0.359	34/22

65/63

	0.65 (0.26–1.91)

0.55 (0.20–1.46)

	0.432

0.233

	17/14

45/63

	0.48 (0.07–2.03)

0.37 (0.14–1.09)

	0.291

0.070

	0.885	
Smoking status		
 Never

 Ever

	16/28

52/39

	1.00

1.02 (0.41–2.64)

	0.964	33/29

66/56

	0.75 (0.25–2.14)

0.83 (0.32–2.25)

	0.613

0.712

	20/32

42/45

	0.38 (0.12–1.21)

0.68 (0.22–2.10)

	0.105

0.479

	0.299	
Alcohol consumptionc		
 Abstemious/low risk

 High risk

	62/60

6/7

	1.00

0.57 (0.15–2.30)

	0401	82/76

17/9

	0.70 (0.37–1.40)

1.10 (0.32–3.60)

	0.301

0.885

	55/7

7/9

	0.50 (0.20–1.27)

0.33 (0.12–1.30)

	0.187

0.103

	0.389	
Vitamin B12		
Physical exercise		
 ≥15 min/day

 <15 min/day

	27/16

43/57

	1.00

0.41 (0.12–1.09)

	0.060	25/19

49/61

	0.41 (0.12–1.33)

0.51 (0.19–1.33)

	0.135

0.166

	27/17

58/59

	0.70 (0.20–2.09)

0.61 (0.18–2.05)

	0.419

0.409

	0.720	
Smoking status		
 Never

 Ever

	21/26

49/47

	1.00

1.09 (0.43–2.77)

	0.890	23/35

51/45

	0.73 (0.29–2.02)

1.11 (0.43–2.76)

	0.539

0.869

	25/28

60/48

	0.99 (0.31–3.20)

1.22 (0.41–3.65)

	0.991

0.712

	0.829	
Alcohol consumptionc		
 Abstemious/low risk

 High risk

	63/65

7/8

	1.00

0.52 (0.13–1.81)

	0.282	61/74

13/6

	0.88 (0.46–1.59)

1.70 (0.44–6.67)

	0.577

0.459

	75/65

10/11

	1.10 (0.47–2.67)

1.02 (0.22–2.71)

	0.802

0.912

	0.353	
Met		
Physical exercise		
 ≥15 min/day

 <15 min/day

	20/18

52/58

	1.00

1.16 (0.43–3.09)

	0.701	36/20

53/58

	1.34 (0.48–3.71)

1.21 (0.47–3.31)

	0.572

0.680

	23/14

45/61

	0.90 (0.20–3.80)

0.52 (0.18–1.33)

	0.878

0.177

	0.740	
Smoking status		
 Never

 Ever

	21/31

51/45

	1.00

1.08 (0.44–2.60)

	0.879	31/31

58/47

	1.20 (0.44–3.18)

1.25 (0.46–3.15)

	0.755

0.643

	17/27

51/48

	0.41 (0.16–1.10)

0.65 (0.27–1.73)

	0.079

0.369

	0.477	
Alcohol consumptionc		
 Abstemious/low risk

 High risk

	63/68

9/8

	1.00

0.95 (0.32–3.45)

	0.925	75/71

14/7

	1.12 (0.60–2.23)

1.10 (0.29–3.37)

	0.707

0.822

	61/65

7/10

	0.49 (0.30–1.09)

0.42 (0.10–1.73)

	0.080

0.221

	0.798	
Choline		
Physical exercise		
 ≥15 min/day

 <15 min/day

	37/13

68/62

	1.00

0.60 (0.20–1.81)

	0.364	29/20

46/57

	0.59 (0.16–1.80)

0.32 (0.13–0.88)

	0.330

0.029

	13/19

36/58

	0.25 (0.10–1.13)

0.40 (0.12–1.08)

	0.070

0.069

	0.710	
Smoking status		
 Never

 Ever

	28/31

77/44

	1.00

1.16 (0.53–2.69)

	0.678	23/30

52/47

	0.49 (0.17–1.54)

0.74 (0.39–1.72)

	0.232

0.450

	18/28

31/49

	0.60 (0.22–1.52)

0.66 (0.21–1.56)

	0.251

0.269

	0.998	
Alcohol consumptionc		
 Abstemious/low risk

 High risk

	92/72

13/3

	1.00

2.31 (0.53–11.97)

	0.361	65/64

10/13

	0.66 (0.36–1.16)

0.27 (0.11–0.82)

	0.163

0.021

	42/68

7/9

	0.61 (0.26–1.05)

0.79 (0.21–2.89)

	0.077

0.730

	0.290	
Betaine		
Physical exercisec		
 ≥15 min/day

 <15 min/day

	57/15

93/62

	1.00

0.76 (0.33–1.78)

	0.508	13/18

28/57

	0.48 (0.15–1.69)

0.22 (0.09–0.55)

	0.242

0.002

	9/19

29/58

	0.12 (0.07–0.44)

0.27 (0.13–0.66)

	0.002

0.004

	0.218	
Smoking statusc		
 Never

 Ever

	45/30

105/47

	1.00

1.51 (0.66–3.48)

	0.330	10/32

31/43

	0.27 (0.09–0.83)

0.56 (0.22–1.46)

	0.022

0.235

	14/27

24/50

	0.50 (0.18–1.38)

0.26 (0.10–0.66)

	0.184

0.005

	0.351	
Alcohol consumptionc		
 Abstemious/low risk

 High risk

	131/72

19/5

	1.00

1.62 (0.37–6.61)

	0.558	37/65

4/10

	0.41 (0.20–0.78)

0.36 (0.08–0.93)

	0.009

0.044

	6/13

32/64

	0.34 (0.23–0.61)

0.31 (0.10–0.98)

	0.001

0.048

	0.298	
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; Met, methionine; OR, odds ratio; T1, first tertile; T2, second tertile; T3, third tertile

Tertiles of nutrient intake: folate (µg/day), for males, T1 ≤ 220.0, T2 220.1–289.0, T3 > 289.1, and females, T1 ≤ 245.0, T2 245.1–300.0, T3: > 300.0; vitamin B2 (mg/day), T1 ≤ 1.3, T2 1.4–1.7, T3 > 1.70; vitamin B6 (mg/day), T1 ≤ 1.5, T2 1.6-2.0, T3 > 2.0; vitamin B12 (µg/day), T1 ≤ 3.9, T2 4.0-5.3, T3 > 5.3; Met (mg/day), for males, T1 ≤ 1324.0, T2 1324.1–1985.0, T3 > 1985.0, and females, T1 ≤ 1564.0, T2 1564.1–2623.0, T3 > 2623.0; choline (mg/day), T1 ≤ 114.0, T2 114.1–190.0, T3 > 190.0; betaine (mg/day), T1 ≤ 119.0, T2 119.1–165.0, T3 > 165.0

aAnalyses were performed using conditional logistic regression analysis adjusted for the following variables (reference categories are underlined): sex (women; men) age (50–59 y old, 60–69 y old), BMI (normal weight, overweight/obesity), physical exercise (< 15 min/day of cycling/sports, ≥ 15 min/day), smoking status (never, past/currently: smoker: ≤ 15 cigarettes/day, > 15 cigarettes/day), Deprivation Index (quintile 1–3, quintile 4–5), Predictive Risk Modelling (level 1–2, level 3–4), energy intake (kcal/day), dietary fibre (g/day), ethanol intake (g/day), antiplatelet (including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) and anticoagulants use (dichotomised variable, yes vs. no), including lifestyle factors separately; participants with missing data for the confounding variables were included as a separate category for these variables. In the analyses of the variables physical exercise, smoking status, and alcohol consumption these same variables were excluded as an adjustment variable

bA value of P < 0.005 was considered significant after the Bonferroni correction. Significant results are highlighted in bold

cConditional exact logistic regression

Discussion

The present study aimed to determine the association between dietary factors and genetic variants related to the FOCM and CRC risk, as well as possible nutrient-gene interactions. Moreover, the combined effects of nutrient intake and lifestyle factors (PE, smoking, and alcohol consumption) on CRC risk were also examined. Our results suggest that betaine intake and interactions between some dietary factors and variants in MTHFR and MTHFD1 genes have an influence on CRC risk in the population studied. The results were confirmed in the subgroup with distal tumour location. On the other hand, no significant interactions were observed between nutrient intake and lifestyle factors on CRC risk.

As we mentioned in the introduction section, to date, few epidemiologic studies have examined the association between betaine and cancer risk, and those who have studied this possible relationship have obtained inconsistent results. Several researchers found an inverse association between betaine intake and breast cancer risk [34]. However, other studies found no evidence that higher intakes of this nutrient reduced the risk of breast cancer [35]. Some studies have reported that a higher intake of betaine was associated with a reduced risk of lung cancer [36], whereas no association was found for epithelial ovarian cancer [37]. It has been suggested that the underlying mechanisms by which a high intake of betaine would reduce the risk of some cancers would be similar to those of folate. Betaine can donate the methyl group to homocysteine as does folate, although the donation of the methyl group by betaine is limited to the liver and the kidney [34]. A high intake of betaine could help prevent the adverse effect resulting from hypomethylation of DNA or restore DNA repair mechanism, and therefore, would lead to reduced cancer risk [36].

Inconsistent results were also observed on the relationship between betaine intake and CRC risk. The Health Professionals Follow-up Study conducted in the United States [38] and an investigation carried out in a Chinese population [39] have examined this possible association and in both studies, no association was found. This result has been attributed, in part, to the fact that the levels of this nutrient would not be critical in folate-nourished populations, because folate and choline metabolic pathways are highly interrelated, and betaine is derived from choline and increase in response to a higher choline intake [40].

Our study, like another case-control study, where plasma betaine was analysed, [41] confirmed the inverse association between betaine intake and CRC risk, even among subjects with an average total folate intake below population recommendations and below the intakes recorded in other studies, such as the Health Professionals Follow-up Study mentioned above, [38] with a total folate intake from diet and supplements of 479–858 µg/day in the total sample. In the present study, the average folate intake was 270.9 µg/day among controls and therefore the intake level of folate was not very high.

Nevertheless, the few published on the association between betaine intake and CRC risk are confusing. Neither the Health Professionals Follow-up Study [38] nor the one carried out by Lu et al. [39] found significant associations for betaine intakes. These discrepancies could be due to differences in the characteristics of participants, the intake and status of other nutrients involved in FOCM, and the design type. In summary, in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, [38] the participants were US male health professionals aged 40 to 75 years, and in Lu et al.´s study, [39], Chinese males and females aged 30 to 75 years. The folate intake in the total sample of Lee et al.´ study [38] was of 479–858 µg/day, whereas, in the control sample of Lu et al.´s study [39] was 240.3 µg/d. Lee et al.´ study [38] is a prospective cohort study, whereas, Lu et al.´s study [39] is a case-control study.

Regarding the possible associations between genetic variants related to the FOCM and CRC risk, in the current study, a genotype in DNMT3B (rs2424913) was related to CRC risk, even though this relationship was not significant after the Bonferroni correction. Other authors did not find a close correlation between this genetic variant and the development of CRC among the Chinese population [42]. As regards potential nutrient-gene interactions on CRC risk, rs1476413, and rs17824591 exhibited significant nutrient-gene interactions with total choline and vitamin B12 intakes, respectively. These findings suggest that these variants in MTHFR and MTHFD1 genes interact with dietary factors to modify the risk for CRC. It should be noted that the mechanism by which choline intake/status affects DNA integrity is not entirely clear but may be through effects on mitochondrial membrane integrity and oxidative stress [43]. Regarding vitamin B12, the underlying mechanism by which a high intake of this vitamin would reduce CRC risk could be related to tumour methylation, as other authors have pointed out in colon cancer [44].

In another case-control study, however, no interactions were found between the MTHFR rs1476413 SNP and dietary factors (including folate and Met) on CRC risk, although other MTHFR and MTHFD1 SNPs exhibited gene-diet interactions with Met intake [28]. The lack of data on the possible interaction between the aforementioned SNPs, and their interaction with betaine, makes it difficult to compare our results to other studies.

Most studies assessing MTHFR and CRC risk have focused on the rs1801133 SNP. The variant allele in this SNP causes an increase in thermolability of the MTHFR enzyme [45] which is associated with decreased plasma folate and increased plasma homocysteine [46]. The potential influence of MTHFR activity on DNA methylation and the availability of uridylates and thymidylates for DNA synthesis and repair makes MTHFR an attractive candidate for a cancer-predisposing gene. Even if other studies found an association between this SNP and the CRC risk and interaction with Met, [42] in the present study no significant association was found between these factors. Furthermore, few studies have assessed polymorphisms in MTHFD1 in relation to risk for CRC [7, 42]. Nevertheless, those SNPs (rs2295638, rs2236225) in which they found interaction with nutrients, specifically with Met [7, 42, 47] were not any of those analysed in the present study.

In any case, even if in the present study no more nutrient-gene interactions were detected, individuals with moderate-high betaine and/or total choline intakes showed a decreased risk, for all genotypes analysed, both in the total sample and in the subgroup with distal tumour location. Finally, concerning interactions between nutrient intakes and lifestyle factors, although no interactions were found, individuals who reported low or no alcohol consumption, and had moderate-high levels of PE and high betaine intake showed the lowest risk of CRC. Even though no data have been found in the literature on these interactions, our findings agree with previous studies about the interaction effects of folate status and lifestyle factors on CRC risk [48].

The main strength of this study compared to other previous published [49] is that colonoscopy was used as a diagnosis criterion to identify both cases and controls to avoid false positives and negatives. To our knowledge, to date, only one other study of the association between diet and CRC risk has been published, in which it was confirmed that controls were free of the disease through colonoscopy [50]. Another strength is the fact that information is provided based on a standardised protocol including not only dietary factors but also other possible determinants of CRC such as health determinants and weight status among others. However, some limitations should be mentioned. First, recall bias is also of concern in case-control studies. Second, the small sample size makes it difficult to detect possible associations and nutrient-gene and nutrient-lifestyle interactions and disease risk, since some genotypes and categories according to lifestyle factors showed low frequencies in our population.

Another disadvantage of the small sample size is that they can produce false-positive results; to avoid it, the Bonferroni correction was used. Third, self-reported data could be subject to measurement errors and the problem of food omissions due to memory failure and under-reporting of unhealthy habits among disease subjects. However, previous validation studies indicate that the self-reported dietary information is reported with sufficient accuracy for use in epidemiology analysis [51]. Fourth, although the FFQ used to collect information on dietary intake in the present study has been validated among people who lived in the same region, this validation did not include specific nutrients such as betaine or total choline, but it included the main food sources of these methyl-donors. So, the possible measurement errors are most likely non-differential and thus do not explain the inverse associations observed in our study.

Fifth, even though data on lifestyles (including diet) were recorded retrospectively—that is, the questions referred to behaviours before participating in the BCSP—it should be also noted that dietary changes are usually modest after participating in the BCSP due to a lack of information and personalised advice [52]. In addition, adults generally maintain relatively stable eating habits for a long time [53]. Therefore, the results of this study are unlikely to be greatly affected by potential changes in eating. Sixth, although we have adjusted for several confounding factors, some residual confounding may result from the misclassification of those variables and confounding by unmeasured variables. Finally, to avoid selection bias of controls, we obtained controls from the same BCSP and in the same period as cases. It should also worth noting that we have compared our results with those of the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, [38] that only includes male participants.

In conclusion, the present study suggests that high betaine intake is associated with decreased risk of CRC among the population studied. Moreover, our results support the existing hypothesis of genetic-nutrient interactions in colorectal carcinogenesis. Total choline and vitamin B12 intake, and the SNPs rs1476413 and rs17824591 may be related, respectively, to CRC risk in this population. High total choline intake together with the MTHFR rs1476413-CC genotype reduces CRC risk, whereas moderate vitamin B12 intake together with the MTHFD1 rs17824591-GG genotype increases CRC risk.

Further studies are necessary to confirm these associations and understand in depth their role in colorectal carcinogenesis, including participants under 50 years old. Understanding the interaction between nutrition and genetic variation can be useful to distinguish between individuals who will and who will not benefit from diet intervention strategies.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Abbreviations

1CM One-carbon metabolism

BCSP Population-based bowel cancer screening program

CI Confidence interval

CRC Colorectal cancer

DI Deprivation index

DNMT DNA methyltransferases

FFQ Food frequency questionnaire

FOCM Folate-mediated one-carbon metabolism

Met Methionine

MTHFD1 Methylene tetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase 1

MTHFR Methylene tetrahydrofolate reductase

OR Odds ratio

PE Physical exercise

PRM Predictive risk modelling

SD Standard deviation

SNP Single nucleotide polymorphism

T Tertile

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the patients who enrolled in this study for their participation, and the DNA Bank unit of the General Genomics and Proteomics Service at the UPV/EHU and the Basque Biobank for Research-OEHUN for its collaboration. The genotyping service was carried out at CEGEN-PRB2-ISCIII; it is supported by grant PT13/0001, ISCIII-SGEFI / FEDER.

Author Contributions

Marta Arroyo-Izaga: conceptualisation, data curation, formal analysis, software, resources, project administration, writing-original draft, validation, visualisation, writing review & editing, funding acquisition, and supervision. Iker Alegria-Lertxundi: conceptualisation, data curation, formal analysis, software, writing-original draft, and writing review & editing. Sara Corchero-Palacios: formal analysis, and writing-original draft. Marian M. de Pancorbo: conceptualisation, validation, visualisation, writing review & editing, funding acquisition, and supervision. The work reported in the paper has been performed by the authors unless clearly specified in the text.

Funding

Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. This research was funded by the Basque Government: Department of Health and Consumer Affairs (2011111153), the Saiotek program (S-PE12UN058), and Education Department (BIOMICs Research Group, MICROFLUIDICs & BIOMICs Cluster of the University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, No. IT1633-22). I.A.-L. was founded by a pre-doctoral grant from the Basque Government (PRE_2014_1_161, PRE_2015_2_0084, EP_2016_1_0098, EP_2016_1_0098, and PRE_2017_2_0006). Open Access funding provided by the University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report.

Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethics Statement

The study was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of the Basque Country (protocol code PI2011006, data of approval 03/23/2012; and PI2014042, data of approval 05/28/2014). All participants gave written informed consent before enrolment in the study, which was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.
==== Refs
References

1. Morgan E Arnold M Gini A Lorenzoni V Cabasag CJ Laversanne M Vignat J Ferlay J Murphy N Bray F Global burden of colorectal cancer in 2020 and 2040: incidence and mortality estimates from GLOBOCAN Gut 2023 72 2 338 344 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327736 36604116
Morgan E, Arnold M, Gini A, Lorenzoni V, Cabasag CJ, Laversanne M, Vignat J, Ferlay J, Murphy N, Bray F (2023) Global burden of colorectal cancer in 2020 and 2040: incidence and mortality estimates from GLOBOCAN. Gut 72(2):338–344. 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-32773636604116 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327736
2. Cancer Observatory of the Spanish Association against Cancer (2022) Accessed December 28, 2023. https://observatorio.contraelcancer.es/
3. World Health Organization. Cancer Today. Global Cancer Observatory [GCO] (2020) Accessed December 28, 2023. http://gco.iarc.fr/today
4. Keum N Giovannucci E Global burden of colorectal cancer: emerging trends, risk factors and prevention strategies Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019 16 12 713 732 10.1038/s41575-019-0189-8 31455888
Keum N, Giovannucci E (2019) Global burden of colorectal cancer: emerging trends, risk factors and prevention strategies. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 16(12):713–732. 10.1038/s41575-019-0189-831455888 10.1038/s41575-019-0189-8
5. Choi SW, Mason JB (2002) Folate status: effects on pathways of colorectal carcinogenesis. J Nutr 132(8 Suppl). 10.1093/jn/132.8.2413s. :2413S-2418S
6. Fedirko V Tramacere I Bagnardi V Rota M Scotti L Islami F Negri E Straif K Romieu I La Vecchia C Boffetta P Jenab M Alcohol drinking and colorectal cancer risk: an overall and dose-response meta-analysis of published studies Ann Oncol 2011 22 9 1958 1972 10.1093/annonc/mdq653 21307158
Fedirko V, Tramacere I, Bagnardi V, Rota M, Scotti L, Islami F, Negri E, Straif K, Romieu I, La Vecchia C, Boffetta P, Jenab M (2011) Alcohol drinking and colorectal cancer risk: an overall and dose-response meta-analysis of published studies. Ann Oncol 22(9):1958–1972. 10.1093/annonc/mdq65321307158 10.1093/annonc/mdq653
7. Liu AY Scherer D Poole E Potter JD Curtin K Makar K Slattery ML Caan BJ Ulrich CM Gene-diet-interactions in folate-mediated one-carbon metabolism modify colon cancer risk Mol Nutr Food Res 2013 57 4 721 734 10.1002/mnfr.201200180 22961839
Liu AY, Scherer D, Poole E, Potter JD, Curtin K, Makar K, Slattery ML, Caan BJ, Ulrich CM (2013) Gene-diet-interactions in folate-mediated one-carbon metabolism modify colon cancer risk. Mol Nutr Food Res 57(4):721–734. 10.1002/mnfr.20120018022961839 10.1002/mnfr.201200180
8. Alegria-Lertxundi I Aguirre C Bujanda L Fernández FJ Polo F Ordovás JM Etxezarraga MC Zabalza I Larzabal M Portillo I M de Pancorbo M Palencia-Madrid L Garcia-Etxebarria K Rocandio AM Arroyo-Izaga M Gene-diet interactions in colorectal cancer: survey design, instruments, participants and descriptive data of a case-control study in the Basque Country Nutrients 2020 12 8 2362 10.3390/nu12082362 32784647
Alegria-Lertxundi I, Aguirre C, Bujanda L, Fernández FJ, Polo F, Ordovás JM, Etxezarraga MC, Zabalza I, Larzabal M, Portillo I, M de Pancorbo M, Palencia-Madrid L, Garcia-Etxebarria K, Rocandio AM, Arroyo-Izaga M (2020) Gene-diet interactions in colorectal cancer: survey design, instruments, participants and descriptive data of a case-control study in the Basque Country. Nutrients 12(8):2362. 10.3390/nu1208236232784647 10.3390/nu12082362
9. Rodríguez IT Ballart JF Pastor GC Jordà EB Val VA Validación De Un Cuestionario De frecuencia de consumo alimentario corto: reproducibilidad y validez [Validation of a short questionnaire on frequency of dietary intake: reproducibility and validity] Nutr Hosp 2008 23 3 242 252 18560701
Rodríguez IT, Ballart JF, Pastor GC, Jordà EB, Val VA (2008) Validación De Un Cuestionario De frecuencia de consumo alimentario corto: reproducibilidad y validez [Validation of a short questionnaire on frequency of dietary intake: reproducibility and validity]. Nutr Hosp 23(3):242–252 PMID: 1856070118560701
10. Telleria-Aramburu N Alegria-Lertxundi I Arroyo-Izaga M Adaptation, validation and reproducibility of a short FFQ to assess food group intake in the population resident in the basque country (Spain) Public Health Nutr 2021 24 3 436 448 10.1017/s1368980020001822 32693859
Telleria-Aramburu N, Alegria-Lertxundi I, Arroyo-Izaga M (2021) Adaptation, validation and reproducibility of a short FFQ to assess food group intake in the population resident in the basque country (Spain). Public Health Nutr 24(3):436–448. 10.1017/s136898002000182232693859 10.1017/s1368980020001822
11. Alegria-Lertxundi I Alvarez M Rocandio AM de Pancorbo MM Arroyo-Izaga M Nutritional adequacy and diet quality in colorectal cancer patients postsurgery: a pilot study Nutr Cancer 2016 68 4 577 588 10.1080/01635581.2016.1158299 27144653
Alegria-Lertxundi I, Alvarez M, Rocandio AM, de Pancorbo MM, Arroyo-Izaga M (2016) Nutritional adequacy and diet quality in colorectal cancer patients postsurgery: a pilot study. Nutr Cancer 68(4):577–588. 10.1080/01635581.2016.115829927144653 10.1080/01635581.2016.1158299
12. Carbajal A, Sánchez-Muniz FJ, Secretariat of Publications and Audiovisual Media (2003) Guía de prácticas en Nutrición y Dietética [Guide to Practices in Nutrition and Dietetics]. University of León, ; :1–3. Accessed December 10, 2020. https://www.ucm.es/data/cont/docs/458-2019-01-04-Guia-Practicas-2019-web.pdf
13. Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Basque Government. Estudio cuantitativo del consumo de alimentos en la CAPV [Quantitative study of food consumption in the autonomous community of the Basque Country]. Basque Government: Central Publication Service (2008) Accessed December 9, 2020. https://www.euskadi.eus/contenidos/informacion/coleccion_elika/es_dapa/adjuntos/Guia_Elika_8.pdf
14. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. USDA’s FoodData Central (2017) Accessed August 9, 2018. https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/
15. Zeisel SH Mar MH Howe JC Holden JM Concentrations of choline-containing compounds and betaine in common foods J Nutr 2003 133 5 1302 1307 10.1093/jn/133.5.1302 12730414
Zeisel SH, Mar MH, Howe JC, Holden JM (2003) Concentrations of choline-containing compounds and betaine in common foods. J Nutr 133(5):1302–1307. 10.1093/jn/133.5.130212730414 10.1093/jn/133.5.1302
16. Iles-Shih L Collins JF Holub JL Lieberman DA Prevalence of significant neoplasia in FOBT-positive patients on warfarin compared with those not on warfarin Am J Gastroenterol 2010 105 9 2030 2035 10.1038/ajg.2010.264 20683445
Iles-Shih L, Collins JF, Holub JL, Lieberman DA (2010) Prevalence of significant neoplasia in FOBT-positive patients on warfarin compared with those not on warfarin. Am J Gastroenterol 105(9):2030–2035. 10.1038/ajg.2010.26420683445 10.1038/ajg.2010.264
17. Ministry of Health, Social Services and Equality, Government of Spain / National Statistics Institute. Encuesta Nacional de Salud. España 2011/12 [National Health Survey, Spain 2011/12]. Accessed December 20 (2019) http://www.msssi.gob.es/estadEstudios/estadisticas/sisInfSanSNS/nivelSalud.htm
18. World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic: report of a WHO consultation, 2000. Accessed December 5 (2019) https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42330
19. Silva Rodrigues RA Martinez Espinosa M Duarte Melo C Rodrigues Perracini M Rezende Fett WC Fett CA New values anthropometry for classification of nutritional status in the elderly J Nutr Health Aging 2014 18 7 655 661 10.1007/s12603-014-0451-2 25226103
Silva Rodrigues RA, Martinez Espinosa M, Duarte Melo C, Rodrigues Perracini M, Rezende Fett WC, Fett CA (2014) New values anthropometry for classification of nutritional status in the elderly. J Nutr Health Aging 18(7):655–661. 10.1007/s12603-014-0451-225226103 10.1007/s12603-014-0451-2
20. Serra-Majem L Aranceta J SENC Working Group on Nutritional Objectives for the Spanish Population Spanish Society of Community Nutrition. Nutritional objectives for the Spanish population. Consensus from the Spanish Society of Community Nutrition Public Health Nutr 2001 4 6A 1409 1413 10.1079/phn2001229 11918491
Serra-Majem L, Aranceta J, SENC Working Group on Nutritional Objectives for the Spanish Population (2001) Spanish Society of Community Nutrition. Nutritional objectives for the Spanish population. Consensus from the Spanish Society of Community Nutrition. Public Health Nutr 4(6A):1409–1413. 10.1079/phn200122911918491 10.1079/phn2001229
21. Ministry of Health and Consumption, Government of Spain. Informes de la Comisión Clínica 2017: Alcohol [Clinical Commission Reports: Alcohol]. Accessed December 10 (2019) http://www.pnsd.msc.es/Categoria2/publica/pdf/InformeAlcohol.pdf
22. Alegria-Lertxundi I Aguirre C Bujanda L Fernández FJ Polo F Ordovás JM Etxezarraga MC Zabalza I Larzabal M Portillo I de Pancorbo MM Palencia-Madrid L Rocandio AM Arroyo-Izaga M Single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with susceptibility for development of colorectal cancer: case-control study in a basque population PLoS ONE 2019 14 12 e0225779 10.1371/journal.pone.0225779 31821333
Alegria-Lertxundi I, Aguirre C, Bujanda L, Fernández FJ, Polo F, Ordovás JM, Etxezarraga MC, Zabalza I, Larzabal M, Portillo I, de Pancorbo MM, Palencia-Madrid L, Rocandio AM, Arroyo-Izaga M (2019) Single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with susceptibility for development of colorectal cancer: case-control study in a basque population. PLoS ONE 14(12):e0225779. 10.1371/journal.pone.022577931821333 10.1371/journal.pone.0225779
23. Orueta JF Nuño-Solinis R Mateos M Vergara I Grandes G Esnaola S Predictive risk modelling in the Spanish population: a cross-sectional study BMC Health Serv Res 2013 13 269 10.1186/1472-6963-13-269 23837560
Orueta JF, Nuño-Solinis R, Mateos M, Vergara I, Grandes G, Esnaola S (2013) Predictive risk modelling in the Spanish population: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res 13:269. 10.1186/1472-6963-13-26923837560 10.1186/1472-6963-13-269
24. School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University. The Johns Hopkins University ACG Case-Mix System. Accessed August 10 (2012) http://www.acg.jhsph.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=46&Itemid=61
25. Verisk Analytics, Inc. DxCG® Introduces Disease Management Calculator. Accessed August 10 (2012) https://www.verisk.com/archived/dxcg-introduces-disease-management-calculator/
26. de Vogel S Wouters KA Gottschalk RW van Schooten FJ de Goeij AF de Bruïne AP Goldbohm RA van den Brandt PA van Engeland M Weijenberg MP Dietary methyl donors, methyl metabolizing enzymes, and epigenetic regulators: diet-gene interactions and promoter CpG island hypermethylation in colorectal cancer Cancer Causes Control 2011 22 1 1 12 10.1007/s10552-010-9659-6 20960050
de Vogel S, Wouters KA, Gottschalk RW, van Schooten FJ, de Goeij AF, de Bruïne AP, Goldbohm RA, van den Brandt PA, van Engeland M, Weijenberg MP (2011) Dietary methyl donors, methyl metabolizing enzymes, and epigenetic regulators: diet-gene interactions and promoter CpG island hypermethylation in colorectal cancer. Cancer Causes Control 22(1):1–12. 10.1007/s10552-010-9659-620960050 10.1007/s10552-010-9659-6
27. Li H Liu JW Sun LP Yuan Y A Meta-analysis of the association between DNMT1 polymorphisms and cancer risk Biomed Res Int 2017 2017 3971259 10.1155/2017/3971259 28473984
Li H, Liu JW, Sun LP, Yuan Y (2017) A Meta-analysis of the association between DNMT1 polymorphisms and cancer risk. Biomed Res Int 2017:3971259. 10.1155/2017/397125928473984 10.1155/2017/3971259
28. Ashmore JH Lesko SM Muscat JE Gallagher CJ Berg AS Miller PE Hartman TJ Lazarus P Association of dietary and supplemental folate intake and polymorphisms in three FOCM pathway genes with colorectal cancer in a population-based case-control study Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2013 52 10 945 953 10.1002/gcc.22089 23893618
Ashmore JH, Lesko SM, Muscat JE, Gallagher CJ, Berg AS, Miller PE, Hartman TJ, Lazarus P (2013) Association of dietary and supplemental folate intake and polymorphisms in three FOCM pathway genes with colorectal cancer in a population-based case-control study. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 52(10):945–953. 10.1002/gcc.2208923893618 10.1002/gcc.22089
29. Pardini B Kumar R Naccarati A Prasad RB Forsti A Polakova V Vodickova L Novotny J Hemminki K Vodicka P MTHFR and MTRR genotype and haplotype analysis and colorectal cancer susceptibility in a case-control study from the Czech Republic Mutat Res 2011 721 1 74 80 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.12.008 21211571
Pardini B, Kumar R, Naccarati A, Prasad RB, Forsti A, Polakova V, Vodickova L, Novotny J, Hemminki K, Vodicka P (2011) MTHFR and MTRR genotype and haplotype analysis and colorectal cancer susceptibility in a case-control study from the Czech Republic. Mutat Res 721(1):74–80. 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.12.00821211571 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.12.008
30. Service of Epidemiology (2004) Dirección Xeral de Saúde Pública, Consellería de Sanidade, Xunta de Galicia, Spain; Unit of Health Analysis and Information Systems, Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO), Washington, DC. Epidat 3.0 program. Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
31. Torres Stone RA Waring ME Cutrona SL Kiefe CI Allison J Doubeni CA The association of dietary quality with colorectal cancer among normal weight, overweight and obese men and women: a prospective longitudinal study in the USA BMJ Open 2017 7 6 e015619 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015619 28679675
Torres Stone RA, Waring ME, Cutrona SL, Kiefe CI, Allison J, Doubeni CA (2017) The association of dietary quality with colorectal cancer among normal weight, overweight and obese men and women: a prospective longitudinal study in the USA. BMJ Open 7(6):e015619. 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-01561928679675 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015619
32. Doubeni CA Laiyemo AO Major JM Schootman M Lian M Park Y Graubard BI Hollenbeck AR Sinha R Socioeconomic status and the risk of colorectal cancer: an analysis of more than a half million adults in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study Cancer 2012 118 14 3636 3644 10.1002/cncr.26677 22898918
Doubeni CA, Laiyemo AO, Major JM, Schootman M, Lian M, Park Y, Graubard BI, Hollenbeck AR, Sinha R (2012) Socioeconomic status and the risk of colorectal cancer: an analysis of more than a half million adults in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study. Cancer 118(14):3636–3644. 10.1002/cncr.2667722898918 10.1002/cncr.26677
33. Romaguera D Vergnaud AC Peeters PH van Gils CH Chan DS Ferrari P Romieu I Jenab M Slimani N Clavel-Chapelon F Fagherazzi G Perquier F Kaaks R Teucher B Boeing H von Rüsten A Tjønneland A Olsen A Dahm CC Overvad K Quirós JR Gonzalez CA Sánchez MJ Navarro C Barricarte A Dorronsoro M Khaw KT Wareham NJ Crowe FL Key TJ Trichopoulou A Lagiou P Bamia C Masala G Vineis P Tumino R Sieri S Panico S May AM Bueno-de-Mesquita HB Büchner FL Wirfält E Manjer J Johansson I Hallmans G Skeie G Benjaminsen Borch K Parr CL Riboli E Norat T Is concordance with World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research guidelines for cancer prevention related to subsequent risk of cancer? Results from the EPIC study Am J Clin Nutr 2012 96 1 150 163 10.3945/ajcn.111.031674 22592101
Romaguera D, Vergnaud AC, Peeters PH, van Gils CH, Chan DS, Ferrari P, Romieu I, Jenab M, Slimani N, Clavel-Chapelon F, Fagherazzi G, Perquier F, Kaaks R, Teucher B, Boeing H, von Rüsten A, Tjønneland A, Olsen A, Dahm CC, Overvad K, Quirós JR, Gonzalez CA, Sánchez MJ, Navarro C, Barricarte A, Dorronsoro M, Khaw KT, Wareham NJ, Crowe FL, Key TJ, Trichopoulou A, Lagiou P, Bamia C, Masala G, Vineis P, Tumino R, Sieri S, Panico S, May AM, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Büchner FL, Wirfält E, Manjer J, Johansson I, Hallmans G, Skeie G, Benjaminsen Borch K, Parr CL, Riboli E, Norat T (2012) Is concordance with World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research guidelines for cancer prevention related to subsequent risk of cancer? Results from the EPIC study. Am J Clin Nutr 96(1):150–163. 10.3945/ajcn.111.03167422592101 10.3945/ajcn.111.031674
34. Zhang CX Pan MX Li B Wang L Mo XF Chen YM Lin FY Ho SC Choline and betaine intake is inversely associated with breast cancer risk: a two-stage case-control study in China Cancer Sci 2013 104 2 250 258 10.1111/cas.12064 23140534
Zhang CX, Pan MX, Li B, Wang L, Mo XF, Chen YM, Lin FY, Ho SC (2013) Choline and betaine intake is inversely associated with breast cancer risk: a two-stage case-control study in China. Cancer Sci 104(2):250–258. 10.1111/cas.1206423140534 10.1111/cas.12064
35. Cho E Holmes MD Hankinson SE Willett WC Choline and betaine intake and risk of breast cancer among post-menopausal women Br J Cancer 2010 102 3 489 494 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605510 20051955
Cho E, Holmes MD, Hankinson SE, Willett WC (2010) Choline and betaine intake and risk of breast cancer among post-menopausal women. Br J Cancer 102(3):489–494. 10.1038/sj.bjc.660551020051955 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605510
36. Ying J Rahbar MH Hallman DM Hernandez LM Spitz MR Forman MR Gorlova OY Associations between dietary intake of choline and betaine and lung cancer risk PLoS ONE 2013 8 2 e54561 10.1371/journal.pone.0054561 23383301
Ying J, Rahbar MH, Hallman DM, Hernandez LM, Spitz MR, Forman MR, Gorlova OY (2013) Associations between dietary intake of choline and betaine and lung cancer risk. PLoS ONE 8(2):e54561. 10.1371/journal.pone.005456123383301 10.1371/journal.pone.0054561
37. Kotsopoulos J Hankinson SE Tworoger SS Dietary betaine and choline intake are not associated with risk of epithelial ovarian cancer Eur J Clin Nutr 2010 64 1 111 114 10.1038/ejcn.2009.109 19707229
Kotsopoulos J, Hankinson SE, Tworoger SS (2010) Dietary betaine and choline intake are not associated with risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. Eur J Clin Nutr 64(1):111–114. 10.1038/ejcn.2009.10919707229 10.1038/ejcn.2009.109
38. Lee JE Giovannucci E Fuchs CS Willett WC Zeisel SH Cho E Choline and betaine intake and the risk of colorectal cancer in men Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2010 19 3 884 887 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-1295 20160273
Lee JE, Giovannucci E, Fuchs CS, Willett WC, Zeisel SH, Cho E (2010) Choline and betaine intake and the risk of colorectal cancer in men. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19(3):884–887. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-129520160273 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-1295
39. Lu MS Fang YJ Pan ZZ Zhong X Zheng MC Chen YM Zhang CX Choline and betaine intake and colorectal cancer risk in Chinese population: a case-control study PLoS ONE 2015 10 3 e0118661 10.1371/journal.pone.0118661 25785727
Lu MS, Fang YJ, Pan ZZ, Zhong X, Zheng MC, Chen YM, Zhang CX (2015) Choline and betaine intake and colorectal cancer risk in Chinese population: a case-control study. PLoS ONE 10(3):e0118661. 10.1371/journal.pone.011866125785727 10.1371/journal.pone.0118661
40. Yan J Jiang X West AA Perry CA Malysheva OV Devapatla S Pressman E Vermeylen F Stabler SP Allen RH Caudill MA Maternal choline intake modulates maternal and fetal biomarkers of choline metabolism in humans Am J Clin Nutr 2012 95 5 1060 1071 10.3945/ajcn.111.022772 22418088
Yan J, Jiang X, West AA, Perry CA, Malysheva OV, Devapatla S, Pressman E, Vermeylen F, Stabler SP, Allen RH, Caudill MA (2012) Maternal choline intake modulates maternal and fetal biomarkers of choline metabolism in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 95(5):1060–1071. 10.3945/ajcn.111.02277222418088 10.3945/ajcn.111.022772
41. Myte R Gylling B Schneede J Ueland PM Häggström J Hultdin J Hallmans G Johansson I Palmqvist R Van Guelpen B Components of one-carbon Metabolism Other than Folate and Colorectal Cancer Risk Epidemiology 2016 27 6 787 796 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000529 27367522
Myte R, Gylling B, Schneede J, Ueland PM, Häggström J, Hultdin J, Hallmans G, Johansson I, Palmqvist R, Van Guelpen B (2016) Components of one-carbon Metabolism Other than Folate and Colorectal Cancer Risk. Epidemiology 27(6):787–796. 10.1097/EDE.000000000000052927367522 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000529
42. Bao Q He BS Chen LP Gu L Nie ZL Wang SK Correlation between polymorphism in the promoter of DNA methyltransferase-3B and the risk of colorectal cancer Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2012 46 1 53 57 22490141
Bao Q, He BS, Chen LP, Gu L, Nie ZL, Wang SK (2012) Correlation between polymorphism in the promoter of DNA methyltransferase-3B and the risk of colorectal cancer. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi 46(1):53–57 PMID: 2249014122490141
43. da Costa KA Niculescu MD Craciunescu CN Fischer LM Zeisel SH Choline deficiency increases lymphocyte apoptosis and DNA damage in humans Am J Clin Nutr 2006 84 88 94 10.1093/ajcn/84.1.88 16825685
da Costa KA, Niculescu MD, Craciunescu CN, Fischer LM, Zeisel SH (2006) Choline deficiency increases lymphocyte apoptosis and DNA damage in humans. Am J Clin Nutr 84:88–94. 10.1093/ajcn/84.1.8816825685 10.1093/ajcn/84.1.88
44. Mokarram P Naghibalhossaini F Firoozi MS Hosseini SV Izadpanah A Salahi H Malek-Hosseini SA Talei A Mojallal M Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T genotype affects promoter methylation of tumor-specific genes in sporadic colorectal cancer through an interaction with folate/vitamin B12 status World J Gastroenterol 2008 14 23 3662 3671 10.3748/wjg.14.3662 18595133
Mokarram P, Naghibalhossaini F, Firoozi MS, Hosseini SV, Izadpanah A, Salahi H, Malek-Hosseini SA, Talei A, Mojallal M (2008) Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T genotype affects promoter methylation of tumor-specific genes in sporadic colorectal cancer through an interaction with folate/vitamin B12 status. World J Gastroenterol 14(23):3662–3671. 10.3748/wjg.14.366218595133 10.3748/wjg.14.3662
45. Frosst P Blom HJ Milos R Goyette P Sheppard CA Matthews RG Boers GJ den Heijer M Kluijtmans LA van den Heuvel LP Rozen R A candidate genetic risk factor for vascular disease: a common mutation in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase Nat Genet 1995 10 1 111 113 10.1038/ng0595-111 7647779
Frosst P, Blom HJ, Milos R, Goyette P, Sheppard CA, Matthews RG, Boers GJ, den Heijer M, Kluijtmans LA, van den Heuvel LP, Rozen R (1995) A candidate genetic risk factor for vascular disease: a common mutation in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. Nat Genet 10(1):111–113. 10.1038/ng0595-1117647779 10.1038/ng0595-111
46. Ma J Stampfer MJ Hennekens CH Frosst P Selhub J Horsford J Malinow MR Willett WC Rozen R Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism, plasma folate, homocysteine, and risk of myocardial infarction in US physicians Circulation 1996 94 10 2410 2416 10.1161/01.cir.94.10.2410 8921781
Ma J, Stampfer MJ, Hennekens CH, Frosst P, Selhub J, Horsford J, Malinow MR, Willett WC, Rozen R (1996) Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism, plasma folate, homocysteine, and risk of myocardial infarction in US physicians. Circulation 94(10):2410–2416. 10.1161/01.cir.94.10.24108921781 10.1161/01.cir.94.10.2410
47. Razzak AA Oxentenko AS Vierkant RA Tillmans LS Wang AH Weisenberger DJ Laird PW Lynch CF Anderson KE French AJ Haile RW Harnack LJ Potter JD Slager SL Smyrk TC Thibodeau SN Cerhan JR Limburg PJ Associations between intake of folate and related micronutrients with molecularly defined colorectal cancer risks in the Iowa women’s Health Study Nutr Cancer 2012 64 7 899 910 10.1080/01635581.2012.714833 23061900
Razzak AA, Oxentenko AS, Vierkant RA, Tillmans LS, Wang AH, Weisenberger DJ, Laird PW, Lynch CF, Anderson KE, French AJ, Haile RW, Harnack LJ, Potter JD, Slager SL, Smyrk TC, Thibodeau SN, Cerhan JR, Limburg PJ (2012) Associations between intake of folate and related micronutrients with molecularly defined colorectal cancer risks in the Iowa women’s Health Study. Nutr Cancer 64(7):899–910. 10.1080/01635581.2012.71483323061900 10.1080/01635581.2012.714833
48. Panprathip P Petmitr S Tungtrongchitr R Kaewkungwal J Kwanbunjan K Low folate status, and MTHFR 677C > T and MTR 2756A > G polymorphisms associated with colorectal cancer risk in Thais: a case-control study Nutr Res 2019 72 80 91 10.1016/j.nutres.2019.10.008 31740010
Panprathip P, Petmitr S, Tungtrongchitr R, Kaewkungwal J, Kwanbunjan K (2019) Low folate status, and MTHFR 677C > T and MTR 2756A > G polymorphisms associated with colorectal cancer risk in Thais: a case-control study. Nutr Res 72:80–91. 10.1016/j.nutres.2019.10.00831740010 10.1016/j.nutres.2019.10.008
49. Castelló A Amiano P Fernández de Larrea N Martín V Alonso MH Castaño-Vinyals G Pérez-Gómez B Olmedo-Requena R Guevara M Fernandez-Tardon G Dierssen-Sotos T Llorens-Ivorra C Huerta JM Capelo R Fernández-Villa T Díez-Villanueva A Urtiaga C Castilla J Jiménez-Moleón JJ Moreno V Dávila-Batista V Kogevinas M Aragonés N Pollán M MCC-Spain researchers. Low adherence to the western and high adherence to the Mediterranean dietary patterns could prevent colorectal cancer Eur J Nutr 2019 58 4 1495 1505 10.1007/s00394-018-1674-5 29582162
Castelló A, Amiano P, Fernández de Larrea N, Martín V, Alonso MH, Castaño-Vinyals G, Pérez-Gómez B, Olmedo-Requena R, Guevara M, Fernandez-Tardon G, Dierssen-Sotos T, Llorens-Ivorra C, Huerta JM, Capelo R, Fernández-Villa T, Díez-Villanueva A, Urtiaga C, Castilla J, Jiménez-Moleón JJ, Moreno V, Dávila-Batista V, Kogevinas M, Aragonés N, Pollán M (2019) MCC-Spain researchers. Low adherence to the western and high adherence to the Mediterranean dietary patterns could prevent colorectal cancer. Eur J Nutr 58(4):1495–1505. 10.1007/s00394-018-1674-529582162 10.1007/s00394-018-1674-5
50. Feldblyum IV Alyeva MK Markovich NI The association between diet and the probability of colorectal cancer among the population of Perm Krai: epidemiological study Vopr Pitan 2016 85 5 60 67 29381303
Feldblyum IV, Alyeva MK, Markovich NI (2016) The association between diet and the probability of colorectal cancer among the population of Perm Krai: epidemiological study. Vopr Pitan 85(5):60–67 PMID: 2938130329381303
51. Vereecken CA Covents M Sichert-Hellert W Alvira JM Le Donne C De Henauw S De Vriendt T Phillipp MK Béghin L Manios Y Hallström L Poortvliet E Matthys C Plada M Nagy E Moreno LA HELENA Study Group Development and evaluation of a self-administered computerized 24-h dietary recall method for adolescents in Europe Int J Obes (Lond) 2008 32 Suppl 5 S26 34 10.1038/ijo.2008.180 19011650
Vereecken CA, Covents M, Sichert-Hellert W, Alvira JM, Le Donne C, De Henauw S, De Vriendt T, Phillipp MK, Béghin L, Manios Y, Hallström L, Poortvliet E, Matthys C, Plada M, Nagy E, Moreno LA, HELENA Study Group (2008) Development and evaluation of a self-administered computerized 24-h dietary recall method for adolescents in Europe. Int J Obes (Lond) 32(Suppl 5):S26–34. 10.1038/ijo.2008.18019011650 10.1038/ijo.2008.180
52. Anderson AS Steele R Coyle J Lifestyle issues for colorectal cancer survivors–perceived needs, beliefs and opportunities Support Care Cancer 2013 21 1 35 42 10.1007/s00520-012-1487-7 22773297
Anderson AS, Steele R, Coyle J (2013) Lifestyle issues for colorectal cancer survivors–perceived needs, beliefs and opportunities. Support Care Cancer 21(1):35–42. 10.1007/s00520-012-1487-722773297 10.1007/s00520-012-1487-7
53. Berstad P Løberg M Larsen IK Kalager M Holme Ø Botteri E Bretthauer M Hoff G Long-term lifestyle changes after colorectal cancer screening: randomised controlled trial Gut 2015 64 8 1268 1276 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307376 25183203
Berstad P, Løberg M, Larsen IK, Kalager M, Holme Ø, Botteri E, Bretthauer M, Hoff G (2015) Long-term lifestyle changes after colorectal cancer screening: randomised controlled trial. Gut 64(8):1268–1276. 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-30737625183203 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307376
