
==== Front
Arch Dermatol Res
Arch Dermatol Res
Archives of Dermatological Research
0340-3696
1432-069X
Springer Berlin Heidelberg Berlin/Heidelberg

39042262
3228
10.1007/s00403-024-03228-1
Original Paper
Detection of demodex mites in papulopustular rosacea using microscopic examination and polymerase chain reaction: a comparative case-control study
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5469-4517
Trave Ilaria ilaria.trave@gmail.com
ilaria.trave@unige.it

http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0151-3126
Salvi Ilaria
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7294-6618
Canepa Paola
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6622-2226
Parodi Aurora
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3108-4123
Cozzani Emanuele
grid.5606.5 0000 0001 2151 3065 Section of Dermatology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, IRCCS - Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
23 7 2024
23 7 2024
2024
316 7 4851 6 2024
1 7 2024
6 7 2024
© The Author(s) 2024
2024
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Demodex mite proliferation is frequently involved in the pathogenesis of rosacea. The gold standard for Demodex identification is microscopic examination on a standardized skin surface biopsy. However, this method of sampling can be distressing and painful, especially when performed on hairy sites. In this case-control study, we compared the sensitivity of PCR and microscopic examination in diagnosing a Demodex infestation. Moreover, we investigated the possible correlations between the presence of Demodex mites and clinical characteristics. In total, 20 patients affected by papulopustular rosacea and 10 controls were included. At both microscopic examination and PCR, patients with rosacea presented a greater prevalence of positive samples than controls at the scalp and at the face. Microscopy had sensitivity of 50% at the face and of 46.7% at the scalp. PCR had sensitivity of 93.75% at the face and of 86.7% at the scalp. The positivity of PCR was associated to a higher frequency of facial papules and pustules. Patients with positivity at the face had a more frequent positivity at the scalp. The scalp could represent a reservoir for the Demodex mites, and should be investigated by sensitive and painless methods. PCR performed on painlessly collected samples should be further investigated.

Keywords

Rosacea
PCR
Demodex mites
Università degli Studi di GenovaOpen access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Genova within the CRUI-CARE Agreement.

issue-copyright-statement© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Rosacea is an inflammatory skin disease with increase of erythema, papules and pustules which may be caused by Demodex mite proliferation [1–3]. For this reason, precise Demodex mite identification is necessary in order to improve the treatment of this inflammatory disease.

Traditionally, a standardized skin surface biopsy (SSSB) with microscopic examination is the gold standard for diagnosis [4]. During our last research, since we have demonstrated that the same Demodex mites (Demodex folliculorum) are increased not only at the face but also at the scalp of patients affected by papulopustular rosacea at the face, we reported the necessity to research for a painless sampling method to study Demodex mites at the scalp, where SSSB has showed to be painful and uncomfortable for patients [5].

PCR is a DNA-based strategy that can be used to identify pathogens by means of specific primers [6].

Our primary aim was to compare the sensitivity of PCR and microscopic examination in diagnosing a Demodex infestation on SSSB. In addition, we investigated the possible correlations between the presence of Demodex mites (diagnosed by PCR or microscopy) and clinical characteristics.

This is the first study comparing the sensitivity of PCR and microscopic examination in diagnosing a Demodex infestation. In addition, we investigated the possible correlations between the presence of Demodex mites (diagnosed by PCR or microscopy) and clinical characteristics.

Materials and methods

In this case-control study, we included patients followed at the Dermatology Clinic (IRCCS, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino) affected by almost-clear, mild, and moderate papulopustular rosacea according to the current diagnostic criteria [7].

To assess disease severity, we applied the Investigator Global Assessment score (IGA score) [8]. Scalp signs (erythema, dandruff) and symptoms (itching, burning) of rosacea were evaluated in all patients. Patients with a history of, or affected by seborrheic dermatitis of the scalp, and patients with rosacea who had received antiparasitic treatments during the previous six months were excluded.

The patients were compared with healthy controls without a history of dermatologic conditions.

To study Demodex mites count, SSSB was performed at the cheek and at scalp by a trained dermatologist (Fig. 1). We preferred to take the sample in the occipital area after shaving 1 cm2 of skin. SSSB is a sampling method in which 1 cm2 of the superficial part of the stratum corneum and of the follicular content of the skin is recovered [4]. Following SSSB test, microscopic examination and PCR were done on the same sample. Microscopic examination was performed with × 10 and × 40 magnifications. Every sample with ≥ 5 Demodex/cm2 (D/cm2) was considered positive (D+) [4].

Fig. 1 Sampling procedure at the cheek

Molecular identification of Demodex mites from the face and scalp was carried out by amplifying the 18 S ribosomal RNA gene using previously described primers and conditions [9]. DNA was extracted from SSSB using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN S.r.l., Italy), following the protocol for the isolation of genomic DNA from tissues. Samples were lysed overnight at 56 °C in ATL buffer and Proteinase K. A PCR mix was prepared for each sample with the following components: 2.5 µl of 10X PCR buffer, 1 µl of 10 mM dNTP mix, 0.8 µl of 50 mM MgCl2, 0.5 µl of each 10 µM primer, 0.2 µl of Invitrogen Platinum Taq DNA Polymerase, and nuclease-free water were combined to make a final volume of 20 µl. The PCR products were visualised using a UV transilluminator (UVITEC Cambridge ‘Gel documentation’ system) after being run on a 1.5% agarose gel stained with SYBR Safe DNA Gel Stain (Invitrogen). The expected PCR product sizes for D. folliculorum and D. brevis were 382 and 317 bp, respectively (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2 Agarose gel electrophoresis of 16 S rDNA gene products of Demodex mites. Lane M: 100 bp Marker; lane 1–27: Demodex isolates from face and scalp; lane N: Negative control, lane P: Positive control

Results

In total, 20 Caucasian patients (17 women, 85% and 3 men, 15%) with an average age of 50.45 years (range 29–72) and 10 controls (8 women, 80%, and 2 men, 30%) with an average age of 49.7 years (range 28–69) were included.

Of the 20 patients, 7 had an almost-clear PPR, 8 had a mild PPR and 5 had a moderate PPR. Six (30%) patients reported itching and 6 (30%) presented dandruff on the scalp. The demographics of cases and controls are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Cases and controls demographics

Characteristics	Controls (n = 10)	Cases (n = 20)	
Gender		
 male	2	3	
 female	8	17	
Age (average)	49.7	50.45	
Rosacea severity			
 IGA 1	n.a.	7	
 IGA 2	n.a.	8	
 IGA 3	n.a.	5	

The results of microscopic examination and PCR analysis are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2 Comparison positive demodex samples in microscopy and PCR between cases and controls

Techniques	Controls (n = 10)	Cases (n = 20)	p	
PCR face			
 negative	9	5	0.001	
 positive	1	15	
PCR scalp				
 negative	8	7	0.020	
 positive	2	13	
Microscopy face				
 negative	9	12	0.09	
 positive	1	8	
Microscopy scalp				
 negative	10	13	0.033	
 positive	0	7	

At the microscopic examination, patients with PPR presented a greater prevalence of Demodex-positive samples than controls at the scalp (35% vs. 0%, p = 0.033) and at the face (40% vs. 10%, p = 0.09). PCR showed a greater prevalence of Demodex-positive samples at the face (75% vs. 25%, p = 0.001) and at the scalp (65% vs. 35%, p = 0.020) in patients with PPR.

In total, 16 face samples were positive at microscopic examination or PCR, and 15 scalp samples were positive at microscopic examination or PCR. These cases were considered positive for the presence of Demodex spp.

Microscopy had sensitivity of 50% at the face and of 46.7% at the scalp. PCR had sensitivity of 93.75% at the face and of 86.7% at the scalp.

The positivity of PCR (but not the positivity of microscopic examination) was associated to a higher frequency of papules and pustules at the face (92.3% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.031). Patients with positivity of PCR or microscopy at the face had a more frequent positivity at PCR or microscopy at the scalp (93.3% vs. 40%, p = 0.032).

The presence of Demodex mites on the scalp (detected by PCR or microscopy) was not associated to the presence of scalp signs and symptoms.

Discussion

In the literature, there are different studies conducted on patients affected by rosacea to evaluate the frequency of positive Demodex mite sampling on the face using SSSB and microscopic observation [4, 5]. By contrast, the studies conducted to evaluate the presence of Demodex mites on the face and on the scalp with PCR are scanty, and only one study reports the presence of Demodex mites detected with PCR [10].

In our study, we compared the sensitivity of PCR and microscopy in detecting the presence of Demodex mites on SSSB samples collected on the face and scalp.

PCR had a greater sensitivity in both locations and it is a convenient and rapid method. In addition, PCR gives standard results, unlike microscopic observation, which provides much more subjective results.

Moreover, PCR analysis can be applied to a variety of samples, including those that do not require invasive methods, such as skin swab and skin wax. For example, for the diagnosis of scabies, Bae et al. found that PCR is able to detect Sarcoptes scabiei mites on skin scrapings with greater sensitivity than microscopy observation [11].

PCR presents several limitations: it is relatively expensive and requires specialized equipment and personnel. Moreover, in our case, PCR was not able to investigate the concentration of mites in the sample, thus not providing information whether Demodex was a saprophyte host or had caused an actual demodicosis linked with its high proliferation at the skin. Nonetheless, real-time PCR could be used in the future, providing quantitative results; further studies are required to compare the results of quantitative PCR and mite count at microscopy.

Traditionally, microscopy constitutes the gold standard for diagnosis of Demodex infestation, because it is a simple, inexpensive, and standardized method [4]. Various samples can be examined by microscopy, such as skin scrapings, etc. [12] and microscopy also allows to observe alive mites and to count them.

Unfortunately, microscopy has several limitations. For example, it is an operator dependent method, which requires specific training and, the sample of choice for microscopic observation, SSSB, can be painful and distressing for the patients, especially when performed on hairy sites, such as the scalp. In addition, microscopy showed to be far less sensitive than PCR in our study, since the detection of mites at optic microscopy is often somewhat difficult, especially in case of limited mite concentration.

The role of Demodex mite proliferation on the scalp is not well known.

Recently, Dall’Oglio et al. have reported Demodex positive scalp skin biopsies in a group of patients with rosacea [13]. Although we found that 9 patients with rosacea presented scalp signs symptoms, we did not find any association between symptoms at the scalp and Demodex mite positivity at microscopy or PCR. This finding may be due to a low number of enrolled patients, however, in our opinion, the scalp could represent a reservoir for the Demodex mites, which can become pathogenetic following the localization on the face. This hypothesis is supported by the greater prevalence of Demodex mites on the scalp in patients with Demodex-positive face samples and by the presence of the same species of Demodex (Demodex folliculorum) at the scalp and face.

By adopting a sensitive method, such as PCR, in a large sample, we are able to detect a greater number of Demodex proliferation at the scalp in symptomatic and asymptomatic rosacea patients.

We propose that PCR could be employed in patients with rosacea with or without clear signs of demodicosis of the scalp, as a more sensitive alternative to microscopy, in order to identify the presence of a reservoir of Demodex that could represent a target of treatment. Hopefully, in the future, effective treatments to control Demodex infestation at the scalp may become available, and could be useful to prevent rosacea recurrences soon after the interruption of a standard treatment.

Moreover, PCR could be particularly useful in patients who refuse invasive or painful procedures, since we hypothesize that it could be similarly sensitive on samples other than SSSB, such as skin scrapings and swabs, that can be obtained painlessly. However, the sensitivity of PCR identification of Demodex on such samples should be investigated in further studies.

In conclusion, we demonstrated that PCR is a sensitive method to identify the presence of Demodex on the face and scalp. In particular, we believe that it could be usefully employed on the scalp of recently treated rosacea patients, in order to initiate a prompt antiparasitic treatment of the scalp, that could help prevent future recurrences.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Author contributions

I.T and I.S. wrote the main manuscript text and carried on the article. P.C. prepared Table 1. A.P. and E.C. corrected the proof. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Università degli Studi di Genova within the CRUI-CARE Agreement.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Regione Liguria.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication of this manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
==== Refs
References

1. Trave I Merlo G Cozzani E Parodi A Real-life experience on effectiveness and tolerability of topical ivermectin in papulopustular rosacea and antiparasitic effect on Demodex mites Dermatol Ther 2019 32 13093 10.1111/dth.13093
Trave I, Merlo G, Cozzani E, Parodi A (2019) Real-life experience on effectiveness and tolerability of topical ivermectin in papulopustular rosacea and antiparasitic effect on Demodex mites. Dermatol Ther 32:13093. 10.1111/dth.1309310.1111/dth.13093
2. Trave I Micalizzi C Gasparini G Cozzani E Parodi A Dermoscopy of papulopustular rosacea and comparison of dermoscopic features in patients with or without concomitant demodex folliculorum Clin Exp Dermatol 2021 46 8 1434 1440 10.1111/ced.14731 33987859
Trave I, Micalizzi C, Gasparini G, Cozzani E, Parodi A (2021) Dermoscopy of papulopustular rosacea and comparison of dermoscopic features in patients with or without concomitant demodex folliculorum. Clin Exp Dermatol 46(8):1434–1440. 10.1111/ced.1473133987859 10.1111/ced.14731
3. Forton FMN De Maertelaer V Rosacea and demodicosis: little-known diagnostic signs and symptoms Acta Derm Venereol 2019 99 1 47 52 10.2340/00015555-3041 30226528
Forton FMN, De Maertelaer V (2019) Rosacea and demodicosis: little-known diagnostic signs and symptoms. Acta Derm Venereol 99(1):47–52. 10.2340/00015555-304130226528 10.2340/00015555-3041
4. Forton F Seys B Density of Demodex folliculorum in rosacea: a case-control study using standardized skin-surface biopsy Br J Dermatol 1993 128 6 650 659 10.1111/j.1365-2133 8338749
Forton F, Seys B (1993) Density of Demodex folliculorum in rosacea: a case-control study using standardized skin-surface biopsy. Br J Dermatol 128(6):650–659. 10.1111/j.1365-21338338749 10.1111/j.1365-2133
5. Trave I Cozzani E Salvi I Parodi A Follicular scales, scalp and ocular involvement in patients with papulopustular rosacea: prevalence and association with Demodex mite proliferation Dermatol Rep 2023 16 1 9798 10.2340/00015555-3041
Trave I, Cozzani E, Salvi I, Parodi A (2023) Follicular scales, scalp and ocular involvement in patients with papulopustular rosacea: prevalence and association with Demodex mite proliferation. Dermatol Rep 16(1):9798. 10.2340/00015555-304110.2340/00015555-3041
6. Trave I Cozzani E Canepa P Verdiani S Parodi A Real-life applicability of the Euroarray dermatomycosis kit in the diagnosis of onychomycosis Mycoses 2022 65 3 317 322 10.1111/myc.13405 34843133
Trave I, Cozzani E, Canepa P, Verdiani S, Parodi A (2022) Real-life applicability of the Euroarray dermatomycosis kit in the diagnosis of onychomycosis. Mycoses 65(3):317–322. 10.1111/myc.1340534843133 10.1111/myc.13405
7. Gallo RL Granstein RD Kang S Mannis M Steinhoff M Tan J Thiboutot D Standard classification and pathophysiology of rosacea: the 2017 update by the National Rosacea Society Expert Committee J Am Acad Dermatol 2017 78 1 148 155 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.08.037 29089180
Gallo RL, Granstein RD, Kang S, Mannis M, Steinhoff M, Tan J, Thiboutot D (2017) Standard classification and pathophysiology of rosacea: the 2017 update by the National Rosacea Society Expert Committee. J Am Acad Dermatol 78(1):148–155. 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.08.03729089180 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.08.037
8. Hopkinson D Moradi Tuchayi S Alinia H Feldman SR Assessment of rosacea severity: a review of evaluation methods used in clinical trials J Am Acad Dermatol 2015 73 1 138 143e4 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.02.1121 25799418
Hopkinson D, Moradi Tuchayi S, Alinia H, Feldman SR (2015) Assessment of rosacea severity: a review of evaluation methods used in clinical trials. J Am Acad Dermatol 73(1):138–143e4. 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.02.112125799418 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.02.1121
9. Kasetsuwan N Kositphipat K Busayarat M Threekhan P Preativatanyou K Phumee A Siriyasatien P Prevalence of ocular demodicosis among patients at Tertiary Care Center, Bangkok, Thailand Int J Ophthalmol 2017 18 1 122 127 10.18240/ijo.2017.01.20
Kasetsuwan N, Kositphipat K, Busayarat M, Threekhan P, Preativatanyou K, Phumee A, Siriyasatien P (2017) Prevalence of ocular demodicosis among patients at Tertiary Care Center, Bangkok, Thailand. Int J Ophthalmol 18(1):122–127. 10.18240/ijo.2017.01.2010.18240/ijo.2017.01.20
10. Casas C Paul C Lahfa M Livideanu B Quantification of Demodex folliculorum by PCR in rosacea and its relationship to skin innate immune activation Exp Dermatol 2012 21 906 910 10.1111/exd.12030 23171449
Casas C, Paul C, Lahfa M, Livideanu B et al (2012) Quantification of Demodex folliculorum by PCR in rosacea and its relationship to skin innate immune activation. Exp Dermatol 21:906–910. 10.1111/exd.1203023171449 10.1111/exd.12030
11. Bae M Kim JY Jung J Cha HH Jeon NY Lee HJ Kim MJ Chang SE Kim SH Diagnostic value of the molecular detection of Sarcoptes scabiei from a skin scraping in patients with suspected scabies PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2020 14 4 e0008229 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008229 32255795
Bae M, Kim JY, Jung J, Cha HH, Jeon NY, Lee HJ, Kim MJ, Chang SE, Kim SH (2020) Diagnostic value of the molecular detection of Sarcoptes scabiei from a skin scraping in patients with suspected scabies. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 14(4):e0008229. 10.1371/journal.pntd.000822932255795 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008229
12. Huang HP Hsu CK Lee JY A new superficial needle-scraping method for assessing Demodex density in papulopustular rosacea J Cosmet Dermatol 2020 9 4 896 900 10.1111/jocd.13082
Huang HP, Hsu CK, Lee JY (2020) A new superficial needle-scraping method for assessing Demodex density in papulopustular rosacea. J Cosmet Dermatol 9(4):896–900. 10.1111/jocd.1308210.1111/jocd.13082
13. Dall’Oglio F Nasca MR Lacarrubba F Vitale P Platania H Nardone B Micali G Rosacea of the scalp: results from a retrospective and prospective randomized controlled study J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2024 10.1111/jdv.19852 39247945
Dall’Oglio F, Nasca MR, Lacarrubba F, Vitale P, Platania H, Nardone B, Micali G (2024) Rosacea of the scalp: results from a retrospective and prospective randomized controlled study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 10.1111/jdv.19852Epub ahead of print39247945 10.1111/jdv.19852
