
==== Front
Cureus
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus
2168-8184
Cureus Palo Alto (CA)

10.7759/cureus.66279
Dermatology
Obstetrics/Gynecology
Oncology
Balancing Maternal Melanoma and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean (VBAC) Delivery: A Case Report Highlighting Shared Decision-Making
Muacevic Alexander
Adler John R
Vurture Gregory 1
Klein Brittany 2
Shapiro Richard 2
Baum Jonathan 1
1 Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hackensack Meridian, Jersey Shore University Medical Center, Neptune, USA
2 Surgical Oncology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, USA
Gregory Vurture gwv203@nyu.edu
6 8 2024
8 2024
16 8 e662796 8 2024
Copyright © 2024, Vurture et al.
2024
Vurture et al.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0., which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
This article is available from https://www.cureus.com/articles/252245-balancing-maternal-melanoma-and-vaginal-birth-after-cesarean-vbac-delivery-a-case-report-highlighting-shared-decision-making
Melanoma is increasingly common among reproductive-age women and is one of the most common cancers diagnosed during pregnancy. The literature for melanoma in pregnancy, especially among those with prior uterine scars, is limited. We present an interesting case of a 22-year-old woman who went to her dermatologist for a suspicious lesion on her thigh. The lesion was excised, and histopathology confirmed that it was a melanoma. The dermatologist recommended immediate delivery. The patient then urged her obstetrician to undergo the risks of an induction of labor (IOL) for a trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) because she desired a large family, and a second cesarean would make this more difficult to happen. She ultimately had a successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) and subsequent excision of the melanoma with surgical oncology in the immediate postpartum period. Therefore, the decision for IOL for TOLAC in this case was based on the patient’s fears regarding melanoma disease progression in her 39th week. Given the short time course between delivery and excision of her melanoma, it is possible that she may have been able to wait for spontaneous labor, which would have avoided the risks associated with IOL for TOLAC. The optimal timing of surgical intervention for melanoma in pregnant patients who desire TOLAC is unknown. In pregnancies that are approaching their due date, waiting for spontaneous labor may be a reasonable approach to avoid the risks of labor induction, especially in women with prior cesarean delivery. A multidisciplinary approach involving dermatology, surgical oncology, and the obstetric team is warranted to optimize both dermatologic and obstetric outcomes.

malignancy
induction of labor
melanoma
vaginal birth after cesarean
trial of labor after cesarean
==== Body
pmcIntroduction

Melanoma is increasingly common among reproductive-age women. It is one of the most common cancers reported in pregnancy, with an incidence of 1-3 out of 10,000 pregnancies [1]. In the United States, the incidence of melanoma varies based on ethnicity [2]. Non-Hispanic patients were most likely to have the disease [2]. The literature regarding the management of melanoma in pregnancy is limited. The decision to intervene becomes more complicated for those with a prior cesarean delivery. There is significant evidence to suggest that those undergoing an induction of labor (IOL) for a trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) are less likely to achieve a successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) compared to those who wait for spontaneous labor [3-6]. There is no data to guide delivery route decisions in pregnant patients with melanoma and a prior cesarean delivery. We present an interesting case of a patient in her third trimester who was found to have a spitz melanoma. She chose IOL for TOLAC to expedite surgical staging of the melanoma and to avoid another cesarean delivery.

Case presentation

A 22-year-old para 1 presented to the dermatologist at 35 weeks gestational age with a dome-shaped mole on her left anterior thigh (Figure 1). Obstetric history is significant for a prior cesarean delivery for breech presentation, with a strong desire for a large family and to avoid another cesarean.

Figure 1 Dome shaped mole of left anterior thigh

The mole increased in size during her pregnancy. The final pathology resulted at 39 weeks and demonstrated spitz melanoma measuring 1.4 mm in Breslow thickness (Figure 2). BRAF status was negative. Dermatology recommended immediate delivery before receiving surgical staging and treatment for the melanoma.

Figure 2 Lymphoscintigraphy demonstrating uptake of the left inguinal lymph node

The patient urgently reached out to her obstetrician to arrange for delivery. She wanted to avoid another cesarean unless necessary. She requested an IOL, which required the use of oxytocin. The patient went on to deliver a healthy male infant, Apgar scores 9 and 9, weighing 3.3 kg. Her induction, delivery, and postpartum courses were uncomplicated. The patient and newborn were discharged home within 24 hours.

Following delivery, surgical staging was scheduled. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was accomplished using filtered technetium radiolabeled sulfur colloid (Figure 3). She then underwent a wide and deep excision of the lesion with a sentinel lymph node biopsy. The surgical defect measured 15x5cm. A complex, layered wound closure was performed. The patient tolerated the procedure well without complications and was discharged the same day. 

Figure 3 Positron emission tomography (PET) scan demonstrating no evidence of metastasis

The final pathology demonstrated pT2a spitzoid melanoma without ulceration or mitoses with scattered spitzoid cells in the sentinel lymph node biopsy of the left inguinal lymph node. The pathologic stage of the melanoma was reported to be Stage IIIA (pT2a, pN1a, cM0). Placental pathology showed no evidence of melanoma infiltration. Subsequent positron emission tomography (PET) scans demonstrated no evidence of recurrent local or distant metastasis. She was ultimately taken under surveillance with a physical exam and ultrasonography of the nodal basin every four months.

In regard to her gynecological health, she chose a levonorgestrel-intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) 52 mg as a long-term, reliable, and reversible contraceptive method while undergoing surveillance of her disease.

Discussion

Melanoma is the one of the most common cancers diagnosed in pregnancy [1,7]. Benign moles may change during pregnancy, which can raise concern and complicate the diagnosis [7]. Often, lesions are classified as atypical Spitz nevi or indeterminate lesions. Nonetheless, a suspicious lesion in a pregnant woman warrants an immediate biopsy.

Currently, there is no concise recommendation regarding the optimal timing for surgical intervention for melanoma in pregnancy or postpartum. One may consider the gestational age to guide steps in management. In the first trimester, we typically begin the metastatic workup with ultrasonography for lymph nodes, followed by excision under local anesthesia. A wide excision and sentinel lymph node biopsy can then be performed later in pregnancy if indicated. In the third trimester, the same workup can be done, followed by a definitive excision and a sentinel lymph node biopsy postpartum. In the second trimester, the metastatic workup is performed with a sentinel lymph node biopsy and fetal monitoring after approximately 26 weeks of gestation; otherwise, preoperative and postoperative fetal heart sounds can be obtained. The timing of a sentinel lymph node biopsy in pregnancy is controversial. Some argue to wait for the postpartum period regardless of gestational age [8], while others recommend it be performed in the second trimester [9].

The patient in the present report did not require oncologic treatment; however, when oncologic treatment is needed, it must be individualized for the patient. Certain combinations of BRAF, MEK, and checkpoint inhibitors can be teratogenic, resulting in severe fetal outcomes [10]. Depending on the BRAF plus MEK inhibitor, patients must avoid lactation or future pregnancy anywhere from 2 weeks to 4 months after the last dose of the specific systemic immunotherapy. Checkpoint inhibitors may require between 3-5 months after the last dose before lactation or future pregnancy may be safe. In the situation of more advanced melanoma, in which one of these immunotherapies may be required, the recommendation is to wait approximately 2-3 years [11].

TOLAC is associated with an increased risk of both catastrophic maternal and fetal complications [3]. These include uterine rupture, endometritis, postpartum hemorrhage, and hysterectomy. Neonatal complications include a low Apgar score, acidosis, and neurologic injury [3]. Melanoma metastasis to the placenta and fetus is an uncommon manifestation that is typically associated with more advanced metastatic disease [12]. Regarding prognosis, most melanoma recurrences occur within 3-5 years of the current pregnancy, and reliable birth control is therefore advised [13]. It is important to note that despite the risk of placental metastasis and the even more rare risk of fetal metastasis, the absolute risk of this complication is low, and therefore the diagnosis of melanoma alone is not an indication for a cesarean section [12]. However, shared decision-making is advised in specific patient populations, such as our patient who already had a uterine scar and ultimately desired a VBAC.

Waiting for spontaneous labor is a reasonable approach to maximizing VBAC success while minimizing intervention. Approximately 80% of patients prior to 41 weeks of gestational age will undergo spontaneous labor [14]. Regarding melanoma, the time course of the disease in pregnancy has been somewhat controversial; however, multiple cohort studies have suggested no significant difference in mortality in those diagnosed with melanoma both during and outside of pregnancy [15-17]. Spontaneous labor is associated with a higher rate of VBAC success [2-5] and is therefore preferred. IOL for TOLAC with oxytocin is not contraindicated and may be reasonable for certain patients but is associated with greater risk when compared to spontaneous labor [3-6] and has been associated with higher rates of uterine rupture [18-19].

Conclusions

Our patient had to balance a new cancer diagnosis, reproductive wishes, and delivery route uncertainties, knowing that delays in staging and treatment may worsen her oncological prognosis. Another cesarean would significantly decrease her ability to pursue a future vaginal delivery, and any postoperative complication(s) could impact or delay staging and treatment. The decision for IOL in this case was based on dermatologic concern for delayed staging and treatment as well as the patient's fears regarding melanoma spread. The risks of inducing labor in a woman with a prior cesarean scar may have outweighed the benefit of expediting treatment. Nonetheless, our patient had a successful obstetric and dermatological outcome. The decision of whether to intervene before or after delivery should therefore be individualized. Ultimately, further research is needed to determine the optimal timing of surgical intervention for melanoma diagnosed during pregnancy, timing of delivery, and delivery route, especially in those with a prior cesarean delivery.

The title of the present case report was generated using Google Gemini.

Disclosures

Author Contributions

Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study.

Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following:

Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work.

Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work.

Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Concept and design:  Gregory Vurture, Brittany Klein, Richard Shapiro, Jonathan Baum

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Gregory Vurture, Brittany Klein, Richard Shapiro, Jonathan Baum

Drafting of the manuscript:  Gregory Vurture, Brittany Klein, Richard Shapiro, Jonathan Baum

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Gregory Vurture, Brittany Klein, Richard Shapiro, Jonathan Baum

Supervision:  Richard Shapiro, Jonathan Baum
==== Refs
References

1 Melanoma in pregnancy Obstet Med Still R Brennecke S 107 112 10 2017 29051777
2 U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: United States cancer statistics 8 2024 2024 https://www.cdc.gov/united-states-cancer-statistics/
3 Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery N Engl J Med Landon MB Hauth JC Leveno KJ 2581 2589 351 2004 15598960
4 Delivery after previous cesarean: a risk evaluation. Swiss Working Group of Obstetric and Gynecologic Institutions Obstet Gynecol Rageth JC Juzi C Grossenbacher H 332 337 93 1999 10074973
5 Predicting outcomes of trials of labor in women attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a comparison of multivariate methods with neural networks Am J Obstet Gynecol Macones GA Hausman N Edelstein R Stamilio DM Marder SJ 409 413 184 2001 11228495
6 Vaginal birth after cesarean: to induce or not to induce Am J Obstet Gynecol Sims EJ Newman RB Hulsey TC 1122 1124 184 2001 11349175
7 Cancer during pregnancy and the postpartum period: A population-based study Cancer Andersson TM Johansson AL Fredriksson I Lambe M 2072 2077 121 2015 25737403
8 A proposal for the timing of management of patients with melanoma presenting during pregnancy J Surg Oncol Broer N Buonocore S Goldberg C Truini C Faries MB Narayan D Ariyan S 36 40 106 2012 22331751
9 Surgical treatment of melanoma in pregnancy: a practical guideline J Dtsch Dermatol Ges Crisan D Treiber N Kull T Widschwendter P Adolph O Schneider LA 585 593 14 2016
10 Pregnancy with successful foetal and maternal outcome in a melanoma patient treated with nivolumab in the first trimester: case report and review of the literature Melanoma Res Xu W Moor RJ Walpole ET Atkinson VG 333 337 29 2019 30730328
11 Hormones, nevi, and melanoma: an approach to the patient J Am Acad Dermatol Driscoll MS Grant-Kels JM 919 931 57 2007 18021848
12 Metastatic melanoma in pregnancy: risk of transplacental metastases in the infant J Clin Oncol Alexander A Samlowski WE Grossman D 2179 2186 21 2003 12775744
13 Hormonal and reproductive factors in relation to melanoma in women: current review and meta-analysis Eur J Cancer Gandini S Iodice S Koomen E Di Pietro A Sera F Caini S 2607 2617 47 2011 21620689
14 Onset and outcomes of spontaneous labour in low risk nulliparous women Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Corbett GA Dicker P Daly S 142 147 274 2022 35640443
15 Mortality in women with pregnancy-associated malignant melanoma J Am Acad Dermatol Johansson AL Andersson TM Plym A Ullenhag GJ Møller H Lambe M 1093 1101 71 2014 25440438
16 Effect of pregnancy on survival in women with cutaneous malignant melanoma J Clin Oncol Lens MB Rosdahl I Ahlbom A Farahmand BY Synnerstad I Boeryd B Newton Bishop JA 4369 4375 22 2004 15514378
17 Is pregnancy-associated melanoma associated with adverse outcomes? J Am Coll Surg Jones MS Lee J Stern SL Faries MB 149 158 225 2017 28457692
18 Factors associated with successful trial of labor after cesarean section: a retrospective cohort study J Pregnancy Thapsamuthdechakorn A Sekararithi R Tongsong T 6140982 2018 2018 29967697
19 Outcomes and risk factors for failed trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) in women with one previous cesarean section: a Chinese population-based study BMC Pregnancy Childbirth He X Dai Q Wu X Zhou J Li J 676 22 2022 36057560
